Alevel DesiDn atlonDslade Sctiool
Transcript of Alevel DesiDn atlonDslade Sctiool
John A. SmithLongslade Upper School, Leicestershire
Longslade School, a Leicestershire plan UpperSchool, was one of the pilot schools involved inthe development of the Oxford A83 Designsyllabus. Having been familiar with the course sinceits inception, and being directly involved in teachingthe syllabus for the past three years, I should like toexpress some ideas involving the teaching aspects ofthis course. I hope that these will not only be ofinterest to the reader but that they will also beuseful, both from the practical teaching point ofview, (I use practical here in the sense of thepractice of teaching and not 'practical' subjects),and from the point of deciding how valid the coursemight be.
In fairness, I must point out that my ownattitude is very much in favour of this examination.In its present format I believe it to be an excellentsyllabus and, with a few minor aspects which arediscussed later, one which would be difficult toimprove upon.
The organisation of such a course can causeproblems, and staffing will depend on the numbersinvolved. At Longslade the average number ofstudents in each year appears to have settled downto 6 or 7 and, therefore, first and second year sixthare taught together to make a viable teaching unit.However, since there are times when it is necessaryto teach each group separately, a second member ofstaff is available for part of the time to allow thegroups to be split. This second member of staffcovers the ceramic element of the course, bothpractical and theoretical. For my part I cover thepractical elements of wood, metal and plastics, andthe theory elements of wood, plastics, and generaldesign philosophy.
The six forty-five minute lessons each week areshared in the following manner (See diagram below).
This system gives 2 lessons which may be usedfor separate groups or for team teaching if required.Where advice is required beyond the knowledge ofthe staff directly involved in the course thenstudents will seek help from other members of staff.This obviously relies heavily on good will within thedepartment and fortunately this is the case atLongslade. It could not be argued that this is an
. ideal system by any means. Although there ispositive inter-action between the two year-groups itwould be an advantage to have more time availablefor separate teaching. Larger groups would alsoinvolve more staff and a wider team approach wouldtherefore be possible. Most important of all,however, is that an even greater time allocationwould be a great help. The biggest problem is thatof covering sufficient of the syllabus, both theoryand practical work, in the time available.
AlevelDesiDnatlonDsladeSctiool
Anxieties have been expressed that theexamination places too much emphasis on theoryand that many students do not have an adequatedesign portfolio upon completion of the syllabus.
On the first count the mark allocation disprovesthis argument with a 60% bias towards practicalwork. This course is very much a practical course ona deeply involved level. On the second count onecan only say that if this is true in some cases, then itis the teaching methods which need revision, andnot the examination syllabus.
It is in the theory part of the course, however,that my own criticisms rest. It is difficult to relatemuch of the theory syllabus to the practical workinvolved in the course, and this is most marked inthe technology questions. There does seem to be anelement of theory for the sake of theory, though Iaccept that this is inevitable in an A level course.However, certain questions do seem to require veryprecise specialist knowledge on topics which mustbe limited to a very small number of candidates.How many pupils, for example, have sufficientinformation to answer a question on concert hallaccousticsl at the depth required for a goodA lev~lpaper?
The wood technology section demonstrates twopoints where I have most cause for concern. Itwould appear that in their desire to makewoodwork more acceptable academically there hasbeen a tendency, upon the part of the examiners, tophrase some questions in more abstract terms.2 Iwould argue that a good question should give thestudent a clear opportunity to put forward hisknowledge, and ideas, without having to spend a lotof time trying to decipher what exactly theexaminer is asking for .
Secondly, there are some questions which seem tobe over specialised for an examination of this typeand level.3 Such questions seem more appropriateto a student specialising in this topic in highereducation than they do in a syllabus where such abreadth of knowledge is required. It is also verydifficult, if not impossible, to teach towards suchquestions with the resources available in mostschools.
