· Agenda Points Description Page No. 53.1 Confirmation of Minutes 1 53.2 Action taken report on...
Transcript of · Agenda Points Description Page No. 53.1 Confirmation of Minutes 1 53.2 Action taken report on...
Government of India
Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Office of Development Commissioner (MSME),
7th Floor, A Wing, Nirman Bhawan, Maulana Azad Road,
New Delhi-110108
Agenda
for
53rd Meeting of Steering Committee
of
Micro & Small Enterprises - Cluster Development Programme (MSE-CDP)
Date &Time : 14.07.20 at 12:00 Noon Venue : New Delhi
INDEX Agenda Points
Description Page No.
53.1 Confirmation of Minutes 1 53.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 53.3 Proposals for Final Approval
Gujarat 53.3.1 CFC in Gold Jewellery Cluster, Jamnagar 3
Karnataka 53.3.2 CFC in Copper Utensils Manufacturing Cluster, Nasalapur, Raibag, District
Belgaum 8
53.3.3 CFC in Grapes & Raisin Processing Cluster, Jamkhandi, Bagalkot 15 53.3.4 CFC in Organic Millets Cluster, Davanagere 22 53.3.5 CFC in Power loom Cluster, Chikodi, Belgaum 29
Kerala 53.3.6 CFC in Steel Furniture Cluster, Ernakulam 35
Maharashtra 53.3.7 CFC in Auto and Engineering Cluster, Nagpur 42
Odisha 53.3.8 CFC in Rice Mill Cluster, Balasore 49
Tamil Nadu 53.3.9 CFC in Home Furnishing Cluster, Karur 55
Telangana 53.3.10 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Buggapadu, Khammam District 61 53.3.11 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Kallem, Jangaon District 65 53.3.12 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Autonagar, Kundanpally Village,
Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District 70
53.3.13 Up-gradation of Industrial Park at Autonagar, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District 74 53.3.14 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Sultanpur, Sangareddy District 78 53.3.15 Up-gradation of Industrial Park at Bhongir, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District 82
53.4 Ratification of Decisions Assam
53.4.1 Time Extension granted for upgradation of infrastructure facilities at Amingaon Export Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP) in Kamrup (Metro) District
86
53.4.2 Time Extension granted for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Pathsala, District Barpeta
88
Kerala 53.4.3 Time extension to CFC in Furniture Cluster, Thrissur 89 53.4.4 Time extension to CFC in Plywood Cluster, Idukki, Ernakulam 90
Any Other Point Punjab 53.5.1 Up-gradation of Industrial Infrastructure in Focal Point, Phase-IV, Ludhiana 91 53.5.2 Up-gradation of Industrial Infrastructure in Focal Point, Jalandhar 92 53.5.3 IID Centre, Raikot, Ludhiana 95
*******
1
Item No. 53.1. : Confirmation of Minutes of 52nd Meeting of Steering Committee held on 22.01.2020.
Minutes of 52nd Meeting of Steering Committee held on 22.01.20 were uploaded on the website and communicated to stakeholders on 07.02.20. Minutes are annexed at Annexure-I. Since no comments have been received from any of the members, minutes may kindly be confirmed.
******
2
Item No. 53.2 : Action Taken Report on the action points of 52nd Meeting of Steering Committee
Item No. Item Description Decision Taken Action Taken 52.3.1 In-principle approval for setting up
of CFC in Cutting Tool Cluster, Patiala, Punjab
In-principle approval accorded
Communicated to all concerned
52.4.1 to 52.4.32 (S)
Final approval for various proposals.
Final approval accorded
52.5.1 to 52.5.5 (S)
Ratification of decisions taken on file.
Ratified the decision of time extension.
52.6 Any Other Points
51.6.1 Proposal for Final Approval for re-engagement of Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship (lIE), Guwahati as Regional Resource Centre for North Eastern Region including Sikkim, for a period of 3 years.
Final approval accorded.
*******
3
Agenda No. 53.3.1: Proposal for final approval for setting up Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Jewellery Cluster, Jamnagar, Gujarat.
Background Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 51st SCM held on 12.09.19,
subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval. Vide email dated 06.07.20, Centre for Entrepreneurship Development (CED),
Government of Gujarat, Gandhi Nagar forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster : Jewellery Cluster District : Jamnagar Location of Cluster : Hathi street Lok Sabha Constituency : Jamnagar Main Product : Ornaments No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Micro :125 Small : 0 Medium : 0
Turnover for the last five years
Year (Rs. in crore) 2013-14 : 44.30 2014-15 : 49.20 2015-16 : 54.60 2016-17 : 60.75 2017-18 : 67.50
Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :
Nil
Employment in Cluster : Total: 1425 Nos. (Direct: 625 Nos. and Indirect: 800 Nos.)
Documents required Status
(i) As agreed upon by State Government, letter regarding enhancement of State share to 20%.
Provided
(ii) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
Provided
(iii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members. Provided (iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (v) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. Provided (vi) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution. Provided (vii) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60
percent of installed capacity. Provided
(viii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Required
(ix) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be
Provided
(x) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Provided
(xi) Details of SPV and MoA and AoA. Provided (xii) No. of beneficiary units (non SPV members) should be enhanced
and list of members to be provided. Provided
4
Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are having no testing facilities, units are using conventional technology, which are affecting quality of the products.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a
common facility centre. Main Problems of Cluster : No Testing Facility
Non availability of Advanced Technology No Quality Lab
Other Information : NA 2. Information about Proposed CFC Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like Advance Technology Testing Lab, Quality Lab to improve the final product.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Styanaran Temple Road, Hathi Streeet, Dis- Jamnagar 361001
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
70 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
100 --
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes Registered lease of
land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
ii. Title is in name of Shri Ghanshyam Gold Jewellery Foundation
iii. Valuation and its basis
NA
iv. Land is sufficient Yes v. Change of land use No vi. If on lease, duration of lease
31 Year
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)
5000 Sq ft --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
NA --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Turning, Casting and Designing Facility for Bangle Ring etc.
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC -- -- (h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Particulars Before Intervention
After Intervention
No. of Units 125 240 Production (K.G.)
5,625 17,640
Turnover (Rs. in Cr)
67.50 176.40
Employment (Nos.)
625 1680
Profit (Rs. 4.38 13.20
--
5
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
In Cr)
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Exempted for NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
--
(j.) Man Power in CFC -- -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
-- --
3. Information about SPV Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Shri Ghanshyam Gold Jewellery Foundation, Address- Styanaran Temple Road, Hathi Street, District- Jamnagar 361001
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Company --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
-- --
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
25.06.19 --
(e.) Number of Members 100 Nos -- (f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Yes, Please Refer SPV MOA - Annexure: B SPV Rules and Regulation Annexure: B
--
(g.) Authorized Share Capital
Provided --
(h.) Paid up capital Provided -- (i.) Shareholding Pattern -- -- (j.) Commitment letter for contribution
-- --
(k.) SPV specific A/c -- -- (l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
Awareness Camp Organized. --
(m.) Technical Institution Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII, Gandhinagar.
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of
-- --
6
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
installed capacity. (o.) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
-- --
(b) Water 5000 ltr/ year -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA -- 4. Implement Arrangements Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Centre for Entrepreneurship Development (CED), Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Centre for Entrepreneurship Development (CED), Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
--
(c.) Implementation Period 18 Month 24 months from date of issuance of final approval letter.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Gandhi Nagar, Guajarat on 05.07.19 under chairmanship of Commissioner , MSME, Govt. of Gujarat
--
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
-- --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
-- TEAC recommended the proposal
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
-- --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
-- --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 37.11 % -- (b.) IRR, Payback period IRR @ 17.69% Pay Back Period comes at
4.78 Years --
(c.) DSCR -- -- (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
25.25 % --
(e.) NPV @ 10% NPV @ 10% comes Rs. Rs.313.78 lakh. -- (f.) DER -- -- (g.) Status of CFCs Only one CFC operational in State and --
7
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
approved in the State one accord Final Approval during 50th SCM held on 02.07.19
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in Lakh) S. No Particulars Amount Recommended by SIDBI/
As per MSE-CDP 1 Land and Building 0.00 95.00 2 Plant & Machinery 844.29 804.09 3 Misc. Fixed Assets 31.50 31.50 4 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 18.00 18.00 5 Provision for contingencies 0.00 42.10 Margin money for Working Capital 20.00 20.00
Total 913.79 1010.69 7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended by SIDBI/
As per MSE-CDP 1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 731.03 707.48 2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Gujarat 91.38 202.14 3 SPV contribution 91.38 101.07 Total 913.79 1010.69
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
SR.NO. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic Price
Rate of
GST GST Total
Cost
1 Bangle Ring and Bead Designing Plant 1 351.70 18% 63.31 415.01
2 Casting Plant 1 329.73 18% 59.35 389.08
Total 804.09 Contingencies @ 5% 40.20
Total Cost of Equipments 844.29 9. Observations:
Following documents are to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Jewellery Cluster, Jamnagar, Gujarat at a total project cost of Rs. 1010.69 lakh with Gol Assistance of Rs.707.48 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 202.14 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs. 101.07 lakh.
******
8
Agenda No.53.3.2: Proposal for final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre in Copper Utensils Manufacturing Cluster, Nasalapur, Raibag, District Belgaum, Karnataka.
Background:
Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 50th SCM held on 02.07.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
Vide letter dated 19.02.20, Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore as Implementing Agency has submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status (i) Registered lease deed in the name of SPV for a minimum
period of 30 years. Provided
(ii) SIDBI appraisal report. Provided (iii) Commitment letter with regard to SPV members’ ability to
utilize at least 60 percent of installed capacity. Provided
(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. Provided (v) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of
GFR/CVC guidelines. Provided
(vi) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Provided
(vii) Certificate from State Government stating that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro.
Provided
(viii) English version of formation of SPV and Bye-Laws or MoA & AoA.
Provided
(ix) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by atleast 51% of the cluster members.
Provided
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Copper Utensils Manufacturing Cluster District Belgaum Location of Cluster : Raibag Lok Sabha Constituency : Chikkodi Main Product : Copper Household / Domestic Utensils – Pots, water boilers, Jug,
Tumbler, Glasses, water filter, water bottles, drums. Cookware’s like - kadai, deg, handi, cooking pans, plates, hammered muglai kadhal, food serving pans, spoons. Hotel and Restaurant Accessories – like large cooking pans, Dining Table accessories, Jugs, Food servicing accessories. Pooja Articles – Taman plate, Gadwa mug, Pulpatra – tumbler, pooja thali, Kalas etc.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro 60 (as per revised report) Small 0 Medium 0
Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount 2013-14 38.26 2014-15 40.29 2015-16 47.90 2016-17 51.10 2017-18 57.60
Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 2314 Nos. (Direct - 461 and Indirect - 1853)
9
Technology Details : At present the Cluster members are using traditional methodology to produce Copper Utensils with an exception of a few spinning lathe machines.
The cluster is not catering to the present day needs and demands of the consumers that have changed over a period of time.
The modern day consumer is very design oriented and health conscious.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes, DSR Conducted By Intaglio Technical and Business Service. Main findings of DSR : It is found that the cluster members are using traditional methods
of manufacturing copper utensils and lack major facilities such as advance reprocessing machinery like the die press, sheet cutting, heat treatment facilities, Design and Laser engraving marking machine and post processing machinery like polishing, buffing, tin steel coating, effluent treatment plant as a result the cluster members are unable to compete with the large scale manufacturers and are not able to cater the demands of the urban national and international market.
Main Problems of Cluster : Traditional practices of manufacturing have limited the variety of products manufactured.
Limitations in design due to lack of technological advancement.
No diversification of product line to suit consumer needs and preferences.
Stiff Competition from the Big players in the market who have a major market share.
Lack of post processing machinery like Buffing and Polishing where the product is given a superior finish and aesthetically pleasing look.
Lack of coating machinery and techniques, Copper coated in Steel and Tin.
Lack of new moulding machineries that mould the utensils into different sizes and shapes.
No marketing taking place through right channels. There is no branding taking place. There is no training and skill up-gradation taking place in the
cluster as a result there is continuous migration of work force. Other Information : The Utensils made of Copper will have superior heat conducting
ability which is a vital component of high quality food preparation. Also copper has an even greater value that other cookware can not match it is naturally antimicrobial. Research has demonstrated that microbes bacteria or germs that come into direct contact with copper or certain copper alloys quickly die, often within hours. Copper Utensils have a reputed to have healing qualities. Copper is used to ward off sickness. Hence many people across the world prefer using copper utensils in the kitchen for health as well as culinary benefits.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC The major facilities proposed in CFC like advance pre-processing machineries like the die press, sheet cutting, heat treatment facilities, Design and Laser engraving marking machine and post processing machineries like polishing, buffing, tin, steel coating, effluent treatment plant helps the cluster members to compete with the large scale manufacturers .
--
10
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
The CFC will enable the cluster members to cater the demands of the urban national and international market.
The CFC will enable the cluster members to undertake manufacturing of new designs, addition verities and product diversification. The facilities proposed in CFC helps the cluster members to improve their present product quality and produce better quality products.
(b.) Location of CFC #786/A, Naslapur, Raibag taluk, Belgaum District-591213.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km 70 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
100 --
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes. Received ii. Title is in name of Registered Lease Deed in the name of
SPV. iii. Valuation and its basis Land on lease basis for 30 years. iv. Land is sufficient Yes, 10 Guntas (10,000 square feet). v. Change of land use Land Conversion NA Order Obtained vi. If on lease, duration of lease Land on lease basis for 30 years.
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes.
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) The SPV proposes to construct the building 9045.51 sq ft. (4995.51 sq. ft. for ground floor+4050 sq. ft. for 1st floor) for CFC.
--
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs. 125.26 lakh. -- (f.) Main Facility Proposed Copper Sheet Flattening and pressing
setup. Utensils Moulding / Forging Pressing
Dies Setup Heat Treatment and Annealing
Chamber Setup Workshop Machinery. Copper Utensils Tin / Steel Coating
Setup. Effluent Treatment Plant. Design Software for Design and New
Products Development. Office equipments and Training
Setup.
--
(g.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Sl. No.
Parameter Before intervention
After Intervention
1. Nos. of units 60 95 2 Turnover (Rs.
in crore) 72.61 90.00
3 Export (Rs. in crore)
Indirect export taking place through traders.
Direct export likely by 5 units
4 Employment Direct – 461 Indirect - 1853
Direct – 600 Indirect – 2500
5 Profit Margins 12% to 14% 23% to 25%
11
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(h.) Pollution clearance required or not
NOC from Karnataka State Pollution Control Board Obtained.
Received
(i.) Man Power in CFC 36 nos. --
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Siddika Metal Industries Owner’s Welfare Association, #786/A, Naslapur, Raibag Taluk, Belgaum District – 591213.
