AGENDA - hrce.ca · ACCELO was created in 2008 to replace the Inner City Education Advisory...
Transcript of AGENDA - hrce.ca · ACCELO was created in 2008 to replace the Inner City Education Advisory...
AGENDA School Board Meeting
Wednesday, April 27, 2011 6:00 pm Board Chambers
33 Spectacle Lake Drive Dartmouth, NS
1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. AWARDS / PRESENTATIONS (Normally awards and presentations
will be limited to 5 minutes – the Chair may extend the time limit under unique circumstances.)
3.1 Teens Now Talk (TNT) Magazine – Jessica Bowden
4. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES/BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES March 29, 2011 (Public Submissions) April 6, 2011 (Special Board)
March 30, 2011 (Regular Board) 5.1 Board Member Sheryl Blumenthal-Harrison provided notice of motion: Notice of reconsideration: That Central Spryfield Elementary be removed
from the list of schools to be reviewed, based on information Board Member Blumenthal-Harrison will provide at the April 27, 2011 Regular Board meeting.
6. CORRESPONDENCE
Halifax Regional School Board 33 Spectacle Lake Drive Dartmouth NS B3B 1X7 T 902 464-2000 Ext. 2321 F 902 464-2420
The HRSB would appreciate the support of the public and staff in creating a scent-reduced environment at all meetings. Please turn off your cell phone. Usage is restricted to outside the Board Chambers. Thank you.
Halifax Regional School Board 33 Spectacle Lake Drive Dartmouth NS B3B 1X7 T 902 464-2000 Ext. 2321 F 902 464-2420
The HRSB would appreciate the support of the public and staff in creating a scent-reduced environment at all meetings. Please turn off your cell phone. Usage is restricted to outside the Board Chambers. Thank you.
7. CHAIR’S REPORT 8. SUPERINTENDENT’S REPORT 9. ITEMS FOR DECISION
MOTIONS: 9.1 Board Member David Finlayson:
Whereas Dr. Stanley Kutcher has assembled a project focused on adolescent mental health; whereas the governing Board has recognized the mental disorders are becoming a larger issue for students; we recommend that the Halifax Regional School Board adopt the training and curriculum for the Mental Health Program and become the first Board in the world to fully endorse this program, and spearhead the delivery to all of our staff and students over the next two school years, starting in September 2011.
9.2 Board Member David Cameron provided the following notice of motion: Whereas reviewing schools for possible closure is stressful for the whole community affected, including students; and Whereas these reviews impose significant costs on the budget of the Board, costs that could otherwise be devoted to the direct education of students; and Be it resolved that when a school has been reviewed for possible closure and the decision of the Governing Board has been that the school should not be closed, no subsequent recommendation to review that school for possible closure shall be made for at least four (4) years from the date of the Governing Board’s decision. Exceptions may be made (a) when a subsequent review within less than four years was an explicit part of the decision of the Governing Board, or (b) when significant and demonstrable changes have occurred, such as a precipitous drop in enrolment, which warrant an earlier review.
10. COMMITTEE REPORTS (Committee reports will be limited to 5
minutes – the Chair may extend the time limit under unique circumstances.)
Halifax Regional School Board 33 Spectacle Lake Drive Dartmouth NS B3B 1X7 T 902 464-2000 Ext. 2321 F 902 464-2420
The HRSB would appreciate the support of the public and staff in creating a scent-reduced environment at all meetings. Please turn off your cell phone. Usage is restricted to outside the Board Chambers. Thank you.
10.1 Audit Committee
10.2 Finance Committee
10.3 Planning, Policy and Priority Committee
10.4 Nova Scotia School Boards Association
11. INFORMATION ITEMS
11.1 Report #11-04-1296 - Advisory Committee on Creating Equitable Learning Outcomes – Geoff Cainen, Director, Programming, and Heather Syms, Coordinator, Education Quality & Accountability
11.2 Report #11-01-1282 - Occupational Health & Safety – Quarterly
Update – October 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 – Mike Christie, Director, Human Resource Services, and John Swales, Manager, Occupational Health & Safety
12. NOTICE OF MOTION 13. DATE OF NEXT MEETING
• Board Meeting – May 25, 2011 14. IN-CAMERA
14. 1 NSTU Ratification – Mike Christie, Director, Human Resource
Services 14.2 Motion to Censure
15. ADJOURNMENT
Public √ Report No. #11-04-1296 Private Date April 27. 2011
HALIFAX REGIONAL SCHOOL BOARD Advisory Committee for Achieving Equitable Learning Outcomes (ACCELO) Report
PURPOSE: To provide the Board with an update and recommendations from the
ACCELO committee. BUSINESS PLAN GOAL: To continue to improve student achievement for all students. BACKGROUND: ACCELO was created in 2008 to replace the Inner City Education
Advisory Committee (ICEAC), a committee whose mandate was to advise the Board on issues affecting students and families in four schools historically designated by the Board as Inner City Schools. The objectives of ICEAC were to foster an understanding of diversity and cross-cultural awareness as it related to inner city communities, to promote the academic, social and emotional well-being of inner city students, and to identify the needs regarding the development of educational and curricular services as they relate to inner city student requirements.
In its mandate, ACCELO builds upon these objectives but it also
extends them to encompass the improvement of the educational experience for students in any schools identified by the Superintendent as requiring additional attention and resources.
The membership of ACCELO consists of 8-10 members selected
from expressions of interest, who represent various partners in education, including parents and those involved in such areas as community services, health and social justice, with consideration of geographic representation. Experience with issues relating to socio-economic conditions that impact learning is considered an asset. At least one representative of ACCELO is drawn from the geographic area that covered the communities serviced by the former ICEAC.
ACCELO has the following mandate:
• To provide advice to the Board on how to better meet the learning
outcomes for at-risk students in particular communities. • To raise issues that may affect the education of these students and
their families. • To respond to all matters, staff reports and committee reports that
are referred to ACCELO. • To provide advice to the Board on how to best engage parents in
particular communities. • To provide advice on policy consultations through the lens of
equitable learning outcomes.
CONTENT: Since its initial meeting, ACCELO identified the following areas of
priority:
• increasing early learning opportunities at schools • finding ways of increasing parental engagement • reducing teacher turnover • improving learning outcomes for at-risk students • allocating resources, as it pertains to the committee’s mandate
The committee members considered two other reports; one by the Canadian Education Association regarding the declining levels of student engagement across the country, and another on the “History of Early Learning opportunities in HRSB” (please see Appendices). These reports allowed the committee to put into a wider perspective some of the challenges faced by the HRSB when it comes to student engagement and the development of early leaning programs.
COST: N/A FUNDING: N/A TIMELINE: Ongoing APPENDICES: A. ACCELO Annual Report B. “History of Early Learning opportunities in HRSB” –
Prepared by English Programs, March 2010 C. Report on the State of Early Childhood Learning – Canadian
Education Association. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Board receives this report for information. COMMUNICATIONS:
AUDIENCE RESPONSIBLE TIMELINE Board Members Heather Syms –
Coordinator, Education Quality and Accountability Lance Bullock – Coordinator, Programs and Student Services
Following Board Approval
From: For further information contact Heather Syms and/or Lance Bullock. To: Board – April 27, 2011 Filename: ACCELO Report Date Last Revised: April 15, 2011
Advisory Committee on Creating Equitable Learning Outcomes (ACCELO) Annual Report Presented to the Halifax Regional School Board April 27, 2011
History and Mandate ACCELO was created in 2008 to replace the Inner City Education Advisory Committee (ICEAC), a committee whose mandate was to advise the Board on issues affecting students and families in four schools historically designated by the Board as Inner City Schools. The objectives of ICEAC were to foster an understanding of diversity and cross-cultural awareness as it related to inner city communities, to promote the academic, social and emotional well-being of inner city students, and to identify the needs regarding the development of educational and curricular services as they relate to inner city student requirements. In its mandate, ACCELO builds upon these objectives but it also extends them to encompass the improvement of the educational experience for students in any schools identified by the Superintendent as requiring additional attention and resources. The membership of ACCELO consists of 8-10 members selected from expressions of interest, who represent various partners in education, including parents and those involved in such areas as community services, health and social justice, with consideration of geographic representation. Experience with issues relating to socio-economic conditions that impact learning is considered an asset. At least one representative of ACCELO is drawn from the geographic area that covered the communities serviced by the former ICEAC. ACCELO is chaired by the Chair of the Board or designate. In addition to community and parent members, other Board staff attendance is determined by the Superintendent on an as-needed basis. In the past two years, ACCELO meetings have benefitted from the regular attendance of the Superintendent Carole Olsen, as well as the following staff members: Heather Syms, Coordinator of Education Quality and Accountability, and Lance Bullock, Coordinator of Programs and Student Services. Our Board Chair, Irvine Carvery, is also a member of this committee. Current community and parent membership includes: Andrea MacDonald, Early Childhood educator; Mike Mansfield, social worker with the Department of Community Services; Darren Ruck, Parent; Gina Jones, Parent, Tatjana Takseva, Associate Professor and educator at Saint Mary's University.
