An investigation of the relationship between English ...
Transcript of An investigation of the relationship between English ...
Running head: EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF-EFFICACY 1
An investigation of the relationship between
English learner teacher collaboration and self-efficacy.
Olivia L. Tate
Northwest Nazarene University
EDUC 7598C
Dr. Tawny Billings
April 18, 2015
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 2
Abstract
Many school districts embed teacher collaboration, organized by grade or content-area, into their
schedules. Teachers, isolated from peers because of their subject(s) or the size of their school
district, may be unable to collaborate with other professionals fulfilling the same role. Isolated
teachers miss out on the benefits of such collaboration, such as increased efficacy or a teachers’
belief in their ability to meet student needs. English learners (EL) are the fastest growing student
demographic in the United States and present schools with unique challenges. Through two
anonymous surveys, this study investigated the relationship between EL teacher collaboration
and self-efficacy of current and former EL teachers in one Idaho school district. Analysis of the
data found a statistically significant correlation between teacher self-efficacy and collaboration
between EL teachers working in the same school. Areas for further study include adjusting
schedules to increase teacher availability and utilizing various electronic collaboration platforms.
Keywords: EL teachers, collaboration, efficacy, isolation
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 3
An investigation of the relationship between EL teacher collaboration and self-efficacy.
Background of the Problem
The limited English proficient (LEP) student population in the United States is the fastest
growing student demographic group in the United States (NEA, 2008). In the decade between
the school years 1997-1998 and 2007-2008, the general student population grew by seven
percent, while the number of LEP student in public school rose by fifty-one percent (TESOL,
2013). During the same decade the rate of LEP student growth in Idaho mirrored the national
trend, at fifty percent (Office, n.d.). For the 2009-2010 school year, the National Clearinghouse
for English Language Acquisition (NCELA) identified the West Ada School District (formerly
the Meridian Joint School District No. 2) as a high incidence and a high-growth district
(NCELA, 2014) for LEP students. An LEP student typically has difficulty understanding
English and comes from a home in which family members speak a language other than English.
Some of the names and acronyms are English language learners (ELL) (Baecher, Rorimer, &
Smith, 2012; Batt, 2008; Gandara, et.al., 2005; Khong & Saito, 2013; Newman, Samimy, &
Romsedt, 2010; Roblero, 2013; Spezzini, Austin, Abbott, & Littleton, 2009; TESOL, 2013), or
students who are learning English as a second language (ESL) (Bell & Baecher, 2012), as well as
culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students (Beasley, Gartin, Lincoln, & Penner-
Williams, 2013). Throughout this review these students will be referred to as English learners or
ELs.
The swift increase of the EL population has resulted in many teachers facing a classroom
of students for whom they have had little if any preparation (Khong & Saito, 2014: Roblero,
2013). Additionally, in the face of high standards, such as the common core, this student
demographic group presents a unique challenge for teachers in which EL teachers play an
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 4
increasingly important role (TESOL, 2013). Teacher efficacy and teacher collaboration can have
a significant impact on the academic progress of ELs (Gandara, et.al., 2005). When teachers
lack training and experience in meeting the instructional needs of ELs, teacher efficacy is
lowered. EL teachers function as a language acquisition expert in schools, collaborating with
general education teachers about how best to meet the needs of students. However, EL teachers
have little opportunity to collaborate with other EL teachers because they are focused on
supporting their general education colleagues and the EL students they serve.
Statement of the Problem
With the rapid increase of the English learner student population in the United States and
its continued anticipated growth (NEA, 2008), coupled with the raising of standards, the role of
EL teachers is becoming increasingly important (TESOL, 2013) in public schools. Additionally,
in Idaho, many districts struggle to find qualified EL teachers to serve the EL students in their
schools (ISDE, 2014). These language acquisition specialists face a significant challenge to
meet their responsibilities for teaching their multi-grade/multi-level EL students, for
collaborating and consulting with general education teachers, building administrators and staff,
as well as for supporting EL families to increase the families’ understanding of school
procedures and participation in school events. Examining the perceptions of EL teachers in the
areas of efficacy, and collaboration is in the best interest of school districts and states because the
better the understanding of the role of these teachers, the better able districts will be in
facilitating and supporting them as they work with this high-impact and vulnerable demographic
subgroup of the student population.
Research Question
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 5
The research question of this study, “What is the relationship between EL teacher
collaboration and self-efficacy?” warrants further research because “by 2025, nearly one out of
every four public school students will be an English Language Learner” (NEA, 2008).
Literature Review
English Learner (EL) Teachers
In a discussion of EL education in California, Gandara, et.al., (2005) noted that English
learners were approximately twenty-five percent of the student population in public schools and
that ELs did not achieve at levels that would provide much of a future for either the students or
the state. Although 47% of ELs passed the California English Language Development Test
(CELDT), only ten percent passed the English Language Arts (ELA) section of the California
Standards Test. There was a large gap in the performance of EL students and their English-
speaking (both English-only and formerly EL students) peers on the California High School Exit
Exams. Only 49% of ELs passed the math exit exam and only 39% passed the ELA exit exam;
while 78% of English-speaking students passed the math exit exam and 81% passed the ELA
exit exam. Additionally, large numbers of English learners are no longer in school four years
after enrolling in the ninth grade. These were the reasons for surveying EL teachers about the
greatest challenges in educating English learners. Of the 5,300 educators who responded,
elementary and secondary teachers across all districts agreed as to the areas where other kinds of
support would most help teachers meet the needs of their English learner students. These areas
were more and better English language development materials, more time to teach students and
to collaborate with colleagues; and more paraprofessional assistance. The researchers found that
“greater preparation for teaching English learners equaled greater teacher confidence in their
skills for working with these students successfully” (Gandara, et. al., 2005).
