Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

168
PLATFORM THINKING APPLIED UX STRATEGY YURY VETROV MAIL.RU GROUP

Transcript of Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

Page 1: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

PLATFORM THINKING

APPLIED UX STRATEGY

YURY VETROV

MAIL.RU GROUP

Page 3: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

DOCUMENT-DRIVEN DESIGNMany designers still focus on deliverables – work products of their creative process. They do research on a market and users, define scenarios and IA, explore solutions through sketching and prototyping, create mockups and guidelines, then give all of their deliverables to the developers.

Page 4: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

R.I.P. THISAs a result, designers spend their time polishing supplementary documentation instead of focusing on the product itself. The purpose of most deliverables is simply to transfer knowledge about the product design to other team members, and they quickly become obsolete. This approach leads to high transactional costs. It’s definitely not an optimal approach!

Page 5: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

THE AGE OF SHREDDERA new approach requires that designers no longer consider their work narrowly, focusing on projects whose goal is to launch a new product or feature. Instead, they focus on bringing a holistic product platform to market, then evolving it. A product or product line then grows systematically, and a company’s UX strategy works on all 3 levels: operational, tactical, and strategic.

Page 6: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

3 LEVELS OF UX MATURITY

CHAOS

OPERATIONAL

TACTICAL

STRATEGIC

Page 7: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

3 LEVELS OF UX MATURITY Operational. The designer is just an implementer, working on

individual design tasks and creating design deliverables.

Tactical. An integral part of a product team and deeply integrates design into other product development processes.

Strategic. The designer is a visionary or product owner who influences strategic decisions on how to evolve a product.

Page 8: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

BUILDING A DESIGN SYSTEM

Page 9: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

GUIDELINES RULE?Classic solutions for systematic product design are guidelines and pattern libraries.

However, they create a“guidelines → design → front-end code → implementation” workflow, where a lot of design and product details get lost.

Page 10: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

1.NOBODY READS DOCUMENTATIONDesigners often complain that developers don’t read the documentation. But, to be fair, designers themselves seldom refer to it when interacting with several people.

They’re always too busy!

Page 11: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

2.A GUIDELINE FOR A PRODUCT LINE? HUH!Specifications often require updates, new patterns emerge, and designers discover better solutions for old designs. As a result, design implementation and the creation of guidelines move on parallel tracks.

So where’s the reference design – in the documentation or the implementation?

Page 12: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

3.DESIGN QUALITY CONTROL IS TIRESOME AND EXPENSIVEDesigners should control every screen of every product, manually.

This approach requires massive effort, and keeping the design quality high takes a lot of time – thus, it’s expensive.

Page 13: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

4.PROBLEMS MULTIPLY WITH DESIGN UPDATESYou should start again from the very beginning, then ensure the full realization of the new design in every product.

Page 14: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

5.DESIGN EXPERIMENTS ARE EXPENSIVEThey require yet another stack of deliverables and increase entropy.

Page 15: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

THE LIST OF PROBLEMS IS EVEN BIGGERPlus, when doing responsive Web design, you can multiply these issues by the number of breakpoints you’re supporting. Many companies just hire more designers in this case.

Page 16: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

BLAZES!WE CAN’T DO IT WITHOUT TECHNOLOGYSystems thinkers are looking at the intersection of design and technology. Only by moving the reference design from static docs to the implementation can you shorten the production cycle to “guidelines = design = front-end code → implementation".

Many troubles with design implementation, enhancement, and support then go away.

Page 17: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

TO MARRYDESIGN + TECHNOLOGY

Many big companies are moving in this direction because it allows them to create and implement good designs faster and cheaper.

Page 18: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

WE DID IT TWICEWe used this ideology to launch two product lines – mobile web

and media products. In this presentation I’ll uncover the details of building such a platform.

Page 19: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

12 MOBILE WEBSITES (2013)We designed the first batch in 3 months – a new record for us.

A component-based design system was born.

Page 20: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

10 NEWS WEBSITES (2014)Time to market dropped from 1-1,5 years to 6 months.

Not to mention decreased support costs and better quality.

http://health. http://weather http://lady.mai http://auto.ma http://kino.mail.ru/

Page 21: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

A UNIVERSAL DESIGN SYSTEMNow we’re building a more universal platform for different

product lines. We have a lot of work to do.

Page 22: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

40 PRODUCTSAdd to this mobile and tablet sites and apps, promo pages… It's about two hundred projects if you sum it up. A lot of them are leaders in their market niches.

My team works on a half of them.

