Jared Klein, Lance F. Bosart, and Daniel Keyser University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY
Alan F. Srock and Lance F. Bosart Dept. of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences
description
Transcript of Alan F. Srock and Lance F. Bosart Dept. of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences
MCS Organization and Development Along Land/Lake-
Induced Thermodynamic Boundaries near Lake Superior
Alan F. Srock and Lance F. BosartDept. of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences
University at Albany/SUNY, Albany, NY
12th Northeast Regional Operational WorkshopCESTM, Albany, NY3-5 November 2010
Supported by NSF Grant #ATM-0646907
Motivation
• Intense, warm-season convection often depends on the location of low-level boundaries
• Natural thermodynamic boundaries often occur near the Great Lakes
• Big question: How can boundaries near the Great Lakes affect the formation and evolution of MCSs?
Lake Breeze Example
Adapted from Keen and Lyons (1978)
Return Flow400-2000 m
LB Inflow 100-1000 m
(water)
Climatology Results
n=70
Climatology Results
n=70
0000 UTC 30 July – 0600 UTC 31 July 2006
Case Study: 30 July 2006
Blue Dots: Wind Reports
Green Dots: Hail Reports
1-h total precipitation (mm) from Stage IV data ending
0800 UTC 30 July 2006
Precipitation Comparison
6-h Eta forecast precipitation (mm) ending 0900 UTC from 0000 UTC 30 July 2006 run
mm
1-h total precipitation (mm) from Stage IV data ending
0800 UTC 30 July 2006
Precipitation Comparison
6-h Eta forecast precipitation (mm) ending 0900 UTC from 0000 UTC 30 July 2006 run
mm
W
E
IR
0915 UTC 29 July
0900 UTC 29 July
Contours every 3 ºC
21 ºC contour
IR
1200 UTC 29 July
1215 UTC 29 July
Contours every 3 ºC
21 ºC contour
IR
1500 UTC 29 July
1515 UTC 29 July
Contours every 3 ºC
21 ºC contour
IR
1800 UTC 29 July
1815 UTC 29 July
Contours every 3 ºC
21 ºC contour
IR
2100 UTC 29 July
2115 UTC 29 July
Contours every 3 ºC
21 ºC contour
IR
0000 UTC 30 July
0015 UTC 30 July
Contours every 3 ºC
21 ºC contour
IR
0300 UTC 30 July
0315 UTC 30 July
Contours every 3 ºC
21 ºC contour
IR
0600 UTC 30 July
0615 UTC 30 July
Contours every 3 ºC
21 ºC contour
IR
0900 UTC 30 July
0915 UTC 30 July
Contours every 3 ºC
21 ºC contour
IR
1200 UTC 30 July
1215 UTC 30 July
Contours every 3 ºC
21 ºC contour
20–km RUC
250 hPa ‒ 0000 UTC 30 July
Height (m), Wind Speed (m s −1), and Winds (m s −1)
m s −1
20–km RUC
250 hPa ‒ 0000 UTC 30 July
Height (m), Wind Speed (m s −1), and Winds (m s −1)
m s −1
20–km RUC
850 hPa ‒ 1200 UTC 29 July
Height (m), Wind (m s−1), θe (K), and θ (K)
K
20–km RUC
850 hPa ‒ 0000 UTC 30 July
Height (m), Wind (m s−1), θe (K), and θ (K)
K
MPX ‒ 0000 UTC 30 July
Red – observed Blue – RUC20
20–km RUC
850 hPa ‒ 0600 UTC 30 July
Height (m), Wind (m s−1), θe (K), and θ (K)
K
20–km RUC
850 hPa ‒ 1200 UTC 30 July
Height (m), Wind (m s−1), θe (K), and θ (K)
K
20–km RUC
CAPE/Shear ‒ 0000 UTC 30 July
CAPE (J kg−1) and 1000‒700 hPa Shear (m s−1)
J kg −1
20–km RUC
CAPE/Shear ‒ 0600 UTC 30 July
CAPE (J kg−1) and 1000‒700 hPa Shear (m s−1)
