Analysis and Comparison of APOD and PD PWM technique … · Impact Factor (2012): 3.358 . Volume 3...
Transcript of Analysis and Comparison of APOD and PD PWM technique … · Impact Factor (2012): 3.358 . Volume 3...
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064
Impact Factor (2012): 3.358
Volume 3 Issue 11, November 2014 www.ijsr.net
Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
Analysis and Comparison of APOD and PD PWM technique CHB Inverter to Three Phase Induction
Machine
Mandapti Durga Lakshmi1, R.V.R.N Pavan Kumar2
1M.Tech Scholar, Department of EEE, SAI ADITYA Institute of Engineering and Technology, Surampalem, AP, India
2Assistant Professor, Department of EEE, SAI ADITYA Institute of Engineering and Technology, Surampalem, AP, India Abstract: The objective of this paper is to develop for improvement of induction machine performance for large industries applications with help of fifteen level CHB level shifted Phase Disposition (PD) and Alternate Phase Opposition Disposition (APOD) PWM technique inverters. Proposed configuration is analysis and comparison of APOD and PD PWM technique applied to three phase induction machine. It has been analyzed in point of THD of induction machine stator currents. THD of APOD is 4.18% and PD is 3.23%. The fifteen level inverter output voltages, harmonic performance of induction machine current, induction machine outputs and THD is available by using simulation of MATLAB/SIMULINK software. Keywords: Alternate Phase Opposition Disposition (APOD), Fifteen level, phase disposition (PD) 1. Introduction In recent years, the basic concept of a multilevel converter is to use a series of power semiconductor switches that properly connected to several lower dc voltage sources to synthesize a near sinusoidal staircase voltage waveform. The small output voltage step results in high quality output voltage, reduction of voltage stresses on power switching devices, lower switching losses and higher efficiency. Three topologies of multi-level inverters are Diode clamped, Flying capacitor inverter and cascaded multi-level inverter. The cascaded multilevel inverter uses several full bridges in series to synthesize waveforms. This topology is free from complicated connections and uses less number of components than diode clamped and flying capacitor multi-level inverter In recent years the control of high-performance induction motor drives for general industry applications and production automation has received widespread research interests. Three phase induction motors are commonly used in many industries and they have three phase stator and rotor windings. Induction machine modeling has continuously attracted the attention of researchers not only because such machines are made and used in largest numbers but also due to their varied modes of operation both under steady and dynamic states. Traditionally, DC motors were the work horses for the Adjustable Speed Drives (ASDs) due to their excellent speed and torque response. But, they have the inherent disadvantage of commutator and mechanical brushes, which undergo wear and tear with the passage of time. In most cases, AC motors are preferred to DC motors, in particular, an induction motor due to its low cost, low maintenance, lower weight, higher efficiency, improved ruggedness and reliability. All these features make the use of induction motors a mandatory in many areas of industrial applications. The advancement in Power electronics and semiconductor technology has triggered the development of
high power and high speed semiconductor devices in order to achieve a smooth, continuous and low total harmonics distortion (THD). Proposed configuration is analysis and comparison of APOD and PD PWM technique applied to three phase induction machine. It has been analyzed in point of THD of induction machine stator currents. The fifteen level inverter output voltages, harmonic performance of induction machine current, induction machine outputs and THD is available by using simulation of MATLAB/SIMULINK software. 2. Proposed Concept This proposed topology of inverter is suitable for high voltage and high power inversion because of its ability of synthesize waveforms with better harmonic spectrum and low switching frequency. For each full bridge inverter the output voltage is given by
Voi = Vdc (S1i – S2i) (1) And the input dc current is
Idci = Ia (S1i – S2i) (2) Where, (a) i =1. .. 3 (number of full bridge inverters employed) for the 11 level type. (b) Ia is the output current of the cascaded inverter. (c) SliandS2, are the upper switch of each full bridge inverter.