Period 1 2 3 4 5 6
Teacher 1 1st yr. 2nd yr. Both Both N/A Both6th 6th groups groups groups
Teacher 2 2nd yr. 1st yr. N/A N/ABoth N/A(Ceramics) 6th 6th groups
Basic Course: Graphicillustration element forthe photographic unit.
I accept that the setting of theory papers must bea very real headache for the examiners and thatsuitable questions are difficult to find. However, Ifeel that there could be a more realistic approach insome areas of the paper particularly relating to theexamples given.
I do not wish to give the impression that thewhole theory paper is in need of revision becausethis is not so. In fact the majority of questions arequite acceptable and cover the basic requirements ofsuch a theory course.
The practical course is undoubtedly the mostsatisfactory part of this syllabus for several reasons.i) In both the basic course and in the major projectthere is plenty of freedom for the school tointerpret the requirements of the syllabus for thebenefit of the individual and the school. Withoutsuch flexibility, a design syllabus would find itdifficult to survive the major problems of diversestaffing skills and variable facilities available.ii) The percentage allocation of 60% in favour ofthe practical element of coursework is recognitionof the intellectual qualities involved in advancedproject-work of this type.iii)The teacher assessment forms4 are a valuablesystem to involve staff positively in the marlcingsofthis work. They provide a more accurate means ofassessing the student's genuine contribution to theproject than would reliance purely on the endproduct and any visual supportive work.
If teacher involvement at this stage is to be reallymeaningful, however, thete ought to be feedbackfrom the examiners on this topic. It is not possibleto tell from the final grade by how much theexaminers have altered the teacher assessment ofeach project. Teachers do need to know howrealistic their marking is if only to arrive atacceptable criteria and standards for assessing futurework. It would also give valuable insight into whichareas of the design process the examiners felt werelacking in each project. Such feedback could onlyresult in a steady improvement of the quality ofwork submitted.
The basic course of design practical work servestwo purposes.
a) It serves as an opportunity to give studentsexperience in several materials, techniques, designphilosophy and methods of presentation of ideas.b) It is an opportunity to develop in students themethods of approach necessary to undertake amajor design project.
At Longslade we have developed a series of aimswhich we hope to cover each year involving variousaspects of the design process. Although the designbriefs vary from year to year a typical series of aims,with accompanying topics, might be as follows:-1. A group project.The students work as a team, deciding how to divideup the project into components and who will lookinto each section. Final analysis of eachcontribution involves team discussion leading to afinal suggested solution. The end product mayinvolve models or an actual produced article. Eachstudent is expected to present a total designportfolio on this topic, adding his owncontribution to the work of other team members,as well as his own major unit of research. e.g. A seatto enable disabled persons, without the use of theirlegs, to learn to sail.2. A technique based project.In this case students are shown a specific techniqueof construction. e.g. Laminating of timber. Theproject involves certain physical tests to determinethe properties of this material. Students areexpected to discuss the validity of such tests andtheir accuracy. Methods of presenting experimentalinformation are discussed together with alternativeforms of experiment.
The technique is then developed by eachindividual into a project which must utilise themajor properties of this technique. This projectusually demonstrates those problems associatedwith narrow, pre-conceived 'solutions' whichproduce unnecessary restrictions on the designer.3. Development of natural form into som.e item.e.g. J ewelleryThe aim is to show both an original source for ideas,and the way that much designing relies upon a subtleinter-development of the understanding of materials,
Basic Course:Graphic illustrationelement for thephotographic unit. 00
00o0F45 0 eoe1Jo o FS.6 ~ TITOOFSo OFll
F14-F20
FlB-F35 0
The performonce 01 a camera is 10 a large extent dependent It its lens.The widerthe aperture the wider the scope of the camera.A wider aperture enables you totake photographs In poor light and 01 fast moving objects.A small aperlure limitsyOU to good light conditions and slow objecls If you have a wide aperlure you
can afford short shutter speeds. The colums. read horizontally.lell what can be ex-pece.'d from on aperture size. For example With an F2 setting shots of people In-doors fast moving cars and also stage photographs can be token. With an F 5.6
setting people outdoors under trees as well as fairly slow sports pictures arepossible.
skills, physical requirements, and aestheticconsiderations.4. Open ended project into some abstract form orpractical application.A topic to test the imagination and initiative of thestudent where the form of development is left tothe individual.e.g. The hand ... developmental drawings leadingto ...?5. Material study.The development of work in one particular materialto whatever level each individual is capable of.e.g. Ceramics.6. Photography.A means of visual expression and a recordingmedium.Photography demonstrates how visual quality candepend largely upon the knowledge and experienceof the process involved. Some projects are purelyvisual.e.g. Patterns in the environment.Other projects may allow the student to express anindividual point of view.e.g. Shop front design, office block development,etc.7. Environmental project.The production of an illustrated portfolio on sometopic of environmental importance.e.g. The effect of concrete on the environment.Aspects of town planning and transport policy.
8. Consumer product.An analysis of a consumer product. Research intoaims, material suitability, production methodsinvolved, etc. Leading to criticism, an awarenessof the compromises involved, and suggestedimprovement.9. A small scale individual project.Based on the definition of a clear need. Aimed atgiving more individual design experience beforeundertaking a major project.,e.g. Camera rifle grip.Adjustable sailing tiller.The dissertation undertaken at the conclusion of thebasic course, is a valuable piece of work, becauseit gives a positive reason for consolidating theunderstanding of the design process developedover this first year.It is an opportunity to bring together all theindividual aspects of each project into acoherent philosophy of design.
Major ProjectPerhaps the most difficult part of a Major Projectis deciding what to do in the first place. Obviouslythe basic course has an important part to playin this. Besides introducing new materials andtechniques the important aim must surely be todevelop those concepts required by the student
when undertaking a major project.From the teaching point of view the following
Basic Course: Developmentof laminating to a newdesign for a yacht steeringunit.
points are helpful when guiding students tomake a suitable choice.a) A project in an area in which a student has anexisting interest or is likely to become interestedand involved is more likely to reach a successfulconclusion.b) Students should be aware of the limitations ofworkshop techniques available. They should beencouraged, however, to take an optimistic viewof their own skills and potential ability. A projectwhich seems obvious and well within their abilitywill not necessarily produce a good result.c) A list of previous major projects, provided by theexamining board, can help the student to visualisethe level of complexity of an average project.d) The student should be able to define a real needfor the specific project chosen.e) A discussion of the official mark sheets with thestudents can help them to analyse their own projectideas to see if they are likely to fulfil all therequirements.Having decided upon a suitable subject the first stepis to map out a plan of action for the work. Whatcan be called an 'Index' to the project.e.g. INDEX '"i. Why the project was chosenii. What the real need wasiii. Areas of informationiv. Experimental workv. Basic problems that had to be solvedvi. Stages of constructionvii. Basic evaluationviii. Costix. Changes made at late stagex. Finishing processesxi. Final evaluation.Obviously, defining the 'real need' and showing thecontext of the design project is very important. It isessential that the student clearly explains this su bjectmatter on the report.What role is the end product intended to satisfy,and what external influences are there likely tobe involved?It is naive to expect students of this age range tobe unaffected by their cultural environment andinevitably previous experience will influence
their ideas. There is nothing wrong with gaininginformation from existing sources, and attemptingto start every project from first principals, wouldseem to be a waste of time in many cases.One task therefore, is to produce a file ofinformation obtained and this can take thefollowing form ...
Manufacturer's circularsMagazine articles, advertisements, etc.Newspaper cuttings which are related in anyway - not necessarily constructional - butmay cover safety, social, environmental aspectsof the design, etc.Material samplesAny connected BSI specificationsLegal requirements.