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 6
Batt (2008) also used surveys to solicit solutions and priorities from Idaho educators, but
focused on rural schools, unlike the California study (Gandara, et. al., 2005) which involved
rural, suburban and urban teachers. Attendees of the annual Idaho Association of Bilingual
Educators conference, were asked to voluntarily complete a survey, and follow-up to some of the
surveys involved focus groups and interviews. The respondents included individuals filling
various and sometimes multiple EL/Bilingual educator roles. Idaho’s ELs are predominantly
native Spanish speakers and the state has a shortage of teachers qualified to work with ELs
(ISDE, 2014). Because of the shortage, paraprofessionals were often the majority of those
working with English learners; many of whom had only received training through in-service
training or workshops. Analysis of the survey responses revealed three significant challenges: a
lack of knowledge and skills of those working with ELs, understaffing and EL practitioners
working with students in multiple schools, and “an overwhelming feeling of the stress involved
in performing a big job solo and in tandem with many extra duties” (Batt, 2008). The
respondents also proposed solutions which included six ranked areas for professional
development, as well as several ideas for restructuring to improve ELL education within rural
school districts.
Collaboration
Hord (2008) found that for much of the history of schools, teachers worked in a climate
of isolation from colleagues with the authority to teach whatever curricula they chose and using
whatever instructional practices they felt best. However, many schools in the 1980’s began to
explore team-teaching and open classrooms which led to conversations about the school as a
workplace and that workplace’s effect on teacher morale, knowledge and skills. During this
time, school districts shifted to having periodical meetings of grade level or departmental teacher
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 7
groups. In these meetings, however, much of their time together, however, was spent on clerical
issues such as, ordering textbooks and supplies, and organizing field trips (Hord, 2008).
Occasionally a teacher might also have shared an instructional strategy or report on a conference
that had been attended. Standards-based teaching brought the next shift which focused on
student achievement. In this shift, it became clear that teachers needed to develop, through
intentional learning, new practices that would enable an increasingly diverse student population
to reach the high standards of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).
Teacher collaboration leads to professional learning and teacher development (Baecher,
Rorimer, & Smith, 2012; Greene, Kim, & Marioni, 2007). Baecher, Rorimer, and Smith (2012)
established a collaborative inquiry group of high school teachers who analyzed video clips (of
participants teaching their own classes) to reflect on classroom instruction of English language
learners (ELLs). Data analysis revealed that while teachers experienced anxiety about sharing
video clips of their own teaching at the beginning of the study, that anxiety was greatly lessened
as the participants learned and practiced an open, non-judgmental analysis of the teaching
videos. Teachers moved from the mindset of looking for good examples, to reflecting on their
own instructional practice and developed a renewed trust in the collaborative process. Trust was
also a key element of Greene, Kim, and Marioni’s (2007) research; they discovered that trust and
professional reciprocity are essential to collegial and collaborative inquiry. When teachers
engage with trusted colleagues and peers in critical reflection on their own instructional
practices, the limits of teacher learning and mastery can expanded.
Successful teacher learning collaborations often occur between colleagues who share
similar contexts (Costa, 1995; Newman, Samimy, & Romstedt 2010; Spezzini, Austin, Abbott, &
Littleton, 2009). Costa (1995) gathered data on the impact of four teacher collaboration
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 8
strategies from elementary teachers in two public school districts in British Columbia, Canada.
Findings revealed that teacher partners who observed each other teaching to gather data to
discuss in collaborative conferences effected more changes that improved student performance
than other teacher collaboration strategies in the study. Newman, Samimy, and Romstedt (2010)
focused on building capacity through sustained interactions between content teachers in Ohio.
The research team, in order to provide a job-embedded professional development model, only
worked with same school collaborative teams. Spezzini, Austin, Abbott, and Littleton (2009)
created a professional development program (PDP) designed to increase local teachers’ capacity
in English as a second language (ESL) best practices. Participant teachers adopted the role of
collaborative peer-mentors with their school colleagues. Even novice teachers often reversed
their role and became a mentor to veteran teachers learning new best practices for working with
English learners (Spezzini, Austin, Abbott, & Littleton, 2009).
Other benefits from teacher collaboration are increased commitment (Haun & Martin,
2004) and that teachers produce more without increasing their use of resources (Donaldson,
1993). Haun & Martin (2004), in their survey of both current and former middle school teachers,
revealed that participating on interdisciplinary collaborative teams helped beginning teachers
more clearly understand their purpose as educators and increase their commitment to remaining
in the teaching profession. Donaldson (1993) discusses the idea that the landscape of school
districts with limited resources, both in terms of budgets and personnel, will likely not change.
Because of these limitations, educators must learn to work smarter collectively. Collaboration
allows educators to be more productive while not greatly reducing resources. A key component
of working collectively is to develop the ability to monitor what educators do in order to
determine the effectiveness of new efforts (Donaldson, 1993).
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 9
When supportive structural conditions (e.g. a time and place to meet), as well as policies
and resources that support faculty in collaborative study (Hord, 2008) are not established,
teachers will resort to informal collaboration (Bell & Baecher, 2012; Stevenson, 2008).
Stevenson (2008) investigated how elementary school teachers’ practical theories influenced
their choice of colleagues with whom to informally collaborate. Results determined that
teachers’ decisions about informal collaboration were based on their personal beliefs about the
implementation of district mandated curriculum and on their expectations for student academic
achievement. Teachers were revealed as either an Adaptor (a teacher who regularly
supplemented or modified district curricular materials and content standards) or a Subscriber (a
teacher who makes minimal modifications to curriculum and standards). Participants were also
identified as having either high or low academic expectations for their students.
Generally, the participating teachers chose informal collaboration colleagues (i.e.
voluntary, unmandated collaboration partners) who shared similar beliefs and expectations. It is
possible that these elements of shared beliefs and expectations also influence the teachers who
participated in Bell and Baecher’s (2012) study. They surveyed English as a Second Language
(ESL) teachers to examine their perceptions of the types of and the challenges to collaboration
with content area or grade level teachers. The ESL teacher respondents reported to sometimes or
usually collaborating, with the nature of the collaboration being overwhelmingly informal.