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Society, registered under Karnataka Society.
--
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
MD-KCTU, JD, DIC-Belgaum, Director MSME Hubli.
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
31.08.17
--
(e.) Number of Members 60 nos.
--
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and AOA submitted
Yes --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 100.00 lakh -- (h.) Paid up capital Rs. 20.00 lakh -- (i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted -- (j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Submitted --
(k.) SPV specific A/c Name of the Bank: Canara Bank Account Number: 0541201001337
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation.
The diagnostic study found that the cluster member have conducted majority of the soft interventions programs such as MSE-CDP awareness programs, Financial management, product quality and safety training programs, visit to other existing cluster etc. in association with the MSME DI Hubli KCTU Bangalore and DIC Belgaum. The cluster members are very much aware of the problems faced by the cluster and have identified the required machinery for the CFC. Hence the Diagnostic Study do not recommend any Soft Intervention for the cluster. The DSR recommends Hard Intervention for the Cluster in terms of establishment of CFC.
--
(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services, Bangalore
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Yes, the SPV has given undertaking for Capacity Utilization of CFC by SPV members and non members.
Received
(o) Utilities (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
289.6345 KVA
--
(b) Water 10 KLD --
12
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA -- 4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt. of Karnataka.
-- (b.) Fund receiving Agency --
(c.) Implementation Period 19 months 24 Months from date of final approval.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
-- Submitted
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
The proposal was discussed in detail during 64th meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65th meeting held on 13.06.19 recommended the proposal to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
Recommended for final approval under MSE-CDP.
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank,if applicable arrangement made)
Yes, in-principle approval of working capital.
--
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
(a.) BEP 44% As per SIDBI- 36.41% (b.) IRR, Payback period 29% As per SIDBI- 27.16% (c.) DSCR N/A -- (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
31% As per SIDBI- 33.63% (Average for 10 years of
unit operational) (e.) NPV 30% As per SIDBI- Rs. 979.90
lakh (Post tax) (f.) DER N/A --
6. Proposed project cost of the CFC is as follow:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount (i) Land (10 guntas on lease for 30 years) 45.00 (ii) Building Construction with compound and Internal Roads – 9045.51 sq.
ft. built up area 116.68
(iii) Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 584.81 (iv) Misc. fixed assets 16.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 16.00 (vi) Contingencies (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 31.57 (vii) Margin money for working capital 14.00 Total 824.06
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed
by IA As per MSE-
CDP/ SIDBI
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 70 576.83 576.83
13
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 20 164.82 164.82 (iii) SPV contribution 10 82.41 82.41
Total 100 824.06 824.06 8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Description No. Amount
A Copper Sheet Flattening and Pressing Setup 1. Heavy Duty Sheet Cutting Machine 1 19.50 2. Sheet Flatting and thinning mill 1 65.13 3. Automatic Sheet Cleaning Machine 1 11.378 B Utensils Moulding and Pressing Dies Setup 4. Deep Drawing Power Press - for cook wares 1 64.45
5. Water vessels / pot pressing power press 1 47.00 6. Pressing Dies 1 39.36 C Heat Treatment and Aniling Chamber Setup 7. Heat Treatment Chamber 1 89.18 D Workshop machineries 8. Heavy Duty Shearing Machine for Circle and Patta
Cutting 1 22.88
9. Spinning Lathe (centre height – 18 inch, 6 feet bed size, V – Belt motor type).
1 15.07
10 Spinning Lathe (centre height – 14 inch, 6 feet bed size, V – Belt motor type).
1 8.84
11 All Geared Lathe Machine for ring Cutting, Pattern Cutting
1 23.25
12 Die Surface Grinding Machine 1 7.69 13 Turning Machine 1 6.46
14 Polishing Machine 1 8.80 15 Buffing Machine 1 3.84 16 Brass Welding Machine 1 1.51 17 MIG / TIG Welding Machine 1 3.641 18 Seam Welding Machine 1 8.344 E Coating Setup 19 Tin Coating Setup 1 8.36 20 Steel Coating Setup 1 10.09 21 Effluent Treatment Plant 1 34.62 F Design Product Development Centre 22 CAD CAM Design Software 1 7.21 23 Table Top Computerized Laser Marking / Engraving
Machine 1 23.061
24 Computers, Windows Software 5 2.77 25 Digital Interactive Classroom Board 1 1.30 26 High Resolution Projector with Auto Lock Screen
Projector with Auto Lock Screen 1 0.59655
14
S.No. Description No. Amount 27 Audio System Amplifier, speakers with cordless and
podium Mic-set. 1 0.65
28 All in one laser colour printer scanner and copier 1 0.58 29 Accounting soft-ware Tally 1 3.51 30 Website and ERP Software Design and Development 1 2.28 31 CCT Camera and DVR and EPABX intercom setup 1 0.81 32 Fire fighting equipment set 1 0.92 33 Air conditioner A/c 2.0 Ton 2 1.51 34 DG Set 1 17.21 35 Electrical installation -- 23.06 Total 584.81
9. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Copper Utensils Manufacturing Cluster, Nasalapur, Raibag, District Belgaum, Karnataka at a total project cost of Rs. 824.06 lakh with GoI assistane of Rs. 576.83 lakh, State Government contribution of Rs. 164.82 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs. 82.41 lakh.
*******
15
Agenda No.53.3.3: Proposal for final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Grapes & Raisin Processing Cluster, Jamkhandi, Bagalkot, Karnataka.
Background Proposal accorded In-principle approval during the 51st SCM held on 12.09.19, subject
to submission of following documents prior to Final approval. Vide letter dated 19.02.20, Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU),
Bangalore as Implementing Agency has submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) Enhancement of Government of Karnataka grant towards the project, to that extent GoI grant would be reduced.
Vide letter dated 12.02.20, Director, Directorate of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises has submitted commitment letter for enhancement of state govt. contribution from 10% to 20% of the project cost.
(ii) SIDBI appraisal report. Provided. (iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. Provided. (iv) English version of registration of SPV
formation.
English version of registration of SPV formation is not signed and seal by Dy. Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Bagalkot.
(v) Bye Laws or MoA and AoA. Provided. (vi) List of SPV members and details of
shareholding pattern.
Vide letter dated 19.02.20, IA has forwarded the list of 164 SPV members along with shareholding pattern.
(vii) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
Provided.
(viii) Details of Project specific bank account. Provided. (ix) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise
at least 60% of installed capacity. Provided.
(x) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Provided.
(xi) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Provided.
(xii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Provided.
(xiii) Document regarding Non Agriculture conversion for change of land use.
Provided.
(xiv) Registered deed documents for land and building in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of
IA has submitted lease agreement for a period of 15 years. Registered land lease deed from
16
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Grapes & Raisin Processing Cluster District Bagalkote Location of Cluster : Jamkhandi Lok Sabha Constituency : Bagalkot Main Product : Yellow Raisins, Golden Raisins, Black Raisins & Green
Raisins. No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro -164 units.
Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount 2014-15 59.60 2015-16 78.40 2016-17 92.65 2017-18 105.80 2018-19 112.50
Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount 2014-15 5.96 2015-16 6.27 2016-17 9.265 2017-18 10.58 2018-19 16.52
Employment in Cluster : 9900 Nos. (Direct-1900 Indirect-8000) Technology Details :
Traditional processing practices like open air Drying, Mechanical vibrator type Grading machine,Manual Sorting and packaging.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes. Main findings of DSR : The Diagnostic Study found that there is abundant
availability of raw materials in the cluster region. The Diagnostic Study recommends for the hard interventions which help to produce better quality products and provides good returns for the cluster members.
Main Problems of Cluster : Traditional Sun drying Process for resins leading to uneven drying.
Prolonged production process. Lack of Automatic Grading Machinery. Lack of Automatic Sorting Machinery. Lack of Cleaning and Packaging facilities in the cluster. Non affordability of cold storage facilities by the cluster
units. Poor marketing channels. Low profits due to middlemen and agents.
Other Information : --
30 years is required).
Revenue Department of Government of Karnataka for a period of 30 years or more is required.
(xv) Undertakings from State Government as well as SPV that CFC will not sell the products.
Not provided.
17
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC The Hard Intervention Proposed in CFC will help to increase the turnover of the cluster units to 30%.
Improve the production process of raisins.
Increase raisins production in the cluster region up to 25% every year.
Maintain International standards of raisins and comply with the quality certifications like ISO, HACCUP etc.
Hygienic Packaging of the raisins.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Survey 277/1, Todalabagi Village, Jamkhandi Taluk and Bagalkot District.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
80
% age of units in radius of 10km
100
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes. 1Acres 10 Guntas of land. Registered land
lease deed from Revenue Department of Government of Karnataka for a period of 30 years or more is required.
ii. Title is in name of SPV. iii. Valuation and its basis 90.00 lakh.
iv. Land is sufficient Yes. -- v. Change of land use NA Converted. -- vi. If on lease, duration of lease
Land on lease basis for 15 years.
30 years required.
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes.
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)
30,000 Sq. ft. --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Not Applicable since SPV is obtaining constructed building on lease. --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Common Facility Center with Automatic raisins drying plant
Common Raisin cleaning and grading center.
Common Raisins Sorting Facility. Common packaging Facility. Dedicated Raisin Cold storage Unit Common Testing laboratory Center.
--
g.) Prod capacity of CFC 32 Tons/ Day.
18
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
S. No.
Particulars Before CFC After CFC
(i) No. of units 164 200
(ii) Turnover (Rs. in crore)
Rs. 112.50 More than Rs. 200.00 p.a.by all the members and farmers.
(iii) Exporting Units
Nil At least 15 units in the cluster will be able to export.
(iv) Employment Direct -1900 Indirect – 8000
Direct -3000 Indirect -15000
(v) Certification No certification
Quality products with export standards and certification using FSSAI testing laboratory in the CFC.
(vi) Profit margin (of cluster members)
14% to 18% The margin is expected to rise to 22% to 25%.
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Yes. NOC obtained from KSPCB.
--
(j.) Man Power in CFC 40 Nos. -- 3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address “Basaveshwara Grape Processing Cluster” Survey No. 2771, Savalagi Road, Todalabagi, Jamkhandi Bagalkot -587301 Karnataka.
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Society. Registered Under Karnataka Societies Registration Act 1960.
--
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Govt. Officials, MSME-DI, Hubli and Managing Director, KCTU.
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
15th May 2019
--
(e.) Number of Members 164 nos.
--
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and AoA submitted
Bye laws enclosed in section 9.
Received.
(g.) Authorized Share Capital
Rs. 149.87 lakh. --
(h.) Paid up capital - -- (i.) Shareholding Pattern - -- (j.) Commitment letter for - -
19
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
contribution (k.) SPV specific A/c Indian Bank bearing A/c No :
6778064002
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation.
SPV has completed the necessary Soft Interventions activities like capacity building, Trust building , exposure visit etc.
(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services Bangalore.
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Yes. SPV has submitted the Commitment letter for utilization of 60 percent capacity.
--
(o) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
400 KW
--
(b) Water 10,000 Ltrs/day -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities - --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore.
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore.
--
(c.) Implementation Period 24 months 24 Months from date of final approval.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
The project is feasible and financially viable and there is tangible demand for the services envisaged.
Received.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Proposal was deliberated during 68th meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 04.09.19 and committee recommended the proposal to place before the Steering Committee for approval.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee (g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
Recommended for final approval under MSE-CDP.
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank,if applicable arrangement made)
Yes.
--
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
BEP 31.64% As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
IRR, Payback period 27.61% DSCR N/A Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
32.42%
NPV Rs. 1785.76 lakh. DER N/A
20
6. Proposed project cost: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI / MSE-
CDP 1 Land and Building Cost (Land – 50
gunta with 30000 sq. ft and Building – 15 years lease)
90.00 90.00
2 Plant and Machinery cost 1288.29 1288.29 3 Misc. fixed assets 21.00 21.00 4 Preliminary and Pre-operative
expenses 20.00 20.00
5 Contingencies 64.41 64.41 6 Margin money for working capital 15.00 13.00
Total 1498.70 1496.70
7. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Revised Proposal by
IA
Recommended by SIDBI / MSE-CDP
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India
70 1047.69 1047.69
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka
20 299.34 299.34
3 SPV contribution 10 149.67 149.67 Total 100 1496.70 1496.70
8. Plant and machinery
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Nos. Total Cost
1. Cold Storage for Raisins & Fresh Grapes Storage
1 424.965
2. Raisin Wet Processing/Washing Setup 1 38.168 3. Resins Drying Setup 1 171.9056 4. Raisins Dry Process-Cleaning, Grading Setup 1 105.304 5. Raisins De-Stemming/Stem Removing Setup 1 111.588 6. Raisins Weighing Setup 1 72.84 7. Metal Detector Setup 1 15.6825 8. Raisins/Dry Grapes Colour Sorting Setup 1 137.9544 9. Raisins/Dry Grapes Box -Packaging Setup 1 12.1155 10. Raisins/Dry Grapes Poly Packaging Setup 1 15.9285 11. Testing Laboratory Machinery Setup 1 10.455 12. RO-Plant 1 6.4575 13. ETP Plant 1 14.8215 14. Material Handling Equipments 1 7.38 15. Electrical Installation 1 16.58778 16. Roof Top Solar Power Plant 1 126.13650
Total 1288.28978 9. Observations: Following documents are to be submitted prior to issue of final approval letter:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (If land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required) vetted by MSME-DI, Hubli.
(ii) English version of registration of SPV formation signed vetted by MEMEDI.
21
(iii) Undertakings from State Government as well as SPV that CFC will not sell the products.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Grapes & Raisin Processing Cluster, Jamkhandi, Bagalkot, Karnataka at a total project cost of Rs.1496.70 lakh with Gol assistance of Rs.1047.69 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs.299.34 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs.149.67 lakh.
********
22
Agenda No.53.3.4: Proposal for final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Organic Millets Cluster, Davanagere, Karnataka.
Background Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 50th SCM held on 02.07.19,
subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval. Vide letter dated 20.02.20, Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation
(KCTU), Bangalore as Implementing Agency has submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval. Vide letter dated 12.02.20, Government of Karnataka has agreed to enhanced State contribution from 10% to 20%.
