An06 P2 Cons Sup

download An06 P2 Cons Sup

of 53

Transcript of An06 P2 Cons Sup

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    1/53

    15/7/04

    Transmittal Note

    SUPPLEMENT TO

    ANNEX 6 OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT

    PART II INTERNATIONAL GENERAL AVIATION AEROPLANES

    (Sixth Edition)

    1. The attached Supplement supersedes all previous Supplements to Annex 6, Part II, and includes differences notified

    by Contracting States up to 15 July 2004 with respect to all amendments up to and including Amendment 22.

    2. This Supplement should be inserted at the end of Annex 6, Part II (Sixth Edition). Additional differences received

    from Contracting States will be issued at intervals as amendments to this Supplement.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    2/53

    SUPPLEMENT TO

    ANNEX 6 OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT

    Part II International General Aviation Aeroplanes

    (Sixth Edition)

    Differences between the national regulations and practices of Contracting States

    and the corresponding International Standards and Recommended Practices

    contained in Annex 6, Part II, as notified to ICAO in accordance with Article 38 of

    the Convention on International Civil Aviation and the Councils resolution of

    21 November 1950.

    JULY 2004

    I N T E R N A T I O N A L C I V I L A V I A T I O N O R G A N I Z A T I O N

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    3/53

    (ii) SUPPLEMENT TOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION)

    15/7/04

    RECORD OF AMENDMENTS TO SUPPLEMENT

    No. Date Entered by No. Date Entered by

    AMENDMENTS TO ANNEX 6, PART II, ADOPTED OR APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL

    SUBSEQUENT TO THE SIXTH EDITION ISSUED JULY 1998

    No.

    Date of

    adoption or

    approval

    Date

    applicable No.

    Date of

    adoption or

    approval

    Date

    applicable

    19 15/3/99 4/11/99

    20 15/3/00 2/11/00

    21 9/3/01 1/11/01

    22 15/3/02 28/11/02

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    4/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) (iii)

    15/7/04

    1. Contracting States which have notified ICAO of differences

    The Contracting States listed below have notified ICAO of differences which exist between their national regulations

    and practices and the International Standards and Recommended Practices of Annex 6, Part II (Sixth Edition), up to and

    including Amendment 22, or have commented on implementation.

    The page numbers shown for each State and the dates of publication of those pages correspond to the actual pages in

    this Supplement.

    StateDate of

    notificationPages in

    SupplementDate of

    publication

    Argentina 17/4/02 2 15/7/04Belarus 6/11/02 1 15/7/04Belgium 22/5/02 1 15/7/04Brazil 6/1/03 2 15/7/04Chile 24/6/02 1 15/7/04China 23/10/02 1 15/7/04

    Cook Islands 13/10/02 3 15/7/04Croatia 28/5/02 1 15/7/04Czech Republic 13/3/03 1 15/7/04France 21/10/02 2 15/7/04Germany 15/10/02 2 15/7/04Italy 31/5/02 1 15/7/04Japan 24/5/02 2 15/7/04Malaysia 21/5/02 1 15/7/04Myanmar 22/1/03 1 15/7/04Norway 6/11/02 1 15/7/04Panama 7/1/03 2 15/7/04Republic of Korea 30/10/02 1 15/7/04Samoa 29/5/03 4 15/7/04

    Singapore 21/11/01 1 15/7/04Sweden 12/3/03 2 15/7/04Uganda 14/6/02 1 15/7/04United Kingdom 8/11/02 3 15/7/04United States 6/11/02 6 15/7/04

    2. Contracting States which have notified ICAO that no differences exist

    StateDate of

    notification StateDate of

    notification

    Bahamas 22/11/02 Ireland 5/10/03Bahrain

    2/6/02

    Jordan

    9/10/02

    Barbados 18/4/02 Kuwait 17/8/02Burundi 18/6/02 Paraguay 20/6/02China (Hong Kong SAR) 23/10/02 Portugal 28/10/02Estonia 29/10/02 Romania 28/10/02Ghana 3/6/02 Slovakia 26/8/02Greece 28/10/02 United Arab Emirates 21/9/02Iraq 22/6/02

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    5/53

    (iv) SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION)

    15/7/04

    3. Contracting States from which no information has been received

    AfghanistanAlbaniaAlgeriaAndorra

    AngolaAntigua and BarbudaArmeniaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBangladeshBelizeBeninBhutanBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBrunei Darussalam

    BulgariaBurkina FasoCambodiaCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCentral African RepublicChadColombiaComorosCongoCosta RicaCte dIvoireCuba

    CyprusDemocratic Peoples Republic

    of KoreaDemocratic Republic of the

    CongoDenmarkDjiboutiDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEthiopia

    FijiFinlandGabonGambiaGeorgia

    GrenadaGuatemalaGuineaGuinea-Bissau

    GuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIran (Islamic Republic of)IsraelJamaicaKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKyrgyzstan

    Lao Peoples DemocraticRepublic

    LatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLithuaniaLuxembourgMadagascarMalawiMaldivesMaliMalta

    Marshall IslandsMauritaniaMauritiusMexicoMicronesia (Federated States of)MonacoMongoliaMoroccoMozambiqueNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNew Zealand

    NicaraguaNigerNigeriaOmanPakistan

    PalauPapua New GuineaPeruPhilippines

    PolandQatarRepublic of MoldovaRussian FederationRwandaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbia and MontenegroSeychelles

    Sierra LeoneSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSwazilandSwitzerlandSyrian Arab RepublicTajikistanThailand

    The former Yugoslav Republicof Macedonia

    TogoTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanUkraineUnited Republic of TanzaniaUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela

    Viet NamYemenZambia

    Zimbabwe

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    6/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) (v)

