an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...
Transcript of an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...
![Page 1: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
AN INTERVENTIONAL STUDY ON THE KNOWLEDGE ATTITUDE AND PRACTICE ON HAND FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE AMONG THE
PARENTS OR CAREGIVERS OF CHILDREN AGED 10 AND BELOW AT NANGA SEKUAU RESETTLEMENT SCHEME
FROM 26TH MARCH TO 10TH JUNE 2012
4th Year Medical Students Community Medicine and Public Health Posting MDP40210
Group 1 (Rotation 1)
Posting Coordinators
Prof Dr Mohd Raili Suhaili Dr Cliffton Akoi
Group Members
Abu Zarin bin Zahari Kiu Kuong Lung Nurul Shahirah binti Abdul Shukor Adrian Loo Wei Nam Ling Kho Lee Rachel Kamea Aqilah binti Zaidan Ling Kok Yung Rebecca anak Tuloi Bong Pao Yub Muhammad Rifai bin Ishak Sim Joo Ching (hIm Hock Peng Muna Fahima binti Zainuddin Sumayyah binti Hashim
ihing Nor Izziatie Eliany binti Alias Tee Jie Xi QR )evi alp R Sivarajah Nur Inani binti Ahmad Tarmizi Teh Thian Ping
46 zhar bin Kiprawi Nuraishah binti Md Nor Yoganantham all Kodiesarn 161 Theng Nurul Fadlin binti Rosli 2012
d
FACULTY OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES
An Interventional Study on the Knowledge Attitude and Practice on Hand Foot and
Mouth Disease among the Parents or Caregivers of Children Aged 10 and Below at Nanga
Sekuau Resettlement Scheme from 26th of March to 10th June 2012
4th Year Medical Students
Community Medicine and Public Health Posting MDP 40210
Group 1 (Rotation 1)
Posting Coordinators
Prof Dr Mohd Raili Suhaili
Dr Cliffton Akoi
Abu Zarin bin Zahari Kiu Kuong Lung Nurul Shahirah binti Abdul Shukor
Adrian Loo Wei Nam Ling Kho Lee Rachel Kamea
Aqilah binti Zaidan Ling Kok Yung Rebecca anak Tuloi
Bong Pao Yub Muhammad Rifai bin Ishak Sim Joo Ching
Chan Hock Peng Muna Fahima binti Zainuddin Sumayyah binti Hashim
HoWei Shing Nor lzziatie Eliany binti Alias Tee Jie Xi
Kamini Devi alp RSi varajah Nur lnani binti Ahmad Tarmizi Teh Thian Ping
Khairul Azhar bin Kiprawi Nuraishah binti Md Nor Yoganantham all Kodiesarn
Khoo Ee Theng Nurul Fadlin binti Rosli
DECLARATION
We declare that this research originates from our own effort except for certain facts and citations
with which the sources have been clearly listed in the bibliography
Abu Zarin Bin Zahari 23028
Adrian Loo Wei N am 23040
Aqilah Binti Zaidan 23155
BongPaoYub 20726
Chan Hock Peng 23259
Ho Wei Shing 23607
Kamini Devi NP RSivarajah 23714
Khairul Azhar Bin Kiprawi 21206
Khoo Ee Theng 23757
Kiu Kuong Lung 18723
Ling Kho Lee 23882
Ling Kok Yung 23883
Muhammad Rifai Bin Ishak 24223
Muna Fahima Binti Zainuddin 24241
Nor Izziatie Eliany Binti Alias 21789
Nur Inani Binti Ahmad Tarmizi 24596
Nuraishah Binti Md Nor 24654
Nurul Fadlin Binti Rosli 19611
Nurul Shahirah Binti Abdul Shukor 24767
Rachel Kamea 24855
Rebecca Anak Tuloi 22164
Sim Joo Ching 25024
Sumayyah Binti Hashim 25182
Tee Jie Xi 20116
Teh Thian Ping 25269
Yoganantham AIL Kodiesaren 25426
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost we are deeply indebted to our posting coordinator Dr CJiffton Akoi
and aU the lecturers of the Department of Community Medicine and Public Health for their
professional supervision and guidance throughout this posting We would also like to extend our
gratitude to our supervisors Prof Dr Mohd Raili Suhaili Dr Cliffton Akoi Dr Mohd Mizanur
Rahman and Dr Helmy Hazrni for their assistance and support in this study In addition much
appreciation goes to the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University Malaysia Sarawak
(UNIMAS) for providing us a chance to do this study and to interact with the local long house
community During this study we have learned to appreciate this new culture and realized the
value of working together as a team We would also like to extend our deepest appreciation to
Mr Sukran Kana Community Development Officer and a special thank you to the Tuai-tuai
Rumah and Sekuau Community for their endless cooperation Last but not least we would also
like to thank the medical team from Lanang and Oya Clinic as well as the UNIMAS drivers
They have worked hard and provided a huge contribution to making this study a success
111
1
ABSTRACT
Hand Foot and Mouth Disease (HFMD) is now considered an emerging infectious disease that
affects the population worldwide In order to cope with the high prevalence of HFMD in
Malaysia level of knowledge and awareness among the population should be assessed so that
appropriate interventions can be carried out The objective of this study was to study the
knowledge attitude and practice on HFMD among the parents or caregivers of children aged 10
years and below at Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme from 26th of March to 10th of June 2012
The results obtained were then using as the baseline data to conduct an intervention beneficial to
the community to enhance their level of knowledge attitude and practice towards HFMD Data
collection was done by face to face interview using interview-based questionnaire Data analysis
was done using SPSS software version 200 Results showed that 611 of the respondents had
good knowledge 522 had good attitude while 558 had good preventive practice towards
HFMD Analysis found a significant association between total knowledge score and the level of
education (plt005) Similar significant association was found between total attitude score and
leveJ of education (plt005) and marital status (plt005) However no significant association was
found between total practice score and socio-demographic characteristics A positive correlation
was found between the knowledge and attitude (pltOOI) as well as attitude and practice
(pltOOOl) Post-intervention study showed significant improvement in the knowledge on mode
of spread of HFMD (plt005) but no significant increase in the t~tal level of knowledge attitude
and practice (pgt005) In conclusion there is a great need for intensive intervention in order to
enhance their awareness on HFMD among the respondents
iv
ABSTRAK
Penyakit Tangan Kaki dan Mulut (HFMD) kini dianggap penyakit berjangkit yang baru muncul
yang memberi kesan terhadap penduduk di seluruh dunia Bagi menghadapi HFMD ynag kerap
berlaku di Malaysia tahap pengetahuan dan kesedaran dalam kalangan penduduk perlu dinilai
supaya campur tangan yang sesuai boleh dijalankan Objektif kajian ini adalah untuk mengkaji
pengetahuan sikap dan amalan mengenai HFMD dalam kalangan ibu bapa atau penjaga
kanak-kanak berusia 10 tahun dan ke bawah di Skim Penempatan Semula Nanga Sekuau dari 26
Mac hingga 10 Jun 2012 Keputusan yang diperoleh digunakan sebagai data asas untuk
menjalankan campur tang an yang dapat memberi manfaat kepada masyarakat bagi
meningkatkan tahap pengetahuan sikap dan amalan ke arah HFMD Pengumpulan data telah
dilakukan melalui temuduga secara bersemuka dengan menggunakan soal selidik berasaskan
temubual Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan perisian SPSS versi 200 Hasil kajian
menunjukkan bahawa 611 responden mempunyai pengetahuan yang baik 522 mempunyai
sikap yang baik manakala 558 mempunyai amalan pencegahan yang baik ke arah HFMD
Analisis mendapati terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara skor pengetahuan jumlah dan
tahap pendidikan (p lt005) dan antara jumlah skor sikap dan tahap pendidikan (p lt005) dan
status perkahwinan (p lt005) Walau bagaimanapun tiada hubungan yang signifikan antara
jumlah skor amalan dan ciri-ciri sosio-demografi Terdapat hubungan positif yang ditemui
antara pengetahuan dan sikap (p lt001) serta sikap dan amalan (p lt0001) Kajian pascashy
campur tangan menunjukkan peningkatan yang ketara dalam pengetahuan tentang cara
penularan HFMD (p lt005) tetapi tidak ada peningkatan yang ketara dalam jumlah tahap
pengetahuan skap dan amalan (pgt 005) Kesimpulannya campur tangan intensif amat
diperlukan untuk meningkatkan kesedaran terhadap HFMD dalam kalangan responden
v
1
ue t Khidmat ~u UUla
tT VERSm MALAYSIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Declaration ii
Abstract lV
List of Abbreviations XVl
Acknowledgements iii
Abstrak v
Table of Contents vi
List of Appendices middot xi
List of Tables xii
List of Figures xiv
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW
11 Introduction
12 Background information 2
13 Statement of problem 3
14 Significance of the study 4
15 Literature review 5
151 Epidemiology 5
152 Risk factors 7
153 Symptoms and signs 8
154 Causative agent 11
155 Mode of spread 11
156 Complications 12
157 Diagnosis and investigations 13
158 M anagement 13
159 Preventive measures 14
1510 Knowledge attitude and practice 15
vi
16
1
I
Research objectives 17
161 General objective 17
162 Specific objectives 17
17 Hypotheses 18
18 Operational definition 19
19 Conceptual framework 21
CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY
21 Research design and setting 22
22 Population and sampling 22
221 Inclusion criteria 23
222 Exclusion criteria 23
23 Variable 23
24 Data collection 24
241 Study instruments 24
242 Procedures 24
243 Ethical issues 25
25 Data entry analysis and interpretation 26
26 Re earch timeline 27
CHAPTER 3 HEALTH INTERVENTION REPORT
31 Introduction 29
32 Objectives 29
33 Health intervention activities 29
331 A day with community ice breaking 30
332 Health intervention programme Prevent HFMD You Can Make A Change 31
333 Mini health intervention programme 38
34 Evaluation of intervention programme 39
35 Awareness of health intervention programme 39
36 Attendance of respondents 39
vii
I
Satisfactory rating of the programme 37
Benefit from the health intervention programme 38
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS
Introduction41
Socio-demographic characteristics 42
421 Age
422 Gender
423 Race
424 Marital status
425 Educational level
426 Employment status
427 Relationship with children
43 Knowledge on HFMD
431 Source of information on HFMD
432 Level of knowledge (Mode of spread)
433 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms)
434 Level of knowledge (Treatment)
435 Level of knowledge (Prevention)
436 Total score of knowledge
437 As ociation between level of knowledge and each socio-demographic
characteristic
44 Level of attitude
441 Total level of attitude
442 Association between level of attitude and eac~ socio-demographic
characteristic
viii
39
40
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
48
51
52
53
54
55
58
60
60
63
--1
45 Level of practice 65
451 Total score of practice 65
452 Association between level of practice and each socio-demographic 67
characteristic
453 Choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD symptoms 69
46 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 70
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
461 Relationship between knowledge and attitude 70
462 Relationship between knowledge and practice 70
463 Relationship between attitude and practice 70
47 Post-intervention results 71
471 Introduction 71
472 Level of knowledge 71
4721 Level ofknowledge (Mode of spread) 72
4722 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms) 73
4723 Level of knowledge (Treatment) 74
4724 Level of knowledge (Prevention) 75
4725 Post intervention total level of knowledge 76
4726 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socio- 79
demographic characteristics
4727 Comparing the means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
473 Level of attitude 82
4731 Post intervention total level of attitude 82
4732 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic 85
characteri tics
4733 Comparing the means of total attitude score Defore and after intervention 87
474 Level of practice 88
4741 Post intervention total level of practice 88
4742 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic 90
characteristics
4743 Comparing the means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
ix
J
CHAPTERS DISCUSSION
50 Introduction 93
51 Health intervention 93
511 Source of knowledge 93
512 Level of knowledge 94
513 Association between level of knowledge and socio-demographic factors 96
514 Level of attitude 97
515 Association between level of attitude and socio-demographic factors 98
516 Level of practice 100
517 Association between level of practice and socio-demographic factors 101
518 Choice of place of treatment if the child shows signs and symptoms of HFMD 102
519 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 103
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
52 Po t-intervention discussion 104
521 Post intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 104
522 Post intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 105
523 Post intervention changes in practice on HFMD 105
524 Relationship between the changes of knowledge attitude and practice on 106
HFMD and socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
525 Comparison between pre- and post-intervention knowledge attitude and 106
practice score
53 Limitation 107
x
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
10961 Conclusions
11062 Recommendations
111REFERENCES 118APPENDIX 1 124APPENDIX 2 130APPENDIX 3
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
21 Population and sampling of the respondents 22
22 Research timeline pre-intervention activities 27
23 Research timeline for post-intervention activities 28
31 Schedule of a day with community Ice breaking 31
32 Schedule of health intervention programme 35
41 Distribution of the respondents by age 44
42 Distribution of the respondents by race 45
43 Distribution of the respondents by marital status 46
44 Distribution of the respondents by educational level 46
45 Distribution of the respondents by employment status 47
46 Relationship of the respondents with the children 47
47 Source of knowledge on HFMD 49
48 Percentage distribution of the respondents by the level of knowledge on 50
HFMD
49 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 57
410 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 58
and level of knowledge
411 Respondents attitude towards HFMD 60
412 Percentage di tribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 63
and level of attitude
xii
413 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 67
and level of practice
414 Distribution of the choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD
symptoms among the respondents
69
415 Relationship between knowledge and attitude knowledge and practice
attitude and practice among the respondents
70
416 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 77
417 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socioshy
demographic characteristics
79
418 Means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
419 Respondents attitude towards HFMD (Post-intervention) 82
420 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
85
421 Means of total attitude score before and after intervention 87
422 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
90
423 Means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
11 The algorithm of classification on severity of children with HFMD 10
12 Conceptual framework 21
31 Source about awareness of health intervention program 40
32 Attendance of respondents 41
33 Rea ons for not coming to the health intervention program by the respondents 41
34 Program that benefits the respondents 42
35 Evaluation of activities done on health intervention program 42
41 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 45
42 Distribution of respondents who had heard of HFMD 48
43 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 51
44 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD 52
45 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD 53
46 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD 54
47 Histogram on the score of knowledge 55
Level of knowledge of the respondents 56
Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection 57
Histogram on the score on attitude 61
Level of attitude of the respondents 62
xiv
412 Histogram showing the score on practice 65
413 Level of practice of the respondents 66
414 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 72
(Post-intervention)
415 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD (Postshy 73
intervention)
416 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD (Postshy 74
intervention)
417 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD (Postshy 75
intervention)
418 Level of knowledge of the respondents (Post-intervention) 76
419 Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection (Post-intervention) 77
420 Post-intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 78
421 Level of attitude of the respondents (Post-intervention) 83
422 Post-intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 84
423 Level of practice of the respondents (Post-intervention) 88
424 Post-intervention changes in practice on HFMD 89
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 2: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
FACULTY OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES
An Interventional Study on the Knowledge Attitude and Practice on Hand Foot and
Mouth Disease among the Parents or Caregivers of Children Aged 10 and Below at Nanga
Sekuau Resettlement Scheme from 26th of March to 10th June 2012
4th Year Medical Students
Community Medicine and Public Health Posting MDP 40210
Group 1 (Rotation 1)
Posting Coordinators
Prof Dr Mohd Raili Suhaili
Dr Cliffton Akoi
Abu Zarin bin Zahari Kiu Kuong Lung Nurul Shahirah binti Abdul Shukor
Adrian Loo Wei Nam Ling Kho Lee Rachel Kamea
Aqilah binti Zaidan Ling Kok Yung Rebecca anak Tuloi
Bong Pao Yub Muhammad Rifai bin Ishak Sim Joo Ching
Chan Hock Peng Muna Fahima binti Zainuddin Sumayyah binti Hashim
HoWei Shing Nor lzziatie Eliany binti Alias Tee Jie Xi
Kamini Devi alp RSi varajah Nur lnani binti Ahmad Tarmizi Teh Thian Ping
Khairul Azhar bin Kiprawi Nuraishah binti Md Nor Yoganantham all Kodiesarn
Khoo Ee Theng Nurul Fadlin binti Rosli
DECLARATION
We declare that this research originates from our own effort except for certain facts and citations
with which the sources have been clearly listed in the bibliography
Abu Zarin Bin Zahari 23028
Adrian Loo Wei N am 23040
Aqilah Binti Zaidan 23155
BongPaoYub 20726
Chan Hock Peng 23259
Ho Wei Shing 23607
Kamini Devi NP RSivarajah 23714
Khairul Azhar Bin Kiprawi 21206
Khoo Ee Theng 23757
Kiu Kuong Lung 18723
Ling Kho Lee 23882
Ling Kok Yung 23883
Muhammad Rifai Bin Ishak 24223
