AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN TONGAN ......i AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN TONGAN PREHISTORY: AN...
Transcript of AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN TONGAN ......i AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN TONGAN PREHISTORY: AN...
i
AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN
TONGAN PREHISTORY: AN
ARCHAEOBOTANICAL
PERSPECTIVE
A Dissertation
by
ELLA USSHER
A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
at the Australian National University
June 2015
School of Culture, History and Language
Department of Archaeology and Natural History
ii
DECLARATION
The research presented here is based on original fieldwork, as well as analysis of micro-
and macrobotanical assemblages excavated by the author on Tongatapu, Kingdom of
Tonga.
I certify that, except where it is stated otherwise, this dissertation is the result of my own
original investigation.
Ella Ussher
iii
Acknowledgements
The completion of this thesis would not have been possible without the contribution and support
of a number of people. Firstly, I would like to thank my Chair of Panel Assoc. Prof. Geoff Clark
for proposing this project and supporting my fieldwork in Tonga, as well as guiding the final
shaping of the written component of my research. My other supervisors, especially Janelle
Stevenson and Matiu Prebble, provided me with invaluable technical support over the last four
years in both the construction of my comparative collection and the analysis of archaeological
material. Many other staff and students at the ANU provided me with specialised advice. These
included Dr Jack Fenner (statistics), Dr Frank Brinks (SEM), Dr Anne Prins (histology), Feli
Hopf and Jay Chin (microbotanical labwork), Rose Whitau (macrobotanical labwork) and
Maxine MacArthur (copy editing). To these people, I am very grateful for their time and sharing
of experience and equipment, without which this research could not have been completed.
On a more personal level, I wish to give a massive thank you to my partner Josh for being so
understanding of the time and effort that needed to go into this PhD project. His love and
support ensured that I retained my sanity at the very end and was well looked after as we
prepared to welcome our little girl into the world. Thanks and lots of love also needs to go to my
family back in NZ who encouraged me to go to Canberra and take my academic career further
so that I could follow my passion for archaeobotany. Close friends and colleagues from the
ANU such as Katherine Seikel, Stuart Hawkins, Jay Chin, Rebecca Jones, Mirani Litster, Feli
Hopf, Christian Reepmeyer, Tim Maloney, Rose Whitau, Ben Shaw, Justin Lewis, and Matthieu
Leclerc all helped create a fun and collegial atmosphere both on and off campus. Finally, I
would also like to express my gratitude to those who helped distract me from my thesis when I
really needed a break by allowing me to follow my other passion in horses, and providing
amazing friendships along the way that I will value forever (Maxine, Ann, Wendy, Keryn,
Claire, Cathy, Jeremy, Fia, and Kaaren).
iv
Abstract
This thesis presents the results of an archaeobotanical study of agricultural development in the
Kingdom of Tonga. Prior to this study, there has been no direct archaeological evidence for
agriculture in Tongan prehistory. Through the implementation of systematic archaeobotanical
techniques, this study aimed to fill this gap and address two key research questions: 1) whether
early colonisers were dependent on introduced crops, or if human dispersal was fuelled
predominantly by the exploitation of natural resources; and 2) whether archaeobotanical data
can provide new evidence to examine the role of agriculture within the development of the
maritime chiefdom in Tonga through agroecological modelling.
This research was divided into two main phases. The first involved the construction of a
comprehensive comparative collection for macrobotanical (vegetative storage and fruit
parenchyma and endocarp), and microbotanical (starch) components of economic and
supplementary plant taxa from Tonga. As part of this, a study of the morphological attributes of
starch and parenchyma was conducted that incorporated multivariate statistical analyses of
diagnostic attributes. Two methods for taxonomic classification were suggested: automated
classification using Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) of starch, and the use of an
Identification Flowchart Key for parenchyma.
In the second phase of research, archaeobotanical data from three sites on Tongatapu,
representing three different time periods in Tongan prehistory, is presented. Macrobotanical and
microbotanical remains were extracted from these sites using flotation, wet-sieving and bulk
stratigraphic sampling and compared to a comprehensive reference collection using a
combination of SEM and light microscopy. Sampled cultural deposits at Talasiu (2750-2650 cal
BP), Leka (1300-1000 cal BP) and Heketa (800-600 cal BP) present new insights into the role
of plant taxa within late-Lapita, the Formative Period, and early stages of the Classic Tu’i
Tonga chiefdom. Modelling using techniques from Human Ecology, specifically agroecology,
replicated past production systems using measures of system efficiency such as nutritional value
of taxa, labour investment and productivity in terms of yields. These were compared to
expectations based on current literature, and a revised chronology for agricultural development
and links to social complexity is presented.
This study demonstrates that multivariate statistical analysis and identification
flowcharts enable the discrimination of starch and vegetative storage parenchyma from most
Tongan plant taxa based on metric and nominal morphological attributes. When applied to
archaeobotanical data these techniques indicate that most staple cultigens and some
supplementary or famine foods were brought to Tonga within a few hundred years of initial
Lapita colonisation. Late prehistoric introductions likely included the sweet potato (Ipomoea
v
batatas) by 600 BP, transported via East Polynesia through the extensive trade networks of the
developing Tongan state. Modelling past production systems linked decreased system
nutritional efficiency over time to horticultural specialisation in primary crops and increasingly
centralised government on Tongatapu. Critically, this analysis modelled the high nutritional
efficiency of Lapita subsistence, and linked this to the division of labour investment between
both economic and supplementary species within a decentralised social hierarchy.
Keywords: archaeobotany, starch, parenchyma, microfossils, Tonga, archaeology, agriculture,
agroecology, production systems, Lapita
vi
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements iii Abstract iv Table of Contents vi List of Tables ix List of Figures xiii List of Abbreviations xvii Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Research aims and objectives 1 Theoretical framework 5 Thesis organisation 6
Chapter 2 Tongan Agriculture in the Pacific Context 9
Research to date 9 Geographic and climatic limitations to agricultural modelling 10 Ethno-historic accounts of plant cultivation in Tonga: 12 Archaeobotany of cultigens in the Pacific 20 Tonga in the Pacific: A summary 30
PART ONE- AN ARCHAEOBOTANICAL COMPARATIVE COLLECTION FOR
TONGA 32 Chapter 3 Reviewing Microbotanical Analysis 33
Biology of starch and identification potential 33 Starch taphonomy 35 Modern starch contamination 42 Sampling strategies and extraction techniques 44
Chapter 4 Reviewing Parenchyma 48
Fresh and charred parenchyma morphology 48 Taphonomic factors affecting macrobotanical preservation 49 Collection and sampling of parenchyma 52 Parenchyma identification 54
Chapter 5 Comparative Collection and Morphometric Studies of Pacific Cultigens 57
Species selection 57 Field collection 58 Laboratory processing of samples 59
Starch processing 59 Histology 60 Experimental charring 61
Recording 62 Light microscopy 62 Scanning Electron Microscopy 62
Morphology of native starch 63 Starch morphology 64 Multivariate statistical analysis of starch 76
Morphology of vegetative storage parenchyma 82 Morphological analysis of fresh samples 82 Description of charcoal 100 Development of an Identification Flowchart Key 106
vii
PART TWO- DEVELOPMENT OF PREHISTORIC AGRICULTURE IN TONGA 112 Chapter 6 Sites and Field Sampling Strategy 113
Methodology for field sampling of archaeological sediments 113 Site selection 113 Field methods 114
Site descriptions 116 Talasiu (TO-Mu-2) 116 Leka (J17) 117 Heketa (TO-Nt-2) 118
Stratigraphic descriptions 119 Talasiu (TO-Mu-2) 119 Leka (J17) 120 Heketa (TO-Nt-2) 122
AMS dating of cultural contexts 124
Chapter 7 Laboratory Methods 126
Microbotanical analysis: Starch residues 126 Experimentation with starch extraction techniques 126 Laboratory processing: Revised starch extraction protocol 132 Light Microscopy 134 Archaeological starch classification: Assemblage-typology approach 134 Archaeological starch classification: Multivariate statistical analysis 135
Macrobotanical analysis: Charred parenchyma and endocarp 136 Laboratory analysis 136
Chapter 8 Results 138
Macrobotanical analysis 138 Quantification of charcoal 138 Parenchyma distribution and identification: Talasiu TP2 case study 142
Microbotanical analysis 144 Extraction, quantification and distribution 144 Identification: Assemblage-typology approach 147 Identification: Multivariate statistics—Discriminant Function Analysis 150
Comparison of modern Pacific production systems 160 Nutrition 161 Labour investment 178 Outputs 187 Output to input ratios: Efficiency calculation 194 System efficiency comparison and system classification 202
Comparison of prehistoric production systems 209 Nutritional comparison of archaeological species 209 Efficiency comparison of archaeological species and production systems 215
Chapter 9 Discussion 221
Timing and nature of plant introductions into Tonga 221 Spondias dulcis— Anacardiaceae 222 Alocasia macrorrhiza— Araceae 222 Amorphophallus paeoniifolius— Araceae 223 Colocasia esculenta— Araceae 223 Cyrtosperma merkusii— Araceae 224 Cocos nucifera— Arecaceae 225 Ipomoea batatas— Convolvulaceae 225
viii
Dioscorea spp.— Dioscoreaceae 226 Inocarpus fagifer— Fabaceae 227 Barringtonia asiatica— Lechythidaceae 228 Artocarpus altilis— Moraceae 228 Musa spp.— Musaceae 229 Piper methysticum— Piperaceae 230 Curcuma longa and Zingiber spp.— Zingiberaceae 231
Modelling archaeological production systems 232 Feasibility of modelling 232 Expected modelling outcomes 234 Modelling Talasiu (TO-Mu-2) 240 Modelling Leka (J17) 244 Modelling Heketa (TO-Nt-2) 247 Comparison of expected and modelled outcomes 250 Specialisation and system efficiency 255 Contamination at Leka and Heketa 256
Linking archaeobotanical data to island colonisation and social complexity 257
Chapter 10 Conclusion 260
Meeting research aims and objectives 260 Future recommendations 267
Micro- and macrobotanical techniques 267 Archaeobotanical research in Tonga and the Pacific 269
Bibliography 271 Appendix A- Species in Reference Collection 294 Appendix B- Description of Parenchyma 296 Appendix C- Starch Images 326 Appendix D- Archaeobotanical Research in the Pacific 331
ix
List of Tables
TABLE 2.1 LIST OF SPECIES RECORDED IN EARLY ETHNO-HISTORIC ACCOUNTS FROM TONGA. ................... 19
TABLE 5.1 HILUM FISSURING OF REFERENCE SPECIES ................................................................................. 66
TABLE 5.2 THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPES OF REFERENCE SPECIES ............................................................... 68
TABLE 5.3 SUMMARY OF STARCH MORPHOLOGY WITHIN REFERENCE COLLECTION .................................... 74
TABLE 5.4 DESCRIPTION OF METRIC AND BINARY VARIABLES USED DURING DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION
ANALYSIS........................................................................................................................................... 76
TABLE 5.5 SPECIES INCLUDED IN CENTRIC AND ECCENTRIC DATASETS FOR TONGAN ANALYSIS ................. 78
TABLE 5.6 GROUND TISSUE CELL SHAPES OF TAXA IN REFERENCE COLLECTION ......................................... 84
TABLE 5.7 GROUND TISSUE CELL DIMENSIONS OF TAXA IN THE REFERENCE COLLECTION .......................... 84
TABLE 5.8 VASCULAR TISSUE ARRANGEMENTS OF TAXA IN REFERENCE COLLECTION ................................ 91
TABLE 5.9 SUMMARY OF PARENCHYMA MORPHOLOGY WITHIN REFERENCE COLLECTION .......................... 96
TABLE 5.10 DESCRIPTION OF MORPHOLOGICAL MODIFICATION WITHIN GROUND TISSUE OF CHARRED
SAMPLES IN THE COMPARATIVE COLLECTION ................................................................................... 103
TABLE 5.11 DESCRIPTION OF MORPHOLOGICAL MODIFICATION WITHIN VASCULAR TISSUE OF CHARRED
SAMPLES IN THE COMPARATIVE COLLECTION ................................................................................... 104
TABLE 8.1 SUMMARY OF TOTAL MACROBOTANICAL ASSEMBLAGES FROM ALL SITES AND TEST-PITS ....... 139
TABLE 8.2 QUANTIFICATION OF COCONUT ENDOCARP FROM ALL SITES AND TEST-PITS ............................ 140
TABLE 8.3 QUANTIFICATION OF OTHER ENDOCARP FROM ALL TEST UNITS ............................................... 141
TABLE 8.4 QUANTIFICATION OF WOOD CHARCOAL AND PARENCHYMA FROM ALL TEST UNITS ................. 142
TABLE 8.5 DISTRIBUTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF PARENCHYMA EXTRACTED FROM TALASIU TP2 ........ 144
TABLE 8.6 OVERALL QUANTITIES (COUNTS) OF STARCH EXTRACTED FROM ALL SAMPLED TEST UNITS AT
TALASIU (TO-MU-2) ........................................................................................................................ 145
TABLE 8.7 DISTRIBUTION OF STARCH COUNTS WITHIN TALASIU TP2 ....................................................... 146
TABLE 8.8 DISTRIBUTION OF STARCH COUNTS WITHIN LEKA TP2 ............................................................ 146
TABLE 8.9 DISTRIBUTION OF STARCH COUNTS WITHIN LEKA TP4 ............................................................ 147
TABLE 8.10 DISTRIBUTION OF STARCH COUNTS WITHIN HEKETA TP3 ...................................................... 147
TABLE 8.11 TABLE OUTLINING SUGGESTED FAMILY OF ORIGIN OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH TYPES FROM
TALASIU TP2. .................................................................................................................................. 149
TABLE 8.12 DISTRIBUTION OF PRELIMINARY IDENTIFICATIONS WITHIN TALASIU TP2 USING THE
ASSEMBLAGE-TYPOLOGY APPROACH ............................................................................................... 150
TABLE 8.13 LEVELS OF CONFIDENCE FROM DFA CLASSIFICATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH FROM
TALASIU TP2. NB HIGH CONFIDENCE (BLACK), MODERATED CONFIDENCE (MEDIUM GREY) AND LOW
CONFIDENCE (LIGHT GREY) .............................................................................................................. 153
TABLE 8.14 FINAL TABLE DOCUMENTING SPECIES REPRESENTED BY ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH WITHIN
TALASIU TP2 NB PRESENCE INDICATED BY BLACK SQUARES .......................................................... 155
TABLE 8.15 LEVELS OF CONFIDENCE FROM DFA CLASSIFICATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH FROM
LEKA TP2. NB HIGH CONFIDENCE (BLACK), MODERATED CONFIDENCE (MEDIUM GREY) AND LOW
CONFIDENCE (LIGHT GREY) .............................................................................................................. 155
TABLE 8.16 FINAL TABLE DOCUMENTING SPECIES REPRESENTED BY ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH WITHIN
LEKA TP2 ........................................................................................................................................ 156
x
TABLE 8.17 LEVELS OF CONFIDENCE FROM DFA CLASSIFICATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH FROM
LEKA TP4. NB HIGH CONFIDENCE (BLACK), MODERATED CONFIDENCE (MEDIUM GREY) AND LOW
CONFIDENCE (LIGHT GREY) ............................................................................................................... 156
TABLE 8.18 FINAL TABLE DOCUMENTING SPECIES REPRESENTED BY ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH WITHIN
LEKA TP4 ......................................................................................................................................... 157
TABLE 8.19 LEVELS OF CONFIDENCE FROM DFA CLASSIFICATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH FROM
HEKETA TP3. NB HIGH CONFIDENCE (BLACK), MODERATED CONFIDENCE (MEDIUM GREY) AND LOW
CONFIDENCE (LIGHT GREY) ............................................................................................................... 158
TABLE 8.20 FINAL TABLE DOCUMENTING SPECIES REPRESENTED BY ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH WITHIN
HEKETA TP3 ..................................................................................................................................... 158
TABLE 8.21 NUTRITIONAL FIGURES AND RANKINGS FOR SPECIES WITHIN THE GADIO ENGA SYSTEM
ACCORDING TO CALORIES, PROTEIN, FATS, CARBOHYDRATES AND TOTAL NUTRITION FIGURES (DATA
FROM DORNSTREICH 1974, 1978) ..................................................................................................... 163
TABLE 8.22 NUTRITIONAL FIGURES AND RANKINGS FOR SPECIES WITHIN BELLONA ISLAND SYSTEM
ACCORDING TO CALORIES, PROTEIN, FATS, CARBOHYDRATES AND TOTAL NUTRITION FIGURES (DATA
FROM CHRISTIANSEN 1975) .............................................................................................................. 166
TABLE 8.23 NUTRITIONAL FIGURES AND RANKINGS FOR SPECIES WITHIN ANUTAN SYSTEM ACCORDING TO
CALORIES, PROTEIN, FATS, CARBOHYDRATES AND TOTAL NUTRITION FIGURES (DATA FROM YEN
1973B) .............................................................................................................................................. 170
TABLE 8.24 NUTRITIONAL FIGURES AND RANKINGS FOR SPECIES WITHIN TONGAN SYSTEM ACCORDING TO
CALORIES, PROTEIN, FATS, CARBOHYDRATES AND TOTAL NUTRITION FIGURES (DATA FROM MINISTRY
OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY 2001) .......................................................................................... 173
TABLE 8.25 NUTRITIONAL FIGURES AND RANKINGS FOR SPECIES WITHIN ONTONG JAVA SYSTEM
ACCORDING TO CALORIES, PROTEIN, FATS, CARBOHYDRATES AND TOTAL NUTRITION FIGURES SYSTEM
(DATA FROM BAYLISS-SMITH 1973, 1986) ....................................................................................... 176
TABLE 8.26 STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF SPECIES’ GROUPINGS IN EXAMPLE SYSTEMS ACCORDING TO
OVERALL NUTRITION FIGURES/100G ................................................................................................. 178
TABLE 8.27 LABOUR INVESTMENT INTO SPECIES WITHIN THE GADIO ENGA SYSTEM (DATA FROM
DORNSTREICH 1974, 1978) ............................................................................................................... 179
TABLE 8.28 LABOUR INVESTMENT INTO SPECIES WITHIN THE BELLONA IS SYSTEM (DATA FROM
CHRISTIANSEN 1975) ........................................................................................................................ 181
TABLE 8.29 LABOUR INVESTMENT INTO SPECIES WITHIN THE ANUTAN SYSTEM (DATA FROM YEN 1973B)
......................................................................................................................................................... 182
TABLE 8.30 LABOUR INVESTMENT INTO SPECIES WITHIN THE TONGAN SYSTEM (DATA FROM MINISTRY OF
AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY 2001) ............................................................................................... 184
TABLE 8.31 LABOUR INVESTMENT INTO SPECIES WITHIN THE ONTONG JAVA PLANT PRODUCTION SYSTEM
(DATA FROM BAYLISS-SMITH 1973, 1986) ....................................................................................... 185
TABLE 8.32 STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF SPECIES’ GROUPINGS IN EXAMPLE SYSTEMS ACCORDING TO
LABOUR INPUT FIGURES .................................................................................................................... 187
TABLE 8.33 OUTPUT COMPARISON OF SPECIES IN GADIO ENGA PLANT PRODUCTION SYSTEM (DATA FROM
DORNSTREICH 1974, 1978) ............................................................................................................... 188
xi
TABLE 8.34 OUTPUT COMPARISON OF SPECIES IN BELLONA ISLAND SYSTEM (DATA FROM CHRISTIANSEN
1975) ................................................................................................................................................ 189
TABLE 8.35 OUTPUT COMPARISON OF SPECIES IN ANUTAN SYSTEM (DATA FROM YEN 1973B)................. 191
TABLE 8.36 OUTPUT COMPARISON OF SPECIES IN TONGAN SYSTEM (DATA FROM MINISTRY OF
AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY 2001) ............................................................................................... 192
TABLE 8.37 OUTPUT COMPARISON OF SPECIES IN ONTONG JAVA PRODUCTION SYSTEM (DATA FROM
BAYLISS-SMITH 1973, 1986) ............................................................................................................ 194
TABLE 8.38 YIELD RATIOS FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SPECIES IN ALL MODERN PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
(KG/TIME UNIT OF LABOUR) .............................................................................................................. 196
TABLE 8.39 OUTPUT TO INPUT RATIOS FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SPECIES USING GADIO ENGA DATA .......... 198
TABLE 8.40 OUTPUT TO INPUT RATIOS FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SPECIES USING BELLONA DATA ............... 199
TABLE 8.41 OUTPUT TO INPUT RATIOS FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SPECIES USING ANUTAN DATA ................. 200
TABLE 8.42 OUTPUT TO INPUT RATIOS FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SPECIES USING TONGAN 2001 DATA ........ 201
TABLE 8.43 OUTPUT TO INPUT RATIOS FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SPECIES USING ONTONG JAVAN DATA ..... 202
TABLE 8.44 STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF NUTRITIONAL VALUE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND EXPECTED
ETHNOGRAPHIC SPECIES ................................................................................................................... 215
TABLE 8.45 STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF NUTRITIONAL VALUE OF SPECIES GROUPS WITHIN
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SYSTEMS AT TALASIU, LEKA AND HEKETA ........................................................ 215
TABLE 9.1 LIST OF ALL SPECIES IDENTIFIED ARCHAEOBOTANICALLY WITHIN THIS STUDY ....................... 222
TABLE 9.2 IDENTIFIED FAMILIES AND SPECIES WITHIN ARCHAEOBOTANICAL REMAINS FROM TALASIU (TO-
MU-2) .............................................................................................................................................. 241
TABLE 9.3 YIELD RATIOS FOR SPECIES IDENTIFIED AT TALASIU MODELLED USING COMPARATIVE SYSTEMS
......................................................................................................................................................... 243
TABLE 9.4 LABOUR INPUTS FOR SPECIES IDENTIFIED AT TALASIU MODELLED USING COMPARATIVE SYSTEMS
......................................................................................................................................................... 243
TABLE 9.5 STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF LABOUR INPUTS FOR GROUPINGS AT TALASIU IN TERMS OF MEAN
DIFFERENCE MODELLED USING COMPARATIVE SYSTEMS .................................................................. 243
TABLE 9.6 IDENTIFIED FAMILIES AND SPECIES WITHIN ARCHAEOBOTANICAL REMAINS FROM LEKA (J17) 245
TABLE 9.7 YIELD RATIOS FOR SPECIES IDENTIFIED AT LEKA MODELLED USING COMPARATIVE SYSTEMS . 246
TABLE 9.8 LABOUR INPUTS FOR SPECIES IDENTIFIED AT LEKA MODELLED USING COMPARATIVE SYSTEMS
......................................................................................................................................................... 247
TABLE 9.9 STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF LABOUR INPUTS FOR GROUPINGS AT LEKA IN TERMS OF MEAN
DIFFERENCE MODELLED USING COMPARATIVE SYSTEMS .................................................................. 247
TABLE 9.10 IDENTIFIED FAMILIES AND SPECIES WITHIN ARCHAEOBOTANICAL REMAINS FROM HEKETA (TO-
NT-2) ............................................................................................................................................... 248
TABLE 9.11 YIELD RATIOS FOR SPECIES IDENTIFIED AT HEKETA MODELLED USING COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE
SYSTEMS........................................................................................................................................... 249
TABLE 9.12 LABOUR INPUTS FOR SPECIES IDENTIFIED AT HEKETA MODELLED USING COMPARATIVE
EXAMPLE SYSTEMS ........................................................................................................................... 249
TABLE 9.13 STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF LABOUR INPUTS FOR GROUPINGS AT HEKETA IN TERMS OF MEAN
DIFFERENCE MODELLED USING COMPARATIVE SYSTEMS .................................................................. 250
xii
TABLE 9.14 COMPARISON OF MODELLED SYSTEM EFFICIENCY WITH RATIOS OF PRIMARY TO
SUPPLEMENTARY SPECIES ................................................................................................................. 255
xiii
List of Figures
FIGURE 5.1 FLOWCHART SHOWING METHODOLOGY FOR THE IMAGING AND RECORDING OF STARCH AND
PARENCHYMA WITHIN THE REFERENCE COLLECTION.......................................................................... 59
FIGURE 5.2 DIAGRAM SHOWING BASIC FEATURES OF STARCH GRANULE MORPHOLOGY ............................. 65
FIGURE 5.3 BOX PLOT OF STARCH GRANULE LENGTHS WITHIN REFERENCE COLLECTION ............................ 72
FIGURE 5.4 BOX PLOT OF STARCH GRANULE WIDTHS WITHIN REFERENCE COLLECTION .............................. 72
FIGURE 5.5 BOX PLOT OF STARCH GRANULE HILUM POSITION TO LENGTH RATIOS WITHIN REFERENCE
COLLECTION ....................................................................................................................................... 73
FIGURE 5.6 PLOT SHOWING DISCRIMINATION OF SPECIES WITHIN CENTRIC DATASET ACCORDING TO FIRST
TWO CANONICAL VARIATES ................................................................................................................ 79
FIGURE 5.7 PLOT SHOWING DISCRIMINATION OF 15 SPECIES WITHIN ECCENTRIC DATASET ACCORDING TO
FIRST TWO CANONICAL VARIATES ...................................................................................................... 79
FIGURE 5.8 CLASSIFICATION MATRIX FOR THE OVERALL CENTRIC DATASET, SHOWING HIGHEST
DISCRIMINATION OF COLOCASIA ESCULENTA, INOCARPUS FAGIFER, MORINDA CITRIFOLIA AND SPONDIAS
DULCIS (SPECIES LISTED VERTICALLY IN THE FIRST COLUMN ARE THE ORIGINAL SPECIES, AND THOSE
LISTED HORIZONTALLY IN THE TOP ROW ARE THE SPECIES TO WHICH DFA CLASSIFIED GRANULES) .. 81
FIGURE 5.9 CLASSIFICATION MATRIX FOR THE OVERALL ECCENTRIC DATASET, SHOWING HIGHEST
DISCRIMINATION OF COLOCASIA ESCULENTA, CURCUMA LONGA, AND DIOSCOREA PENTAPHYLLA
(SPECIES LISTED VERTICALLY IN THE FIRST COLUMN ARE THE ORIGINAL SPECIES, AND THOSE LISTED
HORIZONTALLY IN THE TOP ROW ARE THE SPECIES TO WHICH DFA CLASSIFIED GRANULES) .............. 81
FIGURE 5.10 BOX PLOT OF PARENCHYMA CELL LENGTHS OF TAXA IN THE REFERENCE COLLECTION .......... 87
FIGURE 5.11 BOX PLOT OF PARENCHYMA CELL WIDTHS OF TAXA IN THE REFERENCE COLLECTION ............ 88
FIGURE 5.12 PLOT SHOWING CLASSIFICATION OF PARENCHYMA WITHIN REFERENCE COLLECTION USING
DFA ................................................................................................................................................... 89
FIGURE 5.13 DESCRIPTION OF VASCULAR BUNDLE ARRANGEMENTS WITHIN VEGETATIVE PARENCHYMA
(FROM HATHER 2000) ........................................................................................................................ 90
FIGURE 5.14 BOX PLOT SHOWING VASCULAR BUNDLE LENGTHS WITHIN REFERENCE COLLECTION
ACCORDING TO TISSUE ARRANGEMENT .............................................................................................. 94
FIGURE 5.15 FLOWCHART 1 USED AS AN IDENTIFICATION KEY TO IDENTIFY UNKNOWN PARENCHYMATOUS
SAMPLES WHEN VASCULAR TISSUES ARE VISIBLE ............................................................................. 110
FIGURE 5.16 FLOWCHART 2 USED AS AN IDENTIFICATION KEY TO IDENTIFY UNKNOWN PARENCHYMATOUS
SAMPLES WHEN NO VASCULAR TISSUES ARE VISIBLE........................................................................ 111
FIGURE 6.1 MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES INCLUDED IN THIS STUDY FROM
TONGATAPU ..................................................................................................................................... 116
FIGURE 6.2 STRATIGRAPHIC DIAGRAM OF CULTURAL DEPOSITS WITHIN TALASIU TP2 ............................. 120
FIGURE 6.3 STRATIGRAPHIC DIAGRAM OF CULTURAL DEPOSITS WITHIN LEKA TP2 .................................. 122
FIGURE 6.4 STRATIGRAPHIC DIAGRAM OF CULTURAL DEPOSITS AT LEKA TP4 ......................................... 122
FIGURE 6.5 STRATIGRAPHIC DIAGRAM OF CULTURAL DEPOSITS WITHIN HEKETA TP3.............................. 124
FIGURE 6.6 CALIBRATION OF RADIOCARBON DATES FROM TALASIU (TO-MU-2), LEKA (J17) AND HEKETA
(TO-NT-2) ....................................................................................................................................... 125
FIGURE 8.1 COMPOSITION OF OVERALL MACROBOTANICAL ASSEMBLAGE IN TERMS OF ABUNDANCE....... 139
xiv
FIGURE 8.2 BOX PLOT DEMONSTRATING MAXIMUM LENGTH COMPARISON OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH
TYPE 1 WITH DIOSCOREA SPP. .......................................................................................................... 149
FIGURE 8.3 DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS PLOT FOR CENTRIC DATASET SHOWING ELLIPSES (COLOURED DOTS
REPRESENT REFERENCE SPECIES, BLACK DOTS REPRESENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL GRAINS) ................... 152
FIGURE 8.4 DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS PLOT FOR ECCENTRIC DATASET SHOWING ELLIPSES (COLOURED DOTS
REPRESENT REFERENCE SPECIES, BLACK DOTS REPRESENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL GRAINS) ................... 153
FIGURE 8.5 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND REFERENCE STARCH: (A) ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH IDENTIFIED AS
ARTOCARPUS ALTILIS, (B) MODERN STARCH OF A.ALTILIS, (C) ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH IDENTIFIED
AS ALOCASIA MACRORRHIZA, (D) MODERN STARCH OF A.MACRORRHIZA, (E) ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH
IDENTIFIED AS AMORPHOPHALLUS PAEONIIFOLIUS, (F) MODERN STARCH OF A.PAEONIIFOLIUS, (G)
ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH IDENTIFIED AS BARRINGTONIA ASIATICA, (H) MODERN STARCH OF
B.ASIATICA, (I) ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH IDENTIFIED AS COLOCASIA ESCULENTA, (J) MODERN STARCH
OF C. ESCULENTA, (K) ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH IDENTIFIED AS CURCUMA LONGA, (L) MODERN
STARCH OF C.LONGA, (M) ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH IDENTIFIED AS CYRTOSPERMA MERKUSII, (N)
MODERN STARCH OF C.MERKUSII, (O) ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH IDENTIFIED AS DIOSCOREA ALATA,
(P) MODERN STARCH OF D.ALATA. ..................................................................................................... 159
FIGURE 8.6 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND REFERENCE STARCH CONT.: (Q) ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH IDENTIFIED
AS DIOSCOREA BULBIFERA (R) MODERN STARCH OF D. BULBIFERA, (S) ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH
IDENTIFIED AS DIOSCOREA ESCULENTA, (T) MODERN STARCH OF D.ESCULENTA, (U) ARCHAEOLOGICAL
STARCH IDENTIFIED AS DIOSCOREA NUMMULARIA, (V) MODERN STARCH OF D.NUMMULARIA, (W)
ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH IDENTIFIED AS INOCARPUS FAGIFER, (X) MODERN STARCH OF I. FAGIFER,
(Y) ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH IDENTIFIED AS IPOMOEA BATATAS, (Z) MODERN STARCH OF I.BATATAS,
(AA) ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH IDENTIFIED AS MUSA SP., (AB) MODERN STARCH OF MUSA SP., (AC)
ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH IDENTIFIED AS PIPER METHYSTICUM, (AD) MODERN STARCH OF
P.METHYSTICUM, (AE) ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH (CONTAMINANT) IDENTIFIED AS SOLANUM
TUBEROSUM, (AF) MODERN STARCH OF S.TUBEROSUM, (AG) ARCHAEOLOGICAL STARCH IDENTIFIED
AS SPONDIAS DULCIS, (L) MODERN STARCH OF S. DULCIS. ................................................................. 160
FIGURE 8.7 NUTRITIONAL COMPARISON OF SPECIES WITHIN THE GADIO ENGA PLANT PRODUCTION SYSTEM
(DATA FROM DORNSTREICH 1974, 1978) .......................................................................................... 164
FIGURE 8.8 NUTRITIONAL COMPARISON OF SPECIES WITHIN THE BELLONA ISLAND PLANT PRODUCTION
SYSTEM, SHOWING EXPONENTIAL TREND LINES FOR HORTICULTURAL AND SEMI-CULTIVATED TAXA
(DATA FROM CHRISTIANSEN 1975) ................................................................................................... 167
FIGURE 8.9 NUTRITIONAL COMPARISON OF SPECIES WITHIN THE ANUTAN PLANT PRODUCTION SYSTEM,
SHOWING EXPONENTIAL TREND LINES FOR PRIMARY AND SUPPLEMENTARY TAXA (DATA FROM YEN
1973B) .............................................................................................................................................. 171
FIGURE 8.10 NUTRITIONAL COMPARISON OF SPECIES WITHIN THE TONGAN PLANT PRODUCTION SYSTEM,
SHOWING EXPONENTIAL TREND LINES FOR HORTICULTURAL AND SEMI-CULTIVATED TAXA (DATA
FROM MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY 2001) ................................................................ 174
FIGURE 8.11 NUTRITIONAL COMPARISON OF SPECIES WITHIN THE ONTONG JAVA PLANT PRODUCTION
SYSTEM, SHOWING EXPONENTIAL TREND LINES FOR PRIMARY AND SUPPLEMENTARY TAXA (DATA
FROM BAYLISS-SMITH 1973, 1986) .................................................................................................. 177
xv
FIGURE 8.12 LABOUR COMPARISON OF SPECIES WITHIN THE GADIO ENGA SYSTEM (DATA FROM
DORNSTREICH 1974, 1977) .............................................................................................................. 180
FIGURE 8.13 LABOUR COMPARISON OF SPECIES WITHIN THE BELLONA ISLAND SYSTEM (DATA FROM
CHRISTIANSEN 1975) ....................................................................................................................... 181
FIGURE 8.14 LABOUR COMPARISON OF SPECIES WITHIN THE ANUTAN SYSTEM (DATA FROM YEN 1973B) 183
FIGURE 8.15 LABOUR COMPARISON OF SPECIES WITHIN THE TONGAN SYSTEM (DATA FROM MINISTRY OF
AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY 2001) ............................................................................................... 185
FIGURE 8.16 LABOUR COMPARISON OF SPECIES WITHIN THE ONTONG JAVA PLANT PRODUCTION SYSTEM
(DATA FROM BAYLISS-SMITH 1973, 1986) ....................................................................................... 186
FIGURE 8.17 OUTPUT COMPARISON ACCORDING TO YIELD FOR SPECIES WITHIN GADIO ENGA SYSTEM (DATA
FROM DORNSTREICH 1974, 1978) .................................................................................................... 188
FIGURE 8.18 OUTPUT COMPARISON ACCORDING TO YIELD FOR SPECIES WITHIN BELLONA SYSTEM (DATA
FROM CHRISTIANSEN 1975).............................................................................................................. 190
FIGURE 8.19 OUTPUT COMPARISON ACCORDING TO YIELD FOR SPECIES WITHIN THE ANUTAN SYSTEM (DATA
FROM YEN 1973B) ............................................................................................................................ 191
FIGURE 8.20 OUTPUT COMPARISON ACCORDING TO YIELD FOR SPECIES WITHIN THE TONGAN SYSTEM (DATA
FROM MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY 2001) ............................................................... 193
FIGURE 8.21 COMPARISON ACCORDING TO YIELD FOR SPECIES WITHIN THE ONTONG JAVA PRODUCTION
SYSTEM (DATA FROM BAYLISS-SMITH 1973, 1986) .......................................................................... 194
FIGURE 8.22 OUTPUT TO INPUT RATIO COMPARISON FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SPECIES WITHIN EACH SYSTEM
IN TERMS OF CALORIES ..................................................................................................................... 206
FIGURE 8.23 OUTPUT TO INPUT RATIO COMPARISON FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SPECIES WITHIN EACH SYSTEM
IN TERMS OF PROTEIN ....................................................................................................................... 207
FIGURE 8.24 OUTPUT TO INPUT RATIO COMPARISON FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SPECIES WITHIN EACH SYSTEM
IN TERMS OF FATS (NOTE VERTICAL SCALE IS LOGARITHMIC) ........................................................... 207
FIGURE 8.25 OUTPUT TO INPUT RATIO COMPARISON FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL SPECIES WITHIN EACH SYSTEM
IN TERMS OF CARBOHYDRATES ......................................................................................................... 208
FIGURE 8.26 COMPARISON OF AVERAGE NUTRITIONAL EFFICIENCY RATIOS FOR ALL SYSTEMS (NOTE
VERTICAL SCALE IS LOGARITHMIC) .................................................................................................. 208
FIGURE 8.27 NUTRITIONAL COMPARISON OF SPECIES IDENTIFIED AT TALASIU (TO-MU-2) ...................... 210
FIGURE 8.28 NUTRITIONAL COMPARISON OF SPECIES IDENTIFIED AT TALASIU WITH EXPECTED
ETHNOGRAPHIC SPECIES. .................................................................................................................. 211
FIGURE 8.29 NUTRITIONAL COMPARISON OF SPECIES IDENTIFIED AT LEKA (J17) ..................................... 212
FIGURE 8.30 NUTRITIONAL COMPARISON OF SPECIES IDENTIFIED AT LEKA WITH EXPECTED ETHNOGRAPHIC
SPECIES ............................................................................................................................................ 213
FIGURE 8.31 NUTRITIONAL COMPARISON OF SPECIES IDENTIFIED AT HEKETA (TO-NT-2) ........................ 214
FIGURE 8.32 NUTRITIONAL COMPARISON OF SPECIES IDENTIFIED AT HEKETA WITH EXPECTED
ETHNOGRAPHIC SPECIES ................................................................................................................... 215
FIGURE 8.33 COMPARISON OF CALORIFIC EFFICIENCY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SPECIES FROM TALASIU...... 218
FIGURE 8.34 COMPARISON OF CALORIFIC EFFICIENCY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SPECIES FROM LEKA ........... 218
FIGURE 8.35 COMPARISON OF CALORIFIC EFFICIENCY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SPECIES FROM HEKETA ...... 219
xvi
FIGURE 8.36 MODELLED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ACCORDING TO CALORIFIC EFFICIENCY VALUES FROM
MODERN SYSTEMS ............................................................................................................................ 220
FIGURE 9.1 TREND TOWARDS DECREASED SYSTEM NUTRITIONAL EFFICIENCY AND INCREASED SOCIAL
COMPLEXITY AFTER LAPITA OCCUPATION AT TALASIU (2750-2650 CAL BP) ................................... 259
xvii
List of Abbreviations
BP years before present
bsl below surface level
bd below datum
ºC degrees centigrade
cal calibrated
cm centimetres
cm³ centimetres cubed
DFA Discriminant Function Analysis
hr hours
ioa instance of activity
km kilometres
m metres
m² metres square
µm micrometre
sg specific gravity
1
Chapter 1 Introduction
Plants have played a critical role throughout history, enabling human migration, colonisation
and the formation of complex societies. Many plant species have been biologically adapted to
human exploitation through genetic manipulations that increase productivity and ease
cultivation and transportation. The production and use of plants through horticultural practices
was a critical stepping stone in the development of complex societies in human history. Plants
enabled nutritionally diverse diets, but also provided useful materials such as cordage, fibre,
thatch, cooking and storage vessels, and medicines to name a few. Plant production systems
within the Pacific region are the result of transportation of plants and of concepts relating to
them, as well as localised adaptation to specific island environments. Understanding the role
that these systems played in stimulating and enabling episodes of human movement into and
within Polynesia is critical for developing models of global migration patterns.
There are two prevailing views on human-environment interactions. The first of these
argues that humans reacted passively to environmental change. This traditional perspective has
been challenged by the view that humans act as agents of change, both reacting to and
transforming the landscapes which they inhabit. Island environments represent microcosms of
this ecosystem manipulation and adaptation, and the islands of the Pacific provide an important
setting to test these views. Natural and cultural factors that affected the timing and speed of
movement, settlement patterns, technological development and the transformation of island
environments within the Pacific can arguably provide insights at a global scale.
This archaeobotanical thesis will focus on the links between plant utilisation and
migration episodes within Western Polynesia as well as on the role of plants within the
evolution of social hierarchy through agricultural development, which form core issues in
debates about Pacific settlement processes. Specifically, this thesis will investigate the
introduction and role of prehistoric crops in Tongan prehistory through a study of ancient plant
remains found in Lapita and post-Lapita archaeological sites around Tongatapu.
Research aims and objectives
A primary question examined in this thesis is whether early colonisers were dependent on
introduced crops, or if human dispersal was fuelled predominantly by the exploitation of natural
resources. On a global scale, human migration has traditionally been viewed as stimulated by
the extraction of floral and faunal food resources within diverse environmental contexts. This
stems from the causality concepts of ‘push’ and ‘pull’ factors at both place of origin and
destination, which have been utilised by demographers, geographers and archaeologists alike for
many decades (Anthony 1990; Lee 1966). The colonisation of diverse island landscapes within
the Pacific Ocean, the largest of the Earth’s oceanic divisions at 165.25 million km², has been
2
recognised as an ideal setting to test this theory. The view that exploitation rather than
adaptation drove episodes of Lapita migration into Remote Oceania was taken by Groube
(1971). His ‘strandlooper’ concept for Lapita subsistence, later adopted by Best (1984),
favoured marine exploitation over the utilisation of transported terrestrial crops and animals.
This contrasts with the ‘transported landscape’ proposed by Kirch (1984) and others (Green
1991), in which a full suite of horticultural crops and techniques was brought by Lapita
populations moving eastwards into Polynesia. These were then cultivated and intensified
through adaptation of traditional practices within the varying high volcanic, limestone and atoll
island settings of this region. The scale of ecosystem manipulation and the economic systems
that fuelled this and later pulses of migration from the Western Polynesian homeland into
Central and East Polynesia after 1500 BP are still contested. Global models such as the Ideal
Free Distribution (IFD) from Human Behavioural Ecology (HBE) have been applied to account
for modes of subsistence, new habitat suitability, and population density in predicting migratory
behaviour (Kennett et al. 2006). Comparisons have also been drawn between the migration of
food-producing people in areas such as the Pacific, Atlantic, Caribbean and the Mediterranean,
suggesting that the insularity of island and coastal landscapes affects the rate and dynamics of
colonising episodes (Dawson 2008; Keegan and Diamond 1987; Leppard 2014).
Disentangling local parameters and rates of change, as well as establishing how early
subsistence evolved as locally-adapted cultures emerged is a crucial issue within Pacific
archaeology that can be applied globally. Other archaeobotanical (Crowther 2005, 2009;
Horrocks and Bedford 2004, 2010; Horrocks and Nunn 2007; Horrocks et al. 2009) and isotopic
studies (Bentley et al. 2007; Field et al. 2009; Shaw et al. 2009; Valentin et al. 2010) have
attempted to provide new proxy evidence on Lapita and post-Lapita subsistence, with research
in Near and Remote Oceania. However, there has been very little direct evidence to corroborate
the picture these data sketch. The analysis of both micro- and macrobotanical remains from
archaeological sites has the potential to provide important new data to resolve the significance
of human-plant production systems in the colonisation of the Pacific islands 3000 years ago.
Second, this study will examine whether archaeobotanical data can provide new
evidence to examine the role of agriculture within the development of the maritime chiefdom in
Tonga. Investigation of social complexity in Tonga has often assumed a causal link between the
intensification of agriculture and the development of a complex chiefdom (Aswani and Graves
1998) or primary state (Clark et al. 2014) based on Tongatapu by 750 BP (Burley 1998). This
approach stems from the foundational work of Childe (1925), Clarke (1952), Binford (1968)
and Flannery (1965, 1968), among others, in Europe and the Americas. Simple environmental
determinism and cultural systems theory have gradually evolved into ecological and
evolutionary approaches that seek to explain the emergence of complex societies and the origins
of agriculture through the dynamic that exists between people and their environment. These
3
approaches have generally moved away from unilinear trajectories for social complexity, and
accept that multiple routes may be taken as a response to the same initial conditions. The
‘advantages’ of the adoption of agriculture did not necessarily ensure that this development
would occur, and adaptive changes that might be viewed as regressive in the direction of less
complex cultural forms also occurred (Binford 1968:331).
The islands of Polynesia present unique opportunities to study the links between
tropical production systems, and agricultural intensification in non-industrialised societies.
Testing of the ‘hydraulic hypothesis’ advanced by Wittfogel (1957), that draws a causal
connection between the managerial requirements of complex irrigation and the development of
complex socio-political structures, has been a dominant theme in Pacific research. Case studies
from locations such as the Australs (Bollt 2012), Hawaii (Earle 1980, 1991, 2012; Ladefoged
and Graves 2008; Lincoln and Ladefoged 2014; McCoy and Graves 2012; Sahlins 1958), the
Marquesas (Addison 2006; Allen 2010; Earle 1993), and Futuna (Kirch 1982, 1994) have
investigated the ties between investment in irrigation for wet taro production as landesque
capital, and the development of political economies. The outcomes of these investigations
challenged the idea of a direct link and demonstrated that territorial expansion was often the
result of increasingly intensified dryland agricultural regimes when shorter-fallow and labor-
intensive methods put pressure on the political elite to source other tracts of arable land. These
more complex chains of causality question the uncritical imposition of generic hierarchical
models of political economy that have often been derived from the largely discredited
assumptions of Boserup (1965), Wittfogel, and the unilinear “Mesopotamian Model” of political
economy, settlement pattern, and cultural evolution. ‘Expansion’, rather than ‘intensification’ of
production to create food surplus therefore represents an alternative pathway to socio-political
development both in the Pacific and elsewhere.
Research into dryland agricultural development on Tongatapu therefore presents an
important case study that can be extrapolated and applied within global models linking
production systems to social complexity. The dynamic relationship between known variables
such as the environmental limitations for irrigation, the adoption of intensive dryland
techniques, territorial expansion and centralised control of production through tributary systems
in Tongan prehistory (Awani and Graves 1998; Burley and Connaughton 2007; Green 1973;
Kirch 1988, 1994; Maude 1965; Spenneman 1986) are further explored in this thesis through a
detailed chronology of plant introduction and cultivation. Specific questions are examined, such
as whether the introduction of crops indicate trade and inter-island contact linked to socio-
political development, and also if the creation of food surplus was likely enabled through
intensification or expansion of production and the horticultural range. Did this process of
agricultural development ultimately lead to changes in social hierarchy or were these variables
inextricably linked? What factors were involved in these decision-making processes (i.e.
4
nutritional value, yield, labour investment)? This study sought to answer these research
questions as well as to challenge existing assumptions which are primarily based on a lack of
direct evidence for horticultural practices in prehistory, through systematic archaeobotanical
analysis.
The two main objectives of this research were to construct a comprehensive reference
collection for both starch and parenchyma from economic and supplementary plant species in
Tonga, and to conduct a broad archaeobotanical survey of sediments from sites on the island of
Tongatapu, from both Lapita-associated and post-Lapita contexts. Archaeobotanical techniques
utilised here focus on the identification of both micro- and macrobotanical remains of plant
storage organs. Plant microfossils such as starches, phytoliths and pollen have the potential to
inform upon human interaction with their surrounding landscapes. In particular, these small
remnants of plants can provide direct evidence for the role of plants within the diet and
subsistence of a population. Starch is produced in the roots, tubers, fruits and seeds of plants,
which are the main organs that are processed and eaten by humans (Torrence and Barton 2006).
Additionally, macro-botanical remains such as charred, desiccated or water-logged vegetative
storage parenchymatous tissue are also often diagnostic to species level (Hather 1991, 1994,
2000). These remains can enter into the archaeological record through either natural processes
or through human intervention, such as intentionally growing or processing crops on site. An
analysis of diagnostic morphological attributes of these remains was a crucial initial step
towards enabling the taxonomic identification of material extracted from archaeological
deposits, and built on the foundational work of others in the Pacific region (Babot 2003;
Crowther 2001, 2005, 2009, 2012; Hather 2000; Horrocks and Barber 2005; Horrocks et al.
2004a, 2008, 2012, 2014; Loy 1994; Oliveira 2008, 2012; Paz 2005; Torrence et al. 2004;
Wilson et al. 2010).
Three sites were targeted for this study: Talasiu (TO-Mu-2) dated to around 2750-2650
cal BP, Leka (J17 dated to 1300-1000 cal BP, and Heketa (TO-Nt-2) dated to 800-600 cal BP.
According to Burley (1998), Tongan prehistory can be divided into four key periods: Lapita
(2850-2650 BP), Plainware (2650-1550 BP), Formative Development (1550-750 BP) and
Classic Tongan Chiefdom (750-150 BP). Archaeobotanical data from these three sites on
Tongatapu has provided the basis for a revised chronology based on agricultural development
rather than material culture, and changes the way that the relationship between subsistence and
socio-political change is currently viewed in Tonga. It will be argued here that the early
colonists of Tonga were primarily foragers, with minor elements of agriculture assisting
subsistence. Agriculture was therefore not a later development in Tongan prehistory. Instead,
reliance on the core cultigens likely grew as population size increased and new crops were
introduced through trade and inter-island contact, ultimately allowing a state-level social
hierarchy to emerge through the establishment and control of surplus resources.
5
Theoretical framework
Basics of agroecology
In order to address the two primary research questions within this study, a Human Ecological
approach was taken to model and interpret the archaeobotanical data from Talasiu (TO-Mu-2),
Leka (J17), and Heketa (TO-Nt-2). More specifically, these archaeological systems were
analysed using techniques deriving from Agricultural Ecology or Agroecology, which aims to
visualise cultivation as the creation of an ecosystem or agro-ecosystem (Tivy 1990). The
management of crops and the environment through cultivation produces a habitat which allows
the crop to realise its productive potential. Within this view, the agent becomes an essential
ecological variable in the system, and the ‘ecosystem’ refers to social, cultural and economic
contexts as well as the properties of the natural environment. It is argued that due to positive and
negative feedback loops, whenever humans intercede they generate basic changes in the
functioning of the system (Cox and Atkins 1979:57). Bayliss-Smith (1977) defines four types of
productive efficiency that are calculated within this approach: indigenous efficiency (perceived
output divided by primary input or cost in human effort to supply a population with goods to
maintain and enrich it), exogenous efficiency (exported de-facto output divided by secondary
input or cost to society as a whole of maintaining and enriching any enclave within it),
technoenvironmental efficiency (Harris’ T) (total de-facto output divided by primary input), and
total efficiency (total de-facto output divided by primary and secondary inputs).
Variables considered in these agro-ecosystems often relate to the mode of subsistence,
labour inputs, yield, productivity, demography, as well as social and political constraints like
surplus requirements. Previous applications of this approach in the Pacific have attempted to
model production systems using ethnographic and historic data, and also island carrying
capacity to refine population estimates (Bartruff et al. 2012; Bayliss-Smith 1977, 1978) and
understand socio-political development (Lincoln and Ladefoged 2014). These studies vary in
detail depending on the nature of data available, but often caution against strictly linking
resource production to environmental restrictions or population pressure, as social factors also
play a significant role in determining both population and modes of subsistence (Bayliss-Smith
1978). The degree of precision required to identify the ecological, economic and social
constraints of agro-ecosystems ensures that archaeologists can only broadly hypothesise upon
the interactions between natural and cultural variables. It is difficult to extrapolate whole
prehistoric production systems from historic and ethnographic data, and how these changed over
time.
Modern comparative systems and modelling archaeological systems
Studies of modern agricultural production on Tongatapu have provided descriptions and data
upon the nature of land ownership, cultivation techniques, cropping systems and fallow periods,
and basic productivity within traditional subsistence subsidised by cash-cropping (Maude 1965;
6
Thaman 1976). This data is important, but cannot be assumed to accurately represent the nature
of production throughout Tongan prehistory. The lack of diversity within modern production on
Tongatapu required data collection from other Pacific dryland systems, to be able to model
potential changes in yield and labour inputs resulting from varying cultivation techniques
targeting different ranges of crops. Five systems from the Western Pacific were chosen, to
provide a range of comparable data. They are the Gadio Enga of the New Guinea Highlands
(Dornstreich 1977), Tongatapu (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2001), Bellona Island
(Christiansen 1975), Ontong Java (Bayliss-Smith 1973, 1977, 1986) and Anuta (Yen 1973b) in
the Solomon Island Outliers. Data was collected on the range of plant species cultivated within
each system, and the labour inputs and yields for each of these. These figures were used to
calculate basic efficiency or rate of return ratios for each of these species in terms of nutritional
and yield outputs to labour investment inputs, and to model archaeologically identified species
within a range of different environmental, social and economic contexts. The geographic scale
of each of these systems varied, but efficiency ratios are used to ensure comparability across all
systems. Each system was characterised according to these variables (species diversity,
nutritional diversity, labour diversity, and yield ratio diversity) rather than using loaded
terminology such as ‘broad spectrum’ or ‘intensive’ that often does not capture the range of
production techniques, decision-making and energy investment within different agro-
ecosystems.
To model agricultural development in Tongan prehistory, it was deemed appropriate to
keep the range of assumptions minimal to reduce the potential for error. Therefore an
assessment of productivity was conducted through characterisation of archaeobotanical datasets
using the ranges of yield and labour figures recorded from modern systems. Productivity is only
one variable within an agroecological approach to production, but it can be placed within the
social, ecological and economic context of each system to discuss how the range compared with
expected outcomes based on previous research. It is clear that demographic, climatic and social
factors would have impacted both the scale and intensity of agricultural production in the past,
but these impacts can only be hypothesised within current research. The approach taken within
this thesis therefore aimed to keep modelled assumptions to a minimum and redirect the focus
of agricultural development away from the scale of production, towards a discussion of
decision-making based on system nutritional efficiency and founded on data highlighting the
timing of crop introductions and their use.
Thesis organisation
This study of agricultural development in Tongan prehistory is broken down into two main
components related to the objectives of this research. After a brief review of Tongan agriculture
within the Pacific context (Chapter 2), the first component will focus on the development of a
comparative collection of micro- and macrobotanical remains for Tonga. Chapters 3 and 4
7
assess the feasibility of applying the analysis of starch and vegetative parenchyma to questions
regarding diet and subsistence. The biology, morphology, taphonomy and contamination
potential of each of these remains was reviewed in order to gauge both the preservation and
identification potential of archaeobotanical material. Chapter 5 outlines the methodology to
create a reference collection for this study including species selection, field collection, and
laboratory processing. Sample preparation for imaging using light microscopy and Scanning
Electron Microscopy (SEM) is described, and the collection of morphometric data through the
use of image analysis software. Finally, tools such as replicable multivariate statistical
classifications and identification keys are provided that characterise the morphology of starch
and vegetative parenchyma and will enable the identification of unknown samples from
archaeological deposits. The development of this comparative collection will enable the key
research questions concerning the role of plants within the colonising process and the
development of social hierarchy in the Tongan archipelago to be addressed.
The second component of this thesis deals with the application of micro- and macro-
botanical techniques within archaeobotanical research on Tongatapu to provide a chronology for
crop introductions and agricultural development. Chapter 6 introduces the three sites selected
for analysis, Talasiu (TO-Mu-2), Leka (J17) and Heketa (TO-Nt-2), and details the methods
employed to excavate and extract archaeobotanical remains from cultural deposits. The
establishment of laboratory protocols for the extraction and analysis of both starch and macro-
botanical remains such as charred endocarp and parenchyma is explored in Chapter 7. This
borrows from and also builds on the range of protocols already used in archaeobotanical studies
in the Pacific region. The results of extraction and identification processes from the three sites
are outlined in Chapter 8, along with the cost-benefit analysis of five comparative plant
production systems from the Western Pacific and the archaeological production systems from
each site. Chapter 9 discusses the characterisation and modelling of data from each of the
archaeological sites included in this study. The feasibility of modelling past production systems
using a Human Ecological and Agroecological approach is discussed, along with a comparison
of the expected and modelled outcomes of analysis and how modelled production can be tied to
social complexity. Chapter 9 also discusses the timing of individual crop introductions into
Tonga using the data provided within this study and a new chronology for agricultural
development in Tongan prehistory is outlined. Chapter 10 concludes this thesis with a summary
of the outputs of this research: the development of a comprehensive comparative collection for
Tonga that has applications for the wider Pacific, and an alternative perspective on agricultural
development in Tonga based on proxy and direct evidence for crop cultivation and use.
Recommendations for future research that will build on these outputs through further
application of archaeobotanical techniques such as starch and charred parenchyma analysis
within research in Tonga and Pacific region is also highlighted and emphasis is placed on the
8
potential contribution these remains can make towards answering questions about diet,
subsistence and social complexity in prehistory.
9
Chapter 2 Tongan Agriculture in the Pacific
Context
Research to date
Research into Tongan prehistory has thus far been oriented towards the study of artefacts and
faunal remains. Although a range of archaeological and ethno-historic research has already been
carried out in Tonga, none of these studies have so far addressed the role of agricultural change
within cultural development in the island group. Early research was directed towards gathering
information about the first colonisers, known as the Lapita culture, who had made their way
from Southeast Asia into Melanesia and finally into Western Polynesia by 2800 BP (Burley
1998:349; Burley and Connaughton 2007; Burley et al. 2001). Very little is known about the
role of horticulture within Lapita subsistence, especially in Western Polynesia. However, there
are numerous studies of the wild food components of colonising diets such as shellfish, birds,
reptiles and fish (Burley 1998; Burley and Connaughton 2007; Burley and Dickinson 2001;
Groube 1971; Kirch and Dye 1979; Poulsen 1987; Spenneman 1986, 1989; Steadman, Pregill
and Burley 2002). Archaeologists have been divided over whether a ‘strandlooper’ economy
was employed that focussed on the collection of these natural coastal resources (Best 1984;
Groube 1971); or a subsistence dominated by well-developed agricultural practices (Green
1979; Kirch 1997). The interpretation of the archaeological record is biased towards marine-
based foraging due to the dominance of midden remains within Lapita cultural deposits
(Davidson 1979:93; Davidson and Leach 2001), and current evidence suggests that agricultural
activities were initially of only secondary importance (Burley 1998:355; Poulsen 1987:253-5;
Spenneman 1989).
The signature dentate-stamped pottery has become the cultural marker for the Lapita, but after
2650 BP a trend of undecorated pottery (Plainware) can be seen in the archaeological record
(Burley 1998:359). This is viewed as part of the development of Western Polynesian culture
within Tonga, and was part of a suite of changes that also included expansion further inland and
into off-shore islands. Kirch (1984) argued that expansion was an indication that population
density also began to increase dramatically. Kirch calculated that roughly all of the arable land
on Tongatapu would have come under agrarian use between one to two millennia after
colonisation (1984:222). These, and earlier calculations were based on agricultural practices
involving shifting cultivation with relatively short fallow periods, as recorded by ethnographers
after European contact (Beaglehole and Beaglehole 1941; Green 1973). During this same
period, after 2650 BP reliance on lagoon-based marine resources such as shellfish also
decreased markedly (Spenneman 1989).
10
Between 1500 BP and around 750 BP, very little is known about Tonga’s past. Oral traditions
and genealogy suggest that the first Tu’i Tonga was appointed at around 1000 BP, although
evidence of a widespread and integrated maritime chiefdom within the archaeological record is
difficult to confirm prior to 500 BP (Burley 1998:375). Janet Davidson coined the term ‘the
Dark Age’ for this gap, citing the lack of archaeological sites until late in the first millennium
AD when monumental architecture associated with the development of a complex chiefdom
emerges (Davidson 1979:94-5). More is known about the Tongan maritime chiefdom after 750
BP and the control of land by this central polity based on Tongatapu (Burley 1998; Clark et al.
2008). A complex social hierarchy existed at European contact, culminating in three paramount
chiefly titles known as the Tu’i Tonga, the Tu’i Ha’a Takalaua, and the Tu’i Kanokupolu lines.
To date, there is currently no direct archaeological evidence for agriculture in Tongan
prehistory. Historical linguistics indicates a Proto-Oceanic lexicon containing the basic suite of
Oceanic cultigens (Kirch 1997:206-207), which is assumed to have been transported throughout
Western Polynesia by the Eastern Lapita cultural complex. Thus it is inferred that the Lapita
colonisers had an economy in which agriculture played some continued role. In the late 18th
century the Tongan language had names for a wide range of root and tree crops, although the
core cultigens grown were yam (Dioscorea alata), giant taro (Alocasia macrorrhiza), taro
(Colocasia esculenta), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), coconut (Cocos nucifera), plantain and
bananas (Musa spp.), and breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) (Burley and Connaughton 2007:182).
Ethno-archaeological observations have been made of multi-cropping using intensive dryland
field systems that are suited to the high limestone islands and lack of streams for irrigation
(Kirch 1984). Agricultural features related to these systems, such as stone structures, can also
still be seen in some locations in the Tongan landscape. Although field systems have been
mapped on the outer islands, such as Niuatoputapu (Kirch 1988), no radiocarbon dates are
associated with these features. Based on this information, it has been assumed that a changing
environment, population increase and subsequently reduced food returns forced post-Lapita
Tongan populations to rely more heavily on horticulturally produced food, eventually
manifesting in an increasingly hierarchical society (Spenneman 1986:3).
Geographic and climatic limitations to agricultural modelling
The Kingdom of Tonga comprises more than 170 islands within the South Pacific Ocean, and is
located from 15°30’ to 22° 20’ S latitude and between 173°00’ and 177° 15’ W longitude. The
islands formed on the crest of the Tongan Ridge, bordering the Tonga Trench at the Pacific
Plate Boundary (Roy 1990). Tongatapu is within the southern block of this ridge and is made up
of Pliocene and Pleistocene limestone that reaches a maximum height of 65-70m above sea
level in the southeast, and is little above sea level in the northwest due to a tilt in topography. As
a result, the southern windward shores are composed of near-vertical cliffs and represent the
most rugged topography on an island that is largely flat to gently undulating (Roy 1990; Maude
11
1965; Thaman 1976). There are no permanent streams on the island; free-draining porous soils
above the limestone geological base which enable water to travel to the sea through
underground channels. The location of the island of Tongatapu near the Tropic of Capricorn
results in a mean annual temperature of around 23°C, humidity of up to 79%, and mean annual
rainfall of 187cm (Thaman 1976). Seasonal variation in temperatures is low, only fluctuating by
4°C, but rainfall varies from around 8.4cm in the driest months to 24cm in wet months;
however, there can be considerable variability in rainfall from year to year. Whilst there are
some seasonal and annual fluctuations in climatic conditions, these do not vary significantly
across Tongatapu due to the absence of significant topographic differences.
The geography and climatic conditions on Tongatapu both aid and hinder the modelling
of past production systems. Unlike the Hawaiian archipelago, where dryland agricultural
systems are often constructed and managed within distinct ecological zones (Lincoln and
Ladefoged 2014), the raised limestone island of Tongatapu has little variety within ecological
niches and so has no distinguishable boundaries for the utilisation of diverse production
techniques (Maude 1965). One of the only observed variables affecting the geographic
distribution of crop production is soil type. Two main soil types are present within the
archipelago, the kelefatu soils which are very friable and fertile volcanic soils and vary in
texture from loamy sand to clay, and the tou’one sandy soil that is present at low elevations
close to the sea (Maude 1965; Thaman 1976). Tongatapu has both of these, but the kelefatu is
the most prevalent- covering 90% of the landmass. Yams (Dioscorea spp.) do not grow well
within small areas of tou’one soils; the sandy fast-draining soils are instead better suited to the
cultivation of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). Gibbs (1967) distinguished two sub-categories
between the upland or kelefatu soils. The first of these, ‘Lapaha clays’ are predominant in
Eastern Tongatapu and around the capital Nuku’alofa. The other, ‘Vaini clays’ cover most of
the uplands in the west. The two soils are very similar in texture and composition yet cultivators
in modern times understand the differences in fertility resulting from use and manipulation of
these soils, and the limitations of particular cropping and fallow practices within these (Maude
1965). It is therefore possible that almost all of the available arable land on Tongatapu, around
224.14km² or 55398 acres, could be cultivated using much the same shifting dryland
agricultural techniques, at any point in time. Early censuses estimate that around 7, 308 people
were living on Tongatapu by 1891(Burley 2007), while estimates for pre-contact populations for
the whole archipelago vary from 29700 (Maude 1965) to 40000 (Kirch 1984, 1988).
These two sets of data (geographic variation and historic population figures) have been
used to model carrying capacity during Tongan prehistory by Green (1973; Bayliss-Smith
1978), where populations were supported by per capita acreages of 1.6-2.0 depending on high to
low intensity production. The standard populations were calculated for these intensity levels and
varying proportions of arable land under cultivation, and suggest that under the most intensive
12
system (1.6 acres per person) the entire arable land could have supported 346200 people (Green
1973:70). Based on these figures, and ethnographic descriptions of cultivation systems within
the landscape on Tongatapu, Green argues that the best population estimate for the 18th century
would have been 15000-17000, under conditions of 1.8-2.0 acres per capita in a cultivation
cycle of 8-10 years through bush fallowing agriculture (1973:72). Furthermore, this figure could
easily have been attained up to 1000 years before, but this does not indicate that the population
reached this peak and then stayed at this level. Instead, Green (1973:73) suggests that following
this peak the pressure on land and resources triggered reduction mechanisms such as warfare to
restrain further growth. Green also argues that reduction mechanisms do not necessarily begin
after carrying capacity has been reached, but instead when figures of closer to 60-80% capacity
are attained. These figures set an upper limit on population on Tongatapu of between 18,000 to
24,000 people and suggest population may have been higher in the past than at contact.
More recently, Burley (2007) modelled population estimates for the three key phases in Tongan
prehistory (Lapita, Plainware and Classic Chiefdom). Previous estimates (Green 1973; Kirch
1984; Maude 1965; Walsh 1970), settlement patterns and analysis of material culture (Burley
1999; Spenneman 1987) were utilised to predict the likely rate of population increase over time.
Given a founding population of around 100 people, a conservative population growth rate of
0.003, and a need for approximately 2 acres of productive land per person, the population at the
end of the Lapita period within the archipelago could have been as high as 600-700 people
(Burley 2007). Later during the Plainware and Ancestral Polynesian phases, around half the
projected maximum land could have been under production with agricultural field systems by
AD 400, which may have stimulated long-distance voyaging and exchange networks further
east. Finally late prehistoric populations were predicted to have peaked around 18, 467 on
Tongatapu alone (Burley 2007). The difference between past estimates and these recent figures
indicate that there are varying opinions upon the potential agricultural productivity of land on
Tongatapu, rates of population growth, as well as the acreage needed to support increasing
populations.
Ethno-historic accounts of plant cultivation in Tonga:
Early explorers and missionaries have provided vital details about Tongan subsistence practices
at European contact. Most relevant to this study are descriptions of land tenure, and the
cultivation of crops within the plantations they encountered throughout the archipelago. In
addition, these sources mention the most important economic species including cultigens and
wild species that were made use of in times of famine or hardship. The list of crops witnessed
by Le Maire in 1616 (1967), Abel Tasman in 1643 (1776), Cook in 1773 and 1777 (in
Beaglehole 1969; Cook 1785), La Perouse in 1788 (1799), Labillardiere in 1793 (1800), Wilson
(1799), Mariner in 1791 (Martin 1991), Waldegrave in 1830 (1833), Hemsley (1894), Gifford
(1929), Beaglehole and Beaglehole (1941), and others on Tongatapu, is vital to the development
13
of a comprehensive understanding of late prehistoric and contact period agriculture in Tonga. It
is also possible with such information to assess the temporal changes in reliance on certain
crops. Other researchers have established the value of using ethnographic data as a guide to
understanding the past (David and Kramer 2001, Wylie 1985). Ethnohistoric information is used
in this thesis to create baseline data for the selection and development of a comparative
collection in this study, as well as generating a picture of the environmental and social limits of
production in Tonga under the Tu’i Tonga chiefdom in the historic period.
Plantations
Information can be gathered from these sources on the nature and organisation of agricultural
plantations, within which the majority of cultivated crops were grown. Importantly, early
observers also commented on the division of land and production according to status
differentiation. The first European explorer to reach Tongatapu was Dutch explorer Abel
Tasman in 1643 (1776), followed by Cook in 1773 and again in 1777 (in Beaglehole 1969;
Cook 1785). Tasman (1776), having observed the bounty of Tongatapu through gifts and trade
of pigs, poultry, coconuts, plantains, bananas, yams and other roots, went onshore and noted the
layout of plantations in neat squares within which these crops were cultivated. During his
second voyage in 1773, Cook (in Beaglehole 1969; Cook 1785) explored the islands within the
Vava’u, Ha’apai and Tongatapu groups, and described his encounters with the islanders and
excursions onshore. Cook, his officers, and onboard naturalists commented extensively on the
distribution of plantations across the various islands, and the nature of the crops being cultivated
(Cook in Beaglehole 1969; Cook 1785). On the main island of Tongatapu, Cook (1785)
observed the layout and functional divisions within the individual plantations. The botanical
knowledge of a naturalist on d Entrecasteaux’s voyage to the Vava’u Group, Jacques
Labillardiere (1800), enabled the accurate identification and description of the various crops
within these plantations, along with their domestic or economic purposes. On the larger island
of Tongatapu, multi-cropping seemed to be the common method of cultivation within the
individual plantations, whereby a variety of food plants are grown together within plots.
A surgeon and naturalist on Cook’s second and third voyages, Mr Anderson, travelled more
extensively inland from the coast of Tongatapu and made further notes upon the distribution of
cultivated areas. Eastward of their base near the Fanga ‘Uta lagoon, there was a lack of
uncultivated land for nearly two miles (Anderson in Cook 1785:288). However, further west
most of the country was composed of fenced plantations (1785:314). Johann Reinhold Forster
was another naturalist on Cook’s second voyage whose journals, alongside those of his son
Georg, described the cultivation of fruits and vegetables within organised plantations (Forster
1777, 1778). Georg noted that the coral rock, thin soils and lack of groundwater ensured that
those inhabiting Tongatapu were, in his opinion, forced to labour more greatly than the
Tahitians to produce food (Forster 1777). He argued that this accounted for the regularity of the
14
plantation distribution, and the accurate division of land (Forster 1777). Johann (Forster
1778:223) also observed that the whole of Tongatapu was highly cultivated and seemed to be
private property, the boundaries of which were fenced. Tree crops also commonly bordered or
divided plantations (La Perouse 1799:171).
Cook (in Beaglehole 1969) noted that there were differences between the produce of the
plantations reserved for the chiefly elite or ‘first rank’, and the commoners. Similarly, Captain
Wilson (1799) commented on the links between land tenure arrangements and the layout of
individual plantations. A map was produced from the circumnavigation of Tongatapu,
highlighting the occupied and cultivated areas of the island, and the traditional names for these
locations. Wilson also noted the use of the term ‘abey’ [abi] for these plantations or plots of land
(Wilson 1799:101), which is still in use today but under different tenure conditions.
Land tenure
Complex social hierarchy controlled the division and use of land for agriculture on Tongatapu in
the 18th and 19th Centuries. Accounts from this period describe how this status differentiation
resulted in different conditions for land ownership. These details are essential for reconstructing
the influence that the state-level social hierarchy may have had on crop introductions and
associated horticultural production in the past. Captain Waldegrave (1833) was informed during
his visit in 1830 that the island was divided into 13 portions, with a chief being the proprietor of
each. He was told that chiefs could, and often did, displace residents on the land, and these
chiefs retained a claim to a portion of the agricultural produce (1833:185). This portion was
argued by Waldegrave to be claimed in the absence of an official ‘taxation system’. In addition,
the kings and higher chiefs reserved a portion of the land itself for their own agricultural
production. E. W Gifford spent around nine months in Tonga as a member of the Bayard
Dominick Expedition of Bernice P. Bishop Museum in 1920–21. Gifford noted that in the past
all land and its products were regarded as the property of the Tu’i Tonga (Gifford 1929:102).
Within these lands, those within the domain of the Tu’i Kanokupolu were regarded as his
property, but also subject to the demand of the Tu’i Tonga. Likewise, a similar relationship was
continued between the lesser chiefs and the Tui Kanokupolu. Both Cook (1785) and Mariner (in
Martin 1991) noted similar arrangements. Gifford also argued that there seems to have been no
communal lands in Tongan prehistory, but at the time of his visit there were some clear
examples of modern communal tenancy (1929:176). On Lifuka Island, a particular tract of land
or api belonged to the Queen, but in 1920 it was used as a communal field by the inhabitants of
the village of Pangai, each household having a small section to plant sweet potatoes (1929:176).
During harvesting, a portion was then given in return to the Queen.
All vegetable and animal products within the territory directly controlled by the Tu’i
Kanokupolu were tapu, or off-limits, for anyone but that high chief (Gifford 1929:104). Two
15
petty chiefs were appointed to continuously check that the common people were not utilizing
those products without permission. The titles of these positions were the Tu’i Pangai and the
Tu’i Sinoieiki. During their rounds of the territory, these officers would mark fine bunches of
cooking bananas, breadfruit, yams, sweet potatoes that were suitable for the Tu’i Kanokupolu,
by putting a sharp stick into the base of the tree or hanging coconut leaves from the branches
(1929:104; Mariner in Martin 1991). In the case of yams or sweet potatoes, a stick was placed
into the ground near the crops. These officers also reported to the chief and through him to the
Tui Kanokupolu, upon the amount of crops planted by the farmers, and whether or not they
were sufficient. However, this only applied to the territory of the Haa Ngata Motua lineage. A
range of terms for other roles within Tongan society were also recorded by Gifford. For
example, ‘pule fonua’ was the name for the rulers of the land, or chiefs who control food supply
(1929:104).
Festivals
Related to these intricate systems of land ownership was a yearly pattern of feasting and tributes
based on the produce of plantations. According to early accounts, these were important for the
redistribution of food surpluses and reinforced the ownership and land and production by elites
within Tongan society. The first fruits of the yearly yam harvest or the first of any catch of fish
or other food had to be presented to the chief and to the Tui Tonga before it could be partaken of
by the producers (Gifford 1929:103). Tributes were carried from as far afield as Vava’u. A
select group of people were appointed as petty officers in charge of supplying these food articles
to the Tui Tonga, behind which Gifford believes is a form of religious sanction (1929:103).
These tributes were “virtually made to the gods, but were made to them through the Tui Tonga
who was treated like a god” (1929:103). William Mariner was a resident upon the island of
Tongatapu for several years from 1806 to 1810, and recounted his experiences to John Martin
which were originally published in 1817. During this time, he observed the cultivation of
breadfruit, coconuts and yams on a daily basis, and so could provide detailed descriptions of
horticultural practices throughout the seasons. He witnessed the ‘First fruits’ or ‘inasi ceremony,
and perceived these offerings of the early yam harvest to be a means of insuring the
“…protection of the gods and productions of the earth, of which yams are the most important.”
(Mariner in Martin 1991:381)
In preparation for the ceremony, a particular variety of yams were planted about a month before
the regular crop (Mariner in Martin 1991:381), most likely those described today as the ‘Early
yam’. As soon as this crop arrived at a certain state of maturity, a message was sent to the Tui
Tonga that the yams are fit to be harvested. The Tui Tonga then appointed a day for the
ceremony— usually around 10 days later. The day before the ceremony the yams were dug up
and wrapped in Pandanus leaves, and other provisions such as fish, kava root and mahoa
(arrowroot) are prepared (Mariner in Martin 1991:382). On the day of the ceremony the harvest
16
was brought to the malai or meeting place of the chief of the plantation, and then the procession
carried onto the grave of the last Tui Tonga to receive a ‘blessing’, before returning to the malai.
The yam harvest was then divided into portions. Half was allocated to the king, one quarter was
dedicated to the gods and so appropriated by the priests, and the remainder was given to the Tui
Tonga (Mariner in Martin 1991:382). Mariner thus commented on the generosity of the Tongan
people, particularly those of the lower ranks, whereby it was “…so much the custom of Tonga
to make liberal and profuse presents that the people generally either feast or starve.” (Mariner in
Martin 1991:385)
In addition to the ‘inasi festival, several other ceremonies were carried out during the harvests to
ensure productive success. Mariner describes the ‘tow-tow’ [tau tau] ceremony whereby
offerings of yams, coconuts and other vegetable produce was made to A’lo A’lo, the god of
weather, in particular but also to other gods (Mariner in Martin 1991:385). These concessions
were made for the purpose of ensuring a continuation of favourable weather and soil fertility.
The ceremony was performed initially when the yams were approaching maturity in early
November, and then repeated every ten days seven or eight times. The produce was piled into
three mounds, one of which was given to the gods and the remaining two were given to the
chiefs and their households. After the ceremony, the pile dedicated to the gods was then divided
between the attendees of the festivities. Another form of feasting was the ‘pongipongi’ which
involved the presentation of food and kava to the Tu’i Kanokupolu by chiefs of the Haa Ngata
Motua and Haa Hatea lineages several times a year (Mariner in Martin 1991:99). In general, the
Tu’i Kanokupolu was regarded as the ‘working king’ who oversaw the planting and other
activities for the high king or Tu’i Tonga (Gifford 1929:99). The first Tu’i Kanokupolu Ngata
was sent to Hihifo by the Tu’i Haa Takalaua to supervise agriculture and fishing, passing the
produce to the Tu’i Haa Takalaua, then to the Tu’i Tonga, and the tradition continued until the
independent powerbase in Hihifo eventually overthrew the Tu’i Tonga.
Cropping cycle
Importantly for this study, a small number of European explorers and scientists also commented
on the seasonality and production techniques used to cultivate and harvest crops produced
within these plantations on Tongatapu. These shed light on the restrictions upon production of
annual crops such as taro (Colocasia esculenta) over perennial tree crops such as breadfruit
(Artocarpus spp.) or bananas and plantains (Musa spp.). Anderson (in Cook 1785) argued that
the tropical climate of Tonga would have resulted in a fast turn-over of crops within the
plantations. He commented:
The quick succession of vegetables has been already mentioned; but I am not certain that
the changes of weather, by which it is brought about, are considerable enough to make
them perceptible to the natives as to their method of life, or rather that they should be
17
sensible of the different seasons. This perhaps may be inferred from the state of their
vegetable productions, which are never so much affected, with respect to the foliage, as to
shed that all at once; for every leaf is succeeded by another, as fast as it falls, which causes
that appearance of universal and continual spring round here. (Anderson in Cook
1785:330).
Likewise, Cook himself described the difference in production between his visits. It was noted
that the stocks were replenished despite arriving back again sooner than expected, but the
breadfruits which had been the only original produce available for purchase were replaced with
yams and plantains (1785:272). Large areas that had been fallow previously were transformed
into plantain fields. These observations demonstrate the relatively quick succession of the
seasons, in terms of the vegetables produced on Tongatapu at different times of the year (in
Beaglehole 1969). Seasonal fluctuations were also commented on by La Perouse (1799:171),
who thought that the low islands in this group likely experienced drought at some stage during
the year and commented on the necessity of watering fields. In contrast, on the island of Uoleva
further north in the Ha’apai group, water sources enabled irrigation.
Summary
From these various accounts, it is clear that some crops were used consistently from first
European contact in the mid 18th century, right through until the early 20th century. The staple
cultigens included Elephant ear taro (Alocasia macrorrhiza), breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis),
coconut (Cocos nucifera), taro (Colocasia esculenta), winged yams (Dioscorea alata), the lesser
yam (Dioscorea esculenta), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), plantain and bananas (Musa spp.),
and Polynesian arrowroot (Tacca leontopetaloides). Other fruits, nuts and tubers were also
cultivated to some degree and supplemented these crops. These included the shaddock (Citrus
maxima), turmeric (Curcuma longa), melons (Cucumis melo), Tahitian chestnut (Inocarpus
fagifer), Indian mulberry (Morinda citrifolia), pandanus (Pandanus tectorius), kava (Piper
methysticum), sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum), Otaheite apple (Spondias dulcis), Malay
apple (Syzygium malaccense), and the tropical almond (Terminalia catappa). Finally, a small
range of naturalised plants were utilised for their edible fruits and tubers such as bitter yam
(Dioscorea bulbifera), the giant swamp taro (Cyrtosperma merkusii), and the stink lily
(Amorphophallus campanulatus). The majority of these crops in the proto-historic era were
grown in plantations that surrounded small villages. Each household usually had the use of an
individual plantation for their own subsistence needs, however the land itself could be owned by
the chief or higher chiefs such as the Tui Kanokupolu or Tui Tonga (Gifford 1929:102,
Waldegrave 1833:185). The land belonging to these chiefs was monitored by several officers
appointed by the person holding one of these titles, and crops could be allocated to them upon
maturation and harvesting (Gifford 1929:104). Related to these systems of land ownership was a
18
yearly pattern of feasting and tributes that were brought from as far afield as Vava’u (Mariner in
Martin 1991:385).
The internal organisation of plantations varied, depending on the individual tastes and choices
of the households utilising them. However, most households relied heavily on yams, multi-
cropping them with sweet potato and taro in mounds in the centre of plantations (Beaglehole
and Beaglehole 1941:43-44, Gifford 1929, La Billardiere 1800:366). Arboricultural crops such
as plantains, bananas, and breadfruit were grown bordering the outer limits of the plantations
(La Billardiere 1800:378, Wilson 1799:240). These trees were often left to mature and harvested
each season as the fruits ripened, while the tuberous plants were replanted until the soil in the
plot could no longer sustain growth and the plot was abandoned for a time (Cook in Beaglehole
1969; Cook 1785:271-2). After the introduction of new crops by European settlers such as
manioc and corn, agricultural practices were forced to change to suit the requirements of these
cultigens and there was a reduced reliance on traditional cultigens (Beaglehole and Beaglehole
1941). Despite this shift, these crops recorded by European explorers in the 18th and 19th
Centuries mostly continue to be grown today.
These ethnohistoric details provide essential background information to meet the two main
objectives of this thesis. The lists of species recorded within early accounts provided baseline
data for the construction of a comprehensive reference collection of economic and
supplementary plants used in Tongan prehistory. Likewise, the descriptions of production
techniques, plantation layouts, feasting and tribute systems form a picture of agricultural
production in the proto-historic period at the height of the state prior to European influence.
These details enable some insight into the efficiency of this system in both productive and social
terms, and against which past systems can be compared to link production to social complexity.
19
Table 2.1 List of species recorded in early ethno-historic accounts from Tonga.
Species
Tasman
1643
Cook
1773-77
Forster
1773
Perouse
1780s
Labillardiere
1793
Wilson
1797
Mariner
1817
Orlebar
1830
Waldegrave
1833
Gifford
1929
Beaglehole
1938
Alocasia macrorrhiza X X X
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius X
Artocarpus altilis X X X X X X X X X X
Benincasa hispida X
Broussonetia papyrifera X X X X X
Citrus maxima X X X X
Cocos nucifera X X X X X X X X X X X
Colocasia esculenta X X X X X X X
Cordyline fruticosa/terminalis X
Curcuma longa X X
Cucumis melo X
Dioscora alata X X X X X X X X X X
Dioscorea bulbifera ? X ?
Dioscorea esculenta X ? X ? X
Ficus tinctoria X
Hibiscus manihot X
Inocarpus fagifer X X X
Ipomoea batatas X X X X
Morinda citrifolia X
Musa sp. (bananas) X X X X X X X X X X X
Musa sp. (plantains) X X X X X X X
Pandanus tectorius X X X
Piper methysticum X X X X X X X X
Pritchardia pacifica X
Saccharum officinarum X X X X X X
Spondias dulcis X X X
Syzygium malaccense X
Tacca leontopetaloides X X X
20
Archaeobotany of cultigens in the Pacific
The discussion of agricultural change in Tongan prehistory is the product of the direction of past
research, rather than a paucity of evidence for this floral element of subsistence within the
Tongan archaeological record. Microfossil research in other locations has demonstrated the
applicability of this analysis towards identifying the presence of crops and the nature of their
use within archaeological contexts (Fullagar et al. 1998, 2006; Horrocks et al. 2004; Horrocks,
Grant-Mackie and Matissoo-Smith 2008; Loy et al. 1992; Piperno 2009; Summerhayes at al.
2010, among others). Similarly macrobotanical analysis has been used to provide direct
evidence of plant cultivation and domestication in the New and Old Worlds, and the Indo-
Pacific (Fuller 2007; Oliveira 2008; Paz 2001; Thompson 1994; Ugent et al. 1981).
Unlike archaeological investigations in the Old World, archaeobotanical techniques
have not been consistently applied in the Pacific region. This is due to several factors. The first
of these is that the preservation of plant remains in tropical climates is more variable than in the
cooler or arid northern latitudes (Paz 2005). Second, the agricultural practices of most
prehistoric Pacific communities revolved around the production and consumption of starchy tree
nuts, roots and tubers, rather than small seeds such as wheat or rice which have been the
traditional focus of archaeobotany (Hather 1994:51). Finally, many of the main domestic plants
such as taro (Colocasia esculenta), bananas (Musa spp.), and breadfruit (Artocarpus spp.) are
not genetically or phenotypically identifiable from wild populations (Fairburn 2005a).
Consequently, archaeobotanical investigations in the tropics have often been based on chance
finds (Paz 2005; Glover 1979). Recently, rock shelters, caves, and waterlogged sites have
provided new site types for the preservation of plant remains in tropical climates (Glover 1979;
Oliveira 2008; Paz 2001, 2005; Fairburn 2005a). Analysis of those remains that have been
recovered have suggested that many tropical plant production systems are a poor fit within the
traditional typologies of foraging or farming using wild or domestic species, and so the whole
global system of agricultural classification has subsequently come into question (Fairburn
2005a).
These technical and theoretical issues have complicated the interpretation of plant use
within the archaeobotanical record in the Pacific. Here, the goal is to review the antiquity of
plant use within the Pacific economy, through focusing on the identification of macro- and
microbotanical remains of edible root, tuber, and tree crops. Clearly domestication cannot be
sufficiently discriminated from crop use through morphological or genetic variability within
most of these longer-lived taxa, therefore the history of edible plant use from Island Southeast
Asia, through Near Oceania to Remote Oceania will be assessed in terms of the archaeological
contexts from which these plants were identified and the timing of their use. As much as
possible archaeobotanical data, whether chance or systematic finds has been incorporated into
21
the review. Through this, a chronology of plant introductions in the Pacific economy will be
developed.
Pleistocene: Independent origins for cultivation?
Of the suite of crops that now dominate agriculture in Tonga, including a number of aroids and
yams, many have now been proven to have been first adopted for use within the terminal
Pleistocene in Near Oceania, rather than brought during the mid-Holocene by Austronesian
speakers from Island Southeast Asia. This review will therefore begin within New Guinea,
discussing evidence for the incorporation of root, tuber and tree crops into subsistence before
tracing plant use east to Remote Oceania. It will also be acknowledged that this was not a
unilinear movement, and that some of these same crops were also incorporated into pre-
agricultural diets further west, indicating that plants were also being carried in the opposite
direction.
The earliest evidence for the adoption of root, tuber and tree crops that comprised
significant components of the Pacific economy prior to European contact is in the New Guinea
highlands. Dioscorea yam starch residues found on stone artefacts and charred Pandanus have
been recovered from Joes Garden, Kosipe Mission and dated to over 40,000 BP using
Themoluminescence (TL) dating (Summerhayes et al. 2010). Large amounts of
archaeobotanical data have also been collected from years of excavations at Kuk Swamp.
Within the various phases of occupation at the site, microfossils in the forms of phytoliths,
starch and pollen of known edible cultigens have been identified and interpreted as evidence for
the beginning of cultivation and manipulation of these taxa (Denham 2007; Denham et al. 2003,
2004; Donohue and Denham 2009; Golson 2007; Wilson 1985). Whether these starch-rich
plants were incorporated into an existing highland subsistence system or introduced from lower
elevations as part of a new system during the early Holocene remains unproven due to a lack of
contemporary data from the New Guinea lowlands (Golson 2007). The Kuk sequence has been
divided into several phases, the first two of which have been dated to the Pleistocene and early
Holocene.
Phase 1 (10,200-9910 BP) represents the earliest evidence of plant exploitation within
the upper Wahgi Valley at the wetland margin (Denham 2007:79). A palaeosurface consisting
of pits, runnels, stake and post holes arguably representing wetland management for cultivation
of corms and tubers (Denham 2007; Denham et al. 2003, 2004; Hope and Golson 1995) is
contemporaneous with stone flakes and grinding stones that contain starch residues of taro
(Colocasia esculenta) and a variety of yam (Dioscorea sp.) (Fullagar et al. 2006). Additionally,
seed phytoliths of the Eumusa section of bananas, particularly Musa acuminata morphotypes,
were extracted from sediments below Phase 1, suggesting the presence of this wild variety of
Musaceae within the landscape prior to human occupation (Denham 2007; Denham et al. 2003;
22
Wilson 1985). Phase 2 (6950-6440 BP) has been argued to represent the first unequivocal
evidence for deliberate planting at Kuk Swamp. This comprised of multi-cropping mounded
cultivation of Colocasia taro and Dioscorea sp., most likely Dioscorea alata or Dioscorea
pentaphylla, with Musa spp. and was confirmed through further residue analysis of artefacts
combined with locally elevated frequencies of Musa phytoliths in sediments (Denham 2007;
Denham et al. 2003; Fullagar et al. 2006). In total, over 30 edible plants were identified from
archaeobotanical and palaeoecological investigations in the upper Wahgi Valley. The early to
mid Holocene data collected from excavations at Kuk Swamp have since been interpreted to
indicate that Musa acuminata sp. banksii was first domesticated or deliberately cultivated in
New Guinea, along with the independent domestication of Colocasia esculenta and Dioscorea
alata (Denham 2007; Denham et al. 2003, 2004; Donohue and Denham 2009; Golson 1989,
2007).
Other early archaeobotanical data from Island Southeast Asia, New Guinea and Near
Oceania appears to support these arguments for pre-agricultural transport of species, or
alternatively that the natural dispersal of the immediate ancestors of crops such as various aroids
or Canarium predated human settlement of the region (Yen 1993). Haberle (1994, 1995)
identified Colocasia pollen from a sediment core in Lake Wanum in lowland New Guinea at
around 9000 BP, but argues that this only identifies the presence of this species within the
landscape rather than indicating gardening activity. Similarly, Colocasia and possibly Alocasia
taro has been identified within starch, calcium oxylate crystal and cellulosic tissue in residues
on stone tools from Kilu Cave in the Solomon Islands from 28,000 BP (Loy et al. 1992),
indicating exploitation of these taxa in the Pleistocene. Loy and others (1992:910) argue that the
implications of this and other data suggest that the northern Solomons and Australia should be
included within the natural distribution of these aroids. Further west in Malaysia, research at
Niah Cave has demonstrated that Dioscorea alata and cf. Dioscorea hispida were exploited
around c. 40,000 BP through fragments of charred parenchyma and starch granules (Barton and
Paz 2007:60-62). Fragments of charred rhizomes of aroids were also found in sediments dated
to 23,850-23,020 cal BP, along with starch deriving from the Alocasia (Longiloba complex) or
Cyrtosperma merkusii that could also be associated with even older deposits. It is argued that
Niah Cave deposits represent a relatively broad spectrum subsistence base that included some
toxic plants such as taro which required higher energetic costs in food processing, but proving
that people were deliberately manipulating the distribution of favourable plants such as these is
another matter (2007:72). It is still therefore assumed that the archaeobotanical record of Niah
represents evidence for rainforest foraging of naturally distributed plant taxa. Looking beyond
these starch-rich taxa, a large number of other fruit and nut species including candlenut
(Aleurites sp.), coconut (Cocos nucifera), Pacific almond or galip nut (Canarium spp.), island
23
lychee (Pometia pinnata), Pandanus spp., and Pangium sp. have been identified from deposits
within the Sepik-Ramu region of New Guinea at around 5500BP (Swadling et al. 1991).
Lapita colonisers: Innovation and integration
Thus far, this review has been concerned with late-Pleistocene to mid-Holocene plant
exploitation in the Pacific, culminating in the earliest evidence for agricultural and
arboricultural systems which likely integrated endemic cultigens such as bananas, aroids and
yams. During the latter half of the Holocene, it is argued that a new intrusive culture,
linguistically and genetically distinct from the indigenous people of Near Oceania, arrived in the
West Pacific. These people belonged to the Austronesian-speaking Lapita culture, and were the
first to colonise Remote Oceania, bringing with them a number of cultigens that have been
labelled by some as the ‘transported landscape’ (Kirch 1984). Whether the origins of the Lapita
culture can be traced within Island Southeast Asia, or arose after occupation and interaction
within Papua New Guinea is still under debate. The archaeobotanical record indicates that,
within Near Oceania at least, the Lapita culture integrated some of these taxa that had already
been cultivated in New Guinea into broad spectrum subsistence systems (Gosden 1992; Kirch
1987, 1988, 1989; Matthews and Gosden 1997). These cultigens such as aroids and bananas
were then subsequently incorporated these into the suite of crops brought to Remote Oceania
after 3000 BP.
Within Papua New Guinea, a number of Lapita sites contain preserved micro- and
macrobotanical remains of indigenous and introduced taxa. Two sites are water-logged and
anaerobic conditions have preserved macrobotanical remains of fruits and nuts from a range of
tree crops. Remains from a mid- to late-Holocene site on Arawe Island are identified as deriving
from eight genera and six species including Aleurites sp., Cocos sp., Canarium sp., Cordia sp.,
Cycas circinalis, Dracontomelon sp., Pandanus spp., and Terminalia sp. (Mathews and Gosden
1997:124). Matthews and Gosden (1997) concede that the botanical remains could be the result
of natural beach drift, but point out that the best evidence for human involvement is
modification through extraction processes. Extraction can be seen from the fragmentation
patterns of the Canarium sp. and Terminalia sp., and charring of the Cycas remains (1997:128).
Clearly Canarium continued to play an important role as a food source throughout the
Holocene, as further evidence of the exploitation of this genera was found at another water-
logged site on Mussau Island (Kirch 1987, 1988, 1989). Over 5000 anaerobically preserved
seeds and seed cases representing at last 19 taxa, including Canarium sp., were recovered from
Mussau (Kirch 1988:337). These included coconut (Cocos nucifera), Tahitian chestnut
(Inocarpus fagifer), Corynocarpus caribbeanus, Dracontomelon dao, vi apple (Spondias
dulcis), Pometia pinnata, Pangium edule, and tropical almond (Terminalia catappa).
Additionally, a number of Pandanus spp. fruit segments were recovered from contemporaneous
deposits and shell peelers and scrapers that were argued to indicate the preparation of starchy
24
tubers and corms such as those of Dioscorea and Colocasia (Kirch 1987:177, Kirch 1988:338).
Kirch (1987, 1988, 1989) argued that this data represented the first direct evidence that Lapita
communities cultivated a wide variety of tree crops that are still used today in Melanesia,
indicating that Lapita culture possessed a full component of arboricultural species at 3200-2800
BP.
Gosden (1992:63) argues that the nature of almost identical plant remains from sites in
the Arawe and Mussau Islands indicate that these archaeobotanical records are not
representative of formative stages of agricultural development during the Lapita period, but
instead suggest well-developed arboricultural systems. Therefore, the transition to vegeculture
through integration of local and introduced root crop taxa within subsistence still needs to be
pinpointed. More recently, Lentfer and Green (2004) analysed the microbotanical record at the
Reber-Rakival Lapita site on Watom Island in PNG, with a focus on the phytolith assemblages
from three contexts. The presence of both introduced Eumusa and native Australimusa
morphotypes indicate that the Austronesians could have brought bananas with them, and
possibly at this same stage used the newly encountered cultivars in conjunction with their own
varieties, merging these two streams of banana domestication (Lentfer and Green 2004:85).
As Lapita populations expanded into Remote Oceania, further archaeobotanical
evidence indicates the continued integration of roots, tubers and tree crops into colonizing
subsistence regimes. In Vanuatu, microfossil evidence from the Lapita-associated sites of
Teouma, Vao and Urupiv point to the cultivation of aroids such as Cyrtosperma merkusii, a
range of yams including D. esculenta, D. nummularia and D. pentaphylla, and bananas by 3000
BP (Horrocks and Bedford 2004, 2010; Horrocks et al. 2009, 2014). It has been argued by
numerous researchers that the brackish conditions in beach back-swamps near many early
Lapita settlements would have enabled the initial cultivation of saline-resistant crops such as
Cyrtosperma prior to the establishment of more labour-intensive irrigation required for other
aroids such as Colocasia or Alocasia (Kirch and Lepofsky 1993; Kirch and Yen 1982; Yen
1973a, 1993). Contained within this argument is the assumption that Lapita populations did not
have intensive cultivation techniques, beyond an understanding that these aroids grow best in
wet conditions. The late materialization of irrigation within island sequences can be seen to
suggest that this technology was not transferred, but rather reinvented over generations or
millennia (Kirch and Yen 1982:267). Others such as Spriggs (1990, 2002) instead suggest that
the similarities between pond-field, island bed and taro pit wetland cultivation techniques across
the Pacific indicate that these were not independent innovations, and therefore derived from
prior knowledge and experience within founding populations. Moving east to Fiji,
microbotanical data derived from Bourewa on Viti Levu (Horrocks and Nunn 2007) contained
evidence for the starch, calcium oxylate crystals and xylem vessels of taro (Colocasia esculenta)
and the lesser yam (Dioscorea esculenta) at 3000-2500BP. These identifications would
25
therefore appear to support Spriggs’ (1990, 2002) argument but additional work is required to
further establish this link.
Micronesia: A different branch
Archaeobotanical research in Micronesia demonstrates the transfer and utilisation of crops east
of Island Southeast Asia within the late Holocene. On Kosrae, Athens and others (1996) have
collected both macrobotanical and microfossil data upon the antiquity of plant use within
archaeological and palaeoecological sequences. Wood charcoal of breadfruit (Artocarpus spp.),
Thespesia and Cordyline, along with the charred endocarp and seeds of coconut (Cocos
nucifera), Morinda citrifolia, Pandanus, Terminalia and Inocarpus, and storage parenchyma of
Alocasia taro and cf. Dioscoreaceae were recovered from excavations at Katem (1996:843). The
pollen record from Tafunsak contained abundant giant swamp taro (Cyrtosperma merkusii)
pollen coinciding with the earliest period of occupation at 1997-1709 BP, while breadfruit
pollen was only present in the latest interval at 1264-1150 BP (1996:843; Pickersgill 2004).