    15/7/04

    4. Paragraphs with respect to which differences have been notified

    Paragraph

    Differences

    notified by Paragraph

    Differences

    notified by

    General BelgiumCroatia

    Myanmar

    United States

    Chapter 1

    Definitions Argentina

    Cook Islands

    Samoa

    Sweden

    United Kingdom

    United States

    Chapter 3

    General Italy

    3.2 Cook Islands

    Samoa

    3.3 Panama

    3.5 Cook Islands

    Germany

    Japan

    Samoa

    United States

    Chapter 4

    General Italy

    United States

    4.1.6.1 Germany

    4.3.1 Argentina

    Sweden

    United States

    4.3.2 United States

    4.4.2 Brazil

    France

    4.5 Panama

    4.6.2.1 United States

    4.6.2.2 France

    United Kingdom

    United States4.6.3.1 Cook Islands

    France

    Samoa

    United Kingdom

    4.6.3.2 Cook Islands

    Samoa

    4.6.3.3 Cook IslandsPanama

    Samoa

    4.6.4 United States

    4.8 Argentina

    4.8.1.1 Argentina

    4.9 United Kingdom

    4.10 Sweden

    United Kingdom

    4.11 United States

    4.12 Cook Islands

    Samoa

    4.13 Cook Islands

    Samoa

    4.14 Sweden

    4.15.4 Germany

    4.17 Sweden

    United States

    4.18.1 Cook Islands

    Germany

    Samoa

    United States

    4.18.2 Cook Islands

    Germany

    Samoa

    United States

    Chapter 5

    General Italy

    Chapter 6

    General Argentina

    United States

    6.1.1 Singapore

    United Kingdom

    6.1.3 United States

    6.1.3.1.1 Brazil

    Cook Islands

    FranceGermany

    Japan

    Panama

    Samoa

    Sweden

    United Kingdom

    United States

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    7/53

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    8/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) (vii)

    Paragraph

    Differences

    notified by Paragraph

    Differences

    notified by

    15/7/04

    Cook Islands

    France

    Germany

    ItalyRepublic of Korea

    Samoa

    United States

    6.9.5 Cook Islands

    Germany

    Samoa

    United States

    6.9.6 Belarus

    United Kingdom

    6.9.7 Brazil

    France

    6.10 Panama

    Samoa

    6.10.1 Germany

    6.10.1.1 Brazil

    Cook Islands

    Italy

    Samoa

    6.10.1.2 Brazil

    Cook Islands

    Germany

    Italy

    Samoa

    6.10.1.3 Cook Islands

    Germany

    Italy

    Samoa

    Sweden

    6.10.1.4 Cook Islands

    Germany

    Italy

    Samoa

    6.10.1.4.1 Japan

    Sweden

    United Kingdom

    6.10.1.5 Brazil

    Cook Islands

    FranceGermany

    Italy

    Japan

    Samoa

    Sweden

    United Kingdom

    6.10.1.5.1 Brazil

    Cook Islands

    France

    Germany

    ItalyJapan

    Sweden

    United Kingdom

    6.10.1.5.2 Brazil

    Cook Islands

    France

    Japan

    Samoa

    Sweden

    United Kingdom

    6.10.1.6 Brazil

    Cook Islands

    Germany

    Italy

    Samoa

    6.10.1.7 Brazil

    France

    Japan

    Sweden

    United Kingdom

    6.10.1.7.1 Japan

    Sweden

    6.10.1.7.2 Japan

    Sweden

    6.10.1.7.3 Japan

    Sweden

    6.10.1.7.4 Japan

    Sweden

    6.10.1.7.5 Japan

    Sweden

    6.10.2 Brazil

    Cook Islands

    Germany

    Italy

    Samoa

    6.10.3.1 Brazil

    Cook Islands

    GermanyItaly

    Japan

    Samoa

    United Kingdom

    United States

    6.10.3.2 Argentina

    Brazil

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    9/53

    (viii) SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION)

    Paragraph

    Differences

    notified by Paragraph

    Differences

    notified by

    15/7/04

    Cook Islands

    France

    Germany

    ItalyJapan

    Samoa

    United States

    6.10.4 Brazil

    Cook Islands

    France

    Italy

    Japan

    Samoa

    United Kingdom

    6.10.4.1 Germany

    6.10.4.2 Germany

    6.10.5.1 Cook Islands

    Germany

    Italy

    Japan

    Samoa

    United Kingdom

    United States

    6.10.5.2 Cook Islands

    Germany

    Italy

    Japan

    United States

    6.10.6 Germany

    Italy

    Samoa

    6.10.6.1 Brazil

    Cook Islands

    6.10.6.2 Brazil

    Cook Islands

    France

    Japan

    6.10.6.3 Brazil

    Cook Islands

    Japan

    Sweden

    United Kingdom6.10.7 Cook Islands

    Samoa

    6.10.7.1 Germany

    6.10.7.2 Germany

    6.10.8 Germany

    Samoa

    Sweden

    6.10.8.1 Cook Islands

    France

    Italy

    6.10.8.2 Cook Islands6.10.9 Cook Islands

    Germany

    Italy

    Samoa

    United States

    6.10.10 Brazil

    6.11 Brazil

    France

    Germany

    Sweden

    6.12 United States

    6.12.1 Argentina

    Germany

    Italy

    Japan

    United Kingdom

    6.12.2 Argentina

    Germany

    Italy

    Japan

    United Kingdom

    6.12.3 Germany

    Italy

    Japan

    United Kingdom

    6.12.4 Argentina

    Japan

    6.12.5 Argentina

    6.13 Argentina

    Panama

    6.13.1 Japan

    United Kingdom

    6.13.2 United Kingdom

    6.14 Argentina

    Brazil

    Cook Islands

    France

    GermanyJapan

    Samoa

    United States

    Chapter 7

    General Panama

    7.1.1 United Kingdom

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    10/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) (ix)

    Paragraph

    Differences

    notified by Paragraph

    Differences

    notified by

    15/7/04

    United States

    7.1.2 United States

    7.1.4 United Kingdom

    United States7.2.1 United States

    7.2.4 United States

    Chapter 8

    General Panama

    8.1 Cook Islands

    Samoa

    8.1.1 United Kingdom

    8.1.3 France

    8.2.1 United Kingdom

    8.2.2 Cook Islands

    Samoa

    Sweden

    United States

    8.2.3 Cook IslandsSamoa

    Sweden

    8.3 United Kingdom

    Chapter 9

    General United States

    9.1 Cook Islands

    Italy

    Samoa

    9.2 Italy

    Panama

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    11/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) ARGENTINA 1

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    Chapter 1

    Definitions Aerial Work. The national regulations stipulate that aerial work is the commercial operation of

    aircraft in any manner except for air transport service.

    Chapter 4

    4.3.1 e) Passenger emergency briefing cards are not required.

