Alcohol Education Policy
-
Upload
dan-greenberg -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Alcohol Education Policy
-
8/2/2019 Alcohol Education Policy
1/8
Daniel Greenberg
Prof. Ben Henderson
LA 101H
16 April 2012
Reforming Alcohol Policy at Penn State
Alcohol consumption is a standard social norm throughout college campuses, and is an
issue that is constantlybeing addressed by school administrations and local authorities, as well as
by college students themselves. On weekends, fraternity houses, dormitories, and off-campus
housing are all environments where students are pressured to drink by their friends. Every week,
students across the nation are cited for underage drinking, both on and off campus. Many college
administrations are attempting to extinguish this problem. As devoted as many schools are to
reducing, and hoping to eliminate, drinking on and off their campuses, the efficacy of their
efforts are questionable; new initiatives must be taken to cease the numerous deaths,
hospitalizations, and accidents that occur as a result of high risk alcohol use.
According to an article published in a 2005 issue ofThe Economist, 40% of college
students binge drink1 and close to 1,400 die yearly from alcohol-related events. Harvard
researchers have also found that students on dry campuses drink just as much as their
counterparts on wet campuses. Almost one in every three American colleges has banned
alcohol both on and off campus (United States...). Considering nearly 1 in 10 college students
who report consuming alcohol in the past 2 weeks also report experiencing at least 1 memory
Greenberg 1
1 According to the CDC, binge drinking is typically described as having five or more drinks in a time span of twohours. A drink is defined as 14 grams, or 0.6 ounces, of pure alcohol. This amount of pure alcohol is found a 12ounce can or bottle of beer, an 8 ounce glass of malt liquor, a 5 ounce glass of wine, or a 1.5 ounce, or shot, of 80-
proof distilled liquor (gin, rum, vodka, or whiskey).
-
8/2/2019 Alcohol Education Policy
2/8
blackout during that same time period (Mitchell 149), alcohol consumption is an issue that must
be addressed at remaining universities. Penn State must begin to make progressive reforms to its
current policy to reduce the alcohol consumption of students and better safeguard those who are
legally permitted to consume alcohol.
Compared to other states, Pennsylvania is fairly conservative in regards to their laws on
alcohol consumption and purchasing. Therefore, it could be assumed that Pennsylvania State
University, a state school, has strict laws concerning all aspects of alcohol imaginable. The
Universitys statement on alcohol use is as follows:
Illegal alcohol use or alcohol abuse on or off the premises ofthe University
negatively impacts the University community and places students at personal and
academic risk. While responding to misconduct, the University strives to provide a
healthy and safe experience for students. . . .When alcohol related activity occurs off
the premises of the University, the Office of Student Conduct may consider initiating
disciplinary action under the Off-Campus Misconduct Policy. The University reserves
the right to impose sanctions for the use, possession, service, or consumption of
alcoholic beverages off the premises of the University campus when such behavior
affects a Substantial University Interest ("Penn State...).
Inherently, alcohol is completely barred on campus, except for special occasions (alumni events
and football weekends), where the 21+ crowd is permitted to drink.
Parties and alcohol consumption are parts of college culture which can never be fully
eliminated, and they should not have to be. Still, Penn State is certainly trying to get rid of their
reputation as a top party school, as recently dubbed by The Princeton Review in 2008 (Bickel).
Greenberg 2
http://studentaffairs.psu.edu/conduct/pdf/Off-Campus_Misconduct_Policy.PDFhttp://studentaffairs.psu.edu/conduct/pdf/Off-Campus_Misconduct_Policy.PDFhttp://studentaffairs.psu.edu/conduct/pdf/Off-Campus_Misconduct_Policy.PDF -
8/2/2019 Alcohol Education Policy
3/8
To increase the efficacy of Penn States alcohol-awareness programs, promote Success with
Honor, and ensure that, no act of ours bring shame, (The Alma...) I am proposing new
alcohol policies for Penn State. Since going dry in 2011 and attempting to scale back State
Pattys Day, the administration has definitely made progress, yet in an effort to increase
academic and individual success, it would be in the universitys interest to do more. Altering the
current alcohol education programs for incoming and current students, allowing students 21+ to
drink in alcohol free housing exempt dormitories, and restricting fraternities to having parties
and socials two nights a week will improve alcohol education and awareness and should increase
student academic performance.