*

*

Page 23: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

150MLN USERS (MONTHLY)Total audience of Mail.Ru Group products. We should be careful with redesigns – it’s easy to insult them and lose market share.

Page 24: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

INTUIT HARMONYThere are some fantastic case studies demonstrating it,

including Intuit’s Harmony ecosystem.

Page 25: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

LONELY PLANETIt’s based on their own Rizzo framework.

Page 26: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

POLYMER PROJECTA platform from Google based on material design.

Page 27: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

YANDEX.LEGOA constructor based on BEM (block-element-modifier)

ideology and technology.

Page 28: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

LOTS OF COMPANIES ARE HEREIn 2012-2013, many companies pursued this approach

simultaneously. We started here too.

Page 29: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

There are five levels of maturity for this approach:

1. Design principles have been defined, then implemented in CSS.

2. All products use common UI components.

3. Living guidelines exist that describe design principles and common components. Example components and pages are implemented in code, not shown in screenshots.

4. Prototyping is possible using common components of code from the living guidelines.

5. Design experiments employ common components, making it possible to compare different approaches.

Page 30: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

1. A UNIFIEDVISUAL STYLE, INTERACTION PRINCIPLES, INFORMATION ARCHITECTUREIt benefit users by ensuring that an organization’s products are visually familiar and work in the same way.

This is also great for the brand because it results in a holistic design for an entire product line.

{

Page 31: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

2.100% 90% GUARANTEEThis development process guarantees consistency of a product’s UI because all ready-made code blocks and elements come from the common code base.

The other 10% is up to designers, who should choose design patterns with care when creating screens. You can build a monster even with a perfect toolkit.

Page 32: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

3.EASIER TO DO REDESIGNS AND NEW LAUNCHESThe framework provides all necessary user-interface controls, patterns, and components. It also helps you to build new designs really quickly.

Page 33: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

4.EASIER TO MANAGE A PRODUCT PORTFOLIOIt’s when all products are being built in the same way. Instead of closely monitoring many separate projects, designers can just manage a few core guidelines.

Page 34: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

5.LESS ROUTINE WORKDesigners produce less mockups and other unnecessary artifacts. You can create a page out of ready-made components, bypassing Photoshop altogether in the future.

Page 35: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

6.SCALING BEST PRACTICESSuccessful product decisions have a cumulative effect. For example, if your new design increases pageview metrics on your Sports Web site, you can quickly apply those enhancements to all of your other services.

Page 36: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

7.ALWAYS UP-TO-DATEYou can move from doing large redesigns every couple of years to constantly updating designs.

Large redesigns take a lot of time and effort, and a thousand little enhancements that you’ve made to a design throughout its lifetime typically get lost in the process.

Page 37: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

MANAGING TRENDSUsing common components would make it easy to capitalize on whatever the next design trend after flat design might be.

Of course, running after trends is not a viable design strategy. However, there are sometimes radical transformations that seemingly happen overnight – as with iOS 7. Companies need a way to react to such changes quickly.

Page 38: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

UX STRATEGY’S CRITICAL PARTWe had tried to unify design and implementation several times through specifications, UI Kits, and pattern libraries. But these were never viable solutions.

Developers rarely requested these deliverables, which were internal to the design team.

Page 39: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

Once and for all!When you create, then reuse

an accurate design implementation, you can be much more confident

in the quality of the products you launch.

Page 40: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

The best way to succeedin a product design-unification effort

is to move design artifacts to the implementation level.

Page 41: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

BILL SCOTT

At PayPal, it took 6 weeks to change a block of text on the home page because of tech constraints. This

slowed down the evolution of designs and made experiments impossible. At Netflix, he had made

dev-process simplification one of his team’s primary goals with a flexible HTML5 framework.

Page 42: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

USE DESIGNER’S HEAD,NOT JUST THEIR HANDSReducing the amount of routine, operational work that designers must do lets them move their focus to strategic tasks such as product definition and solving business problems.

Page 43: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

THE COMPANY BENEFITS TOO Successful product decisions have a cumulative effect.

Faster time to market and revenues for new products and features.

Guaranteed design unity.

Reduced costs and efficiency improvements.

Minus costs of creating a platform.

*

*

Page 44: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

HOW TO BUILD YOUR PLATFORM

Page 45: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

STOP THINKING ABOUT SCREENS!Instead, view product design and development as platform development.

For example, look at what Google, Apple, and Microsoft have done. They’ve made terrific progress by building platforms and ecosystems. Even if your company is smaller and has less ambitious goals, you can still learn from these giants.

