ALAMW14 Altmetrics Panel: Redefining Research Impact
-
Upload
william-gunn -
Category
Science
-
view
50 -
download
2
description
Transcript of ALAMW14 Altmetrics Panel: Redefining Research Impact
Redefining research impact
William Gunn
Head of Academic Outreach, Mendeley
@mrgunn
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-2054
Citations are too slow
Google Analytics for research
New data on research impact
Get better data on researcher engagement with research
Get it faster
Serve all the stakeholders in research
...and aggregates research data in the cloud
Mendeley extracts research data…
Mendeley is not just a reference manager!
Install Mendeley Desktop
Collecting rich signals from domain experts.
Rich user profile data
Instrumenting the research workflow
• 2.6 Million users
• 470 M documents
• 4-700K uploads per day
• 90% coverage of Pubmed
• Accessible alternative to citations
Instrumenting the Research Workflow
Search
Read Annotate Organize
Write
Import
http
://arx
iv.org
/htm
l/1203.4
745v1
altmetrics show broader impact
http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Apr-13/AprMay13_Lin_Fenner.html
altmetrics show broader impact
What would people build if they could get the data?
• Impact Story – get credit for all your work
• PLOS ALM – article-level metrics for papers
• Plum Analytics – bespoke analytics for libraries (EBSCO)
• Altmetric.com – altmetrics for publishers. (Digital Science)
New data on research impact
Get better data on researcher engagement with research
Get it faster
Serve all the stakeholders in research
Personalized Impact
New forms of discovery
• Mendeley Suggest
– personalized recommendations based on reading history
• related articles
– relatedness based on document similarity
• third-party platforms
– PubChase, ScienceScape, myScienceWork, Docphin
Secondary literature
Off-line
• Correspondence to journals
• peer review
Online
• peer review
• comments at publishers website (PLOS, PeerJ)
• third-party platforms
– Pubmed Commons, Publons, Stack Exchange, Quora, blog posts
Secondary publication
Secondary publication
How authors use Pubmed Commons
• Went public on Dec 19.
• ~700 comments
• 1 in 5 are from authors
• Commenters must have a paper in Pubmed to comment, but they’re publicly viewable
• Comments can be cited by PMID
http://pubmedcommonsblog.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2013/12/13/expanding-and-updating-the-record-authors-using-pubmed-commons/
• 50% of comments
– add study data
– link to full free text
– give updates related specifically to that publication
– link to newer publications
• 10% used it to add errata or notify readers that the conclusions no longer hold
• only 2 used it to talk about how great their own paper is
How authors use Pubmed Commons
How authors use Pubmed Commons
Issues To Be Addressed
• Identity
• Privacy
• Attribution
• Gaming
• Filtration
Identity
• Mendeley - http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/jonathan-eisen/
• Scopus - http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=35247902700
• Pubmed - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/myncbi/[email protected]/comments/
• ORCID - http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0159-2197
Building a reproducibility dataset
• Mendeley and Science Exchange have started the Reproducibility Initiative
• working with Figshare & PLOS to host data & replication reports
• building open datasets backing high-impact work
• http://cos.io/cancerbiology