    4.8 The national regulations replace the word oil by lubricant.

    4.8.1.1 a) The national regulations require the fuel and lubricant necessary to fly to the planned destination

    and to prolong the flight by an additional 30 per cent of the time calculated for that stage, but this

    supply must not be less than 45 minutes.

    Chapter 6 Use of an airborne collision avoidance system (ACAS). From 1 January 2005, aeroplanes and

    helicopters registered in Argentina and abroad, which have a maximum certificated take-off massin excess of 15 000 kg or an approved maximum configuration of more than 30 seats, excluding

    any pilots seats, and which engage in general aviation flights in which the Argentine Republic

    provides air traffic services, must be equipped with an airborne collision avoidance system of the

    ACAS II type or equipment having similar parameters.

    From January 2005, all aeroplanes and helicopters registered in Argentina and abroad which

    engage in flights above a height of 3 000 ft in the airspace in which the Argentine Republic

    provides air traffic services and which have:

    a) a maximum certificated take-off mass in excess of 5 700 kg; or

    b) an approved maximum configuration of 10 seats or more, excluding any pilots seats, must be

    equipped with ACAS II equipment or equipment having similar parameters.

    From 1 January 2003, the airborne collision avoidance system (ACAS II or equipment having

    similar parameters) shall operate in accordance with the relevant provisions of Annex 10,

    Volume IV.

    6.6 c) The national regulations require two sensitive pressure altimeters.

    6.9.4* Ground proximity warning system not required for piston-engined aircraft.

    6.10.3.2* All turbine-powered multi-engined aeroplanes of a maximum certificated take-off mass in excess

    of 5 700 kg or configured for 10 or more passengers, excluding any pilots seats, must be equipped

    with one or more approved flight recorders. Parameter read-outs required: 11.

    6.12.1 From 1 July 2000, Argentina requires one automatically activated emergency locator transmitter

    (ELT) which operates on 406 and 121.5 MHz.

    6.12.2 From 1 July 2002, Argentina requires one automatically activated ELT which operates on 406 and

    121.5 MHz.

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    12/53

    2 ARGENTINA SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION)

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    6.12.4* The obligation established in this section does not apply to:

    a) commercial air transport aircraft in training operations, within a 50 NM radius of the airport

    from which the operation began;

    b) aircraft engaged in design and flight test operations; and

    c) aircraft during any period in which the automatic ELT has been temporarily removed for

    inspection, repair, modification or replacement, subject to the following:

    1) the aircrafts records must contain a note including the date of initial removal, the brand,

    model, serial number and reasons for the removal of the automatic ELT, and a plate

    located within view of the pilot bearing the legend ELT NOT INSTALLED. The

    absences of the ELT must be indicated in all flight plans; and

    2) operations covered by this exception will cease 90 days after the date on which the

    automatic ELT was removed from the aircraft.

    6.12.5 All aircraft are exempted from the installation of the ELT remote control until 1 January 2005.

    6.13 From 1 July 2000, aircraft registered in Argentina and abroad which engage in general aviation

    flights in the airspace in which the Argentine Republic provides air traffic services, except those

    authorized for aerial air application work and those assigned to flying schools while they are used

    in flight training and gliders, must be equipped with an airborne pressure-altitude reporting

    transponder (secondary surveillance radar (SSR) Mode C).

    6.14* Not implemented.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    13/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) BELARUS1

    15/7/04

    Chapter 6

    6.9.1 As of 1 January 2001, all turbine-engined aeroplanes of a maximum certificated take-off mass in

    excess of 5 700 kg or authorized to carry more than nine passengers shall be equipped with a

    ground proximity warning system if conducting international flights.

    6.9.6 The ground proximity warning system shall provide, as a minimum, warnings of the following

    circumstances:

    a) excessive terrain closure rate;

    b) excessive altitude loss after take-off or go-around; and

    c) unsafe terrain clearance while gear not locked down.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    14/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) BELGIUM1

    15/7/04

    General Belgium has not promulgated regulations for international general aviation corresponding to the

    requirements of Annex 6, Part II International General Aviation Aeroplanes, except for

    rules of the air and maintenance requirements for these types of aircraft.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    15/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) BRAZIL 1

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    Chapter 4

    4.4.2* Not implemented.

    Chapter 6

    6.1.3.1.1 a) Remark: This subject is being analysed. Implementation will possibly occur after 31 December

    2003 for aeroplanes with more than 5 700 kg maximum take-off mass.

    6.1.3.1.1 e) Brazilian regulations apply this requirement only to IFR and night VFR flights.

    6.1.3.1.2* Not implemented.

    6.1.4 The Brazilian regulations do not require break-in points.

    Remark: Brazilian regulations require only external marking of the emergency exits.

    6.3.1 The Brazilian regulations do not presently require anchors.

    Remark: Anchors will be required after 31 March 2003.

    6.4 Not implemented.

    Remark: There is intention to do so in the near future, as practicable.

    6.5.2 The operational rules in Brazil do not require such a device because it is mandatory through the

    6.5.3* type certification rules.

    6.9.3* Brazilian regulations require all aeroplanes manufactured after 31 December 2003 and authorized

    to carry more than six passengers to be equipped with a ground proximity warning system with a

    forward looking terrain avoidance function, and aeroplanes manufactured before 1 January 2004to be equipped with a ground proximity warning system with a forward looking avoidance

    function before 1 January 2007.

    6.9.4* Not implemented.

    6.9.7* Brazilian regulations require all aeroplanes manufactured after 31 December 2003 and authorized

    to carry more than six passengers to be equipped with a ground proximity warning system with a

    forward looking terrain avoidance function, and aeroplanes manufactured before 1 January 2004

    to be equipped with a ground proximity warning system with a forward looking avoidance

    function before 1 January 2007.

    6.10.1.1 The Brazilian regulations use the FAA requirements and consider them similar to the ICAO

    6.10.1.2 requirements.

    6.10.1.5 Not implemented.

    6.10.1.5.1

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    16/53

    2BRAZIL SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION)

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    6.10.1.5.2 Remark: This subject is being analysed. Implementation will occur after 31 December 2003.

    6.10.1.6* Not implemented.

    Remark: There is intention to do so in the near future, as practicable.

    6.10.1.7 In the Brazilian regulations, the Type IA flight data recorder (FDR) or similar is not required for

    general aviation.

