AGE DIFFERENCE IN CERVICAL NEOPLASIA DISTRIBUTION AMONG WOMEN ATTENDING A HOSPITAL BASED AND...
-
Upload
calvin-lambert -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of AGE DIFFERENCE IN CERVICAL NEOPLASIA DISTRIBUTION AMONG WOMEN ATTENDING A HOSPITAL BASED AND...
AGE DIFFERENCE IN CERVICAL NEOPLASIA DISTRIBUTION AMONG WOMEN ATTENDING A HOSPITAL
BASED AND PERIPHERAL SCREENING PROGRAMMES
Dr.Kalavathy Mathurchennath1, Saritha.V.N, Sujathan.K, Preethy Sara George
1 Assistant Professor, Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
Background• Cervical cancer continues to be the second
common malignancy among females of India and Kerala, the rate of which is around 8/100,000/year in Trivandrum
• Regional Cancer Centre (RCC), Trivandrum, India, runs two parallel cervical cancer screening programmes. One regular pap screening in a tertiary Women & Children Govt hospital, Trivandrum(Group1) and second a peripheral screening programme in different Govt Primary Health Centres (PHC) of Trivandrum (Group2)
Objective
• To see the difference in incidence and age distribution of cervical neoplasia among women attending hospital based and peripheral screening programmes
Methodology
• Hospital based screening programme conducted regularly twice in a week in the Govt Women & Children Hospital, Tycaudu, Trivandrum
• Women attending the Gynaec OPD are subjected for routine pap Smear examination
Methodology …..cont..
• Peripheral screening programmes are conducted in 1-2 Govt PHCs in a week. All PHCs in the district are expected to be covered within a period of 18 months.
• The women for the Pap Smear screening are motivated by the Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) female workers.
Methodology.. Cont…
• For both Group1 and Group2, the Pap Smear collection is done by the same team of health staff from RCC.
• Socio demographic details of each woman subjected for Pap smear is collected as a routine in all the cases.
Results
• Data of a total of 4991 women from Group1 and 3033 from Group2 were analysed
• .32% of Group1 and .36% of Group2 had Low grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (LSIL)
• The mean age of incidence of LSIL was 45 in Group1 and 44 in Group2
Results ..cont..
• The incidence of Highgrade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (HSIL) was 1.1% in Group1 and .32% in Group2.
• The mean age of incidence of HSIL was 54.65 in group1 and 43.3 in Group2 and this difference was statistically significant (p value .014)
Discussion
• The almost same LSIL incidence in both groups is expected and the mean age of incidence is also same
• The hospital group has a higher incidence of HSIL as it expected from a high risk group.
• The mean age of incidence of HSIL is significantly lower among the peripheral screened population . This has a great public health importance as it helps to detect asymptomatic women with HSIL who have never been to a hospital at an early age and get treated and arrest the development of cervical cancer