American Media What’s Wrong…and What’s Right. The First Amendment.
-
Upload
jonathan-robbins -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of American Media What’s Wrong…and What’s Right. The First Amendment.
American MediaWhat’s Wrong…and What’s Right
The First Amendment
What motivated the founding fathers to give us this freedom?
No freedom of expression had been tried—and they didn’t like it.
The government isn’t always right—part of the ideals of democracy
Freedom of speech (and the press) is the basis for other freedoms—seen as a foundational right
Marketplace of ideas—when ideas compete (like any free market) the best ideas will win
Safety valve—if you let people speak, they don’t riot
Individuals need expression to achieve self-fulfillment
Government needs a watchdog—the idea of a Fourth Estate
Tolerant society
Benjamin Franklin
Abuses of the freedom of speech ought to be repressed, but to whom dare we commit the
power of doing it?
But what happens when the abuse comes from the pres itself?—Fara Warner
Ideals versus RealityReality
Not all speech is protected—you can’t yell fire in a crowded theater; fighting words; obscenity; libel
Neutral government regulations—time and place restrictions (decency, violence) do not violate the First Amendment
Literal readings of the First Amendment have not prevailed
What if anything is meant by the First Amendment is actually a mystery.
Ideals
Right to speak includes the right to disseminate—the lone pamphleteer—or the lone blogger today
The right to speak includes the right not to speak: You can’t be forced to say the Pledge of Allegiance
Prior restraint is worse than subsequent punishment
If the First Amendment is in conflict with another law, generally the First Amendment wins
1776-present: was this what the founding fathers envisioned? 1700 and 1800s—partisan press was the
norm: Federalist Papers are published, but written by politicians Hamilton, Madison and Jay
Late 1800s—”objective” press comes into being as papers use it as a selling tool; 1882 Dow and Jones begin publishing handwritten news bulletins
Marketplace of ideas giving way to the market—a clash between Jeffersonian ideals with the Monroe Doctrine
Wealthy publishers control the news—not the people; beholden to stock price and shareholders not the news
What bleeds leads—war, crime, sex scandals—it’s nothing new
Technology: printing press, telegraph, typewriter, photography, radio, television, Internet
While founders may have seen citizens, what the “press” saw were consumers.
Today—some of the most pressing issues for US journalism are internal…not external
Sourcing: going to the same people for the same quotes, not telling readers where sources receive their funding; showing articles to sources
Self-censorship: stopping ourselves before we even write
Getting paid to write articles that appear to be objective
Spin from the gov’t and business—where was the press in the global financial mess
Personal bias: Judith Miller
Race for the story: Jayson Blair, Stephen Glass;
Glory days? Corporate media is nothing new Hearst: 1863-1951; already wealthy (his
father owned stakes in big mines) he took over the SF Examiner when he was 24; bought the NY Morning Journal and begins competing with J. Pulitzer’s World
Pulitzer: investigative journalist Nellie Bly; cartoons “The Yellow Kid”; battled with Hearst for circulation through sensationalistic journalism
Bancrofts—owned the WSJ (benevolent and hands-off) until Murdoch buys the paper in 2007
Grahams—Washington Post and Newsweek; more involved and attached to the ideals of journalism—Watergate
Sulzbergers—The New York Times, involved, Pentagon Papers
Today’s Press Barons Murdoch: News Corp. owns
newspapers around the world, television and satellite stations; MySpace, National Geographic Television; American Idol, Fox NewsWSJ for $5 billion from the Bancrofts
Tierney: former p.r. person who bought both of Philly’s largest newspapers
Zell: real estate tycoon who now owns the Tribune companies
Singleton: privately held MediaNews Group; owns the Detroit News
Wendy McCaw: owns the Santa Barbara News Press and runs it as if it is her own publishing platform
Concerns for the U.S. media today…and what can we do Return to the partisan
press
Decline in foreign news
Increase in celebrity news
Large corporations and the fractured Internet—no one in between
Too much focus and fear on the Internet…
Remember our ethics
Focus on why global is local
Reduce dependence on this kind of news to sell
Support and read news that isn’t from either one of these—if you can still find it
Learn how to use the Internet as the perfect medium for journalism
Internal factors that inhibit press freedomThe veil of objectivity
Lack of transparency
The race for the story—not necessarily the race for the truth
Self-censorship
Corporatization
There can be no liberty for a community that lacks the information to detect lies—Walter Lippman
Spreading our view of a “free press” Western media=U.S. press
with a dash of the British involved
A Westerner’s right to know is the world’s right to know
Privatization of the world’s media—is that such a good thing?
Private media—too dependent on advertising and the whims of consumers?
Increasing disdain for the “Western” media and its parachute journalism
Counter to state-controlled media and development media
Privatization may not be all it’s cracked up to be
Or should this be what we promote? Obligation to truth—or at
least transparency of where we received our facts
Loyalty to citizens
Verification
Independence from faction
Independent monitor of power
Forum for public criticism
News that is comprehensive and proportionate
Exercise personal conscience
The final questions: government censorship Information a basic human
right Embedding expand
freedom of press and speech because it gives us insight
The Internet is a boon to press freedom
self-censorship
corporate ownership
Shouldn’t a country be able to control its messages to its people
Don’t “Embeds” lose their objectivity?
The Internet is a negative for press freedom
State censorship
For ThursdayWatch Paris Hilton Inc.
Ideas to ponder:
Do you see yourself as a consumer of media or as a citizen?
Why do you think we care more about Paris Hilton (and her cohorts) than war, famine, global financial crisis?
Any signs this is changing?
Media Journal Exercise(Due Sept. 30 at noon) Find a story about China that is covered by your media—you can go
back in time. If you can’t find one, use a U.S. media story on China
Compare it to the way the Chinese media covered the same issue—use www.chinadaily.com.cn
Who is quoted? And why? Are the quotes from different people?
What differences do you see?
Are there eyewitness accounts in one story versus another that depends on what the “official” word is?
Overall tone of the stories. Do you believe on over the other?
Does the China story try to put the government or the country in the best possible light?