    6.10.2 Brazilian regulations require capacity to record at least the last eight hours of operation.

    6.10.3.1 The Brazilian regulations do not require a Type I FDR or similar for general aviation.

    6.10.3.2* The Brazilian regulations require a Type II FDR or similar which must record at least the last eight

    minutes.

    6.10.4 Not implemented.

    Remark:This subject is being analysed. Implementation will not occur before 31 December 2003.

    6.10.6.1 Brazilian regulations require the capacity to record the last 15 minutes of operation.

    6.10.6.2* Not implemented.

    Remark: There is intention to do so in the near future, as practicable. This rule is not mandatory.

    6.10.6.3 Not implemented.

    Remark: This subject is being analysed. Implementation will not occur before 31 December 2003.

    6.10.10 Not implemented.

    Remark: There is intention to do so in the near future, as practicable.

    6.11 Brazilian regulations do not have a Mach number indicator.

    Remark: There is intention to do so in the near future.

    6.14* Not implemented.

    Remark: There is intention to do so in the near future. This rule is not mandatory.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    17/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) CHILE1

    15/7/04

    Chapter 6

    6.9.2 Only applicable to turbojets with a passenger seating capacity of more than ten.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    18/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) CHINA 1

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    Chapter 6

    6.9.3* Not implemented.

    6.9.4*

    Remark: Date of compliance to be determined.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    19/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) COOKISLANDS1

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    Chapter 1

    Definitions Flight crew member. A crew member assigned by an operator for duty in an aircraft during flight

    time as a pilot or flight engineer.

    Flight time aeroplanes. The total time from the moment the aircraft first moves under its own

    power for the purpose of taking off until the moment it comes to rest at the end of the flight.

    General aviation operation. In the Cook Islands, the generic term general aviation may include

    commercial operations. In such cases, the more stringent provision of Annex 6, Part I, as

    appropriate, is applied.

    Pilot-in-command. In relation to any aircraft, means the pilot responsible for the operation and

    safety of the aircraft.

    Chapter 3

    3.2 The pilot-in-command of an aircraft shall:

    a) be responsible for the safe operation of the aircraft in flight, the safety and well-being of all

    passengers and crew, and the safety of cargo carried;

    b) have final authority to control the aircraft while in command and for the maintenance of

    discipline by all persons on board; and

    c) subject to Section 23, Subsections 3) and 7) of the Civil Aviation Act (Duties of pilot-in-

    command and operator during emergencies), be responsible for compliance with all relevant

    requirements of this Act and regulations and rules made under this Act.

    3.5* Not implemented.

    Chapter 4

    4.6.3.1 Not implemented.

    4.6.3.2

    4.6.3.3

    Operation below DA, DH or MDA. Where a DA, DH or MDA is applicable, no pilot-in-command

    shall operate an aircraft at any aerodrome below the MDA, or continue an instrument approach

    procedure below the DA or DH prescribed in paragraph b), unless:

    a) the aircraft is continuously in a position from which a descent to a landing on the intended

    runway can be made at a normal rate of descent using normal manoeuvres that will allow

    touchdown to occur within the touchdown zone of the runway of intended landing; and

    b) the flight visibility is not less than the visibility prescribed under Part 19 for the instrument

    approach procedure being used.

    c) Landing. A pilot-in-command shall not land an aircraft when the flight visibility is less than

    the visibility prescribed under Part 19 for the instrument approach procedure used.

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    20/53

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    21/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) COOKISLANDS3

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    6.10.1.5.2 Not implemented.

    6.10.1.6*

    6.10.2

    6.10.3.1

    6.10.3.2*

    6.10.4

    6.10.5.1

    6.10.5.2*

    6.10.6.1

    6.10.6.2*

    6.10.6.3

    6.10.7

    6.10.8.1

    6.10.8.2

    6.10.9

    6.14*

    Chapter 8

    8.1 In the context of the Cook Islands Civil Aviation Rules, the owner is the operator. Ministry of

    Transport define operator in relation to an aircraft, as the person flying or using the aircraft, or

    causing or permitting the aircraft to be flown, be used, or be in any place, whether or not the

    person is present with the aircraft.

    8.2.2 CAR 91.631, retention of records, provides for periods of five years or one year respectively.

    8.2.3 In the context of the Cook Islands Civil Aviation Rules, the lessee, like the owner, is the

    operator.

    Chapter 9

    9.1 Not implemented.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    22/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) CROATIA 1

    15/7/04

    General The national regulations are not completed. The decisions on particular applications are taken by

    virtue of ICAO SARPs.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    23/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) CZECHREPUBLIC1

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    Chapter 6

    6.2.1 b) Not applied for aeroplanes operating above the territory of the Czech Republic for which the

    Certificate of Airworthiness was issued for the first time before 31 December 1997.

    6.7 a) The following instruments are not required for VFR night flights:

    a) a means of indicating in the flight crew compartment the outside air temperature; or

    b) a turn and slip indicator, an attitude indicator (artificial horizon), a heading indicator

    (directional gyroscope) or their combinations or integrated flight director systems.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    24/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) FRANCE1

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    Chapter 4

    4.4.2* France has no particular requirements concerning the climb gradient information other than those

    contained in the flight manual.

    4.6.2.2 France does not require the existence of an instrument approach procedure for isolated aerodromes

    with no alternate aerodrome.

    4.6.3.1 France has no particular requirement concerning the continuation of the flight as being dependent

    upon the meteorological conditions at the destination or alternate aerodrome.

    Chapter 6

    6.1.3.1.1 France requires light aeroplanes (maximum certificated take-off mass below 5 700 kg and a

    maximum passenger capacity of nine) to carry first-aid kits only on flights over water or

    designated land areas, and does not require carriage of an extinguisher. The carriage of fuses is

    required only for night flights.

    6.1.3.1.2* France requires carriage of the ground-air signal codes used for search and rescue only on flights

    over designated land areas.

    6.1.3.1.3* France does not require a safety harness for old aeroplanes (those manufactured before 1983).

    6.2.2* France has no particular requirements for controlled VFR flights other than compliance with ATC

    requirements.

    6.7 France does not require aeroplanes flying VFR at night to be equipped with a timepiece, a

    thermometer, pitot anti-icing or passenger cabin lighting.