2
ACCELO has the following mandate:
• To provide advice to the Board on how to better meet the learning outcomes for at-risk students in particular communities. • To raise issues that may affect the education of these students and their families. • To respond to all matters, staff reports and committee reports that are referred to ACCELO. • To provide advice to the Board on how to best engage parents in particular communities. • To provide advice on policy consultations through the lens of equitable learning outcomes. ACCELO meets at least 3 times annually. Since its initial meeting in 2008, the committee discussed its mandate and priorities, as well as which schools would be considered by the committee. Since its initial meeting, ACCELO identified the following areas of priority:
• increasing early learning opportunities at schools • finding ways of increasing parental engagement • reducing teacher turnover • improving learning outcomes for at-risk students • allocating resources, as it pertains to the committee’s mandate
In our discussions, in addition to the staff members’ regular reports, the committee members also considered two other reports; one by the Canadian Education Association regarding the declining levels of student engagement across the country, and another on the “History of Early Learning opportunities in HRSB” (please see attached). These reports allowed us to put into a wider perspective some of the challenges faced by the HRSB when it comes to student engagement and the development of early learning programs. One of the recurring areas of concern for the committee has been the budget allocated to the Board and to schools, and budgetary reductions. The committee has great concerns that in the present budgetary climate, these priorities may not be seen as feasible or relevant. We strongly urge Board Members to ensure that whatever budgetary decisions are made, they do not decrease learning opportunities at-risk students and their communities. In terms of increasing early learning opportunities in schools, the committee agreed it is vital to engage government representatives, who should be invited to schools to see the realities of the learning environment and the challenges faced by students and teachers. The committee suggested that daycares and schools should partner together to have a larger voice in lobbying the government for support of increasing early learning opportunities.
3
4
Based on these deliberations, and in accordance with its mandate and objectives, ACCELO wishes to put forward a series of recommendations to the HRSB. Recommendations
• Invite government representatives to visit schools identified by the HRSB as requiring additional attention and resources in order to see the challenges first hand
• Develop strategies to connect schools with daycares and other community agencies
dealing with pre-school aged children to facilitate better transition into the school system
• Develop more ways for inter-agency collaboration in order to benefit the whole child, by increasing communication with community services, public health, etc.
• Keep the current Early Learning Opportunities program and actively seek additional funds
to expand ELO in more communities
• Develop systemic strategies to increase engagement of students, parents and communities, such as Schools Plus, as an internal example, and KidsFest, as an external example
• Increase opportunities for engagement of adolescent learners by meeting their individual
needs regarding their social, emotional, academic, and physical development (example: Sir Robert Borden – student engagement – student voice)
• Continue to increase alternate learning opportunities for learners, such as the current
FLECs program, Options and Opportunities, Youth Pathway and Transitions.
• Continue to develop strategies to recruit and develop/support the best possible teachers to reduce teacher turnover
• Continue to work with partners, such as HRM, to ensure there is a safe and inviting
learning environment that extends from inside the school onto the playground and surrounding school areas where children spend part of their school day.
We believe that the HRSB’s serious consideration and adoption of these recommendations will result in significant improvements in education for all students, but especially for at-risk students. Prepared by: Tatjana Takševa, on behalf of the ACCELO membership
History of Early Learning Opportunities in HRSB
Four Plus • Began in 1982 (Joseph Howe, St. Patrick’s Alexandra and Bloomfield) • 1983 Rockingstone Heights added • Additional sites added and closed over the years (Added: St. Joseph’s A. McKay, Nelson Whynder, Harbourview and South
Woodside) • Staffed by a teacher and an educational assistant
Pre-Primary (Department of Education)
• Began in 2006 (Ian Forsyth, Robert Jamieson (Oyster Pond Academy), Hillside Park, Central Spryfield) • Two year provincial pilot for 06-07 and 07-08 • Third year cancelled due to age change for new entrants • Staffed by a Lead Early Childhood Educator and a Support Early Childhood Educator
Early Learning Opportunities (ELO)
• Began in September of 2008 at five of the former 4 Plus sites (Joseph Howe, Rockingstone Heights, Nelson Whynder, Harbourview and South Woodside)
• Insufficient registrations at St. Joseph’s A. McKay and St. Pat’s Alexandra so those sites were amalgamated with the Joseph Howe site.
• Staffed by a Lead Early Childhood Educator and a Support Early Childhood Educator (The majority were former pre-primary staff)
Note
• During the 06-07 and 07-08 school years both the 4+ program and the pre-primary program were running simultaneously, giving HRSB a total of 11 early learning classrooms.
Prepared by: Jeff Carruthers, English Program Consultant P-9 March 2010
This publication is available electronically on the Canadian Council on Learning’swebsite at www.ccl-cca.ca.
For additional information, please contact:
CommunicationsCanadian Council on Learning215—50 O’Connor Street, Ottawa ON K1P 6L2Tel.: 613.782.2959Fax: 613.782.2956E-mail: [email protected]
© 2007 Canadian Council on Learning
All rights reserved. This publication can be reproduced in whole or in part with the writtenpermission of the Canadian Council on Learning. To gain this permission, please contact:[email protected]. These materials are to be used solely for non-commercial purposes.
Cite this publication in the following format:Canadian Council on Learning. Report on the State of Early Childhood Learning in CanadaReport on Learning in Canada 2007 (Ottawa: 2007). page(s).
Published in August 2007.Ottawa, Ontario
ISBN 978-0-9782220-4-8
Aussi disponible en français sous le titre Rapport 2007 sur I’état cle l’apprentissagechez les jeunes enfants au Canada.
The Canadian Ccjncil on Learning is an independent, notfor-proflt corporation fundedthrough ar agreement with Human Resources and Social Deveiooment Canada. Its mandateis to promote ano support evidence-based decisions about lear- ;g t-roughout ah stagesof life, from early childhood tnrough to the senior years.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE 2
CHATER 1 Introduction 4
CHAPTER 2 Indicators o Early Chidhood Development 5Birth weight 5Physical development and movement 6Cognitive development 7Language arid communication skills development 8Emotional and social development 10
CHAPTER 3 The Road Ahead 12Where does Canada stand? 12What don’t we know? 12What will CCL do9 13
END NDTES 16
I
L
PREFACE
If learning is a lifelong journey, then the first few yearsare vital in determining what direction the journey islikely to take. A growing body of research indicates thatthe experiences during the first five years of a child’slife have a major bearing on his or her future success inschool, in the workplace, and many other aspects of ahealthy, fulfilling life.
Early childhood is a time of play and discovery, but it isalso the time when children should be mastering fourkey skills—social and emotional, physical, cognitiveand language. These developmental pillars are essentialto their ability to function insociety. Some argue that society’s wisest learning investments are concentrated onearly childhood learning anddevelopment, on the verysolid grounds that the earlyyears are overwhelminglysignificant to all dimensionsof life’s prospects.
Of course, parents play akey role shaping children’sabilities and fostering theirdesire to learn. They providethe earliest and most lastinglearning experiences in theirchildren’s lives and create alearning environment thatwill influence how well theirchildren perform at school,in the community and in theworkplace.
As their children’s first teachers, adults also are models oflifelong learning. By upgrading their skills and acquiringnew knowledge, adults notonly demonstrate their ownability to make informed decisions and lead successfullives, they also improve the likelihood, through example,that their children will become successful lifelong learners.
lifelong learning strengthens individuals, families andsociety. Its cumuiative benefits are passed from onegeneration tc the next, enablinc indiviouals to contributemore fully a parents, worKers, community membersand citizens. An informec and engagec citizenrythat continues to learn tnroughout life is essential to
Canada’s social, economic and cultural well-being-—andis a key ingredient of a vibrant democracy.
This report is an update of the early childhood learningchapter from State of Learning in Canada: No Time for
Complacency, published in January 2007. It containsthe most current data on early childhood learning anddevelopment in Canada, including factors that affectchildren’s learning through their physical, cognitive,communicative, and emotional and social development.
What we see is that mostCanadians are born healthyand their level of development is similar to that of children in other member countries of the Organisationfor Economic Co-operationand Development (OECD).However, more than one infour children in Canada enters school with a learningor behavioural problem thatthreatens his or her futuresuccess. And although family income is not as stronga factor in a child’s success
- at school when comparedwith other countries, thereare inequities that must beaddressed if Canada is tosustain its comfortable levelof social well-being anc economic prosperity.
Early childhood learning anddevelopment are inextricable—without a strong foundation ofphysical, emotional, cognitiveand social development, successful learning is less likely tofollow.
A survey conducted by CCLin 2006 suggests Canadianparents overwhelmingly
agree that children need a well-rounded approach in
their early years. For example, parents place greaterimportance on fostering a positive attitude towardlearning than on school readiness. And their actionsseem to bear out their intentions. The number of parentsand other adults reading daily to children is on the rise—65% in 2004—2005, up from 56% ten years earlier—anactivity known to have a positive impact on a child’sability to learn.
“AT LEAST ONE IN FOUR CANADIAN
YOUNG CHILDREN IS VULNERABLE”
/f\/1J,j; J L ViiJi,’;jL)e Chdc/i a a
According to Whims, children (0 to 11 years
old) are considered as vulnerable’ ai tiier intheir cognitive (learning.) domain or behavioural
domain, based on the “vulnerability index”derived from the National Longitudinal Surveyof Children and Youth.
The index aims to identify children whosechances of leading hcsaltliy and productivelives are somewhat reduced unless there is aconcerted and prolonged effort to intervene ontheir behalf. Children are classified as vulnerable
in their cognitive domain if they score:
• low in their motor and social development(age 0 to 3);
• low on receptive vocabulary (age 4 and 5); or
• low on their mathematics skills (age 6 to 11).
