An Update on Developmental Screeninghsc.ghs.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/An-Update... · and...

39
An Update on Developmental Screening Steven H. Ma, MD Fellow, Division of Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics, GHS Children’s Hospital Michelle M. Macias, MD Medical Director, Division of Developmental Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina Lorraine J. Craigan-Sullivan, MA, LMSW, NCC Developmental Screening Coordinator, Help Me Grow South Carolina Friday, February 26, 2016 2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference Breakout Session 3

Transcript of An Update on Developmental Screeninghsc.ghs.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/An-Update... · and...

An Update on Developmental

Screening

Steven H. Ma, MD Fellow, Division of Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics, GHS Children’s Hospital

Michelle M. Macias, MD Medical Director, Division of Developmental Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina

Lorraine J. Craigan-Sullivan, MA, LMSW, NCC Developmental Screening Coordinator, Help Me Grow South Carolina

Friday, February 26, 2016

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

Breakout Session 3

Conflicts and Disclosure

• Dr. Ma, Dr. Macias, and Ms. Craigan-

Sullivan have no conflicts of interest to

disclose.

• Housekeeping:

– Ask questions as they come up!

– Feel free to stand up, move about, etc.

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

Goals & Objectives

• Define developmental surveillance and

developmental screening and discuss their

importance.

• Discuss the current American Academy of Pediatrics

(AAP) algorithm for developmental surveillance and

screening at pediatric preventive care visits.

• Discuss recent updates to developmental

surveillance and screening.

• Discuss the purpose of Help Me Grow (HMG) and

their role in the screening process and new

screening initiatives.

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

Introduction

• Part C of IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities

Education Act)

– Establishes Early Intervention and assists with state

programs for infants and toddlers with disabilities.

– Birth to 2 years

– Goal: Proactively enhance development of infants

and toddlers with disabilities

• Part B of IDEA

– Establishes free and appropriate special education

services through school districts.

– 3 years to 21 years.

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds

Conference

Introduction

• Problem

– Gap exists, as children continue to fall

through the cracks and escape detection.

• Current detection rates of developmental disorders

are lower than their actual prevalence.

– Also, children with mild impairments may not

get identified until increased school demands

warrants further investigation.

• Only 20-30% of children with developmental

problems are identified prior to school entry.

• So what can be done? 2016 Nurturing Developing Minds

Conference

AAP Developmental Surveillance &

Screening Algorithm

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

Surveillance

AAP Surveillance

Recommendations

• Flexible, longitudinal, continuous and

cumulative process integrated within

family’s medical home

• Should be incorporated at every well-child

visit by a knowledgeable health care

professional based on both observation

and family support

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

AAP Surveillance

Recommendations

• Surveillance confers risk, not a specific

diagnosis.

• Elicited developmental concerns or high

risk for developmental delays warrant

further screening.

• Be cautious with reassurance and temper

with closer monitoring

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

AAP Surveillance

Guidelines

• 5 Components:

– Eliciting and attending to the parents’

concerns about their child’s development

– Documenting and maintaining a

developmental history

– Making accurate observations of the child

– Identifying risk and protective factors

– Maintaining an accurate record of

documenting the process and finding

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

Attending to Parents’

Concerns

• Health care professional should elicit any

parental concern at each well child visit

– “Do you have any concerns about your child’s

development?”

• Absence of parental concern does not

preclude developmental delay.

– Think about minority groups, generational

differences or families from different cultural

backgrounds.

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

Maintaining a

Developmental History

• Make regular, periodic updates to a child’s

timeline for developmental milestones

• Identify age-specific milestones

• Presumes appropriate knowledge of the

usual temporal sequence of development

within primary domains:

– Speech/Language; Gross Motor; Fine Motor;

Cognitive; Social/Emotional

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

Making Observations of

the Child

• Imperative at every well-child visit

• Observe the parent-child interaction during

the visit.

