An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all...

19
An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010

Transcript of An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all...

Page 1: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

An Approach to Conciliating Harassment

Disputes

2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA

“Against all Odds”Ritz Hotel

2 – 4 December 2010

Page 2: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

Overview of Session

1. The commissioners 'mandate' to conciliate harassment disputes.

2. Conciliating a harassment dispute, placing ourselves in an applicant's 'shoes' (including, being aware of, and sensitive to,

our own inherent prejudices.)

3. Best practice approaches.

Page 3: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

Constitution of the RSA, Act 108 of 1996

Equality Section 9 (4)

No person may unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds in terms of subsection (3).

National legislation must be enacted to prevent or prohibit unfair discrimination.

Page 4: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

Subsection 9 (3) includes:

race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth.

Page 5: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

Employment Equity Act, 55 of 1998

Prohibition of unfair discrimination

Section 6 (1) No person may unfairly discriminate, directly or indirectly, against an employee, in any employment policy or practice, on one or more grounds, including race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, family responsibility, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, HIV status, conscience, belief, political opinion, culture, language and birth.

Page 6: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

Section 6 (3) Harassment of an employee is a form

of unfair discrimination and is prohibited on any one, or a combination of grounds of unfair discrimination listed in subsection (1).

Page 7: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

AN APPLICANT’S STORY.......

.

Page 8: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

An Applicant’s Story

What were your observations about what happened:

- At the front desk?- At the conciliation process?

What could have been done differently?

Page 9: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

Best practice approach - from 'front desk' to conciliation

Front desk

- Have designated CMO's deal with discrimination matters. (Key attributes to include; respect, non-judgmentalism and empathy).

- Ensure a dedicated private place to talk without interruptions.

- Elicit relevant information from the applicant in a sensitive manner.

Page 10: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

Front desk continued

- Create a safe supportive environment, put the complainant at ease.

- Ensure confidentiality.

- Create a resource pack to give to applicants.

Page 11: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

Best practice approach - from 'front desk' to conciliation

Conciliation- Provide designated commissioners to deal with non-judgmentalism, empathy, trustworthiness, respect, patience and creativity).- Ensure that discussions take place in a safe supportive environment. (Effective use of separate meetings and side- caucuses). - Do not allow the harassment to continue in the process.

Page 12: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

Conciliation continued

-The applicant may have heightened levels of anxiety – it may thus not be appropriate to adopt a legalistic approach to conciliating these disputes.

- Ensure confidentiality.

- Commissioners to be aware of, and sensitive to own inherent prejudices.

Page 13: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

Conciliation continued

- 80% of communication is non-verbal. Be sensitive to your body language.

- Do not leave the parties alone.

Page 14: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

Further matters to consider when setting up the conciliation - The gender and race of the conciliator.

- The venue for the conciliation.

Page 15: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

Conclusion

1. Our 'mandate' to conciliate harassment disputes is derived from: - The Constitution & - The Employment Equity Act

2. The story of an applicant.

3. Best practice approaches to conciliating harassment disputes.

Page 16: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

Social Justice within the context of the CCMA

“...I want to say therefore that we need to see our work in the CCMA not in isolation, not as people each of us resolving a separate dispute and making things right in relation to a particular dispute.

Page 17: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

Social Justice within the context of the CCMA

What we are doing is participating in the constitutional project with each dispute that we satisfactorily resolve, with each dispute which we ensure is appropriately managed, appropriately handled, ...

Page 18: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

Social Justice within the context of the CCMA

...with each case with which we treat both sides with respect and care, with each case with which we try to ensure that the power imbalance is appropriately resolved we make a contribution to the broader constitutional project.

Page 19: An Approach to Conciliating Harassment Disputes 2010 CCMA COMMISSIONERS INDABA “Against all Odds” Ritz Hotel 2 – 4 December 2010.

Social Justice within the context of the CCMA

We make a contribution to the very survival of our society...”

Justice Yacoob - Constitutional Court Speech delivered to CCMA CPD Seminar, December 2006.