Muna Fahima Binti Zainuddin 24241
Nor Izziatie Eliany Binti Alias 21789
Nur Inani Binti Ahmad Tarmizi 24596
Nuraishah Binti Md Nor 24654
Nurul Fadlin Binti Rosli 19611
Nurul Shahirah Binti Abdul Shukor 24767
Rachel Kamea 24855
Rebecca Anak Tuloi 22164
Sim Joo Ching 25024
Sumayyah Binti Hashim 25182
Tee Jie Xi 20116
Teh Thian Ping 25269
Yoganantham AIL Kodiesaren 25426
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost we are deeply indebted to our posting coordinator Dr CJiffton Akoi
and aU the lecturers of the Department of Community Medicine and Public Health for their
professional supervision and guidance throughout this posting We would also like to extend our
gratitude to our supervisors Prof Dr Mohd Raili Suhaili Dr Cliffton Akoi Dr Mohd Mizanur
Rahman and Dr Helmy Hazrni for their assistance and support in this study In addition much
appreciation goes to the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University Malaysia Sarawak
(UNIMAS) for providing us a chance to do this study and to interact with the local long house
community During this study we have learned to appreciate this new culture and realized the
value of working together as a team We would also like to extend our deepest appreciation to
Mr Sukran Kana Community Development Officer and a special thank you to the Tuai-tuai
Rumah and Sekuau Community for their endless cooperation Last but not least we would also
like to thank the medical team from Lanang and Oya Clinic as well as the UNIMAS drivers
They have worked hard and provided a huge contribution to making this study a success
111
1
ABSTRACT
Hand Foot and Mouth Disease (HFMD) is now considered an emerging infectious disease that
affects the population worldwide In order to cope with the high prevalence of HFMD in
Malaysia level of knowledge and awareness among the population should be assessed so that
appropriate interventions can be carried out The objective of this study was to study the
knowledge attitude and practice on HFMD among the parents or caregivers of children aged 10
years and below at Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme from 26th of March to 10th of June 2012
The results obtained were then using as the baseline data to conduct an intervention beneficial to
the community to enhance their level of knowledge attitude and practice towards HFMD Data
collection was done by face to face interview using interview-based questionnaire Data analysis
was done using SPSS software version 200 Results showed that 611 of the respondents had
good knowledge 522 had good attitude while 558 had good preventive practice towards
HFMD Analysis found a significant association between total knowledge score and the level of
education (plt005) Similar significant association was found between total attitude score and
leveJ of education (plt005) and marital status (plt005) However no significant association was
found between total practice score and socio-demographic characteristics A positive correlation
was found between the knowledge and attitude (pltOOI) as well as attitude and practice
(pltOOOl) Post-intervention study showed significant improvement in the knowledge on mode
of spread of HFMD (plt005) but no significant increase in the t~tal level of knowledge attitude
and practice (pgt005) In conclusion there is a great need for intensive intervention in order to
enhance their awareness on HFMD among the respondents
iv
ABSTRAK
Penyakit Tangan Kaki dan Mulut (HFMD) kini dianggap penyakit berjangkit yang baru muncul
yang memberi kesan terhadap penduduk di seluruh dunia Bagi menghadapi HFMD ynag kerap
berlaku di Malaysia tahap pengetahuan dan kesedaran dalam kalangan penduduk perlu dinilai
supaya campur tangan yang sesuai boleh dijalankan Objektif kajian ini adalah untuk mengkaji
pengetahuan sikap dan amalan mengenai HFMD dalam kalangan ibu bapa atau penjaga
kanak-kanak berusia 10 tahun dan ke bawah di Skim Penempatan Semula Nanga Sekuau dari 26
Mac hingga 10 Jun 2012 Keputusan yang diperoleh digunakan sebagai data asas untuk
menjalankan campur tang an yang dapat memberi manfaat kepada masyarakat bagi
meningkatkan tahap pengetahuan sikap dan amalan ke arah HFMD Pengumpulan data telah
dilakukan melalui temuduga secara bersemuka dengan menggunakan soal selidik berasaskan
temubual Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan perisian SPSS versi 200 Hasil kajian
menunjukkan bahawa 611 responden mempunyai pengetahuan yang baik 522 mempunyai
sikap yang baik manakala 558 mempunyai amalan pencegahan yang baik ke arah HFMD
Analisis mendapati terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara skor pengetahuan jumlah dan
tahap pendidikan (p lt005) dan antara jumlah skor sikap dan tahap pendidikan (p lt005) dan
status perkahwinan (p lt005) Walau bagaimanapun tiada hubungan yang signifikan antara
jumlah skor amalan dan ciri-ciri sosio-demografi Terdapat hubungan positif yang ditemui
antara pengetahuan dan sikap (p lt001) serta sikap dan amalan (p lt0001) Kajian pascashy
campur tangan menunjukkan peningkatan yang ketara dalam pengetahuan tentang cara
penularan HFMD (p lt005) tetapi tidak ada peningkatan yang ketara dalam jumlah tahap
pengetahuan skap dan amalan (pgt 005) Kesimpulannya campur tangan intensif amat
diperlukan untuk meningkatkan kesedaran terhadap HFMD dalam kalangan responden
v
1
ue t Khidmat ~u UUla
tT VERSm MALAYSIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Declaration ii
Abstract lV
List of Abbreviations XVl
Acknowledgements iii
Abstrak v
Table of Contents vi
List of Appendices middot xi
List of Tables xii
List of Figures xiv
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW
11 Introduction
12 Background information 2
13 Statement of problem 3
14 Significance of the study 4
15 Literature review 5
151 Epidemiology 5
152 Risk factors 7
153 Symptoms and signs 8
154 Causative agent 11
155 Mode of spread 11
156 Complications 12
157 Diagnosis and investigations 13
158 M anagement 13
159 Preventive measures 14
1510 Knowledge attitude and practice 15
vi
16
1
I
Research objectives 17
161 General objective 17
162 Specific objectives 17
17 Hypotheses 18
18 Operational definition 19
19 Conceptual framework 21
CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY
21 Research design and setting 22
22 Population and sampling 22
221 Inclusion criteria 23
222 Exclusion criteria 23
23 Variable 23
24 Data collection 24
241 Study instruments 24
242 Procedures 24
243 Ethical issues 25
25 Data entry analysis and interpretation 26
26 Re earch timeline 27
CHAPTER 3 HEALTH INTERVENTION REPORT
31 Introduction 29
32 Objectives 29
33 Health intervention activities 29
331 A day with community ice breaking 30
332 Health intervention programme Prevent HFMD You Can Make A Change 31
333 Mini health intervention programme 38
34 Evaluation of intervention programme 39
35 Awareness of health intervention programme 39
36 Attendance of respondents 39
vii
I
Satisfactory rating of the programme 37
Benefit from the health intervention programme 38
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS
Introduction41
Socio-demographic characteristics 42
421 Age
422 Gender
423 Race
424 Marital status
425 Educational level
426 Employment status
427 Relationship with children
43 Knowledge on HFMD
431 Source of information on HFMD
432 Level of knowledge (Mode of spread)
433 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms)
434 Level of knowledge (Treatment)
435 Level of knowledge (Prevention)
436 Total score of knowledge
437 As ociation between level of knowledge and each socio-demographic
characteristic
44 Level of attitude
441 Total level of attitude
442 Association between level of attitude and eac~ socio-demographic
characteristic
viii
39
40
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
48
51
52
53
54
55
58
60
60
63
--1
45 Level of practice 65
451 Total score of practice 65
452 Association between level of practice and each socio-demographic 67
characteristic
453 Choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD symptoms 69
46 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 70
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
461 Relationship between knowledge and attitude 70
462 Relationship between knowledge and practice 70
463 Relationship between attitude and practice 70
47 Post-intervention results 71
471 Introduction 71
472 Level of knowledge 71
4721 Level ofknowledge (Mode of spread) 72
4722 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms) 73
4723 Level of knowledge (Treatment) 74
4724 Level of knowledge (Prevention) 75
4725 Post intervention total level of knowledge 76
4726 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socio- 79
demographic characteristics
4727 Comparing the means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
473 Level of attitude 82
4731 Post intervention total level of attitude 82
4732 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic 85
characteri tics
4733 Comparing the means of total attitude score Defore and after intervention 87
474 Level of practice 88
4741 Post intervention total level of practice 88
4742 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic 90
characteristics
4743 Comparing the means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
ix
J
CHAPTERS DISCUSSION
50 Introduction 93
51 Health intervention 93
511 Source of knowledge 93
512 Level of knowledge 94
513 Association between level of knowledge and socio-demographic factors 96
514 Level of attitude 97
515 Association between level of attitude and socio-demographic factors 98
516 Level of practice 100
517 Association between level of practice and socio-demographic factors 101
518 Choice of place of treatment if the child shows signs and symptoms of HFMD 102
519 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 103
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
52 Po t-intervention discussion 104
521 Post intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 104
522 Post intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 105
523 Post intervention changes in practice on HFMD 105
524 Relationship between the changes of knowledge attitude and practice on 106
HFMD and socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
525 Comparison between pre- and post-intervention knowledge attitude and 106
practice score
53 Limitation 107
x
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
10961 Conclusions
11062 Recommendations
111REFERENCES 118APPENDIX 1 124APPENDIX 2 130APPENDIX 3
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
21 Population and sampling of the respondents 22
22 Research timeline pre-intervention activities 27
23 Research timeline for post-intervention activities 28
31 Schedule of a day with community Ice breaking 31
32 Schedule of health intervention programme 35
41 Distribution of the respondents by age 44
42 Distribution of the respondents by race 45
43 Distribution of the respondents by marital status 46
44 Distribution of the respondents by educational level 46
45 Distribution of the respondents by employment status 47
46 Relationship of the respondents with the children 47
47 Source of knowledge on HFMD 49
48 Percentage distribution of the respondents by the level of knowledge on 50
HFMD
49 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 57
410 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 58
and level of knowledge
411 Respondents attitude towards HFMD 60
412 Percentage di tribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 63
and level of attitude
xii
413 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 67
and level of practice
414 Distribution of the choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD
symptoms among the respondents
69
415 Relationship between knowledge and attitude knowledge and practice
attitude and practice among the respondents
70
416 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 77
417 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socioshy
demographic characteristics
79
418 Means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
419 Respondents attitude towards HFMD (Post-intervention) 82
420 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
85
421 Means of total attitude score before and after intervention 87
422 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
90
423 Means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
11 The algorithm of classification on severity of children with HFMD 10
12 Conceptual framework 21
31 Source about awareness of health intervention program 40
32 Attendance of respondents 41
33 Rea ons for not coming to the health intervention program by the respondents 41
34 Program that benefits the respondents 42
35 Evaluation of activities done on health intervention program 42
41 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 45
42 Distribution of respondents who had heard of HFMD 48
43 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 51
44 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD 52
45 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD 53
46 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD 54
47 Histogram on the score of knowledge 55
Level of knowledge of the respondents 56
Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection 57
Histogram on the score on attitude 61
Level of attitude of the respondents 62
xiv
412 Histogram showing the score on practice 65
413 Level of practice of the respondents 66
414 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 72
(Post-intervention)
415 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD (Postshy 73
intervention)
416 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD (Postshy 74
intervention)
417 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD (Postshy 75
intervention)
418 Level of knowledge of the respondents (Post-intervention) 76
419 Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection (Post-intervention) 77
420 Post-intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 78
421 Level of attitude of the respondents (Post-intervention) 83
422 Post-intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 84
423 Level of practice of the respondents (Post-intervention) 88
424 Post-intervention changes in practice on HFMD 89
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 3: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
DECLARATION
We declare that this research originates from our own effort except for certain facts and citations
with which the sources have been clearly listed in the bibliography
Abu Zarin Bin Zahari 23028
Adrian Loo Wei N am 23040
Aqilah Binti Zaidan 23155
BongPaoYub 20726
Chan Hock Peng 23259
Ho Wei Shing 23607
Kamini Devi NP RSivarajah 23714
Khairul Azhar Bin Kiprawi 21206
Khoo Ee Theng 23757
Kiu Kuong Lung 18723
Ling Kho Lee 23882
Ling Kok Yung 23883
Muhammad Rifai Bin Ishak 24223
Muna Fahima Binti Zainuddin 24241
Nor Izziatie Eliany Binti Alias 21789
Nur Inani Binti Ahmad Tarmizi 24596
Nuraishah Binti Md Nor 24654
Nurul Fadlin Binti Rosli 19611
Nurul Shahirah Binti Abdul Shukor 24767
Rachel Kamea 24855
Rebecca Anak Tuloi 22164
Sim Joo Ching 25024
Sumayyah Binti Hashim 25182
Tee Jie Xi 20116
Teh Thian Ping 25269
Yoganantham AIL Kodiesaren 25426
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost we are deeply indebted to our posting coordinator Dr CJiffton Akoi
and aU the lecturers of the Department of Community Medicine and Public Health for their
professional supervision and guidance throughout this posting We would also like to extend our
gratitude to our supervisors Prof Dr Mohd Raili Suhaili Dr Cliffton Akoi Dr Mohd Mizanur
Rahman and Dr Helmy Hazrni for their assistance and support in this study In addition much
appreciation goes to the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University Malaysia Sarawak
(UNIMAS) for providing us a chance to do this study and to interact with the local long house
community During this study we have learned to appreciate this new culture and realized the
value of working together as a team We would also like to extend our deepest appreciation to
Mr Sukran Kana Community Development Officer and a special thank you to the Tuai-tuai
Rumah and Sekuau Community for their endless cooperation Last but not least we would also
like to thank the medical team from Lanang and Oya Clinic as well as the UNIMAS drivers
They have worked hard and provided a huge contribution to making this study a success
111
1
ABSTRACT
Hand Foot and Mouth Disease (HFMD) is now considered an emerging infectious disease that
affects the population worldwide In order to cope with the high prevalence of HFMD in
Malaysia level of knowledge and awareness among the population should be assessed so that
appropriate interventions can be carried out The objective of this study was to study the
knowledge attitude and practice on HFMD among the parents or caregivers of children aged 10
years and below at Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme from 26th of March to 10th of June 2012
The results obtained were then using as the baseline data to conduct an intervention beneficial to
the community to enhance their level of knowledge attitude and practice towards HFMD Data
collection was done by face to face interview using interview-based questionnaire Data analysis
was done using SPSS software version 200 Results showed that 611 of the respondents had
good knowledge 522 had good attitude while 558 had good preventive practice towards
HFMD Analysis found a significant association between total knowledge score and the level of
education (plt005) Similar significant association was found between total attitude score and
leveJ of education (plt005) and marital status (plt005) However no significant association was
found between total practice score and socio-demographic characteristics A positive correlation
was found between the knowledge and attitude (pltOOI) as well as attitude and practice
(pltOOOl) Post-intervention study showed significant improvement in the knowledge on mode
of spread of HFMD (plt005) but no significant increase in the t~tal level of knowledge attitude
and practice (pgt005) In conclusion there is a great need for intensive intervention in order to
enhance their awareness on HFMD among the respondents
iv
ABSTRAK
Penyakit Tangan Kaki dan Mulut (HFMD) kini dianggap penyakit berjangkit yang baru muncul
yang memberi kesan terhadap penduduk di seluruh dunia Bagi menghadapi HFMD ynag kerap