Children are classified as vulnerable in theirbehavioural domain if they:
• were rated as having a difficult temperament
(age 0 to 1); or
• were deemed to have one of six behaviourproblems (i.e. anxiety/emotional problem,hyperactivity, inattention, physical aggressionor indirect aggression) at age 2 to 1 1.
F
PREFACE
1:
CCL’s Survey of Canadian Attitudes toward Learningalso reveals that, when it comes to public support forearly childhood learning and development, there isa significant gap between parents’ expectations andreality. Nearly two-thirds of parents feel that localchild-care services are under-funded and that there areinadequate resources for parents who stay home withtheir children. The survey shows that Canadians wantmore support for both options.
Yet despite everything we know about early childhoodlearning, there is still far too much that we do not know.Like much of CCL’s work, this report and the earlierState of Learning in Canada report underscore the needfor comprehensive, consistent, nationwide indicatorsfor early childhood learning. Given the importance thatCanadian parents place on the best way to raise andcare for their children, we need reliable, countrywideinformation to show how our children are progressingand where weaknesses exist. A solid base of evidenceis required in order to identify where improvementsare necessary and what can be done to address thechallenges.
Although the Government of Canada has started torelease a series of annual and bi-annual reports on thestatus of early childhood development under the termsof federal-provincial-territorial agreements on earlychildhood development and care, too many aspects ofearly childhood development in Canada remain unknownand unexplored. Canadians need to know whether we,as a country, are giving our future generation the bestpossible start—and if not, what steps should be taken toremedy the situation.
If we do not tackle such knowledge gaps, we increasethe risk that we might overlook emerging challenges, orthat we will lack the tools to address them.
To help close these gaps, the Canadian Council onLearning and its Early Childhood Learning KnowledgeCentre are studying new approaches to monitoring andreporting on the state of early learning in Canada.
For example, while many indicators of early learningare assessed just before school age, CCL’s EarlyChildhood Learning Knowledge Centre (a consortium oforganizations led by the Centre of Excellence for EarlyChildhood Development at the Université de Montréal)will promote the use of additional indicators of childdevelopment, and of the environment in which childrenare growing up (including resources and services forfamilies), from before birth to the age of four.
We hope that innovative initiatives such as these, alongwith reports such as those issued by the Governmentof Canada, will help bridge the research gaps neededto further the understanding of the formative earlychildhood years in Canada—and ensure our children arewell prepared for the lifelong journey that is learning.
Too often, debate about early childhood learning anddevelopment is polarized around issues of home careversus day care, or private versus public care. What isreally needed is an evidence-based approach focussedon helping individuals and communities address theirown unique concerns. In a world where one size doesnot fit all—where parents and governments requirechoice and response to local conditions—we needcommon benchmarks whereas the data is cohesive,coherent and comparable in order to assess results.
EARLY CHILDHOOD LEARNINGCHAP!RC1
Children’s experiences in the first years of life have alasting impact on their development and future learning.As Nobel laureate James J. Heckman stated, “Learningstarts in infancy, long before formal education begins,and continues throughout life .... Early learning begetslater learning and early success breeds later success.”1
To express it in terms of the four pillars of learning2earlychildhood is when children learn to know, to do, to live•together and to be.
As children develop, they adopt ever more complexskills. Their ability to use their senses and controltheir movements shapes their emotional and socialdevelopment. As they mature emotionally and socially,new cognitive abilities, such as the use of language,emerge.
An important aspect of children’s learning is that itoccurs in stages. There are specific periods during whicha young brain will develop particular skills, such as theability to see with both eyes, to control emotions and tospeak. If a child does not acquire these skills at the rightstage, it may be difficult to catch up later.3
ATTITUDES TOWARD EARLY LEARNING
The Canadian Council on Learning’s 2006 Survey ofCanadian Attitudes toward Learning found that:
• Canadians think learning at all stages of life iscritical to success
• Canadians think that early childhood learningshould focus more on attitudes—such asfostering a positive attitude toward learning—than on school readiness
THE WIRED BRAIN
Human clevelopmtiit is not matter of natureversus nurture, but of nature and nurture
working together. In response to stimuli from theenvironment, the nerve cells of the brain formphysical connections and pathways. This hi inwiring process, which beqins before birth and
continues through life, is most intensive during this’
first three years of development.
CARE AND NEGLECT
A study of children adopted from foreigninstitutions demonstrates the extent to which
serious early neglect can affect a child’sdevelopment. The research revealed that children
reared in privation had lower lOs at the age offour than children ,-aised in caring homes. Perhaps
more surprising was that the difference in brainfunction persisted at age II, even alter the children
had spent seven years with adoptive patents.5Animal research shows that intense stress earlyin life can lead to brnn damage, underscoring
the strong link between early careand a later ability to think and learn.
• There are more than 2 million children under theage of six in Canada.
• The proportion of children under six years ofage declined from 9% of the total Canadianpopulation in 7975 to 6% in 20O5.
4
CHAPTER 02EARLY CHILDHOOD LEARNING
2, dctrs f Eary C dhoo DevecprnetTo understand the state of early childhood learningin Canada, we need to examine four main areas ofdevelopment: physical; cognitive; language and communication; and emotional and social development. Theseareas are linked and interdependent.
Measurements of motor skills, vocabulary, emotionalcontrol and social interactions, for example, tell us howCanadian children are developing and maturing. Wealso need to know about the environmental factors thatinfluence early childhood learning. The most effectivemeasurements are those that are repeated at regularintervals and therefore reveal trends.
In the pages ahead, we explore the state of earlychildhood development in Canada according to thefollowing five indicators:
• birth weight• physical development, including fine
and gross motor development• cognitive development• language and communications skills development• emotional and social development
We review the research on these indicators, describewhat is known about Canada’s performance andprogress, and highlight areas for further attention andinvestigation.
lRTh WEIGHT
The link between low birth weight and risks to laterdevelopment and learning has been established fora long time. A recent study, for example, found thatlow birth weight is associated with lower cognitivedevelopment at ages 7, 11 and 16.8
Birth weight can also provide an indication of theenvironmental factors influencing a child’s health andlearning, as low birth weight is associated with poornutrition, smoking, and alcohol and drug use.’
Societal factors affecting birth weight include a greaterprevalence of fertility treatments and the increasedtendency for women to delay childbearing into their 30sor later.1°
What do we know about Canada’s progress?In 2003, 6% of Canadian babies were born with lowbirth weights (weighing less than 2.5 kg, or 5.5 lb.), aproportion that has remained constant for the past 25years. The frequency of low birth weights in Canadais slightly below the average among countries ofthe Organisation for Economic Co-operation andDevelopment (OECD). The Scandinavian countries,the Netherlands and South Korea have the smallestproportion of low-weight births.
I
TOOLS OF THE TRADE
Under an historic agreement on early childhood development reached by federal, provincial and territorialgovernments in September 2000, the Government of Canada is transferring $500M per year via the Can ada
Social Transfer to provinces and territories for investment in programs and services for children under sixand their families. As part of this agreement, governments have aqreed to report annually on their investmentsin Early Childhood Development programs and services and biennially on a common set of indicators of young
children’s well-being. This agreement has expanded the use of, and interest in, assessment and monitoringtools for early childhood development.
CHAPTERQ
EARLY CHILDHOOD LEARNING
Percentage of babies born with low birth weights,1980—2003
isaz .j.j.i. i,iea
Australia 5.6 “i 6.1 6.3 6.4 ‘°
Canada 5.8 5.5 5.6 5.8
Denmark 5.8 5.2 4.9 5.5
FInland 3.9 3.6 4.3 4.1
France 5.2 1911 5.3 6.4 6.6
Germany 5.5 5.7 6,4 6.8
Iceland 3.4 2.9 3.9 3.1
Italy 5.6 5.6 6.7 6.520a2
Japan 5.2 6.3 8.6 9.1
Korea .. 2.6 3.8 4.1
Netherlands 4 “i’ 4.8 5.1 5.4
New Zealand 5.8 6.2 6.4 6.1
Norway 3.8 4.6 5 4.9
Sweden 4.2 4.5 4.4 4.5
Switzerland 5.1 5.1 5.9 6.5 2O9
United Kingdom 6.7 6.7 7.5 7.6
United States 6.8 7.1 7.6 7.9
Median 5.6 5.6 6.3 6.6
Source: OECD, Health at a Glance 2005
SIA DE’ELD As!: MD’’’!-T
Physical development in the early years includes thedevelopment of the body, the senses, and skills such ascoordination and balance. A vital component of physicalmaturation is motor development, which includesincreases in strength, coordination and movementcontrol. Motor development affects exploration, playand interaction with peers, which in turn influencecognitive, language and social development.
In the first two years of life, a child experiences rapidmotor development. What begins as a few spontaneousand reflexive movements progresses into purposeful armmotions, greater balance, and a newfound ability to sit,crawl, stand and walk.
From ages two to six, children usually learn to run, jump,skip, climb, catch and throw—skills triat are criticai forplay, organized sports and recreational activities. Finemotor skills are also necessary to prepare chi’dren forcommon school tasks, such as controlling a pencil andturning pages.
Many factors affect the development of motor skills,even before birth. A mother’s consumption of tobaccoor alcohol during pregnancy,1’ or maternal stress ordepression, can have negative impacts. Children who livein conditions of poverty, homelessness or family violenceare also more likely to suffer delays in developing basicmotor skills.12 Also, environmental hazards, such asexposure to certain chemical agents during pregnancy,can have adverse effects on development. 1314
A child who does not master gross and fine motor skillsmay struggle at school or develop feelings of inadequacyand frustration.15
What do we know about Canada’s progress?
