Alternative Feeds for Beef Cattle Dr. Matt Poore Extension Ruminant Nutritionist North Carolina...
Transcript of Alternative Feeds for Beef Cattle Dr. Matt Poore Extension Ruminant Nutritionist North Carolina...
Alternative Feeds for Beef Cattle
Dr. Matt Poore
Extension Ruminant Nutritionist
North Carolina State University
Forages are themost efficient feed we have for growing cattle, or cow/calf! Alternative feedsshould supplementa good forage program
What is an Alternative Feed?
A non-traditional source of energy or protein generally to reduce feed cost
NCBA SPA database indicates that feed accounts for over 50% of total costs, in 1992 total cow cost was $390 and feed was $185
Two Basic Types of Byproduct-Based Backgrounding Programs
Small cow/calf producers backgrounding calves after weaning, or producers with small numbers of stockers Forage-Based Programs Single Commodity Supplementation Programs
Mid to large sized commercial backgrounders Feedlot Programs with Total Mixed Rations Commodity Sheds with Complex Blends of
Byproducts
Example of how an alternative feed can impact feed cost
Example. Compare feeding a 14% CP commercial supplement to soybean hulls Commercial concentrate at $150/ton, soybean hulls at $85/ton, mineral at
$500/ton, hay at $60/ton. 84 day feeding, 2.18 lb/day gain Gain valued at $.50/lb Actual data from UMRS, Laurel Springs
Influence of Concentrate Source (6 lb/d) on Performance of Stocker Calves1
Item Corn/SBM Comm 14% Soyhulls Midds
ADG, lbs 2.33 2.17 2.19 2.31
Hay, lb/d 18.8 18.0 17.2 16.9
1 Calves were fed for 84 days on hay and 6 lb of concentrate at the Upper Mountain Research Station, Laurel Springs, NC
Feed Costs for Backgrounding Cattle Fed Soybean Hulls or a Commercial Concentrate
Feed amounts Comm Soyhulls
6 lb concentrate $.45 $.26
17.5 lb hay $.53 $.53
.25 lb mineral $.06 $.06
Total $/day $1.04 $.85
Total $/84 days $87.36 $71.40
Gross Return $92.40 $92.40
Return over Feed $ 5 $ 21
Classification of Alternative Feeds Co-products
Have attained primary ingredient value. Soybean meal, cottonseed meal.
Byproducts Great potential. Some factors may limit their use. Underutilized. Soybean hulls, corn
gluten feed.
Waste products Certain factors greatly limit their usefulness. Broiler litter, cotton waste, potato waste.
Factors Affecting Usefulness of Alternative Feeds
Moisture Content Nutrient Density Local Availability Seasonal Availability Limited Inclusion Rate Handling/Processing/Storage Health Side Effects Public Perception
Common Alternative Feeds in NC Soybean Hulls - Seed coat, high in digestible fiber, good source of energy and protein Wheat Middlings - Byproduct of flour production, good source of energy and protein Corn Gluten Feed - Wet is better than dry, results with dry are sometimes disappointing Whole Cottonseed - Good source of energy (fat) and protein, Gossypol limits use rate Grain Screenings - Quite variable, may contain mycotoxins and weed seeds Recycled Poultry Bedding (RPB) - Formerly known as “litter”. Low in energy, high in CP
(1/2 from NPN) and minerals
Example of a Mixed Byproduct Backgrounding Ration1
Ingredient % AsFed
% DryMatter
Cottonseed Hulls 23.5 26.3Wheat Middlings 9.0 10.0Soybean Hulls 9.0 10.0Corn Screenings 14.0 15.7Cookie Meal 13.5 15.1Cottonseed Meal 11.0 12.3Brewer’s Cond Sol 18.0 10.3Supplement 2.0 2.2
___________________________________
___________________________________1 This diet has consistently given 2.5 to 2.9 ADG over 56 days
Many studies at NCSU and elsewhere have shown thatsoybean hulls, wheat middlings and corn gluten feed are equal or nearly equal to corn and soybean meal,or commercial feeds, when fed at 4-6 lbs/head daily,along with pasture or hay and a good mineral.
Recently we havebeen working withself-feeding programsutilizing byproducts.Soybean hulls seem very well suited to thisuse. Growing cattle will eat 10-18 lb of soybean hulls out of a self-feeder plus hay orpasture, and will gain between 2 and 3 lbs/day
Whole Cottonseed is a Great Supplement for Brood Cows
Whole cottonseed is very economical when purchased in October and November in North Carolina
The high level of protein and fat make it an ideal brood cow supplement
It can be fed off the sod, in bunks or on unrolled hay
Feeding cottonseed (or any fat source) before calving for 30-60 days improves calf vigor and cow reproduction
Cautions When Feeding Whole Cottonseed
Observe daily feeding limits. Cows 0.5% of body weight (6 lbs for a 1200 lb cow) Calves 0.33% of body weight (2 lbs for a 600 lb calf)
Spread out so all can eat at once Don’t feed to bulls except when they are with cows
during the breeding season (because of the toxin gossypol).
Feed every other day to brood cows works, but not more than 10 lb/cow/feeding
Storing Whole Cottonseed
Store under an open shed Don’t cover with plastic because it will
sweat Don’t put it on plastic either. Concrete is
ideal, but if floor of shed is dirt, then put down a layer of hay or straw.
If kept dry it will last at least one year in storage. Carrying over from one year to the next seems to work ok.
Any shed where you can back in a tractor trailer is a potential place to store whole cottonseed or other byproduct feed
Safety of RPB? Is It An Issue?
Animal health issues Copper toxicity Hardware Salmonella and other pathogens?
Public concerns Heavy metals in food supply Potential for pathogen contamination of meat supply Others?
Over the many years broiler litter has been fed there have been few if any incidents that warrant banning RPB as a feed ingredient
Influence of RPB Stacking Method on Performance and Salmonella Shedding in
Beef Calves Calves were fed a control ration or RPB-based diets with or without
monensin RPB was from houses that tested positive for Salmonella Stacking was either deep (normal heat) or shallow (insufficient heat) Backgrounding diets fed for 84 days, then cattle were finished Fecal samples were taken every 2 weeks up until slaughter
Conclusions RPB was Salmonella positive at cleanout and when it arrived at the
research station, but was negative after stacking by either method Deep-stacking RPB improved gain and intake No Salmonella shedding was found throughout the backgrounding and
finishing phase RPB had no negative impact on finishing performance or carcass
characteristics
Future Work with Alternative Feeds
Further determination of the realized value of underutilized byproducts, and developing strategies to get more out of poorly performing products
Manufacturing value-added ingredients from various waste and byproducts common in the region
Improving public acceptance, especially of waste products as feed ingredients
Summary
Alternative feeds have great potential to reduce feed costs for producers in the Mid-Atlantic region
Increased management is almost always necessary to make alternative feed programs work
Byproducts can be used in very simple, one ingredient applications or in complex multi-ingredient rations