All Hands Meeting Jefferson Lab Status Hands Meeting Jefferson Lab Status May 4, 2016 . May 2016...
Transcript of All Hands Meeting Jefferson Lab Status Hands Meeting Jefferson Lab Status May 4, 2016 . May 2016...
All Hands Meeting
Jefferson Lab Status
May 4, 2016
May 2016
Outline
• Current Affairs – Safety – Diversity and Inclusion
– Cyber Woes
– Infrastructure, Campus Plan
– Appointments
• Major Activities
– 12 GeV Upgrade Status
– Funding / Budget Status / Lab Schedule
• Future
– Electron Ion Collider
• Summary
May 2016
Jefferson Lab Safety History
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 (2ndqtr)
# C
ases/2
00,0
00 H
ou
rs W
ork
ed
Total Recordable Case Rate
Days Away, Restricted orTransferred Case Rate
DART Goal TRC Goal
• 1.5 Million + Hours Worked without Recordable Injury (Oct 2014 –
Jan 2016)
• Recent events serve as reminders to report injuries in a timely
fashion, stay focused on situational awareness, and when
conditions change, pause and re-evaluate
May 2016
Work Planning
• We’re excited to be entering the 12 GeV Physics era – but at the same time we have
maintenance work to do as well opportunistic science – PRad, Darklight
• Lots of potential for schedule conflicts, configuration changes, shifting priorities, and
pressure to get things done quickly
• You are responsible for working safely
– If you have questions or concerns, pause, and get clarification
– If conditions change – stop and look at hazards again before starting
– Make sure you have the tools, training, and time you need to do your work
– No shortcuts
• Supervisors are responsible for assuring workers are able to work safely
– Involve workers in your planning, asking “What’s the worst that could happen”
– Don’t let anyone perform work if you are not confident they have the experience
and tools to do it safely
– Resolve concerns in a timely manner and communicate back to the workforce
– Remember you are empowered to stop work as well
May 2016
Work Planning
• I know we are asking you to be very flexible.
– However, many of our injuries/events occur when
the task changes and we don't take the time to fully
understand the impacts of those changes.
• We have to work safely and if we can’t we should stop
work
– This applies to staff and supervisors
– The schedule is mine to worry about
May 2016
Integrated Diversity & Inclusion Management
Overarching goal: develop innate understanding of how to
implement and reinforce (within oneself) Integrated Diversity
& Inclusion Management
What is meant is how to implement IDIM in people’s activities
These activities can for example be:
• A hiring process
• A meeting
• A conversation
• Workforce planning
Succession planning
Professional development
• New employment orientation
May 2016
We All Contribute to Integrated Diversity & Inclusion Management
Expectations for all employees Additional expectations for
managers and supervisors
Additional expectations for
senior management
Make an active effort to include all your
co-workers in activities where appropriate.
Diversity and inclusion starts with yourself.
Set, demonstrate and enforce high
performance standards with emphasis on
diversity & inclusion principles and
personal conduct.
Foster an environment where we can take
full advantage of the strengths of a
diverse group of people working in an
inclusive manner.
Learn from your experiences – both good
and bad; apply these lessons to integrate
D&I into your activities.
Recognize and reward individual and
team performance for activities integrating
diversity and inclusion principles.
Challenge the status quo; actively seek
ways to remove barriers towards diversity
and inclusion and question “why”.
Avoid becoming complacent with routine
activities; take a step back and reassess if
you are inclusive in all facets of these
activities.
Take immediate action to stop
inappropriate behavior.
Set and hold your employees and yourself
accountable to expectations regarding a
diverse and fully inclusive workforce
working with respect to all.
Help find better, more inclusive ways to do
JLab activities; challenge the status quo.
Learn from both positive and negative
experiences; use them as teaching
opportunities.
Develop your managers and employees
understanding of how to implement and
reinforce Integrated Diversity and
Inclusion Management.
Encourage and allow participation of staff
in job fairs and other recruitment efforts.
Integrated D & I Management Poster
May 2016
IT News
• Multifactor Authentication remains a DOE/SC priority
– JLab has had MFA for years for all system administrators and standard
users in business and S&T ‘moderate’ enclaves
• May need to change technologies for the system administrators
– Open Science Systems out of scope (DOE Exclusion)
• Splitting central computing to isolate researchers from standard user
requirement
– Lab employees will have to comply with MFA
• Trying to mitigate for staff with limited computing needs
• Ransomware is particular type of Malware that locks the user’s files or
account and demands a ransom for the key.