    6.9.1

    6.9.26.9.3*

    6.9.4*

    6.9.7

    French regulations for general aviation concern only aeroplanes of more than 15 000 kg or more

    than 30 passengers.

    6.10.1.5 French regulations do not yet include requirements for the recording of data link communications.

    6.10.1.5.1

    6.10.1.5.2

    6.10.1.7 The list of parameters required under French regulations is not in complete compliance with the

    requirements of Annex 6.

    6.10.3.2* France requires a Type II data recorder for aeroplanes with a maximum take-off mass of 14 000 kg

    or over, which conducted their first flight on or after 1 January 1989. It only requires the flightpath to be recorded for aeroplanes with a maximum take-off mass of 14 000 kg or over, which

    conducted their first flight before 1 January 1989.

    6.10.4 The list of parameters for Type IA recorders has not yet been included in French regulations. The

    scope of application with respect to Type IA recorders has consequently not yet been defined.

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    25/53

    2FRANCE SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION)

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    6.10.6.2* France requires cockpit voice recorders for aeroplanes of over 5 700 kg only if they were

    certificated on or after 1 April 1998.

    6.10.8.1 Not implemented.

    6.11 France requires a Mach number indicator only for heavy aeroplanes (maximum certificated

    take-off mass of over 5 700 kg or a passenger capacity of more than nine).

    6.14* Not implemented.

    Chapter 8

    8.1.3 France permits the maintenance release to be signed by a person who is not licensed in accordance

    with Annex 1 for maintenance operations carried out outside an approved organization in the

    following cases:

    a) simple maintenance; and

    b) maintenance on light aircraft for which a restricted certificate that is not in accordance with

    Annex 8 has been issued.

    In these cases, the airworthiness certificate is valid for only six months and renewal is carried out

    directly by the French authorities.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    26/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) GERMANY1

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    Chapter 3

    3.5* Not implemented.

    Chapter 4

    4.1.6.1 Not implemented.

    4.15.4*

    4.18.1*

    4.18.2*

    Chapter 6

    6.1.3.1.1 Germany does not yet have regulations concerning the carriage of the relevant documents, but in

    practice the specific documents are already carried on board aircraft.

    6.1.3.1.2* Not implemented.

    6.1.4.2 Not implemented.

    6.5 This paragraph has not yet been introduced into the national regulations of Germany.

    6.9.2 Not implemented.

    6.9.3*

    6.9.4*

    6.9.5

    6.10.1 Not implemented.

    6.10.1.2

    6.10.1.3 Use of metal foil recorders was not discontinued on 1 January 1995.

    6.10.1.4* Not implemented.

    6.10.1.5

    6.10.1.5.1

    6.10.1.6*

    6.10.2

    6.10.3.1

    6.10.3.2*

    6.10.4.1

    6.10.4.2*

    6.10.5.1

    6.10.5.2*6.10.6

    6.10.7.1

    6.10.7.2

    6.10.8

    6.10.9

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    27/53

    2GERMANY SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION)

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    6.11 Not implemented.

    6.12.1

    6.12.2

    6.12.3

    6.14*

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    28/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) ITALY1

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    Chapter 3 Not implemented.

    Chapter 4 Not implemented except for paragraph 4.4.

    Chapter 5 Not implemented.

    Chapter 6

    6.1.3.1.2* Not implemented.

    6.1.4.2

    6.2.2* Not implemented. Controlled VFR flights are not permitted in Italy.

    6.3.1 Not implemented.

    6.3.2.1*

    6.3.36.4

    6.5.1

    6.5.2

    6.5.3*

    6.9.4*

    6.10.1.1

    6.10.1.2

    6.10.1.3

    6.10.1.4*

    6.10.1.5

    6.10.1.5.1

    6.10.1.6*

    6.10.26.10.3.1

    6.10.3.2*

    6.10.4

    6.10.5.1

    6.10.5.2*

    6.10.6

    6.10.8.1

    6.10.9

    6.12.1

    6.12.2

    6.12.3

    Chapter 9

    9.1 There are no operational requirements.

    9.2

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    29/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) JAPAN1

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    Chapter 3

    3.5* Not implemented.

    Chapter 6

    6.1.3.1.1 d) Aeroplanes are not required to be equipped with manuals containing procedures and visual signals

    3) and 4) for intercepted or intercepting aircraft.

    6.1.3.1.2* Not implemented.

    6.1.4.1 Japan has no requirement for marking of break-in points.

    6.1.4.2

    6.2.2* Aeroplanes operated as controlled VFR flights are not required to carry all equipment necessary

    for IFR flights.

    6.3.1 c) and d) Not implemented. Japan has no requirement for aeroplanes to be equipped with an anchor or a seaanchor (drogue).

    6.3.3 b) Multi-engined aeroplanes are required to carry lifesaving rafts on overwater flights of more than

    720 km. The distance will be amended to 370 km on 17 January 2003.

    6.7 a) Aeroplanes operated at night in accordance with VFR are not required to be equipped with all

    equipment necessary for IFR flights.

    6.9.1 Not implemented. GPWS is required for aeroplanes used for air transportation services.

    6.9.2

    6.10.1.4.1 Not implemented. Japan has no requirement for discontinuation of photographic film FDR.

    6.10.1.5 Not implemented. Japan has no requirement for recording digital communications.

    6.10.1.5.1

    6.10.1.5.2

    6.10.1.7 to Not implemented. Japan has no requirement for Type IA FDR.

    6.10.1.7.5

    6.10.3.1 Aeroplanes other than those used for air transportation services will be required to be equipped

    with FDRs on and after 11 July 2002.

    6.10.3.2* Not implemented. Aeroplanes of a maximum take-off mass of 27 000 kg or less and not engaged

    in air transportation services are not required to be equipped with FDRs.

    6.10.4 Not implemented. Japan has no requirement for Type IA FDR.

    6.10.5.1 Aeroplanes other than those used for air transportation services will be required to be equipped

    with a CVR on and after 11 July 2002.

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    30/53

    2JAPAN SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION)

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    6.10.5.2* Aeroplanes of a maximum take-off mass of 27 000 kg or less and not engaged in air transportation

    services are not required to be equipped with a CVR.

    6.10.6.2* A CVR is required to be capable of retaining the information recorded during the last 30 minutes

    of its operation.