berlaku di Malaysia tahap pengetahuan dan kesedaran dalam kalangan penduduk perlu dinilai
supaya campur tangan yang sesuai boleh dijalankan Objektif kajian ini adalah untuk mengkaji
pengetahuan sikap dan amalan mengenai HFMD dalam kalangan ibu bapa atau penjaga
kanak-kanak berusia 10 tahun dan ke bawah di Skim Penempatan Semula Nanga Sekuau dari 26
Mac hingga 10 Jun 2012 Keputusan yang diperoleh digunakan sebagai data asas untuk
menjalankan campur tang an yang dapat memberi manfaat kepada masyarakat bagi
meningkatkan tahap pengetahuan sikap dan amalan ke arah HFMD Pengumpulan data telah
dilakukan melalui temuduga secara bersemuka dengan menggunakan soal selidik berasaskan
temubual Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan perisian SPSS versi 200 Hasil kajian
menunjukkan bahawa 611 responden mempunyai pengetahuan yang baik 522 mempunyai
sikap yang baik manakala 558 mempunyai amalan pencegahan yang baik ke arah HFMD
Analisis mendapati terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara skor pengetahuan jumlah dan
tahap pendidikan (p lt005) dan antara jumlah skor sikap dan tahap pendidikan (p lt005) dan
status perkahwinan (p lt005) Walau bagaimanapun tiada hubungan yang signifikan antara
jumlah skor amalan dan ciri-ciri sosio-demografi Terdapat hubungan positif yang ditemui
antara pengetahuan dan sikap (p lt001) serta sikap dan amalan (p lt0001) Kajian pascashy
campur tangan menunjukkan peningkatan yang ketara dalam pengetahuan tentang cara
penularan HFMD (p lt005) tetapi tidak ada peningkatan yang ketara dalam jumlah tahap
pengetahuan skap dan amalan (pgt 005) Kesimpulannya campur tangan intensif amat
diperlukan untuk meningkatkan kesedaran terhadap HFMD dalam kalangan responden
v
1
ue t Khidmat ~u UUla
tT VERSm MALAYSIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Declaration ii
Abstract lV
List of Abbreviations XVl
Acknowledgements iii
Abstrak v
Table of Contents vi
List of Appendices middot xi
List of Tables xii
List of Figures xiv
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW
11 Introduction
12 Background information 2
13 Statement of problem 3
14 Significance of the study 4
15 Literature review 5
151 Epidemiology 5
152 Risk factors 7
153 Symptoms and signs 8
154 Causative agent 11
155 Mode of spread 11
156 Complications 12
157 Diagnosis and investigations 13
158 M anagement 13
159 Preventive measures 14
1510 Knowledge attitude and practice 15
vi
16
1
I
Research objectives 17
161 General objective 17
162 Specific objectives 17
17 Hypotheses 18
18 Operational definition 19
19 Conceptual framework 21
CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY
21 Research design and setting 22
22 Population and sampling 22
221 Inclusion criteria 23
222 Exclusion criteria 23
23 Variable 23
24 Data collection 24
241 Study instruments 24
242 Procedures 24
243 Ethical issues 25
25 Data entry analysis and interpretation 26
26 Re earch timeline 27
CHAPTER 3 HEALTH INTERVENTION REPORT
31 Introduction 29
32 Objectives 29
33 Health intervention activities 29
331 A day with community ice breaking 30
332 Health intervention programme Prevent HFMD You Can Make A Change 31
333 Mini health intervention programme 38
34 Evaluation of intervention programme 39
35 Awareness of health intervention programme 39
36 Attendance of respondents 39
vii
I
Satisfactory rating of the programme 37
Benefit from the health intervention programme 38
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS
Introduction41
Socio-demographic characteristics 42
421 Age
422 Gender
423 Race
424 Marital status
425 Educational level
426 Employment status
427 Relationship with children
43 Knowledge on HFMD
431 Source of information on HFMD
432 Level of knowledge (Mode of spread)
433 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms)
434 Level of knowledge (Treatment)
435 Level of knowledge (Prevention)
436 Total score of knowledge
437 As ociation between level of knowledge and each socio-demographic
characteristic
44 Level of attitude
441 Total level of attitude
442 Association between level of attitude and eac~ socio-demographic
characteristic
viii
39
40
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
48
51
52
53
54
55
58
60
60
63
--1
45 Level of practice 65
451 Total score of practice 65
452 Association between level of practice and each socio-demographic 67
characteristic
453 Choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD symptoms 69
46 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 70
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
461 Relationship between knowledge and attitude 70
462 Relationship between knowledge and practice 70
463 Relationship between attitude and practice 70
47 Post-intervention results 71
471 Introduction 71
472 Level of knowledge 71
4721 Level ofknowledge (Mode of spread) 72
4722 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms) 73
4723 Level of knowledge (Treatment) 74
4724 Level of knowledge (Prevention) 75
4725 Post intervention total level of knowledge 76
4726 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socio- 79
demographic characteristics
4727 Comparing the means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
473 Level of attitude 82
4731 Post intervention total level of attitude 82
4732 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic 85
characteri tics
4733 Comparing the means of total attitude score Defore and after intervention 87
474 Level of practice 88
4741 Post intervention total level of practice 88
4742 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic 90
characteristics
4743 Comparing the means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
ix
J
CHAPTERS DISCUSSION
50 Introduction 93
51 Health intervention 93
511 Source of knowledge 93
512 Level of knowledge 94
513 Association between level of knowledge and socio-demographic factors 96
514 Level of attitude 97
515 Association between level of attitude and socio-demographic factors 98
516 Level of practice 100
517 Association between level of practice and socio-demographic factors 101
518 Choice of place of treatment if the child shows signs and symptoms of HFMD 102
519 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 103
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
52 Po t-intervention discussion 104
521 Post intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 104
522 Post intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 105
523 Post intervention changes in practice on HFMD 105
524 Relationship between the changes of knowledge attitude and practice on 106
HFMD and socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
525 Comparison between pre- and post-intervention knowledge attitude and 106
practice score
53 Limitation 107
x
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
10961 Conclusions
11062 Recommendations
111REFERENCES 118APPENDIX 1 124APPENDIX 2 130APPENDIX 3
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
21 Population and sampling of the respondents 22
22 Research timeline pre-intervention activities 27
23 Research timeline for post-intervention activities 28
31 Schedule of a day with community Ice breaking 31
32 Schedule of health intervention programme 35
41 Distribution of the respondents by age 44
42 Distribution of the respondents by race 45
43 Distribution of the respondents by marital status 46
44 Distribution of the respondents by educational level 46
45 Distribution of the respondents by employment status 47
46 Relationship of the respondents with the children 47
47 Source of knowledge on HFMD 49
48 Percentage distribution of the respondents by the level of knowledge on 50
HFMD
49 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 57
410 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 58
and level of knowledge
411 Respondents attitude towards HFMD 60
412 Percentage di tribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 63
and level of attitude
xii
413 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 67
and level of practice
414 Distribution of the choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD
symptoms among the respondents
69
415 Relationship between knowledge and attitude knowledge and practice
attitude and practice among the respondents
70
416 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 77
417 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socioshy
demographic characteristics
79
418 Means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
419 Respondents attitude towards HFMD (Post-intervention) 82
420 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
85
421 Means of total attitude score before and after intervention 87
422 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
90
423 Means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
11 The algorithm of classification on severity of children with HFMD 10
12 Conceptual framework 21
31 Source about awareness of health intervention program 40
32 Attendance of respondents 41
33 Rea ons for not coming to the health intervention program by the respondents 41
34 Program that benefits the respondents 42
35 Evaluation of activities done on health intervention program 42
41 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 45
42 Distribution of respondents who had heard of HFMD 48
43 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 51
44 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD 52
45 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD 53
46 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD 54
47 Histogram on the score of knowledge 55
Level of knowledge of the respondents 56
Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection 57
Histogram on the score on attitude 61
Level of attitude of the respondents 62
xiv
412 Histogram showing the score on practice 65
413 Level of practice of the respondents 66
414 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 72
(Post-intervention)
415 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD (Postshy 73
intervention)
416 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD (Postshy 74
intervention)
417 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD (Postshy 75
intervention)
418 Level of knowledge of the respondents (Post-intervention) 76
419 Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection (Post-intervention) 77
420 Post-intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 78
421 Level of attitude of the respondents (Post-intervention) 83
422 Post-intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 84
423 Level of practice of the respondents (Post-intervention) 88
424 Post-intervention changes in practice on HFMD 89
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 4: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost we are deeply indebted to our posting coordinator Dr CJiffton Akoi
and aU the lecturers of the Department of Community Medicine and Public Health for their
professional supervision and guidance throughout this posting We would also like to extend our
gratitude to our supervisors Prof Dr Mohd Raili Suhaili Dr Cliffton Akoi Dr Mohd Mizanur
Rahman and Dr Helmy Hazrni for their assistance and support in this study In addition much
appreciation goes to the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University Malaysia Sarawak
(UNIMAS) for providing us a chance to do this study and to interact with the local long house
community During this study we have learned to appreciate this new culture and realized the
value of working together as a team We would also like to extend our deepest appreciation to
Mr Sukran Kana Community Development Officer and a special thank you to the Tuai-tuai
Rumah and Sekuau Community for their endless cooperation Last but not least we would also
like to thank the medical team from Lanang and Oya Clinic as well as the UNIMAS drivers
They have worked hard and provided a huge contribution to making this study a success
111
1
ABSTRACT
Hand Foot and Mouth Disease (HFMD) is now considered an emerging infectious disease that
affects the population worldwide In order to cope with the high prevalence of HFMD in
Malaysia level of knowledge and awareness among the population should be assessed so that
appropriate interventions can be carried out The objective of this study was to study the
knowledge attitude and practice on HFMD among the parents or caregivers of children aged 10
years and below at Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme from 26th of March to 10th of June 2012
The results obtained were then using as the baseline data to conduct an intervention beneficial to
the community to enhance their level of knowledge attitude and practice towards HFMD Data
collection was done by face to face interview using interview-based questionnaire Data analysis
was done using SPSS software version 200 Results showed that 611 of the respondents had
good knowledge 522 had good attitude while 558 had good preventive practice towards
HFMD Analysis found a significant association between total knowledge score and the level of
education (plt005) Similar significant association was found between total attitude score and
leveJ of education (plt005) and marital status (plt005) However no significant association was
found between total practice score and socio-demographic characteristics A positive correlation
was found between the knowledge and attitude (pltOOI) as well as attitude and practice
(pltOOOl) Post-intervention study showed significant improvement in the knowledge on mode
of spread of HFMD (plt005) but no significant increase in the t~tal level of knowledge attitude
and practice (pgt005) In conclusion there is a great need for intensive intervention in order to
enhance their awareness on HFMD among the respondents
iv
ABSTRAK
Penyakit Tangan Kaki dan Mulut (HFMD) kini dianggap penyakit berjangkit yang baru muncul
yang memberi kesan terhadap penduduk di seluruh dunia Bagi menghadapi HFMD ynag kerap
berlaku di Malaysia tahap pengetahuan dan kesedaran dalam kalangan penduduk perlu dinilai
supaya campur tangan yang sesuai boleh dijalankan Objektif kajian ini adalah untuk mengkaji
pengetahuan sikap dan amalan mengenai HFMD dalam kalangan ibu bapa atau penjaga
kanak-kanak berusia 10 tahun dan ke bawah di Skim Penempatan Semula Nanga Sekuau dari 26
Mac hingga 10 Jun 2012 Keputusan yang diperoleh digunakan sebagai data asas untuk
menjalankan campur tang an yang dapat memberi manfaat kepada masyarakat bagi
meningkatkan tahap pengetahuan sikap dan amalan ke arah HFMD Pengumpulan data telah
dilakukan melalui temuduga secara bersemuka dengan menggunakan soal selidik berasaskan
temubual Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan perisian SPSS versi 200 Hasil kajian
menunjukkan bahawa 611 responden mempunyai pengetahuan yang baik 522 mempunyai
sikap yang baik manakala 558 mempunyai amalan pencegahan yang baik ke arah HFMD
Analisis mendapati terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara skor pengetahuan jumlah dan
tahap pendidikan (p lt005) dan antara jumlah skor sikap dan tahap pendidikan (p lt005) dan
status perkahwinan (p lt005) Walau bagaimanapun tiada hubungan yang signifikan antara
jumlah skor amalan dan ciri-ciri sosio-demografi Terdapat hubungan positif yang ditemui
antara pengetahuan dan sikap (p lt001) serta sikap dan amalan (p lt0001) Kajian pascashy
campur tangan menunjukkan peningkatan yang ketara dalam pengetahuan tentang cara
penularan HFMD (p lt005) tetapi tidak ada peningkatan yang ketara dalam jumlah tahap
pengetahuan skap dan amalan (pgt 005) Kesimpulannya campur tangan intensif amat
diperlukan untuk meningkatkan kesedaran terhadap HFMD dalam kalangan responden
v
1
ue t Khidmat ~u UUla
tT VERSm MALAYSIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Declaration ii
Abstract lV
List of Abbreviations XVl
Acknowledgements iii
Abstrak v
Table of Contents vi
List of Appendices middot xi
List of Tables xii
List of Figures xiv
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW
11 Introduction
12 Background information 2
13 Statement of problem 3
14 Significance of the study 4
15 Literature review 5
151 Epidemiology 5
152 Risk factors 7
153 Symptoms and signs 8
154 Causative agent 11
155 Mode of spread 11
156 Complications 12
157 Diagnosis and investigations 13
158 M anagement 13
159 Preventive measures 14
1510 Knowledge attitude and practice 15
vi
16
1
I
Research objectives 17
161 General objective 17
162 Specific objectives 17
17 Hypotheses 18
18 Operational definition 19
19 Conceptual framework 21
CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY
21 Research design and setting 22
22 Population and sampling 22
221 Inclusion criteria 23
222 Exclusion criteria 23
23 Variable 23
24 Data collection 24
241 Study instruments 24
242 Procedures 24
243 Ethical issues 25
25 Data entry analysis and interpretation 26
26 Re earch timeline 27
CHAPTER 3 HEALTH INTERVENTION REPORT
31 Introduction 29
32 Objectives 29
33 Health intervention activities 29
331 A day with community ice breaking 30
332 Health intervention programme Prevent HFMD You Can Make A Change 31
333 Mini health intervention programme 38
34 Evaluation of intervention programme 39
35 Awareness of health intervention programme 39
36 Attendance of respondents 39
vii
I
Satisfactory rating of the programme 37
Benefit from the health intervention programme 38
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS
Introduction41
Socio-demographic characteristics 42
421 Age
422 Gender
423 Race
424 Marital status
425 Educational level
426 Employment status
427 Relationship with children
43 Knowledge on HFMD
431 Source of information on HFMD
432 Level of knowledge (Mode of spread)
433 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms)
434 Level of knowledge (Treatment)
435 Level of knowledge (Prevention)
436 Total score of knowledge
437 As ociation between level of knowledge and each socio-demographic
characteristic
44 Level of attitude
441 Total level of attitude
442 Association between level of attitude and eac~ socio-demographic
characteristic
viii
39
40
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
48
51
52
53
54
55
58
60
60
63
--1
45 Level of practice 65
451 Total score of practice 65
452 Association between level of practice and each socio-demographic 67
characteristic
453 Choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD symptoms 69
46 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 70
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
