Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee,...

28
Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/concepts/ 4-th Concept MDI issues and IP Design Feb 5, 2007 –Beijing

Transcript of Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee,...

Page 1: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853,

John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University

For the 4th -Concept team

http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/concepts/

4-th Concept MDI issuesand IP Design

Feb 5, 2007 –Beijing

Page 2: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Iron could be omitted as it adds ~15% to the field value only (field outside of long solenoid is zero).

Homogeneity can be restored by adding current at the ends of main solenoid.

Second solenoid closes the flux (minimal configuration).

Muons can be identified with dual readout calorimeter scheme in more elegant way

Usage of dual solenoidal system plus end wall current system allows: 1) Strict confinement of magnetic field inside limited region 2) Spectroscopy of muons in magnetic field between solenoids

Modular design allows easy modification, re-installations…

All these allow lightweight detector having flexible functionality and remarkable accuracy

No problem with push-pull concept under discussion now

Basic principles put in grounds

Page 3: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

One preliminary comment

Beam delivery system –Final Focus Test Beam Facility- FFTB was constructed to test FF optics, stabilization, beam size measurements.

That was International project with participation of Russia, Germany, Japan, France, USA.

Located at the end of SLAC linac in specially build extension housing. Total length~150 m; Compensation of chromaticity of FF doublet done by sextupoles.

First run 1993; achieved 70nm spot size.

Last run for ILC -2005 -was for test undulator conversion scheme in E-166 experiment

Measured polarization of positrons (~85%)

Disassembled in 2006. Good run!

Page 4: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Losses by SR at collision point due to beamstrahlung of flat beams

sxmax

Nr

E

E

2

230

3

8

sx , are horizontal and longitudinal dimensions. This formula restrains parameters. Substitute this in formula for luminosity (single bunch)

yxyxyx

HfNHfNL

44

22

yxyx ,,, - horizontal and vertical normalized emittances respectively, f - repetition rate, H~1 -is enhancement parameter, is envelope function at IP, sy

(A. Mikhailichenko, V.V. Parkhomchuk, “ Damping Ring for Linear Collider”, Budker INP 91-79, Novosibirsk, 1991).

2

34

2

2

2

118

303

822max

22

10

8.0/

1010103

4

/

L

EEfN

rL

EEfNy

[cm rad] .

L=1034 cm-2 s-1, f=5x2820=141x102, N=0.2 1011, ΔE/E=0.05 , one needs to have vertical invariant emittance as low as

Another preliminary comment

2/13

0382/1

2/1max

)(4

/

r

EENfL

y

Required value for vertical invariant emittance

one can obtain,

εy1.5·10-8 [m rad] . gex=2 10-6 m rad gey=2 10-8 m rad Just remind, for ILC:

This 5% losses of 10MW beam brings radiation to 500kW level.

sx/ sy=639/5.7 nm

Page 5: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Concept of FF optics installation

Tube

Active systems for positioning include stepping motor-driven micro-positioning movers plus piezoelectric fast movers with active loop feedback.

Thanks to the absence of iron all elements are visible from single point.

Page 6: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

L*3m

12.9 m

~30 m

So detector carries final focus optics. More detailed

view

Total weight majorettes by 300 tons in optimistic estimation, so E/M ratio ~10MJ/kg

WALL OF COILS CAN BE RELOCATED IN Z

12.7 M

FF optics has trimming possibilities-mechanical and electric

Front end equipment hut

Total stored energy~2.77 GJ

Frame holds solenoidsAnd all other elements

Page 7: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Wall of coilsAxis-symmetrical system of coils restricts propagation of field out of detector

All side coils are room-temperature ones;

Current density: 1; 8; 4.2; 3.3; 3.7; 1.7 A/mm2

Field outside detector can be zeroed to any level by proper current distribution; Coils can be fixed easily at the end plates

Center of detector

Forces :1.75; 102; 131; 135; 111; 10 tons

In future optimization all coils will have ~same current density; water cooled (required only for #2)

(Effective CMS Current density ~14.2 A/mm2 , meanwhile typical practical current density in directly cooled SC wire is 1500A/mm2 for 3.5 T field--- lot to think about)

Page 8: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Deformations of end plates

Calculated by V.MedjidzadeCalculations carried by B.Wands also

Maximal deformation is in the middle of holder. It is below 5mm.