Page 46: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

If you deconstruct these platforms’ key elements:

general principles of visual and interaction design,

a portfolio of products that includes their own apps,

as well as a vast array of third-party apps (like made by partners and contractors),

these have much in common with what any product company creates.

Page 47: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

WHERE DO I BEGIN?TWO WAYS, AGAIN You can first create guidelines, then build products based on

them.

Or you can launch a successful product, then build guidelines based on it.

Both of which have pros and cons.

Page 48: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

WE CHOSE THE SECOND APPROACHWe scaled the already tried-and-tested design that we’d optimized after doing user research and gathering analytics.

Nearing product launch, then right after release, we conducted many experiments and tests that led to many design tweaks.

This approach is rocky and requires some refactoring.

*

*

Page 49: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

PARALLEL TRACKS ARE HARDWhile designing guidelines and products simultaneously may seem ideal, doing so would take an enormous amount of time because there would be seemingly endless iterations: “A new pattern is proposed → it’s applied to several products →inconsistencies are found → the whole team discusses and fixes the problems → the revised pattern is applied to products”.

On a real project, the product would never get released.

*

*

Page 50: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

MATT MCMANUS

Tells about “continuous design approach”. It’s necessary to abandon the long-held concept of

“final designs”. Designers must be involved throughout the entire product development

process, not just at the beginning.

Page 51: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

DESIGN LANGUAGEA foundation of the design & the platform.

Page 52: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

1.DESIGN MANIFEST OF PRINCIPLESA set of about a dozen principles that help us to integrate brand image with specific product-design decisions.

They work as a high-level checklist that we use to validate our design patterns.

Page 53: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

MAILCHIMPThe company puts a lot of effort into voice and tone.

Page 54: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

MICROSOFTThey advise focusing on content rather than chrome for Metro design, and the role of animation is also foundational. Setting such principles

leads to a consistent experience across all products and devices.

Page 55: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

MY.COMOne principle for our international brand is to combine a minimalistic

white surface for all user-interface blocks with bold red accents.

Page 56: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

However, other brand qualities include personality and emotion. To support these without breaking the first rule, we use colorful backgrounds wherever the main working surface lies on top of a semi-transparent white container.

Page 57: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

A LANGUAGE FOR EVERYBODYYou should tie design principles to a company’s business strategy. For design principles, we do this primarily through branding, ensuring strong impact and value for managers and other team members.

The purpose of brand design principles is to help you make design decisions.

Page 58: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

DESIGN PRINCIPLES FTWPrinciples should not overlap, and there should be a reasonably small

number of them to ensure that they’re memorable. You can find inspiration in this great collection.

Page 59: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

2.INFORMATION ARCHITECTUREConsidering the specific target audience for a product, information architecture principles should guide the distribution of features and scenarios across pages or screens, so you can build a suitable hierarchy and navigation system.

Page 60: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

Within a product line, the information architectures for different products can vary significantly, so may require different approaches:

one-pager;

hierarchy;

linear;

network;

hub and spoke;

or a combination of these.

Page 61: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

You should define what each of these constructs is good for and how to map product features and scenarios to them.

You can also cover labeling, metadata, and organizational schemes – such as alphabetical, geographical, temporal, topical, task based, audience based, or popularity based.

Page 62: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

3.INTERACTION DESIGNSpecific navigation patterns correspond to information architecture principles.

Page 63: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

Navigation bars in the header or footer;

Drop-down menus;

Contextual menus, which appear when a user right-clicks or presses;

Search bars;

Breadcrumbs;

Drop-down list controls for sorting, filtering, or grouping;

Contextual links;

Notification systems and alerts.

Page 64: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

Illustrate these patterns, showing how they should appear on typical screens and annotate the illustrations with usage recommendations that are tied to business goals – for example, contextual links help improve pageview metrics.

Tie all interaction design patterns to device types – that is, patterns for Web applications on the desktop, tablets, and mobile devices, as well as patterns for operating systems that run on tablets, mobile devices, and wearable devices.

Every device type has its own specific input methods such as mouse, touch, and voice; shortcuts, including keyboard shortcuts and gestures; and accessibility features.

Page 65: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

4.VISUAL LANGUAGEThese are specific principles that define visual presentation.

While the manifest of principles speaks on the level of values, visual language is about specific decisions. We should strive to keep a high abstraction level in all definitions.

Page 66: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

1UI GRIDSuperpixels! The increments (or modules) of a grid allow you

to align and measure the sizes and margins of all UI elements.