461 Relationship between knowledge and attitude 70
462 Relationship between knowledge and practice 70
463 Relationship between attitude and practice 70
47 Post-intervention results 71
471 Introduction 71
472 Level of knowledge 71
4721 Level ofknowledge (Mode of spread) 72
4722 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms) 73
4723 Level of knowledge (Treatment) 74
4724 Level of knowledge (Prevention) 75
4725 Post intervention total level of knowledge 76
4726 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socio- 79
demographic characteristics
4727 Comparing the means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
473 Level of attitude 82
4731 Post intervention total level of attitude 82
4732 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic 85
characteri tics
4733 Comparing the means of total attitude score Defore and after intervention 87
474 Level of practice 88
4741 Post intervention total level of practice 88
4742 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic 90
characteristics
4743 Comparing the means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
ix
J
CHAPTERS DISCUSSION
50 Introduction 93
51 Health intervention 93
511 Source of knowledge 93
512 Level of knowledge 94
513 Association between level of knowledge and socio-demographic factors 96
514 Level of attitude 97
515 Association between level of attitude and socio-demographic factors 98
516 Level of practice 100
517 Association between level of practice and socio-demographic factors 101
518 Choice of place of treatment if the child shows signs and symptoms of HFMD 102
519 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 103
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
52 Po t-intervention discussion 104
521 Post intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 104
522 Post intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 105
523 Post intervention changes in practice on HFMD 105
524 Relationship between the changes of knowledge attitude and practice on 106
HFMD and socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
525 Comparison between pre- and post-intervention knowledge attitude and 106
practice score
53 Limitation 107
x
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
10961 Conclusions
11062 Recommendations
111REFERENCES 118APPENDIX 1 124APPENDIX 2 130APPENDIX 3
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
21 Population and sampling of the respondents 22
22 Research timeline pre-intervention activities 27
23 Research timeline for post-intervention activities 28
31 Schedule of a day with community Ice breaking 31
32 Schedule of health intervention programme 35
41 Distribution of the respondents by age 44
42 Distribution of the respondents by race 45
43 Distribution of the respondents by marital status 46
44 Distribution of the respondents by educational level 46
45 Distribution of the respondents by employment status 47
46 Relationship of the respondents with the children 47
47 Source of knowledge on HFMD 49
48 Percentage distribution of the respondents by the level of knowledge on 50
HFMD
49 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 57
410 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 58
and level of knowledge
411 Respondents attitude towards HFMD 60
412 Percentage di tribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 63
and level of attitude
xii
413 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 67
and level of practice
414 Distribution of the choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD
symptoms among the respondents
69
415 Relationship between knowledge and attitude knowledge and practice
attitude and practice among the respondents
70
416 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 77
417 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socioshy
demographic characteristics
79
418 Means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
419 Respondents attitude towards HFMD (Post-intervention) 82
420 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
85
421 Means of total attitude score before and after intervention 87
422 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
90
423 Means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
11 The algorithm of classification on severity of children with HFMD 10
12 Conceptual framework 21
31 Source about awareness of health intervention program 40
32 Attendance of respondents 41
33 Rea ons for not coming to the health intervention program by the respondents 41
34 Program that benefits the respondents 42
35 Evaluation of activities done on health intervention program 42
41 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 45
42 Distribution of respondents who had heard of HFMD 48
43 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 51
44 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD 52
45 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD 53
46 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD 54
47 Histogram on the score of knowledge 55
Level of knowledge of the respondents 56
Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection 57
Histogram on the score on attitude 61
Level of attitude of the respondents 62
xiv
412 Histogram showing the score on practice 65
413 Level of practice of the respondents 66
414 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 72
(Post-intervention)
415 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD (Postshy 73
intervention)
416 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD (Postshy 74
intervention)
417 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD (Postshy 75
intervention)
418 Level of knowledge of the respondents (Post-intervention) 76
419 Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection (Post-intervention) 77
420 Post-intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 78
421 Level of attitude of the respondents (Post-intervention) 83
422 Post-intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 84
423 Level of practice of the respondents (Post-intervention) 88
424 Post-intervention changes in practice on HFMD 89
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 5: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ABSTRACT
Hand Foot and Mouth Disease (HFMD) is now considered an emerging infectious disease that
affects the population worldwide In order to cope with the high prevalence of HFMD in
Malaysia level of knowledge and awareness among the population should be assessed so that
appropriate interventions can be carried out The objective of this study was to study the
knowledge attitude and practice on HFMD among the parents or caregivers of children aged 10
years and below at Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme from 26th of March to 10th of June 2012
The results obtained were then using as the baseline data to conduct an intervention beneficial to
the community to enhance their level of knowledge attitude and practice towards HFMD Data
collection was done by face to face interview using interview-based questionnaire Data analysis
was done using SPSS software version 200 Results showed that 611 of the respondents had
good knowledge 522 had good attitude while 558 had good preventive practice towards
HFMD Analysis found a significant association between total knowledge score and the level of
education (plt005) Similar significant association was found between total attitude score and
leveJ of education (plt005) and marital status (plt005) However no significant association was
found between total practice score and socio-demographic characteristics A positive correlation
was found between the knowledge and attitude (pltOOI) as well as attitude and practice
(pltOOOl) Post-intervention study showed significant improvement in the knowledge on mode
of spread of HFMD (plt005) but no significant increase in the t~tal level of knowledge attitude
and practice (pgt005) In conclusion there is a great need for intensive intervention in order to
enhance their awareness on HFMD among the respondents
iv
ABSTRAK
Penyakit Tangan Kaki dan Mulut (HFMD) kini dianggap penyakit berjangkit yang baru muncul
yang memberi kesan terhadap penduduk di seluruh dunia Bagi menghadapi HFMD ynag kerap
berlaku di Malaysia tahap pengetahuan dan kesedaran dalam kalangan penduduk perlu dinilai
supaya campur tangan yang sesuai boleh dijalankan Objektif kajian ini adalah untuk mengkaji
pengetahuan sikap dan amalan mengenai HFMD dalam kalangan ibu bapa atau penjaga
kanak-kanak berusia 10 tahun dan ke bawah di Skim Penempatan Semula Nanga Sekuau dari 26
Mac hingga 10 Jun 2012 Keputusan yang diperoleh digunakan sebagai data asas untuk
menjalankan campur tang an yang dapat memberi manfaat kepada masyarakat bagi
meningkatkan tahap pengetahuan sikap dan amalan ke arah HFMD Pengumpulan data telah
dilakukan melalui temuduga secara bersemuka dengan menggunakan soal selidik berasaskan
temubual Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan perisian SPSS versi 200 Hasil kajian
menunjukkan bahawa 611 responden mempunyai pengetahuan yang baik 522 mempunyai
sikap yang baik manakala 558 mempunyai amalan pencegahan yang baik ke arah HFMD
Analisis mendapati terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara skor pengetahuan jumlah dan
tahap pendidikan (p lt005) dan antara jumlah skor sikap dan tahap pendidikan (p lt005) dan
status perkahwinan (p lt005) Walau bagaimanapun tiada hubungan yang signifikan antara
jumlah skor amalan dan ciri-ciri sosio-demografi Terdapat hubungan positif yang ditemui
antara pengetahuan dan sikap (p lt001) serta sikap dan amalan (p lt0001) Kajian pascashy
campur tangan menunjukkan peningkatan yang ketara dalam pengetahuan tentang cara
penularan HFMD (p lt005) tetapi tidak ada peningkatan yang ketara dalam jumlah tahap
pengetahuan skap dan amalan (pgt 005) Kesimpulannya campur tangan intensif amat
diperlukan untuk meningkatkan kesedaran terhadap HFMD dalam kalangan responden
v
1
ue t Khidmat ~u UUla
tT VERSm MALAYSIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Declaration ii
Abstract lV
List of Abbreviations XVl
Acknowledgements iii
Abstrak v
Table of Contents vi
List of Appendices middot xi
List of Tables xii
List of Figures xiv
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW
11 Introduction
12 Background information 2
13 Statement of problem 3
14 Significance of the study 4
15 Literature review 5
151 Epidemiology 5
152 Risk factors 7
153 Symptoms and signs 8
154 Causative agent 11
155 Mode of spread 11
156 Complications 12
157 Diagnosis and investigations 13
158 M anagement 13
159 Preventive measures 14
1510 Knowledge attitude and practice 15
vi
16
1
I
Research objectives 17
161 General objective 17
162 Specific objectives 17
17 Hypotheses 18
18 Operational definition 19
19 Conceptual framework 21
CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY
21 Research design and setting 22
22 Population and sampling 22
221 Inclusion criteria 23
222 Exclusion criteria 23
23 Variable 23
24 Data collection 24
241 Study instruments 24
242 Procedures 24
243 Ethical issues 25
25 Data entry analysis and interpretation 26
26 Re earch timeline 27
CHAPTER 3 HEALTH INTERVENTION REPORT
31 Introduction 29
32 Objectives 29
33 Health intervention activities 29
331 A day with community ice breaking 30
332 Health intervention programme Prevent HFMD You Can Make A Change 31
333 Mini health intervention programme 38
34 Evaluation of intervention programme 39
35 Awareness of health intervention programme 39
36 Attendance of respondents 39
vii
I
Satisfactory rating of the programme 37
Benefit from the health intervention programme 38
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS
Introduction41
Socio-demographic characteristics 42
421 Age
422 Gender
423 Race
424 Marital status
425 Educational level
426 Employment status
427 Relationship with children
43 Knowledge on HFMD
431 Source of information on HFMD
432 Level of knowledge (Mode of spread)
433 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms)
434 Level of knowledge (Treatment)
435 Level of knowledge (Prevention)
436 Total score of knowledge
437 As ociation between level of knowledge and each socio-demographic
characteristic
44 Level of attitude
441 Total level of attitude
442 Association between level of attitude and eac~ socio-demographic
characteristic
viii
39
40
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
48
51
52
53
54
55
58
60
60
63
--1
45 Level of practice 65
451 Total score of practice 65
452 Association between level of practice and each socio-demographic 67
characteristic
453 Choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD symptoms 69
46 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 70
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
461 Relationship between knowledge and attitude 70
462 Relationship between knowledge and practice 70
463 Relationship between attitude and practice 70
47 Post-intervention results 71
471 Introduction 71
472 Level of knowledge 71
4721 Level ofknowledge (Mode of spread) 72
4722 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms) 73
4723 Level of knowledge (Treatment) 74
4724 Level of knowledge (Prevention) 75
4725 Post intervention total level of knowledge 76
4726 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socio- 79
demographic characteristics
4727 Comparing the means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
473 Level of attitude 82
4731 Post intervention total level of attitude 82
4732 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic 85
characteri tics
4733 Comparing the means of total attitude score Defore and after intervention 87
474 Level of practice 88
4741 Post intervention total level of practice 88
4742 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic 90
characteristics
4743 Comparing the means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
ix
J
CHAPTERS DISCUSSION
50 Introduction 93
51 Health intervention 93
511 Source of knowledge 93
512 Level of knowledge 94
513 Association between level of knowledge and socio-demographic factors 96
514 Level of attitude 97
515 Association between level of attitude and socio-demographic factors 98
516 Level of practice 100
517 Association between level of practice and socio-demographic factors 101
518 Choice of place of treatment if the child shows signs and symptoms of HFMD 102
519 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 103
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
52 Po t-intervention discussion 104
521 Post intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 104
522 Post intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 105
523 Post intervention changes in practice on HFMD 105
524 Relationship between the changes of knowledge attitude and practice on 106
HFMD and socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
525 Comparison between pre- and post-intervention knowledge attitude and 106
practice score
53 Limitation 107
x
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
10961 Conclusions
11062 Recommendations
111REFERENCES 118APPENDIX 1 124APPENDIX 2 130APPENDIX 3
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
21 Population and sampling of the respondents 22
22 Research timeline pre-intervention activities 27
23 Research timeline for post-intervention activities 28
31 Schedule of a day with community Ice breaking 31
32 Schedule of health intervention programme 35
41 Distribution of the respondents by age 44
42 Distribution of the respondents by race 45
43 Distribution of the respondents by marital status 46
44 Distribution of the respondents by educational level 46
45 Distribution of the respondents by employment status 47
46 Relationship of the respondents with the children 47
47 Source of knowledge on HFMD 49
48 Percentage distribution of the respondents by the level of knowledge on 50
HFMD
49 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 57
410 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 58
and level of knowledge
411 Respondents attitude towards HFMD 60
412 Percentage di tribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 63
and level of attitude
xii
413 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 67
and level of practice
414 Distribution of the choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD
symptoms among the respondents
69
415 Relationship between knowledge and attitude knowledge and practice
attitude and practice among the respondents
70
416 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 77
417 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socioshy
demographic characteristics
79
418 Means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
419 Respondents attitude towards HFMD (Post-intervention) 82
420 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
85
421 Means of total attitude score before and after intervention 87
422 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
90
423 Means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
11 The algorithm of classification on severity of children with HFMD 10
12 Conceptual framework 21
31 Source about awareness of health intervention program 40
32 Attendance of respondents 41
33 Rea ons for not coming to the health intervention program by the respondents 41
34 Program that benefits the respondents 42
35 Evaluation of activities done on health intervention program 42
41 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 45
42 Distribution of respondents who had heard of HFMD 48
43 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 51
44 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD 52
45 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD 53
46 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD 54
47 Histogram on the score of knowledge 55
Level of knowledge of the respondents 56
Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection 57
Histogram on the score on attitude 61
Level of attitude of the respondents 62
xiv
412 Histogram showing the score on practice 65
413 Level of practice of the respondents 66
414 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 72
(Post-intervention)
415 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD (Postshy 73
intervention)
416 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD (Postshy 74
intervention)
417 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD (Postshy 75
intervention)
418 Level of knowledge of the respondents (Post-intervention) 76