Active movers of FF lenses will compensate this effect easily.

Deformation of FF holder is in z-direction. Reinforcement can be done as well.

Δz=4.57mm

Page 9: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

For homogeneity the current density in main coil has longitudinal dependence.

In simplest case it is a Helmholtz-type system with increased current at the ends.

Stored energy is ~2.77GJ for 3.5T axial fieldMagnetic potential

Compensational solenoid deals with residual part of transverse kick

Field across detector

Field used for spectrometry of muons

Page 10: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Final focus optics, mounted inside a cylinder attached to the detector by consoles. This reduces influence of ground motion.

Directional kicker

FF optics

Dual solenoid system

Valves for push-pull disconnection

Page 11: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Recent addition – toroid between TPC and calorimeter for increase of momentum resolution for particles with small angle. TPC will come to r=20cm radially and extend to z=1.7m axially including the readout end plates.

Page 12: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Shown is Cryostat with single bore quads and sextupoles

Other look to the FF optics

Sextupoles

Page 13: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Look to the detector FF optics from outside

Page 14: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Detector end-electronics installed on the separately standing console.

Console (hut) has anti-vibration footers.

Disconnection for push-pull detector exchange

Air pads can be used here

During movement some restraints can be applied

One possible variant;

Other one is when the hut located at side

Page 15: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Detector is well structured-modular

Additional flanges

If collisions with different energies of e+-e- beams can give any advantage, detector can modified to asymmetric one

Here background reactions can be shifted in z from IP;

Useful Higgs created at IP

(Vice versa with Asymmetric B-factory)

Page 16: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Coils installed in frame in Upper building

Places for disconnection

Installation in push-pull scenario

Room for second detector

Page 17: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Concept of detector cave

Mostly of equipment attached to the frame already (solenoids, muon spectrometer parts, calorimeters…)

Pretty modest

Page 18: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

4-th concept detector can easy accommodate any beam optics,

It can be easily installed in cave as it has no heavy Iron;

All MDI questions answered in separate publication distributed.

4th-concept allows easy installation into cave;

Elements of FF optics mounted on detector frame allow better protection against ground motion;

Field can be made homogeneous to satisfy TPC request and measured accurately as, again, there is no interference from Iron (10-4);

Now few topics for discussion

Page 19: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Different energy of colliding beams. It is natural to keep such possibility for ILC. Here all background products generated out of center in contrast with asymmetric B-factory.

ILC accelerating structure is a standing wave type; it allows acceleration in both directions. One can consider the possibility to work at double energy with a stationary target. For this action, the beam accelerated in the first linac must be redirected traverse IP into another one. The phasing could be arranged in a relatively simple way, the optics need to be specially tuned for this.

Zero crossing angle initiated by NLC/JLC type machines. Crossing angle vas not required for TESLA, VLEPP. Zero angles give advantages in optics, preventing from SR in magnetic field of detector and degradation of luminosity. So we think, that this option must be kept in detector design.

Monochromatization –the ability to arrange collision at IP in such a way, that low energy particles from the first beam collide with the higher energy ones in the opposing beam. This idea was considered for circular machines a long time ago. For a single pass system, as the ILC is, realization of such program becomes much easier procedure. Despite significant SR energy spread generated during collision, this might be important for measurements at narrow resonances, including low energy option (Giga-Z).

Work with nonzero dispersion at IP. This might be useful for monochromatization and to simplify the FF optics.

Adiabatic focusing at IP. Focusing arranged with multiplet of quadrupoles, rather than a doublet so that the strength of the lenses changes slowly from lens to lens.

Peculiarity for registering of collisions with both polarized beams. Registration of back-forward asymmetries of secondary products is the main task for operation with polarized particles. This question requires special attention. 4-th magnet allows easy swap polarity.

Page 20: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Envelope function behavior for the multiplet of lenses around IP. IP supposed to be at s=0, left point at abscise axis. Beta-functions for x and y directions at IP in this example is chosen equal the same with values 0.05cm.