While almost all of the study’s ESL teachers desired to collaborate with content area or grade
level teachers, nearly half of the respondents believed that their school lacked a culture of
collaboration and that collaboration between content and ESL teachers was not highly valued.
As Bell and Baecher (2012) found, sometimes teachers work in a school environment that
is less conducive to collaboration. School culture, geographical distance, or content taught can
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 10
isolate some teachers from a community of peers (Bell & Baecher, 2012; Maher, Burroughs,
Dietz, and Karnbach 2010; Pringle, Klosterman, Milton-Brkich, & Hayes, 2010; Richmond &
Manokore, 2011). In such cases, teachers must go beyond the walls of their individual schools
or even beyond their district to find collaboration colleagues. Three research studies examined
these circumstances. First, Richmond and Manokore (2011) sought to improve elementary
science instruction through the use of a teacher community of inquiry. Participants were
volunteers from different schools who received a stipend for time spent attending professional
learning community (PLC) meetings, and developing curriculum or project-related activities.
Participating teachers were more likely to collaborate, discuss and share about teaching practices
with the project PLC colleagues, than with school colleagues.
Second, Pringle, Klosterman, Milton-Brkich, and Hayes (2010) designed a year-long
professional development project using videoconferencing to connect teachers in different school
districts and separated by more than fifty miles. Increasing elementary teachers’ science content
knowledge and inquiry-based teaching practices were the purposes of this collaborative project.
Teachers attended a week-long summer workshop, monthly videoconferences, and another
week-long workshop in winter. The monthly videoconferences followed an agenda and were
structured by the leadership team of facilitators. The project, overall, resulted in a strong belief
in the usefulness of videoconferencing as a tool to support collaboration. In the third study,
Maher, Burroughs, Dietz, and Karnbach (2010) explored how one school district assisted
teachers who were isolated by the solitary nature of their content. St. Mary’s Public Schools
partnered with Johns Hopkins University to support collaboration between fine arts teachers by
implementing an electronic learning community. The features of this community included
discussion forums, online resource sharing, community calendars, as well as instant feedback
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 11
and collaboration. This electronic collaboration venue was open to all disciplines, but data
revealed that it was most used by fine arts teachers a group which was isolated from peers by
their content. In contrast, Van Driel and Berry (2012) take issue with relying on technology as
the sole venue for a professional development program. They highlight problems with the
assertions made by other researchers about the need for professional development programs to
focus on pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) improvement through the compilation of an
online video library. Growth of a teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge occurs most
effectively through active collaboration with colleagues and experiences based in the teacher’s
specific content and context. However, collaboration is often mandated which may have a
limiting effect on collegiality and the collaboration process. The development of pedagogical
content knowledge is a complex journey that requires more support than viewing videos
available from an online library.
Efficacy
Efficacy or a teacher’s belief in her or his ability to meet student needs has been shown to
have significant effects (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2001) on instructional practice (Beasley,
Gartin, Lincoln, & Penner-Williams, 2013; Gebbie, Ceglowski, Taylor & Miels, 2012) and on
job stress and satisfaction (Klassen & Chiu, 2010). Beasley, Gartin, Lincoln and Penner-
Williams (2013) studied the self-efficacy of elementary teachers on meeting the needs of
culturally and linguistically diverse students in one community of the mid-south. In one school
district, 139 elementary teachers from eight schools voluntarily completed a survey of teacher
beliefs and practices. Quantitative analysis of the survey responses exposed that although
teachers had a strong belief in their ability to meet student needs through differentiation, they
were regularly implementing only a few research-based instructional strategies to support the
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 12
learning challenges of diverse students. Findings also indicated that teachers who had been
involved in a partnership program with a nearby university were more likely to provide
differentiated instruction and had higher self-efficacy. Lincoln and Penner-Williams (2013)
encourage further research into partnerships between university teacher preparation programs
and local public schools. In another large study, Klassen & Chiu (2010) also used surveys to
learn about the self-efficacy and job satisfaction of teachers in one province of western Canada.
Analysis of the survey responses highlighted a positive relationship between the self-efficacy of
teachers in the areas of classroom management, instructional strategies, and job satisfaction, and
a negative relationship between overall job stress and job satisfaction. The analysis also
demonstrated that self-efficacy varied by gender and by the age of a teacher’s student population,
and that the psychosocial context of a teacher’s work environment was a factor that influenced
efficacy. The researchers think more research needs to be done to determine the impact on
teacher self-efficacy over a career because much of the focus has been on the early years of a
teacher’s career.
Gebbie, Ceglowski, Taylor & Miels’s (2012) conducted a much smaller study in which
they examined the effect of instructional support on five preschool teachers of children with
disabilities and challenging classroom behaviors. In this study, however, teachers completed
surveys to determine a common area of need: classroom behavior management strategies. They
then participated in training, received mentoring and engaged with other participants in an online
learning community. Qualitative analysis of the data, gathered through interviews and from
online interactions, revealed that each participant’s belief in their own ability to have a positive
impact on the challenging behaviors was strengthened because of the online interactions with
colleagues teaching in a similar instructional setting.
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 13
Summary
While research has been done about collaboration between EL and general education
teachers, the topic of collaboration between EL teachers remains largely untouched. An EL
teacher is frequently the only EL teacher at a building which impacts where and how often
collaboration, with other EL teachers, can happen. Similarly the topic of self-efficacy has
received and is receiving attention from educational researchers, however studies about EL
teacher self-efficacy is lacking. An EL teacher’s self-efficacy involves more than what happens
with students in her/his own classroom. EL students present a wide range of cultural and
linguistic needs which is often shouldered by an EL teacher. An EL teacher has responsibilities
in addition to her/his own student instruction that are somewhat unique. These responsibilities
include supporting and consulting with general education teachers who have English learners
enrolled in their classes, and accomplishing the work needed to meet compliance on state and
federal guidance and regulations. With English learners in public schools anticipated to be
twenty-five percent by the year 2025 (NEA, 2008; TESOL, 2013), research into the relationship
between EL teacher collaboration and teacher self-efficacy is needed and may add knowledge to
the field of education.
