Morogoro Region - Centre for Ecology Law & Policy, University
Analysis of spatial price difference of major staple foods in Tanzania: A case of Rice Dar es Salaam...
-
Upload
muhidinizungo -
Category
Documents
-
view
719 -
download
0
Transcript of Analysis of spatial price difference of major staple foods in Tanzania: A case of Rice Dar es Salaam...
1
CHAPTER ONE
1.0: INTRODUCTION
1.1: Background information
Rice is one of the important staple foods in Tanzania. Its per capita consumption is
about 16Kg, contributing 8% of caloric intake among Tanzanians (Minot, 2010). The
per capita consumption of maize and cassava are estimated at 73Kg and 157Kg
respectively. According to Kadigi (2003), the bulky of paddy consumed in Tanzania is
produced from five regions namely Mbeya, Shinyanga, Mwanza, Morogoro and
Tabora. Morogoro town is located nearly 200Km west of Dar-es-salaam city. It is a
good supplier of rice to Dar-es-salaam markets which receive even rice imported from
outside countries such as Thailand and Vietnam as well.
1.1.1: Characteristics of rice/paddy producers
1.1.1.1: Small farmers
Small rice farmers can further be classified into small tradition farmers and small
irrigation farmers.
i. Small tradition farmers
They cultivate 1-5 acres using tradition methods.
Use hand hoes or hire oxen with a plough.
In some cases (rarely) they hire tractors.
Hire local labour (for planting, weeding, and harvesting/threshing).
2
Earns 150,000 TSH per acre (Assuming all rice is sold).
ii. Small irrigation farmers
Grow about 1ha of rice in an irrigation scheme often controlled by the
government.
Rents the land from the scheme.
Also they rent out their services.
Gross margin can be 175,000 TSH per acre.
1.1.1.2: Larger rice farmers
Grow more than 5 ha of rice in irrigation scheme.
Hires labours to involve in various field operations.
They are cash intensive.
They enjoy economies of scale as a result of operating in large scale cultivation
In addition, both small and large farmers involve in irrigation schemes of paddy.
However, larger farmers are the ones who involve mainly in irrigation schemes than
small farmers.
1.2: PRODUCTION OF PADDY/RICE IN TANZANIA
In general, rice involves about 281,000 rice growing households (Ebony Consulting
International, 2003). Moreover, rice is mainly grown by smallholders under rain fed
3
conditions, where about 74% of total rice area is rain fed lowland rice, 20% is upland
rice and 6% is irrigated.
According to Hamilton and DAI (2010) rice production in Tanzania is taken by small
scale farmers where less than 1% of the rice crop is produced by large scale farmers.
Although more than 99% is produced by smallholder farmers, some of them are part of
large scale rice irrigation schemes that were formerly state managed farms (NBS,
2006). Paddy production is estimated at 1.2 million metric tones annually or 750,000
metric tone of milled rice (Hamilton and DAI, 2010).
1.3: STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM AND JUSTIFICATION
Prices of staple foods in Tanzania have been fluctuating a lot due to various reasons
such as poor harvests leading to shortage of food relative to the demand by the people.
This fluctuation tends to affect the spatial price difference of staple foods between
regions. This is due to the fact that once there is a change in price at one market,
usually a surplus market; this change must be shifted into the deficit region especially if
they are well integrated.
Furthermore, this price fluctuation affects the welfare of both producers and consumers.
Producers are affected once there is a decrease in prices of their produce mainly during
a bumper season while consumers especially those in a deficit region are affected when
there is an increase in prices of those produce (Dawe and Opazo, 2009).
According to Gjolberg et al (2004), the wholesale prices of rice over 1992-2002 were
consistently higher in Dar-es-salaam city than in Morogoro municipality, with the
4
average difference being 4000Tsh/100KG. This suggests that Dar-es-salaam is a deficit
region having higher prices while Morogoro is the surplus region experiencing
relatively lower prices. In addition, this fluctuation of rice prices depicts an upward
trend.
A more recent study by Minot (2010) also indicates fluctuation in wholesale prices of
staple foods. Wholesale prices of maize in Dar-es-salaam were falling in 2006 while
they started to increase sharply in September 2007 and eventually decreased in March
2008. For rice, wholesale price in Dar-es-salaam started to rise in August 2007 and
falling sharply in April 2008. This shows to what extent the staple food prices fluctuate
over time.
While the above two studies have indicated fluctuation of prices of the two staple
foods (rice and maize) no attempt has been made to carry out a detailed spatial price
analysis to show how prices in the two markets are related and factors influencing the
difference in prices between Morogoro and Dar-es-salaam. This study was intended to
analyze spatial price differences of rice between Morogoro municipality and Dar-es-
salaam city.