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

Risk and Protective

Factors

• Risk Factors: – Adverse childhood experiences/toxic stress,

including: abuse, neglect, domestic violence, familial

substance abuse, parental divorce/separation,

caregiver incarceration, bullying, homelessness

• Protective Factors: – Nurturing and attachment, knowledge of parenting

and of child development, parental resilience, social

connections, concrete parental supports,

social/emotional competence of children

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds

Conference

Documenting Findings

• Creating a “paper trail” electronically

• Developmental analog to growth chart

• Leverage electronic medical records and

technology, especially with developmental

surveillance and screening

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

Developmental Screening

• Should be performed if there is concern elicited

on surveillance AND at 9-, 18- and 24/30- month

visits

– Ages chosen based on major milestones within

domains

• Brief standardized tool aids in identification of

children at risk for developmental and/or

behavioral disorder.

• Does not result in a diagnosis or treatment plan!

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds

Conference

Developmental Screening

• Normative: identifies areas in which a

child’s development differs from same-age

peers

• Effective: repeated and regular screening

is more likely to identify delays, as

development is dynamic

• Efficient: most common method is

through validated questionnaires

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds

Conference

When NOT to Screen

• If a child is diagnosed with an identified

delay or disability AND connected to an

appropriate developmental service

– A child has a speech delay and is already

connected with speech therapy.

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

Developmental Screens

• Screening tests should:

– be reliable (consistent results)

– be valid (ability to discriminate risk stratification)

– have good sensitivity (accuracy in identifying delayed

development)

– have good specificity (accuracy in identifying non-

delayed individuals)

• Examples:

– PEDS (Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status)

– ASQ-3 (Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3)

– M-CHAT-R (Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers,

Revised) 2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

M-CHAT-R & M-CHAT-R/F

• 16 to 30 months (not a valid measure for younger or older children)

• Complete initial M-CHAT-R (20 questions) – Score 0-2: not a positive screening

– Score 3-7: proceed with Follow-Up Questionnaire for positive questions

– Score 8-20: POSITIVE SCREENING

• Strongly recommend the child be referred for early intervention and further

evaluation/diagnostic testing (no need for Follow-Up Questionnaire)

• M-CHAT-R/F (Follow-Up Questionnaire) is pass/fail – only ask parent questions for which child failed

– POSITIVE SCREENING if child fails any two items of the Follow-Up Questionnaire

• Strongly recommended the child be referred for early intervention and further

evaluation/ diagnostic testing

• Note: A significant number (98%) of children who test positive on M-CHAT-

R/F will be diagnosed with developmental delay, but not all will be

diagnosed with autism.

• For more information or to use M-CHAT-R/F online scoring system, please

visit www.mchatscreen.com as this site is approved by the developer, Diana

L. Robins, PhD.

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

Screening Results Are

Concerning… Now What?

• Refer for a formal developmental and medical

evaluation with a simultaneous referral to early

developmental intervention/early childhood

services.

– Developmental/medical evaluation may be made by

neurodevelopmental pediatricians, developmental-

behavioral pediatricians, child neurologists, pediatric

physiatrists or child psychiatrists

– Medical evaluation may include: vision screening,

objective hearing evaluation, newborn metabolic

screening or growth charts

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

Summary

Recommendations • Perform developmental surveillance at every preventive visit throughout childhood,

and ensure that such surveillance includes eliciting and attending to parents’

concerns, obtaining a developmental history, making accurate and informed

observations of the child, identifying the presence of risk and protective factors, and

documenting the process and findings.

• Administer a standardized developmental screening tool for children who appear to

be at low risk of a developmental disorder at the 9-, 18-, and or 24/30-month visits

and for those whose surveillance yields concerns about delayed or disordered

development.

• Schedule early return visits for children whose surveillance raises concerns that are

not confirmed by a developmental screening tool.

• Refer children about whom developmental concerns are raised to early intervention

and early-childhood programs.

• Coordinate developmental and medical evaluations for children who have positive

screening results for developmental disorders.

• Document all surveillance, screening, evaluation, and referral activities in the child’s

health chart.