What sh.ould be avoided is the simple collectionand possible mounted display of glossy picturesshowing manufactured examples of the article beingproduced.These will only be of value if the student candemonstrate their true influence on the designin hand.Therefore, specific styles of the article can bedemonstrated by the student, provided that theyare analysed for advantages and disadvantages, andparticular points asked as having potential fordevelopment within the design project.Since the report should be a full record of thestudent's work it is useful to include reference tooutside contacts made by the student. This mayinvolve written contact with manufacturers andsuppliers or even photographic or note evidenceof visits to places of information.e.g. factories, exhibitions, showrooms, etc ....It is also essential, at an early stage, to produce anestimate of the final cost of the article to test itsfeasibility. After all the student will normally beexpected to pay unless it is a commissioned projectof some kind. This is an excellent way of gettingresearch undertaken into comparative materialcosts and also forces the student to make athorough breakdown of the various elements ofthe project.Similarly details of actual costs and purchasesshould be presented as part of the report.
Major Project:Bed settee
Experimental work poses problems in that it needsto be carried out and detailed evidence presentedto the examiner. However, the storage of large jigsin school workshops, already lacking adequatestorage facilities, is a problem, as is the commitmentto the same end of large quantities of valuablematerials. These may be a hidden expense in theproject if they are not reclaimable, or at least outof use for long periods. It is not always possible tofind scrap materials in sufficient quantity for thispurpose either. It is possible, however, to maketemporary jigs by using materials jointed togetherin a non-destructive manner. e.g. By using 'G'cramps, etc. These may not look attractive butthey are useful for gaining information concerningsuch features as size, angles, balance, strength,etc.In this situation the experiments can be shown tothe examiner by such means as photography,diagrams, and tables of results or graphs.Research into alternative techniques can also beshown in this way.
L
Presentation of final experiments and decisions isvery important and should show clearly, to theexaminer, how the project has evolved.Throughout the project, but especially in theearly stages, much thinking will be best presentedin the form of rough sketches. Therefore a goodsketch book full of ideas and comments is anessential part of the course.
In addition, the main elements, especially of thefinal design, will need presenting in more detail, andworking drawings will be necessary.This may involve scale calculations to cover anymoving systems involved.It may also involve clear working drawings of theend product. Quality of presentation plays animportant part, both in influencing the externalexaminer, and in developing a sense of pride inone's work by the student.
The development of adequate drawing skills duringthe basic course can have tremendous value at· thisstage.
Major Project:Mobility toy for bothnormal and physicallyhandicapped children.This is also aconstructive toy.
Major Project:Set of 4 chairs forthe schools 6th formcentre.
I. Mobile toy for both normal and physicallyhandicapped children.
2. New ideas in outdoor furniture.3. Reclining chair.4. Re-design of the spinning wheel.5. Knock down, interchangeable furniture
system.6. J ewellery based on architectural forms.7. Adjustable boat trailer and road trailer.
The use of photography can help a project immenselyand can undertake the recording of such factors as ...
Experimental workVisits concerned with the projectConstruction techniquesConstruction progressTrial runs in certain projects leading to redesign.
Certainly such photographs, well presented, formthe basis for possible discussion during the ViveVoce examination. If all work is well presented,and set out for all to see, the student will be lesslikely to suffer from those blockages of memorythat can occur at such times.Many students are disappointed by the briefness ofthe vive voce examination and it does seem unfairthat the result of one year's very hard continualwork should culminate in a discussion which canbe as brief as fifteen minutes.The end product. though not accounting for toolarge a proportion of the mark sheet, must inevitablyinfluence the mind of the examiner. Therefore it isimportant to complete the design and to completeit well. Craftsmanship is still important and anygood design is worthy of good manufacture.Since modifications at this stage in many types ofproject would be impossible or too expensive thestudent has the opportunity to suggest improvementsand alterations in the final evaluation. It is a bigadvantage to go into the vive voce examinationaware of one's faults and ready to discuss them.On the subject of how much help the teacher shouldgive the student the answer is simple. It will dependon the individual skill, intelligence, and initiative ofthe student .md will be reflected in the final teacher'smark sheet.Finally the student should be encouraged to set upa well presented exhibition of his work for thebenefit of the external examiner.In conclusion the requirements of a major projectcan he set under these main headings ...I. A clear definition of the problem to be solved.2. A thorough investigation into all aspects of the
problem.3. A well made end product.Projects currently being undertaken at Longslade:-
General view of onestudent's exhibitionof work as set out forthe external examination.