2.0: OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
2.1: GENERAL OBJECTIVE
To analyze the spatial price difference of rice between Morogoro and Dar-es-
salaam so as to check to what extent prices of rice in these regions are related.
2.2: SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
a) To examine the trend of rice prices in Morogoro and Dar-es-salaam.
5
b) To identify determinants of rice price differences between these regions.
3.0: HYPOTHESES
a) There is no significant difference between the average wholesale prices/Kg
charged in these two regions (Average wholesale price/Kg in both regions are
statistically equal).
b) Marketing costs are not the major determinants of price differences in these
regions.
4.0: LIMITATIONS/ASSUMPTIONS OF THE STUDY
1. All rice is of the same type and quality.
It was assumed that all rice traded by traders had the same quality and of the same type.
Therefore the differences in quality and type of rice were not captured in this study.
2. Morogoro and Dar-es-Salaam were assumed to have equal variances.
Samples of wholesale monthly rice prices for three years i.e. 2001, 2002 and 2003 in
these regions were assumed to be collected in the population having equal variances.
3. Marketing costs were assumed to be the same in all three situations.
6
CHAPTER TWO
2.0: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1: Staple food prices variation
World food prices have been varying dramatically in recent years due to number of
reasons such as fluctuation in world fuel prices. This is also the case in Tanzania for the
case of major staple foods namely maize, rice and cassava. Therefore, this part is going
to make a review about the variation of staple food prices.
According to the quarterly bulletin on food prices in Africa by FAO regional office for
Africa (2009), region prices remain higher than 2007 levels. For example, price of
maize in Tanzania was 68% higher in October than two years earlier. However, in Dar-
es-salaam the wholesale price of maize dropped to $419/tonne.
Food retail price series were collected and showed seasonal fluctuations as well as a
considerable variation across a large sample of markets in Tanzania (Delgado et al.,
2003). The overview in staple food prices trends by WFP (2009) shows that prices in
Tanzania experience an upward trend relatively to the past five years. Another study by
WFP (2009) on trends in staple food prices in selected vulnerable countries shows that
maize prices in Tanzania increased by 17%.
The shortage of food due to failure of rainfall in 2009, left about 280,000 people in
Tanzania food insecure (FEWSNET, 2009). Another factor that contributed to the
7
shortage of food in some of the areas in Tanzania in 2009 is the increase in maize, rice
and bean prices to 40%-60% above their five year averages (FEWSNET, 2009).
According to the latest edition of Food price watch, the World Bank’s food price index
rose by 15% between October 2010 and January 2011. Moreover, this is 29% above its
level a year earlier and it is only 30% below its 2008 peak.
A more recent study by Falcon and Naylor (2010) reveals an upheaval of staple food
prices in the world in 2008. This sharp rise captured the interest of Economists,
creating some questions about the state of food security, the nature of price variability
and the appropriate strategies for international agricultural development.
Rice prices have been increased in all markets as the case on prices of other staple
foods in Tanzania (USAID, 2008; FEWS NET, 2009). The trend in 2009 shows that
prices of staple food are higher than the last year as well as above the five year
averages. This rise in prices was probably due to increased transportation costs and
traders’ speculation during the hunger season.
According to Minot (2010) wholesale prices of maize tend to move together in the late
2003 and late 2005 in almost all markets in Tanzania. Furthermore, this increase in
price was due to poor harvests in 2003 and 2005 when output fell by 42% and 33%
respectively.
8
A recent study by Dawe and Opazo (2009) using data from new FAO price database
shows that domestic staple food prices in developing countries typically increased by
48% in real terms during the world food crisis in 2008.
In recent years, food prices have increased throughout the world (USAID, 2008; FAO
2008). These reports indicate that during the first three months of 2008, international
nominal prices of all major food commodities reached their highest levels in nearly 50
years while for the case of real prices it is nearly 30 years.
Global food prices started rising sharply in 2006 and reached record levels in the
second quarter of 2008 (Macharia et al., 2009). However, in June 2008 it started to
decline even though it was different in some of the east African countries which
experienced increasing prices in June 2008 and Early 2009. For example, Tanzania
experienced a sharp increase in its food price index (FPI) between the last quarter of
2007 and the first quarter of 2008 i.e. about 9% increase. Eventually, prices dropped
down following a bumper harvest for maize and rice in May 2008.
According to a recent discussion paper by Minot (2011) staple food prices in Tanzanian
markets tend to move with the world staple food prices. For example, Arusha showed
to have a long-run relationship with the world price of maize. For rice, four of the
height rice markets in Tanzania appeared to be linked to world rice markets.
Furthermore, the elasticity of price transmission ranges from 0.24 to 0.54 implies that
24% to 54% of the world rice prices changes are transmitted to the Tanzanian markets.