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Organic Millets Cluster District Davanagere Location of Cluster : Davanagere Lok Sabha Constituency : Davanagere Main Product : Organic Millets whole grains, millet, grinded grain, millet
powdered / flour like Ragi powder, Bajra powder, Rava or semolina material.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro 67 (100%)
Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount 2012-13 24.90 2013-14 25.30 2014-15 27.10 2015-16 28.75 2016-17 31.60
Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 3482 Nos. (Direct - 577 and Indirect - 2905) Technology Details : Conventional Machines like mechanical graders, Mesh
filtration, De Husking and Hulling Machine, Grinding
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI appraisal report. Provided (ii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. Provided (iii) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution. Provided (iv) Commitment letter with regard to SPV members’ ability to
utilize at least 60 percent of installed capacity. Provided
(v) Commitment letter from State Government/SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Provided
(vi) Certificate from State Government stating that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Provided
(vii) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Provided
(viii) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the cluster members.
Required
(ix) IA needs to submit plan regarding value addition, branding and marketing tie-up to make the project viable.
Required
23
Machine, Pulverizes for Flour Processing. Whether DS Conducted : Yes DSR Conducted By Intaglio Technical and Business
Service. Main findings of DSR : The DSR found that the cluster product is very nutritious
and has huge market demand. The DSR found that the cluster members are using
traditional methods and conventional machineries for processing the millets.
The cluster members are having good trust and are aware of the cluster development scheme.
The cluster members lack the machineries for pre-processing activities like cleaning, de-stoning machines and Grading Machines.
The cluster members lack post processing machineries like Colour Sorting, Polishing and Packaging Machineries.
There is very little value addition taking place at present hence the cluster require a research development and value addition center for product diversification.
At present the marketing channel is dominated by traders and middlemen.
Main Problems of Cluster : The cluster members lack the machineries for pre-processing activities like cleaning, De-stoning machines and advance steam treatment and automatic Drying facility.
The cluster members lack post processing machinery like Automatic Grading, Colour Sorting, Polishing and Packaging Machinery.
The Cluster Products are of very high nutritious value but require Advance testing technology for determining the nutritious values as per BIS and FSSAI Standards.
There is very little value addition taking place at present hence the cluster require a research development and value addition center for product diversification.
The Cluster members lack skill upgradation and skill development training facility.
The Cluster members need storage facility for raw material and processed products.
At present the marketing channel is dominated by traders and middlemen. The Cluster lack common branding facility and marketing.
Other Information : Millets grow under dry conditions, can cope with relatively poor soils and require few external inputs. They are a staple food with superior nutritional qualities compared to other cereals. Millets are rich in B vitamins, calcium, iron, potassium, magnesium, zinc, also gluten-free and has low-GI (Glycemic index) thus millets are suitable for people allergies/intolerance of wheat and also for diabetic, weight loss millets are excellent.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC The CFC with pre processing machineries like cleaning, grading will help the cluster members to clean the millets before processing.
The post processing machineries like colour sorting polishing machine will help the cluster members to produce better quality products.
The packaging facilities will help in
--
24
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
proper packaging of cluster products. The value added product
development and testing centre will help the cluster members in product diversification and quality certification.
(b.) Location of CFC The proposed land Survey No. 10/8, Lakavanahalli Village, Mayakonda Hobbali, Bullapura, Davanagere, Karnataka.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km 70
% age of units in radius of 10km
100
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes. Received ii. Title is in name of Registered Lease Deed in the name of
SPV for 30 years. iii. Valuation and its basis Rs. 22.50 lakh as non refundable lease
amount.
iv. Land is sufficient Yes. The SPV has taken 1 acre of land on lease for 30 years.
--
v. Change of land use Yes, NA Order Issued. -- vi. If on lease, duration of lease Land on lease basis for 30 years. -- vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes.
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) The SPV proposes to construct the building 10200 sq ft. for CFC
--
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Building with the estimated cost at Rs. 963/- per sq. ft. --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed 1. Pre processing machineries / Facilities such as: Raw material storage facility. Millets Automatic Fine Cleaning
Machine Setup Millet Automatic De-Stoning
Machine. Millet Steam treatment and Automatic
Dryer 2. Post Processing Machinery / Facilities such as: Millets Automatic Size Grading
Machine Setup Millets Polishing Machine. Millets Automatic Colour Sorter
Machine. Millets Testing Facility. Millets Value Added Products
development & Research Facility. Millets Packaging Machines. Cold Storage Facility.
--
g.) Prod capacity of CFC 12 Tons single shift
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Sl. No.
Parameter Before intervention
After Intervention
1. Nos. of units 67 90 2 Turnover
(Rs. in crore) 47.97 70
3 Export (Rs. in crore)
Indirect export through traders
Direct export likely by 5 units
25
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
4 Employment Direct – 577 Indirect – 2905
Direct – 900 Indirect – 4000
5 Profit Margins Inconsistent profit margins due to price fluctuations.
Consistent and 20% to 25% higher profits for producers due to better quality and price and increased production efficiencies.
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Yes, No Objection Certificate obtained from State Pollution Board.
--
(j.) Man Power in CFC 52 -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
All the SPV members and other principle cluster units would expected utilize the services of various facilities proposed to be established at CFC on user charge basis for sustainability of its operations. Expected Revenue / year: The total revenue generation from user charges of various services is expected to the tune of Rs.241.87 lakh.
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Organic Millets Cluster No. 1579/2, Opposite Ayyappaswamy Temple, Near Old RTO Office, MMC B-Block, Davanagere District, Karnataka.
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Society, registered under Karnataka Society (Registration) Act, 1960.
--
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
MD-KCTU, JD-DIC-Davangere, Director MSME - DI Bangalore.
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
13.05.16 --
(e.) Number of Members 67 -- (f.) Bye Laws or MoA and AOA submitted
MOA/ Bye laws of the cluster is enclosed in section 9.
Received
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Amount in Rs. 73.10 Lakh ( 10% of Project Cost)
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 15 lakh. (i.) Shareholding Pattern Share holding is 1-2% -- (j.) Commitment letter for contribution
SPV has given the commitment letter --
(k.) SPV specific A/c Name: Organic Millets Cluster A/C No.: 155300301000137 IFSC Code: VIJB0001553 Vijaya Bank Vidyanagar, Davanagere, Karnataka.
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation.
The SPV has good trust and corporation among its member’s details available in DPR. The DSR found that the cluster members are having good trust and coordination and have made completed majority of the soft interventions like the trust building programs, capacity building programs, exposure visits to other clusters. Hence the diagnostic study found that the cluster members are ready for undertaking hard interventions.
--
(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services,
26
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
Bangalore (n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Yes, the SPV has given undertaking for Capacity Utilization of CFC by SPV members and non members.
--
(o) Utilities (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
Commercial 200 KVA --
(b) Water 10,000 liters per day. -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Nil. --
4. Implementation Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt. of Karnataka.
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt. of Karnataka.
--
(c.) Implementation Period 19 months 24 Months from date of final approval, as per MSE-CDP.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
- SIDBI Appraisal Report received.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
The proposal was discussed in detail during 64th meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65th meeting held on 13.06.19 recommended the proposal to place before steering committee for In-principle approval.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
--
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
Yes, in principle approval of working capital letter attached.
--
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 27.75%
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
(b.) IRR, Payback period 24.97% (c.) DSCR NA (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
34.88%
(e.) NPV Rs.823.13 lakh (Past tax) (f.) DER NA
27
6. Proposed project cost: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
As per MSE-CDP
1. Land (1 acres for 30 years lease) 22.50 22.50 22.50 2. Building 112.85 112.85 112.85 3. Plant & Machinery (including
electrification) 513.24 513.24 513.24
4. Misc. fixed assets 12.85 12.85 12.85 5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 14.00 14.00 14.00 6. Contingencies (2% building and 5% on
plant and machinery) 27.92 27.92 27.92
7. Margin money for working capital 12.15 12.15 12.15 Total 715.51 715.51 715.51
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA As per MSE-
CDP/SIDBI 1. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 70 500.85 500.85 2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 20 143.11 143.11 3. SPV contribution 10 71.55 71.55 Total 100 715.51 715.51
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh) S.
No. Description No. Power Requirement
(HP/KW) Cost
1. Millet Cleaning Machine1.5 tons/hour 1 27HP 20.30
2. Millet Steamer and Dryer 1.5 tons/hour 1 9HP 46.11
3. Millet Automatic Polishing Machine 1.5 tons/hour
1 68.5HP 49.70
4. Millet Automatic Colour Sorter 1.5 tons/hour
1 15HP 50.27
5. Millet Packaging with Automatic Weighing, Stitching, Sealing, and Labeling Machine Setup 5 to 25 kg bag size, 20 PPM, Thermal Code Labeler /Printer
1 6HP 77.52
6. Pouch Packing Machine 50 gms to 500 gms
1 3.5HP 21.47
7. Value Added Product Development Center Setup Modular Setup
1 3HP 12.96
8. Cold Storage 500 Tons Capacity, 2 to 15 degree Celsius room temperature, 415v/50 hz, 3hp
1 118HP 101.53
9. Weigh Bridge 60 Tons Capacity 1 2HP 7.14 10. Testing Equipment testing setup 1 1HP 26.54 11. DG SET 160 KVA 1 0 10.88 12. ETP 20KLD 1 20 KLD 30.61
28
S. No.
Description No. Power Requirement (HP/KW)
Cost
13. Rain Water Harvesting Plant 25 KLD 1 25 KLD 10.67
14. Electrical installation & fittings: Wiring, Electrical Installation and Fittings Transformer, Changeover Pannel, Power Management Unit
1 00 29.84
15. Fire Fighting and Safety Equipment's Hand Held and wall mounted cans with Safety equipment
1 00 7.63
16. Office Equipment's and Setup CCTV setup, Computers, Windows and Antivirus Software, Tall Software, Website Development and Hosting MIS Software
1 00 10.07
Total 513.24 9. Observations: Following documents are to be submitted prior to issue of final approval letter:
(i) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the cluster members.
(ii) IA needs to submit plan regarding value addition, branding and marketing tie-up to make the project viable.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Organic Millets Cluster, Davanagere, Karnataka at a total project cost of Rs.715.51 lakh with Gol assistance of Rs.500.85 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs.143.11 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs.71.55 lakh.
**********
29
Agenda No.53.3.5: Proposal for final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Power loom Cluster, Chikodi, Belgaum, Karnataka.
Background:
Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 50th SCM held on 02.07.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
Vide letter dated 21.02.20, Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore as Implementing Agency has submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status (i) Registered land documents in the name of SPV, in case of
leased land, the lease period should be for a minimum of 30 years.
Provided
(ii) SIDBI appraisal report. Provided (iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. Provided (iv) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution. Provided (v) Commitment letter with regard to SPV members’ ability to
utilize at least 60 percent of installed capacity. Provided
(vi) Commitment letter from State Government/SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Provided
(vii) Certificate from State Government stating that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Provided
(viii) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Provided
(ix) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by atleast 51% of the cluster members.
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Powerloom Cluster District Belgaum Location of Cluster : Chikkodi Lok Sabha Constituency : Chikkodi Main Product : Cotton Cloth Material, Cotton Mixed Sarees, Cotton based
towels and cotton and silk mixed cloth materials, Cotton and poly cotton suiting and shirting material.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro 150 Small 0 Medium 0
Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount 2013-14 54.00 2014-15 72.00 2015-16 118.00 2016-17 126.00 2017-18 135.00
Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Nil
30
Employment in Cluster : 6200 Nos. Technology Details : Traditional Power looms Automatic Power looms (Air
jet/Auto loom) Shuttle Looms, Shuttled Saree Making Looms, Rapier Looms are being used by the units. Value addition and the manufacturing of fabrics according to customer’s compliances, is not possible without introducing modern technology machines.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes. Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study has found that the cluster needs to
be supported with new technology machineries for the promotion and progress of the cluster.
The diagnostic study recommends the hard interventions for the cluster to overcome the technological backwardness of the cluster.
Main Problems of Cluster : Lack of Proper Raw Material Bank. Lack of Warping and Sizing Facility for Air jet Auto
Looms. Lack of Warping and Sizing Facility for Shuttle and
Rapier Looms. Lack of Warping and Sizing Facility for Saree Processing
Looms. Lack of Design Development Facility. Lack of Post Looming Processing Machineries like
Calendaring, Polishing, Cutting and Folding Machines. Lack of Digital Printing Machine. Poor Quality up-gradation and Lack of Dedicated
Training Facility. Lack of Value Addition and Product Diversification.
Other Information : Power loom industry in Nej-Chikodi region is famous for its cotton and cotton mixed fine fabric cloth, though the cluster is not very old, it has gained regional recognition.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
(a.) Justification for CFC The Interventions proposed in CFC will overcome the adversaries in the cloth production.
The raw material procurement and storage intervention will overcome the price fluctuation.
The short comings in the pre looming process like warping, sizing, calendaring and digital printing, will be taken care by the CFC.
The post loom activities like polishing, packing etc. will help the cluster product in marketing.
The product diversification and design center will help the cluster members to venture into newer market areas and will give them necessary support to survive the changing market trends and demands.
The dedicated marketing center with marketing staff will be an added advantage for the cluster members.
--
(b.) Location of CFC The proposed land Nej Village, Chikodi taluk, Belgaum District- 591239.
--
31
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
% age of units in radius of 5km 70 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
100 --
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes. Received ii. Title is in name of SPV. Registered Lease Deed in the name
of SPV for 30 years. iii. Valuation and its basis Land on lease basis for 30 years. iv. Land is sufficient Yes. The SPV has taken 1 acre of land on
lease for 30 years. v. Change of land use Yes vi. If on lease, duration of lease Land on lease basis for 30 years. vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes.
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) The SPV proposes to construct the building 19300 sq ft. for CFC
--
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Building with the estimated cost at Rs. 254.60 lakh. --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Common Raw Material Bank. Common Warping and Sizing
Facility for Airjet Auto Looms. Common Warping and Sizing
Facility for Shuttle and Rapier Looms.
Common Warping and Sizing Facility for Saree Processing Looms.
Common Design Development Facility.
Common Post Looming Processing Machineries like Calendaring, Polishing, Cutting and Folding Machines
Common Digital Printing Machine Common Finished Product Storage
Facility
--
g.) Prod capacity of CFC Total Proposed Production of CFC =12500 kg of Yarn Processing into beams (single shifts).
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Sl. No.
Parameter Before intervention
After Intervention
1. Nos. of units 150 250 2 Turnover
(Rs. in crore) 135 200
3 Export (Rs. in crore)
Indirect export taking place through traders.
Direct export likely by 5 units Rs. 25 crore.
4 Employment Direct – 1200 Indirect - 5000
Direct – 3000 Indirect – 10000
5 Profit Margins 12% to 14% 25%
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Yes, No Objection Certificate obtained from State Pollution Board.
Received
(j.) Man Power in CFC 52 --
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
(a.) Name and Address Ideal Hi-Tech Power loom Cluster Association Hebbal,
--
32
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
Survey No. 41/1, Nej Village, Chikodi Taluk, Belgaum District
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Society, registered under Karnataka Society (Registration) Act, 1960.