J kg −1
20–km RUC
CAPE/Shear ‒ 1200 UTC 30 July
CAPE (J kg−1) and 1000‒700 hPa Shear (m s−1)
J kg −1
1º GFS
850 hPa ‒ 0000 UTC 30 July
Q-vec, Q-vec convergence, Height (dam), Temperature (ºC)
∙∆
Q
1º GFS
850 hPa ‒ 0600 UTC 30 July
Q-vec, Q-vec convergence, Height (dam), Temperature (ºC)
∙∆
Q
1º GFS
850 hPa ‒ 1200 UTC 30 July
Q-vec, Q-vec convergence, Height (dam), Temperature (ºC)
∙∆
Q
Synoptic Overview
• Large-scale conditions favorable for MCS formation, but eastern MCS did not develop until reaching lake boundary
• Ample low-level moisture advected northeastward throughout the period, likely aided by evapotranspiration
• Thermodynamic boundary persisted over the Northern Plains through the 30th, but not over Wisconsin
1500 UTC 29 July 2006
Surface Wind (kt), θ (K), Radar (dBZ)
0000 UTC 30 July 2006
Surface Wind (kt), θ (K), Radar (dBZ)
0600 UTC 30 July 2006
Surface Wind (kt), θ (K), Radar (dBZ)
0600 UTC 30 July 2006
Surface Wind (kt), θ (K), Radar (dBZ)
Temperature (oC)
29/06 29/12 29/18 30/00 30/06 30/12
Wind (kt)
EAU HYR ASX 45006
Temperature (oC)
29/06 29/12 29/18 30/00 30/06 30/12
Wind (kt)
EAU HYR ASX 45006
Surface Conclusions
• Two boundaries remained in the wake of the 29 July MCS over central WI:– Southern boundary weakened throughout the
day on cold side of boundary– Northern near-shore boundary remained strong
throughout, aided by natural land/lake temperature gradient
• Eastern part of the next MCS (30 July) organized along northern near-shore boundary at SW edge of Lake Superior
WRF Modeling Study
• Simulations run to test effect of land/lake boundary on development of convection
• Key details:– Initialized at
0000 UTC 30 July
– 4 km horizontal grid spacing
– Explicit convection
RUCWRF 6-h forecast
Height (m), Wind (m s−1), θe (K), and θ (K)
850 hPa ‒ 0600 UTC 30 July
K
RUCWRF
Height (m), Wind (m s−1), θe (K), and θ (K)
850 hPa ‒ 0900 UTC 30 July
K
WRF 9-h forecast
ObservedWRF
Surface Wind (kt), Reflectivity (dBZ), and θ (K)
Surface ‒ 0300 UTC 30 July
WRF 3-h forecast
ObservedWRF
Surface Wind (kt), Reflectivity (dBZ), and θ (K)
Surface ‒ 0600 UTC 30 July
WRF 6-h forecast
ObservedWRF
Surface Wind (kt), Reflectivity (dBZ), and θ (K)
Surface ‒ 0900 UTC 30 July
WRF 9-h forecast
ObservedWRF
Surface Wind (kt), Reflectivity (dBZ), and θ (K)
Surface ‒ 1200 UTC 30 July
WRF 12-h forecast
Modeling Conclusions
• WRF simulation resolves key upper-level and synoptic-scale features well
• Near-surface differences between simulation and observations led to differences in reflectivity/precipitation/MCS development
• Better representation of lake-induced near-surface boundaries is likely important for improved forecast of MCS development
Conclusions
• Near-surface land/lake boundary helped to focus development of the eastern MCS on 30 July
• Eastern MCS did not fully develop until low-level moisture reached near-surface land/lake boundary
• Proper representation of near-surface land/lake boundaries important to improving forecasts of near-lake MCS development
Email: [email protected]