Page 67: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

Many products now use an 8-pixel grid, including Android and Google products. Windows 8 and Windows Phone use a 5-pixel grid, while iOS uses an 11-pixel grid.

The 8-pixel increment is great because you can always divide it by 2 – for example, to create 2-pixel rounded rectangles. At Mail.Ru, our UI grid limits sizes and margins to 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 48, 96, or 128 pixels.

This approach became an unexpected boon for us, greatly reducing the number of disputes and errors relating to every tiny screen detail.

It’s better to measure a grid in density-independent pixels (dp) rather than in pixels.

Page 68: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

Designers calculate by a rule, not with a gutIt significantly decreases the number of

unnecessary disputes and small mistakes, hugely improving the quality of design.

Page 69: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

2STRUCTURAL GRIDThe number and size of the columns and gutters

that define a UI layout.

Page 70: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

A 12-pixel grid is most prevalent now because the most popular frameworks use it.

However, we chose to implement a rhythmic grid – a series of 40-pixel columns with 20-pixel gutters. This results in 16 columns for 1024-pixel viewports, 20 for 1280-pixel viewports, 24 for 1440-pixel viewports, and 26 for 1600-pixel viewports. This approach allowed us to unify different generations of our designs.

The structural grid defines how responsiveness works for layouts on screens of various resolutions.

Page 71: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

3LAYOUTSNow, getting to the level of specific design solutions, what UI work areas are necessary, and how are they distributed on the structural

grid?

Page 72: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

A page layout may consist of a single column, as is popular on landing pages.

But most follow a classic two-column approach.

However, specialized and professional layouts often have three columns.

Alternatively, a layout may comprise an infinite flow of cards or tiles, as popularized by Pinterest.

A layout may also define a vertical ratio, but that’s rare.

Page 73: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

4CONTAINERSEvery column in a layout holds containers that stack one after

another. Containers have a common visual style and logic.

Page 74: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

You place content and controls within containers, which are useful in defining visual presentation – for example, using borders, backgrounds, shadows, and headers – and define interaction logic for the container itself.

Containers make platform development easier and simplify adding new patterns or tweaking current patterns. If there are more elements than a container can display on a screen, overflow logic becomes necessary – for example, a Show More link that expands a list, page navigation, or infinite scrolling – whether vertical or horizontal. If you choose horizontal scrolling and want to change the style and position of arrows or add a swipe gesture for touch devices, you can do it at the container level instead of changing every instance.

You can be also define overlays and tutorials here.

*

*

Page 75: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

5TYPOGRAPHIC GRIDLine height and type sizes should be based on the UI grid.

Use the idea of base-text scaling to build this grid.

Page 76: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

For example, in our case, font parameters should be multiplied by four. This is easy to do for headings, but problems often arise with the body text:

web-font rendering is unpredictable in Windows and often requires many hacks and tweaks;

16 pixels for the base text may be too large for a specific user interface.

Nevertheless, if the line height fits into your UI grid well, it’s already good enough. Display and text fonts won’t break the grid.

Page 77: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

GRIDLOVERAn online grid generator

that brings most of scaling approaches together.

Page 78: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

6COLOR PALETTEAdd complementary values for your primary brand colors. Define formulas for borders, box shadows, overlays, etc.

Page 79: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

UI colors, including black and white and several shades of gray for base surfaces, borders, and supplementary text; colors for errors and other system messages – typically, red, green, and yellow; and colors for links.

Accent colors – for example, for content categories. These could use some variance algorithm – for example, to display states, they could be tinted or shaded.

All of these additional colors should be harmonious with the primary brand colors.

Page 80: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

7UI KITOnce you’ve created UI and typographic grids and paired them

with a color palette, you can create basic building blocks.

Page 81: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

Buttons (primary and secondary action buttons, option buttons, text and/or icon buttons for toolbars);

Links;

Generic and specific input boxes;

Drop-down lists such as combo boxes, date pickers, and country selectors for telephone codes;

Selectors such as check boxes, radio buttons, and switches;

UGC (User-Generated Content) loaders for photos, videos, and files.

Each of these requires states such as focused, active, hover, and unavailable.

Page 82: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

8DESIGN MATHo Add the text “Save” in the base text size.

+ Add standard padding around the text.

+ Fill the space around the text with the standard background color for controls.

+ Draw a border using a standard color, stroke width, and corner radius.

+ Add a standard box shadow beneath the button.

Page 83: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

A common languageAs long as your design standards exist, they

will lead all designers and developers to consistently make the same design decisions,

no matter where they are.