    6.10.6.3 A CVR is required to be capable of retaining the information recorded during the last 30 minutes

    of its operation.

    6.12.1 Multi-engined aeroplanes are required to carry an ELT on overwater flights of more than 720 km.

    The distance will be amended to 370 km on 17 January 2003, and aeroplanes will be required to

    be equipped with an ELT when operated over a designated land area on and after 17 January 2003.

    6.12.2 Not implemented. Japan has no requirement for aeroplanes to be equipped with an automatic ELT.

    6.12.3

    6.12.4*

    6.13.1 Aeroplanes are required to be equipped with a pressure altitude transponder when operated in

    airspace designated by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.

    6.14* Not implemented. Japan has no requirement for the use of boom or throat microphones.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    31/53

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    32/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) MYANMAR 1

    15/7/04

    General Myanmar has not promulgated regulations for international general aviation corresponding to the

    requirements of Annex 6, Part II, except for maintenance requirements.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    33/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) NORWAY1

    15/7/04

    Chapter 6

    6.9.2 Norway will not require retrofitting for aeroplanes equipped with GPWS before 1 October 2001.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    34/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) PANAMA 1

    15/7/04

    Chapter 3

    3.3 Reports concerning violations of regulations in emergency situations must be submitted within

    five days.

    Chapter 4

    4.5 Completed flight preparation forms must be retained for one year.

    4.6.3.3 Parameters have been established for Category II and Category III operations.

    Chapter 6

    6.1.3.1.1 It is obligatory to carry the flight clearance documents on board.

    6.4 The entire airspace of Panama is designated land area, and it is obligatory for all aircraft to be

    equipped with an emergency locator transmitter.

    6.8 Panama permits the operation of aircraft that do not meet Stage 2 or 3 noise level requirements if

    they have been registered prior to 1 January 2003. Aircraft registered after this date must meet

    Stage 3 noise level requirements.

    6.10 These recommendations are obligatory, and the requirements established for turbine-powered

    aeroplanes have been extended to turbo-propeller aeroplanes.

    6.13 It is obligatory for aircraft used for commercial passenger transport to be equipped with a device

    to provide warning in the case of loss of pressurization.

    Chapter 7 Panama requires the use of two-way communication equipment for all aircraft and all operationscarried out in its airspace.

    Chapter 8 The following special airworthiness requirements are obligatory for aircraft operating in Panamas

    airspace:

    a) every 24 months the static pressure, system, altimeter and automatic pressure-altitude

    reporting system must be inspected;

    b) every 24 months the transponder must be inspected; and

    c) the passenger and crew compartments must contain materials that are at the very least

    fire-resistant, and each receptacle for towels, paper and trash must be made of fire-resistantmaterial that includes a medium for containing possible fires.

    Chapter 9

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    35/53

    2PANAMA SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION)

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    9.2 A flight crew of two pilots is obligatory for aircraft authorized to operate using IFR and to carry

    more than 10 passengers.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    36/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) REPUBLIC OFKOREA 1

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    Chapter 6

    6.9.3* Not implemented.

    Remark: Korea has no turbine-engined general aviation aeroplanes of a maximum take-off mass of

    5 700 kg or less and authorized to carry more than five but not more than nine passengers.

    6.9.4* Not regulated.

    Remark: Korea has no piston-engined general aviation aeroplanes of a maximum certificated take-

    off mass in excess of 5 700 kg or authorized to carry more than nine passengers.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    37/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) SAMOA 1

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    Chapter 1

    Definitions Flight crew member. A crew member assigned by an operator for duty in an aircraft during flight

    time as a pilot or flight engineer.

    Flight time aeroplanes. The total time from the moment the aircraft first moves under its own

    power for the purpose of taking off until the moment it comes to rest at the end of the flight.

    General aviation operation. In the Samoa Civil Aviation System, the generic term general

    aviation can include commercial operations. In such cases, the more stringent provision of

    Annex 6, Part I, as appropriate, is applied.

    Pilot-in-command. In relation to any aircraft, means the pilot responsible for the operation and

    safety of the aircraft.

    Chapter 3

    3.2 The pilot-in-command shall:

    a) be responsible for the safe operation of the aircraft in flight, the safety and well-being of all

    passengers and crew, and the safety of cargo carried;

    b) have final authority to control the aircraft while in command and for the maintenance of

    discipline by all persons on board; and

    c) subject to Section 13A of the Civil Aviation Act (Duties of pilot-in-command and operator

    during emergencies), be responsible for compliance with all relevant requirements of this Act

    and regulations and rules made under this Act.

    3.5* Not implemented.

    Chapter 4

    4.6.3.1 Not implemented.

    4.6.3.2

    4.6.3.3

    CAR 91.413 c). Operation below DA, DH or MDA. Where a DA, DH or MDA is applicable, no

    pilot-in-command shall operate an aircraft at any aerodrome below the MDA, or continue an

    instrument approach procedure below the DA or DH prescribed in paragraph b) unless:

    a) the aircraft is continuously in a position from which a descent to a landing on the intended

    runway can be made at a normal rate of descent using normal manoeuvres that will allow

    touchdown to occur within the touchdown zone of the runway of intended landing; and

    b) the flight visibility is not less than the visibility prescribed under Part 97 for the instrument

    approach procedure being used; and

    c) except for a Category II or Category III precision approach procedure prescribed under Part 97

    for that aerodrome that includes any necessary visual reference requirements, at least one of

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    38/53

    2SAMOA SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION)

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    the following visual references for the intended runway is distinctly visible and identifiable to

    the pilot:

    1) the approach lighting system; or

    2) the threshold markings; or

    3) the threshold lights; or

    4) the runway-end identification lights; or

    5) the visual approach slope indicator; or

    6) the touchdown zone or touchdown zone markings; or

    7) the touchdown zone lights; or

    8) the runway or runway markings; or

    9) the runway lights.

    d) Landing. A pilot-in-command shall not land an aircraft when the flight visibility is less than

    the visibility prescribed under Part 97 for the instrument approach procedure used.

    e) Missed approach procedures. Each pilot-in-command shall immediately execute the missed

    approach procedure prescribed under Part 97 if:

    1) the requirements of paragraph c) are not met at either of the following times:

    i) when the aircraft is being operated below MDA; or

    ii) upon arrival at the missed approach point, including a DA or DH where a DA or DH isspecified and its use is required, and any time after that until touchdown; or

    2) an identifiable part of the aerodrome is not distinctly visible to the pilot during a circling

    manoeuvre at or above MDA, unless the inability to see an identifiable part of the

    aerodrome results only from normal manoeuvring of the aircraft during approach.

