Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

24
Airbus policy on selection of thrust reversers Following reverser failures OLV Air Asia - Kuala Lumpur - 20 - 24 September 2010

Transcript of Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

Page 1: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

Airbus policy on selection of thrust reversers Following reverser failures

OLV Air Asia - Kuala Lumpur - 20 - 24 September 2010

Page 2: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 2

4 Training recommendations

3 Reminder on operational impacts

Contents

5 Conclusion

2 Reverse thrust selection policy

1 Background

Page 3: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 3

4 Training recommendations

3 Reminder on operational impacts

Contents

5 Conclusion

2 Reverse thrust selection policy

1 BackgroundBackground

Page 4: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 4

Background

• Runway excursion events at landing,not only on Airbus aircraft

due to mishandling of thrust levers, following , for instance, a dispatch with one thrust reverser deactivated

• Two main types of mishandling after touchdown: Both thrust levers in REV, then one to CLB or TOGA

One thrust lever remains in CLBOR

For both scenarii : potential runway excursionpotential runway excursion

Page 5: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 5

Background

Since April 2006:

Symmetric selection of thrust reverse levers

AIRBUS

M M E L

• MMEL with reverser deactivated:

Before April 2006 : Recommended NOT to select reverse thrust

on affected engine

For A320 family/A330/A340/A380 Simplification of MMEL- procedure:

Select ALL reversers, unless all reversers deactivated Since April 2006: For A320 Family aircraft Since June 2006: Extended to all Airbus aircraft types

Page 6: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 6

Background

Since April 2006:

AIRBUS

M M E L

• MMEL with reverser deactivated (cont’d):

For A310/A300-600/B2/B4

Simplification of MMEL- procedure: Select First ALL reversers to Idle, then MAX REV only

on the operative side

(Due to failure cases* where the thrust lever cannot move beyond REV IDLE )

*:Depends on Engine type

Page 7: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 7

Background

AIRBUS

M M E L Today’s presentation: Recall of the Airbus policy,

including in-flight failure impacting reverser statusfor A320 Family/A330/A340/A380 *

ENG REVERSE UNLOCKED ENG FAIL HYD G+B SYS LO PRELEC DC BUS 1+2 FAULT

A320 examples

* : Most of the examples are A320 examples, but principle also valid for LR and A380

Page 8: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 8

Background

• For A300/A310/A300-600:Specific presentation during the dedicated

A300/A310/A300-600 session :“Landing Procedure Enhancement “

Page 9: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 9

4 Training recommendations

3 Reminder on operational impacts

Contents

5 Conclusion

2 Reverse thrust selection policyReverse thrust selection policy

1 Background

Page 10: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 10

Reverser Selection Policy

• A simple and common policySame procedure for

– MMEL dispatch, and– In-flight failures

At least one reverser operative:

Select ALL thrust reversersAt least one reverser operative:

Select ALL thrust reversers

Airbus general recommendation is:

All reversers inoperative and/or de-activated: Do NOT select thrust reversers

All reversers inoperative and/or de-activated: Do NOT select thrust reversers

Always symmetric selection of thrust reverser levers

AIRBUS

M M E L

Same procedure for Rejected Take Off (RTO) and for landing

Page 11: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 11

Reverser Selection Policy

Common sense: no benefit of selecting the reversers Be prepared (dedicated briefing for RTO) Retard thrust levers to Idle Importance of arming the ground spoilers

– To ensure extension of ground spoilers and autobrake activation

All reversers inoperative and/or de-activated: Do NOT select thrust reversers

All reversers inoperative and/or de-activated: Do NOT select thrust reversers

At least one reverser operative:

Select ALL thrust reversersAt least one reverser operative:

Select ALL thrust reversersProcedure consistent with Standard Operating Procedure

Page 12: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 12

Reverser Selection Policy

• FCTM revision in 2008 (SA/LR:July 2008 ; A380:October 2008) recommendation on the reverser selection when reverser(s) is inoperative (covering in-flight failures and MEL dispatch)

Page 13: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 13

4 Training recommendations

3 Reminder on operational impactsReminder on operational impacts

Contents

5 Conclusion

2 Reverse thrust selection policy

1 Background

Page 14: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 14

Reminder on operational impacts

• What are the operational consequences if you select all reversers while one reverser is inoperative ?