This information combined with the micro-charcoal record from the same core indicated that a
lowland agroforest was established on the island at a very early date, and further burning was
not needed as this would only damage existing crop trees (Athens et al. 1996:843).
Further south, Di Piazza (1998) identified evidence for introduced taxa on Kiribati
through analysis of wood charcoal and endocarp within an earth oven dated to around 1430 to
1645 AD. A number of species were interpreted as fuel sources including Cocos nucifera,
Cordia subcordata, Pemphis acidula, Guettarda speciosa, and Morinda citrifolia, as well as
edible remains such as Pandanus tectorius that had cooked in the oven. The pounding and
eating of the drupes of Pandanus have been recorded ethnographically (Di Piazza 1998), as well
as the utilization of the uneaten portions as the preferred fuel to ensure fires last long enough to
cook pigs or Cyrtosperma. Ethnographic and historic accounts highlight the importance of the
giant swamp taro within subsistence throughout Micronesia, as this saline-resistant crop can be
grown relatively easily within atoll environments. Although it has recently been discovered that
Cyrtosperma is actually endemic to Micronesia (Athens and Stevenson 2001), pollen of this
species has also been recorded at 4500 BP within the Ngerchau core in Palau (Athens and Ward
2001) but there is no supporting archaeological evidence for occupation.
Island Melanesia and Polynesia: Evidence for extensive and intensive cultivation
It is often assumed that early human arrival and colonisation in Remote Oceania introduced a
number of core cultigens within the taro-yam complex, and arboricultural taxa into a large
variety of island environments. As the socio-politics and material culture of these colonizing
populations evolved into what is sometimes termed Ancestral Polynesian Society (APS) within
Western Polynesia and then expanded east to the Society Islands, Tahiti, Marquesas, Easter
Island, Hawaii and New Zealand, plant cultivation also evolved to suit local growing conditions.
26
The difficulty of transporting crops by canoe over large stretches of ocean and plant
translocation led to the exclusion of some species from localised subsistence strategies. Post-
Lapita archaeobotanical evidence from islands within Remote Oceania has elucidated the timing
of these introductions, as well as the contexts within which these taxa were cultivated or
exploited.
This section of the review begins with an assemblage of microbotanical remains that are
not associated with Ancestral Polynesian Society, but instead with Podtanean post-Lapita
deposits in New Caledonia that are synchronous with this cultural transition in Polynesia.
Horrocks, Grant-Mackie and Matissoo-Smith (2008) identified cultigens including C. esculenta,
D. esculenta and one or more undifferentiated species of Dioscorea from identification of starch
granules and calcium oxylate crystals within archaeological deposits dated to 2700-1800 BP in
Me` Aure` Cave. The presence of these taxa was interpreted to fill a crucial gap in establishing
“a continuous spatio-temporal record of ceramic-age agriculture across the western Pacific
(2008:179). Further to this, Dotte-Sarout (2010; Dotte-Sarout et al. 2013) investigated whether
arboriculture could be identified from the anthracological record at precolonial Kanak sites in
New Caledonia, dated after 1300 AD. Results indicated a continuance of a forest gardening
tradition focusing on Ficus sp., Syzygium malaccense, Aleurites moluccana, Hibiscus tiliaceus,
Cordia subcordata, Calophyllum inophyllum, Artocarpus altilis, Cocos nucifera, Terminalia
catappa among others, originating from the Austronesian/Indo-Pacific sphere of interaction
(2013:133).
The Polynesian triangle is bound by the island groups of Hawaii in the north, New
Zealand in the south, and Rapanui to the east. This boundary defines the culturally and
genetically distinct Polynesians from the Melanesians of Fiji, Vanuatu, New Caledonia and
islands further west. The botanical record of Hawaii is important for investigating the expansion
of cultivars to the northern extreme of Polynesia. Along with Tonga, the Hawaiian archipelago
represents one of only a small number of cases where dryland agriculture was adopted (Yen
1982). It is often presumed that where possible, irrigation for taro will be developed and that
dryland techniques are a secondary choice (Spriggs 1982; Yen 1982). Both macro- and
microbotanical remains demonstrating the nature and extent of dryland crop utilisation have
been recovered from a temporally and geographically diverse range of archaeological sites.
Douglas Yen was the first to apply modern identification techniques to assemblages of plant
remains from dry rockshelters and open sites on Kaho’lawe Island, Molokai, Oahu and Hawaii
Island (Allen 1984). From these sites, a number of primary (Dioscorea alata, Ipomoea batatas,
Cocos nucifera, Musa sp., Lagenaria sp, Saccharum sp., Piper methysticum) and secondary
cultigens (Canarium sp., Pandanus sp., Cordyline sp., Aleurites moluccana) were identified
(1984:22-23). Following this, several projects targeted the recovery of carbonised and
desiccated plant remains using systematic flotation and sieving techniques. Rosendahl and Yen
27
(1971) recovered complete and fragmentary carbonised remains of sweet potato (Ipomoea
batatas) dated to between 1425 and 1725 AD, while Allen (1983, 1984) identified small
fragments of desiccated taro corm along with noni (Morinda citrifolia), coconut and kou
(Cordia cf. subcordata) that were interpreted as evidence for purposeful environmental
modification. Microfossil evidence from phytoliths and starch has thus far lent support to
identification of macrobotanical remains. Musa phytoliths were located within samples taken
from the Kona field system, along with the starch and xylem vessels of a root crop cautiously
identified as Ipomoea batatas, dated to 1300-1625 AD (Horrocks and Rechtman 2009). In an
attempt to combine both macro and microbotanical analyses, Kirch and others (2005) extracted
the charred remains of Cordyline fruticosa and many seeds from an earth oven from Kahikinui
dated to 460-280 cal BP, along with pollen, phytolith and micro-charcoal assemblages from
sediments that were interpreted as evidence for mulching practices consistent with those
techniques recorded ethnographically in Hawaii.
To the east, Rapanui, or Easter Island, has been the focus of archaeological projects
seeking to answer questions surrounding the enigma of the Moai statues and the prehistoric
Polynesian culture that created them. Despite this, very little archaeobotanical research has been
initiated. The question of agricultural development within subsistence practices has been raised,
and most often dealt with through consideration of the context of dryland agricultural features
(Stevenson et al. 1999; Wozniak 1999) and land evaluation (Louwagie and Langohr 2002;
Louwagie et al. 2006). The first to address agricultural change through the implementation of
archaeobotanical techniques was Cummings (1998) at La Perouse Bay. The contents of a
possible lowland garden-pit feature were analysed, and the microbotanical remains of both
sweet potato and taro were recovered in the form of pollen and starch granules, respectively.
Following this, Horrocks and Wozniak (2008) conducted a microfossil survey of sediments
within transects near ahu, house sites and presumed horticultural areas. These deposits were
found to contain pollen deriving from bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria), and starch of the
common yam (Dioscorea alata), sweet potato, and taro. The presence and abundance of these
taxa, along with pollen evidence of forest clearance, were interpreted as reflecting the intensive
mixed-crop, dryland production of these cultigens, dominated by yams and sweet potato, and
supplemented by taro and bottle gourd (2008:16). More recently, Horrocks and others (2012)
cored lake sediments in the crater of Rano Kau, and used a combination of light microscopy and
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIS) to assess microbotanical evidence for
agricultural practices within the crater. Some starch granules were much degraded, but were
able to be tentatively identified as that of sweet potato, the common yam and taro using FTIS
(Horrocks et al. 2012:195-198). In addition, pollen and phytoliths of other cultigens such as
paper mulberry (Broussonetia papyrifera), bananas, and possibly bottle gourd were also
28
identified and used to argue that the crater was the location for a mixed-crop horticultural
system after 1610-1410 cal BP.
Similar to Rapanui, New Zealand in the southern point of the Polynesian triangle is a
case study for archaeological projects investigating dryland subsistence in the lower latitudes,
specifically the subantarctic convergence zone of the Pacific. A large array of microbotanical
studies have been conducted on Maori gardening soils, gardening features such as stone walls
and mounds, house sites, coprolites, and within lake sediment cores from throughout the North
and South Islands (Horrocks 2004; Horrocks and Barber 2005; Horrocks and Lawlor 2006;
Horrocks, Smith, Nichol, Shane and Jackman 2008; Horrocks, Smith, Nichol and Wallace 2008;
Horrocks et al. 2002, 2003, 2004, 2007, 2011). Within these sediments a number of prehistoric
introductions are identified from diagnostic starch granules, phytoliths, pollen and xylem
vessels. The identified taxa include paper mulberry, sweet potato, Colocasia taro, bottle gourd,
and yams, indicating that multi-cropping of selections of these crops was common in production
systems that utilised lithic mulching and mounding to enable production of tropical cultigens in
a cooler temperate climate. Production was argued to have been supplemented by the
exploitation of native taxa such as bracken (Pteridium spp.). Almost all of this data has been
collected from deposits that have been radiocarbon or AMS dated to post- 1300 AD, or are
above the Kaharoa tephra (dated to 1300 AD). Currently there is no direct evidence for
agricultural practices from first settlement (around 1200-1300 AD) until this period.
On the outer edges of the Polynesian triangle, islands such as Futuna, Pitcairn and the
Marquesas Islands have also received attention from archaeobotanical research. Piazza and
Frimigacci (1991) analysed pollen records from three cores near water sources on Futuna dated
from around 600 BP to the present. Within these cores was direct evidence for the giant taro
(Alocasia), bananas (Musa spp.), and some species within the family Moraceae argued to most
likely be breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) (Piazza and Frimigacci 1991:131). These crops were
interpreted as evidence for the antiquity of pond-field construction and swiddening practices,
which could be traced back to the Kele Mea period that pre-dated the development of socio-
political stratification, involving the the emergence of strong chiefly titles on the island. Turning
to the southeast, Hather and Weisler (2000) and Horrocks and Weisler (2006) have carried out
micro- and macrobotanical analyses of sites on Pitcairn Island in the Pitcairn Group. Leaf
parenchymatous tissues of Cyrtosperma merkusii were recovered in situ within archaeological
deposits associated with prehistoric earth ovens, dated from 1000-1600 AD (Hather and Weisler
2000) Following this, Horrock and Weisler (2006) analysed deposits within a stratigraphic
profile from a drainage ditch, and found evidence for the cultivation of sweet potato (Ipomoea
batatas) and taro (Colocasia esculenta) through the presence of starch and xylem vessels
consistent with these taxa. Unfortunately, there was limited age control in the disturbed profile,
and there is a possibility that these remains date to the historic period after the Bounty mutineers
29
settled the island. Work by Allen and Ussher (2013) on the island of Nuku Hiva in the
Marquesas has recently identified the presence of sweet potato on shell scrapers dated to 1200-
1400 AD. This represents the earliest direct evidence for the cultivation of sweet potato within
the archipelago. A number of other economic cultigens were also identified from residues on
multi-use shell tools from occupation sites in the Anaho Valley dated to after 1400 AD,
including kava (Piper methysticum), breadfruit, taro and a variety of yam (Allen and Ussher
2013:2810).
So far, this review has investigated archaeobotanical data for plant introductions and
cultivation in the outer limits of Polynesia. It will now turn to the interior of the triangle and
assess the research that has been carried out in the Cook Islands, Samoa and the Society Islands.
Chance finds of macrobotanical remains from Mangaia in the Cook Islands and Upolu in Samoa
have been identified by Hather (1994; Hather and Kirch 1991) using a systematic identification
system that has enabled the classification of parenchymatous fragments of roots and tubers. On
Mangaia, both charred epidermal tissues and unattached epidermal fragments identified as
peelings and the edible root sweet potato were collected from the Tangatatau rock-shelter in
conjunction with wood charcoal and the charred drupes of Pandanus tectorius (Hather and
Kirch 1991). The research was significant as it suggested that the sweet potato was in central
eastern Polynesia by 1000 AD, and was argued by the Hather and Kirch to lend credence to
Yen’s tripartite hypothesis for the distribution of this cultigen in the Pacific (1991:892-3). The
tripartite hypothesis proposes three pathways for sweet potato into Oceania: a prehistoric
transfer from South America to Polynesia, transport by the Spanish from Mexico to the
Philippines, and a later introduction from Europe to the East Indies and New Guinea
(Montenegro et al. 2008).
Further east, parenchymatous remains of Dioscorea spp. were identified using Scanning
Electron Microscopy (SEM) from excavations carried out by Green and Davidson (1969, 1974)
on the island of Upolu in Samoa (Hather 1992, 1994b). The fragments were 2-6mm in size and
were identified to genus from the morphology of vascular tissues, but the state of preservation
and lack of epidermal tissues inhibited classification to species. More recently, Kahn and
Ragone (2013) identified fragments of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) exocarp on house
platforms in the ‘Opunohu Valley on Moorea, Society Islands dated to around the middle of the
17th century. This built upon the chronology for the cultivation of breadfruit in Tahiti
established by Orliac (1997) when charred breadfruit wood was recovered an earth oven from
the Papeno’o Valley in rock-shelter deposits dated to the 14th century.
Tonga: The gap in the archaeobotanical record
Within Western Polynesia, the Tongan Archipelago represents an important location for
archaeological research. This island group is acknowledged both as the homeland for the
30
colonisation of East Polynesia, as well as the terminus for Lapita migration. Despite this, only a
very small number of palaeoecological studies have contributed information upon Polynesian
introductions and associated cultivation practices in Tonga. Fall (2005, 2010) and Fall and
Drezner (2011, 2013) document the first evidence of Colocasia in pollen cores taken from the
Avai’o’vuna Swamp and the Ngofe Marsh within the Vava’u group, and on Eua in the
Tongatapu group from 2600 BP. Other introductions at this time included Casuarina
equisetifolia, Cordyline fruticosa, and Pometia pinnata. Indigenous species such as Canarium
harveyi, Cocos nucifera and Pandanus tectorius display an increase in pollen associated with
Lapita settlement (2900-2600 BP) that may indicate their cultivation for food. In addition to
these Lapita-associated introductions, Fall (2010) documents the introduction of the Polynesian
cultigen Ipomoea batatas as a historic introduction into the archipelago. This supports Kirch’s
(1978, 1990) argument that the adoption of this versatile South American cultivar in Tonga
coincided with the arrival of Europeans. However, the cultivation of sweet potato was
documented in Tonga during Cook’s second voyage in 1777, which may in fact suggest
prehistoric rather than historic transfer of this cultigen. No macrobotanical remains have been
recovered from archaeological sites within the archipelago that could corroborate these
identifications, and there is a significant lack of horticultural features in the archaeological
record. The absence of an archaeobotanical record for Tonga is significant due to the
importance of these islands for Pacific migration, and therefore a targeted and systematic regime
of flotation, wet-sieving and bulk soil sampling for macro- and microbotanical remains the
logical approach to address this problem.
Tonga in the Pacific: A summary
Around the Pacific, archaeologists and palaeoecologists have begun to use multi-disciplinary
approaches that combine natural and cultural datasets to enable the development of chronologies
for localised and regional plant introductions and utilization. From the identification of taxa
within the archaeobotanical record, interpretations have been made about the movement of
crops around the Pacific region through island colonisation and trade, as well as the nature of
crop production through localised innovation and adaptation. It appears that the taro-yam
complex was the most extensive horticultural system and was transported from Near Oceania
into Remote Oceania by the Lapita cultural complex to all of the outer limits of East Polynesia.
Current archaeobotanical data reflect the movement of human and plant populations
throughout the Pacific, but also local environmental limitations and cultural practices that
affected the number and types of cultigens that were grown. Further east, islands become higher
and entirely volcanic in origin, making irrigation ineffective in more temperate climates. It is
reasonable to assume that these island populations relied less on those aroids that required some
form of irrigation, such as Alocasia and Cyrtosperma to ‘intensively’ cultivate, and instead
‘extensively’ cultivated dryland crops through mounding such as yams (Dioscorea sp.) and
31
sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) or the arboricultural production of breadfruit (Artocarpus sp.)
and bananas (Musa sp.). However, questions have been raised regarding how to define intensive
agriculture, and how visible these cultivation techniques are within the archaeological record
(Leach 1999).
The assumption that population growth and social production are the primary drivers for
intensification, begs the question as to how to explain cases such as the Tu’i Tonga chiefdom
under current typologies where intensification in the traditional sense (Boserup 1965) is defined
as increased labour input holding land as a constant. By European arrival, almost all of
Tongatapu was dedicated to agriculture, but to fit this classic definition for intensification this
dryland production would be required to have developed from swidden agriculture with a
shortening of fallow length in plots, followed by permanent plot boundaries and a trend towards
rain water control and soil additives (Yen 1973a). A chronology of horticultural production is
required to identify this process, something currently lacking within archaeological research in
Tonga. In light of this, this thesis investigates the development of production systems over time
using Tongatapu as a case study, and seeks to elaborate upon and test modes of production other
than the classically defined intensive techniques, using archaeobotanical data and
agroecological modelling.
32
PART ONE- AN ARCHAEOBOTANICAL
COMPARATIVE COLLECTION FOR
TONGA
33
Chapter 3 Reviewing Microbotanical
Analysis
This study uses a combination of both micro- and macrobotanical techniques to research
subsistence strategies adopted within the Tongan archipelago in prehistory. Starch analysis and
the study of charred parenchyma are both areas of archaeobotany that have been under-utilised
due to perceived issues with taphonomy, extraction and the diagnostic value of morphological
characteristics of these botanical remains. This chapter explores past research, and demonstrates
that the cumulative data from experimental studies, ethnography and applications of these
findings within archaeological research has enabled a greater understanding of human-plant
interaction. The current study will utilise the results of past research into taphonomy and
identification techniques, and develop these further to enable later classification of these micro-
and macrobotanical remains extracted from sites on Tongatapu within Part Two of this thesis.
Although it is a relatively new area of archaeobotany, starch analysis has been applied
to answer a range of archaeological questions regarding population migration, diet and
subsistence, tool function, and human-environmental interaction. Yet the chemical and
biological properties of starch as a carbohydrate, and how these can change under different
conditions such as heating or cooling, are still mostly not well understood. Reichert (1913)
conducted the first scientific study of starch and its properties, and his seminal guide is often
used in microbotanical research. Variation in starch morphology at different taxonomic levels is
well known, and has been used to identify starch found in sediments (Horrocks et al. 2004,
2008; Horrocks and Lawlor 2006; Horrocks and Rechtman 2009; Lentfer et al. 2002; Therin
1994; Therin et al. 1999) or as residues on stone artefacts (Barton 2007; Field et al. 2009;
Fullagar 1998, 2006; Fullagar et al. 1998, 2006; Loy et al. 1992; Loy 1994; Pearsall et al. 2004),
pottery (Crowther 2001, 2005, 2009), and dental calculus (Boyadjian et al. 2007; Henry and
Piperno 2008; Reinhard et al. 2001).
Biology of starch and identification potential
The biological characteristics of starch grains offer a unique picture of plant use in the past.
Starch is produced as a form of energy storage during photosynthesis and is found in plastids in
every kind of tissue in most green plants. Light energy is converted to potential energy within
the chloroplasts found in leaves through the splitting of water into hydrogen and oxygen (Banks
and Greenwood 1975; Gott et al. 2006). The freed hydrogen combines with carbon dioxide from
the atmosphere to form glucose, which is stored in two forms. It can be hydrolysed, synthesised
and then stored overnight as reserve starch within the amyloplasts in storage organs such as
roots, tubers, fruits and seeds (Cortella and Pochettino 1994:172; Jane et al. 1994), or used
during the day as transitory starch in chloroplasts (Banks and Greenwood 1975:1). Transitory
34
starch is much smaller and less diagnostic than reserve starch and is mostly found in the leaves,
stem and petiole (or leaf stem) (Banks and Greenwood 1975:1; Gott et al. 2006; Messner 2011).
Starch itself is biologically defined as discrete insoluble semi-crystalline polymers
consisting of linear amylase and highly branched amylopectin. The internal structure of these
granules is composed of alternating semi-crystalline and amorphous growth rings, and an
amorphous core (Cai and Wei 2013). Granules are formed within the plastids from a nucleation
point, or hilum, from which these layers of amylose and amylopectin are accreted (Loy
1994:89). The optical pattern created by these layers is called ‘lamellae’, and these increase in
density and insolubility towards the outer margins of the granule. Three different types of
crystalline structures have been identified within starch granules through X-ray diffraction
techniques, designated as A-, B- and C-types (Banks and Greenwood 1975:242; Gott et al.
2006). A-types contain a pattern that is visible in most cereals, while B-types are seen
commonly in tubers and C-types are within most root and seed starches (Cortella and Pochettino
1992:178). Heat and moisture during plant growth dictate the percentages of each type produced
within the plastids.
Partly due to the semi-crystalline structure of starch, granules are also birefringent in
polarised light, displaying a ‘Maltese’ or ‘extinction cross’ pattern. This effect is created by
light passing through the grain which is deflected owing to the differences in density and
structure of the various lamellae. This deflection creates interference which in turn results in the
generation of localised bright and dark regions that extend radially when polarised due to the
spherical shape of granules (Loy 1994:89). These interference patterns are not unique in their
physicochemical structure and can sometimes be confused with synthetic semi-crystalline
polymers which form spherulitic structures that are not unlike starch in the early stages of
growth when viewed in polarised light (Banks and Greenwood 1975:247). However, it is the
combination of attributes that are visible in both polarised and brightfield light that permit the
direct identification of starch grains microscopically.
The growth of starch within the plastids is under genetic control, and size and shape of
granules is determined by the conditions within the cell. The type of starch granule that grows is
also dictated by the plastid, where a single nucleus gives rise to a ‘simple’ starch granule and a
multiplicity of nuclei form ‘compound’ granules (Banks and Greenwood 1975:251; Gott et al.
2006:41; Loy 1994:90). Each granule within a compound granule exhibits its own birefringence
pattern and has the potential to separate and become simple granules. Other traits such as the
morphology of the hilum region including vacuoles and fissuring, and the density,
hydrophobicity (insolubility) and thickness of the accretion layers are also inherited genetic
effects (Loy 1994:91). Because of genetic control over starch morphology, there is the potential
to identify the botanical origin of native starch. Some granules within a population are highly
35
diagnostic, whereas others are less useful for identifying the species of origin due to features
that overlap with other taxa (Gott et al. 2006:40). It is these diagnostic or ‘signature’ types that
are mainly used to identify unknown taxa found in archaeological assemblages.
Many studies of species-specific starch morphology and physicochemistry have been
conducted to assess the range of variation within any given sample at different taxonomic
levels. Initial studies only used light microscopy (Gott et al. 2006; Barton and Fullagar 2006;
Reichert 1913) but more recent use of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) enables high
resolution imaging of the three-dimensional shape of starch (Barton and Fullagar 2006:52; Jane
et al. 1994; Lindeboom et al. 2004). Comprehensive analyses of starch morphology have
demonstrated that attributes such as the presence of lamellae, hilum features, three- and two-
dimensional shape, shape modifiers such as faceting, and overall size, characterise different
biological taxa. Further, there is also evidence that starch can vary morphologically within
different organs of the same plant (Gott et al.2006; Jane et al. 1994:46; Loy 1994; Reichert
1913), which suggests that if these features were also diagnostic, it could be particularly useful
to archaeologists attempting to understand plant exploitation and processing in the past.
Starch taphonomy
Detailed studies in both archaeobotany and the food sciences have emphasised the range of
changes that can occur when native starch is exposed to a range of physical, chemical and
biological environments. A number of methodological studies have focused on these
taphonomic issues, highlighting the changes that can affect native starch biochemistry and
morphology under differing conditions both prior to and after deposition, and how these factors
can influence the identification and quantification process (Babot 2003; Crowther 2009, 2012;
Haslam 2004; Henry et al. 2009; Weston 2009).
Plant processing
Archaeobotanical research targets plant remains that are found within archaeological, and
therefore anthropogenic, contexts. Most starch remains found within domestic deposits such as
occupation floors or middens derive from economic or supplementary plant taxa that have been
processed in some way. Roasting, charring, boiling, milling, pounding, freezing, dehydrating,
and rehydrating are all examples of cultural food processing techniques that can affect the
morphology and chemistry of starch granules (Babot 2003; Crowther 2009; Henry et al. 2009;
Laurence 2013:34-36; Messner and Schindler 2010). The effects of various cooking techniques
on starch have been by far the most researched of these processing techniques. Experiments
have been tailored to assess the range of the conditions under which starch either melts or
gelatinises when exposed to water and/or heat.
The thermal conversion of starch is defined when “…starch is converted from an
ordered, semi-crystalline to a disordered, amorphous state during cooking…” (Crowther 2012,
36
2009:23). Gelatinisation can occur when starch is exposed to both moisture and increased
temperature, causing swelling and a loss of birefringence (Banks and Greenwood 1975:259-67;
Messner and Schindler 2010). Species-specific water-dependent temperature thresholds affect
the nature and timing of starch thermal conversion (Crowther 2009; Henry et al. 2009:917), but
complete and uninhibited gelatinisation of all granules can only occur when more than 60-65%
water is present. Within most Pacific cultigens the temperature range for gelatinisation under
excess moisture is around 60-85˚C (Moorthy 2002). Partial gelatinisation is possible when these
conditions are not met and the amylopectin crystallites only partly melt, resulting in an
incomplete loss of birefringence and limited morphological change. Swelling is also reversible
up to a point when loss of optical properties begins, which occurs within a population of starch
grains over a relatively narrow temperature range of 5-10˚C (Banks and Greenwood 1975:260).
Melting of starch crystallites occurs when granules are dry-heated, through charring or
roasting at temperatures above 220˚C. Starch heated in the absence of moisture will thermally
degrade through breaking down into smaller glucose units and eventually carbonise before
becoming structurally disordered (Crowther 2012, 2009:26). Experimentation has demonstrated
the visible changes that can occur during these types of cooking techniques. Babot (2003)
roasted samples of corn (Zea mays L.) kernels and quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.),
reporting that these granules displayed various combinations of flat relief, weak birefringence,
deformation of the extinction cross, clumping and slight gelatinisation, but not all grains showed
gelatinisation features. Babot concluded that the water content at time of cooking and the
heating temperature were responsible for the damage (Babot 2003:73). Similarly, the effects of
charring were evident in changes in granule birefringence, swelling and clumping, but were
dependent on grain size (Babot 2003:74). Starch size is related to hydration, where water
molecules inhabit the crystalline regions of the amyolopectin molecules (Torrence and Barton
2006). Smaller starch granules have less capacity for swelling, while gelatinisation occurs more
quickly for larger granules unless these granules have a high ratio of amylase to amylopectin
which buffers gelatinisation (Banks and Greenwood 1975:260; Crowther 2012; Saul et al.
2012:3484).
Studies also demonstrated that gelatinization is not as simple as dry heat versus wet heat
cooking, or charring and roasting versus boiling. Consideration must be given to the role that
heat-transfer mechanisms and micro-climates have in the cooking process (Messner and
Schindler 2010). In earth ovens the thermal agent is heated rock. When these are placed in direct
contact with starchy organs, the oven is instantaneously heated through trapping hot moist air
which emanates from the food and is then vaporised when this comes in contact with the rocks,
resulting in complete breakdown of starch within the oven (2010:334). In contrast, when the
external heat source is in the form of fire on top of the earth oven that increases in temperature
gradually, the moisture is slowly evaporated from the organ and starch is damaged but can still
37
survive cooking. Messner and Schindler (2010) therefore argue that “…the environmental
conditions generated by the heat transfer systems were of greater influence to starch degradation
than temperature alone.” Different water-uptake mechanisms in different wet cooking methods
also affect the rate and nature of gelatinization. For example, boiling increases water absorption
at a faster rate, but steaming allows more uniform absorption over time (Crowther 2009:28-29).
These factors, and the type and order of cooking procedures followed can greatly affect the
archaeological visibility of particular activities. Two of the main methods for cooking starchy
foods in the Pacific throughout prehistory have been by steaming in earth ovens and boiling, so
these studies’ findings are particularly relevant to this study.
Other studies have demonstrated that the temperature during charring can significantly
alter the nature of starch damage. Low temperatures up to 220ºC will not commonly cause any
morphological changes, but higher temperatures up to 350ºC can cause complete loss of
structure or fusion of granules similar to those observed within boiled samples at lower
temperatures (Valamoti 2008). Similarly the location of starch within an organ that has been
cooked whole at any temperature will limit the amount of damage. For example, granules in the
centre of grains are more likely to survive any cooking method as these are protected from the
effects of liquid and heat (2008:269). Some alteration of morphology, such as slight swelling, is
still possible.
Crowther (2012, 2009) reviews the potential for starch survival within charred and
carbonised residues on ceramics, and argues that these are ideal contexts for recovering non-
gelatinised granules as evidence of cooked foods under particular charring conditions. The
temperature must not exceed starch thermal degradation temperature, but this depends on the
intensity of the heat source, the distance of the vessel from that source and the location on the
vessel where the granules are located. Secondly, desiccation and carbonisation must occur
relatively quickly before all starch granules undergo gelatinisation. Starch granules of
underground storage organs (USO) such as roots and tubers are less likely to survive charring
without gelatinisation due to the high water content within these organs, biasing the
archaeological record towards cereals and legumes where these organs are utilised (2012).
Further studies have looked beyond the morphological changes that can occur within
starch granules exposed to charring, and instead attempted to assess whether the survival of
starch granules within charred residues reflect the intensity of plant use. Raviele (2011)
replicated charred maize residue construction under controlled conditions, where the variables
tested were the ratio of plant extract to water and meat, and the type of maize (Zea mays) (whole
green cob, whole green kernel, lightly pounded dried kernel, whole dried kernel and ground
maize flour).The overall results did not demonstrate a trend for increasing abundance with
increasing proportions of maize in residues, suggesting differential survival of starch during
38
charring. Despite this, it was noted that dried kernels and cob had higher abundances of starch
survival, most likely a result of high starch production within maize at this time of organ
development (Raviele 2011:2711). Similarly, Saul and colleagues (2012) experimentally
replicated charring conditions for einkorn (T. monococcum) and acorn (Quercus sp.) in ceramic
pots at more than 100ºC for three hours. These experiments indicated that starch can survive
repeated charring episodes in relatively high quantities (184 granules mg-1 and 608 mg-1
respectively).
Other food processing techniques such as parching, fermentation, freezing and milling
can also cause distinctive damage to native starch granules. Henry and others (2009) tested
different cooking techniques on both ground and whole legumes and grains. One of these tests
involved parching three millilitres of each sample for three minutes in a muffle furnace at
200ºC. The authors noted a significant degree of heterogeneity within the sample, but argued
that parching caused the most distinctive damage to granules (Henry et al. 2009:918). Most
granules appeared encrusted with small particles that were either small starch granules or other
organic material, which does not occur through any other cooking technique. Other common
morphological changes associated with parching were the definition of lamellae and
development of deep radial fissures (Henry et al. 2009:921). Within the same study, starch
granules were exposed to yeast to replicate fermentation. Whole samples displayed surprisingly
little change except for a possible extra ‘arm’ within the extinction cross; however, granules
within the ground samples often displayed signs of ‘hollowing out’ at the hilum. (2009:921).
Effects of freezing on starch granules from several cereals, tubers and legumes has also
been tested, and indicate that this process changes both the chemical properties of the starch
granules, specifically a loss of birefringence, and also the physical appearance of the grains in
terms of flat relief, fragmenting, fissuring, breaking and bursting (Babot in Beck and Torrence
2006:66-67; Babot 2003:74). Milling involves the application of friction to plant parts and their
by-products, and is a technique most commonly used for separating the starchy endosperm of
grains from the pericarp (Henry et al. 2009:916). Experimentation has revealed the extensive
damage that milling can have on starch granules, which includes truncation, incompleteness,
fracturing, collapsing, and bursting (Babot 2003:76). Some damage also can occur at the hila,
with fissuring and large open vacuoles. In contrast, short term pounding using stone implements
has been demonstrated to have very limited affect on starch granules aside from the
disaggregation of compound granules (Robertson, in Beck and Torrence 2006:68-69).
Damage caused by these various food processing techniques can render starch
unrecognisable as such in archaeological contexts. Studies have therefore attempted to use other
chemical tests to identify the presence of cooked starch residues on artefacts or in sediments.
Congo Red (empirical formula C32H22N6O6S2Na2) stain has been used in the agricultural and
39
food sciences as a contrast stain for cellulose, starch and amyloid fibrils, but the potential of this
stain to test for cooked or damaged starch in archaeological contexts has only been recognised
within the last two decades (Cortella and Pochettino 1994; Lamb and Loy 2005; Lamb 2003;
Reichert 1913; Weston 2009). The stain only binds to proteins in alkaline or acid buffer
conditions, so at a neutral pH only starch and cellulose will be stained. Unaltered or undamaged
starch is hydrophobic and so does not take up the stain, but starch that has become disordered
allows Congo Red to react with the amylase content of these granules resulting in a red
discolouration with an orange-red or green-gold glow in cross-polarised light (Lamb and Loy
2005:1434). Trypan blue has been used in much the same way, penetrating the outer layer of
damaged starch granules to stain the exposed interior blue (Barton 2007:1734).
Some researchers have argued that these stains are not reliable indicators of the
presence of starch within archaeological contexts, and have subsequently experimented with
thermally stable α-amylase, an enzyme that degrades the chemical linkages contained within
starch (Hardy et al. 2009). These tests involve exposing a sample of extracted residue to α-
amylase and observing the degradation of objects tentatively identified as starch (2009:251).
Alternatively a sub-sample can be used as a control by adding α-amylase, and comparing this to
the remaining analysed portion of extracted residue (Saul et al. 2012). If starch is thought to be
present in the remaining sample but not visible within the control, then this is a good indication
that the identification of starch within an archaeological sample is correct. However, this can be
problematic as it is not possible to confirm the identification of individual granules.
Starch in sediments
Soil properties such as pH levels, temperature, texture and moisture content, in conjunction with
soil constituents including enzymes, bacteria, fungi and earthworms, play the greatest role in
influencing starch degradation and movement after deposition (Barton and Matthews 2006;
Haslam 2004:1721). These factors are particularly relevant in tropical climates such as Tonga
which generally have low rates of organic preservation (Hather 1994). A large array of studies
has been carried out under varying soil conditions, either as individual variables or in
conjunction with one another. These experimental studies been utilised by archaeologists and
archaeobotanists to further our understanding of the extent to which morphological and
chemical changes can occur after deposition within archaeological contexts.
One of the most common causes of starch degradation within tropical sediments is
through hydrolysis, whereby starch is chemically broken down by polysaccharidases (enzymes)
produced by bacteria and fungi. When plant and animal cellular material decays, these enzymes
are released into the soil in significant quantities and are present in almost every soil type
encountered throughout the world (Cheshire et al. 1974). Two classes of enzyme-producing
bacteria are recognised: autochthonous, which grow slowly and predominate when there is little
40
oxidisable substrate and zymogenous, which respond to substrate addition by rapidly increasing,
with the majority dying out after substrate exhaustion (Burns 1982; Haslam 2004). It is
therefore possible for inactive enzymes and the bacteria that produce them to exist in the soil
prior to starch deposition. The presence of these enzymes, and their potential to remain inactive
in the soil substrate, limits the potential for starch survival in archaeological contexts.
To gauge the extent and rate of starch degradation, several studies have replicated
hydrolysis in vitro (Mellon et al. 2002; Steup et al. 1983). Results indicate that the majority of
both transitory and reserve starch is degraded within the first few days of exposure to enzymatic
digestion, with rates of decomposition after this following an asymptotic curve (Haslam
2004:1720, Barton 2009). Within this generalised trend there are species-specific differences in
enzyme attack patterns and rates, depending upon factors such as granule structure and size,
amylose to amylopectin ratios and crystal types (Haslam 2004: 1720; MacGregor 1980; Zhang
et al. 2005). Haslam (2004) compiled these studies into a table that archaeobotanists can use to
understand and interpret possible biases in the archaeological record. When ranked, taxonomic
patterning suggests that the rate of enzymatic degradation increased when granule size and
amylose content decreased. Some species such as bananas (Musa and Eumusa spp.) are resistant
to enzymatic degradation unless gelatinised (Zhang et al. 2005:144). Once gelatinisation begins
the rate of degradation increases as enzymes have easier access to the more susceptible
amorphous cores of the granules of most taxa. The temperature at which gelatinisation occurs
does not appear to be a significant factor affecting the rate of starch degradation for each taxa.
However, as discussed previously, the amount of moisture in the soil regulates the extent of
swelling and gelatinisation and thus has more impact (Haslam 2004). One variable that does
seem to affect the presence of microbial, enzyme and fungal activity in soils is depth. Enzymatic
degradation of starch is much more likely to occur closer to the surface than at midpoints or
near basal deposits, where activity is correlated with the presence of other organic matter
(Haslam 2004:1721; Taylor and Belton. 2002). The rate of starch degradation is also seen on
artefacts, where starch abundance at 108 weeks is already representative of those in
archaeological contexts (Barton 2009:135).
Other taphonomic factors that affect starch preservation in sediments include
temperature, pH and moisture content of the sedimentary matrix. These variables have the
potential to damage starch through causing gelatinisation or damaging the biochemical
properties of granules; however, these rarely directly affect starch individually, and so should be
considered in conjunction with enzymatic hydrolysis (Haslam 2004). It is the interplay between
these variables and the presence of microbial and enzyme activity that cause starch degradation.
As mentioned earlier, temperature and moisture cause swelling and shrinking of starch, enabling
various enzymes access to the interior of the granule. The same principles described in relation
to heating and cooling within food processing techniques is applicable to soil conditions.
41
Hydrolysis can also occur in both acidic and alkaline soils, but is slower than enzymatic
decomposition (2004:1721). Some enzymes often favour different pH levels, such as invertase
which is more active in more alkaline soils, whereas amylase can affect starch in any conditions
(Dick et al. 2000).
Quantitative studies of starch preservation (Barton 2009; Haslam 2009; Therin 1998)
have made observations of displacement of starch within sediments over time. Therin (1998)
attempted to replicate the downward displacement of starch grains in various sandy matrices
using groundwater. Variables tested included sediment particle size, irrigation rate and starch
grain size, monitored over a two-month period. The results indicated that there is limited
downward movement of starch grains, but within this overall trend patterning related to granule
and particle size. Larger starch grains have less chance of becoming mobile, but if they do
move, these granules move slowly and have less chance of becoming trapped. Smaller sand
particles also correlate with less starch mobility, but an increase in irrigation rate will increase
starch movement. Haslam (2009) attempted to take this experimentation a step further, and
investigate both upward and downward movement of starch, as well as lateral movement. These
parameters mirrored those used by Therin (1998), but only one sand matrix was tested with
larger particles of 250-500µm. The sediment was autoclaved for 30 mins at 120ºC to eliminate
fungi and bacteria then placed into a PVC pipe ‘cross’ with a small amount of starch (0.1g) in
the centre, and placed upright (Haslam 2009:95). The experiment was irrigated at a rate of
160ml twice a day from the top of the set-up for a period of 30 days. The sediment was then
sampled at 27 locations within the cross and processed for starch extraction, revealing that
around 16% of starch moved downward up to 6cm although the highest number of starch was
still found at the centre (2009:98). Very small numbers of starch also moved laterally up to
12cm, and upwards 2cm from the centre. The implications of these experiments are that
researchers need to assess factors such as sediment compaction, particle size and local rainfall
when interpreting the potential movement of starch in sediments, along with other taphonomic
issues such as bioturbation and human activities.
Researchers have sought to provide solutions to taphonomic issues through
investigating the types of conditions that are favourable for starch preservation (Barton 2009;
Haslam 2009, 2004; Laurence 2013). The presence of heavy metals within soils or high clay
content can neutralise enzymes and thus limit the effect that bacteria and fungi can have on
starch granules within these deposits (Haslam 2004). Additionally, soil aggregates, or
Particulate Organic Matters (POMs), and residues on artefacts can form a protective barrier for
starch through limiting surface area accessible for enzyme digestion. Artefact surfaces can also
provide a micro-environment that protects starch from the effects of temperature, moisture and
downward displacement through groundwater. Studies of starch residues on bone, wood, lithic
and ceramic artefacts indicate that the preservation of these residues in soils is possible.
42
However, experiments that attempt to replicate archaeological deposition of tools used for food
processing have produced no conclusive results (Barton 2009; Haslam 2004; Lu 2003). The
results of one study indicate that starch is in fact more likely to survive as residues on artefacts
if the tool remains on the surface for some time, as sunlight can reduce enzymatic degradation
(Barton 2009). Another experiment found that starch residues on buried tools had high survival
rates of around 75% after 71 days (Lu 2003:124), but the highest quantities of starch were found
on tools that were in sheltered conditions on the surface which supports Barton’s (2009)
hypothesis.
Modern starch contamination
Contamination has plagued archaeobotanical studies involving the analysis of microbotanical
remains. Many studies have attempted to understand the nature and sources of contamination
that can occur both in situ and during post-excavation processing in the laboratory.
Contamination is defined here as starch that can be added to samples through aeolian (airborne)
processes or through transmission by direct contact. Laurence (2013; Laurence et al. 2011)
provides an extensive review of modern airborne starch contamination that derives from food
processing factories such as flour and maize mills, as well as starch that is contained in pollen.
Pollen starch is undistinguishable from reserve starch and can be released when pollen ruptures
either on the ground or mid-air (Laurence et al. 2011:215). Both insect and wind-pollinated
species can produce pollen starch which provides energy for the pollen tube (Baker and Baker
1979). Microscopic slides placed close to sites in Texas where earth ovens were being assessed
for ancient starch contained quantities of starch after 96 hours.
Other researchers have recommended that archaeological studies should incorporate an
assessment of environmental airborne starch contamination in the field (Loy and Barton 2006;
Messner 2011). Yet others recommend sampling sediments surrounding artefacts to assess
whether residues on tools are accurate representations of use or contamination (Barton 2007,
Loy et al. 1992; Williamson 2006). This is determined through the taxa and quantities present in
either sample. This is problematic for a number of reasons. Fullagar and others (1998:51) argue
that the: “...difficulty in comparing starch grains on tools with starch grains in sediments is the
arbitrary choice of a quantity of sediment for a comparison with a given quantity of residue”.
Similarly, as pointed out earlier, starches in sediments can be more prone to enzymatic
degradation, so false negative results can be the outcome of these studies (Laurence et al. 2011;
Zarillo and Kooyman 2006). It is also difficult to argue that starch found in sediments is
contamination or vice versa, if consideration is given to the fact that an area may have been used
for food processing and that a tool was left in the same location after use.
Transmission of starch through handling and equipment is another source of
contamination in the field. This has been addressed in a number of studies, particularly those
43
concerned with residues on artefacts. Handling of an artefact both during original use and post-
excavation processes can cause starch to become attached to both working surfaces and other
areas of the tool that are not directly related to use (Barton 2007; Loy et al. 1992). Modern
handling contamination can be avoided by wearing starch-free gloves when bagging artefacts
into new zip lock bags in the field (Barton et al. 1998:1233; Hart 2011), but often analyses
include artefacts that have been excavated without these protocols and so researchers have
sought a means to test for levels of contamination. Suggestions to control for contamination
include testing various locations on the artefact, proposing that use-related starch is
concentrated around working edges (Barton et al. 1998; Loy et al. 1992; Piperno and Holst
1998). Another control is to compare artefact use-wear with the results of starch analysis (Allen
and Ussher 2013; Barton 2007; Ussher 2009). Where these are complementary, this provides
strong support for food processing technology.
Airborne native starch can not only contaminate sediments in situ or during fieldwork,
but also within the laboratory along with starch found in chemicals or through manual
transmission. There have been a number of published studies highlighting potential sources of
starch contamination in laboratory environments (Crowther et al. 2014; Laurence 2013;
Laurence et al. 2011; Loy and Barton 2006; Loy et al. 1992; Messner 2011). The most extensive
of these is that carried out by Crowther and others (2014), where not only the consumables and
equipment in the laboratory were tested for the presence of starch, but also surfaces and air
within various working spaces. This was designed as a comparative study between ancient
starch laboratories at the University of Calgary and Oxford University, and the results strongly
suggest that starch contamination is a major concern that needs to be addressed before
interpreting archaeological material. Consumables were tested by sampling liquids or exterior
swabs, while environmental samples were taken using horizontal ‘passive’ traps, or vertical
stationary or mobile adhesive traps. High numbers of wheat (Triticum sp.), maize (Zea mays)
and potato (Solanum tuberosum) starch were found on particular brands of powder-free gloves,
pipette tips, paper towels, and within Calgon and Sodium polytungstate commonly used for
heavy liquid separation (Crowther et al. 2014:86). Spaces that had significant quantities of
starch included fume hoods, floors and work benches, but these numbers were lessened after
cleaning.
Crowther and others’ (2014) study corroborate data from previous studies. Powder-free
gloves have been also been tested for starch contamination by Laurence (2013; Laurence et al.
2011) and others within the medical sciences (Campbell et al. 1984; Makela et al. 1997;
Newsom and Shaw 1997; Wilson and Garach 1981), and found to have varying quantities of
maize starch. These gloves are manufactured in the same factories as powdered gloves, and
therefore can easily be subjected to contamination by airborne starch if care is not taken.
Similarly, Newsom and Shaw (1997) conducted a survey of airborne starch within a hospital
44
environment and found that an average of 13.8 granules/30L air was present even in areas such
as intensive care units. Many of the starch granules observed within these studies displayed
signs of morphological and physicochemical modification such as cracking and gelatinisation
(Crowther et al. 2014:101; Laurence et al. 2011:228), indicating that the condition of starch
cannot necessarily be taken as an indicator of its age.
Protocols that limit the potential for modern starch contamination in the field and in the
laboratory have been developed in response to these studies. There are no alternatives for
powder-free gloves, but some brands have little or no starch contamination and should be
selected over others (Crowther et al. 2014). It is also possible to limit the amount of contact
gloves have with samples by using equipment such as sterilised forceps. Limiting or excluding
the use of paper products can also reduce the amount of airborne starch within the laboratory
environment. All centrifuge tubes, mixing rods, Petri dishes, sieves and pipette tips should be
treated for decontamination with 5% sodium hydroxide (Crowther et al. 2014:102) or
hypochlorite (Laurence 2013: 52; Laurence et al. 2011) prior to use. These protocols are also
replicable in the field, where particular powder-free gloves should be worn when handling
samples, and contact with the sample should be limited before placing in zip lock bags. All
sampling equipment at the very least should be cleaned with boiling water before use, but
disposable items should be utilised where possible. Food should also not be consumed on site
(Loy and Barton 2006:165).
Spatial differentiation for various tasks within the laboratory is also essential. Any
processing of modern starches for reference collections or experimentation should be carried out
in a different room to that where post-excavation processing of sediments is usually undertaken
(Crowther et al. 2014; Loy et al. 1992). This is especially important if samples are being
dehydrated and then milled or pounded. Consumable and environmental contamination should
be monitored on a regular basis to ensure the risk of contamination is low during different stages
within the working week or seasons. Monitoring of airborne starch in the field is also a useful
measure to at least provide a gauge of the most common modern morphotypes and quantities of
starch within the local environment (Crowther et al. 2014; Laurence et al. 2011; Loy and Barton
2006).
Sampling strategies and extraction techniques
Research on sampling and extraction techniques has continually forced revision of the methods
used to extract starch. These differ technically when researchers are dealing with residues on
artefacts or in sediments, but issues of scale influence both. By nature micro-analyses such as
microbotanical studies represent high resolution palimpsests of events occurring in the past, but
it can be difficult to interpret the spatial and temporal scale of these events. It is therefore
essential that the choice of a sampling strategy is related to a specific research question, and the
45
connection between the microbotanical remains and the processes that created the
archaeological record is made explicit by comparing samples. It is this comparison that ensures
that a sample represents more than just micro-scale data. Here, discussion focuses on the
sampling and extraction of sediments, as this relates to the methodological approach employed
on Tongatapu in the current research.
Many microbotanical studies target multiple microfossils, and an appropriate sampling
strategy incorporates taking samples from a combination of archaeological features and
background environmental deposits in swamps or trenches. Samples need to be of an
appropriate size, or multiple samples should be taken from the same contexts, due to problems
stemming from the use of combined multiple microfossil extraction techniques (Coil et al. 2003;
Korstanje 2003; Torrence 2006b). Pearsall (2000) provides a number of different guidelines for
sampling strategies that target either individual excavated contexts such as house floors, or sub-
sampling multiple contexts from stratigraphic profiles. Often project research questions dictate
the selection of one of these over the other, but an excellent example of integrating both these
techniques was published by Coil (2003) in a study targeting changes in agricultural practices
and ecology as part of the Kahikinui Archaeological Project in Hawaii. The combination of
archaeological and palaeoecological data from individual features, trenches in agricultural
landscapes, and sediment cores enabled discussion of landscape use and change within temporal
and geographic scales.
Where studies focus on site function, sampling tends to target individual features or
contexts of interest within a defined boundary. In the Pacific, Horrocks (and Barber 2005;
Horrocks and Bedford 2005, 2010; Horrocks, Smith, Nichol, Shane and Jackman 2008;
Horrocks, Smith, Nichol and Wallace 2008; Horrocks and Wosniak 2008; Horrocks et al. 2004,
2012) has sampled a range of agricultural features such as ditches, stone walls and terraces for
preserved starch, as well as the surrounding landscape. Balme and Beck (2002) sampled
residues on artefacts and sediments to discuss inter-site activity areas within a rock shelter at
Petzeks Cave in NSW, Australia. Similarly, sampling of sediments from prehistoric features has
been integrated into archaeological projects carried out in Asia and the New World, particularly
in locations where macrobotanical preservation is low. This analysis has led to the identification
of functional variation within and between sites (Laurence 2013; Messner, Dickau and Harbison
2008), which has been extrapolated further to discus mobility, and the nature and chronology of
plant domestication (Barton 2005; Holst, Moreno and Piperno 2007; Messner, Dickau and
Harbison 2008; Perry et al. 2007). These examples demonstrate how well-dated and carefully
sampled individual contexts can provide information upon site function.
Stratigraphic column sampling, often within test pits or excavation trenches, provides a
means of establishing plant use over time. The technique is borrowed from palaeoenvironmental
46
research (Pearsall 2000), and involves evenly spaced or continuous samples taken from the
exposed section of excavation units (Coil 2003; Lentfer and Therin 2006; Therin et al.1999;
Torrence 2006b). Sampling generally proceeds from the base of the freshly scraped section and
works towards the top, with samples carefully placed into labelled zip lock bags using cleaned
sampling tools to avoid cross-contamination (Lentfer and Therin 2006:153). Others prefer to
sample in the laboratory environment and use box monoliths to collect sediments in situ (Reitz
and Shackley 2012). Sampling using paleoenvironmental coring techniques is also common
where information is sought upon background environmental and landscape change (Coil 2003;
Horrocks et al. 2011; Therin et al.1999) and is validated by studies of modern environmental
variation within surface samples (Lentfer et al. 2002; Lenfter and Therin 2006).
Sample sizes often vary as it is difficult to gauge the density of starch preserved within
sediments unless a pilot study has been conducted (Torrence 2006b). Most researchers
recommend that more sediment is taken than the standard 1-5g that will usually be processed in
each batch, with standard sample sizes of up to 100g taken from each context or stratigraphic
level (Fullagar et al. 1998:51-2). This enables replication of extraction and identification
processes to confirm results, as well as multiple samples to be taken for the extraction of other
organic material aside from starch such as phytoliths and pollen.
Once these samples have been collected in the field, they are sub-sampled for starch
extraction in the laboratory using one of a number of methodologies. Steps generally involve
sample preparation, disaggregation and deflocculation to break up sediments, the removal of
unwanted particles, slide mounting and viewing; however, there are a number of ways in which
each of these steps can be carried out (Coil et al. 2003; Torrence 2006b). Experimental studies
have demonstrated that many chemicals used during standard paleoenvironmental laboratory
protocols can damage starch, and therefore alternatives must be sought (Crowther 2009;
Torrence 2006b). Crowther (2009) conducted a range of experiments to test a number of
chemicals and processing techniques that had been used previously to extract starch from
sediments and charred residues. These experiments showed that nitric acid, hydrogen peroxide
and heavy liquid in the form of sodium polytungstate (Na6 (H2W12O40)(SPT) had some
damaging effects on starch granules. Instead, Crowther (2009:82-83) recommended a protocol
using simple chemical disaggregation using weak sodium hydroxide in conjunction with mild
agitation and limited sonication within an ultrasonic bath.
Similarly, Torrence and Therin (in Torrence 2006b) tested the effects of Calgon,
caesium chloride (CsCl), and sodium polytungstate— two chemicals used for heavy liquid
flotation on native starch granules. Samples were monitored at regular intervals up to one week
by sub-sampling. The results of these experiments contrasted with Crowther’s (2009) in that
sodium hydroxide did not have any corrosive effect on granules, nor did this chemical affect
47
starch quantities when sub-samples were compared over time (Torrence and Therin, in Torrence
2006b:156-7). Caesium chloride was found to have a deleterious effect, but this peaked after
five hours of exposure and starch quantities subsequently stabilised. Overall, the 5% dilution of
Calgon was found to be the most damaging chemical, with only 59% of starch remaining after
five hours of exposure. Torrence and Therin (in Torrence 2006b:157) concluded that other
means of deflocculation be explored in the future. The difference between these results for
sodium polytungstate may be explained by another study on taphonomy in the laboratory by
Korstanje (2003), where Zinc Iodide (ZnI2) was assessed as another potential means of heavy
liquid separation. In this experiment, the use of the chemical was constant, while other variables
such as humidity and temperature varied. Korstanje (2003:116) concluded that Zinc Iodide
could only be considered destructive to starch when combined with humidity and heat during
slide preparation and scanning.
Heat is a variable that has been debated by starch analysts with regard to starch
extraction protocols. As discussed earlier, starch gelatinises or melts when exposed to heat and
moisture, and so these environments are mostly avoided in starch extraction protocols.
However, some protocols suggest that sediments are dried prior to processing to ensure that
weights of sediment remain consistent within samples, and also to reduce excessive moisture
that can affect the concentration of chemicals (Lentfer and Therin 2006:160). It is argued that
heat should be kept at a maximum of 40ºC, when a longer period of exposure is required. This
temperature limit also applies to slide drying, where it is recommended that slides are either
dried slowly at very low temperatures on a hotplate (Lentfer, pers comm. 2008), or covered at
room temperature (Coil et al. 2003; Kortanje 2003).
Variation within processing protocols also reflects the type and contents of the
sediments that are being processed. Some chemicals such as hydrogen peroxide are useful
oxidising chemicals to disaggregate sediments high in clay or organic content, or charred
residues (Crowther 2009; Lentfer and Therin 2006). Calgon is also often used as a deflocculant
to separate clay particles. Where these are not required, many protocols simply use heavy liquid
flotation and sieving to separate starch from sediments (Atchison and Fullagar 1998; Barton et
al. 1998; Fullagar et al. 1998; Messner 2011; Therin et al. 1999; Therin 1994). Many
researchers are also quick to point out that techniques are often only in early stages of
development and so protocols are only broad outlines of principles rather than definitive
methodologies (Fullagar et al. 1998; Korstanje 2003; Therin et al. 1999). Protocols for starch
extraction must constantly be updated in light of new data about starch modification that is
produced both in the food sciences and archaeobotany. Microwave extraction is a new technique
that is currently being tested, especially where fast results are required (Parr 2002, 2006), and
involves the pressurization and digestion of organic material within the microwave before
sieving to capture microfossils.
48
Chapter 4 Reviewing Parenchyma
The analysis of archaeological parenchyma (or charred vegetative storage tissues) has been
under-researched within archaeobotany due to a prevailing view that these remains do not
preserve in tropical conditions. Where these remains are preserved in archaeological contexts,
they can be extracted through a combination of excavation and flotation practices. When
analysed, these data can then provide information upon the diet and subsistence practices of
prehistoric cultures that utilise root and tuber crops, such as those in the Pacific. Additionally,
the presence of charred parenchyma can be used to infer inter- and intra-site function involving
food processing and cooking areas, and also the timing and geographic range of crop dispersal
and population migration. Hather (2000) in his seminal guide suggests compiling a comparative
collection of relevant domestic and wild species, in the form of both histological thin sections
and experimentally charred samples that should be analysed using Scanning Electron
Microscopy (SEM).
Fresh and charred parenchyma morphology
Few archaeobotanical studies have sought to establish the range of morphological
characteristics of vegetative storage parenchyma that are distinctive at various taxonomic levels.
Most of what is currently known has been sourced from biology and agricultural sciences.
Histological thin sectioning and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) have enabled gross
morphology and anatomical characteristics of plant roots and tubers to be studied in detail, and
have been replicated by archaeobotanists. Basic anatomical characteristics can be divided into
those observed in root-derived tissues and those from stem-derived tissues (Hather 2000; Lebot
2009). A root is the underground portion of the main axis of the plant or branches of the axis,
while a stem is the portion of the main axis or branch that is leaf and flower-bearing (Pearsall
2010:153). When stems occur underground, such as corms and stem tubers, they retain many of
the anatomical leaf-bearing features including buds and internodes (2010:153; Pate and Dixon
1982:14-21). In contrast, roots lack these gross morphological features. Primary root tissues
within dicotyledons and monocotyledons share many morphological similarities (Barlow 1987;
Hather 2000:61). A central stele contains the vascular tissues of the phloem, xylem and the
vascular cambium surrounded by a layer of endodermis and pericycle enclosed within the outer
cortex and epidermis. Secondary root cellular structure in gymnosperms and dicotyledons
displays secondary growth within the secondary vascular tissues of the phloem and xylem
originating from the vascular cambium, and a periderm originating from an outer cork cambium
(Hather 2000: 61; Pearsall 2010:153). Monocotyledons do not exhibit secondary root growth.
Stem tissues contrast with roots, consisting of a much simpler anatomy. An outer epidermis
surrounds a region of ground tissue or cortical parenchyma, through which runs vascular tissues
and the stele (Hather 2000:49). Within these broad anatomical distinctions, taxa differ
49
morphologically due to the function and growth context of these various tissues. Cell shape,
size, wall characteristics, and arrangement within the ground and vascular tissues vary across
taxonomic levels, along with the arrangement of vascular tissues and cavities within the stele
(Hather 2000; Pearsall 2010:158). Patterns of tertiary growth can also differ, sometimes even at
the level of individual plants due to localised environmental conditions.
Archaeobotanists by necessity must take these morphological analyses a step further to
compare fresh and unaltered parenchymatous tissues with experimentally charred material that
is more likely to resemble the preserved botanical remains found in archaeological contexts. A
small number of studies have attempted to replicate archaeological charring conditions through
the use of muffle furnaces or experimental hearths (Hather 1993, 1994a, 1994b, 2000; Mason et
al. 1994; Oliveira 2008, 2012; Paz 2001; Pryor et al. 2013). Samples of vegetative storage
parenchyma from species that had geographic ranges pertinent to the locations of archaeological
projects were selected, charred under various conditions and then observed using combinations
of light microscopy and SEM. Many distinctive changes in morphology were noted; particularly
where samples were charred from fresh state and so still had high moisture content, as opposed
to being dried prior to exposure to heat (Hather 1994a, 1994b, 2000; Paz 2001).
Alterations of vegetative storage tissues occur during charring or desiccation, but vary
according to charring conditions. Variables such as temperature, period of exposure to heat and
oxidising conditions (such as immersion in substrate) can create further modification of tissue
morphology (Hather 1991:663; Hather 1993; Pearsall 2010). Features such as the creation of
tension fractures and vesicles, the deterioration and subsequent transformation of the phloem
into cavities or solid carbon, and modification of cell characteristics such as wall thickening and
compression can alter the original morphology of roots and tubers (Hather 1991:3-8, Paz
2001:88-105). Tension fractures are caused by the ripping apart of tissues along lines of
weakness, while vesicles are created through the dissipation of steam within the tissue (Hather
1994a:54). Lignified tissues such as the xylem are generally preserved during charring, but the
living tissues within the ground tissue and the phloem are either altered or completely
breakdown. The water content of tissues prior to charring can significantly increase the extent to
which these tissues are altered or damaged (Hather 1993:3). It is important that the nature and
scope of these changes is understood when attempting to identify unknown botanical remains
extracted from archaeological or palaeoenvironmental contexts.
Taphonomic factors affecting macrobotanical preservation
Unlike the analysis of starch granules within archaeological and palaeoenvironmental contexts,
the taphonomy of vegetative storage parenchyma is poorly known. This is a direct result of the
lack of archaeobotanical projects targeting the charred remains of these relatively soft tissues
under the presumption that preservation will be low or non-existent. Conditions for preservation
50
of parenchyma are primarily limited to those that either desiccate, water-log or char these
botanical remains (Hather 1991, 1992, 1994, 2000). Another less common form of preservation
includes mineralised or semi-mineralised remains that are either impregnated or coated by semi-
crystalline minerals that protect the soft tissues from fast decay (Paz 2001:40). While wood
charcoal and seeds may change little on preservation (unless compressed), vegetative storage
tissues tend to undergo a number of physical transformations (Hather 1991:662). This is because
roots and tubers have a higher proportion of parenchyma tissues and a smaller portion of cells
with lignified walls than stem wood (Pearsall 2010:161). Experimental charring has emphasised
the nature of some of these changes which include expansion or shrinkage of tissues, the
deterioration or loss of more fragile regions, and fragmentation (Hather 2000:74, 1991:662-3).
The paucity of root and tuber macro-remains in archaeological sites is often directly
related to how these resources are processed and used. As these are generally sources of food
the only part of the organ that often remains is the peel (Allen 1983; Kahn and Ragone 2013;
Pearsall 2010:154). Some root peelings are tough and fibrous but others have periderms that
decay relatively quickly and are very fragile if charred. Other aspects of the biology of roots and
tubers also make any preservation unlikely. For example, if these organs are dropped or
discarded by humans they are often scavenged by animals or are susceptible to agents of decay
due to the high calorific value and moisture content (Holden et al. 1995:777). High moisture
content also makes these organs prone to distortion and fragmentation if exposed to heat,
especially once charred (Holden et al. 1995:777; Pearsall 2010:157). Those fragments or whole
organs of vegetative storage parenchyma that do preserve are most likely roots and tubers that
have been discarded into the fire as spoiled goods or accidentally charred during roasting
(2010:157). Ethnoarchaeological observation in the Philippines has confirmed these as possible
cultural taphonomic processes that enable charred parenchyma to enter the archaeological
record (Paz 2001:80). Charcoal is formed in the reducing conditions within the ash in the base
of a fire or hearth, rather than the oxidising conditions of the open flame which eventually
reduces tissue to ash. Some small dense fragments of tissue can fall through the structure of the
fire into the ash and transform into preserved charcoal (Hather 1991:663).
Hather warns that quantification of taxa within preserved parenchyma is unlikely to
result in meaningful interpretation because the cultural and taphonomic processes affecting the
conditions of preservation are largely unknown (Hather 2000:74). However, it is possible to
utilise some of the current data about macrobotanical preservation and post-depositional
processes derived from studies of wood charcoal or anthracology. Thery-Parisot and others
(2010) describe the range of ‘filters’ that botanical remains will pass through before being
incorporated into palaeoenvironmental or archaeobotanical reconstructions. These include
societal filters such as selection, hearth maintenance and storage; combustion filters such as
anatomical changes and differential fragmentation; depositional and post-depositional filters
51
include anthropogenic factors, mechanical factors and diagenesis; and archaeological or
anthrocological filters including sampling, identification and quantification (Thery- Parisot et al.
2010:143). Post-depositional filters can be broken down into specific cultural processes such as
trampling, re-working and sweeping, and natural taphonomic agents such as bioturbation,
atmospheric factors, mechanical constraints that cause pressure or friction in the sediments and
can induce chemical alteration, water and the pH of soils (Thery-Parisot et al. 2010:147-150).
Where these process act homogenously within a particular context, they will not affect the
palaeoecological signature, but this is rare and differential preservation can often be observed
within these records.
These post-depositional processes can lead to vertical and horizontal migration of
remains as well as fragmentation and disappearance (Paz 2001, 2005; Oliveira 2008; Hather
1994, 1995). Nelson (1992) and Greenlee (1992) assessed the nature of downward displacement
of macrobotanical remains within shell midden contexts. Each argues that the ratio of shell to
soil matrix will affect the porosity of the midden, and thus also the amount of movement that is
possible (Greenlee 1992:262; Nelson 1992:254). As a general rule, particles smaller than 2mm
are most susceptible to movement through mechanical processes, as well as bioturbation by
roots, earthworms and burrowing animals (Nelson 1992:254; Thery-Parisot et al. 2010:147).
Paz (2001) also explores the role that soil matrix can play in the preservation and movement of
macrobotanical remains. He argues that the compaction of clay soils inhibit matrix mixing
except where bioturbation has occurred, but agrees with Nelson (1992) and Greenlee (1992) that
the porosity of shell midden and also sandy deposits allow greater degrees of turbation and
downward displacement (Paz 2001:40).
Questions of context security can also be addressed through assessment of the forms
and taxa of preserved macrobotanical remains within a given strata. Purely charred remains can
be considered reasonably representative of an in situ deposit, especially where upper layers do
not contain any untransformed or intrusive remains that have not undergone charring,
desiccation, water-logging or mineralisation (Paz 2001:262). Where downward percolation has
occurred, the distribution of seeds and small charcoal should be indicative of this movement,
with greater densities of remains in lower levels of particular deposits or facies within shell
middens (Nelson 1992:243). Post-depositional homogenisation by chemical processes such as
prolonged submersion in brackish groundwater can also occur and mask variability in separate
and disparate depositional events (Nelson 1992:251). These studies argue that by assessing the
context, sedimentary matrix, and nature of botanical remains, some natural and cultural post-
depositional taphonomic processes can be recognised and incorporated into the interpretation of
the archaeobotanical record.
52
Macrobotanical preservation within tropical climates like those in the Pacific is
generally thought to be poor. However, a number of archaeobotanical projects in the Asia-
Pacific region have proven that these conditions do not necessarily inhibit long term
preservation of soft tissues (Allen 1983; Barton and Paz 2007; Hather 1991, 1992, 1994a,
1994b, 1995; Paz 2001, 2005). Desiccated remains are rarely found unless in caves or rock-
shelters. Water-logged remains are a more common form of soft vegetative tissue recovered in
the region (Hather 1992:71). Anaerobic brackish lagoon settings have preserved large
assemblages of botanical remains within modern beach deposits formed by clay erosion. For
example nuts and other large seeds were preserved within these conditions at the site of
Talepakemalai on Eloaua Island in the Mussau Island group (Hather 1992; Kirch 1989). Charred
remains of roots, tubers, wood, seeds and nuts form the majority of preserved plant tissue found
in archaeological and palaeoenvironmental contexts. Within these remains, fruits, roots and
tubers are less common, but have been extracted and identified on a number of occasions within
rock shelter deposits (Hather and Kirch 1991; Oliveira 2008, 2012; Paz 2001), shell middens,
house floors (Coil and Kirch 2005; Kahn and Ragone 2013; Yen 1974) and dry sandy open sites
(Hather 1994).
Collection and sampling of parenchyma
Preserved vegetative storage parenchyma can be extracted from archaeological contexts using
established archaeobotanical methods for collection of macrobotanical remains. These usually
involve flotation, or wet or dry-sieving of excavated material, alongside collection of material in
situ (Hather 1994a; Pearsall 2010; Thompson 1994:14). Sieving involves the manual agitation
of material to loosen sedimentary aggregates and allow smaller particles to fall through the
various sized meshes, retaining a portion that contains botanical material (Hageman and
Goldstein 2009:2846).This separation is more effective and less biased than collection of
botanical material by eye during excavation. Dry-sieving is not always effective when
processing clay or silty sedimentary matrices, and so wet-sieving or flotation is more commonly
used in these circumstances. Wet-sieving utilises water to further breakdown tough aggregates
or sediments that have high clay content. Limiting factors affecting the effectiveness of dry or
wet-sieving techniques are the size of the mesh used which can bias the types of remains
collected, and the amount of force used to push material through the mesh can also damage or
fragment preserved botanical remains (Pearsall 2010:13).
Water flotation utilises differences in density of organic and inorganic material to
separate organic material such as charred botanical remains from the soil matrix. When carried
out on a large scale, this technique can separate much higher quantities and range of botanical
material than sieving alone (Pearsall 2010). Mechanical bulk flotation devices can be employed
to process large amounts of sediment where water is freely available or where equipment is
available for water recycling (Hageman and Goldstein 2009; Pearsall 2010); however, these
53
machines can increase the risk of charcoal fragmentation. These systems use flowing water to
break up sediments and release any charred botanical remains that have a specific gravity or are
less dense than water to float to the surface. The remains are caught in sieves with varying mesh
diameters to create flot fractions of different sizes (Pearsall 2010:50-52). Mechanical systems
are designed to limit the need for extra personnel to operate them, but must be overseen for
maintenance and to collect samples (Hageman and Goldstein 2009:2847-8). Bucket flotation is
often used where equipment and access to water is limited (Fairburn 2005b; Mason et al.1994;
Oliveira 2008; Paz 2001). These tub or bucket systems involve manual agitation of sediments,
with muslin cloth pegged into a bucket replacing sieves to catch botanical remains that are
decanted from the surface of the diluted sediment. Heavy residue remains in the bucket, which
is then either discarded or wet-sieved, to collect any remaining botanical or artefactual material.
Comparisons of the flotation techniques have demonstrated the effectiveness of the mechanical
systems (40-100%) over the bucket systems (6-100%) in terms of recovery rates (Wright 2005).
It has been argued by some archaeobotanists that dry-sieving is the most appropriate
technique for the separation of vegetative storage parenchyma due to the fragility of these soft
tissues when preserved in charred, desiccated or mineralised forms (Hather 2000:74). Other
studies have demonstrated that the utilisation of both sieving and flotation can result in the
recovery of increased quantities and also greater taxonomic diversity (Fairburn 2005b;
Hageman and Goldstein 2009). Both techniques have advantages in the separation of particular
types of botanical remains and specific taxa. Flotation enables the collection of material with
low specific gravities such as many seeds, while sieving can facilitate the collection of endocarp
and wood that is often too dense to be recovered through flotation. A combined approach is
essential when consideration is given to the fact that that different environmental conditions
during carbonisation can cause some botanical remains to vary in density, and thus affect the
odds of recovery through flotation (Wright 2005:24).
The selection of a sampling strategy can also influence the recovery of botanical
remains using techniques highlighted here. It is most often impractical to process all excavated
material from within large-scale projects for all size-classes of preserved botanical remains, and
an appropriate sampling regime must be chosen that enables the particular research questions to
be answered. Lennstrom and Hastorf (1995) caution against taking the ‘feature bias’ approach
that targets only features or areas of concentrated carbon, as it is just as relevant to discover
areas that do not contain botanical material. The most common macrobotanical sampling
techniques are the ‘blanket sampling’ strategy, whereby a sample is taken from every excavated
context and feature (Fairburn 2005b:10; Pearsall 2010:66-68). These include ‘scatter’ or
composite sampling where small amounts of matrix are gathered throughout a context and
combined in the same collection bag, where samples derive from a column or sequence of
deposits, and point bulk sampling of precisely located areas within a context (Pearsall 2010;
54
Wright 2005:20). Comparison of these techniques indicate that composite samples tend to
recover higher quantities and diversity of charred material, but had a smaller range of variability
within the density of material compared to point bulk sampling. Pearsall (2001:71) argues that
this indicates that scatter samples captures a greater range of actions and places within an
occupation level, but may also be a biased approach to sampling.
Sampling strategies involve the collection of a small amount of material considered
representative of a particular context, but the way and form in which the sample is measured can
also vary, and influence archaeobotanical interpretation. Sample size is usually measured by
weight or volume, although these can both be influenced by the amount of moisture within the
sedimentary matrix (Wright 2005:20). Even very small amounts of water can increase the
weight of soil, for example 1ml of water at 4ºC weighs 1g. Volume is often measured using a
calibrated bucket, but wet matrix can be harder to pack into these buckets and thus more
difficult to accurately measure. Wright (2005) demonstrated this difference in volume by also
comparing the types of sediment being measured when wet and dry or partially dried. Clay
sediments had an average increase in volume of 25%, while silty sediment only increased 9%
and sand was almost exactly the same, with an increase of only 1%. These results indicate that
consistency is required to ensure that sample sizes can be considered representative and are
comparable (Lennstrom and Hastorf 1995:705). Despite this, repeated wetting and drying of
samples is not recommended, as this can weaken the cellular structure of charred remains and
increase rates of fragmentation (Greenlee 1992; Hather 2000; Paz 2005).
Parenchyma identification
Researchers, both in the Pacific and elsewhere, targeting the extraction and identification of
vegetative storage tissues have emphasised the need to define the criteria upon which taxonomic
identification is based. At the most basic level, charred vegetative storage parenchymatous
tissues can be distinguished from wood charcoal based on several gross morphological and
anatomical characteristics (Hather 1991:673; 1993:3, 2000; Pearsall 2010). These include:
Fragments are often rounded in shape, unless recently fractured, as corners and
protruding tissues tend to be removed cell by cell.
Cells are mostly rounded in shape and more or less isodiametric in dimension, with very
few highly elongated cells resembling vessels or tracheids in wood.
The texture of parenchymatous tissues is usually dull but some areas will be dense and
reflective where vascular tissues or schlerenchyma has formed solid carbon.
Charred vegetative parenchymatous organs often contain regular or irregular cavities,
caused by the evaporation of moisture, that are identifiable under low power
microscopy.
55
Beyond these basic characteristics of charred vegetative parenchymatous tissues, the
preservation and size of fragments determine the level of taxonomic identification that can be
achieved. Archaeobotanists are currently divided over the diagnostic value of morphological
and anatomical characteristics, and how to define confidence in classifications based on these
attributes. Most agree that by studying the overall form of root and tuber material, external
characteristics, anatomical structure, and alteration of tissues through charring process, it is
often possible to identify archaeological material (Paz 2001; Pearsall 2010), but caution against
attempting precise identification on poorly preserved remains that lack features of diagnostic
value. Hather (2000:72-73) argues that for a character to be diagnostic within the scope of a
comparative collection, it should satisfy four conditions. Firstly, it should be common enough to
be found in all recovered fragments that have this characteristic. Secondly, it should be easily
observable and thus have survived preservation and post-depositional processes. Thirdly, it
should be a stable character that does not vary infraspecifically. Finally, the character should
vary between species or higher level taxonomic groups. High confidence identifications are not
usually based on single diagnostic characters; rather remains are classified using a range of
different attributes.
Pioneering research by Hather (1991, 1993, 2000) established the overall diagnostic
value of the morphological and anatomical components of roots and tubers through analysing
the rate of preservation, frequency of occurrence within an organ, stability and range of
variation of each. In general he argues that characters of the gross morphology and surface
features are rarely found on preserved fragments of parenchymatous tissues from roots and
tuber, unless these organs are small before charring (Hather 2000:73). However, when these are
present these are generally of high diagnostic value. Parenchyma and sclerenchyma cells usually
preserve relatively well, but the range of variation between these is often observed to be quite
low when comparing different taxonomic groups. Vascular tissues also preserve well except
within the secondary growth of roots, but in contrast to ground tissue, mostly varies between
species or higher taxonomic groups.
Paz (2001, 2005) takes these findings further by establishing the range of variation
within the periderm, examples of which have been recovered from several locations around the
Asia-Pacific region (as mentioned earlier), including within his own research. Importantly, Paz
also describes the specific criteria by which remains can be identified to plant taxon, specific
organ or as vegetative storage parenchyma (Paz 2001:82-85). For example, remains can be
identified to a particular taxonomic group if the fragments fit all or most of the features of a
reference species such as cell size, shape, the arrangement of vascular tissues, and crystal or
starch grain morphology (Paz 2001:82). Without preserved cellular structure with observable
shapes, walls, and vascular tissues, remains cannot be identifiable to species or any higher
taxonomic grouping with high confidence. Instead, prefixes such as ‘cf.’ or the suffix ‘type’ can
56
be used to indicate moderate confidence classifications. When these criteria are not met, these
can often still be identified morphologically and artefactually using characters of charring as
root or stem tubers (Paz 2001:83). Aside from morphological and anatomical characters, other
criteria include matching images, illustrations, local or regional flora citations, taxonomic
details of the species, and the geographic distribution of taxa (Paz 2001:71). These criteria
established by Paz for the identification of parenchyma have not been universally adopted by
other researchers, but Oliveira (2008, 2012) has used the same methodology in his research in
East Timor. These criteria were successful in aiding the identification of a number of economic
and supplementary crops within these locations.
57
Chapter 5 Comparative Collection and
Morphometric Studies of Pacific Cultigens
Chapters 3 and 4 of this thesis highlighted the issues and potential applications of starch and
parenchyma within archaeobotany in the Pacific. The biological features of these botanical
remains were outlined, which influence both taxonomic classification and also long term
preservation. Preservation of micro and macrobotanical remains particularly in tropical climates
was discussed, along with other taphonomic factors such as bioturbation and the effects of
cultural processes such as charring and boiling. A number of techniques for the extraction of
starch and parenchyma from sediments were also reviewed. These reviews influenced the
decision to establish a comprehensive reference collection for this study, which incorporated a
detailed morphometric study of both economic and supplementary species from the Kingdom of
Tonga.
Species selection
Ethnobotanical and historical resources were used as guides for the inclusion of species in the
modern comparative collection for this study. The list of crops recorded by early explorers and
missionaries such as Cook (1785), La Perouse (1788), La Billardiere (1793), Wilson (1799),
Mariner (in Martin 1991), Waldegrave (1873), Gifford (1929), Beaglehole and Beaglehole
(1941), and others on Tongatapu, is vital to the development of a comprehensive understanding
of late prehistoric and contact period agriculture in Tonga. Ethnobotanists have attempted to
assess the origins and dispersal of these plants in the Pacific for many years (Whistler 2009,
Yen 1974) and lists of endemic, native, and Polynesian or European introduced species within
Tonga are constantly evolving. An inclusive approach was taken in this study, and so sourced
many economic species that may have reached the Tongan archipelago. Other researchers have
established the value of using ethnographic data as a cautious analogy for the past (David and
Kramer 2001; Wylie 1985), and this information was used to develop an ethnographic baseline
for the development of a comprehensive comparative collection in this study.
Historical and contemporary sources indicate that prehistoric horticulture within the
Tongan archipelago was dominated in late prehistory by a small number of starch-rich crops for
the provision of crucial carbohydrates. The most important of these were a range of yams
(Dioscorea spp.), including D. nummularia, D. esculenta, D. alata, and D. bulbifera. Dryland
production of aroids such as Alocasia macrorrhiza, and Colocasia esculenta were seasonally
alternated with the production of yams within plantations, as was the planting of sweet potato
(Ipomoea batatas) in mounds. Arboricultural production of bananas (Musa spp.), breadfruit
(Artocarpus altilis) and the Tahitian chestnut (Inocarpus fagifer) was also an essential
agricultural component. Supplementary to these core species, was a range of alternative plants
58
that were either cultivated or utilised such as the Ambarella (Spondias dulcis), the elephant foot
yam (Amorphophallus campanulatus) and the Polynesian arrowroot (Tacca leontopetaloides).
These included a number of species that were also part of this transported landscape from
Wallacea and Southeast Asia, but others were native or endemic species that produced roots,
tubers, fruits and seeds that were either edible through processing, or used for other cultural
purposes (such as kava or Piper methysticum, and the fish-poison tree- Barringtonia asiatica).
Plant products fulfilled a number of vital roles within Polynesian society, and so the inclusion of
a range of species within the comparative collection for this study will shed light on the
antiquity of some of these practices with Tongan prehistory.
Field collection
The major portion of the comparative collection used in this study was collected from the island
of Taveuni in Fiji. Approximately 25 species were collected here, with another 15 species
collected in Tonga and Palau. Each vegetative storage organ of the plant was sampled. These
species included a range of both economic and supplementary plants. The comparative
collection built on an earlier range of economic species that had been compiled for the author’s
research in the Marquesas (Ussher 2009). Most islands in Polynesia share the core suite of crops
thought to have either been brought as part of the initial Lapita package (Kirch 1984; Green
1979) or through later migration and interaction, with some environmental restrictions upon
their production capacities. It is therefore relevant to include most of these species from Palau,
Fiji and the Marquesas, in addition to the Tongan specimens, within the comparative collection
for this study.
The major families collected included a range of aroids (Araceae), members of the
Dioscoraceae and Convolvulaceae family, and Moraceae. A survey of Taveuni was carried out
under the guidance of Botanist Bee Gun from the Crisp Lab at the Australian National
University. The help of Botanist and Ecologist, Dr Ann Kitalong, was enlisted in Palau to
survey areas in the Rock Islands and Babeldoab for cultivars. Local names of species were
recorded and used to source plants in communities and plantations. Voucher specimens were
collected for each species included in the reference collection, and are stored either at the
University of Auckland, or the National Herbarium in Canberra. These were air dried quickly
using dry heat in the field, stored within labelled folds of newspaper and compressed using a
wooden plant press (Prebble, pers comm. 2011). The dry heat prevented any mould from
developing upon the specimens from the humid tropical climate.
The organs sampled for starch were stored for transport within alcohol in order to
preserve the original structure (integrity) of the sample, and prevent decay. The samples were
then each labelled and sealed with masking tape to prevent leakage and evaporation during
transportation and storage until laboratory processing commenced back at the Australian
59
National University (ANU). A sample collection sheet was completed for each species,
including details about the geographic location of each plant, a plant morphological description,
and a more specific description of each of the organs sampled using current botanical
terminology. In addition to these specimens collected by the author, a selection of other
economic cultivars was included from a collection housed at the ANU by Douglas Yen.
Samples had been desiccated and powderised before being stored. The desiccated state of these
specimens meant that these could only be included in the starch component of the comparative
collection. Likewise, a number of charred specimens stored at the ANU by Jon Hather were
included in the parenchyma component of the comparative collection.
Laboratory processing of samples
Each of the samples collected in the field was first removed from their original containers and
put into a new sterilised vial with 70% Ethanol and 30% De-ionised water for storage until
further processing began. Each sample was then divided into four sub-samples to allow for
starch extraction, histological thin sectioning and experimental charring for parenchyma from
dried and fresh states.
Figure 5.1 Flowchart showing methodology for the imaging and recording of starch and parenchyma within
the reference collection
Starch processing
The starch samples were processed using a methodology established by Ussher (2009, 2012) in
creating a comparative collection for the Marquesan archipelago, and including methods
suggested in Field (2006). Two methods were used to extract starches from the parenchymatous
tissues of the vegetative organs sampled. The first of these were to simply cut a fresh section
from the organ and press that section onto the slide (Gott in Field 2006). The second was to
gently crush the sample in a mortar and pestle with some distilled water, and then put this
60
extracted residue onto a slide using a pipette (Lentfer, pers.com). The slide was then covered
with a Petri dish until the residue had dried. Glycerol was used as a permanent mountant, due to
the reflective and viscous properties of this compound which allows starch granules to be rolled
and viewed during light microscopy (Field 2006:112). Finally, each sample was covered with a
cover-slip and sealed with nail polish.
Histology
A histological thin section was made from each plant species and organ collected, to
demonstrate parenchymatous cell arrangement, structure and contents. The samples collected
were removed from the 70% Ethanol, and a small 1cm cubed fragment was taken from each
sample and placed into a mixture of 95% (70% dilution) alcohol, 1% glacial acetic acid, and 4%
formaldehyde. This fixative formula was recommended by Hather (2000:78) and is known as
FAA (Formalin-Acetic-Alcohol) (Miksche and Berlyn 1976:30). This fluid is stable, has a good
hardening action and material can be stored in it for years. The samples were left in the FAA
mix fixative for approximately two weeks, by which time the organs had soaked up the mixture
and partially solidified/preserved as dead plant tissue. This solution enabled greater precision
during microtomy to cut thin sections.
Thin sections were made by Anne Prins in the Histology Laboratory at the John Curtin
Medical Research Centre. Several methods for processing samples prior to microtomy were
tested. A white potato (Solanum tuberosum) was also preserved in the fixative formula, and then
used to experiment with microtomy and staining. The Standard Bouins Cycle technique was
applied to prepare the samples after they were placed into small histological baskets. This
technique involves several stages of soaking samples in varying percentages of ethanol warmed
to 40˚C, starting with 70% and finishing in 100%, then baths of chloroform at 40˚C and paraffin
wax at 60˚C. These were then placed in the microtome and cut into 5, 8, 12, 15 and 20µm thin
sections. Experimentation with the white potato indicated that the most appropriate section size
during microtomy was 15µm, as thinner sections tended to rip and thicker sections were
difficult to mount onto the slides. The paraffin embedded thin sections were then mounted on
heated slides and placed in xylol to dissolve the wax, and finally washed with 100%, 90% and
70% ethanol, and tap water prior to staining.
As part of the staining process the sections were treated with 3% glacial acetic acid for
three minutes, and then washed well with running tap water. The slides were then immersed in
Alcian Blue (1%) stain with a pH of 2.5 for 30 minutes, washed in running tap water again, and
finally immersed in a Safranin (0.02%) counter-stain for five minutes and then dehydrated.
After staining, the sections were blotted, allowed to air dry and cover-slipped with Leica
Micromount used as a permanent mountant.
61
The experimental thin sections were observed using light microscopy at x100 and x200
magnification. The cell walls were in good condition, and many starch granules were still
visible and displayed birefringence in some samples. The fact that starch was preserved in these
thin sections was surprising, as starch generally gelatinises at between 30-60˚C (Barton and
Torrence 2006). Here the starch was not only still in native condition, but also abundant within
the cell structures. It was therefore decided that the Paraffin embedded preparation was the most
appropriate for the remainder of the samples within the reference collection. The samples were
prepared in the same way as the experimental white potato and then analysed using light
microscopy in the Microscopy Laboratory in the Department of Archaeology and Natural
History at the ANU.
Experimental charring
To understand the morphological changes that occur during charring, plant materials within the
reference collection were experimentally charred in a muffle furnace. These samples were then
compared with the parenchyma cell organisation and structures observed in the thin sections.
Recommended temperatures and length of time for charring vary according to the type of plant
tissue, i.e. woody or non-woody tissue. Orvis and others (2005) suggest charring woody stem
material, soft-leaf tissue, needle-leaf tissue and monocot tissue at 550˚C for only eight to nine
minutes. Boardman and Jones (1990) tested a range of temperatures, times and atmospheric
conditions (oxidised or reduced). It was discovered that most plant components (granules,
glumes, rachis and straw) will carbonise after 1-2 hours at 300-250˚C, with greater distortion at
higher temperatures even within shorter time periods (1990:5-9). Similarly, Wright (2003)
experimented with charring achenes, kernels, seeds and rind segments of a variety of species.
Variables tested included thermal atmosphere, temperature, duration and moisture content.
Overall, some generalities could be made regarding the carbonisation process including that the
higher the temperature, and longer the exposure, the more likely the specimen will ash rather
than carbonise, and that moist specimens generally survived oxidation better than dry samples.
Finally, a reducing atmosphere was more conducive to preservation by carbonisation than
oxidation (2003:582). The results of these previous studies were used to determine the
techniques used within the current research.
Two small 1cm cubed samples were cut from the remaining plant material for each
sample, and wrapped in tin foil. One sub-sample of each sample was placed into large tin trays,
and then put into an incubator at 60˚C for 48 hours to dry. The second sample was placed into a
pre-heated muffle furnace at 300˚C for 2 hours (Hather 2000:85), or until the samples had
turned to charcoal (Boardman and Jones 1990:3). They were then removed from the furnace and
cooled. Once dried, the remaining samples were also charred in the furnace. All samples were
then fractured to reveal a flat plane that could be viewed using Reflected light microscopy and
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) (Hather 2000:76).
62
Recording
Light microscopy
Starch
Light microscopy was used to view and record attributes of both starch residues and also
parenchymatous plant material in the comparative collection. A Leica DM6000 Compound
Transmitted Light Microscope was utilised to analyse the modern starch samples and record 18
attributes of 50 granules from each slides. Images of each grain were taken, and these were then
analysed using ImageJ software to measure specific attributes. These attributes included
maximum length, width, length of the extinction cross, distance between the hilum and end of
the grain, maximum distance between the arms of the cross, maximum angle of the cross, hilum
location, 3D shape, and presence of lamellae, a small or large vacuole, an equatorial groove,
compressed or discoid structure, multiple facets, flat facets, hilum fissures, raphides (calcium
oxalate crystals), and the style of extinction cross.
The inclusion of metric variables has been recommended by a number of previous
morphological studies including that by Torrence and others (2004), and more recently by
Wilson and colleagues (2010) in their study using image analysis to determine morphological
variety within native reference starch. Metric variables enable much greater differentiation
between taxa, and reduce observer bias during classification. Granules were viewed in both
brightfield and cross-polarised light, so that attributes of the extinction cross could be imaged
and recorded. The data collected during light microscopy was then entered into an Excel
database, with a spreadsheet created for each species and organ sampled.
Parenchyma The histological thin sections were also viewed using light microscopy. Both transverse and
longitudinal sections were imaged and attributes of the cell structure and arrangement were
recorded. These included descriptions of the boundary tissues such as the epidermis, periderm
and cortex, general ground or conjunctive tissues, as well as the vascular tissues. Cell
morphology was recorded through attributes such as cell length, width, shape and dimensions,
as well as cell contents and the presence of inter-cellular spaces. The arrangement and
organisation of vascular bundles were also recorded according to known typologies (Hather
2000). To gain representative samples of tissues, 40 cells from each species and organ, and five
vascular arrangements were measured and described. The images of the thin sections were
viewed and analysed using ImageJ software.
Scanning Electron Microscopy
High resolution, low voltage field emission scanning electron microscopy (HRLVFESEM) was
chosen as one method for the analysis and imaging of the charred parenchyma and starch
samples. This technology provides topographical contrast of small features that are only
63
minimally coated while charging is substantially decreased as a result of lowered beam energy
(Schatten 2008), creating a three-dimensional view of objects. Secondary emission (SE)
signaling was chosen as the amount of SE signal collected from each point is roughly
proportional to the angle between the viewing direction and the normal surface. This type of
image conveys a relatively accurate impression of sample surface topography to the human
brain (Pawley 2008), creating a detailed three-dimensional image of important morphological
features.
Sample preparation
The experimentally charred samples were carefully hand fractured to create a flat plane for
viewing cell structure and arrangement, then attached to an SEM stub using carbon tape. All
starch samples were processed in the following way. A small amount of crushed specimen was
mixed with distilled water onto a small circular glass cover-slip, which was then attached to the
stub using nail polish and left to dry. Carbon tape was placed over the edge of the cover-slip and
the sides of the SEM stub to create a path for the electrons to escape when the sample was
placed in the SEM chamber. All samples were sputter coated with platinum gold at 20
milliamps for 3 minutes to create a relatively even conductive coating for imaging and analysis.
Imaging
The Zeiss UltraPlus FESEM at the Centre for Advanced Microscopy at the ANU was then used
to image each sample at up to 10,000x magnification. A total of nine samples were able to be
placed in the chamber of the SEM at any one time. Each sample was targeted in turn and images
taken of the sample at various magnifications, with appropriate scales embedded. Lower
magnifications of 200-1000x were used to capture images of the cellular tissues and their
arrangements. Higher powered magnification was used to take high-resolution images of
cellular structure, cell contents, and modifications that occur during the charring process.
Imaging was affected by occasionally insufficient or uneven sputter coating of the sample
resulting in the charging of the electron beam which causes images to be blurred in areas. This
could not be avoided in some instances as re-coating with platinum gold would result in further
unevenness and charging. The resulting images of the starch and charred samples of
parenchyma were used to supplement the descriptions of morphology within the comparative
collection, and were vital towards enabling identification of unknown archaeological material in
Part Two of this thesis..
Morphology of native starch
Research within the food sciences has been investigating starch chemistry and physical
morphology for many years. The results of these studies have demonstrated that these aspects of
starch can vary at different taxonomic levels; however it is clear that many species contain a
number of starch morphotypes that are shared with other species (Banks and Greenwood 1975;
Crowther 2012; Henry et al. 2009; Nwokocha and Williams 2011; Parr 2002; Reichert 1913).
64
The compilation of a comprehensive reference collection including both economic and wild
starch-producing species is essential to identify starch preserved within archaeological contexts.
Understanding the characteristics that differentiate between starch morphology at species, genus
or family level, is the only means by which starch extracted from archaeological sediments or as
residues on tools can be securely identified.
Starch morphology
As mentioned previously, a range of starch attributes were analysed for all plant specimens in
the comparative collection. These included a combination of metric, nominal and binary
attributes. It became clear that each specimen (species or organ) contained a range of different
starch morphotypes. Sometimes as many as eight morphotypes were recorded within a single
sample. A signature type was usually present in each specimen and was recognised as being the
most diagnostic morphotype within the random 50 granules recorded. This may not necessarily
be the most commonly represented morphotype. It will be demonstrated here that there is a large
degree of morphological overlap between many specimens within the modern comparative
collection (see Table 5.3). Nonetheless, the identification of these signature types is essential for
establishing an explicit method for the taxonomic classification of unknown archaeological
starch granules.
Hilum features
The hilum is the point from which a starch granule grows and is thus the core of the granule
(Banks and Greenwood 1975). Due to the fact that the hilum is a fixed point on the granule, its
location appears to change as the granule is rolled and viewed from different angles. The hilum
can therefore be used as a point of orientation when describing the three-dimensional shape of
granules. A number of genetic modifications can alter the appearance of the hilum. Hila can
often be observed as a small or large vacuole, or as a fissure or crack on granules. In the
comparative collection developed for use for this study, a large range of specimens contained
starch with a vacuole at the hilum (see Table 5.1, Figure 5.2). Small vacuoles were recorded on
starch morphotypes within 18 specimens, and were commonly seen in 11 of these. All recorded
starch from Piper methysticum had small vacuoles. Conversely, small vacuoles were rare in
most of the Artocarpus and Dioscorea genera, as well as in the seeds of Barringtonia asiatica
and Pteridium sp. Large vacuoles were present in a much smaller number of specimens, and
were common in M. citrifolia and S. dulcis, but rarely observed in B. asiatica, Cyrtosperma
merkusii and Ipomoea polpha. The starch morphotypes of Spondias dulcis all had either a small
or large vacuole, indicating that these are diagnostic traits of starch from this species.
65
Figure 5.2 Diagram showing basic features of starch granule morphology
Fissuring at the hilum was also observed within 18 specimens in the comparative
collection. There are a range of different types of fissuring that can occur within starch (ICSN
2011), and a small number of these were present within the collected specimens. The most
common type was longitudinal fissuring, where the fissure extends along the long axis of the
grain. Nine specimens had granules with longitudinal fissuring, but it was only common in three
species, Amorphophallus paeoniifolius, Dioscorea rotundata and P. methysticum. Radial
fissuring was also identified. This is defined as fissuring that originates at the hilum and spreads
outwards to the margins (ICSN 2011; Reichert 1913), and was commonly recorded within two
species, Ipomoea polpha and Piper methysticum. Transverse fissuring extends at a right angle to
the long axis of the grain (ICSN 2011), and was observed in a total of five specimens (see Table
5.1). Both I. polpha and Spondias dulcis granules commonly feature this hilum type. Stellate
fissuring is another common type recorded within the comparative collection. These star-shaped
fissures were common in three species- I. polpha, P. methysticum and S. dulcis, and rare in
Artocarpus heterophyllus and Inocarpus fagifer.
Several other types of hilum fissuring were identified within a smaller range of species.
Oblique fissures are simple fissures that do not follow any particular axis on the grain (ICSN
2011, Reichert 1913) and were found commonly on granules from Dioscorea rotundata but
only very rarely on Solanum tuberosum. Irregular fissures are those that are uneven in geometry
and were observed on the starch of three specimens; however, this type was only common in I.
polpha and P. methysticum. The presence of a mesial cleft, a large, deep and variably ragged
interior crack that runs parallel to the long axis of the grain (ICSN 2011), was only noted in the
starch of P. methysticum. Likewise, branching fissures were only observed in S. dulcis. These
are fissures that feature subdivisions from the main branch. The final type of fissuring within the
comparative collection is actually classed as an ‘indentation’ at the hilum, and was observed
frequently in A. paeoniifolius but only rarely in I. fagifer.
66
Table 5.1 Hilum fissuring of reference species
Lamellae
Lamellae are the growth layers that begin forming at the hilum and disperse towards the
margins of the granule. These were ‘distinct’ in many large starch morphotypes deriving from
the Dioscorea genus including Dioscorea alata, Dioscorea bulbifera, Dioscorea nummularia,
Dioscorea pentaphylla, and Dioscorea rotundata. Distinct lamellae were also visible on all
recorded starch from Curcuma longa and most starch from Musa sp. 1. ‘Indistinct’ or less
prominent lamellae were observed on larger starch morphotypes from the fruit of Artocarpus
altilis, Horsfieldia palauensis, Ipomoea batatas, Ipomoea polpha and Musa sp.2 .Smaller starch
morphotypes, such as those seen within Alocasia macrorrhiza, Colocasia esculenta and
Dioscorea esculenta may have lamellae, but the limitation of light microscopy inhibit the ability
to view these features, and lamellae were also not often visible using SEM.
Three-dimensional shape
Two and three-dimensional shapes are commonly used to describe and discriminate between
starch morphotypes. In this study only three-dimensional (3D) shape was used as the granules
were rolled during light microscopy to optimise visualisation of all planes of the granules.
Fifteen different 3D shapes were observed within the comparative collection. These included a
variety of rounded shapes such as spherical, sub-spherical, ovate, ellipsoidal, sub-ovate,
pyriform (pear-shaped), reniform (kidney-shaped) and shapes with single or multiple facets such
as dome, hemispherical, prismatic, polyhedral, quadrangular, cylindrical, conical, and prismatic.