    4.12* Not implemented.

    4.13*

    4.18.1*

    4.18.2*

    Chapter 6

    6.1.3.1.1 d) 3), Not implemented.

    4) and e)

    6.1.3.1.2*

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    39/53

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    40/53

    4SAMOA SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION)

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    Chapter 9

    9.1 Not implemented.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    41/53

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    42/53

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    43/53

    2SWEDEN SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION)

    15/7/04

    6.10.1.7 to Partly covered.

    6.10.1.7.5

    6.10.6.3 Not implemented.

    6.10.8

    6.11 Not implemented.

    Chapter 8

    8.2.2 No 90-day requirement after permanent withdrawal of unit from service.

    8.2.3 Not implemented.

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    44/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) UGANDA 1

    15/7/04

    Chapter 6

    6.3 Not implemented.

    6.4

    ___________________

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    45/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) UNITED KINGDOM1

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    Chapter 1

    Definitions Pilot-in-command. In United Kingdom legislation, pilot-in-command in relation to an aircraft

    means a person who for the time being is in charge of the piloting of the aircraft without being

    under the direction of any other pilot in the aircraft.

    Chapter 4

    4.6.2.2 The commander of the aircraft must be satisfied before flight that the flight can be safely made,

    taking into account the weather reports and forecasts and any alternative course of action in case

    the flight cannot be completed as planned.

    4.6.3.1 The requirement to discontinue the flight towards the destination is not mandated.

    4.9 Oxygen requirements are not mandated.

    4.10 Oxygen requirements are not mandated.

    Chapter 6

    6.1.1 The following are not required to be approved: maps, charts and codes; first-aid equipment;

    timepieces; torches; whistles; sea anchors; rocket signals; equipment for mooring, anchoring and

    manoeuvring on water; paddles; food and water; stoves, cooking utensils, snow shovels, ice saws,

    sleeping bags, arctic suits; and megaphones.

    6.1.3.1.1 a), b)

    and c) 1)

    The requirements for a first-aid kit, fire extinguishers and seats are not mandated for all types of

    flight.

    6.1.4.1 The method of marking break-in areas may differ.

    6.1.4.2 The method of marking break-in areas may differ.

    6.3.1 Seaplane special equipment is not mandated.

    6.3.3 United Kingdom relies on provision of guidance material. United Kingdom recommendations on

    life jackets and rafts provide a higher level of safety.

    6.4 Signalling devices and lifesaving equipment are not mandated for areas where search and rescue

    would be especially difficult.

    6.7 c), e) and f) A landing light, passenger compartment lights, and torches for each crew member station, are not

    mandated.

    6.9.6 TAWS Class B parameters are not specified in CAA regulatory material.

    6.10.1.4.1 Use of photographic film flight data recorders has not been prohibited from 1 January 2003.

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    46/53

    2UNITED KINGDOM SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION)

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    6.10.1.5 The requirements for recording, correlation and duration of data link communications are not

    mandated for new aeroplanes from 1 January 2005.

    6.10.1.5.1 The requirements for recording, correlation and duration of data link communications are not

    mandated for new aeroplanes from 1 January 2007.

    6.10.1.5.2 The requirement to record the content and time of data link messages is not mandated.

    6.10.1.7 The parameters for Type IA flight data recorders are not specified in United Kingdom regulatory

    material.

    6.10.3.1 Type I flight data recorders are not mandated for all categories of certificates of airworthiness for

    aeroplanes over 27 000 kg maximum certificated take-off mass.

    6.10.4 The requirement for Type IA flight data recorders in new aeroplanes over 5 700 kg from

    1 January 2005 is not mandated.

    6.10.5.1 Cockpit voice recorders are not mandated for all categories of certificates of airworthiness for

    aeroplanes over 27 000 kg maximum certificated take-off mass.

    6.10.6.3 The requirement for the cockpit voice recorder in new aeroplanes over 5 700 kg from 1 January

    2003 to retain the last two hours of information is not mandated.

    6.12.1 The ELT requirements applicable until 1 January 2005 for extended flights over water and

    designated land areas as described in 6.4 are not mandated.

    6.12.2 The automatic ELT requirements for extended flights over water and designated land areas as

    described in 6.4 are not mandated for new aeroplanes from 1 January 2002.

    6.12.3 The automatic ELT requirements for extended flights over water and designated land areas as

    described in 6.4 are not mandated for all aeroplanes from 1 January 2005.

    6.13.1 Partially implemented. United Kingdom requires pressure-altitude reporting transponder for

    flights in designated airspace.

    6.13.2* Not implemented.

    Chapter 7

    7.1.1 United Kingdom requires radio communication equipment for IFR flights in controlled and

    notified airspace. Gliders are excepted.

    7.1.4 Radio communication equipment capable of communicating on prescribed frequencies is not

    mandated for extended flights over water and designated land areas as described in 6.4.

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    47/53

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    48/53

    SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION) UNITED STATES1

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    General The United States does not accept any provision of Annexes 2, 6, 10 or 11 or any other Annex as a

    Standard or Recommended Practice as applicable to State aircraft. In accordance with Article 3(a)

    of the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the Convention and its Annexes are not

    applicable to State aircraft. In so far as any provisions of Annexes 2, 6, 10 or 11 address the

    operation or control of State aircraft, the United States considers such provisions to be in the

    nature of a special recommendation of the Council, advisory only, and not requiring the filing of

    differences under Article 38 of the Convention.

    Chapter 1

    Definitions Note. The United States expresses distances in terms of feet and miles rather than metres. A

    significant number of North American operators and aircraft are not equipped with metric unit

    displays.

    Approach and landing operations using instrument approach procedures.

    Category I (CAT I) operation. For a Category I operation, the United States requires a decision

    height (DH) of not less than 200 ft (60 m) and either visibility of not less than one-half mile(800 m) or a runway visual range of 2 400 ft (732 m) (RVR 1 800 ft (548 m) with operative

    touchdown zone and runway centre line lights).

