Aka
-
Upload
richard-edwards -
Category
Documents
-
view
127 -
download
6
description
Transcript of Aka
5th February 2014
This morning…
1.Intro’s etc
2.Lifting the lid (on your data)
3.DataShaka; go on then, impress us…
4.Further questions, next steps etc
Intro’s…
The Data Journey…
The agency problem…
Client A
A/C Team
Solution
Vendor
Client B
A/C Team
Solution
Vendor
Client D
A/C
Team
Solution
Vendor
Client C
A/C Team
Solution
Vendor
Client E
A/C
Team
Solution
Vendor
Client A
A/C Team
Solution
Client B
A/C Team
Solution
Client A
A/C Team
Solution
Client B
A/C Team
Solution
Client A
A/C Team
Solution
Client B
A/C Team
Client A
A/C Team
Solution
Client B
A/C Team
Client C
A/C Team
Solution
Client A
A/C Team
Solution
Client B
A/C Team
Client C
A/C Team
Solution
Client D
A/C Team
Solution
Client E
A/C Team
Client A
A/C Team
Solution
Client B
A/C Team
Client C
A/C Team
Solution
InternalClient A
IT
Solution
Internal Client B
Finance
Solution
The brief.
1. Ticketing - Database +
Analysis Tool
2. More sources
3. Future needs…
The Ticketing Journey…
AudienceAgents Theatres
ENTAAudience View
Ticket MasterTessitura
Clients
The Brief.
The Brief. 1. Creating a Database
1. Creating an analysis tool
2. More Sources
3. Future needs
Evolving SourcesEvolving Query Space
Evolving AKA User NeedsEvolving Client Needs
Lifting the lid…
A small sample came with the brief
A bigger example set requested
LearningsAction
1. Multiple Formats for ‘the same’ conceptual set
2. Different formats from the same system
3. Data quality/format issues1. Ticket data all delivered by email2. Data in CSV, XLS and PDF3. A lot of manual work4. Historical data stored in folders in Excel5. Local server ‘almost full’
Examining what we received
1. MSG files can be automatically extracted
2. Data can be automatically extracted from PDF
3. All three formats must be handled4. Email must be handled5. There is duplication in the files
Core domain data set exploration 1. Waste within data acquisition
Duplication and Waste: an efficiency opportunity…
• 30th December 2013 to 26th January 2014
(28 days)
• 4 different report types split overo Advanceo Dailyo Wrap
• CSV and PDF file format
• 115 files
• 47.6mb
• Most detailed level:
o Price Type
• Waste due to pivots and aggregates:
approx. 25%
o 3 report areas, 4 reports = 1
unnecessary
Duplication and Waste: an efficiency opportunity…
• 30th December 2013 to 26th January 2014
(28 days)
• 4 different report types split overo Advanceo Dailyo Wrap
• CSV and PDF file format
• 115 files
• 47.6mb
• Most detailed level:
o Price Type
• Waste due to pivots and aggregates:
approx. 25%
o 3 report areas, 4 reports = 1
unnecessary
• 30th December 2013 to 27th January 2014 (29
days)
• 12 different report types split overo Advanceo Maturedo On-Day sales
• XLS and PDF file format
• 256 files
• 45.7mb
• Most detailed level: o Seat Type by Price Band by Discount
type by Performance Type
• Waste due to pivots and aggregates: approx.
75%
o 3 report areas, 12 reports = 9
unnecessary
LearningsAction
1. Multiple Formats for ‘the same’ conceptual set
2. Different formats from the same system
3. Data quality/format issues1. Ticket data all delivered by email2. Data in CSV, XLS and PDF3. A lot of manual work4. Historical data stored in folders in Excel5. Local server ‘almost full’
1. MSG files can be automatically extracted
2. Data can be automatically extracted from PDF
3. All three formats must be handled4. Email must be handled5. There is duplication in the files1. Waste within data acquisition2. A rich and valuable core set3. Many connection points for other sets
A small sample came with the brief
A bigger example set requested
Examining what we received
Core domain data set exploration
Report Date
Unpaid
Count
Unpaid
Net
UnpaidCharges
Unpaid
Total
Seats Comps Value Capacity TargetReserved
SeatsReserved
Value…*Potential
Value
Source
Show Theatre
ShowType
ShowMonth
ShowYear
ShowDay
ShowDOW
Discount Type Price
BandSeat Type
PaymentChannel Agent
CardType
Show/Theatre
Location/Theatre
Segment
Ticketing
PaidMedia Social
Media
Print Media
BroadcastMedia
Weather
Events
Out of homeMedia
And we only looked at 2 shows over 30 days…
Analysis Tool
Database
DataShaka…
Store
Harvest
“Everything is a source...”