Gross motor skills
Gross motor skills are required for the movement oflarger muscles in the arms, legs, torso and feet. Theseskills were last assessed in the National LongitudinalSurvey of Children and Youth (NLSCY) in 2000—2001.Nearly 90% of children aged four and five were found tohave average or above-average gross motor skills. Therewas little difference between boys and girls.
Gross motor skills, 0 to five-year-olds, 2000—2001
89.7% 10.3%
Both sexes 89.2% 10.8%
Fine motor skills
The NLSCY also assessed fine motor skills, which involvethe coordinated movement of the hands, fingers, toes,wrists and other smaller muscles. In 2004—2005, 87% of0 to five-year-olds were considered to have average orabove-average fine motor skills. More boys (15%) weredelayed in their development than girls (11%).
Fine motor skills, 0 to three-year-olds, 2004—2005
Boys
Girls
AVERAGE OR ABOVE DELAYED
88.8% 11.2%
Source: Statistics Canada, National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth
I
AVERAGEOR ABOVE DELAYED
Source: Statistics Canada. ‘ational Longitudina Survey of Chilciren and Youth
CHAPTER(2EARLY CHILDHOOD LEARNING
I
OGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT
Cognitive development involves mental processes suchas thinking and reasoning. Every child develops at adifferent pace, but cognitive development generallytends to occur in stages.
Cognitive development milestones1”17
AG L
Zero—onemonth newborn reflexes; recognition memory for simple stimuli
One—four deferred imitation of adults’ facial expressions, somemonths awareness of object permanence; limited anticipation of
events
sensibility to changes In number or amount of things;Four—eight development of object concept; use of shape, texture, andmonths colour to Identify ol,jects; use of own body but also of simple
landmark cues to locate objects in space
ability to retrieve an object from the first location In which ItElght—12 Is hidden; categorization of social stimuli (for example, humanmonths versus non-human movement patterns); simple problem
solving by combining sub.goals
12—18 classification of objects according to physical similarities;months exploration of objects by acting on them In novel ways;
experimenting with actions when solving problems
at ago two, memory span of abouttwo Items; use of naming18—36 and looking as simple memory strategies; ability to drawmonths scribbles; elementary planning capabilities
more complex thematic object classification (objects thatfunction together or complement one another); recognitionperformance for 50-plus items; understanding thatThre. thinking is something that takes place inside oneself; basicy.ars understanding of numbers 1—10; ability to uses symbol fora real.world event, as component of problem solving; child’sscribbles now become pictures
basic understanding of how one can take the perspectiveof another; understanding of pretend and make-believe;Four years enhanced categorization skills; concept of cardinality; recallof three or four itemi can occur
understanding relations such as bigger and smaller, drawingsFive—six become more realistic; can distinguish between theory andyears evidence
Many factors can promote or hinder cognitive development. Development is most likely to progress when:
• parents encourage learning through games andthe use of appropriate play materials;Th
• books are available and parents read to their children;19• mothers encourage their children, show affection
and engage in their activities;20a children in child care enjoy high-quality care with
trained caregivers and organized, age-appropriateand stimulating activities;21children are raised in a safe and comfortableneighbourhood and a clean environment;23
• children are not exposed to tobacco, alcohol ordrugs in the womb;24and
• children from high-risk environments are integratedwith those living with more advantages.25
What do we know about Canada’s progreThe National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youthapplied two tests to assess cognitive developmentamong children aged four and five.
a The “Who Am I?” Test involved copying andwriting tasks designed to gauge a child’s ability toconceptualize and reconstruct geometric shapes,and to understand and use symbols like letters andwords.The “Number Knowledge Assessment” examineda child’s early comprehension of numbers.
By both measures, most Canadian children demonstratedan average or advanced level of development in2004-2005. However, significant differences were notedbetween children based on family income.
In the “Who Am I’?” Test, 19% of children from low-income families were considered to have delayeddevelopment, compared to 14% of other children. Inthe Number Knowledge Assessment, 28% of childrenfrom low-income famiIies showed delayed development,compared to 14% of other children.
Cognitive development of four- and flve-year-olds byfamily income, 2004-2005
I LI AVI RAC I Al Al I
Whe Am l? Teat
Total 14,8% 65.8% 19.4%
Above LICO * 13,8% 65.5% 20.7%
Below LICO 19.4% 67% 13.6%
Numb.r Knowledge Assessment
Total 16.4% 72.6% 11.1%
Above LICO 13.8% 74.2% 12.1%
Below LICO 28.4% 64.8% 6.8%
Source: Statistics Canada, National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth* Low income cut-off
Although the risk of developmental delay is greaterfor children in economically disadvantaged families,it is important to note that children from all economicbackgrounds can experience developmental delay. infact, the Ontario Child Health Study demonstrated thatwhile children in lower-income families were more likelythan children from wealthier families to have cognitive orbehavioural disorders, the greatest number of childrenwith these difficulties is actually from middle-incomefamilies.
ChAPTER aEARLY CHILDHOOD LEARNING
Developmental disorders by family income,ages four to 16
$1O,000—$25,000 17.4 26.5%
$25,000—S50,000 16.8 48.7%
>$50,000 14.9 10.3%
All Income Levels 18.2 - 100.0%
Source: Norrie McCain, Margaret and J. Fraser Mustard. Early Years Study FinalReport (Government of Ontario, Ontario Children’s Secretariat, 1999)
International comparisons
A 2002 study used the “Who Am I?” Test to comparethe ability of six-year-old children in five countries tounderstand and copy shapes and symbols. Canadianchildren scored higher overall than children in Swedenand India, about the same as those in Australia, but lowerthan children in Hong Kong.
International comparison of “Who Am I?” Test results,six-year-olds, 2002
Source: de Lemos, Molly. Patterns of Young Children’s Development:An International Comparison of Development as Assessed by Who Am I?(Gatineau, Que.: Human Resources Development Canada, 2002).
;: .:::—
From birth to age six, oral language is pivotal for achild’s development.26 In primary and elementaryschools, the acquisition of language has an impact ona child’s capacity to read and write,27 socialize28 andunderstand what is going on in the classroom.29
8 For most children, learning to speak seems natural andeffortless. This is not, however, always so. In fact, about
• 8—9% of young children suffer from speech difficulties.30Speech impediments, especially if they persist past theage of five, increase the risk of social, academic and
• emotional problems later in life?1
sounds and non-verbal communicative acts;
Birth to one year from eight to 12 months, there is more controlover vocalization and the use of invented words,gesturing and gaze direction
the first meaningful words are spoken end aOne to two years vocabularybegins to emerge
the ordering of words and sentences points to theTwo to three years development of grammar skills
continued increase In sentence length and theformation of complex sentences signal theThree to five years consolldstlon and advancement of languagelearning
Factors influencing language learning include:33a family history of language or learning difficulties,gender, as males have a higher rate of languageand learning difficulties, andneurological injury or other types of physicaldisorders that lead to learning difficulties.
External factors also affect language development,including:
• how much parents speak to the child and thecomplexity of their vocabulary and grammar,34how much parents or other caregivers read to thechild, particularly as this develops an emotionalcloseness, and
a the mother’s ability to respond verbally to thefocus of the child’s attention and activities.35
Reading with the child, often and regularly, promoteslanguage deveiopment, especially if the child is askedquestions and is engaged in the activity. Other ways topromote language include reciting poems, teaching thechild to recognize letters and their sounds, and teachingchildren to recognize and write their names.36
<$10,000
RISK Of OI’iE OR F’I*RCENiAOE Or TOFALFAMII INCOMF I 1ORI— DI Of OP CAO S II II
(I’ER 1110 CffI_DRKIA RADII 1111(011— I-rI-I
36.3 14.5%
Canadian researchers are leaders in the studyof language and literacy impairments and
their association with behavioural problemsfrom infancy into the school years. Canadianresearchers of the Canadian Language andLiteracy Research Network (CLLRNet) arecurrently studying how early verbal delays
are linked to social adjustment.
Early language development generally occurs in thefollowing sequence:32
a8La
0aa
Australia Canada Sweden India Hong Kong
Mean scores on symbols I Mean score on copying scale
CHAPTER G2EARLY CHILDHOOD LEARNING
What do we know about Canada’s progress?Receptive vocabulary
The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Revised (PPVT-R)assesses receptive vocabulary—or the words a childcan understand—at ages four and five. The test,included in Canada in the NLSCY, requires the child toidentify pictures that match words being read out by aninterviewer.
Most Canadian children assessed with the PPVT-R since1994—1995 showed average or advanced progress in thisarea. The proportion of children scoring in the delayedrange showed a slight decline, from 16% in 1994—1995to 14% in 2004—2005, the most recent year for whichstatistics are available.
PPVT-R test of language development, four- and fiveyear-olds, 1994—1995 to 2004—2005
1994—1995 15.9% 68.8% 15.3%1996—1997 16.7% 69.5% 13.9%1998—1999 15.9% 70.8% 13.3%2000—2001 14.5% 69.1% 16.4%2002—2003 13.1% 69.6% 17.3%2004—2005 13.6% 70% 16.5%
Approximately one-quarter of children from low-incomefamilies were considered to have delayed receptivevocabulary development, compared to 11% of otherchildren.