In all aspects of the design course, however, onemust be wary of simply replacing the narrowmaterials orientated subjects with a course ofpure 'problem solving'. This 'problem solving'approach can be equally restricting and can lead tothe concept of design being totally involved inproduct development with an industrial design basis.Although recognising this as an important elementof design, and one that reflects the work of mostprofessional designers, it is important that anydesign course can cater for the more subjectiveelements of creativity which are less easy to defineand evaluate.Therefore, there must be scope to develop suchconcepts as intuition, awareness, personal values,a questioning of such restrains as form and function,inventiveness, and originality.The aim must surely be to develop in students whatProfessor Cookes describes as 'Constructivedissatisfaction', whether or not they are continuingto follow design courses in higher education.The A83 syllabus is a demanding one to teach, butone which brings immense job satisfaction to theteachers involved. It is also capable of stretching themost able of students and places no artificial limitson individual development. The positive influenceof such work being visible to other levels of pupilsis also an important motivational factor.As a final point, let me stress that successfulapplication to any such course is aided by previouseducational experience. Therefore, the A leveldesign course should not be seen in isolation but asa continuum on a well structured early designeducation.
Notes from Text1. The design of a concert hall involves a compromise
between functional and aesthetic requirements.List the requirements that the designer of sucha building has to fulItl, and indicate where difficultiesmight arise. 1975 Paper 1.
2. Some wooden artefacts of extreme antiquity exist.How could you ensure that a wooden article madetoday could have a comparable chance of survival?1976 Paper 2.Rather ambiguous. Is the examiner asking forprecautions to be taken during manufacture, or is •he asking about a suitable environment for thekeeping of existing furniture?
3. What are the factors that determine the availability oftimber for production purposes at any given time?1976 Paper 2.
4. Assessment form A and Assessment form B .5. Professor H.D. Cooke, Assistant Director, Leicester
Polytechnic. Speaking at the Design Council Seminar,28 January, 1978, Leicester Polytechnic.
"8~
DE
SM.;S
PRO
JEC
TA
SSE
SSM
EN
T
ISCH
OO
L:
CA
ND
IDA
Te
ITl"T
OR
;
iAs.
~sam
etlt
form
A)
Proj
ect
Titl
e:T
each
erIn
•••ol
••••m
tlllt
..nJS
T[F
ICA
TIO
N4
5W
bl,.''''-
l.Wb'''
••••-
V,ll
ere
appr
opri
ate
refe
r~"
e.te
d
IT
ick
one
box
2L
ngne
eded
Lng
need
ed(o
the
rl"p
orl:
Ihe
"p1'
OO
ul'l'
Wel
ihta
.H
f'.du
.eR
AT
lNG
per
row
!!!£
!!he
lp?
leut
belp
"lo
gbo
ok;n
ott's
,ur
s4(e
t('h
es;
tuto
r'aim
preS
lion:
my
3ot
.her
fact
ors
Ho'
"w
ell
••..•
.•pro
-SA
wre
alne
edw
hich
Soun
dtlr
let
baae
don
Rea
sona
ble
need
baae
dFa
iled
todl
liCeJ
"'Iln
eed
Uns
ound
choi
ce.
noje
ctdl
O_
('ona
i-co
uld
be.c
h!e
•••ed
.Il.i
htde
llcle
ncy
Inre
-on
adeq
.late
reco
pilio
npr
oper
l7,
orre
lour
ce.
reco
gniti
onof
reeo
urce
lde
rinl
:~s
ourc
esco
cnill
ngre
.our
ce.
orof
relO
Jrce
.di
mly
reco
gni.e
de"
IlId
nll!