9
A report by USAID (2008) shows that regions in Tanzania such as Mbeya, Iringa and
Morogoro have shown increased prices of major food crops. In addition, there are
various reasons for this increase in prices such as poor harvests of major food crops,
higher transport cost of major food, increased demand for food by consumers, Oil and
energy supplies and rising cost in energy which contribute to the increasing of
agricultural production cost which is eventually reflected into food prices.
2.2: Determinants of staple food prices variation
According to Nyange and Wobst (2005), the price volatility is determined by market
forces i.e. demand and supply of a product. This implies once there is an imbalance
between demand and supply of a product, and then prices are likely to fluctuate in the
process of re-gaining an equilibrium point. The demand side factors (rising incomes,
increasing world population and urbanization) and supply side factors (high agricultural
input prices and declining agricultural input resources) influence the price increase of
the product (ILRI, 2009).
The behavior of the domestic food prices depends highly on the degree of tradability of
the commodity (Delgado et al., 2004; Haggblade and Dewina, 2010; Minot, 2010). For
international commodities, domestic prices are expected to follow the world prices of
the same commodities unless otherwise there are significant barriers to trade.
Conversely, if not, it is likely to be determined by domestic supply and demand of that
particular commodity.
10
Naylor and Falcon (2010) argues that weather variability, changes on population,
fluctuation of Petroleum prices, speculation and stockholding and changes on exchange
rates are the major determinants of staple food price variation. They insist that any
changes in these factors are likely to be shifted into the staple food price and hence its
variation.
A recent report by a Central Bank of Lesotho (2010) also suggests that the increasing
demand on food along with the world population growth is one among the determinants
of variation of staple food prices. This increase in demand on food due to an increase in
world population may result to an imbalance between demand and supply of food, the
former being relatively higher. This might be compensated by the price increase as it is
the case since July 2010.
According to the report by FEWS NET (2009) on the Tanzania food security, it is
postulated that increased demand at the markets and increased transportation costs
caused by high fuel prices are likely to contribute to high food prices. This report
suggests that variability in food prices may be caused by changes in demand and
transport costs
.
Agricultural prices vary because production and consumption are variable (Gilbert and
Morgan, 2010). However, predictable and unpredictable should be distinguished from
the economic point of view because the latter is characterized by the elements of
shocks. This implies that, shocks in production and consumption are transmitted into
11
price variability. Furthermore, it postulates that speculation and stockholding or
purchase currently and sell in future at relatively higher prices also determine the
degree of food price variability.
A more recent study by Rashid and Minot (2010) suggests that the variation of
commodity prices between locations and over time is a natural market phenomenon
and, in addition, excessive variability of staple food prices to a large extent is a
reflection of a lack of market integration across space.
Kilima et al (2008) studies changes in the variability of maize prices using monthly
maize wholesale price data from seven regions of Tanzania between 1983 and 1998.
The results revealed that market liberalization increased both the level and the
variability in the maize prices. This suggests that market forces namely demand and
supply are major determinants of price variability.
According to Jayne et al (2005) government intervention contributes potentially to the
staple food prices variability particularly in maize market. These interventions are
maize export bans as what is the case in recent years in Tanzania, unexpected changes
on import tariffs and government importation and sell to selected buyers. Once there
are changes in at least one of these mentioned interventions, it is likely that changes to
be shifted into prices resulting to its variability.
12
Schlosser (2006) applied regression models using the actual spatial price variation so as
to determine the causes of spatial price variation over time. He used mean price,
standard deviation and coefficient of variation as the tools to measure price variations.
In addition, coefficient of variation for each item was regressed against a dummy
variable commodity (good or service) so as to determine whether an item is a good or
service while assigning 1 to a good and 0 for service. In this study, he mentioned
supply and demand, transport costs and market characteristics as the major
determinants of price variation. For the case of market characteristics, the study
describes that characteristics such as monopoly situation in the industry leads to higher
price variation and conversely if there are relatively many competitors in the industry,
then price variability is likely to be relatively low since there is a stiff competition.
2.3: Analysis of spatial prices variation
The major economic approaches that are used to measure the degree of spatial price
integration are the Law of One Price (LOP), Co-integration (regression analysis),
Ravallion model and Granger-Causality (Baulch, 1997).
Nyange and Wobst (2005) applied Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedastic
(ARCH) regression to analyse the monthly price data over the period of 1992-2000 in
predominantly consumer, producer and border markets of Dar-es-salaam, Dodoma and
Arusha respectively. The essence of this analysis was to examine changes in maize
price levels and variability in Tanzania so as to evaluate effects of Strategic Grain
Reserve on stabilizing domestic market prices against alternative food security policies
such as regional food stock and trade.