Page 84: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

FORM LAYOUTSForm elements should have field sets defined. Consider the placement of field labels, tip or descriptive text, validation rules, and error text.

Page 85: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

GRAPHICS AND ILLUSTRATIONSYou should define standards for photos, other content images, and user avatars, including their proportions, typical sizes, and alternate sizes for various screen resolutions. Try to fit them into the column grid.

Page 86: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

UI ICONSThese should follow brand guidelines, so you can build a universal icon set for all products.

Define their general style, stroke width, color palette, volume-representation principles, and their placement in user interfaces or promotional materials. Lay out small or mid-sized icons in a standardized grid.

Page 87: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

Define the general style of illustrations. Consider creating a mood board when making decisions about style.

You can base large illustrative icons on the metaphors you’ve used in small UI icons, adding detail.

Page 88: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

INFOGRAPHICS AND DATA VISUALIZATIONSOne more design asset to unify.

You’d need all of these only for highly specialized products, but some of these are in wide use.

Page 89: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

Tables;

Common types of diagrams such a histograms, pie charts, and bar, line, and area graphs;

Specialty diagrams such as bubble, ring, radar, and span charts, Venn and Sankey diagrams, maps and cartograms, heatmaps, tag clouds, trees and tree maps, mindmaps, block charts, flow diagrams, timelines, and arc diagrams.

Page 90: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

ANIMATION MODELIn a perfect product, all transitions between states and screens should be based on a well-defined model. Animation should be consistent, making users more comfortable.

Page 91: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

For example, an overlay could slide down from the top of the screen, then slide back up when it’s closing. For a multi-step wizard, the next step could slide in from the right; the previous step, from the left.

The best source of inspiration for animations are the three major mobile operating systems:

Android (orchestration);

iOS (before and after iOS7);

Windows Phone (which introduced the modern approach to UI animation).

Page 92: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

ADSFirst, define an advertisement grid – within the limitations of the design grid – which typically determines the visual appearance of ads.

To determine design-friendly ad formats, it’s critical that you communicate with sales as much as with developers.

Page 93: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

Set standards for your ad inventory. Define types and sizes of display and contextual ads, branding principles for pages and patterns, and limitations for full-screen banners and other aggressive advertising approaches.

Set requirements for internal promotions as well.

Second, define an advertising-layout grid, which determines where ads are placed in a layout.

Page 95: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

5.DESIGN PRINCIPLES IN CODEOnce you’ve defined basic design principles, you can bake them into your CSS – thus, completing the first platform-maturity level. Plus, icon fonts and SVG sprites simplify your usage of graphics.

Designers should understand code, so they can build a truly future-proof platform.

Page 96: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

Design is defined on every project phaseSystems thinking and the continuous

improvement of a design implementation throughout the product development cycle are

key to delivering high-quality products.

Page 97: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

GLOBAL VARIABLESModern CSS preprocessors like SASS and Less let you define variables, which is a great way of implementing design principles in code.

Once you’ve defined standards in code, you can easily update them globally, magically changing the design of your whole product line.

Page 98: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

TOKENS TO UNIFY WEB AND NATIVEThese are “super variables” stored outside of a specific platform like web, iOS, Android, etc. Then this specific platform imports tokens and stores variables in CSS, XML, or other format required by its technology.

It allows you to keep visual language consistent across web and native development environment.

The idea was proposed by Salesforce

*

*

Page 99: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

TYPICAL PAGE LAYOUTSAlso, code examples of typical page layouts, including a header, footer, content area, and columns will make your guidelines easier to use and understand.

Page 100: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

PATTERN LIBRARYCreate common user-interface components

and re-build products on them.

Page 101: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

UI COMPONENTSSince your goal is to simplify your production cycle to “guidelines = design = front-end code → implementation”, a component is ready-made code that defines a UI element and applies visual appearance and user-interaction logic to it.

Components should be independent of their context, so you can put them anywhere, on any page, and they won’t break.

Page 102: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

PATTERNS 2.0A component is a classic design pattern. The difference is that you’re

no longer using deliverables to define them, control their implementation quality, or support them.

Page 103: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

COMPANY-WIDE UPDATESFurthermore, if you want to update a pattern, you just have to change the code in the unified code base to update the component in all of the products based on your framework.