'edl
?••
•Iee
verl
a
Com
preb
en.a
iOll
01.
No
.igni
lican
tom
III
Ion.
Proj
flC
teon
llder
edl.n
Ade
q.L
ates
cope
ofFe
wad
ditio
nal
fact
onV
ery
limite
dvi
ewin
deed
proJ
ect
••a
""bo
leve
ryw
ide
cont
ext
rele
vant
!act
ora
outa
:ide
Imm
edia
teta
rget
P\aD
D.iJ
lCaD
dT
lPt
cont
rol
oncu
rren
tln
teill
gent
chm
gel
ofR
easo
Mbi
e.b
iUty
toR
eeoc
n11e
cl.o
me
need
Wor
ked
ina
very
Orp
.tlls
attO
Il01
.ta
rget
IIrg
eta.
clrc
umst
ance
sm
anag
etim
eaD
def
!ort
ror
plan
ninc
haph
a:r.
an:l:
fash
ion
.,..,...•
'"C
ompl
eleD
esa
&ri
dC
ompl
ete
IJld
deta
iled
All
aspe
cta
cove
red
Rat
her
patc
hy~
IlO
lL
Id-I
em
ore
than
aSh
oddy
,ill
-org
anis
edp~
tatio
not
reco
rds
wel
l-or
glJl
lled
.Ith
ough
inva
riab
lest
riki
ngin
any
resp
ect
diar
yw
ith.I
gnlf
lcan
tlI
haJl
o,,"
desc
ript
ion
-""",
and
com
pete
ntly
msd
ede
pth,
but
wilb
rel9
on-
area
aom
itted
able
care
Ho•
••w
ell
a.nd
Wel
l-ch
oaen
,va
ried
Fair
leve
lo!
.kllJ
,lo
me
Ade
quat
ely
choa
enao
dL
eave
sso
met
hing
tobe
Litt
lere
cogn
ition
ofap
tlyhu
tbeC
I.l'l
-ill
ustr
atio
n:fa
irle
vel
rese
rvat
ion
onva
riet
yre
al:lo
ll.ab
lyex
ecut
edde
.ired
all
roun
dro
leof
illus
trat
ion
dida
teiU
ustr
ated
ofsk
Ul
ofap
tnes
sid
e••
?
Qua
tityd
Abl
eto
give
good
8JK
IV
ery
fair
revi
eww
ithR
easo
nabl
eor
a~at
eO
flly
limite
dab
ility
toU
nabl
eto
criti
cise
r•••
•tuat
tOll
dilJ
P'ls
slon
ate
crltl
clam
(ew
'blln
d·sp
ots'
vtew
-se
ealJ
()m
f:re
•••iew
prog
ress
and
own
actio
nsor
delig
nsre
ason
sfo
rre
-dea
lpac
tlOfl
.
Dec
Isio
nm
akin
c:R
ance
ofpo
aslb
llitie
sSe
vera
lpo
nibl
litie
sA
tle
aat
one
alte
rnat
i••
•eO
ther
poaa
lblli
ties
De-
,sio
nsuk
enon
aan
dC
'oos
ider
ati(
>nex
plor
ed;
avaU
able
con.
lder
ed,
with
con-
give
nin
reas
oo.a
ble
atle
utre
c:oc
nise
dra
ll",m
basi
son
lyof
ahem
atin
'sev
iden
ceca
refu
lly.I
dera
ble
logi
cal
ded-
amou
ntol
thoq
bt"e
ighe
dlic
tion
Tho
rouc
tmea
sin
Wid
est
poss
ible
rang
eSe
verl
lty
pes
ofA
dequ
ate
expe
rim
ents
;O
nly
llmite
din
lorm
-N
ore
alte
sts
mad
e;p1
n1O
Cin
Jonn
-of
expe
rim
ents
/res
our-
sour
cea/
test
sae
arch
edor
real
lona
blec
over
·al
lon
ortr
lvia
lle.ts
nore
alsc
orce
sco
n-
.."'"ce
.ex
plor
edor
cond
l.lct
adag
eof
d;ila
lI.c
blev
edsu
ited
Ho•
••••
eUdo
e!>
Cov
ers
unde
rlyi
ngV
ery
reve
alin
a:ab
oot
Goo
din
som
ear
ea.