13
Rashid and Minot (2010) suggested Cointegration analysis, Threshold Autoregressive
(TAR) and Parity Bound Model as the suitable methods in analyzing spatial arbitration.
Cointegration takes non-stationary into account and allows long-run relationship as
well as the speed of adjustment; however, it does not distinguish between lack of
integration because of market inefficiency and lack of integration because the
difference is too small.
Karfakis and Rapsomanikis (2008) used threshold co-integration to examine the
relationship between prices in a number of well connected and remote markets in
Tanzania. In addition, this approach was used to approximate the magnitude of
transport and other transaction costs between the markets. The threshold co-integration
suggested that regional markets in Tanzania are integrated.
Brempong and Asare (2007) also used co-integration to study the monthly time series
price data from January 1996 to December 2003 so as to measure the extent to which
the rice prices in spatially markets are integrated or co-move. This study suggests that
prices of imported rice in Ghana do not share the common properties with the local
prices trends in the central market.
Separate regressions were used by Minot (2010) to study the relationship between
domestic staple foods prices as well as the transmission of changes in international food
price to domestic markets in Tanzania.
14
Campenhout (2007) used Threshold Auto-regressive (TAR) model and Parity Bound
Model (PBM) to analyze the relationship between maize prices in Iringa and other six
markets in Tanzania. Weekly price data over the period of 1989 to 2000 were used in
this analysis.
Korir, et al (2003) applied Cointegration analysis in analyzing the average monthly
wholesale bean prices (secondary data) from four markets namely Arusha, Moshi,
Taveta and Nairobi. In addition, Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) test, Granger
causality test and Pearson’s bivariate correlation coefficient were used to test the
stationarity of prices and first difference, capturing the direction of causality in price
changes and analysig the market integration respectively.
Boysen (2009) used descriptive statistics and regression methods to assess the spatial
variability and transmission of prices in Uganda. Time series data were used and
classified into two datasets namely time series of retail prices for six major local
markets in Uganda and national household survey 2002/2003 which includes detailed
information on expenditure and unit value data for 9711 households.
Standard Vector Error Correlation Model and Threshold Vector Error Correlation
Model (TVECM) were used by Amikuzuno (2010) to estimate the speed of price
adjustments between the net producer and net consumer market pairs. Two datasets
were used in this analysis namely High Frequency Data (HFD) and Low Frequency
Data (LFD) in five major Tomato markets in Ghana.
15
Barry and Piggot (2001) applied Threshold Cointegration models to analyze and
evaluate the spatial price dynamics among regional corn and Soybean markets in North
Carolina. They found that Threshold reflecting the influences of transaction costs is
confirmed and markets are strongly spatially integrated.
It is important to note that two spatially separated markets are said to work efficiently if
and only if the price difference between them is not larger than the transaction costs
required to move the good from surplus market to deficit market (Rapsomanikis, 2003).
16
CHAPTER THREE
3.0: METHODOLOGY
3.1: Description of the research design
The design of the research was a case study of two regions i.e. Dar-es-salaam city and
Morogoro municipality and the item concerned was rice.
These two regions are located almost 200Km apart, Morogoro being located at the
western side of Dar-es-salaam. Morogoro is one among the surplus regions that
produce rice in Tanzania.
3.1.1: Ifakara town
Ifakara is a small rural town in Kilombero district, Morogoro region, south central
Tanzania. It is the headquarter of the Kilombero district administration and the main
trading centre for Kilombero and Ulanga districts. The town is located near the
Tanzania-Zambia Railway (TAZARA) line, at the edge of the Kilombero valley, a vast
swampland flooded by the mighty Kilombero River.
3.2: Sampling methods
Methods that were used to select sample are simple random sampling and purposive
sampling methods. The sample was selected randomly from the groups of traders who
are involved in rice trade in these two regions particularly those who transport rice from
Ifakara to different markets in Dar-es-Salaam.
3.3: Sample size
Total of 21 traders who transport rice from Morogoro (Ifakara) to Dar-es-Salaam city
were interviewed in order to get data which were later used to estimate rice prices in
17
both good and bad seasons. In addition, these data were also used to estimate average
prices of buying and selling rice for both traders and farmers.
3.4: Data collection
Both primary and secondary data were collected for the study as described below.
3.4.1: Primary data collection
Structured questionnaires as well as face to face interviews were used to collect
primary data from traders who transport rice from Morogoro (Ifakara) to Dar-es-salaam
city.