Before incoming freshman arrive on campus, they are expected to complete The First-
Year Testing, Consulting, and Advising Program (FTCAP), which requires them to watch videos
and complete surveys on dangers of drinking and their drinking patterns, respectively.
Attempting to frighten freshmen, usually before they have even graduated high school, the
program educates first-year students on the damaging effects of underage drinking, and the
negative effects in can have on their grades and background reports. A study conducted on
college students perceptions on campus alcohol policies at a northeastern public school found
that most students are aware about university policies in place and their penalties, yet still
proceeded to consume alcohol (Marshall). In a similar study that examines students knowledge
of attitudes toward campus alcohol policies and how they relate to alcohol consumption and
alcohol social norms, (Mitchell) less than half of the students surveyed accepted the campus
rules and policies on alcohol consumption and almost 80% reported engaging in consuming
alcohol at social events. The University has good intentions, but they could nevertheless be doing
Greenberg 3
-
8/2/2019 Alcohol Education Policy
4/8
-
8/2/2019 Alcohol Education Policy
5/8
this housing since it offers relatively large general areas adjacent to the rooms where students
who are 21 and over could partake in alcohol consumption. Since East, South, Pollock, West, and
North halls all house freshmen and undergraduates under the age of 21, these areas would remain
alcohol free. If a minor is found in one of the rooms consuming alcohol, there would be similar
punishment inflicted to what is in place today; this new policy would have no effect on the
current penalty of underage drinking on campus. Community-assistants (CAs) would be
responsible for monitoring students and making sure they are remaining safe and responsible,
and would be responsible for reporting anyone underage found in the presence of alcohol.
Although on-campus housing for upperclassmen is limited because of the requirement for
all first-year students to live on campus, alcohol free exempt housing carries many benefits to the
maturation and safety of students. Especially appealing to parents who are unsure about their
children moving off-campus because of the risk and lack of safety, AFHE housing would provide
a safe environment for 21 year olds and older to drink under the monitoring of responsible
community assistants to teach responsibility. Allowing these students to drink on campus may
also create a new culture, or trend, where students wouldnt necessarily have a huge desire to
move off campus since they can enjoy the benefits of being close to their classes and having a
clean living space while also being able to consume alcohol in their private residence, possibly a
big motive for moving off campus.
The final measure of my alcohol policy reformation is to place greater restrictions on the
privileges of fraternities to be able to schedule social events and parties. An article published in
theJournal of Alcohol and Drug Education found that, partygoers' actual blood alcohol
concentration (BAC) found students at fraternity parties to become significantly more
Greenberg 5
-
8/2/2019 Alcohol Education Policy
6/8
intoxicated than students at private parties, regardless of their Greek-life affiliation (Caron 52).
If a fraternity was found having an unregistered party any day other than Friday or Saturday,
there would be infractions incurred by the Inter-Fraternal Council, including immediate social
probation. Restricting fraternities to registering parties and socials to Fridays and Saturdays
means less partying and drinking during school nights, which could lead to increased grades and
more involvement with student clubs and groups, expanding the horizons of students.
Eliminating parties from occurring on Wednesday, Thursday, and Sunday nights should reduce
alcohol-related incidents and addictions, considering fraternities are where the majority of binge
drinking occurs. Having less intoxicated students aimlessly wandering downtown will probably
result in less arrests and crime as well. However, for most of the above measures to be
successful, it is important that the University fully enforce a zero tolerance policy for minors and
boost the level of strict enforcement by officers, something lots of campus police are found to be
lacking today (Toomey 339). Night after night, campus and local officers have been found to
become lazy and let students go with just a slap on the wrist.
Binge drinking and heavy underage alcohol consumption are plaguing college
campuses across the nation. Studies find that the current policies and education programs in
place are quite ineffective, since over 80% of students choose to drink despite anti-alcohol
education. By requiring students to complete a credited course on alcohol education, which
counts toward their GPA, students would be motivated to do well in the course and would have
better chances of remembering the material taught to them. Since most juniors and seniors turn
21 during their college years and they are most likely drinking off campus, allowing 21+ students
to drink on campus would teach them responsible drinking because they would be monitored by
Greenberg 6
-
8/2/2019 Alcohol Education Policy
7/8
CAs. For the most part, fraternity houses are a significant source of binge drinking. Restricting
the amount of alcohol related social events fraternities can hold will abate the social scene where
students become pressured by peers and it becomes okay to drink excessively. By enacting all of
these initiatives, I believe Penn State will be able to improve upon their alcohol consumption
prevention programs and reduce the amount of unsafe drinking that occurs both on and off
campus.
