Against Space

20
space is not fundamental. time might be. Sean Carroll, Caltech http://preposterousuniverse.com/

description

Space is not fundamental (although time might be). Talk at the 2010 Philosophy of Science Association Meeting, Montreal. By Sean Carroll, http://preposterousuniverse.com/

Transcript of Against Space

Page 1: Against Space

space is not fundamental.time might be.

Sean Carroll, Caltech

http://preposterousuniverse.com/

Page 2: Against Space

“What is and is not fundamental”is not fundamental.

What features will be important ingredients in an ultimate (as yet hypothetical) comprehensive theory of everything.

Theories often have very different-looking butequivalent descriptions (e.g. soliton/particleduality). Who is to say what is “fundamental”?

But some things are certainly not fundamental;e.g. temperature. Theories using them are notcomprehensive. Space is like that.

Page 3: Against Space

Classical Mechanics

Start with a set of coordinates .

These obey second-order equations of motion:

Specifying the coordinates alone doesn’t determinea solution; need to give and .

Page 4: Against Space

Coordinates qi and momenta pj.

Hamiltonian function H(qi, pj).

Hamilton’s equations:

Together we have a = {qi, pj}, defining phase space .

A single point a(t0) in defines a unique trajectory.

Hamiltonian Mechanics

Page 5: Against Space

Phase space is a symplectic manifold.

A symplectic form is a closed, invertible 2-form.

Trajectories are integral curves of the Hamiltonianvector field,

a(t)

Xa

Page 6: Against Space

The coordinate/momentum distinction is blurred.

Conventionally:

cotangent bundle T*M = {qi, pi}

= phase space

configuration space M, coordinates qi

symplectic form = dpi dqi

(automatic)

Every cotangent bundle is a symplectic manifold, butnot every symplectic manifold is a cotangent bundle.

Symplecticity is more “fundamental” than coordinate/momentum distinction.

Page 7: Against Space

Mechanics is invariant under canonical transformations:

{q, p} {Q(q,p), P(q,p)}

that leave the form of Hamilton’s equations unchanged.

Example:

Nothing “fundamental” about which are the coordinates,which are the momenta.

Qi = pi ,

Pj = -qj .

Page 8: Against Space

Why don’t we live in momentum space?

Think of interacting harmonic oscillators.

Interactions are local in position, not in momentum.

Better: position is the thing in which interactions are local.

Page 9: Against Space

Quantum mechanics

States are rays in Hilbert space: |.

Evolution is governed by the Schrödinger equation:

Energy eigenbasis:

Dynamics are defined by the eigenvalues {En},

the spectrum of the Hamiltonian.

Page 10: Against Space

Where is “space” in the quantum state?

We can define a position operator with eigenstates

in terms of which the state is

But we don’t have to; momentum also works.

These are related by Fourier transform,

Page 11: Against Space

Or other bases, e.g. creation/annihilation operatorsfor a simple harmonic oscillator.

Here,

These operators raise and lower energy eigenstates:

Page 12: Against Space

Entanglement

For a generic multiparticle state |,

The wave function is not a function of space,but of many copies of space.

Things don’t happen in “space”; they happenin Hilbert space.

Again, it’s locality of interactions that tempts usto speak otherwise.

Page 13: Against Space

Quantum Field Theory

QFT would seem to deeply privilege “space”; theHamiltonian is an integral over space. But why?

Interactions are local in space:

not in momentum:

Page 14: Against Space

Gravity

Consider a compact dimension on a circle.R

A scalar field can be decomposedinto Kaluza-Klein modes

with energies

From the higher-dimensional perspective, these modes comprise a tower of massive states.

Conversely: if every field has such a tower, that implies an extra dimension.

Page 15: Against Space

M-theory’s 11th dimension

Witten 1995: there are supersymmetric particlemultiplets in Type IIA string theory with massesthat depend on the coupling as

Small : states are heavy and decouple.Large : Kaluza-Klein tower, as if an extra dimension.

Q: How many dimensions are there in string theory?

A: It depends.

x11

10 dimensionalIIA string theory

11 dimensionalsupergravity

Page 16: Against Space

T-duality: string theory on a small circle isequivalent to string theory on a big circle.Momentum/winding duality.

Mirror symmetries: IIA string theory on one Calabi-Yaumanifold equals IIB string theory on another one.

These are gauge symmetries; exact equivalence.

No such thing as the “true” compactification.

Page 17: Against Space

R

Holography

Maximum entropy inside a regionof space doesn’t go as R3, thevolume, but as R2, the area.

Discovered in the context ofblack holes, but believed to be more general.

Significance:

The world is not made of separate degrees offreedom at each point in space.

Emergent space isn’t just a matter of discreteness.

Page 18: Against Space

Maldacena, 1997:quantum gravity(string theory) onfive-dimensionalanti-de Sitter spacetimes a five-sphereis equivalent to aconformal field theory without gravity on the four-dimensional boundary.

“The spacetime one is in” is not unambiguously defined.

10 dimensionsAdS5 x S5

4-dimensionalMinkowski space

AdS/CFT

Page 19: Against Space

• QM, states, time, & the Schrödinger equation:

Space somehow recovered from |.

• QM, states, & the Wheeler-de Witt equation:

Space and time recovered from |.

• A generalization of, or replacement for, QM.

What might be fundamental?

Page 20: Against Space

Closing ruminations

• Space/coordinates are picked out by thespecific Hamiltonian of the world, notby the structure of our theories.

• Investigations of quantum gravity providestrong evidence that space is emergent,and in a deeper way than local discreteness.Degrees of freedom are not local.

• Unwarranted speculation: trying to understandthe early universe will help us understandthe role of space & time.