--
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
MD-KCTU, JD-DIC-Belgaum, Director MSME - DI Hubli.
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 27-07-2018 -- (e.) Number of Members 150 (as per revised proposal)
--
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and AOA submitted
MOA/ Bye laws of the cluster are enclosed in section 9.
Received
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Amount in Rs. 149.61 Lakh ( 10% of Project Cost)
--
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 15 lakh.
--
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Equal share holding among all members.
Received
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Submitted. --
(k.) SPV specific A/c Syndicate Bank, Branch: Sankeshwar, Hebbal, Hukkeri Taluk, Belgaum Account No. 05773070002400 IFSC Code: SYNB 0000 577 Account Type: Current Account.
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation.
The SPV has good trust and corporation among its members details available in DPR As the cluster members are aware of their problems and have good unity they have also visited some of the cluster and have learned about cluster scheme and cluster development process. The cluster members have come forward to prepare the DSR and DPR by their own contribution hence the DSR recommends Hard Interventions for the Cluster.
--
(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services, Bangalore
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Yes, the SPV has given undertaking for Capacity Utilization of CFC by SPV members and non members.
Received
(o)Utilities (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
250 KW --
(b) Water 10 KLD -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt. of Karnataka.
-- (b.) Fund receiving Agency --
(c.) Implementation Period 19 months 24 Months from date of final approval.
33
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
- SIDBI Appraisal Report received.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th meeting held on 13.06.19 recommended the proposal to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval. (f.) Approval of Technical
Committee (g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
Recommended final approval under MSE-CDP.
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
Yes, in principle approval of working capital letter received.
--
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 38% As per SIDBI- 37.24% (b.) IRR, Payback period 25% As per SIDBI- 29.83% (c.) DSCR N/A -- (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
30% As per SIDBI- 32.34%
(e.) NPV 26% As per SIDBI- Rs. 1536.29 lakh (post tax)
(f.) DER N/A -- (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed for
5% and 10% reduction of capacity or fall in sales and the figures are satisfactory and as per the limits specified in the guidelines.
--
6. Proposed project cost of the CFC is as follow:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount
1. Land (1 acre on lease for 30 years) 45.00 2. Building Construction with compound and Internal Roads –
19300 sq. ft. built up area 254.60
3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 1055.50 4. Misc. fixed assets 15.00 5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 15.00 6. Contingencies (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 60.41 7. Margin money for working capital 13.28 Total 1458.79
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA Recommended by
SIDBI / MSE-CDP (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of
India 80.00 1021.15 1021.15
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka
20.00 291.76 291.76
(iii) SPV contribution 10.00 145.88 145.88 Total 100.00 1458.79 1458.79
34
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification) (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Description No. Amount Plane Cloth Sizing and Warping setup For 340 CM Panna Cloth – Airjet Auto Looms
1. Warping Machine (Yarn to General Beam) 1 332.10 2. Sizing (General Beam to Loom Beam + Ganji) 1 344.40 For 152 CM Panna Cloth – Plain Shuttel Looms
3. Warping Machine (Yarn to General Beam) 1 36.29
4. Sizing (General Beam to Loom Beam + Ganji) 1 56.37 Hillkal Polyester Saree Warping and Sizing setup
5. Saree Warping Machine 39.05 6. Saree Sizing Machine 1 9.41 7. Boiler 1 76.69 8. DG Set 1 17.21 9. UPS 1 13.85 10. Overhead Crane 2 19.43 11. Compressor 1 11.69 12. Cloth Rolling + Stretching + Carrier + Inspection Machine 1 14.76 13. Digital Fabric Printing 1 55.35 14. Fabric Calendaring Machine 1 22.14 15. Fabric Cutting + Folding Machine 1 6.765
Total 1055.50 9. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Power loom Cluster, Chikodi District, Belgaum, Karnataka at a total project cost of Rs. 1458.79 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 1021.15 lakh, State Government contribution of Rs. 291.76 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs. 145.88 lakh.
*******
35
Agenda No.53.3.6: Proposal for final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Steel Furniture Cluster, Ernakulam, Kerala.
Background Proposal accorded In-principle approval during the 51st SCM held on 12.09.19,
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to Final approval. Vide letters dated 05.02.20 and 06.03.20, Government of Kerala has submitted the
following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
Documents required Status
A(i) Enhancement of SPV contribution to Rs.300.00 lakh, to that extent GoI contribution will be reduced.
52nd meeting of Steering Committee held on 22.01.20 granted retention of means of finance of SPV share of Rs. 221.27 lakh.
(ii) No. of beneficiary units and SPV members should be enhanced and list of members to be provided (State Government representative informed that 80 more units agreed to become SPV members).
The Additional Director of Industries and Commerce, Govt. of Kerala vide letter dated 24.09.19 has informed that already 80 more units have expressed interest in utilising the proposed CFC. However, details of 59 SPV members were provided as against the earlier reported 41 nos. of SPV members.
(iii) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required).
Land document in local language received. However, english version of land documents vetted by MSME-DI, Thrissur is required.
(iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided. (v) Commitment letter from State
Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Provided.
(vi) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
Provided.
(vii) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilize at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Provided.
(viii) Details of production capacity. Provided. (ix) NOC from State Pollution Control
Board. Provided.
(x) Certificate of SPV formation is required.
Provided.
(xi) Details of shareholding pattern. Details of shareholding pattern of 59 SPV members submitted.
(xii) Details of SPV bank account. Details of SPV bank account is not legible to read. Required clear copy.
(xiii) Bye Laws or MoA & AoA. Unsigned copy submitted. However, copy of MoA & AoA signed by Board of Directors required.
(xiv) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Provided.
B(i) Letter regarding creation of state-of-the-art Design Centre with latest software & training facilities.
Provided.
36
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Steel Furniture Cluster District Ernakulam Location of Cluster : Kalady Lok Sabha Constituency : Ernakulam Main Product : Household Steel Furniture, Hotel Furniture, School / College
Furniture, Hospital Furniture, Office Furniture, Garden Furniture, Theatre Furniture, Auditorium Furniture, Shopping Mall Furniture.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
549 Nos. (Micro - 525 and Small - 24 )
Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount 2012-13 484.00 2013-14 538.00 2014-15 598.00 2015-16 664.00 2016-17 738.00
Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 22439 nos. (Direct – 7439 & Indirect – 15000) Technology Details : There is need for firms in the cluster to establish design
studio and cutting facilities and value added component development facilities and testing lab facilities. Basically, cluster core firms confront gaps in terms of Raw material primary processing facilities. There is no facility for quality cutting, value added component development facility in the region. Cluster firms do not have access to capital intensive equipment in terms of advanced component development with respect to steel furniture. They are therefore constrained to produce lower value added products and are also not able to expand the product market mix.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes. Main findings of DSR : The important findings encapsulated in the DSR may be
viewed in terms of critical gaps identified on the raw material primary processing and value-added component development front. These gaps are evidently constraints that merit establishment of relatively capital-intensive equipment. Appropriate interventions could enable development of better quality products and enable the graduation of firms into producing value-added products like hospital furniture, quality auditorium chairs etc.
Main Problems of Cluster : The most critical gaps in the cluster value-chain activities (in the intra-cluster value-chain) may be redressed by way of a facility that comprise raw material primary processing facility and value added component development facility. The common facility basically comprises and facilitates several facilities that will complement existing core activity of steel furniture manufacturing in individual enterprises. The operations within the facility may be viewed in terms of raw material primary processing facility and value added component development facility.
Other Information : -- 2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC The machinery & Equipment based on latest technology are required to meet the
--
37
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
challenges faced by the cluster units. (b.) Location of CFC The facility is proposed to be located in
Kombanad Village, Kunnathnadu Taluk, Ernakulam Dist.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km 33% -
% age of units in radius of 10km
100% -
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired The land has been acquired by the SPV. Land document in
local language received. However, english version of land documents vetted by MSME-DI, Thrissur is required.
ii. Title is in name of The title is in the name of SPV. iii. Valuation and its basis The land has been bought by the SPV as
per market rates.
iv. Land is sufficient Yes, the land measuring 1.3 acre is sufficient
--
v. Change of land use -.
--
vi. If on lease, duration of lease NA
--
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
NA
--
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) The total land area is 1.3 acre out of which 24625.34 sq. ft. is built up area.
--
(e.) Rate of construction of building
The rate of construction of building is Rs. 755/sq.ft approximately. --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Raw material primary processing facility.
Value-added component machines facility.
--
g.) Prod capacity of CFC The equipment and technology options may be viewed in terms of terms of raw material primary processing facility and value-added component machines.
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Sl. No.
Parameter Before intervention
After Intervention
1. Nos. of units 549 10-15% increase 2 Turnover (Rs.
in crore) 738.00 1358.00
3 Export (Rs. in crore)
Nil Competitive import substitution & substitute to China products.
4 Employment Direct
7,349 Nos 10,439 Nos.
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
-- -
(j.) Man Power in CFC 17 members per Shift -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Total gross revenue in flow works out to Rs. 776.45 lakh per annum on the basis of operating capacity (on continuous shift basis) of 80 per cent. For projection purpose, operating capacity of 80% is considered for the first year of operation, and 85% subsequently.
3. Information about SPV
38
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Kalady Steel Consortium Private Limited. No. 14/29-A, Devimandiram, Near Chelamattom Temple, Chelamattom, Okkal PO, Ernakulam, Kerala – 683550.
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Pvt. Ltd. --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Government of Kerala.
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
07.03.17.
Document required.
(e.) Number of Members 59 nos.
As per SIDBI appraisal, the AoA of Kalady Steel Consortium Private Ltd. does not have provision for enrolling new members into SPV. A suitable condition regarding inclusion of provision for enrolling new members into the company has been stipulated.
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and AOA submitted
Submitted. Document required.
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 248.00 lakh (h.) Paid up capital -- (i.) Shareholding Pattern -- -- (j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Submitted. --
(k.) SPV specific A/c The SPV specific A/c is in Indian Overseas Bank. A/c No. 006902000009651
Document required.
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation.
SPV members who include key office bearers of some related industry association have already taken the lead as pursue several joint and co-operative initiatives. These could very well serve as a demonstration for other MSE enterprise clusters in the State.
--
(m.) Technical Institution The name of Technical Institution is Federal Institute of Science and Technology (Angamaly).
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
--
--
(O) Utilities (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
The total power requirement of the CFC is 118 KVA.
--
(b) Water 1750 liters per day. -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA --
39
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Kerala Bureau of Industrial Promotion (K-BIP), Thiruvananthapuram
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Kerala Bureau of Industrial Promotion (K-BIP), Thiruvananthapuram
(c.) Implementation Period 12 months 24 Months from date of final approval.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
As per SIDBI appraisal report, the project is technically feasible and financially viable. The proposed performance indicators and financial position are satisfactory.
Received.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 67th meeting of held on 09.08.19 recommended the proposal to place before the Steering Committee for In-principle approval, subject to creation of state-of-the-art Design Centre with latest software & training facilities.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee (g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division: (h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
The working capital arrangements have been made from Indian Overseas Bank.
--
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
BEP 23%
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
IRR, Payback period IRR is 29.76% and payback period is 3 year 11 months.
DSCR N/A
Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
25.90 %
NPV Rs. 960.15 lakh DER NA
6. Proposed project cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Proposed by
IA at the time of in-principle approval
Recommended by SIDBI / MSE-CDP
1. Land & Site Development 100.00 120.00 2. Building & Other Civil Construction 186.00 186.00 3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 1180.08 1180.08 4. Misc. fixed assets 10.00 10.00 5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 30.00 30.00 6. Contingencies (2% building and 5% on plant and
machinery) 62.72 62.72
7. Margin money for working capital 2.47 2.47 Total 1571.27 1591.27
40
7. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Approved in 52nd meeting
Recommended by SIDBI / MSE-CDP
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1050.00 1050.00 1050.00* 2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Kerala 300.00 300.00 300.00 3 SPV contribution 221.27 221.27 241.27 Total 1571.27 1571.27 1591.27
*70% of eligible project cost of Rs. 15.00 crore. 8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
9. Observations: Following documents are to be submitted prior to issue of final approval letter:
(i) English version of registered land documents in the name of SPV vetted by MSME-DI, Thrissur.
(ii) Details of SPV bank account is not legible to read. Clear copy required. (iii) Copy of MoA & AoA signed by Board of Directors required. As per SIDBI
appraisal, the AoA of Kalady Steel Consortium Private Ltd. does not have provision for enrolling new members into SPV. A suitable condition regarding inclusion of provision for enrolling new members into the company has been stipulated.
S. No. Description No. Power Requirement (HP/KW)
Cost
1. Fully Automatic Panel Bending Machine 1 20 560.59 2. CNC Shearing Machine (with front table
attachment) 1 40 35.85
3. CNC Hydraulic Press brake 1 12 39.02 4. CNC 3 axis Pipe Bending Machine 2 15 169.30 5. Punching Machine (Turret Punch CNC Machine) 1 14 246.85 6. Hydraulic Press Notching Machine (30 ton) 1 12 27.34
7. Transformer 1 0 2.95 8. A.C 3 0 0.90 9. Compressor 1 5 3.06 10. Online UPS 4 0 25.48 11. DG Set 1 0 7.40 12. Computer - Administrative Purpose 1 0 0.80 13. Computer - Fully Automatic Panel Bending
Machine and Punching Machine (Turret Punch CNC Machine)
1 0 4.35
14. Electrification Expenses 56.19
Total 1180.08
41
10. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Steel Furniture Cluster, Ernakulam, Kerala at a total project cost of Rs.1591.27 lakh with Gol assistance of Rs.1050.00 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs.300.00 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs.241.27 lakh.
********
42
Agenda No.53.3.7: Proposal for final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Auto and Engineering Cluster, Nagpur, Maharashtra.
Background Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval. Vide letter dated 19.06.20, Development Commissioner (Industries), Government of
Maharashtra, Mumbai submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster : Auto and Engineering Cluster District : Nagpur Location of Cluster : Hingna MIDC, Nagpur Main Product :
Automotive Components, CI Casting and Forging, Control Panels, Precision Machining and Sheet Metal Press Components
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Micro 573 Small 143 Total 716
Turnover(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :
Year Amount 2012-13 977 2013-14 1051 2014-15 1130 2015-16 1215 2016-17 1307
Documents required Status
(i) Confirmation from State Government regarding their contribution towards the Project.
Provided
(ii) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (If land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required).
Provided
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (iv) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost
escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost. Provided
(v) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Required
(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilize at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Provided
(vii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Provided
(viii) Tangible outcomes such as number of units, turnover, export, employment etc. in the format provided.
