An Introduction to Evidence-Based...

42
1 © 2008 Studer Group www.studergroup.com An Introduction to Evidence-Based Leadership Bob Murphy, R.N., Esq., FACHE National Speaker, Studer Group What’s Right in Health Care SM | Evidence to Outcomes Source: Medical Center Arlington, Arlington, TX, Total beds=270 7.80 7.60 6 7 8 Q2 Annualized Savings in First Year: $65,216 (30 bed unit) Worked Hours per patient Day Return on Investment: Improved Productivity Individualized Patient Care Hourly Rounding Nurse Leader Rounding on Patients Tactic and Tool Implemented:

Transcript of An Introduction to Evidence-Based...

1 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

An Introduction to Evidence-Based Leadership

Bob Murphy, R.N., Esq., FACHENational Speaker, Studer Group

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Source: Medical Center Arlington, Arlington, TX, Total beds=270

7.807.60

6

7

8

Q1 Q2

Annualized Savings in First Year: $65,216 (30 bed unit)

Wo

rked

Ho

urs

p

er

pati

en

t D

ay

Return on Investment: Improved Productivity

Individualized Patient Care

Hourly Rounding

Nurse Leader Rounding on Patients

Tactic and Tool Implemented:

2 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Source: Southwest Washington M.C., Vancouver, WA, 360 beds

$494

$16,037$17,574

$0$2,000$4,000$6,000$8,000

$10,000$12,000$14,000$16,000$18,000

Month 1 Month 2 Month 3

Annualized Upfront Collections Increased: $136,420

Up

-fro

nt

co-p

ay

collect

ion

s

Return on Investment: Upfront Collections

AIDET

Tactic and Tool Implemented:

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Return on Investment:ED Left Not Seen

8.4

5.74.8 4.5

0123456789

10

% LWS

Cal Y2006 May June July

Hourly Rounding/IPC implemented April 2007

Hourly RoundingIndividualized Patient Care

Tactic and Tool Implemented:

Annualized ROI: $969,000($500/patient x 1938 patients)

Source: Baptist Hospital of Miami, Miami, FL, Annual adult visits = 57,000

3 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Return On Investment: Reduction of Employee Turnover and ROI

24%

16%

22%

17%

21%

12%

31%

16%

25%

19%21%

19%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Tot BMC NCBH NEBH SLBH *SEBH

FY06 FY07

$923,832 $1,815,565 $410,058$3,086,810 $1,135,139

* All turnover onlySource: Baptist Health System, San Antonio, TX, Total Beds = 1673

Peer Interviewing

30/90 Day Meetings

Tactic and Tool Implemented:

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Return on Investment: Reduction of Falls

18401651 1696

0

500

1000

1500

2000

Y2004 Y2005 Y2006

Hourly Rounding implemented 2005

Estimated Annualized Savings: $1.65 million

(150 falls x 11,000)

Hourly Rounding

Tactic and Tool Implemented:

Source: Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, Admissions: 60,632 , Total Beds = 1002, Estimated cost per fall = $11k, Hourly Rounding implemented in 2005

4 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

1. Dots are connected consistently to purpose, worthwhile work and making a difference

2. Balanced approach 3. Objective accountability

system4. Leaders have the training

to be successful 5. Sequenced approach to

introduction of new behaviors

6. Process in place to re-recruit the high and middle performers and address low performers (HML)

7. Process in place to take best practices and standardize across organization

8. Leaders “always” do desired behaviors

9. Good verification systems to hardwire behaviors

Why Organizations Attain/Sustain Excellence

Rev 12.07

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Purpose, worthwhile work

and makinga difference

®

Healthcare Flywheel®

• Bottom Line Results

(Transparency and Accountability)

• Self-Motivation

• Prescriptive To Do’s

5 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

PrescriptivesPassion

Passion + Prescriptives = Results

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Standardization AcceleratorsMust HavesSM

Performance Gap

Objective Evaluation

SystemLeader

Development

Foundation Breakthrough

STUDER GROUP:

Rev 12.07

RoundingThank You NotesEmployee SelectionPre and Post Phone CallsKey Words at Key TimesPrinciple 3, 5, 6, & 9

Re-recruit high and middle performersMove low performers up or out Principle 4

Agendas by pillar Peer interviewing30/90 day sessionsPillar goalsPrinciple 1 & 2

Leader Eval Mgr (LEM)Staff Eval Mgr (SEM)Discharge Call Manager (DCM)Rounding MgrIdea Express

Aligned Goals Aligned Behavior Aligned ProcessCreate process to assist leaders in developing skills and leadership competencies necessary to attain desired resultsPrinciple 4 & 8

Implement an organization-wide staff/leadership evaluation system to hardwire objective accountabilityPrinciple 2 & 7

Evidence-Based LeadershipSM

(EBL)

6 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Barriers to Change

• Denial• Rationalization• Blame• Uniqueness• Unwillingness• Not Skilled

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Must Haves®

• Aligning Leader Evaluations with Desired Outcomes

• Rounding for Outcomes• Employee Thank You Notes• Employee Selection and the First 90 Days • Pre and Post Phone Calls• Key Words at Key Times

7 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Department MeetingsEmployee Conversations Employee R&RStaff Selection and OrientationStaff and Patient RetentionStaff PolicyPatient ConversationsPre Phone CallsPost Phone CallsStaff and Leader EvaluationOnly new item

Current Practice

Consistent AgendasRounding for OutcomesThank You NotesPeer interviewing and 30/90 Day MeetingsIndividual Employee MeetingsStandards of BehaviorKey Word at Key TimesPre Phone CallsPost Phone CallsStaff and Leader EvaluationLeadership Training

Effective Approach

Not New - Better

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Aligned Goals

Objective Evaluation

System

* Principle 2 and 7

Must HavesSM

Performance Gap

Aligned Behavior

Standardization Accelerators

Aligned Process

Leader Development

Aligned Goals

Objective Evaluation

System

8 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Leader and Staff Evaluation

Accountability and Prioritization

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Leader Evaluation Requirements

Evaluation must be:• Objective• Measurable• Weighted• Contain metric ranges (1-5)

9 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

• Clearly connects the goals of the organization to individual leader

• Provides prioritization roadmap for leader

• Keeps leaders focused on what is really important

• Allows senior leader to continuously monitor leader performance

• Provides for organizational agility

Why Have Leader Evaluations Based on Objective Goals?

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

“Ask yourself, can leaders or staff under-perform and still get a good

evaluation?”

Bob Murphy, R.N., Esq., FACHENational Speaker/CoachStuder Group

10 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Leader Development

* Principle 4 and 8

Must HavesSM Performance

Gap

Aligned Behavior

Standardization Accelerators

Aligned ProcessAligned Goals

Objective Evaluation

System

Leader Development

Aligned Goals

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

“The pace of change in healthcare is accelerating, we need new skills to

be ready for the future.”

Bob Murphy, R.N., Esq., FACHENational Speaker/CoachStuder Group

11 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Basic Leadership Skills: The Foundation

Leaders must be skilled in:• Running effective meetings• Managing financial resources• Answering tough questions so as to not create a

“we/they” culture (compensation including salaries)

• Selection of talent• Development of talent• Critical thinking• De-selection• Understanding the external environment

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Must HavesSM

* Principle 3, 5, 6 and 9

Performance Gap

Aligned Behavior

Standardization Accelerators

Aligned ProcessAligned Goals

Objective Evaluation

System

Leader Development

Must HavesSM

Aligned Behavior

12 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Key Must HavesSM

• Got Chart• Physician

Preference Card • Physician Code• Rounding for

Outcomes

• Leader Rounding on Patients

• Post Visit Calls• Hourly Rounding• Individualized

Patient Care• Bedside Shift

Report• AIDET• Pre Visit Calls

• Rounding with Employees

• Employee Thank You Notes

• Peer Interviewing • 30 and 90 Day

Meetings (Input)• Employee

Attitude Survey • Employee Forums • Bright Ideas

Patient• Standards

PhysiciansPatientsEmployees

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Employee Strategies

• Rounding for Outcomes (Input)

• Employee Thank You Notes (Reward Desired Performance)

• Peer Interviewing (Select)

• 30 and 90 Day Meetings (Input)

• Employee Attitude Survey (Diagnostic)

• Employee Forums (Alignment / Recognition)

