Agile talent management

38

Transcript of Agile talent management

the vast majority of employee development programs and talent

management are not working

the vast majority of employee development programs and talent

management are not working

...this has created a feeling that talent management, employee assessments,

career plans, etc... do not reach the targets

...this has created a feeling that talent management, employee assessments,

career plans, etc... do not reach the targets

...but it has been shown that the problem is not to be found on talent

management programs by themselves, but

how to apply them all...

...but it has been shown that the problem is not to be found on talent

management programs by themselves, but

how to apply them all...

" While most companies still have annual reviews, more than 80% (Deloitte Human Capital Trends 2014) reveal they are not worth the time people spend on them. Today companies want programs that focus on real-time feedback, coaching, development, and agile approaches to goal management. This means reshaping performance management to be more agile, developmental, and transparent. "Josh Bersin

Principal and Founder, Bersin by DeloitteRead the complete article here: Top Ten disruptions in HR technology

methodology

1 Short employee development cycles prone to continuous

long employee development cycles1

VS

2 use of the job position catalog for conducting assessments

use of multipurpose assessment questionnaires for different job

positions2VS

3 maintain an up-to-date job catalog, to behavior level

not to have a job position catalog according to daily

reality of positions3VS

?4 Identify and assess only observable,

objective and unique behavior for every job position

subjective and difficult to interpret criteria when

evaluating behavior4VS

ACTIVE

STOPPED

DRAFT

5 Activate and deactivate the assessment of behavior depending on company

strategic goals

assess always the same behavior for a given position5

VS

6 integrate quantitative targets with an appropriate weight in the employee’s

assessment

not associate the quantitative numerical goals of every

employee with his assessment6VS

7 design specific algorithms for each job position based on their key

points and company goals

give the same importance to each of the areas of competence or behavior7

VS

8 the employee drives his assessment & development aligned with the interests

of the company

the employee is outside his assessment & development8

VS

9 different assessments depending on the relationship between evaluator

and evaluated person

believe that the solution lies on 360º assessments to get

objective results9VS

automate the entire process and integrate all information in

a unique front end

to use manual processes and several tools in the process

VS

10

10

11to use fresh, easy an intuitive tools that convey agility and

modernity

to use complex tools that require specific training which are not suitable for low level profiles11

VS

automatically generate personalized action plans for each employee

not generate an individual action plan for every employee

VS

12

12

associate training programs, mentoring, articles and content that allows the employee

to self-improve weak aspects

not associate weakness found in assessments to specific and personalized

training activities for improvement

VS

13

13

14 automated processes easy to configure and maintain

laborious processes for the HR Department14VS

14 always recognize top performers

not recognizing the best in class employees14VS

15 collect in real time overall measurements and evolution indicators per competence, behavior,

goal, etc... for every employee

not collect measurements of employee changes15

VS

16 collect real time aggregated data and evolution for every level of the organization

not collect analytical aggregated data at the different levels of the company16

VS

RESULTADOS

>10%

INCREASEPRODUCTIVITY

RESULTS

OTHER BENEFITS

Average ticket Product losses Learning

Customersatisfaction

Motivation Staff turnover

RESULTS

Agile Talent Management

9.9

Agile Talent Management

Competency assessment

Quantitative goals

Assessment and goals indicators, evolution, employee valueActions for continuous improvement

Personalizedalgorithm for every

job position

Employee´sdashboard

Agile Talent Management

• In Intalligent there is no need for an organization chart. Instead, we use the term “perspectives” to refer to who evaluates whom.

Organization charts?

• 360º, 180º, 90º assessments? Yes, but not based on fixed organization charts. Perspectives are fully flexible to allow you to design your own performance assessment matrix

Agile Talent Management

Department´s dashboard,

unit, brand, office, etc...

...every level of the organization has his

own dashboard

Intuitive questionnaires

with color codes

Matrix questionnaires to

streamline theprocess,

evaluating several employeesat the same time

Agile Talent Management

Personalizedaction plans for every employee

Agile Talent Management

Rewards best employeeswith badges

TOPPERFORMER

2015

The result: broad recognition of 21st century skills and experiences.

Hermes Romero

[email protected]@hermeromerohttps://www.linkedin.com/pub/hermes-romero

Agile Talent Management