Appreciative Inquiry foundation course (français) 2014 - Appreciative Inquiry France
An Introduction to Appreciative Inquiry Dr John Peters Academic Development and Practice Unit...
-
Upload
darlene-skinner -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of An Introduction to Appreciative Inquiry Dr John Peters Academic Development and Practice Unit...
An Introduction to Appreciative Inquiry
Dr John PetersAcademic Development and Practice Unit
October 2008
A word to describe working at UW
• Demanding• Frustrating• Challenging• Soul destroying
• unfolding• Exciting• Weaving• Exciting• empowering• New
Learning Outcomes
• Set Appreciative Inquiry in the context of other applied research methods
• Explain the key features of Appreciative Inquiry methodology
• Make an informed judgement about whether to use this method for:– Research– Change Management
• Implement a piece of Appreciative Inquiry
Plan
• Explain the emergence of Appreciative Inquiry as a method
• Introduce the AI framework
• Do a small piece of AI
• Discuss other applications
Appreciative Inquiry• Ap-pre’ci-ate, v., 1. valuing; the act of recognizing the
best in people or the world around us; affirming past and present strengths, successes, and potentials; to perceive those things that give life (health, vitality, excellence) to living systems 2. to increase in value, e.g. the economy has appreciated in value. Synonyms: valuing, prizing, esteeming, and honouring.
• In-quire’ (kwir), v., 1. the act of exploration and discovery. 2. To ask questions; to be open to seeing new potentials and possibilities. Synonyms: discovery, search, and systematic exploration, study.
What is it?• A reaction against problem-focused action
research• Shifts focus to strengths and positives, to the
‘positive core’ of a situation or organisation• Focus on social construction & collective
strengths• ‘A cooperative, coevolutionary search for the
best in people, their organizations, and the world around them.’
– [Cooperrider & Whitney 2005]
The Key Question in AI
• The ‘unconditional positive question’
• The systematic discovery of what gives “life” to a living system when it is most alive, most effective, and most constructively capable in economic, ecological, and human terms.
• What gives life here?
The 4-D cycle
• Discovery Phase– Sharing the positives
• Dream Phase– Sharing a vision
• Design Phase– Sharing what should be
• Destiny Phase– Sharing a commitment to change
1. Discovery Phase
• What gives life here?
• Making explicit and appreciating the best of what is
• What most enthuses you about …?
• Tell the story about a situation when you have felt most alive, engaged, valued, etc.
• Mobilising the community and sharing findings through ‘propositional statements’
Things that give life at UW 1
• The people: they encourage you and help you innovate and do things
• If you have an idea you are encouraged to develop it
• I have the opportunity to work in line with my core values and beliefs
• I have the opportunity to be creative and discover new things
Things that give life at UW 2
• The students: their enthusiasm, challenge and contribution
• Opportunity to develop personally and own learning with students and colleagues
• The opportunity to make narratives from disparate sources
• Being part of a community that caters for personal and professional development
Propositional statements
• I feel life in working at Worcester when:– There are opportunities for personal
development– There is freedom and flexibility to develop
ideas– There is encouragement and support– I can work pro-actively with students– My work is in line with my core motivational
drivers, values and beliefs
2. Dream Phase
• Envisioning what might be
• So what is at our heart?
• What should be the ideal?
• What have we always wanted to be?
• What is the world calling us to become?
• Picturing a future: drawing a vision
Visions of the University of Worcester
• Constant circulation of positive energy
• Nourishing
• Open
• Growing, organic – no ceiling or limit
• Connected
• Community and participatory
• Inclusive and non-hierarchical
3. Design Phase
• Co-constructing
• What should we be?
• Possibility propositions and new organising principles
• What would this organisation be like if it were designed to maximise the positive core and accelerate the achievement of our dream?
4. Destiny Phase
• Not the action plan!
• ‘An inspired movement not a packaged product’
• ‘Positive protest’
• Realising the dream
• An appreciative organisation
Can we use this?
• As an evaluation process
• As an annual cycle
• Constant renewal
• Still issues about – action planning: how does it get changed?– So what about the negatives?
• As a marketing device!
References• Cooperrider, D & Whitney, D 2005 Appreciative
Inquiry: a positive revolution in change, San Francisco
• Ludema, J. Whitney, D. Mohr, B. & Griffin, T. 2003 The Appreciative Inquiry Summit, San Fancisco
• Ludema, J. Cooperrider, D & Barrett, F. 2001 ‘Appreciative Inquiry: the power of the unconditional positive’ in Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. Handbook of Action Research
• http://ai.cwru.edu