The nomenclature used to describe these shapes follow the International Code for Starch
Nomenclature (ICSN) compiled in 2011 with some modification.
Rounded granules were observed within 27 of the 29 specimens within the comparative
collection (see Table 5.2). The two species that did not have rounded starch morphotypes were
D. esculenta and C. longa. The most commonly observed shape was spherical or “…a sphere in
Longitudinal Radial Oblique
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius Artocarpus heterophyllus Dioscorea rotundata
Artocarpus altilis seed Barringtonia asiatica fruit Solanumtuberosum
Dioscorea nummularia Cyrtosperma merkusii
Dioscorea rotundata Dioscorea alata Indentation
Inocarpus fagifer seed Dioscorea bulbifera Amorphophallus paeoniifolius
Musa sp. 2 Ipomoea polpha Inocarpus fagifer seed
Piper methysticum Piper methysticum Transverse
Tacca leontopetaloides Barringtonia asiatica fruit
Xanthosoma sagittifolium Stellate Dioscorea rotundata
Irregular Artocarpus heterophyllus Ipomoea batatas
Cyrtosperma merkusii I.fagifer seed Ipomoea polpha
Ipomoea polpha Ipomoea polpha Spondias dulcis
Piper methysticum Piper methysticum Branching
Mesial cleft Spondias dulcis Spondias dulcis
Piper methysticum
67
which all radii are equal length.” (Reichert 1913), with a total of 22 specimens containing
starch that matched this description. Within these specimens were members of a range of
different families, and so there does not appear to be any diagnostic value in this shape for
taxonomic classification. Likewise, sub-spherical granules were present within 15 specimens
from the Anacardiaceae, Araceae, Convolvulaceae, Dioscoreaceae, Lecythidaceae, Moraceae,
Musaceae, and Solanaceae. These are spherical granules with some small degree of curvature or
are scalene, where all three main diameters are of unequal length. Also present in a large
percentage of the reference collection were elongated granules which tend to be high in amylase
(Gott et al. 2006). Ovate (n=16), subovate (n=2), and ellipsoidal (n=9) granules were commonly
observed within members of the Dioscoreaceae and Musaceae families. These are distinguished
from one another based on the diameter of the proximal, mesial and distal ends of the grain.
Ellipsoidal granules have both distal and proximal ends equal in size, while ovate granules tend
to be more egg-shaped with one end wider than the other. Sub-ovate are elongated granules with
the same variation as described for sub-spherical granules. Other variations to these rounded
granules included reniform or kidney-shaped granules, and pyriform or pear-shaped granules.
These differ from the sub-ovate and sub-spherical granules based on a larger degree of curvature
(reniform) and scalar width variation (pyriform). Pyriform granules were only recorded in those
specimens belonging to the genus Musa, while reniform granules were present in five different
specimens representing four different families including Dioscoreacae, Convolvulaceae,
Musaceae, and Solanaceae.
More angular starch shapes were also very common within the comparative collection.
Twenty eight of the 29 specimens had at least one angular morphotype. The only species that
did not was Dioscorea pentaphylla. These shapes vary in the nature and number of straight or
rounded sides (facets) that define the margins and diameters of the granules. Angular granules
have been formed in compound starch granules, where a number of granules are clustered
together within the parenchymatous cells, creating pressure facets. Single faceted 3D shapes
include dome and hemispherical granules, which are differentiated from one another based on
elongation. A domed granule is half an oval, while a hemispherical granule is half a sphere.
Domed granules were present in 12 specimens, while hemispherical granules were slightly more
common, being recorded within 15 specimens. Four of the five aroids, and both members of the
Artocarpus genera within the comparative collection contained hemispherical granules. The
remaining aroid, Xanthosoma sagittifolium, instead had dome-shaped granules. Some specimens
contained both shapes, including Artocarpus heterophyllus, Amorphophallus paeoniifolius, the
seeds of Barringtonia asiatica, Cyrtosperma merkusii, Morinda citrifolia and Piper
methysticum.
68
Table 5.2 Three-dimensional shapes of reference species
Multi-faceted angular shapes recorded included conical, cylindrical, polyhedral,
quadrangular, and prismatic. A number of specimens contained starch that could be described as
conical, having a flat circular base and a tapering top. These included Curcuma longa, most of
the members of the Dioscorea genus apart from D. pentaphylla which has more ovate granules,
both Musa spp., and Solanum tuberosum. Cylindrical granules fall part way between rounded
and angular, being described as having “…a circular base and top, both of equivalent size.”
(Reichert 1913). This shape was not commonly observed, and was present only in three
specimens. Four specimens contained granules that had six sides, with four being elongated, and
thus could be described as quadrangular. Within these four specimens, less than five of these
granules were observed. The most common multi-faceted angular shape by a significant margin
was polyhedral. Polyhedral granules are defined as “…having many faces that are not
necessarily of the same two dimensional shape.” (Reichert 1913). These were recorded in all of
the aroids, several members of the Dioscoreaceae family, and a range of other Monocots and
Eudicots totalling 15 specimens.
Dome Reniform
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius Ipomoea batatas Artocarpus heterophyllus Dioscorea nummularia
Artocarpus altilis fruit Inocarpus fagifer seed Amorphophallus paeoniifolius Dioscorea pentaphylla
Artocarpus altilis seed Ipomoea polpha Barringtonia asiatica fruit Ipomoea polpha
Artocarpus heterophyllus Morinda citrifolia fruit Barringtonia asiatica seed Musa sp. 1
Barringtonia asiatica fruit Musa sp. 1 Cyrtosperma merkusii Solanum tuberosum
Barringtonia asiatica seed Piper methysticum Horsfieldia palauensis
Colocasia esculenta Pteridium sp. Ipomoea polpha Sub-ovate
Cyrtosperma merkusii Spondias dulcis Morinda citrifolia fruit Musa sp. 1
Dioscorea nummularia Solanum tuberosum Musa sp. 1 Solanum tuberosum
Dioscorea pentaphylla Tacca leontopetaloides Piper methysticum
Horsfieldia palauensis Xanthosoma sagittifolium Pteridium sp.
Xanthosoma sagittifolium
Alocasia macrorrhiza Dioscorea rotundata Alocasia macrorrhiza Inocarpus fagifer seed
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius Horsfieldia palauensis Artocarpus altilis fruit Ipomoea polpha
Artocarpus altilis fruit Musa sp. 1 Artocarpus heterophyllus Musa sp. 1
Artocarpus altilis seed Musa sp. 2 Barringtonia asiatica fruit Musa sp. 2
Dioscorea alata Piper methysticum Barringtonia asiatica seed Piper methysticum
Dioscorea bulbifera Pteridium sp. Dioscorea bulbifera Spondias dulcis
Dioscorea nummularia Spondias dulcis Dioscorea rotundata Solanum tuberosum
Dioscorea pentaphylla Solanum tuberosum Ipomoea batatas
Alocasia macrorrhiza Dioscorea bulbifera Alocasia macrorrhiza Horsfieldia palauensis
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius Ipomoea batatas Amorphophallus paeoniifolius Ipomoea batatas
Artocarpus altilis fruit Inocarpus fagifer seed Artocarpus altilis fruit Inocarpus fagifer seed
Artocarpus altilis seed Morinda citrifolia fruit Artocarpus altilis seed Morinda citrifolia fruit
Artocarpus heterophyllus Piper methysticum Artocarpus heterophyllus Pteridium sp.
Barringtonia asiatica seed Spondias dulcis Colocasia esculenta Tacca leontopetaloides
Colocasia esculenta Tacca leontopetaloides Cyrtosperma merkusii Xanthosoma sagittifolium
Cyrtosperma merkusii Dioscorea esculenta
Ellipsoidal Conical Quadrangular Pyriform
Barringtonia asiatica fruit Curcuma longa Artocarpus altilis seed Musa sp. 1
Barringtonia asiatica seed Dioscorea alata Artocarpus heterophyllus Musa sp. 2
Dioscorea bulbifera Dioscorea bulbifera Dioscorea esculenta
Dioscorea nummularia Dioscorea nummularia Ipomoea polpha
Ipomoea polpha Dioscorea rotundata Cylindrical Prismatic
Musa sp. 1 Musa sp. 1 Musa sp. 2 Xanthosoma sagittifolium
Musa sp. 2 Musa sp. 2 Spondias dulcis
Pteridium sp. Solanum tuberosum Tacca leontopetaloides
Spherical
Ovate Sub-spherical
Hemispherical Polyhedral
69
Modifiers of shape
These three-dimensional shapes can be altered by several other morphological attributes.
Faceting was discussed above in terms of the development of overall shapes when granules are
formed in compound clusters. Sometimes these ‘pressure facets’ are minimal, and only create
slight impressions on the sides of granules. These granules are usually rounded in shape but
have one or two pressure facets on the margins. Additionally, some dome or hemispherical
granules can have an additional one to two pressure facets where these granules have been
formed in clusters of three granules. They still retain the shape of half a sphere or oval. These
types of pressure faceting are common in Amorphophallus paeoniifolius, Barringtonia asiatica,
Cyrtosperma merkusii, Inocarpus fagifer, Ipomoea batatas, Ipomoea polpha, and Piper
methysticum.
A small number of specimens within the comparative collection contained granules that
were ‘compressed’ so that the granules had a smaller dimension in one plane than the other.
These granules had to be consistently rolled to view this modification of shape in profile. Three
of the yams- Dioscorea alata, Dioscorea bulbifera, and Dioscorea rotundata, and a ginger-
Curcuma longa, all have conical or ovate starch granules that are frequently compressed. In
addition, both Musa spp. within the comparative collection also have compressed forms, but
these are less commonly observed than non-compressed granules. Equitorial grooves often
coincide with compressed granules or those that have uneven dimensions in different planes,
and can be seen as a fold that runs along the long axis of the granules when these are turned on
edge (ICSN 2011). This feature was common in Dioscorea rotundata and noted in Artocarpus
altilis, Amorphophallus paeoniifolius, Dioscorea alata and Piper methysticum.
Several shape modifications were restricted to only one or two particular specimens
within the comparative collection, and so can be considered diagnostic attributes of starch
morphotypes. The first of these were ‘projections’, which were defined as areas that extend
beyond the main surface of the grain (Reichert 1913), and were present on all recorded granules
from C. longa, and a small number of granules of Dioscorea pentaphylla. The conical starch
granules deriving from these specimens also had sharply tapering tips that differentiated these
from granules seen in other specimens. The starch of Morinda citrifolia were often noticeably
‘concave-convex’ where one side curves inward and the other curves outward (ICSN 2011),
creating a hollowed appearance. Finally, the conical starch of Dioscorea bulbifera each had a
distinctive ‘bend’ at the proximal end of the granule just below the hilum. This was sharper than
a ‘curve’ which is defined as a smooth bend in the form of the granule (Reichert 1913).
Granule length and width
The maximum length of starch granules is used by many starch analysts to identify unknown
archaeological starch as a univariate statistical technique within an assemblage-type approach
(Field et al. 2009; Therin et al. 1999). Following these studies, the range of granule lengths
70
within the comparative collection were analysed and compared as assemblages of each species
(see Figure 5.3). Most of the recorded starch within the comparative collection falls into the 8-
25µm range (86% of species), and due to the relatively narrow range there is a significant
amount of overlap between specimens. Only a small number of specimens have ranges that are
larger or smaller than this. Several of the yams, Dioscorea pentaphylla and Dioscorea
rotundata, as well as both Musa spp., Curcuma longa, Ipomoea polpha and Solanum tuberosum
all have maximum lengths that could exceed 40µm. Of these, the Dioscorea spp. are the only
specimens that have an average length above 40µm. Overall, Dioscorea pentaphylla has the
largest starch within the comparative collection, with an average length of 90µm, and a
maximum of 145µm and are therefore taxonomically distinctive. On the smaller end of the
spectrum, several specimens have starch morphotypes that can range below 8µm. These include
Artocarpus altilis seed and fruit, Artocarpus heterophyllus, Alocasia macrorrhiza, Colocasia
esculenta, Cyrtosperma merkusii, Dioscorea bulbifera, Dioscorea esculenta, Horsfieldia
palauensis, Inocarpus fagifer, Ipomoea batatas, Ipomoea polpha, Morinda citrifolia, Pteridium
sp., Tacca leontopetaloides and Xanthosoma sagittifolium. The only specimen to have the entire
range of maximum lengths below 8µm is C. esculenta, which has an average length of 4µm.
Despite this, this species cannot be distinguished from others solely on this attribute, as a
number of other specimens have overall ranges that overlap with Colocasia esculenta such as
Alocasia macrorrhiza and Artocarpus altilis.
A study of granule widths revealed that there is substantial variation in the comparative
collection based on this metric attribute. The starch of most taxa had widths between 7-19µm
(93% of species), which is marginally smaller than the range of starch lengths for most species.
However, unlike starch lengths, there is a greater number of specimens that contain starch
smaller or larger than this range (see Figure 5.4). Sixteen specimens have granules that range in
width above 19µm. Dioscorea pentaphylla is once again distinguishable by having the largest
starch granules in this second dimension. A total of 20 specimens contain starch morphotypes
that can range smaller than 7µm, but only six of these specimens have average widths below
this point. The smallest width range was recorded within the starch of Colocasia esculenta
which has a median of 4µm, and a total range of 2-7µm.
Clearly, there is a significant amount of overlap in these two variables in the
comparative collection. Only one specimen can be confidently distinguished from others based
on either of these variables. Dioscorea pentaphylla has starch that ranges larger in length and
width that any other specimens. On the smaller end of the spectrums for both widths and
lengths, C. esculenta consistently has the lowest medians for these attributes, but this species
still overlaps with the total range of others within the comparative collection. Therefore it is not
able to be distinguished solely on these attributes.
71
Other metric variables
In addition to maximum length and width, a number of other metric variables were measured on
all starch granules sampled from each species within the comparative collection. As mentioned
previously, these included the ‘length of the extinction cross’, ‘maximum distance between the
arms of the cross’, ‘distance between the hilum and the end of the granule’, and the ‘maximum
angle within the arms of the extinction cross’. Most of these measurements are not diagnostic of
species on its own when compared through univariate analyses of the starch assemblages in the
comparative collection. These are more relevant when considered in multivariate statistical
analyses as these dimensions are related to the three-dimensional shape and surface texture of
starch granules. Therefore several of these will not be explored here, but instead will be
compared as variables in the multivariate morphometric analysis later in this chapter.
Hilum position can be compared between specimens but only when this is considered as
a ratio between the ‘length’ and the ‘distance between the hilum and the end of the granule’ (see
Figure 5.5). This ratio enables statistical differentiation between starch that is centric (end-on)
or eccentric (side-on). Centric hila are those that have a ratio that falls between 0.5-0.6, meaning
that the hilum is close to the centre of the granule. These granules have been viewed and
recorded end-on. Eccentric hila are those that have a ratio falling in the range of 0.61-1, and
indicate that the granule has been viewed side-on. This is particularly relevant for granules that
vary in dimension across different planes such as ovate or conical granules. When the
distribution of these ranges is compared between specimens, it is clear that most sampled
granules from each specimen have been recorded in both centric and eccentric views. However
a number of specimens were primarily viewed side-on, including C. longa, D. alata, D.
bulbifera, D. nummularia, D. pentaphylla, D. rotundata, Musa spp., S. tuberosum and S. dulcis.
This is most likely a result of the ovate, sub-ovate or conical shape of these granules which
makes them hard or impossible to view completely end-on. Another 18 specimens were
primarily viewed end-on, and this is similarly a result of shape, but in this case granules are
mostly spherical or polygonal and so are even in length across all dimensions. These hilum
position ratios were used within the following multivariate statistical analysis to divide the
starch within the comparative collection into comparable datasets.
72
Figure 5.3 Box plot of starch granule lengths within reference collection
Figure 5.4 Box plot of starch granule widths within reference collection
73
Figure 5.5 Box plot of starch granule hilum position to length ratios within reference collection
74
Table 5.3 Summary of starch morphology within reference collection
Species Organ
Length
range
(µm)
Width
range
(µm)
Length to
hilum position
ratio range
3D shape Other features
Artocarpus altilis Fruit 5-12 3-12 0.5-0.6Hemispherical, ovate, polygonal,
spherical, sub-spherical
Small vacuole and flat single and multiple faceting common.
Equitorial grooves and lamellae rare.
Artocarpus altilis Seed 3-12 3-9 0.5-0.75Hemispherical, ovate, polygonal,
quadrangular, spherical
Flat and curved single and multiple faceting common. Small vacuoles
and longitudinal fissuring rare
Artocarpus
heterophyllusFruit 4-13 3-13 0.5-0.6
Dome, hemispherical, polygonal,
quadrangular, spherical, sub-
spherical
Flat and curved single and multiple faceting common. Small vacuoles
and stellate or radial fissuring rare
Alocasia macrorrhiza Corm 2-10 2-9 0.5-0.6Hemispherical, ovate, polygonal,
sub-spherical
Flat and curved single and multiple faceting common. Simple and
compound grains.
Amorphophallus
paeoniifoliusCorm 12-36 7-30 0.5-0.71
Dome, hemispherical, ovate,
polygonal, spherical
Flat and curved single and multiple faceting and longitudinal fissuring
or indentation common. Equitorial grooves rare. Simple and
compound grains.
Barringtonia asiatica Fruit 8-20 6-20 0.5-0.73Dome, ell ipsoidal, spherical, sub-
spherical
Flat and curved multiple faceting common. Curved single faceting,
large and small vacuoles and radial or transverse fissuring rare.
Barringtonia asiatica Seed 8-20 6-17 0.5-0.78
Dome, ell ipsoidal,
hemispherical, spherical, sub-
spherical
Small vacuole and flat and curved single and multiple faceting
common. Large vacuole rare.
Colocasia esculenta Corm 3-8 2-7 0.5-0.75Hemispherical, polygonal,
spherical, sub-spherical
Flat multiple and single faceting common. Simple and compound
grains.
Curcuma longa Rhizome 15-60 14-30 0.8-1 Conical All lenticular, lamellae, proximal protrusion and tapered tip.
Cyrtosperma merkusii Corm 5-26 5-26 0.5-0.6Dome, hemispherical, polygonal,
spherical
Small vacuole and flat and curved single and multiple faceting
common. Radial or irregular fissuring and large vacuole rare. Simple
and compound grains.
Dioscorea alata Root tuber 10-25 5-19 0.62-1 Conical, ovateCommonly lenticular and lamellae present. Equitorial groove, small
vacuole and radial fissuring rare.
Dioscorea bulbifera Aerial bulbil 5-30 4-26 0.62-0.96
Conical, hemispherical,
ell ipsoidal, ovate, sub-spherical,
triangular
Commonly lenticular or wedge-shaped, bent with flat multiple and
single faceting and lamellae present and rare radial fissuring.
Dioscorea esculenta Root tuber 3-13 3-11 0.5-0.75 Polygonal, quadrangularFlat and curved multiple and single faceting common. Simple and
compound grains.
Dioscorea
nummularia Root tuber 11-50 10-39 0.62-0.9
Conical, ell ipsoidal, kidney,
ovate, spherical
Lamellae and single flat faceting common. Multiple flat faceting, small
vacuole and longitudinal fissuring rare.
75
Species Organ
Length
range
(µm)
Width
range
(µm)
Length to
hilum position
ratio range
3D shape Other features
Dioscorea rotundata Root tuber 34-95 15-62 0.62-0.94 Conical, ovate, sub-sphericalLamellae present. Commonly lenticular with equitorial groove and
parallel fissuring. Small vacuole rare.
Horsfieldia
palauensis Nut 5-27 4-24 0.5-0.67
Dome, ovate, polygonal,
spherical
Small vacuole and flat multiple and single faceting common. Lamellae
rare.
Inocarpus fagifer Seed 6-21 6-19 0.5-0.6Hemispherical, polygonal,
spherical, sub-spherical
Small vacuole and flat multiple and single faceting common.
Longitudinal fissuring or indentation rare.
Ipomoea batatas Root tuber 4-17 4-16 0.5-0.6Hemispherical, polygonal,
spherical, sub-spherical
Small vacuole and flat and curved multiple and single faceting
common. Lamellae and transverse fissuring rare.
Ipomoea polpha Root tuber 7-51 7-46 0.5-0.73
Dome, ell ipsoidal,
hemispherical, kidney,
polygonal, quadrangular,
spherical, sub-spherical
Small vacuole and stellate, transverse, radial or irregular fissuring
common. Flat and curved multiple and single faceting, lamellae and
large vacuoles rare.
Morinda citrifolia Fruit 5-15 4-14 0.5-0.6Dome, hemispherical, polygonal,
spherical
Large vacuole, concave-convex and curved multiple and single faceting
common. Flat multiple and single faceting rare.
Musa sp. 1 Fruit 9-53 7-32 0.62-0.95
Conical, dome, ell ipsoidal,
kidney, ovate, pyriform,
spherical, sub-ovate, sub-
spherical
Lamellae, flat single faceting and lenticular shape rare.
Musa sp. 2 Fruit 8-61 6-48 0.62-0.92Conical, cylindrical, ell ipsoidal,
ovate, pyriform, sub-spherical
Lamellae and small vacuole common. Flat single faceting, longitudinal
fissuring and lenticular shape rare.
Piper methysticum Primary root 8-26 4-20 0.5-0.6Dome, hemispherical, ovate,
spherical, sub-spherical
Small vacuole present. Lamellae and longitudinal, stellate, irregular,
radial or mesial cleft fissuring common. Flat and curved multiple and
single faceting, lenticular shape, and equitorial groove rare.
Pteridium sp. Rhizome 4-13 3-11 0.5-0.6Dome, ell ipsoidal, ovate,
polygonal, spherical
Flat and curved single faceting common. Flat and curved multiple
faceting and small vacuole rare.
Solanum tuberosum Stem tuber 11-62 10-42 0.65-0.89Conical, kidney, ovate, spherical,
sub-ovate, sub-spherical
Lamellae present. Small vacuole common. Flat single faceting and
oblique fissuring rare.
Spondias dulcis Fruit 13-32 8-27 0.5-0.94Cylindrical, hemispherical,
ovate, spherical, subspherical
Small or large vacuole present. Lamellae and stellate, branching or
transverse fissuring common. Flat single faceting rare.
Tacca
leontopetaloides Stem tuber 4-20 3-17 0.5-0.67
Conical, cylindrical,
hemispherical, polygonal,
spherical
Flat and curved multiple and single faceting common. Longitudinal
fissuring rare. Simple and compound grains.
Xanthosoma
sagittifoliumCorm 4-13 3-12 0.5-0.6
Dome, polygonal, prismatic,
spherical
Flat and curved multiple and single faceting common. Longitudinal
fissuring rare. Simple and compound grains.
76
Multivariate statistical analysis of starch
Discriminant Function Analysis
Multivariate statistics in the form of Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) was used to
discriminate between starch morphotypes observed at various taxonomic levels within the
comparative collection used for this study. DFA is a form of linear discrimination where
classification is based on the probabilities of an individual granule coming from groups with
particular means and variances (Torrence et al. 2004). This method is naturally comparative,
where data regarding modern plant taxa for which the taxonomy is known, provides the basis
for making predictions about unknown or unclassified individuals (Kovarovic et al. 2011),
making this statistical technique ideal for morphometric comparisons here. DFA utilises
predictor variables to determine the linear dimensions along which known groups are best
separated (Tabachnick and Lidell 2007). A new set of variables, known as discriminant
functions, are derived from building linear combinations of the original variables that maximise
between within-group variance. The number of discriminant functions is equal to the number of
groups minus one, and unless there are fewer predictor variables than groups, they only account
for the variance which best discriminates groups according to that model. Other possible options
such as logistical discrimination and nearest neighbour make fewer or no assumptions of the
data, but do not allow ready interpretation of the results in terms of individual variables
(Drennan 1996; Torrence et al. 2004), which is important for this study.
Data was collected during light microscopy and subsequent image analysis, whereby 18
attributes of 50 granules per sample were recorded, formed the dataset for the DFA. Each grain
had been rolled to view the 3D shape, but the metric variables including length and width were
measured off a photograph taken at a particular orientation. The Excel reference database was
therefore divided into two based on the orientation or view (eccentric/side-on or centric/end-on)
through which each grain had been recorded.
Table 5.4 Description of metric and binary variables used during Discriminant Function Analysis
View Metric
Centric Length 3D Shape- dome/hemispherical Small vacuole at hilum
Width 3D Shape- ellipsoidal/ovate Multiple facetting
Length of cross 3D Shape- reniform Flat facetting
Maximum distance between arms of cross3D Shape- angular (polyhedral, prismatic,
quadrangular, hexagonal)Curved/rounded facetting
Maximum distance between hilum and end 3D shape- pyriform/subspherical Fissuring at hilum
Maximum angle of the cross 3D Shape- spherical Concave-convex
Equitorial groove Large vacuole at hilum
Lamellae
Eccentric Length 3D Shape- conical/triangular Lamellae
Width 3D Shape-cylindrical Vacuole at hilum
Length of cross 3D Shape- dome/hemispherical Multiple facetting
Maximum distance between arms of cross 3D Shape- ellipsoidal/ovoidal Flat facetting
Maximum distance between hilum and end 3D Shape- reniform Curved/rounded facetting
Maximum angle of the cross3D Shape- angular (polyhedral, prismatic,
quadrangular, hexagonal)Fissuring at hilum
3D Shape- spherical Large vacuole
3D Shape- subspherical/subovoidal Tapered tip
Compressed Bent
Equitorial groove
Binary (presence or absence)
77
In order to be able to combine the data recorded from the range of ordinal, binary and
nominal variables, the nominal (or discontinuous) variables were converted into a series of
binary attributes. Thus 3D shape was converted into 14 binary variables, and the style of the
extinction cross was converted into three binary variables, each indicating the presence or
absence of that particular shape or style for that grain. After this data manipulation, a total of 34
variables were included in the initial DFA datasets and outputs.
PAST statistical software was used to conduct the multivariate statistical analyses. To
set a baseline for subsequent dataset comparison, both reference databases were initially
combined and entered into the PAST software together. The DFA was run using linear
discrimination and a confusion matrix was constructed based on the ‘classifier’ output from this
function. Essentially the DFA used the attributes included in the dataset as a ‘learning sample’
to predict the classification of each starch grain, and to establish how well each species could be
re-classified back into its own grouping. The confusion matrix gave an overall percentage of
correct re-classifications for the dataset, which when both orientations were combined was
48.3%.
This figure is statistically quite low, and emphasised the need to attempt the division of
the reference collection according to orientation, so that starch would only be compared to other
granules recorded in the same view. Due to the three dimensional nature of starch granules,
granules can be imaged and recorded from many different angles. In order to establish some
consistency within the datasets, the orientation was decided according to an acceptable range of
length to hilum position ratios for eccentric and centric views. As discussed earlier, this ratio
was calculated for each reference starch grain by dividing the maximum distance between the
hilum and the end of the grain, by the total length of the grain. A centric or end-on grain could
have a ratio of 0.5-0.6, and an eccentric or side-on grain could have a ratio of 0.61-1.0. The
database was thus divided according to these ratio ranges. Each reference database was entered
into the software separately, and outputs created in the same manner as the combined dataset.
Within the eccentric (side-on) view, the confusion matrix calculated that the total percentage of
correct re-classifications for that view was 53.6%. The centric dataset had a total percentage of
34%.
Clearly, the starch morphotypes in the eccentric dataset are more easily discriminated
from each other than those in the centric dataset. To increase the percentage of correct re-
classifications within the centric dataset and thus ensure that the archaeological starch can be
more confidently classified using DFA, some changes were made to the variables included in
the datasets. The ‘loadings’ which outline the role of each variable towards discrimination
within the DFA for each dataset were reviewed, and decisions were made to remove or re-
arrange some binary categories. The DFA was run with these new datasets, and higher
78
percentages of successful reclassification of species were achieved within both the eccentric and
centric views. The final DFA were run based on these revised datasets. Overall, the percentage
of starch granules within the eccentric dataset that were correctly reclassified to species was
72.98%. Understanding these values was vital towards characterizing starch morphology at
species level. Plots were then created that visually demonstrated the ability to discriminate
between each of the species in each of the datasets (see Figure 5.6and Figure 5.7). . These also
indicated the amount of discrimination due to each of the first two canonical variates, which
form the axis for the plot.
Table 5.5 Species included in centric and eccentric datasets for Tongan analysis
The reference collection up until this point had included a number of species that have never
been recorded in Tonga, such as Ipomoea polpha and Dioscorea rotundata but which had been
included to further our understanding of starch morphology at genus level within the larger
comparative collection. Ultimately the point of this analysis is to classify archaeological starch
with a high degree of confidence, and the inclusion of these species was making the
discrimination between species in both views more difficult due to similarities between their
recorded starch morphology. Species were therefore restricted to those found in Tonga in late
prehistory and also common contaminants. The final species list to be used in Part Two of this
thesis for the identification of archaeological starch included fourteen species within the
eccentric dataset, and fifteen species in the centric dataset, but again these were not necessarily
the same species within both datasets. The overall success rates of correct reclassifications
within these new datasets were 68.4% for eccentric, and 56.7% for centric.
Eccentric Centric
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius Alocasia macrorrhiza
Artocarpus altilis Amorphophallus paeoniifolius
Barringtonia asiatica Artocarpus altilis
Colocasia esculenta Barringtonia asiatica
Curcuma longa Colocasia esculenta
Dioscorea alata Cytrosperma merkusii
Dioscorea bulbifera Dioscorea esculenta
Dioscorea esculenta Inocarpus fagifer
Dioscorea nummularia Ipomoea batatas
Dioscorea pentaphylla Morinda citrifolia
Musa spp. Piper methysticum
Solanum tuberosum Pteridium sp.
Spondias dulcis Spondias dulcis
Tacca leontopetaloides Tacca leontopetaloides
Xanthosoma sagittifolium
79
Figure 5.6 Plot showing discrimination of species within centric dataset according to first two canonical
variates
Figure 5.7 Plot showing discrimination of 15 species within eccentric dataset according to first two canonical
variates
Classification matrices
When the confusion matrices for each of the datasets are analysed, it becomes apparent that
some species contain starch morphotypes that are more distinctive than others. In the centric
dataset only eight of the 20 specimens had over 60% of granules correctly re-assigned. The
80
specimen with the highest percentage of correct re-assignments were Colocasia esculenta with
77%, followed closely by Inocarpus fagifer with 76%, Morinda citrifolia and Spondias dulcis
with 74%, Amorphophallus paeoniifolius with 72%, and Pteridium sp. with 71%. The
specimens that were the least able to be differentiated within the eccentric view (i.e. under 30%)
include Barringtonia asiatica seed (11%), Xanthosoma sagittifolium (24%), Artocarpus
heterophyllus (25%), and Artocarpus altilis seed (26%). As discussed previously, starch from
several species was more easily distinguished within the eccentric view, and 12 of the 19
specimens included in this dataset had over 60% of granules correctly re-assigned. Of these, two
specimens, C. esculenta and S. dulcis, had all recorded starch re-assigned to the original
specimens. Only slightly less successful than these was Curcuma longa with 98% and
Dioscorea rotundata with 94%. The specimens with the lowest percentages of correct re-
assignment within the eccentric dataset, and thus the least able to be differentiated using
attributes within the dataset are Dioscorea esculenta (24%) and Ipomoea polpha (30%).
Automated classification of granules of unknown origin
The multivariate statistical analysis fulfilled several goals within the morphological analysis of
the comparative collection. Firstly, the analysis emphasised those attributes that were most
useful towards discriminating between the starch morphotypes found in specimens included in
the comparative collection. Of the 21 variables compared within the centric dataset, and the 25
variables in the eccentric dataset, the metric variables consistently had the highest loadings. This
suggests that these attributes are an important source of morphological variation. Of these,
starch ‘length’ had the highest loading in the centric dataset, while ‘length of cross’ and
‘maximum distance between the arms of the cross’ had higher loadings within the first two
canonical variates in the eccentric dataset. Surprisingly all other attributes, such as categories of
three-dimensional shapes, contributed minimally to the differentiation of species within the
comparative collection which implies that these should not be heavily relied on for
identification of unknown granules. The automated classification of unknown granules using
DFA is a useful first step, but should be expressed with varying levels of confidence and
visually cross-checked before final confirmation of taxonomic identifications, as will be
explored in Part Two of this thesis.
81
Figure 5.8 Classification matrix for the overall centric dataset, showing highest discrimination of Colocasia
esculenta, Inocarpus fagifer, Morinda citrifolia and Spondias dulcis (species listed vertically in the first column
are the original species, and those listed horizontally in the top row are the species to which DFA classified
granules)
Figure 5.9 Classification matrix for the overall eccentric dataset, showing highest discrimination of Colocasia
esculenta, Curcuma longa, and Dioscorea pentaphylla (species listed vertically in the first column are the
original species, and those listed horizontally in the top row are the species to which DFA classified granules)
82
Morphology of vegetative storage parenchyma
Morphological analysis of fresh samples
Hather (1991, 2000) discriminates between the vegetative storage parenchyma that is found in
roots and tubers, and all other parenchymatous organs such as fruits, seeds, and nuts. He makes
this distinction because the function of these organs is to store reserve starch and carbohydrates
during photosynthesis for plants, and thus these organs share many similar morphological traits.
It is this storage function, and subsequent calorific and nutritional value, that led to the
development of many prehistoric subsistence strategies based upon the collection or cultivation
of these starchy organs (Barton and Paz 2007; Denham 2007b; Golson 2007; Holden, Hather
and Watson 1995).
In the comparative collection of modern parenchyma developed for this study, a number
of fruits and seeds were also included. The justification for these inclusions was that these
organs also often produce starch and other vitamins and minerals, and have been recorded in the
ethnographic record for Tonga (Beaglehole and Beaglehole 1941; Gifford 1929; Whistler 2009)
to supplement diets either on a regular basis or during times of famine. Fruits such as breadfruit
(Artocarpus altilis), the tropical almond (Inocarpus fagifer), and bananas (Musa spp.) were
grown bordering plantations of yams (Dioscorea spp.), aroids (Colocasia esculenta, Alocasia
macrorrhiza, Cyrtosperma merkusii), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), kava (Piper
methysticum) and arrowroot (Tacca leontopetaloides). Under the premise that these crops were
being processed and cooked in the same areas as the roots and tubers, it is possible that some
macro-remains of these organs may end up charred in hearths and were preserved in
archaeological contexts. This has been documented elsewhere in Polynesia by the recent find of
breadfruit in Tahiti (Kahn and Ragone 2013).
The organisation of tissues within fruits does differ from that of stem and root-derived
organs, and therefore they were described separately. The basic cell morphology and types of
boundary, ground and some vascular tissues were recorded for each sample of non-vegetative
storage parenchyma. Some similarities emerged such as the nature of the ground tissues and the
arrangement of vascular bundles where these were present within the organ. Most of the fruits
included in this study are Dicotyledons or Eudicotyledons, and thus have different anatomical
features from Monocotyledons which form the bulk of the species within the comparative
collection. This data thus provided a means of comparison with the stem and root-derived
organs. Here, fresh samples will be analysed using univariate and multivariate statistical
analyses to study parenchyma morphology, with a small study upon the changes that occur
during charring. These studies summarise the descriptions provided in Appendix A.
83
Ground tissue morphology
Some of the distinguishing features of parenchyma ground tissue are best described through
comparison of these tissues with hardwood. Some differences to wood charcoal include
consistent cell shapes that are usually rounded or angular; the presence of distinctive vascular
bundles or tissues, and there are usually very few rays dividing these tissues. When comparing
vegetative and non-vegetative storage parenchyma from within roots, tubers, fruits and seeds
with each other these morphological features need to be teased apart to allow identification of
charred material where possible.
As described above, 40 cells from each specimen were recorded to assess the
morphology of parenchymatous ground tissues within roots, tubers, fruits and seeds. The length
and width of each cell was recorded, along with cell shape (rounded, angular or rounded-
irregular), and cell dimensions (isodiametric or elongated). On top of these attributes of the
individual cells, some overall descriptions were made about the ground tissue. These included
the overall presence or absence of inter-cellular spaces, and the variety of cell contents that had
been preserved in the histological thin sections.
Most species contained ground tissue that were consistently either rounded (60%,
n=26), rounded-irregular (12%, n=5), or angular (21%, n=9); however a small percentage (7%,
n=3) had both rounded and angular cell shapes within the same specimen. These included
Artocarpus altilis, Colocasia esculenta, and Dioscorea alata, and interestingly these species do
not share any phenotypical or genotypical traits with one another aside from the fact that all
three specimens are types of starchy organs. These specimens represent a range of different
storage organs including a fruit (A. altilis), a corm (C. esculenta) and a tuber (D. alata). The
yams (Dioscoreaceae) are traditionally classified as root tubers; however the anatomy of these
organs is much closer to stem-derived tissue than true roots. Onwueme (1978) argues that the
yam tuber is “probably neither a root nor a stem structure. Rather it is a structure that
originates from the hypocotyls- the transition zone between the stem and the root”. With this in
mind, the attributes for describing stem anatomy have been used here for yams rather than root
anatomy, especially with regard to the arrangement of vascular tissues and overall tissue
organisation.
The ground tissues of the remaining yams (Dioscorea bulbifera, Dioscorea esculenta,
and Dioscorea nummularia) and the Polynesian arrowroot (Tacca leontopetaloides), which also
belongs to the Dioscoreaceae family, are all rounded in shape. Similarly, the remaining aroids
(Alocasia macrorrhiza, Cyrtosperma merkusii, and Xanthosoma sagittifolium) have rounded
cells within the ground tissues. Other starchy crops such as the bananas (Musa spp.), kava (P.
methysticum) and a type of ginger (Zingiberaceae sp.) contain more irregularly rounded cells
within the ground tissue. The majority of the Pteriodophytes or ferns have more angular shaped
cells, including Asplenium sp., Pteridium sp., and Todea sp. Similarly many of the fruits such as
84
Barringtonia asiatica, Barringtonia racemosa, Ficus tinctorius, Spondias dulcis, and Syzygium
malaccense have angular ground tissue cells.
Table 5.6 Ground tissue cell shapes of taxa in reference collection
The majority of specimens included in this analysis had ground tissue parenchyma cells
that were a mixture of elongated (greater in length than width) and broadly isodiametric
(roughly even in length and width) in dimension. These specimens with mixed dimensions
totalled 37 out of the full 43 specimens, equating to 86%. The remaining 14% (n=6) of
specimens had consistently broadly isodiametric cell dimensions. These included Barringtonia
asiatica fruit, Barringtonia racemosa seed, Dioscorea nummularia, Ficus copiosa, Saccharum
officinarum, and Xanthosoma sagittifolium, and represent a range of different plant families and
organ types. There does not appear to be any patterning that may suggest why this particular
range of specimens has solely isodiametric cells within the recorded random sample of ground
tissue recorded.
Table 5.7 Ground tissue cell dimensions of taxa in the reference collection
Rounded- irregular Angular
Artocarpus altilis seed Epipremnum pinnatum Musa sp. 1 Asplenium sp.
Alocasia macrorrhiza Ficus copiosa Musa sp. 2 Barringtonia asiatica fruit
Angiopteris sp. Inocarpus fagifer Piper methysticum Barringtonia racemosa seed
Asplenium sp. Morinda citrifolia Solanum tuberosum Ficus tinctorius
Araceae sp. Pangium edule Zingiberaceae sp. Ipomoea batatas
Barringtonia asiatica
seedPueraria lobata Pteridium sp.
Barringtonia racemosa
fruitSaccharum officinarum Spondias dulcis
Cordyline fruiticosa Pandanus tectorius Mixed Syzygium malaccense
Cyrtosperma merkusiiTabernaemontana
aurantiacaArtocarpus altilis fruit Todea sp.
Dioscorea bulbifera Tacca leontopetaloides Colocasia esculenta
Dioscorea esculenta Xanthosoma sagittifolium Dioscorea alata
Dioscorea nummularia Zingiberaceae sp.
Rounded
Isodiametric
Barringtonia asiatica fruit Artocarpus altilis seed Ipomoea batatas
Barringtonia racemosa seed Artocarpus altilis fruit Inocarpus fagifer
Dioscorea nummularia Alocasia macrorrhiza Morinda citrifolia
Ficus copiosa Angiopteris sp. Musa sp. 1
Saccharum officinarum Asplenium sp. Musa sp. 2
Xanthosoma sagittifolium Araceae sp. Pangium edule
Barringtonia asiatica seed Pueraria lobata
Barringtonia racemosa fruit Piper methysticum
Colocasia esculenta Pandanus tectorius
Cordyline fruiticosa Pteridium sp.
Cyrtosperma merkusii Spondias dulcis
Dioscorea alata Syzygium malaccense
Dioscorea bulbifera Solanum tuberosum
Dioscorea esculenta Tabernaemontana aurantiaca
Dioscorea nummularia Tacca leontopetaloides
Epipremnum pinnatum Todea sp.
Ficus tinctorius Zingiberaceae sp.
Mixed
85
The statistical analysis of cell lengths and widths points to a large degree of overlap in
these particular attributes of ground tissue morphology. Box plots were created using the PAST
statistical software to visually display the range of cell lengths and widths for each of the
specimens included in the modern comparative collection. Outliers were indicated within the
ranges of almost every species and organ, indicating that the random sample of 40 cells
recorded in this study may not fully represent the degree of variation within the ground tissue of
each specimen.
Despite this, the box plots demonstrate that most cell lengths within the comparative
collection fall into a range larger than 40µm and smaller than 160µm. A number of species have
cell lengths that could exceed 160µm, including Alocasia macrorrhiza, Angiopteris sp.,
Asplenium sp., Dioscorea alata, Dioscorea esculenta, Dioscorea nummularia, Ficus copiosa,
Ficus tinctorius, Ipomoea batatas, Musa sp. 2, Spondias dulcis, Solanum tuberosum, Tacca
leontopetaloides and Todea sp. The overall ranges of many of these species are very similar,
and therefore the diagnostic value of this attribute of ground tissue morphology is reduced. To
narrow this down further it may be more useful to consider the smaller number of species that
have cell lengths that can exceed 240µm. These include Angiopteris sp., Asplenium sp., D.
esculenta, D. nummularia and S. dulcis. The largest cells recorded within the comparative
collection are in the ground tissues of Asplenium sp. and D. esculenta, which both can exceed
320µm in length. On the smaller end of the spectrum, some specimens have cell lengths that can
range below 40µm such as the fruit of Artocarpus altilis and the stem of Saccharum
officinarum. The two samples of the fruit phalange of Pandanus tectorius, and the root tuber of
D. nummularia indicate that there can be some intra-species diversity in cell lengths, and
therefore this attribute of ground tissue morphology should be considered mostly undiagnostic
on its own.
All taxa within the reference collection have cell widths within the ground tissues that
can range between 30-120µm. However, just over a third of the specimens have cell width
ranges where the minimum widths are smaller than 30µm (37%, n=16). These include A. altilis
fruit, Araceae sp., B. asiatica fruit, B. racemosa seed, C. merkusii, F. copiosa, F. tinctorius, I.
fagifer, M. citrifolia, Musa sp. 1., Pangium edule, S. dulcis, Syzygium malaccense, S.
officinarum, and both Zingiber spp. The specimens that have ground tissue cell widths that
range above 120µm (35%, n=15) include Alocasia macrorrhiza, Angiopteris sp., Asplenium sp.,
D. alata, D. bulbifera, D. esculenta, D. nummularia, F. tinctorius, Musa sp.2, S. dulcis, S.
malaccense, S. tuberosum, T. leontopetaloides and Todea sp.. The largest cell widths by quite a
significant margin are those of D. esculenta, which range up to 230µm and so is a diagnostic
attribute of parenchyma from this species.
86
Considering the degree of overlap between specimens in the univariate analysis of each
of the recorded metric attributes, it was prudent to carry out a multivariate statistical study that
could assess the relationships between sets of attributes in the modern comparative collection. A
dataset was created in the PAST program that included the data of four attributes: cell lengths,
widths, shapes and dimension of 40 recorded ground tissue cells from each specimen. Cell
shape and dimensions were turned into nominal variables, with a number from 1-3 representing
each shape (rounded, rounded-irregular or angular) and 1-2 representing each type of dimension
(isodiametric or elongate).
DFA of the parenchyma attributes was carried out in the same way that the starch
samples were analysed. A confusion matrix was created, with a total of only 21.8% of the
recorded cells being correctly re-classified back into the original species. This figure is
statistically very low, indicating that the majority of modern specimens could not be easily
disciminated from one another based on these four attributes. Despite this, a small number of
specimens were able to be separated from the remaining groupings reasonably well. The most
easily discriminated was Musa sp. 1,which had a total of 78% correct reclassifications into
original species. Closely following this was Dioscorea esculenta with 73%. Several species
including the seed of Barringtonia racemosa (60%), and the fruit of Ficus copiosa (58%) had
over half of all the cells correctly reclassified. The outputs of the DFA complemented the
outcome of the univariate analysis, suggesting that there is substantial overlap within the
morphology of ground tissues of many of the specimens in the modern comparative collection.
Clearly some species will be more easily identified during the sorting of archaeological samples
based on the morphology of ground tissue, such as those that have cells larger than 160µm or
smaller than 40µm, those that have mixed cell shapes or consistently isodiametric cell
dimensions. The majority of cells do not fall within these ranges, and so other non-metric
attributes need to also be considered.
87
Figure 5.10 Box plot of parenchyma cell lengths of taxa in the reference collection
88
Figure 5.11 Box plot of parenchyma cell widths of taxa in the reference collection
89
Figure 5.12 Plot showing classification of parenchyma within reference collection using DFA
Other features of the ground tissue can include the presence of inter-cellular spaces,
sclerenchyma, collenchyma, fibre bundles, duct cavities and cell contents. These can also be
used to differentiate some species from one another. For example, both Musa sp. 1 and Musa sp
2. have duct cavities three to four cells long throughout the ground tissue that separate rows of
parenchymatous cells. These species also contain fibre bundles which are also common
throughout Zingiber spp., Asplenium sp., Cordyline fruticosa, Epipremnum pinnatum, and
Pandanus tectorius. Regions of sclerenchyma can be observed within the pith of the fruit of
Artocarpus altilis, Pangium edule, and Piper methysticum; while collenchmya forms the pith of
Angiopteris sp. Inter-cellular spaces are present in most ground tissues; however it is absent in
Dioscorea bulbifera, Pteridium sp., Spondias dulcis, Saccharum officinarum, and Solanum
tuberosum. Cell contents can include also raphides, starch granules, druses and other types of
crystals. Raphides are most commonly seen in aroids, but are also noticeable in the ground
tissue of Tacca leontopetaloides.
Vascular tissue morphology
The overall tissue organisation within the parenchyma of the modern specimens varies between
the root and stem-derived organs, and the fruits and seeds, alongside the typical anatomical
differences between Monocots and Dicots. The vascular tissues within these types of organs
therefore also vary. Bundles of vascular tissues are present in stem-derived organs, where the
phloem and xylem are either encircling or abutting one another. These bundles can be organised
within the organ in one of three ways: 1) Dictyostele, where the bundle is formed as a chamber
surrounding the pith and can be broken into segments; 2) Eustele, where bundles are arranged
concentrically as either primary or secondary tissues radiating from the pith; or 3) Atactostele,
where the bundles are organised seemingly haphazardly within the ground tissue of the organ.
90
The arrangement of the xylem and the phloem within the bundles can also be categorised into
morphological types. These include:
Amphivasal concentric— xylem completely encircles the phloem;
Amphivasal open ends— xylem almost completely encircles phloem apart from each
end of the bundle;
Amphivasal u-shaped-—xylem partially surrounds the phloem in a u-shape formation;
Amphicribal concentric— phloem completely encircles the xylem;
Amphicribal open ends— phloem almost completely encircles xylem apart from each
end of the bundle;
Amphicribal u-shaped— phloem partially surrounds the xylem in a u-shape formation
Open collateral- bundles of phloem and xylem abut one another with a region of
cambium between the two types of tissue;
Closed collateral- bundles of phloem and xylem abut one another with no region of
cambium between the two types of tissue;
Bicollateral—bundles of phloem and xylem abut one another with a region of cambium
between the two types of tissue, and another additional bundle of phloem or xylem is
present below this arrangement.
Figure 5.13 Description of vascular bundle arrangements within vegetative parenchyma (from Hather 2000)
When considering the stem-derived organs such as corms, rhizomes and stem tubers, it
is clear that the majority of vascular tissues are organised within an atactotstele morphology
(58%, n=11). Much smaller numbers are organised within a eustele (16%, n=3), or dictyostele
arrangement (26%, n=5). Those specimens that contain an atactostele arrangement of vascular
tissues tend to be corms and stem tubers of Monocots, while the dictyostele arrangement is most
91
common in the Pteriodophytes or fern rhizomes, and the eustele arrangement is commonly seen
in Dicots. When the arrangements of vascular tissues within these bundles are broken down into
their respective categories, further patterning becomes apparent. Some specimens did not have
visible or clear vascular tissues and so were not included in the below table (see Table 5.8).
All of the aroids (Araceae) assessed within this study have vascular bundles within an
atactostele pattern of stele organisation (as these are Monocots), and the vascular tissues are of
an amphivasal arrangement where the phloem is surrounded by the xylem. Colocasia esculenta
is the only aroid to contain two different types of amphivasal bundling, having both amphivasal
concentric and u-shaped. Both Alocasia macrorrhiza and Cyrtosperma merkusii have
amphivasal open-ended bundles, while Xanthosoma sagittifolium has bundles of amphivasal
concentric arrangement. Another family belonging to the Monocots are the yams
(Dioscoreaceae) and therefore have vascular bundles within an atactostele organisation;
however these tissues differ from those belonging to the aroids as they are all of collateral
bundling arrangement. Dioscorea alata and both samples of Dioscorea nummularia have
bundles of open collateral arrangement with a region of cambium between the vascular tissues,
while Dioscorea esculenta has closed collateral bundles without the layer of cambium. The only
species from Dioscoreaceae to have a bicollateral arrangement is Tacca leontopetaloides, but
outside this family Solanum tuberosum and Saccharum officinarum also contain bundles of this
arrangement. The two specimens belonging to the Zingiberaceae family both have vascular
tissues of amphicribal concentric arrangement where the xylem is surrounded the phloem.
Table 5.8 Vascular tissue arrangements of taxa in reference collection
Collateral Amphivasal Amphicribal
Dioscorea alata Alocasia macrorrhiza Zingiberaceae sp.
Dioscorea bulbifera Colocasia esculenta
Dioscorea esculenta Cordyline fruticosa Stem- Dictyostele
Dioscorea nummularia Cyrtosperma merkusii Angiopteris sp.
Tacca leontopetaloides Xanthosoma sagittifolium Asplenium sp.
Solanum tuberosum Epipremnum pinnatum Pteridium sp.
Saccharum officinarum Todea sp.
Collateral Amphicribal Unknown
Ficus copiosa Artocarpus altilis Pangium edule
Ficus copiosa Morinda citrifolia
Amphivasal Inocarpus fagifer Ficus tinctorius
Barringtonia asiatica Musa sp. 1
Barringtonia racemosa Musa sp. 2 Root
Pandanus tectorius Spondias dulcis Ipomoea batatas
Syzygium malaccense Pueraria lobata
Tabernaemontana aurantiaca Piper methysticum
Stem- Atactostele
Fruit
92
The arrangement of vascular tissues within the fruits can vary significantly between
samples. Where vascular bundles are present, these are not organised within an atactostele,
eustele or dictyostele arrangements, but depend on other anatomical features of the organs. The
arrangement of the tissues in the bundles is described, but not the overall organisation within the
fruit as these do not fit any of the morphological categories used previously. The main purpose
of including these samples is the description of basic cell and vascular morphology, in order to
explore some differences between these organs and vegetative storage parenchyma. Almost half
of the fruit specimens included within the comparative collection have vascular bundles of
amphicribal arrangement (47%, n=8). Within these are a number of specimens with amphicribal
concentric bundles including both Musa spp. and Tabernaemontana aurantiaca, and one
example of a specimen with amphicribal u-shaped in Artocarpus altilis. A different version of
amphicribal arrangement is seen in Syzygium malaccense where a stellate pattern of the xylem is
present. Both fruits of Barringtonia spp. and Pandanus tectorius contained amphivasal
concentric bundles. Finally, there is one specimen that contains vascular tissues with more than
one type of arrangement. Ficus copiosa has amphicribal concentric and u-shaped alongside
closed collateral bundles.
The true roots have vascular tissues that are regions of parenchyma within the stele and
cortex of the organs, and there is very little variation between Monocotyledons and
Dicotyledons. In primary root tissues, the cortex is often wide and the stele is central with very
little pith (Hather 2000:61). A region of endodermis and pericycle separate the cortex from the
stele, within which are alternate regions of phloem, xylem and cambium. The number of regions
of vascular tissues within the stele can be as few as two (diarch), three (triarch), four (tetrarch),
five (pentarch) or many (polyarch). Secondary root tissues have a different organisation of the
vascular tissues, where the cortex is shed and the stele expands to replace the ground tissue by
expanding centripetally to produce xylem and centrifugally to produce phloem and parenchyma.
The centre of the organ is therefore composed of xylem and the outer region is composed of
phloem and pericyclic parenchyma with a cambium separating these, and a periderm on the
external surface.
The root samples within the modern comparative collection have some variation within
the vascular tissues. The specimen of Pueraria lobata or Kudzu is a primary root tissue and has
a polyarch xylem organisation within the stele with many vessels. Kava (Piper methysticum)
root is a secondary structure that has many arms of fibre and xylem radiating from the pith, and
bundles of phloem in between these. Sweet potato or Ipomoea batatas has a typical vesicular
xylem that shows signs of anomalous tertiary growth next to vessels, surrounded by
parenchymatous phloem outside the cambium.
93
Having considered the nature of bundle arrangements, it became clear that a level of
overlap within the morphology of these vascular tissues exists. A univariate study of bundle
lengths was carried out to assess the potential role of this attribute in distinguishing between
species within the comparative collection. As demonstrated in the box and whisker plot (below,
see Figure 5.14), there is again significant overlap in the measured specimens, with the majority
of specimens falling into the 150-600µm range. However a number of species are smaller or
larger than this. Rather than comparing this attribute across the whole comparative collection, it
is more useful to consider each of the typologies for bundling morphology. When the range of
specimens containing each type of bundling arrangement is compared with one another, bundle
length becomes an important attribute in differentiating between them.
Within the atactostele collateral typology Dioscorea alata has statistically larger
bundles than the other five specimens. Where the other specimens have bundle lengths that
range between approximately 150-550µm, D. alata has a range from 250-890µm. On the
opposite end of the spectrum, Saccharum officinarum is the only specimen with this bundle
typology that also has bundles smaller than 150µm. It is harder to differentiate between the
specimens with atactostele amphivasal arrangement. There is overlap between the bundle length
ranges of all specimens apart from Xanthosoma sagittifolium which has the bundles that can be
smaller than 150µm, with a minimum size of 100µm. Both Zingiber spp. within the atactostele
amphicribal bundle typology have statistically different bundle length ranges. Zingiber sp.
(BG957) has a range from 300-450µm, while Zingiber sp. (EU008) has a range smaller than this
between 160-300µm.
The fruit specimens can also be differentiated based on the ranges of bundle lengths
within the bundle typologies. The specimens with amphivasal bundles have some overlap
between 210-750µm, but the box plot shows that there some specimens with smaller bundles
that can be differentiated from the others. Barringtonia asiatica has very little overlap with any
other species, with a range of 85-160µm which represents the smallest bundles in this
typological category. Slightly larger than this is Barringtonia racemosa, which has a range of
150-410µm and therefore can be identified based on bundle lengths from 160-210µm. The
remaining Pandanus spp. specimens within this bundle typology cannot be differentiated based
on bundle length. Amphicribal specimens have a much larger amount of overlap between the
bundle length ranges of specimens. At the smaller end of the spectrum, bundles smaller than
170µm can belong to either Artocarpus altilis or Musa sp. 1. Bundles larger than 620µm can
only belong to Musa sp. 2 according to these statistical ranges.
94
Figure 5.14 Box plot showing vascular bundle lengths within reference collection according to tissue
arrangement
Combining these two morphological attributes allows more accurate differentiation of
parenchyma in the comparative collection. For those specimens that had similar bundle lengths
to others with the same bundle typology, a multivariate approach was needed to further test
whether classification of unidentified samples is possible based on bundle morphology. This
multivariate statistical approach included an additional variable- bundle width- within a PAST
dataset and used the same DFA approach as that used to explore starch and parenchyma cell
morphology. First, individual datasets were created for the atactostele (stem-derived roots and
tubers) and the fruits so that these could be analysed separately. Two ordinal variables were
included- bundle length and width, and one nominal- bundle morphology.
The specimens within the atactostele bundle typology dataset had an overall correct
reclassification rate of 74.7%. A number of specimens had all five recorded bundles correctly
re-classified into the same specimen. These included Araceae (EU2012-08), Cordyline
fruticosa, Dioscorea esculenta, Saccharum officinarum, Tacca leontopetaloides, Xanthosoma
sagittifolium and Zingiber sp. Several others only had one bundle incorrectly classified, such as
Dioscorea nummularia, Epipremnum pinnatum and another Zingiber sp. Alocasia macrorrhiza,
Cyrtosperma merkusii, Dioscorea alata and X. sagittifolium all had 60% (n=3) of the five
bundles reclassified correctly, while the remaining two specimens had less than half of the
bundles correctly assigned and were not easily discriminated from the other specimens based on
95
these three attributes. The overall loadings from this analysis indicated that bundle length was
consistently the most diagnostic variable included in the dataset.
The confusion matrix constructed indicated that the specimens in fruit bundle
typologies were less able to be distinguished from one another based on bundle length, width
and arrangement, than the atactostele specimens. Overall, 70.2% of the bundles included in this
dataset were correctly reclassified to specimen of origin. As with the atactostele dataset, there
were a number of specimens that had all of the included bundles correctly re-assigned. These
specimens included Artocarpus altilis, Barringtonia asiatica, Musa sp.1, and Syzygium
malaccense. Several others had over half of the bundles correctly reclassified to original
species, including Musa sp. 2 and Pandanus tectorius with 80% correct. The outputs of using
DFA on this dataset indicate that these particular specimens are able to be differentiated from
the others within the dataset based on the three attributes for bundle morphology used here.
Bundle length was again shown to be the most diagnostic variable within the loadings for the
fruit dataset.
Consideration of the diagnostic value of these attributes within the atactostele and fruit
datasets separately is useful for discrimination when the arrangement of vascular bundles is
known; however when attempting to identify a fragment of archaeological parenchyma, the
overall arrangement is not always visible within that particular fragment. Considering this, the
value of bundle morphology in the dataset as a whole was assessed. The atactostele and fruit
datasets were combined and the DFA run again with the same three variables of bundle length,
width and arrangement. Overall, the percentage of correct re-classifications within this dataset
was 62.3%. Eight specimens had all five recorded bundles correctly re-assigned, including
Artocarpus altilis, Araceae sp., Barringtonia asiatica, Dioscorea esculenta, Musa sp. Syzygium
malaccense, Saccharum officinarum, and Tacca leontopetaloides. These were all specimens that
had 100% correct re-classifications within the separated datasets and so are easier to classify
when compared to the whole range of specimens with vascular bundling in the comparative
collection. Another five specimens had four out of the five bundles re-classified to the correct
specimen of origin. These included Cordyline fruticosa, Epipremnum pinnatum, Musa sp.2,
Pandanus tectorius and Zingiber sp. These and a further five specimens, Alocasia macrorrhiza,
Cyrtosperma merkusii, Xanthosoma sagittifolium, Zingiber sp. had over half of the included
vascular bundles allocated to the original specimen and could therefore be identified based on
these three attributes with a moderate level of confidence. The remaining seven species could
not be confidently differentiated from the other specimens included in the analysis. These
specimens include Barringtonia racemosa, Colocasia esculenta, Dioscorea alata, Dioscorea
nummularia, Ficus copiosa, Pandanus tectorius and Tabernaemontana aurantiaca.
96
Table 5.9 Summary of parenchyma morphology within reference collection
Species Organ Boundary tissue description
Cell
length
range
(µm)
Cell
width
range
(µm)
Ground tissue description
Vascular
bundle length
range (µm)
Vascular bundle
width range (µm)Vascular tissue description
Artocarpus altilis Fruit
Outer epidermis of 2-3 layers of thickened
radially organised rounded and isodiametric
cells.
40-60 30-40
Rounded and isodiametric, angular and
elongate, rounded and elongate. Inter-
cellular spaces.
100-600 70-280 Atactostele and amphicribal u-shaped.
Artocarpus altilis Seed
Outer thin epidermis composed of 1 layer of
radially organised rounded and isodiametric
cells with thickened cell walls.
60-80 50-65
Mostly rounded and isodiametric, some
elongate. Inter-cellular spaces. Pith of
sclerenchyma.
80-900 75-360 Atactostele and amphicribal concentric.
Alocasia macrorrhiza Corm
A layer of thick periderm. Cortex of c.20 rows
of angular and elongated cells with very thin
cell walls. Vascular cambium of 2 rows of
similar cells with thicker walls.
80-130 70-100Mostly rounded and isodiametric, some
elongate. Inter-cellular spaces. 300-560 200-450 Atactostele and amphicribal open-ended.
Angiopteris sp. Rhizome
Outer epidermis of 3 layers of radially
organised rounded and elongated cells with
thickened cell walls.
100-150 85-100Rounded and elongate, some
isodiametric. Inter-cellular spaces.Unmeasured Unmeasured Dictyostele.
Asplenium sp. 1 Rhizome
Outer epidermis of one layers of radially
organised angular and isodiametric cells with
thickened cell walls. Below this a broad region
of 7-8 rows of fibres.
55-80 45-70Rounded and isodiametric, some
elongate. Inter-cellular spaces.770-960 390-810 Dictyostele and amphicribal concentric.
Asplenium sp. 2 Rhizome
Outer epidermis of one layers of radially
organised angular and isodiametric cells with
thickened cell walls. Below this a broad region
of 7-8 rows of fibres.
115-175 90-130Angular and isodiametric or elongate.
Inter-cellular spaces.160-950 110-570 Dictyostele and amphicribal concentric.
Barringtonia asiatica Fruit
Outer epidermis of one layer of very small
radially organised rounded and isodiametric
cells with a thick outer cell wall. Below this a
row of palisade mesophyll cells.
55-105 40-75Angular and isodiametric. Inter-cellular
spaces.85-160 85-150 Eustele and amphivasal concentric.
Barringtonia asiatica Seed
Outer epidermis of one layers of very small
radially organised rounded and isodiametric
cells with thick cell walls. Two rows of
vascular cambium separates the cortex and
pith.
50-70 35-50Rounded and isodiametric, some
elongate. Inter-cellular spacesNot observed Not observed Not observed
Barringtonia racemosa Fruit
Thin epidermis of a single layer of angular
and elongated cells with thick cell walls.
Another possible 10 rows of rounded and
elongated cortical parenchyma below the
epidermis.
45-65 35-50Rounded and isodiametric, some
elongate. Inter-cellular spaces.150-400 110-300 Eustele and amphivasal concentric.
Barringtonia racemosa Seed
Outer epidermis of one layers of rounded and
isodiametric cells with a thick outer cell wall.
Two rows of very small angular and elongated
cells make up the vascular cambium which
separates the cortex and pith.
60-85 50-70Angular and isodiametric. Inter-cellular
spaces.Not observed Not observed Not observed
Colocasia esculenta Corm
Outer thickened epidermis composed of 3
layers. 20 rows of cortical parenchyma
angular and elongated with thin cell walls.
Two rows of angular and isodiametric cells
with thick cell walls make up the vascular
cambium.
70-100 50-75Rounded or angular and isodiametric or
elongate. Inter-cellular spaces.230-580 160-400
Atactostele and amphivasal concentric or
u-shaped.
97
Species Organ Boundary tissue description
Cell
length
range
(µm)
Cell
width
range
(µm)
Ground tissue description
Vascular
bundle length
range (µm)
Vascular bundle
width range (µm)Vascular tissue description
Cordyline fruticosa Root
Outer thickened epidermis and below this a
region of cortical parenchyma which is
rounded and isodiametric with thin cell walls.
55-75 40-55Angular and isodiametric or elongate.
Inter-cellular spaces.200-300 100-200
Atactostele and amphivasal concentric.
Fibre sheath.
Cyrtosperma merkusii Corm Not observed 40-80 30-50Rounded and elongate, some
isodiametric. Inter-cellular spaces.300-500 200-300µm Atactostele and amphivasal open-ended.
Dioscorea alata Root tuberEpidermis consisting of 4 layers of angular
and elongated cells with thick cell walls.80-110 50-75
Rounded and elongate or isodiametric,
some irregularly rounded and elongate.
Inter-cellular spaces.
230-880 85-340 Atactostele and closed collateral.
Dioscorea bulbiferaAerial
bulbil
One layer of thickened epidermis. A region of
vascular cambium of five rows of angular and
elongated cells.
95-130 75-100Rounded and isodiametric, some
elongate.Not observed Not observed Not observed
Dioscorea esculenta Root tuberEpidermal region of 3 layers of angular and
elongated cells.150-235 100-160
Rounded and isodiametric, some
elongate. Some inter-cellular spaces.150-380 80-240 Atactostele and closed collateral.
Dioscorea nummularia Root tuberThickened epidermis outside 5 rows of
angular and elongated cortical parenchyma.75-115 60-100
Rounded and isodiametric, some
elongate. Inter-cellular spaces.155-435 100-250 Atactostele and open or closed collateral.
Epipremnum pinnatum Corm
Thickened single-layer periderm above 5 rows
of angular and elongated primary cortical
parenchyma cells with thin cell walls. Another
five rows of similarly shaped cells compose a
region of secondary cortex. A row of vascular
cambium of one layer of rounded and
elongated cells.
70-95 50-70Rounded and isodiametric, some
elongate. Inter-cellular spaces.220-375 180-300 Eustele and amphivasal u-shaped.
Ficus copiosa Fruit Not observed 40-60 30-45Rounded and isodiametric. Inter-
cellular spaces.70-380 60-150
Eustele and closed collateral or
amphicribal u-shaped or concentric.
Ficus tinctorius Fruit Not observed 55-90 25-70Angular and isodiametric or elongate.
Inter-cellular spaces.Not observed Not observed Not observed
Ipomoea batatas Root tuber
A region of periderm of about 4 rows of
radially-orientated angular and isodiametric
cells with thin cell walls.
80-115 60-90
Region of parenchymous secondary
phloem outside the cambium. Angular
and isodiametric, some elongate.
Not applicable Not applicable
The parenchyma within the secondary
xylem same as phloem, regions of
anomalous tertiary growth adjacent to
individual vessels. Divide both
periclinally and tangentially to produce
concentric radiating rings of tertiary
xylem.
Inocarpus fagifer Seed
A layer of endocarp consists of a row of
angular and isodiametric cells with very thick
cell walls.
45-100 35-75Rounded and isodiametric, some
elongate.Unmeasured Unmeasured Atactostele and amphicribal u-shaped.
Morinda citrifolia Fruit Not observed 40-60 30-50Rounded and isodiametric, some
elongate.Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Musa sp. 1 Fruit Not observed 60-90 50-70
Irregularly rounded and isodiametric,
some elongate. Inter-cellular spaces and
duct cavities.
80-115 70-100 Eustele and amphicribal concentric.
Musa sp. 2 Fruit Not observed 73-215 46-170
Irregularly rounded and isodiametric,
some elongate. Inter-cellular spaces,
duct cavities and fibre bundles.
220-680 180-370 Eustele and amphicribal concentric.
98
Species Organ Boundary tissue description
Cell
length
range
(µm)
Cell
width
range
(µm)
Ground tissue description
Vascular
bundle length
range (µm)
Vascular bundle
width range (µm)Vascular tissue description
Pandanus tectorius Fruit
phalange
Epidermis of one row of thickened, rounded
and isodiametric cells. Below is one row of
similarly rounded and isodiametric cells with
slightly thinner cell walls.
60-100 40-70Rounded and isodiametric, some
elongate. Inter-cellular spaces.260-750 210-430
Atactostele and amphicribal concentric.
Concentrated near pith. Fibre sheath.
Pangium edule Fruit
Periderm made up of around 6 rows of
angular and elongated cells. Below is a region
of parenchyma interspersed with
sclerenchyma.
40-80 30-60Rounded and isodiametric, some
elongate. Inter-cellular spaces.Not applicable Not applicable
Xylem vessels are present near the pith of
the fruit.
Pueraria lobata Primary
root
Region of periderm of about 5 rows of angular
and isodiametric cells with thin cell walls. The
cambium separates the cortex from the stele,
and is composed of an endodermis and
pericyle of one row.
25-45 20-30Rounded and isodiametric, some
elongate. Inter-cellular spaces.Not applicable Not applicable
Secondary xylem same as those within the
phloem, however there are regions of
anomalous tertiary growth adjacent to
individual vessels. Polyarch xylem. Many
areas of tertiary xylem and phloem are
also present and are dissected by
medullary rays.
Piper methysticum Primary
root
Region of periderm of 3 rows of angular and
isodiametric cells that are thick walled.45-75 35-60
Rounded and isodiametric. Inter-
cellular spaces (pith).Not applicable Not applicable
Primary tissues made up of angular and
isodiametric cells with very few inter-
cellular spaces. Within this, wide
medullary rays made up of l igneous
fibres and also xylem vessels. Scanty
paratrachial to vasicentric layers of
xylem cells abut these rays and are
differentiated by thinner walls and more
angular shape. Bundles of phloem are
contained within these areas of xylem.
Exterior to the cambium are further
bundles of xylem within the
parenchymous tissues.
Pteridium sp. Rhizome Outer epidermis of around 3 layers of rounded
and elongated cells with thickened cell walls.80-115 65-90
Angular and elongate, some
isodiametric.Unmeasured Unmeasured Dictyostele.
Solanum tuberosum Stem tuber
Outer thickened epidermis, cortex consists of
about 4-5 rows of angular and elongate cells
with thinner walls. The vascular cambium is
two layers of angular cells.
90-130 70-100Irregularly rounded and elongate or
isodiametric.Unmeasured Unmeasured Atactostele and bicollateral.
Spondias dulcis Fruit
Outer thickened periderm, and a cortical
region of approximately 5-10 rows of rounded
and isodiametric cells with thick cell walls.
85-160 55-95Angular and elongate, some
isodiametric. Thin cell walls.280-400 140-240
Eustele and closed collateral or
amphicribal concentric.
Syzygium malaccense Fruit
Thin epidermis of a single row of angular and
elongated cells, with a thicker exterior wall.
Several rows of small cells that are angular in
shape and more isodiametric in dimension
are below this within the cortex
75-120 45-85Angular and elongate, some
isodiametric. Few inter-cellular spaces.250-620 150-330
Eustele and amphicribal stellate with
polyarch xylem inside bundle.
Tabernaemontana
aurantiaca Fruit
Epidermis a single row of tangentially
flattened angular and elongated cells35-60 25-40
Rounded and elongate or isodiametric.
Inter-cellular spaces.175-370 100-230 Eustele and amphicribal concentric.
99
Species Organ Boundary tissue description
Cell
length
range
(µm)
Cell
width
range
(µm)
Ground tissue description
Vascular
bundle length
range (µm)
Vascular bundle
width range (µm)Vascular tissue description
Tacca leontopetaloides Stem tuber
Periderm of 3 rows of r angular and elongated
cells with thin cell walls, with the outermost
row having a thicker external wall
70-100 60-80Rounded and isodiametric, some
elongate. Inter-cellular spaces250-530 100-270 Atactostele and bicollateral.
Todea sp. Rhizome
Outer epidermis of one layers of angular and
isodiametric cells with thickened cell walls.
Below is a broad region of fibres.
75-135 60-105Angular and isodiametric, some
elongate.Unmeasured Unmeasured Dictyostele.
Xanthosoma
sagittifolium Corm
Periderm of 4 rows of angular and
isodiametric cells with thin cell walls, with
the outermost row having a thicker external
wall.
55-80 50-60Rounded and isodiametric. Inter-
cellular spaces.90-270 80-230
Atactostele and amphivasal concentric.
Fibre sheath.
Zingiberaceae sp. 1Primary
root
Thickened periderm with around 10 rows of
thick walled cells that are rounded and
broadly isodiametric in dimension.
55-80 50-60Irregularly rounded and isodiametric or
elongate. Inter-cellular spaces.296-447 240-352
Eustele and closed collateral. Fibre
sheath.
Zingiberaceae sp. 2Primary
root
Periderm of around 10 rows of rounded and
elongated thick walled cells. Thicker exterior
wall of the outermost layer. Vascular
cambium that is a single layer of more
angular and elongated cells.
75-105 50-85Rounded and isodiametric, some
elongate.160-309 112-240
Eustele and amphicribal concentric. Fibre
sheath.
100
Description of charcoal
Each of the specimens in the modern comparative collection was experimentally charred from
both dried and fresh state to assess the nature of morphological changes in the boundary, ground
and vascular tissues. SEM images provided high resolution records of the results of the charring
process. These morphological changes were described at an individual level for each specimen
in Appendix A, and are summarised briefly here. The conditions of charring were described
earlier within this chapter (see section ‘Experimental charring’), but it is important to note that
the temperature, time and access to oxygen were kept consistent for all of the specimens. The
charred specimens represent only one experiment in charring conditions, and morphological
changes may be different under alternative charring conditions of different temperatures, length
of exposure to heat, and oxidising conditions.
Boundary tissues
A small number of changes can occur in boundary tissues during charring. The epidermis or
periderm often becomes compressed or alternatively transforms into a region of solid carbon.
The carbonisation of the boundary tissues occurs in stem and root-derived tissues, as well as
fruits primarily within the samples charred from fresh state. There are also examples of this
carbonisation occurring in the samples that were dried prior to charring such as that within
Asplenium sp., Cordyline fruticosa, Dioscorea bulbifera, Inocarpus fagifer, Morinda citrifolia,
Spondias dulcis and Tabernaemontana aurantiaca. The remaining samples charred from a dried
state had epidermal or peridermal tissues that were either compressed or retained their original
morphology. Similarly, those tissues within samples charred from a fresh state were either
turned to solid carbon or were observed to be in the same condition as the uncharred sample.
These observations indicate that the samples charred from a dry state were more consistent in
terms of morphological changes than those charred from fresh state.
Ground tissues
Ground or conjunctive tissues can undergo a range of different morphological changes when
charred from fresh and dried states. First, the shape of the cells can change. Seven specimens in
the comparative collection evidenced cell shape change. One specimen, Barringtonia asiatica,
had more rounded cells rather than angular when dry-charred. The cells of another specimen,
Asplenium sp. became more angular in both samples. The remaining specimens had either partly
or wholly cells in the ground tissue that were originally rounded and had become more
irregularly rounded. These included Alocasia macrorrhiza, Dioscorea alata, Dioscorea
nummularia, Pandanus tectorius and Zingiber sp. in the dry-charred samples, but only A.
macrorrhiza, and another sample of Pandanus tectorius and Zingiber sp. in the wet-charred
samples.
Many specimens also had either inter-cellular spaces or whole regions of ground tissue
transform to solid carbon. This change was only slightly more common in the wet-charred
101
samples, which is an unexpected observation. The wet samples are more hydrated when
exposed to the high temperature during charring, and so greater modification is usually observed
in the form of carbonisation and tension fractures as the liquid evaporates. Carbonisation of
inter-cellular spaces was observed within six dry and wet-charred specimens, but these were not
the same specimens in both instances. Within the dry-charred samples, these included Alocasia
macrorrhiza, Artocarpus altilis seed, Barringtonia racemosa seed, Dioscorea bulbifera, Ficus
copiosa and Musa sp.2. The specimens with this variety of carbonisation in the wet-charred
samples included A. macrorrhiza, Colocasia esculenta, Dioscorea alata, .D. bulbifera, F.
copiosa and Musa sp.2. Almost half of the modern reference collection also had regions or
complete carbonisation of the ground tissue. Of the total 36 specimens, 15 specimens had
carbonisation in the dry-charred samples (42%), and 16 specimens had carbonisation in the wet-
charred samples (44%).
Cavities, tension fractures and vesicularisation also often occurred within both the wet and dry-
charred samples from the evaporation of water within the samples. The process of cavity
formation and fracturing is called rhexigeny (Hather 2000:41, 1993:4) and involves the
mechanical tearing of tissues under tension. The location of these tears in the ground tissue can
vary. Some were observed within the cambium, separating the cortex from the pith, while others
were near vascular tissues or were randomly located throughout the pith. Cavities formed within
12 of the dry-charred specimens, but were much more common in the wet-charred samples.
Over half of the specimens in the comparative collection had cavities form in the wet-charred
samples. This modification was observed in a total of 18 specimens. These included A. altilis
seed, Angiopteris sp., Barringtonia asiatica seed, B. racemosa seed, C. esculenta, Musa sp
1.and Xanthosoma sagittifolium, which only form cavities when charred from fresh state.
Alternately, Cyrtosperma merkusii only formed cavities within the dry-charred sample. Tension
fractures were also very common, forming in eight dry and wet-charred samples, but again these
were not the same specimens in both types of samples. Only Musa sp. 2., Pueraria lobata,
Pteridium sp., Spondias dulcis and X. sagittifolium had cavities form in both wet and dry-
charred samples.
Vesicularisation is the formation of air spaces by the explosion of cells under pressure.
Hather (2000:45) describes this process as occurring when “...the water content of cells heats up
and eventually boils, resulting in the rupture of the cell and a release of water vapour under
pressure. The escaping water vapour bubbles through the tissue, compressing cells and causing
the formation of vesicles.” The vesicular appearance is a by-product of the fact that some of the
cells are still visible as such but become much smaller and the cell walls are smooth with the
outline of cells on the internal surface. This form of cellular modification was observed in nine
dry-charred specimens and eight dry-charred specimens. These were mostly the same specimens
in both, with the exception of Angiopteris sp., Colocasia esculenta, and Cyrtosperma merkusii
102
which were only vesicular in the dry-charred samples and Dioscorea nummularia, which only
had vesicles in the wet-charred samples.
A number of changes can also directly occur within the ground tissue cells and affect
the appearance of these cells. Roughly one third of the reference collection had samples that
exhibited cell compression either regionally or throughout the ground tissue in the dry-charred
samples (n=12), and half of the collection had this modification within the wet-charred samples.
This was usually a by-product of the formation of cavities and tension fractures within these
tissues. Those specimens that only had cell compression within the wet-charred samples
included Angiopteris sp., Asplenium sp., C. esculenta, Ipomoea batatas, Musa sp.1, Tacca
leontopetaloides, and Todea sp. A smaller number of samples only had compression in the
samples charred from dried state, including Dioscorea esculenta, Inocarpus fagifer, Pueraria
lobata and Xanthosoma sagittifolium.
103
Table 5.10 Description of morphological modification within ground tissue of charred samples in the comparative collection
Dried Fresh Dried Fresh Dried Fresh Dried Fresh Dried Fresh Dried Fresh Dried Fresh Dried Fresh Dried Fresh Dried Fresh Dried Fresh Dried Fresh Dried Fresh
Alocasia macrorrhiza X X X X X X X X
Artocarpus altilis fruit X
Artocarpus altilis seed X X X
Angiopteris sp. X X X X X
Asplenium sp. 1 X X X X X
Asplenium sp. 2 X X X X
Barringtonia asiatica seed X X X
Barringtonia racemosa seed X X X X X
Colocasia esculenta X X X X X
Cordyline fruticosa X X X X X X
Cyrtosperma merkusii X X
Dioscorea alata X X X X X
Dioscorea bulbifera X X X X X X X X X X
Dioscorea esculenta X X X X
Dioscorea nummularia X X X
Epipremnum pinnatum X X X X
Ficus copiosa X X X X X
Ficus tinctorius X X X X
Ipomoea batatas X X X X
Inocarpus fagifer X X X X X X
Morinda citrifolia X X x X X X
Musa sp. 1 X X X X X
Musa sp. 2 X X X X X X
Pandanus tectorius X X X X
Pangium edule X X
Pueraria lobata X X X X
Piper methysticum X X
Pteridium sp. X X X X X X
Spondias dulcis X X X X X X X X
Syzygium malaccense X X X X X X X X
Tabernaemontana aurantiaca X X X X X X
Tacca leontopetaloides X X X X X
Todea sp. X X
Xanthosoma sagittifolium X X X X X X X
Zingiberaceae sp. 1 X X X X X X
Zingiberaceae sp. 2 X X X X X X
Carbonisation
Fractured/collapsed
cells Shallower cells
Inter-cellular
spaces carbonise Cavities
Tension
fractures
Compression of
cells
Thicker cell
walls
Thinner cell
wallsSpeciesCells
rounded
Cells
angular
Cells
irregular Vesicularisation
104
Table 5.11 Description of morphological modification within vascular tissue of charred samples in the comparative collection
Dried Fresh Dried Fresh Dried Fresh Dried Fresh Dried Fresh Dried Fresh Dried Fresh
Alocasia macrorrhiza X
Artocarpus altilis fruit X X
Artocarpus altilis seed X X
Angiopteris sp. X X
Asplenium sp. 1 X X X
Asplenium sp. 2 X X X X
Barringtonia asiatica seed
Barringtonia racemosa seed
Colocasia esculenta X X
Cordyline fruticosa X X X
Cyrtosperma merkusii X X X
Dioscorea alata X X
Dioscorea bulbifera
Dioscorea esculenta X X X
Dioscorea nummularia X X
Epipremnum pinnatum X X
Ficus copiosa X X
Ficus tinctorius
Ipomoea batatas
Inocarpus fagifer X X
Morinda citrifolia X X
Musa sp. 1 X X
Musa sp. 2 X X
Pandanus tectorius X X
Pangium edule X X
Pueraria lobata X X X
Piper methysticum
Pteridium sp.
Spondias dulcis X X
Syzygium malaccense X X
Tabernaemontana aurantiaca
Tacca leontopetaloides X X
Todea sp. X X
Xanthosoma sagittifolium
Zingiberaceae sp. 1 X X X
Zingiberaceae sp. 2 X X
Cambium fractureSpecies
Phloem- cavity Phloem- carbon Bundle separates Cambium- carbon Fibre sheath-carbon Phloem compressed
105
Cells were also often fractured or collapsed in many of the wet and dry-charred
samples. This process often rendered regions of the ground tissue unrecognisable. Many of the
fruits exhibited this change, including Ficus tinctoria, Morinda citrifolia, Musa sp. 1, Pangium
edule, Pandanus tectorius, Spondias dulcis, Syzygium malaccense and Tabernaemontana
aurantiaca within either the wet or dry-charred samples. A small number of stem and root-
derived specimens had large areas of collapsed cells with exposed cell contents such as starch,
crystals and druses. These included Cordyline fruticosa, Epipremnum pinnatum, Ipomoea
batatas and Zingiber sp. In addition, a very small number of specimens exhibited signs that cells
became shallower during dry-charring, indicating a change in cell dimension. These included
Dioscorea esculenta and I. batatas.
Where specimens did not show signs of cell compression or collapse, many instead had
thickening or thinning of the cell walls. This can result from cells swelling and solidifying
during intense heating of liquids within the tissues. Within the dry-charred samples, Alocasia
macrorrhiza, Artocarpus altilis seed, Barringtonia asiatica seed, Colocasia esculenta, and
Dioscorea bulbifera all had cell walls that were thicker than those observed within the
histological thin sections. Only A. macrorrhiza and D. bulbifera had this occur within the
samples charred from fresh state. Conversely, a small number of samples had thinning of the
cell walls after charring. These included D. alata and Zingiber sp. in the dry-charred samples,
and D. esculenta and Zingiber sp. within the wet-charred samples. The sample of C. fruticosa
that was charred from dried state did not show signs of thickening or thinning of cell walls, but
instead had a pitted texture on the interior of the cell lining.
Vascular tissues
A smaller array of changes occurred in the vascular tissues during the charring process. The
root-derived specimens experienced less modification in parenchyma morphology. Only
Pueraria lobata had some rhexigenous tension fractures and carbonisation occur within the
vascular cambium, separating the secondary xylem from the phloem. This occurred in both the
wet and dry-charred samples of the species. The vascular bundles of the stem-derived specimens
and fruits often had significant morphological changes occur through charring. The thick non-
living lignified walls of the xylem are able to withstand the intense heat of the charring process
much better than the more fragile thin living tissues of the phloem that often contains sugars and
nutrients. The xylem was therefore consistently preserved in original condition, but the phloem
either turned to solid carbon or became a cavity.
The phloem became a cavity within 11 of the dry-charred specimens and 12 of the wet-
charred specimens, which represents just over a third of the 33 fruits and stem-derived charred
specimens. These included most of the yams (Dioscorea spp.) including Tacca leontopetaloides
and both Musa spp. Another 14 specimens exhibited the fusion of tissues within the phloem in
the dry-charred samples, consequently transforming these tissues into solid carbon. These
106
included both the fruit and seed of Artocarpus altilis, several of the Pteriodophytes, and three of
the aroids. Colocasia esculenta, Cyrtosperma merkusii and Xanthosoma sagittifolium had this
change occur within the phloem, but interestingly the only other aroid in the comparative
collection, Alocasia macrorrhiza, did not exhibit any changes in the dry-charred samples made
from the corm. However, change did occur within the wet-charred sample of A. macrorrhiza. It
is also interesting to note that the phloem within the corm of C. merkusii did not exclusively
turn to solid carbon in the dry-charred samples; some regions of the phloem were instead
compressed. This could indicate differential charring within the sample. Some specimens such
as Dioscorea bulbifera did not have recognisable vascular bundles within the charred samples
(this could be result of the sample selection and fracturing process) and thus could not be
described here. It is important to note that the arrangement of vascular tissues within the root
and stem-derived tissues and fruits did not change under charring. The xylem is still identifiable
as such, and the presence of the phloem as either carbon or a cavity enables description of the
arrangement of vascular tissues, and also the organisation of these tissues within the organ
where the fragment is large enough.
Other changes that could occur within the vascular bundles included the formation of a
cavity abutting the bundles, where these tissues have broken away from the surrounding
conjunctive tissue. This was only noted in a small number of specimens of the dry-charred
samples, which included Cordyline fruticosa, C. merkusii and Dioscorea esculenta. The fibre
sheaths surrounding the vascular bundles of the rhizomes of Asplenium spp. and Zingiber sp.
also turned to solid carbon within the dry-charred samples. Only one Asplenium species
exhibited this variation of tissue carbonisation within the wet-charred samples.
In summary, the morphological changes that can occur during charring need to be
considered during the identification process. Some significant changes to cell and tissue
morphology can occur when plant specimens are charred either from dried or fresh states and
these changes will inhibit any identification that is based solely on morphological patterning in
fresh samples. However, these changes described here are based upon particular charring
conditions, and so it is hard to gauge how these might differ under alternative conditions such as
different temperatures, length of exposure and oxidising conditions. An awareness of the nature
of these changes and an understanding of why these might occur are essential components of a
methodology that will aid classification of unknown archaeological parenchyma to a taxonomic
level with confidence.
Development of an Identification Flowchart Key
Through exploration of the morphology of ground tissues and vascular tissues separately, it
becomes clear that many taxa in the comparative collection are able to be differentiated from
one another. These tissues are the components of parenchyma most likely to be observed and
107
preserved within the archaeological record, and therefore the attributes analysed above can aid
identification of these specimens with a moderate-to-high level of confidence. Where taxa could
not be differentiated based on the morphology of one of these tissues, an identification
flowchart key is useful that combines all of the known diagnostic features of parenchyma within
the reference collection. Depending upon the presence or absence of vascular tissues, the
flowchart can guide identification of an unknown sample to various taxonomic levels based
firstly upon the arrangement of vascular tissues, then bundle morphology, and finally
considering cell morphology. If one attribute cannot be observed, another avenue allows
identification using other attributes. Sometimes it is only possible to narrow the list of potential
classifications, and the key is the first step in identifying unknown parenchyma. Further
examination of SEM and light microscopic imagery, along with consideration of geographic and
environmental boundaries for plant distribution can aid final identification.
Essentially, two flowcharts were created based on the morphological data collected
from the thin sections made from each specimen in the comparative collection. The first key is
the primary flowchart, and is usable if some vascular tissues are visible within an unidentified
fragment of desiccated or charred parenchyma. This chart starts by considering the arrangement
of vascular tissues, then the morphology of bundling, and finally the cell morphology is used to
differentiate between taxa. If particular attributes are not able to be observed, the key can at
least facilitate classification to the type of organ from which it derived (fruit, stem-derived or
root-derived), or to family level in some cases. There is more morphological patterning within
the vascular tissues of stem-derived tissues at family level, and particular vascular arrangements
can be seen throughout the specimens of a family. For example, collateral vascular bundles are
present in the members of the Dioscoreaceae family within the comparative collection, while
amphivasal bundles are present in all members of the Araceae family. The specimens of fruits
included in the comparative collection also have these types of bundles, but other aspects of
cellular morphology and charring characteristics differentiate these at family level.
The second key is usable if vascular tissues cannot be observed within the sample and
only uses attributes of cell morphology such as shape and cell lengths. Attributes such as the
presence of fibres, vessels, duct cavities and inter-cellular spaces were also used when possible.
Clearly some changes to boundary, ground and vascular tissues occur during charring and those
observed changes were incorporated into this key. This key may only be able to provide a list of
tentative classifications that are not usually from the same genus or family. This is because there
is a lot less morphological patterning within the ground tissue at these taxonomic levels. There
is significant overlap between fresh specimens, but particular characteristics of charring can be
used to differentiate these to some degree.
108
Sometimes several directions within the flow charts could be taken to arrive at the same
classification. This is because some species have several cell shapes or bundle arrangements, or
charring could affect cell shape or dimensions. If a junction is reached where the particular
attributes to further narrow down the list of possible classifications are not visible, then the data
in Appendix A containing detailed descriptions of the fresh and charred samples can be
examined. Where boundary tissues are present, these descriptions can be used instead to
differentiate between this list. Photographs and SEM images of the reference collection then
needed to be considered along with geographical data for the distribution of each of the species.
It was deemed useful here to adopt the determination system using identification criteria and
associated levels of confidence compiled by Paz (2001) and later used by Oliveira (2008). This
determination system has been used successfully by these researchers in the past to analyse
macrobotanical plant remains from a range of archaeological contexts in the Asia-Pacific region
(Barker et al. 2011; Barton and Paz 2007; Oliveira 2008; Paz 2001, 2005). Plant samples are
determined to taxa using the following criteria:
Non prefixed: Photographic reference(s) and/or illustration reference(s); reference material not
essential; exact fit of the taxonomic features, geographic distribution, and species citation in the
local flora;
Prob.: Flora citation, geographic area compatibility, an agreement with taxonomic details;
image OR illustration OR reference material (not necessarily an exact or good fit);
Cf.: All six categories may or may not exist; archaeological specimen resembles image OR
illustration OR reference material OR previous identification; flora, taxonomic details and
geographic area but with doubts;
Elim.: Lowest level of confidence for a binominal determination to species level, but with no
access to image, illustration or reference material; taxonomic description, geographic area and
other species of same genus were eliminated from local/regional flora (= likely candidate);
Suffix 'type': Very low level of confidence, used only at family and genus level of
determination; shape of specimen fits the geographic distribution, some morphological
characters, and may be in the local flora;
Form shape description: None of the six types of information exist (image, illustration,
reference collection, flora, taxonomic details and geographic area), but the specimen is
distinctly a seed, nut fragment or a certain plant part.
The identification process for archaeological parenchyma incorporated a large amount
of data derived from the modern comparative collection to provide classifications with varying
levels of confidence, expressed using the determination system of Paz (2001). The two
109
identification flowchart keys enable the classification of unknown plant samples that have
varying levels of tissue preservation to at least the type of organ from which fragments have
derived. This information is crucial to the interpretation of plant use within a site or landscape.
The presence of crops is a good indicator of at least low-level agricultural practices. Here, this
information will be used as stand-alone data and to corroborate the data collected from the
analysis of soil samples for ancient starch residues. The presence of starch and parenchyma
from a particular family, genus or species will provide complementary records for the presence
of economic and famine species within the sites of Talasiu, Leka and Heketa on Tongatapu in
the Kingdom of Tonga.
110
Figure 5.15 Flowchart 1 used as an identification key to identify unknown parenchymatous samples when vascular tissues are visible
111
Figure 5.16 Flowchart 2 used as an identification key to identify unknown parenchymatous samples when no vascular tissues are visible
112
PART TWO- DEVELOPMENT OF
PREHISTORIC AGRICULTURE IN
TONGA
113
Chapter 6 Sites and Field Sampling Strategy
This chapter outlines the methods used to extract botanical remains from three archaeological
sites on Tongatapu of varying antiquity. The archaeobotanical program builds upon the work
carried out to date within Polynesia (Chapter 2) and attempts to answer the key research
questions regarding the role of plants within colonising subsistence and migration episodes in
Western Polynesia and the later development of social complexity through the establishment of
the maritime Tu’i Tonga chiefdom. Revised protocols are established for both field and
laboratory methods, building on those currently used both in the Pacific and elsewhere
(Chapters 3-4) through new experimentation. Experiments were conducted in reaction to
problems highlighted within previous studies in terms of the success of extractions within
differing deposits, and the risk of contamination from laboratory equipment. The results of these
experiments were used to provide data on the presence of plant taxa within well-dated cultural
deposits that are presented and discussed in Chapters 8 and 9.
Methodology for field sampling of archaeological sediments
Site selection
During fieldwork in November 2011, sediments were sampled from open archaeological sites
using flotation and bulk sampling for microbotanical analyses. Comparisons of identified taxa
within sediments were made on a spatial scale across north-eastern Tongatapu, to provide a
scope for the chronology of the introduction of crops and development of production systems.
This incorporated test-pitting at two known sites on the south-eastern edge of the Fanga’Uta
Lagoon, and one site at Heketa on the northern coast underneath the ‘esi or chiefly back-rest
monolith. Talasiu (TO-Mu-2) and Leka (J17) are both located in the Mua region within the
village of Lapaha and are now inland although Talasiu is located on the edge of an old
palaeoshore (Dickinson 2007). The ‘esi (TO-Nt-2) is attributed to the construction phase at
Heketa initiated by the 11th Tui Tonga within local traditions, and is considered contemporary
with the Ha’amonga trilithon of the same complex.
These sites had already been located, surveyed and sampled for archaeological material
by Clark and others (2008), Golson (1957), McKern (1929), Poulsen (1987), and Spenneman
(1986, 1989) in archaeological projects on Tongatapu. McKern (1929) carried out the first
major archaeological survey of the Tongan archipelago as part of the Bayard Dominick
Expedition of the Bernice P. Bishop Museum in 1920-21. Mapping and excavation of the tombs
and enclosing ditch at Lapaha and Heketa was a particular focus of his work, and his labelling
of the tombs has been used in all subsequent archaeological research. Langi Leka (J17) and the
‘esi at Heketa (TO-Nt-2) were among the monuments mapped by McKern. Golson (1957)
carried out a limited survey of Tongatapu and offshore islets, exploring the potential for using
ceramics as cultural markers. During this survey Golson excavated a section of a site named by
114
Spenneman TO-Mu-2 near the village of Talasiu, and reported on the potential of the pottery-
bearing midden. Golson encouraged one of his students, Jens Poulsen, to further explore the
ceramic typological sequence within Tongatapu. Poulsen (1964, 1967, 1987) subsequently spent
a year carrying out a detailed program of excavation around the Fanga’Uta lagoon.
Following extensive archaeological research in the late 1960s by Davidson (1969,
1971), Groube (1971) and others that focused on late prehistoric sites and the construction of a
Tongan culture history, Spenneman (1986) spent some months in Tonga attempting to locate
post-Lapita sites in accordance with the research prerogatives of the Tongan Dark Age Project
initiated at the ANU. He returned to the site at Talasiu (TO-Mu-2) and sampled the midden for
ceramic and organic material for radiocarbon dating, reporting on the presence of decorated and
plainware pottery within the same context. Most recently, Geoff Clark returned to Tongatapu in
2006–2008 to assess the construction sequences of the monumental sites of Heketa and Lapaha
as part of two Australian Research Council (ARC) grants exploring the development of social
hierarchy in Tongan prehistory.
These surveys of the archaeological landscape on Tongatapu and subsequent
excavations have provided valuable insights into the nature and timing of cultural deposits. The
sites were all noted to have intact deposits with little disturbance related to subsequent
occupation. The morphology of the material culture and age ranges of dating material (shell and
charcoal) also indicated that each of these sites represented a different chronological period
within Tongan prehistory spanning over 2000 years. The presence of refuse such as shell,
fishbone and charcoal within the deposits at the sites also pointed to the likelihood that the sites
were where domestic practices such as cooking and rubbish disposal took place. These three
sites were selected for my PhD research based on site preservation and the reasonable
possibility that macrobotanical remains might be recovered that would allow archaeobotanical
exploration of plant use in Tongan prehistory.
Field methods
High-resolution excavation techniques were employed at Talasiu, Leka and Heketa to gain
information about subsistence practices and vegetation history at the three sites. Botanical,
faunal and artefactual remains were collected from test-pits of around 50x50cm using simple
bucket flotation and wet sieving. These techniques are recommended for use in tropical climates
(Fairburn 2005b; Pearsall 2010), where access to water and technical equipment can be limited.
Some further revision of these techniques was required due to issues that were encountered
during fieldwork, and therefore a revised protocol was established that suited the conditions
specific to Tongatapu during the 2011 season. The methodology can thus be broken down into
four sequential activities:
1. Excavation and bulk sampling
115
2. Bucket flotation
3. Wet sieving
4. Sorting, identification and quantification
Excavation:
Test pits of 50x50cm were marked out using string and excavated in 5cm arbitrary levels,
referred to as ‘spits’. There was slight variation in the size of the test-pits where contemporary
cultural deposits had been already sampled in previous test-pits at particular sites. If a change in
stratigraphy was noticed during excavation, a new level was begun. All excavated material was
placed into buckets for flotation with a water-proof label. Any observed charcoal concentrations
were sampled in situ and wrapped in aluminium foil. The charcoal locations were then recorded
on datasheets for each spit. The datasheets also included detailed information upon the soil
texture, colour, sorting, and inclusions. Bulk soil samples of around 100g were retained from a
10cm-wide bulk soil sampling column that was measured out and marked on the test pit wall,
with samples reserved for microbotanical analysis.
