ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES
description
Transcript of ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES
![Page 1: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES
![Page 2: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Alternatives Lot-Sizing SchemesThe silver-meal heuristicLeast Unit CostPast Period Balancing
![Page 3: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Silver-Meal HeuristicForward method that requires determining the
average cost per period as a function of the number of periods the current order to span.
Minimize the cost per periodFormula : C(j) = (K + hr2 + 2hr3 + … + (j-
1)hrj) / jC(j) average holding cost and setup cost per
periodk order cost or setup costh holding costr demand
![Page 4: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
MethodI. Start the calculation from period 1 to next
period C(1) = K C(2) = (K + hr2) / 2 C(3) = (K + hr2 + 2hr3) / 3
II. Stop the calculation when C(j) > C(j-1)III. Set y1 = r1 + r2 + … + rj-1IV. Start over at period j, repeat step (I) – (III)
![Page 5: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ExampleA machine shop uses the Silver-Meal
heuristic to schedule production lot sizes for computer casings. Over the next five weeks the demands for the casing are r = (18, 30, 42, 5, 20). The holding cost is $2 per case per week, and the production setup cost is $80. Find the recommended lot sizing.
![Page 6: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Step I, II & IIIr = (18, 30, 42, 5, 20)k = $80h = $2
Starting in period 1• C(1) = 80• C(2) = [80 + (2)(30)] / 2
= 70• C(3) = [80 + (2)(30) + (2)(2)(42)] / 3
= 102.67 Stop the calculation as the C(3) > C(2)• y1 = r1 + r2
= 18 +30 = 48
![Page 7: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Step IVStarting in period 3• C(1) = 80• C(2) = [80 + (2)(5)] / 2
= 45• C(3) = [80 + (2)(5) + (2)(2)(20)] / 3
= 56.67. Stop• y3 = r3 + r4
= 42 + 5 = 47
![Page 8: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Since period 5 is the final period, thus no need to start the process again.
Set y5 = r5 = 20Thus y = (48, 0, 47, 0, 20)
![Page 9: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Least Unit Cost• Similar to Silver-Meal method• Minimize cost per unit of demand• Formula : C(j) = (K + hr2 + 2hr3 + … + (j-
1)hrj) / (r1 + r2 + … + rj • C(j) average holding cost and setup cost
per period• k order cost or setup cost• h holding cost• r demand
![Page 10: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
MethodI. Start the calculation from period 1 to next
period C(1) = K / r1 C(2) = (K + hr2) / (r1 + r2) C(3) = (K + hr2 + 2hr3) / (r1 + r2 + r3 )
II. Stop the calculation when C(j) > C(j-1)III. Set y1 = r1 + r2 + … + rj-1IV. Start over at period j, repeat step (I) – (III)
![Page 11: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Step I, II & IIIr = (18, 30, 42, 5, 20)k = $80h = $2
Starting in period 1• C(1) = 80 / 18
= 4.44• C(2) = [80 + (2)(30)] / (18 + 30)
= 2.92• C(3) = [80 + (2)(30) + (2)(2)(42)] / (18+30+42)
= 3.42 Stop the calculation as the C(3) > C(2) • y1 = r1 + r2
= 18 +30 = 48
![Page 12: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Step IV• Starting in period 3• C(1) = 80 / 42
= 1.9• C(2) = [80 + (2)(5)] / (42 + 5)
= 1.92 Stop• y3 = r3
= 42 = 42
![Page 13: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Step IVStarting in period 4• C(1) = 80 / 5
= 16• C(2) = [80 + (2)(20)] / (5 + 20)
= 4.8• y4 = r4 + r5
= 5 + 20 = 25
• Thus y = (48, 0, 42, 25, 0)
![Page 14: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Part Period BalancingSet the order horizon equal to the number
of periods that most closely matches the total holding cost with the setup cost over that period.
![Page 15: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Exampler = (18, 30, 42, 5, 20) Holding cost = $2 per case per weekSetup cost = $80
Starting in period 1
Because 228 exceeds the setup cost of 80, we stop. As 80 is closer to 60 than to 228, the first order horizon is two periods,
y1 = r1 +r2 = 18 + 30 = 48
Order horizon
Total holding cost
1 02 2(30) = 603 2(30) + 2(2)(42) = 228
closest
![Page 16: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Starting in period 3
• We have exceeded the setup cost of 80, so we stop.• Because 90 is closer to 80 than 10, the order horizon is three
periods.• y3 = r3 + r4 + r5
= 42 + 5 + 20 = 67
• y = (48, 0, 67, 0, 0)
Order horizon
Total holding cost
1 02 2(5) = 103 2(5) + 2(2)(20) = 90
closest
![Page 17: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Comparison of ResultsSilver – Meal Least Unit
CostPart Period Balancing
Demand r = (18, 30, 42, 5, 20)
Solution y = (48, 0, 47, 0, 20)
y = (48, 0, 42, 25, 0)
y = (48, 0, 67, 0, 0)
Holding inventory 30+5=35 30+20=50 30+5+(2)
(20)=75Holding cost 35(2)=70 50(2)=100 75(2)=150Setup cost 3(80)=240 3(80)=240 2(80)=160Total Cost 310 340 310 The Silver Meal and Part Period Balancing heuristics resulted in the same least expensive costs.
![Page 18: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Exercise 14 – pg 381• A single inventory item is ordered from an outside
supplier. The anticipated demand for this item over the next 12 months is 6, 12, 4, 8, 15, 25, 20, 5, 10, 20, 5, 12. Current inventory of this item is 4, and ending inventory should be 8. Assume a holding cost of $1 per period and a setup cost of $40. Determine the order policy for this item based on
a) Silver-Mealb) Least unit costc) Part period balancingd) Which lot-sizing method resulted in the lowest
cost for the 12 periods?
![Page 19: ALTERNATIVES LOT-SIZING SCHEMES](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081503/56815c31550346895dca1337/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Exercise 17 – pg 381• The time-phased net requirements for the base
assembly in a table lamp over the next six weeks are
• The setup cost for the construction of the base assembly is $200, and the holding cost is $0.30 per assembly per weeka) Determine the lot sizes using the Silver-Meal heuristicb) Determine the lot sizes using the least unit cost
heuristicc) Determine the lot sizes using part period balancingd) Which lot-sizing method resulted in the lowest cost
for the 6 periods?
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6Requirements 335 200 140 440 300 200