• Establish working relationships with state and local programs, services, and

resources. 2016 Nurturing Developing Minds

Conference

Updates on Developmental

Screening

Screening Initiatives

• One of 26 affiliates nationwide

• Serve families in Greenville, Pickens, Charleston, Dorchester, and Berkeley Counties with children birth to 8 years old

• Focused on child development, learning, and behavior

• Free developmental screening for children birth to 5 ½ years

• Connect families to existing community-based programs and supports

• Provide resources to professionals working with families where an additional need is identified

• Work to foster and enhance collaboration across systems

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

Screening Initiatives

LOCAL

• Universal screening program with ASQ-3 and ASQ:SE/SE-2 (online, paper)

• Maintaining Abstinence in Neonates (MAiN) Program through GHS

• Children entering foster care through Pendleton Place’s Assessment Center

• Children receiving Greenville County First Steps child care scholarships

SOUTH CAROLINA

• Technical assistance to Home Visiting programs through partnership with the Children’s Trust of SC

• Child Care Centers in partnership with DSS-Early Care and Education, SCPITC, SCIC, DHEC

• Read, Rattle, and Roll community-based developmental screening event

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

Ages and Stages

Questionnaires

• Educates parents about developmental

activities as they complete the screening

– Parent knowledge about child development

serves as a Protective Factor

• Written on a 3rd to 5th grade reading level

• Intervals are available for every age from 1

month to 5 ½ years (ASQ:SE-2 up to 6

years)

• High validity and reliability 2016 Nurturing Developing Minds

Conference

HMG SC’s Student Survey

Parents identified where they want to learn about child development

Pediatrician/Physician

Child Care Center/School

Prenatal OB Visits

Other

Government Agency

Newborn Nursery/NICU

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

HMG SC ASQ-3 SCREENING

RESULTS

Above the Cutoff

Monitoring

Below the Cutoff

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

HMG SC ASQ-3 SCREENING

RESULTS

Due to Physician Referral Column1

Above the Cutoff

Monitoring

Below the Cutoff

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

HMG SC ASQ-3 SCREENING

RESULTS

Child Care Scholarship

Recipients Column1

Above the Cutoff

Monitoring

Below the Cutoff

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

HMG SC ASQ:SE

SCREENING RESULTS

Above the Cutoff

Below the Cutoff

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

How Long Parents are

Concerned*

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

CONNECTION TO SERVICE

• Screening without connection to service is unethical

• National rate for connection to service for children already identified with a delay/disability by MD: 11%

(Halfon N, Regalado M. Assessing development in the pediatric office. Pediatrics 2004:113 (6 suppl)1926-1933; Kavanagh, J., Gerdes, M., Sell, K., Jimenes, M. and Guevara, J. SERIES: An Integrated Approach to Supporting Child Development. PolicyLab: Summer 2012.)

• HMG SC connection rate – 2014: 81%

– 2015: 79%

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds

Conference

Case Scenario 1

• MD and parent concerned with child’s speech at 24 month well-visit

• MD referred mother to speech therapy program

• Child’s insurance not accepted by this specific speech therapy program

• 3 year old well-visit, MD and parent agreed speech had worsened significantly

On-going developmental screening would help identify this as a concern prior to 24 month well-visit

HMG SC could assist with connection to service

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds

Conference

Case Scenario 2

• Child was enrolled in HMG SC on-going developmental screening program at birth, screened at 2 months, 6 months prior; scores were above the cutoff

• Screening completed at 11 months and all scores were above the cutoff

• Three weeks later, mother completed additional screening and identified speech as a concern

• Mother provided consent to communicate and share results with pediatrician

• Child was referred to BabyNet and found eligible for speech therapy

• Pediatrician was informed of connection to service

On-going and repeated screening is effective in identifying later developing delays

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

Screening Scenario 3

• Mother heard about HMG SC through pediatrician’s office, wanted to know more about child development

– Initial ASQ-3 completed at 8 months • Scored below the cutoff in gross motor and mother identified this

as a concern

• Mother was not ready to be referred for evaluation with BabyNet

- Re-screened with ASQ-3 at 9 months • Score below the cutoff in gross motor again

• Mother spoke with friends, who advised her to “wait and see”

• Mother agreed to BabyNet services and child was connected within 1 month

On-going developmental screening could potentially identify this as a concern before parent recognized as a concern

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference

Screening Scenario 4

• Mother heard about HMG SC through child care provider, as a result of concerns for her 16 month old who was not walking and did not want to eat solid food

• 16 month ASQ-3 completed and all scores were below the cutoff; concerns identified in gross motor, feeding issues – Recommended follow-up with Pediatrician

– Referred to BabyNet for further evaluation

On-going developmental screening could potentially identify this as a concern before parent recognized the concern

2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference