An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October...
-
Upload
neil-osborne -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
1
Transcript of An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October...
![Page 1: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
An Introduction to Development Ethics
Formulation of USAID White Paper
on Development EthicsOctober 2011
![Page 2: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
CONCEPTS OF DEVELOPMENT ETHICS
moral agency; thinking and acting ethically
![Page 3: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Goal: Human Flourishing/Well-being
• Successful execution of a rational plan of life, by which the person determines the good for himself or herself.
• John Rawls
• “That human persons are flourishing means that their lives are good, or worthwhile, in the broadest sense.”
• Thomas Pogge
![Page 4: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Moral Vocabulary?
• Myth of value-neutrality• “Us” and “Them”
– North and South– experts/managers and “beneficiaries”
• Ethics as rules vs. ethics as principled motivation
• Ethical thinking, ethical discernment– Ethical justification
• Development
![Page 5: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
“Development”
• More than “democracy”• What it isn’t
– Goulet’s “triple curse” of underdevelopment• Poverty
• Powerlessness
• Hopelessness
• The translation of economic opportunities into social opportunities
• Stability and peace• Democracy and participation• Justice, human freedoms/human rights
![Page 6: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Reality Checkethics & morality?
Developing Country Context:Widespread povertyResource scarcityWeak institutionsInadequate infrastructureShallow (if any) democracyCorruptionGender inequality, SGBVMarginalized populations under threatEnvironment under stressUnmanaged land usePoor or no planningSignificant health challengesInadequate education, brain-drainViolent conflict, injustice
![Page 7: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Why “Morality”?
• An important way of thinking about development ~ moving beyond Codes of Conduct or disclosure rules
• Qualitative focus to “development” ~ pursued through discernment and moral intuition– Development for what? For whom?– Development meaning what? Who defines this?– How much is enough? Who gets to decide?– Who is responsible for development? Why?– What about trade-offs? And the losers?
![Page 8: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Moral content?
• In less developed countries, growing extremes of wealth and poverty– A pampered elite vs. those suffering the most
crushing human poverty– Instability, violent conflict, impunity
• Stability and development depend on social order ~ and social order comes from: – social contract ~ an agreement to “behave”
– power and coercion (and sometimes tyranny)
– cooperation and caring
– competition ~ with rules and tradeoffs
![Page 9: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Human Dignity ?
• What to do in societies seemingly hostile to the concept of human dignity?– Severe and worsening poverty – Deprivation of opportunities– Loss of hope, limited options– Loss of “voice”, lack of power – Dehumanization, extreme violence, SGBV
• Is respecting universal human dignity an important goal of development that ought to be prioritized by USAID?– Merely rhetoric?
![Page 10: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Pursuit of the Common Good ~ 1
• Policies and actions that best serve to promote the essential components of human well-being or flourishing for each person or
• Going for the best net score of individual interests within and among the whole community (utilitarian) – i.e. sacrifices some people’s interests to further
that of many others
![Page 11: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Pursuit of the Common Good ~ 2
• What is the “common good”?– Subject to moral disagreements– Identified, agreed upon, and “owned” only through
a participatory and deliberative democratic process
• reasoning together ~ respectfully
• How does good governance facilitate the articulation of a society’s sense of the common good?
![Page 12: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Pursuit of the Common Good ~ 3
• Unavoidable trade-offs– “A moral justification must be provided to
justify this sacrifice of perceived self-interest, and not simply the weight of majority interests.”
• Richard Flathman
– Measuring the impact of trade-offs ~ a decision-maker’s role
• “advocate” or “expert”?• legitimacy?
![Page 13: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Common Good Goals: Stability, Safety and Security
• Conditions of stability, order, predictability, and freedom from bodily harm
• Healthy environment ~ to live within a country without becoming ill, or dying early
• Economic security– Access to employment and/or other forms of
welfare
• Rule of law and defense institutions that ensure safety ~ police, judiciary, military
![Page 14: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Participation & Voice ~ Who Governs? Why? How?
• Power, wealth, and “voice” concentrated at the center ~ national governments & elites– Weak or no accountability to non-elites, women,
marginalized groups
• Governments generally fail to:– Offer and sustain vision-driven leadership– Demonstrate a public service ethos– Manage equitable distribution– Facilitate local participation– Listen to non-elite citizens
![Page 15: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Participation and Inclusion ~ 1
• In conditions of scarcity, who ought to decide:– What “good” development and “good” governance
mean – What the obligations of good governance impose,
and when they must be met – What should be done when “good governance”
values clash with other values • Where’s the balance?
– Popular participation in governance vs. representative democratic institutions of government vs. elite control
– Hijacking or manipulating public participation
![Page 16: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Participation and Inclusion ~ 2
• Is meaningful popular participation in decision-making a realistic expectation?– expensive, prolonged, subject to failure– who identifies the “stakeholders”? on what basis?
who is excluded? why? with what mandate?
• Does donor-facilitated “stakeholder participation” reflect accurate demographic and power realities?
![Page 17: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Participation and Inclusion ~ 3
• Deliberative Democracy is an ideal, not wholly a practical objective– What role for ideals and principles?
• “Careful structuring” of the participatory and deliberative process: – Differentiate and consider different views of means
and ends of development and good governance– Balance between expert opinion and public values– Everyone has voice, everyone is listened to
![Page 18: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Moral Visibility
• Illustrative moral and ethical dimensions:– freedoms and opportunities ~ who enjoys?– land ownership & access rights ~ who controls?– environmental/ecological integrity ~ who profits?– inequitable distribution ~ “trickle down”– rights of vulnerable & marginalized minorities– democracy, deliberation, and participation – gender equality and women’s empowerment– reducing corruption and promoting integrity– mitigating/preventing violent conflict – caring about people and the environment– modeling public service
![Page 19: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Ideals ~ 1
• Social justice– Fair, even-handed treatment of all individuals and
groups within a society– Prerequisite for the achievement of human
flourishing • Rasmussen
• Care– The “caring relationship” between self and others
• Gilligan
![Page 20: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Ideals ~ 2
• Distributive justice– On what basis should social institutions distribute
burdens and benefits? Enforced how?• John Rawls
• Civic virtue, integrity, transformative leadership, “followership”
• Aristotle• Joanne Ciulla
• Human rights and freedoms • Amartya Sen
![Page 21: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Reality Check
• “Survival takes priority over dignity”– Margalit
• Political leadership in the South is often top-down or even autocratic – Neither accountable nor inclusive– Seldom issues-driven
• Power prevails over principles– Low public expectations of integrity– Thin view of the “public good”, weak social capital– Large segments of the population (women) lack
voice
![Page 22: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
ETHICAL GOVERNANCE
moral demands and “good” governance
![Page 23: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Moral Demands
• Human rights claimants and duty bearers– What happens when human rights cannot be met
right away?
• Basic human needs met first– In scarcity, how distributed?
• Centralized planning, or the free market?
• Expecting and enforcing good governance– Is democracy enough?
• Demanding tangible performance standards from public servants
![Page 24: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Challenge to Good Governance
• What ought decision-makers to do to respect and respond to those moral demands that recognition of basic human dignity entails?
• What about:– social justice and equity? – human flourishing? – the common good? – participation and inclusion? – safety, stability and security? – a caring, compassionate society?– democratic values?– social capital?
![Page 25: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Development … For What?