3.4.2: Secondary data collection
Secondary data on wholesale monthly prices of rice in both regions for the period of
time 2001, 2002 and 2003 were collected from the Ministry of Industry, Trade and
Marketing of Tanzania located in Dar-es-Salaam. In addition, secondary data on the
trends of fuels prices in Tanzania were collected from various previous studies so as to
ensure critical analysis of the rice prices patterns in these two regions as far as fuels
prices trends are concern.
3.5: Survey and questionnaire administration
A survey was conducted by the researcher himself for two days in the mid-May 2011.
The data were collected at market place and at milling machines by using structured
questionnaires prepared in English but translated in Kiswahili during the data
collection. In addition, face to face interviews with traders using Kiswahili was also
done since Kiswahili is understood better by all respondents and was therefore a useful
language for the purpose of the study. This helped in making the response rate from the
18
traders more useful and, indeed, they seemed to be aware about the research on their
business. Respondents were asked on the following important variables:
a) Traders were asked on the quantities of rice they purchase from farmers as well
as whether they resale all of them or not. Also they were asked to mention the
buying and selling prices of the rice they purchase from farmers.
b) Also traders were asked to to mention the buying and selling prices during good
and bad season regarding the availability of rice(supply).
c) Moreover, they were asked to specify the cost for each marketing function they
incur namely packaging, storage, processing, loading, transportation and
unloading.
d) Eventually they were asked to mention taxes and/or market charge they pay if
any.
3.6: Data analysis
3.6.1: Software
Data from the questionnaire survey were analyzed using Excel software computer
program. Excel was used to simplify the analysis of quantitative secondary data on
wholesale monthly prices of rice in 2001, 2002 and 2003 for both regions. Also it was
used to calculate percentages and averages for primary data on different cost elements
of the marketing costs. In addition, it displayed quantitative statistics which were t-
statistics.
19
3.6.2: Descriptive analysis
Descriptive statistics were used in the analysis of the study data. It included deduction
of means and percentages of marketing costs during different situations of rice
availability.
3.6.3: Quantitative analysis
The mean difference t-test was used to test the hypothesis that there is no significant
difference in wholesale monthly rice prices charged in Morogoro Municipality and in
Dar-es-Salaam city.
3.7: Tools of testing hypotheses
1. T-test was used to test the significance of hypothesis that there is no significant
difference in wholesale monthly prices of rice charged in these regions.
2. Percentages and pie chart were used to show the proportion of marketing costs
to the average price difference.
3.8: Decision rule
For T-test, the rule of thumb was to reject the null hypothesis if and only if the
corresponding P value is less than the predetermined significant level of 5%, and fail to
reject if p value is greater than the predetermined significant level of 5%.
20
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1: Gender of the respondents.
All 21 respondents who were interviewed were males i.e. 100% of the respondents.
This suggests that males dominate this trade by being more involved directly in this
trade rather than females. However, this does not conclude that males are the owners of
the businesses since they might be sent on behalf of the owners who are probably
females.
4.2: Statistical significance of price gap between Morogoro and Dar-es-Salaam
regions.
Results from Table 1 on the T-test show that the price gap of rice per 100KG between
these two regions is statistically significant, (P<0.05). This can be explained by the fact
that the profit margin attached by the rice traders as well as marketing costs incurred
are expected to contribute substantially in the price difference in these regions.
21
Table 1: T-test of wholesale prices of rice for Morogoro and Dar-es-Salaam
refions
Mean
Wholesale
price for
Morogoro
Mean Wholesale
price for Dar-es-
Salaam
df Sig. (2-tailed) t-value
Price
TSH/100KG
33321.56
38588.56
70
0.0000*
-4.174
* Implies statistically significant at 5%.
4.3: Trend of wholesale monthly rice prices in Morogoro town and Dar-es-salaam
city for the year 2001, 2002 and 2003.
Figure 1 of this report shows that wholesale monthly prices of rice in both regions are
almost moving together. However, prices in Morogoro are relatively lower throughout
the specified period of time i.e. 2001, 2002 and 2003 even though there are some
occasions whereby the prices in Morogoro are higher than that of Dar-es-Salaam.
The tendency of wholesale prices of rice in Dar-es-Salaam being higher than that of
Morogoro helps us to explain the fact that the former is the deficit region relatively to
the latter. In addition, the average gap is 5,267 TSH per 100KG. This result is the same
to what was concluded by Gjolberg et al (2004) who studied the movement of the
prices of maize, beans, and rice over 1992-2002 between Dar es Salaam and Morogoro
22
(a rice surplus region).Their study showed that monthly wholesale prices in Dar-es-
Salaam is relatively higher than that in Morogoro and the average gap was 4,000TSH
per 100 KG. Therefore from this comparison, it can be concluded that the average gap
of rice prices in these regions increased from 4,000TSH per bag over 1992-2002 to
5,267 TSH per bag over 2001 and 2003.
Also from figure 2 of this report, it depicts that the gap of monthly wholesale rice
prices between these regions fluctuate a lot due to various reasons such as seasonality
due to rainfall. Indeed, it should be noted that Dar-es-Salaam is a deficit region, hence
we expect it to have higher prices than Morogoro town. However, this is not always the
case since the gaps in some months are negative following the fact that prices in
Morogoro being higher than that in Dar-es-Salaam because the latter is also receiving
rice from other surplus regions in the country as well as rice from outside the country.
This makes supply of rice in Dar-es-Salaam to increase and hence lowering the price of
rice and sometimes become relatively lower comparing to that prevail in Morogoro.
Table 2: Wholesale monthly rice prices in Morogoro town and Dar-es-salaam city
S/N TIME WHOLESALE RICE
PRICES
IN MOROGORO
(TSH/100KG)
WHOLESALE RICE PRICES
IN
DAR-ES-SALAAM
(TSH/100KG)
1. Jan/2001 36,833 43,500
23
2. Feb/2001 35,500 45,250
3. Mar/2001 35,400 37,692
4. Apr/2001 35,564 38,410
5. May/2001 38,125 38,542
6. Jun/2001 29,167 40,000
7. July/2001 29,875 35,583
8. Aug/2001 27,722 33,796
9. Sept/2001 25,357 36,750
10. Oct/2001 27,667 36,250
11. Nov/2001 28,143 38,000
12. Dec/2001 28,500 38,000
13. Jan/2002 31,714 38,917
14. Feb/2002 32,333 37,542
15. Mar/2002 34,455 35,925
16. Apr/2002 32,875 35,063
17. May/2002 28,500 36,385
18. Jun/2002 25,727 37,000
19. July/2002 23,750 33,000
20. Aug/2002 23,000 32,500
21. Sept/2002 39,021 41,211
22. Oct/2002 24,396 33,889
23. Nov/2002 24,667 33,000
24
24. Dec/2002 36,000 40,000
25. Jan/2003 28,900 39,542
26. Feb/2003 31,773 37,136
27. Mar/2003 32,318 39,273
28. Apr/2003 34,132 39,447
29. May/2003 39,667 37,200
30. Jun/2003 39,729 38,667
31. July/2003 39,200 37,883
32. Aug/2003 38,688 40,091
33. Sept/2003 41,667 45,000
34. Oct/2003 43,607 46,286
35. Nov/2003 45,375 46,125
36. Dec/2003 50,229 46,333
SOURCE: Ministry of Trade, Industry and Marketing of Tanzania.
4.4. Average quantity of rice purchased and sold, purchasing and selling prices of
rice/KG (A case of traders).
According to the analyzed data on prices of rice per KG during good and bad seasons
with respect to the availability of rice from the farmers, it showed that the average
prices per KG paid by traders during good and bad seasons are 597.9TSH/KG and
832.5TSH/KG respectively. In addition, normal average buying and selling price of rice
by rice traders under normal situation are 575.7TSH/KG and 1162.7TSH/KG
respectively. However, it should be noted that the research was not able to capture the
25
type and quality attributes of rice which are among the factors that differentiate prices
of rice classified in different grades. Therefore, this study assumed that all rice
purchased by different traders was the same as far as their types and qualities are
concern, and the major emphasis was given in estimating the averages prices of rice in
three situations namely normal situation whereby rice is neither shortage nor plenty,
good season whereby rice is available in abundance and bad season whereby rice is
available not in abundance.
Also results show that quantities of rice purchased by rice traders are all sold. This can
be explained by the fact that majority of rice traders who purchase rice from Ifakara to
Dar-es-Salaam markets are small traders i.e. majority purchase on average between 1-3
tones while few of them purchase between 4-7 tones. This difference in quantities
purchased from one trader to another is due to their difference level of their capital.
Therefore, the quantity purchased on average by each trader is about 1.82 tones.
Table 3: Prices, quantities of rice purchased and sold by rice traders at Ifakara
Item Value
Average quantity of rice purchased by rice traders (Tone)
1.83
Average quantity of rice sold by rice traders (Tone)
1.83
26
Average price of rice paid by rice traders under Normal situation
(TSH/KG)
575.7
Average price of rice received by rice traders under normal season
(TSH/KG)
(TSH/KG)
1162.7
Average price of rice paid by traders during bad season (TSH/KG)
832.5
Average price of rice paid by rice traders during good season (TSH/KG)
597.9
Average price of rice received by rice traders during good season (TSH/KG)
1169.05
Average price of rice received by rice traders during bad season (TSH/KG)
1359.5
SOURCE: Own calculations from the data collected.