Required
43
Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :
Year Amount 2012-13 2.85 2013-14 2.94 2014-15 3.02 2015-16 3.12 2016-17 3.22
Employment in Cluster : Direct employment: 9776 Indirect employment: 23660 Women: 313
Technology Details : The technologies used by most of the micro units are conventional, the small size units have installed some of the advance CNC based Machine tools. The technology employed in the process of designing the system particularly in casting, forging and fabrication units are conventional and old age. The Machining units are employing conventional Machine tools as well as CNC based Machine Tools. The testing facilities are locally available in MIDC Industries Association, Hingna, Nagpur. The advance tool room facilities are either not available at Nagpur or of small capacities mainly used for individual consumption by units.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes Main findings of DSR : Inadequate tool room and design facilities, advance
testing facilities at affordable rates, Training needs to fulfill skilled manpower requirement. Raw material bank to procure raw material in bulk and also to fulfill the timely requirement of MSEs to cater to OEMS with cost competitive rates and avoid unwanted inventory in the form of raw material.
Main Problems of Cluster : 1) No advance tool room activities in the proximity of the cluster. 2)No advance testing facilities 3)No multi skill training facilities 4) No bulk purchases arrangements exists to meet the raw material requirements.
Other Information : N/A 2. Information about Proposed CFC Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC In absence of Inadequate tool room and design facilities, advance testing facilities at affordable rates, Training needs to fulfill skilled manpower requirement. Raw material bank to procure raw material in bulk, at present there is no common facility center to offer services to the MSEs to meet the challenges of regular cost effectiveness on account of peer pressure from OEMs. The number of MSEs can avail services from CFC to strengthen their value chain analysis and deliver products at competitive rates.
-
44
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(b.) Location of CFC MIDC, Hingna, Nagpur % age of units in radius of 5km
68 -
% age of units in radius of 10km
32 -
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired No, comfort letter has been obtained from
MIDC --
ii. Title is in name of NA iii. Valuation and its basis NA iv. Land is sufficient The offered land is sufficient to set up
CFC. v. Change of land use NA vi. If on lease, duration of lease
NA
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
NA
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) Proposed 15300 sq ft - (e.) Rate of construction of building
Approximately INR 109.30 lakhs -
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Common Processing Centre CAD / CAM Design Centre Training Centre
-
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Based on 300 working days calculated machinery utilisation 70% for common machining and tooling center
-
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct /indirect employment, etc.)
Expected outcome after setting up of CFC would be in the range of 25 to 30% increase in domestic sales and exports would reach 8 to 10% hike and in terms of direct employment the same could be anticipated in the range of 12 to 16% overall, and indirect employment would be increased by 20 to 22%.
Tangible outcomes like number of units, turnover, export, employment etc. is required.
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
NA -
(j.) Man Power in CFC 36 based on the 70% machine utilisation in subsequent years could be seen rise by 20 to 25%.
-
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
1. Year 1 at 70% capacity- INR 514.5 lakhs 2. Year 2 at 80% capacity- INR 617.40 lakhs 3. Year 3 at 85% capacity- INR 688.79 lakhs 4. Year 4 at 85% capacity- INR 723.23 lakhs 5. Year 5 at 85% capacity- INR 759.39 lakhs
-
3. Information about SPV Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Nagpur Auto and Engineering Cluster. -
45
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
N.S. Engineering Industries, Plot no C-12, MIDC Hingna Road, Nagpur- 40016.
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Private Limited Company -
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Representative of the District Industries Center Nagpur and MSME - DI Nagpur official will be nominated after tripartite agreement.
-
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 09 Jan 2013 - (e.) Number of Members 25 - (f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Yes -
(g.) Authorized Share Capital INR 10 lakhs - (h.) Paid up capital INR 2 lakhs - (i.) Shareholding Pattern Provided - (j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Provided -
(k.) SPV specific A/c SBI Current Account no- 32774390252 IFSC code- SBIN0001632 Branch- Hingna Industrial Estate
-
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
1. Exposure visit to Auto Cluster Pune 2. Exposure visit to Nashik Engineering Cluster 3. Workshop on bulk purchasing of raw material scheme by NSIC 4. Workshop on labour laws, issues and upcoming reforms and its impact on MSME's
-
(m.) Technical Institution 1.Mahindra & Mahindra 2. Government of Polytechnic 3. Industrial Training Institute, Saoner 4. Shri. Ramdeobaba College of Engineering and Management, Nagpur.
-
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Provided Received
(o.) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
138.258 KW -
(b) Water INR 0.60 lakhs - (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities INR 10.65 lakhs -
4. Implement Arrangements Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency MIDC, Nagpur Maharashtra Development Commissioner (Industries),
46
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
Govt. of Maharashtra
(b.) Fund receiving Agency MIDC, Nagpur Maharashtra Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC), Mumbai
(c.) Implementation Period 2 years As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
After according In-principle approval from GoI DPR will be submitted to SIDBI for appraisal.
SIDBI appraisal received.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
- -
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
- Recommended by Technical Committee.
(g.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
NA -
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 10.45 % - (b.) IRR, Payback period 14 % - (c.) DSCR 12.61 - (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
35.47 % -
(e.) NPV INR 409.35 lakhs - (f.) Sensitivity Analysis By dropping 5% in user charges : BEA
11.04% ROCE 29.94% IRR 13% NPV INR 247.53 Lakhs
-
6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow: (Rs. in Lakh)
S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended by SIDBI / MSE-CDP
1 Land and its Development 120.00 99.76 2 Building and other Civil Constructions 109.35 154.16 3 Plant & Machinery(including electrification) 1356.22 1382.87 4 Misc. fixed assets 25.03 32.87 5 Preliminary and Pre-operative expenses 30.40 9.75 6 Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant
and machinery) 41.15 78.49
7 Deposits 0.00 5.00 8 Margin money for Working Capital 1.99 0.10 Total Project Cost 1684.14 1763.00
47
7. Proposed means of finance are as follows: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended by SIDBI / MSE-CDP
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1350.00 1234.10 2 Government of Maharashtra contribution 168.41 352.60 3 SPV contribution 165.73 176.30 Total 1684.14 1763.00
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Description No. Power Requirement
(HP/KW) Cost
1. CNC Turn mill Centre(TMC250/1000) 1 18KW 84.12 2. 5-Axis High performance VMC 1 35KW 379.70 3. 3D CMM 1 5.97KW 75.35 4. Profile Projector 1 2KW 21.16 5. Hardness Tester 1 1.50 6. Portable Surface Roughness Tester 1 1.63 7. Wire Cut 1 10.8KW 138.36 8. Surface Grinding Machine 1 - 54.00 9. Semi-Automatic Double Column Band
Saw Machine 1 1.492KW 16.18
10. Laser Cutting Machine 1 15 KW 335.75 11. CNC Synchro Hydraulic Press Brake 1 20 HP 63.66 12. Spark Erosion Machine 1 5.6KW 16.07 13. Cylindrical Grinding Machine 1 4 HP 72.49 14. Pallet Truck - Hydraulic 1 - 4.00 15. Air Conditioners 8 5KW 3.66 16. CNC Carbide End Mill & Drill Point
Sharpening machine with Step Drill 1 - 1.28
17. Trimos/Digital height 1 - 5.17 18. CAD, CAM centre for 20 persons 0 - 66.93 19. Over head crane 1 10KW 18.46 20. Electrical Transformer & Control Panel,
Main Cabling etc. 0 - 23.40
Total 132.862 1382.87 9. Observations: Following documents are to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(ii) Tangible outcomes such as number of units, turnover, export, employment etc. in the format provided.
48
10. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Auto and Engineering Cluster, Nagpur, Maharashtra at a total project cost of Rs.1763.00 lakh with Gol assistance of Rs.1234.10 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs.352.60 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs.176.30 lakh.
******
49
Agenda No.53.3.8: Proposal for final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Rice Milling Cluster, Balasore, Odisha.
Background Proposal was recommended in the 69th Techno Economic Appraisal Committee
(TEAC) meeting held on 25.09.19 for final approval. Vide letter dated 21.05.20, Government of Odisha submitted the following documents
and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status (i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (ii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. Provided (iii) Copy of Article of Association and Memorandum of
Association. Provided
(iv) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution. Provided (v) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members. Provided (vi) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet
the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Provided
(vii) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Provided
(viii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Provided
(ix) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the cluster members.
Provided
(x) Mandate form of Project Specific Bank Account in Schedule A bank of Implementing Agency.
Provided
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster Rice Milling Cluster District Balasore Location of Cluster Balasore Lok Sabha Constituency Balasore Main Product
Rice, Rice bran & Husk.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Small-46
Turnover for the last five years (Rs in Crore)
2013-2014 : Rs. 200.00 2014-2015 : Rs. 200.00 2015-2016 : Rs. 200.00 2016-2017 : Rs. 200.00 2017-2018 : Rs. 200.00
Exports for the last five years (Rs in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster Cluster provides direct employment to 2500 and indirect employment to 4000 persons.
Technology Details Use of traditional technology for Paddy cleaning, De-husking, Sorting, Milling & Packaging.
Whether DS Conducted Diagnostic Study was conducted by MSME-DI, Cuttack
50
during 2013-14. Main findings of DSR The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a
common facility centre. Main Problems of Cluster • No facility for value addition for bran
• Lack of testing laboratory • Limited use of technology for sorting and polishing etc.
Other Information 21 millers have come together to form Special Purpose Vehicle - M/s Balasore Rice Milers Consortium Private Limited.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC Rice millers are presently selling bran to neighbouring states due to lack of extraction facilities in the region. Besides, longer duration of storage of bran leads to increase in Free Fatty Acid (FFA) and hampering the quality.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Z-6/1, IID Centre at Somanathpur of Balasore, Odisha
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
60 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
100 --
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes Received ii. Title is in name of M/s Balasore Rice Millers Consortium
Pvt. Ltd. iii. Valuation and its basis IDCO land costing Rs.1.13 crore iv. Land is sufficient Yes (ac.5.144 land allotted) v. Change of land use No required vi. If on lease, duration of lease
Not applicable
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Not applicable
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) Guard room - 269.10 sft; Office complex - 2400 sft (two floors); Factory - 18083.37 sft
--
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Guard room - Rs.1115/ ; Office complex -Rs1250/0; Factory - Rs.824/- (excluding cost of Gate, provision for toilet & Canteen)
--
(f.) Main Facility Proposed • Solvent extraction from Rice Bran • Extraction of silica from husk ash • Extraction of oryzanol from rice
bran oil and other agro products • Setting up of ultra-modern mandis
for procurement of paddy and other raw materials as well as sale of rice
• De-oiled rice bran & Crude Oil and other by-products
--
51
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
• Research and Development centers • Common warehousing, marketing,
export and import of finished products and raw material and other such related works as deemed fit by the company from time to time.
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Testing Facility for raw materials and finished products; 200 TPD Solvent Extraction; Advanced Research & Development Facilities, Common Warehouse and Training facility
--
(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment etc.)
Particulars Before CFC After CFC No. of units 46 50 Turnover (Rs. in crore)
200.00 225.00
Export Nil Direct export likely by 3 units with ISO 22000 certification
Employment 2000 2500 Output 10850 MT per
year 12500 MT per year
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Yes Received
(j.) Man Power in CFC Total manpower required for CFC is 84 -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
SPV has projected revenue generation with 80% utilization of the facility for the first year and 100% by 5th year. User charges to be decided after establishment of CFC.
--
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Balasore Rice Millers Consortium Private Limited, at Balasore Chamber of Industries and Commerce, Udyog Bhavan, Plot No. 25/B, Industrial Estate, Balasore, - 756001
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Private limited by Share --
(c.) Name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
GM, DIC, Balasore and Official from MSME-DI Cuttack to be included.
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 9th August, 2016 -- (e.) Number of Members 40 -- (f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Yes Received
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs.1,80,00,000/- -- (h.) Paid up capital Rs.14550000/- as 13.08.2018 (RoC
website) --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern 320 shares distributed among 40 Received
52
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
members (j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Members have agreed for their share of 10% of project cost
Received
(k.) SPV specific A/c Share Capital Account No 36086447419 and Current Account No. 36081892125 at State Bank of India SME Branch, Balasore.
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to to be highlighted with support documentation
Joint initiatives like exposure visit, seminars, workshops have been undertaken through Soft interventions by MSMEDI
--
(m.) Technical Institution Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar and Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Declaration furnished by SPV members to utilize 60% of the capacity
Received
(o.) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
1 MVA --
(b) Water 20000 litres -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities nil -- 4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Odisha Small Industries Corporation Ltd., Cuttack (State PSU)
As per guidelines (b.) Fund receiving Agency (c.) Implementation Period 24 months -- (d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR has been approved by the State Level Project Steering Committee on 04.08.2018.
Received
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Submitted Received.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
Submitted Recommended by Technical Committee.
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
-- --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
Not applicable --
53
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 22.40 % (Below 60% prescribed) As per SIDBI, 40.94% (b.) IRR, Payback period 36.82% (Above 10% prescribed) As per SIDBI, 21.71% (c.) DSCR Not applicable -- (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
39% (Above 25% prescribed) As per SIDBI, 38.68% for the 10 years period
(e.) NPV Positive As per SIDBI, Rs. 1028.84 lakh (Post tax)
(f.) DER Not applicable -- (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis conducted on
both parameters i.e. Drop in User Fee and Drop in Capacity
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
-- 4 approved CFCs. Out of which, 3 CFCs are commissioned
6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow:
(Rs. in lakh) Sr. No Particulars Proposed by
IA Recommended by SIDBI/
As per MSE-CDP (i) Land 113.17 113.17 (ii) Land development & Building 295.40 295.40 (iii) Plant & Machinery 1077.02 1077.02 (iv) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 12.44 12.44
Total 1498.03 1498.03 7. Proposed means of finance are as follows:
(Rs. in lakh) Sr. No
Particulars % Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As
per MSE-CDP (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 70 1048.62 1048.62 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Odisha 20 299.61 299.61 (iii) SPV contribution 10 149.80 149.80
Total 100 1498.03 1498.03 8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Description No. Amount
1. Bag filter 1 8.50 2. Ash Management System 1 12.50 3. Water Softner (40m3/hour) 1 10.50 4. Raw material and Feed Weighing System 1 70.44 5. Preparatory Section 1 82.98 6. Main Plant with structural 1 343.57 7. Meal conditioning section & erection 1 272.93 8. Effluent Treatment Plant 1 9.30 9. 6 TPH Boiler, Erection, Accessories & Statutory
fees 1 82.85
54
S. No. Description No. Amount 10. Weighbridge with structure 1 21.30 11. Lab Room and equipment 1 26.75 12. Transformer 1 MVA, structural cost, line drawing,
PCC panel & cable 1 84.65
13. Diesel Generator set 1 48.50 14. Computers & Peripherals 1.25 15. Furniture & Fixtures 1.00
Total 1077.02 9. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Rice Milling Cluster, Balasore, Odisha at a total project cost of Rs. 1498.03 lakh with Gol assistance of Rs. 1048.62 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 299.61 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs. 149.80 lakh.