PPVT-R test of language development, four- and fiveyear-olds by family income, 2004—2005
CE! AYED AVERCE ADVANCEL
13.6% 70%
11.2% 70.7%
canada 16.5%Above LICO’ 18.1%Below LICO 8.9%
Source: Statistics Canada, National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth*L0W income cut.off
24.8% 66.4%
Communication skills
The NLSCY assesses communication skills by measuringa child’s capacity to vocalize, understand oral speech,and pass a message on to someone else. In 2004—2005,almost 90% of children aged 0 to 3 years had average orbetter communication skills. However, more boys (13%)than girls (8%) fell within the range considered delayed.CommunicatIon skills 0 to three-year-olds, 2004-2005
.iiw_
Boys 86.9% 13.1%Girls 92.6% 7.5%Both s.xes 89.7% 10.3%
Source: Statistics Canada, National Longitudinal Survey of Children and ‘Youth
Reading to children
A higher proportion of children under the age of sixwere being read to daily by their parents or other adultsin 2004—2005 (65%) than in 1994—1995 (56%), accordingto the NLSCY. Again, the survey demonstrated a linkbetween a family’s income and its likelihood of dailyreading. In 2004—2005, 57% of children in low-incomefamilies were read to daily, compared to 67% of otherchildren.
Proportion of children, from birth to five years, beingread to daily, 1994-1995 to 2004—2005
Source: Statistics Canada, National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%MORE ON EARLY LITERACY
For further information, please see HowParents Foster Early Literacy, publishedby the Canadian Council on Learning aspart of its Lessons in Learning series.
Available at www.ccl-cca.ca.
I0%
Source: Statistics Canada, National Longitudinal Survey ci Children anc Youth
CHAPTE
EARLY CHILDHOOD LEARNING
F
EMOT DNA.. AND SDCA DEVELOPMENT
Children in their early years have to learn to live withothers and to develop relationships. The emotionaland social development of young children involves thefollowing:
• The development of social and emotional bondsof attachment with a significant adult, usuallythe parentThese bonds are particularly important duringtimes of distress, sickness or fatigue.37 Such bondsalso teach independence, the capacity to interactwith others and to recognize emotional signals.
• The ability to control emotionsEmotional and behavioural self-control, whichtypically begins at the age of two, is associatedwith an ability to pay attention and concentrate,and to regulate emotional responses in differentenvironments.
• Integration within peer groupsFrom the age of one, a child can interact withother children.38 Limited at first, these interactionsbecome increasingly important and frequent bythe time the child is in school or child care. Peerinteractions teach social rules and cues. As childrenintegrate into their peer groups, they learn tosuppress aggressive behaviour, understand groupsocial structures, develop leadership skills and formfriendships.
Steps in a child’s emotional and social development include:
Infants can communicate with other infants through smiling,Six months touching and babbling.
Most children can participate with their peers in activitiesOne year related to objects.
Children can play with other children, imitate others, andTwo years change their roles in play.
Pro-social behaviour, or behaviour intended to help or
Three to five benefit others, and games of simulation are developedand aggressive behaviour diminishes. At four, children canyears name their best friends and distinguish between peers theylike and dislike.
What do we know about Canada’s progress?To gauge the social and emotional development ofCanadian children, the National Longitudinal Surveyof Children and Youth (NLSCY) measured physicalaggression (bullying, being mean, fighting), indirectaggression (taking revenge, telling secrets, spreadinggossip), and personal and social maturity.
As the tables on the following pages reveal, genderdifferences are common. More boys (16%) than girls(12%) between the age of two to five show highlevels of physical aggression. The proportion of preschool children displaying high degrees of indirectaggressiveness decreased from 11% in 1994—1995 to 6%in 2004—2005.
On the other hand, the proportion of girls (11%)considered to have delayed development in personaland social skills was almost half that forrn boys (18%).However, it is important to note that boys and girls tendto follow different trajectories.39
TRENDS IN PHYSICAL AGGRESSION
The NLSCY illustrates three distinct trendsin physical aggression as a child matures
from toddler age to pre-adolescence.For most children (83%) physicalaggression decreased over this
period, but one in six children retainedtheir aggressive behaviour.
Children with consistently high levelsof aggression tended to be boys, tocome from low-income families, and
to have mothers with little education.The mothers, moreover, were more
likely to report more hostile andineffective parenting strategies.4
CHAPTER 2
[1
EARLY CHILDHOOD LEARNING
Source: Statistics Canada, National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth
HF I,H ID (‘F:
[Physical aggressiveness among Indirect aggressiveness among Personal/social developmentI two- to flve-year-olds, four- to flve-year-olds, among 0 to three-year-olds,
2004-2005 2004—2005 2004—2005
EBeth sex.s 85.8% 14.2% Both sez•s 93.7% 6.3%[ Both s.x.s 14.6% 85.4%I Boys 84.0% 16.0% Boys 93.7% 6.3%[Giris 87.7% 12.3% Girls 93.7% 6.3%
Boys 17.9% 82.1%
Girls 11.1% 88.9%Source: Statistics Canada, National Longitudinal Source: Statistics Canada, National LongitudinalSurvey of Children and Youth Survey of Children and Youth Source: Statistics Canada, National Longitudinal. Survey of Children and Youth
Children aged four and five with high levels of indirect aggressiveness, 1994—1995 to 2004—2005
14%
12%
10%.
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%.1994-1995 1996-1997 1998-1999
.c
1L2004-2005
• Canada • Boys • Girls
2002-2003
CHAPTER
EARLY CHILDHOOD LEARNING
r
frHER DDES CANADA STAND?
The research leaves no doubt that early childhoodlearning and development are vital for lifelong learningand life readiness. And yet, many Canadian children arenot experiencing optimal early development.
In fact, more than one in four children (29.54%)is entering Grade 1 with learning or behaviouraldifficulties that could affect future success in academicsand life in general.4’ Although some children are atgreater risk of developmental delays, such problemsaffect children in all demographic groups. Thus, itis important to achieve a better understanding ofthe current developmental status of Canadian children,and how this status can be improved.
Toward that end, governments in Canada have beenseeking new ways to monitor and report on thestatus ofearly childhood development. For example, in supportof the federal-provincial-territorial agreement on earlychildhood development, each government reportsbiennially on indicators of child well-being.42 This is inaddition to regular reporting on their investments andprogress in enhancing programs and services for youngchildren and their families.
The well-being reports are based on a collaborativefederal-provincial-territorial effort to develop and reporton a set of common indicators, using the best availabledata on children’s well-being in the areas of physicalhealth and motor development, emotional health, socialknowledge and competence, and cognitive learning andlanguage communication. The Well-Being of Canada’sYoung Children: Government of Canada Report coversthe common set of indicators of child well-being at thenational level as well as information on the family aridcommunity contexts in which children are growing up.
Individually, and together, these reports—which arebased on findings from the National Longitudinal Surveyof Children and Youth and key national sources of healthdata—contribute to a greater understanding of howCanada’s young children are doing, and the factorscontributing to their well-being, across the domains ofchild development.
Significant information on early childhood developmenthas come to light through the creation of new datasources. Examples, which are described in greater detailon pages 14-15, include:
Early Development Instrument• Linked provincial databases in Manitoba• The Early Years Evaluation• The Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child
Development• Understanding the Early Years
WHAT DON’T WE KNOW?
As illuminating as they are, the current data sourcesprovide only a fragmented picture. There is significantroom to expand these types of initiatives and startpiecing together a richer picture of what we know aboutearly learning across Canada.
The information on early childhood learning collectedat present does not tell us everything we need toknow at a pan-Canadian level. The current tools, suchas the NLSCY and other data initiatives, provide a richunderstanding of determinants of early childhooddevelopment, such as parental education. However,there is a need for better assessment of the “outcomes”of early childhood development, and learning inparticular. Another key knowledge gap is in the area ofthe factors influencing the development trajectories ofchildren with fewer opportunities, especially Aboriginaland disabled children.
Ideally, Canada would gather data that would also allowus to make more complete comparisons between ourdomestic situation and that of children living in othercountries. To achieve that goal, there is a need for aninternational forum to share the current knowledgeof early childhood development science and developcommon instruments.
A 2004 report by the Organisation for EconomicCo-operation and Development43 found that there issignificant scope to expand our research and deepenour understanding of early learning across Canada. Oneapproach would be to develop a comprehensive data
CHAPTER a3EARLY CHILDHOOD LEARNING
F
strategy on early childhood learning and development,with a focus on children’s development trajectories.This would require more longitudinal data (such as theNLSCY and the Quebec Longitudinal Study of ChildDevelopment) with more direct assessments at differentpoints in a child’s early development stage, and thenlater in life as a youth and adult.
No single survey will ever answer all the questionsrelated to a field as complex as early childhood learningand development. Consequently, the data strategyshould take advantage of available data sources for earlychildhood development, as well as integrate data fromdifferent sources—something Manitoba is trying to dowith its linked database initiative.
Action is required on a number of knowledge fronts—from enhanced data and information collection, tomore analysis and research in key areas, to betterdissemination and sharing.
WHAT WILL CCL DO?
Early childhood learning is one of five priority issuesidentified by the Canadian Council on Learning. CCLhas established the Early Childhood Learning KnowledgeCentre to identify and share effective practices andways to improve monitoring and reporting on the stateof early learning in Canada. The knowledge centreis a consortium of organizations led by the Centre ofExcellence for Early Childhood Development at theUniversité de Montréal.
