After a Guilty Verdict G543 Forensic Psychology (GMN) (1)Imprisonment (planned behaviours,...

After a Guilty Verdict

G543

Forensic Psychology (GMN)

(1)Imprisonment (planned behaviours, (2)depression/suicide,

(3)prison situation/roles)

After a guilty verdict

• This section considers what happens to a person once they have been found guilty and been sentenced.

• Sentences can be custodial (prison) or non-custodial (probation)

• Both have advantages and disadvantages

• You have 5 minutes to list as many as possible

After a guilty verdict

• Psychologists are interested in the effect on the individual of the punishment or treatment.

• This is different to the perspectives sociologists might take.

• They are interested in the effect it has on society and not the individual.

• Discuss what psychological affect prison would have given Sean Mercer and also people in general.

In the exam

• (a) Identify the link between imprisonment and suicide. [10]

• (b) Evaluate the usefulness of research into the psychological effects of imprisonment.

January 2010

(a) Identify the link between imprisonment and suicide. [10]

• The link between imprisonment and suicide, particularly in young offenders, is well established and the better candidate will clearly identify this link with reference to research such as Dooley, 1990. Better answers will be marked by elaboration, quality and/or example, as well as explicit application of evidence. The weaker candidate may make general or bland statements which lack detail or specific references.

(b) Evaluate the usefulness of research into the psychological effects of imprisonment (15)

• The question asks the candidate to evaluate usefulness. This can refer to how well the research can be applied, how the research is useful to the individual or the use of the research on a societal level. It may be useful in considering the prison situation and roles, depression and suicide risk of prisoners and planned behaviours once freed from jail.

In the exam

• (a) Describe research into planned behaviours once freed from jail. [10]

• (b) Evaluate the use of qualitative and quantitative data when researching imprisonment. [15]

January 2013

(a) Describe research into planned behaviours once freed from jail. [10]

• The bullet-point title asks for ‘planned behaviours once freed from jail’ and this is fulfilled by schemes and regimes being put in place to produce a positive effect on recidivism rates. This can be affected by employment experience for example. The specification refers to Gillis and Nafekh (2005) but other research such as Farrington et al (2002) is equally acceptable.

(b) Evaluate the use of qualitative and quantitative data when researching

imprisonment. [15]

• Pros and cons, strengths and weaknesses, advantages and limitations of qualitative and quantitative data can all be considered. When looking at planned behaviours in preparation for after imprisonment, depression and suicide during imprisonment and the prison situation are all available from the specification. They provide sources of evidence of the range from content analysis to numbers and data.

In the exam

• (a) Describe research into the prison situation and roles. [10]

• (b) Evaluate the methodology used in research into imprisonment.

June 2013

(a) Describe research into the prison situation and roles. [10]

• Candidates are likely to refer to research by Zimbardo who initially considered participants acting out the roles of prisoners and guards in a prison simulation. The pathological reaction of the prisoners as much as the guards was noteworthy. Candidates may refer to Reicher and Haslam’s study although this focused more on group dynamics than roles, so candidates should explicitly link the ‘role’ aspect. Candidates may choose 2 or more pieces of research to consider prison situation and roles. Candidates who only consider prison situation cannot get higher than band 3.

(b) Evaluate the methodology used in research into imprisonment.

• This question is an open evaluation so can refer to strengths as well as limitations, but must be specifically about methodology used in research rather than about imprisonment itself. So research was conducted in a particular place and time, such as Canada or the UK, and in 60s or 70s, so not as cross-sectional as some other research. Large samples of 23,525 Canadian federal offenders, 442 unnatural deaths occurring in prison in the UK or an overview of over 2,000,000 US prisoners benefit particularly the reliability and representativeness of the research. Any other methodological issues may be presented, from the methods themselves such as experimental design through to methodological issues such as ecological validity.

Planned behaviours /Study 1 - Background

Judges blamed for prison boom

• The 71% rise in the prison population between 1991 and 2001 was due to a "misplaced emphasis on toughness rather than effectiveness" as courts sentence more people to prison and for longer terms, according to a report by the Prison Reform Trust.

Is prison an effective deterrent?

• Edward Garnier (April 06), the Shadow Minister for Home Affairs, thinks that imprisoning criminals is 'hugely expensive and not working'.

• His view is shared by many, and the fact that 70 per cent of prisoners are convicted of another crime within two years of being released would seem to support that statement.

• Jamie Whyte, writing in The Times, says this fact tells us nothing about how much prison deters the rest of the population.

• He thinks it is good value and that we should do more of it.