419 Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection (Post-intervention) 77
420 Post-intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 78
421 Level of attitude of the respondents (Post-intervention) 83
422 Post-intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 84
423 Level of practice of the respondents (Post-intervention) 88
424 Post-intervention changes in practice on HFMD 89
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 6: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ABSTRAK
Penyakit Tangan Kaki dan Mulut (HFMD) kini dianggap penyakit berjangkit yang baru muncul
yang memberi kesan terhadap penduduk di seluruh dunia Bagi menghadapi HFMD ynag kerap
berlaku di Malaysia tahap pengetahuan dan kesedaran dalam kalangan penduduk perlu dinilai
supaya campur tangan yang sesuai boleh dijalankan Objektif kajian ini adalah untuk mengkaji
pengetahuan sikap dan amalan mengenai HFMD dalam kalangan ibu bapa atau penjaga
kanak-kanak berusia 10 tahun dan ke bawah di Skim Penempatan Semula Nanga Sekuau dari 26
Mac hingga 10 Jun 2012 Keputusan yang diperoleh digunakan sebagai data asas untuk
menjalankan campur tang an yang dapat memberi manfaat kepada masyarakat bagi
meningkatkan tahap pengetahuan sikap dan amalan ke arah HFMD Pengumpulan data telah
dilakukan melalui temuduga secara bersemuka dengan menggunakan soal selidik berasaskan
temubual Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan perisian SPSS versi 200 Hasil kajian
menunjukkan bahawa 611 responden mempunyai pengetahuan yang baik 522 mempunyai
sikap yang baik manakala 558 mempunyai amalan pencegahan yang baik ke arah HFMD
Analisis mendapati terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara skor pengetahuan jumlah dan
tahap pendidikan (p lt005) dan antara jumlah skor sikap dan tahap pendidikan (p lt005) dan
status perkahwinan (p lt005) Walau bagaimanapun tiada hubungan yang signifikan antara
jumlah skor amalan dan ciri-ciri sosio-demografi Terdapat hubungan positif yang ditemui
antara pengetahuan dan sikap (p lt001) serta sikap dan amalan (p lt0001) Kajian pascashy
campur tangan menunjukkan peningkatan yang ketara dalam pengetahuan tentang cara
penularan HFMD (p lt005) tetapi tidak ada peningkatan yang ketara dalam jumlah tahap
pengetahuan skap dan amalan (pgt 005) Kesimpulannya campur tangan intensif amat
diperlukan untuk meningkatkan kesedaran terhadap HFMD dalam kalangan responden
v
1
ue t Khidmat ~u UUla
tT VERSm MALAYSIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Declaration ii
Abstract lV
List of Abbreviations XVl
Acknowledgements iii
Abstrak v
Table of Contents vi
List of Appendices middot xi
List of Tables xii
List of Figures xiv
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW
11 Introduction
12 Background information 2
13 Statement of problem 3
14 Significance of the study 4
15 Literature review 5
151 Epidemiology 5
152 Risk factors 7
153 Symptoms and signs 8
154 Causative agent 11
155 Mode of spread 11
156 Complications 12
157 Diagnosis and investigations 13
158 M anagement 13
159 Preventive measures 14
1510 Knowledge attitude and practice 15
vi
16
1
I
Research objectives 17
161 General objective 17
162 Specific objectives 17
17 Hypotheses 18
18 Operational definition 19
19 Conceptual framework 21
CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY
21 Research design and setting 22
22 Population and sampling 22
221 Inclusion criteria 23
222 Exclusion criteria 23
23 Variable 23
24 Data collection 24
241 Study instruments 24
242 Procedures 24
243 Ethical issues 25
25 Data entry analysis and interpretation 26
26 Re earch timeline 27
CHAPTER 3 HEALTH INTERVENTION REPORT
31 Introduction 29
32 Objectives 29
33 Health intervention activities 29
331 A day with community ice breaking 30
332 Health intervention programme Prevent HFMD You Can Make A Change 31
333 Mini health intervention programme 38
34 Evaluation of intervention programme 39
35 Awareness of health intervention programme 39
36 Attendance of respondents 39
vii
I
Satisfactory rating of the programme 37
Benefit from the health intervention programme 38
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS
Introduction41
Socio-demographic characteristics 42
421 Age
422 Gender
423 Race
424 Marital status
425 Educational level
426 Employment status
427 Relationship with children
43 Knowledge on HFMD
431 Source of information on HFMD
432 Level of knowledge (Mode of spread)
433 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms)
434 Level of knowledge (Treatment)
435 Level of knowledge (Prevention)
436 Total score of knowledge
437 As ociation between level of knowledge and each socio-demographic
characteristic
44 Level of attitude
441 Total level of attitude
442 Association between level of attitude and eac~ socio-demographic
characteristic
viii
39
40
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
48
51
52
53
54
55
58
60
60
63
--1
45 Level of practice 65
451 Total score of practice 65
452 Association between level of practice and each socio-demographic 67
characteristic
453 Choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD symptoms 69
46 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 70
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
461 Relationship between knowledge and attitude 70
462 Relationship between knowledge and practice 70
463 Relationship between attitude and practice 70
47 Post-intervention results 71
471 Introduction 71
472 Level of knowledge 71
4721 Level ofknowledge (Mode of spread) 72
4722 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms) 73
4723 Level of knowledge (Treatment) 74
4724 Level of knowledge (Prevention) 75
4725 Post intervention total level of knowledge 76
4726 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socio- 79
demographic characteristics
4727 Comparing the means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
473 Level of attitude 82
4731 Post intervention total level of attitude 82
4732 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic 85
characteri tics
4733 Comparing the means of total attitude score Defore and after intervention 87
474 Level of practice 88
4741 Post intervention total level of practice 88
4742 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic 90
characteristics
4743 Comparing the means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
ix
J
CHAPTERS DISCUSSION
50 Introduction 93
51 Health intervention 93
511 Source of knowledge 93
512 Level of knowledge 94
513 Association between level of knowledge and socio-demographic factors 96
514 Level of attitude 97
515 Association between level of attitude and socio-demographic factors 98
516 Level of practice 100
517 Association between level of practice and socio-demographic factors 101
518 Choice of place of treatment if the child shows signs and symptoms of HFMD 102
519 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 103
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
52 Po t-intervention discussion 104
521 Post intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 104
522 Post intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 105
523 Post intervention changes in practice on HFMD 105
524 Relationship between the changes of knowledge attitude and practice on 106
HFMD and socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
525 Comparison between pre- and post-intervention knowledge attitude and 106
practice score
53 Limitation 107
x
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
10961 Conclusions
11062 Recommendations
111REFERENCES 118APPENDIX 1 124APPENDIX 2 130APPENDIX 3
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
21 Population and sampling of the respondents 22
22 Research timeline pre-intervention activities 27
23 Research timeline for post-intervention activities 28
31 Schedule of a day with community Ice breaking 31
32 Schedule of health intervention programme 35
41 Distribution of the respondents by age 44
42 Distribution of the respondents by race 45
43 Distribution of the respondents by marital status 46
44 Distribution of the respondents by educational level 46
45 Distribution of the respondents by employment status 47
46 Relationship of the respondents with the children 47
47 Source of knowledge on HFMD 49
48 Percentage distribution of the respondents by the level of knowledge on 50
HFMD
49 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 57
410 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 58
and level of knowledge
411 Respondents attitude towards HFMD 60
412 Percentage di tribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 63
and level of attitude
xii
413 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 67
and level of practice
414 Distribution of the choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD
symptoms among the respondents
69
415 Relationship between knowledge and attitude knowledge and practice
attitude and practice among the respondents
70
416 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 77
417 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socioshy
demographic characteristics
79
418 Means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
419 Respondents attitude towards HFMD (Post-intervention) 82
420 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
85
421 Means of total attitude score before and after intervention 87
422 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
90
423 Means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
11 The algorithm of classification on severity of children with HFMD 10
12 Conceptual framework 21
31 Source about awareness of health intervention program 40
32 Attendance of respondents 41
33 Rea ons for not coming to the health intervention program by the respondents 41
34 Program that benefits the respondents 42
35 Evaluation of activities done on health intervention program 42
41 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 45
42 Distribution of respondents who had heard of HFMD 48
43 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 51
44 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD 52
45 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD 53
46 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD 54
47 Histogram on the score of knowledge 55
Level of knowledge of the respondents 56
Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection 57
Histogram on the score on attitude 61
Level of attitude of the respondents 62
xiv
412 Histogram showing the score on practice 65
413 Level of practice of the respondents 66
414 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 72
(Post-intervention)
415 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD (Postshy 73
intervention)
416 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD (Postshy 74
intervention)
417 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD (Postshy 75
intervention)
418 Level of knowledge of the respondents (Post-intervention) 76
419 Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection (Post-intervention) 77
420 Post-intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 78
421 Level of attitude of the respondents (Post-intervention) 83
422 Post-intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 84
423 Level of practice of the respondents (Post-intervention) 88
424 Post-intervention changes in practice on HFMD 89
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 7: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ue t Khidmat ~u UUla
tT VERSm MALAYSIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Declaration ii
Abstract lV
List of Abbreviations XVl
Acknowledgements iii
Abstrak v
Table of Contents vi
List of Appendices middot xi
List of Tables xii
List of Figures xiv
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW
11 Introduction
12 Background information 2
13 Statement of problem 3
14 Significance of the study 4
15 Literature review 5
151 Epidemiology 5
152 Risk factors 7
153 Symptoms and signs 8
154 Causative agent 11
155 Mode of spread 11
156 Complications 12
157 Diagnosis and investigations 13
158 M anagement 13
159 Preventive measures 14
1510 Knowledge attitude and practice 15
vi
16
1
I
Research objectives 17
161 General objective 17
162 Specific objectives 17
17 Hypotheses 18
18 Operational definition 19
19 Conceptual framework 21
CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY
21 Research design and setting 22
22 Population and sampling 22
221 Inclusion criteria 23
222 Exclusion criteria 23
23 Variable 23
24 Data collection 24
241 Study instruments 24
242 Procedures 24
243 Ethical issues 25
25 Data entry analysis and interpretation 26
26 Re earch timeline 27
CHAPTER 3 HEALTH INTERVENTION REPORT
31 Introduction 29
32 Objectives 29
33 Health intervention activities 29
331 A day with community ice breaking 30
332 Health intervention programme Prevent HFMD You Can Make A Change 31
333 Mini health intervention programme 38
34 Evaluation of intervention programme 39
35 Awareness of health intervention programme 39
36 Attendance of respondents 39
vii
I
Satisfactory rating of the programme 37
Benefit from the health intervention programme 38
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS
Introduction41
Socio-demographic characteristics 42
421 Age
422 Gender
423 Race
424 Marital status
425 Educational level
426 Employment status
427 Relationship with children
43 Knowledge on HFMD
431 Source of information on HFMD
432 Level of knowledge (Mode of spread)
433 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms)
434 Level of knowledge (Treatment)
435 Level of knowledge (Prevention)
436 Total score of knowledge
437 As ociation between level of knowledge and each socio-demographic
characteristic
44 Level of attitude
441 Total level of attitude
442 Association between level of attitude and eac~ socio-demographic
characteristic
viii
39
40
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
48
51
52
53
54
55
58
60
60
63
--1
45 Level of practice 65
451 Total score of practice 65
452 Association between level of practice and each socio-demographic 67
characteristic
453 Choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD symptoms 69
46 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 70
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
461 Relationship between knowledge and attitude 70
462 Relationship between knowledge and practice 70
463 Relationship between attitude and practice 70
47 Post-intervention results 71
471 Introduction 71
472 Level of knowledge 71
4721 Level ofknowledge (Mode of spread) 72
4722 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms) 73
4723 Level of knowledge (Treatment) 74
4724 Level of knowledge (Prevention) 75
4725 Post intervention total level of knowledge 76
4726 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socio- 79
demographic characteristics
4727 Comparing the means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
473 Level of attitude 82
4731 Post intervention total level of attitude 82
4732 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic 85
characteri tics
4733 Comparing the means of total attitude score Defore and after intervention 87
474 Level of practice 88
4741 Post intervention total level of practice 88
4742 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic 90
characteristics
4743 Comparing the means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
ix
J
CHAPTERS DISCUSSION
50 Introduction 93
51 Health intervention 93
511 Source of knowledge 93
512 Level of knowledge 94
513 Association between level of knowledge and socio-demographic factors 96
514 Level of attitude 97
515 Association between level of attitude and socio-demographic factors 98
516 Level of practice 100
517 Association between level of practice and socio-demographic factors 101
518 Choice of place of treatment if the child shows signs and symptoms of HFMD 102
519 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 103
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
52 Po t-intervention discussion 104
521 Post intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 104
522 Post intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 105
523 Post intervention changes in practice on HFMD 105
524 Relationship between the changes of knowledge attitude and practice on 106
HFMD and socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
525 Comparison between pre- and post-intervention knowledge attitude and 106
practice score
53 Limitation 107
x
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
10961 Conclusions
11062 Recommendations
111REFERENCES 118APPENDIX 1 124APPENDIX 2 130APPENDIX 3
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
21 Population and sampling of the respondents 22
22 Research timeline pre-intervention activities 27
23 Research timeline for post-intervention activities 28
31 Schedule of a day with community Ice breaking 31
32 Schedule of health intervention programme 35
41 Distribution of the respondents by age 44
42 Distribution of the respondents by race 45
43 Distribution of the respondents by marital status 46
44 Distribution of the respondents by educational level 46
45 Distribution of the respondents by employment status 47
46 Relationship of the respondents with the children 47
47 Source of knowledge on HFMD 49
48 Percentage distribution of the respondents by the level of knowledge on 50
HFMD
49 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 57
410 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 58
and level of knowledge
411 Respondents attitude towards HFMD 60
412 Percentage di tribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 63
and level of attitude
xii
413 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 67
and level of practice
414 Distribution of the choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD
symptoms among the respondents
69
415 Relationship between knowledge and attitude knowledge and practice
attitude and practice among the respondents
70
416 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 77
417 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socioshy
demographic characteristics
79
418 Means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
419 Respondents attitude towards HFMD (Post-intervention) 82
420 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
85
421 Means of total attitude score before and after intervention 87
422 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
90