• Bright Ideas (Innovation/process improvement and input)

• Managing up (Communication)

• Service Teams (Involvement)

13 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Rounding for

Outcomes

Employee - Input

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Rounding for Outcomes - Staff

Follow-up

Tools and Equipment

Systems to Improve

People to Recognize

What is Working Well

Concern and Care

Rounding with Staff

14 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Verification: Rounding Log

Safety

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Study conducted by Dr. Gerald Graham, Management Professor at Wichita State UniversityMotivating Today’s Employees, Bob NelsonTalent+, 1998

Top 5 Workplace Incentives

1. Written Thanks From Manager/Executive Team Leader

2. Personal Thanks From Manager

3. Promotion for Performance

4. Public Praise5. Morale-Building

Meetings

15 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Thank You Notes

Reward Desired Performance

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Recognize and Reward Behavior

• Reinforces positive behavior • Creates role models for other staff• Shows staff how they can make a

difference• Creates improved results across

organization

16 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Verification: Thank You Grid

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Compliment to Criticism Ratio

1 compliment 1 criticism

2 compliments1 criticism

3 compliments1 criticism

Negative1 to 1

Neutral2 to 1

Positive!3 to 1

Source: Tom Connellan, “Inside the Magic Kingdom”, pgs 91-95

17 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

January 7, 2008Dear Susan,John Smith wrote me the nicest note about the number of positive comments you have been getting on the patient satisfaction surveys. Your patients notice how you check on them every hour and are available to meet their needs. John also told me you are helping interview staff for the unit. This is very important. Thank you for being at our organization!Sincerely,Bob

Employee Thank You Note Sample

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Selection

Select

18 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Impact on Turnover

17.9%

14.2% 15.1%

11.9%

0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%14%16%18%20%

Overall Turnover Nursing Turnover2006 2007 2006 2007Jewish Hospital St. Mary’s Healthcare – Louisville Kentucky, 42,000 discharges, Total beds = 1,900 beds

268 positions retained 75 positions

retained

Total Estimated ROI: $9 million Overall

Tactic and Tool Implemented:

Behavioral and Peer Interviewing

30 and 90 Day Meetings

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

A set of performance standards has been developed by the employees of ______________________ to establish specific behaviors that all employees are expected to practice while on duty.

By incorporating these standards as a measure of overall work performance, ______________________ makes it clear that employees are expected to adhere to and practice the standards of performance outlining the Standards of Performance handbook.

I have read and understand the Standards of Performance handbook and I agree to comply with and practice the standards outlined within.

______________________ _____________________Signature of Applicant Date

…includes a signed agreement and

commitment to the standards and values of

the organization

Application Process: Signing the Standards (Early On)

19 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

InitiativeWhat processes or techniques have you learned to make a

job easier or more effective? What was your discovery process and how did you implement your idea?

Work EnvironmentTell me about a time when your unit was full and you had to care for multiple patients. How did you prioritize your work?

CommunicationDescribe a time when you had a miscommunication with a patient or family member. What did you do and what was

the outcome?

Behavioral Based Questions

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Supervisor asks the following:• How do we compare with what we said?• What’s working well? Have there been any

individuals who have been helpful to you?• Based on your prior work, what ideas for

improvement do you have?• Is there any reason that you feel this is not

the right place for you?• Do you know of anyone who would be a

good fit for our organization?• As your supervisor, how can I help you?

90-Day Meetings

20 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Patient and Families

Performance Gap

Aligned Behavior

Standardization Accelerators

Aligned ProcessAligned Goals

Objective Evaluation

System

Leader Development

Must HavesSM

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Sample distribution of inpatient satisfaction scoreresponses to achieve excellence

99thPercentileHospital

64thPercentileHospital

1’s 2’s 3’s 4’s 5’s

1% 2% 7% 24% 66%

1% 2% 8% 34% 55%

2% 2% 8% 36% 52%35thPercentile

Reference: Press Ganey and Associates, March 2007

Let’s look at Service – 4 vs 5

21 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Patient Prescriptives

• Leader Rounding on Patients• Post Visit Calls• Hourly Rounding• Individualized Patient Care• Bedside Shift Report• AIDET• Pre Visit Calls

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

What is HCAHPS?