*****
55
Agenda No.53.3.9: Proposal for final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Home Furnishing Cluster, Karur, Tamil Nadu.
Background Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval. Vide letter dated 30.12.19, Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation
Limited (TANSIDCO), Chennai submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster : Home Furnishing Cluster District : Karur Location of Cluster : Gandhi Grammam Lok Sabha Constituency : Karur Main Product: Cotton fabric home furnishings of 20s and 10s No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Micro 600 Small 40 Medium 10 Total 650
Turnover(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :
Year Amount 2015-16 3140 2016-17 3611 2017-18 4153 2018-19 4776 2019-20 5492
Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :
Nil
Documents required Status
(i) Confirmation from State Government regarding enhancement of their contribution towards the Project.
Provided
(ii) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (If land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required).
Required
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (iv) Tangible outcomes such as number of units, turnover, export,
employment etc. Required
(v) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Provided
(vi) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Required
(vii) Details of SPV bank account. Provided (viii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC
guidelines. Provided
(ix) Certificate from State Pollution Control Board. Required (x) Number of units in the radius of 5 Km & 10 Km of the cluster Provided
56
Employment in Cluster : 29600 Nos. (Direct – 9600 & Indirect – 20000) Technology Details : The equipment and technology options may be viewed in
terms of terms of training as well as value-added printed fabric/garments components (like printed panels, printed collars, and printed cuff) development machines.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes Main findings of DSR : Critical gap identified on the training, value-added apparel
component development and testing front. Main Problems of Cluster : The important findings encapsulated in the DSR may be
viewed in terms of critical gap identified on the training, value-added apparel component development and testing front.
Other Information : No other information. 2. Information about Proposed CFC Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC The CFC could help cluster firms even double capacity utilization. Profit margins may double from 5-10 percent. Units could graduate to value added products. More importantly, the envisaged common facility will help existing firms move up the value-chain; help expand product and market mix (value added home furnishings; apparel products.). The CFC will also enable increase in employment by at least about 3000 persons directly; train manpower to the tune of at least 3500 persons in 5 years.
--
(b.) Location of CFC The facility is proposed to be located in Karur Taluk, Karur Dist. The SPV is procuring necessary land. About 42048 sq. ft. of this land will be the built-up area of the site.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
- --
% age of units in radius of 10km
- --
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Registration of land has been
undertaken by the SPV Registered land documents in the name of SPV is required. (If land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for minimum 30 years is required).
ii. Title is in name of The title is in the name of SPV iii. Valuation and its basis The land is to be secured on 16 year
lease basis with lease rental of Rs. 10 lakh (Land + Building).
iv. Land is sufficient Yes, the land is sufficient v. Change of land use Change of land use is not required vi. If on lease, duration of lease
16 years
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes, it is legally tenable
57
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 42048 -- (e.) Rate of construction of building
Building and civil works (building also on lease basis along with renovation) Rs. 110 lakh
--
(f.) Main Facility Proposed • Automatic Fabric Spreader & Cutting.
• Printing. • Embroidery. • Testing Facilities.
--
(g.)Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
(i) Expected turnover rise to Rs. 5,970 cr (ii) Capacity utilization may increase by at least 50 %. (iii)Increase in employment by 8000 persons directly. (iv)Profit margins may double from 5 to 10 percent.
Tangible outcomes like number of units, turnover, export, employment etc.
(h.) Pollution clearance required or not
Not required Required
(i.) Man Power in CFC 68 Nos. -- (j.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Total gross revenue in flow works out to Rs.890.11 lakh per annum on the basis of operating capacity (on continuous shift basis) of 80 per cent.
--
(k.) No other information -- 3. Information about SPV Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Plot no.69, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Vennaimalai, Karur 639006.
Certificate of incorporation received. (b.) Nature of SPV(company
or Society or Trust) Registered as Private Limited under section 7 of Companies Act 2014.
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
The provision for State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV.
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV Jan 8, 2016 -- (e.) Number of Members 22 members (f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
-- Received.
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 180 lakh -- (h.) Paid up capital Rs. 200 lakh -- (i.) Shareholding Pattern Provided -- (j.) Commitment letter for contribution
It is provided --
(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No. 1227201005096, Canara Bank, Karur
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by
Provided, attached at Annexure IV of DPR
--
58
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation (m.) Technical Institution Provided -- (n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
-- Required
(o.) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
277 Kva
(b) Water 7000 ltr/ day (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Nil
4. Implement Arrangements Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation Limited (TANSIDCO), Chennai
As per guidelines
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation Limited (TANSIDCO), Chennai
--
(c.) Implementation Period 12 months -- (d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
It is being appraised Cluster Development Coordination Committee
--
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
It is still awaited --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
It is still awaited Recommended by Technical Committee.
(g.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
It is obtained from Canara Bank Received.
5. Financial Analysis of CFC Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 24 -- (b.) IRR, Payback period 30.30, 3 year 11 months -- (c.) DSCR Nil -- (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
26.03% --
(e.) NPV Rs. 924.10 lakh --
59
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(f.) DER NA -- (g.) Sensitivity Analysis NA -- (h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
NA --
6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended
by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(i) Land and its Development 10.00 10.00 (ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 110.00 110.00 (iii) Plant & Machinery(including electrification) 1266.37 1266.37 (iv) Misc. fixed assets 20.00 20.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum
2% of project cost 30.00 30.00
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
65.52 65.52
(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 5.31 5.31 Total 1507.20 1507.20
7. Proposed means of finance are as follows:
(Rs. in lakh) S.
No. Particulars Amount Recommended by SIDBI/
As per MSE-CDP 1. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1229.69 1178.99 2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamil Nadu 100.00 150.70 3. SPV contribution 177.51 177.51
Total 1507.20 1507.20 8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh) S.
No. Description No. Power Requirement
(HP/KW) Cost
1. CAD 1 0 30.84 2. Spreader 3 14 80.97 3. Cutter 1 0 119.19 4. Spreading Table 1 0 40.21 5. St. Knife Cutting Machine 4 2 2.73 6. Band Knife Cutting Machine 1 1 3.34 7. Computers 2 2.5 1.26 8. Air Conditioning 1 2 0.42 9. Supporting equipments 1 0 20.18 10. Multicolour Printing Small 1 50 125.76 11. Multicolour Printing Large 1 77 177.65
60
S. No.
Description No. Power Requirement (HP/KW)
Cost
12. Multicolour Printing with Foil option 1 42 138.39 13. Exposing Machine 1 8 95.19 14. Stretching Machine 1 0 59.37 15. UPS 1 0 0.99 16. Air Conditioning 1 2 0.42 17. Compressor / Stabilizer 1 15 9.81 18. Humidification 1 10 15.77 19. Supporting equipment 1 0 2.81 20. Embroidery machine (for larger dimension) 1 2.25 63.50 21. Embroidery Mc Sequin 1 2.25 97.50 22. Laser Engraving 1 5 3.68 23. Fusing Machine 1 2 1.38 24. Air conditioner 4 2 1.92 25. UPS 1 0 1.25 26. Testing Lab 1 10 29.56 27. Supporting equipments 4 13 81.99 28. Electrisation - - 60.29
Total 1266.37
9. Observations: Following documents are to be submitted prior to issue of final approval letter:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (If land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required).
(ii) Tangible outcomes such as number of units, turnover, export, employment etc. (iii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are
Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (iv) Certificate from State Pollution Control Board.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Home Furnishing Cluster, Karur, Tamil Nadu at a total project cost of Rs.1507.20 lakh with Gol assistance of Rs.1178.99 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs.150.70 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs.177.51 lakh.
******
61
Agenda No.53.3.10: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Buggapadu, Khammam District, Telangana.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 51st SCM held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 19.02.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status
(i) As agreed upon by State Government, letter regarding enhancement of State share to 30%
Vide letter dated 30.09.19, Govt. of Telangana has committed to contribute state share of 30% of the project cost.
(ii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency with clear title, complying zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc.
Received
(iii) Copy of approved layout plan Received (iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received (v) Tangible outcomes of the project in
prescribed format. Required.
(vi) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost
Received
(vii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines
Received
(viii) TSIIC Ltd., Hyderabad should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Telangana / TSIIC
Undertaking received from Vice Chairman & Managing Director, Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited,Hyderabad
(ix) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Received
(x) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component costs as per format provided.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Pre-registration Information Name of Organization : Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Telangana District : Khammam. Industrial Estate : Industrial Park Buggapadu (Greenfield).
62
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area 142.54 acres. Area to be developed 56.14 acres. Number and sizes of plots developed Total No. of plots – 52
Plot Size No. of plots < 0.5 acre 33 0.5 – 1 acre 09 1 - 1.25 acre 04 Above 1.25 acre 06 Total No. of Plots 52
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory 3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation limited (TSIIC Ltd.), Hyderabad.
As per MSECDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received.
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes, The proposed site is approachable through a blacktopped single lane road connecting Sathupally and Patwarigudem village and further to Palvancha. The nearest railway station to the site is Khammam located at ~90 km. The nearest airport to the project site is the Gannavaram airport near Vijayawada at 90 km from project site. Rajahmundry Airport and Rajiv Gandhi International Airport at Hyderabad are located at ~120 km and ~ 290 km from the project site. The nearest ports to the project site are Kakinada Deep Water Port & proposed Machilipatnam Port. Water for the proposed industrial park can be sourced from the Mission Bhagiratha Pipeline.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (TSIIC) is already in possession of land required for the development of all infrastructure facilities with clear title.
Received
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes.
63
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Received
Basis of elements of project Cost
Estimated have been prepared based on TSSSR.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
As per SIDBI Report: Description Year 2020 Cumulative
up to 2025 Setting up of new units in Nos.
30 52
Aggregate Investments from MSEs (Rs. in lakhs)
3000 5200
Aggregate Employment in Nos.
240 415
Expected Indirect Employment in Nos.
480 830
Justification of the Proposal The development of IP Buggapadu for MSEs in Food Processing, general engineering & allied sector is expected to induce investments essentially through new entrants to the food processing and allied industrial segments in the region. In addition, the development of IP is expected to generate direct & indirect employment opportunities for the local people.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S.
No. Particulars Proposed Cost
by IA As per MSE-
CDP / Recommended
by SIDBI 1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure (i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary
wall / fencing 87.05 87.05
(ii) Cost of laying roads (internal roads – CC) 208.13 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump
houses 126.63 110.00
(v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00 (vi) Drainage 74.25 60.00 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work
work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
63.37 63.38
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00 10.00 Sub Total 589.43 550.43
64
S. No.
Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
As per MSE-CDP /
Recommended by SIDBI
2 Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00 20.00 (ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/
Documentation Centre 21.00 20.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50 30.00 (iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00 20.00 (v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 38.50 38.50 (vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00 20.00
Sub Total 154.00 148.50 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 80.00 80.00 4. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 24.70 20.00 Total 848.13 798.93
5. Proposed means of finance
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP /
Recommended by SIDBI (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 639.14 559.25 (ii) Govt. of Telangana / IA 208.99 288.88
Total 848.13 848.13 * GoI grant of Rs. 559.25 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost of Rs.798.93 lakh. 6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from State Government. 7. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Buggapadu, Khammam District, Telangana at a total project cost of Rs. 848.13 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 559.25 lakh, State Government contribution of Rs. 288.88 lakh. .
*****
65
Agenda No.53.3.11: Proposal for Final approval for setting up new Industrial Estate at Kallem, Jangaon District, Telangana.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 51st SCM held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 19.02.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status (i) As agreed upon by State Government,
letter regarding enhancement of State share to 30%
Vide letter dated 30.09.19, Govt. of Telangana has committed to contribute state share of 30% of the project cost.
(ii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency with clear title, complying zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc.
Received
(iii) Copy of approved layout plan. Received (iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (v) Tangible outcomes of the project in
prescribed format. Required.
(vi) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(vii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines
Received
(viii) TSIIC Ltd., Hyderabad should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Telangana / TSIIC.
Undertaking received from Vice Chairman & managing Director, Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, Hyderabad
(ix) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Received
(x) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component costs as per format provided.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Pre-registration Information Name of Organization : Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation
Limited. State
: Telangana
District :
Jangaon.
Industrial Estate :
Industrial Park Kallem (Greenfield).
66
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area 133.04 acres. Area to be developed 56.89 acres. Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 250
Plot Size (sq. mtr.) No. of plots 549 sq. m 221 550-600 sq. m 15 600-650 sq. m. 8 Above 650 sq. m 6 Total No. of Plots 250
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory 3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation limited (TSIIC Ltd.), Hyderabad.
As per MSECDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted -
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes, Proposed site for establishing Industrial park is near Kallem Village,Lingala Ghanpur Mandal in Jangaon district of Telangana State. The project site is located near kallem village off NH 163 at a distance of about 5 km. The nearest railway station is Pembarti Railway station which is about 6.5 km away & Jangaon railway station is located at ~about 10 km. The nearest airport is the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport at Hyderabad located at ~ 115 km. The nearest ports to the project site are Krishnapatnam Port and Kakinada Deep Water Port.
--
Whether land is in possession Implementing Agency (TSIIC) is Received
67
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
in the name of IA with Clear Title
already in possession of land required for the development of all infrastructure facilities with clear title.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Received
Basis of elements of project Cost
Estimated have been prepared based on TS SSR.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
S.No. Description Year 2020
Cumulative up to 2025
1. Units in Nos. 185 250 2. Investment (Rs. in
crore) 185.00 250.00
3. Employment in Nos. 3700 5000 4. Expected Indirect
Employment 7400 10000
Justification of the Proposal The Industrial park is proposed to encourage the prospective entrepreneurs to set up MSE in their line of experience taking advantage of the infrastructure facilities being created. The development of IP Kallem for MSE in textile and garment sector (more than 50% woman entrepreneurs) is expected to induce investments from new entrains to the textile garments and allied industrial segments in the region. Telangana Government is encouraging textile garments industry in the nearby Warangal urban districts in commitments of which developed a textile mega park over an area of 1000 acres. Recently Telangana Government has entered in to MOU with Korean Govt. / Industrialist for establishment of forward and backward textile industry in this park.