Greenberg 7
-
8/2/2019 Alcohol Education Policy
8/8
Works Consulted
Beal, Kristin. "The Pros & Cons of a Wet Campus: The Cons." UNO Gateway. 12 Oct. 2010.
Web. 12 Apr. 2012. .
Bickel, Chris. "Students Surprised by PSU Ranking on Playboy Party-school List." The Daily
Collegian Online. Penn State, 30 Apr. 2009. Web. 15 Apr. 2012. .
Caron, Sandra L., Eilean G. Moskey, and Cindy A. Hovey. "Alcohol use among Fraternity and
Sorority Members: Looking at Change Over Time." Journal of Alcohol and Drug
Education 47.3 (2004): 51-66. ProQuest Criminal Justice; ProQuest Education Journals;
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source. Web. 16 Apr. 2012.
Glindemann, Kent E. Reducing excessive alcohol consumption at university fraternity parties: A
cost-effective incentive/reward intervention.Addictive behaviors 32.1 01 Jan 2007:
39-48.Elsevier. 15 Apr 2012.
Marshall, Brenda L. College Student Perceptions on Campus Alcohol Policies and Consumption
Patterns. Journal of drug education 41.4 01 Oct 2011: 345. Baywood Publishing
Company. 12 Apr 2012.
Mitchell, Rebecca J., Traci L. Toomey, and Darin Erickson. "Alcohol Policies on CollegeCampuses." Journal of American College Health 53.4 (2005): 149-57. ProQuest
Education Journals; ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source. Web. 12 Apr. 2012.
"Penn State Office of Student Conduct | Alcohol Policy." Penn State Office of Student Conduct.
Web. 15 Apr. 2012. .
"The Alma Mater." For The Glory of Old State. Web. 15 Apr. 2012. .
Toomey, Traci L. Enforcing Alcohol Policies on College Campuses: Reports from CollegeEnforcement Officials. Journal of drug education 41.3 01 Jan 2011: 327-344. Baywood
Publishing Company. 12 Apr 2012.
"United States: Booze Control; Dry Campuses." The Economist Jan 22 2005: 50-32. ABI/
INFORM Complete. Web. 12 Apr. 2012 .
Greenberg 8
http://www.psu.edu/ur/about/almamater.htmlhttp://www.psu.edu/ur/about/almamater.htmlhttp://www.psu.edu/ur/about/almamater.htmlhttp://studentaffairs.psu.edu/conduct/policies/alcohol.shtmlhttp://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2009/04/30/students_surprised_by_psu_rank.aspxhttp://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2009/04/30/students_surprised_by_psu_rank.aspxhttp://www.unogateway.com/opinion/the-pros-cons-of-a-wet-campus-the-cons-1.1791036http://www.unogateway.com/opinion/the-pros-cons-of-a-wet-campus-the-cons-1.1791036http://www.psu.edu/ur/about/almamater.htmlhttp://www.psu.edu/ur/about/almamater.htmlhttp://www.psu.edu/ur/about/almamater.htmlhttp://www.psu.edu/ur/about/almamater.htmlhttp://studentaffairs.psu.edu/conduct/policies/alcohol.shtmlhttp://studentaffairs.psu.edu/conduct/policies/alcohol.shtmlhttp://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2009/04/30/students_surprised_by_psu_rank.aspxhttp://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2009/04/30/students_surprised_by_psu_rank.aspxhttp://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2009/04/30/students_surprised_by_psu_rank.aspxhttp://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2009/04/30/students_surprised_by_psu_rank.aspxhttp://www.unogateway.com/opinion/the-pros-cons-of-a-wet-campus-the-cons-1.1791036http://www.unogateway.com/opinion/the-pros-cons-of-a-wet-campus-the-cons-1.1791036http://www.unogateway.com/opinion/the-pros-cons-of-a-wet-campus-the-cons-1.1791036http://www.unogateway.com/opinion/the-pros-cons-of-a-wet-campus-the-cons-1.1791036