An Update on Developmental Screeninghsc.ghs.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/An-Update... · and...
Transcript of An Update on Developmental Screeninghsc.ghs.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/An-Update... · and...
An Update on Developmental
Screening
Steven H. Ma, MD Fellow, Division of Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics, GHS Children’s Hospital
Michelle M. Macias, MD Medical Director, Division of Developmental Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina
Lorraine J. Craigan-Sullivan, MA, LMSW, NCC Developmental Screening Coordinator, Help Me Grow South Carolina
Friday, February 26, 2016
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
Breakout Session 3
Conflicts and Disclosure
• Dr. Ma, Dr. Macias, and Ms. Craigan-
Sullivan have no conflicts of interest to
disclose.
• Housekeeping:
– Ask questions as they come up!
– Feel free to stand up, move about, etc.
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
Goals & Objectives
• Define developmental surveillance and
developmental screening and discuss their
importance.
• Discuss the current American Academy of Pediatrics
(AAP) algorithm for developmental surveillance and
screening at pediatric preventive care visits.
• Discuss recent updates to developmental
surveillance and screening.
• Discuss the purpose of Help Me Grow (HMG) and
their role in the screening process and new
screening initiatives.
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
Introduction
• Part C of IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act)
– Establishes Early Intervention and assists with state
programs for infants and toddlers with disabilities.
– Birth to 2 years
– Goal: Proactively enhance development of infants
and toddlers with disabilities
• Part B of IDEA
– Establishes free and appropriate special education
services through school districts.
– 3 years to 21 years.
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds
Conference
Introduction
• Problem
– Gap exists, as children continue to fall
through the cracks and escape detection.
• Current detection rates of developmental disorders
are lower than their actual prevalence.
– Also, children with mild impairments may not
get identified until increased school demands
warrants further investigation.
• Only 20-30% of children with developmental
problems are identified prior to school entry.
• So what can be done? 2016 Nurturing Developing Minds
Conference
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
Surveillance
AAP Surveillance
Recommendations
• Flexible, longitudinal, continuous and
cumulative process integrated within
family’s medical home
• Should be incorporated at every well-child
visit by a knowledgeable health care
professional based on both observation
and family support
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
AAP Surveillance
Recommendations
• Surveillance confers risk, not a specific
diagnosis.
• Elicited developmental concerns or high
risk for developmental delays warrant
further screening.
• Be cautious with reassurance and temper
with closer monitoring
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
AAP Surveillance
Guidelines
• 5 Components:
– Eliciting and attending to the parents’
concerns about their child’s development
– Documenting and maintaining a
developmental history
– Making accurate observations of the child
– Identifying risk and protective factors
– Maintaining an accurate record of
documenting the process and finding
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
Attending to Parents’
Concerns
• Health care professional should elicit any
parental concern at each well child visit
– “Do you have any concerns about your child’s
development?”
• Absence of parental concern does not
preclude developmental delay.
– Think about minority groups, generational
differences or families from different cultural
backgrounds.
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
Maintaining a
Developmental History
• Make regular, periodic updates to a child’s
timeline for developmental milestones
• Identify age-specific milestones
• Presumes appropriate knowledge of the
usual temporal sequence of development
within primary domains:
– Speech/Language; Gross Motor; Fine Motor;
Cognitive; Social/Emotional
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
Making Observations of
the Child
• Imperative at every well-child visit
• Observe the parent-child interaction during
the visit.
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
Risk and Protective
Factors
• Risk Factors: – Adverse childhood experiences/toxic stress,
including: abuse, neglect, domestic violence, familial
substance abuse, parental divorce/separation,
caregiver incarceration, bullying, homelessness
• Protective Factors: – Nurturing and attachment, knowledge of parenting
and of child development, parental resilience, social
connections, concrete parental supports,
social/emotional competence of children
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds
Conference
Documenting Findings
• Creating a “paper trail” electronically
• Developmental analog to growth chart
• Leverage electronic medical records and
technology, especially with developmental
surveillance and screening
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
Screening
Developmental Screening
• Should be performed if there is concern elicited
on surveillance AND at 9-, 18- and 24/30- month
visits
– Ages chosen based on major milestones within
domains
• Brief standardized tool aids in identification of
children at risk for developmental and/or
behavioral disorder.