Monochromatization

Adiabatic focusing

Example of Adiabatic Focusing of 1TeV beam

In addition to standard optics we are considering the adiabatic final focusing with local compensation of chromaticity and residual dispersion at IP

Residual chromaticity at IP is a positive factor for monochromatization

dsssGHR )()()(4

1

gradient changes, β ~const, so chromaticity might be lowered significantly by neighboring lens

Chromaticity

Page 21: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

In addition to standard optics we are considering the adiabatic final focusing with local compensation of chromaticity and residual dispersion at IP

14 mrad crossing angle can be accommodated by 4th CD frame

Active system supposed to be in use for moving the lenses. It eliminates influence of asymmetric deformations induced by ponderomotive forces and ground motion

Dual bore SC quadrupole developed and tested at Cornell. Distance between room temperature walls ~25mmSeptum between SC apertures~5 mm

Beam optics with crossing angle might look pretty similar.

Page 22: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Directional Kicker scheme for head-on collisions

Zero crossing angle scheme, top view. Kicker operates in vertical direction (out from the view to the plane of Figure). Distance between kicker and the Lambertson/Picconi magnet ~40m. Scaled cross section of this magnet is represented in upper part of Figure.

Detector accommodates 14 mrad optics. We also working for head on collision scheme

~50m

Page 23: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Kicker is TEM type, so it interacts with counter-propagating beam ;So the beam kicked by electrical and magnetic field

TESLA has electrostatic separator plus transverse magnetic field.

Magnetic field between current sheets does not depend on distance between them if they are wide enough. This opens a possibility for relatively long pulse, ~1msec scale

Page 24: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

Pulse duty is, slightly longer than the beam train, ~1.2 msec

)(

220

HR

Hdl

Lused

mmused

40104102

100103 56

5

Nra 0Perturbation of emittance

For L≈ 40 m, , (i.e. 0.8mm), cmused210820

cmkGHRHdl 150)( H0.5kG for 300 cm long kicker.

HR=3 106 kG cm (1 TeV)

For 20 sigma

For impedance ~50Ω, E~3MV/m; For 1 cm size it comes to 30kV, current0.6kA

(Power in a beam)=2x1010x2820x5x250x109x1.6x10-19=11.28 MW;

10% SR comes to ~1MW of radiation from IP

(Spot at septum location)= 50m·1/γ=50000mm·2·10-60.1 mm

sxmax

Nr

E

E

2

230

3

8

Page 25: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

4-th CD fits into any scenario of FF arrangements

Scenario with Beam Switch Yard allows independent operation of detectors

Cost of additional optics is comparable with all push-pull complications

FF lenses are mostly expensive and every detector has these lenses already

4th CD can be easily fit into this scenario

Page 26: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

CONCLUSIONS

4th-concept allows easy installation into cave as it has no heavy Iron;

Elements of FF optics mounted on detector frame allow better protection against ground motion;Field can be made homogeneous to satisfy TPC request and measured accurately as, again, there is no interference from Iron (10-4);

4-th concept easily accommodates 14 mrad optics. Head on collision scheme allows undoubted benefits for HEP and for the beam optics. Directional kicker with TEM wave for example can be used here;

Measures against vibrations force to locate front end electronics in a separate hut installed on vibration-isolative footers;

Modular concept of 4-th detector allows easy exchange of different equipment, such as TPC, vertex detector, sections of calorimeter, etc.;

Detector could be manufactured at lowest cost;

Detector can be reassembled quickly to take benefits from different energy of colliding e+e- beams;Detector allows relatively quick flip of magnetic field orientation for calibration of asymmetry; this is beneficial for collisions with polarized beams.

Page 27: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts
Page 28: Alexander Mikhailichenko, Cornell University, LEPP, Ithaca, NY 14853, John Hauptman, Shewook Lee, Iowa University For the 4 th -Concept team lc/wwstudy/concepts

One recommendation…

The service tunnel must be shifted so its axis runs through the center of second detector even the only one detector will be in operation at the beginning.

This is in case …