Bucket Flotation:
The excavated material from each level was weighed using a spring balance, and the volume
was calculated by pouring the sediment into a bucket with volume marks (litres). This
measurement was then recorded in a flotation logbook. The material was then divided into
buckets, so that each bucket was filled to one-third (33%) of its volume. Water was added until
the bucket was nine-tenths (90%) full, and the material was gently stirred by hand. This mixture
was left to settle and deflocculate for around 5-10 minutes (after Fairburn 2005b).
A flotation sieve was set up by pegging muslin mesh into a bucket with large holes cut into the
base. To recycle water, this rested on two cut branches that sat atop a plastic washing tub. The
excavated material was then decanted into the muslin, allowing any material that was floating
on the surface of the water to be separated from the heavy residue that had sunk to the bottom of
the bucket. More water was then added to the heavy residue, and the process of settling and
decanting was repeated at least twice until no more material was visible floating on the surface.
The muslin was then unpegged from the lip of the bucket and tied to create a sack that held the
‘flot’ sample with a waterproof label showing the site, test-unit number, level number and date.
Finally, these flot samples were placed onto a string line to dry in the sun, and then put into
labelled aluminium foil envelopes in zip-lock bags.
Wet sieving:
The remaining heavy residue was taken to a new station for wet sieving through a 3mm mesh
sieve. Again water recycling techniques were employed by keeping water in two large plastic
washing tubs. The sieves were immersed in these tubs to just below the rim and agitated.
Keeping the rim out of the water ensured that no larger material floating on the surface (such as
leaves) could enter the sieve while being agitated. Once all dirt was removed from the sample,
116
the remaining material was placed onto a plastic rice sack with a water-proof label to dry in the
sun.
Sorting, identification and quantification:
Some basic sorting of the dried material was carried out in the field. Heavy residue from each
level was dry-sieved using a 6mm mesh sieve to create a large (>6mm) and small (<6mm)
fraction. Each fraction was sorted and recorded separately. These fractions were placed onto
trays and sorted using tweezers into basic material types: ceramics, lithic material, other
artefacts, bone, shell, charcoal, seeds and other organics. The sorted fraction were then bagged
and labelled. After being returned to the ANH laboratories at the Australian National
University, further sorting and quantification of both the heavy residue and the flot samples was
carried out. The heavy residue was sorted in much the same way as that in the field, and weights
of the various artefacts and material types were recorded. The flot samples were also sorted into
material types such as seeds, wood charcoal, charred root and tuber parenchyma, land snails,
bone and insect remains. The weights and counts of these were then recorded on datasheets
which were then digitised.
Figure 6.1 Map showing location of archaeological sites included in this study from Tongatapu
Site descriptions
Talasiu (TO-Mu-2)
All three sites were cultural midden deposits of varying sizes and concentrations. Talasiu (TO-
Mu-2) in the Mua region is a late Lapita-associated site which was first excavated by Golson
117
(1957). Golson’s field-notes (1957) describe the density of shell and pottery within his
excavation units, causing his team to halve the size of the original unit from 10ft² to 10x5ft.
During survey, Spenneman (1986:38) noted that the midden site extended as far south as the
Langi or monumental stone tombs (J18-J19) but was distinct from another nearby midden (TO-
Mu-67). Spenneman sampled the midden and recorded a mix of decorated and undecorated
pottery, stone flakes, adzes and adze fragments, and a coral abrader alongside some fragmented
human remains.
Evaluation of the topography and geology of the Mua region indicates that the midden
was originally deposited on the shore of the Fanga’Uta lagoon; however, later extensive land
reclamation using coral rubble, limestone and soil in-filled the inter-tidal lagoon flats, and the
site is now approximately 200m inland from the current lagoon shore, except to the north where
an inlet cuts close to the site (Dickinson 2007). The midden stretches approximately 100m along
the old palaeoshore (Spenneman 1986). The site could have been an attractive location for
settlement in prehistory, with a small limestone solution channel and spring located near the site
that provides a source of fresh water and feeds into the lagoon (Spenneman 1986; Valentin and
Clark 2013). Several cultural strata are present at the site, the earliest of which is composed of
many cooking and other domestic features cut or embedded into the reddish sterile clay. Above
this is the deposition of a dense midden of near shore and inter-tidal shellfish and fish from the
lagoon. Cut into this midden and the earlier domestic features are a number of complete and
incomplete burials, believed to be mostly contemporary with the deposition of the midden from
2700-2500 cal BP (Valentin and Clark 2013).
The only test pit excavated at Talasiu (TP2) for this project was a 50x50cm test-unit
that sampled the cultural midden, and cut into the sterile basal clay by 5cm. The whole unit was
a total of 100cm in depth, with every 5cm of deposit excavated, processed and described as a
separate level or spit. All excavated material from these spits was processed using flotation and
wet-sieving to isolate botanical, faunal and cultural material. A total of 19 spits were excavated
and processed for botanical remains. 100gm bulk samples were taken from each level within a
10cm sampling column marked out on the north-facing profile of TP2, where stratigraphic
levels were most distinctive, for starch analysis.
Leka (J17)
Langi Leka (also known as Lekamakatuituioha or ‘Puipui’) is a four-tier monumental tomb or
langi (J17) built during the classic Tu’i Tonga chiefdom phase of Tongan prehistory, and is said
to be associated with Tu’i Tonga Tulunga (McKern 1929:41). The langi is located about 400m
inland from the Fanga’Uta lagoon in the community known today as Lapaha, within the Mua
region of Tongatapu. Geophysical survey at Langi Leka indicates that the langi had been built
on top of an older cultural deposit. Initial excavations were carried out in 2008 to assess the
118
nature and timing of this older occupation through test-pitting. These prior excavations also
shed light on the construction sequence for the langi. Attempts were made to relocate TP1which
had been abutting Langi Leka. It was believed that TP1 had been found, and TP2 was
subsequently excavated parallel to this location further west. A 2x1m test pit was measured out
and extended north from the base of the first tier of the langi. The red clay and coral
construction rubble debris was recorded and then removed in bulk, so that the darker cultural
material below could be excavated and processed in a 100x50cm test pit in the northern end of
the excavation. It turned out this unit missed the more dense shell midden that pre-dated Langi
Leka by about 5m. Despite this, seven 5cm levels were processed for botanical remains below
90cmbd through flotation and wet-sieving.
In a second attempt, another test 2x1m unit (TP3) was opened up approximately 2m to
the east of TP2. TP3 also abutted the langi, and was sampled from 90cmbd within the cultural
material using the same techniques employed for TP2, but this time from within a 100x50cm
test pit in the southern end of the excavation. Cultural deposits were encountered in both TP2
and TP1, although these were not of the same density noted during previous excavations. TP3
was abandoned and back-filled after excavating to 110cmbd. TP1 was finally located after a
system of shovel-test pitting along the base of Langi Leka was employed and the modern fill
was quickly removed. The northern baulk was cleaned and chosen for sampling the cultural
deposit observed at 95cmbd. A 25x50cm test unit was cut into the baulk, and material above
95cm was discarded. Sampling began below this in the dense cultural midden with every 5cm
level excavated, processed and recorded in the same manner as other test pits made at Talasiu
and Leka.
Heketa (TO-Nt-2)
The final site chosen for excavation and botanical sampling was located in the north-east at
Heketa near the ‘esi’ or chiefly backrest known as Makafakinanga (TO-Nt-2) situated close to
the Ha’amonga a Maui trilithon (TO-Nt-1). This complex is composed of nine stone structures
(Nt-1 to 9) that represent a short period of monumental stone architecture construction, forming
an early centre of the classic Tu’i Tonga chiefdom (Clark and Reepmeyer 2014) or state (Kirch
1994). Tongan traditions associate most of the structures with the 11th Tu’i Tonga, Tuitatui,
while an earth mound is tied to the 10th Tu’i Tonga, Momo (McKern 1929). Dates for the
construction of the stone architecture all fall within the 14th century (Clark and Reepmeyer
2014; Spenneman 2002), but several earlier deposits have been located underneath these
structures dating to the 12th-14th century AD, indicating that the site may have also been a
significant place associated with early Tu’i Tonga Hikuleo for several centuries before this. In
traditions the centre of the chiefdom was moved south to Lapaha by the 12th Tu’i Tonga
Talatama.
119
This original test pit (TP1) had been excavated in order to assess the construction
sequence for the ‘esi or backrest monolith. The aim was to cut into the baulk of this original test
pit to sample a cultural midden and charcoal deposit that predates the erection of the ‘esi which
had been recorded and dated previously. With this in mind, a 50x50cm test pit (TP2) was
marked out about 1.5m away from the ‘esi. The first test pit was excavated to 90cm below
datum (bd), when the sterile clay was encountered. Each 5cm level was sampled for botanical,
faunal and artefactual material through flotation and wet-sieving. Assessment of the profile and
excavated material suggested that this test pit had only sampled the edge of the feature exposed
in the original test pit.
Further test pits were then used to locate the looser and more mixed backfill of TP1, and
then this backfill was removed to expose the original walls of the test pit. The final unit, TP3,
was excavated into the cleaned face of the baulk between TP1 and TP2. TP3 was a 50x30cm
test unit that was excavated to 105cmbd below datum, where the sterile clay was again
encountered. All material from each 5cm level after 40cmbd was processed using flotation and
wet-sieving. The material above this point was all sterile red clay which capped the cultural
deposits and topsoil, and had already been sampled within TP2. This strategy allowed specific
targeting of the cultural deposit within this test unit.
Stratigraphic descriptions
Talasiu (TO-Mu-2)
The whole test unit consisted of very compact shell midden with limited sediment matrix. There
was very little if any topsoil, and below this some distinctions can be made within the midden
deposit. The top 20cm (Layer 1) below the current surface level contained a disturbed and
highly fragmented shell deposit with a light grey brown silty matrix. Charcoal, coral and
limestone inclusions were very common. The presence of many small rootlets combined with a
lack of protective topsoil contributed to the disturbed nature of this uppermost deposit. Below
this was a region of more compact shells to a depth of around 35cmbd (Layer 2) that were also
highly fragmented within a coarse yellow brown silty clay matrix. Higher concentrations of
charcoal were noted throughout the deposit and possible volcanic ash lenses. The transition
between Layer 2 and 3 is not level, indicating that the surface of Layer 3 was undulating.
Layer 3 was a thick (35-60cmbd) deposit of loose large shell fragments with a friable
yellow red clay matrix and large amounts of charcoal throughout. More pottery was located
between 50-60cmbd, and large fragments of Tridacna were found at the base of this deposit. A
small feature (Feature 1) was cut into Layer 3 from above and had more compact shell. It is
possible that this was a disturbance from a tree root observed within this deposit. Layer 4 was
another undulating layer below this with very compact large shell fragments, charcoal
fragments, and a red clay matrix that extends to 80cmbd. At the base of this layer was another
120
possible feature (Feature 2) which was rounded with a diameter of 8cm, and cut into Layer 5. A
higher density of shell was noted in the north-west corner of the test unit. The final and bottom
layer (Layer 5) of midden was a reddish clay sediment with small crushed shell and charcoal at
the base of the midden. The base of the layer slopes towards the north-west corner, and so this
was recorded as Feature 3, however this may just reflect the undulating nature of the original
ground surface. Importantly, there were also small fragments of dentate-stamped and plainware
pottery found inter-mixed throughout the lower half of this assemblage, and near the base of the
test unit at 85-90cmbd in the south-west corner. Sterile orange brown clay was encountered at
95cmbd.
Figure 6.2 Stratigraphic diagram of cultural deposits within Talasiu TP2
Leka (J17)
All three test pits at Leka revealed an interesting construction sequence for the langi or tomb,
with features that were associated with the ditch for slotting the stone facing of the first tier of
the tomb into place, and limestone cobbles providing support for these. Below these
construction features were cultural deposits associated with occupation at the site prior to the
development of monumental architecture at Lapaha. This occupation seemed to be centred near
the location of TP4, where the deposit was deepest and contained the highest concentration of
archaeological material.
The stratigraphy observed within TP2 represents a range of deposits associated with the
construction of the langi, and the older cultural surface upon which the langi was built. The
uppermost layer below the surface, Layer 1 was a coral gravel deposit with red brown clay
matrix that was more concentrated near the surface and more diffuse towards the base. This
121
layer is most likely construction debris from the langi. Below this was deposit of reddish brown
clay (Layer 2) with dispersed charcoal that capped an older cultural deposit (Layer 3). Layer 3
was a medium brown silty clay cultural deposit with many charcoal inclusions. Some red clay
from the base of this layer was inter-mixed with the cultural material from 105-125cmbd. This
layer sat upon the surface of the sterile red brown clay at 125cmbd.
In TP3 a shallow topsoil deposit (Layer 1) was visible below this surface from 5-15cm
below the datum. Layers 2-5 were various coral gravel fill deposits within the ditch cut to allow
the placement of the limestone tomb stones. At the base of this ditch was a surface of large
limestone cobbles up to 20cm in diameter that were used to hold the beachrock slabs in place.
Layer 2 also appeared to extend out to be a coral gravel path that surrounded the base of the
langi. Layer 6 was a sterile red brown mixed clay in which was a tephra ash lens (Layer 7). It is
believed that the large amount of sediment that created this layer was the result of ongoing
tephra ash falls after 1000 BP. These deposits capped the mid-brown silty clay cultural layer
(Layer 8) with small dispersed shell fragments and charcoal. This deposit was the only layer
sampled for flotation and microbotanical analysis.
The stratigraphy of TP4 resembled that seen within TP2 and TP3, although the cultural
deposit below 95cmbd contained a more dense concentration of shell, bone and charcoal.
Similar to TP2, this cultural deposit was located below various mid-reddish brown clay deposits
(Layers 1-3). The top of the cultural deposit was a mid-brown silty clay layer (Layer 4) from
95cmbd, with some dispersed shell, charcoal, fishbone, fire-cracked rocks and small limestone
cobbles. Shell midden composed the lower half of the cultural deposit (Layers 5-6) from
125cmbd, and had internal stratigraphic differences. A mid-brown silty matrix was observed at
the top (Layer 5), above a more red clay matrix at the base (Layer 6). The frequency of charcoal
within the deposit increased between 135-140cmbd. By 140-145cmbd the cultural deposit began
gradually transitioning into red clay with fewer shells and charcoal. The base of the excavation
was sterile orange brown clay (Layer 7).
122
Figure 6.3 Stratigraphic diagram of cultural deposits within Leka TP2
Figure 6.4 Stratigraphic diagram of cultural deposits at Leka TP4
Heketa (TO-Nt-2)
The initial test pit at TO-Nt-2 (TP2) revealed the edge of two deposits, one possibly related to
the construction of the ‘Esi, and the other deriving from a pre-stonework phase of occupation at
the site. Below the topsoil within this unit was a layer of red brown volcanic clay to a depth of
123
around 20-25cm below datum (bd) (Layer 1). Below this was a layer of beach-rock sand debris
inter-mixed with some of this red brown clay to 25-30cmbd (Layer 2). A dark brown clay
deposit with some humic material was beneath this to 30-35cmbd (Layer 3), and capped the
cultural material. Layer 4 was a deposit of cultural material with dark brown clay matrix and
charcoal fragments which was observed below these surfaces. The density of cultural material in
this deposit was sparse. The base of this feature was sloping towards the south, and so the
deepest point of the cut was at 70cmbd in the western-facing profile at the south-east corner.
The shallowest point of the base of the deposit was at 53cmbd. A small pocket of shells
followed the contour of the base of this deposit, about 3cm above the sterile clay. This deposit
was possibly cut into another older occupation layer that had higher concentrations of shell,
coral and charcoal and thus appeared darker from 70-93cmbd within the profile (Layer 5). The
base of this deposit grades to less shell and more charcoal at the base. Both cultural deposits sat
on top of a surface of sterile orange brown clay (Layer 6). This test pit was dug to
approximately 99cmbd when the sterile clay was encountered.
The profile of stratigraphy within TP3 mostly resembled that of TP2. Red brown
volcanic clay below the topsoil extended to a depth of 25cmbd (Layer 1). Below this was the
same beach-rock sand inter-mixed with this clay (Layer 2), most likely related to the shaping of
the limestone slab for the ‘esi. This layer of debris capped a cultural deposit (Layer 3) at 30-
35cmbd. The cultural deposit consisted of dense large shell and charcoal fragments with a dark
silty loose clay matrix. There was some tree root disturbance within the deposit in the south-
west corner, from 45-60cmbd. Near the base at 85cmbd was a white ashy lens (Layer 5) within
a deposit of concentrated burnt crushed shell, charcoal, large whole shells, and many diodont or
puffer fish spines (Layer 4) from 80cmbd to the base of the feature. Very high densities of
mussel shell and a whole Lambis was located directly underneath Layer 5, grading to higher
concentrations of Diodontidae spines in with medium orange brown clay from the base of the
layer. The base of the deposit was encountered at 95cmbd, where the feature was cut into the
orange brown sterile clay seen in TP2 (Layer 6).
124
Figure 6.5 Stratigraphic diagram of cultural deposits within Heketa TP3
AMS dating of cultural contexts
In order to identify samples for dating, the wet-sieved, flotation, and in-situ charcoal samples
were sorted into those that could be identified as coconut, other endocarp or nuts, and other
charcoal (wood and parenchyma). Coconut endocarp was identified based on the surface
texture, which consists of a ‘cross-hatched’ type of pattern where clusters of three or four
elongated parenchymatous cells are orientated at 45 degree angles to each other, as well as the
thickness and density of the cross-section. Coconut is also very difficult to fracture, due to the
density of the endocarp, but when it does fracture it does so relatively evenly and cleanly. The
methods employed to extract macrobotanical remains from these sites were successful in
producing small amounts of coconut from the wet-sieved material and in situ samples at all
three sites. In order to develop a chronology for these sites, three samples of charred coconut
endocarp were selected from spits (levels) located near the top, middle and bottom of one test-
pit from each site for dating at the Waikato Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory (WRDL).
The results of AMS dating indicate that all three sites are from separate and relatively discrete
time periods within Tongan prehistory. The midden at Talasiu (TO-Mu-2) can be dated to
around 2750-2650 cal BP, and appears to have accumulated over a period of around 100 or less
years. All three radiocarbon samples had narrow age ranges that overlapped very closely with
one another, indicating a relatively short depositional period. This site therefore represents
refuse from a settlement that is on the cusp of late-Lapita and Ancestral Polynesian Society
(APS). These dates are supported by the ceramic assemblage from Talasiu, which is composed
primarily of plain ware with a few dentate-stamped sherds in lower levels of the midden (Clark
et al. In press; Golson 1957; Spenneman 1986).
125
Figure 6.6 Calibration of radiocarbon dates from Talasiu (TO-Mu-2), Leka (J17) and Heketa (TO-Nt-2)
Occupation underneath Langi Leka (J17) can be dated to around 1300-1000 cal BP, and
so falls within the Formative Period (1550-750 BP) in Tongan prehistory (see Chapter 1), of
which little is known (Burley 1998:365-8; Davidson 1979). The abandonment of pottery
traditions around this time leaves an impoverished archaeological record, with a total of only 16
sites on Tongatapu representing these 800 years of occupation. The cultural deposit sampled for
radiocarbon dating represents another relatively short period of deposition, with all three date
ranges overlapping within a 100-200 year period.
Finally, the sampled Heketa (TO-Nt-2) material was from two deposits. One is around
800-600 cal BP and at the end of the Formative Period, while the other is a later deposit that is
related to the development of early monumental architecture in Tonga during the Classic Tu’i
Tonga chiefdom after 600BP (Burley 1998:368-79; Clark and Reepmeyer 2014). Two
radiocarbon samples were from this lower and earlier deposit, and the remaining sample
originates from the more recent feature and fill that caps this older pre-stonework architecture
surface.
126
Chapter 7 Laboratory Methods
A combination of micro- and macrobotanical techniques was implemented to research and
identify plant use at three stages in Tongan prehistory. Sites were selected based on the results
of previous archaeological investigations on Tongatapu and sampled for botanical remains using
current archaeobotanical methods, modified for tropical environments. A combination of
flotation, wet-sieving and bulk stratigraphic sampling was used to extract all micro- and
macrobotanical material from each test-pit. Laboratory processing of these botanical remains
built on current techniques after experimentation revealed issues with contamination in the
laboratory environment and also methods for the dispersal of microcharcoal concentrations
within archaeological sediments, and the isolation of starch during heavy liquid separation. A
revised protocol for starch extraction is published here for future use in microbotanical analysis.
The extracted starch and parenchyma was analysed using both light microscopy and SEM, but
was then classified to taxa using a combination of multivariate statistical analysis in the form of
Discriminant Function Analysis, identification flowchart keys and visual checking of matches
that is outlined in Chapter 8
Microbotanical analysis: Starch residues
Experimentation with starch extraction techniques
As emphasised within Chapter 3, a number of previous technical studies of starch residue
extraction and processing from sediments have highlighted issues with current protocols, such
as sampling strategies, contamination and the use of destructive chemicals (Barton et al. 1998;
Coil 2003; Crowther 2009; Korstanje 2003; Parr 2002; Therin and Lentfer, in Torrence 2006b;
Torrence 2006b; Torrence and Therin, in Torrence 2006b). New protocols are constantly
developed to address the effects of different taphonomic, environmental and laboratory
conditions. In the current study, several experiments were designed to solve issues that arose
during the first round of laboratory processing, especially potential contamination from the
chemicals and equipment used. This experimentation sought to deal with this potential
contamination in the laboratory setting, as well as issues with the removal of micro-charcoal
that can inhibit viewing of starch granules on glass slides and the recycling of heavy liquid. The
results of these experiments enabled the development of a revised protocol that suited the nature
of the archaeological deposits being sampled and the laboratory equipment available at the
ANU.
Experiment One: Potential for starch contamination from Calgon, de-ionised water, filter mesh,
LST and Glycerol
The risk of contamination during post-excavation processing has been outlined in previous
research by Loy and Barton (in Torrence 2006b), Laurence (2013) and most recently Crowther
(2014). Experiments were designed to investigate the potential for contamination from materials
127
used to process the archaeological sediments. To do this, each material was independently tested
for the presence of starch, and any observed starch was recorded and counted.
Calgon
Firstly, powdered Calgon or sodium hexametaphosphate was tested by mixing the powder with
de-ionised water to produce four 500ml samples of 5% Calgon. A magnetic mixer was added to
each of the samples, and these were then placed on a hotplate set to 20˚C to allow the Calgon to
dissolve into the de-ionised water. Once this had occurred, the samples were each filtered
through a 10µm laboratory-grade-filtration mesh. The mesh was then cut into three parts,
mounted onto slides, and covered with a cover-slip. Mountant was not added to the samples, as
these were constructed only as temporary slide mounts. The slides were then viewed using light
microscopy in both brightfield and polarised light.
The results of this experiment suggested relatively high numbers of starch contaminants
from powdered Calgon. Sample 1 had a total of 35 grains, Sample 2 contained 12 grains,
Sample 3 had 69 grains, and Sample 4 had 37 grains. The predominant starch types encountered
were taxonomically identified as wheat (Triticum spp.), and maize (Zea mays). It is possible that
contamination of the Calgon occurred in the laboratory storage for the Department of
Archaeology and Natural History, as the bag had been left open for a time. It is also plausible
that some contamination can occur even within laboratory-grade Calgon during manufacture, as
many companies produce both Calgon and powdered maize (along with other dehydrated or
milled plant products).
To resolve this issue and enable Calgon to be used as a deflocculant during processing
of the archaeological samples, the 5% Calgon/de-ionised water mix was filtered through a 5µm
laboratory filtration mesh to remove any potential starch contaminants. The filtered mix was
then always covered unless being added to soil samples in starch extraction processes to break
down clay particles.
De-ionised water
Four 500ml samples of de-ionised water were processed in a similar manner to the Calgon. The
beakers were poured through a circle of 10µm filtration mesh and the filter paper was then cut
into three parts and mounted on slides as temporary mounts. No starch was observed within
these samples during light microscopy, and so it was concluded that de-ionised water could not
be a source of starch contamination when used in extracting starch from archaeological
sediments.
Filtration mesh
Four circles of 10µm mesh laboratory-grade filtration mesh were dampened with de-ionised
water, after previous experimentation revealed that this was not a potential source of starch
contamination. These circles were then each cut into three parts, placed onto slides, and then
128
covered with a coverslip. Light microscopy revealed that very little starch can be found on
filtration paper, with only one to two grains observed on any of the samples (Sample 2), and
therefore these are also not a significant source of contamination during processing of
archaeological sediments.
Lithium hexametaphosphate (LST)
Two samples of unused and two samples of recycled LST heavy liquid at 2.0sg were also tested
for starch contamination. These were filtered through individual rounds of 10µm filtration
mesh, and cut into strips before being placed on slides as temporary mounts. These slides were
then observed using light microscopy and any observed starch morphotypes were recorded. No
starch was observed within any of these samples, indicating that these are not sources of starch
contamination during processing.
Glycerol
Glycerol was the mountant chosen to create permanently mounted slides for both the
comparative collection and the starch extracted from archaeological sediments. It has a high
refractive index and ensures starch is preserved and protected from enzymatic attack, while also
allowing starch granules to be rolled. To test whether the Glycerol used in the Palynological
Laboratory in the Department of Archaeology and Natural History could be a potential source of
starch contamination, four slides were produced with 100µl of Glycerol on each. These slides
were covered with a cover-slip, and then observed using light microscopy. Three wheat starch
granules were found in total on these four slides, and so this material is a potential source of
starch contamination, but the contamination is very small.
Conclusions
These experiments assessed the amount and types of starch within a number of standard or
regularly employed chemicals and materials used to extract starch residues. Of the five materials
tested, only three contained any visible starch. Glycerol and filtration paper had very small
amounts of starch, with less than three granules observed in any one sample. Based on these
results it was decided that the use of glycerol and filtration paper within the current protocol was
acceptable and required no further processing. In contrast, the test involving unfiltered Calgon
highlighted that this material could be a significant source of contamination from modern wheat
and maize starch. Up to 69 starch grains were observed in each of the four samples. These
findings indicate that a major revision of the deflocculation process was required to enable
archaeological sediments to be processed without the risk of contamination. In light of this, it
was decided that the pre-mixed Calgon needed to be filtered through a 5µm filtration mesh prior
to use. All other materials were acceptable for use within the revised laboratory protocol.
Experiment Two: Removal of charcoal from samples
The soil samples collected from Talasiu, Leka and Heketa were taken from shell middens of
various densities, and it was noted that there were high concentrations of microcharcoal present
129
in the soil matrix. Microcharcoal can make light microscopy difficult by obscuring the visibility
of any potential starch grains, and so needs to be either removed or dispersed in starch
extraction. Several experiments were carried out to establish whether particular methods were
effective in this, and also to gauge the effect these methods had on starch residues. These
replicated and built on experiments carried out by Crowther (2009:62-82).
Lithium hexametaphosphate (LST)
One method tested for the removal of charcoal was to use Heavy Liquid to remove light
fractions of material from soil samples. Wood charcoal has a specific gravity (sg) or ratio of
density of 0.4sg, which enables it to float on water during archaeobotanical flotation techniques.
However, the microcharcoal observed in this experiment has instead settled in water during Step
Two of the methodology outlined here. It was hypothesised that this microcharcoal may be able
to be removed using a heavy liquid with a specific gravity heavier than water (1.0sg), but lighter
than the specific gravity of starch (1.7sg).
One archaeological sediment sample (Talasiu Spit 18) was selected to be sub-sampled
and processed to the point where Heavy Liquid in the form of lithium heteropolytungstate (LST)
was added using the methodology outlined below. Thirty millilitres of LST at 2.0sg was added
to the sample, and centrifuged at 1500rpm for 30mins. This was decanted through a 5µm
filtration mesh, enabling the LST to be separated from the extracted material and thus easily
recycled. The mesh was then placed in the top of a Falcon tube and de-ionised water was used
to wash the material caught on the mesh into the tube. All material lighter than 2.0sg and larger
than 5µm was therefore retained. Another LST solution at 1.2sg was then added, and the
process repeated so that a fraction that was lighter than 1.2sg was separated. The heavy fraction
was also retained as this should contain any starch residues.
The results of this experiment indicate that microcharcoal cannot be separated using
LST set at 1.2sg. Most of the charcoal examined tended to become waterlogged when exposed
to liquid over a sustained period of time, and became too dense to float. The differential specific
gravities of microcharcoals are probably a result of differing wood densities before charring,
particle size, and density as a result of water absorption. These changes probably occur either in
the soil or during Step One and Step Two.
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)
The second method tested in an attempt to remove charcoal from the archaeological sediments
was the addition of hydrogen peroxide or H2O2. Talasiu Spit 18 was again selected to be sub-
sampled for this experiment. The sample was processed until the point where it was reduced to
allow slide preparation. The sample was placed into a thin glass centrifuge tube under the fume
hood, and 10% hydrogen peroxide was added to the sample one drop at a time to gauge any
chemical reaction. There was no immediate reaction, nor to a higher percentage dilution of 30%
130
added in the same manner. There was only a very small reduction in the amount of charcoal
observed within the sample.
The final test in this experiment involved the application of 30% hydrogen peroxide and
then the sample was placed in a beaker of water on a hotplate to stimulate a stronger chemical
reaction. The water was warmed to 30˚C, and the sample was observed for 1.5 hours within
which time there was still no reaction. A slide was prepared after the final test in this experiment
to observe any effects of these chemicals on starch morphology. It was clear that most starch
had either gelatinised or dissolved. Very low numbers of starch in native condition were
observed in this test sample.
Simple dispersal
The final method tested in this experiment was not to remove the charcoal, but to allow simple
dispersal within the sample. Rather than preparing only one or two slides from the reduced
samples after processing, three to four slides were constructed. This allowed any micro-charcoal
present in the samples to be dispersed over a larger number of slides, reducing the possibility of
these charcoal particles obscuring any starch granules present in the samples.
Conclusions
The use of chemical agents to remove microcharcoal from archaeological sediments was not
successful for a variety of reasons. Heavy Liquid separation using LST at 1.2sg was not able to
float off micro-charcoal, due to the varying densities of wood charcoal. Some microcharcoal
was removed during this process, but high concentrations remained in the heavy fraction that
also contained the extracted starch grains. Similarly, 10% and 30% hydrogen peroxide proved to
be ineffective in dissolving charcoal, even when heat was added in an attempt to produce a
stronger reaction. In addition, such concentrations of hydrogen peroxide affected starch
morphology and preservation, rendering the use of these chemicals unacceptable.
Experiment Three: Removal of supernatant and recycling of heavy liquid
A simple experiment was carried out during the first phase of laboratory processing of the
archaeological soil samples to allow the separation of the supernatant after heavy liquid in the
form of lithium heteropolytungstate (LST) was added. Current methodologies (Horrocks 2004;
Therin and Lentfer, in Torrence 2006b) either pipette or decant the supernatant into a separate
tube, leaving the heavy residue behind in the original centrifuge tube to either be kept for a
second phase of heavy liquid separation or to be discarded. Experimentation was conducted to
ease recycling of heavy liquid for use within other samples and reduce inter-sample
contamination.
During this experiment six samples from one spit (level) at Talasiu (TO-Mu-2) were
processed up to the stage prior to heavy liquid separation. Exactly 30ml of LST at 2.0sg was
added to all four of these samples within centrifuge tubes which were then placed into the
131
centrifuge and spun at 1500rpm for 15mins. At this point two samples were chosen to attempt
pipetting off the supernatant, two samples were selected for decanting, and two samples were
chosen to test a new method which involved decanting the supernatant through a 5µm mesh
(Janelle Stevenson, pers.com). The reason for attempting this new method was to reduce the
amount of non-starch material within the sample after heavy liquid processing and to ease the
process of recycling the heavy liquid through separating the starch from the LST immediately.
Each set of samples were then processed accordingly. Individual techniques for separating the
supernatant were assessed for ease of use in terms of the time it took to carry out the separation,
the efficiency of the separation in terms of the amount of heavy residue within the supernatant,
and the subsequent steps needed to remove and recycle the heavy liquid.
Pipette Technique
Pipetting the supernatant off the top of the heavy residue which had sunk to the bottom of the
centrifuge tube proved to be a very efficient technique for separating the light and heavy
fractions. Very little of the heavy residue was accidentally added to the light fraction. However,
the method was also very time-consuming as only small amounts of the supernatant could be
removed at a time, taking around 5 minutes. The heavy liquid then needed to be removed from
the light fraction through various steps involving the dilution of the sample to wash the heavy
liquid and retain starch residues. The heavy liquid then needed to be passed through a glass
mesh to remove any contaminants. To increase the specific gravity of the heavy liquid, it was
put inside a glass beaker on a magnetic stirrer at low heat and monitored until enough water had
evaporated to return the LST to 2.0sg. This was again a time-consuming process, taking around
eight hours to enable the heavy liquid to be reused.
Decanting Technique
Decanting the supernatant into a new centrifuge tube took less time to separate the heavy and
light fractions—approximately 1 minute— but was less effective. There was some mixing of the
two fractions as the last of the supernatant was carefully poured into the second tube. This
meant that the final slides had more organic material than those made from the pipette samples.
The same process was then used to recycle the heavy liquid through dilution, sieving and
evaporating water to return the LST to 2.0sg.
Sieving Technique
Pouring the supernatant through the 5µm mesh was a time-consuming process as small amounts
of organic residue from the top of the heavy fraction was inter-mixed with the light fraction, as
seen within the decanting technique, and combined with charcoal to clog the mesh. A pump had
to be used to slowly allow the supernatant to pass through the mesh, taking around 10 minutes.
The light fraction remained on the 5µm mesh, and was then put into the top of a centrifuge tube
and washed off into the tube using de-ionised water. Only one wash was required to remove any
residual LST from the sample before the sample could be reduced for slide construction.
132
Despite being more time-consuming in terms of separating the supernatant from the heavy
fraction, the technique was very effective at separating the heavy liquid from the light fraction
quickly without any dilution, enabling the LST to be used immediately after only one further
step of sieving through a glass filter paper.
Conclusions
Both pipetting and decanting the supernatant off from above the heavy fraction were more time-
effective methods than the sieving technique in terms of separating the light fraction for further
processing. Of these, pipetting was the most effective technique to reduce the amount of heavy
residue accidentally entering the light fraction during separation. Once these samples were
separated, both the pipette and decanted samples required further processing to remove the
heavy liquid and enable it to be re-used for subsequent samples. This processing added
approximately eight hours (dependent on the amount of heavy liquid being recycled) to the
laboratory protocol. In contrast, the sieved samples only involved one step of centrifuging and
decanting that took around four minutes, before the sample was ready to be reduced and placed
on a slide. The process of removing contaminants from the heavy liquid by filtering through a
glass mesh, and repeating this step added another five minutes to the protocol before the heavy
liquid was ready to be reused. Therefore, despite the initial processing time, the sieving
technique is the most time effective and efficient overall method for separating the supernatant
and recycling the heavy liquid.
Laboratory processing: Revised starch extraction protocol
After experimentation highlighted potential sources of starch contamination within the materials
used during standard starch extraction processes, a method for dispersing charcoal and a new
technique for removing the supernatant after density separation and recycling heavy liquid were
incorporated into a final extraction protocol. This protocol was based on modification of
techniques published by Horrocks (2004), Torrence (2006a, b) and Field (pers. comm. 2012). It
involved steps to sub-sample, deflocculate, settling, sieving, centrifuging, density separation,
and reduction of samples for slide construction.
Note on sub-sampling and site variation
Talasiu was the first site to be analysed for the presence of starch residues. A 3gm sub-sample
was taken from each 5cm spit excavated from the test-pit, and processed to extract preserved
starch residues. After radiocarbon dating revealed that all three sites represent relatively discrete
time periods, it became clear that there was little intra-site age variation and so few
chronological differences would be observed within each of these sites. A decision was made,
therefore, to sub-sample every second 5cm spit to gain a representative distribution of starch
preservation within the deposits sampled at Leka and Heketa.
Heketa had very low quantities of starch during the first round of analysis. As a result, a
decision was made to re-process four spits from the site with new sub-samples. A few changes
133
were made in the processing technique to assess the potential of different variables in methods
for starch extraction. The samples were sieved through a 250µm filtration mesh, rather than
125µm. Secondly, the samples were placed in the centrifuge for 30 minutes rather than 15
minutes during heavy liquid separation. This gave a larger window of time for starch to release
from the heavy fraction and become part of the supernatant.
Laboratory protocol for starch extraction from archaeological sediments
Step 1: A 3gm representative sub-sample of each archaeological sample was measured
out and placed into a 50ml capacity Falcon centrifuge tube. Ten millilitres of filtered
5% Calgon mix was then added as a deflocculant to each of the tubes before the tubes
were capped and individually vortexed for 30 seconds.
Step 2: The samples in the tubes were poured into a glass beaker with 500ml of de-
ionised water and covered. Stokes Law was employed to calculate the amount of time
that the samples should be left to allow organic particles to settle. It was established that
samples should be left for at least three hours to allow the clay particles to separate, and
organic spherical particles larger than 5µm to settle 10cm at terminal velocity in water
at temperatures of 17-21˚C. After three hours each sample was decanted, refilled with
500ml de-ionised water and covered. These processes were repeated at least twice or
until the supernatant was clear.
Step 3: The sample was then poured through a 125µm sieve to remove the larger
organic fraction.
Step 4: The remaining sample was poured into a Falcon tube and capped, before being
centrifuged at 2000rpm for four minutes and then decanted. This process was repeated
until the supernatant was visibly clear.
Step 5: As much liquid was removed at this point and then 30ml of heavy liquid in the
form of lithium heteropolytungstate (LST) at 2.0sg was added to each sample. The
samples were then again put back into the centrifuge and spun at 1500rpm for 15
minutes.
Step 6: Each sample was decanted through a new 5µm mesh circle, enabling the LST to
be separated from the extracted material and thus easily recycled. The mesh was then
placed in the top of a Falcon tube and de-ionised water was used to wash the material
caught on the mesh into the tube. All material larger than 5µm was therefore retained.
Step 7: The samples were then centrifuged at 2000rpm for four minutes and decanted.
This process was repeated twice to wash and dispose of any remaining LST.
Step 8: The final step involved reducing the samples to less than 5ml by allowing the
samples to settle overnight and then pipetting off the supernatant. This remaining
material was placed onto slides and allowed to dry before Glycerol was added. The
material on the slide was gently agitated to release the dried starch residues from the
134
glass, and then a cover-slip was placed over it and sealed with nail polish to ensure that
the slide was protected from contamination.
Light Microscopy
All samples of extracted starch residues from Talasiu, Heketa and Leka were observed and
imaged using light microscopy. A Leica DM6000 Compound Transmitted Light Microscope
within the Centre for Advanced Microscopy at the ANU was used to view starch in both
brightfield and cross-polarised light. Each slide was viewed in horizontal transects, enabling all
starch to be observed and eliminating the prospect of accidentally recording the same grain
twice. Images were taken of every starch grain encountered, with quantification capped at 100
grains per sample. These 100 grains were usually counted over several slides from a particular
sample, meaning no sampling technique was employed. Often the samples contained less than
100 grains in which case absolute counts were recorded. Images were taken in both brightfield
and cross-polarised light to enable recording of attributes related to the size and shape of the
grain, and also the extinction cross which can only be viewed in cross-polarised light. Each
imaged grain was given a number which correlated with the file names for any digital
photographs taken of that grain. The grains were rolled by tapping the top of the cover-slip
gently to enable accurate description of the three dimensional shape. This technique also
allowed the observer to note if the grain was lenticular or biconvex in one plane of view.
Archaeological starch classification: Assemblage-typology approach
To explore morphological patterning in the archaeological starch assemblage, a number of
starch morphotypes were created based on a combination of the nominal and metric attributes.
This analytical technique has been used elsewhere as a means of gauging morphological
variation within archaeological assemblages (Barton 2005; Crowther 2009:150-2; Lentfer et al.
2002; Mercader et al. 2008). The technique is most often used where a comprehensive
comparative collection is not available and therefore the ‘rules’ of group membership are not
clear (Crowther 2009:150). Breaking down the archaeological assemblage into ‘types’ enabled
the range of morphological diversity within each context to be studied, and provide an estimate
of the number of taxa present. This approach was also useful to identify starch that had been
modified through various cultural and natural taphonomic processes, using the work of Barton
(2009), del. P. Babot (2003:69-82) and Crowther (2009:19-61, 2012). The primary
morphological variable used in this study was three-dimensional shape, followed by shape
modifiers such as the number and type of pressure faceting, and the presence and type of
fissuring at the hilum.
Pinpointing the species from which these starch types could have originated was a
critical next step. To do this the morphotypes were compared to those observed within the
comparative collection. This was done by analysis of the morphological patterning recorded
135
within the Excel database, and images taken during light microscopy and SEM. Most often, a
number of matches were possible. To narrow this list down further, the archaeological starch
types were then compared to the length and width ranges of the matches. This assemblage-based
approach can also highlight the possibility that archaeological starch does not originate from
any taxa in the comparative collection, and therefore may only be identified to genus or family
level, or remain as an unknown morphotype.
Archaeological starch classification: Multivariate statistical analysis
After the assemblage typologies had been created and some basic taxonomic identifications
were given to the extracted archaeological starch based on visual or size characteristics,
multivariate statistical analysis was carried out to further extrapolate or confirm these
identifications. The extracted archaeological starch was classified using multivariate statistical
analysis in the form of Linear Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA). The statistical analysis
was based on the analysis of the reference material, and was used to classify archaeological
starch using the same variables. These were classified in the same manner as the reference
starch, but as ‘ungrouped specimens’ that were not included in the learning parameters for the
DFA.
The database for each test-pit from each site was divided into two based on the
orientation ratios, and the range of variables altered according to those assessed and deemed to
be significant from the analysis of the comparative collection. Instead of being given a
‘grouping’ as within the datasets from the comparative collection, a ‘?’ was entered into this
column for each archaeological starch grain. Each archaeological starch grain was named in the
‘point’ column according to the spit from which they were extracted, and the grain number
given to them during recording. In this way, each archaeological dataset could be individually
compared to one of the two datasets (side-on or end-on) from the comparative collection, and
each starch grain given a predicted classification alongside the reference starch. These were
given through the ‘classifier’ output for each dataset, and each starch grain could be traced back
to the sample from which it was extracted through the name it was given in the point column.
Quantification of the classifications was carried out so that the number of starch grains
matched to each species within a particular sample could be calculated. These figures gave an
overview of the range of species potentially present within each sample and the quantities of
starch classified within these groupings. During this phase, the results of classifications from
both datasets were combined; however, it became clear that in order to do this some system was
needed to filter the classifications, creating a statistical gauge for the level of confidence in the
presence of any species within a sample.
Confidence in these classifications in a particular sample was made by fulfilling a
number of criteria. High confidence classifications had to have a successful reclassification rate
136
within DFA for that species of over 60%, and more than five grains had been matched to that
species within that sample. Moderate confidence classifications had to either have over 60%
correct reclassification but less than five grains matched, or less than 60% correct
reclassification and over five grains matched to that species within that sample. Low confidence
classifications were given when the reclassification for that species was less than 60%, and less
than five grains were matched to that species. In this way, each classification made using DFA
was acknowledged, but a means of gauging the actual likelihood of that species being present in
a particular spit was also provided. The identifications were then confirmed using visual
checking of the images of the archaeological starch. These were compared with the images of
the species taken using light microscopy and SEM to which the DFA had classified each grain,
confirming or eliminating these as possible taxonomic classifications.
Macrobotanical analysis: Charred parenchyma and endocarp
Laboratory analysis
Macrobotanical remains were collected using three different methods during the excavation
process. Any large charcoal fragments above 1cm in diameter observed during excavation of the
test units were collected and placed in aluminium foil envelopes. These samples were labelled
according to the site, test unit and spit from which they derived. Charcoal and seeds were also
collected within both the light and heavy fractions during flotation. The light fraction floated
during bucket flotation when water was added to the soil, and the heavy fraction remained in the
bottom of the bucket to be wet-sieved. Some charcoal can become water-logged and therefore
sinks during this process. This depends on the degree of charring within the fragments, and
porosity of the material.
In the quarantine laboratory at the ANU, the heavy fraction was sieved through a 3mm
mesh to create two size fractions, smaller and larger than 3mm. These fractions were then sorted
into material and artefact types including shell, ceramics, land snails, seeds, and charcoal. These
were bagged separately and labelled according to the site, test pit, spit and sample type (in situ,
flot or wet-sieved). The flot (light fraction) was likewise sorted into material types such as
charcoal, seeds, insect remains, pumice, small bone and landsnails. The charcoal from each of
these sources, including in-situ, was then further sorted into parenchyma, wood charcoal and
endocarp.
Charred endocarp
Where possible the endocarp was identified to genus or species level. This taxonomic
identification was carried out first through the observation of surface morphology and features,
and second through fracturing endocarp fragments down the radial section, and viewing the cell
arrangement. Coconut (Cocos nucifera) has a distinctive surface texture on both the exterior and
interior surfaces of the endocarp. This texture is created by a cell arrangement that creates a
137
‘cross-hatched’ effect through long, thin parenchyma cells that stack horizontally and vertically
alternately. Candlenut (Aleurites moluccana) is identifiable through distinctive surface
morphology. The exterior surface of the endocarp has a bumpy and slightly warped texture
similar to a walnut, and a high degree of curvature relative to fragment size.
Parenchyma
Parenchyma was identified to taxonomic level using the range of morphological features
recorded within the comparative collection. Each fragment tentatively identified as
parenchymatous was firstly described in terms of general and surface morphology (Hather
2000), and then fractured along the transverse and longitudinal planes to record cell
arrangement and bundling features. The fractured parenchyma was placed into a small Petri dish
and nestled in a bed of salt, and an Olympus Compound light microscope was used to view and
image the fragments in reflected light. These fragments were confirmed as parenchyma based
on morphology which differs from wood charcoal. These morphological traits include a more
rounded surface due to the exposure and erosion of cells; surface features such as buds,
detachment scars and spines; few visible rays and thus a more uneven fracture; consistent cell
shapes that are usually rounded or angular; and the presence of distinctive vascular bundles or
tissues.
Each fragment was identified as either stem or root-derived vegetative parenchyma, and
then to species of origin where possible. The identification flowchart key was utilised to provide
either a single identification or a list of possible identifications where no further breakdown of
the taxa is possible due to morphological overlap, or other features of the archaeological
parenchyma are not visible. These taxonomic identifications were then confirmed using images
from both light microscopy and SEM. The images could also be utilised to eliminate or confirm
taxa where a list of possible identifications is provided.
Classifications were then given based on the determination system outlined in Chapter 5
using identification criteria and associated levels of confidence compiled by Paz (2001) and by
Oliveira (2008). This determination system has been used successfully by these researchers in
the past to analyse macrobotanical plant remains from a range of archaeological contexts in the
Asia-Pacific region (Barker et al. 2011; Barton and Paz 2007; Oliveira 2008; Paz 2001, 2005).
The identification key is useful as a means of breaking down the morphology in the comparative
collection. However, there was a reasonable likelihood that some samples would not match any
of the specimens within the comparative collection due to both the condition of fragments and
also the fact that the reference collection is not exhaustive. The reference collection also has a
general focus on economic and non-economic plant taxa from Western Polynesia, and so would
require the inclusion of additional specimens for use in other geographic locations.
138
Chapter 8 Results
Presentation of results is divided into four main sections. The first section considers the
quantification and identification of macrobotanical remains from all test units and sites. The
various extraction techniques utilised in the field is also compared in terms of the effectiveness
of the recovery of charred endocarp, wood charcoal and parenchyma. Each site will also be
compared in terms of the quantities of identified material, the distribution of these in test units
and the results of a case study presented for the identification of parenchyma at Talasiu. The
second section focuses on the quantification and identification of microbotanical remains in the
form of starch grains. Once again each site is compared in terms of starch preservation, the
numbers of identified species and the distribution of starch within test units according to dated
cultural deposits. The third section analyses a number of Western Pacific plant production
systems using theoretical insights from Evolutionary and Human Ecology for assessing
efficiency of yield and associated nutritional returns. These modern examples provide a useful
range of models within which the past systems, represented by archaeobotanical remains, can be
assessed and placed in the final section of this chapter.
Macrobotanical analysis
Quantification of charcoal
Macrobotanical assemblage breakdown
Overall, macrobotanical preservation within all of the sites and test units was relatively good,
with small quantities of a range of plant material recovered. However, these remains only
composed up to 0.46% of the total pre-processing material weights removed from these units
(including soil, shell and other matrices). Within these assemblages, the largest quantities of
macrobotanical material were recovered from Talasiu TP2, with a total weight of 60.8g. The
smallest assemblage was recovered from Leka TP3, however only three spits were processed
from this test unit.
The quantification of the macrobotanical assemblage was primarily based on the
separation and analysis of three main components: coconut, other endocarp, and wood charcoal,
from which vegetative storage parenchyma was separated later. Wood charcoal composed the
bulk of the macrobotanical assemblages from almost all the test units at Talasiu (TO-Mu-2),
Leka (J17) and the Heketa (TO-Nt-2), making up around 78% of the collective weight (see
Table 8.1 and Figure 8.1). Only Leka TP4 varied from this trend, with wood charcoal making up
only 26% of the macrobotanical assemblage from this test unit. In particular, Talasiu TP2 had
the greatest amount and distribution of non-endocarp charcoal (53.4g). For this reason, this test
unit was selected as a case study for the separation and identification of vegetative storage
parenchyma. Only very small quantities of parenchyma (<1g) were found in any given sampled
deposit. Aside from wood charcoal, non-coconut endocarp was the second most common
139
macrobotanical material recovered and quantified, composing around 17% of the total
assemblage. Coconut endocarp was recovered from every test unit, but only in small quantities
and so made up only 5.8% of the overall assemblage.
The quantification of macrobotanical materials is analysed here in terms of the rates of
recovery from flotation, wet-sieving and in situ collection, and the overall quantities, as well as
the distribution of these quantities within each test unit. This quantification indicated both the
success of various methods for extraction of particular plant remains, as well as the effects of
site taphonomy and formation processes upon archaeobotanical assemblage composition.
Table 8.1 Summary of total macrobotanical assemblages from all sites and test-pits
Figure 8.1 Composition of overall macrobotanical assemblage in terms of abundance
Coconut endocarp
Basic sorting processes highlighted an interesting pattern in the macrobotanical extraction
process. Coconut endocarp was extracted exclusively during the wet-sieving stage of
archaeobotanical processing in the field. This is most likely because of the higher density of
coconut endocarp, which does not float as well as wood charcoal, or other varieties of endocarp.
Another possibility is that coconut endocarp does not disaggregate easily from clay soils during
the initial deflocculation process before flotation. No experimental tests were carried out to test
either of these ideas. These coconut endocarp fractions were separated primarily to enable
selection of samples for AMS dating.
When all of the test units are compared directly, the highest quantities of coconut
endocarp were observed within Talasiu TP2 and Heketa TP3 with a total of 1.6g in each test
unit. However, when these quantities are considered as a fraction of the total macrobotanical
weight for each test unit, the highest percentages were extracted from Leka TP3 (10.7%) and
TP4 (19.5%) (see Table 8.2). The remaining test units contained coconut endocarp fractions that
Botanical material Talasiu Leka TP2 Leka TP3 Leka TP4 Heketa TP2 Heketa TP3 Total (g) % of assemblage
Coconut (g) 1.6 0.6 0.1 0.7 1.6 1.2 5.8 4.832125302
Endocarp (g) 5.8 0.3 2.3 4.1 2.6 5.1 20.2 16.82912605
Wood charcoal/parenchyma (g) 53.37 8.47 2.4 1.72 4 24.07 94.03 78.33874865
Total (g) 60.77 9.37 4.8 6.52 8.2 30.37 120.03
% of total material weight 0.0219 0.0064 0.0065 0.0696 0.1708 0.4658
140
were less than 10% of the entire macrobotanical weight, with Leka TP3 containing the smallest
percentage.
Recovered coconut endocarp was distributed throughout the test unit from Talasiu, with
quantities found in every stratigraphic layer, aside from the sterile clay at the base, and almost
every spit. Only one stratigraphic layer was processed in TP2 from Leka. This layer was Layer
8, which was a mid-brown silty clay cultural layer with charcoal, and this contained coconut
endocarp in the bottom 20cm (105-125cm below surface) before sterile clay was encountered.
Leka TP3 only contained coconut endocarp in this same cultural layer in the top 5cm (90-
95cmbs). In contrast, coconut endocarp was extracted from all sampled stratigraphic layers in
Leka TP4 (Layers 4-6), but not every spit in these. Small quantities were recovered from the
lower 15cm (110-125cmbs) of Layer 4, a mid-brown silty clay layer similar to that observed in
TP2 and TP3, and the top 5cm (125-130cmbs) and middle (134-140cmbs) of Layer 5 in a more
dense shell deposit. Coconut endocarp was also recovered from the bottom 10cm (155-
170cmbs) of this test unit in the mixed clay and shell deposit of Layer 6. At Heketa, coconut
was extracted from all stratigraphic layers in TP2, but was not observed within the bottom 10cm
of this test unit (90-100cmbs). Coconut endocarp extracted from TP3 was mostly concentrated
in the lower 35cm (70-105cmbs) of this test unit, in the base of Layer 3 and throughout Layers
4-5.
Table 8.2 Quantification of coconut endocarp from all sites and test-pits
Other endocarp
Both wood charcoal and non-coconut endocarp composed a large percentage of the
macrobotanical remains from all sites and test units. Endocarp was successfully extracted using
all three archaeobotanical techniques employed during fieldwork. Wet-sieving and in situ
collection resulted in the extraction of endocarp from all test-units, whilst flotation had more
variable rates of recovery. This could be the result of issues with the flotation of endocarp
already highlighted with regard to coconut endocarp extraction. This fraction was separated as a
preliminary step towards the selection of samples for AMS dating. These endocarp fractions
remain unidentified because of the lack of a comprehensive comparative collection. Some
Aleurites moluccana was observed but was not separated from other endocarp due to a focus
within this study on the identification of parenchyma within the macrobotanical remains.
Site TP Wet-sieved (g) In-situ (g) Flot (g) Total % of total macrobotanical weight
Talasiu 2 1.6 0 0 1.6 2.6
Leka 2 0.6 0 0 0.6 6.4
Leka 3 0.1 0 0 0.1 2.1
Leka 4 0.7 0 0 0.7 10.7
Heketa 2 1.6 0 0 1.6 19.5
Heketa 3 1.2 0 0 1.2 4.0
Total 5.8 0 0 5.8 45.3
141
The quantification of other endocarp followed the same pattern as coconut endocarp,
whereby the highest quantities were extracted from Talasiu TP2 (5.8g) and Heketa TP3 (5.1g)
(see Table 8.3). When quantities of endocarp are considered as percentages of the total weight
of macrobotanical material extracted from these test units, Leka TP4 clearly has the highest
percentage of other endocarp (62.9%), while Leka TP2 has the lowest (3.2%) by a significant
margin.
Talasiu test unit TP2 again has recovered endocarp distributed throughout all strata.
Only two spits did not contain any non-coconut endocarp, at 0-5cmbs and 80-85cmbs. The three
test units at Leka have variable distributions of endocarp throughout the observed stratigraphic
layers. Endocarp was recovered from the top (90-95cmbs), middle (105-110cmbs) and bottom
(120-125cmbs) spits of Layer 5 in TP2. In contrast, TP3 had non-coconut endocarp in all three
sampled spits of the same stratigraphic layer, while TP4 had small quantities of endocarp
throughout the test unit apart from the top 5cm (95-100cmbs). Non-coconut endocarp was found
throughout all strata within TP2 and TP3 at Heketa, but was absent from the bottom 5cm (100-
105cmbs) of TP3.
Table 8.3 Quantification of other endocarp from all test units
Wood charcoal and parenchyma
The separation of monocot and dicot wood and parenchymatous charcoal from coconut and
other endocarp was the final stage in the quantification of macrobotanical material. Because of
the similarity of vegetative storage parenchyma to wood charcoal, any plant-derived charred
material that was not endocarp was separated first and weighed as a single fraction. Because of
the abundance of charcoal from Talasiu TP2, this unit was used as a test for identifiable
parenchymatous material. Wet-sieving and flotation techniques were by far the most successful
method for recovering both wood charcoal and parenchyma. The vesicular cellular structure and
specific gravity of wood charcoal enables this material to float relatively easily in water, a fact
which has been utilised by archaeobotanists for many years. The success of wet-sieving, as a
follow-up to flotation steps, is most likely the result of the inability of technicians to easily
deflocculate clay sediments to release wood charcoal in the field using bucket flotation methods.
The highest quantities of wood charcoal (including parenchyma) were recovered from
test unit TP2 at Talasiu with a total of 53.4g (see Table 8.4). TP3 at Heketa had the second
greatest quantity (24.1g) of wood charcoal, while the remaining test units all had less than 10g.
Spit TP Wet-sieved (g) In-situ (g) Flot (g) Total % of total macrobotanical weight
Talasiu 2 3.6 0.9 1.3 5.8 9.5
Leka 2 0.2 0.1 0 0.3 3.2
Leka 3 0.6 1.4 0.3 2.3 47.9
Leka 4 2.4 1.7 0 4.1 62.9
Heketa 2 1.6 0.3 0.7 2.6 31.7
Heketa 3 3.9 0.7 0.5 5.1 16.8
Total 12.3 5.1 2.8 20.2 172.0
142
Despite these figures, when these quantities are viewed as percentages of the whole
macrobotanical assemblages from each of these test units, Leka TP2 has the highest percentage
of wood charcoal, with 90.4%. These statistics indicate that the assemblages from Talasiu TP2,
Leka TP2 and TP3, and Heketa TP3 are all dominated by wood charcoal. In contrast only 26.4%
of recovered charcoal is represented by wood charcoal in Leka TP4, while Heketa TP3 has just
under half (48.8%).
The distribution of these quantities within the test units from the sites of Talasiu, Leka
and Heketa are variable; however, at least small amounts of wood charcoal were present in
every spit and stratigraphic layer sampled. In Talasiu TP2, most charcoal was concentrated
around Layer 3 (40-75cm) where it is likely that larger fragments were preserved in the matrix
of loose shell and yellow red clay. Very little charcoal was recovered from Layers 1, 2 and 5 in
the more compact shell midden deposits. Leka TP2, TP3 and TP4, and Heketa TP2 had
relatively even distribution of wood charcoal in the test units, with small amounts (<2g) in every
spit and stratigraphic layer. In contrast, Heketa TP3 had the largest concentration of charcoal
within Layer 4 (80-90cmbs) with 12.5g, while the remaining strata had less than 5g.
Table 8.4 Quantification of wood charcoal and parenchyma from all test units
Parenchyma distribution and identification: Talasiu TP2 case study
Within this section the macrobotanical assemblage from test unit TP2 at Talasiu (TO-Mu-2) was
chosen to conduct a case study for the separation and identification of vegetative storage
parenchyma. Due to the documented difficulty of separating these charred remains from wood
charcoal (Hather 2000), it was decided to analyse only one of the six test units excavated during
the 2011 field season. Talasiu TP2 was chosen for the abundance of charcoal in the
macrobotanical assemblage of this unit, on the assumption that the preservation of any
vegetative storage parenchyma was likely to be the greatest.
Parenchyma was first separated from wood charcoal based on ground tissue
morphology, such as consistent cell shapes that are usually rounded or angular; the presence of
distinctive vascular bundles or tissues, usually with very few rays dividing these tissues. This
initial step enabled the presence of vegetative and non-vegetative parenchyma (i.e. fruits) in
samples to be recorded. The distribution of these remains in the test unit varied, although at least
one fragment of charred parenchyma was extracted from each stratigraphic layer. The disturbed
Spit TP Wet-sieved (g) In-situ (g) Flot (g) Total % of total macrobotanical weight
Talasiu 2 23.7 17.9 11.8 53.4 87.8
Leka 2 3.5 4.5 0.5 8.5 90.4
Leka 3 0.8 1.6 0.0 2.4 50.0
Leka 4 1.0 0.3 0.5 1.7 26.4
Heketa 2 2.0 1.1 0.9 4.0 48.8
Heketa 3 22.4 1.2 0.5 24.1 79.3
Total 53.4 26.6 14.1 94.0 382.6
143
midden within Layer 1, and very compact shell midden deposit in Layer 2 both contained three
fragments. The largest overall quantity of parenchyma was recovered from the loose large shell
matrix composing Layer 3 (see Table 8.5), with a total of five fragments. Layer 4 below this
contained another two fragments, while the basal cultural layer of reddish clay and small
crushed shell only contained one fragment.
Each fragment was identified to species where possible, using a range of attributes of
ground tissue and vascular tissue morphology, and the identification flowchart key created for
the reference collection (Chapter 5). Most fragments could be identified with a moderate degree
of confidence, and were therefore labelled with the prefix ‘cf.’, indicating that most
morphological features matched the written descriptions and resembled the reference SEM
images.
A number of different families are represented within the identified parenchyma
assemblage. These included Araceae, Dioscoreaceae, Moraceae, Musaceae, and Zingiberaceae.
Four fragments were identified as cf. Colocasia esculenta, or the common taro and were
extracted from Layers 2 and 3 to a maximum depth of 65cmbs. Two species belonging to the
Dioscorea or yam genus, Dioscorea alata and Dioscorea nummularia, were found in Layers 3
and 4, with a total of four identified fragments. A single fragment identified as cf. Artocarpus
altilis (breadfruit) fruit/flesh was found in Layer 2 between 25-30cmbs. Interestingly, a single
fragment of parenchyma from Layer 3 was identified as belonging to the Musaceae family,
indicating that the flesh of this fruit was either intentionally cooked or discarded into a fire and
incorporated into the ash. Members of the Ginger family Zingiberaceae, such as Zingiber
zerumbet or Curcuma longa were often cultivated and eaten in Tonga or used for medicinal and
ornamental purposes. The antiquity of this use is demonstrated by the recovery of parenchyma
identified confidently to this family within the archaeobotanical record at Talasiu. The
remaining fragments could only be identified as ‘root-derived’ (Layer 3), or were left classified
as ‘unidentifiable’ (Layers 1 and 5).
144
Table 8.5 Distribution and identification of parenchyma extracted from Talasiu TP2
Microbotanical analysis
Extraction, quantification and distribution
Microbotanical assemblage breakdown
Starch was successfully extracted from all test units sampled for microbotanical remains from
Talasiu (TO-Mu-2), Leka (J17) and Heketa (TO-Nt-2). Due to time constraints, only four of the
six excavated test units were sampled, with a total of 39 bulk soil samples processed. These test
units included Talasiu TP2, Leka TP2 and TP4, and Heketa TP3, and were chosen based on site
taphonomy and the likelihood of microbotanical preservation. Of these, Talasiu TP2 contained
the largest quantity (count) of starch grains, but this is biased by the large number of samples
analysed from this site. Every spit or level was sampled from Talasiu TP2, whilst every second
spit was sampled from the remaining test units. This alteration of the microbotanical
subsampling procedure was made after Talasiu TP2 was completely processed, and counts
revealed that there was very little variation in starch distribution within the test unit apart from a
spike at the very base of the cultural deposits. Due to time constraints, it was deemed
appropriate to process every second sample and halve the overall processing time.
With this in mind, it may be appropriate to compare the quantities of starch from each
of the test units as an average based on the number of processed samples (see Table 8.6). When
these figures are calculated, it becomes clear that Leka TP2 had the highest quantity of starch
per sample, with an average of 93 grains. Leka TP3 followed with an average of 31.4 grains per
Depth Spit Layer Parenchyma Identification
0-5 1 1
5-10 2 1
10-15 3 1 x
Unidentifiable
Zingiberaceae
15-20 4 1 x Zingiberaceae
20-25 5 2 x cf. Colocasia esculenta
25-30 6 2 x cf. Artocarpus altilis fruit
30-35 7 2 x cf. Colocasia esculenta
35-40 8 3
40-45 9 3 x
cf. Dioscorea alata
cf. Musaceae
45-50 10 3 x cf. Colocasia esculenta
50-55 11 3 x cf. Dioscorea alata
55-60 12 3 x Root-derived
60-65 13 3 x cf. Colocasia esculenta
65-70 14 4
70-75 15 4 x cf. Dioscorea alata
75-80 16 4 x cf. Dioscorea nummularia
80-85 17 5
85-90 18 5 x Unidentifiable
90-95 19 5
95-100 Control 6
145
sample, just slightly higher than Talasiu TP2 which contained an average of 22.5 grains per
sample. The lowest average derived from TP3 at Heketa (9 grains). Considering that AMS
dating indicates that this site was the most recently occupied, these figures would indicate that
either plant food was not being processed or discarded in these cultural deposits at Heketa, or
that taphonomic factors such as soil pH levels or enzymatic activity heavily impacted starch
preservation. These quantities from each test unit will be briefly discussed with regard to the
distribution of starch throughout the sampled cultural deposits below.
Table 8.6 Overall quantities (counts) of starch extracted from all sampled test units at Talasiu (TO-Mu-2)
Talasiu (TO-Mu-2)
Test unit TP2 from Talasiu contained a total of 449 starch grains, extracted from 20 processed
3gm bulk soil samples (see Table 8.7). When this quantity is broken down into the distribution
of starch grains within each recorded stratigraphic layer, some patterning emerges. The
disturbed midden at the top of the test unit (0-20cmbs) which composes Layer 1 has a total of
107 starch grains from four samples. Layer 2 below this has the smallest quantity of starch
grains, with a total of 47 grains from three samples. Layer 3 has the largest number of samples
(n=6), however this deposit has a quantity of starch (96 grains) that falls in the middle of the
range when compared to the other strata. Layer 4 had the second smallest quantity of starch with
64 grains from three samples. Finally, Layer 5 at the base of the cultural deposits had the largest
quantity, with a total of 128 grains extracted from three samples. The control sample taken from
the sterile clay below the shell midden had seven starch grains, which most likely derived from
the transition between these two deposits.
Site Total samples analysed Total count Average/sample
Talasiu TP2 20 449 22.5
Leka TP2 4 372 93.0
Leka TP4 8 251 31.4
Heketa TP3 7 63 9.0
Totals 39 1135 29.1
146
Table 8.7 Distribution of starch counts within Talasiu TP2
Leka (J17)
Two test units were sampled from excavations at Leka, TP2 and TP4. Leka TP3 was excluded
from this analysis as stratigraphic comparisons revealed that the cultural deposit sampled within
this test unit was already sampled in TP2. TP2 had a total starch count of 372 starch grains
extracted from four 3gm bulk soil samples. These were distributed relatively evenly throughout
the test unit, which seems reasonable considering these four samples were taken from the same
stratigraphic layer (Layer 7) (see Table 8.8). Slightly fewer starch grains were recovered in the
lower 10cm of the unit, above the sterile clay. This is most likely a result of sampling as these
figures are not significantly different from the samples above, especially when considered in
comparison with other samples from other test units.
Table 8.8 Distribution of starch counts within Leka TP2
Leka TP4 had a different starch distribution pattern. Most starch was located in Layer 4
in two samples from 95-110cmbs, where the 100 grain maximum count was reached for both
samples. Layer 4 is possibly the same as Layer 7 in TP2, but the distance between these two
units makes this correlation difficult to prove. However, this would explain the high quantity of
Depth Spit Layer Starch count
0-5 1 1 11
5-10 2 1 19
10-15 3 1 34
15-20 4 1 43
20-25 5 2 11
25-30 6 2 11
30-35 7 2 25
35-40 8 3 14
40-45 9 3 5
45-50 10 3 20
50-55 11 3 6
55-60 12 3 46
60-65 13 3 5
65-70 14 4 16
70-75 15 4 10
75-80 16 4 38
80-85 17 5 18
85-90 18 5 24
90-95 19 5 86
95-100 Control 6 7
Totals 449
Depth Spit Layer Starch count
90-95 1 7 102
100-105 3 7 100
110-115 5 7 82
120-125 7 7 88
Totals 372
147
starch extracted from these deposits, especially in comparison with other deposits in TP4.
Below Layer 4, starch quantities drop off significantly in Layers 5-6. Layer 5 has a total of 30
starch grains from three samples, while Layer 6 only has five grains from two samples.
Table 8.9 Distribution of starch counts within Leka TP4
Heketa (TO-Nt-2)
Only one test unit from Heketa was sampled for microbotanical remains. A decision was made
to sample TP3, and leave TP2 due to both time constraints, and the fact that stratigraphic
comparison indicated that the deposit sampled in TP2 (Layer 4) was most likely the same as
Layer 3 in TP3. As mentioned earlier, TP3 had the smallest amount of extracted starch with a
total of 63 starch grains from seven samples. Similar to Leka TP3, the highest quantity of starch
was extracted from the uppermost layer, Layer 3, with 43 grains recorded (see Table 8.10).
Below this, Layer 4 had 11 grains extracted from two samples, while Layer 5 had only seven
grains. Layer 5 is an ash lens within Layer 4, and this could explain the low quantity in this
sample.
Table 8.10 Distribution of starch counts within Heketa TP3
Identification: Assemblage-typology approach
As Talasiu TP2 was the first test unit to be processed for starch and classified using multivariate
statistics in the form of Linear Discriminant Function Analysis, this unit was utilised as a case
study. The assemblage-typology approach was compared with the DFA classifications, followed
by visual checking of starch grains. All of the extracted archaeological starch was recorded
using the same morphological attributes as the comparative collection and entered into an Excel
Depth Spit Layer Starch count
95-100 1 4 100
105-110 3 4 100
115-120 5 4 16
125-130 7 5 9
135-140 9 5 16
145-150 11 5 5
155-160 13 6 5
165-170 15 6 0
Totals 251
Depth Spit Layer Starch count
40-45 1 3 25
50-55 3 3 9
60-65 5 3 2
70-75 7 3 7
80-85 9 4 9
90-95 11 5 7
100-105 13 4 4
Totals 63
148
database. Once this was complete, it was important to establish what morphological patterning
could be seen within the assemblage. Therefore, a number of starch types were created that were
based on a combination of the recorded nominal attributes. The primary variable used was
shape, and then further attributes such as the number and type of pressure faceting, and the
presence and type of fissuring at the hilum. The abundance of these starch types in the
assemblage from Talasiu TP2 was calculated. However, as we still do not fully understand
factors affecting starch production with plant organs and starch preservation in sediments,
quantification may not be the best analytical technique to use here. Simple presence or absence
was deemed to be more appropriate and was used for further analysis.
In order to establish the identity of starch types they were compared to those grains in
the comparative collection. Most often, a number of possible matches were made. To narrow
this down further, the archaeological starch types were compared to the length range of the
matches. For example, Type 1 or cone-shaped grains, were present in the yams Dioscorea alata,
Dioscorea bulbifera, Dioscorea rotundata and Dioscorea nummularia. It is possible to rule out
D. rotundata based on length, and probably also D. nummularia (see Figure 8.2). Therefore this
starch type most likely originated from D. alata or D. bulbifera, but it is probably most
appropriate to keep this identification at family level at this stage (see Table 8.11).
149
Figure 8.2 Box plot demonstrating maximum length comparison of archaeological starch Type 1 with
Dioscorea spp.
Table 8.11 Table outlining suggested family of origin of archaeological starch types from Talasiu TP2.
This preliminary starch identification suggests that the Talasiu assemblage contains
starch from Dioscoreaceae, Musaceae and from the Araceae or aroid family, in this case most
likely originates from Cyrtosperma merkusii or the giant swamp taro, and Amorphophallus
paeoniifolius, the giant stink lily, rather than Colocasia esculenta or the common taro.
Interestingly, comparison of these archaeological starch grains with reference specimens not
150
expected to be present within the time period represented by the deposits at Talasiu tentatively
identified some of the starch as possibly originating from the Convolvulaceae family to which
Ipomoea batatas or sweet potato belongs. Clearly, this species should not be in the assemblage
as I. batatas is thought to be a late prehistoric or historic introduction into Tonga (Fall 2010;
Kirch 1978, 1990), and so is either contamination or a misidentification. Later multivariate
statistics and visual checking ruled out the identification of I. batatas for Talasiu TP2. The
distribution of identifications suggested by the assemblage- typology approach is outlined in
Table 8.12.
The assemblage-typology approach suggests some basic family-level identifications of
archaeological starch from Talasiu TP2. However, the use of multivariate statistics in the form
of Discriminant Function Analysis enabled these identifications to be more confidently
narrowed to species for a larger number of extracted grains. In light of the more accurate
species-level data provided by multivariate statistical analysis, assemblage-typology analysis
was not applied to the rest of the sites and test units from Leka (J17) and Heketa (TO-Nt-2). For
the multivariate statistics, a comprehensive reference collection was available containing both
nominal and metric data with light microscope and SEM imagery, enabling the comparison of
reference material data with that from extracted archaeological starch.
Table 8.12 Distribution of preliminary identifications within Talasiu TP2 using the assemblage-typology
approach
Identification: Multivariate statistics—Discriminant Function Analysis
Linear Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) within the PAST statistical software package was
utilised as part of a multivariate statistical approach to the identification of archaeological starch
Layer Spit Depth Dioscorea sp. Musaceae Araceae
1 1 0-5cm •
1 2 5-10cm •
1 3 10-15cm •
1 4 15-20cm • •
2 5 20-25cm • •
2 6 25-30cm •
2 7 30-35cm • •
3 8 35-40cm •
3 9 40-45cm
3 10 45-50cm • •
3 11 50-55cm
3 12 55-60cm •
3 13 60-65cm
4 14 65-70cm •
4 15 70-75cm •
4 16 75-80cm •
5 17 80-85cm •
5 18 85-90cm • •
5 19 90-95cm • • •
6 Control 95-100cm
151
grains. The methods for applying this technique within the reference collection to assess the
morphological diversity of Pacific cultigens (Chapters 3-5), and how this statistical analysis
would enable the classification of archaeological starch with varying degrees of confidence
(Chapter 8) have already been explained. The results of this analysis will be presented here,
along with the steps taken to create a species list of high confidence for each of the three sites
under analysis.
Starch classifications were made using the same algorithms developed for the reference
collection, and were assessed with varying degrees of confidence based on the species-level
data. In order to interpret archaeological classifications each sample was analysed according to
the number of starch grains classified to each species, and the percentage of correct
reclassifications of that species when the reference collection comparison stage had been carried
out (Chapter 5). To reiterate, these criteria were:
High confidence classifications had to have a successful reclassification rate within
DFA for that species of over 60%, and more than five grains had been matched to that
species within that sample.
Moderate confidence classifications had to either have over 60% correct reclassification
but less than five grains matched, or less than 60% correct reclassification and over five
grains matched to that species within that sample.
Low confidence classifications were given when the reclassification for that species was
less than 60%, and less than five grains were matched to that species.
The database of archaeological starch extracted from each sample (spit) was divided
into two based on the orientation of each starch grain (eccentric/side on or centric/end-on).
These were compared to the two datasets created for the reference collection. The outputs of the
DFA produced a list of classifications, as well as Discriminant Analysis plots showing the
distribution of archaeological grains according to the first two canonical variates (see Figure 8.3
and Figure 8.4). These act as visual guides for inspection of Mahalanobis distances from group
centroids and ellipses (Baxter 2003) and Figure 8.3suggests that many of the archaeological
grains classified in the centric dataset may in fact belong to none of these groups. In contrast, in
Figure 8.4 the distribution of archaeological grains within the eccentric reference dataset more
often falls within the ellipses of these species, in some species more commonly than others.
Talasiu (TO-Mu-2)
All of the 449 starch grains extracted from 3g soil sub-samples from TP2 at Talasiu were
assigned to a species using DFA. When these classifications were tabulated according to sample
(spit) and level of confidence, it became clear that the archaeological starch grains were
assigned to most of the species within the reference collection with at least low level
confidence. The only species not apparently represented by archaeological starch were
152
Xanthosoma sagittifolium (modern taro introduction), Curcuma longa (turmeric) and Dioscorea
pentaphylla (five-leaved yam). Several species could be classified with high confidence within
the test unit. These included Colocasia esculenta (common taro), Inocarpus fagifer (Tahitian
chestnut), Musa sp.2 (banana), Piper methysticum (kava) although this could be considered a
contaminant, and Spondias dulcis (Otaheite apple). Some starch was also classified with low
level confidence to suspected historic or modern contaminants, including Ipomoea batatas
(sweet potato), which was probably a late prehistoric introduction and Solanum tuberosum
(white/Irish potato), which is a modern contaminant. These present problems for the dataset, but
visual checking of the starch classifications within the next stage of the analysis proved
successful in eliminating misclassifications from the final species lists.
Figure 8.3 Discriminant analysis plot for centric dataset showing ellipses (coloured dots represent reference
species, black dots represent archaeological grains)
153
Figure 8.4 Discriminant analysis plot for eccentric dataset showing ellipses (coloured dots represent reference
species, black dots represent archaeological grains)
Table 8.13 Levels of confidence from DFA classification of archaeological starch from Talasiu TP2. NB High
confidence (black), moderated confidence (medium grey) and low confidence (light grey)
Using visual checking techniques, many classifications were rejected, leaving a much
smaller final species list for Talasiu TP2. Some obvious misclassifications were also able to be
corrected using this step, and new classifications provided. Three aroids were represented after
visual assessment in this final list, including Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (elephant foot yam),
Colocasia esculenta, and Cyrtosperma merkusii (giant swamp taro), along with two yams—
Dioscorea alata and Dioscorea bulbifera, two bananas, Piper methysticum (kava), and several
arboreal species including Artocarpus altilis (breadfruit), Barringtonia asiatica (fish poison
Depth Layer Spit Alo
casi
a m
acro
rrh
iza
(G
ian
t Ta
ro)
Aro
id
Am
orp
ho
ph
allu
s p
aeo
niif
oliu
s
(El
ep
han
t Fo
ot
Yam
) A
roid
Art
oca
rpu
s al
tilis
(B
read
fru
it)
Bar
rin
gto
nia
asi
atic
a
(Fi
sh P
ois
on
Tre
e)
Co
loca
sia
esc
ule
nta
(C
om
mo
n T
aro
) A
roid
Cu
rcu
ma
lon
ga
(Tu
rme
ric)
Cyr
tosp
erm
a m
erk
usi
i
(G
ian
t Sw
amp
Tar
o)
Aro
id
Dio
sco
rea
alat
a
(C
om
mo
n Y
am)
Dio
sco
rea
bu
lbif
era
(B
itte
r Y
am)
Dio
sco
rea
esc
ule
nta
(Le
sse
r Y
am)
Dio
sco
rea
nu
mm
ula
ria
(Sp
iny
Yam
)
Ino
carp
us
fagi
fer
(Tah
itia
n c
he
stn
ut)
Ipo
mo
ea
bat
atas
(Sw
ee
t P
ota
to)
CO
NTA
MIN
ATI
ON
Mo
rin
da
citr
ifo
lia
(In
dia
n m
ulb
err
y)
Mu
sa s
p.
1
(Ban
ana)
Mu
sa s
p.
2
(Ban
ana)
Pip
er
me
thys
ticu
m
(Kav
a)
Pte
rid
ium
sp
.
(Bra
cke
n)
Sola
nu
m t
ub
ero
sum
(Wh
ite
Po
tato
) C
ON
TAM
INA
TIO
N
Spo
nd
ias
du
lcis
(Ota
he
ite
Ap
ple
or
Am
bar
ella
)
Tacc
a le
on
top
eta
loid
es
(Po
lyn
esi
an A
rro
wro
ot)
Xan
tho
som
a sa
gitt
ifo
lium
(Arr
ow
leaf
Ele
ph
ant
Ear
Taro
)
Aro
id C
ON
TAM
INA
TIO
N
0-5 1 1
5-10 1 2
10-15 1 3
15-20 1 4
20-25 2 5
25-30 2 6
30-35 2 7
35-40 3 8
40-45 3 9
45-50 3 10
50-55 3 11
55-60 3 12
60-65 3 13
65-70 4 14
70-75 4 15
75-80 4 16
80-85 5 17
85-90 5 18
90-95 5 19
95-100 6 Control
154
tree), Inocarpus fagifer, and Spondias dulcis. These were tabulated according to the presence of
these species, as quantification of classifications at this final stage was not made due to starch
preservation and taphonomy. The distribution of these species in the test unit may also be
subject to these same issues of taphonomy and preservation.
Despite this, some general patterning noted during analysis will be discussed here. Of
particular interest was the observation that several species were present throughout most
stratigraphic layers within the test unit, notably A. paeoniifolius and I. fagifer present in every
layer. These are not primary crops, but are instead recorded ethnographically and through oral
traditions as supplementary or famine foods. Only one species, Musa sp. 1, was present in only
a single deposit (Layer 5). Some interesting stratigraphic patterning emerges in the range of
species recorded within each deposit. Layer 1 (0-20cmbs) contains starch from all three aroids,
both yams, I. fagifer, P. methysticum and S. dulcis. Layer 2 (20-35cmbs) also contains starch
from three aroids, but only one of the yams— D. alata, along with several arboreal species
including B. asiatica, I. fagifer and S. dulcis. Layer 3 is the largest (in terms of thickness) of all
of the deposits recorded within TP2, and has the largest number of species, including all the
previously mentioned species apart from D. bulbifera and Musa sp.1. Layer 4 contains two of
the aroids, A. paeoniifolius and C. merkusii, a single yam species— D. alata, P. methysticum,
and a number of arboreal species including A. altilis, B. asiatica, and I. fagifer. The lowermost
cultural deposit, Layer 5, contained a fairly comprehensive species list, which included all three
aroids, D. bulbifera, both Musa sp., A. altilis, B. asiatica, I. fagifer, P. methysticum and S.
dulcis.
Depth Layer Spit Am
orp
ho
ph
allu
s p
aeo
nii
foli
us
(El
ep
han
t Fo
ot
Yam
) A
roid
Art
oca
rpu
s al
tili
s
(B
read
fru
it)
Bar
rin
gto
nia
asi
atic
a
(Fi
sh P
ois
on
Tre
e)
Co
loca
sia
esc
ule
nta
(C
om
mo
n T
aro
) A
roid
Cyr
tosp
erm
a m
erk
usi
i
(G
ian
t Sw
amp
Tar
o)
Aro
id
Dio
sco
rea
alat
a
(C
om
mo
n Y
am)
Dio
sco
rea
bu
lbif
era
(B
itte
r Y
am)
Ino
carp
us
fagi
fer
(Tah
itia
n c
he
stn
ut)
Mu
sa s
p. 1
(Ban
ana)
Mu
sa s
p. 2
(Ban
ana)
Pip
er
me
thys
ticu
m
(Kav
a)
Spo
nd
ias
du
lcis
(Ota
he
ite
Ap
ple
or
Am
bar
ell
a)
0-5 1 1
5-10 1 2
10-15 1 3
15-20 1 4
20-25 2 5
25-30 2 6
30-35 2 7
35-40 3 8
40-45 3 9
45-50 3 10
50-55 3 11
55-60 3 12
60-65 3 13
65-70 4 14
70-75 4 15
75-80 4 16
80-85 5 17
85-90 5 18
90-95 5 19
95-100 6 Control
155
Table 8.14 Final table documenting species represented by archaeological starch within Talasiu TP2 NB
Presence indicated by black squares
Leka (J17)
In total, 623 starch grains were extracted from 12 bulk soil samples taken from the two
excavated test units at Leka (J17), and each of these grains were again classified using DFA to a
suggested species based on the statistical data collected for the reference collection. Each of
these two test units will be analysed separately first, and then the two sets of final classifications
will be discussed together.
The first of these units, TP2, had four soil samples processed for starch extraction. From
these samples, a large list of possible classifications was produced using DFA, and interpreted
with varying levels of confidence. As with the classifications provided for Talasiu TP2, most
species in the reference collection were represented in the list of assignments for the
archaeological starch from Leka TP2. Only four species- Alocasia macrorrhiza, Curcuma
longa, Morinda citrifolia (Indian mulberry), and Pteridium sp. (bracken fern) were not included
in the preliminary list of assignments. Also similar to Talasiu TP2, several of the same species
at Leka TP2 were often classified with high confidence throughout the test unit, including A.
paeoniifolius, I. fagifer and S. dulcis. This is most likely a direct result of the high re-
classification rate of these species within the multivariate analysis of starch morphological
attributes within the reference collection, which created the algorithm for the classification of
archaeological starch. Many other species were classified with moderate confidence, and very
few with low confidence. Some potential contaminants were identified within this test unit,
including I. batatas and S. tuberosum distributed throughout the unit, with low or moderate
confidence.
Table 8.15 Levels of confidence from DFA classification of archaeological starch from Leka TP2. NB High
confidence (black), moderated confidence (medium grey) and low confidence (light grey)
Once these classifications were assessed using visual checking, a final smaller list of
species was made for the archaeological starch from Leka TP2. These species were all from the
same cultural deposit (Layer 7), as this was the only stratigraphic layer sampled from this test
unit, but there is some variation in the distribution of these species at different depths within this
layer. Several species are present throughout the deposit, including Amorphophallus
Depth Layer Spit Am
orp
ho
ph
allu
s p
aeo
nn
iifo
liu
s
(El
ep
han
t Fo
ot
Yam
) A
roid
Art
oca
rpu
s al
tili
s
(B
read
fru
it)
Bar
rin
gto
nia
asi
atic
a
(Fi
sh P
ois
on
Tre
e)
Co
loca
sia
esc
ule
nta
(C
om
mo
n T
aro
) A
roid
Cyr
tosp
erm
a m
erk
usi
i
(G
ian
t Sw
amp
Tar
o)
Aro
id
Dio
sco
rea
alat
a
(C
om
mo
n Y
am)
Dio
sco
rea
bu
lbif
era
(B
itte
r Y
am)
Dio
sco
rea
esc
ule
nta
(Le
sse
r Y
am)
Dio
sco
rea
nu
mm
ula
ria
(Sp
iny
Yam
)
Ino
carp
us
fagi
fer
(Tah
itia
n c
he
stn
ut)
Ipo
mo
ea
bat
atas
(Sw
ee
t P
ota
to)
CO
NTA
MIN
ATI
ON
Mu
sa s
p. 1
(Ban
ana)
Mu
sa s
p. 2
(Ban
ana)
Pip
er
me
thys
ticu
m
(Kav
a)
Sola
nu
m t
ub
ero
sum
(Wh
ite
Po
tato
) C
ON
TAM
INA
TIO
N
Spo
nd
ias
du
lcis
(Ota
he
ite
Ap
ple
or
Am
bar
ell
a)
Tacc
a le
on
top
eta
loid
es
(Po
lyn
esi
an A
rro
wro
ot)
90-95 7 1
100-105 7 3
110-115 7 5
120-125 7 7
156
paeoniifolius, Cyrtosperma merkusii and Inocarpus fagifer. Artocarpus altilis is identified in all
spits apart from Spit 5 (110-115cmbs), while Spondias dulcis is present in all but Spit 1 (90-
95cmbs). A number of species are present in only one sample, including Colocasia esculenta,
Barringtonia asiatica, Curcuma longa (identified only using visual checking), Dioscorea
esculenta, Musa sp.1, and Piper methysticum. The significance of these identifications will be
discussed later in this section.
Table 8.16 Final table documenting species represented by archaeological starch within Leka TP2
A larger number of samples were processed for Leka TP4 (n=7), although this did not
result in greater quantities of extracted starch. The preliminary classifications of this starch
produced a list of low-to-high confidence assignments that was quite different to that of TP2,
although again four species from the reference collection were not included in this list—
Alocasia macrorrhiza, Xanthosoma sagittifolium, Curcuma longa and Dioscorea pentaphylla.
Very few species were classified with high confidence in any sample. Those species that were
classified with high confidence included Barringtonia asiatica, Inocarpus fagifer, and Musa sp.
2, and represented a mix of cultivated and semi-cultivated species. A number of other species
could primarily be classified with only low level confidence, including Cyrtosperma merkusii,
Artocarpus altilis, Dioscorea esculenta, Dioscorea nummularia, Ipomoea batatas and Tacca
leontopetaloides. The remaining species were mostly classified with moderate level confidence
due to low numbers or low re-classification rates in the reference collection.
Table 8.17 Levels of confidence from DFA classification of archaeological starch from Leka TP4. NB High
confidence (black), moderated confidence (medium grey) and low confidence (light grey)
Depth Layer Spit Am
orp
ho
ph
allu
s p
aeo
nii
foli
us
(El
ep
han
t Fo
ot
Yam
) A
roid
Art
oca
rpu
s al
tili
s
(B
read
fru
it)
Bar
rin
gto
nia
asi
atic
a
(Fi
sh P
ois
on
Tre
e)
Co
loca
sia
esc
ule
nta
(C
om
mo
n T
aro
) A
roid
Cu
rcu
ma
lon
ga
(Tu
rme
ric)
Cyr
tosp
erm
a m
erk
usi
i
(G
ian
t Sw
amp
Tar
o)
Aro
id
Dio
sco
rea
esc
ule
nta
(Le
sse
r Y
am)
Ino
carp
us
fagi
fer
(Tah
itia
n c
he
stn
ut)
Mu
sa s
p. 1
(Ban
ana)
Pip
er
me
thys
ticu
m
(Kav
a)
Spo
nd
ias
du
lcis
(Ota
he
ite
Ap
ple
or
Am
bar
ell
a)
90-95 7 1
100-105 7 3
110-115 7 5
120-125 7 7
Depth Layer Spit Am
orp
ho
ph
allu
s p
aeo
nn
iifo
liu
s
(El
ep
han
t Fo
ot
Yam
) A
roid
Art
oca
rpu
s al
tili
s
(B
read
fru
it)
Bar
rin
gto
nia
asi
atic
a
(Fi
sh P
ois
on
Tre
e)
Co
loca
sia
esc
ule
nta
(C
om
mo
n T
aro
) A
roid
Cyr
tosp
erm
a m
erk
usi
i
(G
ian
t Sw
amp
Tar
o)
Aro
id
Dio
sco
rea
alat
a
(C
om
mo
n Y
am)
Dio
sco
rea
bu
lbif
era
(B
itte
r Y
am)
Dio
sco
rea
esc
ule
nta
(Le
sse
r Y
am)
Dio
sco
rea
nu
mm
ula
ria
(Sp
iny
Yam
)
Ino
carp
us
fagi
fer
(Tah
itia
n c
he
stn
ut)
Ipo
mo
ea
bat
atas
(Sw
ee
t P
ota
to)
CO
NTA
MIN
ATI
ON
Mo
rin
da
citr
ifo
lia
(In
dia
n m
ulb
err
y)
Mu
sa s
p. 1
(Ban
ana)
Mu
sa s
p. 2
(Ban
ana)
Pip
er
me
thys
ticu
m
(Kav
a)
Pte
rid
ium
sp
.
(Bra
cke
n)
Sola
nu
m t
ub
ero
sum
(Wh
ite
Po
tato
) C
ON
TAM
INA
TIO
N
Spo
nd
ias
du
lcis
(Ota
he
ite
Ap
ple
or
Am
bar
ell
a)
Tacc
a le
on
top
eta
loid
es
(Po
lyn
esi
an A
rro
wro
ot)
95-100 4 1
105-110 4 3
115-120 4 5
125-130 5 7
135-140 5 9
145-150 5 11
155-160 6 13
157
The final analysis of these classifications produced a list of species containing a range
of both primary cultivated and supplementary species. As observed in TP2, the presence of
Solanum tuberosum indicates some contamination within these samples (likely from the
laboratory environment). Layer 4 (95-120cmbs) contained the largest number of species to
which the extracted archaeological starch could be confidently assigned. From within this layer
of mixed shell and clay matrix, starch deriving from three aroids— Amorphophallus
paeoniifolius, Cyrtosperma merkusii and Colocasia esculenta, four yams— Dioscorea alata,
Dioscorea bulbifera, Dioscorea esculenta and Dioscorea nummularia, and a number of tree
crops and supplementary species such as Artocarpus altilis, Barringtonia asiatica, Inocarpus
fagifer, one Musa sp. and Spondias dulcis were extracted. Layer 5 (125-150cmbs) had a much
smaller list of species present, including one aroid— C. merkusii, one yam— D. alata, P.
methysticum (which again may also be a contaminant and will be discussed in Chapter 9), S.
tuberosum, and arboreal species such as A. altilis, I. fagifer and S. dulcis. Layer 6 (155-
160cmbs) had only one species that could be confirmed using visual checking, being S. dulcis.
Table 8.18 Final table documenting species represented by archaeological starch within Leka TP4
When the classifications from these two test units from Leka (J17) are combined, a
much larger overall list of species identified as being utilised from 1300 to 1000 cal BP. This
list includes three aroids— A. paeoniifolius, C. merkusii and C. esculenta, four yams— D. alata,
D. bulbifera, D. esculenta and D. nummularia, P. methysticum, a number of tree crops and
supplementary species such as A. altilis, B. asiatica, I. fagifer, two Musa spp., and S. dulcis.
Heketa (TO-Nt-2)
The single test unit processed for starch at Heketa, TP3, contained a total of 63 starch grains
extracted from seven samples, indicating a very low level of starch preservation compared to
that observed within all of the other test units. Despite this, a number of low-to-high level
confidence classifications were assigned to these grains using DFA. Only two species could be
assigned to starch with high confidence in any of the samples, and these were Inocarpus fagifer
and Spondias dulcis within Spit 1 (40-45cmbs) from Layer 3. These were also classified with
Depth Layer Spit Am
orp
ho
ph
allu
s p
aeo
nii
foli
us
(El
ep
han
t Fo
ot
Yam
) A
roid
Art
oca
rpu
s al
tili
s
(B
read
fru
it)
Bar
rin
gto
nia
asi
atic
a
(Fi
sh P
ois
on
Tre
e)
Co
loca
sia
esc
ule
nta
(C
om
mo
n T
aro
) A
roid
Cyr
tosp
erm
a m
erk
usi
i
(G
ian
t Sw
amp
Tar
o)
Aro
id
Dio
sco
rea
alat
a
(C
om
mo
n Y
am)
Dio
sco
rea
bu
lbif
era
(B
itte
r Y
am)
Dio
sco
rea
esc
ule
nta
(Le
sse
r Y
am)
Dio
sco
rea
nu
mm
ula
ria
(Sp
iny
Yam
)
Ino
carp
us
fagi
fer
(Tah
itia
n c
he
stn
ut)
Mu
sa s
p. 2
(Ban
ana)
Pip
er
me
thys
ticu
m
(Kav
a)
Sola
nu
m t
ub
ero
sum
(Wh
ite
Po
tato
) C
ON
TAM
INA
TIO
N
Spo
nd
ias
du
lcis
(Ota
he
ite
Ap
ple
or
Am
bar
ell
a)
95-100 4 1
105-110 4 3
115-120 4 5
125-130 5 7
135-140 5 9
145-150 5 11
155-160 6 13
158
moderate confidence in other samples. Another seven species were identified with
predominantly moderate levels of confidence, and this list includes Amorphophallus
paeoniifolius, Barringtonia asiatica, Dioscorea bulbifera, Musa sp. 2, Piper methysticum,
Pteridium sp., and Solanum tuberosum (contaminant). Six remaining species could only be
classified with low confidence, including Alocasia macrorrhiza, Cyrtosperma merkusii,
Artocarpus altilis, Dioscorea esculenta, and Ipomoea batatas. The remaining species from the
reference collection were not represented by any archaeological starch from TP3.
Table 8.19 Levels of confidence from DFA classification of archaeological starch from Heketa TP3. NB High
confidence (black), moderated confidence (medium grey) and low confidence (light grey)
Table 8.20 Final table documenting species represented by archaeological starch within Heketa TP3
From this list of classifications, a final table of species identified in Heketa TP3 was
produced. The distribution of these classifications within the three sampled cultural deposits
indicates some variation among the types of species present, but very little variation in the
number of species. Layer 3 (40-75cmbs) contains all four of the aroids— A. macrorrhiza, A.
paeoniifolius, C. esculenta and C. merkusii, P. methysticum, several arboreal species including
Depth Layer Spit Alo
casi
a m
acro
rrh
iza
(G
ian
t Ta
ro)
Aro
id
Am
orp
ho
ph
allu
s p
aeo
nii
foli
us
(El
ep
han
t Fo
ot
Yam
) A
roid
Art
oca
rpu
s al
tili
s
(B
read
fru
it)
Bar
rin
gto
nia
asi
atic
a
(Fi
sh P
ois
on
Tre
e)
Cyr
tosp
erm
a m
erk
usi
i
(G
ian
t Sw
amp
Tar
o)
Aro
id
Dio
sco
rea
bu
lbif
era
(B
itte
r Y
am)
Dio
sco
rea
esc
ule
nta
(Le
sse
r Y
am)
Ino
carp
us
fagi
fer
(Tah
itia
n c
he
stn
ut)
Ipo
mo
ea
bat
atas
(Sw
ee
t P
ota
to)
Mu
sa s
p. 2
(Ban
ana)
Pip
er
me
thys
ticu
m
(Kav
a)
Pte
rid
ium
sp
.