Page 104: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

Here are some examples of components:

navigation – tabs, alphabetical navigation, calendar navigation, search, filters, sorting controls, and a browsing history;

lists – drop-down lists, matrices, horizontal sliders, and asynchronous tile grids;

media – videos, infographics, a photo gallery, and social-media embeds;

informers – gadgets that display information about the weather, stocks and commodities, sport statistics, schedules, horoscopes, or world clocks;

social interactions – comments, surveys, ratings, feedback, and social sharing.

Page 105: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

TYPICAL PAGESIn addition to defining specific components, you should define typical page types based on them. Create newsletter templates as well.

It’s best to standardize anything that you use more than once.

Page 106: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

News listing;

Article;

Search results;

Settings;

User profile;

Sign in and sign up;

Blank pages

Server errors.

Page 107: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

SEMANTIC CODE IN COMPONENTSOne basic principle is that the names for patterns should have semantic meaning and refer to types of elements rather than their style – for example, second-level heading or surface for cards rather than 24pt font or surface color #F0F0F0 – or refer to their target usage – for example, main content, more information on a topic, or supplementary links.

As long as you do this, the goal of making updates across your entire product line easy will work as intended.

*

*

Page 108: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

UNIFICATION OR BORINGFICATION?Having several products or services based on the same components might lead to boring user interfaces.

Your platform should let you stylize certain properties of components for specific products, without altering the main component’s essential design.

Page 109: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

STYLIZATION EXAMPLESOur team decided to use different accent colors for specific products. Each product has its own accent color to differentiate it from other products. You

can also use different fonts, decorative elements, illustrations, and icons.

Page 110: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

LIVING GUIDELINESOne more project based

on common components.

Page 111: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

100% ACCURATEIt shows a real implementation, not just screenshots.

This radically simplifies quality control for a product line.

Page 112: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

Its first sections should describe general principles, which you’ve extracted from your actual CSS.

Then include ready-made components that you’ve used in real products. You should describe each of these components, including where and why it should be used.

Even if you’ve built a simplified system that is similar to Bootstrap, it will help you greatly in systematizing design.

Page 113: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

I LOVE THIS RESOURCE!I refer to styleguides.io again –

it’s a huge directory of tools to create living guidelines.

Page 114: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

AUTO-HEALING SYSTEMA spider script occasionally goes through all products, comparing their CSS to reference values.

Then, if there are inconsistencies, designers should get a list of the problems discovered.

Page 115: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

PROTOTYPINGRe-factor the design process.

Page 116: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

LESS INSERTIONSOnce all key parts of a platform are up and running, you can simplify your production cycle even further and leave behind tools for deliverables creation entirely.

When living guidelines show a component’s HTML code, it becomes easy to create a real page in an HTML editor using layout templates.

Page 117: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

PHOTOSHOP SUCKS LESS OFTENMany designers are no longer afraid to code. Coding in HTML and CSS are simple enough, and there are many simple tutorials and ready-made examples of code on the Web.

Photoshop or Sketch are great for design exploration. But, especially for RWD, it’s getting harder to work productively without moving at least part of your process into a browser.

Page 118: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

AXURE IN A BROWSERIf your company has the resources and your platform is mature enough, you could go further and build an online tool for visual prototyping.

Designers could drag ready-made components onto a page to create an interactive prototype.

Page 119: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

PROJECT POLYMER CONSTRUCTORGoogle has a web tool,

which lets you to create Material Design in a browser.

https://polymer-designer.appspot.com/

Page 120: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

BOOTSTRAP-BASEDSimilar visual constructors exist for Bootstrap –

for example, Jetstrap.

Page 121: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

REAL DATAWhile good designers don’t use “Lorem ipsum”, it takes a bit of effort to create mock data.

Showing different states of pages and patterns takes even more time, so making data easy to import into a prototype would help us to do this faster.

Page 122: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

COMMUNICATE EASIERIn addition to a functional prototype’s being cheap to create, it works much better as a communication tool. You can link pages and use all of the logic and scripts from the production version.

Plus, pages are all properly responsive, so you don’t have to address same problems again and again.

Page 123: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

DESIGN EXPERIMENTSLooking for the best patterns across alternative solutions.

Page 124: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

A/B TESTING OUT OF THE BOXDesign patterns don’t solve problems once and for all. You should always strive to find better solutions. You should experiment as much as possible and compare alternative approaches.

A great platform should afford the ability to do this systematically and inexpensively, making it simpler to do usability testing and run A/B tests.

Page 125: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

KNOWLEDGE BASEYou can save historical versions of patterns, including the details about and results of experiments.

This helps you to learn why they worked or how they failed, so you can gain insights that you can apply when creating future enhancements.