Methodology
Purpose
The purpose of this action research study was to investigate the perceptions of English
learner (EL) teachers in the areas of EL teacher collaboration and self-efficacy. This study
specifically focused on the perceptions of EL teachers in the West Ada School District (West
Ada). Participants included both current and former EL teachers of West Ada. The participants
voluntarily completed a survey about EL teacher collaboration in West Ada. Those participants
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 14
who are currently teaching EL students, also completed a second questionnaire about teacher
self-efficacy. The researcher hoped that analysis of the data collected from the investigation of
the variables, EL teacher collaboration and self-efficacy, would reveal specific areas of need or
avenues of support that could then be used to assist WASD EL coaches and administrators in
their efforts to provide continually-improving support for EL teachers in the district.
Sample
The West Ada School District is the largest school district in Idaho with a student
enrollment of over 36,000 students in the 2013-2014 school year (Swindell, 2013). The district’s
boundaries include schools located in the cities of Meridian, Boise, Eagle and Star. EL teachers
of the West Ada School District are representative of EL teachers working in Idaho’s larger
suburban public school districts, such as the Boise, Nampa, Pocatello, Bonneville Joint, Coeur
d’Alene, Idaho Falls, Twin Falls, Vallivue, and Caldwell School Districts. West Ada’s EL
teachers are also representative of EL teachers working in similar suburban school districts
throughout the United States of America.
Sample participants were recruited from certified teachers employed as EL teachers for
the West Ada School District over the past fifteen years. In WASD, EL teachers are assigned to
teach elementary school (kindergarten through fifth grades), middle school (sixth through eighth
grades), high school (ninth through twelfth grades), or a combination thereof. Of the twenty-
three teachers who are currently teaching EL students and fulfilling the additional duties
assigned to EL teachers in the West Ada School District, twenty-two participated in the study.
Of the twenty-seven former EL teachers, twenty participated in the study. The study resulted in
two samples, one quantitative and one qualitative. Each sample is comprised of both current and
former EL teachers.
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 15
Demographics of Participants
For the quantitative, correlational analysis, only teachers who are currently teaching
students in a classroom setting were included in this sample. This sample of 32 EL teachers of
the West Ada School District included 22 current EL teachers (20 females and 2 males) and 10
former (9 females and 1 male). Participants self-identified their race/ethnicity, this sample
included 27 white/Caucasians, 3 Hispanics/Latinos, 1 Asian, and 1 who did not identify any
race/ethnicity. The teachers reported their overall teaching experience which is distributed thus:
40.6 percent have 1-9 years, 25.0 percent have 10-18 years, and 34.4 percent have 19-27 years.
The participating teachers also related their years of experience teaching EL students: 62.5
percent have 1-9 years of EL teaching experience, 28.1 percent have 10-18 years, and 9.4 percent
have 19-27 years. Participants also identified the grade-levels they are teaching. The sample
includes: 12 (36.4 percent) elementary teachers, 4 (12.1 percent) middle school teachers, 12
(36.4 percent) high school teachers, one (3.0 percent) teaching middle and high school, one (3.0
percent) teaching elementary and middle school, one (3.0 percent) teaching elementary, middle
and high school EL students, and one did not specify any grade level.
There was a larger sample for the qualitative analysis because while most are working in
the field of education, some have retired or are no longer working, and others have moved on to
work in other fields of endeavor. This sample of 42 West Ada EL teachers included 22 current
EL teachers (20 females and 2 males) and 20 former (18 females and 2 males). Sample
participants identified their race/ethnicity as follows, 35 white/Caucasians, 4 Hispanics/Latinos,
2 Asians, and 1 who did not identify any race/ethnicity. The distribution of participants
according to their years of overall teaching experience is: 38.1 percent with 1-9 years, 28.6
percent with 10-18 years, and 33.3 percent with 19-27 years. The distribution according to
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 16
reported years of experience teaching EL students is: 59.5 percent with 1-9 years, 31.0 percent
with 10-18 years, and 9.5 percent with 19-27 years.
Research Design.
This was a mixed-methods study involving questionnaires. Two surveys developed by
the researcher, the Survey for Former EL Teachers of the West Ada School District and the
Survey for Current EL Teachers of the West Ada School District, included open-ended questions
which required qualitative analysis. Another questionnaire came from the research of Dr. Megan
Tschannen-Moran. The Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2001) was
analyzed quantitatively.
Instrumentation
Data Sources
Former EL Teacher Survey. The Former EL Teacher Survey (FELTS) was developed
by the researcher who currently works as an EL coach for the West Ada School District (WASD)
and also worked for several years as an EL teacher for the district. It is important to note that
this school district’s name changed from Joint School District No. 2 (JSD#2) to the West Ada
School District in June of 2014, and the FELTS makes reference to both names throughout
because the former EL teachers were possibly not be familiar with the district’s new name. The
FELTS (see Appendix B) included demographics and EL teaching and collaboration experience
with the WASD and included both closed and open-ended questions. Questions for the FELTS
were developed using the researcher’s personal experience and memory of conversations with
both current and former colleagues of the WASD.
Validity. The validity of this researcher-developed survey came from the items being
based on the specifics of WASD EL teacher collaboration experiences. The items incorporated
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 17
the constraints of access and location under which West Ada EL teachers work and collaborate.
This measure had never been used before, therefore there is no other data to support its validity.