Paper ID: OCT141314 2168
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064
Impact Factor (2012): 3.358
Volume 3 Issue 11, November 2014 www.ijsr.net
Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
Tm
Discrete,Ts = 5e-005 s
powerguiVabcIabc
A
B
C
abc
Three-PhaseV-I Measurement
PWM Block
NOT
LogicalOperator9
NOT
LogicalOperator8
NOT
LogicalOperator7
NOT
LogicalOperator6
NOT
LogicalOperator5
NOT
LogicalOperator41
NOT
LogicalOperator40
NOT
LogicalOperator4
NOT
LogicalOperator39
NOT
LogicalOperator38
NOT
LogicalOperator37
NOT
LogicalOperator36
NOT
LogicalOperator35
NOT
LogicalOperator34
NOT
LogicalOperator33
NOT
LogicalOperator32
NOT
LogicalOperator31
NOT
LogicalOperator30
NOT
LogicalOperator3
NOT
LogicalOperator29
NOT
LogicalOperator28
NOT
LogicalOperator27
NOT
LogicalOperator26
NOT
LogicalOperator25
NOT
LogicalOperator24
NOT
LogicalOperator23
NOT
LogicalOperator22
NOT
LogicalOperator21
NOT
LogicalOperator20
NOT
LogicalOperator2
NOT
LogicalOperator19
NOT
LogicalOperator18
NOT
LogicalOperator17
NOT
LogicalOperator16
NOT
LogicalOperator15
NOT
LogicalOperator14
NOT
LogicalOperator13
NOT
LogicalOperator12
NOT
LogicalOperator11
NOT
LogicalOperator10
NOT
LogicalOperator1
NOT
LogicalOperator
-K-
b2
From9
a2
From8
b4
From7
a4
From6
b3
From5
b23
From41
a23
From40
a3
From4
b43
From39
a43
From38
b33
From37a33
From36
b63
From35
a63
From34
b03
From33a03
From32
b13
From31a13
From30
b6
From3
b53
From29a53
From28
b22
From27
a22
From26
b42
From25
a42
From24
b32
From23a32
From22
b62
From21
a62
From20
a6
From2
b02
From19a02
From18
b12
From17a12
From16
b52
From15a52
From14
b0
From13a0
From12
b1
From11a1
From10
b5
From1a5
From
0
Tm
mA
B
C
Asynchronous MachineSI Units
g CE
9
g CE
8
g CE
7
g CE
6
g CE
5
g CE
4
g CE
3
g CE
20
g CE
2
g CE
19
g CE
18
g CE
17
g CE
16
g CE
15
g CE
14
g CE
13g C
E
12
g CE
11
g CE
10
g CE
1
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
20
2
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
1
g CE
9
g CE
8
g CE
7
g CE
6
g CE
5
g CE
4
g CE
3
g CE
20
g CE
2
g CE
19
g CE
18
g CE
17
g CE
16
g CE
15
g CE
14
g CE
13
g CE
12
g CE
11
g CE
10
g CE
1
g CE
9
g CE
8
g CE
7
g CE
6
g CE
5
g CE
4
g CE
3
g CE
20
g CE
2
g CE
19
g CE
18
g CE
17
g CE
16
g CE
15
g CE
14
g CE
13
g CE
12
g CE
11
g CE
10
g CE
1
g CE
9
g CE
8
g CE
7
g CE
6
g CE
5
g CE
4
g CE
3
g CE
20
g CE
2
g CE
19
g CE
18
g CE
17
g CE
16
g CE
15
g CE
14
g CE
13
g CE
12
g CE
11
g CE
10
g CE
1
g CE
g CE
g CE
g CE
<Electromagnetic torque Te (N*m)>
<Rotor speed (wm)>
Figure 1: Proposed topology of fifteen level CHB inverter
fed induction machine. Now the output voltage of each phase of the multilevel cascaded inverter is given by: VOn= ∑Vo; i = 1, 2 .... n (3) 2.1 Carrier Based Disposition PWM Method 2.1.1 Phase Disposition Technique (PD) It is based on a comparison of a sinusoidal reference waveform with vertically shifted carrier waveform as shown in figure 2. This method uses N - 1 carrier signals to generate N level inverter output voltage [3]. All the carrier signals have the same amplitude, same frequency and are in phase [7]. In this method fourteen triangular carrier wave have compared with the one sinusoidal reference wave.
Figure 2: Phase Disposition Modulation.
2.1.2 Alternate Phase Opposition Disposition Technique (APOD) In Alternate Phase Opposition Disposition PWM (APOD), every carrier waveform is out phase with its neighboring carrier wave by 180 degree as shown in figure 3. All the carrier waveform have same frequency, same amplitude and but compare one carrier waveform to neighbor carrier waveform is phase shifted 180 degree. Odd carrier waveforms are in phase but compare to even carrier waveform are out of phase shift 180 degree in odd carrie waveform [3].
Figure 3: Alternate Phase Opposition Disposition PWM.
2.2 Induction Machine In recent years the control of high-performance induction motor drives for general industry applications and production automation has received widespread research interests. Induction machine modeling has continuously attracted the attention of researchers not only because such machines are made and used in largest numbers but also due to their varied modes of operation both under steady and dynamic states.
Paper ID: OCT141314 2169
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064
Impact Factor (2012): 3.358
Volume 3 Issue 11, November 2014 www.ijsr.net
Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
Figure 4: Equivalent circuit refers to stator of induction
machine The rotor current is
The complete circuit model with all parameters referred to the stator is in figure. Where Rs and Xs are the per phase resistance and leakage reactance of the stator winding. Xm represents the magnetizing reactance. R’r and X’r are the rotor resistance and reactance referred to the stator. I’r is the rotor current referred to the stator. There will be stator core loss, when the supply is connected and the rotor core loss depends on the slip.