• Does not result in a diagnosis or treatment plan!
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds
Conference
Developmental Screening
• Normative: identifies areas in which a
child’s development differs from same-age
peers
• Effective: repeated and regular screening
is more likely to identify delays, as
development is dynamic
• Efficient: most common method is
through validated questionnaires
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds
Conference
When NOT to Screen
• If a child is diagnosed with an identified
delay or disability AND connected to an
appropriate developmental service
– A child has a speech delay and is already
connected with speech therapy.
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
Developmental Screens
• Screening tests should:
– be reliable (consistent results)
– be valid (ability to discriminate risk stratification)
– have good sensitivity (accuracy in identifying delayed
development)
– have good specificity (accuracy in identifying non-
delayed individuals)
• Examples:
– PEDS (Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status)
– ASQ-3 (Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3)
– M-CHAT-R (Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers,
Revised) 2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
M-CHAT-R & M-CHAT-R/F
• 16 to 30 months (not a valid measure for younger or older children)
• Complete initial M-CHAT-R (20 questions) – Score 0-2: not a positive screening
– Score 3-7: proceed with Follow-Up Questionnaire for positive questions
– Score 8-20: POSITIVE SCREENING
• Strongly recommend the child be referred for early intervention and further
evaluation/diagnostic testing (no need for Follow-Up Questionnaire)
• M-CHAT-R/F (Follow-Up Questionnaire) is pass/fail – only ask parent questions for which child failed
– POSITIVE SCREENING if child fails any two items of the Follow-Up Questionnaire
• Strongly recommended the child be referred for early intervention and further
evaluation/ diagnostic testing
• Note: A significant number (98%) of children who test positive on M-CHAT-
R/F will be diagnosed with developmental delay, but not all will be
diagnosed with autism.
• For more information or to use M-CHAT-R/F online scoring system, please
visit www.mchatscreen.com as this site is approved by the developer, Diana
L. Robins, PhD.
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
Screening Results Are
Concerning… Now What?
• Refer for a formal developmental and medical
evaluation with a simultaneous referral to early
developmental intervention/early childhood
services.
– Developmental/medical evaluation may be made by
neurodevelopmental pediatricians, developmental-
behavioral pediatricians, child neurologists, pediatric
physiatrists or child psychiatrists
– Medical evaluation may include: vision screening,
objective hearing evaluation, newborn metabolic
screening or growth charts
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
Summary
Recommendations • Perform developmental surveillance at every preventive visit throughout childhood,
and ensure that such surveillance includes eliciting and attending to parents’
concerns, obtaining a developmental history, making accurate and informed
observations of the child, identifying the presence of risk and protective factors, and
documenting the process and findings.
• Administer a standardized developmental screening tool for children who appear to
be at low risk of a developmental disorder at the 9-, 18-, and or 24/30-month visits
and for those whose surveillance yields concerns about delayed or disordered
development.
• Schedule early return visits for children whose surveillance raises concerns that are
not confirmed by a developmental screening tool.
• Refer children about whom developmental concerns are raised to early intervention
and early-childhood programs.
• Coordinate developmental and medical evaluations for children who have positive
screening results for developmental disorders.
• Document all surveillance, screening, evaluation, and referral activities in the child’s
health chart.