– Late January, a user received a Phishing ransomware email, opened it,
• Downloaded the malware and encrypted the disk
• Restored from backup—NO RANSOM PAID
– Other attacks foiled by Symantec anti virus
May 2016
Scientific Computing News
• For NP, computing is increasingly important for theory, experiment, and accelerators
– JLab is making the case for a Core Competency in Computer Science, Data
and Visualization
• Jlab hosted a very successful workshop on the Future Trends In Nuclear Physics
Computing in March
– 80+ participants
• Exascale 2025 project: DOE initiative to build/deploy exascale machine by 2025-
2027
– LQCD has been invited to submit a full proposal for funding
• There is a NP-ASCR planning workshop in June with JLAB participation for Theory
and Experiment.
– Goal of the workshop to enable ASCR to develop a strategic roadmap
– And develop a coherent ONP approach to Exascale 2025
• Computation Collaboration
– Advanced Discussions with Old Dominion University
May 2016
Utilities Infrastructure Modernization (UIM)
Progress
– 82% complete
– Remaining Contingency – $2.3M /45%
– Estimate to Complete – $5.4M
Project Elements
– Accelerator Site Electrical Distribution – complete
– Accelerator Site Cooling Towers – complete
– Computer Center Cooling & Power – 87% complete
– Cryogenics Test Facility (CTF) Building & Equipment – 60% complete
– Communications – 98% complete
Use of Contingency
– Redundant CHL-II C-6 Helium Compressor – 50% complete
– CTF Cooling Tower – 85 % complete
– Computer Center Reconfiguration – Preparing to award
May 2016
Jefferson Lab 2025 Campus Plan
Projects
1. ESH&Q Building
2. Core Computing Sustainability
3. Cryogenics Equipment Upgrade
4. Physics Technical Support Building
5. Central Materials Storage Area Expansion
6. Shipping & Receiving Building
7. Facilities Operations Building
8. Water Reuse Capture & Tank
9. Lab Road Improvements
10. Property Storage Building
11. Site Stormwater Management
12. Accelerator Storage Building
13. Cryogenics Infrastructure Modernization
14. CEBAF Center Renovation - Wings A, B, C
15. EEL Modernization
16. CEBAF Center Office Expansion
17. UESC
18. Jefferson Lab Electron Ion Collider (JLEIC)
May 2016
Personnel News
• Electron Ion Collider Physics Leadership
– Rik Yoshida (ex ZEUS, ATLAS, ANL) joined Jefferson Lab as leader
of our EIC Physics Group
• Theory
– Mike Pennington will leave the lab as (he) planned on June 30
after an exceptional term as Head of Theory.
• Position advertised
• Co-chairs Joe Carlson, LANL & Bob McKeown, Jefferson Lab.
– Members are Charlotte Elster (Ohio U.), Franz Gross
(Jefferson Lab emeritus), Frithjof Karsch (Bielefeld U. &
BNL), Krishna Rajagopal (MIT), and Feng Yuan (LBNL)
– Interviews May 2-3, 2016
– Robert Edwards has agreed to serve as interim Head of Theory
May 2016
New Appointments (effective May 2, 2016)
• Chief Operating Officer
Michael Maier has accepted the position of Chief Operating Officer. Mike comes to
Jefferson Lab from Pacific Architects and Engineers where he was Vice President for
Space System Operations. Mike’s experience includes leading a 1,300 person contract
responsible for the instrumentation, communication, and information systems used to
command and control all space launches from Cape Canaveral and the Kennedy Space
Center and a network of tracking stations across the Atlantic basin. Mike’s role will
include much of the conventional portfolio of the traditional COO …..
• Chief Planning Officer
…… we have created a new position in the directorate with the title Chief Planning
Officer. The responsibility of the Chief Planning Officer will be to coordinate and manage
the allocation of laboratory resources and budgets across the divisions, including
internally and externally funded projects, and to facilitate development of the Lab’s
operations and research budgets with the DOE Office of Nuclear Physics.
…………….We are delighted that Allison Lung, who is currently the Deputy Project
Manager for the 12 GeV CEBAF Upgrade and has worked at Jefferson Lab for 18 years,
has agreed to accept this position, ……..
May 2016
Jefferson Lab Organization
Director H. Montgomery
Accelerator Science
Advisory Comm.
Nuclear Physics
Program Adv. Comm.
University Relations
JSA Board of Directors
Chair
Laboratory
Operations
JSA Finance & Audit
Committee
Internal Audit
Effective 5/2/16
Laboratory
Programs
Laboratory
Planning
Deputy Director Science & Tech
R. McKeown
Chief Operating Officer
M. Maier
Chief Planning Officer A. Lung
May 2016
Other Personnel Issues
• Claus Rode will retire on May 31.