(Bra
cke
n)
Sola
nu
m t
ub
ero
sum
(Wh
ite
Po
tato
) C
ON
TAM
INA
TIO
N
Spo
nd
ias
du
lcis
(Ota
he
ite
Ap
ple
or
Am
bar
ell
a)
Xan
tho
som
a sa
gitt
ifo
liu
m
(Arr
ow
leaf
Ele
ph
ant
Ear
Taro
) A
roid
CO
NTA
MIN
ATI
ON
40-45 3 1
50-55 3 3
60-65 3 5
70-75 3 7
80-85 4 9
90-95 5 11
100-105 4 13
Depth Layer Spit Alo
casi
a m
acro
rrh
iza
(G
ian
t Ta
ro)
Aro
id
Am
orp
ho
ph
allu
s p
aeo
nii
foli
us
(El
ep
han
t Fo
ot
Yam
) A
roid
Art
oca
rpu
s al
tili
s
(B
read
fru
it)
Co
loca
sia
esc
ule
nta
(C
om
mo
n T
aro
) A
roid
Cyr
tosp
erm
a m
erk
usi
i
(G
ian
t Sw
amp
Tar
o)
Aro
id
Ino
carp
us
fagi
fer
(Tah
itia
n c
he
stn
ut)
Ipo
mo
ea
bat
atas
(Sw
ee
t P
ota
to)
Mu
sa s
p. 2
(Ban
ana/
pla
nta
in)
Pip
er
me
thys
ticu
m
(Kav
a)
Spo
nd
ias
du
lcis
(Ota
he
ite
Ap
ple
or
Am
bar
ell
a)
40-45 3 1
50-55 3 3
60-65 3 5
70-75 3 7
80-85 4 9
90-95 5 11
100-105 4 13
159
A. altilis, I. fagifer, S. dulcis, and one probable contaminant- I. batatas. Layer 4 (80-90, and
100-105cmbs) contains all of the aroids apart from C.merkusii, a range of arboreal species
including A. altilis, I. fagifer, and Musa sp. 2, and also I. batatas. Layer 5 represents an ash lens
within Layer 4, and therefore was expected to contain very little, if any starch. During
processing only a few grains were extracted from this deposit, and only one confident
classification could be assigned to these grains during this final stage of analysis, being I.
fagifer.
Figure 8.5 Archaeological and reference starch: (A) archaeological starch identified as Artocarpus altilis, (B)
modern starch of A. altilis, (C) archaeological starch identified as Alocasia macrorrhiza, (D) modern starch of
A. macrorrhiza, (E) archaeological starch identified as Amorphophallus paeoniifolius, (F) modern starch of A.
paeoniifolius, (G) archaeological starch identified as Barringtonia asiatica, (H) modern starch of B. asiatica, (I)
archaeological starch identified as Colocasia esculenta, (J) modern starch of C. esculenta, (K) archaeological
starch identified as Curcuma longa, (L) modern starch of C. longa, (M) archaeological starch identified as
Cyrtosperma merkusii, (N) modern starch of C. merkusii, (O) archaeological starch identified as Dioscorea
alata, (P) modern starch of D. alata.
160
Figure 8.6 Archaeological and reference starch cont.: (Q) archaeological starch identified as Dioscorea
bulbifera (R) modern starch of D. bulbifera, (S) archaeological starch identified as Dioscorea esculenta, (T)
modern starch of D. esculenta, (U) archaeological starch identified as Dioscorea nummularia, (V) modern
starch of D. nummularia, (W) archaeological starch identified as Inocarpus fagifer, (X) modern starch of I.
fagifer, (Y) archaeological starch identified as Ipomoea batatas, (Z) modern starch of I. batatas, (AA)
archaeological starch identified as Musa sp., (AB) modern starch of Musa sp., (AC) archaeological starch
identified as Piper methysticum, (AD) modern starch of P. methysticum, (AE) archaeological starch
(contaminant) identified as Solanum tuberosum, (AF) modern starch of S. tuberosum, (AG) archaeological
starch identified as Spondias dulcis, (L) modern starch of S. dulcis.
Comparison of modern Pacific production systems
Comparative ethnographic examples from the Western Pacific region were analysed to establish
the range of plant species exploited through production or collection techniques. Nutritional,
labour, and productivity data were collated from published examples, to assess and compare the
nature of decision-making in a variety of production systems. These variables will be compared
and contrasted to discuss decision-making and crop selection. Five systems from the Western
Pacific were chosen due to the nature of comparable data available from modern ethnographic
studies. These included the Gadio Enga of the New Guinea Highlands (Dornstreich 1977),
161
Tongatapu (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2001), Bellona Island (Christiansen 1975),
Ontong Java (Bayliss-Smith 1973, 1977, 1986) and Anuta (Yen 1973b) in the Solomon Island
Outliers. These systems were chosen based on the quality and consistency (in terms of time
frame for data collection) of data available within each ethnographic study, and to represent a
variety of environmental contexts (atoll, high island, raised limestone islands). Several systems
also involved some use of cash-cropping (Bellona, Ontong Java and Tongatapu), but it will be
argued here that these cannot be easily separated from subsistence production as these
contribute to total efficiency (total de-facto output divided by primary and secondary inputs)
(Bayliss-Smith 1977) within these systems.
Data was collated on the range of plant species cultivated within each system, and the
labour inputs and yields for each of these. Units of labour inputs were recorded as hours
invested in agricultural production and collection of gathered species, specifically those invested
in garden preparation, maintenance and harvesting of crops. These were compared to outputs in
terms of yield in kilos and nutritional benefits over the same time frame. These figures were
used to calculate basic efficiency or rate of return ratios for each of these species in terms of
nutritional and yield outputs to labour investment inputs. Understanding the basic energetic
inputs to output ratios of these systems, without consideration of variables such as social values,
acreage planted or harvested, seasonal variation and single or multi-cropping techniques is an
important first step towards detailing the nutritional costs and benefits each system within an
Human Ecological framework. While it is important to acknowledge the role that other variables
play in decision-making, it is not possible to create a model that incorporates all of them. These
variables cannot be determined archaeologically, and so providing basic quantifiable nutritional,
labour and productivity data may at least allow interpretation of the past through modelling
hypothetical and testable production systems.
Nutrition
The exploited plant species listed within each of the ethnographic examples, many of which
feature in the archaeobotanical record from of Talasiu (TO-Mu-2), Leka (J17) and Heketa (TO-
Nt-2), were assessed for their calorific, protein, fat and carbohydrate values for 100g of edible
plant material. Some spices and ceremonial or medicinal plants such as kava (Piper
methysticum) and betel nut (Areca catechu) were also included in this analysis, primarily
because these were cultivated and could have contributed to dietary needs, even if that was not
their primary purpose. Nutritional data was collected and collated for these species, allowing
comparisons to be made across each system. A total nutritional figure per 100g for each species
was created that added all of the values together. These species were considered separately, and
then as groups described by their authors as horticultural, semi-cultivated, or gathered (or close
synonyms of these such as gardening). These nutritional values are heavily relied upon in the
literature on Evolutionary Ecology and Human Ecology to predict subsistence choices, and
162
provide interesting comparison with ethnographically recorded cases of labour and energy
investment.
Gadio Enga, New Guinea
Of the modern systems analysed, the largest range of utilised plant species was present within
the Gadio Enga system observed by Dornstreich (1973, 1977) in Highland New Guinea. A total
of 35 species was recorded over an entire subsistence season (one year). Animal foods were
included in this dataset and contributed to 25% of dietary protein and 75% of fats, but were not
included in this modelling exercise which targets the role of plants within diet. A range of
nutritional data was collated for species, and the mean of these ranges was used as a final figure
for comparison. The species were broken down into groups including horticulture, gathered,
sago and silviculture—which involves controlling the establishment, growth, composition,
health and quality of forests to meet cultural needs. Interestingly, those species with the highest
calorific value for 100g of edible plant were many of the arboreal species that were either
managed through silviculture or gathered (see Table 8.21). These included semi-cultivated
Pandanus spp., and gathered Canarium spp., Macaranga spp., and Elaeocarpus sp. Root crops
grown through horticulture such as Colocasia esculenta, Dioscorea spp. and Ipomoea batatas
were ranked 11th, 12th and 15th according to calorific value within this system, where highest
calorific value ranked 1 and lowest value ranked 35. In terms of protein value within the same
quantity of edible plant, a similar pattern within the Gadio Enga system is evident, although the
top ranked species for protein is the introduced Abelmoschus manihot, a horticulturally
produced plant. Aside from this cultigen and Phaseolus vulgaris, the horticultural species
generally rank very low compared to the silvicultural and gathered arboreal species.
Arboreal species also rank very highly in fat content, comprising the top eight-ranked
species within the system. The highest ranked horticultural species is P. vulgaris which was
ranked 9th, followed by A. manihot at 10th. The primary root crops are scattered throughout the
rankings below these, with Colocasia esculenta ranked 16th, Dioscorea spp. ranked 26th and
Ipomoea batatas ranked 28th. Patterning within the ranking of species for carbohydrate value
differs from those seen within the other nutritional values. Metroxylon spp. (sago) pith has the
highest amount of carbohydrates per 100g within the Gadio Enga system. Several arboreal fruits
rank just below this crop, but root crops such as C. esculenta (ranked 4th) rank higher than that
seen within the other values.
163
Table 8.21 Nutritional figures and rankings for species within the Gadio Enga system according to calories, protein, fats, carbohydrates and total nutrition figures (data from Dornstreich
1974, 1978)
Species Mean kcal Rank kcal Protein mean Rank protein Fat mean Rank Fat Carbohydrates mean Rank carbohydrates Total figures Overall rank nutrition
Abelmoschus manihot 369.6 5 21.1 1 2.8 10 15.002 14 408.5 5
Areca catechu 249.0 8 5.0 10 4.0 7 47 2 305.0 8
Artocarpus altilis flesh 82.5 16 2.6 16 0.9 11 19.0 12 105.0 17
Artocarpus altilis seeds 150.0 9 6.0 9 0.5 14 30.0 5 186.5 10
Canarium spp. 644.0 2 14.2 5 68.5 1 5.5 27 732.2 2
Carica papaya 43.0 22 0.5 32 0.3 18 11.0 18 54.8 23
Colocasia esculenta 132.5 11 1.7 21 0.4 16 31.6 4 166.2 11
Cucumis sativa 16.0 29 0.6 30 0.1 28 3.6 29 20.3 33
Curcubita moschata 45.0 20 1.0 26 0.1 28 11.7 17 57.8 22
Cympobogon citratus 25.0 27 2.5 17 0.1 28 0.0 33 27.6 31
Dioscorea spp 128.0 12 1.8 20 0.1 26 26.9 7 156.7 13
Diplazium sp. 341.0 6 14.3 4 0.1 26 8.3 21 363.7 7
Edible ferns 50.0 18 0.3 34 3.2 8 6.0 24 59.5 21
Elaeocarpus sp. 375.0 4 15.0 3 30.0 4 16.0 13 436.0 4
Ficus sp. 13.0 32 7.6 8 9.0 5 5.3 28 34.9 28
Gnetum gnemon 28.0 26 5.0 10 0.2 24 11.0 18 44.2 27
Inocarpus fagifer 240.0 9 4.5 12 4.5 6 40.0 3 289.0 9
Ipomoea batatas 95.0 15 1.6 22 0.1 28 20.1 10 116.8 15
Lagenaria siceraria 14.0 30 0.6 30 0.0 33 3.4 30 18.0 34
Luffa sp. 13.0 32 0.7 29 0.3 17 14.34 15 28.3 30
Macaranga spp. 601.0 3 18.9 2 60.4 3 7.4 22 687.7 3
Manihot esculenta 135.0 10 0.9 28 0.0 33 24.0 8 159.9 12
Metroxylon spp. 323.5 7 0.3 34 0.3 18 79.0 1 403.1 6
Musa spp. 113.5 13 1.2 25 0.3 18 27.3 6 142.3 14
Oenanthe javanica 40.0 23 3.6 15 0.3 18 6.0 24 49.9 25
Pandanus spp. 683.0 1 11.9 6 66.0 2 22.0 9 782.9 1
Pangium edule 40.0 23 1.0 26 0.1 28 20.0 11 61.1 19
Phaseolus vulgaris 97.0 14 8.1 7 3.0 9 0.0 33 108.1 16
Piper betel 44.0 21 4.0 14 0.4 15 6.0 24 54.4 24
Rorippa sp. 17.0 28 2.0 19 0.3 23 3.0 31 22.3 32
Rungia sp. 14.0 30 2.4 18 0.3 18 0.1 32 16.8 35
Saccharum edule 38.0 25 4.1 13 0.2 24 5.5 27 47.8 26
Saccharum officinarum 58.0 17 0.5 32 0.0 33 14.0 16 72.5 18
Setaria palmifolia 22.0 27 1.4 24 0.6 13 6.5 23 30.5 29
Zingiber zerumbet 48.0 19 1.5 23 0.9 11 9.5 20 59.9 20
164
A total nutritional figure was created by combining the values for calories, protein, fat
and carbohydrates for each species from 100g of edible material (see Figure 8.7). This enabled
an overall comparison of all species within the system. According to this value, Pandanus spp.
had the highest nutritional value with a total figure of 782.9/100g, followed by a number of
gathered arboreal species. The highest ranked horticulturally produced crop is again A. manihot,
with a figure of 408.5/100g, while root crops such as C. esculenta rank 11th with a figure of
166.2/100g, and Dioscorea spp. rank 13th with a figure of 156.7/100g. When the averages of
each of the production groups are compared, sago production ranks the highest; however, this is
biased by this group containing only this single species. When the remaining groups are
compared, those species grown using silviculture appear to have the highest total nutrition
figures with an average of 246.4/100g, followed closely by gathered species which have an
average of 225.9/100g. Surprisingly, horticulturally produced species have the lowest average—
99.4/100g within the Gadio Enga system.
Figure 8.7 Nutritional comparison of species within the Gadio Enga plant production system (data from
Dornstreich 1974, 1978)
Bellona, Solomon Islands
The plant production system on Bellona was recorded by Christiansen (1975) between the years
1965-66, describing a total of 29 plant species utilised within this system. Species within this
system were categorised by the author into two groups: horticulture and semi-cultivated. The
latter group includes plants which require some anthropogenic manipulation for initial growth
but are mostly untended after this time apart from harvesting on a regular basis or
opportunistically. This semi-cultivated category includes many arboreal species from which
fruits are harvested and mostly eaten raw, or through some processing to remove toxins
165
(Christiansen 1975:36-7). Gathering or hunting of plant, animals and fish is described by
Christiansen as a means of filling the temporal gap in food supplies during different seasons,
during which the bulk of available foods are sourced from outside horticultural practices for at
least a month or more.
Firstly, in terms of calories, the highest ranked species are again the arboreal semi-
cultivated species such as Pandanus spp. and Canarium spp., which is similar to the rankings
seen in the Gadio Enga system (see Table 8.22). Here though, the highest ranked horticultural
species is Cocos nucifera (coconut), ranked 3rd with a calorific value of 425.5/100g for the
mature meat of the fruit. This is followed by the horticulturally produced root crop Pueraria
lobate (kudzu vine), the rhizome of which has a calorific value of 382/100g. Kudzu is not often
cultivated today, but instead is naturalised on many Pacific Islands. The common root crops
such as Colocasia esculenta (12th) and Dioscorea spp.(14-15th, 17-18th, 23rd) appear within the
middle of the spread of calorific rankings along with Musa spp. (16th). Many of the arboreal
species of which fruits are eaten raw, such as Spondias dulcis and Syzygium spp., rank the
lowest of all the utilised species.
Comparison of protein values reveals a similar pattern to calories. Semi-cultivated
arboreal species dominate the highest rankings based on protein content, with the highest
ranking horticultural species, Artocarpus altilis (seeds) being ranked 6th. Root crops generally
rank very low (>15th), apart from Tacca leontopetaloides (Polynesian arrowroot), which ranks
7th with a protein value of 5.1/100g. The fat content of these species again follows a similar
pattern to calories and protein, with C. nucifera ranking the highest of the horticultural species
with 34-43/100g (ranked 3-4th), followed by T. leontopetaloides ranked at 8th with 2.6/100g. The
remaining root crops all have less than 0.4/100g and rank lower than 15th. Similar to the
patterning observed within the Gadio Enga system, the carbohydrate values of these species
provides a different distribution of rankings compared to the other nutritional figures.
Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane) ranks the highest, with a total value of 100/100g— meaning
that this species is entirely composed of carbohydrates. Root crops such as Alocasia
macrorrhiza, Colocasia esculenta, Tacca leontopetaloides, Ipomoea batatas and Dioscorea spp.
also rank very highly according to carbohydrate value, along with some semi-cultivated arboreal
species. These figures are not all that surprising, considering that the carbohydrate value of
these species is generally argued to be the reason that they were initially domesticated.
166
Table 8.22 Nutritional figures and rankings for species within Bellona Island system according to calories, protein, fats, carbohydrates and total nutrition figures (data from Christiansen
1975)
Species Mean kcal Rank kcal Protein mean Rank protein Fat mean Rank Fat Carbohydrates mean Rank carbohydrates Total figures Overall rank nutrition
Alocasia macrorrhiza 106.0 18 2.0 17 0.2 22 22 10 130.1 18
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius 135.0 10 2.2 14 0.1 27 18.19 18 155.5 13
Artocarpus altilis flesh 82.5 22 2.6 12 0.9 12 19.0 17 105.0 22
Artocarpus altilis seeds 150.0 9 6.0 6 0.5 13 30.0 5 186.5 10
Burckella sp. 56.0 25 1.1 25 1.3 11 20.1 12 78.5 24
Canarium spp. 644.0 2 14.2 2 68.5 1 5.5 27 732.2 2
Canavalia sp. 372.0 6 34.8 1 1.5 10 51.7 3 460.0 5
Cocos nucifera immature meat 105.0 20 2.4 13 8.0 7 7.0 26 122.4 19
Cocos nucifera mature meat 425.5 3 4.4 9 43.2 3 10.5 23 483.6 3
Cocos nucifera mature milk 328.5 7 3.4 10 34.5 4 5.5 27 371.9 7
Colocasia esculenta 132.5 12 1.7 21 0.4 15 31.6 4 166.2 11
Cucumis melo 34.0 28 0.8 27 0.2 18 8.0 25 43.0 29
Dioscorea alata 119.7 15 2.1 16 0.1 25 19.6 16 141.5 16
Dioscorea bulbifera 106.0 18 1.9 18 0.1 27 25.3 8 133.3 17
Dioscorea esculenta 120.3 14 1.8 19 0.2 21 20.05 14 142.3 14
Dioscorea nummularia 106.7 17 1.7 22 0.1 29 13.3 20 121.7 20
Dioscorea pentaphylla 82.0 23 1.7 20 0.1 25 20.0 15 103.8 23
Ficus sp. 13.0 31 7.6 5 9.0 6 5.3 29 34.9 30
Gnetum sp. 28.0 29 5.0 8 0.2 18 11.0 22 44.2 28
Ipomoea batatas 95.0 21 1.6 23 0.1 23 20.1 12 116.8 21
Mangifera sp. 60.0 24 0.8 27 0.4 14 15.0 19 76.2 25
Manihot esculenta 135.0 10 0.9 26 0.0 30 24.0 9 159.9 12
Morinda citrifolia 38.0 27 2.7 11 1.8 9 12.0 21 54.5 26
Musa spp. 113.5 16 1.2 24 0.3 16 27.3 6 142.3 15
Pandanus spp. 683.0 1 11.9 3 66.0 2 22.0 10 782.9 1
Pueraria lobata 382.0 4 2.1 15 0.1 23 27.1 7 411.3 6
Saccharum officinarium 375.0 5 0.0 31 0.0 30 100.0 1 475.0 4
Spondias dulcis 43.7 26 0.8 27 0.3 16 3.65 31 48.5 27
Syzygium spp. 21.0 30 0.7 30 0.2 18 5.3 29 27.2 31
Tacca leontopetaloides 122.0 13 5.1 7 2.6 8 89.4 2 219.1 9
Terminalia sp. 258.0 8 9.6 4 24.0 5 8.3 24 299.9 8
167
Finally, the total nutritional figures for all 29 plant species within the Bellona Island
system were compared (see Figure 8.8). From these, Pandanus spp. again ranks the highest,
followed by Canarium spp., another group of semi-cultivated arboreal species. The highest
value of the horticulturally produced species was recorded in C. nucifera mature meat with a
total nutritional figure of 483.5/100g. A mixture of cultivated grasses (sugarcane), fruits
(Canavalia spp. and C. nucifera mature milk), and root crops (Pueraria lobata) all had total
figures greater than 300/100g, and thus were ranked higher than the next highest ranked semi-
cultivated species— Terminalia spp. When the two groups are compared, the averages of each
are essentially very similar. Horticulturally produced species have an average total nutritional
figure of 215.8/100g, while semi-cultivated species have an average of 205.9/100g.
Figure 8.8 Nutritional comparison of species within the Bellona Island plant production system, showing
exponential trend lines for horticultural and semi-cultivated taxa (data from Christiansen 1975)
Anuta, Solomon Islands
An ethnographic, ecological and archaeological survey of Anuta was carried out by Yen and
others (1973b) over several field seasons in 1970-71. Details of Anutan subsistence were
recorded over a period of 37 days, with the aim of investigating the reputed intensity of
agricultural practice on the island (Yen and Gordon 1973). The use of 19 plant species was
recorded within this survey. When the nutritional values of these species are compared, some
very different patterning can be observed from both the Gadio Enga and Bellona Island systems,
primarily due to the reduced number of exploited arboreal species (see Table 8.23). Unlike the
other modern systems, the Anutan plant species were not divided by the authors into any
groups. However, since labour and productivity data were recorded for only a few of these, this
was taken to indicate that these were primary crops, while all others were most likely
168
supplementary species. This assumption may not be correct, and so the interpretation of these
categories within the nutritional figures will not carry the same weight as those used in the other
systems.
The archaeology and ecology of Anuta and nearby Tikopia have been compared by researchers
in the past (Firth 1939; Kirch 1995; Kirch and Yen 1982). Agricultural production on Tikopia
was similar to Anuta in a number of ways including major crop dominance, the use of some tree
species as well as root crops, and the mulching of taro and manioc with coconut fronds (Yen
and Gordon 1973). Some important differences also existed in the past between these two
locations. Sweet potato is significantly more important in Tikopia than Anuta, but is produced
alongside other root crops using less intensive agricultural techniques within the mountainous
areas where dryland terracing is absent (Firth 1939; Yen and Gordon 1973). Tikopian
agriculture was instead more intensive in flat corraline areas where rotational practices with
crop successions of taro, manioc or sweet potato predominate. These factors were taken into
consideration alongside the availability of labour and yield data when deciding to use data from
Anuta, rather than Tikopia. It was decided that, as described by Yen (1973), Anuta represented a
highly intensive agricultural system, possibly the most intensive within the Pacific and
presented a unique case study for this modelling exercise.
Calorific comparison indicates that the highest ranked species are the few arboreal
species within this system, including Canarium spp. with a value of 644/100g, followed by
mature meat of Cocos nucifera with a value of 425.5/100g. Those species with little other data
recorded, being supplementary species such as Curcuma longa (turmeric), Metroxylon
salomonense (sago), and Inocarpus fagifer, are often ranked higher than ‘primary crops’ such as
Colocasia esculenta, Manihot esculenta (cassava), and Cyrtosperma merkusii (giant swamp
taro). A slightly different range of supplementary crops dominate the highest rankings according
to protein content. Canarium spp. again takes out the top rank with a value of 14.2/100g,
followed by another fruit tree, Barringtonia procera, with a value of 9.7/100g. These arboreal
species are then followed in ranking by a number of root crops (Curcuma longa and Tacca
leontopetaloides). The highest ranked ‘primary crop’ is Cocos nucifera with a protein value of
4.35/100g within mature meat. All primary root crops have a protein value of less than 2/100g.
Comparison of the fat content of these plant species indicates that both primary and
supplementary arboreal species generally have higher values than root crops. Those that differ
from this trend include C. longa with a ranking of 3rd, and T. leontopetaloides with a ranking of
9th out of the 21 total species. Carbohydrate values provide a different trend, but both of these
root crops again rank very highly. In fact, T. leontopetaloides has the highest carbohydrate
content with a value of 89.4/100g. Primary root crops such as Colocasia esculenta, Dioscorea
169
spp. and Manihot esculenta all range from 20-30/100g and rank in the top ten of the 19 species.
Again, this trend was expected.
The overall nutrition figures suggest that in general, those species grouped here as
supplementary have higher nutritional value than those grouped as primary crops (Figure 8.9),
as expected if production costs are lower for certain crops with low-to-medium nutritional
value. The averages of these groups confirm this trend, where supplementary species have an
average of 310.5/100g, while primary species only have an average of 190.3/100g. Within this
pattern it was also observed that arboreal species tend to have higher values than root crops. The
highest overall ranked species was Canarium spp. with a value of 732.2/100g, followed by C.
nucifera mature meat with 483.5/100g. The highest ranked root crop was C.longa with a value
of 437/100g, and the next was T. leontopetaloides with 219.1/100g. The highest ranked primary
root crop was C. esculenta, followed closely by M. esculenta.
170
Table 8.23 Nutritional figures and rankings for species within Anutan system according to calories, protein, fats, carbohydrates and total nutrition figures (data from Yen 1973b)
Species Mean kcal Rank kcal Protein mean Rank protein Fat mean Rank Fat Carbohydrates mean Rank carbohydrates Total figures Overall rank nutrition
Alocasia macrorrhiza 106.0 16 2.0 12 0.2 17 22 11 130.1 16
Areca catechu 249.0 7 5.0 5 4.0 8 47 4 305.0 7
Artocarpus altilis 82.5 19 2.6 10 0.9 11 19.0 15 105.0 19
Barringtonia procera 243.0 8 9.7 2 11.8 4 35.3 6 299.8 8
Burckella obovata 56.0 20 1.1 17 1.3 10 20.1 12 78.5 20
Canarium sp. 644.0 1 14.2 1 68.5 1 5.5 20 732.2 1
Cocos nucifera immature meat 105.0 17 2.4 11 8.0 6 7.0 18 122.4 17
Cocos nucifera mature meat 425.5 2 4.4 7 43.2 2 10.5 17 483.6 2
Cocos nucifera mature milk 328.5 5 3.4 9 34.5 3 5.5 20 371.9 6
Colocasia esculenta 132.5 11 1.7 14 0.4 13 31.6 7 166.2 11
Curcuma longa 354.0 4 8.0 3 10.0 5 65.0 3 437.0 3
Cyrtosperma merkusii 122.0 13 0.5 19 0.2 16 19.91 14 142.6 14
Dioscorea spp. 128.0 12 1.8 13 0.1 18 26.9 9 156.7 13
Inocarpus fagifer 240.0 9 4.5 6 4.5 7 40.0 5 289.0 9
Ipomoea batatas 95.0 18 1.6 15 0.1 19 20.1 12 116.8 18
Manihot esculenta 135.0 10 0.9 18 0.0 20 24.0 10 159.9 12
Metroxylon salomonense 323.5 6 0.3 21 0.3 14 79.0 2 403.1 4
Musa spp. 113.5 15 1.2 16 0.3 14 27.3 8 142.3 15
Piper betel 44.0 21 4.0 8 0.4 12 6.0 19 54.4 21
Saccharum officinarum 375.0 3 0.5 20 0.0 20 14.0 16 389.5 5
Tacca leontopetaloides 122.0 13 5.1 4 2.6 9 89.4 1 219.1 10
171
Figure 8.9 Nutritional comparison of species within the Anutan plant production system, showing exponential
trend lines for primary and supplementary taxa (data from Yen 1973b)
Tongatapu, Tonga Archipelago
In 2001, an agricultural census was conducted by the Tongan Ministry of Agriculture and
Forestry. This included a survey of agricultural holdings, productivity and labour investment,
from which a list was provided of all plant species utilised on Tongatapu. This list contains 22
plant species, and was again broken down for comparative purposes into two groups,
horticultural and semi-cultivated based on ethnographic data from European Contact-era
recordings of subsistence strategies (Beaglehole and Beaglehole 1941; Cook in Beaglehole
1969; Cook 1875; Gifford 1929; La Perouse 1799; La Billardiere 1800; Mariner in Martin 1991;
Maude 1965; Wilson 1799; Waldegrave 1873). This census was chosen over Maude’s (1965)
research based on the geographic scope (all of Tongatapu) and consistency of labour investment
with yield data in terms of the time period of data collection (one year).
The distribution of calorific values of these crops follows a similar trend to most of the
other modern systems. Arboreal species including Pandanus spp., Canarium spp. and Cocos
nucifera have the highest rankings, while the root crops are ranked below these at 7th (Colocasia
esculenta), 8th-11th (Dioscorea spp.) and 10th (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) (see Table 8.24). All
three varieties of Musa spp. rank just below these with calorific values ranking from 11th to 13th.
Comparison of protein content indicates that arboreal species again take out the top 9 rankings,
but within these are a number of horticulturally produced crops such as A. altilis with a protein
value of 2.55/100g, and C. nucifera. The highest ranked root crop is A. macrorrhiza with a
value of 1.95/100g, followed by C. esculenta with a value of 1.7/100g. The lowest ranked
172
species are semi-cultivated fruit crop S. dulcis and horticulturally produced Piper methysticum
(kava), which is cultivated as a sedative for medicinal and recreational consumption, and is
therefore not consumed to meet daily nutritional requirements.
The fat content of these 20 species included in this nutritional comparison demonstrate
a very similar pattern to that observed within both other systems, and also within the previously
described values. Many arboreal species are ranked highest, with fat content values greater than
1/100g. The highest ranked root crop is X. sagittifolium (elephant ear taro) with a value of
0.4/100g, followed by C. esculenta. All three Musa spp. have values from 0.3-0.4/100g and so
rank closely with these root crops. Ipomoea batatas, on the other hand, is ranked very low with
a value of only 0.1/100g. The ranking of carbohydrate values again demonstrate the high values
of horticulturally produced crops such as C. esculenta (31.6/100g), Musa spp. (27.3-32/100g),
Dioscorea spp. (19-26.85/100g), and X. sagittifolium (23.63/100g).
When these nutritional figures are combined, it would appear that arboreal species again
rank much higher than root crops (see Figure 8.10). Once again Pandanus spp. is ranked the
highest, followed by Canarium spp. and C. nucifera. The highest ranked root crop is also C.
esculenta, followed by one of the recorded Dioscorea sp. This reflects the overall similarities in
the species composition of the Tongan system with the others. When the averages of the two
horticultural and semi-cultivated groups are compared, it becomes clear that the semi-cultivated
species have greater overall nutritional value than the horticultural species. The average for the
semi-cultivated group is 337.9/100g, while that for the horticultural species is much lower at
183.8/100g.
173
Table 8.24 Nutritional figures and rankings for species within Tongan system according to calories, protein, fats, carbohydrates and total nutrition figures (data from Ministry of Agriculture
and Forestry 2001)
Species Mean kcal Rank kcal Mean protein Rank protein Fat mean Rank Fat Carbohydrates mean Rank carbohydrates Total figures Overall rank nutrition
Alocasia macrorrhiza 106.0 15 2.0 10 0.2 17 22 10 130.1 16
Artocarpus altilis 82.5 19 2.6 7 0.9 8 19.0 14 105.0 19
Artocarpus heterophyllus 95.0 17 1.7 13 0.6 9 23.0 9 120.3 17
Canarium sp. 644.0 2 14.2 1 68.5 1 5.5 19 732.2 2
Cocos nucifera immature meat 105.0 16 3.4 5 34.5 4 5.5 19 148.4 12
Cocos nucifera mature meat 425.5 3 4.4 4 43.2 3 10.5 17 483.6 3
Cocos nucifera mature milk 328.5 5 2.4 8 8.0 5 7.0 18 345.9 5
Colocasia esculenta 132.5 7 1.7 13 0.4 13 31.6 3 166.2 7
Dioscorea sp. 1 128.0 8 1.8 11 0.1 18 26.9 6 156.7 8
Dioscorea sp. 2 122.0 11 2.1 9 0.1 21 19.6 13 143.8 13
Disocorea sp. 3 128.0 8 1.8 11 0.1 18 26.9 6 156.7 8
Inocarpus fagifer 240.0 6 4.5 3 4.5 6 40.0 1 289.0 6
Ipomoea batatas 95.0 17 1.6 15 0.1 20 20.1 12 116.8 18
Morinda citrifolia 38.0 21 2.7 6 1.8 7 12.0 16 54.5 20
Musa sp. 1 122.0 11 1.3 17 0.4 11 32.0 2 155.7 10
Musa sp. 2 113.5 13 1.2 18 0.3 14 27.3 4 142.3 14
Musa sp. 3 113.5 13 1.2 18 0.3 14 27.3 4 142.3 14
Pandanus sp. 683.0 1 11.9 2 66.0 2 22.0 10 782.9 1
Piper methysticum 6.0 22 0.2 22 0.5 10 0.2 22 6.9 22
Saccharum officinarum 375.0 4 0.5 21 0.0 22 14.0 15 389.5 4
Spondias dulcis 43.7 20 0.8 20 0.3 14 3.65 21 48.5 21
Xanthosoma sagittifolium 125.0 10 1.5 16 0.4 11 23.6 8 150.5 11
174
Figure 8.10 Nutritional comparison of species within the Tongan plant production system, showing
exponential trend lines for horticultural and semi-cultivated taxa (data from Ministry of Agriculture and
Forestry 2001)
Ontong Java Atoll, Solomon Islands
The atoll of Ontong Java was surveyed by Bayliss-Smith (1973, 1977, 1986) from 1970-1971 as
a component of his doctoral research and part of the South Pacific Smallholder Project. This
survey targeted agricultural production and associated ecosystem manipulation over time, with a
focus on the limits of island carrying capacity. Through this, a total of 13 utilised plant species
were recorded, including a range of tree crops from which fruits were harvested and also a
number of traditional and recently introduced root crops. Most of the atoll is divided into
specific ecosystems or vegetation units from which particular food products are extracted. Cash-
cropping involving copra production and exports also have enabled other subsistence products
to be imported back into the island. These plant species can be roughly divided into two groups,
primary and supplementary based on Bayliss-Smith’s (1977) description of production
techniques and energy investment. For example, Curcuma longa is grown extensively on the
island and is cultivated as a form of social production rather than subsistence. This species is
still therefore grouped here as primary rather than a supplementary subsistence crop.
A calorific comparison of species within the Ontong Java system ranks Pandanus
tectorius highest, with a value of 683/100g (see Table 8.25). Within this system, Pandanus is
cultivated within coconut woodland and is considered a primary crop. Following this in the
calorific ranking is Cocos nucifera, and then Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane) which are both
primary cultigens. Other arboreal species such as Carica papaya (papaya) and Artocarpus altilis
175
(breadfruit) rank at the bottom of the system, while Musa sp. also ranks relatively low at 10th.
The highest ranked primary root crop is C. longa, followed closely by C. esculenta and X.
sagittifolium. In terms of protein, Pandanus also ranks the highest, and is followed by one
primary and one supplementary root crop, C. longa and Tacca leontopetaloides. Interestingly,
the next highest ranked primary root crop according to protein value is Alocasia macrorrhiza.
Patterning of fat content follows very closely that of protein values, with some minor
reshuffling within the rankings. The same four species have the highest rankings— a
combination of both arboreal and root crops, and supplementary and primary crops. The lowest
ranked species is S. officinarum with a fat value of 0/100g, ranked just below Ipomoea batatas
which has a fat value of 0.1/100g. The ranking of these species according to carbohydrate
values follows a now well-established pattern, dominated by high-ranked primary and
supplementary root crops such as T. leontopetaloides (1st), C. longa (2nd), and C. esculenta (3rd).
The overall nutritional figures reflect the consistently high rankings of arboreal species
such as P. tectorius and C. nucifera, as well as supplementary root crops including C. longa and
T. leontopetaloides (see Figure 8.11). The primary root crops were ranked 7th and below. When
the averages of the two groupings are compared, there is only a slight difference between them.
Primary crops have a slightly higher average (265.8/100g) than those species categorised as
supplementary (222.8/100g).
176
Table 8.25 Nutritional figures and rankings for species within Ontong Java system according to calories, protein, fats, carbohydrates and total nutrition figures system (data from Bayliss-
Smith 1973, 1986)
Species Mean kcal Rank kcal Protein mean Rank protein Fat mean Rank Fat Carbohydrates mean Rank carbohydrates Total figures Overall rank nutrition
Alocasia macrorrhiza 106.0 11 2.0 8 0.2 13 22 6 130.1 12
Artocarpus altilis 82.5 14 2.6 6 0.9 7 19.0 10 105.0 14
Carica papaya 43.0 15 0.5 14 0.3 11 11.0 12 54.8 15
Cocos nucifera immature meat 105.0 12 3.4 5 34.5 3 5.5 15 148.4 9
Cocos nucifera mature meat 425.5 2 4.4 4 43.2 2 10.5 13 483.6 2
Cocos nucifera mature milk 328.5 5 2.4 7 8.0 5 7.0 14 345.9 5
Colocasia esculenta 132.5 6 1.7 9 0.4 9 31.6 3 166.2 7
Curcuma longa 354.0 4 8.0 2 10.0 4 65.0 2 437.0 3
Cyrtosperma merkusii 122.0 8 0.5 13 0.2 12 19.91 9 142.6 10
Ipomoea batatas 95.0 13 1.6 10 0.1 14 20.1 8 116.8 13
Musa sp. 113.5 10 1.2 12 0.3 10 27.3 4 142.3 11
Pandanus tectorius 683.0 1 11.9 1 66.0 1 22.0 6 782.9 1
Saccharum officinarum 375.0 3 0.5 14 0.0 15 14.0 11 389.5 4
Tacca leontopetaloides 122.0 8 5.1 3 2.6 6 89.4 1 219.1 6
Xanthosoma sagittifolium 125.0 7 1.5 11 0.4 8 23.6 5 150.5 8
177
Figure 8.11 Nutritional comparison of species within the Ontong Java plant production system, showing
exponential trend lines for primary and supplementary taxa (data from Bayliss-Smith 1973, 1986)
Nutritional comparisons of groupings
Some basic statistical analyses were carried out to test whether the overall nutritional figures of
species in each grouping or category in each modern system were statistically different. These
categories were compared using Student’s two-sample t-test, to evaluate the difference in means
between the two categories in light of the pooled standard deviations from both categories
(Drennan 1996). The null hypothesis is that the difference between means of the two
populations is not greater than 0, while the alternative hypothesis argues that the mean
difference is greater than 0. A simple mean comparison may suggest that two groups (or
populations) are different, but the t-test indicates how significant that difference actually is.
Firstly, the pooled standard deviation and pooled standard error for each system were calculated
and then a final figure that indicates the difference between these categories according to
standard errors. This figure was then used to explain the probability that the two categories are
in fact statistically different using the t test distribution table. Within archaeology the generally
accepted probabilty and associated confidence level is 95% or over to statistically reject the
null-hypothesis.
Within the Gadio Enga system the horticulture and gathered categories were compared
nutritionally (see Table 8.26). The overall nutritional figures of these two categories were
shown through Student’s two-sample t-test to have a difference of 1.76 standard errors, arguing
that the probability of these groups being from the same population is 20%. Therefore, despite a
178
difference in mean of 126.4, these are not significantly different. The comparison of categories
within Bellona Island, Tonga, and Ontong Java all proved that these systems were not
statistically different based on the number of species being compared and the associated
confidence in statistical differences between nutritional values. The only system that was close
to having two statistically different categories was that from Anuta. The comparison of means
from primary and supplementary species on Anuta proved that these were nutritionally different
with 90% confidence by 1.93 standard errors, but not enough to reject the null hypothesis that
these are from the same population.
Table 8.26 Statistical comparison of species’ groupings in example systems according to overall nutrition
figures/100g
Labour investment
Looking beyond the nutritional value of species within each of the example systems, the amount
of labour invested in the cultivation, maintenance, harvesting and storage provides a significant
insight into the nature of decision-making within these systems. Energy invested into food
production can be used as a gauge of where subsistence preferences lie in terms of nutritional
outputs, or other social or environmental factors. These labour values will be compared with a
variety of these nutritional outputs to discuss diet and productivity within plant food production
system.
Gadio Enga, New Guinea
Labour investment in this system was recorded by Dornstreich (1973) as instances of activity
rather than as accumulated hours or energy spent cultivating and processing plant species.
Although an ‘instance of activity’ could equate to any number of man-hours, these data enables
at least some basic comparison of labour investment and therefore inputs into the Gadio Enga
plant production system. When these figures are compared and then ranked, it becomes clear
that labour is directed towards some species and plant categories far more than others.
The highest ranked species by a significant margin is Metroxylon spp., or sago, with a
total of 148 recorded instances of activity over the observed subsistence season (see Table 8.27,
Figure 8.12). Sago production was noted by Dornstreich (1973, 1977) to provide a significant
component of the Gadio Enga diet. Many lower ranked horticultural species share similar values
for labour investment, due to the fact that recorded instances of activity were divided between
Example system Pooled standard deviation Pooled standard error Difference Confidence Mean difference
Gadio Enga (horticulture vs
gathered) 188.7 71.6 1.8 90% 126.5
Bellona Island (horticulture vs
semi-cultivated) 201.5 74.8 0.3 <50% 10.0
Tonga 2001 Agricultural Survey (primary vs
supplementary crops) 197.6 94.7 1.6 80% 154.1
Ontong Java (primary vs
supplementary crops) 203.6 118.9 0.4 <50% 43.0
Anuta Atoll (primary vs
supplementary crops) 153.4 62.0 1.9 90% 120.2
Nutrition (total figures/100g)
179
particular resource areas at various altitudes and distances from the village. For this reason,
Dioscorea spp. is ranked 2nd with 39.5 instances of activity, followed by a number of cultivated
crops such as Abelmoschus manihot, Colocasia esculenta, Cucumis sativa (cucumber), Ipomoea
batatas and Manihot esculenta (cassava or tapioca). Many gathered arboreal species such as
Ficus sp. (fig), Elaeocarpus sp., Artocarpus altilis and the herb Oenanthe javanica (Japanese
parsley) are ranked the lowest within this system according to labour. Most surprising in this
data is the very low ranking of A. altilis, as breadfruit is usually cultivated in most Pacific
production systems for seeds or flesh and therefore time is invested in initial planting, weeding,
harvesting and storage. This ranking may reflect overall or situational subsistence decision-
making. For example, that year breadfruit may not have grown well due to environmental
factors and so labour was invested elsewhere, or that once breadfruit was established trees
required little labour investment.
Table 8.27 Labour investment into species within the Gadio Enga system (data from Dornstreich 1974, 1978)
Species Labour inputs- instances of activity Rank inputs
Abelmoschus manihot 30.1 3
Areca catechu 20.7 21
Artocarpus altilis flesh 10.3 26
Artocarpus altilis seeds 10.3 26
Colocasia esculenta 30.1 3
Cucumis sativa 30.1 3
Curcubita moschata 30.1 3
Cympobogon citratus 30.1 3
Dioscorea spp 39.5 2
Edible ferns 28.8 18
Elaeocarpus sp. 11.8 23
Ficus sp. 28.8 18
Ipomoea batatas 30.1 3
Manihot esculenta 30.1 3
Metroxylon spp 148.0 1
Musa spp. 30.1 3
Oenanthe javanica 11.8 23
Pandanus spp. 20.7 21
Pangium edule 11.8 23
Phaseolus vulgaris 30.1 3
Piper betel 30.1 3
Rorippa sp. 30.1 3
Rungia sp. 28.8 18
Saccharum edule 30.1 3
Saccharum officinarum 30.1 3
Setaria palmifolia 30.1 3
Zingiber zerumbet 30.1 3
180
Figure 8.12 Labour comparison of species within the Gadio Enga system (data from Dornstreich 1974, 1977)
Bellona, Solomon Islands
Christiansen (1975) recorded hours of labour over a year, according to the types of gardens and
species within them. Therefore, many species within the Bellona Island system share the same
figures for labour investment, and so also have the same rankings when all species are compared
(see Table 8.28, Figure 8.13). Despite this, some species stood out within the system. One
example of this is the case of Ipomoea batatas which ranked the highest in the system, with
around 33,000 hours of labour invested in this crop in a year. Either the cultivation of this
species is labour intensive to maintain productive yields, or sweet potato is regarded as a
nutritionally or socially important cultigen and therefore time is invested accordingly to increase
cultivation more than other horticulturally produced species. Such considerations will be
discussed later in the chapter when output to input ratios are calculated. Three Dioscorea spp.
are ranked below this, with labour investment values of 16,683 hours/year. Two of the aroids,
Alocasia macrorrhiza and Colocasia esculenta rank 5th due to a total of 11,872 hours/year being
dedicated to the production of these two cultigens. Horticulturally produced or semi-cultivated
arboreal species such as Cocos nucifera, Burckella sp. and Canarium spp. generally rank below
these root crops. Artocarpus altilis again ranks the lowest according to labour investment, a
trend which requires comparison across these systems.
181
Table 8.28 Labour investment into species within the Bellona Is system (data from Christiansen 1975)
Figure 8.13 Labour comparison of species within the Bellona Island system (data from Christiansen 1975)
Species Labour hrs/yr Rank inputs
Alocasia macrorrhiza 11872.0 5
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius 854.1 11
Artocarpus altilis flesh 60.0 27
Artocarpus altilis seeds 60.0 27
Burckella sp. 854.1 11
Canarium spp. 854.1 11
Canavalia sp. 854.1 11
Cocos nucifera immature meat 3333.3 8
Cocos nucifera mature meat 3333.3 8
Cocos nucifera mature milk 3333.3 8
Colocasia esculenta 11872.0 5
Cucumis melo 854.1 11
Dioscorea alata 16683.0 2
Dioscorea bulbifera 854.1 11
Dioscorea esculenta 16683.0 2
Dioscorea nummularia 16683.0 2
Dioscorea pentaphylla 854.1 11
Ficus sp. 854.1 11
Gnetum sp. 854.1 11
Ipomoea batatas 33000.0 1
Mangifera sp. 60.0 27
Manihot esculenta 854.1 11
Morinda citrifolia 854.1 11
Musa spp. 9425.0 7
Pandanus spp. 100.0 26
Pueraria lobata 854.1 11
Saccharum officinarium 854.1 11
Spondias dulcis 60.0 27
Syzygium spp. 60.0 27
Tacca leontopetaloides 854.1 11
Terminalia sp. 854.1 11
182
Anuta, Solomon Islands
Labour investment on Anuta was recorded by Yen (1973b) over a 37 day period for a family
group. These figures are compared here according to both species and also grouping (Table 8.29
and Figure 8.14). The highest intensity of labour investment was directed towards horticultural
species, with very little investment in supplementary species. This is an expected trend
according to the nature and definition of the groupings used within this example system. The
highest ranked species according to labour investment is Manihot esculenta with a total of 125.6
recorded hours, followed closely by Colocasia esculenta with 108.6 hours. These two crops
have the highest labour investment by a significant margin, with the next ranked species,
Artocarpus altilis, having only 62.6 hours dedicated to production. The highest ranked
supplementary species are Areca catechu (betel palm) and Piper betel (betel leaf), which are
cultivated together for betelnut consumption, each had only 2.2 hours of labour invested over
the recorded period. The lower ranked species are all those grouped as supplementary aside
from Ipomoea batatas which only had 0.7 hours spent on cultivation and processing.
Table 8.29 Labour investment into species within the Anutan system (data from Yen 1973b)
Species Labour inputs (hrs/37 days) Rank inputs
Alocasia macrorrhiza 0.7 12
Areca catechu 2.2 10
Artocarpus altilis 62.6 3
Barringtonia procera 0.7 12
Burckella obovata 24.3 4
Canarium sp. 0.7 12
Cocos nucifera immature meat 10.1 7
Cocos nucifera mature meat 10.1 7
Cocos nucifera mature milk 10.1 7
Colocasia esculenta 108.6 2
Curcuma longa 0.7 12
Cyrtosperma merkusii 18.3 6
Dioscorea spp. 0.7 12
Inocarpus fagifer 0.7 12
Ipomoea batatas 0.7 12
Manihot esculenta 125.6 1
Metroxylon salomonense 0.7 12
Musa spp. 20.3 5
Piper betel 2.2 10
Saccharum officinarum 0.7 12
Tacca leontopetaloides 0.7 12
183
Figure 8.14 Labour comparison of species within the Anutan system (data from Yen 1973b)
Tongatapu, Tonga Archipelago
During the 2001 agricultural census conducted in Tonga, some data was collected on the
amount of labour invested into agricultural production by gender and relationship to the land
(owner, family or worker) per week. These labour figures were used to estimate yearly labour
investment into agriculture. These total figures were further broken down into estimated
species-specific figures through the use of acreage data detailing land dedicated to specific crop
production within the same census (see Table 8.30 and Figure 8.15). This avoided dealing with
the amount of labour dedicated to most European export crops. The patterning in these figures
closely matches that expected based on early historic and ethnographic recordings of Tongan
subsistence production. Most labour in the census was invested in the production of the Early
yam (Dioscorea sp.2, presumably Dioscorea alata) which is known to be a very important
cultigen within Tongan culture and related to surplus production for tributes and festivals.
Around 1,122,947.3 hours of labour were directed towards the production of this crop in the
census year. Ranked just below this species is another horticulturally produced cultigen,
Xanthosoma sagittifolium, which is also a historic introduction into Tonga that is now favoured
over the common taro because large quantities of this species can be grown using established
dryland production techniques. Due to the popularity of this introduction the common taro ranks
3rd, with 1,015,599.1 hours/year of labour investment. Other root crops also rank highly,
including Piper methysticum which ranks 7th with a total of 131,428.5 hours/year of labour
investment. Most semi-cultivated species rank below the horticultural crops, aside from
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Man
iho
t e
scu
len
ta
Co
loca
sia
esc
ule
nta
Art
oca
rpu
s al
tilis
Bu
rcke
lla o
bo
vata
Mu
sa s
pp
.
Cyr
tosp
erm
a m
erk
usi
i
Co
cos
nu
cife
ra m
atu
re m
eat
Co
cos
nu
cife
ra m
atu
re m
ilk
Co
cos
nu
cife
ra im
mat
ure
me
at
Are
ca c
ate
chu
Pip
er
be
tel
Can
ariu
m s
p.
Cu
rcu
ma
lon
ga
Me
tro
xylo
n s
alo
mo
ne
nse
Sacc
har
um
off
icin
aru
m
Bar
rin
gto
nia
pro
cera
Ino
carp
us
fagi
fer
Tacc
a le
on
top
eta
loid
es
Dio
sco
rea
spp
.
Alo
casi
a m
acro
rrh
iza
Ipo
mo
ea
bat
atas
Lab
ou
r in
pu
ts (
hrs
/37
day
pe
rio
d)
Species
Anuta Labour Comparison
Primary
Supplementary
184
Pandanus sp., which ranks above one Dioscorea sp., Saccharum officinarum and A. altilis, with
a total of 10,706.9 hours/year investment. It is interesting that Artocarpus altilis once again
ranks low within this system.
Table 8.30 Labour investment into species within the Tongan system (data from Ministry of Agriculture and
Forestry 2001)
Species Labour (hrs/yr) Rank inputs
Alocasia macrorrhiza 296824.2 6
Artocarpus altilis 5991.6 16
Cocos nucifera immature meat 120503.1 8
Cocos nucifera mature meat 120503.1 8
Cocos nucifera mature milk 120503.1 8
Colocasia esculenta 1015599.1 3
Dioscorea sp. 1 10450.4 14
Dioscorea sp. 2 1122947.3 1
Disocorea sp. 3 461086.1 4
Inocarpus fagifer 3002.1 17
Ipomoea batatas 332514.0 5
Morinda citrifolia 2942.0 18
Musa sp. 1 73029.6 11
Musa sp. 2 56565.4 12
Pandanus sp. 10707.0 13
Piper methysticum 131428.5 7
Saccharum officinarum 7723.8 15
Spondias dulcis 259.7 19
Xanthosoma sagittifolium 1069745.0 2
185
Figure 8.15 Labour comparison of species within the Tongan system (data from Ministry of Agriculture and
Forestry 2001)
Ontong Java, Solomon Islands
Energy use and investment of labour within the Ontong Java plant production system over a
year was directed primarily towards the cash-cropping and export of copra from Cocos nucifera.
This species therefore dominates the man-hours dedicated to agriculture on the island, with a
total of 202,960 hours spent cultivating, harvesting and processing this export item over the year
recorded by Bayliss-Smith (1973) (see Table 8.31 and Figure 8.16). Within the ethnographic
study from which this data was extracted, it is argued that the energy investment into export
items rather than subsistence species directly should not be discounted completely as time
wasted. The currency generated from these exports enabled other subsistence items to be
brought into the Ontong Java system that might not be grown or accessed any other way, and
thus still contribute to diet and system outputs, if not directly through a nutritional contribution.
Subsistence items that were grouped as primary crops, such as Colocasia esculenta and
Cyrtosperma merkusii, are ranked just below C. nucifera, with around 43,830 hours/year
dedicated to each of these species. There is an important tradition of turmeric (Curcuma longa)
cultivation on Ontong Java for cultural as well as subsistence reasons, and therefore 9,200
hours/year was spent on the production of this species. Labour investment in all other species
was simply described as dedicated toward village crop cultivation or gathering wild fruits, with
very low time investment in comparison with the aforementioned major horticultural cultigens.
Table 8.31 Labour investment into species within the Ontong Java plant production system (data from Bayliss-
Smith 1973, 1986)
Species Labour inputs (hrs/yr) Rank inputs
Alocasia macrorrhiza 183 7
Artocarpus altilis 183 7
Carica papaya 183 7
Cocos nucifera immature meat 202960 1
Cocos nucifera mature meat 202960 1
Cocos nucifera mature milk 202960 1
Colocasia esculenta 43830 4
Curcuma longa 9200 6
Cyrtosperma merkusii 43830 4
Ipomoea batatas 183 7
Musa sp. 183 7
Pandanus tectorius 183 7
Saccharum officinarum 183 7
Tacca leontopetaloides 183 7
Xanthosoma sagittifolium 183 7
186
Figure 8.16 Labour comparison of species within the Ontong Java plant production system (data from Bayliss-
Smith 1973, 1986)
Labour input comparison of groupings
Student’s t-test and associated confidence distribution tables were again used to calculate
whether the groupings of species for each modern system used in this study were significantly
different according to mean (see Table 8.32). Compared to the levels of confidence in
differences generated for the nutritional data, those established for the labour inputs in each
system were generally much higher. The groupings or categories within three systems were
shown to be statistically different with acceptable confidence. The comparison of labour
investment into horticultural and gathered species in the Gadio Enga plant production system
was shown to be different by 5.8 standard errors with 99.9% confidence. From this, the absolute
means of these groups were shown to be different by a value of 19 hours. Similarly, a
comparison of horticultural and semi-cultivated species within the Bellona Island system
calculated that these two groupings were different by 2.6 standard errors, the probability of
these being different is 98% according to the number of species in each category. Finally, the
difference between primary and supplementary species within the Anutan system was shown to
be 4.6 standard errors, and so can be argued to be different with 100% confidence. The means of
these two categories were different by 14.5 hours. The remaining two systems could not be
shown to be statistically different with high probability in labour investment.
187
Table 8.32 Statistical comparison of species’ groupings in example systems according to labour input figures
Outputs
The nutritional and energy outputs from each of the example systems provide essential data
about the costs and benefits of labour investment into each plant species within production
systems. These figures were calculated based on the productivity or yield for each species
within the time period for which ethnographic data was collected. Because these time periods
vary, these figures cannot be compared directly across the different systems. Here, yield and
associated outputs will be outlined for each species within each Pacific production system.
Because of biases in the data for recorded outputs, the groupings in each example system will
not be statistically compared. The section following this discussion on system outputs will focus
on patterning in the output to input ratios for each species in each of the example systems. These
ratios can be used as a gauge for ‘system efficiency’ according to energy returns.
Gadio Enga, New Guinea
System output data for the Gadio Enga was recorded over one subsistence season, or a full year.
When the yields for species within this system are directly compared, it becomes clear that the
horticulturally produced species have the greatest productivity (see Table 8.33, Figure 8.17).
The highest yielding species within this season was Colocasia esculenta, from which 1987.4 kg
of edible material was harvested. Ranked just below this was another staple crop, Metroxylon
spp., with a total yield of 1117.4kg. Other arboreal species generally ranked low within the
system, aside from Musa spp. (although these are technically herbs not trees) which rank 4th as
this genus is more like root crops in terms of growth and yields. The highest supplementary
arboreal species was Pandanus spp. which was ranked 13th with a total yield of 28.5kg. Root
crops such as C. esculenta, Ipomoea batatas, and Manihot esculenta, on the other hand,
generally rank relatively high. Dioscorea spp. are the only taxa to differ from this trend, with a
ranking of 14th due to a yield of 13.3kg. It is interesting to note the high yield and associated
rank of edible ferns, which comes in at 7th with a yield of 60.7kg. From these data, the total
yields from each of the groupings revealed an expected pattern. Horticultural production had a
total yield of 2935.1kg, while sago had 1117.4kg, gathering had 220.88kg, and finally
silviculture had only 50kg.
Example system Pooled standard deviation Pooled standard error Difference Confidence Mean difference
Gadio Enga (horticulture vs
gathered) 8.5 3.3 5.8 99.90% 19.0
Bellona Island (horticulture vs
semi-cultivated) 649.6 243.1 2.6 98% 619.0
Tonga 2001 Agricultural Survey (primary vs
supplementary crops) 6435.6 3086.4 1.9 90% 5889.8
Ontong Java (primary vs
supplementary crops) 76265.7 44470.2 1.4 80% 63238.6
Anuta Atoll (primary vs
supplementary crops) 10.5 4.6 3.2 100% 14.5
Labour Inputs (hours or instances of activity)
188
Table 8.33 Output comparison of species in Gadio Enga plant production system (data from Dornstreich 1974,
1978)
Figure 8.17 Output comparison according to yield for species within Gadio Enga system (data from
Dornstreich 1974, 1978)
Species Yield (kg) Rank Kcal Protein Fats Carbohydrates
Abelmoschus manihot 50.0 9 184.8 10558.8 1395.7 7499.4
Areca catechu 0.7 24 1.8 36.2 29.0 340.7
Artocarpus altilis flesh 10.3 17 8.5 263.9 93.1 1966.3
Artocarpus altilis seeds 10.3 17 15.5 620.9 51.7 3104.6
Colocasia esculenta 1987.4 1 2633.4 33786.5 6956.0 628030.7
Cucumis sativa 4.1 21 0.7 24.7 4.1 148.2
Curcubita moschata 84.0 5 37.8 839.9 84.0 9818.0
Cympobogon citratus 0.4 25 0.1 9.1 0.4 0.0
Dioscorea spp 13.4 14 17.1 234.0 16.7 3589.9
Edible ferns 60.7 7 30.3 182.1 1942.3 3641.8
Elaeocarpus sp. 12.1 16 45.5 1821.9 3643.8 1943.4
Ficus sp. 7.0 19 0.9 532.4 628.5 371.8
Ipomoea batatas 498.2 3 473.3 7971.4 498.2 100140.1
Manihot esculenta 62.5 6 84.4 562.6 0.0 15003.4
Metroxylon spp 1117.4 2 3614.9 3352.3 3352.3 882217.1
Musa spp. 172.3 4 195.6 1981.9 517.0 47049.3
Oenanthe javanica 12.5 15 5.0 449.3 37.4 748.8
Pandanus spp. 28.5 13 194.8 3394.2 18825.1 6275.0
Pangium edule 59.0 8 23.6 590.1 59.0 11802.3
Phaseolus vulgaris 0.2 26 0.2 17.4 6.5 0.0
Piper betel 3.1 22 1.4 124.9 12.5 187.4
Rorippa sp. 44.2 11 7.5 883.4 110.4 1325.2
Rungia sp. 7.0 19 1.0 168.3 21.0 3.5
Saccharum edule 0.1 27 0.0 2.3 0.1 3.1
Saccharum officinarum 29.2 12 16.9 145.9 0.0 4085.8
Setaria palmifolia 47.7 10 10.5 668.1 286.3 3102.0
Zingiber zerumbet 0.8 23 0.4 12.1 7.3 76.8
189
Bellona, Solomon Islands
The yield (mT) for each species within the Bellona system was recorded over a single year. The
highest ranked amongst these were three of the yam species— D. alata, D. esculenta and D.
nummularia— each with yields of around 211.7mT over the recorded year (see Table 8.34,
Figure 8.18). Musa spp. ranked 4th with a yield just below these species. This genus represented
the highest ranked arboreal taxa within the system, followed by Cocos nucifera with a yield of
100mT. A number of horticultural root crops such as Ipomoea batatas. Colocasia esculenta, and
Alocasia macrorrhiza rank 8-9th with yields from 65-98mT. Some semi-cultivated arboreal
species exploited for fruits, including Mangifera sp., Spondias dulcis and Syzygium sp., are
ranked 11th with yields of 5mT. The remaining taxa within the system had low yields, and
included a range of both horticultural and semi-cultivated species. Overall, the horticultural
species collectively had a much higher yield than the range of semi-cultivated species, with a
total of 1387.6mT compared to 37.5mT.
Table 8.34 Output comparison of species in Bellona Island system (data from Christiansen 1975)
Species Yield (mT) Rank Kcal Protein Fat Carbohydrates
Alocasia macrorrhiza 65 9 68.9 1267.5 97.5 14300.0
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius 2.5 14 3.4 56.0 1.5 454.8
Artocarpus altilis flesh 2.5 14 2.1 63.8 22.5 475.0
Artocarpus altilis seeds 2.5 14 3.8 150.0 12.5 750.0
Burckella sp. 2.5 14 1.4 27.5 32.5 502.5
Canarium spp. 2.5 14 16.1 355.0 1712.5 137.5
Canavalia sp. 2.5 14 9.3 870.0 37.5 1291.3
Cocos nucifera immature meat 100 5 105.0 2350.0 8000.0 7000.0
Cocos nucifera mature meat 100 5 425.5 4350.0 43200.0 10500.0
Cocos nucifera mature milk 100 5 328.5 3400.0 34500.0 5500.0
Colocasia esculenta 65 9 86.1 1105.0 227.5 20540.0
Cucumis melo 2.5 14 0.9 20.0 5.0 200.0
Dioscorea alata 211.7 1 253.4 4361.0 169.4 41514.4
Dioscorea bulbifera 2.5 14 2.7 48.5 1.5 631.5
Dioscorea esculenta 211.7 1 254.7 3747.1 381.1 42445.9
Dioscorea nummularia 211.7 1 225.9 3493.1 105.9 28198.4
Dioscorea pentaphylla 2.5 14 2.1 43.3 2.0 500.0
Ficus sp. 2.5 14 0.3 189.8 224.0 132.5
Gnetum sp. 2.5 14 0.7 125.0 5.0 275.0
Ipomoea batatas 98 8 93.1 1568.0 98.0 19698.0
Mangifera sp. 5 11 3.0 40.0 20.0 750.0
Manihot esculenta 2.5 14 3.4 22.5 0.0 600.0
Morinda citrifolia 2.5 14 1.0 67.5 45.0 300.0
Musa spp. 202 4 229.3 2323.0 606.0 55146.0
Pandanus spp. 2.5 14 17.1 297.5 1650.0 550.0
Pueraria lobata 2.5 14 9.6 52.5 2.5 677.5
Saccharum officinarium 2.5 14 9.4 0.0 0.0 2500.0
Spondias dulcis 5 11 2.2 40.0 15.0 182.5
Syzygium spp. 5 11 1.1 35.0 10.0 265.0
Tacca leontopetaloides 2.5 14 3.1 127.5 64.5 2235.0
Terminalia sp. 2.5 14 6.5 240.0 600.0 207.5
190
Figure 8.18 Output comparison according to yield for species within Bellona system (data from Christiansen
1975)
Anuta, Solomon Islands
The outputs of the family garden within the Anutan production system, as recorded by Yen
(1973b) over a 37 day period, were solely derived from primary species. Clearly there is a bias
within the nature of recorded outputs in terms of yield over this time period. Perhaps the season
within which these outputs were recorded was that when only a small number of species were
being harvested. Another option is that the recorders were only given access to data from
particular species. No explanation of the data is given by the authors. In any case, outputs in
terms of yield were recorded for only six of the total 19 species. Highest ranked amongst these
species is Manihot esculenta, with a total yield of 254.7kg over the recorded period (see Table
8.35, Figure 8.19). There is a significant difference between this crop and the yield of the next
highest ranked species, Colocasia esculenta, which had 163.3kg. The remaining taxa all had
yields of less than 50kg. Based on these data, the recorders were able to make estimates for the
expected annual yield of these species from the number of plants or trees within the plantation.
Manioc or Manihot esculenta was expected to have the highest yield of around 2,511kg,
followed by C. esculenta with 1610kg. Breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) was expected to yield
around 326kg, while Musa spp., was expected to yield only 127kg over a year. Lowest expected
annual yield was from Burckella sp. with only 41kg.
191
Table 8.35 Output comparison of species in Anutan system (data from Yen 1973b)
Figure 8.19 Output comparison according to yield for species within the Anutan system (data from Yen 1973b)
Species Yield (kg) Rank Kcal Protein Fat Carbohydrates
Alocasia macrorrhiza 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Areca catechu 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Artocarpus altilis 33.1 3 27276.9 843.1 297.6 6281.9
Barringtonia procera 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Burckella obovata 4.2 6 2328.6 45.7 54.1 835.8
Canarium sp. 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cocos nucifera immature meat 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cocos nucifera mature meat 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cocos nucifera mature milk 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Colocasia esculenta 163.3 2 216354.0 2775.9 571.5 51598.4
Curcuma longa 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cyrtosperma merkusii 20.5 4 24993.9 104.5 32.8 4078.9
Dioscorea spp. 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Inocarpus fagifer 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ipomoea batatas 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Manihot esculenta 254.7 1 343798.2 2292.0 0.0 61119.7
Metroxylon salomonense 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Musa spp. 12.9 5 14619.2 148.1 38.6 3516.3
Piper betel 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Saccharum officinarum 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tacca leontopetaloides 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Man
iho
t e
scu
len
ta
Co
loca
sia
esc
ule
nta
Art
oca
rpu
s al
tilis
Cyr
tosp
erm
a m
erk
usi
i
Mu
sa s
pp
.
Bu
rcke
lla o
bo
vata
Ou
tpu
ts (y
ield
(kg
))
Species
Anuta Output Comparison
Primary crops
Supplementary
192
Tongatapu, Tongan Archipelago
The output data within the 2001 Agricultural Census in Tonga had similar biases to that
observed of the Anutan system. Data from Tongatapu only included yields of the core cultigens,
which have been grouped here as horticultural species. There is therefore a recording bias
towards this category. Aside from these core cultigens, many other horticultural and all
supplementary species were excluded from the ranking based on outputs. It is not likely that
these species had no yield over this time period on Tongatapu, and so to rank these species as
‘0’ for yield would skew the comparisons.
Of those taxa for which there are data, Xanthosoma sagittifolium is ranked the highest
with an annual yield of 13,677.5mT on Tongatapu (see Table 8.36, Figure 8.20). This is not
unexpected due to the popularity in Tonga of this introduced dryland taro from South America.
Ranked just below this with a yield of 13,637.9mT, is the ‘Early yam’ or Dioscorea sp. 2. Again
the high yield of this species is not unexpected due to the cultural significance of this cultigen in
Tonga. The common taro, Colocasia esculenta, had a recorded annual yield of 9,088.7mT, and
was ranked 3rd. Root crops dominate the remaining rankings according to yield, although some
arboreal species are interspersed amongst these, including Musa spp. ranked 7-8th and Pandanus
sp. ranked 9th with a total annual yield of 1,394.5mT.
Table 8.36 Output comparison of species in Tongan system (data from Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
2001)
Species Yield (mt) Rank Kcal Protein Fat Carbohydrates
Alocasia macrorrhiza 1869.0 6 1981.1 36445.0 2803.5 411174.8
Artocarpus altilis 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Artocarpus heterophyllus 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Canarium sp. 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cocos nucifera immature meat 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cocos nucifera mature meat 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cocos nucifera mature milk 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Colocasia esculenta 9088.7 3 12042.5 154507.8 31810.4 2872027.5
Dioscorea sp. 1 126.9 10 162.5 2221.1 158.6 34077.5
Dioscorea sp. 2 13637.9 2 16638.3 280941.1 10910.3 2674395.3
Disocorea sp. 3 5599.8 4 7167.7 97996.1 6999.7 1503539.9
Inocarpus fagifer 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ipomoea batatas 5100.9 5 4845.9 81614.4 5100.9 1025280.9
Morinda citrifolia 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Musa sp. 1 1833.8 7 2237.2 23839.5 7335.2 586819.4
Musa sp. 2 1632.2 8 1852.6 18770.6 4896.7 445598.7
Musa sp. 3 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pandanus sp. 1394.5 9 9524.2 165941.6 920348.4 306782.8
Piper methysticum 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Saccharum officinarum 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Spondias dulcis 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Xanthosoma sagittifolium 13677.5 1 17096.9 199691.8 54710.1 3231998.4
193
Figure 8.20 Output comparison according to yield for species within the Tongan system (data from Ministry of
Agriculture and Forestry 2001)
Ontong Java, Solomon Islands
Data recording caused some issues with the comparison of outputs from species within the
Ontong Java plant production system. Four species had no yield data recorded, including all
three of the species classified as supplementary. This biases the grouping comparison towards
the primary species, but it is not likely that this reflects the actual yield data for the recorded
time period. One reason is because of the social importance of turmeric (Curcuma longa)
production mentioned by Bayliss-Smith (1973). Despite this, no yield data are given. Perhaps
environmental limitations affected production that year.
For those species for which yield data is available, Cocos nucifera, ranks the highest
with a total annual yield of 110,700kg (see Table 8.37, Figure 8.21). Of the purely subsistence
crops, Cyrtosperma merkusii ranks the highest with an annual yield of 69,230kg. This is
followed by another aroid, Colocasia esculenta, with a yield of 40,180kg. These two species are
described as core cultigens within the Ontong Java system, grown using wetland techniques that
make the most of the island’s geographic and environmental constraints. Several arboreal
species such as Carica papaya, Musa spp. and Pandanus tectorius all rank above the lowest
ranked root crop, Xanthosoma sagittifolium, which had an annual yield of only 250kg. Perhaps
this dryland species of taro is not as viable as wetland varieties within the atoll environment.
194
Table 8.37 Output comparison of species in Ontong Java production system (data from Bayliss-Smith 1973,
1986)
Figure 8.21 Output comparison according to yield for species within the Ontong Java production system (data
from Bayliss-Smith 1973, 1986)
Output to input ratios: Efficiency calculation
Once the figures for nutritional values, labour inputs, outputs in terms of yield and associated
nutritional returns have been calculated for each species within each system, the ‘efficiency’ of
energy returns can then be calculated. In this study, it was deemed appropriate to focus on the
species that have been identified archaeobotanically at Talasiu (TO-Mu-2), Leka (J17) and the
Heketa (TO-Nt-2) through extracted starch grains and charred macrobotanical remains. This
Species Yield (mT) Rank Kcal Protein Fat Carbohydrates
Alocasia macrorrhiza 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Artocarpus altilis 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Carica papaya 9.6 6 4.1 47.9 28.7 1052.7
Cocos nucifera immature meat 110.7 1 143.7 4654.6 47230.5 7529.5
Cocos nucifera mature meat 110.7 1 157.0 1605.2 15940.8 3874.5
Cocos nucifera mature milk 110.7 1 121.2 867.2 2952.0 2583.0
Colocasia esculenta 40.2 5 53.2 683.1 140.6 12696.9
Curcuma longa 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cyrtosperma merkusii 69.2 4 84.5 353.1 110.8 13783.7
Ipomoea batatas 4.7 7 4.5 75.2 4.7 944.7
Musa sp. 1.8 8 2.0 20.2 5.3 480.5
Pandanus tectorius 1.3 9 8.9 155.9 864.6 288.2
Saccharum officinarum 0.4 10 1.5 2.1 0.0 57.4
Tacca leontopetaloides 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Xanthosoma sagittifolium 0.3 11 0.3 3.7 1.0 59.1
195
decision was made firstly due to the large range of species within each system, and secondly as
the ultimate aim of this analysis is to assess the variation of outputs to inputs within a range of
production systems, in order to model archaeological systems. Each of the archaeological
species was therefore compared across each of the example systems according to energy and
nutritional outputs per time unit. Firstly, a ratio is created for each species that compares the
outputs to inputs in terms of yield in kilos, calories, protein, fats, and carbohydrates separately.
These are then combined to assess efficiency in terms of the nutritional value of yield per time
unit of labour invested. Efficiency is calculated here as:
𝑌𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑 (𝑘𝑔) × 𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 (𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠, 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑖𝑛, 𝑓𝑎𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑏𝑜𝑦ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑠/𝑘𝑔)
𝐿𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑟 (ℎ𝑟𝑠 𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑦)
It is important to point out that the scale of production across each of the example
systems is different, but the creation of a simple ratio is argued here to be one technique that
diminishes this problem. A larger scale system such as that recorded for Tongatapu requires
more hours of labour to gain more outputs, while a smaller scale system such as that on Anuta,
which is that of a single family, requires fewer hours for fewer outputs. The calculated ratio is
assumed to be the same if production techniques and environmental limitations are the same.
One factor that does have to be considered is that the time unit for the Gadio Enga system was
recorded as ‘instances of activity’ rather than hours, and so the ratios are going to be skewed
towards an over-representation of outputs to inputs. Unfortunately, this cannot be avoided
within these comparisons. The results of ratio comparisons within each system will be noted
here, and overall patterning between systems discussed within the following section. The ratios
for species in each system is compared to gauge the source of highest energy and nutritional
returns from labour investment in terms of calories, proteins, fats and carbohydrates. These will
also be considered in comparison to the direct yield ratios.
Yield ratio comparison across systems
The yield for each species varied dramatically across the different modern systems (see Table
8.38). Some systems such as Anuta and Ontong Java were consistently low-yielding in relation
to time invested, thus creating greater disparity across the systems for all species apart from
Cyrtosperma merkusii and Ipomoea batatas. The overall greatest difference in yield was that
observed for Colocasia esculenta. The highest yielding system for this species was the Gadio
Enga, producing an output ratio of 66.1kg per instance of activity, while the lowest yielding
system, Ontong Java, produced only 900g per hour. Similarly, Artocarpus altilis yielded
41.7kg/hr within the Bellona system, but only 1kg/instance of activity within the Gadio Enga
and 500g/hr within the Anutan production system. Likewise, in assessing the yield ratios for
Cocos nucifera, there is a big contrast between the high ratio observed within the Bellona
system (30kg/hr) and the low ratio within the Ontong Java example. Many species only had one
196
yield ratio due to the lack of data from other systems. These include: Amorphophallus
paeoniifolius, Spondias dulcis and Zingiber zerumbet.
The Bellonan and Tongan systems often had similar high yield ratios as both are raised
limestone islands. All of the main Dioscorea yams were relatively high yielding in comparison
to labour inputs in the Bellona and Tongan production systems, ranging from 12.14-12.69kg/hr,
but had very low ratios in the Gadio Enga system. Similarly, both Musa sp. had yield ratios of
21-25kg/hr, compared to 9.6kg/h in Ontong Java, 5.7kg/instance of activity in Gadio Enga, and
only 0.6kg/hr in the Anutan system. Alocasia macrorrhiza was only present in the Bellona and
Tongan systems, and had similar yield ratios, 5.48kg/hr in the Bellona system and 6.3kg/hr in
the Tongan system. One of the only species for which these systems had radically different
ratios, was Ipomoea batatas. The Tongan system produced a yield ratio of 15.3kg/hr, while the
Bellona system only produced 3kg/hr. Similarly, Dioscorea bulbifera, commonly a naturalised
yam species, was produced in the Tongan system at 12.1kg/hr, while in the Bellona system only
3kg/hr was produced. It should be noted that the ratio within the Tongan system was calculated
based on the same yields for all yam varieties, while the Bellona system has specific figures for
each Dioscorea species.
Table 8.38 Yield ratios for archaeological species in all modern production systems (kg/time unit of labour)
Gadio Enga, New Guinea
In the Gadio Enga production system, the species providing the highest output to input return
ratio in terms of calories was Colocasia esculenta or the common taro (see Table 8.39). This
cultigen had a ratio of 87,609.2kcal/instance of activity (ioa), while the next highest ratio was
Species Gadio Enga Bellona Is Anuta Tongatapu Ontong Java
Alocasia macrorrhiza 0.0 5.5 0.0 6.3 0.0
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
Artocarpus altilis 1.0 41.7 0.5 0.0 0.0
Cocos nucifera 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
Colocasia esculenta 66.1 5.5 1.5 8.9 0.9
Curcuma longa 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cyrtosperma merkusii 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 1.6
Dioscorea alata 0.3 12.7 0.0 12.1 0.0
Dioscorea bulbifera 0.3 2.9 0.0 12.1 0.0
Dioscorea esculenta 0.3 12.7 0.0 12.1 0.0
Dioscorea nummularia 0.3 12.7 0.0 12.1 0.0
Inocarpus fagifer 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ipomoea batatas 16.6 3.0 0.0 15.3 25.7
Musa sp.1 5.7 21.4 0.6 25.1 9.6
Musa sp.2 5.7 21.4 0.6 25.1 9.6
Piper methysticum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Solanum tuberosum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Spondias dulcis 0.0 83.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Zingiber zerumbet 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Average 5.1 13.5 0.2 6.8 2.5
197
that from Ipomoea batatas with 15,746.2kcal/ioa. Musa spp. had the highest ratios for arboreal
species within the system, with 6507.7kcal/ioa. Another arboreal tree crop, Breadfruit or
Artocarpus altilis had a ratio of 826.5kcal/ioa. Most of the Dioscorea yams ranked relatively
low in comparison to these other cultigens, with ratios of 433.7kcal/ioa. The lowest overall
calorific gain compared to labour investment was Zingiber zerumbet, which had a ratio of only
12.9kcal/ioa. These ratios also closely match the highest yield ratios for the Gadio Enga system.
The ratios for proteins, fats and carbohydrates follow much the same patterning and
distribution as those for calories and overall yield. Clearly, the varying nutritional values for any
of these species were insufficient to change the high-low distribution of ratios within the
system. The distributions of values were largely dictated by the large differences between the
yield and yield ratios for each species. Low ratios indicate that the production of species such as
Dioscorea yams and Z. zerumbet is relatively inefficient, with low returns for time invested.
These are gathered species and most likely require time for searching and harvesting that does
not provide efficient returns compared to that produced from horticulture or even ‘silviculture’.
In contrast the production techniques for species such as Colocasia esculenta and Ipomoea
batatas within the Gadio Enga system are highly efficient, as significantly greater gains are
made in terms of yield and associated nutritional values, for less time invested.
It is interesting to note that when these figures are compared with some other Highland
PNG ethnographic datasets, the efficiency of some crop production is almost reversed. For
example, within the Modopa (Waddell 1972) sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) production has an
output to input ratio of 8,075kcal/hr, while Dioscorea alata yams have a ratio of 10,258kcal/hr.
These figures are lower and higher (respectively) than those calculated for the Gadio Enga, and
reflect a primary focus on sweet potato production using large plano-convex mounding within
open fields that are very rarely fallowed. Less time is invested in yam production within similar
mounds in mixed gardens, but the calculated yield per hour is higher than that for sweet
potatoes. In a Lowland PNG example, the Oriomo (Ohtsuka 1983) focus on sago production
(2,000kcal/hr), with the horticultural production of other crops (980kcal/hr) primarily
maintained to provide stability to the seasonal food supply. Chance shortages of sago was
compensated by other staples from the gardens, both enriching diet and stabilising supply
(Ohtsuka 1983:121). Wild plants only contributed seasonally to diet and in small amounts. Meat
from hunted animals contributed around 67.1% of protein and 4.3% of energy, with an average
of 25 minutes per day per capita dedicated to hunting compared to 118.8 mins for sago and 92.1
mins for horticulture (Ohtsuka 1983:119-18).
198
Table 8.39 Output to input ratios for archaeological species using Gadio Enga data
Bellona, Solomon Islands
The highest yielding species for time invested in production in the Bellona system was Spondias
dulcis (see Table 8.40). However, the nutritional output ratios suggest that this species would
not necessarily have been preferentially cultivated or harvested over others within the system.
This yield ratio is most likely the result of seasonal harvesting of this species from areas close to
the village, so only a small amount of time is invested in searching, but high yields are gained
for the time that is invested (Christensen 1975). While still high compared to many other species
in the Bellona system, S. dulcis did not have the highest ratios for calories, proteins, fats or
carbohydrates. The species with the highest ratio for calorific gain over time invested was in
fact Cocos nucifera, with a ratio of 127,651.3kcal/hr, followed by S. dulcis with a ratio of
36,416.7kcal/hr. Artocarpus altilis also ranked relatively high with a ratio of 34,375kcal/hr. The
lowest ranked species was Ipomoea batatas, which is interesting as this is a horticulturally
produced cultigen. This species had a ratio of only 2,821.2kcal/hr— lower than the lowest
ranked semi-cultivated species, Dioscorea bulbifera, which had a ratio of 3,102.7kcal/hr.
The ratios for protein follow much the same pattern as that observed within the
distribution of calorific gain with the Bellona system. When the ratios according to fats are
assessed, there are some slight differences. Cocos nucifera remains the highest yielding species
with a ratio of 12960g/hr, followed by Spondias dulcis and Artocarpus altilis. However, within
the lower ratios there are some changes. The two species with the lowest fat ratios are
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius and D. bulbifera, two semi-cultivated species with ratios of only
Species Kcal/ioa Protein/ioa (g) Fat/ioa (g) Carbohydates/ioa (g)
Alocasia macrorrhiza 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Artocarpus altilis 826.5 25.5 9.0 190.3
Colocasia esculenta 87609.2 1124.0 231.4 20894.0
Curcuma longa 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cyrtosperma merkusii 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dioscorea alata 433.7 5.9 0.4 91.0
Dioscorea bulbifera 433.7 5.9 0.4 91.0
Dioscorea esculenta 433.7 5.9 0.4 91.0
Dioscorea nummularia 433.7 5.9 0.4 91.0
Inocarpus fagifer 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ipomoea batatas 15746.2 265.2 16.6 3331.6
Musa sp.1 6507.7 65.9 17.2 1565.3
Musa sp.2 6507.7 65.9 17.2 1565.3
Piper methysticum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Solanum tuberosum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Spondias dulcis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Zingiber zerumbet 12.9 0.4 0.2 2.6
199
1.8g/hr. Ipomoea batatas has a ratio of 3g/hr, which is just marginally greater than these two
species.
Ratios according to carbohydrates produce further changes in the distribution of low-to-
high ratios in the Bellona system. The highest gain in terms of carbohydrates is provided by A.
altilis, with a ratio of 7916g/hr. Despite having an average carbohydrate content of 5-10/100g in
comparison to other species within the system, C. nucifera still has the second highest ratio.
This indicates that the techniques used for the subsistence production as well as export of this
species were highly efficient, along with environmental suitability on the atoll (Christensen
1975). This species is followed by a number of horticultural root and tree crops that have high
carbohydrate content, such as most Dioscorea yams, Musa spp., Colocasia esculenta and
Alocasia macrorrrhiza. Ipomoea batatas had the lowest ratio of 596g/hr. When this figure is
compared to the high carbohydrate content of this species (20.1/100g), it could be argued that
the production of I. batatas within the Bellona system is not efficient in comparison with other
horticultural crops. In other words, to gain calories, fats, protein and carbohydrates to contribute
to daily diet with least time investment, I. batatas would not be the best selection in the
recorded Bellona system. A more obvious choice would be either C. nucifera or A. altilis.
Table 8.40 Output to input ratios for archaeological species using Bellona data
Anuta, Solomon Islands
The recorded inputs and outputs for species in the Anutan system did not include many of the
archaeologically identified species from Tongatapu. Therefore, there are fewer species to
compare in terms of output to input ratios, with data available for only five crops (see Table
Species Kcal/hr Protein/hr (g) Fat/hr (g) Kg carbohydates/hr (g)
Alocasia macrorrhiza 5803.6 106.8 8.2 1204.5
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius 3951.5 65.6 1.8 532.4
Artocarpus altilis 34375.0 1062.5 375.0 7916.7
Cocos nucifera 127651.3 1305.0 12960.1 3150.0
Colocasia esculenta 7254.5 93.1 19.2 1730.1
Curcuma longa 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cyrtosperma merkusii 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dioscorea alata 15189.4 261.4 10.2 2488.4
Dioscorea bulbifera 3102.7 56.8 1.8 739.4
Dioscorea esculenta 15265.5 224.6 22.8 2544.3
Dioscorea nummularia 13539.8 209.4 6.3 1690.2
Inocarpus fagifer 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ipomoea batatas 2821.2 47.5 3.0 596.9
Musa sp.1 24325.7 246.5 64.3 5851.0
Musa sp.2 24325.7 246.5 64.3 5851.0
Piper methysticum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Solanum tuberosum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Spondias dulcis 36416.7 666.7 250.0 3041.7
Zingiber zerumbet 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
200
8.41). Of these, C. esculenta produced the highest ratios for most nutritional outputs, as well as
yield. This indicates that of these species, C. esculenta. was produced with the highest
efficiency in terms of returns for labour investment. This species had ratios of 1992.2kcal/hr,
8.5g/hr for protein, 5.3g/hr for fats, and 475.1g/hr in terms of carbohydrates. Likewise,
Cyrtosperma merkusii, another aroid, had relatively high ratios of outputs to inputs with 1365
kcal/hr and 222.9g/hr of carbohydrates.
On Anuta, Yen (1973b) notes that the trees and perennial species within the agricultural system
required the least attention during the cropping cycle, and in particular that bananas needed only
limited weeding, thinning and the creation of windbreaks. It is then interesting to note that Musa
spp. and Artocarpus altilis have lower yield and overall nutritional values than other staples.
There are some subtle differences in the efficiency of labour investment between two of
these core staple aroids, Colocasia esculenta and Cyrtosperma merkusii. Cyrtosperma merkusii
had relatively high ratios in terms of nutritional value apart from fats and protein, while C.
esculenta had the lowest ratios for all nutritional values. This may be because Cyrtosperma is
cultivated as a perennial species on Anuta, while a strict cycle of crop rotation is maintained for
common taro and manioc (Manihot esculenta) which also involves harvesting for storage. The
production of common taro is therefore more labour intensive, but apparently more efficient in
terms of yield and nutritional returns.
Table 8.41 Output to input ratios for archaeological species using Anutan data
Species Kcal/hr Protein/hr (g) Fat/hr (g) Carbohydates/hr (g)
Alocasia macrorrhiza 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Artocarpus altilis 435.7 13.5 4.8 100.4
Cocos nucifera 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Colocasia esculenta 1992.2 8.5 5.3 475.1
Curcuma longa 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cyrtosperma merkusii 1365.8 5.7 1.8 222.9
Dioscorea alata 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dioscorea bulbifera 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dioscorea esculenta 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dioscorea nummularia 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Inocarpus fagifer 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ipomoea batatas 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Musa sp.1 720.2 7.3 1.9 173.2
Musa sp.2 720.2 7.3 1.9 173.2
Piper methysticum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Solanum tuberosum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Spondias dulcis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Zingiber zerumbet 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
201
Tongatapu, Tongan Archipelago
The most efficient horticultural species within the Tongan system in terms of yield and
nutritional returns were Musa spp. (see Table 8.42). The production of these crops produced a
yield to time investment ratio of 25.11kg/hr, and the difference in yield ratios compared to other
species along with generally high nutritional values ensured that these crops also had high
nutritional ratios. The calorific gain for labour investment for both Musa spp. was
32,751.1kcal/hr, while protein was 331.8g/hr, fats were 86.5g/hr and carbohydrates were
7,877g/hr. There is a significant difference between these species and those with the next
highest ratios. Below Musa spp., the next highest ratios for calories, and carbohydrates were
those from all yam species. In terms of fats Colocasia esculenta and Ipomoea batatas had
higher ratios, while I. batatas also had a greater ratio for protein.
The least efficient species was consistently Alocasia macrorrhiza, which is not
cultivated as commonly as other aroids such as C. esculenta or Xanthosoma sagittifolium on
Tongatapu, according to the Agricultural Census (2001). Despite the size of the corms of this
taro species, the flavour is considered less palatable, processing time is longer, and this species
cannot be harvested as often as other varieties. It may also be the case that this aroid cannot be
grown as efficiently as other aroids using dryland techniques. Depending upon the nutritional
contribution needed by those cultivating and consuming these species, these differences in
efficiency could impact the decision to cultivate more or less of a particular crop, or changes in
the nature of labour investment through alterations to production techniques.
Table 8.42 Output to input ratios for archaeological species using Tongan 2001 data
Species Kcal/hr Protein/hr (g) Fat/hr (g) Carbohydates/hr (g)
Alocasia macrorrhiza 6674.4 122.8 9.4 1385.2
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Artocarpus altilis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cocos nucifera 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Colocasia esculenta 11857.6 152.1 31.3 2827.9
Curcuma longa 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cyrtosperma merkusii 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dioscorea alata 15545.3 212.5 15.2 3260.9
Dioscorea bulbifera 15545.3 212.5 15.2 3260.9
Dioscorea esculenta 15545.3 212.5 15.2 3260.9
Dioscorea nummularia 15545.3 212.5 15.2 3260.9
Inocarpus fagifer 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ipomoea batatas 14573.4 245.4 15.3 3083.4
Musa sp.1 32751.1 331.8 86.6 7877.6
Musa sp.2 32751.1 331.8 86.6 7877.6
Piper methysticum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Solanum tuberosum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Spondias dulcis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Zingiber zerumbet 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
202
Ontong Java, Solomon Islands
Similar to the Anutan system, Ontong Java had very little data for most of the species identified
archaeologically on Tongatapu and therefore for this comparative exercise (see Table 8.43).
Despite this, some assessment can be made from the existing data upon the efficiency of these
crops in the Ontong Java production system. The species with the highest ratio for yield in terms
of time investment was I. batatas, and this species also had the highest ratios for calories,
protein, and carbohydrates. In terms of fats, the highest ratio was that from Cocos nucifera
(78.5g/hr), which was significantly higher than the next highest ratio, derived from both Musa
spp. (28.8g/hr). Both Colocasia esculenta and Cyrtosperma merkusii had roughly similar ratios
when compared to other species. This is because these two crops are often grown together in
freshwater swamps using similar techniques (Bayliss-Smith 1977:336). Although more land is
dedicated to the production of Cyrtosperma, the yield ratios are similar and Colocasia has
higher nutritional content in all values.
Table 8.43 Output to input ratios for archaeological species using Ontong Javan data
System efficiency comparison and system classification
When each of the archaeologically identified species are compared according to the ratio of
outputs to inputs in terms of calories, proteins, fats and carbohydrates across each of the modern
systems, it becomes clear that there are often significant differences (see Figures 8.22-8.25). As
highlighted earlier in the analysis of these efficiency ratios within these systems individually,
often the same patterning can be seen within all of the nutritional values. This patterning
indicates that there are no significant differences in the ranking of various nutritional values for
Species Kcal/hr Protein/hr (g) Fat/hr (g) Carbohydates/hr (g)
Alocasia macrorrhiza 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Artocarpus altilis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cocos nucifera 773.6 7.9 78.5 19.1
Colocasia esculenta 1214.7 15.6 3.2 289.7
Curcuma longa 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cyrtosperma merkusii 1927.0 8.1 2.5 314.5
Dioscorea alata 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dioscorea bulbifera 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dioscorea esculenta 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dioscorea nummularia 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Inocarpus fagifer 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ipomoea batatas 24398.9 410.9 25.7 5162.3
Musa sp.1 10915.8 110.6 28.9 2625.6
Musa sp.2 10915.8 110.6 28.9 2625.6
Piper methysticum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Solanum tuberosum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Spondias dulcis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Zingiber zerumbet 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
203
species within these systems, and where there are changes in the ranking, the variances in values
are not significant enough to overcome the difference in overall yield ratios between species.
The consistency in patterning within output to input ratios can be seen within (Figures 8.22-
8.25).
Cocos nucifera or coconut provides an extreme example of these statistical differences
in efficiency of production at species level. Within the Bellona system C. nucifera has a ratio of
12.7kcal per hour, while within the Ontong Javan production system it has 0.7kcal per hour.
These differences are also reflected within other nutritional efficiency ratios for this species
within these systems. Clearly there is difference in the production techniques used by these two
systems. Ontong Java and Bellona both invested extra time into C. nucifera as part of a cash-
cropping initiative to supplement subsistence (Bayliss-Smith 1977; Christensen 1975), but this
labour input produced a much lower annual yield and associated calorific gain in the Ontong
Java system.
In another example, Artocarpus altilis or breadfruit produced much higher yield and
nutritional gain to lower labour inputs within the Bellona system (34,375kcal/hr, 1,062.5g/hr
protein, 375g/hr fat, 7,916g/hr carbohydrates) than either the Gadio Enga (826.5kcal/instance of
activity, 25.5g/ioa protein, 9g/ioa fat, 190.3g/ioa carbohydrates) or Anutan systems
(435.7kcal/hr, 13.5g/hr protein, 4.8g/hr fat, 100.4g/hr carbohydrates). These three systems are
based within very different environmental contexts. Bellona mostly consists of raised limestone,
while Anuta is a small volcanic island and the Gadio live in the New Guinea highlands. These
differing settings might partially explain the subsistence variation in nutritional efficiency ratios.
Similarly, Colocasia esculenta or the common taro produced a significantly higher yield
within the Gadio Enga system (87,609.2kcal/instance of activity) using dryland techniques than
any of the other systems, although this high ratio may be a result of the time unit used.
Interestingly, the dryland production of taro on Tongatapu and Bellona also resulted in the
generally higher output to input ratios of 11.827.6kcal/hr and 7,254.5kcal/hr, while wet
techniques on Ontong Java and Anuta resulted in much lower ratios of 1214.7kcal/hr and
1992.2kcal/hr. In support of this trend, while only two dryland systems had recorded outputs for
Alocasia macrorrhiza or the giant taro, the ratios from these were very similar. Within the
Bellona system the ratio for this species was 5,803.6kcal/hr (106.7g/hr protein, 8.2g/hr fats,
1,204.5g/hr carbohydrates), while that in the Tongan system was 6,674.4kcal/hr (122.7g/hr
protein, 9.4g/hr fats, 1,385.2g/hr carbohydrates) which is only marginally higher. Bayliss-Smith
(1977) argues that the Ontong Java subsistence prior to the cash-cropping of copra was based on
the production of taro, but the income generated by copra enabled the incorporation of new
imported goods into production and consumption patterns. This change may have heavily
impacted the efficiency of taro production on Ontong Java at the time this system was recorded.
204
Again, there are also differences in the environmental contexts within which these systems are
based, such as rainfall and geology, that will impact the efficiency of taro crop production.
The output to input ratios of these species were generally more similar across the
different systems. This was often the case for many of the aroids other than C. esculenta,
Dioscorea yams, Ipomoea batatas or sweet potato, and Musa spp. bananas or plantains. For
example, I. batatas had output to input ratios of 15,746.2kcal/instance of activity (265.2g/ioa
protein, 16.6g/ioa fat, 3331g/ioa carbohydrates) within the Gadio Enga system, 2,821.2kcal/hr
(47g/hr protein, 2.96g/hr fats, 596.9g/hr carbohydrates) within Bellona, 14,573.4kcal/hr
(245.5g/hr protein, 15.3g/hr fats, 3,063.4g/hr carbohydrates) within the Tongan system, and
24,398.9kcal/hr (410.9g/hr protein, 25.7g/hr fats, 5,162.3g/hr carbohydrates) within the Ontong
Java system. The highest of these ratios were recorded within the Ontong Java system, and in
this case I. batatas was grown within the village environs on a small scale along with several
tree crops. The overall similarities in ratios, compared to others within these systems, could
indicate that production techniques for sweet potato such as mounding, planting, harvesting and
storage are relatively equal in terms of efficiency across different settings and scales. In another
example, only two systems had recorded outputs for A. macrorrrhiza or the giant taro, but the
ratios from these were very similar. Within the Bellona system the ratio for this species was
5,803.6kcal/hr while that in the Tongan system was 6,674.4kcal/hr— only marginally higher.
Overall, the greatest similarity among the ratios was between the Bellona and Tongan
systems. These systems had ratios that varied only by 1000-3000kcal/hr for A. macrorrhiza, C.
esculenta, Dioscorea alata, Dioscorea esculenta, and Dioscorea nummularia, and varied by
8000kcal for both Musa spp. These systems share a number of environmental similarities, such
as a geological setting on a limestone raised island, and relatively consistent rainfall throughout
the year, allowing the utilisation of dry production of taro. Both cultures also attach high social
importance to the production of yams, and use similar propagation, planting and plant
maintenance techniques such as trellising (Christensen 1975; Ministry of Agriculture and
Forestry 2001).
The greatest difference in ratios was that between the Bellona and Anutan systems (see
Figure 8.26). While the species within the Bellona system had an average ratio of
24,155.6kcal/hr (353.2g/hr protein, 1,060.5g/hr fats, 2872.1g/hr carbohydrates), the Anutan
average was only 1,046.8kcal/hr (8.46g/hr protein, 3.14g/hr fats, 229g/hr carbohydrates). The
Anutan system consistently had the lowest ratios for each species within this system, indicating
that production techniques used within the mountain setting were generally inefficient in
comparison with those used within other systems. The highest ratios of outputs to inputs within
this system were those from Colocasia esculenta (taro) of 1992.2kcal/hr (8.5g/hr protein,
5.3g/hr fats, 475.1g/hr carbohydrates), suggesting that this was the crop that provided the
205
highest rate of return for lowest labour inputs. It is interesting that Yen (1973b: 139) asserts that
the Anutan system was in his subjective opinion, “…one of the most intensive extant in the
Pacific, despite the shortage of land and water, which could have conferred the potentiality for
the well-known form of intensive agricultural production, irrigation farming of taro.” Yen
(1973b) argued that the intensity of labour dedicated to agricultural production per hectare of
land on Anuta in comparison to the swidden horticulture of the Hanunoo of Mindoro in the
Philippines (3000/hectare versus 7000/hectare) supported this claim.
Based on the recorders’ own descriptions, these systems were classified as ranging from
mixed to shifting or intensive agriculture. However, as argued by Dornestreich (1977:247-8),
these terms are superficial and do not do justice to the full range of people’s actual subsistence
behaviour. Instead, a subsistence typology should include information upon a) the
environmental factors which substantially affect food getting, b) all the food-getting activities
which compose the people’s subsistence system, and c) all the foods obtained by these activities
in the form of a quantified account of food returns throughout an entire subsistence cycle
(197:248). This comparative study has attempted to assess these Western Pacific example
systems using these criteria, in order to provide a range of production systems within which the
potential systems archaeobotanically identified on Tongatapu can be considered.