• Ideals of human and social well-being• The “decent society” ~ honor in equal
measure = universal human dignity– Margalit
• Respecting what is “truly human” – Rousseau, Kant, Nussbaum, Sen
• Achieving freedom and human agency– Sen, Crocker
![Page 26: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES
core methodology of normative analysis
![Page 27: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Five Objections
1) Moral issues are largely arbitrary and subjective in nature, changing in scope and intensity
2) Seeking common ground on moral concerns risks upsetting the status quo
3) The quality of a moral dialogue on substantive issues depends upon uncommon tolerance, reflection, mutual respect, and a deliberative ethos ~ rare in governance processes
4) Moral values and systems are largely unreliable in policy making ~ universalism vs. relativism
5) Moral values are extremely difficult to measure, monitor and evaluate
![Page 28: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Response to #1
moral issues are largely arbitrary and subjective in nature, changing in scope and intensity•Morality is not arbitrary
– persuasively justified and rational– ethics is the systematic and critical study of moral
beliefs, values and concerns •In ethics, our values and beliefs are organized into various (and to some extent, competing) systems, each of which exhibits coherence and matches our considered judgments and deeply felt beliefs
![Page 29: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Response to #2
seeking common ground on moral concerns risks upsetting the status quo•Yes ~ attending to moral concerns risks upsetting the status quo by thoughtfully challenging the existing economic and power relationships within any given society •The existence of widespread poverty, corruption, injustice, and the lack of universal respect for human dignity demand such a challenge
![Page 30: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Response to #3
the quality of a moral dialogue on substantive issues depends upon uncommon tolerance, reflection, mutual respect, and a deliberative ethos•If this claim were accepted, it would be difficult to imagine a society’s moral progress over time•Leadership of morally virtuous persons is not a necessary condition to progress•The application of an ethical framework to the participatory process may facilitate a moral dialogue of substance and quality
![Page 31: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Response to #4
moral values and systems are largely unreliable in policy making•Certain values are universal and fundamental to human nature
– e.g. Universal Declaration of Human Rights
•Local culture, tradition, and context ought to significantly influence and shape the implementation of development initiatives
– provided they are responsive to universal values
![Page 32: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Response to #5moral values are extremely difficult to measure, monitor and evaluate•Empirical data says much about progress in achieving morally desirable goals
– birth weight of babies ~ a good proxy for measuring shortcomings in quality of life and the need for better nutrition and health care
•Qualitative factors are subject to meaningful evaluation through a variety of techniques, from focus groups to surveys
– the experience of poverty, the enjoyment of basic freedoms and opportunities, and the prevalence of respect for human dignity
![Page 33: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
DATA DRIVEN ETHICAL DEVELOPMENT
measuring ethical progress in development
![Page 34: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Measuring development ~ 1
• Poverty thresholds (Collier’s “Bottom Billion”)• 8 Millennium Development Goals• Happiness and well-being; human suffering• Women’s empowerment; gender equity• Political freedom
– free, partly free, not free (Freedom House)
• Economic progress– gross domestic product (GDP)– gross national product (GNP)– physical quality of life index (PQLI)
![Page 35: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Measuring development ~ 2
• Human Development Index (HDI)• Capability Approach• Level and quality of democracy• USAID’s Strategic Framework for Africa
– Reduce corruption
– Increase civil society’s effectiveness
– Strengthen democratic governance and rule of law
– Increase participation of marginalized groups
– Improve fairness and inclusivity of political processes
![Page 36: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Standard Tools for Evaluating Development
• Through the Democracy & Good Governance Lens– Political economy analysis
• Power, rules of the competitive game• Who is included, who is excluded?
– Economic analyses• Market analysis• Cost-benefit analysis
– Perceptions analysis• “Customer” satisfaction• Service delivery
![Page 37: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Less Conventional (for USAID) Tools for Evaluating Development
• Through the Democracy & Good Governance Lens – Human development analysis (HDI)– Other normative analyses
• Human rights, capability approach, Kantian duties
– Environmental analysis– Gender analysis & gender audits
![Page 38: An Introduction to Development Ethics Formulation of USAID White Paper on Development Ethics October 2011.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649de75503460f94ae1726/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
“It is one thing to design democratic institutions, quite another to educate or persuade citizens to live by democratic precepts.”
~ Laurence Whitehead