• Establish working relationships with state and local programs, services, and
resources. 2016 Nurturing Developing Minds
Conference
• One of 26 affiliates nationwide
• Serve families in Greenville, Pickens, Charleston, Dorchester, and Berkeley Counties with children birth to 8 years old
• Focused on child development, learning, and behavior
• Free developmental screening for children birth to 5 ½ years
• Connect families to existing community-based programs and supports
• Provide resources to professionals working with families where an additional need is identified
• Work to foster and enhance collaboration across systems
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
Screening Initiatives
LOCAL
• Universal screening program with ASQ-3 and ASQ:SE/SE-2 (online, paper)
• Maintaining Abstinence in Neonates (MAiN) Program through GHS
• Children entering foster care through Pendleton Place’s Assessment Center
• Children receiving Greenville County First Steps child care scholarships
SOUTH CAROLINA
• Technical assistance to Home Visiting programs through partnership with the Children’s Trust of SC
• Child Care Centers in partnership with DSS-Early Care and Education, SCPITC, SCIC, DHEC
• Read, Rattle, and Roll community-based developmental screening event
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
Ages and Stages
Questionnaires
• Educates parents about developmental
activities as they complete the screening
– Parent knowledge about child development
serves as a Protective Factor
• Written on a 3rd to 5th grade reading level
• Intervals are available for every age from 1
month to 5 ½ years (ASQ:SE-2 up to 6
years)
• High validity and reliability 2016 Nurturing Developing Minds
Conference
HMG SC’s Student Survey
Parents identified where they want to learn about child development
Pediatrician/Physician
Child Care Center/School
Prenatal OB Visits
Other
Government Agency
Newborn Nursery/NICU
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
HMG SC ASQ-3 SCREENING
RESULTS
Above the Cutoff
Monitoring
Below the Cutoff
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
HMG SC ASQ-3 SCREENING
RESULTS
Due to Physician Referral Column1
Above the Cutoff
Monitoring
Below the Cutoff
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
HMG SC ASQ-3 SCREENING
RESULTS
Child Care Scholarship
Recipients Column1
Above the Cutoff
Monitoring
Below the Cutoff
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
HMG SC ASQ:SE
SCREENING RESULTS
Above the Cutoff
Below the Cutoff
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
CONNECTION TO SERVICE
• Screening without connection to service is unethical
• National rate for connection to service for children already identified with a delay/disability by MD: 11%
(Halfon N, Regalado M. Assessing development in the pediatric office. Pediatrics 2004:113 (6 suppl)1926-1933; Kavanagh, J., Gerdes, M., Sell, K., Jimenes, M. and Guevara, J. SERIES: An Integrated Approach to Supporting Child Development. PolicyLab: Summer 2012.)
• HMG SC connection rate – 2014: 81%
– 2015: 79%
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds
Conference
Case Scenario 1
• MD and parent concerned with child’s speech at 24 month well-visit
• MD referred mother to speech therapy program
• Child’s insurance not accepted by this specific speech therapy program
• 3 year old well-visit, MD and parent agreed speech had worsened significantly
On-going developmental screening would help identify this as a concern prior to 24 month well-visit
HMG SC could assist with connection to service
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds
Conference
Case Scenario 2
• Child was enrolled in HMG SC on-going developmental screening program at birth, screened at 2 months, 6 months prior; scores were above the cutoff
• Screening completed at 11 months and all scores were above the cutoff
• Three weeks later, mother completed additional screening and identified speech as a concern
• Mother provided consent to communicate and share results with pediatrician
• Child was referred to BabyNet and found eligible for speech therapy
• Pediatrician was informed of connection to service
On-going and repeated screening is effective in identifying later developing delays
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
Screening Scenario 3
• Mother heard about HMG SC through pediatrician’s office, wanted to know more about child development
– Initial ASQ-3 completed at 8 months • Scored below the cutoff in gross motor and mother identified this
as a concern
• Mother was not ready to be referred for evaluation with BabyNet
- Re-screened with ASQ-3 at 9 months • Score below the cutoff in gross motor again
• Mother spoke with friends, who advised her to “wait and see”
• Mother agreed to BabyNet services and child was connected within 1 month
On-going developmental screening could potentially identify this as a concern before parent recognized as a concern
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference
Screening Scenario 4
• Mother heard about HMG SC through child care provider, as a result of concerns for her 16 month old who was not walking and did not want to eat solid food
• 16 month ASQ-3 completed and all scores were below the cutoff; concerns identified in gross motor, feeding issues – Recommended follow-up with Pediatrician
– Referred to BabyNet for further evaluation
On-going developmental screening could potentially identify this as a concern before parent recognized the concern
2016 Nurturing Developing Minds Conference