The intensity of labour investment in particular crops, using various production
techniques that vary from cultivation through semi-cultivation to pure gathering of wild
resources, has been compared to the overall yield and nutritional returns. There are of course
limits to these data because of differences in what was deemed valuable by the recorders. Also,
comparison of the intensity of labour between systems is problematic as each example varies in
both scale and recorded time periods. Despite this, some descriptions can be made upon the
efficiency of these systems in relation to the diversity of species exploited. Overall system
efficiency was measured by dividing the total system efficiency by the number of species
utilised within each system to create an average ratio of outputs to inputs. Patterning according
to almost all nutritional values was the same, aside from carbohydrates (see Figure 8.26).
Diversity of species is categorised as low (0-14 species), moderate (15-19 species), and high
(20+ species). Yield ratio diversity is described as the difference between the average and
highest value for all species, and categorised as low (0-10), moderate (16-30), high (31+). These
systems can then be ranked in order of overall system efficiency and described as follows:
1. Bellona— high species diversity, insignificant nutritional diversity between groupings,
significant labour diversity between groupings, high yield ratio diversity.
2. Tongatapu— moderate species diversity, insignificant nutritional diversity between
groupings, insignificant labour diversity between groupings, moderate yield ratio
diversity.
206
3. Gadio Enga— high species diversity, insignificant nutritional diversity between
groupings, significant labour diversity between groupings, high yield ratio diversity.
4. Ontong Java— low species diversity, insignificant nutritional diversity between
groupings, insignificant labour diversity between groupings, moderate yield ratio
diversity.
5. Anuta— moderate species diversity, insignificant nutritional diversity between
groupings, significant labour diversity between groupings, low yield ratio diversity.
Figure 8.22 Output to input ratio comparison for archaeological species within each system in terms of calories
207
Figure 8.23 Output to input ratio comparison for archaeological species within each system in terms of protein
Figure 8.24 Output to input ratio comparison for archaeological species within each system in terms of fats
(note vertical scale is logarithmic)
208
Figure 8.25 Output to input ratio comparison for archaeological species within each system in terms of
carbohydrates
Figure 8.26 Comparison of average nutritional efficiency ratios for all systems (note vertical scale is
logarithmic)
209
Comparison of prehistoric production systems
The analysis of ethnographic examples from the Western Pacific has enabled the efficiency of
crop production in different environmental settings to be assessed and discussed. These systems
were ranked and described in terms of species and diversity of production technique
(horticultural, semi-cultivated, gathered), as well as the efficiency of labour investment in terms
of yield and nutritional returns. In this section the species identified within each of the
archaeological sites of Talasiu (TO-Mu-2), Leka (J17) and Heketa (TO-Nt-2) will be firstly
compared to those species that have been ethnographically recorded within accounts of Tongan
agriculture at the point of European contact, and are expected to be able to be identified
archaeobotanically, in terms of overall nutritional value, labour and productivity. It was
expected that these comparisons could facilitate discussion of the completeness of these
systems, as well as system characterisation, when these are later compared to the Western
Pacific example production systems during the second component of analysis.
Nutritional comparison of archaeological species
Talasiu (TO-Mu-2)
All of the species identified in the microbotanical and macrobotanical remains from Talasiu
were compared and then ranked according to the same nutritional values discussed within the
modern production systems (see Figure 8.27). The calories, protein, fats and carbohydrates
within 100g of edible plant material from each archaeologically identified species were
compared, and an overall rank given out of 14, where a low number equalled a high nutritional
value. These species were then grouped into primary and supplementary species based on
ethnographic data and the most common categorisation of these species within the example
production systems.
Overall, Cocos nucifera and Inocarpus fagifer were ranked the highest and Piper
methysticum was consistently ranked the lowest. Aroids such as Colocasia esculenta tended to
be ranked high for overall nutrition figures (3rd), but varied from low to moderate ranking in
terms of individual nutritional figures. Artocarpus altilis had very similar rankings to C.
esculenta. The two remaining aroids, Cyrtosperma merkusii and Amorphophallus paeoniifolius,
both ranked relatively high according to calories (5th and 4rd), and A. paeoniifolius also ranked
high for protein (4th). With regard to fats, carbohydrates and overall nutritional figures these two
species tended to rank low or moderately. Of the two yam species, Dioscorea alata generally
ranks higher in all values than Dioscorea nummularia, which ranks very low (12th) according to
overall nutrition. Both Musa spp. were ranked high for overall nutrition (5th) and carbohydrates
(3rd), but ranked moderately according to calories, protein and fat. The two remaining
supplementary species, Spondias dulcis and Zingiber sp., both ranked low for overall nutrition
(13th and 12th) and most other values. The two exceptions to this pattern were that Zingiber sp.
ranked high (4th) and S. dulcis ranked moderately (7th) for fats.
210
When these rankings are compared according to the groupings of primary and
supplementary crops, some basic patterning can be determined. According to calories, the
primary crops rank slightly higher, with an average ranking of 5.7 over the supplementary
average of 8.3. The average rankings according to overall nutrition were almost exactly the
same, with 5.9 for primary crops and 8.6 for supplementary. Comparison of protein rankings
revealed that these two groups had almost equal averages of 7.4 within primary crops and 7.3 in
the supplementary. In terms of rankings for fat content, the supplementary species actually tend
to rank higher. These had an average of 6.3, while primary crops had an average of 7.6. Finally,
according to carbohydrates the primary crops again rank higher with an average of 6, compared
to 9.1 within the supplementary species. Overall these figures suggest that the primary crops
tend to rank higher than supplementary, which confirms the fact that these species would have
been given preference for cultivation.
Figure 8.27 Nutritional comparison of species identified at Talasiu (TO-Mu-2)
To gauge whether Talasiu could represent a complete system, a list of species was
developed from the ethnographic record of Tongan agriculture. This list was narrowed to
include only those species that contained starch, endocarp, fruit or vegetative storage
parenchyma that was likely to be processed and therefore enter the archaeological record at
Talasiu (TO-Mu-2). The species that were identified in the archaeobotanical record at Talasiu
were then compared nutritionally to these ethnographic species. When these two groups are
graphed, the exponential trend lines for both archaeological and ethnographic species follow
exactly the same curve (see Figure 8.28). When these two groups are compared statistically
Primary crops Supplementary
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Art
oca
rpu
s al
tilis
Co
cos
nu
cife
ra
Co
loca
sia
esc
ule
nta
Cyr
tosp
erm
a m
erk
usi
i
Dio
sco
rea
alat
a
cf. D
iosc
ore
a n
um
mu
lari
a
Mu
sa s
p.1
Mu
sa s
p.2
Am
orp
ho
ph
allu
s p
aeo
niif
oliu
s
Dio
sco
rea
bu
lbif
era
Ino
carp
us
fagi
fer
Pip
er
me
thys
ticu
m
Spo
nd
ias
du
lcis
Zin
gib
era
ceae
typ
e
Ran
kin
g
Species
Talasiu Nutritional Rankings
Rank kcalories
Rank protein
Rank Fat
Rank carbohydrates
Rank nutrition
Primary crops
Supplementary
Expon. (Rank nutrition)
211
using Student’s t-test, they cannot be differentiated, although the difference in averages is 43.06
(see Table 8.44). As to whether the species identified at Talasiu could represent a complete
agricultural system, the question needs to be posed: do these archaeological species represent
the best choices in terms of overall nutrition, and are they therefore more likely to be included in
the diet at Talasiu? This comparison would suggest that they are generally equal to the
ethnographic species in nutrition and so the results are inconclusive.
Figure 8.28 Nutritional comparison of species identified at Talasiu with expected ethnographic species.
Leka (J17)
The ranking of species identified at Leka within both microbotanical and macrobotanical
remains is compared in order to make suggestions about possible decision-making in terms of
preferential cultivation and consumption. Leka has some additional species added to the
provisions list compared to that of Talasiu, altering the rankings (see Figure 8.29). The highest
ranked species in most values was Cocos nucifera, followed by Curcuma longa or turmeric,
which is grouped here as a supplementary species according to ethnographic accounts of the use
of this crop. Following these was Inocarpus fagifer, another supplementary crop, which ranked
3rd in all categories apart from protein and carbohydrates, for which this species ranked 2nd.
Piper methysticum again ranked the lowest, followed closely by Spondias dulcis and Dioscorea
nummularia. In most cases the rankings closely resemble those seen in the archaeological
species identified at Talasiu, but would have lowered rank due to the high rank of C. longa. Of
the yams, Dioscorea alata no longer ranks the highest due to the inclusion of D. esculenta
which has higher nutritional rankings in all values apart from protein. A clear source of
contamination was Solanum tuberosum, which was identified in the microbotanical remains.
This species also ranks very low, aside from relatively high rank according to protein content
(7th).
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Pan
dan
us
tect
ori
us
Co
cos
nu
cife
ra
Cu
rcu
ma
lon
ga
Pu
era
ria
lob
ata
Ino
carp
us
fagi
fer
Tacc
a le
on
top
eta
loid
es
Co
loca
sia
esc
ule
nta
Xan
tho
som
a sa
gitt
ifo
lium
Am
orp
ho
ph
allu
s p
aeo
niif
oliu
s
Cyr
tosp
erm
a m
erk
usi
i
Dio
sco
rea
esc
ule
nta
Dio
sco
rea
alat
a
Art
oca
rpu
s al
tilis
Mu
sa s
p.1
Mu
sa s
p.2
Dio
sco
rea
bu
lbif
era
Dio
sco
rea
nu
mm
ula
ria
Ipo
mo
ea
bat
atas
Alo
casi
a m
acro
rrh
iza
Dio
sco
rea
pe
nta
ph
ylla
Zin
gib
er
zeru
mb
et
Spo
nd
ias
du
lcis
Mo
rin
da
citr
ifo
lia
Syzy
giu
m m
alac
cen
se
Be
nin
casa
his
pid
a
Cu
cum
is m
elo
Pip
er
me
thys
ticu
m
Tota
l nu
trit
ion
fig
ure
s (/
10
0g)
Species
Talasiu and Expected Ethnographic Economic Species Nutritional Comparison
Archaeological
Ethnographic
Expon. (Archaeological)
Expon. (Ethnographic)
212
When these nutritional rankings are compared for the groupings of primary,
supplementary and contamination species for Leka, some patterning can be discerned. In terms
of calorific ranking, the primary crops rank slightly higher with an average of 7.8, while
supplementary crops have an average of 8.3. Primary crops also rank slightly higher than
supplementary species according to carbohydrates and overall nutrition, with average rankings
of 7.7 and 7.8 over 8.6 and 8.5, accordingly. Interestingly, the supplementary crops rank higher
than primary crops when the rankings for protein and fats are compared. In terms of protein,
supplementary crops have an average ranking of 7.3, while primary crops have an average of
9.4. Similarly, the supplementary crops have an average fat ranking of 7, while primary crops
have an average of 8.7. The contamination group ranks low compared to both groups in all
categories apart from protein, for which this group has a rank of 6th.
Figure 8.29 Nutritional comparison of species identified at Leka (J17)
As was the case with data from Talasiu, these species identified archaeologically at
Leka were then compared nutritionally to those species that would be expected to be identified
within the archaeobotanical record based on ethnographic accounts of Tongan agriculture (see
Figure 8.30). These two groups were compared using the overall nutritional figures from 100g
of edible plant material and graphed accordingly. The exponential trend lines for each were very
similar, although there was some divergence, suggesting that archaeological species may have
slightly lower overall nutritional value. However, when these two groups were compared
statistically using Student’s t-test distribution, they could not be differentiated with any
confidence (<50%). In fact, a comparison of the averages of these two groups provided a
difference in mean of only 5.47. This comparison would suggest that the archaeological species
Primary crops Supplementary Contamination
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Art
oca
rpu
s al
tilis
Co
cos
nu
cife
ra
Co
loca
sia
esc
ule
nta
Cyr
tosp
erm
a m
erk
usi
i
Dio
sco
rea
alat
a
Dio
sco
rea
esc
ule
nta
Dio
sco
rea
nu
mm
ula
ria
Mu
sa s
p.1
Mu
sa s
p.2
Am
orp
ho
ph
allu
s p
aeo
niif
oliu
s
Cu
cum
a lo
nga
Dio
sco
rea
bu
lbif
era
Ino
carp
us
fagi
fer
Pip
er
me
thys
ticu
m
Spo
nd
ias
du
lcis
Sola
nu
m t
ub
ero
sum
Ran
kin
g
Species
Leka Nutritional Rankings
Rank kcalories
Rank protein
Rank fat
Rank carbohydrates
Rank nutrition
Primary crops
Supplementary
Contamination
Expon. (Rank nutrition)
213
are almost exactly equal to the ethnographic species in nutrition and so the results are again
inconclusive.
Figure 8.30 Nutritional comparison of species identified at Leka with expected ethnographic species
Heketa (TO-Nt-2)
The species identified using archaeobotanical techniques at Heketa were compared using the
same nutritional values as those explored amongst species within the example production
systems (see Figure 8.31). This list of species was markedly smaller than those from Talasiu or
Leka, and so the rankings of species found at this site is different. As at Talasiu, the highest
ranking species was Inocarpus fagifer, which ranked first according to all nutritional values,
including overall nutritional figures. Piper methysticum also again ranked the lowest in all
values apart from fat, which is ranked 3rd. Similarly, Spondias dulcis ranked very low in all
values apart from fat, ranking 5th in this category. Of the aroids, Colocasia esculenta generally
ranked the highest, with high to moderate rankings according to all values. The remaining aroids
ranged from moderate to low ranking in all values, with a few exceptions. Alocasia macrorrhiza
ranked high according to protein value (5th), while Cyrtosperma merkusii ranked high in calories
(5th), and A. paeoniifolius ranked high in both calories and protein (4th). Ipomoea batatas is a
possible modern or historic contaminant, but was included within the primary species for
comparison, and ranks moderately according to protein (7th) and low in all other values. Only
one Musa sp. was identified at the Heketa, and this ranked low according to carbohydrates (3rd),
but moderately for calories, protein, fats and overall nutrition.
When these rankings are considered according to the grouping of species into primary,
supplementary or contamination species, the nutritional value of core cultivated crops in
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Pan
dan
us
tect
ori
us
Co
cos
nu
cife
ra
Cu
rcu
ma
lon
ga
Pu
era
ria
lob
ata
Ino
carp
us
fagi
fer
Tacc
a le
on
top
eta
loid
es
Co
loca
sia
esc
ule
nta
Xan
tho
som
a sa
gitt
ifo
lium
Am
orp
ho
ph
allu
s p
aeo
niif
oliu
s
Cyr
tosp
erm
a m
erk
usi
i
Dio
sco
rea
esc
ule
nta
Dio
sco
rea
alat
a
Art
oca
rpu
s al
tilis
Mu
sa s
p.1
Mu
sa s
p.2
Dio
sco
rea
bu
lbif
era
Dio
sco
rea
nu
mm
ula
ria
Ipo
mo
ea
bat
atas
Alo
casi
a m
acro
rrh
iza
Dio
sco
rea
pe
nta
ph
ylla
Sola
nu
m t
ub
ero
sum
Zin
gib
er
zeru
mb
et
Spo
nd
ias
du
lcis
Mo
rin
da
citr
ifo
lia
Syzy
giu
m m
alac
cen
se
Be
nin
casa
his
pid
a
Cu
cum
is m
elo
Pip
er
me
thys
ticu
m
Tota
l nu
trit
ion
fig
ure
s (/
10
0g)
Species
Leka and Expected Ethnographic Economic Species Nutritional Comparison
Archaeological
Ethnographic
Expon. (Archaeological)
Expon. (Ethnographic)
214
comparison with those that were most likely used on a more arbitrary basis can be assessed. In
most cases, the difference in average rankings between these two groups is minimal. Primary
crops were marginally higher ranked according to calories, with an average of 5.3 compared to
the supplementary average of 5.75. The average rankings for protein were exactly the same for
each group. Supplementary species ranked higher on average according to fat, with an average
of 4.7 over an average of 5.6 in the primary crops. This was the only category in which
supplementary species ranked higher than primary crops. The greatest difference between these
two groups was observed within the rankings of carbohydrate content. Primary crops had an
average ranking of 4.5, compared to an average of 7 within the supplementary species.
Contamination species were not included in this comparison as it was deemed unnecessary.
Figure 8.31 Nutritional comparison of species identified at Heketa (TO-Nt-2)
As a follow up to this nutritional analysis of archaeological species, these were then
compared to species that could possibly also have contributed to Tongan diet and subsistence
when Heketa was occupied (see Figure 8.32). The two groups again appeared to differ slightly
according to overall nutritional figures for 100g of edible plant material, when the exponential
trends are plotted on a bar graph distributing these species from highest value to lowest.
However, a statistical comparison of these groups using Student’s t-test revealed that these
groups cannot be differentiated according to nutrition (see Table 8.44, Table 8.45), despite an
overall difference in values of 0.82 pooled standard deviations and a difference of 55.21
according to mean. These results have once again proven inconclusive in discerning whether the
archaeological species could represent a complete system of nutritionally preferred species.
Primary crops Supplementary
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Alo
casi
a m
acro
rrh
iza
Art
oca
rpu
s al
tilis
Co
cos
nu
cife
ra
Co
loca
sia
esc
ule
nta
Cyr
tosp
erm
a m
erk
usi
i
Mu
sa s
p.2
Am
orp
ho
ph
allu
s p
aeo
niif
oliu
s
Ipo
mo
ea
bat
atas
Ino
carp
us
fagi
fer
Pip
er
me
thys
ticu
m
Spo
nd
ias
du
lcis
Ran
kin
g
Species
Heketa Nutritional Ranking
Rank kcalories
Rank protein
Rank Fat
Rank carbohydrates
Rank nutrition
Primary crops
Supplementary
Expon. (Rank nutrition)
215
Figure 8.32 Nutritional comparison of species identified at Heketa with expected ethnographic species
Table 8.44 Statistical comparison of nutritional value of archaeological and expected ethnographic species
Table 8.45 Statistical comparison of nutritional value of species groups within archaeological systems at
Talasiu, Leka and Heketa
Efficiency comparison of archaeological species and production systems
The individual archaeological species from each of the sites of Talasiu (TO-Mu-2), Leka (J17)
and Heketa (TO-Nt-2) were combined into a list for each site, and then compared to the
efficiency ratios provided by each of the modern Western Pacific systems. The comparisons
enabled consideration of the efficiency (nutritional value of yield per time unit of labour
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Pan
dan
us
tect
ori
us
Co
cos
nu
cife
ra
Sacc
har
um
off
icin
aru
m
Cu
rcu
ma
lon
ga
Pu
era
ria
lob
ata
Ino
carp
us
fagi
fer
Tacc
a le
on
top
eta
loid
es
Co
loca
sia
esc
ule
nta
Xan
tho
som
a sa
gitt
ifo
lium
Am
orp
ho
ph
allu
s p
aeo
niif
oliu
s
Cyr
tosp
erm
a m
erk
usi
i
Dio
sco
rea
esc
ule
nta
Dio
sco
rea
alat
a
Art
oca
rpu
s al
tilis
Mu
sa s
p.1
Mu
sa s
p.2
Dio
sco
rea
bu
lbif
era
Dio
sco
rea
nu
mm
ula
ria
Ipo
mo
ea
bat
atas
Alo
casi
a m
acro
rrh
iza
Dio
sco
rea
pe
nta
ph
ylla
Zin
gib
er
zeru
mb
et
Spo
nd
ias
du
lcis
Mo
rin
da
citr
ifo
lia
Syzy
giu
m m
alac
cen
se
Be
nin
casa
his
pid
a
Cu
cum
is m
elo
Pip
er
me
thys
ticu
m
Tota
l nu
trit
ion
fig
ure
s (/
10
0g)
Species
Heketa and Expected Ethnographic Economic Species Nutritional Comparison
Archaeological
Ethnographic
Expon. (Archaeological)
Expon. (Ethnographic)
Archaeological site Pooled standard deviation Pooled standard error Difference Confidence Mean difference
Talasiu (archaeological vs
ethnographic) 175.0 67.8 0.6 <50% 43.1
Leka (archaeological vs
ethnographic) 173.7 67.3 0.1 <50% 5.5
Heketa (archaeological vs
ethnographic) 180.1 67.4 0.8 50% 55.2
Nutrition (total figures/100g)
Archaeological system Pooled standard deviation Pooled standard error Difference Confidence Mean difference
Talasiu (primary crops vs
supplementary species) 65.9 35.6 1.9 90% 68.9
Leka (primary crops vs
supplementary species) 61.4 32.3 0.1 <50% 3.9
Heketa (primary crops vs
supplementary species) 77.2 46.7 1.6 80% 73.2
All sites (primary crops vs
supplementary species) 41.1 19.9 0.3 <50% 5.9
Total nutritional figures (per 100g)
216
invested) of archaeological species in each site, and then an overall comparison of efficiency
that may reflect the level of labour intensity within each time period represented by these sites.
The species list from each site is here treated as a complete system, but as earlier data suggests,
this is unlikely to be the case. Nevertheless, this analysis will speculate about the categorisation
of these archaeological systems according to the spectrum provided within the modern
production systems. These past systems will be placed in the context of current hypotheses upon
the development of agriculture within Tongan prehistory in Chapter 9.
Inter-site comparison of species
Each species in each of the Tongatapu sites has already been assessed according to output to
input ratios that describe the efficiency of production techniques according to calories, protein,
fats and carbohydrates. In this section, the combined species list from each site will be broken
into the three groupings of primary crops, supplementary and contamination species and an
efficiency comparison conducted according to calorific gain for time invested. The intention
here is to model how these production systems may have functioned in the past, facilitating later
discussion of preferences for cultivation. Clearly all of these species were utilised in some form,
but which would have been staples? And how did these species enable the intensification of
production to create surplus for the development of social hierarchy? To answer these questions,
it is important to consider the ecology of agricultural systems in terms of context, inputs and
feedbacks, and how these systems evolved over time.
When the species identified archaeobotanically in test units from Talasiu (TO-Mu-2),
Leka (J17) and Heketa (TO-Nt-2) are compared in terms of calorific efficiency, some
suggestions can be made about crop preference (see Figures 8.33-8.35). Calorific efficiency
ratios were selected as a focus; as previous assessments have suggested that most other
nutritional value output to input ratios follow similar patterning. Of the 8 primary species and 6
supplementary species at Talasiu, Cocos nucifera has the highest average calorific efficiency
ratio (64,210kcal/time unit) from all of the systems. This was followed by Spondias dulcis,
primarily due to a lack of data from systems other than Bellona. Colocasia esculenta followed
these species, with an average ratio of 21,500kcal/time unit and had the highest ratios of the
aroids. Both Musa spp. had average ratios of 15,500kcal/time unit, just above Artocarpus altilis
with an average of 11,700kcal/time. Of the yams, Dioscorea alata has the highest ratio average
of 10,400kcal/time unit, marginally higher than Dioscorea nummularia which had an average of
9,800kcal/time unit. The only supplementary yam species, Dioscorea bulbifera, had a lower
average of 6300kcal/time unit. The two remaining aroids, Amorphophallus paeoniifolius
(3,900kcal/time unit) and Cyrtosperma merkusii (1.2kcal/time unit) both have very low
averages compared to C. esculenta. Zingiber zerumbet had the lowest average compared to all
other species, based on a single ratio of 1.3kcal/time unit from the Gadio Enga system. Two
species, I. fagifer and P. methysticum had no data available and so were not included.
217
Comparison of species at Leka revealed mostly similar distributions of average calorific
efficiency ratios. These species included ten primary crops, five supplementary species, and one
contaminant. Due to the inclusion of a few new species, some small ranking changes were
observed. For example, D. alata does not have the highest average ratio amongst the Dioscorea
yam species identified at Leka. Instead, D. esculenta, with a ratio of 10,400kcal/time unit has
the highest average. This mirrors the nutritional figures discussed earlier in this section. Several
species have no data from any of the systems, or are not particularly relevant as contaminants,
and therefore were not compared. These include Curcuma longa, Inocarpus fagifer, Piper
methysticum and Solanum tuberosum.
The list of species identified at Heketa is smaller than those from Talasiu and Leka,
with only seven primary crops, six supplementary and no contamination species. Of these the
top seven average ratios belong to species categorised here as primary crops. As at Talasiu and
Leka, Cocos nucifera has the highest average ratio at Heketa. The inclusion of another aroid
within this comparison changes the distribution amongst these taro species. Alocasia
macrorrhiza had a higher average than both A. paeoniifolius and C. merkusii, with a ratio of
6,200kcal/time unit. Ipomoea batatas is possibly contamination within this site, but as explained
earlier has not been classified as such here. This species has an average ratio that ranks between
Musa sp.2 and A. altilis. Zingiber zerumbet again has the lowest average ratio of all species
identified at Heketa. Three species had no data from any of the example systems and so could
not be included in this comparison, including Curcuma longa, Inocarpus fagifer and Piper
methysticum.
Statistically, the groupings of primary, supplementary and contamination species at
Talasiu, Leka and Heketa were not markedly different according to calorific efficiency ratings.
There was a difference in average of 7,100kcal/time unit at Talasiu between primary and
supplementary groups, 1,900kcal/time unit at Leka, and 5,800kcal/time unit at Heketa.
However, these groups could not be differentiated using Student’s t-test with any confidence
above 50% based on the average ratios from all of the example production systems, which is
unexpected considering the generally high averages of primary crops. When these ratios are
then averaged themselves, these higher figures tend to become smoothed out over the number of
species included in the comparison.
In light of this, it was deemed worthwhile to simply consider the ratios of primary to
supplementary crops within each of these archaeobotanical assemblages. Talasiu has a ratio of
1.3:1, while Leka has a ratio of 2:1 and Heketa is 1.4:1. These indicate exploitation of a closer
to equal range of economic and supplementary plant taxa at Talasiu, increased specialisation in
primary crops at Leka, and some diversification again at Heketa.
218
Figure 8.33 Comparison of calorific efficiency of archaeological species from Talasiu
Figure 8.34 Comparison of calorific efficiency of archaeological species from Leka
219
Figure 8.35 Comparison of calorific efficiency of archaeological species from Heketa
Efficiency comparison of past production systems
The overall system efficiency (in terms of calories) of these archaeological production systems
was calculated in the same manner as for the modern systems and compared. Species from each
of the sites of Talasiu (TO-Mu-2), Leka (J17) and Heketa (TO-Nt-2) were combined into
individual site lists, and then averaged according to the calorific efficiency values of each of the
example production systems from Gadio Enga, Bellona, Tongatapu, Ontong Java and Anuta.
This comparison enabled some overall comparison of the efficiency of the archaeological
production systems from available data, if these systems are considered complete and resembled
modern systems (see Figure 8.36). Clearly, the ratios for species within the Bellona production
system were the most efficient in terms of calorific gain for time investment, while those from
Anuta were the lowest. Therefore, if any of the three archaeological systems represented by
archaeobotanical data at Talasiu, Leka or Heketa resembled the Bellona system, these would be
more efficient in terms of calorific gain than if they were similar to the Anutan system.
220
Figure 8.36 Modelled archaeological systems according to calorific efficiency values from modern systems
In light of these comparisons, Chapter 9 will consider the descriptions of each of the
modern production systems in terms of species, nutritional, labour and yield diversity, as well as
the environmental context and production techniques utilised. These descriptions will be used to
predict the most appropriate models for archaeological production systems within this modern
range. These models will also be considered in the context of current hypotheses about the
antiquity of crop introductions and the subsequent development of agriculture in Tonga. It will
be argued that, due to the lack of data available upon variables such as acreage dedicated to
particular crops, scale of production, true labour investment, and dietary requirements of
individuals, modelling archaeological systems against a range of known examples using
Evolutionary and Human Ecological techniques can at least create new hypotheses upon the
nature of agricultural systems in the past. It is important to note that social production will not
be excluded from these models, as although this form of production is considered inefficient in
terms of basic nutritional returns, this is still visible within this analysis and can be used to
explain differences in productive efficiency between some species.
221
Chapter 9 Discussion
This thesis sought to investigate the role of crops within colonising subsistence, as well as the
links between the production systems in which these crops are cultivated and the development
of social complexity in Tongan prehistory. With these aims in mind, the results of
archaeobotanical investigations at Talasiu (TO-Mu-2), Leka (J17) and Heketa (TO-Nt-2) are
discussed here, focussing on modelling archaeological production systems. An agroecological
approach to the analysis of agricultural systems was made in Chapter 8, weighing the nutritional
costs and benefits of utilising particular plants in different environmental contexts. A scale was
created for species diversity, nutritional value, labour investment and intensity, and yield
diversity. Through this scale, the efficiency of both individual species and the system as a whole
could be assessed to provide known parameters to model archaeological production systems.
Chapter 8 provided the data and summarised patterning needed to be able to consider the most
appropriate descriptions of systems in the past, as well as highlighting limitations. These models
are placed in this chapter in the context of current hypotheses for Tongan and Western
Polynesian agricultural development. Further, the antiquity of crop use will be considered in
terms of the movement of people throughout the Western Pacific and also how crop use is tied
to the development of social complexity in Tonga, culminating in the emergence of the state-
level Tu’i Tonga paramount chiefdom.
Timing and nature of plant introductions into Tonga
The chronology of crop introductions into Tonga and the development of production systems
have been inferred through data from palaeoenvironmental research, linguistics and
ethnographic studies (Burley and Connaughton 2007; Fall 2005, 2010; Fall and Drezner 2011,
2013; Kirch 1997; Maude 1965; Thaman 1976). In terms of economic species, there has been
some conflict over the nature and timing of introductions due to differences in the information
derived from oral traditions and that from scientific botanical, linguistic, genetic and
archaeological research. Previous data and debates within Tonga and also the wider Pacific
region will be considered here to address the first of the research questions of this thesis
regarding the role of crops in the colonisation of the Pacific, alongside new data from the
current research at Talasiu (TO-Mu-2), Leka (J17) and Heketa (TO-Nt-2) (see Table 9.1). These
data will be used to construct a new chronology for the timing of crop introductions into Tonga.
222
Table 9.1 List of all species identified archaeobotanically within this study
Spondias dulcis— Anacardiaceae
Botanical research has suggested that Spondias dulcis, known commonly as Otaheite apple or
vī, is probably native to the Indo-Malayan region, but was an ancient introduction in the Pacific
as far east as the Marquesas (Whistler 2009). This species has not been recorded in any previous
palaeoenvironmental research conducted in the Tongan archipelago (Fall 2005, 2010; Fall and
Drezner 2011, 2013), or archaeobotanical research elsewhere in the Pacific, and therefore the
relative timing of introduction to Tonga was not known. The presence of microbotanical
remains of the species in the form of unmodified starch residues within well-dated deposits at
Talasiu suggest that Spondias was introduced prior to 2750-2650 cal BP during the Lapita era.
Spondias is not completely naturalised within island landscapes, arguably due to the large fruit
which have no natural dispersers (Whistler 2009), and so would likely have been introduced as a
cultivated supplementary fruit which was a source of food and medicine. Its use was historically
documented by Cook (1785), La Billiardere (1793) and Waldegrave (1833). This species was
also present throughout at Leka and Heketa.
Alocasia macrorrhiza— Araceae
The giant taro or kape, is presumed to have been a prehistoric introduction into Tonga. This
species is probably native to tropical Asia or New Guinea based on current distributions of wild
species and subsequent cultivars which spread as far north as Hawaii and east to the Marquesas
(Matthews 2014; Purseglove 1972; Whistler 2009). There is currently no palaeobotanical
evidence for the introduction of A. macrorrhiza to any of the islands of Tonga. The earliest
evidence from other locations within the Pacific document this aroid in the Solomon Islands at
Family Species
Anacardiaceae Spondias dulcis
Araceae
Alocasia macrorrhiza
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius
Colocasia esculenta
Cyrtosperma merkusii
Arecaceae Cocos nucifera
Convolvulaceae Ipomoea batatas
Dioscoreaceae
Dioscorea alata
Dioscorea bulbifera
Dioscorea esculenta
Dioscorea nummularia
Fabaceae Inocarpus fagifer
Lecythidaceae Barringtonia asiatica
Moraceae Artocarpus altilis
Musaceae Musa spp.
Piperaceae Piper methysticum
Solanaceae Solanum tuberosum
ZingiberaceaeCurcuma longa
Unknown
223
Kilu Cave by 28,000 BP (Loy et al. 1992), and north at Kosrae in Micronesia by around 1900
BP (Athens et al. 1996). Further east on Futuna, Piazza and Frimigacci (1991) documented the
presence of pollen deriving from A. macrorrhiza at around 600 BP. The earliest evidence for the
use of this cultigen in Tonga is dated to 800-600 cal BP from deposits within TP4 at Heketa.
Ethnographic descriptions of the cultivation of this species in plantations at the time of
European contact describe dryland production alongside yams, bananas, sweet potato and
coconut (Cook in Beaglehole 1969; Cook 1785; Mariner 1817). Around eight varieties are
recorded within Tonga that can be differentiated based on appearance (Maude 1965).
Consumption of the stem was preferential to the root and leaves, which were often used to
propagate new plants (Maude 1965).
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius— Araceae
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius is one of the least commonly cultivated aroids in the Pacific and
is known as elephant foot yam or more affectionately as the giant stink lily. The Tongan name
for this species is teve. Literature describes a larger reliance upon this species in the recent past,
but it is now utilised primarily as a famine food and is largely semi-cultivated or naturalised in
secondary forest and plantations (Purseglove 1972; Whistler 2009). Records of this species
within Tongan history are limited to one possible mention by Cook (1785:332), where he
describes “…a large root called ‘kape’, one not unlike our white potatoes called ‘mawhawha’;
the taro, or coccos of other places, and another called ‘jeejee’”. This could refer to the teve. A
later study noted the presence of Amorphophallus in bush allotments, but described these plants
as uncultivated and, according to informants, eaten only in times of famine (Thaman 1976).
Archaeobotanical investigations in this study have identified the presence of A. paeoniifolius at
all three sites, indicating that this species was introduced early by 2750-2650 cal BP during the
later stages of Lapita settlement on Tongatapu.
Colocasia esculenta— Araceae
The common taro is arguably one of the most versatile cultigens incorporated into the
production systems of the Pacific region. It can be grown in a variety of different climatic and
geological contexts, using wet irrigation or dryland shifting cultivation techniques (Kirch 1994;
Leach 1999; Spriggs 1996, 2002; Yen 1973a). It was thought native to Southeast Asia (Whistler
2009), but has been found within archaeological deposits in the Solomon Islands dated to
28,000 cal BP (Loy et al. 1992), at Niah Cave in Malaysia by 23,850-23,020 cal BP (Paz and
Barton 2007) and in Papua New Guinea by 10,220-6440 cal BP at Kuk Swamp (Denham et al.
2003), indicating that the wild progenitor of this species may have had a wider distribution than
was thought (Matthews 2014). The taxonomy and domestication of this species is also
complicated by the distribution of Colocasia formosana in Southeast Asia, a wild naturally
dispersed taro that is phenotypically close to C. esculenta (Matthews et al. 2015). Prehistoric
movement of C. esculenta into Remote Oceania is attributed to the Lapita Cultural Complex as
224
far eastwards as Western Polynesia and Polynesians are most likely responsible for initial
migration and subsequent adaptation of this crop to the diverse island landscapes of Central and
Eastern Polynesia.
The earliest evidence of Colocasia near Western Polynesia is at Bourewa in Fiji at
3050-2500 BP through starch grain, raphide and xylem tissue identification (Horrocks and Nunn
2007). Starch residues on pottery from Upolu, Samoa have been confirmed as common taro
within deposits dated to the Late Lapita occupation of the region by 2750 BP (Crowther 2009).
Starch, pollen and parenchyma of taro has been identified in many post-Lapita or late Holocene
deposits in Rapanui (Cummings 1998; Horrocks and Wozniak 2008; Horrocks et al. 2012 ),
New Caledonia (Horrocks, Grant-Mackie and Matissoo-Smith 2008), Kosrae (Athens et al.
1996), Mangaia (Kirch et al. 1995), Hawaii (Allen 1981, 1984), the Marquesas (Allen and
Ussher 2013), Pitcairn (Horrocks and Weisler 2006) and New Zealand (Horrocks and Barber
2005; Horrocks and Lawlor 2006; Horrocks, Smith, Nichol, Shane and Jackman 2008;
Horrocks, Smith, Nichol and Wallace 2008; Horrocks et al. 2004, 2007). Previous
palaeoenvironmental research in Tonga has identified pollen from Colocasia within swamp
cores from Vava’u and Eua dated to around 2600 BP (Fall 2005, 2010).In the current research
parenchyma and starch grains of Colocasia esculenta were identified in deposits from Talasiu,
Leka and Heketa. Results indicate that this crop was at least introduced into the Tongan
archipelago by 2750-2650 cal BP through Late Lapita migration and was utilised throughout
Tongan prehistory.
Cyrtosperma merkusii— Araceae
Native to Melanesia, it has been argued that Cyrtosperma merkusii or the giant swamp taro may
have been one of the first species cultivated in Remote Oceania by the Lapita settlers of the
region. The brackish conditions in beach back-swamps near many early Lapita settlements
would have enabled the initial cultivation of saline-resistant crops such as Cyrtosperma prior to
the establishment of more labour-intensive irrigation required for other aroids such as Colocasia
or Alocasia (Kirch and Lepofsky 1993; Yen 1973a, 1982, 1993). On atolls Cyrtosperma is
grown within various sized pits dug to access the freshwater aquifer (Weisler 1999), and so this
is another possible cultivation technique that would have enabled early settlers to survive on
raised limestone islands such as Tongatapu where traditional irrigation of common taro
(Colocasia) was impossible. The earliest evidence of Cyrtosperma within the Pacific is from
pollen dated to around 4500 BP in mangrove cores taken from Ngerchau region of Palau
(Athens and Ward 2001), although this may be due to natural distribution (Athens and
Stevenson 2012). Within Remote Oceania, starch, raphides and xylem tissues of giant swamp
taro was identified within Late Lapita-associated deposits from Urupiv in Vanuatu, dated to
around 2700 BP (Horrocks and Bedford 2004; Horrocks et al. 2014). Other evidence of
cultivation has been found in more recent deposits on Kosrae dated to 1997-1350 BP (Athens et
225
al. 1996), the Pitcairn Group after 950 BP (Hather and Weisler 2000), and parenchyma on
Mangaia from 788-331 BP (Kirch et al. 1995). Microbotanical evidence for Cyrtosperma at
Talasiu, Leka and Heketa, represents the first recorded identifications of this species in the
Tonga. The presence of this taxa within deposits at Talasiu, a late Lapita-associated site,
indicate that this cultigen may indeed have been grown using the same pit agricultural
techniques observed in Micronesia until more intensive dryland techniques for other aroids and
yams were fully developed and this became a minor staple.
Cocos nucifera— Arecaceae
Cocos nucifera, known commonly as coconut or niu in Tonga, was often present prior to human
arrival due to dispersal of the large floating fruit on ocean currents, surviving up to 110 days
before husks become waterlogged (Gunn et al. 2011;Whistler 2009). It is undoubtedly one of
the most important cultivated species in the Pacific region, providing a source of water, food,
fuel, and numerous household items such as food storage vessels and thatch (Gunn et al. 2011).
The nutritional analysis of Cocos within this study points to the high calorific, protein, and fat
content of the mature meat, especially compared to other common cultigens. The only core
nutrient that this species lacks is carbohydrates, which is often provided by multi-cropping
cultivation with starchy root, tuber and tree crops in plantations. There have been some attempts
to associate the cultivation of coconut with Lapita settlement in Island Melanesia at Arawe
(Matthews and Gosden 1997), which may have actually been the result of beach drift, and more
confidently on Mussau from 3200-2000 BP (Kirch 1987, 1988, 1989). In Tonga, this species is
documented within pollen records prior to Lapita arrival but an increase in pollen quantities
around 2600 BP could indicate the cultivation of Cocos for food after this time (Fall 2005,
2010; Fall and Drezner 2011, 2013). The identification of charred endocarp deriving from
Cocos nucifera at Talasiu confirms this association, and continued cultivation is proven by the
presence of macrobotanical remains in deposits at Leka and Heketa, and also through many
ethnographic records (Beaglehole and Beaglehole 1941; Cook 1785; Gifford 1929; Orlebar
1830; La Billardiere 1800; La Perouse 1799; Mariner in Martin 1991; Waldegrave 1833; Wilson
1797).
Ipomoea batatas— Convolvulaceae
The cultivation of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), or kumala, is an important dryland crop in
Tonga. Ipomoea was listed as a major crop by Maude (1965), and was recorded within several
agricultural censuses (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 1985, 1994, 2001). The timing for
the introduction of this South American cultivar into Tonga is disputed. Two possibilities are
enabled within the ‘tripartite hypothesis’ proposed by Barrau (1957) and developed by Yen
(1974), Green (2005) and Clarke (2009). The first is that this species was an early Polynesian
introduction of plants within the ‘Kumara’ line from Central and Eastern Polynesia (Roullier et
al. 2013). The second possibility is that Ipomoea was a later introduction during the 18th or 19th
226
Centuries by either Polynesians or Europeans, supported by Kirch’s research on Niuatoputapu
(1978, 1990). Genetic research does not provide much clarity in Western Polynesia (Denham
2013; Roullier et al. 2013). Early historic accounts clearly document the presence of this
cultigen as early as the late 18th century (La Billardiere 1793) and into the 19th century onwards
(Gifford 1929; Beaglehole and Beaglehole 1941; Waldegrave 1833). It is therefore most likely
that it was in fact a Polynesian import, and is supported by archaeobotanical evidence from
Eastern and Central Polynesia which documents the cultivation of Ipomoea on Mangaia from
around 950 BP (Hather and Kirch 1991), in the Marquesas by 750-350 BP (Allen and Ussher
2013), Hawaii at 650-325 BP (Horrocks and Rechtman 2009), Rapanui by 650-150 BP
(Cummings 1998; Horrocks and Wozniak 2008) and in New Zealand to the south by 704-550
cal BP (Horrocks et al. 2007). Considering these dates and the maritime connections of the
Tongan state, it is not unlikely then that Ipomoea batatas was present within the archaeological
system at Heketa from at least 600 cal BP, and is not a modern contaminant. Further, the
archaeological starch was also compared to that of beach morning glory (Ipomoea pes-caprae)
which grows near the sea, but did not match the morphology of that species.
Dioscorea spp.— Dioscoreaceae
Yams have played a very important role in Tongan agricultural and cultural practices
throughout prehistory. Three main named types are recognised ‘ufi tokamu’a (early yam), ‘ufi
tokamu’i (late yam) and ‘ufi lei (sweet yam), but there are many variants within each type. The
early yam and late yam have been botanically identified both as Dioscorea alata, while the
sweet yam is Dioscorea esculenta. During his third voyage Cook described these two species as
“The roots are yams of which are two sorts, one black, and so large, that it often weighs 20 to
30 pounds; the other white, and long, seldom weighing a pound” (1785:331-2). In 1643 Tasman
traded European goods for provisions for the ship from Tongatapu that included yams (Tasman
1776). Other species that have been ethnographically recorded are Dioscorea bulbifera which is
naturalised and the aerial bulbils are often used as a famine food (Waldegrave 1833; Whistler
2009), Dioscorea nummularia and Dioscorea pentaphylla, although these are less commonly
cultivated. Early ethnographers and missionaries commented on the importance of yams within
Tongan festivals such as the ‘inasi or first fruits festival, the tau tau ceremony, and pongipongi
feasting (Cook in Beaglehole 1969; Cook 1785; Gifford 1929; Mariner in Martin 1991). Others
noted the arrangement of yam crops within plantations, methods for cultivation, and annual crop
cycling. Cook (1785) specifically commented on the distinct layout and functional divisions
within individual plantations, as well as the differences between the produce reserved for the
chiefly elite and the commoners.
None of these Dioscorea spp. have been identified within palaeoenvironmental or
archaeological deposits within the Tongan archipelago prior to this study. The recovery of D.
alata, D. nummularia and D. bulbifera at Talasiu therefore provides the earliest evidence for the
227
introduction of this genus into Tonga, and data from Leka indicates continued cultivation into
the Formative Period. The presence of D. esculenta in deposits dated to 800-600 cal BP at Leka
suggests that this may have been a later introduction, or is perhaps due to preservation bias. In
any case, the arrival of yams can only be securely dated to after this time within the Formative
Period. Elsewhere in the Pacific, the use of Dioscorea yams has been documented as early as
around 40,000 BP at Niah Cave in Malaysia (Paz and Barton 2007), and 10,220-9100 BP at Kuk
Swamp in PNG (Denham 2007). Lapita-associated use has been indicated by the recovery of
microbotanical remains identified as D. esculenta from Fiji and Vanuatu (Horrocks and Nunn
2007; Horrocks et al. 2013), and D. nummularia and D. pentaphylla also from Vanuatu
(Horrocks and Bedford 2010). Other evidence from Central and Eastern Polynesia support the
early transportation of these crops further into Remote Oceania. In fact, yams were transported
to each corner of the Polynesian Triangle as far as Hawaii in the north (Allen 1984), Rapanui to
the east (Horrocks and Wozniak 2008; Horrocks et al. 2012), and New Zealand in the south
(Horrocks and Barber 2005; Horrocks, Smith, Nichol, Shane and Jackman 2008; Horrocks,
Smith, Nichol and Wallace 2008). These place the findings of this study within the broader
Western Pacific context, and indicate that yams played an important role in Lapita and post-
Lapita subsistence.
Inocarpus fagifer— Fabaceae
The Tahitian chestnut or ifi, is cultivated as a supplementary species in plantations or found
naturalised in secondary forest. It is believed to have originated in the Indo-Malayan region and
has a current distribution as far east as the Marquesas (Walter and Sam 2002; Whistler 2009).
Early explorers and ethnographers recorded the presence of ifi in Tongan subsistence. One of
the earliest was La Billardiere who described the placement of and consumption of this species.
He wrote: “The sugar canes we saw there, were planted at a pretty considerable distance from
each other, under the shade of inocarpus edulis [polynesian chestnut], the fruit of which these
people roast and eat, its flavour much resembling that of the chestnut.”(La Billardiere
1793:366). Two other early ethnographers who recorded the cultivation of this species were
Gifford (1929) and Waldegrave (1833).
The earliest recorded evidence for the consumption of Inocarpus within the Pacific
region is from the Lapita-associated site of Mussau, where pericarp dated to 3200-2000 BP was
recovered (Kirch 1987, 1988, 1989). Very little further evidence for the prehistoric use of this
species has been found in archaeobotanical studies. Huebert (2014) recovered small quantities
of Inocarpus wood charcoal on Nuku Hiva in the Marquesas, associated with deposits dated
after the 17th century. In Micronesia, Inocarpus was identified on Kosrae by Athens and others
(1996) through parenchyma relatively dated to around 1900 BP. The identification of starch
from Inocarpus fagifer within this study is the first microbotanical evidence for the cultivation
of this food, and the first evidence for the introduction of this species into Tonga by 2750-2650
228
cal BP. This species was present throughout the strata at Talasiu, Leka and Heketa indicating
that the nature of starch morphology and chemistry for this species facilitates high rates of
preservation. It is also possible that this supplementary species was more heavily relied upon in
the past.
Barringtonia asiatica— Lechythidaceae
The fish-poison tree or futu is not an introduced species to Tonga, having a native distribution
from Madagascar through to the Marquesas in the east in coastal stands of vegetation (Walter
and Sam 2002; Whistler 2009). It is not consumed, but rather the seed within the endocarp is
removed and grated to produce a pulp. The pulp is then mixed with sand and wrapped in leaves
before being placed in shallow areas of lagoons where there is little water circulation and fish
are forced to breach the surface to escape the effects of the poison. Fish are then caught easily in
nets (Whistler 2009). The species has only been recorded rarely in archaeobotanical
assemblages in the Pacific, and mostly within relatively recent deposits after 500 BP (Huebert
2014). Pollen records from Vava’u in Tonga have confirmed the presence of this species from
around 2600 BP in sampled marine clays along with Rhizophora mangroves, Thespesia
populnea, Guettarda, Cocos nucifera and Pandanus tectorius (Fall 2005). This
palaeoenvironmental evidence supports the identification of Barringtonia asiatica within
deposits at Talasiu and Leka from 2750-2650 cal BP. It is unlikely that starch grains of the seed
of Barringtonia entered the archaeological record at Talasiu through natural aeolian or hydraulic
processes, as the seed would need to somehow be exposed, dehydrate and then be abraded
enough to release reserve starch grains that were blown or washed into deposits. This suggests
that the species was being used for cultural and subsistence purposes (fishing) during late Lapita
occupation at least through to the Formative Period.
Artocarpus altilis— Moraceae
Artocarpus altilis is a domesticated variety of breadfruit or mei deriving from A. camansi
(breadnut) which is both wild and cultivated in New Guinea (Jones et al. 2012; Kennedy and
Clarke 2004). There is also hybridisation with Artocarpus mariennensis, endemic within
Micronesia (Ragone and Raynor 2009), cultivars from which may have also been distributed
across the Micronesian-Polynesian divide. Domestication processes, timing and spread of these
varieties is complex, and not yet fully understood. In Remote Oceania, Artocarpus altilis and A.
altilis X A. mariennensis hybrids are divided into two types, seeded and seedless cultivars.
Seedless varieties are taxonomically identified as A. altilis, and tend to be cultivated for
carbohydrates contained within the starchy fruit. Seeded varieties are either identified as A.
altilis or hybrids of A. altilis and A. mariennensis, and are often cultivated for both the flesh and
the seeds that are also a source of starch. Despite some varieties producing seeds, A. altilis is not
propagated through seeds, but rather from root and shoot cuttings from which seedlings are
produced (Ragone 2006). The geographic and chronological details of the development and
229
spread of breadfruit remain to be fully investigated. (Jones et al. 2012; Kennedy and Clarke
2002)
Although the species does not play a prominent role within subsistence today on
Tongatapu, early ethnographic evidence suggests that this crop may have been much more
popular within plantations in the past (Beaglehole and Beaglehole 1941; Cook 1785; Gifford
1929; Orlebar 1830; La Billardiere 1800; La Perouse 1799; Mariner in Martin 1991; Tasman
1776; Waldegrave 1833; Wilson 1797). Dutch explorers La Maire in 1616 (1967 reprint) and
Tasman in 1643 (1776) observed that provisions they traded for included breadfruit, however it
was not as commonly grown as in the Society Islands. Cook (1785:272) describes the breadfruit
as the first food articles that his crew could purchase when they first arrived, and the trees
themselves were interspersed with little order alongside coconut and close to villages. La
Perouse in the 1780’s (1799:170) also described Tongatapu as having “…no trees; but such as
like the cocoa, breadfruit, that affords them subsistence”. Archaeobotanical evidence for the
cultivation of breadfruit has been found within a number of post-Lapita sites in Polynesia and
Micronesia. The starch, pollen, wood or exocarp parenchyma of this crop has been identified in
Kosrae (Athens et al. 1996), Society Islands (Kahn and Ragone 2013; Orliac 1997), Marquesas
(Allen and Ussher 2013; Huebert 2014), and possibly on Futuna (Piazza and Frimigacci 1991).
Prior to this study, there had been no palaeoenvironmental or archaeological evidence for the
cultivation of breadfruit in Fiji-West Polynesian prehistory. The recovery of starch and possibly
the storage parenchyma of the fruit of A. altilis at Talasiu indicate the species may have been
one of the initial Lapita crop introductions to Tonga. Further, the species was likely cultivated
throughout prehistory, as evidenced by small numbers of preserved starch grains at both Leka
and Heketa.
Musa spp.— Musaceae
Cultivated forms of the genus Musa are a complex, confused and confusing group, of great
importance in the Pacific and elsewhere. At least three distinctive lineages of cultivated bananas
have been described for Oceania, all of them with at least partial New Guinea ancestry.
Although biomolecular evidence has shown the complexities of these lineages, they are yet to
be distinguished in the archaeobotany of Remote Oceania (Kennedy 2008). They can be
difficult to differentiate taxonomically, and have therefore been simply classified as Musa spp.
within the reference collection and archaeobotanical identifications. The first domestication of
the Musa genus probably occurred within the Pacific region. The earliest evidence for possible
cultivation derives from Kuk Swamp in Papua New Guinea where phytoliths extracted from
archaeological deposits date to 10,200-6400 cal BP (Denham et al. 2003, 2004; Fullagar et al.
2006; Wilson 1985). There is also convincing evidence that Musa spp. were transported into
Remote Oceania by Lapita times. Starch and phytoliths from these crops have been identified
within Lapita associated deposits in the Reef Islands of the Solomons (Crowther 2009), and on
230
Urupiv and Matilau in Vanuatu (Horrocks and Bedford 2010; Horrocks et al. 2009).
Furthermore, Musa phytoliths, pollen, endocarp and vegetative storage parenchyma have been
recovered in Eastern and Central Polynesia from a number of locations (Allen 1984; Horrocks
and Rechtman 2009; Horrocks et al. 2012; Kirch et al. 1995; McAllister 1933; Piazza and
Frimigacci 1991). The data from Talasiu, Leka and Heketa on Tongatapu fits well within this
chronology and distribution. But which particular lineages within the Musa genus were
cultivated by the Lapita settlers of Tongatapu and the Western Pacific, and transported
throughout the rest of Remote Oceania, remain to be established. Given the great diversity of
Oceanian cultivated bananas, it is quite likely that multiple movements , replacements and
accretions have contributed to this set of vital arboreal crops that are low maintenance but also
high yielding and are still cultivated today.
Piper methysticum— Piperaceae
The kava root is used throughout Polynesia and Micronesia as a relaxant often during traditional
festivals and rituals, and for medicinal purposes. It is thought to be native to Vanuatu where it
was first utilised and domesticated as a male clone of the endemic species Piper wichmannii
(Whistler 2009) before being transported east to West Polynesia and north to Micronesia. It is
solely propagated by hand through root and stem cuttings as populations outside of Vanuatu are
all male, which gives strength to the hypothesis that this species was anthropogenically-
introduced to all other islands in the Pacific where it is currently grown (Balick and Lee 2009).
Currently, there is no direct evidence for the timing of the domestication of kava within
Vanuatu, and the movement east. However, a number of studies support the hypothesis that this
may have occurred during Lapita settlement and interaction through analysis of ceramics that
resemble kava bowls and cups (Green 1974; Palmer 1968), linguistics (Geraghty 1983),
chemistry and biology of kava varieties (Lebot et al. 1997), and skeletal analysis of
temporomandibular joint (TMJ) degeneration that can be tied to kava preparation (Visser 1994).
Archaeobotanical evidence for kava cultivation and consumption has been recovered from late
prehistoric deposits in the Marquesas from 550-350 BP (Allen and Ussher 2013), and Hawaii
(Allen 1984) although a fossilised stem fragment belonging to a member of the Piperaceae
family has been identified in deposits associated with Lapita artefacts and dates to 3600-2400
BP (Kirch 1989).
Evidence from early ethnographic accounts point to the prominent role that this sedative
played in Tongan culture. Cook’s (1785) surgeon, Mr Anderson, commented that kava was
commonly planted about their houses, and that the root was the only part dug up for ceremonies.
Servants were observed breaking the roots into pieces, scraping the dirt off with a shell, and
preparing the mix (1785:318). Cook (1785:282) himself noted that on Tongatapu there was
“…hardly anywhere without the kava plant, from which they make their favourite liquor.” La
Billardiere’s crew (1793:339) were treated to a dinner of yams roasted in the fire embers and
231
plantains, which La Billardiere assumed were to take the heat from the stomach produced by the
‘intoxicating liquor’ of kava. Furthermore, he describes “...its stalk, frequently bigger than the
thumb, is tolerably straight, and requires no support. They cut off several pieces in the spaces
between the knots, and they made us a present of them, informing us, that they set them in the
ground, in order to propagate the plant.” During the 1920’s Gifford (1929) observed that most
festivals and ceremonies involved the presentation of both food and kava to higher chiefs such
as the Tu’i Tonga or Tu’i Kanokupolu. One of the most detailed accounts of kava consumption
was published by Collocott (1927), where he describes the etiquette and placement of titled
individuals during kava ceremonies within a ‘kava-ring’. The careful distribution of roots is also
described in detail along with the methods for preparing the brew, with some comments on
modern adaptations of traditional practices. At least seven different types of kava are described
in terms of root size and how these are brought to these ceremonies.
Accounts and archaeological evidence from elsewhere in the Pacific are important for
assessing the nature of kava consumption in the past, and the timing of its introduction and
cultivation in Tonga. The microbotanical evidence from Talasiu (TO-Mu-2) suggests that this
crop was probably imported to Tonga during initial colonisation, but possibly in the latter part
of this period. This data ties in with current evidence suggesting late Lapita transportation of
kava out of northern Vanuatu during a period of interaction that facilitated the development of
the Proto-Polynesian language (Green 1966; Kirch 1989; Lebot et al. 1997; Visser 1994). The
presence of starch deriving from Piper methysticum within well-dated deposits at Leka (J17)
and Heketa (TO-NT-2), indicates the continued cultivation and incremental inclusion of this
crop within Tongan social practices. It is likely that the use of kava became tied to the
development of social hierarchy within Tongan prehistory, and was used to validate positions
within this hierarchy, as observed by Collocott (1927) and Gifford (1929) even after European
contact.
Curcuma longa and Zingiber spp.— Zingiberaceae
Members of the ginger family have played important roles in Tonga and the wider Pacific as
food items, but also for medicinal and domestic purposes. Most are thought to have been first
cultivated in Southeast Asia, but are now widely distributed throughout Melanesia, Polynesia
and Micronesia (Purseglove 1972; Whistler 2009). Curcuma longa or turmeric (ango) is
cultivated primarily as a dye for colouring tapa cloth or for body decoration. The methods for
processing the harvested roots varies throughout the Pacific, but generally involves some
washing, grating, straining, cooking and drying (Whistler 2009). There are only a small number
of ethnographic accounts that note the cultivation of turmeric in Tonga, including Cook (1785),
and Gifford (1929). Recent studies of Tongan agricultural production have noted the rare
presence of turmeric within allotments, often in a wild state, but protected due to the value of
the rhizome for the preparation of dye (Thaman 1976). It may be that this crop is preferentially
232
cultivated closer to the village or within house gardens, rather than bush allotments. Other
varieties of ginger are not mentioned within early ethnographic accounts pertinent to Tonga, but
Zingiber zerumbet was recorded by Whistler (2009) during botanical survey. This particular
species of Zingiber was used as a shampoo, to add scent to tapa, and the sap could also be
drunk. There have been no recovered archaeobotanical remains of any plants belonging to
Zingiberaceae in the Pacific prior to this study. Here the vegetative storage parenchyma of the
rhizome of an unknown species within the Zingiberaceae family was identified in late Lapita-
associated deposits at Talasiu, and the starch of Curcuma longa was extracted from sediments at
Leka that can be dated to within the Formative Period of Tongan prehistory from 1300-1000 cal
BP. This evidence points to the use of members of this family within Tongan subsistence from
at least 2750-2650 cal BP, and continued archaeobotanical investigations on Tongatapu may
further elucidate the chronology of use for gingers in Tonga.
Modelling archaeological production systems
Each of these plant introductions in Tongan prehistory were either cultivated or utilised as
supplementary species in tropical production systems. The nutritional values and efficiency
(inputs vs. outputs) of each of these taxa extracted from the archaeological sites included in this
research (Talasiu, Leka and Heketa) were compared in Chapter 8. Here, these were combined to
characterise and discuss each of the archaeological production systems. These modelled systems
were used to address each of the two key research questions regarding the role of plants in the
subsistence of colonising populations in Tonga, and within the development of the social
complexity seen through evolution of the maritime chiefdom or state. Critically, it would appear
that modelled decreased system nutritional efficiency is linked to increased specialisation in
primary crops, observed through the ratios of numbers of primary to supplementary crops within
each of these archaeobotanical assemblages. Discussion will focus on how people may have
been cultivating or exploiting plants found in the archaeobotanical record, based on the context
of modern production systems, and also how changing system efficiency over time can be
linked to species diversification or specialisation.
Feasibility of modelling
Two main issues concern the feasibility of modelling archaeological systems, based on both the
data available and the approach used in this thesis research. It is important to address whether
the list of species identified in various micro- and macrobotanical remains at each site included
in this study might represent a ‘complete’ production system. Due to limitations in the faunal
data at all three sites, a full comparison with the protein dietary components was deemed
inappropriate. Further, without knowing the specific dietary requirements of the populations
occupying each of these sites in the past and the contribution of other food sources, it cannot be
calculated whether plant or animal species could have provided sufficient nutritional and
energetic benefits. These dietary requirements depend on the age, gender, and lifestyle of each
233
member of the population, and therefore cannot be gauged from the limited data available at
Talasiu, Leka and Heketa. When these archaeological plant species are compared with other
ethnographically recorded species in accounts of Tongan agriculture, there is no statistical
difference in overall nutrition between the groups. This remains the case even when the list
restricted to only those species that are likely to be processed during food preparation and then
preserved in these archaeological deposits. Future analysis of modern soil samples from
agricultural systems to gauge the presence and quantity of plant microfossil and macrobotanical
material would enable greater accuracy in the analysis of plant inputs to outputs from
archaeological samples.
For each of the archaeological sites, statistical comparisons were made using overall
nutritional figures (combination of calories, fat, protein and carbohydrates within 100g of edible
material), and compared using Student’s two-sided t test and distributions. None of these were
statistically different with over 95% confidence and so the null hypothesis that these could have
been from the same population was unable to be rejected. These results are interpreted here to
suggest that there was no major nutritional advantage to be gained by choosing any of the
ethnographic species in addition to those found within the archaeological assemblages. So it is
plausible that these archaeological species could be viewed as composing ‘complete’ systems,
based purely on overall nutrition. Comparison of yield ratios may reveal a different patterning,
but this data is variable and is not available for all species. It would also be unlikely that all of
the ethnographically recorded species were introduced during initial settlement and were
therefore present throughout the Tongan sequence. The implication of this being that species
were most likely introduced gradually over time, and could feasibly be represented by the
ranges of species found archaeobotanically.
The second issue concerns the approach taken to modelling the archaeological systems.
It is argued here that an agroecological approach allows alternative hypotheses to be explored
through basic comparison of nutritional ranking, with overall system efficiency measured in
terms of the nutritional or energetic value of estimated yield (outputs) per unit of time invested
in labour (inputs). Using criteria that have been developed to describe a modern range of
ethnographic production systems from the Western Pacific, these archaeological systems were
characterised and modelled in terms of overall calorific efficiency (as assessment of individual
nutritional values revealed that patterning of system efficiency was generally equal) according
to predicted labour investment. This overall system nutritional efficiency was based on the
labour and yield data from the modern system that most closely resembled each archaeological
system, based on these characterisations.
The specific features of modern and archaeological systems explore a range of options
for labour investment and associated yield and nutritional return ratios that attempt to avoid the
234
issues of geographic and temporal scale, breaking overall efficiency down into outputs per man-
hour for ease of comparison. Of course, this analysis does not provide any measure of social or
cultural benefits that require consideration of efficiency at the level of individuals. It is a purely
nutritional and energetic approach to productivity that explores decision-making through the
cultivation capacity of plants identified archaeologically based on a range of recorded and
described Pacific production systems.
Expected modelling outcomes
Based on current hypotheses for island colonisation and settlement, it was expected that this
modelling would indicate a pattern of developing complexity and intensity within production
systems over time from Talasiu (TO-Mu-2) (2750-2650 cal BP) through to Heketa (TO-Nt-2)
(800-600 cal BP). After weighing the arguments for Lapita subsistence, it is clear that the
‘strandlooper’ or solely marine-based forager-type hypothesis (Best 1984; Groube 1971) is
unlikely in light of current isotopic, faunal, and botanical evidence (Horrocks and Bedford 2004,
2010; Horrocks and Nunn 2007; Horrocks et al. 2009, 2014; Kinaston et al. 2013; Kinaston,
Bedford, Richards, Hawkins, Gray, Jaouen, Valentin and Buckley 2014; Kinaston, Buckley,
Valentin, Bedford, Spriggs, Hawkins and Herrscher 2014; Valentin et al. 2010). Initial dispersal
of populations may not have involved the introduction of plants, but this quickly changed within
one or two generations. If Lapita subsistence strategies did involve some element of terrestrial
production, the question remains as to the degree of reliance on imported plants over any
endemic or native species, and how these plants were cultivated. The argument over mental
templates within colonising populations involving knowledge of wet taro production using
pondfield construction and irrigation has been discussed partly in Chapter 2 (Bellwood 2005,
2011; Kirch and Lepofsky 1993; Spriggs 1990, 1996, 2003; Yen 1973a). These arguments for
and against independent development of pondfield irrigation are mostly irrelevant when
discussing horticultural systems on Tongatapu. This raised limestone island is not suitable for
wet taro production and extensive dryland techniques were utilised instead. However, this
argument is worth considering in relation to the types of crops that may have been brought to
the archipelago and experimented with. These agricultural techniques may also have been
brought to Tonga and Samoa before moving out into Central and Eastern Polynesia after a
1500-year pause that saw the transition to Ancestral Polynesian Society. It seems unlikely that
independent innovation of pondfield irrigation occurred over and over throughout the Pacific,
and yet current archaeobotanical and archaeological evidence does not suggest that colonising
populations utilised these techniques until much later in historical sequences. Instead it has been
argued that early Lapita migration into Western Polynesia was initially supported by ‘broad-
spectrum’ subsistence strategies, as defined by Ingold (2000) and Kennedy and Clark (2004)
utilising both cultivation systems and marine-based technology (Hunt 1980; Kirch 1978:12).
With regard to Tonga specifically, Burley (1998; Burley and Dickinson 2001) agrees, promoting
Kirch’s (1994) refined definition of a middle ground position, whereby agricultural activities
235
were initially of secondary importance and possibly limited to low energy swidden-type
cultivation.
The arguments generally depend on the timing and speed of the migration from Near
Oceania into Remote Oceania. New data from Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates from the
Bismarcks, Fiji and Vanuatu suggests that there was only a pause of around 130-290 years from
3360 to 3240BP in this eastern end of Near Oceania before colonisation began in Island
Melanesia and Western Polynesia by 3250-2900 BP (Denham et al 2012:44; Sheppard 2011).
New data from Tonga indicates the archipelago was also first colonised relatively quickly
around 2900-2800 (Burley et al. 2015). This relatively fast migration might suggest that
agricultural techniques such as pondfield irrigation would not necessarily provide an advantage
within subsistence practices at this early stage of colonisation. Causal factors such as population
growth and environmental change are unlikely to have forced the adoption of labor-intensive
techniques within such a short time frame.
One ecological approach attempted to operationalise migration episodes through the
Ideal Free Distribution (IFD) concept. Kennett, Anderson and Winterhalder (2006) used this
technique to account for modes of subsistence, new habitat suitability, and population density in
predicting migratory behaviour in the colonisation of East Polynesia. The concept predicted a
‘leap-frogging’ type of behaviour, with periodic episodes of migration followed by population
growth. Modes of subsistence are seen as the key variable influencing population growth and
environmental or habitat variability. For example, low level and later intensive food production
contributed to faster decreases in habitat suitability through environmental degradation, but
concurrently increased the overall carrying capacity of many remote island habitats (Kennett et
al. 2006:268). Overall the archaeological data from Oceania is argued to be consistent with the
predictions of the IFD model, with the long interval between the initial settlement of Near
Oceania at around 35,000 BP and movement in to Remote Oceania at around 3300 BP matching
the curve for foragers living on large islands (Kennett et al. 2006:285). Further, the rapid
migration into Remote Oceania after the colonisation of Western Polynesia is consistent with
the predicted curves for food production on small islands, while the intensification of these
systems can be viewed as an implication of the 1500-year pause here before later migration into
East Polynesia.
Considering these arguments, it was hypothesised that the Late Lapita production
system at Talasiu, several hundred years after initial settlement, would most likely have
resembled ‘broad-spectrum’ subsistence. This system would be characterised by high species
diversity including a number of both supplementary native and introduced species as well as
known Lapita cultivated cultigens such as a range of aroids, yams and tree crops. Production
techniques would focus predominantly on multi-cropping annual and perennial species that
236
would provide short-term returns for labour investment. Arboriculture would probably still play
a small role in this system and would have low efficiency in terms of yield and nutritional
benefits from labour investment. The comparative ethnographic system that best matches this
description would be the Gadio Enga production system, which utilises plants within a number
of agro-ecosystems that range from fully cultivated or managed to just simply gathered native or
naturalised species.
Looking beyond Late Lapita subsistence at Talasiu, the timing of occupation at Leka
(J17) represents settlement of the area during the Formative Period from around 1300-1000 cal
BP. Due to a lack of archaeological or archaeobotanical data, nothing is known about the role of
plants within subsistence strategies at this time. There is no evidence that the integrated
maritime Tu’i Tonga chiefdom had yet emerged, and the monumental architecture associated
with this chiefdom had not yet been constructed. The use of the phrase ‘the Dark Age’ for this
period by Janet Davidson (1979:94-5) is still relatively accurate, as the disappearance of pottery
after 1500 BP has meant that little is known about the nature of local cultural developments
until around 1000 BP (Burley 1998). Sites become both difficult to find and define. Limited
material remains from excavated sites suggest relative continuity between the Plainware and
Formative Periods; however, faunal data from Niuatoputapu indicate less reliance on marine
resources and increased production of pig (Kirch 1988). Data that has been correlated to the end
of the Formative Period point to an expansion of earthen burial mound construction, probably
associated with population growth (Burley 1998; Spenneman 1989).
Archaeobotanical remains from occupation at Leka reflect subsistence technology
influenced by concepts brought with the Lapita colonisers or through later migration and
interaction, and also by local development. It is clear that the fragile ecological composition of
islands, in conjunction with their insularity, makes them environmentally dynamic and
susceptible to any change. In an ongoing dialectic between environmental-human-climatic
factors, modes of subsistence are both created and restricted by environmental and social factors
within this dynamic ecological setting. Leppard (2014:10) has argued, however, that
environmental thresholds may not be the most valuable concept for visualising carrying capacity
early on in island sequences, but rather culturally-created thresholds that may have been
crossed. Pressure on food resources required innovative ways of alleviation, such as expansion
to new niches, intensification of food production systems or new modes of distributing
resources (Leppard 2014:10). Modes of distribution are argued by many Pacific researchers to
also include exchange networks within and between island groups (Green 1987; Kirch 1987,
1997; Summerhayes 2000; Terrell 1989). Unfortunately limited archaeological evidence during
this post-Lapita period in Tonga makes the association of subsistence practices with cultural
development difficult. Interaction was frequent in early and late phases of Tongan prehistory,
suggesting that this also the case in the ‘Dark Age’. It can only be assumed that any changes
237
that occurred paved the way for the subsequent development of the classic Tu’i Tonga
chiefdom, and multi-tiered social hierarchy (Davidson 1979). All of these environmental and
cultural factors, as well as those transported mental templates for production strategies already
discussed, would have characterised the form and flexibility of production at Leka.
With these factors in mind, it is likely that subsistence during the post-Lapita Formative
Period was characterised by continued experimentation with introduced cultigens, some
intensification of production to cope with environmental, social or demographic factors, and
further exploitation of natural resources. Studies of environmental change on Tongatapu have
pointed to a gradual drawdown of sea level from the mid-Holocene hydro-isostatic highstand
that would have drastically changed the shoreline of the Fanga’ Uta Lagoon (Dickinson 2001,
2007). The changing lagoon environment impacted the extraction of resources from this inshore
ecosystem, and is argued to have resulted in a significant decrease in the size and variability of
faunal marine species, particularly shellfish, through over-exploitation (Grono 2012). This
change was particularly clear in cultural deposits from Leka TP4 (Grono 2012). Clearly, there
was a change in the focus of subsistence from the marine to the terrestrial environment based on
previous evidence from occupation at Leka and other sites dated to the Formative era in the
Tongan archipelago.
The background to subsistence and cultural development at Leka would suggest that the
production system represented by archaeobotanical data from this site would have high species
diversity through continued periods of interaction and migration. This expansion of the
economic plant repertoire on Tongatapu should also correlate with significant nutritional
diversity between primary and supplementary crops. Continued experimentation with
production techniques suitable for the Tongan environment involving both new and established
cultigens would have resulted in increased overall efficiency in terms of energy and nutritional
returns, but would also have increased labour diversity between staple and other crops. For these
reasons, it was expected within this study that the archaeological production system evidenced
by cultural deposits at Leka would most likely resemble the Bellona system. This system was
characterised by shifting dryland cultivation with some intensive production for the cash-
cropping of copra, supplemented by the exploitation of supplementary species.
The final phase of Tongan prehistory, represented by archaeobotanical data from this
research, is the transition to a centralised maritime chiefdom which integrated the entirety of the
Tongan archipelago by at least 500 BP. Two deposits from test units at Heketa dated to around
800-600 cal BP and 600 cal BP, and fall into a period characterised by the development of
monumental architecture at Heketa as an early centre for chiefly political control (Clark and
Reepmeyer 2014; Spenneman 2002). At this later end of the Tongan sequence, subsistence is
argued elsewhere to have become more intensive or extensive to develop surplus to support the
238
increasing socio-political complexity of the Tongan chiefdom (Aswani and Graves 1998; Clark
et al. 2008; Poulsen 1983, 1987; Spenneman 1989). Other proximal causes have also been
emphasised, such as environmental and demographic factors and warfare, but primacy has been
given to extensive and labour-intensive dryland food production strategies (Kirch 1984).
Modelling of agricultural dryland production and increasing population by both Green
(1973:69-73) and Kirch (1984:222) indicates that all of the arable land on Tongatapu could have
come under production by AD 1000 or possibly earlier. The timing of this ceiling on the
availability of land is argued to coincide with the amalgamation of local control into a central
polity on Tongatapu, and the beginning of a period of maritime expansion that extended Tongan
influence as far afield as Fiji, Samoa, Niue and Futuna (Aswani and Graves 1998:144). In his
interpretive model, Kirch (1984) elaborated on Green’s (1973) initial hypothesis of land
pressure triggering population control measures, arguing that population growth and
competition for land resulted in a series of regional chiefdoms that constantly assimilated
smaller groups to increase overall control and ended with the formation of a central polity on
Tongatapu. This was based on Carneiro’s (1970) hypothesis for state formation.
Correlation between the development of monumental architecture on Tonga and
emerging social complexity has also been drawn by a number of researchers. McKern (1929)
was the first to study this evolutionary confluence, and argued that the organisation of
manpower required to construct these stone platforms was the logical result of centralised
political and social power held by the Tu’i Tonga. Others have since expanded this hypothesis.
For example, Clark and others (2008) have argued that the change in form from non-sepulchral
architecture to large burial platforms at around AD 1450 coincided with the political integration
of the chiefdom under the 24th Tu’i Tonga, Kau’ulufonua 1, and reorganisation of titles into the
sacred (Tu’i Tonga) and the secular (Tu’i Ha’atakalaua). The transition to sacred chief began
with the move of power from Heketa to Lapaha by the 12th Tui Tonga, Talatama, but was
intensified by this further stratification. Oral traditions also link the 24th Tu’i Tonga to an
increase in territorial expansion to Uvea, Futuna and Samoa. Clark and others (2008) speculate
that at this crucial stage in the Tongan chronology an emphasis on the semi-divine status of the
chiefly lineages resulted in an increase in social complexity through further stratification of the
political hierarchy, but also increased the risk of chiefs distancing themselves from practical
government and control. It can be postulated that the segment of the population providing the
manpower required for construction may have been unable to produce their own food, and so
surplus would also have been needed to feed these workers. Redistribution of food for this
purpose may have resulted in the emergence of the tribute system, although this is difficult to
prove.
More recently, discussion has centred on the nature and scale of interaction within
Western Polynesia and how this influenced developing social complexity. There is some
239
evidence for early interaction within this region during Lapita settlement and the development
of Ancestral Polynesian Society or more classic Western Polynesian culture (Best 1984; Burley
et al. 2011; Clark et al. 2014). Later in Tongan prehistory, further development of trade
networks may have both extended and reinforced Tongan influence within Fiji and Samoa
during the development of the maritime state (Clark et al. 2014). These long-distance political
and economic exchanges within the second millennium AD have been traced through the
sourcing of lithic material from state and pre-state contexts on Tongatapu, and post-ceramic
contexts from Samoa. Results indicated a non-local long-distance source for 66% of analysed
stone artefacts from Tongatapu, but predominantly local sources for the Samoan material.
Interarchipelago interaction was clearly a feature of early occupation on Tongatapu that
intensified with the development of stratified society. It was argued from this data that an
important consequence of social complexity was the establishment of new types of specialised
sites for the transmission of people, plants and materials (Clark et al. 2014).
The connection between expansion of horticultural production and social complexity is
supported by early ethnographic accounts of intensive cultivation practices and tribute systems
evident during the yearly pattern of festivals such as the ‘inasi or first fruits festival (Gifford
1929; Mariner in Martin 1991). Intensification of production arguably enabled the development
of political economies within other islands and archipelagos, such as Hawaii (Earle 1980, 1991,
2012; Graves et al. 2011; Kirch et al. 2012; Kirch 1994; Ladefoged and Graves 2008, 2011;
McCoy and Graves 2012), Futuna (Kirch 1976, 1984, 1994), and the Marquesas (Addison 2006;
Allen and Addison 2002; Allen 2010; Earle 1993; Rolett 1998). The transition from broad-
spectrum subsistence strategies to more labor-intensive dryland agriculture was not a simple
process. It required decisions and political control of land to change cultivation and processing
techniques which increase the availability of essentially lower-ranked and less efficient
resources. This was likely to be a response to the decreased availability of higher-ranked
resources in terms of nutrition and energy efficiency, sourced through hunting or gathering.
However, the pathway to agricultural development through agroforestry, arboriculture, irrigated
vegeculture, or rain-fed vegeculture depends on both environmental constraints and cultural
factors. Understanding the mechanisms of change during this transition through the
intentionality within varying levels of decision-making is critical, and is the means by which
these can be linked to the current chronology of migration and socio-political development.
With these discussions in mind, it is expected that the archaeological production system
at Heketa, if complete, would most closely resemble the analysed Anutan production system. It
is likely that plant production at this point focussed primarily on dryland crops such as taro and
yams that would produce the largest yields within short periods of time, but not necessarily the
greatest nutritional returns. Overall system efficiency would be lower due to the decrease in
species diversity, and the utilisation of labour-intensive methods for crop production through
240
shortening of fallow lengths and reduction of production areas, after an initial period of
expansion. Labour diversity between groupings of plants (primary or supplementary) would
therefore also have become significant.
In summary, the archaeological plant production systems represented by
archaeobotanical remains from Talasiu (TO-Mu-2), Leka (J17), and the Heketa (TO-Nt-2) are
expected to have been similar to those from Gadio Enga, Bellona and Anuta respectively. These
expectations were based purely on weighing current arguments of the nature and role of
subsistence within Late Lapita, Formative Period, and the monumental state. The expectations
are compared with the outcomes of modelling archaeological systems using an agroecological
approach to view these systems in terms of species, nutritional and possible yield diversity, as
well as labour efficiency considering outputs for crops, groups (primary or supplementary) and
the overall system.
Modelling Talasiu (TO-Mu-2)
The dense and expansive midden at the site of Talasiu (TO-Mu-2) represents a well-dated
snapshot of subsistence in the Late Lapita period through faunal, floral and artefactual material.
AMS dates from test unit TP2 have pinned the occupation of Talasiu to around 2750-2650 cal
BP based on short-lived charred endocarp extracted from throughout the unit. The narrow range
of all dates from these deposits suggests that the midden at Talasiu represents settlement on the
shoreline of the Fanga ‘Uta Lagoon for around 100 years or less. Talasiu is therefore not the
earliest dated site on Tongatapu, as the site of Nukuleka closer to the entrance of the lagoon has
been U/th dated to 2838±8 cal BP (Burley 2001a,b; Burley et al. 2015), but archaeobotanical
data from Talasiu can provide information about the early post-settlement phase of Tongan
prehistory. As the Lapita cultural complex evolved into Polynesian society, whose descendents
would later colonise Central and Eastern Polynesia, production systems played a major role in
facilitating this process. This vital transitional phase is reflected within the data from Talasiu,
and can be modelled using an ecological approach to production systems that considers the
range of utilised species, and the nutritional efficiency of these that would influence decision-
making regarding the types of production techniques engaged in cultivation, management or
opportunistic gathering practices.
The range of species identified within archaeobotanical remains from Talasiu TP2
represents a mix of arboreal species and root and tuber crops from a number of different
families (see Table 9.2). Only one of these taxa is considered endemic or native to Tongatapu,
and the remainder must therefore have been introduced by Lapita colonisers or their
descendents. Cocos nucifera has been found within pre-human deposits in pollen cores from
Avai’o’vuna Swamp on Vavau during a marine high-stand dated to 4500-2600BP (Fall 2010),
and likely arrived through the flotation of fruit upon marine currents. All but two of the
241
identified taxa are generally accepted to have been early prehistoric introductions into Tonga.
One exception is Ipomoea batatas, known more commonly as the sweet potato, which is a
known later introduction from South America via Eastern Polynesia that is suspected by some
researchers to even be a historic introduction (Kirch 1978, 1990), and was therefore classified as
modern contamination within this assemblage. The other is Piper methysticum or kava, which
some oral traditions in Tonga suggest was a late prehistoric export from Vanuatu, but has not so
far been corroborated with linguistic or genetic data. Considering this it has been included
within the list of species, primarily to keep an open mind about this crop in terms of the timing
of its introduction and the role this species may have played within production systems in the
past. There are also a number of species that have not previously been identified within Lapita-
associated deposits in Melanesia or Western Polynesia. These include the aroid Amorphophallus
paeoniifolius, the yam Dioscorea bulbifera, Inocarpus fagifer (Tahitian chestnut), Barringtonia
asiatica (Fish-poison tree), Artocarpus altilis (breadfruit), and Piper methysticum or kava.
Table 9.2 Identified families and species within archaeobotanical remains from Talasiu (TO-Mu-2)
Using the criteria derived from the analysis of production systems from the Western
Pacific, the archaeological production system at Talasiu (at least that based on those species
identified archaeologically) can be described and compared to this range of ethnographic
examples. Compared to this range of systems, Talasiu has moderate species diversity (15
species), and has insignificant nutritional diversity between groupings of ‘primary crops’ and
‘supplementary species’ (90% confidence). The labour and yield diversity of species within the
Talasiu system cannot be known. However, when these species are compared using the figures
from all of the example systems, a range of possibilities can be gauged. In the case of Talasiu,
the average yield ratios (see Table 9.3) within the archaeological system can range from low (0-
10) to high (31+) diversity, depending on the figures used. Despite large differences between
the average labour inputs for each grouping when these are modelled using the figures from the
Family Species
Anacardiaceae Spondias dulcis
Araceae
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius
Colocasia esculenta
Cyrtosperma merkusii
Arecaceae Cocos nucifera
Dioscoreaceae
Dioscorea alata
Dioscorea bulbifera
Dioscorea nummularia
Fabaceae Inocarpus fagifer
Lecythidaceae Barringtonia asiatica
Moraceae Artocarpus altilis
Musaceae Musa spp.
Piperaceae Piper methysticum
Zingiberaceae Unknown
242
example systems (see Table 9.4), these are not deemed to be statistically significant differences
when calculated using Student’s t-test (95% confidence or over based on the number of
compared samples). When modelled on the Bellona Island data, labour investment between the
two groups could be differentiated by 2.04 standard errors, but based on the number of samples
(degrees of freedom) the probability of samples or species being from the same group is 20%.
This probability does not allow rejection of the null hypothesis that these two groups could
belong to the same population based on mean difference (see Table 9.5). Under these conditions
the Talasiu system could be characterised as:
Talasiu— moderate species diversity, insignificant nutritional diversity between
groupings, insignificant labour diversity according to groupings, low-to-high yield ratio
diversity.
Based on this, the Talasiu system most likely resembled the production system recorded
on Tongatapu in 2001 in the Agricultural Census of that year. If this is the case then the average
calorific efficiency of this system is around 20666kcal/hr, with a total calorific efficiency of
123996kcal/hr (see Figure 8.36). When it is considered that the data from the 2001 Tongatapu
system was based on an intensive cash-cropping economy, this characterisation is unexpected. It
was expected that the Talasiu system would more closely resemble the Gadio Enga production
system, which was described as ‘mixed’ or ‘diverse’ by Dornstreich (1977) involving similar
labour investment into each species within a range of exploited agro-ecosystems, if late Lapita
subsistence fell somewhere between a ‘strandlooper’ and ‘transported landscape’ economy.
Using the comparative analysis carried out during this study, the Gadio Enga system was
characterised as having high species diversity, insignificant nutritional diversity between
groupings, significant labour diversity between groupings and moderate yield ratio diversity.
Clearly these do not match the description of Talasiu outlined here, and this discrepancy will be
discussed at the end of this section.
243
Table 9.3 Yield ratios for species identified at Talasiu modelled using comparative systems
Table 9.4 Labour inputs for species identified at Talasiu modelled using comparative systems
Table 9.5 Statistical comparison of labour inputs for groupings at Talasiu in terms of mean difference
modelled using comparative systems
Species Gadio Enga Bellona Is Anuta Tongatapu Ontong Java
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
Artocarpus altilis 1.0 41.7 0.1 0.0 0.0
Cocos nucifera 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
Colocasia esculenta 66.1 5.5 0.0 8.9 0.9
Cyrtosperma merkusii 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.6
Dioscorea alata 0.3 12.7 0.0 12.1 0.0
Dioscorea bulbifera 0.3 2.9 0.0 12.1 0.0
Dioscorea nummularia 0.3 12.7 0.0 12.1 0.0
Inocarpus fagifer 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Musa sp.1 5.7 21.4 2.5 25.1 9.6
Musa sp.2 5.7 21.4 2.5 25.1 9.6
Piper methysticum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Spondias dulcis 0.0 83.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Zingiber zerumbet 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Average 5.7 16.8 0.4 6.8 1.6
Grouping Species
Gadio Enga
(instances of activity)
Bellona Is
(hours/yr)
Anuta
(hrs/37 days)
Tongatapu
(hrs/yr)
Ontong Java
(hrs/yr)
Primary crops Artocarpus altilis 10.3 60.0 62.6 115.2 183.0
Cocos nucifera nd 3333.3 30.3 2317.4 202960.0
Colocasia esculenta 30.1 11872.0 108.6 19530.8 43830.0
Cyrtosperma merkusii nd nd 18.3 nd 43830.0
Dioscorea alata 39.5 16683.0 0.7 21595.1 nd
Dioscorea nummularia 39.5 16683.0 0.7 8867.0 nd
Musa sp.1 30.1 9425.0 20.3 1404.4 183.0
Musa sp.2 30.1 9425.0 20.3 1404.4 183.0
Supplementary Amorphophallus paeoniifolius nd 854.1 nd nd nd
Dioscorea bulbifera 39.5 854.1 0.7 201.0 nd
Inocarpus fagifer nd nd 0.7 57.7 nd
Piper methysticum nd nd nd 2527.5 nd
Spondias dulcis nd 60.0 nd 5.0 nd
Zingiber zerumbet 30.1 nd nd nd nd
Average 31.1 6925.0 26.3 5275.0 48528.2
Example system Pooled standard deviation Pooled standard error Difference Confidence Mean difference
Gadio Enga (primary crops vs
supplementary) 9.3 7.6 0.6 <50% 4.9
Bellona Island (primary crops vs
supplementary) 5424.6 4429.2 2.4 95% 9050.8
Anuta Atoll (primary crops vs
supplementary) 13.4 10.6 0.9 60% 9.8
Tongatapu (primary crops vs
supplementary) 7192.8 4650.4 1.6 80% 7192.8
Ontong Java (primary crops vs
supplementary) 87899.2 0.0 0.0 0 0.0
Labour Inputs (hours or instances of activity)
244
Modelling Leka (J17)
The Formative Period (1500-1000 BP) led to the later development of a complex social
hierarchy in Tongan prehistory but the archaeological record is characterised currently by a
general lack of evidence for any cultural, political or technological change. With regard to
changes in subsistence strategies, few sites have been dated to this period, and fewer still have
been excavated to collect data on both faunal and floral components of diet. Occupation at Leka
(J17) is an important site to assess both these components in terms of the expansion of territorial
resource use, due to the decline in available near-shore marine species through overuse and
environmental change. The faunal remains from Leka have been analysed by Grono (2012) and
confirm that the hydro-isostatic drawdown of sea level after the mid-Holocene reduced the
availability of many larger shellfish species, prompting a gradual focus inland that is also
reflected within settlement patterns during this time (Poulsen 1967; Spenneman 1986, 1989).
The debate surrounding post-Lapita plant production systems, which has focussed on factors
such as mental templates, continued interaction and migration, environmental thresholds and
change, culturally-created thresholds, and demographic change, has already been outlined. It is
important to discuss early production at Leka, and how this compares with expectations based
on this contextual background.
The list of identified species in the micro- and macrobotanical remains from Leka again
includes a number of arboreal, root and tuber crops, as well as supplementary species that would
have been semi-cultivated or gathered from native or naturalised plants. As was the case with
species identified in deposits at Talasiu, these are mostly prehistorically introduced plants apart
from Cocos nucifera, and all but the White potato (Solanum tuberosum) are considered to have
been introduced prior to European contact. This species has been labelled as a contaminant in
samples from Leka that probably occurred during laboratory processing but this will be
discussed later in this chapter. Piper methysticum is thought to be a late prehistoric introduction,
and so is also possibly a contaminant within these samples, but as was the case for Talasiu, this
species will be incorporated as a supplementary species as it may be an early introduction.
Because so little is known about the Formative Period in Tongan prehistory, none of these
species have previously been identified within palaeoenvironmental or archaeological deposits
from this time, and therefore these contribute greatly to knowledge upon subsistence and the
role plants played in the evolution of social hierarchy and political economy.
245
Table 9.6 Identified families and species within archaeobotanical remains from Leka (J17)
The combined list of species from Leka was modelled as a complete plant production
system and compared with the range of modern production systems The same criteria used to
characterise modern systems were applied to the data from Leka, and used to gauge the extent
of species and overall system diversity and efficiency in terms of nutrition, yield and labour
inputs. There are limitations to this, as some plant data is not available for all modern systems,
but when these species are treated as a system, patterning emerges that at least eliminates some
modern systems and pinpoints others that are more likely similar to that at Leka. This system
has moderate species diversity in all primary and supplementary species (16 species in total),
but insignificant nutritional diversity between these groupings (<50% confidence). The labour
and yield diversity of species in the Leka system cannot be known. However, when these
species are compared using the figures from all of the example systems, a range of possibilities
can be gauged. The average yield ratios for species within the Leka system can vary from low-
to-high diversity (see Table 9.7), when modelled using figures from all of the comparative
systems. Average labour input figures for each grouping varied markedly between these
example systems (see Table 9.8), but most were not able to be shown to be statistically different
using Student’s t test and associated two-sided distribution. Labour diversity between the
groupings was only significant when modelled using data from the Bellona system (2.64
standard deviations and 95% confidence), but was followed closely by Anuta (0.86 standard
deviations and 90% confidence). From these descriptions the Leka system can be characterised
as:
Leka— moderate species diversity, insignificant nutritional diversity between
groupings, significant labour diversity, low-to-high yield ratio diversity.
Family Species
Anacardiaceae Spondias dulcis
Araceae
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius
Colocasia esculenta
Cyrtosperma merkusii
Arecaceae Cocos nucifera
Dioscoreaceae
Dioscorea alata
Dioscorea bulbifera
Dioscorea esculenta
Dioscorea nummularia
Fabaceae Inocarpus fagifer
Lecythidaceae Barringtonia asiatica
Moraceae Artocarpus altilis
Musaceae Musa spp.
Piperaceae Piper methysticum
Solanaceae Solanum tuberosum
Zingiberaceae Curcuma longa
246
The description of the Leka system, if the list of species identified archaeobotanically
within test units at this site are considered to represent a complete system, most closely
resembles the Anutan system. The data recorded and compared for the Anutan system suggested
that the utilisation of plants on this small high island involved a moderate number of species,
but when these were grouped into primary or supplementary species according to the nature of
their use and production there was no significant nutritional diversity between these groups.
However, there was significant diversity within labour inputs for each of these groups, which
differed by 3.17 standard deviations with 100% confidence. Overall yield ratio diversity was
low between species within the Anutan system. If this model is correct, then the overall
efficiency of the Leka system was 1268kcal/hr, which is the least efficient of all of the
simulated systems for Leka, and is significantly lower than Talasiu. This exercise in modelling
the archaeological production system at Leka does not meet the original expectations, which
suggested that this system would most closely resemble the Bellona system based on current
hypotheses for island colonisation and the role of agriculture in the development of social
hierarchy. If this model is correct, then the Leka system was probably more labour intensive
than originally presumed, and focussed on the cultivation of a narrow range of primary crops,
with little labour invested in the exploitation of supplementary species. The implications of
these findings will be discussed later in further detail.
Table 9.7 Yield ratios for species identified at Leka modelled using comparative systems
Species Gadio Enga Bellona Is Anuta Tongatapu Ontong Java
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
Artocarpus altilis 1.0 41.7 0.1 0.0 0.0
Cocos nucifera 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
Colocasia esculenta 66.1 5.5 0.0 8.9 0.9
Curcuma longa 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cyrtosperma merkusii 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.6
Dioscorea alata 0.3 12.7 0.0 12.1 0.0
Dioscorea bulbifera 0.3 2.9 0.0 12.1 0.0
Dioscorea esculenta 0.3 12.7 0.0 12.1 0.0
Dioscorea nummularia 0.3 12.7 0.0 12.1 0.0
Inocarpus fagifer 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Musa sp.1 5.7 21.4 2.5 25.1 9.6
Musa sp.2 5.7 21.4 2.5 25.1 9.6
Piper methysticum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Solanum tuberosum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Spondias dulcis 0.0 83.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Average 5.0 15.5 0.3 6.7 1.4
247
Table 9.8 Labour inputs for species identified at Leka modelled using comparative systems
Table 9.9 Statistical comparison of labour inputs for groupings at Leka in terms of mean difference modelled
using comparative systems
Modelling Heketa (TO-Nt-2)
The cultural deposits at Heketa have radiocarbon ages which place occupation at this site to the
Formative Period, and transitioning to the early stages of the Classic Tu’i Tonga chiefdom
initially based at Heketa before moving to south to Lapaha after the 14th century AD. Two
distinct cultural deposits were dated using AMS. Charred coconut endocarp from Layer 3 dated
to around 600 cal BP, while endocarp from Layers 4-5 produced a calibrated range of 800-600
cal BP. There is some overlap between these ranges, and so it is possible that these represent
either two discreet systems or events, or a continuity of site occupation and associated plant
production. When the ranges of identified species within these deposits are compared, there are
differences in the number and type of species present. Layer 3 has ten species including six
primary and four supplementary species. Layers 4-5 have seven species, which includes five
primary and only two supplementary species. Due to the possible overlap in dates and low
overall preservation of microbotanical remains within these deposits from Heketa TP4 that may
have biased the distribution of these identifications, it was decided to treat the list of species
identified within TP4 at Heketa as a single system for modelling. The data provides an
interesting insight into the type of production system that may have enabled the creation of
Grouping Species
Gadio Enga
(instances of activity)
Bellona Is
(hours/yr)
Anuta
(hrs/37 days)
Tongatapu
(hrs/yr)
Ontong Java
(hrs/yr)
Primary crops Artocarpus altilis 10.3 60.0 62.6 115.2 183.0
Cocos nucifera nd 3333.3 30.3 2317.4 202960.0
Colocasia esculenta 30.1 11872.0 108.6 19530.8 43830.0
Cyrtosperma merkusii nd nd 18.3 nd 43830.0
Dioscorea alata 39.5 16683.0 0.7 21595.1 nd
Dioscorea esculenta 39.5 16683.0 0.7 8867.0 nd
Dioscorea nummularia 39.5 16683.0 0.7 8867.0 nd
Musa sp.1 30.1 9425.0 20.3 1404.4 183.0
Musa sp.2 30.1 9425.0 20.3 1404.4 183.0
Supplementary Amorphophallus paeoniifolius nd 854.1 nd nd nd
Curcuma longa nd nd nd nd 9200.0
Dioscorea bulbifera 39.5 854.1 0.7 201.0 nd
Inocarpus fagifer nd nd 0.7 57.7 nd
Piper methysticum nd nd nd 2527.5 nd
Spondias dulcis nd 60.0 nd 5.0 nd
Zingiber zerumbet 30.1 nd nd nd nd
Contamination Solanum tuberosum nd nd nd nd nd
Average 32.0 7812.0 24.0 5574.4 42909.9
Example system Pooled standard deviation Pooled standard error Difference Confidence Mean difference
Gadio Enga (primary crops vs
supplementary) 9.3 7.4 0.5 <50% 3.5
Bellona Island (primary crops vs
supplementary) 5565.9 3768.1 2.6 95% 9931.1
Anuta Atoll (primary crops vs
supplementary) 13.0 10.2 0.9 50% 8.7
Tongatapu (primary crops vs
supplementary) 7044.6 4313.9 1.7 80% 7314.9
Ontong Java (primary crops vs
supplementary) 78619.5 0.0 0.0 0 48528.2
Labour Inputs (hours or instances of activity)
248
surplus for tributes that supported a centralised political system and an archaic state evolving at
this time.
A number of arboreal, root and tuber species composed this archaeological production
system at Heketa. As was the case for Talasiu and Leka, these species represent a mix of both
primary crops and supplementary species. However, the number of species identified within
micro- and macrobotanical remains is much smaller compared to the two other sites, with only
seven primary crops and four supplementary species. This could suggest a preservation bias.
These taxa are primarily prehistoric introductions, aside from Cocos nucifera. Ipomoea batatas
is either a prehistoric or historic import to Tonga, but is treated as part of the primary crops
within the assemblage from Heketa due to the late prehistoric date ranges for these deposits.
This decision was made to at least attempt to model a system that includes I. batatas as this is a
dryland crop that currently grows well in Tonga, and if it was introduced earlier than expected,
would have played an important role in plant production and overall system efficiency. This will
be discussed in greater detail later in this chapter.
