Analysis: Devi and Mahanagar

2
Analyse/read Satyajit Ray's films "Devi" and "Mahanagara" in context of him being a social historian through these films. You can a ls o site examples from h is other films if you want. Devi(1960) and Mahanagar(1963) and many of Ray¶s other films revolve around a female  protagonists playing various roles of observers, instigators and also victims to various social norms and changes. All these soc ial elements are portrayed through its effects on o ne single microcosm of a family. Devi is a tale set in rural India in a rich zamindar hou sehold. It is a period drama set in 1860 at Chandipur, Bengal. Doyamoyee, the protagonist is the wife of the uneducated Zamindar¶s younger western educated so n. She¶s the household favourite of all, from the father in law to the nephew to the house pet. The son has to leave to complete his education at the Calcutta University. The father in law then has a vision in which Doyamoyee appears as an incarnation of the goddess Kali. Waking up a nd believing his vision to be true he acts immediately and installs his own daughter in law as a goddess idol in the family idol and the ordeal ensues. The husband returns to find out his wife has been t aken from him for reasons beyond t he grasp of his western educated rationalist mind. The peop le of the village gather from time to t ime daily to worship her. The nephew distances himself from his beloved aunt. All this while Doyamoyee has no day in it, neither does she put up any kind of protest like any ot her traditionally brought up girl of her times. Meanwhile as the son tries to reason with his father about his wife¶s divinity, through a stroke of sheer coincidence or fate, an apparent miracle takes place as a boy is healed at her feet. This cements the father¶s resolve and now people come from afar to pray to her. All this breaks when the goddess fails to save the life of her own nephew a s he dies in her arms. T his drives Doyamoyee, the bo y¶s mother and the father in law, all of them to desperation and madness. The film ends at this incomplete note, leaving everything in the film to interpretation. The film shows various social forces of the t imes, the uneducated and religious, almost fundamentalist old Zamindar, his educated younger son with the rationalist sensibili ties o f western progressive education,the half-educated traditionally brought up daughter in law, bound  by her duties as a daug hter in law, also the do ctor representing lesser known ancient knowledge of Ayurveda. All these forces come to loggerheads with each other. Although in the film

Transcript of Analysis: Devi and Mahanagar

Page 1: Analysis: Devi and Mahanagar

8/7/2019 Analysis: Devi and Mahanagar

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/analysis-devi-and-mahanagar 1/2

Analyse/read Satyajit Ray's films "Devi" and "Mahanagara" in context of him being a social

historian through these films. You can also site examples from his other films if you want.

Devi(1960) and Mahanagar(1963) and many of Ray¶s other films revolve around a female

 protagonists playing various roles of observers, instigators and also victims to various social

norms and changes. All these social elements are portrayed through its effects on one single

microcosm of a family.

Devi is a tale set in rural India in a rich zamindar household. It is a period drama set in 1860 at

Chandipur, Bengal. Doyamoyee, the protagonist is the wife of the uneducated Zamindar¶s

younger western educated son. She¶s the household favourite of all, from the father in law to the

nephew to the house pet. The son has to leave to complete his education at the Calcutta

University. The father in law then has a vision in which Doyamoyee appears as an incarnation of 

the goddess Kali. Waking up and believing his vision to be true he acts immediately and installs

his own daughter in law as a goddess idol in the family idol and the ordeal ensues. The husband

returns to find out his wife has been taken from him for reasons beyond the grasp of his western

educated rationalist mind. The people of the village gather from time to time daily to worship

her. The nephew distances himself from his beloved aunt. All this while Doyamoyee has no day

in it, neither does she put up any kind of protest like any other traditionally brought up girl of her 

times. Meanwhile as the son tries to reason with his father about his wife¶s divinity, through a

stroke of sheer coincidence or fate, an apparent miracle takes place as a boy is healed at her feet.

This cements the father¶s resolve and now people come from afar to pray to her. All this breaks

when the goddess fails to save the life of her own nephew as he dies in her arms. This drives

Doyamoyee, the boy¶s mother and the father in law, all of them to desperation and madness. The

film ends at this incomplete note, leaving everything in the film to interpretation.

The film shows various social forces of the times, the uneducated and religious, almost

fundamentalist old Zamindar, his educated younger son with the rationalist sensibilities of 

western progressive education,the half-educated traditionally brought up daughter in law, bound

 by her duties as a daughter in law, also the doctor representing lesser known ancient knowledge

of Ayurveda. All these forces come to loggerheads with each other. Although in the film

Page 2: Analysis: Devi and Mahanagar

8/7/2019 Analysis: Devi and Mahanagar

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/analysis-devi-and-mahanagar 2/2

religious fundamentalism holds dominance over all events that take place, in the end this

religious fanaticism leads to an ultimate tragedy.

Mahanagar is another masterpiece from Ray. With this film Ray for the 1st time in his career 

ventured to explore a cityscape instead of a rural background. Here the family¶s daughter in law,

Arati goes out of the homestead and starts working as a salesgirl as her husband, Subrata finds it

difficult to support the family of 6 on his meager income. This transformation from a demure

housewife to a bold working woman and the effect it has on the people around her in her life is

the centre point of the story. Set in Calcutta during the 1950¶s at a time when the population was

fast expanding and good paying jobs were scarce. India was still a nascent country, with

reminders of the British raj lingering here and there in the metropolis. It was also a time when

Anglo-Indians were present in the country in much larger numbers than they are today. The

influence of an Anglo Indian colleague on Arati is quite clear throughout the film. This was a

film which for the 1st

time put a woman on the same stature as the man, and perhaps a little

ahead of the man sometimes. The film cleverly sets the tone of the times by using radio news

reports in the background, discussions of people over in the restaurants and also the closing

down of the bank where Subrata worked. The transformations in Arati are physically manifested

using props such as the lipstick, the goggles and also her 1st

month¶s salary, with which she

 brings home gifts for everyone in the family. The conflict between generations on the issue of 

having a working and earning a daughter in law is depicted by the father in laws rejection of state

of affairs at his home and refusing to take money from his daughter in law. His principles are so

rigid that he would rather go door to door seek out his old students and beg for alms rather than

take money from his daughter in law.

Thus, through the medium of these films and many more like the Apu trilogy, Jalsaghar, and

even ShatranjkeKhiladi etc., Satyajit Ray puts forth his point of view of various times in history

where there was a cultural or economic upheaval in the society. Ofcourse these scripts were

adapted from short stories. But it was Ray¶s choice to adapt these stories and show them the way

he did. Thus Satyajit Ray can be said to be a social historian.