• Laboratory Director Search
– Don Geesaman has agreed to serve as Chair of the search
committee
– A twenty person, international committee has agreed to serve
– Montgomery will stay until a new director is installed
May 2016
12 GeV Upgrade Project
Project Scope (~97% complete): • Doubling the accelerator beam energy - DONE
• New experimental Hall D and beam line - DONE
• Civil construction including utilities - DONE
• Upgrades to Experimental Halls B & C - ~94%
• Halls B & C Detectors – DONE
TPC = $338M
ETC = ~$10M
May 2016
CEBAF 2015 Highlights
Spring 2015:
• 1.9 GeV/pass set-up to support simultaneous Hall A/D ops
• Power event damaged cold compressor bearings
• Reconfigured CEBAF for one CHL operation; 1.1 GeV/pass
• Successful runs: Hall B (HPS) and Hall D (GlueX)
Fall 2015:
• 5 week run establishes CEBAF at design energy
• Measured emittance meets initial year physics specs
• 12 GeV to Hall D and 11 GeV to Hall A
Summer 2015:
• He processing SRF cavities complete
• Repair CHL1 SC1 cryo system w/SNS cold compressor
A & D beam separated
on 5th pass at 9.6 GeV
D: 1st production
polarized photons
Established Capability for 2016 Physics
May 2016
6
.
6
8
.
8
11
GeV
6
.
6 8
.
8
11
GeV
11
GeV
8
.
8
3 2 1
days
5 days 4 4 4
1
3
16
days
1
3
2
0
10 calendar weeks in Spring 2016
Fall 2014
x
x x x x
x x x x
x x
DVCS
DVCS: A High impact experiment for 3D nucleon imaging
Early Science of 12 GeV Era in Halls A and D
May 2016
Early Science of 12 GeV Era at Low Energy
Heavy Photon Search (HPS)
Funded by DOE HEP and NP.
Invariant mass peak from
Moller scattering events
PRad
High Precision Low Q2 Proton Radius Measurement
Installation in Hall B Underway
Funded by NSF - NP and DOE - NP
DarkLIGHT Installation and operation at LERF
Phase I: FY16-17
Funded by NSF - NP and DOE - NP
May 2016
Spring 2016
• Plan: 10 week run
– Deliver up to 11 GeV to Hall A and
– 12 GeV to Hall D for physics,
– 2.2 GeV to Hall B on (some) weekends
• Central Cryoplant issues
– ~3 weeks lost
• Machine Recovery not satisfactory (~2 weeks lost)
– Reset Machine,
– Run extended to April 25, but significant short fall compared to
ambitions
– Performed well during last weeks
May 2016
Spring 2016
• Hall A
– DVCS
• Substantial data in Q2 scans
– GMp
• ~1% statistics at Q2~5, 12 GeV2
• Hall B
– Heavy Photon Search (test run)
– Detector worked well, silicon operated at 0.5 mm from beam
– Recorded ~77% of targeted 2.1 GeV data
• Hall D
– GlueX (commissioning)
– Magnet refrigeration reconfigured
• Stable operation for most of run at 1200 amps
• Stable operation for ~6 days at 1345 amps
– Detector and Data Acquisition worked well
– Hallway chatter about physics papers to come from these data
May 2016
Summer 2016
• Hall B
– Torus assembly, cooldown, power has priority
– Potential single hall(low energy operations for PRad experiment
• Hall C
– Limited scope, 1-pass beam test to dump.
• Injector – Bubble chamber experiment
• Low Energy Recirculator Facility
– Machine restored with support from Commonwealth funding
– First test run for Nuclear Physics (Darklight) experiment
• Cryo-systems Maintenance program
May 2016
Jefferson Lab Mission: Accelerator Technology
FRIB LCLS-II
Description New user facility at MSU for rare isotope studies 4 GeV superconducting linac in existing SLAC tunnel
Collaboration MSU, State of Michigan, DOE-SC; Jefferson Lab ANL, Cornell, FNAL, LBNL, SLAC, Jefferson Lab
JLab Scope Cryogenics system: design, procurement, fabrication, integration. Cryomodule: engineering & design finalization.
Cryoplant: design & acquisition. Cryomodule & cavities for half of linac. Q0 R&D, LLRF, machine physics.
Status FDR for 2K Cold Compressors – Feb 2016 • Transfer line sections being installed
Beta 0.041 design complete – Feb 2016 Beta 0.29 design started
CD-3B Review - April 2015 • Authorize long lead procurements including all
cryomodule and major cryoplant contracts First 2 cryogenic plant procurements placed Several SRF contracts placed including cavities
• Vendors performing well All procurements for prototype cryomodule complete
• Assembly started – October 2015 CD-2/3A Approved Spring 2016
Maintain and enhance world leadership in SRF, polarized e- source, ERL, and cryogenic technology: Partner in SRF-based accelerator construction projects
May 2016
Commonwealth of Virginia Funding
Special Request $4.2M in the FY15 - FY16 biennium to help prepare
for the possible Electron Ion Collider:
• $3.7M in FY16 to complete the site studies
• $0.25M in FY16 to attract a leading scientist to Virginia
Included in the Commonwealth of Virginia Budget
• Request FY17-18 biennium
• $2.4M for Accel. R&D with aim to further reduce EIC technical risk
has thus far been retained in the Commonwealth Budget.