Page 126: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

A CUMULATIVE EFFECTThe main benefit of a platform is that every project uses an actual version of a component from the unified code base.

So you can quickly distribute an optimized variant across the whole product line, and the company benefits from cumulative advances.

Page 127: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

ALGORITHM-DRIVEN DESIGN?

Or meta-design.

Page 128: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

DESIGN ALGORITHMS, NOT SCREENSOn algorithmic platforms, designers and developers define logic that considers content, context, and user data, then the platform compiles a design based on principles and patterns.

Page 129: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

SUPER-DUPER-FINE-TUNINGIn this way, it is possible to fine-tune the tiniest details of a user interface for specific usage scenarios, without your having to draw and code dozens of screen states.

Page 130: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

AUTOMATED MAGAZINE LAYOUTSThe existing content had poor semantic structure, and it was too expensive to update by hand. A special script parsed an article and, depending on its content – for example, the number of paragraphs and words in each article, photos and their formats –the script chose the most suitable pattern in which to present parts of the article.

Page 132: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

THE GRID CMSIt chooses templates and retouches and crops photos all by itself.

It runs A/B tests to choose the most suitable patterns.

Page 133: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

RENEAn experimental tool for generative design by Jon Gold.It creates design variations from user defined variables.

Page 134: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

PARAMETRIC TYPOGRAPHYTools like Robofont and Adobe Faces, which give designers

flexibility and present new options.

Page 135: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

ARE WE THERE YET?Algorithmic design is far from being an established approach –it’s rarely even discussed today.

But, in the future, it could definitely help designers to achieve truly groundbreaking designs, even on more mature platforms. It will automate the routine, freeing us for new thinking.

Page 136: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

OUR STORYMail.Ru Group is taking this platform approach.

To get there, we’ve committed to the whole process of framework creation and

implementation.

Page 137: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

1.CREATE THE REFERENCE DESIGN AND THE PLATFORMWe defined a suitable and scalable information architecture, interaction-design principles, visual styles, and a technical solution for implementing the framework.

Page 138: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

2.MOVE ALL PRODUCTS TO THE PLATFORMWe’ve expanded our unified code base with new patterns and made the back-end for every product conform to framework requirements.

We use two strategies: either redesign a product from scratch or update it gradually component by component, page by page.

Page 139: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

3.REFACTOR THE DESIGN PROCESSWe’ve created design solutions for core product tasks and are fine-tuning the technical solution now, so we’ll be able to dispense with most design artifacts soon and create new screens out of ready-made blocks of code from our unified code base.

Page 140: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

4.REFACTOR THE DESIGNWe’ve released a dozen products and discovered a lot of problems after their launch, so refactoring their designs is taking a significant amount of time. Plus, design trends are changing, requiring further refactoring.

It takes some time to setup the product update process – you need component versioning and management approval workflow.

Page 141: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

WE’RE ON THIS WAYWe are now on the third and fourth steps of our framework-implementation process. We’ve seen benefits from working with the platform from the very beginning, the evolution of our designs is becoming easy, and we’ve reduced unnecessary design-documentation work significantly.

Page 142: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

We’re currently updating the visual design across our platform, so we’ll find out whether this is as easy as we intended. When rolling out a set of living guidelines, implementation takes a couple of years, so there is always the risk that new design trends may emerge.

Even so, you should strictly follow your own standards. Sure, during the framework rollout, some of your products won’t have up-to-date visual designs. But once you’ve launched your platform, you’ll have the luxury of updating the designs for a dozen products at one time, in a matter of just a few weeks.

Page 143: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

WHAT ABOUT APPS?The component-based model that I’ve described is for the Web.

However, we’ve thought about applying this idea to mobile apps, using bundles instead of components. These are shared libraries to which we’ve applied a unified design. But for now, we’re focused on our Web platform.

Page 144: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

WE HAD OUR SHARE OF PROBLEMSNevertheless, looking back, I believe that we could have made the implementation process faster and shorter. I’ve told you about both our mistakes and our good decisions, so your job will be easier if you decide to follow our path. We have had our share of problems to be sure, but the overall result of this effort has been amazing for our products, our users, and our product teams.

Page 145: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

BEING TOUGHWhen you’re implementing guidelines, they must be authoritative. To achieve systematic design, always use existing patterns and components whenever possible.

Page 146: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

However, if there’s a need to introduce something new, you should determine whether you’ll use it again in the future. If so, create a new pattern or component.

This is the only way to keep your design framework up to date and your product portfolio consistent. It also ensures that your framework will be easy to support, enable you to create comfortable user interfaces, and be a positive for your brand.