Currently, many indicators of early learning are assessedjust before school age. The Early Childhood LearningKnowledge Centre intends to promote the developmentand use of additional indicators that would provideinformation on child development from before birth tothe age of four. CCL will also highlight the importance ofindicators related to the environment in which childrenare growing up, including the resources and servicesthat are available to families.
Canada’s future depends on our ability to provide ourchildren with the foundation they need to achieve theirfull potential in life. Governments, early childhoodeducators, parents and society as a whole all have aninterest in supporting early development.
Unfortunately, today we do not have all the informationwe need to understand how well our children aredeveloping in Canada, information that would enableus to identify the steps that should be taken to get allyoung Canadians on a path toward a fulfilling life. Asits contribution to the efforts to fill this gap, CCL isdeveloping a comprehensive data strategy that willidentify the information required to understand areasof strength and weakness, and provide a foundation forbetter decision making by governments, educators andparents themselves.
CH
APT
ER
EAR
LYC
HIL
DH
OO
DL
EA
RN
ING
TH
FF
ply
flFV
EL
OPM
EN
T!IM
ENT
The
Farl
yD
evel
opm
ent
Inst
rum
ent
(ED
I)w
ascr
eate
din
1997
toas
sess
child
deve
lopm
ent
and
scho
olre
adin
ess
atki
nder
gart
enag
e.It
was
desi
gned
byth
eO
ffor
dC
entr
efo
rC
hild
Stu
dies
(for
mer
lyth
eC
anad
ian
Cen
tre
for
Stu
dies
ofC
hild
ren
atR
isk)
atM
cMas
ter
Uni
vers
ityin
Ham
ilton
,O
nt.,
inpa
rtne
rshi
pw
ithth
eF
ound
ers’
Net
wor
kan
dth
eE
arly
Yea
rsA
ctio
nG
roup
inN
orth
Yor
k,O
nt.
The
EDI
serv
esas
anou
tcom
em
easu
refo
rea
rly
life
and
asa
base
line
mea
sure
for
the
scho
olye
ars.
Thr
ough
ach
eckl
ist
fille
dou
tby
kind
erga
rten
teac
hers
,th
ein
stru
men
tga
uges
phys
ical
heal
than
dw
ell-
bein
g,so
cial
com
pete
nce,
emot
iona
lm
atur
ity,
lang
uage
and
cogn
itive
deve
lopm
ent,
and
com
mun
icat
ion
skill
san
dge
nera
lkn
owle
dge.
Eac
hca
tego
ryco
ntai
nsa
vuln
erab
ility
thre
shol
d.C
hild
ren
who
scor
ebe
low
the
thre
shol
dar
esa
idto
belim
ited
orvu
lner
able
inth
atpa
rtic
ular
dom
ain
ofth
eir
deve
lopm
ent.
Com
mun
itie
sar
ein
form
edof
the
prop
orti
onof
vuln
erab
lech
ildr
enw
ithin
thei
rge
ogra
phic
boun
dari
es.
The
EDI
gath
ers
data
onab
out
half
ofal
lfi
ve-y
ear-
olds
inC
anad
a.It
isus
edin
Bri
tish
Col
umbi
a,M
anit
oba,
Ont
ario
and
othe
rre
gion
sof
the
cOun
try.
InB
ritis
hC
olum
bia,
for
inst
ance
,th
eH
uman
Ear
lyL
earn
ing
Par
tner
ship
(HEL
P)us
edth
eED
Ito
iden
tify
scho
oldi
stri
cts
whe
rech
ildr
enw
ere
mos
tin
need
ofin
terv
enti
ons.
(See
map
.)
14Fo
rm
ore
info
rmat
ion
onth
eED
I,pl
ease
see:
ww
w.o
ffor
dcen
tre.
com
/rea
dine
ss/
Least
Vu
lnera
ble
14.0
Wes
tV
anco
uver
15.2
Koo
tena
y-
CoL
umbi
a16
.6R
ocky
Mou
ntai
n18
.1C
ampb
ell
Riv
er19
.4V
erno
n
Vul
nera
bili
tyby
Scho
olD
istr
ict
Per
cent
age
ofch
ildr
envu
Lne
rabl
eon
one
orm
ore
scal
esof
the
EDI
Cyc
le1
Most
Vul
nera
ble
Lowri
BeL
ow16.3
[j
16.4
to22.8
rzi2
2.9
-27.5
[27.6
-31.1
Hig
h(JA
bo
ve
31.2
35.7
40.0
40
.34
0.4
43
.7
Van
couv
erIs
Lan
dW
est
Nis
ga’a
Van
couv
erP
rinc
eR
uper
tC
entr
alC
oast
Not
ew
Sour
er,
EDI
Cyc
le1(
2000
-20
04).
Hu
man
Ear
lyL
aarn
lag
Part
ners
hip.
The
tota
lso
mpl
esi
zein
43.4
35.
For
Arr
owL
akes
,R
evol
otok
e.C
entr
alC
oast
,V
anco
uver
Isla
ndW
est
and
Nia
gon
(dio
ttlc
ts10
,19.
49.8
4an
d92
.res
pcct
rtcl
y),
Cyc
leII
nclu
des
data
from
2005
sod
2006
Inor
der
tole
rera
seth
esa
mpl
esi
ze.
Col
our
elam
lifra
tlos
Isb
aud
up
on
puw
loda
lod
ghbo
urho
rdsy
,ind
lo-f
lFfl
’S
ept
2006
sozo
54S
e4
eC
o.,
4—
—Is
—IO
5t*
35O
afoa
aI54
5454
4.54
CH
APT
ERQ
3EA
RLY
CH
ILD
HO
OD
LEA
RN
ING
TH
EEA
RLY
YE
AR
SE
VA
LU
AT
ION
The
Early
Yea
rsE
valu
atio
n(E
YE)
isde
sign
edto
help
educ
ator
sas
sess
the
skill
sof
child
ren
aged
four
tosi
x,w
hoar
em
akin
gth
etr
ansi
tion
tosc
ho
ol.
4Fi
veas
pect
sof
earl
ych
ildde
velo
pmen
tan
dsc
hool
-rea
dine
ssar
eev
alua
ted:
•aw
aren
ess
ofse
lfan
dth
een
viro
nmen
t(g
enra
Ikn
owle
dge)
•so
cial
skill
s,be
havi
our
and
appr
oach
esto
lear
ning
•co
gnit
ive
skill
s
•la
ngua
gean
dco
mm
unic
atio
n
•ph
ysic
alde
velo
pmen
t
The
eval
uatio
nco
nsis
tsof
a10
-min
ute
asse
ssm
ent
bya
teac
her
and
adi
rect
asse
ssm
ent
com
plet
edby
the
child
over
20to
3Dm
inut
es.
1(51
Res
earc
hIn
tern
atio
nal
Inc.
has
cond
ucte
dth
ree
pilo
t stu
dies
toas
sess
the
relia
bilit
yof
EYE.
Mor
ein
form
atio
nis
avai
labl
eat
:w
ww
.ksi
rese
arch
.com
/eye
l
TH
EQ
UE
BE
CL
ON
GIT
uDIN
AL
STU
DY
OF
CH
ILD
DE
VE
LO
PME
NT
The
Que
bec
Lon
gitu
dina
lS
tudy
ofC
hild
Dev
elop
men
t(Q
LSC
Iai
ms
toid
enti
fyfa
ctor
sth
ataf
fect
the
soci
alde
velo
pmen
tan
dac
adem
icpe
rfor
man
ceof
youn
gpe
ople
inth
epr
ovin
ce.
The
firs
tro
und
ofth
eQ
LSC
Dbe
gan
in19
98w
itha
coho
rtof
2,12
0ch
ildr
enbo
rnin
1997
—19
98.
The
chil
dren
wer
esu
rvey
edan
nual
lyfr
omth
eag
eof
five
mon
ths
tofo
urye
ars.
Ase
cond
phas
eof
the
stud
yis
now
unde
rway
and
will
cont
inue
until
2011
.
For
mor
ein
form
atio
n,pl
ease
see:
ww
w.j
esui
sjes
erai
.sta
t.go
uv.q
c.ca
letu
de..a
n.ht
m
UN
DE
RST
AN
DIN
GT
hEEA
RLY
YE
AR
S
Und
erst
andi
ngth
eEa
rlyY
ears
(UEY
)is
are
sear
chin
itiat
ive
fund
edby
Hum
anR
esou
rces
and
Soci
alD
evel
opm
ent
Can
ada.
Und
erU
EY,
part
icip
atin
gco
mm
unit
ies
rece
ive
info
rmat
ion
onth
esc
hool
read
ines
sof
thei
rki
nder
gart
ench
ildre
n,fa
mily
and
com
mun
ity
fact
ors
that
infl
uenc
ech
ildre
n’s
deve
lopm
ent,
and
the
avai
labi
lity
oflo
cal
reso
urce
sfo
rch
ildre
nan
dfa
mili
es.
LIN
KE
DPR
OV
INC
IAL
DA
TA
BA
SES
INM
AN
ITO
BA
The
Man
itoba
Cen
tre
for
Hea
lthPo
licy
(MC
HP)
atth
eU
nive
rsity
ofM
anito
baus
esan
onym
ous
aãni
nist
rativ
eda
taba
ses
that
can
belin
ked
toge
ther
for
spec
ific
rese
arch
proj
ects
(ww
w.u
man
itoba
.ca/
cent
res/
mch
p/da
ta.h
tm).