Reliability. The FELTS had a broader focus than simply collaboration. There were five
sections to the survey: Section I – Demographics and Former WASD/JSD#2 EL Teaching
Position; Section II – Collaboration Experiences in WASD/JSD#2; Section III – Job Stress / Job
Satisfaction; Section IV – My EL Teaching Position(s) with WASD/JSD#2; and Section V –
Reasons for Leaving EL Teaching Position with WASD/JSD#2. Section one of the survey
covered demographical data of the participants, such as gender, teaching experience, and current
job. Section two included questions relating to the respondents’ beliefs about collaboration and
also asked for input on collaboration venues and experiences WASD/JSD#2. Section three
requested that participants rate their job stress and job satisfaction while teaching ELs for
WASD/JSD#2, and share specific factors that led to job stress and to job satisfaction. Section
four addressed whether their former EL teaching position was full or part time, and the grade
levels of the EL students with whom they worked. Section five sought information about the
factors that led the decision to leave EL teaching in WASD/JSD#2.
Usability. The FELTS is a four-page, 29-item survey for former EL teachers of the
WASD or JSD#2. The five sections of the survey are clearly marked and did not present
participants with difficulty. Completing the survey took from 15 to 30 minutes and was
available as a paper and pencil document or in electronic form as an Adobe survey document.
While the survey included twenty Likert-scale questions and several closed questions, the open-
ended questions about collaboration topics and venues required coding by the researcher to
identify commonalities and patterns in the responses. A researcher-developed survey was
chosen in order to include the specifics of collaboration in the WASD/JSD#2.
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 18
Current EL Teacher Survey. The Current EL Teacher Survey (CELTS) was developed
by the researcher who has worked for the WASD as both an EL teacher and an EL coach. The
CELTS (see Appendix C) includes demographics and EL teaching and collaboration experience
with the WASD with participants responding to both closed and open-ended questions.
Questions for the CELTS were developed using the researcher’s personal experience and
memory of conversations with the EL coaching staff, and both current and former EL teachers of
the WASD.
Validity. The validity of this researcher-developed survey came from the items being
based on the specifics of EL teacher collaboration experiences in West Ada. The items
incorporated the constraints of access and location under which EL teachers work and
collaborate. This measure had never been used before, therefore there is no other data to support
its validity.
Reliability. The CELTS consists of the same first three sections of the Former EL
Teacher Survey. The three sections of the survey were: Section I – Demographics and Current
WASD EL Teaching Position; Section II – Collaboration Experiences in West Ada; and Section
III – Job Stress / Job Satisfaction. Section one of the survey covered demographical data of the
participants, such as gender, teaching experience, and current EL teaching position. Section two
included questions relating to the respondents’ beliefs about collaboration and also asked for
input on collaboration venues and experiences West Ada. Section three requested participants to
rate their job stress and job satisfaction working as an EL teacher for WASD, and to share
specific factors that lead to job stress and to job satisfaction.
Usability. The CELTS is a four-page, 26-item survey for current West Ada EL teacher.
The three sections of the survey were clearly marked and did not present participants with
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 19
difficulty. Completing the survey took from 15 to 30 minutes and was completed as a paper and
pencil document or electronically as an Adobe survey document. While the survey included
twenty Likert-scale questions and several closed questions, the open-ended questions required
coding by the researcher to identify commonalities and patterns in the responses. A researcher-
developed survey was chosen in order to include the specifics of collaboration in the WASD.
Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale. Teacher efficacy, or the belief in her/his own
capability to meet the needs of students, was of interest to Dr. Megan Tschannen-Moran and Dr.
Anita Woolfolk Hoy because it “is a simple idea with significant implications” (Tschannen-
Moran & Hoy, 2001). In their 2001 study, they learned that there were several student outcomes
that could be positively affected by efficacy: achievement; motivation; and student efficacy.
Additionally, teachers with strong efficacy were more likely have higher levels of organization
and planning, and were more likely to be open to try new strategies and ideas in their classrooms.
However their investigation of several existing teacher efficacy scales revealed “persistent
measurement problems” (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2001). Tschannen-Moran and Hoy (2001)
developed a new measure in the process of the research they conducted at Ohio State University.
The measure was initially called the Ohio State teacher efficacy scale, but is now called the
Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale (Tschannen-Moran & Barr, 2004; Tschannen-Moran & Hoy,
2007). The efficacy scale was tested in three studies which reduced the number of items from 52
to a 24-item long form and a 12-item short form of the measure (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy,
2001).
For this research study the Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy,
2001) long form of 24 items was used (TSES-24, see Appendix D). The researcher learned of
this measure while reviewing the literature on teacher efficacy and through a Google™ search
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 20
which led to Dr. Tschannen-Moran’s research tools website. The researcher then contacted Dr.
Megan Tschannen-Moran by phone and email to request permission to use the TSES-24. Dr.
Tschannen-Moran gave verbal and written permission to utilize the scale and, in turn, requested
that upon completion of this research study, a report of the study be shared with her.
Validity. To test the validity of its construct, the TSES-24 was assessed against two other
teacher efficacy measures to determine correlations. The TSES-24 positively correlated to the
Rand measure (Armor, & et.al., 1976) and the Hoy’s and Woolfolk’s (1993) adaptation of the
Gibson and Dembo Teacher Efficacy Scale (1984). The new measure, TSES-24, was revealed to
be reasonably valid due to correlations found during analysis of the three measures. There were
strong correlations between these measures on items that test personal teaching efficacy or those
classroom factors under a teacher’s personal control, and lower correlations on items assessing
general teaching efficacy or the external factors that influence students (Tschannen-Moran &
Hoy, 2001).
Reliability. According to Cronbach’s alpha requirement for reliability, an item must have
an alpha value of .7 or higher. The TSES-24 is statistically reliable as evidenced by an alpha
value of .94. Each of the 24 items on the TSES-24 relates to one of three categories of teacher
efficacy. There are eight items dealing with efficacy in student engagement, eight items
addressing efficacy in instructional strategies, and eight items covering efficacy in classroom
management.