27
From Table 4, Storage services are offered free of charge by the owners of the
processing (milling) machines and that is why it is not included in estimating marketing
costs. However, for the case of processing costs, it is not included in Table 4 since it is
paid by farmers themselves before selling their rice to traders.
Table 4: Estimation for marketing costs incurred by traders
LOADING
(TSH/KG)
PACKAGING
(TSH/KG)
TRANSPORT
(TSH/KG)
UNLOADING
(TSH/KG)
TOTAL
MARKETING
COSTS
(TSH/KG)
4.01 6.31 61.11 3.756 75.186
SOURCE: Own calculations from the data collected.
Table 5: Marketing margin, costs and proportion of marketing costs in the price
gap between Morogoro and Dar-es-Salaam.
Duration Marketing
margin(Farmer –
Trader, TSH/KG)
Marketing
costs(TSH/KG)
Proportion of
Marketing costs in
price gap (%)
Normal season 587 75.186 12.8
Bad season 571.11 75.186 13.164
28
Good season 526.98 75.186 14.267
Figure 3.
4.5. Determinants of staple food prices variation
From the results presented in the Table 6, it shows that prices of rice vary according to
the variation in availability of rice i.e. supply of rice. This can be evidenced by the
variation of both buying and selling prices of rice by traders during good and bad
seasons. These variations of rice prices are also the results of weather variation. In
addition, prices are lower in good season whereby supply of rice is relatively higher
than demand while prices are higher during bad season from October to January (off-
season) whereby supply of rice is relatively low comparing to demand. The results are
29
comparable with other studies on the same topic. Variation of staple food prices is due
to forces of demand and supply in the domestic markets and variation in weather
conditions (Nyange and Wobst, 2005; Naylor and Falcon, 2010; Delgado et al., 2004;
Haggblade and Dewina, 2010; Minot, 2010).
Moreover, the analysis done from the prices of fuel collected from other studies show
that prices of rice in both regions tend to move together with the variation in the prices
of fuel in Tanzania. These results are the same to the results by Naylor and Falcon
(2010) and FEWS NET (2009) whereby in both studies, it was found that prices of
fuels play a significant role in determining prices of staple foods. Consider the
Movement of rice prices in both regions and the movement of prices for Diesel and
Gasoline.
30
Trends of avearage annual wholesale
rice prices
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
19951997
20002001
20022003
2004
YEAR
PR
ICES
(TSH
/100
KG
)
Morogoro
Dar-es-Salaam
56
Figure 4.
31
Trends of fuels prices
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
19951997
20002001
20022003
2004
YEAR
PR
ICES
(U
S C
ENTS
/LIT
RE)
Gasoline
Diesel
Figure 5.
32
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1: Conclusion
The conclusion made is based on the statistical significance of the gap between these
two regions, trend of wholesale rice prices, marketing margin during different
situations of regarding availability of rice and determinants of staple food prices
variation.
5.1.1: significance of the gap between these two regions
The critical question of whether average wholesale rice prices in these regions are
statistically the same was one among the important issues covered in this study. It was
shown that the price gap between these regions is statistically significant at 5% using t-
test tool.
5.1.2: Trend of wholesale rice prices between these regions
It was shown that monthly wholesale prices in these regions tend to move together
throughout the specified period of time i.e. 2001, 2002 and 2003. However, there are
some occasions whereby prices in Morogoro are higher than that of Dar-es-Salaam.
This may be the result of importation of rice from outside countries into the latter
which increases supply of rice and hence relative lower prices than the former.
5.1.3: Marketing margin
Marketing margin between farmers and traders differ in different situations regarding
the availability/supply of rice. The marketing margin normal, good and bad situations
are 587TSH/KG, 571.11TSH/KG and 526.98TSH/KG respectively. In addition, the
33
proportion of marketing costs in the marketing margin for the three mentioned
situations are 12.85, 13.164% and 14.267% respectively.
5.1.4: Determinants of staple food prices variation.
The study revealed that the major determinants of staple food prices variation are
supply and demand of the product regarding the climatic conditions and on-season as
well as off-season (October to January), variation in the fuels’ prices.
5.2: Recommendations
The government should make an effort to reduce prices of fuels because are the
essential element of transport for commodities particularly rice. As we have seen in the
results and discussion part, transport costs account about 81.28% in the marketing costs
incurred by rice traders. The government can achieve this strategy through reducing
taxation on fuels imported in our country. This will reduce cost burden which is usually
shifted to final consumers by traders involving in fuels industry in our country.
Also the government should improve its monitoring system on provision of farm inputs
particularly to small holder farmers so as to make sure that the targeted farmers get
these inputs at lower prices as planned. This will help to increase number of those who
get these inputs which will help to reduce costs of production and eventually reduction
in prices of rice to the final consumers of rice as well as its volatility.