Gi•
••e.a
very
limite
dG
ives
liltle
orno
reop
ortt
uatif
yth
inki
nC('o
mpl
etel
yun
derl
ying
thin
king
pict
ure
ofth
econ
ten
just
iflC
'atio
npr
ojec
l"of
proJ
ecl
e•••al
uatio
a?
QlJ
ality
dm
an-
Ow
nIl
mila
lionl
and
Goo
dov
er.I
I,bu
tw
ithA
dequ
ate
degr
eeof
Sho•
••so
me
evid
ence
Can
not
reco
gnis
eow
nuf
:l.•.-lur
('C:
asse
m-
dem
ands
ofde
.lpsU
ght
defi
cien
cies
skill
achI
eved
of.k
llll"
limlte
dlim
itsor
dem
ands
ofbl
~·-
}la"
ing
rett-
•.••
.el
lre
cogn
iaed
area
proj
ect
an:!
toJe
m.a
..pds
ofpr
ojrc
l"
N"a
blra
lfla
irli8
tura
l,flu
ent"
Mar
bdly
good
intM
eA
•••erlle
inth
i.Sh
ow.
ollly
limite
dU
nfor
tuna
tely
110r
eal
(or.
t_it-
1.lll
lve
dellp
erre
lpec
lre
epee
tab
Uity
t.Dna
tede
e1gD
ablU
tyh1
tyto
,de
lip?
The
rear
ese
vera
lgo
odpo
ints
but
aspe
ctco
uld
beco
vere
dm
uch
bette
r.
Wor
kha
sso
me
mer
it,bu
tis
defi
nite
lybe
low
aver
age.
Som
ere
serv
atio
nsbu
tqu
ality
isst
ilJad
equa
te.
(i)
rele
vanc
eof
prac
tical
Zw
ork
~(ii)-q
-U-a
'-H
-y-O
-C-t-------+
----------ir-------+
--------+---------l
f-ar
gum
ent
0: '" ~(H
i)re
cogn
ition
o~~
:r~~~
~
JUST
IFIC
ATI
ON
3E
nter
the
num
ber
ofth
ew
ork
you
feel
tobe
mos
tre
leva
ntto
each
asse
ssm
ent.
~~
i)f~
~par
a-.
1=<:
know
ledg
eof
Q::;\
.l.,02
prop
ertie
s~O
"'-l
(ii)
com
para
-o
f-tiv
eg:
~~~
~c,:~
~~:e
of.(i
)R
ange
&.re
leva
nce
ofcr
iteri
a
cZ
~(ii)
Rec
ogni
tion
ofpr
oduc
·"
iJtio
nan
dus
erVi
;::as
pect
s'"0
i:2iii)
Abi
lity
to()
com
pare
prod
ucts
ofva
ryin
gty
pe'
(i)
Abi
lity
to:.::
cons
ider
>-0:
leve
lof
0:0
requ
irem
ent
«~
(ii)
Abi
lity
toD
Zco
nsid
eri
seve
ral
pos-
JZ
sibl
ean
swer
s"
'"Vi
(iii)
Qua
lity
of0: .•.
'"C
hose
n0
De~
ign
Skill
s-
inte
llige
ntE
expl
orat
ion
with
rega
rdto
cand
idat
e's
prev
ious
expe
rien
ce.
Erg
onom
icF
Psy
cho-
logi
cal
Eco
nom
ic
How
far
has
cand
idat
ere
cogn
ised
the
vari
ous
infl
uenc
esan
dth
eir
effe
cts?
4LI
STO
FEX
ERC
ISES
&O
THER
WO
RK
DO
NE