Usability. The TSES-24 is a two-page survey for teachers. Each of its 24 items is
phrased as a question which participants rated on a nine-point Likert scale from ‘none at all’ to ‘a
great deal’. This survey was provided to participants according to their preference as either a
paper and pencil, or an online Adobe survey document. The TSES-24 took from ten to fifteen
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 21
minutes for participants to complete. It was chosen for this research study because of its simple,
user-friendly design for respondents and because of the clear scoring process for the researcher.
Method of Collection
The measures used to collect data for this study were questionnaires. Questionnaires
were chosen because the overall purpose of this research study was enquiry and also because as
Mills (2014) asserts questionnaires enable the researcher to gather a great deal of data in a short
amount of time. The surveys for this study were given to participants in the format of their
choice: paper and pencil, or as an electronic document. There was a six-week window in which
the teacher volunteers responded. Of the former and current EL teachers who consented to
participate in the study, ten former EL teachers completed only the researcher-developed FELTS
survey, while the current EL teachers and ten former EL teachers completed two surveys, either
the CELTS or the FELTS, and the TSES-24. The CELTS and FELTS, researcher-developed
surveys addressed areas of demographics, EL teacher collaboration, job stress, and job
satisfaction; some responses were recorded on a Likert scale and others were open-ended. The
second measure was the Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2001),
which asked participants to judge their own capability to meet the needs of their students in their
current teaching position by responding to twenty-four, Likert-style questions. The completed
surveys were returned either through the US postal system or as an email attachment.
Data Analysis
Method of Analysis
This mixed-methods study used questionnaires to survey current and former West Ada
EL teachers in order to investigate the question, “What is the relationship between EL teacher
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 22
collaboration and self-efficacy?” The researcher anticipated that data analysis would reveal that
there is a relationship between EL teacher collaboration and efficacy.
Sample participants were certified teachers who have/had been employed as EL teachers
for the West Ada School District, the state of Idaho’s largest school district, over the past fifteen
years. The quantitative and qualitative samples were comprised of both current and former EL
teachers. Individuals who have taught EL for the West Ada School District over the past fifteen
years are representative of EL teachers working in Idaho’s larger suburban school districts and as
well as EL teachers working in similar suburban school districts throughout this country.
Participant recruits for this study are currently or have been employed as EL teachers in
the elementary, middle or high schools of the West Ada School District. All 23 current West
Ada EL teachers and 27 former West Ada EL teachers were contacted; not every former EL
teacher was contacted. The 50 EL teachers who were contacted had the study described to them
and were asked to participate in one of three ways: at a West Ada district-level EL teachers’
meeting, individually by, or through written correspondence from the researcher. The participant
recruits were handed, mailed, or email a consent form to return to the researcher if they agreed to
voluntarily participate in the study.
Three instruments were used in this study, two were developed by the researcher and the
third was developed through the research about teacher self-efficacy conducted by Drs.
Tschannen-Moran and Hoy (2001). Dr. Tschannen-Moran gave permission for the use of the
instrument entitled the Teachers Sense of Efficacy Scale. The researcher-developed surveys
inquired about EL teacher collaboration, job stress and job satisfaction. During a six week
window, the surveys were sent to participants according to their preference of form, either
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 23
electronic or paper-pencil format. Some follow-up emails and phone calls were necessary to
clarify some responses.
This mixed-methods study required both quantitative and qualitative analysis.
Quantitative analysis was conducted for responses to both the Current EL Teacher Survey
(CELTS), and the Former EL Teacher Survey (FELTS), and the Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale
(TSES), including a two tailed, bivariate correlation analysis to determine if there is a
relationship between EL teacher collaboration and self-efficacy. Qualitative analysis of the
responses to some of the open-ended questions of the CELTS and the FELTS required coding
and categorization, which was then organized into themes. Initially, the researcher intended to
include more of the qualitative data, but decided to exclude much of the qualitative data in order
to protect the confidentiality of the participants.
Results of Analysis
Quantitative analysis involved conducting a two-tailed, bivariate correlation analysis of
three variables. The variables included in the analysis were: 1) the TSES – Teacher Sense of
Efficacy Scale, 2) the frequency of collaboration between certified EL teachers in the same
building, and 3) the frequency of collaboration between certified EL teachers in different
buildings within one school district. The analysis revealed a statistically significant positive
correlation, r(29) = .034, p< .05, between teacher efficacy and the frequency of collaboration
between certified EL teachers in the same building. This correlation indicates that an EL
teacher, assigned to a school at which another EL teacher also works, will have the opportunity
to collaborate with a peer who has the same instructional and consultative responsibilities. This
opportunity to collaborate provides the benefit of increasing self-efficacy or that EL teacher’s
belief in her or his ability to meet the needs of her or his limited English proficient students.
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 24
Qualitative analysis of the responses to the open-ended questions about collaboration on
the CELTS and the FELTS required coding and categorization to identify themes. The
qualitative sample participants (N=42) were given 21 topics and asked to select all topics about
which she or he would like to collaborate with other EL teachers. Every topic offered on the
survey was selected. The most-selected topics were: consulting with general education teachers
(35 responses), resources (33 responses), and Response to Intervention (RTI) for EL students (30
responses). Figure 1 displays the totals of participant responses for all topic listed on the
CELTS/FELTS.