3. MATLAB/SIMULINK Results In this paper, the simulation model based on MATALB/SIMULINK is developed under level shifted APOD and PD PWM techniques. A 3- phase multilevel inverter has been developed using IGBT because IGBT is a very popular device among 11 high power semiconductor switches. This three phase inverter fed to three phase squirrel cage induction machine. The following are simulation results of APOD and PD PWM technique inverter fed induction motor.
Figure.5: Stator Voltages and Currents of induction motor
under APOD PWM technique.
Figure 6: Speed and Electromagnetic torque of induction
motor under APOD PWM technique.
Figure 7: THD % of stator current under APOD PWM
technique.
Figure 8: Stator voltages and currents of induction motor
under PD PWM technique.
Paper ID: OCT141314 2170
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064
Impact Factor (2012): 3.358
Volume 3 Issue 11, November 2014 www.ijsr.net
Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
Figure 9: Speed and Electromagnetic torque of induction
motor under PD PWM technique.
Figure 10: THD % of stator current under PD PWM
technique. Figure 7 and 10 shows the THD % of stator current under APOD and PD PWM technique of induction motor. It is clear about THD % is low in PD technique, but 3rd harmonic is high. Now THD % is high in APOD technique compare to PD, but 3rd harmonic low.
Table 1: Comparison of APOD and PD PWM technique current THD% and Harmonic
Technique THD% 3rd Harmonic 5th Harmonic 7th Harmonic APOD 4.18% 0.54% 0.03% 0.11%
PD 3.23% 2.40% 0.33% 0.71% 4. Conclusion The SPWM control strategy method for three phase fifteen level cascaded H bridge multilevel inverter fed induction motor has been presented in this paper. The carrier based disposition of PDPWM and APODPWM method have simulated and results have been tabulated. The PDPWM method has given the better THD% than APODPWM, but
3rd, 5th and 7th harmonics content is low in APODPWM technique. APODPWM technique is better for induction motor under speed and torque. The simulation of fifteen level cascaded H bridge multi level has been designed and simulated as MA TLAB / Simulink environment. References [1] B.P.Mcgrath and D.G Holmes "reduced n PWM
harmonic distortion for multi level inverters operating over a wide modulation range" IEEE Transactions on power electronics vol 21 no 4 pp94 1-949, july 2006
[2] G. Carrara, S. Gardella, M. Marchesoni,R. Salutari, G. Sciutto, "A New MultilevelPWM Method: A Theoretical Analysis," IEEETransactions on Power Electronics, vol. 7, no. 3,July 1992, pp. 497-505.
[3] Leon M.Tolbert and Thomas G. Habetler "Novel multilevel inverter carrier based PWM method" IEEE Transaction On Industry Application Vol 35 No 5 Sep 1999 pp 1098-1107
[4] Aglidis and M.Calasis "Application specific harmonic performance evaluation of multi carrier PWM techniques" in IEEE PESC, pp 172-178
[5] lRodriguez, J.S.Lai, and F. Z.Peng,"Multilevel Inverters: A Survey ofT opologies, Controls, and Applications", IEEETransactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 49,No. 4, August 2002,pp.724-739
[6] H.Y Wu, X.N He "Research on PWM control of cascade Multilevel converter" Proc of the Third International conference on Power Electronics and Motion Control, pp 1099- 1103, 2000.
[7] B.P.Mcgrath and D.G Holmes "Multi carrier PWM strategies for multilevel inverter" IEEE Transaction on Industrial Electronics, Volume 49, Issue 4, Aug 2002, pp 858-867
[8] Martha Calais, Lawrence lBorlel Vassilios G. Agelidis "Analysis of Multi carrier PWM Methods for a single phase five level inverter" IEEE Transaction on Power electronics , July 2001,pp 1351-1356
[9] D.GHolmes, and B.P.McGrath,"Opportunities for Harmonics cancellation with Carrier based PWM for Two level and multilevel cascaded inverters," in confRec.IEEE/IAS Annual Meeting, 1999.
[10] Tianhao Tang, Jingan Han, Xinyuan Tan, "Selective Harmonic elimination for a cascaded multilevel inverter " IEEE Transation on Industrial Electronics,2006 IEEE international Symposium,volume2, July 2006, pp997-98I
[11] D.Mohan and Sreejith B.Kurub "Performance Analysis of Multi Level Shunt Active Filter based on SDM" in CiiT International Journal of Digital Signal Processing pp42 - 46
[12] Villanueva, E. Correa, P. Rodriguez, l Pacas, M "Control of a Single-Phase Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Inverter for GridConnected.
[13] L. M. Tolbert, F. Z. Peng, T. G. Habetler, “Multilevel converters for large electric drives,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol.35, no. 1, Jan. /Feb. 1999, pp. 36-44.
Paper ID: OCT141314 2171