Whi
leth
elin
kbe
twee
nso
da-e
cono
mic
stat
us(S
ES)
and
scho
olpe
rfor
man
ceis
gene
rally
wel
les
tabl
ishe
d,th
ecr
eativ
eus
eof
prov
inci
alda
taba
ses
allo
wed
the
MC
PHto
prod
uce
even
mor
ete
lling
stat
istic
sfo
ra
proj
ect
know
nas
the
Chi
ldH
ealth
Atla
s20
04.
The
top
grap
h(r
ight
)il
lust
rate
sw
hat
scho
ols
see
whe
nth
eyre
view
Edu
cati
onM
inis
try
data
onth
epe
rfor
man
ceof
chil
dren
taki
ngth
est
anda
rdiz
edG
rade
3la
ngua
gear
tste
st.
Nin
ety-
four
perc
ent
ofst
uden
tsliv
ing
inhi
gh-S
ES
area
spa
ssed
the
test
, com
pare
dto
83%
ofth
ose
from
low
-SE
Sar
eas.
How
ever
,th
ebo
ttom
grap
h(r
ight
)te
lls
adi
ffer
ents
tory
.In
this
case
,res
earc
hers
incl
uded
mor
eco
mpr
ehen
sive
popu
lati
on-r
egis
try
info
rmat
ion.
Whe
nal
lch
ildre
nw
hosh
ould
have
been
in•
Gra
de3
inW
inni
peg
in19
98-1
999
wer
ein
clud
edin
the
expa
nded
data
set.
only
50%
ofth
ech
ildre
nfr
omlo
w-
Lau
nche
din
1999
inN
orth
Yor
k,O
nt.,
UEY
was
refi
ned
asa
pilo
tpr
ojec
tin
12co
mm
unit
ies.
Itha
sbe
ena
pan-
Can
adia
npr
ogra
msi
nce
2004
,w
ithup
to10
0co
mm
unit
ies
rece
ivin
gsu
ppor
tbe
twee
n20
05an
d20
08.
Mor
ein
form
atio
nis
avai
labl
eat
ww
w.h
rsd.
gc.c
a/en
/hip
/sd/
300_
UE
Yln
fo.s
htm
l
SES
fam
ilies
pass
edth
ete
st.
Chi
ldre
nfr
omth
elo
wes
tSE
Sgr
oup
wer
em
ore
likel
yto
have
fail
edth
ete
st,
been
abse
ntor
exem
pted
,or
had
alre
ady
been
held
back
atle
ast
one
grad
ean
dw
ere
ther
efor
eno
long
erw
ithth
eir
Gra
de3
coho
rt.
Mor
ede
tail
son
this
proj
ectm
aybe
foun
dat
:w
ww
.um
anit
oba.
calc
entr
es/m
chp/
repo
rts/
chil
djne
qual
iti&
Per
form
ance
ofW
inni
peg
pupi
lson
stan
dard
ized
Gra
de3
languag
.ar
tste
st,
base
don
fam
ilyIn
com
e19
98—
1999
Pass
/fai
lra
teof
thos
ew
how
rote
the
test
Figu
res
with
all
eigh
t-ye
ar-a
Ids
who
shou
ldha
vew
ritt
enth
ete
st
lxx ¶i.
I:.
Law
l.aw
-mid
dIe
MId
cIH
iqh
Sod
a..,
cra
nk
llam
a
END NOTES
F
Heckman, James J. Invest in the Very Young (Chicago: Ounce of Prevention Fundand the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy Studies, 2000).Available at www.ounceofprevention.org. Accessed Sept. 26, 2006.
2 United Nations Educations). Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO):Four pillars of learning. Available at www.unesco.org/delors/fourpil.htm
3 Norrie McCain, Margaret and J. Fraser Mustard. Early Years Study Final Report(Government of Ontario, Ontario Children’s Secretariat, 1999).Available at www.children.gov.on.ca. Accessed Oct. 14, 2006.
4 Norrie McCain, M. Early Years Study Final Report, 1999.
5 Beckett, C., et ci. “Do the Effects of Early Severe Deprivation on CognitionPersist into Early Adolescence? Findings from the English and RomanianAdoptees Study,” Child Development, 77(31(2006). pp. 696—711.
6 Bremner, J. D. “Does Stress Demae the Brain?” Biological Psychiatry, 45 (1999).pp. 797—805. Also, McEwen, B. S. The Effects of Stress on Structural andFunctional Plasticity in the Hippocampus,” Neurobiology of Mental Illness (NewYork: Oxford University Press, 1999). pp. 475—493.
7 Statistics Canada. “Estimates of Population by Age and Sex for Canada,Provinces and Territories,” CANSIM (Ottawa). Table 051-0001.
8 Jefferis B., C. Power, and C. Herrsman. “Birthweight, childhood socioeconomicenvironment, and cognitive development in the 1958 British birth cohort study,”British Medical journal. 325(73591:305 (Aug. 10,2002).
9 Public Health Agency of Canada. Healthy Development of Children and Youth:The Role of the Determinants of Health (Ottawa: Health Canada, 1999).Available at www.phac-aspc.gc.ca. Accessed Oct. 14, 2006.
10 Or,ganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Health eta Glance:OECD Indicators 2005 (Pari OECD, 2005).
11 Trasti N. and T. Vik. “Smoking in Pregnancy and Children’s Mental andMotor Develqpment at Age 1 and 5 Years, Early Human Development, 55(2)11999). pp.l3?—4?. Also, Autti-Ramo, I. and M. Granstrom. “The PsychomotorDevelopment During the First Year of life of Infants Exposed to IntrauterineAlcohol of Various Duration:Fetal Alcohol Exposure and Development,” Neuropediatrics, 22(1991).pp.S9—64.
12 Solan, H. and R. Moslan. “Children in Poverty: Impact on Health, VisualDevelopment and School Failure.” Journal of Optometric Visual Development,2811997) pp.?—25.
13 Wigle, Donald T., et ci. “Environmental Hazards: Evidence for Effects on ChildHealth,” Journal of Toxicology & Environmental health: Part B 10, 1(2007),pp.3-39.
14 Grandjean, p. and Landrigan P.J. “Developmental neurotoxicity of industrialchemicals,” The Lancet 368, 9553 (2006), pp. 2167- 2178.
15 Doherty. Gillian. Zero to Six: The Basis for School Readiness (Human ResourcesDevelopment Canada, 1997).
16 Berk, L E. Child development, Second Canadian Edition (Toronto: PearsonEducation Canade, 2006).
17 Bukatko, D. and M. W. Daehler. Child development: A Thematic Approach, FifthEdition (Boston: Houghton Muffin, 2004).
18 Bradley, R. H., at al. “The Home Environments of Children in the United States.Part I: Variations by Age, Ethnicity, and Poverty Status,’ Child Development, 7212001). pp. 1,B44—1,B67.
19 Lefebvre, P. and P. Merrigan. Family Background, Family Income, MaternalWork and Child Development (Ottawa: Human Resources Development Canada,1998). Also, Lipps, G. and 3. Yiptong-Avila. From Home to School—How CanadianChildren Cope lOttawa: Statistics Canaoa’s Culture, Tourism and the Centre forEducation Statistics, 1999). Catalogue no. 89F01 1 7XIE.Available at www.statcan.ca. Accessed Sept. 11, 2006.
20 Keating, 0. P. and F. K. Miller, “Individual Pathways in Competence and Coping:From Regulatory Systems to Habits of Mind,” Developmental Health and theWealth of Nations: Social, Biological and Educational Dynamics (New York:Guilford Press, 1999). pp. 220—234.
21 Early Childhood Learning Knowledge Centre. “Why is High-quality Child CareEssential? The Link Between Quality Child Care and Learning,” Lessons inLearning (Ottawa: Canadian Council on Learning, 2006) Available at www.ccl.cca.ca. Accessed Sept. 9, 2006.
22 Kohen, D., C. Hertzman and M. Weiris. “Environmental Changes and Children’sCompetencies”. Technical Report, W-98-1 5E lOttawa: Applied Research Branchof Human Resources Development Canada, 1998).
23 Bradley, R. H. “The Home Environments of Children in the United States,”Child Development.
24 Fried, PA. “Tobacco Consumption During Pregnancy and its Impact on ChildDevelopment,” Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development, Online version(Montreal: Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development). Available atwww.excellence-esrlychildhoed.ca. Accessed Oct. 12, 2006.
25 WilIms, 3. D. “Quality and Inequality in Children’s Literacy: The Effects ofFamilies, Schools, and Communities,” Developmental Health and the Weafth ofNations: Social, Biological and Educational Dynamics (New York: Guilford Press,1999). pp. 72—93.
26 Tomblin, B. “Literacy as an Outcome of Language Development and its Impacton Children’s Psychosocial and Emotional Development,” Encyclopedia on EarlyChildhood Development, Online version (Montreal: Centre of Excellence forEarly Childhood Development). Available at www.excellence-earlychildhood.ca.Accessed on Sept. 12. 2006.
27 Ehri, L. C., at ci. “Phonemic Awareness Instruction Helps Children Learn to Read:Evidence from the National.Reading Panel’s Mete-analysis,” Reading ResearchQuarterly, 36 (2001). pp. 250—287. Also, Storch, S. A. and 0. J. Whltehurst. “OralLanguage and Code-related Precursors of Reading: Evidence from a LongitudinalStructural Model,” Developmental Psychology, 38 (20021, pp. 934—945.