Figure 1
The survey also asked for suggestions for other collaboration topics; eight participants
offered additional topics. Some of the additional topics suggested for collaboration with other EL
0 10 20 30 40
Consulting with Gen. Ed. Teachers
Resources
RTI for EL students
Family Involvement
Student Academic Needs
Instructional Strategies
Advocating for Students
Implementing WIDA / EL Standards
Interventions
Assessment
Differentiation
Teaching Writing
Educational Learning Plans
Student Engagement
Idaho Core / State Standards
Teaching Reading
Classroom Management
Teaching Grammar
Teaching Listening
Teaching Speaking
Conducting Meetings
Topics for EL teacher collaboration
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 25
teachers were: 1) teaching, adapting, and/or modifying current district curriculum so that it is
“appropriate for EL students,” 2) scheduling and student placement, 3) “valuing students home
language and cultures,” 4) ancillary issues, such as poverty, lack of access to technology and/or
technological skills, the “impact of social media on … EL students,” and 5) “strategies and
resources specifically for newcomers.”
Some participants described their ideas for increasing opportunities for collaboration
between EL teachers. Three themes emerged from the ideas shared by twenty-two of the
respondents. The most commonly suggested theme was to build into the annual schedule days or
half-days for “in-person” “instructional collaboration” with “no other agenda” when EL teachers,
as one participant wrote, “can discuss … the issues they are facing at their individual schools, …
EL teachers would feel less isolated and, maybe, more empowered to serve their student
populations.” Some teachers have already created their own opportunities, as another stated, “I
met with another EL … teacher this year for a professional development day to co-plan units.”
The second theme to emerge was that technology should be used to facilitate collaboration
between EL teachers in different schools that are geographically too distant for teachers to meet
face to face during district-mandated collaboration time on Wednesday mornings. As one
respondent shared, “I like the web cam video collaborations …. It's the best and most time
efficient way to collaborate with other EL teachers I've experienced since I began working as an
EL teacher for this school district." The third theme involves establishing a common prep time
for EL faculty who teach the same grade levels or subjects. One participant stated, “I would love
to give up a prep period once a month in order to get ideas from other teachers.”
Findings
Implications for Practice
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 26
Currently, West Ada provides a weekly, district-wide, mandated collaboration time on
Wednesdays, during the first hour of the school day for all elementary, middle and high schools.
EL teachers are responsible for participating according to their teaching assignment(s). EL
teachers who are the only EL teacher in their school, typically collaborate with a grade-level
team, a content-area department, or an individual teacher during Wednesday collaboration, but
rarely have the opportunity to collaborate with another EL teacher. There are some West Ada
EL teachers who are assigned to work in a school with another EL teacher and because of this
proximity, they have more opportunities to collaborate with a fellow EL teacher. Collaboration
with grade-level teams, content-area departments, or individual teachers is necessary and
important because it provides a mechanism through which the result can be improved support for
EL students and professional development or growth for teachers in the instruction of and
teaching strategies for culturally and linguistically diverse students. However, since not all EL
teachers have the opportunity to collaborate with other EL teachers during district-mandated
collaboration time, they do not reap the benefits that result from collaborating with other
educators fulfilling the same role. The statistically significant positive correlation between EL
teacher self-efficacy and collaboration between certified EL teachers in the same building found
by the data analysis, indicates that a priority should be placed on providing regular opportunities
for all West Ada EL teachers to collaborate with another EL teacher or teachers.
Limitations of Study
The researcher’s focus on EL teachers of the West Ada School District created a
significant limitation because of the resulting small sample sizes. Both the quantitative sample
(N=32) and the qualitative sample (N=42) sizes were very small. Other limitations resulted
because the researcher-created surveys, the CELTS and the FELTS, were new and untried. The
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 27
sequence of questions resulted in some respondents not answering all of the questions which
pertained to her or him and for some questions the options listed were too narrow in scope, both
of which affected the data collected.
Recommendations for Future Study
The EL teachers who participated in this study are also representative of ‘singleton’
teachers which is a term used in the West Ada School District. Singletons are teachers of
disciplines or content areas for which there are fewer and sometimes only one class offered at a
school during a school year, such as band, choir, orchestra, health occupations, family &
consumer science, and professional/technical education teachers. Also, teachers in small rural
schools may be ‘singletons’ due to the size of their school district or community. The benefits of
providing collaboration opportunities to ‘singleton’ teachers is an area that would benefit from
further research. Additionally, further research should be done on which modes of collaboration
yield the most benefit to EL teachers or other singleton teachers. Online collaboration and
periodic full- or half-day collaboration opportunities which are built into teachers’ schedules are
venues that should be researched further. Particular attention should be focused on the venues
for collaboration offered through technological platforms which could allow for collaboration
across large distances. Additionally, research into teachers in different buildings being assigned
the same planning period to facilitate their availability for electronic collaboration would be
beneficial to the field of education.
Conclusion
Research has documented that teachers can improve their instructional practice through
sustained collaboration (Baecher, Rorimer, & Smith, 2012; Greene, Kim, & Marioni, 2007).
There are, however, those isolated teachers for whom collaboration with like-colleagues is
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 28
difficult due to their content area or geographical location. Collaboration is meant to benefit
students by providing an opportunity for teachers to learn from colleagues, therefore it is
incumbent upon school leadership to ensure that all faculty are benefiting from this valuable
professional development mechanism.
Given the statistically significant correlation found between EL teacher collaboration and
self-efficacy, it would seem to be important for the school district to provide ways for ‘singleton’
teachers, including EL teachers and faculty in other disciplines who are working in isolation
from their peers to collaborate with peer teachers in West Ada. Additionally, ways of providing
opportunities for collaboration that are extended, a half- or full-day, should be explored. As one
teacher articulated,
“I think that for collaboration to be meaningful (i.e.: allowing teachers
opportunities not just to talk about instruction but also to digest, reflect, and try
out/implement ideas that come as a result of that collaboration) it needs to take
place in larger chunks of time. During mandated collaboration - lasting only
around 45 min to an hour - teachers generally participate, but when the allotted
collaboration time is up, they find themselves rushing back to their classrooms
and getting swept up in the day to day requirements that teaching requires. Thus,
they have little to no time to meaningfully reflect - when the thinking is fresh in
their minds - and work towards putting the ideas from collaboration into action.”