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems

• A standardized national patient survey, allowing public sharing of comparable data across all acute care hospitals

22 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Leader Rounding on Patients

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Leader Rounding on Patient -Outcomes

Per

cent

ile Percent

14

4

38

20 1626

95

34

63

74 76

53

98%90%

81%

100%99%92%

0

20

40

60

80

100

PCU SSC MBC MSC WCU BH0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2005 4Q 2006 % Patient Rounded OnSource: Presbyterian Hospital, Albuquerque, NM, Beds = 375

Leader Rounding on Patient

Tactic and Tool Implemented:

23 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Rounding for Patient Outcomes

Set Expectations

Identify Patient and Family Needs

Give instructions on what to do if they do not get the care they expect

Explain the feedback system

Document NeedsRounding with Patients and

Families

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Verification: Leader Rounding on Patient Log

24 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Outcomes: Rounding on Patients“Did a Nurse Manager Visit You During Your Stay?”

96th96th89th

96th

45th

8th14th

44th

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Overall Nurses Section Response toConcerns/Complaints

Likelihood toRecommend

Nat

iona

l Per

cent

ile R

anki

ng

Yes

No

Source: Inpatient surveys received April 22-June 4, 2007n=361 surveys (55%=YES; 44%=NO)

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Post Visit Phone Calls

Saves Lives

25 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Reality of Adverse Events Post Discharge

Type of Adverse Events

66%17%

5%

8%

4%

Adverse Drug Event

Procedure Related

Nosocomial Infection

Fall

Other

* 81 events occurred in 76 patients

“Nearly 1 in 5 patients”*

400 patients surveyed

76 (19%) had adverse events after discharge

* “Adverse Events After Discharge from Hospital”, Annals of Internal Medicine, February 2003

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Post Visit Calls: Patient Perception of Care - Inpatient

75

98

76

98

60

99

56

98

59

98

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3Q06 4Q06 1Q07 2Q07 3Q07

No Call Call

“Likelihood of Recommending”

Source: Hackensack University Medical Center, Inpatient admissions=75,297, Total beds = 781

Post Visit Calls - Discharge Call Manager

Tactic and Tool Implemented:

Perc

en

tile

Ran

k

Inpatient Admissions

= 75,297

26 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Post Visit Calls:Patient Perception of Care - ED

27

76

47

88

32

87

62

95

63

93

47

77

25

76

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1Q 06 2Q06 3Q06 4Q06 1Q07 2Q07 3Q07

No Call Call

“Likelihood of Recommending”

Perc

en

tile

Ran

k

Source: Emergency Department, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, ED Visits: 85,034

Post Visit Calls - Discharge Call Manager

Tactic and Tool Implemented:

85,034 ED Visits

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Hourly Rounding

Preventing Falls, Decubuti and Restraints

27 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

13,216

9,3168,315

0

3,000

6,000

9,000

12,000

15,000

Pre-Rounding Weeks 1-2 Weeks 3-4

One Hour

1 Hour Rounding/29 beds

37.8% reduction

* Reduction for one-hour was statistically significant (p=.000)

Call L

igh

t R

ing

s

Call Light Reductions After Implementing Rounds

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

One Hour: n=18 units

79.991.9

0

20

40

60

80

100

Pre One Hour Rounding During One Hour Rounding

1 Hour Rounding +12.0 point

mean increase

Overa

ll N

urs

ing

Service: Patient Satisfaction Increased

28 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

25

12

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Pre One-Hour During One hour

1 Hour Rounding 50% reduction

Pati

en

t Falls

(n=18 units)

Quality: Patient Falls Reduced

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

7

5

0

2

4

6

8

10

Pre One-Hour During One hour

1 Hour Rounding 14% reduction

No

soco

mia

l D

ecu

bit

i

(n=9 units)

Quality: Skin Breakdown Reduced

29 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Hourly Rounding Steps

8. Document the round on chart.

7. Tell each patient when you will be back.

6. Close the conversation.

5. Conduct an environmental assessment.

4. Assess additional comfort needs.

3. Address the 3 P’s of pain, position and potty.

2. Perform scheduled tasks. (Explain and Duration)

1. Use opening key words to reduce anxiety.

Hourly Rounding

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Key Words at Key Times

Reducing Anxiety

30 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Things said and done to “connect

the dots” and help patients,

staff and physicians

understand why we do things and what is going on.