28 Cohen, N. J. Language impairment and psychopathology In Infants, chIldren, andadolescents (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001).
29 Whitehurst, 6. J., and C. J. Lonigan. “Child Development and EmergentLiteracy,” Child Development, 69(3)11998). pp. 848—872.
30 National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, StatistIcson voice, speech, and language (Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Deafnessand Other Communication Disorders; National Institutes of Health). Available atwww.nidcd,nih,gov. Accessed Sept. 14, 2006.
31 Glogowska, M., et al. “Early Speech-and-language-Impaired Children:linguistic, literacy, and Social Outcomes,” Developmental Medicine and ChildNeurology, 48(2006). pp. 489—494. Also, Cohen NJ. “The Impact of LanguageDevelopment on the Psychosocial and Emotional Development of YoungChildren,” Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development, Online version.(Montreal: Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development). Available atwww.excellence-earlychlldhood.ca. Accessed Sept. 12,2006..
32 Partly adapted from Dc Maio, Louis J. Stages of Language Development(Moorhead, MN: Parent-Child Communication Program of Minnesota StateUniversity). Available at http:I/www.mnstate.edu/pccp/. Accessed Oct. 13,2006.
33 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of MentalDisorders, Fourth Edition, test revision (Washington, D.C.: 2000),
34 Hart, B. and T. R. Risley. Meaningful differences in the everyday experience ofyoung American children (Baltimore, U.S.: Paul H. Brookes Publishing, 1995).
35 Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., M. H. Bornstain and L Baumwell. “MaternalResponsiveness and Children’s Achievement of Language Milestones,” ChildDevelopment, 72 (2001). pp. 748—767.
36 Canadian Council on Learnin, “How Parents Foster Early Literacy,” Lessons inLearning (Ottawa: 2006). Available at www.ccl-cca.ca. Accessed Feb. 1,2006.
37 Bowlby, 3. Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1 INew York, NY: Basic Books, 1969).
38 Boivin, M. “The Origin of Peer Relationship Difficulties in Early Childhoodand their Impact on Children’s Psychosocial Adjustment and Development,”Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development, Online version IMontreal:Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development, 20051.Available at www.excellence-earlychildhood.ca. Accessed Sept. 15, 2006.
39 Eaton, Warren 0. and Alice Piklai Vu. “Are Sex Differences in Child MotorActivity Level a function of Sex Differences in Muturational Status?” ChildDevelopment 60,4(1989), p.p 1005—1011.
40 CSté, S.M., et al. “The Development of Physical Aggression from Toddlerhoodto Pre-adolescence: A Nation-wide Longitudinal Study of Canadian Children,”Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34(11(2006). pp. 71—85.
41 lMllms, D. Vulnerable Children Table 3.2 p. 54 (Edmonton: University of AlbertaPress, 2002). Also, Kershaw, P., et a). The British Columbia Atlas of ChildDevelopment, First edition (Human Early Learning Partnership and WesternGeographical Press, 2005).
42 The Federal/Provincial/Territorial Communiqué on Early Childhood Developmentis available at www.ecd.elcc.ca/en/ecd/ecd...home.shtml.
43 OECD. Early Childhood Education and Care Policy: Canada Country Note (Paris:OECD Directorate for Education). Available at www.sdc.gc.ca/en/cs/sp/sdc/socpol/publications/reports/2004-00261 9/Country.pdf. Accessed Sept. 26. 2006.
44 Information presented here on the EYE is largely based on Whims, J. D., andJ. Beswick. The Early Years Evaluation—Teacher Assessment 11<51 ResearchInternational Inc.) Available at www.ksiresearch.com/eye/. Accessed Sept. 29,2006.
45 Toe Institut de Ia statistique oe Québec. Quebec Longitudinal Study of ChildDevelopment IQuebec). Available at www.jesuisjeserai.stat.gouv.qc.ca/.
Public X Report No. 11-01-1282 Private Date: March 8th, 2011
HALIFAX REGIONAL SCHOOL BOARD
Occupational Health & Safety – Quarterly Update – Q4 2010
October 1, 2010 to December 30, 2010
PURPOSE: To inform the Board of Occupational Health & Safety (OHS) issues. BUSINESS PLAN GOAL: To continue to improve student achievement and learning for all students. BACKGROUND: Reporting on a quarterly basis is part of a due diligence process so the Board
is aware of HRSB OHS significant statistics and activities. CONTENT: Please see Appendix A - Occupational Health & Safety Quarterly Update,
Q4 2010, October 1, 2010 to December 30, 2010. COST: n/a FUNDING: n/a TIMELINE: n/a APPENDIX: Appendix A - Occupational Health & Safety Quarterly Update, Q4 2010,
October 1, 2010 to December 30, 2010. RECOMMENDATION: The Board accept the report for information. COMMUNICATIONS: n/a From: John Swales, OHS Manager (2204) [email protected] To: Board March 23rd, 2011
OHS Report Q4_2010 Page 1 of 1 Report # 11-01-1282
11-01-1282 - APPENDIX A
Occupational Health & Safety Quarterly Update
Q4 2010 October 1 to December 31, 2010
School Insurance Program (SIP) – Reported Incidents
Incidents
Reporting Quarter Year Before Quarter Preceding Quarter
Group Oct. 1 to Dec. 31, ‘10 Oct. 1 to Dec. 31, ‘09 Jul. 1 to Sep. 31, ‘10
Employees: 77 Not available 41
Other, incl. students: 280 Not available 166
SIP Incident Report forms are submitted by school administrators for incidents occurring to school community members during school related activities.
43% of employee incidents reported to SIP were in relation to the position of Educational Program Assistant.
Group Leading Location Leading Injury Leading Cause Leading Body Part
Employees: Class/Resource Rm (33 %)
Bruise/Abrasion/ Swell (34%) Slip/Trip/Fall (33%) Arm and Hand
related Other, incl. students: Playground Bruise/Abrasion/
Swelling Slip/Trip/Fall Head/Forehead
Incidents resulting in a lost time injury or medical attention are also reported under Workers’ Compensation Board or Injury on Duty below. Nova Scotia Teacher’s Union (NSTU) This group of employees is not covered by WCB.
NSTU Injury On Duty applications received Reporting Quarter Year Before Quarter Preceding Quarter Oct. 1 to Dec. 31, ‘10 Oct. 1 to Dec. 31, ‘09 Jul. 1 to Sep. 31, ‘10
Injuries on Duty 5 3 1
OH&S Division of Department Labour and Workforce Development
Workplaces Inspected: Workplaces with Compliance Orders Issued:
Total Compliance Orders Issued:
0 0 0
Appendix A_OHS Quarterly Update Q4_2010_draft Page 1 of 3
11-01-1282 - APPENDIX A
Workers’ Compensation Board (WCB) Claims
33 claims were submitted to the Workers’ Compensation Board. Eight claims had no resulting medical expense or benefits paid. 17 of the claims have lost time. The following graph shows 4th Quarter WCB data.
WCB Q4 Claim Data
40
30
43
38.2
30.1
2225
34
21
33
129
118
17
$32
$13
$21
$17$15
05
10152025
303540
4550
Quarter to Quarter Info
# of
Cla
ims
or W
eeks
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
Thou
sand
s
Bene
fits
Paid
in Q
Weeks of Benefi ts in Q 40 30 43 38.2 30.1
Submitted Cla ims 22 25 34 21 33
Lost Time Cla ims 12 9 11 8 17
Benefi t $'s Paid in Q $32,176 $13,371 $21,279 $17,321 $14,883
Q4_'06 Q4_'07 Q4_'08 Q4_'09 Q4_'10
Note: Q4 ‘06 “Weeks of Benefits in Q” is an estimate only.
Appendix A_OHS Quarterly Update Q4_2010_draft Page 2 of 3
11-01-1282 - APPENDIX A
Appendix A_OHS Quarterly Update Q4_2010_draft Page 3 of 3
The graph below presents historical quarterly data as annual totals. Weeks of Benefits and Benefit Dollars Paid are trending lower. The trend lines for Submitted Claims and Lost Time Claims do not have a clear trend.
WCB Annual Claim Data(based on per Q totals - not cumulative claim costs)
222.5
183.3167.3
141.3
126117
86
113
54 5038 45
$108
$97$90
$67
0
50
100
150
200
250
Quarter
# of
Cla
ims
or W
eeks
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
Thou
sand
s
Ben
efits
Pai
d
Benefi t WEEKS 222.5 183.3 167.3 141.3
Submitted 126 117 86 113
Lost Time 54 50 38 45
Benefi ts $107,722 $96,715 $89,537 $66,854
'07 '08 '09 '10
Employee Training 95 Educational Program Assistants were recertified in Emergency First Aid. 67 custodians who work alone were Emergency First Aid certified. 41 Principals and Vice Principals were Emergency First Aid certified. 75 Educational Program Assistants were certified in Nonviolent Crisis Intervention. Nonviolent Crisis Intervention courses for some Operations staff, school Administration Assistants and Central Office staff are being offered in the coming quarter. Requests for Action from workplace JOHS Committees (received) Three Request for Action forms were received by the Manager OH&S during the period. They have been addressed. There were no outstanding Requests for Action at the end of the period. Other The basic OHS Audits at 10% of (randomly selected) HRSB schools has been deferred to March and April.