423 Means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
11 The algorithm of classification on severity of children with HFMD 10
12 Conceptual framework 21
31 Source about awareness of health intervention program 40
32 Attendance of respondents 41
33 Rea ons for not coming to the health intervention program by the respondents 41
34 Program that benefits the respondents 42
35 Evaluation of activities done on health intervention program 42
41 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 45
42 Distribution of respondents who had heard of HFMD 48
43 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 51
44 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD 52
45 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD 53
46 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD 54
47 Histogram on the score of knowledge 55
Level of knowledge of the respondents 56
Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection 57
Histogram on the score on attitude 61
Level of attitude of the respondents 62
xiv
412 Histogram showing the score on practice 65
413 Level of practice of the respondents 66
414 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 72
(Post-intervention)
415 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD (Postshy 73
intervention)
416 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD (Postshy 74
intervention)
417 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD (Postshy 75
intervention)
418 Level of knowledge of the respondents (Post-intervention) 76
419 Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection (Post-intervention) 77
420 Post-intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 78
421 Level of attitude of the respondents (Post-intervention) 83
422 Post-intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 84
423 Level of practice of the respondents (Post-intervention) 88
424 Post-intervention changes in practice on HFMD 89
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 8: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
16
1
I
Research objectives 17
161 General objective 17
162 Specific objectives 17
17 Hypotheses 18
18 Operational definition 19
19 Conceptual framework 21
CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY
21 Research design and setting 22
22 Population and sampling 22
221 Inclusion criteria 23
222 Exclusion criteria 23
23 Variable 23
24 Data collection 24
241 Study instruments 24
242 Procedures 24
243 Ethical issues 25
25 Data entry analysis and interpretation 26
26 Re earch timeline 27
CHAPTER 3 HEALTH INTERVENTION REPORT
31 Introduction 29
32 Objectives 29
33 Health intervention activities 29
331 A day with community ice breaking 30
332 Health intervention programme Prevent HFMD You Can Make A Change 31
333 Mini health intervention programme 38
34 Evaluation of intervention programme 39
35 Awareness of health intervention programme 39
36 Attendance of respondents 39
vii
I
Satisfactory rating of the programme 37
Benefit from the health intervention programme 38
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS
Introduction41
Socio-demographic characteristics 42
421 Age
422 Gender
423 Race
424 Marital status
425 Educational level
426 Employment status
427 Relationship with children
43 Knowledge on HFMD
431 Source of information on HFMD
432 Level of knowledge (Mode of spread)
433 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms)
434 Level of knowledge (Treatment)
435 Level of knowledge (Prevention)
436 Total score of knowledge
437 As ociation between level of knowledge and each socio-demographic
characteristic
44 Level of attitude
441 Total level of attitude
442 Association between level of attitude and eac~ socio-demographic
characteristic
viii
39
40
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
48
51
52
53
54
55
58
60
60
63
--1
45 Level of practice 65
451 Total score of practice 65
452 Association between level of practice and each socio-demographic 67
characteristic
453 Choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD symptoms 69
46 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 70
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
461 Relationship between knowledge and attitude 70
462 Relationship between knowledge and practice 70
463 Relationship between attitude and practice 70
47 Post-intervention results 71
471 Introduction 71
472 Level of knowledge 71
4721 Level ofknowledge (Mode of spread) 72
4722 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms) 73
4723 Level of knowledge (Treatment) 74
4724 Level of knowledge (Prevention) 75
4725 Post intervention total level of knowledge 76
4726 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socio- 79
demographic characteristics
4727 Comparing the means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
473 Level of attitude 82
4731 Post intervention total level of attitude 82
4732 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic 85
characteri tics
4733 Comparing the means of total attitude score Defore and after intervention 87
474 Level of practice 88
4741 Post intervention total level of practice 88
4742 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic 90
characteristics
4743 Comparing the means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
ix
J
CHAPTERS DISCUSSION
50 Introduction 93
51 Health intervention 93
511 Source of knowledge 93
512 Level of knowledge 94
513 Association between level of knowledge and socio-demographic factors 96
514 Level of attitude 97
515 Association between level of attitude and socio-demographic factors 98
516 Level of practice 100
517 Association between level of practice and socio-demographic factors 101
518 Choice of place of treatment if the child shows signs and symptoms of HFMD 102
519 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 103
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
52 Po t-intervention discussion 104
521 Post intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 104
522 Post intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 105
523 Post intervention changes in practice on HFMD 105
524 Relationship between the changes of knowledge attitude and practice on 106
HFMD and socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
525 Comparison between pre- and post-intervention knowledge attitude and 106
practice score
53 Limitation 107
x
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
10961 Conclusions
11062 Recommendations
111REFERENCES 118APPENDIX 1 124APPENDIX 2 130APPENDIX 3
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
21 Population and sampling of the respondents 22
22 Research timeline pre-intervention activities 27
23 Research timeline for post-intervention activities 28
31 Schedule of a day with community Ice breaking 31
32 Schedule of health intervention programme 35
41 Distribution of the respondents by age 44
42 Distribution of the respondents by race 45
43 Distribution of the respondents by marital status 46
44 Distribution of the respondents by educational level 46
45 Distribution of the respondents by employment status 47
46 Relationship of the respondents with the children 47
47 Source of knowledge on HFMD 49
48 Percentage distribution of the respondents by the level of knowledge on 50
HFMD
49 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 57
410 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 58
and level of knowledge
411 Respondents attitude towards HFMD 60
412 Percentage di tribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 63
and level of attitude
xii
413 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 67
and level of practice
414 Distribution of the choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD
symptoms among the respondents
69
415 Relationship between knowledge and attitude knowledge and practice
attitude and practice among the respondents
70
416 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 77
417 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socioshy
demographic characteristics
79
418 Means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
419 Respondents attitude towards HFMD (Post-intervention) 82
420 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
85
421 Means of total attitude score before and after intervention 87
422 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
90
423 Means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
11 The algorithm of classification on severity of children with HFMD 10
12 Conceptual framework 21
31 Source about awareness of health intervention program 40
32 Attendance of respondents 41
33 Rea ons for not coming to the health intervention program by the respondents 41
34 Program that benefits the respondents 42
35 Evaluation of activities done on health intervention program 42
41 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 45
42 Distribution of respondents who had heard of HFMD 48
43 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 51
44 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD 52
45 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD 53
46 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD 54
47 Histogram on the score of knowledge 55
Level of knowledge of the respondents 56
Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection 57
Histogram on the score on attitude 61
Level of attitude of the respondents 62
xiv
412 Histogram showing the score on practice 65
413 Level of practice of the respondents 66
414 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 72
(Post-intervention)
415 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD (Postshy 73
intervention)
416 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD (Postshy 74
intervention)
417 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD (Postshy 75
intervention)
418 Level of knowledge of the respondents (Post-intervention) 76
419 Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection (Post-intervention) 77
420 Post-intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 78
421 Level of attitude of the respondents (Post-intervention) 83
422 Post-intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 84
423 Level of practice of the respondents (Post-intervention) 88
424 Post-intervention changes in practice on HFMD 89
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 9: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Satisfactory rating of the programme 37
Benefit from the health intervention programme 38
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS
Introduction41
Socio-demographic characteristics 42
421 Age
422 Gender
423 Race
424 Marital status
425 Educational level
426 Employment status
427 Relationship with children
43 Knowledge on HFMD
431 Source of information on HFMD
432 Level of knowledge (Mode of spread)
433 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms)
434 Level of knowledge (Treatment)
435 Level of knowledge (Prevention)
436 Total score of knowledge
437 As ociation between level of knowledge and each socio-demographic
characteristic
44 Level of attitude
441 Total level of attitude
442 Association between level of attitude and eac~ socio-demographic
characteristic
viii
39
40
43
44
44
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
48
51
52
53
54
55
58
60
60
63
--1
45 Level of practice 65
451 Total score of practice 65
452 Association between level of practice and each socio-demographic 67
characteristic
453 Choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD symptoms 69
46 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 70
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
461 Relationship between knowledge and attitude 70
462 Relationship between knowledge and practice 70
463 Relationship between attitude and practice 70
47 Post-intervention results 71
471 Introduction 71
472 Level of knowledge 71
4721 Level ofknowledge (Mode of spread) 72
4722 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms) 73
4723 Level of knowledge (Treatment) 74
4724 Level of knowledge (Prevention) 75
4725 Post intervention total level of knowledge 76
4726 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socio- 79
demographic characteristics
4727 Comparing the means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
473 Level of attitude 82
4731 Post intervention total level of attitude 82
4732 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic 85
characteri tics
4733 Comparing the means of total attitude score Defore and after intervention 87
474 Level of practice 88
4741 Post intervention total level of practice 88
4742 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic 90
characteristics
4743 Comparing the means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
ix
J
CHAPTERS DISCUSSION
50 Introduction 93
51 Health intervention 93
511 Source of knowledge 93
512 Level of knowledge 94
513 Association between level of knowledge and socio-demographic factors 96
514 Level of attitude 97
515 Association between level of attitude and socio-demographic factors 98
516 Level of practice 100
517 Association between level of practice and socio-demographic factors 101
518 Choice of place of treatment if the child shows signs and symptoms of HFMD 102
519 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 103
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
52 Po t-intervention discussion 104
521 Post intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 104
522 Post intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 105
523 Post intervention changes in practice on HFMD 105
524 Relationship between the changes of knowledge attitude and practice on 106
HFMD and socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
525 Comparison between pre- and post-intervention knowledge attitude and 106
practice score
53 Limitation 107
x
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
10961 Conclusions
11062 Recommendations
111REFERENCES 118APPENDIX 1 124APPENDIX 2 130APPENDIX 3
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
21 Population and sampling of the respondents 22
22 Research timeline pre-intervention activities 27
23 Research timeline for post-intervention activities 28
31 Schedule of a day with community Ice breaking 31
32 Schedule of health intervention programme 35
41 Distribution of the respondents by age 44
42 Distribution of the respondents by race 45
43 Distribution of the respondents by marital status 46
44 Distribution of the respondents by educational level 46
45 Distribution of the respondents by employment status 47
46 Relationship of the respondents with the children 47
47 Source of knowledge on HFMD 49
48 Percentage distribution of the respondents by the level of knowledge on 50
HFMD
49 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 57
410 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 58
and level of knowledge
411 Respondents attitude towards HFMD 60
412 Percentage di tribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 63
and level of attitude
xii
413 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 67
and level of practice
414 Distribution of the choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD
symptoms among the respondents
69
415 Relationship between knowledge and attitude knowledge and practice
attitude and practice among the respondents
70
416 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 77
417 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socioshy
demographic characteristics
79
418 Means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
419 Respondents attitude towards HFMD (Post-intervention) 82
420 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
85
421 Means of total attitude score before and after intervention 87
422 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
90
423 Means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
11 The algorithm of classification on severity of children with HFMD 10
12 Conceptual framework 21
31 Source about awareness of health intervention program 40
32 Attendance of respondents 41
33 Rea ons for not coming to the health intervention program by the respondents 41
34 Program that benefits the respondents 42
35 Evaluation of activities done on health intervention program 42
41 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 45
42 Distribution of respondents who had heard of HFMD 48
43 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 51
44 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD 52
45 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD 53
46 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD 54
47 Histogram on the score of knowledge 55
Level of knowledge of the respondents 56
Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection 57
Histogram on the score on attitude 61
Level of attitude of the respondents 62
xiv
412 Histogram showing the score on practice 65
413 Level of practice of the respondents 66
414 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 72
(Post-intervention)
415 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD (Postshy 73
intervention)
416 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD (Postshy 74
intervention)
417 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD (Postshy 75
intervention)
418 Level of knowledge of the respondents (Post-intervention) 76
419 Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection (Post-intervention) 77
420 Post-intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 78
421 Level of attitude of the respondents (Post-intervention) 83
422 Post-intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 84
423 Level of practice of the respondents (Post-intervention) 88
424 Post-intervention changes in practice on HFMD 89
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 10: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
45 Level of practice 65
451 Total score of practice 65
452 Association between level of practice and each socio-demographic 67
characteristic
453 Choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD symptoms 69
46 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 70
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
461 Relationship between knowledge and attitude 70
462 Relationship between knowledge and practice 70
463 Relationship between attitude and practice 70
47 Post-intervention results 71
471 Introduction 71
472 Level of knowledge 71
4721 Level ofknowledge (Mode of spread) 72
4722 Level of knowledge (Signs and symptoms) 73
4723 Level of knowledge (Treatment) 74