Table 9.10 Identified families and species within archaeobotanical remains from Heketa (TO-Nt-2)
Species diversity at Heketa is very low, with only 11 species in total, again possibly
indicating preservation bias. When the taxa are grouped into primary and supplementary
species, there is no significant nutritional diversity between these two groups. The averages of
these groups differ by 1.56 standard deviations, but based on the number of samples being
compared this figure equates to an 80% probability that these samples are different, which is not
high enough to reject the null hypothesis that these groups share similar nutritional values. The
average yield ratios indicate low-to-high diversity within these species (see Table 9.11), based
on the possible range provided by the example systems. Finally, a statistical comparison of
labour invested into the primary and supplementary species using Student’s t test, based on the
range of data from modern systems, indicates that there is insignificant labour diversity between
these groups (see Table 9.12 and Table 9.13). The highest probability of difference was seen
within the data from the Bellona system, which differed by 1.3 standard deviations and 70%
Family Species
Anacardiaceae Spondias dulcis
Araceae
Alocasia macrorrhiza
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius
Colocasia esculenta
Cyrtosperma merkusii
Arecaceae Cocos nucifera
Convolvulaceae Ipomoea batatas
Fabaceae Inocarpus fagifer
Moraceae Artocarpus altilis
Musaceae Musa spp.
Piperaceae Piper methysticum
249
confidence in mean difference, but again this was not enough to reject the null hypothesis. From
these criteria, the archaeological system represented by archaeobotanical data from Heketa can
be characterised as:
Heketa— low species diversity, insignificant nutritional diversity between groupings,
insignificant labour diversity between groupings, low-to-high yield ratio diversity.
It was expected that an archaeological plant production system dated to around 800-600
BP in Tonga would most closely resemble the Anutan system, based on current ideas upon the
links between intensive systems and the development of social hierarchy. The modelled
characterisation of the system at the Heketa site would suggest that this system probably was
more like that recorded on Ontong Java by Bayliss-Smith (1973, 1977). If this is true, then the
overall efficiency of the Heketa system in terms of outputs to inputs would be higher than if this
system had been more similar to Anuta. The result of this is a modelled overall nutritional
efficiency of 7846kcal/hr (Ontong Java), rather than 881kcal/hr (Anuta). This characterisation
suggests that the Heketa system could have been less labour intensive than originally thought. It
is also possible that increased trade networks during this time had enabled the economy to
incorporate the export of some higher yielding but lower labour investment crops in exchange
for the import of other subsistence items, as seen in the Ontong Java economy.
Table 9.11 Yield ratios for species identified at Heketa modelled using comparative example systems
Table 9.12 Labour inputs for species identified at Heketa modelled using comparative example systems
Species Gadio Enga Bellona Is Anuta Tongatapu Ontong Java
Alocasia macrorrhiza 0.0 5.5 0.0 6.3 0.0
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
Artocarpus altilis 1.0 41.7 0.1 0.0 0.0
Cocos nucifera 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
Colocasia esculenta 66.1 5.5 0.0 8.9 0.9
Cyrtosperma merkusii 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.6
Inocarpus fagifer 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ipomoea batatas 16.6 3.0 0.0 15.3 25.7
Musa sp.2 5.7 21.4 2.5 25.1 9.6
Piper methysticum 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Spondias dulcis 0.0 83.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Average 8.1 17.6 0.3 5.1 3.5
Grouping Species
Gadio Enga
(instances of activity)
Bellona Is
(hours/yr)
Anuta
(hrs/37 days)
Tongatapu
(hrs/yr)
Ontong Java
(hrs/yr)
Primary crops Alocasia macrorrhiza nd 11872.0 0.7 296824.2 183.0
Artocarpus altilis 10.3 60.0 62.6 115.2 183.0
Cocos nucifera nd 3333.3 30.3 2317.4 202960.0
Colocasia esculenta 30.1 11872.0 108.6 19530.8 43830.0
Cyrtosperma merkusii nd nd 18.3 nd 43830.0
Ipomoea batatas 30.1 33000.0 0.7 6394.5 183.0
Musa sp.2 30.1 9425.0 20.3 1404.4 183.0
Supplementary Amorphophallus paeoniifolius nd 854.1 nd nd nd
Inocarpus fagifer nd nd 0.7 57.7 nd
Piper methysticum nd nd nd 2527.5 nd
Spondias dulcis nd 60.0 nd 5.0 nd
Average 25.1 8809.6 30.9 36575.2 41621.7
250
Table 9.13 Statistical comparison of labour inputs for groupings at Heketa in terms of mean difference
modelled using comparative systems
Comparison of expected and modelled outcomes
There are some significant discrepancies between the expected and modelled characterisations
of the archaeological production systems. Based on previous data and hypotheses, it was
expected that the late Lapita site of Talasiu would resemble the ‘broad-spectrum’ subsistence
system of the Gadio Enga, the Formative Period site at Leka would have been similar to the
mixed shifting cultivation of the Bellona system, and the late Formative and early Classic Tu’i
Tonga chiefdom site of Heketa would resemble the more intensive Anutan system. However,
modelling these archaeological systems based on the criteria for productivity and diversity used
to describe modern systems indicated similarities to different systems within this range. The
modelling exercise suggested that Talasiu could have instead resembled the Tongatapu 2001
system, while Leka was modelled to have been more labour intensive and less efficient than
previously assumed and so closer to the Anutan system. Interestingly, Heketa was suggested to
be closer in similarity to the production system of Ontong Java, which features land and labour
intensive subsistence and cash-cropping techniques with little investment in gathering of semi-
cultivated, naturalised or native species.
Unfortunately, there was no descriptive context provided in the Tongan Agricultural
Census (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2001). Therefore, it may be useful to consider the
context of the Bellonan system, based on already established similarities between the
environmental context, shifting cultivation practices and productivity of these two systems. The
Bellona system was based on ‘manipulated and natural ecosystems’ (Christiansen 1975:29).
Gardening was conducted alongside gathering, collecting and fishing. The term ‘gardening’ was
used by Christiansen for these reasons: “...tilling is not practised, plants are individually placed
in individually treated sites, the areas planted are usually small, and generally the plants used in
these areas are annuals, vegetatively propagated (corms, tubers, bulbils, cuttings) and are thus
not sown, but laid/planted.” (Christiansen 1975:30) Local gardening was described as a
rejuvenation of a natural juvenile ecosystem after initial clearing, with high biomass production
and relatively low species diversity. Soil fertility was maintained through long fallow periods
enabling wild plant regeneration and nutrient cycling. This characterises shifting cultivation and
thus the Bellonan system is described as such by Christiansen (1975:31).
Example system Pooled standard deviation Pooled standard error Difference Confidence Mean difference
Gadio Enga (primary crops vs
supplementary) 12.1 0.0 0.0 0% 0.0
Bellona Island (primary crops vs
supplementary) 10520.1 8589.6 1.3 70% 11136.7
Anuta Atoll (primary crops vs
supplementary) 15.2 16.2 0.7 50% 10.8
Tongatapu (primary crops vs
supplementary) 100536.9 71090.3 0.8 50% 53567.7
Ontong Java (primary crops vs
supplementary) 878.899.24 0.0 0.0 0 0.0
Labour Inputs (hours or instances of activity)
251
The exploitation of a number of niches in these manipulated and natural ecosystems
was enabled through the application of simple technology that involves low and ‘rational’ inputs
of labour to achieve subsistence sufficient only for local needs (1975:30). Christiansen ascribes
lower efficiency, but greater stability to the utilisation of natural potential on the island.
Analysis of output to input ratios within this study indicated that this was not always the case.
For example, Spondias dulcis or Otaheite apple, which is a semi-cultivated species, was shown
to have the highest nutritional return ratios of all of the species in the Bellonan system, due to
very low labour investment for a high yield. These differences in views on efficiency could be
due to the types of outputs measured, seasonal variation or the nature of data included in the
original study which also made use of fishing records.
The techniques described for cultivation through shifting cultivation, combined with the
exploitation of natural resources on this raised limestone island, makes sense when compared
with the Talasiu data. Although it was expected that the balance of labour invested in cultivated
to supplementary-type species exploited would be more similar to the Gadio Enga ‘mixed’
subsistence, by 2650 BP the island may have been settled for several hundred years. It is
possible that this later stage of island colonisation was already characterised by greater
emphasis on multi-cropping in vertically stratified gardens of crop storeys starting with
vegeculture interspersed with tree crops such as bananas and breadfruit (Addison 2006) using
shifting cultivation.
A more surprising outcome of modelling was the suggestion that the archaeological
production system represented by botanical remains extracted from Leka was most similar to
the Anutan system. The use and cultivation of plants on Anuta was described by Yen (1973b) as
“...one of the most intensive extant in the Pacific, despite the shortage of land and water, which
could have conferred the potentiality for the well-known forms of intensive agricultural
production, irrigation farming of taro.” Yen (1973b:139) clarifies that this system is a mixed
agricultural form of both high and low labour requirements which together indicates a highly
intensive system. Technologically, agriculture was seen as intensive due to the construction of
structures such as dry terraces or permanent fields, also in terms of land use within agronomy
through crop rotation, mulching, and finally labour expenditure. The intensity of this system
was such that Yen (1973b:148) also argues that the attainment of carrying capacity would span
a shorter period on Anuta than in many other island settings, and in fact the island was close to
this point when the original study was conducted. Forms of storage were utilised for many of
the root, tuber and tree crops that are high in starch content. This involved the fermentation of
processed taro, manioc, breadfruit, banana, Cyrtosperma taro, and Burckella fruits, and sealing
within lined pits for periods of time that are crop-specific. Yen describes storage as a possible
means of dealing with population increase, and indicates the emergence of more formalised
agricultural organisation in Anutan prehistory (1973b:147). Anuta was completely self-
252
sufficient at the time that this system was recorded, without any real cash objectives in
agriculture such as those seen elsewhere on the production and export of copra. This presented
Yen (1973b) with a unique opportunity to study traditional subsistence without any modern
industrial influences, and is one of only two systems analysed within this study that had no
cash-cropping.
Several key concepts within Yen’s description of the Anutan system offer possible
explanations for the similarities between this and the archaeological system at Leka. At first
glance, it is surprising that agriculture in Tonga may have intensified to the point of
comparatively low system efficiency in terms of nutritional returns already by 1300-1000 cal
BP. However, when this is considered in terms of the modelled carrying capacity of Tongatapu
in terms of agricultural acreage required to support an increasing population, argued to have
been reached as early as 800 BP (Kirch 1994) or 1000 BP (Green 1973), some contextual
similarities emerge. The described self-sufficiency of the Anutan system may have also
characterised agricultural production on Tongatapu during dates represented within deposits at
Leka, as the extensive networks of trade and interaction associated with the maritime chiefdom
were established at this time but later intensified (Clark et al. 2014). It is therefore possible that
Tongatapu had been nearing the attainment of carrying capacity at this time, and therefore
agricultural production was reducing in system nutritional efficiency during the Formative
Period.
This assumption ties into Kirch’s (1994) argument that the stimulus for warfare and
conquest was often the need to expand agricultural production in dryland systems such as that
seen on Tongatapu and in the Hawaiian archipelago. Expansion of political control acquired
greater land under one centralised polity, and relieved pressure on existing land currently under
production. The development of political economies, especially within primary and secondary
states, is therefore generally seen as directly related to the emergence of intensive and expansive
agricultural systems. Kirch (1994:27-244) drew on the ethnographic as well as archaeological
record of the two chiefdoms of Sigave and Alo-Alofi from Futuna, which indicated that
agricultural practices in wet and dry environments responded to identical underlying pressures
of population increase and of the societal demands for surplus to fuel the competitive
exchange/feasting cycle. Whereas Sigave (wet) could utilise opportunities for pondfield
irrigation of taro, the opposing chiefdom of Alo-Alofi (dry) was forced to adopt more labor-
intensive short-fallow shifting cultivation, closer to Boserup’s model of intensification
(1994:244). In an extension upon this model, McCoy and Graves (2012) suggest that the limited
potential for surplus production from small valley irrigated fields on the island of Hawaii could
place these systems in the same category as rain-fed dryland farming, influencing decisions to
engage in expansionist warfare by chiefs seeking to expand their power base. The Hawaiian
data is further supported by archaeological and ethnographic research conducted within the
253
Austral archipelago (Bollt 2012), where chronologies of inter- and intra-island warfare were
stimulated by the limited potential for irrigation of taro due to island size and environmental
constraints.
It is possible that greater investment of labour into primary crops may have reduced
overall system efficiency in the past, but energy storage through in-ground surplus accumulation
(Bayliss-Smith and Hviding 2014) may have instead increased the efficiency of particular taxa
in terms of social returns. These social returns would have both stimulated and been created by
the increasing socio-political complexity of the Tongan cultural system. Elites mobilised
subsistence goods from commoners by asserting ownership over agricultural land, thus enabling
the supply of food to specialists such as warriors and priests who validate the authority of those
elites. This Formative Period has been pinpointed as a critical stage in Tongan prehistory that
likely lead to the development of the classic Tu’i Tonga chiefdom after 1000 BP, or possibly
later. The modelled changes in agricultural production and associated environmental constraints
described here could go some way towards explaining why these socio-political developments
occurred later.
This hypothesis is further supported by the modelled similarities between the Ontong
Java and the archaeological plant production system at Heketa from 800-600 cal BP. It was
expected that this archaeological system would most likely resemble the Anutan system due to
increasing system intensity over time as a result of the need for surplus production facilitating
socio-political developments. However, modelling suggested that in fact the earlier system at
Leka was more similar to the Anutan system, and that Heketa most likely resembled the slightly
more nutritionally efficient Ontong Java system. Considering this and earlier discussion upon
the limits of carrying capacity on Tongatapu, it is possible that by 800-600 cal BP
archaeological production had increased in efficiency through the introduction of export items
from trade within the increasing network of islands under the control or influence of the
maritime chiefdom. Primary crops that were more nutritionally efficient in terms of labour
investment could have been incorporated into the diet on Tongatapu, not necessarily through
production but through importation and redistribution. This was documented ethnographically
as part of the festival and tribute system, where yam production in particular was monitored by
chiefly-appointed petty officers and brought to Tongatapu from as far afield as Vavau as part of
the first fruits or ‘inasi festival (Cook in Beaglehole 1969; Gifford 1929; Mariner in Martin
1991). A crop of yams was planted around one month before the regular crop, and was
harvested early in time to be given as tribute for the festival (Mariner in Martin 1991). Other
festivals were also conducted throughout the year to ensure the productive success of
cultivation, with gifts of yams, coconuts, kava root, fish and arrowroot given to the gods, the
chiefs and their households (Mariner in Martin 1991).
254
If this hypothesis is accepted, there are three explanations as to why the system at
Heketa may have been similar to the Ontong Java production system, and appears to have
increased in overall nutritional efficiency since the Formative Period. The first possibility is that
the low preservation of microbotanical remains at Heketa led to the exclusion of some species
from the system modelling exercise. The second option is that the incorporation of tributes from
other islands, as well as traded goods, allowed renewed investment of labour into more
nutritionally efficient but lower yielding species. Tied to this is a third explanation— that the
archaeobotanical record at Heketa may not in fact reflect only those species that were produced
or utilised from Tongatapu, but also these other islands and so appear greater in overall
nutritional efficiency. Each of these will be explored here to further understand and explain the
modelling of this archaeological system.
The comparatively low quantities of starch and also the number of species present
within the archaeobotanical remains at Heketa suggest that the microbotanical preservation at
this site was not good. Most surprising was the absence of any starch identified as belonging to
the Dioscorea or yam family. Clearly these were heavily relied upon at the point of European
contact, and evidence from Talasiu and Leka indicate that these crops had been cultivated in the
past. This suggests that there are certainly some species missing from the production system at
Heketa. As yams are not as nutritionally efficient as many other staple crops such as bananas
(Musa spp.) or sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), but are generally more efficient than the aroids,
it is possible that the actual production system at Heketa may have been less efficient than that
from Ontong Java. Interestingly, yams were not cultivated within the Ontong Java system,
which instead focussed primarily on the subsistence production of aroids such as Colocasia
esculenta and Cyrtosperma merkusii, sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) and the cash-cropping of
Cocos nucifera. This omission may have biased the model towards characterising the Heketa
system as most similar to that from Ontong Java but also may point to the increasingly
important role of sweet potato in the Tongan economy.
Overall the two key differences between the Anutan and the Ontong Java system are
that there is more labour invested in supplementary species and greater diversity within yield
ratio in the latter example system. As has been demonstrated within this study, the investment of
some labour into non- or semi-cultivated species often results in high nutritional returns due to
high nutritional rankings, especially arboreal species. By specialising in the cultivation of
primary crops such as yams and aroids which have moderate yield ratios but low overall
nutrition, the Anutan's decrease the overall nutritional efficiency of the system. The type of
‘technoenvironmental efficiency’ which has been measured within this study applies
specifically to the Ontong Javan, Bellonan and Tongan ethnographic systems due to the
inclusion of de facto outputs. These are the surplus outputs or yields that are created to facilitate
the exportation of goods for cash-cropping, but do not include the cash or traded goods that
255
come back into the system. It is therefore possible to measure the role that the creation of
surplus would have played, but difficult to accurately assess how the incorporation of any
tributes that fed back into the system would have benefitted the efficiency of the production
system at Heketa.
It seems likely that the introduction of alternative sources of nutrition without any
primary labour inputs would have increased overall efficiency, but this cannot be modelled here
without knowing the exact labour investment data. In any case, it is unlikely that goods were
only moving in one direction— into Tongatapu—after the Fiji-Western Polynesian interaction
sphere was established. The incorporation of tributes into diet and the economy on Tongatapu
may have enabled the renewed investment of labour into more nutritionally efficient
supplementary species and therefore may explain the increase in system efficiency after the
Formative Period (Leka). We cannot know for sure whether species present at Heketa were
grown nearby but, as explored here, this may explain the similarities to Ontong Java along with
the changes in decision-making in production resulting from the tribute system.
Specialisation and system efficiency
Patterning between modelled system efficiency and ratios of numbers of primary to
supplementary systems indicates a link between these two variables. Modelled system
nutritional efficiency was based on figures derived from the characterisation of past systems and
similarities to modern production systems (see Figure 8.36). Talasiu most closely resembled the
system on Tongatapu in 2001, while Leka resembled Anuta and Heketa probably resembled the
Ontong Java system (see Table 9.14). The modelled efficiency of these systems therefore
decreases between Talasiu (2750–2650 cal BP) and Leka (1300-1000 cal BP), before increasing
slightly again at Heketa (800-600 cal BP). The numbers of primary and supplementary species
within these systems vary over time. The highest ratio of primary to supplementary species was
observed at Leka (2:1), while the lowest was at Talasiu (1.3:1). Considering this, a link can be
drawn between specialisation in primary crops, seen through this high ratio at Leka, and
decreased system nutritional efficiency. Similarly, diversification through exploitation of a
number of supplementary taxa alongside primary crops, can be linked to increased system
efficiency at Talasiu, with Heketa falling somewhere between these two systems.
Table 9.14 Comparison of modelled system efficiency with ratios of primary to supplementary species
Archaeological
system
Ratio of primary to
supplementary species
Modelled system Nutritional efficiency
(kcal/hr)
Talasiu (2750-2650 cal BP) 1.3:1 Tongatapu 123996
Leka (1300-1000 cal BP) 2:1 Anuta 1268
Heketa (800-600 cal BP) 1.4:1 Ontong Java 7846
256
Contamination at Leka and Heketa
The issue of contamination from white potato (Solanum tuberosum) and also possibly sweet
potato within archaeological deposits at Leka and Heketa needs to be addressed. Contamination
is most likely to have occurred during field collection, or laboratory processing for starch
extraction. Modern starch contamination during collection and handling of samples in the field
has been discussed within a number of studies. These have indicated that modern starch can
enter archaeological soil samples during sampling from aeolian (wind) sources (Laurence
(2013; Laurence et al. 2011; Loy and Barton 2006; Messner 2011), although this is unlikely in
Tonga as starch tends to only becomes airborne when dried, or from handling of samples
(Barton et al. 1998:1233; Hart 2011) Through experimentation with laboratory processing and
also assessment of current literature, it was discovered that some laboratory grade chemicals and
equipment contained modern native starch. Previous studies had recorded high numbers of
starch from wheat (Triticum sp.), white potato (Solanum tuberosum), and maize (Zea mays) on
powder-free gloves, pipette tips, paper towels, and within Calgon and Sodium polytungstate
commonly used for heavy liquid separation (Campbell et al. 1984; Crowther et al. 2014;
Laurence 2013; Laurence et al. 2011; Makela et al. 1997; Newsom and Shaw 1997; Wilson and
Garach 1981). This was confirmed by testing lab materials used in this study, with Calgon
providing the greatest source of contamination. Airborne starch was also found in laboratory
spaces in low numbers in native and modified condition (Crowther et al. 2014; Laurence et al.
2011; Newsom and Shaw 1997).
Appropriate protocols to limit starch contamination have been suggested by previous
studies, and were built on here. These involved using starch-free gloves and zip lock bags both
in the field and in the laboratory, cleaning the face of the baulk before sampling in the field,
cleaning sampling equipment or using individual sampling equipment for each stratigraphic
unit, sterilising all laboratory equipment and workspaces, and filtering 5% Calgon solutions to
remove any modern starch before use. Unfortunately, these techniques can only limit
contamination and it is always possible that some modern starch has entered archaeological
samples. However, the common types of contaminants, namely wheat, maize and white potato,
would be easily identified within samples from Tongatapu as these are unlikely to have been
grown at any time on the island. The presence of the white potato or Solanum tuberosum at
Leka is most likely explained as a contaminant from pre- or post-excavation handling or
processing.
The historical integrity of samples is therefore presumed to be intact and all other
species present are assumed to be of prehistoric age. This is supported by the co-occurrence of
parenchyma at Talasiu identified as C. esculenta, A. altilis fruit, D. alata, D. nummularia, Musa
spp., and Zingiber spp. It is also assumed here that the presence of sweet potato at Heketa is not
a modern contaminant as the dating of other archaeobotanical remains of this species within
257
deposits from Eastern and Central Polynesia coincide with the later deposits from TP4. There
are also numerous instances of early historic and ethnographic documentation of extensive
sweet potato cultivation on Tongatapu. This evidence will be discussed in detail within the next
section of this chapter, dealing with the timing of crop introductions into Tonga.
Linking archaeobotanical data to island colonisation and
social complexity
The archaeobotanical identifications from Talasiu (TO-Mu-2), Leka (J17), and Heketa (TO-Nt-
2) were discussed in this section, in terms of agricultural production systems at various points in
Tongan prehistory, and the broader context of these species-level identifications. Modelling
archaeological production systems based on characteristics defined for modern systems in the
west Pacific, such as species diversity and nutritional efficiency in terms of outputs to labour
inputs, enabled a basic analysis of crop production in the past. Some variables were unknown
and so the full possible range for each species, based on the figures from modern systems, was
assumed in each archaeological system in terms of yield and labour inputs. Species in each
system were defined as primary crops or supplementary based on ethnographic and agricultural
studies from Tonga, in order to assess the statistical differences between these two groups in
terms of yield, nutritional efficiency and labour inputs.
Comparison of modern systems revealed that overall system efficiency was often tied to
the inclusion of a number of supplementary species within subsistence systems, rather than a
heavy reliance on primary crops. Specialisation in primary crops can therefore be linked to
decreased overall system nutritional efficiency. Supplementary species, especially arboreal,
tended to have higher nutritional value than most primary crops, but had lower yield ratios in
terms of productivity from labour investment. Some balance between the two groups resulted in
higher system nutritional efficiency, such as that seen in the Bellona system in the Solomon
Islands (Christiansen 1975). Less efficient systems such as that observed by Yen (1973b) on
Anuta invested more labour into a narrow range of primary crops, resulting in lower ratios of
nutritional returns to labour inputs than that recorded in other systems. This trend was
reinforced through the links between ratios of primary to supplementary species, and modelled
system efficiency within the archaeological systems. This patterning was critical towards
linking decreased system efficiency to the formation of centralised government on Tongatapu.
The results of this study suggest that plant production strategies after initial settlement
on Tongatapu by the eastern Lapita Cultural Complex, under a decentralised social hierarchy,
may have involved a greater diversity of species than originally presumed. Many of the core
traditional cultigens were present within archaeological deposits at Talasiu from 2750-2650 cal
BP, including a number of root crops from the aroids (Araceae), and yams (Dioscorea spp), as
well as arboreal crops such as bananas (Musaceae) and breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis).
258
Alongside these were a number of supplementary crops such as kava (Piper methysticum),
ginger (Zingiberaceae), and arboreal fruits including the Otaheite apple (Spondias dulcis) and
the Tahitian chestnut (Inocarpus fagifer). This range of both primary and supplementary species
most likely resulted in a relatively efficient system in terms of nutritional returns through
diversification of labour investment, and would have been utilised alongside hunting and
gathering of marine resources. The hydro-isostatic drawdown affecting sea levels within the
Fanga’Uta Lagoon during the mid-Holocene (Dickinson 2001, 2007) appear to have gradually
impacted this harvesting of marine species in terms of lower species diversity and size (Grono
2012). Overall subsistence strategies at this time appear to have turned towards the exploitation
of terrestrial resources in the archaeobotanical record at Leka from 1300-1000 cal BP. The
number of species present within test units at this site increase slightly from that observed at
Talasiu to include a number of highly ranked crops such as Dioscorea esculenta and Curcuma
longa in terms of nutritional value but low in terms of yield to labour investment. These species
served to increase the diversity of labour investment between primary and supplementary
species (suggesting specialisation), and decrease the overall efficiency of the system. Finally, a
much smaller list of species was recovered from archaeological deposits under the Heketa (TO-
Nt-2) in the north east of Tongatapu. This is thought to be due in part to taphonomic factors
affecting microbotanical preservation, but also could reflect subsistence changes resulting from
the development of social hierarchy in Tongan. Overall, modelled system efficiency increased
slightly from that seen at Leka, owing to less labour diversity within primary and supplementary
crops (diversification) and higher overall yield to labour input ratios. It has been suggested that
the networks established through the maritime chiefdom would have increased trade and tributes
coming into Tongatapu, alleviating pressure on subsistence when carrying capacity was
approached.
These plant production systems were clearly engaged in a cyclical system of
involvement with the evolution of social hierarchy and associated socio-political development
in Tonga over time. They both facilitated and encouraged change through cultural reactions to
decreasing system nutritional efficiency, and were impacted by these changes through the
introduction of new species or changing species diversity (diversification vs. specialisation).
The assessment of individual species introductions into Tonga further expands the context of
these changes. Most species were introduced into Tonga within the first few hundred years of
settlement, relied on as supplementary or primary cultigens that complemented the exploitation
of marine resources. Demographic and environmental factors such as soil geology and climatic
limitations are thought to have pushed Tongatapu to reach carrying capacity by as early as 1000
BP, necessitating expansion of political control to alleviate pressure on local subsistence
systems. Clearly, there is an overall decrease in system nutritional efficiency and increase in
259
social complexity after 2750-2650 cal BP, linked to increased specialisation in the production of
primary crops over supplementary crops (see Figure 9.1).
Figure 9.1 Trend towards decreased system nutritional efficiency and increased social complexity after Lapita
occupation at Talasiu (2750-2650 cal BP)
Modelling archaeological production systems and the introduction and utilisation of
individual species into Tongatapu was carefully assessed with relation to current debates and
evidence from both Tonga and the wider Pacific. Attempts were made to model how and why
plant production systems were utilised on Tongatapu, using high resolution techniques to extract
archaeobotanical data from three well-dated sites. The data from Talasiu (TO-Mu-2), Leka (J17)
and Heketa (TO-Nt-2) was interpreted within a Human Ecological framework to model
agricultural systems, and sought to validate or provide alternatives to current hypotheses and
expectations. The implementation of further archaeobotanical research will either support or
disprove the narrative for the development of agricultural systems in Tongan prehistory
presented here, but at least a new baseline has been provided against which new data can be
applied.
260
Chapter 10 Conclusion
Meeting research aims and objectives
This thesis had two main objectives. The first of these was to construct a comprehensive
comparative collection of both starch grains and vegetative storage parenchyma from economic
and supplementary plant species in Tonga. A detailed morphological study was carried out on
these micro- and macrobotanical remains to discern how taxa could be differentiated.
Morphological analysis also enabled the development of tools (multivariate statistics and
identification flowchart keys) to identify samples of unknown origin to taxonomic levels. The
second objective of this research was to utilise the comparative collection to identify
archaeobotanical remains from three sites on Tongatapu dated from 2750-2650 cal BP (Talasiu),
1300-1000 cal BP (Leka), and 800-600 cal BP (Heketa). Cultural deposits at these sites contain
archaeological data from three time periods within Tongan prehistory, ranging from late Lapita
through to the early stages of state formation in Tonga.
Several key research questions were asked of the archaeobotanical data from Talasiu
(TO-Mu-2), and deposits underneath Langi leka (J17) and Heketa (TO-Nt-2). One primary
question examined was whether early colonisers in West Polynesia were dependent on
introduced crops, or if human dispersal was fuelled predominantly by the exploitation of natural
resources. A further research question sought to establish whether archaeobotanical data can
provide new evidence to examine the role of agriculture within the development of the maritime
chiefdom in Tonga. After conducting this archaeobotanical research, several important
conclusions were drawn about the comparative collection and the role of plants in Tongan
prehistory. These are summarised here and will be explored in further detail within this chapter:
Multivariate statistical analysis and identification flowcharts can enable the
discrimination of starch and vegetative storage parenchyma from most Tongan
economic and supplementary taxa based on metric and nominal morphological
attributes.
A detailed chronology of plant introductions from three sites on Tongatapu indicate that
most staple cultigens and some supplementary or famine foods were brought to Tonga
within a few hundred years or less of initial Lapita colonisation. Late prehistoric
introductions likely included the sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) by 600 BP, transported
from South America via East Polynesia through the extensive trade networks of the
developing Tongan state.
Production systems involving the cultivation of these core cultigens alongside a number
of semi-cultivated taxa, changed over time in terms of species diversity through
diversification of labour or specialisation in primary crops, and overall system
efficiency based on modelled nutritional value, yields and labour investment. Modelled
261
production systems here links decreased system efficiency to increased horticultural
specialisation. This trend can be linked to a contemporary increase in social complexity
through development of centralised government and control of resources that enabled a
slight increase of system nutritional efficiency by 800-600 cal BP through minor
diversification (either through production on Tongatapu or de-facto outputs). This
supports the view that expansion of Tongan control within Fiji-West Polynesia was
likely stimulated by extensive dryland agricultural production on Tongatapu, population
increase and environmental limitations to production.
One of the primary aims of this thesis research was to develop a comprehensive
reference collection of starch and vegetative storage parenchyma from economic plants in
Tonga. This was a crucial step towards identifying archaeobotanical remains from the three sites
of Talasiu (TO-Mu-2), Leka (J17) and Heketa (TO-Nt-2) on Tongatapu. Around 40 plant
species were collected during surveys of plantations in Tonga, Fiji and Palau. Of these, 35
species were able to be sampled and analysed for parenchyma, and 27 contained significant
quantities of starch to enable statistical sampling of granule morphology. A number of species
had several organs sampled, as more than one organ could be consumed or otherwise utilised
according to ethnographic and ethnobotanical records of plant use. To enable accurate
identification of these micro- and macrobotanical remains, detailed morphological studies were
carried out that assessed a range of both metric and nominal attributes. The use of high
resolution imagery with Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) enabled greater accuracy of
measurement and more detailed description of morphological variables than with standard light
microscopy. Morphological studies facilitated differentiation of the species within the reference
collection through characterisation of the full range of morphological variation in each sample.
There was considerable overlap within the distribution of many of these attributes within both
starch and parenchyma in the reference collection, but multivariate statistical comparison of
metric variables highlighted attributes where these species varied.
Both starch granules and vegetative storage parenchyma form and compose the
structure of plant organs that are most commonly consumed within the traditional subsistence
strategies of the Pacific region and represent crucial direct evidence for the cultivation and
dietary contribution of Pacific cultigens. It is essential that the morphological characteristics of
each species is imaged and described accurately to identify these micro and macrobotanical
remains. A combination of light microscopy and SEM were used to image and measure the
variables described here, and this data was assessed using a combination of identification
flowcharts and multivariate statistics in the form of Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA). All
summed data and imagery was entered into a Filemaker database that will be made available
online for public access.
262
Identification flowcharts are more basic forms of morphological descriptions and were
used to distinguish the range of characteristics present within each species or plant organ
sampled in the reference collection for parenchyma. Due to the range of characteristics within
different tissue types in the samples of parenchyma, it was decided that multivariate statistical
analysis of the full range of attributes for each species would not be useful. Tables were created
in this study for both starch and parenchyma that summarised a number of key characteristics
and will facilitate the identification of unknown archaeological material. From this, two
flowcharts were used (with vascular tissues and without) that broke down these attributes of
parenchyma within the reference collection. These incorporated both fresh and charred
morphological characteristics of the various boundary, ground and vascular tissues. Sometimes
it was not possible to distinguish samples beyond family or genus level due to very similar
characteristics or a large amount of overlap. Overall, these identification flowchart keys allowed
a number of key taxa to be identified with moderate confidence and prefixed with ‘C.f’, as
samples both resembled images and matched geographic range of species.
Multivariate statistics enabled a full comparison of all metric and nominal variables
within starch granule morphology, and was also utilised to discriminate between the
distributions of individual attributes of parenchyma within species in the reference collection.
Nominal (discontinuous) variables were converted into binary (presence or absence) variables to
facilitate the comparison of these non-metric attributes. A comparison of the full range of
morphological variables in starch granules was conducted by dividing the main dataset into two
smaller datasets, according to the angle at which granules were viewed and recorded. This
created an eccentric (side-on) and a centric (end-on) dataset. Confusion matrices were created
that indicated how well each species or plant organ could be distinguished from all other species
included within each dataset. These showed the distribution of classifications when linear
discrimination is used to assess morphological variance for each species, in essence these
highlight the percentage of starch granules that were correctly re-assigned to the species of
origin based on the characteristics recorded. Higher percentages of correct re-assignments
indicated that a species or organ contains starch that is less similar to other species and can
therefore be more easily distinguished morphologically from others within the dataset. These
matrices also indicated the species that morphologically overlap and therefore tended be
misclassified as one another. The overall results of this analysis produced 67.61% correct re-
assignments within the eccentric (side-on) view and 46.78% within the centric (end-on) view.
This technique has both strengths and weaknesses, resulting from inherent statistical
assumptions. A number of parameters have an effect on the accuracy rate of DFA classification,
including the number of groups, the number of predictor variables, and sample sizes in each
group. A primary weakness of the automated classifications generated by DFA is that this
technique must provide a group assignment. These assignments are therefore exclusive and so
263
restrict identification of unknown samples only to those groups or species included in the
analysis. If archaeological (unknown) starch derives from taxa that are not in the comparative
collection, DFA will still attempt to classify granules to taxa or groups that are included.
However, a review of the scores of the first two canonical variates for each unknown granule
can indicate how close the match is to the range for reference species. DFA is also designed to
maximise the differences between groups. This results in an overall tendency to correctly assign
individual granules at a higher rate than that expected by chance alone, even if the dataset is
comprised of predictor variables (attributes) that in fact bear no real relationship to group
membership. Unless each of the outputs for predictor variables are assessed (in this case
attributes) the results of DFA can be mistakenly interpreted as representing the successful
attribution of individuals to their groups on the basis of meaningful functions, when instead
these are the result of the inherent property of the analysis. With this in mind, it is important that
the discriminatory values of attributes are assessed before the classification of unknown
granules is attempted. This check provides an indication of the probability of failing to
distinguish between two plant taxa. Another benefit of this step is that this provides an
assessment of all morphological variables and identifies which are most important for
discrimination between taxa, and classification. Overall, multivariate statistical analysis created
a useful automated classification system for archaeological starch that could be interpreted with
low-to-high confidence, and confirmed using visual checking of images from both light
microscopy and SEM. Observer bias is not removed from this process but further highlights the
importance of using a population rather than a single case approach to identification. Not all
granule morphologies are characteristic and the presence or absence of a nondiagnostic form in
association with a more generic type could be definitive of a particular species (Torrence et al.
2004), a relationship that only multivariate statistical analysis considers.
This archaeobotanical study is the first to combine two detailed complementary records
of micro- and macrobotanical remains from the same organs of economic plant species in the
Pacific region. A stringent sampling strategy and consistent recording techniques, particularly in
the case of starch, enabled the accurate recording of a number of variables deemed useful within
current literature (Crowther 2009; Hather 1991, 1994, 2000; ICSN 2011; Torrence, Wright and
Conway 2004; Wilson et al. 2010). This process resulted in the identification of many
diagnostic attributes at various taxonomic levels. Further, the incorporation of multivariate
statistical analysis highlighted the amount of morphological overlap between these species, and
pinpointed those species that could be identified with greater confidence than others within the
reference collection. It is intended that one major output of this research will be to make the
recorded data and images from both light microscopy and SEM available online, using the
Filemaker database that was created during this first component of this PhD project. There are
no online databases currently available for the Pacific region, and so this will be a major step
264
towards encouraging more accurate and consistent identifications for preserved starch and
parenchymatous material found in palaeoecological and archaeological deposits.
Prior to this thesis research, little was known about the antiquity of crop introductions
into Tonga and their use in plant production systems in the past. A small number of
palaeoenvironmental studies (Fall 2005, 2010; Fall and Drezner 2011, 2013; Flenley et al. 1999)
have painted a picture of vegetation change from pollen and spores within swamp cores, and
also explored the timing and mechanisms for plant dispersal. The impact of human arrival in
Vava’u, Tonga was demonstrated through an increase in micro-charcoal after 2600 BP
suggesting the burning of tropical hardwood, and possible increases in soil erosion from
increased clay deposition between 2400 and 800 14C yr BP (Fall 2005, 2010). Lowered
numbers of native birds and bats (Steadman 2002) also probably led to the loss of rainforest
trees through disrupting seed dispersal mechanisms The introduction of a number of species
after 2600 BP, or an increase in pollen concentrations, is thought to be associated with Lapita
arrival and later Polynesian occupation (2010). New species introductions around 2600-2500 BP
included Casuarina equisetifolia, Colocasia esculenta, Cordyline fruticosa, Ludwigia octovalis,
Poaceae spp., and Pometia pinnata (Fall 2005; Flenley et al. 1999). Those species for which
pollen increased after this time, suggesting cultivation or expansion of habitat, included
Canarium harveyi, Cocos nucifera, and Pandanus tectorius (Fall 2005; Flenley et al. 1999). The
first appearance of a number of other species was documented within these studies from 2400-
1100 BP, including Erythrina variegata, Gardenia tannaensis and Stenochlaena palustris (Fall
2005; Flenley et al. 1999).
It is clear that there was a significant gap in terms of data regarding most species that
featured within ethnographic recordings of the traditional Tongan economy. Research as part of
this project sought to fill this gap through the application of high-resolution archaeobotanical
techniques upon well-dated archaeological deposits from throughout Tongan prehistory.
Through these methods, a chronology for the introduction and cultivation of many new plant
species was developed and can now be added to the existing data. From the site of Talasiu (TO-
Mu-2), dated to around 2750-2650 cal BP and therefore associated with late Lapita occupation
on Tongatapu, the first recorded evidence for a number of new economic species was
documented. These species included the root and tuber crops Amorphophallus paeoniifolius
(elephant foot yam or stink lily), Cyrtosperma merkusii (giant swamp taro), Dioscorea alata
(common yam), Dioscorea bulbifera (bitter yam), Dioscorea nummularia (spiny yam), Piper
methysticum (kava), and several members of the Zingiberaceae family (gingers). Introduced
alongside these were a number of arboreal or tree crops including Artocarpus altilis (breadfruit),
Inocarpus fagifer (Tahitian chestnut), Musa spp. (banana and plantains), and Spondias dulcis
(Otaheite apple). The presence of starch and charred endocarp of both Cocos nucifera (coconut)
and Barringtonia asiatica (fish-poison tree) within these deposits indicate that these species
265
were utilised by those populations occupying Talasiu. Only two new species were recorded
from deposits at Leka (J17) dated to 1300-1000 cal BP. These included another species of yam,
Dioscorea esculenta (lesser yam), and another ginger, Curcuma longa (turmeric). Finally, the
introduction of Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato) and Alocasia macrorrhiza (giant taro) can be
documented from identified starch granules within deposits dated to 800-600 cal BP under the
Heketa (TO-Nt-2).
To understand the development of production systems that featured the cultivation and
consumption of these species, and how these linked to social complexity, a Human Ecological
approach to modelling archaeological systems was taken. A simple cost-benefit assessment of
system efficiency was carried out in terms of work inputs to yield and nutritional outputs, as
properties of systems within agricultural ecology (agroecology). Characterisation of these
systems were according to criteria roughly based on those suggested by Dornstreich (1977) and
included species diversity (number of species utilised), nutritional diversity between groupings
(e.g. primary or supplementary species), labour investment diversity between groupings, and
yield ratio diversity between all species. System ‘completeness’ was assessed through
nutritional comparisons with traditional economic species that were ethnographically recorded
at the time of European contact. It was concluded that there was no statistical differences in
terms of nutrition between those recorded ethnographically and archaeobotanically, even when
these were narrowed to those that produce starch or need to be processed or cooked before
consumption, and therefore more likely to be included in midden deposits. The only exception
to this is possibly Heketa, where starch quantities were very low compared to the other two
sites, and the absence of any yam species at this later stage in Tongan prehistory could suggest
that preservation of micro-remains at this site was not good and therefore the record is biased in
some way.
These archaeological systems were compared to a small number of published
ethnographic examples of systems from locations in the Western Pacific. These included that of
the Gadio Enga in the Highlands of Papua New Guinea (Dornstreich 1977), three Solomon
outliers including Bellona Island (Christiansen 1975), Ontong Java (Bayliss-Smith 1973, 1977,
1986) and Anuta (Yen 1973b), and Tongatapu (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2001).This
exercise suggested that the late-Lapita production system at Talasiu (2750-2650 cal BP) most
closely resembled that recorded in the 2001 Tongan Agricultural Census, and therefore had an
overall modelled system efficiency of around 124kcal/hr. Plant production during the Formative
Period, as represented by identified species at Leka (1300-1000 cal BP) most closely resembled
the Anutan production system, and as such had a much lower modelled overall efficiency of
1.3kcal/hr. Finally production at the site of Heketa (800-600 cal BP) during the late
Formative/early Classic Tu’i Tonga Chiefdom period could have most closely resembled the
Ontong Javan system with an overall system efficiency of 7.8kcal/hr. This indicated that
266
productive and nutritional efficiency decreased between Talasiu and Leka, but increased again
between Leka and Heketa, and emphasised the need to assess these systems in historical
context.
It is argued here that Lapita colonising populations on Tongatapu likely invested in the
production of a more diverse range of traditional core cultigens and supplementary species than
originally presumed. The nutritional value of these species and the implied nature of their
cultivation using a system of aroid pits (Cyrtosperma) and dryland multi-cropping techniques
with elements of arboriculture would have resulted in a relatively efficient system that was used
alongside marine-based and terrestrial foraging. Data from Leka suggest that plant utilisation
during the Formative Period reflected an increased interest in the exploitation of terrestrial
resources. This was due to marine resource over-exploitation and changes in the marine
ecosystem within the Fanga’Uta Lagoon resulting from hydro-isostatic drawdown of sea level
after the mid-Holocene marine high-stand. Specialisation in primary crops within the production
system at this time subsequently increased diversity within labour investment in primary and
supplementary crops and decreased overall system efficiency due to the limited nutritional
efficiency of new species. Soon after, Tongatapu may have been close to reaching carrying
capacity based on modelled population figures and acreages of cultivated land required to feed
them (Green 1973; Kirch 1984, 1988). One reaction to this situation would have been the
beginning of expansionist strategies that enabled the eventual development of the classic Tu’i
Tonga maritime chiefdom or state. The trade networks and control of agricultural resources
established by the central polity on Tongatapu after around 750 BP (Clark et al. 2014) created
an interaction sphere that may have served to relieve pressure on local production. This could
explain the modelled increase in overall system efficiency in the system at Heketa from 800-600
cal BP, owing to less labour diversity within primary and supplementary crops through minor
diversification into nutritionally efficient supplementary taxa, and higher overall yield to labour
input ratios.
A simple unilinear trajectory towards increasing labour inputs into dryland techniques
through fallow reduction and expansion of production, and decreasing overall system efficiency,
is not supported by the modelled data from this study. Instead evidence points towards a system
of causation and reaction to social, environmental and economic factors that enabled
populations to not only survive but also thrive on a raised limestone island such as Tongatapu
where a variety of ecological niches for diverse wetland cultivation techniques, such as those
observed on high islands, did not exist. The socio-political climate on the island evolved to cope
with environmental and climatic limitations on production, through expansion of control and
influence.
267
Palaeonvironmental and ethnobotanical studies point to the almost complete removal of
primary forest on Tongatapu, replaced with plantations in various states of cultivation or bush
fallow, or areas of now permanent secondary forest (Ellison 1989; Fall 2005, 2010; Fall and
Drezner 2011, 2013. The geology and rich volcanic soils of the island lent themselves to the
gradual transformation of the landscape to full scale extensive multi-cropping and shifting
dryland production. This process inevitably led to demographic pressure on production, and
island carrying capacity being reached earlier than on many other Pacific islands (e.g. Vanuatu,
Fiji and New Caledonia). The system could not be further intensified in terms of further fallow
reduction or increased cultivation, and so expansion of political control to other islands in the
archipelago and the greater Western Pacific region would have been necessary. New interaction
spheres and control of resources could have enabled a change in the focus of vegeculture away
from some less efficient primary crops towards new species such as Ipomoea batatas (sweet
potato) (Allen and Ballard 2001; Ballard 2005; Green 2005; Leach 2005). All producers
participated in ethnographically recorded tribute systems (Cook in Beaglehole 1969; Gifford
1929; Mariner in Martin 1991) which created alternative systems of food redistribution. This
would have almost certainly nutritionally as well as socially benefitted most elements of society,
from the chiefs to the matapules and commoners in different ways. Ultimately, the adaptation of
production systems within an evolving social and political climate was a continuing process that
did not halt after European contact. The continued ability of those on Tongatapu to adopt new
crops such as Xanthosoma sagittifolium (tannia or talo futuna) and increase production of
traditional cultigens for export outside Tonga is evidence of a resilient relationship between the
people and the land.
Future recommendations
Micro- and macrobotanical techniques
A number of techniques were utilised in this study that are currently relatively underemployed
in the Pacific. Very few archaeological studies incorporate any archaeobotanical techniques
within research strategies, and those that do have tended to be without any strict sampling
regimes to ensure consistency and enable replication. Within those studies that have been
conducted, there have been numerous studies involving the identification and quantification of
pollen, phytoliths and wood charcoal due to high rates of preservation, while very few have
targeted starch and even fewer have analysed charred, water-logged or desiccated vegetative
storage parenchyma. Background research as part of this study has shown that this bias has been
the result of an unfounded belief that these remains do not preserve in tropical climates, and that
these remains cannot be confidently identified.
Starch is often analysed only as chance finds as residues on artefacts or soil samples
from archaeological features, and parenchyma has similarly been primarily collected as random
268
finds that were often identified based on surface morphology rather than internal cellular
structure. These chance finds in the broader Pacific region, and preservation of starch and
parenchyma within deposits at Talasiu (TO-Mu-2), Leka (J17) and Heketa (TO-Nt-2), validate
the need to incorporate flotation or sieving within excavation techniques in projects that are
assessing subsistence and lifeways of people in the past. At the very least, bulk soil samples
should be collected to process and analyse later in a laboratory environment where less
contamination can occur. This study has demonstrated that these micro- and macrobotanical
remains can be extracted from a variety of archaeological deposits, and that these often preserve
relatively well in order to facilitate identification using techniques established here. Some
consideration does need to be given to sources of contamination within the field and laboratory
environment, and taphonomic processes, to ensure the antiquity of identified specimens.
It was foreseen that the development of a comprehensive reference collection would be
the best way to understand morphological variation at various taxonomic levels in starch and
charred parenchyma, and thus to identify archaeobotanical remains. The analysis of the
reference collection built upon the previous work of others (Allen and Ussher 2013; Babot
2001; Barton 2005; Barton et al. 1993,1998; Crowther 2009; Field 2006; Fullagar 2006;
Fullagar et al. 1996, 1998; Hather 1991, 1994, 2000; Horrocks 2004;; Horrocks and Barber
2005; Horrocks and Bedford 2010; Horrocks and Rechtman 2009; Horrocks and Weisler 2006;
Horrocks et al. 2004, 2012; Lentfer 2009; Loy 1994; Loy et al. 1992; Torrence, Wright and
Conway 2004; Ussher 2009) with regard to starch and parenchyma within the Pacific. The
analysis of a range of metric and descriptive nominal variables using light microscopy,
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), charting and multivariate statistics enabled a greater
understanding of morphology, and therefore confidence in the identification of unknown
archaeological samples. The multivariate statistical analysis identified those plant species or
families that could be more easily discriminated from others, and highlighted where extra steps
of visual checking would be required. There is still room for improvement, especially regarding
the development of an automated system for starch classification with greater accuracy,
measured through lowered rates of misclassification from multivariate statistical analysis. The
introduction of new attributes and improved image analysis software may contribute to this
(Coster and Field 2015).
It is hoped that these approaches to the extraction and identification of starch and
vegetative storage parenchyma in this thesis will enable others engaged in the field of
archaeobotany to collect and analyse these micro- and macrobotanical remains. This analysis is
crucial towards elucidating the history of plant use in the Pacific region, where subsistence was
and still is focussed primarily on the cultivation of starchy root, tuber and arboreal species.
Starch and parenchyma derive directly from these organs which have been consumed in the
past, and are still staple dietary components today. These provide clear evidence for diet and
269
subsistence, and therefore need to be further studied in terms of more detailed morphological
and also biochemical analysis, as well as archaeobotanical applications. Each new piece of
published research has built on the foundation of others, and this study is no exception.
However, more work is yet to be done to understand starch preservation, contamination and
biases that impact the interpretation of the archaeological record (Barton and Torrence 2015).
This study has provided a baseline for the identification of assemblages from Tongatapu and
these now need to be expanded to other locations in the Pacific through further research,
transparency and consistent application of techniques.
Archaeobotanical research in Tonga and the Pacific
The archaeobotanical analysis in this study was the first to have been conducted in the Tongan
archipelago. However, the limited geographical and temporal scope of this analysis has meant
that a chronology has been created from modelling high-resolution data from narrow time
periods on one small area of an island within the archipelago. Time was a factor in the decision
to restrict analysis to six small test units from three sites, but the primary focus of this project
was to scale back analysis from large horizontal excavations that require coarse-grained
analysis, instead utilising fine-grained archaeobotanical techniques that target extraction of large
quantities of micro- and macrobotanical remains alongside faunal and artefactual material.
The successful recovery of these remains highlights the potential for further
incorporation of these techniques within archaeological research strategies in tropical climates
such as those on Tonga. A range of archaeological deposits were sampled, from dense midden
to buried cultural deposits, and both starch and charred seeds, wood charcoal and endocarp were
recovered from them all. The case study of charred parenchyma from Talasiu especially
emphasises the nature of preservation of these fragile remains and points to the benefits of
analysing them as a record of prehistoric plant use, or to complement microbotanical studies.
The identification of charred remains was used in this study to both confirm and add to the lists
of species cultivated and used within early production systems on Tongatapu. The parenchyma
data added weight to the identification of some controversial or unexpected species at the late-
Lapita site of Talasiu. This study has shown that it is crucial that this relatively unknown type of
macro-remains be incorporated into future archaeobotanical studies that target diet and
subsistence in the Pacific.
The three sites, from which archaeobotanical data was collected within this study, are
well-dated and narrow in time depth, each representing only 100-200 years of occupation. This
was seen as an advantage, enabling detailed data to be collected about subsistence within
‘snapshots’ of Tongan prehistory. Major inter-site variation was not expected, and was not
observed, enabling initial modelling of singular archaeological production systems at each site.
Inter-site variation, on the other hand, provided the basis for temporal comparison of these
270
systems and the timing of plant introductions into Tonga. These ‘snapshots’ of plant production
and use from 2750-2650 cal BP, 1300-1000 cal BP, and 800-600 cal BP indicated the rate of
change and interaction occurring during crucial periods in Tongan prehistory. Clearly, more
research is required to fill the gaps, and elucidate in greater detail the role of plants in Tongan
subsistence, and to test the hypothesis for agricultural development proposed here. Would the
modelled systems, the basis for an alternative chronology, hold up under further testing using
newly collected archaeobotanical data? There is only one way to find out and that is through
further and more detailed archaeobotanical studies in the Tongan archipelago, especially at sites
dated to early Lapita occupation and the later end of the Tongan sequence.
271
Bibliography
Addison, D. 2006. Feast or Famine? Predictability, Drought, Density and Irrigation: The
Archaeology of Agriculture in Marquesas Islands Valleys. . Unpublished PhD thesis,
University of Hawaii.
Allen, B. J., and C. Ballard, 2001. Beyond intensification? Reconsidering agricultural
transformations. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 42: 157-162.
Allen, M. S. 1983. Analysis of archaeobotanical materials. In J. T. Clark and P. V. Kirch (eds.)
Archaeological Investigations of the Mudlane–Waimea–Kawaihae Road Corridor,
Island of Hawaiʻi. pp.384-400. Honolulu, Hawaii: Department of Anthropology,
Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum.
Allen, M. S. 1984. A review of archaeobotany and paleoethnobotany in Hawaii. Hawaiian
Archaeology 1: 19-30.
Allen, M. S. 2010. Oscillating climate and socio-political process: the case of the Marquesan
chiefdom, Polynesia. Antiquity 84: 86-102.
Allen, M. S., and E. Ussher 2013. Starch analysis reveals prehistoric plant translocations and
shell tool use, Marquesas Islands, Polynesia. Journal of Archaeological Science 40:
2799-2812.
Allen, M. S., D. Addison 2002. Prehistoric settlement at Anaho Bay, Nuku Hiva, Marquesas
Islands: Preliminary observations. Archaeology in Oceania 37: 87-91.
Anderson, A. 2004. Islands of ambivalence. In S. M. Fitzpatrick (ed.) Voyages of Discovery:
The Archaeology of Islands. pp.251-313. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood
Publishing Group.
Anderson, A., J. Chappell, M. Gagan, and R. Grove 2006. Prehistoric maritime migration in the
Pacific islands: An hypothesis of ENSO forcing. Holocene 16: 1-6.
Anthony, D. W. 1990. Migration in archeology: The baby and the bathwater. American
Anthropologist 92: 895-914.
Aswani, S., and M.W Graves 1998. The Tongan maritime expansion: a case in the evolutionary
ecology of social complexity. Asian Perspectives 37: 135-164.
Atchison, J., and R. Fullagar 1998. Starch residues on pounding implements from Jinmium
rock-shelter. In R. Fullagar (ed.) A Closer Look: Recent Australian Studies of Stone
Tools. pp.109-126. Sydney: Archaeological Computing Laboratory.
Athens, J. S., and J.V. Ward. Paleoenvironmental evidence for early human settlement in
Palau: The Ngerchau core. Pacific 2000: Proceedings of the Fifth International
Conference on Easter Island and the Pacific, 2001 Los Ossos, CA. Easter Island
Foundation, 165-178.
Athens, J. S., J.V. Ward, and G.M. Murakami 1996. Development of an agroforest on a
Micronesian high island: prehistoric Kosraean agriculture. Antiquity 70: 834-846.
Athens, J. S. and J. Stevenson 2012. Pohnpei coring records: the natural distribution of
Cyrtosperma chamissonis. Journal of Pacific Archaeology 3: 35-48.
Babot, M. d. P. 2003. Starch grain damage as an indicator of food processing. In D. M. Hart,
and L.A. Wallis (ed.) Phytolith and Starch Research in the Australian-Pacific-Asian
Regions: The State of the Art. Papers from a Conference Held at ANU, August 2001,
Canberra, Australia. pp.69-82. Canberra: Pandanus Books.
272
Baker, H. G., and I. Baker 1979. Starch in Angiosperm pollen grains and its evolutionary
significance. American Journal of Botany 66: 591-600.
Ballard, C. 2005. Still good to think with: The sweet potato in Oceania. In C. Ballard, P.
Brown, R.M. Bourke and T. Harwood (eds.) The Sweet Potato in Oceania: A
Reappraisal. pp.1-16. Sydney: Oceania Publications.
Ballard, C., P. Brown, R. M. Bourke and T. Harwood (eds.) 2005. The Sweet Potato in
Oceania: A Reappraisal, Sydney: University of Sydney.
Balme, J., and W.E. Beck 2002. Starch and charcoal: Useful measures of activity areas in
archaeological rockshelters. Journal of Archaeological Science 29: 157-166.
Banks, W., and C.T. Greenwood 1975. Starch and its Components. Edinburgh: Edinburgh
University Press.
Barker, G., L. Lloyd-Smith, H. Barton, F. Cole, C. Hunt, P.J. Piper, R. Rabett, V. Paz, and K.
Szabo 2011. Foraging-farming transitions at the Niah Caves, Sarawak, Borneo.
Antiquity 85: 492-509.
Barlow, P. W. 1987. The cellular organisation of roots and its response to the physical
environment. In P. J. Gregory, J.V. Lake and D. A. Rose (eds.) Root Development and
Function. pp.1-26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barrau, J. 1955. Subsistence Agriculture in Melanesia. Noumea: South Pacific Commission.
Barton, H. 2005. The case for rainforest foragers: The starch record at Niah Cave, Sarawak.
Asian Perspectives 44: 56-72.
Barton, H. 2009. Starch granule taphonomy: The results of a two-year field experiment. In M.
Haslam, G. Robertson, A. Crowther-Smith, S. Nugent and L. Kirkwood (eds.)
Archaeological Science Under a Microscope: Studies in Residue and Ancient DNA
Analysis in Honour of Thomas H. Loy. pp.129-140. Canberra: ANU E Press.
Barton, H., and P. White 1993. Use of stone and shell artifacts at Balof 2, New Ireland, Papua
New Guinea. Asian Perspectives 32: 169-181.
Barton, H., and R. Fullagar 2006. Microscopy. In R. Torrence and H. Barton (eds.) Ancient
Starch Research. pp.47-52. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, Inc.
Barton, H., and R. Torrence 2015. Cooking up new recipes for ancient starch: Assessing
current methodologies and looking to the future. Journal of Archaeological Science 56:
194-201.
Barton, H. and V. Paz 2007. Subterranean diets in the tropical rainforests of Sarawak. In T. P.
Denham, J. Iriarte and L. Vrydaghs (eds.) Rethinking agriculture: archaeological and
ethnoarchaeological perspectives. One World Archaeology. pp.50-77. California: Left
Coast Press Inc.
Barton, H., R. Torrence, and R. Fullagar 1998. Clues to stone tool function re-examined:
Comparing starch grain frequencies on used and unused obsidian artefacts. Journal of
Archaeological Science 25: 1231-1238.
Bayliss-Smith, T. P. 1973. Ecosystem and Economic System of Ontong Java Atoll, Solomon
Islands. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.
Bayliss-Smith, T. P. 1977. Energy use and economic development in Pacific communities. In
T. P. Bayliss-Smith and R. G. Feacham (eds.) Subsistence and Survival: Rural Ecology
in the Pacific. pp.317-362. London: Academic Press.
273
Bayliss-Smith, T. P. 1978. Maximum populations and standard populations: The carrying
capacity question. In D. Green, C. Haselgrove and M. Spriggs (eds.) Social
Organisation and Settlement: Contributions from Anthropology, Archaeology and
Geography. Part 1. pp.129-152. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.
Bayliss-Smith, T. P. 1986. Ontong Java Atoll: Population, Economy and Society, 1970-1986.
Armidale, NSW: South Pacific Smallholder Project, University of New England.
Bayliss-Smith, T. P. 2012. Taro, turmeric and gender. In R. Feinberg and R. Scaglion (eds.)
Polynesian Outliers: State of the Art. pp.109-138. Pittsburgh, PA: University of
Pittsburgh.
Beaglehole, E., and P. Beaglehole, 1941. Pangai: Village in Tonga. Wellington: The
Polynesian Society.
Beaglehole, J. C. (ed.) 1969. The Voyage of the Resolution and Adventure 1772-1775.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beck, W., and R. Torrence 2006. Starch pathways. In R. Torrence and H. Barton (eds.) Ancient
Starch Research. pp.53-74. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, Inc.
Bellwood, P. 2005. First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies. Oxford: Blackwell
Publishing.
Bentley, R. A., H. R. Buckley, M. Spriggs, S. Bedford, C. J. Ottley, G. M. Nowell, C. G.
Macpherson and D. G. Pearson 2007. Lapita migrants in the Pacific's oldest cemetery:
Isotopic analysis at Teouma, Vanuatu. American Antiquity 72: 645-656.
Best, S. 1984. Lakeba: the prehistory of a Fijian island. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University
of Auckland.
Binford, L. R. 1968. Post-Pleistocene adaptations. In S. R. Binford and L. R. Binford (eds.)
New Perspectives in Archaeology. pp.313-341. Chicago: Aldine.
Boardman, S., and G. Jones, 1990. Experiments on the effects of charring on cereal plant
components. Journal of Archaeological Science 17: 1-11.
Bollt, R. 2012. The taro wars of the Austral Islands, East Polynesia. In D. Addison, M. Spriggs
and P. Matthews (eds.) Irrigated Taro Colocasia esculenta in the Indo-Pacific:
biological, social and historical perspectives. pp.53-82. Osaka, Japan: National
Museum of Ethnology.
Boserup, E. 1965. The conditions of agricultural growth: the economics of agrarian change
under population pressure. London: Allen & Unwin.
Boutain, J. R., A.R. Brown, D.T. Webb and B.H. Toyofuku, 2010. Simplified procedure for
hand fracturing, identifying, and curating small macrocharcoal remains. International
Association of Wood Anatomists Journal 31: 139-147.
Boyadjian, C., S. Eggers, and K. Reinhard 2007. Dental wash: A problematic method for
extracting microfossils from teeth. Journal of Archaeological Science 34: 1622-1628.
Burley, D. 1998. Tongan archaeology and the Tongan past, 2850-150BP. Journal of World
Prehistory 12: 337-392.
Burley, D. 2007. Archaeological demography and population growth in the Kingdom of Tonga.
In P. V. Kirch and J. Rallu (eds.) Growth and Collapse of Pacific Island Societies :
Archaeological and Demographic Perspectives. pp.177-202. Hawaii: University of
Hawaii Press.
274
Burley, D., and S.P. Connaughton 2007. First Lapita settlement and its chronology in Vava'u,
Kingdom of Tonga. Radiocarbon 49: 131-137.
Burley, D., and W.R Dickinson 2001. Origin and significance of a founding settlement in
Oceania. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 98: 11829-11831.
Burley, D., K. Edinborough, M. Weisler, and J. Zhao 2015. Bayesian modeling and
chronological precision for Polynesian settlement of Tonga. PLoS ONE 10: e0120795.
Burley, D., P. J. Sheppard and M. Simonin 2011. Tongan and Samoan volcanic glass: PXRF
analysis and implications for constucts of Ancestral Polynesian Society. Journal of
Archaeological Science 38: 2625-2632.
Burley, D., W. Dickinson, A.Barton, and R. Shutler Jnr. 2001. Lapita on the periphery. New
data on old problems in the Kingdom of Tonga. Archaeology in Oceania 36: 89-104.
Burns, R. G. 1982. Enzyme activity in soil: Location and a possible role in microbial ecology.
Soil Biology and Biochemistry 14: 423-427.
Cai, C., and C. Wei 2013. In situ observation of crystallinity disruption patterns during starch
gelatinization. Carbohydrate Polymers 92: 469-478.
Campbell, P. R., T.B. Hugh, M.J. Coleman, V.F. Munro and L.A. Hart 1984. A comparison of
surface particle contamination of powdered and non-powdered surgical gloves.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 54: 559-563.
Carneiro, R. L. 1970. A theory of the origin of the state. Science 169: 733-738.
Cheshire, M. V., G. Anderson, M.P. Greaves, and C.M. Mundie 1974. Decomposition of soil
polysaccharide. Journal of Soil Science 25: 483-498.
Childe, V. G. 1925. The Dawn of European Civilisation. New York: Knopf.
Christiansen, S. 1975. Subsistence on Bellona Island (Mungiki): A Study of the Cultural
Ecology of a Polynesian Outlier in the British Solomon Islands Protectorate.
Copenhagen: C.A. Reitzels Forlag.
Clark, G., and C. Reepmeyer 2014. Stone architecture, monumentality and the rise of the early
Tongan chiefdom. Antiquity 88: 1244-1260.
Clark, G., D. Burley and T. Murray 2008. Monumentality and the development of the Tongan
maritime chiefdom. Antiquity 82: 994-1008.
Clark, G., C. Reepmeyer, N. Melekiola, J. Woodhead, W. R. Dickinson and H. Martinsson-
Walin 2014. Stone tools from the ancient Tongan state reveal prehistoric interaction
centers in the Central Pacific. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111:
10491-10496.
Clarke, A. C., M.K. Burtenshaw, P.A. McLenachan, D.L. Erickson and D. Penny 2006.
Reconstructing the origins and dispersal of the polynesian bottle gourd (Lagenaria
siceraria). Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 893-900.
Clarke, J. G. D. 1952. Prehistoric Europe: The Economic Basis. New York: The Philosophical
Library.
Coil, J., and P.V. Kirch 2005. An Ipomoean landscape: Archaeology and the sweet potato in
Kahikinui, Maui, Hawaiian Islands. In C. Ballard, P. Brown, R.M. Bourke and T.
Harwood (eds.) The Sweet Potato in Oceania: A Reappraisal. pp.71-84. Sydney:
Oceania Publications.
275
Coil, J., M.A. Korstanje, S. Archer, C.A. Hastorf 2003. Laboratory goals and considerations for
multiple microfossil extraction in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science 30:
991-1008.
Collocott, E. E. V. 1927. Kava ceremonial in Tonga. Journal of the Polynesian Society 36: 21-
47.
Cook, J. 1785. A Voyage to the Pacific Ocean : Undertaken by the Command of His Majesty
for Making Discoveries in the Northern Hemisphere; Performed Under the Direction
of Captains Cook, Clerke, and Gore, in His Majesty's ships the Resolution and
Discovery in the years 1776... 1780. London: H. Hughs.
Cortella, A., and M. Pochettino 1994. Starch grain analysis as a microscopic diagnostic feature
in the identification of plant material. Economic Botany 48: 171-181.
Coster, A. C. F., and J.H. Field 2015. What starch grain is that?- A geometric morphometric
approach to determining plant species origin. Journal of Archaeological Science 58: 9-
25.
Cox, G. W., and M.D. Atkins 1979. Agricultural Ecology, United States of America: W.H.
Freeman and Company.
Crowther, A. 2001. Pots, Plants and Pacific Prehistory: Residue Analysis of Plain Lapita
Pottery from Anir, New Ireland, c. 3300 B.P. Unpiblished BA (Hons) Thesis,
University of Queensland.
Crowther, A. 2005. Starch residues on undecorated Lapita potsherds from Anir, New Ireland.
Archaeology in Oceania 40: 62-66.
Crowther, A. 2009. Investigating Lapita Subsistence and Pottery Use through Microscopic
Residues on Ceramics: Methodological Issues, Feasibility and Potential. Unpublished
PhD Thesis University of Queensland.
Crowther, A. 2012. The differential survival of native starch during cooking and implications
for archaeological analyses: A review. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
4: 221-235.
Crowther, A., M. Haslam, N. Oakden, D. Walde and J. Mercader 2014. Documenting
contamination in ancient starch laboratories. Journal of Archaeological Science 49: 90-
104.
Cummings, L. 1998. A review of recent pollen and phytolith studies from various contexts on
Easter Island. In C. M. Stevenson, G. Lee and J. Morin (eds.) Easter Island in Pacific
Context, South Seas Symposium. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference
on Easter Island and East Polynesia. Los Osos: Easter Island Foundation Occasional
Paper, Bearsville and Cloudmountain Presses.
David, N. and C. Kramer (eds.) 2001. Ethnoarchaeology in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Davidson, J., and F. Leach 2001. The strandlooper concept and economic naivety. In G. R.
Clark, A.J. Anderson and T. Vunidilo (ed.) The Archaeology of Lapita Dispersal in
Oceania: Papers from the Fourth Lapita Conference, June 2000, Canberra, Australia.
pp.115-124. Canberra: Pandanus Books.
Davidson, J. M. 1969. Archaeological excavations in two burial mounds at 'Atele, Tongatapu.
Records of the Auckland Institute and Museum 6: 251-286.
Davidson, J. M. 1971. Preliminary report on an archaeological survey of the Vava'u Group,
Tonga. Royal Society of New Zealand Bulletin 8: 29-40.
276
Davidson, J. M.1979. Samoa and Tonga. In J. D. Jennings {Ed.), The Prehistory of Polynesia,
pp. 82-100. Harvard University Press.
Dawson, H. 2008. Unravelling “mystery” and process from the prehistoric colonization and
abandonment of the Mediterranean islands. In J. Conolly and M. Campbell (eds.)
Comparative Island Archaeologies. Oxford: Archaeopress.
Denham, T. 2007. Early agriculture: Recent conceptual and methodological developments. In
T. Denham and P.White (eds.) The Emergence of Agriculture: A Global View. pp.1-25.
New York: Routledge.
Denham, T. 2011. Early agriculture and plant domestication in New Guinea and Island
Southeast Asia. Current Anthropology 52: S379-S395.
Denham, T., S. Haberle and A. Pierret 2009. A multi-disciplinary method for the investigation
of early agriculture: Learning lessons from Kuk. In A. Fairburn, S. O'Connor and B.
Marwick (eds.) New Directions in Archaeological Science. pp.139-154. Canberra:
ANU E press.
Denham, T., S. Haberle, and C. Lentfer 2004. New evidence and revised interpretation of early
agriculture in Highland New Guinea. Antiquity 78: 839-857.
Denham, T. P., S.G. Haberle, C. Lentfer, R. Fullagar, J. Field, M. Therin, N. Porch and B.
Winsborough 2003. Origins of agriculture at Kuk Swamp in the Highlands of New
Guinea. Science 301: 189-193.
di Piazza, A. 1998. Archaeobotanical investigations of an earth oven in Kiribati, Gilbert
Islands. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 7: 149-154.
di Piazza, A., and D. Frimigacci 1991. A thousand years of gardening: A history of subsistence
on Futuna. Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association Bulletin 11: 124-140.
Dick, W. A., L. Cheng, and P.Wang 2000. Soil acid and alkaline phosphatase activity as pH
adjustment indicators. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32: 1915-1919.
Dickinson, W. 2001. Paleoshoreline record of relative Holocene sea levels on Pacific islands.
Earth-Science Reviews 55: 191-234.
Dickinson, W. 2007. Paleoenvironment of Lapita sites on Fanga ‘Uta Lagoon, Tongatapu,
Kingdom of Tonga. In S. Bedford, C. Sand and S. P. Connaughton (eds.) Oceanic
Explorations: Lapita and Western Pacific Settlement. pp.177-186. Canberra: ANU E-
Press.
Donohue, M., and T. Denham 2009. Banana (Musa spp.) domestication in the Asia-Pacific
Region: Linguistic and archaeobotanical perspectives. Ethnobotany Research and
Applications 7: 293-332.
Dornstreich, M. D. 1973. An Ecological Study of Gadio Enga (New Guinea) Subsistence.
Unpublished PhD Thesis, Columbia University.
Dornstreich, M. D. 1977. The ecological description and analysis of tropical subsistence
patterns: An example from New Guinea. In T. P. Bayliss-Smith and R. G. Feacham
(eds.) Subsistence and Survival: Rural Ecology in the Pacific. pp.243-272. London:
Academic Press.
Dotte-Sarout, E. 2010. 'The Ancestor Wood'. Trees, Forests and precolonial Kanak Settlement
on New Caledonia Grand Terre: Case Study and Anthracological Approach in the
Tiwaka Valley. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Universite Paris I Sorbonne and the
Australian National University.
277
Dotte-Sarout, E., J. Oetcho, J. Bole, D. Barret and C. Sand 2013. Of charcoals and forests:
Results and perspectives from an archaeobotanical investigation of precolonial kanak
settlement sites in New Caledonia. In G. K. Summerhayes, and H. Buckley (ed.)
Pacific Archaeology: Documenting the Past. Papers from the 2011 Lapita Pacific
Archaeology Conference. pp.12-137. Otago: University of Otago Studies in
Archaeology.
Earle, T. K. 1980. Prehistoric irrigation in the Hawaiian Islands: An evaluation of evolutionary
significance. Archaeological and Physical Anthropology in Oceania 15: 1-28.
Earle, T. K. 1991. The evolution of chiefdoms. In T. K. Earle (ed.) Chiefdoms: economy,
power, ideology. pp.1-15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Earle, T. K. (ed.) 1993. Chiefdoms: power, economy and ideology. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Earle, T. K. 2012. Taro irrigation and primary state formation in Hawaii. Senri Ethnological
Studies 78: 95-114.
Fairburn, A. 2005a. An archaeobotanical perspective on Holocene plant-use practices in
lowland northern New Guinea. World Archaeology 37: 487-502.
Fairburn, A. 2005b. Simple bucket flotation and wet-sieving in the wet tropics. Palaeoworks
Technical Papers 4: 1-15.
Fall, P. 2005. Vegetation change in the coastal-lowland rainforest at Avai'o'vuna Swamp,
Vava'u, Kingdom of Tonga. Quaternary Research 64: 451-459.
Fall, P. 2010. Pollen evidence for plant introductions in a Polynesian tropical island ecosystem,
Kingdom of Tonga. In S. Haberle, J. Stevenson and M. Prebble (eds.) Terra Australis.
pp.257-275. Canberra: ANU E-Press.
Fall, P., and T. Drezner 2011. Plant Dispersal, Introduced Species, and Vegetation Change in
the South Pacific Kingdom of Tonga. Pacific Science 65: 143-156.
Fall, P., and T. Drezner 2013. Species origins, dispersal, and island vegetation dynamics in the
South Pacific. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103: 1041-1057.
Felgate, M. 2003. Leap-frogging or limping? Recent evidence from the lapita littoral fringe,
New Georgia, Solomon Islands. In S. Bedford, C. Sand and S. P. Connaughton (eds.)
Oceanic explorations. Lapita and Western Pacific settlement. Terra Australis 26.
pp.123-140. Canberra: Australian National University.
Field, J. 2006. Reference collections. In R. Torrence and H. Barton (eds.) Ancient Starch
Research. pp.95-114. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, Inc.
Field, J. S., E. E. Cochrane and D. M. Greenlee 2009. Dietary change in Fijian prehistory:
isotopic analyses of human and animal skeletal material. Journal of Archaeological
Science 36: 1547-1556.
Firth, R. 1939. Primitive Polynesian Economy. London: George Routledge and Sons Ltd.
Flannery, K. V. 1965. The ecology of early food production in Mesopotamia. Science 147:
1247-1256.
Flannery, K. V. 1968. Archaeological systems theory and early Mesoamerica. In B. J. Meggers
(ed.) Anthropological Archaeology in the Americas. pp.67-87. Washington, D.C.:
Anthropological Society of Washington.
278
Flenley, J. R., C.T. Hannan and M.J. Farrelly 1999. Final report on the stratigraphy and
palynology of swamps on the islands of Ha'afeva and Foa, Ha'apai, Tonga. Massey
University, Geography Programme Miscellaneous Publication Series 99/3,.
Palmerston, NZ.
Forster, G. 1777. A Voyage Round the World in His Majesty's sloop, Resolution, commanded
by Capt James Cook, during the years 1772, 3, 4, and 5. London: Printed for B. White
and others.
Forster, J. R. 1778. Observations made during a Voyage round the World, on Physical
Geography, Natural History and Ethic Philosophy. London: Printed for G. Robinson.
Fullagar, R. 1998. Use-wear, residues and lithic technology. In R. Fullagar (ed.) A Closer
Look: Recent Australian Studies of Stone Tools. pp.13-18. Sydney: Archaeological
Computing Laboratory.
Fullagar, R. 2006. Starch on artifacts. In R. Torrence and H. Barton (eds.) Ancient Starch
Research. pp.177-204. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, Inc.
Fullagar, R., J. Field, T. Denham, and C. Lentfer, 2006. Early and mid Holocene tool-use and
processing of taro (Colocasia esculenta), yam (Dioscorea sp.) and other plants at Kuk
Swamp in the highlands of Papua New Guinea. Journal of Archaeological Science 33:
595-614.
Fullagar, R., J. Furby and B. Hardy 1996. Residues on stone artefacts: State of a scientific art.
Antiquity 70: 740-745.
Fullagar, R., T. Loy, and S. Cox 1998. Starch grains, sediments and stone tool function:
Evidence from Bitokara, Papua New Guinea. In R. Fullagar (ed.) A Closer Look:
Recent Australian Studies of Stone Tools. pp.49-60. Sydney: Archaeological
Computing Laboratory.
Fuller, D. Q. 2007. Contrasting patterns in crop domestication and domestication rates: Recent
archaeobotanical insights from the Old World. Annals of Botany 100: 903-924.
Geraghty, P. A. (1983). The History of Fijian Languages. Oceanic Linguistics Special
Publication No.19. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
Gibbs, H. S. 1967. Soils of Tongatapu Island, Tonga. New Zealand Soils Newsletter 6: 219-
223.
Gifford, E. W. 1929. Tongan Society.B.P.Bishop Museum, Bulletin 61. Honolulu.
Glover, I. 1979. Prehistoric plant remains from Southeast Asia: With special reference to rice.
In M. Taddei (ed.) South Asian Archaeology 1977. pp.5-37. Naples: Instituto
Universitario Orientale.
Goldberg, P., and R.I. Macphail 2006. Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford:
Blackwell Publishing.
Golson, J. 1957. Notes on Tongan Excavations.
Golson, J. 2007. The origins and development of New Guinea agriculture. In T. Denham, P.
White (ed.) The Emergence of Agriculture: A Global View. pp.175-183. New York:
Routledge.
Goreki, P. 1992. Lapita smoke screen? In J.-C. Galipaud (ed.) Poterie lapita et peuplement.
Actes du Colloque Lapita, Noumea. pp.27-47. Noumea: ORSTOM.
279
Gosden, C. 1992. Production systems and the colonisation of the Western Pacific. World
Archaeology 24: 55-69.
Gott, B., H. Barton, D. Samuel, R. Torrence 2006. Biology of starch. In R. Torrence and H.
Barton (eds.) Ancient Starch Research. pp.35-46. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, Inc.
Graves, M. W., C. K. Cachola-Abad and T. N. Ladefoged 2011. The evolutionary ecology of
Hawaiian political complexity: Case studies from Maui and Hawai’i Island. In P. V.
Kirch (ed.) Roots of Conflict: Soils, Agriculture, and Sociopolitical Complexity in
Ancient Hawai’i. pp.135-162. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.
Green, R. 1973. Tonga's Prehistoric Population. Pacific Viewpoint 14: 61-74.
Green, R. 1974. Sites with Lapita pottery: Importing and Voyaging. Mankind 9:253-259
Green, R. 1979. Lapita. In J. Jennings (ed.) The Prehistory of Polynesia. pp.27-69. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
Green, R. 1987. Obsidian results from the lapita sites of the Reef/Santa Cruz Islands. In W. M.
Ambroe and J. M. J. Mummery (eds.) Archaemetry: further Australasia studies.
pp.239-249. Canberra: Department of Prehistory. Research School of Pacific Studies.
Australian National University.
Green, R. 2000. A range of disciplines support a dual origin for the bottle gourd in the Pacific.
Journal of the Polynesian Society 109: 191-197.
Green, R. 2005. Sweet potato transfers in Polynesian prehistory. In C. Ballard, P. Brown, R.M.
Bourke and T. Harwood (eds.) The Sweet Potato in Oceania: A Reappraisal. pp.43-62.
Sydney: Oceania Publications.
Green, R., and J. Davidson 1969. Archaeology in Western Samoa. Vol. 1. Auckland: Auckland
Institute and Museum.
Green, R., and J. Davidson 1974. Archaeology in Western Samoa. Vol 2. Auckland: Auckland
Institute and Museum.
Greenlee, D. M. 1992. Effects of recovery techniques and postdepositional environment on
archaeological wood charcoal assemblages. In J. K. Stein (ed.) Deciphering a Shell
Midden. pp.261-282. San Diego: Academic Press.
Grono, E. 2012. And Then There Were None: A Case-study of Maritime Adaptation and
Resource Use in Prehistoric Tongatapu, Tonga. Unpublished BA (Hons) Dissertation,
Australian National University.
Groube, L. 1971. Tonga, Lapita pottery and Polynesian origins. Journal of the Polynesian
Society 80: 278-316.
Gunn, B. F., L. Baudoin, and K. M. Olsen 2011. Independent origins of cultivated coconut
(Cocos nucifera L.) in the Old World tropics. PLoS ONE 6: e21143.
Haberle, S. 1994. Anthropogenic indicators in pollen diagrams: Problems and prospects for late
Quaternary palynology in New Guinea. In J. Hather (ed.) Tropical Archaeobotany:
Applications and New Developments. pp.172-204. London: Routledge.
Haberle, S. 1995. Identification of cultivated Pandanus and Colocasia in pollen records and the
implications for the study of early agriculture in New Guinea. Vegetation History and
Archaeobotany 4: 195-210.
280
Hageman, J. B., and D.J. Goldstein 2009. An integrated assessment of archaeobotanical
recovery methods in the Neotropical rainforest of northern Belize: Flotation and dry
screening. Journal of Archaeological Science 36: 2841-2852.
Hart, T. 2011. Evaluating the usefulness of phytoliths and starch grains found on survey
artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science 38: 3244-3253.
Haslam, M. 2004. The decomposition of starch grains in soils: Implications for archaeological
residue analyses. Journal of Archaeological Science 31: 1715-1734.
Haslam, M. 2009. Initial tests on the three-dimensional movement of starch in sediments. Terra
Australis 28: 93-104.
Hather, J. G. 1991. The identification of charred archaeological remains of vegetative
parenchymous tissue. Journal of Archaeological Science 18: 661-675.
Hather, J. G. 1992. The archaeobotany of subsistence in the Pacific. World Archaeology 24:
70-81.
Hather, J. G. 1994. Identification of charred root and tuber crops from archaeological sites in
the Pacific. In J. G. Hather (ed.) Tropical Archaeobotany: Applications and New
Developments. pp.51-64. London: Routledge.
Hather, J. G. 1996. The origins of tropical vegeculture: Ziniberaceae, Araceae and
Pioscoreaceae in South Eastern Asia. In D. R. Harris (ed.) The origins and spread of
agriculture and pastoralism in Eurasia. pp.538-550. London: University College
London Press.
Hather, J. G. 2000. Archaeological Parenchyma. London: Archetype Publications.
Hather, J. G., and M. Weisler 2000. Prehistoric Giant Swamp Taro (Cyrtosperma chamissonis)
from Henderson Island, Southeast Polynesia. Pacific Science 54: 149-156.
Hather, J. G., and P.V. Kirch 1991b. Prehistoric sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) from Mangaia
Island, Central Polynesia. Antiquity 65: 887-893.
Hemsley, W. B. 1894. The flora of the Tonga or Friendly Islands, with descriptions of and
notes on some new or remarkable plants, partly from the Solomon Islands. Journal of
the Linnean Society of London 30: 158-217.
Henry, A., and D. Piperno, 2008. Using plant microfossils from dental calculus to recover
human diet: a case study from Tell al-Raqa'i Syria. Journal of Archaeological Science
35: 1943-1950
Henry, A., H. Hudson, and D. Piperno 2009. Changes in starch grain morphologies from
cooking. Journal of Archaeological Science 36: 915-922.
Holden, T. G., J.G. Hather and J.P.N. Watson 1995. Mesolithic Plant Exploitation at the Roc
del Migdia, Catalonia. Journal of Archaeological Science 22: 769-778.
Holliday, V. T. 2004. Soils in Archaeological Research, New York: Oxford University Press.
Holst, I., J.E. Moreno and D.R. Piperno 2007. Identification of teosinte, maize, and Tripsacum
in Mesoamerica by using pollen, starch grains, and phytoliths. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Science 104: 17608-17613.
Hope, G., and J. Golson 1995. Late Quaternary change in the mountains of New Guinea.
Antiquity 69: 818-830.
Horrocks, M. 2004a. Polynesian plant subsistence in prehistoric New Zealand: A summary of
the microfossil evidence. New Zealand Journal of Botany 42: 321-334.
281
Horrocks, M., and I. Barber 2005. Microfossils of introduced starch cultigens from an early
wetland ditch in New Zealand. Archaeology in Oceania 40: 106-114.
Horrocks, M., and I. Lawlor 2006. Plant microfossil analysis of soils from Polynesian
stonefields in South Auckland, New Zealand. Journal of Archaeological Science 33:
200-217.
Horrocks, M., and J. Wozniak 2008. Plant microfossil analysis reveals disturbed forest and a
mixed-crop, dryland production system at Te Niu, Easter Island. Journal of
Archaeological Science 35: 126-142.
Horrocks, M., and M. I. Weisler 2006. A short note on starch and xylem of Colocasia
esculenta (taro) in archaeological deposits from Pitcairn Island, southeast Polynesia.
Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 1189-1193.
Horrocks, M., and P. D. Nunn 2007. Evidence for introduced taro (Colocasia esculenta) and
lesser yam (Dioscorea esculenta) in Lapita-era (c. 3050-2500 cal. yr. BP) deposits
from Bourewa, south-west Viti Levu Island, Fiji. Journal of Archaeological Science
34: 739-748.
Horrocks, M., and R.B. Rechtman 2009. Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) and banana (Musa
sp.) microfossils in deposits from the Kona Field System, Island of Hawaii. Journal of
Archaeological Science 36: 1115-1126.
Horrocks, M., and S. Bedford 2004. Microfossil analysis of Lapita deposits in Vanuatu reveals
introduced Aracea (aroids). Archaeology in Oceania 39: 67-74.
Horrocks, M., and S. Bedford 2010. Introduced Dioscorea spp. starch in Lapita and later
deposits, Vao Island, Vanuatu. New Zealand Journal of Botany 48: 179-183.
Horrocks, M., G. Irwin, M. Jones, and D. Sutton 2004. Starch grains and xylem cells of sweet
potato (Ipomoea batatas) and bracken (Pteridium esculentum) in archaeological
deposits from Northern New Zealand. Journal of Archaeological Science 31: 251-258.
Horrocks, M., G. Irwin, M. McGlone, S. Nichol, and L. Williams 2003. Pollen, phytoliths and
diatoms in prehistoric coprolites from Kohika, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. Journal of
Archaeological Science 30: 13-20.
Horrocks, M., I. Smith, I. Walter and S. Nichol 2011. Stratigraphic and plant microfossil
investigation at Cook's Cove, North Island, New Zealand: reinterpretation of Holocene
deposits and evidence of Polynesian-introduced crops. Journal of the Royal Society of
New Zealand 41: 237-258.
Horrocks, M., I. Smith, S. Nichol, and R. Wallace 2008. Sediment, soil and plant microfossil
analysis of Maori gardens at Anaura Bay, eastern North Island, New Zealand:
comparison with descriptions made in 1769 by Captain Cook’s expedition. Journal of
Archaeological Science 35: 2446-2464.
Horrocks, M., I. Smith, S. Nichol, P. Shane, and G. Jackman 2008. Field survey,
sedimentology and plant microfossil analysis of sediment cores from possible
cultivation sites at Tolaga Bay, eastern North Island, New Zealand. Journal of the
Royal Society of New Zealand 38: 131-147.
Horrocks, M., J. Grant-Mackie, and E. Matissoo-Smith 2008. Introduced taro (Colocasia
esculenta) and yams (Dioscorea spp.) in Podtanean (2700-1800 years BP) deposits
from Me´ Aure´ Cave (WMD007), Moindou, New Caledonia. Journal of
Archaeological Science 35: 169-180.
282
Horrocks, M., M.D. Jones, R.E. Beever and D.G. Sutton 2002. Analysis of plant microfossils in
prehistoric coprolites from Harataonga Bay, Great Barrier Island, New Zealand.
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 32: 617-628.
Horrocks, M., M.K. Nieuwoudt, R. Kinaston, H. Buckley and S. Bedford 2014. Microfossil
and Fourier Transform InfraRed analyses of Lapita and post-Lapita human dental
calculus from Vanuatu, Southwest Pacific. Journal of the Royal Society of New
Zealand 44: 17-33.
Horrocks, M., P.A. Shane, I.G. Barber, D.M. D'Costa, and S.L. Nichol 2004. Microbotanical
remains reveal Polynesian agriculture and mixed cropping in early New Zealand.
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 131: 147-157.
Horrocks, M., S. Bedford, and M. Spriggs 2009. A short note on banana (Musa) phytoliths in
Lapita, immediately post-Lapita and modern period archaeological deposits from
Vanuatu. Journal of Archaeological Science 36: 2048-2054.
Horrocks, M., S. Bulmer and R.O. Gardner 2008. Plant microfossils in prehistoric
archaeological deposits from Yuku rock shelter, Western Highlands, Papua New
Guinea. Journal of Archaeological Science 35: 290-301.
Horrocks, M., S. Nichol, P. Augustinus, and I. Barber 2007. Late Quaternary environments,
vegetation and agriculture in northern New Zealand. Journal of Quaternary Science
22: 267-279.
Horrocks, M., W. T. Baisden, M. K. Nieuwoudt , J. Flenley, D. Feek, L. Gonza´lez Nualart, S.
Haoa-Cardinali, and T. Edmunds Gorman 2012. Microfossils of Polynesian cultigens
in lake sediment cores from Rano Kau, Easter Island. Journal of Palaeolimnology 47:
185-204.
Huebert, J. M. 2014. The Role of Arboriculture in Landscape Domestication and Agronomic
Development: A Case Study from the Marquesas Islands, East Polynesia. Unpublished
PhD Thesis, University of Auckland.
Huish, R. D., K.H. Huish, T.J. Walker, and G. Shrestha 2014. Traditional Tongan treatments
for infections: Bioassays and ethnobotanical leads for activity Journal of Medicinal
Plant Research 8: 1215-1222.
Hunt, T. L. 1980. Toward Fiji's past: archaeological research on south-western Viti Levu.
Unpublished MA(Hons) Thesis, University of Auckland.
ICSN. 2011. The International Code for Starch Nomenclature [Online]. Available:
http://fossilfarm.org/ICSN/Code.html [Accessed 02/05/2015.
Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill.
London: Routledge.
Jane, J., S. Leas, H. Zobel and J.F. Robyt 1994. Anthology of starch granule morphology by
Scanning Electron Microscopy. Starch/starke 46: 121-129.
Jones, A. M. P., S.J. Murch, J. Wiseman, and D. Ragone 2012. Morphological diversity in
breadfruit (Artocarpus, Moraceae): Insights into domestication, conservation, and
cultivar identification. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 60: 175-192.
Kahn, J. G., and D. Ragone 2013. Identification of carbonized breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis)
skin: Refining site function and site specialization in the Society Islands, East
Polynesia. Journal of Ethnobiology 33: 237-258.
Keegan, W. F. and J. M. Diamond 1987. Colonisation of islands by humans: A biogeographical
perspective. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 10: 49-92.
283
Kennedy, J. 2008. Pacific bananas: Complex origins, multiple dispersals? Asian Perspectives
47: 75-94.
Kennedy, J. and W. Clarke 2004. Cultivated landscapes of the Southwest Pacific. Resource
Management in Asian Pacific. Working Paper 50. Canberra.
Kennett, D. J., A. Anderson and B. Winterhalder 2006. Ideal free distribution, food production,
and the colonisation of Oceania. In D. J. Kennett and B. Winterhalder (eds.)
Behavioural ecology and the transition to agriculture. Berkeley: University of
California Press.
Kinaston, R., H. Buckley, F. Valentin, S. Bedford, M. Spriggs, S. Hawkins and E. Herrscher
2014. Lapita diet in Remote Oceania: New stable isotope evidence from the 3000-year-
old Teouma site, Efate Island, Vanuatu. PLoS ONE 9: e90376.
doi:90310.91371/journal.pone.0090376.
Kinaston, R., S. Bedford, M. Richards, S. Hawkins, A. Gray, K. Jaouen, F. Valentin and H.
Buckley 2014. Diet and human mobility from the Lapita to the Early Historic Period
on Uripiv Island, Northeast Malakula, Vanuatu. PLoS ONE 9: e104071.
doi:104010.101371/journal.pone.0104071.
Kirch, P. V. 1976. Ethno-archaeological investigations in Futuna and Uvea (Western
Polynesia). A preliminary report. Journal of the Polynesian Society 85: 27-69.
Kirch, P. V. 1978. The Lapitoid period in West Polynesia: Excavations and survey in
Niuatoputapu, Tonga. Journal of Field Archaeology 5: 1-13.
Kirch, P. V. 1984. The Evolution of the Polynesian Chiefdoms. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Kirch, P. V. 1987. Lapita and Oceanic cultural origins: excavations in the Mussau Islands,
Bismarck Archipelago, 1985. Journal of Field Archaeology 14: 163-180.
Kirch, P. V. 1988. Niuatoputapu: The Prehistory of a Polynesian Chiefdom. Seattle: Burke
Museum.
Kirch, P. V. 1989. Second millenium BC arboriculture in Melanesia: Archaeological Evidence
from the Mussau Islands. Economic Botany 43: 225-240.
Kirch, P. V. 1990. Monumental architecture and power in Polynesian chiefdoms: A
comparison of Tonga and Hawaii. World Archaeology 22: 206-222.
Kirch, P. V. 1994. The Wet and Dry: Irrigation and Agricultural Intensification in Polynesia.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kirch, P. V. 1997. The Lapita Peoples: Ancestors of the Oceanic world. The peoples of South-
East Asia and the Pacific. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.
Kirch, P. V., and D. Lepofsky 1993. Polynesian irrigation: Archaeological and linguistic
evidence for origins and development. Asian Perspectives 32: 183-204.
Kirch, P. V., and D. E. Yen 1982. Tikopia: The Prehistory and Ecology of a Polynesian
Outlier. Honolulu: Bishop Museum Press.
Kirch, P. V., and T. Dye 1979. Ethno-archaeology and the development of Polynesian fishing
strategies. Journal of the Polynesian Society 88: 53-76.
Kirch, P. V., G. Asner, O. A. Chadwick, J. Field, T. Ladefoged, C. Lee, C. Puleston, S.
Tuljapurkar and P. M. Vitousek 2012. Building and testing models of long-term
284
agricultural intensification and population dynamics: A case study from the Leeward
Kohala Field System, Hawai’i. Ecological Modelling 227: 18-28.
Kirch, P. V., J. Coil, A.S. Hartshorn, M. Jeraj, P.M. Vitousek and O.A. Chadwick 2005.
Intensive dryland farming on the leeward slopes of Haleakala, Maui, Hawaiian Islands:
Archaeological, archaeobotanical, and geochemical perspectives. World Archaeology
37: 240-258.
Korstanje, M. A. 2003. Taphonomy in the laboratory: Starch damage and multiple microfossil
recovery from sediments. In D. M. Hart and L. A. Wallis (eds.) Phytolith and Starch
Research in the Australian-Pacific-Asian Regions: The State of the Art. Papers from a
Conference Held at ANU, August 2001, Canberra, Australia. pp.105-118. Canberra:
Pandanus Books.
Kovarovic, K., L.C. Aiello, A. Cardini and C.A. Lockwood 2011. Discriminant function
analyses in archaeology: are classification rates too good to be true? Journal of
Archaeological Science 38: 3006-3018.
La Billardiere, J. J. H. 1800. Voyage in Search of La Perouse Performed by Order of the
Constituent Assembly, During the Years 1791, 1792, 1793, and 1794. London: J.
Stockdale.
La Perouse, J. F. G. 1799. A Voyage Around the World Performed in the Years
1785,1786,1787, and 1788 by the Bussole and Astrolabe, Under the Command of
J.F.G. de Le Perouse/ Published by Order of the National Assembly, Under the
Superintendence of L.A. Milet-Mureau... London: Printed by A. Hamilton, for GG. and
J. Robinson.
Ladefoged, T. N. and M. W. Graves 2008. Variable development of dryland agriculture in
Hawai’i: a fine-grained chronology from the Kohala Field System, Hawai’i Island.
Current Anthropology 49: 771-802.
Lamb, J., and T. Loy 2005. Seeing red: The use of Congo Red dye to identify cooked and
damaged starch grains in archaeological residues. Journal of Archaeological Science
32: 1433-1440.
Lamb J. 2003. The Raw and the Cooked: A Study on the Effects of Cooking on Three
Aboriginal Plant Foods from Southeast Queensland. Unpublished BA(Hons) Thesis,
University of Queensland.
Laurence, A. R. 2013. Trials and Tribulations of Ancient Starch Research: An Investigation of
Contamination and Earth Ovens at Fort Hood, Texas Unpublished PhD Thesis, Texas
A&M University.
Laurence, A. R., A.V Thoms, V.M Bryant, and C. McDonough 2011. Airborne starch granules
as a potential contamination source at archaeological sites. Journal of Ethnobiology 31:
213-232.
Leach, H. M. 1999. Food processing technology: Its role in inhibiting or promoting change in
staple foods. In C. Gosden and J. Hather (eds.) The Prehistory of Food: Appetites for
Change. pp.129-138. London: Routledge.
Leach, H. M. 2005. Ufi kumara, the sweet potato as a yam. In C. Ballard, P. Brown, R.M.
Bourke and T. Harwood (eds.) The Sweet Potato in Oceania: A Reappraisal. pp.63-70.
Sydney: Oceania publications.
Lebot, V. 2009. Tropical Root and Tuber Crops: Cassava, Sweet Potato, Yams and Aroids.
Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
285
Lebot, V., M. Merlin, and L. Lindstrom 1997. Kava- the Pacific Elixir: The Definitive Guide to
its Ethnobotany, History and Chemistry, Rochester: Healing Arts Press.