    Category II (CAT II) operation. The United States requires that Category II provide approaches to

    minima of less than 200 ft (60 m) decision height/2 400 ft (732 m) runway visual range to as low

    as 100 ft (30 m) decision height/1 200 ft (365 m) runway visual range.

    Category IIIB (CAT IIIB) operation. The United States criteria are the same as those adopted in

    Annex 6, Part II. However, the runway visual range is expressed in feet less than 700 ft (200 m)

    but not less than 150 ft (50 m).

    Minimum descent altitude (MDA) or minimum descent height (MDH). The United States does not

    use the term MDH (or height above aerodrome) to describe an altitude or height in a non-precisionapproach or circling approach below which descent must be made without the required visual

    reference.

    Chapter 3

    3.5* The pilot-in-command is not required to have available on board the aeroplane information

    concerning search and rescue services.

    Chapter 4

    General In addition to the flight preparation requirements of Annex 6, Part II, Chapter 4, the United Statesrequires United States-registered large or turbine-powered multi-engined general aviation,

    passenger-carrying aircraft, wherever operated, to adequately secure and stow food, beverage, and

    passenger service equipment during aircraft movement on the surface, take-off and landing.

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    49/53

    2UNITED STATES SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION)

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    4.3.1 Except for large and turbine-powered multi-engined aeroplanes, the United States does not require

    the pilot-in-command to ensure that crew members and passengers are familiar with the location

    and use of emergency exits, life jackets, oxygen dispensing equipment or other emergency

    equipment provided for individual use.

    4.3.2 Except for large and turbine-powered multi-engined aeroplanes, the United States does not require

    the pilot-in-command to ensure that all persons on board are aware of the location and generalmanner of use of the principal emergency equipment carried for collective use.

    4.6.2.1 The United States does not require a destination alternate aerodrome when the weather at the

    aerodrome of intended landing is forecast to have a ceiling of at least 2 000 ft (600 m) and a

    visibility of at least 3 miles (4.8 km). In addition, standard alternate aerodrome minima are

    prescribed 600 ft (185 m) ceiling and 2 miles (3.2 km) visibility for precision approaches, and

    800 ft (243 m) ceiling and 2 miles (3.2 km) visibility for non-precision approaches.

    4.6.2.2 b) Under United States regulations, the forecast period for the destination alternate aerodrome is from

    one hour before to one hour after the estimated time of arrival. In addition, the minima for

    ceiling/visibility at the aerodrome of intended landing are 2 000 ft (600 m) and 3 miles (4.8 km);

    that is, when at least such minima exist, no alternate aerodrome is required.

    4.6.4 In addition to the Standard prescribed in Annex 6, Part II, 4.6.4, the United States prohibits a pilot

    from taking off a United States-registered large or turbine-powered multi-engined general aviation

    aeroplane if there is frost, snow, or ice adhering to critical systems, components and surfaces of

    the aircraft.

    4.11 The pilot-in-command is not required to ensure that all persons on board the aircraft during an

    emergency are instructed in emergency procedures.

    4.17 The United States does not specify the authority, qualifications or competency of persons

    permitted to taxi aeroplanes on the movement area of an aerodrome.

    4.18.1* The United States has no provisions concerning aircraft refuelling with passengers on board.

    4.18.2*

    Chapter 6

    General In addition to the aeroplane instruments and equipment Standards prescribed in Annex 6, Part II,

    Chapter 6, the United States requires that all United States-registered turbojet-powered aeroplanes,

    wherever operated, be equipped with an altitude alerting system or device. The United States also

    requires that all transport category aeroplanes used in air commerce in the United States and all

    United States-registered transport category aeroplanes used in air commerce outside the United

    States must use an aural speed warning device.

    6.1.3 The United States requires that all large and turbine-powered multi-engined general aviation

    aircraft of United States registry have the following emergency equipment in addition to theequipment specified in Annex 6, Part II, 6.1.3: two fire extinguishers in the passenger

    compartment of aircraft accommodating 30 or more passengers; a crash axe for aeroplanes

    accommodating more than 19 passengers; a portable megaphone for aeroplanes seating more than

    60 but less than 100 passengers, and two megaphones for aeroplanes with a seating capacity of

    more than 100 passengers.

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    50/53

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    51/53

    4UNITED STATES SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX6,PARTII(SIXTHEDITION)

    ________________

    * Recommended Practice

    15/7/04

    d) a rate-of-climb and descent indicator.

    6.7 a) and Aeroplanes operated under visual flight rules at night are not required to be equipped with:

    c) to f)

    a) a turn and slip indicator;

    b) an attitude indicator (artificial horizon);

    c) a heading indicator (directional gyroscope);

    d) a means of indicating whether the supply of power to the gyroscopic instruments is adequate;

    e) a sensitive pressure altimeter;

    f) a means of indicating the outside air temperature;

    g) a timepiece with a sweep second hand;

    h) an airspeed indicating system with a means of preventing malfunctioning due to condensationor icing;

    i) a rate-of-climb and descent indicator;

    j) a landing light;

    k) illumination for flight instruments and equipment;

    l) lights in passenger compartments; and

    m) a flashlight (electric torch) for each crew member station.

    6.9 14 CFR 91.223 requires GPWS installation on new products now, but allows exceptions forproducts produced before March 2002. The rule requires that the installation of GPWS on all

    products must be completed by March 2005, well before the proposed ICAO compliance date. The

    rule states that at a minimum, Class B TAWS equipment must be installed on aircraft with six or

    more passengers.

    Remark: FAA regulations require compliance for all aircraft by 29 March 2005, two years before

    the proposed ICAO date of January 2007. The FAA rule is more stringent in that all aircraft with a

    passenger configuration of six or more (regardless of mass) must comply, as well as specifications

    of the TAWS must meet a perfunctory minimum standard in accordance with Technical Standard

    Order (TSO)-C151.

    6.9.1 to

    6.9.5

    Ground proximity warning systems are not required on general aviation aircraft, including turbine-

    engined aeroplanes with a take-off mass greater than 5 700 kg or capable of carrying more thannine passengers.

    6.10.3.1

    6.10.3.2*

    The United States does not base requirements for flight data recorders on aircraft mass, but on

    passenger and engine configuration.

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    52/53

  • 7/29/2019 An06 P2 Cons Sup

    53/53