--
68
4. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by
SIDBI 1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure (i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall /
fencing 100.48 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 258.71 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump
houses 121.93 110.00
(v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00 (vi) Storm Water Drainage 72.93 60.00 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work
including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
226.64 226.33
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00 10.00 Sub Total 810.69 726.33 2 Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00 20.00 (ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation
Centre 21.00 20.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50 30.00 (iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00 20.00 (v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 38.50 38.50 (vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00 20.00
Sub Total 154.00 148.50 3. Sewage Treatment Facilities 75.00 75.00 4. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 31.19 20.00 Total 1070.88 969.83
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S.
No. Particulars Proposed by
IA As per MSE-CDP /
Recommended by SIDBI (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 776.10 678.88 (ii) Govt. of Telangana / IA 294.78 392.00
Total 1070.88 1070.88 * GoI grant of Rs. 678.88 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost of Rs.969.83 lakh.
69
6. Observations: Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from State Government. 7. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up new Industrial Estate at Kallem, Jangaon District, Telangana at a total project cost of Rs. 1070.88 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 678.88 lakh, State Government contribution of Rs. 392.00 lakh . .
*****
70
Agenda No.53.3.12: Proposal for Final Approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Autonagar, Kundanpally Village, Ramagundam Mandal in Peddapalli District, Telangana.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 51st SCM held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 19.02.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad submitted the following
documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status (i) As agreed upon by State Government,
letter regarding enhancement of State share to 30%
Vide letter dated 30.09.19, Govt. of Telangana has committed to contribute state share of 30% of the project cost.
(ii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency with clear title, complying zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc.
Received.
(iii) Copy of approved layout plan. Received (iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (v) Tangible outcomes of the project in
prescribed format. Required.
(vi) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(vii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Received
(viii) TSIIC Ltd., Hyderabad should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Telangana / TSIIC.
Undertaking received from Vice Chairman & managing Director, Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, Hyderabad
(ix) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Received
(x) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component costs as per format provided.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Pre-registration Information Name of Organization
: Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited.
State : Telangana District : Peddapalli. Industrial Estate : Autonagar Kundanpally (Greenfield IP).
71
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area 25.97 acres. Area to be developed 25.97 acres. Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 250
Plot Size (sq. m.) No. of plots 0-150 104 150-200 54 200-400 36 400-500 56 Total No. of Plots 250
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory 3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency (IA) Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure
Corporation limited (TSIIC Ltd.), Hyderabad.
As per MSECDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes, the proposed site for establishing Autonagar (AN) is near Kundanpally Village, Ramagundam Mandal in Peddapalli district (LWE District1) of Telangana State. The project site is located near Kundanpally Village abutting SH 1 & NH 63 . Well connected to Rajiv Gandhi International Airport at Hyderabad located at ~ 260 km. The nearest ports to the project site are Proposed Machilipatnam Port and Kakinada Deep Water Port.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (TSIIC) is already in possession of land required for the development of all infrastructure facilities with clear title.
Received
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of
Yes. Received.
72
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks approved project cost and any escalation in cost Basis of elements of project Cost
Estimated have been prepared based on TSSSR.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project (as per SIDBI Report)
Description Year 2020 Cumulative up to 2025
Units in Nos. 100 250 Investment Rs. in Crores 25.00 62.50 Employment in Nos. 1000 2500 Expected Indirect Employment
2000 5000
Justification of the Proposal The Industrial park is proposed to encourage the prospective entrepreneurs to set up MSE in their line of experience taking advantage of the infrastructure facilities being created. The location as having advantage of coal mines, NTPC power plant and Ramgundam fertilizer plant. In view of this there is scope for development of ancillary and allied industries. In addition to this there is growth potential for setting up auto servicing, body building, general engineering etc.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed
Cost by IA As per MSE-CDP /
Recommended by SIDBI 1 Land Development and Other
Overhead Infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / fencing
53.07 53.07
(ii) Cost of laying roads 228.20 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks,
and pump houses 104.97 104.97
(v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00 (vi) Drainage 69.24 60.00 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-
work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
250.91 250.00
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00 10.00 Sub Total 736.39 698.04 2 Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00 20.00 (ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/
Documentation Centre 21.00 20.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50 30.00 (iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00 20.00
73
S. No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets
35.00 35.00
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities
21.00 20.00
Sub Total 150.50 145.00 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 75.00 75.00 4. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 28.86 20.00 Total 990.75 938.04
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S.
No. Particulars Proposed
by IA As per MSE-CDP /
Recommended by SIDBI (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 750.43 656.62 (ii Govt. of Telangana / IA 240.32 334.13
Total 990.75 990.75 * GoI grant of Rs. 656.62 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost of Rs.938.04 lakh. 6. Observations: Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from State Government. 7. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up new Industrial Estate at Autonagar, Kundanpally Village, Ramagundam Mandal in Peddapalli District, Telangana at a total project cost of Rs. 990.75 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 656.62 lakh, State Government contribution of Rs. 334.13 lakh.
*****
74
Agenda No.53.3.13: Proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Park at Autonagar, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 51st SCM held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 19.02.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad submitted the following
documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status (i) As agreed upon by State Government,
letter regarding enhancement of State share to 30%
Vide letter dated 30.09.19, Govt. of Telangana has committed to contribute state share of 30% of the project cost.
(ii) Registered land documents with clear title, in the name of Implementing Agency.
Received
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received (iv) Status of completed ID projects in the
State as per format provided and details of operating units in present project
Received
(v) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost
Received
(vi) TSIIC Ltd., Hyderabad should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Telangana / TSIIC.
Undertaking received from Vice Chairman & Managing Director, Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, Hyderabad
(vii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Received
(viii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component costs as per format provided.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information Name of Organization : Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure
Corporation Limited. State : Telangana District : Rangareddy. Industrial Estate : Autonagar at Hyderabad (Existing)
75
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area 221.29 acres Area to be developed 221.29 acres Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 1410
Plot Size (in acres) No. of plots 0 - 0. 25 1292 0.26 - 0.5 62 0.5 – 1.0 35 1.0 – 3.0 21 Total No. of Plots 1410
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory 3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited (TSIIC), Hyderabad.
As per MSECDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes, this industrial estate is located at a distance of 15 km from Hyderabad on the road leading to Vijayawada from Hyderabad – NH65. The nearest Railway station to this estate is 15 km Secunderabad / Hyderabad / Kachiguda. Well connected to Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, Hyderabad, located to a distance of 25 km.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (TSIIC) is already in possession of land required for the development of all infrastructure facilities with clear title.
Received
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Received
Basis of elements of project Cost
Estimated have been prepared based on TS SSR.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the Particulars Present Projected up to
76
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
project Status 2025 Existing units (Nos.) 1350 1450 Total Investment (Rs. in crore.)
949.08 986.58
Total employment (Nos.)
7915 8415
Total turnover (Rs. in crore)
225.36 236.59
Justification of the Proposal This estate was developed 40 years ago exclusively for Auto ancillary sector and infrastructural facilities provided at that time have been damaged and resulted frequent maintenance. This being auto industrial estate number of auto ancillaries, repair establishments, logistics and other units are established, due to this the traffic density of heavy container vehicles is very high, and hence contributed to erosion in roads, dust and air pollution etc. In order to arrest the pollution and damage of roads, it is necessary to re-lay the total approach roads, replace water distribution and sewerage lines, construction of Effluent Treatment Facilities, replacement of existing street lights, improve the green cover and fencing of the estate along the eastern [art (Vanasthali Deer Park). The facilities, thus now proposed to be created will enhance the industrial work environment and improve outlook of the estate.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S.
No. Particulars Proposed
Cost by IA
As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by
SIDBI 1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure (i) Cost of site fencing & leveling 97.00 97.00 (ii) Cost of laying Cement Concrete roads 227.18 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump
houses 153.87 110.00
(v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00 (vi) Storm Water Drainage 97.50 60.00 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work
work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
224.00 224.00
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00 10.00 Sub Total 829.55 721.00 2 Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00 20.00 (ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/
Documentation Centre 21.00 20.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50 30.00 (iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00 20.00
77
S. No.
Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by
SIDBI (v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets ` 38.50 38.50 (vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00 20.00
Sub Total 154.00 148.50 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 40.00 40.00 4. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 30.71 20.00 Total 1054.26 929.50
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed
by IA As per MSE-CDP /
Recommended by SIDBI (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 743.60 650.65 (ii) State Government / IA 310.66 403.61
Total 1054.26 1054.26 * GoI grant of Rs. 650.65 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost of Rs.929.50 lakh
-
6. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Park at Autonagar, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana at a total project cost of Rs.1054.26 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 650.65 lakh, State Government contribution of Rs. 403.61 lakh. .
*****
78
Agenda No.53.3.14: Proposal for Final Approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Sultanpur, Sangareddy District, Telangana.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 51st SCM held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 19.02.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad submitted the following
documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status (i) As agreed upon by State Government, letter
regarding enhancement of State share to 30%. Vide letter dated 30.09.19, Govt. of Telangana has committed to contribute state share of 30% of the project cost.
(ii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency with clear title, complying zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc.
Received
(iii) Copy of approved layout plan. Received (iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (v) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed
format. Required.
(vi) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(vii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Received
(viii) TSIIC Ltd., Hyderabad should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Telangana / TSIIC.
Received
(ix) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Received
(x) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component costs as per format provided.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization
: Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited.
State :
Telangana
District :
Sangareddy.
Industrial Estate :
Industrial Park Sultanpur (Greenfield IP for FICCI Ladies Organisation).
79
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area 552.70 acres Area to be developed 48.39 acres Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 36
Plot Size (in acres) No. of plots 0.5 – 1.0 28 1.01 – 1.20 8 Total No. of Plots 36
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory 3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation limited (TSIIC Ltd.), Hyderabad.
As per MSECDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes, the nearest railway station to the site is Lingampally located at ~15 km. The nearest airport to the project site is the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport at Hyderabad located at ~ 60 km south of project site. The nearest ports to the project site are Machilipatnam Port and Kakinada Deep Water Port.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (TSIIC) is already in possession of land required for the development of all infrastructure facilities with clear title.
Received
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Received
Basis of elements of project Cost
The estimates are based on Telangana State Standard Scheduled of Rates (SSR) – 2019-20.
Received
Tangible Outcomes of the Description Year Year Required.
80
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
project 2022 2025 Setting up of new units in Nos.
16 24
Aggregate Investments from MSEs (Rs. in Lakhs)
2400 3600
Aggregate Employment in Nos.
160 240
Expected Indirect Employment in Nos.
320 480
Justification of the Proposal The proposed industrial park is developed exclusively for allotment to women entrepreneurs (FLO) MSME sector. The site is located at a distance of 59 kms. from Hyderabad and 8 kms from Patancheru with good road connectivity. There will be good demand for these industrial plots as it is in close proximity to the raw material and market source. Abundant skill / un-skilled manpower, supervisor staff is available due to the presence of industrial activity in the vicinity.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed
Cost by IA As per MSE-CDP /
Recommended by SIDBI 1 Land Development and Other Overhead
Infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / fencing
100.45 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads (CC Roads) 196.00 196.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead
tanks, and pump houses 116.01 110.00
(v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00 (vi) Storm Water Drainage 67.63 60.00 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution
net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
252.08 250.00
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00 10.00 Sub Total 762.17 746.00 2 Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative and Services
Centre 21.00 20.00
(ii) Telecommunication /Cyber 21.00 20.00
81
S. No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI
Centre/ Documentation Centre (iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50 30.00 (iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00 20.00 (v) Raw material storage facility,
Marketing outlets 35.00 35.00
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities
21.00 20.00
Sub Total 150.50 145.00 3. Contingencies & Pre-operative
expenses 27.38 20.00
Total 940.05 911.00 5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by
IA As per MSE-CDP /
Recommended by SIDBI (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 728.80 637.70 (ii) Govt. of Telangana /IA 211.25 302.35
Total 940.05 940.05 * GoI grant of Rs. 637.70 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost of Rs. 911.00 lakh 6. Observations: Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from State Government. 7. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up new Industrial Estate at Sultanpur, Sangareddy District, Telangana at a total project cost of Rs. 940.05 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 637.70 lakh, State Government contribution of Rs. 302.35 lakh.
*****
82
Agenda No.53.3.15: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Park at Bhongir, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, Telangana.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 51st SCM held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 19.02.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad submitted the following
documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status (i) As agreed upon by State Government,
letter regarding enhancement of State share to 30%
Vide letter dated 30.09.19, Govt. of Telangana has committed to contribute state share of 30% of the project cost.
(ii) Registered land documents with clear title, in the name of Implementing Agency
Received.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received (iv) Status of completed ID projects in the
State as per format provided and details of operating units in present project.
Received
(v) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(vi) TSIIC Ltd., Hyderabad should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Telangana / TSIIC.
Undertaking received from Vice Chairman & Managing Director, Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, Hyderabad.
(vii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Received
(viii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component costs as per format provided.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under: 1. Pre-registration Information Name of Organization : Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State
: Telangana
District :
Yadadri Bhuvanagiri.
Industrial Estate :
Industrial park at Bhongir (Existing)
83
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area 64 acres Area to be developed Existing Industrial Park (63.05 acre) Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 59
After further subdivision, No. of plots – 94 Plot Size (in acres) No. of plots < 0. 25 15 0.26 - 0.5 42 0.5 – 1.0 32 > 1.0 5 Total No. of Plots 94
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory 3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation limited (TSIIC Ltd.), Hyderabad.
As per MSECDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes, project site is well connected by road, rail and air. The project site has excellent road network through NH 163 & SH 17. The nearest railway station to the project site is Bhongir located at about 3.5 km. The nearest airport to the project site is the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport at Hyderabad located at ~ 75 km towards southwest from the site. Adequate water & power supply facilities in the vicinity/IP.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (TSIIC) is already in possession of land required for the development of all infrastructure facilities with clear title.
Received
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Received
84
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Basis of elements of project Cost
Estimated have been prepared based on TS SSR.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Particulars Present Status
Projected up to 2025
Units in Nos. 83 93 Total Investment (Rs. in crore.)
73.17 77.87
Total employment (Nos.) 1029 1377 Total turnover (Rs. in crore)
122.21 690.00
Justification of the Proposal The up-gradation of infrastructure in the IP Bhongir will facilitate improved functioning of the existing units and setting up of new units in the allotted plots. The up-gradation will facilitate in setting up of another 10 units with increased investments of Rs. 4.70 crore and employment of 116 direct and 232 indirect by the year 2025..
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S.