Lee, E. S. 1966. A theory of migration. Demography 3: 47-57.
Lennstrom, H. A., and C.A. Hastorf 1995. Interpretation in context: Sampling and analysis in
paleoethnobotany. American Antiquity 60: 701-721.
Lentfer, C., and M. Therin 2006. A protocol for extraction of starch from sediments In R.
Torrence and H. Barton (eds.) Ancient Starch Research. pp.159-161. Walnut Creek:
Left Coast Press.
Lentfer, C., and R. Green 2004. Phytoliths and the evidence for banana cultivation at the Lapita
Reber-Rakival site on Watom Island, Papua New Guinea. Records of the Australian
Museum Supplement 29: 75-88.
Leppard, T. P. 2014. Mobility and migration in the Early Neolithic of the Mediterranean:
questions of motivation and mechanism World Archaeology 46: 481-501.
Lincoln, N., and T. Ladefoged 2014. Agroecology of pre-contact Hawaiian dryland farming:
the spatial extent, yield and social impact of Hawaiian breadfruit groves in Kona,
Hawai'i. Journal of Archaeological Science 49: 192-202.
Lindeboom, N., P.R. Chang and R.T. Tyler 2004. Analytical, biochemical and physicochemical
aspects of starch granule size, with emphasis on small granule starches: A review.
Starch/starke 56: 89-99.
Louwagie, G., and R. Langohr 2002. Testing land evaluation methods for crop growth on two
soils of the La Pérouse area (Easter Island, Chile). Rapa Nui Journal 16: 23-28.
Louwagie, G., C.M. Stevenson and R. Langohr 2006. The impact of moderate to marginal land
suitability on prehistoric agricultural production and models of adaptive strategies for
Easter Island (Rapa Nui, Chile). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 25: 290-317.
Loy, T. 1994. Methods in the analysis of starch residues on prehistoric stone tools. In J. G.
Hather (ed.) Tropical Archaeobotany: Applications and New Developments. pp.86-113.
London: Routledge.
Loy, T., and H. Barton 2006. Post-excavation contamination and measures for prevention. In
R. Torrence and H. Barton (eds.) Ancient Starch Research. pp.165-167. Walnut Creek:
Left Coast Press.
Loy, T., M. Spriggs, and S. Wickler 1992. Direct evidence for human use of plants 28,000
years ago: Starch residues on stone artefacts from the northern Solomon Islands.
Antiquity 66: 898-912.
Lu, T. 2003. The survival or starch residue in a subtropical environment. In D. M. Hart and L.
A. Wallis (eds.) Phytolith and Starch Research in the Australian-Pacific-Asian
Regions: The State of the Art. Papers from a Conference Held at ANU, August 2001,
Canberra, Australia. pp.119-126. Canberra: Pandanus Books.
MacGregor, A. W. 1980. Action of malt alpha-amylases on barley starch granules. MBAA
Technical Quarterly 17: 215-221.
Makela, S., M. Yazdanpanah, I. Adatia and G. Ellis 1997. Disposable surgical gloves and
pasteur (transfer) pipettes as potential sources of contamination in nitrate and nitrate
assays. Clinical chemistry 43: 2418-2420.
Martin, J. 1991. Tonga Islands: William Mariner's Account. Tonga: Vava'u Press.
286
Mason, S. L. R., J.G. Hather and G.C. Hillman 1994. Preliminary investigation of the plant
macro-remains from Dolni Vestonice 11, and its implications for the role of plant foods
in Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Europe. Antiquity 68: 48-57.
Matthews, P., and C. Gosden 1997. Plant remains from water-logged sites in the Arawe
Islands, West New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea: Implications for the history
of plant use and domestication. Economic Botany 51: 121-133.
Matthews, P., V.D. Nguyen, D. Tandang, E.M. Agoo, and D. A. Madulid 2015. Taxonomy and
ethnobotany of Colocasia esculenta and C. formosana (Araceae): Implications for the
evolution, natural range, and domestication of taro. Aroideana 38E: 153-176.
Matthews, P. J. 2014. On the Trail of Taro: An Exploration of Natural and Cultural History.
Osaka, Japan: National Museum of Ethnology.
Maude, A. 1965. Population, Land and Livelihood in Tonga. Unpublished PhD Thesis,
Australian Nation University.
McClatchey, W. 1993. Traditional use of Curcuma longa (Zingiberaceae) in Rotuma.
Economic Botany 47: 291-296.
McCoy, M. D. and M. W. Graves 2012. Small valley irrigated taro agriculture in the Hawaiian
Islands: an extension of the 'wet and dry' hypothesis. In D. Addison, M. Spriggs and P.
Matthews (eds.) Irrigated Taro Colocasia esculenta in the Indo-Pacific: biological,
social and historical perspectives. . pp.115-134. Osaka, Japan: National Museum of
Ethnology.
McKern, W. C. 1929. Archaeology of Tonga. Honolulu: Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum
Mellon, F. A., R.N Bennett, B. Holst, and G. Williamson 2002. Intact glucosinolate analysis in
plant extracts by programmed cone voltage electrospray LC/MS: Performance and
comparison with LC/MS/MS methods. Annals of Biochemistry 306: 83-91.
Mercader, J., T. Bennett, and M. Raja 2008. Middle Stone Age starch acquisition in the Niassa
Rift, Mozambique. Quaternary Research 70: 283-300.
Messner, T. 2011. Acorns and Bitter Roots: Starch Grain Research in the Prehistoric Eastern
Woodlands, Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
Messner, T., and B. Schindler 2010. Plant processing strategies and their affect upon starch
grain survival when rendering Peltandra virginica (L.) Kunth, Araceae edible. Journal
of Archaeological Science 37: 328-336.
Messner, T., R. Dickau and J. Harbison 2008. Starch grain analysis: Methodology and
applications in the Northeast. In J. P. Hart (ed.) Current Northeast Paleoethnobotany
II. pp.111-128. USA: New York State Education Department.
Miksche, J. P., and G.P. Berlyn 1976. Botanical Microtechnique and Cytochemistry, Ames:
Iowa State University Press.
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2001. Tonga: Agricultural Census 2001. Nuku'alofa,
Tonga.
Moorthy, S. N. 2002. Physicochemical and functional properties of tropical tuber starches: A
review. Starch/starke 54: 559-592.
Nelson, M. 1992. Shell midden deposits and the archaeobotanical record: a case study from the
northwest coast. In J. K. Stein (ed.) Deciphering a Shell Midden. pp.239-259. San
Diego: Academic Press.
287
Newsom, S. W. B., and M. Shaw 1997. A survey of starch particle counts in the hospital
environment in relation to the use of powdered latex gloves. Occupational medicine
47: 155-158.
Nwokocha, L. M., and P.A. Williams 2011. Comparative study of physicochemical properties
of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) and white yam starches. Carbohydrate Polymers 85:
294-304.
Ohtsuka, R. 1983. Oriomo Papuans: Ecology of Sago-Eaters in Lowland Papua. Tokyo:
University of Tokyo Press.
Oliveira, N. 2008. Subsistence Archaeobotany: Food Production and the Agricultural
Transition in East Timor. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Australian National University.
Oliveira, N. 2012. Recovering, analysing and identifying Colocasia esculenta and Dioscorea
spp. from archaeological contexts in Timor-Leste. In M. Spriggs, D. Addison and P. J.
Matthews (eds.) Irrigated Taro (Colocasia esculenta) in the Indo-Pacific: Biological,
Social and Historical Perspectives. pp.265-284. Osaka: Springer.
Oppenheimer, S. J. and M. Richards 2001. Fast trains, slow boats, and the ancestry of the
Polynesian islanders. Science Progress 84: 157-181.
Orlebar, J. 1976. A Midshipman's Journal on board H.M.S. Seringapatam During the Year,
1830. San Diego: Tofua Press.
Orliac, M. 1997. Human occupation and environmental modifications in the Papeno’o Valley,
Tahiti. In P. V. Kirch and T. L. Hunt (eds.) Historical Ecology in the Pacific Islands:
Prehistoric Environmental and Landscape Change. pp.200-229. New Haven, CT: Yale
University Press.
Orvis, K. H., C.S. Lane and S.P. Horn 2005. Laboratory production of vouchered reference
charcoal from small wood samples and non-woody plant tissues. Palynology 29: 1-11.
Palmer, J. B. (1968). Recent results from the Sigatoka Archaeological Program.. In I. Yawata,
and H. Sinoto (eds). Prehistoric Culture in Oceania. pp. 19-27. Honolulu, Bishop
Museum Press.
Parr, J. F. 2002. The identification of Xanthorrhoea resins by starch morphology: Prospects for
archaeological and taxonomic applications. Economic Botany 56: 260-270.
Parr, J. F. 2006. Microwave extraction of starch. In R. Torrence and H. Barton (eds.) Ancient
Starch Research. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Pate, J. S., and K.W. Dixon 1982. Tuberous, Cormous and Bulbous Plants. Biology of an
adaptive strategy in Western Australia, Nedlands, W. Australia: University of Western
Australia Press.
Pawley, J. B. 2008. LVSEM for biology. In J. P. H. Schatten (ed.) Biological Low-Voltage
Scanning Electron Microscopy. pp.27-106. New York: Springer.
Paz, V. 2001. Archaeobotany and cultural transformation: patterns of early plant utilisation in
Northern Wallacea. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.
Paz, V. 2005. Rock shelters, caves, and archaeobotany in Island Southeast Asia. Asian
Perspectives 44: 107-118.
Pearsall, D. M. 2000. Paleoethnobotany: A Handbook of Procedures. San Diego, California:
Academic Press.
288
Pearsall, D. M. 2007. The impact of maize on the subsistence systems of South America. In T.
Denham and P. White (eds.) The Emergence of Agriculture: A Global VIew. pp.83-
105. New York: Routledge.
Pearsall, D. M. 2010. Paleoethnobotany: A Handbook of Procedures. Second Edition. Walnut
Creek: Left Coast Press.
Pearsall, D. M., K. Chandler-Ezell, and J.A. Zeidler 2004. Maize in ancient Ecuador: Results of
residue analysis of stone tools from the Real Alto site. Journal of Archaeological
Science 31: 423-442.
Perry, L., R. Dickau, S. Zarrillo, I. Holst, D.M. Pearsall, D.R. Piperno, M.J Berman, R.G.
Cooke, K. Rademaker, A.J. Ranere, J.S. Raymond, D.H. Sandweiss, F. Scaramelli, K.
Tarble, and J.A. Zeidler 2007. Starch fossils and the domestication and dispersal of
Chili Peppers (Capsicum spp. L.) in the Americas. Science 315: 986-988.
Pickersgill, B. 2004. Crops and cultures in the Pacific: New data and new techniques for the
investigation of old questions. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 2: 1-8.
Piperno, D., A. Ranere, I. Holst, J. Iriarte, and R. Dickau 2009. Starch grain and phytolith
evidence for early ninth millennium B.P. maize from the Central Balsas River Valley,
Mexico. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 106: 5019-5024.
Piperno, D., and I. Holst 1998. The presence of starch grains on prehistoric stone tools from the
humid Neotropics. Indications of early tuber use and agriculture in Panama. Journal of
Archaeological Science 25: 765-776.
Poulsen, J. 1964. Preliminary Report on Pottery Finds in Tonga. Asian Perspectives 8: 184-
195.
Poulsen, J. 1967. A Contribution to the Prehistory of the Tongan Islands. Unpublished PhD
Thesis, Australian Nation University.
Poulsen, J. 1983. The chronology of early Tongan prehistory and the Lapita ware. Journal de
la Société des océanistes 76: 46-56.
Poulsen, J. 1987. Early Tongan Prehistory: The Lapita Period on Tongatapu and its
Relationships. Canberra: Highland Press.
Pryor, A. J. E., M. Steele, M.K. Jones, J. Svoboda and D.G. Beresford-Jones 2013. Plant foods
in the Upper Palaeolithic at Dolnı Vestonice? Parenchyma redux. Antiquity 87: 971-
984.
Purseglove, J. W. 1972. Tropical Crops: Monocotyledons. London: Longman.
Ragone, D. 1991. Ethnobotany of breadfruit in Polynesia. In P. A. Cox and S. A. Banack (eds.)
Islands, Plants and Polynesians: An Introduction to Polynesian Ethnobotany. pp.203-
220. Portland: Dioscorides Press.
Ragone, D. 2006. Artocarpus altilis (breadfruit). In C. R. Elevitch (ed.) Traditional Trees of
Pacific Islands: Their Culture, Environment and Use. pp.85-100. Hawaii: Permanent
Agriculture Resources.
Ragone, D., and B. Raynor 2009. Breadfruit and its traditional cultivation and use on Pohnpei.
In M. J. Balick (ed.) Ethnobotany of Pohnpei: Plants, People and Island Culture.
pp.63-88. Hawaii: University of Hawai'i Press.
Raviele, M. E. 2011. Experimental assessment of maize phytolith and starch taphonomy in
carbonized cooking residues. Journal of Archaeological Science 38: 2708-2713.
289
Reichert, E. T. 1913. The Differentiation and Specificity of Starches in Relation to Genera,
Species, etc.. Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
Reinhard, K., S.F. De Souza. C. Rodriques, E. Kimmerle, and S. Dorsey-Vinton 2001.
Microfossils in dental calculus: A new perspective on diet and dental disease. In E.
Williams (ed.) Human Remains: Conservation, Retrieval and Analysis. Proceedings of
a Conference Hekd in Williamsburg, VA, Nov 7-11th 1999. pp.113-118. Oxford:
Archaeopress.
Reitz, E. J., and M. Shackley 2012. Spores, pollen, phytoliths, starch grains, and other
microbotanical remains. In E. J. Reitz and M. Shackley (eds.) Environmental
Archaeology. Manuals in Archaeological Method, Theory and Technique. pp.263-300.
USA: Springer.
Rolett, B. V. 1998. Hanamiai: Prehistoric Colonization and Cultural Change in the Marquesas
Islands (East Polynesia). New Haven: Department of Anthropology and the Peabody
Museum.
Roullier, C., L. Benoit, D.B. McKey and V. Lebot 2013. Historical collections reveal patterns
of diffusion of sweet potato in Oceania obscured by modern plant movements and
recombination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 110: 2205-2210.
Roy, P. S. 1990. The Morphology and Surface Geology of the Islands of Tongatapu and
Vava'u, Kingdom of Tonga. CCOP/SOPAC Technical Report 62 Sydney: Department
of Mineral Resources, New South Wales Government.
Saul, H., J. Wilson, C.P. Heron, A. Glykou, S. Hartz and O.E. Craig 2012. A systematic
approach to the recovery and identification of starches from carbonised deposits on
ceramic vessels. Journal of Archaeological Science 39: 3483-3492.
Schatten, H. 2008. High-resolution, low voltage, field-emission scanning electron microscopy
(HRLVFESEM) Applications for cell biology and sample preparation protocols. In: H.
a. J. B. P. Schatten (ed.) Biological Low-Voltage Scanning Electron Microscopy. New
York: Springer.
Shaw, B. J., G. R. Summerhayes, H. R. Buckley and J. A. Baker 2009. The use of strontium
isotopes as an indicator of migration in human and pig Lapita populations in the
Bismarck Archipelago, Papua New Guinea. Journal of Archaeological Science 36:
1079-1091.
Sheppard, P. J. 2011. Lapita colonization across the near/remote oceania boundry. Current
Anthropology 52: 799-840.
Sheppard, P. J. and R. Walter 2006. Revised model of Solomon Islands culture. Journal of the
Polynesian Society 115: 47-76.
Spenneman, D. H. R. 1986. Archaeological Fieldwork in Tonga 1985-1986. Canberra:
Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National
University.
Spenneman, D. H. R. 2002. Urbanisation in Tonga: expansion and contraction of political
centres in a tropical chiefdom. In P. Sinclair, W. Mutoro and G. Abung (eds.) The
Development of Urbanism in Africa from a Global Perspective.
Spenneman, D. R. 1989. 'Ata 'A Tonga Mo 'Ata 'O Tonga: Early and Later Prehistory of the
Tongan Islands. Unpublished PhD Thesis Australian National University.
Spriggs, M. 1990. Why irrigation matters in Pacific prehistory. In D. E. Yen and J. M. J.
Mummery (eds.) Pacific Production Systems: Approaches to Economic Prehistory.
Papers from a Symposium at the XV Pacific Science Congress, Dunedin, New Zealand,
290
1983. Canberra: Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies,
Australian National University.
Spriggs, M. 1996. Chronology and colonisation in Island Southeast Asia and the Pacific: New
data and an evaluation. In J. Davidson, Irwin, G., Leach, B. F., Pawley, A., and D.
Brown (eds) Oceanic Culture History: Essays in Honour of Roger Green, New Zealand
Journal of Archaeology Special Publication, Auckland, pp. 33-50
Spriggs, M. 2002. Taro-cropping systems in the Southeast Asian-Pacific Region: An
archaeological update. In P. J. Matthews and S. Yoshida (eds.) Vegeculture in Eastern
Asia and Oceania. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.
Steadman, D. W., G.K. Pregill and D. V. Burley 2002. Rapid prehistoric extinction of iguanas
and birds in Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 99: 3673-
3677.
Steup, M., H. Robenek, and M. Melkonian 1983. In-vitro degredation of starch granules
isolated from spinach chloroplasts. Planta 158: 428-436.
Stevenson, C. M., J. Wozniak and S. Haoa 1999. Prehistoric agricultural production on Easter
Island (Rapa Nui), Chile. Antiquity 73: 801-812.
Summerhayes, G. K. 2000. Lapita interaction. Canberra: Australian National University.
Summerhayes, G. K., M. Leavesley, A. Fairburn, H. Mandui, J. Field, A. Ford and R. Fullagar
2010. Human adaptation and plant use in Highland New Guinea 49,000 to 44,000 years
ago. Science 330: 78-81.
Swadling, P., N. Araho and B. Ivuyo 1991. Settlements associated with the inland Sepik-Ramu
Sea. Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association Bulletin 11: 92-212.
Tabachnik, B. G. and L. S. Fidell 2007. Multivariate Statistics, 5th Ed. Boston: Allyn and
Bacon.
Tasman, A. J. 1776. Abel Jansen Tasman's Journal, Translated from the Original Dutch by
Charles Godfrey Woide, Chaplain of His Majesties Dutch Chapel of St James, British
Library.
Taylor, J. R. N., and P.S. Belton 2002. Sorghum. In J. R. N. Taylor and P. S. Belton (eds.)
Pseudocereals and less common cereals. Grain properties and utilization potential.
pp.25-91. Berlin: Springer.
Terrell, J. E. 1989. Commentary: What Lapita is and what Lapita isn't. Antiquity 63: 623-626.
Thaman, R. R. 1976. The Tongan Agricultural System: With Special Emphasis on Plant
Assemblages. Suva, Fiji: University of the South Pacific.
Therin, M. 1994. Subsistence through starch: The examination of subsistence changes on
Garua Island, West New Britain, Papua New Guinea, through the extraction and
identification of starch from sediments. . Unpublished BA (Hons) Thesis, University of
Sydney.
Therin, M. 1998. The movement of starch grains in sediments. In R. Fullagar (ed.) A Closer
Look: Recent Australian Studies of Stone Tools. pp.61-72. Sydney: Archaeological
Computing Laboratoy.
Therin, M., R. Fullagar, and R. Torrence 1999. Starch in sediments: A new approach to the
study of subsistence and land use in Papua New Guinea. In C. Gosden and J. Hather
(eds.) The Prehistory of Food: Appetites for Change. pp.438-462. London: Routledge.
291
Thery-Parisot, I., L. Chabal, and J. Chrzavzez 2010. Anthracology and taphonomy, from wood
gathering to charcoal analysis. A review of the taphonomic processes modifying
charcoal assemblages, in archaeological contexts. Palaeogeography,
Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 291: 142-153.
Thompson, G. B. 1994. Wood charcoals from tropical sites: A contribution to methodology and
interpretation. In J. G. Hather (ed.) Tropical Archaeobotany: Applications and New
Developments. pp.9-33. London: Routledge.
Tivy, J. 1990. Agricultural Ecology. Essex: Longman Group UK Limited.
Torrence, R. 2006a. Starch and archaeology. In R. Torrence and H. Barton (eds.) Ancient
Starch Research. pp.17-34. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, Inc.
Torrence, R. 2006b. Starch in sediments. In R. Torrence and H. Barton (eds.) Ancient Starch
Research. pp.145-176. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, Inc.
Torrence, R. and H. Barton (eds.) 2006. Ancient Starch Research, Walnut Creek: Left Coast
Press, Inc.
Torrence, R., R. Wright, and R. Conway 2004. Identification of starch granules using image
analysis and multivariate techniques. Journal of Archaeological Science 31: 519-532.
Ugent, D., S. Pozorski, and T. Pozorski 1981. Prehistoric remains of the sweet potato from the
Casma Valley of Peru. Phytologia 49: 401-415.
Ussher, E. 2009. Application of Starch Residue Analysis within Archaeological Research in the
Pacific: A Marquesan Case Study. Unpublished MA Thesis, University of Auckland.
Valamoti, S., D. Samuel, M. Bayram, and E. Marinova 2008. Prehistoric cereal foods from
Greece and Bulgaria: Investigation of starch microstructure in experimental and
archaeological charred remains. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 17: 265-276.
Valentin, F., and G. Clark 2013. Early polynesian mortuary behaviour at the Talasiu site,
Kingdom of Tonga. Journal of Pacific Archaeology 44: 1-14.
Valentin, F., H. R. Buckley, R. Herrscher, R. Kinaston, S. Bedford, M. Spriggs, and S.
Hawkins 2010. Lapita subsistence strategies and food consumption patterns in the
community of Teouma (Efate, Vanuatu). Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 1820-
1829
Visser, E. P. 1994. Skeletal evidence of kava use in prehistoric Fiji. Journal of the Polynesian
Society 103: 299-317.
Waddell, E. 1972. The Mound Builders: Agricultural Practices, Environment and Society in
the Central Highlands of New Guinea. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Waldegrave, R. N. 1833. Extracts from a private journal kept on board H.M.S. Seringapatam,
in the Pacific 1830. Journal of the Royal Geographic Society 3: 168-196.
Walter, A., and C. Sam 2002. Fruits of Oceania. Canberra: ACIAR Monograph No. 85.
Weston, J. 2009. Seeing red: The use of biological stain to identify cooked and
processed/damaged starch grains in archaeological residues. In A. S. Fairbairn, S.
O'Connor and B. Marwick (eds.) New Directions in Archaeological Science. pp.77-92.
Canberra: ANU E Press.
Whistler, W. A. 1991. Polynesian plant introductions. In P. A. Cox and S. A. Banack (eds.)
Islands, Plants and Polynesians: An Introduction to Polynesian Ethnobotany. pp.41-
66. Portland: Dioscorides Press.
292
Whistler, W. A. 2009. Plants of the Canoe People: An Ethnobotanical Voyage through
Polynesia. Lawai, Kaua'i: National Tropical Botanical Garden.
Williamson, B. 2006. Investigation of potential contamination on stone tools. In R. Torrence
and H. Barton (eds.) Ancient Starch Research. pp.89-90. Walnut Creek: Left Coast
Press.
Wilson, D. F., and V. Garach 1981. Surgical glove starch granuloma. Oral Surgery, Oral
Medicine, Oral Pathology 51: 342-345.
Wilson, J. 1799. A Missionary Voyage to the Southern Pacific Ocean, Performed in the Years
1796, 1797, 1798 in the Ship Duff. London: T. Gillet.
Wilson, J., K. Hardy, R. Allen, L. Copeland, R. Wrangham, and M. Collins 2010. Automated
classification of starch granules using supervised pattern recognition of morphological
properties. Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 594-604.
Wilson, S. M. 1985. Phytolith analysis at Kuk, an early agricultural site in Papua New Guinea.
Archaeology in Oceania 20: 90-97.
Wittfogel, K. 1957. Oriental Despotism: Comparative Study of Total Power. New Haven: Yale
University Press.
Wozniak, J. 1999. Prehistoric horticultural practices on Easter Island: Lithic mulched gardens
and field systems. Rapa Nui Journal 13: 95-99.
Wright, P. 2003. Preservation or destruction of plant remains by carbonization? Journal of
Archaeological Science 30: 577-583.
Wright, P. 2005. Flotation samples and some paleoethnobotanical implications. Journal of
Archaeological Science 32: 19-26.
Wylie, A. 1985. The reaction against analogy. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory
8: 63-111.
Yen, D. E. 1973a. The origins of oceanic agriculture. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology
in Oceania 8: 68-85.
Yen, D. E. 1973b. Agriculture in Anutan subsistence. In D. E. Yen and J. Gordon (eds.) Anuta:
A Polynesian Outlier in the Solomon Islands. Honolulu: Department o f Anthropology.
Yen, D. E. 1974. The Sweet Potato in Oceania: An Essay in Ethnobotany. Honolulu: Bishop
Museum Press.
Yen, D. E. 1993. The origins of subsistence agriculture in Oceania and the potentials for future
tropical food crops. Economic Botany 47: 3-14.
Yen, D. E. 2005. Reflection, refraction and recombination. In C. Ballard, P. Brown, R.M.
Bourke and T. Harwood (eds.) The Sweet Potato in Oceania: A Reappraisal. pp.181-
188. Sydney: Oceania Publication.
Yen, D. E. and J. Gordon (eds.) 1973. Anuta: A Polynesian Outlier in the Solomon Islands.
Honolulu, Hawaii: Department of Anthrpology, Bernice P. Bishop Museum.
Zarrillo, S., and B. Kooyman 2006. Evidence for berry and maize processing on the Canadian
Plains from starch grain analysis. American Antiquity 71: 473-499.
Zerega, N. J. C., D. Ragone and T.J. Motley 2004. Complex origins of breadfruit (Artocarpus
altilis, Moraceae): Implications for human migration in Oceania. American Journal of
Botany 91: 760-766.
293
Zhang, P., R.L. Whistler, J.N. BeMiller, and B.R. Hamaker 2005. Banana starch: Production,
physicochemical properties, and digestibility—A review. Carbohydrate Polymers 59:
443-458.
294
Appendix A- Species in Reference Collection
Family
Spe
cies
Co
mm
on
nam
eLo
cal nam
e (To
nga)
Origin
sU
tilisation
Ach
ariaceae
Pa
ng
ium
edu
le R
ein
w.
Foo
tball fru
itn
on
eSo
uth
east A
siaA
ltern
ative fo
od
An
acardiace
aeSp
on
dia
s du
lcis P
arkinso
nO
tahe
ite ap
ple
viIn
do
-Malaya
Alte
rnative
foo
d
Ap
ocyn
aceae
Tab
erna
emo
nta
na
au
ran
tiaca
Gau
dich
.n
on
en
on
eTro
pical A
sia/Pacific
Me
dicin
al
Arace
aeA
loca
sia m
acro
rrhiza
(L.) Scho
tt G
iant taro
kap
eTro
pical A
sia or N
ew
Gu
ine
aStap
le fo
od
Am
orp
ho
ph
allu
s pa
eon
iifoliu
s (D
en
st.) Nico
lson
Stink lily
teveM
adagascar to
Ind
o-M
alayaA
ltern
ative fo
od
Co
loca
sia escu
lenta
(L.) Scho
ttTaro
talo
Sou
the
ast Asia
Staple
foo
d
Cyrto
sperm
a m
erkusii (H
assk.) Scho
ttG
iant sw
amp
tarovia
or via
kan
aIn
do
-Malaya
Staple
foo
d
Epip
remn
um
pin
na
tum
(L.) Engl.
Drago
ntail p
lant
no
ne
Old
Wo
rld Tro
pics
Alte
rnative
foo
d
Xa
nth
oso
ma
sag
ittifoliu
m (L.) Sch
ott
Tann
iata
lo fu
tun
aTro
pical A
me
ricaStap
le fo
od
Are
caceae
Co
cos n
ucifera L.
Co
con
ut
niu
Old
Wo
rld Tro
pics
Staple
foo
d, d
rink
Do
me
stic- fibre
, thatch
, vesse
ls, timb
er
Me
dicin
al
Asp
aragaceae
Co
rdylin
e frutico
sa (L.) C
he
v.Ti
siH
imalayas to
No
rthe
rn A
ustralia
Alte
rnative
foo
d
Do
me
stic-fibe
r, thatch
Asp
len
iaceae
Asp
leniu
m sp
. Sp
lee
nw
orts
no
ne
Ind
ian/P
acific Oce
ans
Alte
rnative
foo
d
Co
nvo
lvulace
aeIp
om
oea
ba
tata
s L.
Swe
et p
otato
kum
ala
Ne
w W
orld
Staple
foo
d
Co
nvo
lvulace
aeIp
om
oea
po
lph
a (P
.K. Latz.)
Gian
t swe
et p
otato
no
ne
Au
straliaA
ltern
ative fo
od
De
nn
staed
tiales
Pterid
ium
sp.
Bracke
na
ruh
eG
lob
alA
ltern
ative fo
od
Dio
score
aceae
Dio
scorea
ala
ta (L.)
Gre
ater yam
ufi
Sou
the
ast Asia
Me
dicin
al
Dio
scorea
bu
lbifera
(L.)B
itter yam
ho
iO
ld W
orld
Trop
icsA
ltern
ative fo
od
Dio
scorea
esculen
ta (L.)
Lesse
r yamu
fileiSo
uth
east A
siaStap
le fo
od
Dio
scorea
nu
mm
ula
ria Lam
.Sp
iny yam
pa
lai
Sou
the
ast Asia
Staple
foo
d
Dio
scorea
pen
tap
hylla
(L.)Five
-finge
red
yamlen
aSo
uth
east A
siaStap
le fo
od
Dio
scorea
rotu
nd
ata
Po
ir.W
hite
Gu
ine
a yamn
on
eW
est A
fricaStap
le fo
od
Tacca
leon
top
etalo
ide
s (L.) Ku
ntze
Po
lyne
sian arro
wro
ot
ma
ho
a'a
Trop
ical Asia
Staple
foo
d
Fabace
aeIn
oca
rpu
s fag
ifer (Parkin
son
ex Zo
llinge
r) Fosb
erg
Tahitian
che
stnu
tifi
Ind
o-M
alaya/Me
lane
siaA
ltern
ative fo
od
Pu
eraria
lob
ata
(Willd
.) Oh
wi
Ku
dzu
aka
Eastern
/Sou
the
rn A
siaA
ltern
ative fo
od
Lecyth
idace
aeB
arrin
gto
nia
asia
tica (L.) K
urz
Fish-p
oiso
n tre
efu
tuIn
dian
/Pacific O
cean
sFo
raging/h
un
ting
Ba
rring
ton
ia ra
cemo
sa (L.) Sp
ren
gP
ow
de
r-pu
ff tree
no
ne
Ph
illipin
es
Do
me
stic- soap
Marattiace
aeA
ng
iop
teris sp
.G
iant fe
rns
ha
lufe
Mad
agascar to So
uth
Pacific
Alte
rnative
foo
d
295
Family
Spe
cies
Co
mm
on
nam
eLo
cal nam
e (To
nga)
Origin
sU
tilisation
Mo
raceae
Arto
carp
us a
ltilis (Parkin
son
) Fosb
erg
Bre
adfru
itm
eiN
ew
Gu
ine
aStap
le fo
od
Arto
carp
us h
eterop
hyllu
s Lam
. Jackfru
itn
on
eM
alaysiaStap
le fo
od
Ficus co
pio
sa Ste
ud
.Fig
no
ne
Sou
the
ast Asia/P
acificA
ltern
ative fo
od
Ficus tin
ctoriu
s G
.Forst
Dye
r's figm
asi'a
taIn
dia/P
acific
Alte
rnative
foo
d
Do
me
stic-fibe
r, dye
Mu
saceae
Mu
sa sp
p. (h
ybrid
s)B
anan
as/Plan
tains
fusi
Ind
o-M
alaya/Ne
w G
uin
ea
Staple
foo
d
Myristicace
aeH
orsfield
ia p
ala
uen
sis K
ane
h.
no
ne
no
ne
Palau
Alte
rnative
foo
d
Osm
un
diace
aeTo
dea
sp.
Kin
g fern
no
ne
Sou
th A
frica to N
ew
Zealan
dA
ltern
ative fo
od
Pan
dan
aceae
Pa
nd
an
us tecto
rius
Parkin
son
Screw
pin
efa
/hin
ga
no
Trop
ical Asia to
East Po
lyne
sia
Alte
rnative
foo
d
Do
me
stic- fibre
, thatch
Me
dicin
al
Pip
erace
aeP
iper m
ethysticu
m Fo
rst. f.K
avaka
vaV
anu
atu
Alte
rnative
foo
d/d
rug
Me
dicin
al
Po
aceae
Sacch
aru
m o
fficina
rum
L.Su
garcane
toTro
pical A
siaStap
le fo
od
Ru
biace
aeM
orin
da
citrifolia
L.In
dian
mu
lbe
rryn
on
uSo
uth
east A
sia
Alte
rnative
foo
d
Me
dicin
al
Solan
aceae
Sola
nu
m tu
bero
sum
L.P
otato
no
ne
Ne
w W
orld
Staple
foo
d
Zingib
erace
aeC
urcu
ma
lon
ga
L.Tu
rme
rica
ng
oSo
uth
east A
siaD
om
estic-d
ye
Zing
iber zeru
mb
et (L.) Ro
scoe
ex Sm
.Sh
amp
oo
ginge
ra
ng
oa
ng
oIn
do
-Malaya/So
uth
ern
Asia
Do
me
stic-sham
po
o
Me
dicin
al
296
Appendix B- Description of Parenchyma
Alocasia macrorrhiza (L.) G. Don: Corm (BG948)
Thin sections
Epidermis- A layer of thick periderm protects a cortical region of around 20 radially organised
rows of angular and elongated cells with very thin cell walls. Below this are two rows of
similarly shaped cells with thicker walls that make up the vascular cambium.
Ground tissue- Interior to this is a wide region of amyliferous parenchymatous tissue through
which run vascular bundles. The parenchyma cells tend to be between 80-130µm in length, and
70-100µm in width. Cells are mostly rounded and isodiametric in dimension (60%), however
around 40% are elongated. Inter-cellular spaces are present but no cell contents were observed
aside from cell nuclei. This was most likely a result of the process of the construction of the
histological thin sections.
Vascular tissues- Vascular bundles are atactostele and so are widely separated and run
apparently randomly through the organ. They are amphicribal concentric in arrangement with
open ends (phloem surrounding the xylem apart from at each end of the bundle). The bundles
range in length from 300-560µm, and 200-450µm in width.
Charred samples
Charred dried- Within the cortex the vascular tissues preserve quite well. The cells within the
conjunctive tissue become more irregularly rounded in shape but the dimensions are much the
same as within the thin section. Cell walls become thicker and the inter-cellular spaces turn to
solid charcoal. The tissues within the pith are altered by the formation of large cavities that
compress the surrounding cells. Some starch granules preserve.
Charred fresh- The tissues are much the same as the sample charred from dried state, apart from
the phloem which has become solid carbon within the cortex.
297
Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson) Fosberg: Fruit (BG947)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- An outer epidermis composed of two to three
layers of thickened radially organized rounded and isodiametric cells. Below this is a wide
region of amyliferous parenchymatous tissue through which run vascular bundles. These
parenchyma cells tend to be between 40-60µm in length, and 30-40µm in width. Cell shape and
dimensions are relatively diverse, but the most common cell combination is rounded and
isodiametric in dimension (40%), however a small number are angular and elongate (25%), or
rounded and elongate (28%). Inter-cellular spaces are present and starch granules and druses
were also observed within cells. Vascular bundles are atactostele and so are widely separated
and run apparently randomly through the organ. The bundles are amphicribal u-shaped in
arrangement (phloem surrounding the xylem in a u-shaped formation), and range in length from
100-600µm, and 70-280µm in width.
Charred samples
Charred dried- Within the vascular tissues, the xylem preserved quite well but the phloem
turned to solid carbon. The epidermis also becomes solid carbon along with many rows of cells
within the ground tissue. The remaining cells within the conjunctive tissue are much the same as
within the thin section.
Charred fresh- The tissues are generally preserved better within the freshly charred sample. The
phloem has turned to solid carbon surrounding the xylem, but the ground and boundary tissues
are still relatively the same morphologically.
Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson) Fosberg: Seed (BG947)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- An outer thin epidermis composed of only one
layer of radially organised rounded and isodiametric cells with thickened cell walls. Interior to
this is a wide region of amyliferous parenchymatous tissue through which run vascular bundles
of varying sizes. The parenchyma cells tend to be between 60-80µm in length, and 50-65µm in
298
width. Cells are mostly rounded and isodiametric in dimension, however roughly 25% are
elongated. Inter-cellular spaces are present and starch granules and druses were also observed
within cells. The pith is composed of sclerenchyma. Vascular bundles are atactostele and so are
widely separated and run apparently randomly through the organ. They are amphicribal
concentric in arrangement (phloem surrounding the xylem). The bundles range in length from
80-900µm, and 75-360µm in width.
Charred samples
Charred dried- Within the cortex the cells forming the conjunctive tissues have thicker cell walls
and inter-cellular spaces become solid carbon. The cells within the pith are much the same as
within the thin section. The xylem preserved well but the phloem turned to solid carbon during
charring.
Charred fresh-Within the vascular tissues, the xylem preserved quite well but the phloem turned
to solid carbon. The epidermis also becomes solid carbon and large cavities formed in the pith
that compresses the surrounding cells. The remaining cells within the conjunctive tissue are
much the same as within the fresh sample.
Angiopteris sp. :Rhizome (MP1152-005)
Thin sections
Epidermis- An outer epidermis composed of around three layers of radially organised rounded
and elongated cells with thickened cell walls.
Ground tissue- Interior to this is a region of cortical parenchymatous tissue. The parenchyma
cells tend to be between 100-150µm in length, and 85-100µm in width. Cells are a combination
of rounded and elongate in dimension (53%), and isodiametric (47%). Inter-cellular spaces are
present and starch granules were also observed within cells. Within the parenchyma is a wide
region of collenchyma with smaller rounded isodiametric cells and large inter-cellular spaces.
Vascular tissues- A dictyostele arrangement is present, however the vascular bundles could not
be clearly observed within the histological thin sections.
299
Charred samples
Charred dried- The xylem preserves relatively well, but the surrounding phloem turns to solid
carbon along with the fiber sheath. Most conjunctive parenchyma cells become solid carbon, but
some small vessels survive within these. Some starch granules preserve.
Charred fresh-The vascular tissues are much the same as the dried charred sample. Many cells
within the ground tissue flatten and compress, and large cavities forms within the pith. The
epidermis becomes mostly solid carbon.
Asplenium sp.:Rhizome (EU003)
Thin sections
Epidermis- An outer epidermis composed of one layers of radially organised angular and
isodiametric cells with thickened cell walls. Below this is a broad region of approximately seven
to eight rows of fibres that separate the epidermis and the conjuctive tissue within the pith.
Ground tissue- Interior to this is a region of cortical parenchymatous tissue. The parenchyma
cells tend to be between 55-80µm in length, and 45-70µm in width. Cells are rounded in shape
and predominantly isodiametric in dimension (77%), with a smaller percentage being elongate
(23%). Inter-cellular spaces are present within this conjunctive tissue. Starch granules and
druses were also observed within the cell contents.
Vascular tissues- A dictyostele overall arrangement is present, where the vascular chamber is
broken into segments. The segments are amphicribal concentric in arrangement, where the
xylem vessels are surrounded by the phloem. The sizes of these segments differ, with an total
length range of 770-960µm and width range of 390-810µm.
Charred samples
Charred dried and fresh- The xylem preserves relatively well, but the surrounding phloem turns
to solid carbon along with the fiber sheath. Most conjunctive parenchyma cells become
compressed and more angular, especially longitudinally, and some become solid carbon. Many
very small starch grains survived the charring process.
300
Asplenium sp. :Rhizome (MP1152-009)
Thin sections
Epidermis- An outer epidermis composed of one layers of radially organised angular and
isodiametric cells with thickened cell walls. Below this is a broad region of fibres that separate
the epidermis and the conjuctive tissue within the pith
Ground tissue- Interior to this is a region of amyliferous cortical parenchymatous tissue. The
conjunctive parenchyma cells are relatively large compared to other ground tissue observed
within the comparative collection. They range from 115-175µm in length, and 90-130µm in
width. Cells are consistently angular in shape but range markedly in dimension. Around 53%
are isodiametric and 47% are elongated. Inter-cellular spaces are present and starch granules
were also observed within cells.
Vascular tissues- A dictyostele arrangement is present, where the vascular chamber is broken
into segments. The segments are amphicribal concentric in arrangement, whereby the xylem is
surrounded by the phloem, and range in length from 160-950µm and width from 110-570µm.
Charred samples
Charred dried- The xylem preserves relatively well, but the surrounding phloem turns to solid
carbon along with the fiber sheath. Tension fractures divide the conjunctive parenchyma cells
which mostly turns to solid carbon, especially within the periderm.
Charred fresh- The vascular tissues are much the same as for the dried charred sample, however
the ground tissue preserves much better in the fresh sample. The morphology of the cells is
angular and broadly isodiametric. Some compression of cells is visible, and the periderm
becomes mostly solid carbon. Fibre bundles also preserve.
301
Barringtonia asiatica (L.) Kurz: Fruit (EU2012-06)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- An outer epidermis composed of one layer of
very small radially organised rounded and isodiametric cells with a thick outer cell wall. Below
this is a row of palisade mesophyll cells. Interior to this is a wide region of amyliferous
parenchymatous tissue. The parenchyma cells tend to be between 55-105µm in length, and 40-
75µm in width. Cells are consistently angular and isodiametric in dimension. Inter-cellular
spaces are present but no cell contents were observable within the thin sections. Vascular
bundles are of the eustele type, and amphivasal concentric in arrangement (xylem surrounding
the phloem) with a fiber sheath. Bundles range in length from 85-160µm, and 85-150µm in
width.
Barringtonia asiatica (L.) Kurz: Seed (EU2012-06)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- An outer epidermis composed of one layers of
very small radially organised rounded and isodiametric cells with a thick outer cell wall. Below
this is a region of cortical parenchyma, roughly the same size and shape as the ground tissue
within the pith. Two rows of vascular cambium separates the cortex and pith. Within the cortical
and conjunctive tissue within the pith, the parenchyma cells tend to be between 50-70µm in
length, and 35-50µm in width. Cells are consistently mostly rounded and isodiametric in
dimension, with roughly 33% being rounded and elongated. Inter-cellular spaces are present and
starch was observable within the cells. Vascular bundles were not observed within the
histological thin sections for this specimen.
Charred samples
Charred dried- Cells within the epidermis, cortex and conjunctive tissue at the pith all survive
charring with very little modification of morphology.
302
Charred fresh- These tissues do not preserve so well when charred from fresh state. The cells
become mostly solid carbon within the cortex and pith, with a few small surviving cells
interspersed throughout. Large cavities form within these regions. The epidermis becomes solid
carbon with cell wall casts.
Barringtonia racemosa (L.) Spreng: Fruit (EU2012-12)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- A thin epidermis is composed of a single layer
of angular and elongated cells with thick cell walls. Another possible ten rows of rounded and
elongated cortical parenchyma below the epidermis. Within the conjunctive tissue within the
pith, the parenchyma cells tend to be between 45-65µm in length, and 35-50µm in width. Cells
are consistently mostly rounded and isodiametric in dimension, with roughly 28% being
rounded and elongated. Inter-cellular spaces are present but no cell contents were observed.
Vascular bundling is within a eustele arrangement typical of dicotyledons, and is of amphivasal
concentric arrangement. The length range of the bundles is between 150-400µm, and the width
is 110-300µm.
Barringtonia racemosa (L.) Spreng: Seed (EU2012-12)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- An outer epidermis composed of one layers of
very small radially organised rounded and isodiametric cells with a thick outer cell wall. Below
this is a region of cortical parenchyma which is angular and elongated with thick cell walls.
303
Two rows of very small angular and elongated cells make up the vascular cambium which
separates the cortex and pith. Within the conjunctive tissue within the pith, the parenchyma cells
tend to be between 60-85µm in length, and 50-70µm in width. Cells are consistently angular
and broadly isodiametric. Inter-cellular spaces are present and starch was observed within the
parenchymatous cells. No vascular bundles were able to be observed within the histological thin
sections.
Charred samples
Charred dried- The parenchymous cells within the cortex and pith generally remain in good
condition throughout the charring process. However the cells become more rounded, with
thicker cell walls, and inter-cellular spaces become solid carbon. The epidermal cells become
more compressed. Tension fractures form in the pith.
Charred fresh- These tissues do not preserve so well when charred from fresh state. The cells
become mostly solid carbon within the cortex and pith, with a few small surviving cells
interspersed throughout. Large cavities form within these regions. The epidermis becomes solid
carbon with cell wall casts.
Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott: Corm (BG1013)
Thin sections
Epidermis-- An outer thickened epidermis composed of three layers. Below this is a region of
around 20 rows of cortical parenchyma which is angular and elongated with thin cell walls. Two
rows of angular and isodiametric cells with thick cell walls make up the vascular cambium
which separates the cortex and pith.
Ground tissue- Within the conjunctive tissue within the pith, the amyliferous parenchyma cells
are between 70-100µm in length, and 50-75µm in width. Cells are very inconsistent in shape
and dimension. Around 33% of cells are rounded and isodiametric, 28% are rounded and
elongated, 20% are angular and isodiametric, and another 20% are angular and elongated.. Inter-
cellular spaces are present, and starch and raphides (calcium oxylate crystals) were observed
within the cells contents.
304
Vascular tissues- Vascular bundles of both amphivasal concentric and u-shaped arrangement are
present within an atactostele type of overall arrangement within the organ. The length range of
the bundles is 230-580µm, and the width is 160-400µm.
Charred samples
Charred dried- Within the vascular tissues, the xylem preserves very well but the phloem turns
to solid carbon within the surrounding xylem. The cells walls within the conjunctive tissues of
the pith become much thicker and the tissues become more vesicular. The epidermis is mostly
turned to ash and shed. Where these cells do survive the preservation is very good and
morphology does not differ much from the thin sections.
Charred fresh- The tissues charred from fresh state becomes more compressed, with inter-
cellular spaces becoming solid carbon. Large cavities form within the pith. The vascular tissues
survive in much the same form as for the dry charred sample.
Cordyline fruticosa (L.) A.Chev: Stem (EU006)
Thin sections
Epidermis-- An outer thickened epidermis and below this is a region of cortical parenchyma
which is rounded and isodiametric with thin cell walls. There is no obvious vascular cambium
which separates the cortex and pith.
Ground tissue- Within the pith, the parenchyma cells are between 55-75µm in length, and 40-
55µm in width. Cells are consistently angular in shape but vary in dimension. Around 55% of
cells are isodiametric and the remaining 45% are elongated. Inter-cellular spaces are present, but
no cell contents were observed apart from the cell nuclei.
Vascular tissues- Vascular bundles of amphivasal concentric arrangement are present within an
atactostele type of overall arrangement within the organ. The length range of the bundles is 200-
300µm, and the widths are between 100-200µm. Fibres also sheath each of the vascular
bundles.
Charred samples
Charred dried- The phloem within the vascular bundles becomes a cavity surrounded by xylem
and fibres. Large cavities also form between these bundles in many places. Elsewhere the cells
305
become more compressed. The epidermis turns to solid carbon with casts of cell walls on the
exterior surface.
Charred fresh- These tissues do not preserve so well when charred from fresh state. The cells
become compressed, folded and flattened within the cortex and pith, with a few small surviving
cells interspersed throughout. Pitting is visible on the inside of the cells. Large cavities form
within these regions of conjunctive tissue. The epidermis becomes solid carbon with cell wall
casts.
Cyrtosperma merkusii (Hassk.) Schott: Corm (EU2012-
09)
Thin sections
Epidermis- Could not be viewed within the histological thin sections.
Ground tissue- The amyliferous parenchyma cells that form the conjunctive tissue are between
40-80µm in length, and 30-50µm in width. Cells are consistently rounded in shape but vary in
dimension. Around 65% of cells are elongated and the remaining 35% are isodiametric. Inter-
cellular spaces are present, and starch granules were observed within the cell contents.
Vascular tissues- Vascular bundles of amphivasal arrangement with open ends are present
within an atactostele type of overall arrangement within the organ and so being present at
random intervals and locations within the organ. The length range of the bundles is 300-500µm,
and the widths are between 200-300µm.
Charred samples
Charred dried- The phloem within the vascular bundles becomes compressed and solid carbon is
some places, surrounded by xylem. The vascular bundles tend to break away from the
surrounding tissue leaving a large cavity. Large cavities also form between the conjunctive
tissues in many places. Elsewhere the cells are preserved well but the tissue becomes more
vesicular overall.
Charred fresh- The fresh charred sample turned to ash.
306
Dioscorea alata (L.): Tuber (EU0013)
Thin sections
Epidermis- An epidermis consisting of four layers of angular and elongated cells with thick cell
walls.
Ground tissue- Below this is a region of amyliferous parenchyma cells that form the conjunctive
tissue. These are between 80-110µm in length, and 50-75µm in width. Cells are consistently
rounded in shape but vary in the regularity of shape and dimension. Approximately 28% of cells
are irregularly rounded in shape and elongated in dimension. The remainder are rounded and
elongated (45%) or isodiametric (29%). Inter-cellular spaces are present, and many starch
granules were observed within the cell contents.
Vascular tissues- Vascular bundles are of closed collateral arrangement and are present within
an atactostele type of overall arrangement within the organ and so being present at random
intervals and locations within the organ. The length range of the bundles is 230-880µm, and the
widths are between 85-340µm.
Charred samples
Charred dried- The phloem within the vascular bundles becomes a cavity abutting the xylem
within the collateral bundle. Large cavities also form within the pith. Elsewhere the cells
become more irregularly shaped with thin walls. Many large starch granules are preserved
within the cells.
Charred fresh- The cells within the cortex become mostly solid carbon that have amalgamated
with inter-cellular spaces, with a few small cells interspersed. Large cavities form within these
regions of conjunctive tissue. Starch is preserved with the cells. Vascular bundles are preserved
in much the same form as for the sample that was dry charred.
307
Dioscorea bulbifera (L.): Aerial bulbil (BG942)
Thin sections
Epidermis- One layer of thickened epidermis. Below this is a region of cortical parenchyma
cells that are rounded and broadly isodiametric with thick cell walls. Many intercellular spaces
are also present between cells. A region of vascular cambium separates the parenchyma within
the cortex and the pith. This is made up of five rows of angular and elongated cells.
Ground tissue- The amyliferous parenchyma within the pith are between 95-130µm in length,
and 75-100µm in width. Cells are consistently rounded in shape but vary in dimension.
Approximately 62% of cells are rounded in shape and isodiametric in dimension. The remainder
are rounded and elongated. Inter-cellular spaces are not present within the conjunctive tissue,
but many starch granules were observed within the cell contents.
Vascular tissues- Vascular bundles could not be observed within the histological thin sections.
Charred samples
Charred dried- The epidermis becomes solid carbon during charring. Cells within the
conjunctive tissues of the pith remain rounded and isodiametric but the walls thicken and inter-
cellular spaces become solid carbon. Large cavities form throughout the ground tissue.
Charred fresh- The boundary and ground tissues are mostly the same as for the sample charred
from dried state, however tension fractures and larger cavities form.
Dioscorea esculenta (L.): Tuber (EU020)
Thin sections
Epidermis- The epidermal region consists of three layers of angular and elongated cells.
Ground tissue- Below this is a region of amyliferous parenchyma which are between 150-
235µm in length, and 100-160µm in width. Cells are consistently rounded in shape but vary in
dimension. Approximately 62% of cells are rounded in shape and isodiametric in dimension.
The remainder are rounded and elongated. Inter-cellular spaces are sometimes present within
the conjunctive tissue but are rare. Many compound starch granules were observed within the
cell contents.
308
Vascular tissues- Vascular bundles are within an atactostele arrangement and so randomly run
throughout the organ. The bundles themselves are of closed collateral arrangement, with no
cambium between the vascular tissues. The length range of the bundles is 150-380µm, and the
widths are between 80-240µm.
Charred samples
Charred dried- The phloem within the vascular bundles becomes a cavity abutting the xylem
within the collateral bundles. Large cavities also form between these bundles within the
conjunctive tissue. Elsewhere the cells become shallower, and the epidermal cells become more
compressed.
Charred fresh- These tissues do not preserve so well when charred from fresh state. The cells
become more fragile with thinner cell walls. There is also carbonization of cell walls within
large cavities that form in the ground tissue.
Dioscorea nummularia Lam.: Tuber (EU012)
Thin sections
Epidermis- A thickened epidermis with a layer of five rows of angular and elongated cortical
parenchyma cells.
Ground tissue- Below this is a region of amyliferous parenchyma which are between 75-115µm
in length, and 60-100µm in width. Cells are consistently rounded in shape but vary slightly in
dimension. Approximately 82% of cells are rounded in shape and isodiametric in dimension.
The remainder are rounded and elongated. Inter-cellular spaces are present within the
conjunctive tissue and starch granules were observed within the cell contents.
Vascular tissues- Vascular bundles are within an atactostele arrangement and so randomly run
throughout the organ. The bundles themselves are of closed or open collateral arrangement, with
a cambium separating the vascular tissues. The length range of the bundles is 155-435µm, and
the widths are between 100-250µm.
Charred samples
Charred dried- The parenchyma cells within the cortex become more irregularly shaped, while
those in the pith mostly retain the original morphology. The vascular cambium becomes a
309
tension fracture and separates the cortex from the pith. Within the vascular tissues, the phloem
either becomes a cavity or survives in original condition.
Charred fresh- The vascular and conjunctive tissues become more vesicular when charred from
fresh state. The cell walls merge in places and become areas of solid carbon.
Epipremnum pinnatum (L.) Engl.: Corm (EU011)
Thin sections
Epidermis- A thickened single-layer peridermis lies above a region consisting of around five
rows of angular and elongated primary cortical parenchyma cells with thin cell walls. Another
five rows of similarly shaped cells compose a region of secondary cortex. A row of vascular
cambium that consists of one layer of rounded and elongated cells.
Ground tissue- Below this is a region of conjunctive tissue within the pith, consisting of
amyliferous parenchyma cells which are between 70-95µm in length, and 50-70µm in width.
Cells are consistently rounded in shape but vary slightly in dimension. Approximately 72% of
cells are rounded in shape and isodiametric in dimension. The remainder are rounded and
elongated. Inter-cellular spaces are present within this conjunctive tissue and small sparsely
distributed starch granules were observed within the cell contents.
Vascular tissues- Vascular bundles are within a eustele arrangement. The bundles themselves
are of amphivasal arrangement (phloem surrounded by xylem) in a u-shape pattern. The length
range of the bundles is 220-375µm, and the widths are between 180-300µm.
Charred samples
Charred dried and fresh- Cells within the boundary and conjunctive tissues become compressed
and collapsed around the vascular bundles. Many crystals survive and can be seen within the
cell contents. The xylem and fibre sheaths maintain their original morphology, but the phloem
becomes a cavity within the surrounding xylem vessels.
310
Ficus copiosa Steud.: Fruit (EU-2012-13)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- Parenchyma cells are consistently rounded in
shape and isodiametric in dimension. Inter-cellular spaces are visible between these. The length
range of these cells is between 40-60µm, and the width range is between 30-45µm. Vascular
bundles of closed collateral and amphicribal u-shaped or concentric form were observed within
a eustele-type arrangement in the fruit. The bundles ranged in length from 70-380µm, and in
width from 60-150µm.
Charred samples
Charred dried and fresh- The parenchyma cells in the cortex of both the fresh and dry-charred
samples become compressed and inter-cellular spaces become solid carbon. Seeds in the pith of
the fruit survive charring and maintain original morphology. The surface morphology also
retains the original ‘peaked’ texture. The ground tissues also become more vesicular overall.
The vascular bundles retain the xylem but the phloem turns to solid carbon.
Ficus tinctoria G.Forst.: Fruit (MP1152-004)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- Parenchyma cells are consistently angular in
shape but vary in dimension. The majority of cells are elongated in dimension (57%), with just
under half being isodiametric (43%). Inter-cellular spaces are visible between these but no cell
contents were recorded in this particular sample. The length range of these cells is between 55-
90µm, and the width range is between 25-70µm. No vascular bundles were recorded.
311
Charred samples
Charred dried and fresh- The cells in the cortex become solid carbon within the wet-charred
sample, but those in the dry-charred sample are still visible but have become compressed. The
conjunctive tissues closer to the pith collapses during charring from both fresh and dried state.
The seeds survive the charring process. Some original surface texture is also retained in parts.
Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.: Tuber (EU023)
Thin sections
Epidermis- A region of periderm consisting of about four rows of radially-orientated angular
and isodiametric cells with thin cell walls.
Vascular Tissues- Below this is a region of parenchymous secondary phloem outside the
cambium consisting of angular cells that range from elongated (28%) to isodiametric (72%) in
dimension. The length range of these cells is 80-115µm, and the widths vary from 60-90µm.
The cambium consists of two rows of angular and elongated cells with slightly thicker walls,
and separates the secondary phloem and xylem. The parenchyma within the secondary xylem
themselves are the same as those within the phloem, however there are regions of anomalous
tertiary growth adjacent to individual vessels. These parenchyma divide both periclinally and
tangentially to produce concentric radiating rings of tertiary xylem.
Charred samples
Charred dried- Parenchyma cells retain much of the original fresh morphology, but become
possibly slightly shallower. Some tension fractures within the conjunctive tissues. The vascular
tissues survive the charring process with no noticeable modification.
Charred fresh- The cells within the cortex become more compressed and often appear fractured
and condensed. The epidermal cells retain original condition, but tension fractures separate
these boundary tissues from the conjunctive tissues in places. Vascular tissues are much the
same as within the dry-charred sample.
312
Inocarpus fagifer (Parkinson ex Zollinger) Fosberg:
Seed (BG955)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- A layer of endocarp protects the internal region
of amyliferous parenchyma cells. This consists of a row of radially-orientated angular and
isodiametric cells with very thick cell walls. The endocarp also divides the internal
parenchymous tissue through the centre longitudinally. Contained within the bounds of the
endocarp is a region of parenchymous tissue that consists of rounded and predominantly
isodiametric cells (75%), with a length range of 45-100µm and width range of 35-75µm. The
bundling arrangements of vascular tissues are amphicribal u-shaped and are within an
atactostele arrangement whereby the tissues run seemingly randomly throughout the organ.
Charred samples
Charred dried and fresh- The epidermal cells become solid carbon, and the cells within the
conjunctive tissue become more condensed and compressed. Within the vascular bundles, the
xylem preserves well but the phloem becomes solid carbon surrounding these tissues. Large
vessels form in the pith of the organ.
Morinda citrifolia L.: Fruit (BG941)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- Parenchyma cells are consistently rounded in
shape but vary in dimension. The majority of cells are isodiametric (85%), with a smaller
percentage being elongated (15%). Inter-cellular spaces are visible between these but no cell
313
contents were recorded in this particular sample. The length range of these cells is between 40-
60µm, and the width range is between 30-50µm. Vascular tissues were visible but as this is not
a sample of vegetative parenchyma these bundles did not match any of the typologies used for
root or stem-derived tissues.
Charred samples
Charred dried and fresh- Epidermal cells turn to solid carbon after charring from both dried and
fresh states. The cells within the conjunctive tissues become compressed and cell walls can
collapse. The xylem retains original condition, but the phloem becomes a cavity.
Musa sp.1: Fruit (BG1014)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- Within the conjunctive tissue, the cells are
irregularly rounded in shape but vary in dimensions. The majority of cells are isodiametric
(85%), with the remainder being more elongated (15%). Inter-cellular spaces are visible, as are
large numbers of duct cavities located between the cells closer to the pith of the organ. The
length range of these cells is 60-90µm, and the widths range from 50-70µm. Small vascular
bundles are present in a eustele overall arrangement and are of amphicribal concentric
arrangement. These bundles range in length from 80-115µm, and in width from 70-100µm.
Many large starch granules are visible within the cell contents.
Charred samples
Charred dried- Many large starch granules survive the charring process. Cells within the
boundary tissues, cortex and pith all mostly collapse. The xylem and fibre bundles retain
original morphology but phloem becomes a cavity.
Charred fresh- The parenchyma cells in the pith retain original condition in terms of shape and
dimensions, but the inter-cellular spaces become cavities alongside the duct cavities. Tension
fractures also form. The cortical region is more collapsed than the pith, with compressed and
fractured cells walls.
314
Musa sp.2: Fruit (BG995)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- The overall morphology of this sample is very
similar to Musa sp.1 (BG1014) above, however there are several difference in cell size and
shape that can allow differentiation between these two species. Cell lengths range from 73-
215µm, and widths range from 46-170µm. Within the conjunctive tissue, the cells are
irregularly rounded in shape but vary in dimensions. The majority of cells are isodiametric
(75%), with the remainder being more elongated (25%). Inter-cellular spaces are visible, as are
large numbers of duct cavities located between the cells closer to the pith of the organ. Large
vascular bundles are present in a eustele overall arrangement and are of amphicribal concentric
arrangement. These bundles range in length from 220-680µm, and in width from 180-370µm.
Bundles of fibres are disparately located within the organ. Many large starch granules are
visible within the cell contents.
Charred samples
Charred dried and fresh- Within both the samples wet and dry-charred the cell morphology
retains original condition, however inter-cellular spaces become solid carbon. The duct cavities
are also preserved. Some tension fractures form within the pith, and fractures also form along
the vascular cambium. Overall the tissues become more vesicular. Within the vascular tissues,
the phloem becomes a cavity.
Pandanus tectorius Parkinson: Fruit phalange
(EU2011-03)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
315
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- The epidermis is composed of one row of
thickened, rounded and isodiametric cells. Below the epidermis is one row of similarly rounded
and isodiametric cells with slightly thinner cell walls. This borders a region of parenchyma
interspersed with vascular bundles surrounded by fibre sheaths. The vascular bundles are more
highly concentrated towards the centre of the phalange and tend to be of amphicribal
arrangement. The length range of these bundles is 260-750µm, and the width range is from 210-
430µm. The amyliferous parenchyma cells form the conjunctive tissue for the organ and are
composed of rounded cells that are mostly isodiametric in dimension (63%). These cells range
in length from 60-100µm and in width from 40-70µm. Inter-cellular spaces are often present
between the cells.
Charred samples
Charred dried and fresh- When charred, cell morphology becomes more irregularly rounded and
slightly collapsed. The fibre sheaths surrounding the vascular bundles retain their original
morphology along with the xylem, but the phloem becomes a cavity in the centre of the bundle.
Pangium edule Reinw.: Fruit (EU2012-02)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- A periderm forms the outer surface of the organ
and this boundary tissue is made up of around six rows of angular and elongated cells. Below
the periderm is a region of parenchyma interspersed with sclerenchyma. These cells have
relatively thick cell walls. The conjunctive tissue is composed of rounded cells that are mostly
isodiametric in dimension (75%). These cells range in length from 40-80µm and in width from
30-60µm. Inter-cellular spaces are often present between the cells. Xylem vessels are present
near the pith of the fruit.
Charred samples
Charred dried and fresh- The parenchmous cells within the ground and boundary tissues
collapsed in many regions, especially closer to the pith. Other regions have retained the original
316
cell morphology. Within the vascular tissues the xylem vessels have also retained the condition
of the fresh samples, but the phloem has become solid carbon.
Pueraria lobata (Willd): Root (BG974)
Thin sections
Epidermis- A region of periderm consisting of about five rows of radially-orientated angular
and isodiametric cells with thin cell walls.
Vascular tissues- Below this is a region of parenchymous cortex outside the cambium consisting
of rounded cells that range from elongated (35%) to isodiametric (65%) in dimension. The
length range of these cells is 25-45µm, and the widths vary from 20-30µm. The cambium
separates the cortex from the stele, and is composed of an endodermis and pericyle of one row
each. The parenchyma within the secondary xylem themselves are the same as those within the
phloem, however there are regions of anomalous tertiary growth adjacent to individual vessels.
There are many vessels within the xylem which is polyarch in arrangement. Many areas of
tertiary xylem and phloem are also present and are dissected by medullary rays.
Charred samples
Charred dried- Cells in all tissues become compressed, including the secondary xylem which
also becomes fractured and compacted. However, the vessels within the xylem survive charring
very well. Areas of solid carbon form around the stele and tension fractures separate the
vascular tissues along the phloem in places.
Charred fresh- Within the sample charred from fresh state, the preservation of cell morphology
within the stele was much greater. Large xylem vessels also maintain original condition and
structure. The cambium split after a large tension fracture formed along this boundary,
separating the secondary vascular tissues. Some starch granules also survived the charring
process.
317
Piper methysticum G.Forst: Root (EU-2011-02)
Thin sections
Epidermis- A region of periderm consisting of three rows of angular and isodiametric cells that
are thick walled and radially orientated.
Vascular tissues- Below this is cortical amyliferous parenchymous tissue within the primary
tissues, made up of angular and isodiametric cells with very few inter-cellular spaces. Within
this region are wide medullary ray sections made up of ligneous fibres which are thick walled
cells rounded in shape in transverse section, and also xylem vessels. Scanty paratrachial to
vasicentric layers of xylem cells abut these rays and are differentiated by thinner walls and more
angular shape. Bundles of phloem are contained within these areas of xylem. Exterior to the
cambium are further bundles of xylem within the parenchymous tissues. At the centre of the
root is a region of pith. The cells within the pith have a length range of 45-75 µm and a width
range of 35-60µm, and are rounded and isodiametric in dimension with many inter-cellular
spaces.
Charred samples
Charred dried and fresh- When charred from both fresh and dried state, the root of the kava
plant retains much of the original ground and vascular tissue morphology. Cell shape and
dimensions do not change drastically, however some small cavities can form within the
medullary rays of fibres alongside the xylem vessels. Large amounts of starch survive the
charring process within the ground tissues between the rays of fibres, in fact these cells are jam-
packed full of starch.
318
Pteridium sp.: Rhizome (EU002)
Thin sections
Epidermis- An outer epidermis composed of around three layers of radially organised rounded
and elongated cells with thickened cell walls.
Ground tissue- Interior to this is a region of cortical parenchymatous tissue. The parenchyma
cells tend to be between 80-115µm in length, and 65-90µm in width. Cells are a combination of
angular in shape and elongate in dimension (60%), and isodiametric (40%). Inter-cellular spaces
are not present and starch granules were also observed within cells.
Vascular tissues- A dictyostele arrangement is present, however the vascular bundles could not
be clearly observed within the histological thin sections.
Charred samples
Charred dried and fresh- Most tissues become either very compacted or turn to solid carbon
when charred from either fresh or dried state. Large cavities and tension fractures form
throughout the ground and vascular tissues. This species within the genus Pteridium would be
very hard to identify as charcoal.
Solanum tuberosum (L.): Stem tuber
Thin sections
Epidermis- An outer thickened epidermis outside a region of cortical parenchyma. The cortex
consists of about four to five rows of angular and elongate cells with thinner walls. The vascular
cambium is also two layers of angular cells that are slightly more isodiametric
Ground tissue- Interior to this is a region of amyliferous parenchymatous tissue. The
parenchyma cells tend to be between 90-130µm in length, and 70-100µm in width. Cells are
irregularly rounded in shape and elongated in dimension (53%), and isodiametric (47%). Inter-
cellular spaces are not present but many large starch granules were observed within cells.
Vascular tissues- Vascular bundles are bicollateral in arrangement and tend to be long and thin
in overall dimensions. The bundles themselves are arranged within an atactostele orientation,
and so appear to be randomly located within the organ.
319
Spondias dulcis (L.): Fruit (BG981)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- A region of periderm forms the boundary tissue
for this fruit, composed of an outer thickened periderm, and a cortical region of approximately
five to ten rows of rounded and isodiametric cells with thick cell walls. The thickness of the
periderm varies around the circumference of the organ. The ground tissue within the pith has
thinner cell walls and is angular in shape and primarily elongated in dimension (75%). These
cells within the conjunctive tissue range in length from 85-160µm , and in width from 55-95µm.
There are no inter-cellular spaces visible within the cells, but many starch granules can be seen
within the cell contents. Vascular bundles vary between closed collateral and amphicribal
concentric arrangement within an overall eustele arrangement of these tissues within the organ.
These bundles range in length from 280-400µm, and in width from 140-240µm.
Charred samples
Charred dried- The tissues within the periderm and cortex becomes solid carbon with small
vessels interspersed throughout these regions. Other ground tissues generally maintain the
original cell shape but these can also appear fractured. Within the vascular tissues, the xylem
preserves well but is surrounded by a band of phloem that has turned to solid carbon. Large
cavities form in the pith.
Charred fresh-The tissues within the fresh-charred sample have many of the same modifications
as within the sample dried prior to charring. The periderm and cortex becomes a region of solid
carbon, and some ground tissues within the pith retain the original morphology with angular and
elongated cells. However aside from these areas of cells, the pith mostly becomes highly
vesicular with large cavities and tension fractures.
320
Syzygium malaccense (L.)Merr.: Fruit (EU2012-01)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- A thin epidermis composed of a single row of
angular and elongated cells, with a thicker exterior wall. Several rows of small cells that are
angular in shape and more isodiametric in dimension are below this within the cortex, followed
by a region of parenchmous ground tissues. The ground tissue is composed of larger angular and
mostly elongated cells (55%), and very few inter-cellular spaces. The length range of these cells
is from 75-120µm, and the width range is from 45-85µm. Vascular bundles are dispersed
throughout the cortex and pith within a eustele arrangement, and are of amphicribal ‘stellate’
arrangement themselves. Within these bundles the xylem forms a stellate polyarch pattern with
the many steles, surrounded by the phloem. These bundles range is length from 250-620µm, and
width from 150-330µm.
Charred samples
Charred dried and fresh- All ground tissues collapse and become fractured, or meld into solid
carbon during the charring process. Within the vascular tissues, the phloem surrounding the
xylem with the stele turns to solid carbon but the xylem maintains its original morphology.
Large cavities form within the ground tissue and tension fractures separate the areas of solid
carbon from each other, creating a highly vesicular overall appearance.
Tabernaemontana aurantiaca Gaudich.: Fruit
(EU2012-05)
(Not vegetative storage parenchyma)
321
Thin sections
Basic cell morphology and tissue arrangement- The epidermis a single row of tangentially
flattened angular and elongated cells. Interior to this is a region of amyliferous parenchymatous
tissue. These conjunctive parenchyma cells tend to be between 35-60µm in length, and 25-
40µm in width. Cells are rounded in shape and elongated in dimension (53%), and isodiametric
(47%). Inter-cellular spaces are present but no cell contents were visible within the cell walls.
Vascular bundles are within an eustele arrangement and tend to be amphicribal concentric in
arrangement. The length range of the bundles is 175-370µm, and the range of widths is between
100-230µm.
Charred samples
Charred dried and fresh- The epidermal cells become solid carbon during the charring process
from both dry and fresh states. Fibre bundles survive in original condition. The ground tissues
become collapsed, solid carbon in places and generally more vesicular in appearance. Vascular
tissues were not visible as such within charcoal.
Tacca leontopetaloides (L.) Kuntz: Root tuber
(EU2015)
Thin sections
Epidermis- The periderm consists of three rows of radially orientated angular and elongated
cells with thin cell walls, with the outermost row having a thicker external wall.
Ground tissue- Below this is a region of conjunctive tissue within the pith, consisting of
amyliferous parenchyma cells which are between 70-100µm in length, and 60-80µm in width.
Cells are consistently rounded in shape but vary slightly in dimension. Approximately 83% of
cells are rounded in shape and isodiametric in dimension. The remainder are rounded and
elongated. Many inter-cellular spaces are present within this conjunctive tissue and numerous
starch granules, druses and calcium oxylate crystals are visible within the cell contents.
Vascular tissues- Vascular bundles are within an atactostele arrangement and tend to be
bicollateral in arrangement. The length range of the bundles is 250-530µm, and the range of
widths is between 100-270µm.
322
Charred samples
Charred dried- In general cell morphology is preserved in original condition within the ground
and boundary tissues. Some small cavities form within the pith and cortex, along with a small
number of tension fractures nearer the pith. Bundles of raphides survive the charring process.
Within the vascular tissues the phloem becomes a cavity, but the xylem preserves well.
Charred fresh- Many large cavities form within the pith of the sample charred from fresh state.
The interior of these cavities have the outline of cell walls on the surface. Ground tissues
become more vesicular overall, and the epidermal cells become compressed in shape. Again
small bundles of raphides survive within cells in the ground tissues.
Todea sp.: Rhizome (EU004)
Thin sections
Epidermis- An outer epidermis composed of one layers of radially organised angular and
isodiametric cells with thickened cell walls. Below this is a broad region of fibres that separate
the epidermis and the conjuctive tissue within the pith
Ground tissue- Interior to this is a region of cortical parenchymatous tissue. The parenchyma
cells tend to be between 75-135µm in length, and 60-105µm in width. Cells are angular in shape
and predominantly isodiametric in dimension (65%), with a smaller percentage being elongate
(35%). Inter-cellular spaces are not present and starch granules were also observed within cells.
Vascular tissues- A dictyostele arrangement is present, where the vascular chamber is broken
into segments.
Charred samples
Charred dried- The ground tissue preserves the charring process in original condition, but the
boundary tissue becomes solid carbon. Within the dictyostele vascular bundles, the xylem
survives however the surrounding phloem becomes solid carbon.
Charred fresh- The charred ground tissue within the fresh-charred sample are similarly in good
original condition. The epidermis and regions of sclerenchyma also mostly retain their
morphology, with some areas of more compressed cells. Bundles of fibres also preserve. The
323
phloem becomes a large cavity within the vascular bundles, leaving only some areas of xylem
cells within the vascular chamber.
Xanthosoma sagittifolium (L.) Schott.: Corm (EU-2012-
10)
Thin sections
Epidermis- The periderm consists of four rows of radially orientated angular and isodiametric
cells with thin cell walls, with the outermost row having a thicker external wall.
Ground tissue-. The amyliferous parenchyma cells that form the conjunctive tissue are between
55-80µm in length, and 50-60µm in width. Cells are consistently rounded in shape and
isodiametric in dimension. Inter-cellular spaces are present, and many compound starch
granules were observed within the cell contents.
Vascular tissues- Vascular bundles are within an atactostele arrangement and tend to be
amphivasal concentric in arrangement (phloem surrounded by xylem). The length range of the
bundles is 90-270µm, and the range of widths is between 80-230µm.
Charred samples
Charred dried- Ground tissues survive mostly in original condition, however these become more
vesicular. Bundles of raphides are present within cavities between cells. Tension fractures form
along the vascular cambium, separating the boundary tissues from the ground tissues. The
peridem becomes compressed.
Charred fresh- There is much greater modification of tissues within the sample charred from
fresh state. Areas of ground tissue have survived in original condition, but the majority of these
tissues become solid carbon with many small vesicles along with the periderm. Large tension
fractures and cavities form withi the pith with the outlines of cell walls on the interior surfaces.
Within the vascular bundles, the xylem survives but the phloem becomes solid carbon.
324
Zingiber sp.: Rhizome (BG957)
Thin sections
Epidermis- A thickened periderm composes the surface of the rhizome, with around ten rows of
thick walled cells that are rounded and broadly isodiametric in dimension.
Ground tissue-. The amyliferous parenchyma cells that form the conjunctive tissue below the
periderm are between 55-80µm in length, and 50-60µm in width. Cells are consistently
irregularly rounded in shape but vary in dimension. The majority of cells are elongated in
dimension (60%) but a small number are broadly isodiametric (40%). Inter-cellular spaces are
present, but no cell contents were visible during light microscopy of the histological thin
sections.
Vascular tissues- Vascular bundles are within an eustele arrangement and tend to be closed
collateral in arrangement, with a fibre sheath surrounding the bundles. The bundles are more
concentrated in the pith of the rhizome, and more disparate towards the periderm. These range
in length from 296-447µm and width from 240-352µm.
Charred samples
Charred dried and fresh- The vascular bundles are easily identifiable as such within the charred
samples, with the fibre sheath and xylem tissues surviving the charring process in good original
condition. The phloem does not survive and becomes a cavity within these bundles. The
surrounding conjunctive tissue collapses and becomes more irregularly shaped with thin cells
walls. Cells within the periderm also become more compressed.
325
Zingiber sp.: Rhizome (EU007)
Thin sections
Epidermis- The periderm consists of around ten rows of rounded and elongated thick walled
cells that are radially orientated. The exterior wall of the outermost layer is thicker than the
other cell walls. There is a vascular cambium below this that is a single layer of more angular
and elongated cells.
Ground tissue-. The pith of the organ is composed of conjunctive amyliferous parenchyma cells
that are consistently rounded in shape, and predominantly isodiametric in dimension (60%).
This differs from another unidentified species from the Zingiberaceae family that has been
included within the comparative collection and is described above, where a smaller percentage
of cells are isodiametric. The cells range in length from 75-105µm, and 50-85µm in width.
Inter-cellular spaces are present.
Vascular tissues- Vascular bundles are within a eustele arrangement and tend to be amphicribal
concentric in arrangement, with a fibre sheath surrounding the bundles. The bundles are more
concentrated in the pith of the rhizome, and more disparate towards the periderm. These range
in length from 160-309µm and width from 112-240µm.
Charred samples
Charred dried and fresh- The xylem within the vascular bundles survive the charring process in
good original condition, however the phloem and fibre sheath does not survive and become
solid carbon surrounding these bundles. The surrounding conjunctive tissue mostly becomes
compressed but there are regions of surviving cells with original morphology between these
bands of compressed cells. Cells within the periderm become solid carbon with small vesicles.
326
Appendix C- Starch Images
Alocasia macrorrhiza (L.) G.Don: Corm (BG948)
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Dennst) Nicolson: Corm (YEN)
Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson) Fosberg: Fruit (BG947)
Barringtonia asiatica (L.) Kurz: Fruit (EU2012-06)
327
Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott: Corm (BG1013)
Curcuma longa L.: Rhizome (EU-2008-01)
Cyrtosperma merkusii (Hassk.) Schott: Corm (EU2012-09)
Dioscorea alata (L.): Tuber (EU0013)
Dioscorea bulbifera (L.): Aerial bulbil (BG942)
328
Dioscorea esculenta (L.): Tuber (EU020)
Dioscorea nummularia Lam.: Tuber (EU012)
Dioscorea pentaphylla (L.): Tuber (YEN)
Inocarpus fagifer (Parkinson ex Zollinger) Fosberg: Seed (BG955)
Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.: Tuber (EU023)
329
Ipomoea polpha R.W Johnson: Tuber (YEN)
Morinda citrifolia L.: Fruit (BG941)
Musa sp.1: Fruit (BG1014)
Musa sp.2: Fruit (BG995)
Piper methysticum G.Forst: Root (EU-2011-02)
330
Solanum tuberosum (L.): Stem tuber
Spondias dulcis (L.): Fruit (BG981)
Tacca leontopetaloides (L.) Kuntz: Root tuber (EU2015)
Xanthosoma sagittifolium (L.) Schott.: Corm (EU-2012-10)
331
Appendix D- Archaeobotanical Research in
the Pacific
Pe
riod
Family
TaxaLo
cation
Bo
tanical re
main
sP
ub
lication
Date
s
Ple
istoce
ne
/Early Ho
loce
ne
Ach
ariaceae
Pa
ng
ium
edu
leD
on
gan C
ave, Se
pik-R
amu
, PN
GSe
ed
Swad
ling e
t al. 1991>5,500 B
P
Arace
aeA
loca
sia lo
ng
ilob
a/C
yrtosp
erma
merku
siiN
iah C
ave, M
alaysiaStarch
Paz an
d B
arton
2007<40,000 B
P
Alo
casia
ma
crorrh
izaK
ilu C
ave,B
uka Islan
d, So
lom
on
Is.Starch
Loy e
t al. 199228,000 cal. B
P
Co
loca
sia escu
lenta
Kilu
Cave
,Bu
ka Island
, Solo
mo
n Is.
StarchLo
y et al. 1992
28,000 cal. BP
Niah
Cave
, Malaysia
Pare
nch
yma
Paz an
d B
arton
200723,850-23,020 cal. B
P
Ku
k Swam
p, P
NG
StarchD
en
ham
et al. 2003
10,220-6440 cal. BP
Lake W
anu
m, P
NG
Po
llen
Hab
erle
1995~ 9,000 B
P
Bu
rserace
aeC
an
ariu
m sp
p.
Do
ngan
Cave
, Sep
ik-Ram
u, P
NG
See
dSw
adlin
g et al. 1991
>5,500 BP
Eup
ho
rbiace
aeA
leurites m
olu
ccan
aD
on
gan C
ave, Se
pik-R
amu
, PN
GSe
ed
Swad
ling e
t al. 1991>5,500 B
P
Dio
score
aceae
Dio
scorea
ala
ta
Niah
Cave
, Malaysia
StarchP
az and
Barto
n 2007
<40,000 BP
Dio
scorea
cf.hisp
ida
Niah
Cave
, Malaysia
Pare
nch
yma
Paz an
d B
arton
200721,130 cal. B
P
Dio
scorea
sp.
Ku
k Swam
p, P
NG
StarchD
en
ham
200710,220- 9910 cal. B
P
Mu
saceae
Mu
sa sp
. (Eum
usa
/Au
stralim
usa
)
Ku
k Swam
p, P
NG
Ph
ytolith
s
De
nh
am e
t al. 2003, 2004;
Fullagar e
t al. 2006;
Wilso
n 1985
10,220-6440 cal. BP
Pan
dan
aceae
Pa
nd
an
us sp
.D
on
gan C
ave, Se
pik-R
amu
, PN
GD
rup
es
Swad
ling e
t al. 1991>5,500 B
P
Sapin
dace
aeP
om
etia p
inn
ata
Do
ngan
Cave
, Sep
ik-Ram
u, P
NG
See
dSw
adlin
g et al. 1991
>5,500 BP
Mid
Ho
loce
ne
- Lapita
Ach
ariaceae
Pa
ng
ium
edu
leM
ussau
Is, PN
GP
ericarp
Kirch
1987,1988, 19893200-200 0 B
P
An
acardiace
aeD
raco
nto
melo
n sp
.A
rawe
Is, PN
GSe
ed
Matth
ew
s and
Go
sde
n 1997
3840-1580 BP
Mu
ssau Is, P
NG
See
dK
irch 1987,1988, 1989
3200-200 0 BP
Spo
nd
ias d
ulcis
Mu
ssau Is, P
NG
End
ocarp
Kirch
1987,1988, 19893200-200 0 B
P
Arace
aeC
olo
casia
esculen
taB
ou
rew
a, FijiStarch
, raph
ide
s, xylem
Ho
rrocks an
d N
un
n 2007
3050-2500 BP
An
ir Island
s, PN
GStarch
Cro
wth
er 2001, 205, 2009
c.3300 BP
Re
ef Islan
ds, So
lom
on
sStarch
Cro
wth
er 2009
c. 3100 BP
Mu
lifanu
a, Samo
aStarch
Cro
wth
er 2009
c. 2750 BP
Cyrto
sperm
a m
erkusii
Uru
piv, V
anu
atuStarch
, raph
ide
s, xylem
Ho
rrocks an
d B
ed
ford
2004;
Ho
rrocks e
t al. 20132700 B
P
Nge
rchau
, Palau
Po
llen
Ath
en
s and
Ward
20014500 B
P
Are
caceae
Co
cos n
ucifera
Araw
e Is, P
NG
End
ocarp
Matth
ew
s and
Go
sde
n 1997
3840-1580 BP
Mu
ssau Is, P
NG
End
ocarp
Kirch
1987,1988, 19893200-2000 B
P
Bo
raginace
aeC
ord
ia sp
.A
rawe
Is, PN
GSe
ed
Matth
ew
s and
Go
sde
n 1997
3840-1580 BP
Mu
ssau Is, P
NG
See
dK
irch 1987,1988, 1989
3200-200 0 BP
Bu
rserace
aeC
an
ariu
m sp
p.
Araw
e Is, P
NG
End
ocarp
Matth
ew
s and
Go
sde
n 1997
3840-1580 BP
Mu
ssau Is, P
NG
End
ocarp
Kirch
1987,1988, 19893200-200 0 B
P
Calo
ph
yllaceae
Ca
lop
hyllu
m in
op
hyllu
mM
ussau
Is, PN
GSe
ed
Kirch
1987,1988, 19893200-200 0 B
P
Co
mb
retace
aeTerm
ina
lia ca
tap
pa
Araw
e Is, P
NG
See
dM
atthe
ws an
d G
osd
en
19973840-1580 B
P
Mu
ssau Is, P
NG
See
dK
irch 1987,1988, 1989
3200-200 0 BP
Cycad
aceae
Cyca
s circina
lisA
rawe
Is, PN
GSe
ed
Matth
ew
s and
Go
sde
n 1997
3840-1580 BP
332
Period Family Taxa Location Botanical remains Publication Dates
Mussau Is, PNG Seed Kirch 1987,1988, 1989 3200-200 0 BP
Dioscoreaceae Dioscorea esculenta Bourewa, Fiji Starch, raphides, xylem Horrocks and Nunn 2007 3050-2500 BP
Vao and Urupiv, Vanuatu Starch Horrocks et al. 2013 3000-2600 BP
Dioscorea nummularia Vao, Vanuatu Starch Horrocks and Bedford 2010 3100-2800 BP
Dioscorea pentaphylla Vao, Vanuatu Starch Horrocks and Bedford 2010 3100-2800 BP
Euphorbiaceae Aleurites moluccana Arawe Is, PNG Seed Matthews and Gosden 1997 3840-1580 BP
Fabaceae Inocarpus fagifer Mussau Is, PNG Pericarp Kirch 1987,1988, 1989 3200-2000 BP
Musaceae Musa sp. Reef Islands, Solomons Starch, phytoliths Crowther 2009 c.3100 BP
Urupiv, Vanuatu Phytoliths Horrocks and Bedford 2011 3000-2700 BP
Matilau, Vanuatu Phytoliths Horrocks et al. 2009 2800-2500 BP
Pandanaceae Pandanus spp. Arawe Is, PNG Drupes Matthews and Gosden 1997 3840-1580 BP
Mussau Is, PNG Drupes Kirch 1987,1988, 1989 3200-200 0 BP
Sapindaceae Pometia pinnata Mussau Is, PNG Seed Kirch 1987,1988, 1989 3200-200 0 BP
Late Holocene Araceae Alocasia macrorrhiza Katem compound, Kosrae Parenchyma Athens et al. 1996 c.1900 BP
Futuna Pollen Piazza and Frimigacci 1991 ~600 BP
Colocasia esculenta Me Aure Cave, New Caledonia Starch Horrocks et al. 2008 2700-1800 BP
Avai'o'vuna Swamp, Vavau, Tonga Pollen Fall 2005; Fall 2010 ca. 2600 BP
Ngofe Marsh, Vavau, Tonga Pollen Fall 2010 ca. 2000 BP
Finpea, Kosrae Pollen Athens et al. 1996 1523-1350 BP
Tangatatau, Mangaia Parenchyma Kirch et al. 1995 788-331 BP
Mauna Kea Adze Quarry, Hawaii Parenchyma Allen 1981, 1984 ~775 BP
La Perouse Bay, Rapanui Starch Cummings 1998 650-150 BP
Te Niu, Rapanui Starch Horrocks and Wozniak 2008 650-150 BP
Stonefields, Auckland Starch, xylem Horrocks and Lawlor 2006 550-380 cal. BP
Nuku Hiva, Marquesas Starch Allen and Ussher 2013 550-350 BP
Rangihoua Bay, NZ Starch Horrocks et al. 2004 ~500 BP
Triangle Flat, NZ Starch Horrocks et al. 2004 430-260 BP
Rano Kau, Rapanui Starch Horrocks et al. 2012 post. 1605-1414 cal. BP
Aspouri Peninsula, NZ Starch, xylem Horrocks et al. 2007 Undated
Motutangi, NZ Starch Horrocks and Barber 2005 Undated
Anaura Bay, NZ Starch Horrocks et al. 2008b Undated
Pitcairn Island Starch, xylem Horrocks and Weisler 2006 Undated
Cyrtosperma merkusii Tafunsak, Kosrae Pollen Athens et al. 1996 1997-1709 BP
Finpea, Kosrae Pollen Athens et al. 1996 1523-1350 BP
Henderson Island, Pitcairn Group Leaf parenchyma Hather and Weisler 2000 post. 950 BP
Tangatatau, Mangaia Parenchyma Kirch et al. 1995 788-331 BP
Arecaceae Cocos nucifera Katem compound, Kosrae Endocarp Athens et al. 1996 c.1900 BP
Tangatatau, Mangaia Endocarp/mesocarp Kirch et al. 1995 788-331 BP
Mauna Kea Adze Quarry, Hawaii Endocarp Allen 1981, 1984 ~775 BP
Nikunau, Kiribati Endocarp Piazza 1998 520-305 BP
Tiwaka Valley, New Caledonia Wood Dotte-Sarout et al. 2013 post. 650 BP
Kaho'olawe/Kuli'ou'ou/Lapakahi/
Anaeho'omalu/Kane'ohe/Kalahuipua'a/
Ka'ahumanu, Hawaii Endocarp, husk Allen 1984 Varied
333
Period Family Taxa Location Botanical remains Publication Dates
Asparagaceae Cordyline fruticosa Avai'o'vuna Swamp, Vavau, Tonga Pollen Fall 2005; Fall 2010 ca. 2600 BP
Ngofe Marsh, Vavau, Tonga Pollen Fall 2010 ca. 2200 BP
Katem compound, Kosrae Wood Athens et al. 1996 c.1900 BP
Tangarutu, Rapa Wood Prebble and Anderson 2012 900-320 BP
Tangatatau, Mangaia Wood Kirch et al. 1995 788-331 BP
Kahikinui, Hawaii Wood Kirch et al. 2005 460-285 cal. BP
Kaho'olawe/Kuli'ou'ou/Kalahuipua'a, Hawaii Wood Allen 1984 Varied
Boraginaceae Cordia subcordata. Mauna Kea Adze Quarry, Hawaii Wood Allen 1981, 1984 ~775 BP
Nikunau, Kiribati Wood Piazza 1998 520-305 BP
Tiwaka Valley, New Caledonia Wood Dotte-Sarout et al. 2013 post. 650 BP
Nuku Hiva, Marquesas Wood Huebert et al. 2010 500-300 BP
Burseraceae Canarium spp. Kalahuipua'a, Hawaii Endocarp Allen 1984 700-200 BP
Calophyllaceae Calophyllum inophyllum Tiwaka Valley, New Caledonia Wood Dotte-Sarout et al. 2013 post. 650 BP
Combretaceae Terminalia catappa Katem compound, Kosrae Parenchyma Athens et al. 1996 c.1900 BP
Tiwaka Valley, New Caledonia Wood Dotte-Sarout et al. 2013 post. 650 BP
Convovulaceae Ipomoea batatas Tangatatau, Mangaia Parenchyma Hather and Kirch 1991 ~950 BP
Nuku Hiva, Marquesas Starch Allen and Ussher 2013 750-350 BP
Whangapoua, NZ Starch Horrocks et al. 2007 704-550 cal. BP
Kona, Hawaii Starch, xylem Horrocks and Rechtman 2009 650-325 BP
La Perouse Bay, Rapanui Pollen Cummings 1998 650-150 BP
Te Niu, Rapanui Starch Horrocks and Wozniak 2008 650-150 BP
Stonefields, Auckland Starch Horrocks and Lawlor 2006 550-380 cal. BP
Lapakahi, Hawaii Parenchyma Allen 1984; Rosendahl 1972 525-225 BP
Harataonga Bay, NZ Starch Horrocks et al. 2002 562-386 cal. BP
Rangihoua Bay, NZ Starch Horrocks et al. 2004 ~500 BP
Triangle Flat, NZ Starch Horrocks et al. 2004 430-260 BP
Rano Kau, Rapanui Starch Horrocks et al. 2012 post. 1605-1414 cal. BP
Hamurana Rd, Bay of Plenty, NZ Starch Horrocks et al. 2003 260-160 BP
Pouerua/Puketona, NZ Starch, xylem Horrocks et al. 2004 pre. 150 BP
Avai'o'vuna Swamp, Vavau, Tonga Pollen Fall 2005; Fall 2010 Historic
Motutangi, NZ Starch Horrocks and Barber 2005 Undated
Anaura Bay, NZ Starch Horrocks et al. 2008b Undated
Pitcairn Island Starch, xylem Horrocks and Weisler 2006 Undated
Cucurbitaceae Lagenaria siceraria Rano Kau, Rapanui Pollen Horrocks et al. 2012 post. 1605-1414 cal. BP
Tangarutu, Rapa Pericarp Prebble and Anderson 2012 900-320 BP
Te Niu, Rapanui Pollen Horrocks and Wozniak 2008 650-150 BP
Harataonga Bay, NZ Pollen Horrocks et al. 2002 562-386 cal. BP
Pouerua/Puketona, NZ Pollen Horrocks et al. 2004 pre. 150 BP
Kaho'olawe/Kuli'ou'ou/
Anaeho'omalu/Kane'ohe/Kalahuipua'a/
Ka'ahumanu, Hawaii Endocarp Allen 1984 Varied
334
Period Family Taxa Location Botanical remains Publication Dates
Dioscoreaceae Dioscorea alata Halawa, Hawaii Parenchyma Allen 1984 750-450 BP
Te Niu, Rapanui Starch Horrocks and Wozniak 2008 650-150 BP
Anaura Bay, NZ Starch Horrocks et al. 2008b Undated
Dioscorea esculenta Me Aure Cave, New Caledonia Starch Horrocks et al. 2008 2700-1800 BP
Dioscorea sp. Me Aure Cave, New Caledonia Starch Horrocks et al. 2008 2700-1800 BP
Rano Kau, Rapanui Starch Horrocks et al. 2012 post. 1605-1414 cal. BP
Nuku Hiva, Marquesas Starch Allen and Ussher 2013 550-350 BP
Motutangi, NZ Starch Horrocks and Barber 2005 Undated
Upolu, Samoa Parenchyma
Hather 1994b; Green and
Davidson 1969, 1974 900-540 BP
Euphorbiaceae Aleurites moluccana Kaho'olawe/Kuli'ou'ou/Lapakahi/
Kane'ohe/Halawa/Kalahuipua'a/Anahulu/Ka'ahumanu,
Hawaii Endocarp, seed Allen 1984 Varied
Tangarutu, Rapa Endocarp Prebble and Anderson 2012 900-320 BP
Tangatatau, Mangaia Endocarp Kirch et al. 1995 788-331 BP
Fabaceae Inocarpus fagifer Katem compound, Kosrae Parenchyma Athens et al. 1996 c.1900 BP
Nuku Hiva, Marquesas Wood Huebert 2014 post. 1700
Moraceae Artocarpus altilis Katem compound, Kosrae Parenchyma Athens et al. 1996 c.1900 BP
Finpea, Kosrae Pollen Athens et al. 1996 1523-1350 BP
Malsu, Kosrae Pollen Athens et al. 1996 1264-1150 BP
Papeno'o Valley, Society Islands Wood Orliac 1997 ~650
Tiwaka Valley, New Caledonia Wood Dotte-Sarout et al. 2013 post. 650 BP
Nuku Hiva, Marquesas Starch Allen and Ussher 2013 550-350 BP
Nuku Hiva, Marquesas Wood Huebert 2014 682 BP-present
Opunohu Valley, Society Islands Exocarp Kahn and Ragone 2013 ~250 BP
cf. Artocarpus altilis Futuna Pollen Piazza and Frimigacci 1991 ~600 BP
Broussonetia papyrifera Rangihoua Bay, NZ Pollen, phytoliths Horrocks et al. 2004 ~500 BP
Rano Kau, Rapanui Pollen Horrocks et al. 2012 post. 1605-1414 cal. BP
Ficus sp. Tiwaka Valley, New Caledonia Wood Dotte-Sarout et al. 2013 post. 650 BP
Musaceae Musa sp. Rano Kau, Rapanui Phytoliths Horrocks et al. 2012 post. 1605-1414 cal. BP
Tangatatau, Mangaia Leaf parenchyma Kirch et al. 1995 788-331 BP
Kona, Hawaii Phytoliths Horrocks and Rechtman 2009 650-325 BP
Futuna Pollen Piazza and Frimigacci 1991 ~600 BP
Kaho'olawe, Hawaii Wood Allen 1984; McAllister 1933 Unknown
Myrtaceae Syzygium malaccense Tiwaka Valley, New Caledonia Wood Dotte-Sarout et al. 2013 post. 650 BP
Pandanaceae Pandanus tectorius Tangatatau, Mangaia Drupes Hather and Kirch 1991 ~950 BP
Tangarutu, Rapa Drupes/leaf Prebble and Anderson 2012 900-320 BP
Pandanus sp. Katem compound, Kosrae Parenchyma Athens et al. 1996 c.1900 BP
Nikunau, Kiribati Drupes Piazza 1998 520-305 BP
Kaho'olawe/Kuli'ou'ou/Anaeho'omalu
Kane'ohe/Halawa/Kalahuipua'a/
Ka'ahumanu, Hawaii Drupes Allen 1984 Varied
335
Period Family Taxa Location Botanical remains Publication Dates
Piperaceae Piper methysticum Nuku Hiva, Marquesas Starch Allen and Ussher 2013 550-350 BP
Kaho'olawe/Kuli'ou'ou/Anaeho'omalu/
Kane'ohe/Ka'ahumanu, Hawaii Wood Allen 1984 Varied
Poaceae Saccharum officinarum Kaho'olawe/Kuli'ou'ou/Kalahuipua'a, Hawaii Wood Allen 1984 Varied
Rubiaceae Morinda citrifolia Katem compound, Kosrae Wood Athens et al. 1996 c.1900 BP
Nikunau, Kiribati Wood Piazza 1998 520-305 BP
Mauna Kea Adze Quarry, Hawaii Wood Allen 1981, 1984 ~775 BP
Sapindaceae Pometia pinnata Ngofe Marsh, Vavau, Tonga Pollen Fall 2010 ca. 2500 BP