May 2016
Federal Funding
• Omnibus FY16: JLab allocation is $1.5M below Pres. budget.
Keep 16 weeks running; Retain staff
Delay some activities, accelerator spares increased risk
• FY2017
– Letter from 6 Senators supporting Nuclear Physics at LRP* level ($645M)
– “Directors” visit Cherry Murray, Head of Office of Science on Jan 16.
– Pres. Budget release Feb. 9: NP at $636, an increase of 3%
– Jefferson Lab
• Operations budget will support 23 weeks of running
– This is 4 weeks less than expected/hoped
• Infrastructure $8M included for End Station Cryo upgrade
* LRP = Long Range Plan
May 2016
Spring 2016 Senate & House
• Senate-Nuclear Physics supported at the President’s Budget level (+3%)
• House -Nuclear Physics supported at FY2016 level (~+0.5%)
• NP conducting internal impact studies; not yet asked us
May 2016
Beam for Commissioning Beam for Physics Non-CLAS12 Ops
Hall A
Hall D
Accelerator
Hall B
Hall C
Activity
Beam
Activity
Beam
Activity
Beam
Activity
Beam
Activity
Beam
Fiscal Year 2016 2017 2018
Calendar Year 2016 2017 2018
CLAS12 Construction/Installation
Physics
Physics
SHMS Construction/Installation
Activity
CEBAF Three-Year Schedule Feb 2016
Non-CLAS12 Ops*
Activity
Physics
Activity SBS Construction
Physics Comm.
Physics
Opportunistic Physics
Physics
Opportunistic Physics
Opportunistic Physics
Physics
Physics
Physics
Physics
* Potential PRad Summer 2016 run
May 2016
NSAC 2015 LRP
RECOMMENDATION I
The progress achieved under the guidance of the 2007 Long Range Plan has reinforced U.S. world leadership in nuclear science. The highest priority in this 2015 Plan is to capitalize on the investments made.
RECOMMENDATION II
We recommend the timely development and deployment of a U.S.-led ton-scale neutrinoless double beta decay experiment.
RECOMMENDATION III
We recommend a high-energy high-luminosity polarized EIC as the highest priority for new facility construction following the completion of FRIB.
RECOMMENDATION IV
We recommend increasing investment in small-scale and mid-scale projects and initiatives that enable forefront research at universities and laboratories.
Manifest impact on Electron Ion Collider
Users Organization/Meetings
National Academy Study
Enhanced explicit EIC Accelerator R&D
Increased interest in collaboration with
Jefferson Lab
May 2016
EIC Timeline
Activity Name 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
12 GeV Operations
12 GeV Upgrade
FRIB
EIC Physics Case
NSAC LRP
NAS Study
CD0
EIC Machine
Design and R&D
CD1(Down-select)
CD2/CD3
EIC Construction
CD0 = DOE “Mission Need” statement; CD1 = technology and site selection (VA/NY)
CD2/CD3 = establish project baseline cost and schedule
May 2016
JLab EIC Figure 8 Concept
Initial configuration:
• 3-10 GeV on 20-100 GeV ep/eA collider
• Optimized for high ion beam polarization:
polarized deuterons
• Luminosity:
up to few x 1034 e-nucleons cm-2 s-1
Low technical risk
Upgradable to higher energies
250 GeV protons + 20 GeV electrons
Flexible timeframe for Construction
consistent w/running 12 GeV CEBAF
Thorough cost estimate completed
presented to NSAC EIC Review
Cost effective operations
Fulfills White Paper Requirements
Current Activities
Site evaluation (VA funds)
Accelerator, detector R&D (DOE and VA funds)
Design optimization (examine alternatives) Cost reduction
Electron Ion Collider at Jefferson Lab
May 2016
Jefferson Lab EIC
May 2016
Director’s Perspective
• Emphases – Core Nuclear Physics
• Finish the upgrade project, safely, on time, and within budget.
• Full-time operations. Operations budgets continue to be a concern here.
• Reliability and Risk Mitigation
• Advance new NP projects beyond the upgrade
– Develop Jefferson Lab EIC design:
• Technical Designs, Collaboration, (Land now secured)
– Technology Collaborations
• Large projects, like FRIB and LCLS-II, within context of NP – management is key
• Computational Physics
– LERF Initiatives, 1st Tests for Nuclear Physics Operations
– Management/Personnel
• Operations Functions are vital to the functioning of the lab
• New Appointments
• Recent Engagements – Top Down Cyber Security – Multi Factor Access
– Ethics program improvements
– Diversity & Inclusion (Integrated Diversity and Inclusion Management)
Jefferson Lab continues to be an exciting place
May 2016
JLab Open House – April 30, 2016
~12,000 visitors agree