4724 Level of knowledge (Prevention) 75
4725 Post intervention total level of knowledge 76
4726 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socio- 79
demographic characteristics
4727 Comparing the means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
473 Level of attitude 82
4731 Post intervention total level of attitude 82
4732 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic 85
characteri tics
4733 Comparing the means of total attitude score Defore and after intervention 87
474 Level of practice 88
4741 Post intervention total level of practice 88
4742 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic 90
characteristics
4743 Comparing the means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
ix
J
CHAPTERS DISCUSSION
50 Introduction 93
51 Health intervention 93
511 Source of knowledge 93
512 Level of knowledge 94
513 Association between level of knowledge and socio-demographic factors 96
514 Level of attitude 97
515 Association between level of attitude and socio-demographic factors 98
516 Level of practice 100
517 Association between level of practice and socio-demographic factors 101
518 Choice of place of treatment if the child shows signs and symptoms of HFMD 102
519 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 103
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
52 Po t-intervention discussion 104
521 Post intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 104
522 Post intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 105
523 Post intervention changes in practice on HFMD 105
524 Relationship between the changes of knowledge attitude and practice on 106
HFMD and socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
525 Comparison between pre- and post-intervention knowledge attitude and 106
practice score
53 Limitation 107
x
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
10961 Conclusions
11062 Recommendations
111REFERENCES 118APPENDIX 1 124APPENDIX 2 130APPENDIX 3
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
21 Population and sampling of the respondents 22
22 Research timeline pre-intervention activities 27
23 Research timeline for post-intervention activities 28
31 Schedule of a day with community Ice breaking 31
32 Schedule of health intervention programme 35
41 Distribution of the respondents by age 44
42 Distribution of the respondents by race 45
43 Distribution of the respondents by marital status 46
44 Distribution of the respondents by educational level 46
45 Distribution of the respondents by employment status 47
46 Relationship of the respondents with the children 47
47 Source of knowledge on HFMD 49
48 Percentage distribution of the respondents by the level of knowledge on 50
HFMD
49 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 57
410 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 58
and level of knowledge
411 Respondents attitude towards HFMD 60
412 Percentage di tribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 63
and level of attitude
xii
413 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 67
and level of practice
414 Distribution of the choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD
symptoms among the respondents
69
415 Relationship between knowledge and attitude knowledge and practice
attitude and practice among the respondents
70
416 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 77
417 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socioshy
demographic characteristics
79
418 Means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
419 Respondents attitude towards HFMD (Post-intervention) 82
420 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
85
421 Means of total attitude score before and after intervention 87
422 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
90
423 Means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
11 The algorithm of classification on severity of children with HFMD 10
12 Conceptual framework 21
31 Source about awareness of health intervention program 40
32 Attendance of respondents 41
33 Rea ons for not coming to the health intervention program by the respondents 41
34 Program that benefits the respondents 42
35 Evaluation of activities done on health intervention program 42
41 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 45
42 Distribution of respondents who had heard of HFMD 48
43 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 51
44 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD 52
45 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD 53
46 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD 54
47 Histogram on the score of knowledge 55
Level of knowledge of the respondents 56
Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection 57
Histogram on the score on attitude 61
Level of attitude of the respondents 62
xiv
412 Histogram showing the score on practice 65
413 Level of practice of the respondents 66
414 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 72
(Post-intervention)
415 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD (Postshy 73
intervention)
416 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD (Postshy 74
intervention)
417 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD (Postshy 75
intervention)
418 Level of knowledge of the respondents (Post-intervention) 76
419 Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection (Post-intervention) 77
420 Post-intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 78
421 Level of attitude of the respondents (Post-intervention) 83
422 Post-intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 84
423 Level of practice of the respondents (Post-intervention) 88
424 Post-intervention changes in practice on HFMD 89
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 11: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
CHAPTERS DISCUSSION
50 Introduction 93
51 Health intervention 93
511 Source of knowledge 93
512 Level of knowledge 94
513 Association between level of knowledge and socio-demographic factors 96
514 Level of attitude 97
515 Association between level of attitude and socio-demographic factors 98
516 Level of practice 100
517 Association between level of practice and socio-demographic factors 101
518 Choice of place of treatment if the child shows signs and symptoms of HFMD 102
519 Relationship between level of knowledge level of attitude and level of 103
practice (KAP) concerning HFMD before intervention
52 Po t-intervention discussion 104
521 Post intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 104
522 Post intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 105
523 Post intervention changes in practice on HFMD 105
524 Relationship between the changes of knowledge attitude and practice on 106
HFMD and socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
525 Comparison between pre- and post-intervention knowledge attitude and 106
practice score
53 Limitation 107
x
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
10961 Conclusions
11062 Recommendations
111REFERENCES 118APPENDIX 1 124APPENDIX 2 130APPENDIX 3
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
21 Population and sampling of the respondents 22
22 Research timeline pre-intervention activities 27
23 Research timeline for post-intervention activities 28
31 Schedule of a day with community Ice breaking 31
32 Schedule of health intervention programme 35
41 Distribution of the respondents by age 44
42 Distribution of the respondents by race 45
43 Distribution of the respondents by marital status 46
44 Distribution of the respondents by educational level 46
45 Distribution of the respondents by employment status 47
46 Relationship of the respondents with the children 47
47 Source of knowledge on HFMD 49
48 Percentage distribution of the respondents by the level of knowledge on 50
HFMD
49 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 57
410 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 58
and level of knowledge
411 Respondents attitude towards HFMD 60
412 Percentage di tribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 63
and level of attitude
xii
413 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 67
and level of practice
414 Distribution of the choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD
symptoms among the respondents
69
415 Relationship between knowledge and attitude knowledge and practice
attitude and practice among the respondents
70
416 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 77
417 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socioshy
demographic characteristics
79
418 Means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
419 Respondents attitude towards HFMD (Post-intervention) 82
420 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
85
421 Means of total attitude score before and after intervention 87
422 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
90
423 Means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
11 The algorithm of classification on severity of children with HFMD 10
12 Conceptual framework 21
31 Source about awareness of health intervention program 40
32 Attendance of respondents 41
33 Rea ons for not coming to the health intervention program by the respondents 41
34 Program that benefits the respondents 42
35 Evaluation of activities done on health intervention program 42
41 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 45
42 Distribution of respondents who had heard of HFMD 48
43 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 51
44 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD 52
45 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD 53
46 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD 54
47 Histogram on the score of knowledge 55
Level of knowledge of the respondents 56
Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection 57
Histogram on the score on attitude 61
Level of attitude of the respondents 62
xiv
412 Histogram showing the score on practice 65
413 Level of practice of the respondents 66
414 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 72
(Post-intervention)
415 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD (Postshy 73
intervention)
416 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD (Postshy 74
intervention)
417 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD (Postshy 75
intervention)
418 Level of knowledge of the respondents (Post-intervention) 76
419 Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection (Post-intervention) 77
420 Post-intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 78
421 Level of attitude of the respondents (Post-intervention) 83
422 Post-intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 84
423 Level of practice of the respondents (Post-intervention) 88
424 Post-intervention changes in practice on HFMD 89
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 12: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
10961 Conclusions
11062 Recommendations
111REFERENCES 118APPENDIX 1 124APPENDIX 2 130APPENDIX 3
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
21 Population and sampling of the respondents 22
22 Research timeline pre-intervention activities 27
23 Research timeline for post-intervention activities 28
31 Schedule of a day with community Ice breaking 31
32 Schedule of health intervention programme 35
41 Distribution of the respondents by age 44
42 Distribution of the respondents by race 45
43 Distribution of the respondents by marital status 46
44 Distribution of the respondents by educational level 46
45 Distribution of the respondents by employment status 47
46 Relationship of the respondents with the children 47
47 Source of knowledge on HFMD 49
48 Percentage distribution of the respondents by the level of knowledge on 50
HFMD
49 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 57
410 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 58
and level of knowledge
411 Respondents attitude towards HFMD 60
412 Percentage di tribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 63
and level of attitude
xii
413 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 67
and level of practice
414 Distribution of the choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD
symptoms among the respondents
69
415 Relationship between knowledge and attitude knowledge and practice
attitude and practice among the respondents
70
416 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 77
417 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socioshy
demographic characteristics
79
418 Means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
419 Respondents attitude towards HFMD (Post-intervention) 82
420 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
85
421 Means of total attitude score before and after intervention 87
422 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
90
423 Means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
11 The algorithm of classification on severity of children with HFMD 10
12 Conceptual framework 21
31 Source about awareness of health intervention program 40
32 Attendance of respondents 41
33 Rea ons for not coming to the health intervention program by the respondents 41
34 Program that benefits the respondents 42
35 Evaluation of activities done on health intervention program 42
41 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 45
42 Distribution of respondents who had heard of HFMD 48
43 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 51
44 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD 52
45 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD 53
46 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD 54
47 Histogram on the score of knowledge 55
Level of knowledge of the respondents 56
Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection 57
Histogram on the score on attitude 61
Level of attitude of the respondents 62
xiv
412 Histogram showing the score on practice 65
413 Level of practice of the respondents 66
414 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 72
(Post-intervention)
415 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD (Postshy 73
intervention)
416 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD (Postshy 74
intervention)
417 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD (Postshy 75
intervention)
418 Level of knowledge of the respondents (Post-intervention) 76
419 Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection (Post-intervention) 77
420 Post-intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 78
421 Level of attitude of the respondents (Post-intervention) 83
422 Post-intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 84
423 Level of practice of the respondents (Post-intervention) 88
424 Post-intervention changes in practice on HFMD 89
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 13: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
21 Population and sampling of the respondents 22
22 Research timeline pre-intervention activities 27
23 Research timeline for post-intervention activities 28
31 Schedule of a day with community Ice breaking 31
32 Schedule of health intervention programme 35
41 Distribution of the respondents by age 44
42 Distribution of the respondents by race 45
43 Distribution of the respondents by marital status 46
44 Distribution of the respondents by educational level 46
45 Distribution of the respondents by employment status 47
46 Relationship of the respondents with the children 47
47 Source of knowledge on HFMD 49
48 Percentage distribution of the respondents by the level of knowledge on 50
HFMD
49 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 57
410 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 58
and level of knowledge
411 Respondents attitude towards HFMD 60
412 Percentage di tribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 63
and level of attitude
xii
413 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 67
and level of practice
414 Distribution of the choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD
symptoms among the respondents
69
415 Relationship between knowledge and attitude knowledge and practice
attitude and practice among the respondents
70
416 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 77
417 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socioshy
demographic characteristics
79
418 Means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
419 Respondents attitude towards HFMD (Post-intervention) 82
420 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
85
421 Means of total attitude score before and after intervention 87
422 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
90
423 Means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
11 The algorithm of classification on severity of children with HFMD 10
12 Conceptual framework 21
31 Source about awareness of health intervention program 40
32 Attendance of respondents 41
33 Rea ons for not coming to the health intervention program by the respondents 41
34 Program that benefits the respondents 42
35 Evaluation of activities done on health intervention program 42
41 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 45
42 Distribution of respondents who had heard of HFMD 48
43 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 51
44 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD 52
45 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD 53
46 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD 54
47 Histogram on the score of knowledge 55
Level of knowledge of the respondents 56
Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection 57
Histogram on the score on attitude 61
Level of attitude of the respondents 62
xiv
412 Histogram showing the score on practice 65
413 Level of practice of the respondents 66
414 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 72
(Post-intervention)
415 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD (Postshy 73
intervention)
416 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD (Postshy 74
intervention)
417 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD (Postshy 75
intervention)
418 Level of knowledge of the respondents (Post-intervention) 76
419 Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection (Post-intervention) 77
420 Post-intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 78
421 Level of attitude of the respondents (Post-intervention) 83