Page 147: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

REAL-WORLDEXAMPLES

Page 148: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

A.BOOTSTRAP-LIKE SYSTEMSPro: Faster and cheaper. You can quickly profit from inexpensive design experiments, fast prototyping, and simplified development support.

Con: Design updates are still painful.

Page 149: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

SMALL COMPANIES CAN DO IT TOOBootstrap and Foundation already solve a lot the problems by

implementing design principles in code, providing living guidelines, and supporting prototyping.

Page 150: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

BUILD YOUR OWN BOOTSTRAPLots of visionary publications by Anna Debenham, Brad Frost, Mark Otto, and Dave Rupert were released around this time.

Page 151: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

REALLY?Although these frameworks lack the benefits of a component-based system – they can’t simplify updates of a whole product line.

Page 152: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

B.COMPONENT-BASED SYSTEMPro: It guarantees the quality of the design implementation and offers the benefits of easy product updates.

Con: It requires much more effort.

Page 153: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

REACT VS BEMFamous frameworks for true component-based design systems.

We use BEM ideology and some pieces of its technology.

Page 154: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

THAT’S OUR CHOICEWe chose this approach at Mail.Ru Group. It started in the middle

of 2012 from a simple idea and an experiment.

Page 155: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

NATHAN CURTIS

Nathan Curtis writes in-depth articles about key parts of design systems and processes. He published a book “Modular Web Design”

back in 2009.

Page 156: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

ANNA DEBENHAM

She was one of the pioneers in creating living style guides. She collects examples of such

systems, articles, presentations, and tools. This is a marvelous resource, and I strongly

recommend that you check it out.

Page 157: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

BRAD FROST

Brad Frost is the author of Atomic Designideology. He is currently writing a book on this

subject and has already published some chapters from it on his Web site.

Page 158: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

FROM COVER TO COVER!A link heaven on living guidelines and component systems.

It’s better than any book!

Page 159: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

CLARITY CONFERENCEFirst conference on design systems launched in 2016.

Page 160: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

CONCLUSION

Page 161: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

I’m confident:Any modern UX strategy

should employ platform principles to ensure a good outcome for your products.

Page 162: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

Wanna build a solid, sustainable foundation for a product or an entire product line?

Forget about creating static guidelines and pattern libraries and instead take a platform

approach. Interim design artifacts add unnecessary costs to design projects.

Page 163: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

It becomes faster and cheaper to get new products and features to market.

It guarantees that you’ll achieve a unified design and sustain it in the future.

It lets you run more design experiments to find the best solutions.

It benefits your whole product line by scaling the enhancements you’ve made to individual products.

Designers work more with their heads, not just their hands.

Page 164: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

LEAVING HEROIC REDESIGNS BEHINDInstead, you’ll be able to constantly update your designs.

The platform approach lets you spend more time thinking about product design rather than design documentation and maintenance.

Page 165: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

P.S.Just don’t go extreme! Any new approach is an augmentation and evolvement of existing ones, but not an abolishment.

It’s stupid to scream that modern designers only work in a browser and everyone who still uses Photoshop/Sketch is ancient. But you’ll ruin your career if you’re still bounded by classic tools.

I hope it’s not about you :)

*

*

Page 166: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

CREDITS: DESIGNEUGENE BELYAEV

EUGENE DOLGOV

MARIA BOBROVA

EUGENE FERULEV

ARTEM GLADKOV

ALEXEY KANDAUROV

DMITRY OSADCHUK

GEVORG GLECHYAN

ALEXANDER KIROV

ALEXEY SERGEEV

PAVEL SKRIPKIN SVETLANA SOLOVIEVA

ANDREW SUNDIEV YURY VETROV

KONSTANTIN ZUBANOV

Page 167: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

CREDITS: DEVELOPMENTALEXANDER BEKBULATOV

ANTON EPREV

DMITRY BELYAEV

EUGENE IVANOV

ANDREW KUSIMOV

SERGEY NOZHKIN

BORIS REBROV

STANISLAV MIKHALSKY

ANTON POLESHUK

PAVEL RYBIN

PAVEL SCHERBININ

MAXIM TRUSOV

ARSTAN TOREGOZHIN

VITALY VASIN

PAVEL VDOVTSEV KONSTANTIN VOROZHEIKIN

Page 168: Amuse UX 2015: Y.Vetrov — Platform Thinking

THANK YOU!YURY VETROV

www.jvetrau.com twitter.com/jvetrau