Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’
description
Transcript of Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’
![Page 1: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’
Christa Davis Acampora
IAS FellowHunter and The Graduate Center
City University of New York
![Page 2: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
"this crusade, this war on terrorism, is going to take awhile"
—George W. Bush, September 16, 2001
![Page 3: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
I. Theories of Being Human and the Political
II. Political Agonism
III. Ways of Being Opposed
IV. The Structure of Opposition of ‘The Axis of Evil’
V. Enmity, Sovereignty, and War
VI. The Disappearance of the Enemy
VII. A Warrior’s Story
![Page 4: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Theories of Being Human and the Political
![Page 5: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Political Agonism
![Page 6: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Challenges for Modern Democracies
• Legitimation
• Recognition of genuine difference and disagreement
• Creating Community
![Page 7: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Ways of Being Opposed
![Page 8: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Ways of Being Opposed
• Good/Bad
• Good/Evil
![Page 9: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Structure of Opposition andThe Axis of Evil
![Page 10: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
“We are not deceived by their pretenses to piety. We have seen their kind before. They are the heirs of all
the murderous ideologies of the 20th century. By sacrificing human life to serve their radical visions—by abandoning every value except the will to power—they
follow in the path of fascism, and Nazism, and totalitarianism. And they will follow that path all the way,
to where it ends: in history's unmarked grave of discarded lies”
—George W. Bush, September 20, 2001
![Page 11: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
PNAC web site
![Page 12: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
PNAC Founders
![Page 13: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
PNAC Participants
![Page 14: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
“At present the United States faces no global rival. America’s grand
strategy should aim to preserve and extend this advantageous position as
far into the future as possible.”
—Project for the New American Century,“Rebuilding America’s Defenses”
![Page 15: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The Mission for “Pax Americana”: “to preserve an international security
environment conducive to American interests and ideals” … “the task is to secure and expand
the ‘zones of democratic peace;’ to deter the rise of a new great-power competitor; defend
key regions of Europe, East Asia, and the Middle East; and to preserve American
preeminence through the coming transformation of war made possible by new technologies.”
—Project for the New American Century,“Rebuilding America’s Defenses”
![Page 16: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
“As the world’s sole superpower [it is] the final guarantor of security,
democratic freedoms and individual political rights”
—Project for the New American Century,“Rebuilding America’s Defenses”
![Page 17: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Enmity, Sovereignty, and War
![Page 18: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
“The distinction of friend and enemy denotes the utmost degree of intensity of a union or
separation, of an association or dissociation.”
—Carl Schmitt,The Concept of the Political
![Page 19: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Sovereignty refers to the location of decisive power, ultimate authority; thus only sovereign groups or entities can organize politically in friend-enemy relations, because only such sovereign entities have the power to make
judgements and take actions that distinguish others as friends or enemies.
![Page 20: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
“By virtue of this power over the physical life of men, the political community transcends all
other associations or societies.”
—Carl Schmitt,The Concept of the Political
![Page 21: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
“Humanity as such cannot wage war because it has no enemy … The concept of humanity
excludes the concept of the enemy, because the enemy does not cease to be a human
being….”
—Carl Schmitt,The Concept of the Political
![Page 22: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
“To confiscate the word humanity, to invoke and monopolize such a term probably has certain
incalculable effects, such as denying the enemy the quality of being human and declaring him to
be an outlaw of humanity; and a war can thereby be driven to the most extreme
inhumanity.”—Carl Schmitt,The Concept of the Political
![Page 23: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The Disappearance of the Enemy
![Page 24: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
“the worst confusion arises when concepts such as justice and freedom are used to legitimize
one’s own political associations and to disqualify or demoralize the enemy...”
… such as ideas as the basis for war are “sinister or crazy”
—Carl Schmitt,The Concept of the Political
![Page 25: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
A Warrior’s Story
![Page 26: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Colonel Ted Westhusing, West Point
![Page 27: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Petraeus, Boston Globe
![Page 28: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Joseph Fil, Stars and Stripes
![Page 29: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
“the offices of the soldier, sailor, airman, or marine … arise from the creation of conventional social offices” to protect the citizenry. But “our status as human beings …
is ontologically prior to any social position one may occupy [and this] generates moral principles to which we
claim we ought to adhere”
—Westhusing, “Killing Al Qaeda the Right Way”
![Page 31: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
“if the office of soldier arises from the moral obligation to protect innocents, it is contradictory for the soldier to intentionally harm innocents in order to protect some
other innocents.”
![Page 32: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
The “ethical divide that now exists between the Coalition’s war effort, which disdains the intentional targeting of innocents, and the terrorists, who do not
hesitate to slaughter directly thousands of innocents … the war on terror requires for its success that we
separate ourselves ethically from those whom we fight.”
![Page 33: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
“peace and counter terrorism operations require an explicit acknowledgement of both the commanders’
moral responsibility for force protection and the military members’ moral justification to defend themselves fully”
—Westhusing, “Taking Terrorism and ROE Seriously”
![Page 34: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
—Army Psychologist
Westhusing’s worldview was “surprisingly limited. He could not shift his mid-set from the military notion of
completing a mission irrespective of cost, nor could he change his belief that doing the right thing because it was
the right thing to do should be the sole motivator for businesses.”
![Page 35: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
“It shows how one man’s life and the fervent beliefs that defined it, were crushed by the corruption and
deceit that he saw around him.”
—Robert Bryce, The Texas Observer
![Page 36: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
![Page 37: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Army Field Manual COIN Draft
• “The More You Protect Your Force, the Less Secure You Are”
• “The Best Weapons for COIN Do Not Shoot”• “Sometimes Doing Nothing Is the Best
Reaction”• “Most Important Decisions Are Not Made By
Generals”
![Page 38: Agonistic Politics and The ‘War on Terror’](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081503/56814647550346895db357ae/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)