Key Words at Key Times

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Studer Group Five Fundamentals

A

I

D

E

T

Acknowledge

Introduce

Duration

Explanation

Thank You

31 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Outcome - Outpatient Satisfaction

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

July

-04

Sep

t-04

Nov

-04

Jan-

05

Mar

ch-0

5

May

-05

July

-05

Sep

t-05

Nov

-05

Jan-

06

Mar

ch-0

6

May

-06

July

-06

Sep

t-06

Nov

-06

Jan-

07

Mar

ch-0

7

May

-07

July

-07

Sep

t-07

AIDET Training Began

Source: Advocate Good Samaritan Hospital, Downers Grove, IL, Beds = 303, Admissions = 17,486, measured by Press Ganey Associates, Inc.

AIDET

Tactic and Tool Implemented:

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Improved clinical

outcomes and increased

patient and physician

satisfaction

Advantages of AIDETSM

DecreasedAnxiety

IncreasedCompliance+ =

Decrease anxiety with increased compliance

32 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Performance Gap

* Principle 4

Must HavesSM

Aligned Behavior

Standardization Accelerators

Aligned ProcessAligned Goals

Objective Evaluation

System

Leader Development

Performance Gap

Aligned Behavior

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

“We get more quality, productivity and service by focusing on our high

performers rather than low performers.”

Bob Murphy, R.N., Esq., FACHENational Speaker/CoachStuder Group

33 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Definition

Professionalism

Teamwork

Knowledge & Competence

Communication

Comes to work on timeGood attitudeProblem solvesYou relax when they are scheduledGood influenceUse of peer interviewsPillar ownershipBrings solutions

Safety Awareness

Adheres to policies concerning breaks, personal phone calls, leaving the work area, and other absences from work.

Demonstrates high commitment to making things better for their team and organization as a whole.

Eager to change for the good of the organization. Strives for continuous professional development.Consistently communicates organizational. Does not create we/they. Provides frequent feedback to staff.Demonstrates the behaviors of safety awareness in all aspects of work.

H

Definition of High Performer

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Definition

Professionalism

Teamwork

Knowledge & Competence

Communication

Good attendanceLoyal most of timeInfluenced by high and low performerWants to do a good jobCould just need more experienceHelps manager be aware of problems

Safety Awareness

Usually adheres to policies concerning breaks, personal phone calls, leaving the work area, and other absences from work.

Committed to improving performance of their team and organization. May require coaching to fully execute.

Invested in own professional developments. May require some coaching to fully execute.

Usually communicates organizational information. Occasionally uses we/they language. Provides some feedback to staff.

Demonstrates the behaviors of safety awareness in all aspects of work.

M

Definition of Middle Performer

34 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Definition

Professionalism

Teamwork

Knowledge & Competence

Communication

Points out problems in a negative wayPositions leadership poorlyMaster of “We/They”Passive aggressiveThinks they will outlast the leaderSays manager is the problem

Safety Awareness

Does not communicate effectively about absences from work. Handles personal phone calls in a manner that interferes with work. Breaks last longer than allowed.

Demonstrates little commitment to their team and the organization.

Shows little interest in improving own performance or the performance of the organization. Develops professional skills only when asked.

Does not communicate organizational information. Uses language to create we/they culture. Does not provide feedback.

Performs work with little regard to the behaviors of safety awareness.

L

Definition of Low Performer

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Moving the High Performers

• Tell them where the organization is going• Thank them for their work• Outline why they are so important• Ask if there is anything you can do for

them

35 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Person with Middle Performance Conversation

Reassure individual goal is to retain• S : Support

– Describe good qualities – calm down their anxiety

• C : Coach– Cover development opportunity

• S : Support– Reaffirm good qualities

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Person with Low Performance Conversation

Does not start meeting on a positive note• D : Describe

– Describe what has been observed.• E : Evaluate

– Evaluate how you feel.• S : Show

– Show what needs to be done.• K : Know

– Know consequences of continued same performance.

• Follow up

36 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

What Has Been Accomplished?