http
file
FTP
API
market
place
secure
server
Unify
DeliverTimeT
UnifiedData
Context
C
SignalS
ValueV
ConsilientConnection
istChaordicRobustFlexible
Any question of any data.
32
Time Context Signal Value
Context Type
Ct
Sales
Ct
34
{ "name":"Nutrigum" "followers_count": 39061, "friends_count": 12986, "listed_count": 917,}
Harvested at 2013-10-01 17:35:00
{ "category": "Company", "talking_about_count": 58550, "username": "healthyx", "likes": 1985655, "link": "http://healthyx"}
Harvested at 2013-10-01 19:12:00
<performance> <account> Healthy X Limited </account> <cam>nutrigum – branding</cam> <data> <date v=“2013-10-01”> <impr>14000</impr> <clk>1500</clk> <cnv>10</cnv> </date> </data></ performance >
Adserver
Sales <filterTags>Nutrigum</filterTags><tagStats> <tag>~SOURCE~t</tag> <tagDisplayName> TWITTER </tagDisplayName> <matchCount>71</matchCount> <popularity> <popularityCount> <timeInterval> 2013-10-01 </timeInterval> <count>2.0</count> <normalizedCount> 2.0</normalizedCount> </popularityCount> </popularity> </tagStats>
eCRMDate,productId,userId,number,ppu2013-10-01,123,321,2,5.002013-10-01,123,521,1,5.002013-10-01,333,444,2,15.002013-10-01,854,111,1,20.00
Some Data…
Store
Harvest
“Everything is a source...”
http
file
FTP
API
market
place
secure
server
Unify
DISQ
Unstructured
Relational
Graph
In Memory
Document Store
File System
Big Table
Deliver
Enterprise Data Store
TimeT
UnifiedData
Context
C
SignalS
ValueV
Your data in TCSV…
Lots of TCSV
Viewing & analysing……
Other ways to view…
Clients
Ways of working
Partnershi
p
An Agile Approach
Lean
Change
Collaboration Communication
Agile
Pitch
Statement of Work signed
off
Follow-up:Tech Deep Dive
SurgeryWorkshop
1.Analysis Tool
1.TicketingDatabase
2.More
Sources
3.The Future
6-8 weeks 8-10 weeks
How Much?
Phase Configure Monthly Timing1. Ticketing £25k £5k 6-8 weeks
2. More sources £15k Incl. 8-10 weeks
3. Future TBC TBC TBC
Total £40k £5k
There is not one answer.
Solutionapproach Pro’s Con’s
Re-Seller
Custom Build
Data As A Service
Solutionapproach Pro’s Con’s
Re-Seller• Off the shelf ‘modules’• Polished• Safe buy
• Lack of influence• Take ‘as is’• ‘just’ a sales team
Custom Build
Data As A Service
Solutionapproach Pro’s Con’s
Re-Seller• Off the shelf ‘modules’• Polished• Safe buy
• Lack of influence• Take ‘as is’• ‘just’ a sales team
Custom Build• Get what you want• Direct involvement• Can be cheaper
• Get what ‘only you’ want• Focussed on ‘now’• Or more expensive
Data As A Service
Solutionapproach Pro’s Con’s
Re-Seller• Off the shelf ‘modules’• Polished• Safe buy
• Lack of influence• Take ‘as is’• ‘just’ a sales team
Custom Build• Get what you want• Direct involvement• Can be cheaper
• Get what ‘only you’ want• Focussed on ‘now’• Or more expensive
Data As A Service• Proven specialist platform• Fully configurable• Future proof
• Data vs DV specialists• Requests not instructions• Active involvement