For school leaders in West Ada, it is necessary to ensure that EL teachers have additional regular
opportunities to learn from and with other EL teachers, so that they are empowered to more
effectively support their general education peers and meet the needs of a vulnerable student
population, their culturally and linguistically diverse students.
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 29
References
Baecher, L., Rorimer, S., & Smith, L. (2012). Video-mediated teacher collaborative inquiry:
Focus on English language learners. High School Journal, 95(3), 49-61.
Batt, E. G. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of ELL education: Potential solutions to overcome the
greatest challenges. Multicultural Education, 15(3), 39-43.
Beasley, J., Gartin, B., Lincoln, F., & Penner-Williams, J. (2013). Teacher efficacy and practice
in meeting the needs of diverse learners: How do partnerships support teachers? SRATE
Journal, 22(2), 1-7.
Bell, A. B. and Baecher, L. (2012). Points on a continuum: ESL teachers reporting on
collaboration. TESOL Journal, 3(3), 488–515.
Costa, J. (1995). Teacher collaboration: A comparison of four strategies. Alberta Journal of
Educational Research, 41(4), 407-20.
Donaldson, G. R. (1993). Working smarter together. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 12-16.
Gandara, P., Maxwell-Jolly, J., Driscoll, A., Policy Analysis for California Education, B.A.,
Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning, S. A., & California Univ., S. T. (2005).
Listening to teachers of English language learners: A survey of California teachers’
challenges, experiences, and professional development needs. Policy Analysis for
California Education, PACE.
Gebbie, D., Ceglowski, D., Taylor, L., & Miels, J. (2012). The role of teacher efficacy in
strengthening classroom support for preschool children with disabilities who exhibit
challenging behaviors. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(1), 35-46.
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 30
Greene, W. L., Kim, Y. M., & Marioni, J. L. (2007). The reflective trio: A model for
collaborative self-study in teacher education. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 4(1),
41-58.
Haun, D. D., & Martin, B. N. (2004). Attrition of beginning teachers and the factors of
collaboration and school setting. RMLE Online: Research in Middle Level Education,
27(2), 1-7.
Hord, S. M. (2008). Evolution of the professional learning community: Revolutionary concept is
based on intentional collegial learning. Journal of Staff Development, 29(3), 10-13.
Idaho State Department of Education (ISDE). (2014). Public School Information 2014
Legislative Report: Limited English Proficient (LEP). Boise, ID: Idaho State Department
of Education. Retrieved October 5, 2014 from
https://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/publications/communications_docs/2014/2014%20LEP%
20Legislative%20Report_FINAL.pdf.
Khong, T., & Saito, E. (2014). Challenges confronting teachers of English language learners.
Educational Review, 66(2), 210-225.
Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. (2010). Effects on teachers' self-efficacy and job satisfaction:
Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology,
102(3), 741-756. doi:10.1037/a0019237
Maher, J., Burroughs, C., Dietz, L., & Karnbach, A. (2010). From solo to ensemble: Fine arts
teachers find a harmonious solution to their isolation. Journal of Staff Development,
31(1), 24-29.
Mills, G. (2014). Data collection techniques. In Action research: A guide for the teacher
researcher (pp. 93-94). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 31
National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition (NCELA). (2014). District focus:
Idaho. Retrieved September 30, 2014, from
http://www.ncela.us/files/uploads/T3SIS_LEA/id_meridian.pdf.
National Education Association (NEA). (2008). English language learners face unique
challenges. Retrieved October 1, 2014, from
www.nea.org/assets/docs/HE/ELL_Policy_Brief_Fall_08_(2).pdf
Newman, K. L., Samimy, K., & Romstedt, K. (2010). Developing a training program for
secondary teachers of English language learners in Ohio. Theory into Practice, 49(2),
152-161.
Office of English language acquisition, language enhancement, and academic achievement for
limited English proficient students. (n.d.). Idaho: Rate of EL growth 1997/1998-
2007/2008. Retrieved September 30, 2014, from http://www.ncela.us/t3sis/state/idaho/.
Pringle, R., Klosterman, M., Milton-Brkich, K., & Hayes, L. (2010). Collaborative distance
learning. Science and Children, 47(9), 52-56.
Richmond, G., & Manokore, V. (2011). Identifying elements critical for functional and
sustainable professional learning communities. Science Education, 95(3), 543-570.
Roblero, B. (2013). The importance of preparing teachers to educate vulnerable populations.
Harvard Journal of Hispanic Policy, 2597-115.
Spezzini, S. S., Austin, J. S., Abbott, G. G., & Littleton, R. R. (2009). Role reversal within the
mentoring dyad: Collaborative mentoring on the effective instruction of English language
learners. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 17(4), 297-315.
doi:10.1080/13611260903284382
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 32
Stevenson, H. J. (2008). To adapt or subscribe: Teachers' informal collaboration and view of
mandated curricula. Issues in Teacher Education, 17(1), 75-95.
Swindell, J. (Ed.). (2013, November 1). Idaho Ed Trends Data. Retrieved April 15, 2015, from
http://www.idahoedtrends.org/data
TESOL International Association. (2013). Overview of the common core state standards
Initiatives for ELLs. TESOL International Association.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Tschannen-Moran, M. & Barr, M. (2004). Fostering student achievement: The relationship
between collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and Policy in
Schools, 3, 187-207.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs
of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International
Journal of Research and Studies, 23(6), 944-956.
Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical
content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26-28.
doi:10.3102/0013189X11431010
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 33
Appendix A
NIH Certificate
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 34
Appendix B
Former EL Teacher Survey
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 35
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 36
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 37
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 38
Appendix C
Current EL Teacher Survey
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 39
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 40
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 41
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 42
Appendix D
Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale
EL TEACHER COLLABORATION AND SELF EFFICACY 43