• Leader demonstrates concern and care for team member

• Leader demonstrates commitment to team member professional development

• Leader affirms and shows appreciation for high and middle

• Leader lets people with sub-par performance know exactly where they stand and next steps for their performance

• Leader role models value driven leadership

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Frequently Asked Questions

• What if a person is good clinically and good with the patient but cannot work with co-workers?

• What about the high performer who has an attendance problem?

• What if the sub-par performer has been in organization a long time?

• What if my leader is a sub-par performer?

• If I deal with staff with performance issues and other leaders do not, will people think I am a mean leader?

• What if all past evaluations are good?

• What if I have not documented well?

• What if HR protects people?

37 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Standardization

* Principle 1 & 2

Must HavesSM Performance

Gap

Aligned Behavior Aligned ProcessAligned Goals

Objective Evaluation

System

Leader Development AcceleratorsStandardization

Aligned Processes

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

What hospitals might standardize

• Agendas• Supervisory Meeting Model• Staff Selection and the First 90 Days• Employee Forums• Communication Boards• Verification• Rounding Times

38 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Board Agenda Sample

• Community Needs Assessment Status

• % of employee volunteers

• New Patient Volume Growth

• Surgical Growth

• No-shows

• Operating Margin (MTD / YTD)

• Turnover

• Turnover –First 90 Days

• Employee Satisfaction and Retention

• Agency Costs

• Vacancies

• Key Clinical Indicator Review

• Medication Errors

• Reduction of Patient Falls

• Patient Satisfaction

• Physician Satisfaction

CommunityGrowthFinancePeopleQualityService

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Department Head Agenda Sample

• Upcoming Safety Fairs and Community Events

• Volume compared to budget

• Specific Service line growth

• No-shows

• ED Diversion

• LWBS

• Operating Margin

• Cash Collections

• AR days

• Turnover

• Upcoming hospital celebrations

• Upcoming Peer Interview training

• Standard of the Month

• Key Clinical Indictors –results for the organization

• LOS

• Patient Satisfaction all service lines

• Patient letter

CommunityGrowthFinancePeopleQualityService

39 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Department Specific Agenda Sample

• Upcoming safety fair

• Department employee recognition for volunteer hours

• Dept admissions

• Community events

• Hospital growth YTD

• Dept productivity

• Dept supply costs

• Key actions for staff to take next 30 days

• Hospital financial perform-ance YTD

• Introduce new employee

• Dept turnover

• Peer interview update

• Upcoming training activities

• Reward and recognition

• Dept quality indicators

• Dept LOS• Key action

steps for staff to take next 30 days

• New tools and equipment

• Dept patient satisfaction

• Patient comments

• What we have improved

• Where we need to focus

• Ideas from staff

• Post visit phone calls

CommunityGrowthFinancePeopleQualityService

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Studer Group Supervisory Meeting ModelLeaders bring the following items and results to

their immediate supervisor:• Leader Evaluation • Monthly Report Card• 90-Day Plan-Professional Development• Linkage Grid from Leadership Development

Institute (LDI)• Rounding Logs • Thank you notes • People Trends and Issues-Standards of

Behavior

40 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Verification Tools - Samples

Employee:• Leader Rounding on

Employee Log• 30 and 90 Day New

Employee Meeting Report

• Thank you Note Grid

Patient:• Leader Rounding on

Patient Log• Hourly Rounding Log• IPC Rounding Log• Bedside Shift Report

Rounding Log• AIDET Interaction

Assessment

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Accelerators

Must HavesSM

Performance Gap

Aligned Behavior

Standardization

Aligned ProcessAligned Goals

Objective Evaluation

System

Leader Development Accelerators

Aligned Processes

41 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Accelerators

• Leader Evaluation Manager (LEM)• Staff Evaluation Manager (SEM)• Discharge Call Manager (DCM)• Rounding Manager• Idea Express

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

It is not about 4’s and 5’s …. but

saving lives

42 © 2008 Studer Groupwww.studergroup.com

What’s Right in Health CareSM | Evidence to Outcomes

Purpose, Worthwhile Work

and Making a Difference

Thank You!

Bob Murphy, RN, Esq., FACHECell (850) 393-4481

[email protected]