422 Post-intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 84
423 Level of practice of the respondents (Post-intervention) 88
424 Post-intervention changes in practice on HFMD 89
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 14: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
413 Percentage distribution of respondents by socio-demographic characteristics 67
and level of practice
414 Distribution of the choice of seeking medical advice for treatment of HFMD
symptoms among the respondents
69
415 Relationship between knowledge and attitude knowledge and practice
attitude and practice among the respondents
70
416 Total level of knowledge for each subsection 77
417 Relationship between changes in knowledge on HFMD and socioshy
demographic characteristics
79
418 Means of knowledge score before and after intervention 81
419 Respondents attitude towards HFMD (Post-intervention) 82
420 Relationship between changes in attitude on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
85
421 Means of total attitude score before and after intervention 87
422 Relationship between changes in practice on HFMD and socio-demographic
characteristics
90
423 Means of total practice score before and after intervention 92
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
11 The algorithm of classification on severity of children with HFMD 10
12 Conceptual framework 21
31 Source about awareness of health intervention program 40
32 Attendance of respondents 41
33 Rea ons for not coming to the health intervention program by the respondents 41
34 Program that benefits the respondents 42
35 Evaluation of activities done on health intervention program 42
41 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 45
42 Distribution of respondents who had heard of HFMD 48
43 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 51
44 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD 52
45 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD 53
46 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD 54
47 Histogram on the score of knowledge 55
Level of knowledge of the respondents 56
Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection 57
Histogram on the score on attitude 61
Level of attitude of the respondents 62
xiv
412 Histogram showing the score on practice 65
413 Level of practice of the respondents 66
414 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 72
(Post-intervention)
415 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD (Postshy 73
intervention)
416 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD (Postshy 74
intervention)
417 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD (Postshy 75
intervention)
418 Level of knowledge of the respondents (Post-intervention) 76
419 Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection (Post-intervention) 77
420 Post-intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 78
421 Level of attitude of the respondents (Post-intervention) 83
422 Post-intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 84
423 Level of practice of the respondents (Post-intervention) 88
424 Post-intervention changes in practice on HFMD 89
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 15: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
LIST OF FIGURES
PAGE
11 The algorithm of classification on severity of children with HFMD 10
12 Conceptual framework 21
31 Source about awareness of health intervention program 40
32 Attendance of respondents 41
33 Rea ons for not coming to the health intervention program by the respondents 41
34 Program that benefits the respondents 42
35 Evaluation of activities done on health intervention program 42
41 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 45
42 Distribution of respondents who had heard of HFMD 48
43 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 51
44 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD 52
45 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD 53
46 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD 54
47 Histogram on the score of knowledge 55
Level of knowledge of the respondents 56
Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection 57
Histogram on the score on attitude 61
Level of attitude of the respondents 62
xiv
412 Histogram showing the score on practice 65
413 Level of practice of the respondents 66
414 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 72
(Post-intervention)
415 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD (Postshy 73
intervention)
416 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD (Postshy 74
intervention)
417 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD (Postshy 75
intervention)
418 Level of knowledge of the respondents (Post-intervention) 76
419 Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection (Post-intervention) 77
420 Post-intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 78
421 Level of attitude of the respondents (Post-intervention) 83
422 Post-intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 84
423 Level of practice of the respondents (Post-intervention) 88
424 Post-intervention changes in practice on HFMD 89
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 16: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
412 Histogram showing the score on practice 65
413 Level of practice of the respondents 66
414 The level of knowledge on mode of spread of HFMD among respondents 72
(Post-intervention)
415 The level of respondents knowledge on signs and symptoms of HFMD (Postshy 73
intervention)
416 The level of respondents knowledge on treatment of HFMD (Postshy 74
intervention)
417 The level of respondents knowledge on prevention of HFMD (Postshy 75
intervention)
418 Level of knowledge of the respondents (Post-intervention) 76
419 Level of knowledge of the respondents for each subsection (Post-intervention) 77
420 Post-intervention changes in knowledge on HFMD 78
421 Level of attitude of the respondents (Post-intervention) 83
422 Post-intervention changes in attitude on HFMD 84
423 Level of practice of the respondents (Post-intervention) 88
424 Post-intervention changes in practice on HFMD 89
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 17: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
eNS Central Nervous System
CSF Cerebrospinal Auid
CV-AI6 Coxsackievirus A 16
CVS Cardiovascular System
EV 71 Enterovirus 71
HFMD Hand Foot and Mouth Disease
KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice
xvi
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 18: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute viral illness that affects children and
infants which may occur in cluster or outbreaks This disease occurs around the world but
particularly affect East and Southeast Asia the most This disease can lead to death if
mplications develop This viral illness is caused by the group of human enterovirus including
genus of family Picornaviridae Polioviruses Echoviruses Coxsackie virus groups A and B
and Bandenteroviruses 68-71 are the members of the enterovirus genus which harm human
(Zeichhardt amp Grunert 2004) The viruses mainly transmit through direct contact with discharge
infected person such as saliva blisters fluid or stool of the infected person A child with
-_LI usually presents with mild fever accompanied by headache sore throat and general
malaise Eventually the sign of blister-like sore develops on the hands feet and buttocks of the
child Most of the children with this disease also suffer from ulcers in the mouth throat and
_IDe leading to loss of appetite HFMD is closely related to poor hygiene and close contact
iofected persons This disease can be severe when it can cause neurological complications
buman being (Chang et a1 1999)
In the year 1998 the worlds largest outbreak of HFMD had occurred in Taiwan where
00000 cases were reported Out of these numbers 400 of the cases involved neurological
~ati4ons and 78 of them died (Ho et al 1999) In the following year HFMD caused
__liiea in Western Australia and Perth In the subsequent year outbreak of this disease had
reported in Korea Taiwan Singapore Japan and Peninsular Malaysia (Podin et aI 2006)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 19: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
In Malaysia this contagious disease had become endemic causing outbreak and death
6 children (Ministry of Health of Malaysia 2010) About 2628 cases were reported in the
ear 1997 with 31 cases of death involving mostly children and infants In the year 2010 the
JlUI~1I of cases spiked up to 8769 cases but decreased in the subsequent year to 2919 cases
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) there was an increase in the
Dumber of cases in Sarawak from April to June 1997 There were 29 cases of death due to
RFMD involving children less than 6 years old due to progressive cardiorespiratory failure
About 100 of cases were characterized by presence of fever 66 had ora ulcer and 62 with
on their extremities Furthermore 24 children presented with cardiopulmonary symptoms
Therefore health promotion and education especially on hygiene should be conducted in
bull __sil This is very important in order to prevent the prevalence of HFMD not only in
IftDlaYBiia but also worldwide
Background information
enga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme is one of the four major Rajang Security Command
COM) areas in Sibu Division Sarawak This resettlement is located in Selangau District
is approximately 45 kiiometres from Sibu town Nanga Sekuau Resettlement Scheme was
to be set up in 1972 Currently it has a total of 2q relocated longhouses with a recorded
pqPJlllw(lln of 3677 in which 95 are Than while 5 is shared by other ethnics Clean water to
supplied by Public Works Department (PWD) while 24 hour electrical supply is
IiIIKnWlbe Sarawak Electrical Supply Company (SESCO) The rubbish collection is catered
Rural District Council There is also a Sekuau Health Clinic which provides health
2
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 20: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
I ces to the community including Rural Curative Service (RCS) Outpatient Department
(OPO) Maternal and Child Health Care (MCHC) Village Health Service (VHS) and School
Health Service (SHS) The clinic also has the expanded scope of services such as Special Needs
Ciildren Early Intervention Program and Program Warga Emas The area is accessible by road
also by river Majority of the residents are farmers and a minority are government servants
or working in private sectors
13 Statement of the problem
Due to human population growth all over the world frequent international traveling
crowded habitats urbanization and alteration of microbial properties outbreaks of certain
infectious diseases are frequently heard HFMD is also now considered an emerging infectious
disease that affects the population worldwide
Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the primary risk factor for the transmission of HFMD is
Ibrough household transmission Thus the more the children in a family the higher the risk of
household transmission Kampung Sekuau resettlement scheme is a village consisting of several
houses which can accommodate on average more than hundred residents per house Thus in
_i~(3IOW~tIed living environment the risk of the children getting HFMD is high If the parents or
iClilease the incidence in the village will be remarkably high Thus through this research we
like to identify the ocio-demographic characteristics and to study the knowledge attitude
10 years and
that we can assess the KAP status of the parents on the disease
3
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 21: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
The social impact of HFMD to the health care providers family members and chBdren
also of much concern in this research For the health care providers the social cost of HFMD
IS quite substantial Lou and Lin (2006) stated that the direct cost which includes hospitalization
Woratory tests diagnostic test on children infected with HFMD in United States is around $ 69 shy
111 while the indirect cost for a hired caretaker and patient worker consumed about $ 63 - 442
Furthermore a family with a child infected with HFMD will have a negative impact on their
daily livings and work The childs academic performance wil1 be affected as well Thus it is
important for us to conduct a study to assess the KAP on HFMD among the parents so that
intervention can be done to improve their KAP
Our target populations in this research are the parents or caregiver of any child aged 10
years and below This is because a study has proven that children aged 10 years and below are
_epable to HFMD (Nervi 2012)
Significance of the study
The findings made through this interventional study will be useful as a baseline data for
professionals and researchers who are interested in a similar study Besides it will give
_lIt information to parents or caregiver of the children concerning the necessary care and
liIrilV8IlIti(]in of the disease
4
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 22: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
luUI Khidmal Maklumllt AkadtbullbullHmiddot UNIVERSm l1ALA)SIA SARAWAJ(
Literature review
Epidemiology
The virus EV71 which causes HFMD was first discovered in 1969 when it was isolated
child with aseptic meningitis Since then the virus had spread to many parts of the world
HFMD due to EV71 infection involved two patterns of outbreak The first pattern was sporadic
or small outbreak which has occurred in the United States Sweden Japan and Australia The
__ pattern was an epidemic outbreak which involved high mortality and had occurred in
countries such as Bulgaria in 1975 (44 deaths) Hungary in 1978 (47 deaths) Malaysia in
1J7 (at least 31 deaths) and Taiwan in 1998 involving 78 deaths (Chan et aI 2011) Their
deges showed that the outbreaks in Vietnam Malaysia Taiwan and China had claimed more
large outbreak of HFMD due to the neurovirulent strain of EV71 emerged in Malaysia
997 and caused a high mortality of at least thirty-one cases of death among young children
IDIjority of deaths were from Sibu with eleven reported cases while Sarikei had seven death
years later in 2000 there was another recurrent outbreak of the disease in Malaysia
deggilt cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia There was another outbreak in the year
Malaysia but the cases and mortality rate were not recorded well Then there was
two recorded cases of death in Peninsular Malaysia during late 2005 followed by a larger
in Sarawak with six deaths Nevertheless the ongoing outbreak continued in year 2010
Malaysia (Chua amp Abdul 2011) Their studies showed that recurrence of HFMD
m~_curred every 24 years
5
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 23: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
On the 23rd February 2006 there were 923 reported HFMD cases in Sarawak as
-1P1IecI to 73 cases in 2005 Sibu division 436 cases were reported from 1 st January 2006 to
February 2006 However there were only 80 reported cases over the previous years There
41 registered cases reported in Kuching in 2005 followed by 118 cases the following year
Bintulu the number of cases reported were 13 in 2005 and increased to 211 cases in 2006
(Sarawak Health Department 2006)
In the year 2007 the number of HFMD cases in Sarawak was 6571 In the year 2008
INlftP1IIfIII1P a high number of HFMD cases in Sarawak which recorded 10505 cases which is a
iDcrease from the previous year (The Star Online 2009) In the year 2009 HFMD records
~Idll~ the epidemic level in Sarawak with a total number of 9655 cases reported (The Star
~~_ 2012) In the year 2010 there were 8769 cases of HFMD in Malaysia (Bernamacom
In 2011 HFMD in Malaysia recorded a total number of 2919 cases Sarawak recorded
_~IU_ number of HFMD in the country which is 914 cases followed by Selangor which had
~ - The other reported cases were Johor and Perlis with identical 300 cases and Penang
RII)IJUIIIIC There was no reported death case in year 2011 (Bernamacom 2011)
Since the HFMD outbreak in Malaysia in 1997 was found to be due to human enterovirus
I) a surveillance programme was set up in March 1998 to study the patterns and
Iiiisti~cs of the disease in Sarawak as well as to understand the dynamics of EV71
IIpln as a measure to provide early warning of impending outbreaks Based on their
et aI 2006) they showed that EV71 outbreaks have occurred every three years in
as the outbreak in year 1997 2000 2003 and 2006 Besides it was shown that the
6
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7
![Page 24: an interventional study on the knowledge, attitude and practice on ...](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022030319/58676abe1a28abc8408ba134/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
epidemiological curves were influenced by social factors such as the media influence or
movements during big public holidays especially during Hari Gawai which is a local
unique to people in Sarawak In these studies EY71 was proven as not the only virus
_lied with HFMD as other subgenus or serotype of enterovirus such as Coxsackievlirus A 16
AIO can cause the disease as well However it is known that EY71 is the
virus that causes very large outbreaks The transmission of virus can be rapid as many
-PICstart travelling or moving about the state especially during festive season such as Hari
ben the outbreaks has not reached baseline
According to the Sarawak Health Department (2006) children below 10 years old are
w lnerable to get this disease However the disease is more severe with higher number of
aJiPli(atilons in children under 5 years old There is no difference in number between males and
There are several areas in Sarawak which have been identified as hotspots of HFMD
IIklilldllldes Sibu Miri Kuching and Bintulu (Sarawak Health Department 2006)
~tIimiddotng to Chang et al (2002) the risk factors of HFMD are children previous contact
disease or herpangina cases attendance at kindergarten or child care centers large
of children in a family and residence in a rural area Poor hygienic and sanitary
rIIr also found to be one of the risk factors for HFMD (Chinese CDC 2008)
_lren less than J0 years of age are the group that is susceptible to HFMD (Nervi
outEll there is still lack of evidence to support this the relative immaturity of the
7