Indeed, in depth research should further be done to capture the attributes of quality and
type of rice and how they affect the prices of rice due to the fact that this study ended
assuming all rice are the same as far as quality and type attributes are concern.
34
REFERENCES
Abdulai, A. (2007). Spatial and vertical price transmission in food staple market chain
in Eastern and Southern Africa: What is the evidence?
Amikuzuno, J. (2010). Spatial price transmission analysis in Agricultural markets:
Does the data frequency improve our estimation. A paper presented at the joint 3rd
African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE) and 48th
Agricultural
Economists Association of South Africa (AEASA) Conference, Cape Town, South
Africa.
Boysen, O. (2009). Border price shocks, spatial price variation and their impacts on
poverty in Uganda: A discussion paper number 306.
Brempong, S.A. and Asare, Y.B.O. (2007). Has imported rice crowded out domestic
rice production in GHANA? What has been the role of policy?
Campenhout, B. V. (2007). Modeling Trends in Food Markets integration: Method and
an Application to Tanzanian Markets.
Dawe, D. and Opazo, C.M. (2009). How much did developing country domestic Staple
food prices increase during the world food crisis? How much have they declined?
Economic Institute of Cambodia, (2006). Cambodia competitiveness report.
Eskola, E. (2005). Agricultural marketing and supply chain management in Tanzania:
A case study of Mtwara, Morogoro and Dar-es-salaam. Working paper series no. 16.
35
Gilbert, C.L. and Morgan, C.W. (2010). Food price volatility.
Haggblade, S. and Dewina, R. (2010). Staple food prices in Uganda. A paper prepared
for the COMESA policy seminar on Variation in staple food prices: Causes,
Consequences, and policy options. Under the African Agricultural Marketing Project
(AAMP). January 25-26, Maputo, Mozambique.
Hertel, T.M. et al. (2001). Trade policy, Staple food price variability and the
vulnerability of low income households: A paper prepared for presentation at the fourth
Annual Conference on global Economic Analysis. June 27-29, 2001, Purdue
University.
http:// www.aec.msu.edu/ff2/seminar_3/aamp_maputo_12_spatial_price_variation.pdf
http:// www.ratin.net/grid/lib/grid.js trade intelligence network
Ihle, R. and Taubadel, S.V.C. (2010). Semi-parametric Evidence on the nature of price
transmission in Tanzania maize markets: A paper prepared for presentation at the
Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (AAEA), CAES and WAEA. Joint
annual meeting. July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado.
Kadigi, R.M.J. (2003). Rice production economics at the local and National level: A
case study of Usangu plains in Tanzania.
Korir, M. K. et al. (2003). Spatial price integration: A Cointegration approach to
regional bean markets in Kenya and Tanzania.
36
Madundo, S.M. (2009). Analysis of price trends for major food crops produced in
Tanzania: A case study of Mbeya, Iringa and Morogoro. Unpublished special project
report, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro.
Minot, N. (2010). A paper on variation in staple food prices: Causes, consequence, and
policy options, Maputo, Mozambique.
Naylor, R.L. and Falcon, W.P. (2010). Food security in an Era of Economic Volatility.
Nyange, D. and Wobst, P. (2005). Effects of strategic Grain Reserve, trade and
Regional production on maize price volatility in Tanzania: An ARCH Model analysis.
Rapsomanikis, G. and Karfakis, P. (2008). Margins across time and space: Threshold
Cointegration and spatial pricing application to commodity markets in Tanzania.
Rashid, S. and Minot, N. (2010). Are Staple food Markets in Africa efficient? Spatial
price analyses and Beyond. A paper presented at the COMESA policy seminar “Food
price variability”: Causes, Consequences, and policy options. Under COMESA-MSU-
IFPRI. African Agricultural Markets Project (AAMP). January 25-26, 2010, Maputo,
Mozambique.
Scholsser, B.S. (2006). Analysis of Spatial Variation in prices through time.
UNDP, (2004). The macroeconomics of poverty reduction in Cambodia.
Weber, K.I. (2005). Spatial price linkages in North America milled rice markets.
37
www.bdsknowledge.org./.../DAI%20pesa%20Rice%subsector%20study%20April%20
2003.pdf
www.dfid.gov.uk/r4d/pdf/outputs/water/R804_Report_ELEBWU_3_Report.pdf
www.fao.org/ES/esc/common/ecg/.../GEORGE_Margins_Time_space.pdf
www.ratin.net/document/2009_eastern_africa_trade_flow.xls.from www.ratin.net
www.Tanzaniagateway.org/docs/agriculturalmarketingandsupplymanagementinTanzan
ia.pdf