No. Particulars Proposed Cost
by IA As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by
SIDBI 1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure (i) Cost of land filling/leveling including
boundary wall / fencing 76.50 76.50
(ii) Cost of laying roads 212.14 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and
pump houses 85.31 85.31
(v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00 (vi) Storm Water Drainage 67.46 60.00 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work
work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
74.96 74.80
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00 10.00 Sub Total 546.37 526.61 2 Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00 20.00 (ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/
Documentation Centre 21.00 20.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 28.00 28.00 (iv) Bank/ Post Office 17.50 17.50
85
S. No.
Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by
SIDBI (v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing
outlets ` 42.00 42.00
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 17.50 17.50 Sub Total 147.00 145.00
3. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 20.80 20.00 Total 714.17 691.61
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP
/ Recommended by SIDBI
(iii) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 551.82 484.13 (iv) State Government / IA 162.35 230.04
Total 714.17 714.17 *GoI grant of Rs. 484.13 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost of Rs.691.61 lakh. 6. Proposal for Steering Committee: Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Park at Bhongir, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, Telangana at a total project cost of Rs. 714.17 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 484.13 lakh, State Government contribution of Rs. 230.04 lakh. .
*****
86
Agenda No. 53.4.1: Ratification of Time Extension granted for upgradation of infrastructure facilities at Amingaon Export Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP) in Kamrup (Metro) District, Assam.
S. No. Description Status
1 Name of the proposal and location
Upgradation of infrastructure facilities at Amingaon Export Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP) in Kamrup (Metro) District, Assam.
2 Approval accorded 38th SCM held on 28.07.15 3 Final approval
order issued on 19.07.16
4 Name of the IA Assam Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (AIDC),
Guwahati. 5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 474.56 Govt. of Assam : 118.64
Total : 593.20
6 Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh) S.No.
Particulars Approved Cost
1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure (i) Land filling/leveling including boundary wall
and fencing: 70.82
(ii) Laying roads 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 7.10 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and
pump houses 0.00
(v) Water harvesting 9.64 (vi) Drainage 59.98 (vii) Power distribution, Street light arrangements,
etc. 82.73
(viii)
Other (Sanitary Convenience): 0.00
Sub Total 430.27 2 Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative Office building 150.00 (ii) Telecom/Cyber/Documentation centre (iii) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre (iv) Bank/Post office (v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing
outlets (vi) First aid centre, Creche, Canteen Sub Total 150.00 3 Effluent Treatment Facilities 0.00 4 Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 12.93
87
S. No. Description Status Grand Total 593.20
7 Total GoI grant released
Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh) 1st on 25.04.17 : 200.00 2nd on 12.03.20 : 227.00 Total : 427.00
8 Validity upto 31.12.19 9 Time extension
accorded on file up to
31.12.20
10 Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension accorded on file.
**********
88
Agenda No. 53.4.2: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Pathsala, District Barpeta, Assam.
S. No. Description Status
1 Name of the proposal and location
Setting up of new Industrial Estate at Pathsala, District Barpeta, Assam.
2 Approval accorded 30th SCM held on 19.06.12 3 Final approval order
issued on 24.09.12
4 Name of the IA Assam Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (AIDC), Guwahati.
5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 584.00 Govt. of Assam : 145.44
Total : 729.44
6 Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No Particulars Approved cost
(i) Land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing
100.00
(ii) Laying roads 199.98 (iii) Road side greenery & social
forestry 7.10
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
70.98
(v) Drainage 52.48 (vi) Power distribution, Street light
arrangements, etc. 208.01
(vii) Administrative and Other Services Complex
76.59
(viii) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses
14.30
Total 729.44 7 Total GoI grant released Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh)
1st on 28.03.14 : 65.00 2nd on 24.08.16 : 95.568 3rd on 15.03.18 : 230.00 4th on 11.03.19 : 125.00 Total : 515.568
8 Validity upto 31.01.20 9 Time extension
accorded on file up to 31.03.20
10 Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension accorded on file.
*********
89
Agenda No. 53.4.3: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC in Furniture Cluster, Thrissur, Kerala.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal and location
Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Furniture Cluster, Thrissur, Kerala.
2. Approval accorded 38th SCM held on 28.07.2015. 3. Final approval
order issued on 30.10.15
4. Name of the IA Kerala Bureau of Industrial Promotion (KBIP), Thiruvananthapuram
5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 1002.46 Govt. of Kerala Grant : 289.01 SPV contribution : 153.61
Total : 1445.08
6. Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh) Particulars Approved
Cost
Land and its Development 107.00
Building and other Civil Constructions 132.30
Plant & Machinery 1101.45
Misc. fixed assets 10.00
Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
28.00
Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
57.72
Margin money for Working Capital 8.61
Total Project Cost 1445.08
7. Total GoI grant released
(Rs. in lakh) 1st installment on 28.11.18 501.23 2nd installment on 24.01.20 300.738
8. Validity upto 31.03.20 9. Time extension
accorded on file up to
31.12.20
10. Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension accorded on file.
*********
90
Agenda No. 53.4.4: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC in Plywood Cluster, Idukki, Ernakulam, Kerala.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal and location
Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Plywood Cluster, Idukki, Ernakulam, Kerala.
2. Approval accorded 45th SCM held on 22.11.17. 3. Final approval order
issued on 11.04.18
4. Name of the IA Kerala Bureau of Industrial Promotion (KBIP), Thiruvananthapuram
5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 982.884 Govt. of Kerala Grant : 280.824 SPV contribution : 140.412
Total : 1404.12
6. Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh) Particulars Approved
Cost Land and its Development 105.00 Building and other Civil Constructions 214.20 Plant & Machinery 980.00 Misc. fixed assets 15.00 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
28.12
Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
53.28
Margin money for Working Capital 8.52 Total Project Cost 1404.12
7. Total GoI grant released
No fund has been released so far.
8. Validity upto 10.04.20 9. Time extension
accorded on file up to
10.10.21
10. Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension accorded on file.
*********
91
Agenda No. 53.5.1: Re-allocation of funds in respect of up-gradation of Industrial Infrastructure in Focal Point, Phase-IV, Ludhiana, Punjab.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal and location
Up-gradation of Industrial Infrastructure in Focal Point, Phase-IV, Ludhiana, Punjab
2. Approval accorded 43rd SCM held on 09.03.17
3. Final approval order issued on
10.11.17
4. Name of the IA Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC), Chandigarh
5. Means of Finance
(Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 376.20 PSIEC contribution : 293.94
Total : 670.14
6. Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh) Components Approved
Cost Proposed Revised
Cost (i) Land Development
(including levelling / fencing etc.)
90.00 90.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 200.00 360.00 (iii) Road side greenery &
social forestry 10.00 10.00
(iv) Water supply (including overhead tanks and pumps houses)
115.00 115.00
(v) Water Harvesting 10.00 10.00 (vi) Drainage 62.00 62.00 (vii) Other (sanitary
conveniences) 10.00 10.00
(viii) Administrative and other services complex (including raw material storage, creche, office building et.)
160.00 --
(ix) Contingencies and pre-operative expenses
13.14 13.14
Total 670.14 670.14
7. Total GoI grant released
Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh) 1st on 23.07.18 : 89.58 2nd on 02.01.20 : 63.63
Total : 153.21
8. Validity upto 15.11.2020
10. Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly consider the decision taken in the 71st TEAC Meeting held on 06.03.20 regarding re-allocation of funds from the Head “Administrative and Other Service Complex” to the Head “Up-gradation of road”, amounting to Rs. 160.00 lakh.
**********
92
Agenda No. 53.5.2: Re-allocation of funds in respect of up-gradation of Industrial Infrastructure in Focal Point, Jalandhar, Punjab.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal and location
Up-gradation of Industrial Infrastructure in Focal Point, Jalandhar, Punjab
2. Approval accorded 45th SCM held on 22.11.17
3. Final approval order issued on
23.07.18
4. Name of the IA Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC), Chandigarh
5. Means of Finance
(Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 716.45 PSIEC contribution : 240.72
Total : 957.17
6. Project Costs and component wise details
(Rs. in lakh) Components Approved
Cost Proposed Revised
Cost
(i) Cost of land filling / leveling including boundary wall / fencing
100.60 100.60
(ii) Cost of laying roads 209.84 577.21
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry
9.81 9.81
(iv) Water supply (including overhead tanks and pump houses)
79.02 79.02
(v) Water Harvesting 12.96 12.96
(vi) Drainage 61.99 --
(vii) Power (sub-station and distribution network, including street lighting etc, generation of non-conventional energy)
224.83 155.67
(viii) Other (sanitary conveniences)
7.63 7.63
(ix) Administrative office 46.22 --
93
building
(x) Tele communication / cyber centre/ documentation centre
20.00 --
(xi) Conference hall / exhibition centre
30.00 --
(xii) Bank / Post office 20.00 --
(xiii) First aid centre, crèche, canteen facilities
20.00 --
(xiv) Effluent Treatment facilities
100.00 --
(xv) Contingencies and pre-operative expenses
14.27 14.27
Total 957.17 957.17
7. Total GoI grant released
Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh) 1st on 10.09.18 : 200.00 2nd on 15.11.19 : 317.54
Total : 517.54
8. Validity upto 22.07.20
10. Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly consider the decision taken in the 71st TEAC Meeting held on 06.03.20 regarding re-allocation of funds from the Head “Administrative and Other Service Complex”, Power, Effluent Treatment Facilities and Drainage” to the Head “Up-gradation of road”, amounting to Rs.367.37 lakh.
**********
94
Agenda No. 53.5.3: Setting up of Integrated Infrastructure Development (IID) Centre at Raikot, Ludhiana, Punjab.
(i) The proposal for setting up of IID Centre at Raikot, Ludhiana, Punjab was approved by High Powered Committee constituted under the scheme of Integrated Infrastructural Development (Including Technological Back-up Services) for Small Scale Industries (later on linked with MSE-CDP Scheme), in its meeting held on 16.05.01 at a total project cost of Rs. 482.21 lakh. Approval was conveyed through Office Memorandum dated 11.07.01. PSIEC, Chandigarh was the Implementing Agency (IA) for the project. The project was supposed to be completed by 31.03.02.
The funding pattern of the project is as under:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 40 193.00 (ii) Loan from SIDBI 60 289.21
Total project cost 100 482.21 (ii) The project was financed by SIDBI by way of grant from Government of India to the
extent of Rs. 193.00 lakh and term loan of Rs. 289.21 lakh from SIDBI. As per the approval and provision of erstwhile IID Scheme, SIDBI, Chandigarh Branch had disbursed an amount of Rs. 250.00 lakh to PSIEC, Chandigarh on 04.04.02, out of which, Rs. 150.00 lakh as a loan component and Rs. 100.00 lakh as GoI grant. The GoI grant of Rs. 100.00 lakh was released to PSIEC, Chandigarh i.e. Implementing Agency on 28.05.02.
(iii) After a lapse of 8 years, a letter was received from the PSIEC, Chandigarh dated 30.03.10 in which they asked for the release of balance grant to the tune of Rs. 93.00 lakh. They also enclosed the Quarterly Progress Report (QPR) for the quarter ending March 2010. From the QPR, it was observed that 187 industrial plots and 256 residential plots had been created in the centre against the targeted 281 Industrial plots.
(iv) To review the progress of the project, vide this Office letter dated 21.07.10, MSME-DI, Ludhiana was requested to verify the details.
(v) Officers of MSME-DI, Ludhiana, Implementing Agency and District Industry Centre (DIC) visited the centre on 27.09.10. As per the physical verification report, no proper infrastructure had been created and also no unit had been set up in the centre.
(vi) Vide this Office letter dated 21.10.10, Principal Secretary, Industries & Commerce, Government of Punjab was requested to look into the matter personally on the gravity of irregularities happened for implementing the project by the IA. The reminders was also issued vide letters dated 07.03.11 & 15.03.11.
(vii) Vide this Office letter dated 25.08.11, Principal Secretary, Industries & Commerce, Government of Punjab was informed that due to irregularities happened in the implementation of the project, the funds may be recovered from the Implementing Agency with penal interest. Hence, it was requested to send the comments before the proposal for recovery is moved.
(viii) Vide this Office letter dated 07.10.11, PSIEC, Chandigarh was requested (under intimation to Government of Punjab) to refund the GoI grant of Rs. 100.00 lakh along with the interest.
(ix) As the progress of the project was not satisfactory, the proposal was placed in the 40th Steering Committee Meeting held on 23.06.16 & 02.07.16, the Committee decided
95
that State Government should refund the GoI grant of Rs. 100.00 lakh with interest. The same was conveyed vide this Office letter dated 24.10.16.
(x) After a gap of almost 2 years, Principal Secretary, Department of Industries & Commerce, Government of Punjab vide his D.O. letter dated 15.05.18 requested to withdraw the decision taken by Steering Committee (on 23.06.16 & 02.07.16) to refund of GoI grant of Rs. 100.00 lakh and also requested to release of balance GoI grant of Rs. 93.00 lakh for IID centre of Raikot, Ludhiana, Punjab.
(xi) In response to the D.O. letter, vide this office letter dated 04.07.18, a factual report on the status of the said ID centre was sought from MSME-DI, Ludhiana.
(xii) Vide letter dated 10.06.19, MSME-DI, Ludhiana has submitted the following documents in response to this Office letter dated 04.07.18:
(i) Joint Visit Report dated 02.05.19. (ii) Attendance sheet of Joint Visit. (iii) Photograph of Joint Visit. (iv) Revised layout plan with 256 Residential and 179 Industrial plots. (v) Copy of the estimated cost of Rs. 283.93 lakh for left over work. (vi) Expenditure statement as on 30.03.10 certified by Chartered Accountant.
(xiii) As per expenditure statement submitted, an amount of Rs. 332.60 lakh [(Rs. 577.58
lakh- Rs. 244.98 lakh (Cost of land development)] had been incurred by PSIEC as on 30.03.10, which also includes an amount of Rs. 100.00 lakh as GoI grant. As per report, PSIEC has also submitted the cost estimates of Rs. 282.06 lakh to complete the leftover work at Industrial Focal Point, Raikot. MSME-DI, Ludhiana in its report also mentioned that PSIEC would raise the request for release of remaining Rs.93.00lakh share of GoI grant after completion of this left over work.
(xiv) On the basis of report submitted by MSME-DI, Ludhiana, the proposal was placed in
the 71st Techno-Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 06.03.20 for its recommendation. Committee recommended the proposal for placing it before ensuing SCM for its approval to revert the decision of 40th SCM for refund of GoI grant of Rs.100.00 lakh from PSIEC and for continuation and completion of the project.
(xv) In view of the above, Steering Committee may kindly consider the decision taken in the 71st TEAC Meeting regarding:
(i) Reverting the decision of 40th SCM for refund of GoI grant of Rs. 100.00 lakh
from PSIEC. (ii) Release of GoI grant after completion of left over work once it is vetted /
verified by MSME-DI, Ludhiana in its Joint Verification Report.
******