Reminder of operational impacts:1 - ECAM effect at reverser selection2 - Landing distance impacted3 - Lateral control considerations4 - Maintenance action or MEL entry for next flight

Page 15: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 15

Reminder on operational impacts

– No green “REV” indication (amber or no indication)Callout “NO REVERSE ENGINE x”

1 - ECAM effect at reverser selection

ENG 2 REV FAULT

– “ENG x REV FAULT” alert may appear

As reminder only, no further action required

Page 16: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 16

Reminder on operational impacts

2 - Landing distance impacted

50ft

Apply the landing distance factor provided in the QRH

“APPROACH WITH FAILURES” - OLM 2008

« LANDING DISTANCE WITH FAILURES » - PARIS 2009

Session 9 A320 Family/A330/A340

Refer to :

Landing Distance with failuresNew Landing Distance Factors

Page 17: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 17

Reminder on operational impacts

3 – Be prepared for lateral control

– Crosswind limitations for automatic rollout (depending on aircraft type) remain applicable:

– Apply the usual FCTM and FCOM-SOP techniques for lateral control:

FCOM – SOP:

Example : A320 FCOM 3.01.22:

Page 18: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 18

Reminder on operational impacts

4 - Maintenance action or MMEL entry for next flight

MMEL

Page 19: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 19

4 Training recommendationsTraining recommendations

3 Reminder on operational impacts

Contents

5 Conclusion

2 Reverse thrust selection policy

1 Background

Page 20: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 20

Training recommendations

• BRIEFING:Highlight importance of briefing: Focus the unusual => not a

litany– Review the reversers status– Brief the thrust reverser selection and associated display

Guidelines for Flight Crew Training Centers In case of One reverser inoperative:

Page 21: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 21

Training recommendations

• TRAINING : FOT (10 Oct 2007): “Training recommendation on Dispatch with One

Thrust Reverser Deactivated” :– Airbus recommends to reinforce flight crew training (initial and recurrent)

for situations of dispatch with one thrust reverser deactivated and/or for situations with failure leading to inoperative thrust reverser.

Page 22: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 22

4 Training recommendations

3 Reminder on operational impacts

Contents

5 ConclusionConclusion

2 Reverse thrust selection policy

1 Background

Page 23: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

© A

IRB

US

S.A

.S.

All

right

s re

serv

ed.

Con

fiden

tial a

nd p

ropr

ieta

ry d

ocum

ent.

May 2009 16th Performance and Operations conference Page 23

Conclusion

Airbus policy : SYMMETRIC USE of the thrust levers on

A320 Family/A330/A340/A380 to reduce risk of runway

excursions, following reverser failure

TRAINING and CREW BRIEFING are KEY FACTORS for correct thrust lever management in unusual situations.

WHEN AT LEAST ONE REVERSER

OPERATIVE

Select ALL thrust reversers

Select ALL thrust reversers

AIRBUS

M M E L

Page 24: Airbus Policy on Selection of Thrust Reversers

Proprietary document.

By taking delivery of this Presentation (hereafter “Presentation”), you accept on behalf of your company to comply with the following. No other property rights are granted by the delivery of this Presentation than the right to read it, for the sole purpose of information. This Presentation, its content, illustrations and photos shall not be modified nor reproduced without prior written consent of Airbus S.A.S. This Presentation and the materials it contains shall not, in whole or in part, be sold, rented, or licensed to any third party subject to payment or not. This Presentation may contain market-sensitive or other information that is correct at the time of going to press. This information involves a number of factors which could change over time, affecting the true public representation. Airbus assumes no obligation to update any information contained in this document or with respect to the information described herein. The statements made herein do not constitute an offer or form part of any contract. They are based on Airbus information and are expressed in good faith but no warranty or representation is given as to their accuracy. When additional information is required, Airbus S.A.S can be contacted to provide further details. Airbus S.A.S shall assume no liability for any damage in connection with the use of this Presentation and the materials it contains, even if Airbus S.A.S has been advised of the likelihood of such damages. This licence is governed by French law and exclusive jurisdiction is given to the courts and tribunals of Toulouse (France) without prejudice to the right of Airbus to bring proceedings for infringement of copyright or any other intellectual property right in any other court of competent jurisdiction.