• What do you think?

Is prison an effective deterrent?

• You have unlimited funding

• How would you stop the re-offending of:

• Drug dealers

• Car thieves

• ? Any other, you choose

Imprisonment

• Imprisoning people is thought to be the most effective punishment for a crime and is frequently demanded by the public.

• But how does it work psychologically?• Skinners work on operant conditioning

(learning through punishment or reward) can be used to explain how prison works as a deterent and as a punishment.

• Explain how?

Imprisonment

• Prison works (if at all) because it deprives a person of liberty and free will.

• These are replaced by restrictions (in space, movement and choice over actions and contacts).

• If this acts as a deterent to criminals then it can be seen as a negative reinforcer and should strengthen avoidance behaviour (staying on the right side of the law).

Imprisonment

• According to Skinner, if punishment is to be effective, it should weaken that undesirable behaviour, or, ideally, stop it altogether.

Imprisonment

• However, prisons do not work as the theory's predicts.

• Either as a punisher or negative enforcer

• Explain why this may be, what's happened to society?

• How would you change this and why?

• Recidivism is rife, is life better inside for some youths than on the outside?

Imprisonment: An incentive to behave?

• Many people are critical of the parole system (the fact that prisoners are often released early and rarely serve their full sentence);

• What are the arguments for and against this?• However, this is an important incentive, crucial

to the smooth operation of the prison system. • Applications for parole are allowed after a

minimum term (set by the judge) has been served.

Imprisonment: An incentive to behave?

• Success will depend on the nature of the offence, the judge’s comments on sentencing and crucially the inmate’s behaviour in prison.

• This gives the prisoner an incentive to behave and comply with prison rules.

• Without this incentive many inmates would be unmanageable (Zimbardo/BBC Study)

Ajens Theory of planned behaviour

• This theory helps us to understand how we can change the behaviour of people.

• Believes that human action is guided by 3 things (next slide)

•Based on:1 – Behavioural beliefs (about the likely consequence of their behaviour – going straight)

2 – Normative beliefs (beliefs about the normative expectations of others – most people are not criminals)

3 – Control beliefs (do they feel in control)

The theory of planned behaviour applied to an offender’s likelihood of ‘going

straight’ – Azjen (1988)• Azjen Theory of Planned Behaviour can be

applied to a prisoner leaving jail.• A prisoner needs to have a positive intention to

stay out of prison.• This will be influenced by the prisoners beliefs

about the value of their life (Attitude) on the outside and how much confidence they have that they can control what will happen to them (Perceived behavioural control).

The theory of planned behaviour applied to an offender’s likelihood of ‘going

straight’ – Azjen (1988)• The amount of control a prisoner may feel

they have is dependent on many variables.

• Can you list some (3 minutes)

• Aggression, education, addiction

• Now describe the theory of planned behaviour by applying it to an actual criminal.

Study 1

Gillis & Nafekh (2005) – The impact of Community-based employment on offender

reintegration.


reintegration. • This study was conducted in Canada

• Focussed on inmates who were about to be released having completed their sentence

• In their prison it was possible to start an employment programme in the final months of their sentence


reintegration

• The success rates of those with a planned exit from prison are compared using a matched pairs design with prisoners with no planned employment

• Why is it important for a prisoner to get a job?

• Money, friends, meaning


reintegration

• Aim: - To investigate the effect on recidivism rates of a community-based employment scheme (more importantly employment status and outcomes)


reintegration

• Sample: - Federal offenders conditionally released between January 1998 and January 2005

• 23,525 individuals

• 95% Males and 5% Female


reintegration

• Procedure: - A content analysis (analysing statistics from the government) of data from Canada’s Offender Management System was completed on 23,525 individuals released between January 1998 and January 2005 (95% were male).

• A matched pairs design was used • The two groups that were compared on

outcomes were those employed (G1) prior to release on a special programme for offenders and those that were unemployed (G2).


reintegration• Offenders were matched for: • gender • risk level • release year • sentence length • family/marital relations • substance abuse • emotional orientation • community functioning • Attitudes (Azjen).


reintegration

• Results: Those on the employment programme were more likely to remain on conditional release (i.e. not sent back to prison) and less likely to return to custody with a new offence.

• The average time for the whole sample to get employment outside was 6 months for men and 10 months for women (why?)

• At the end of the study period 70% of the employed group (G1) remained out of prison, compared to just 55% of the unemployed group (G2).


reintegration

• Median return time (to jail) was also longer for the employed group (37 months, compared to 11 months).

• So even if they did end up in prison it still took them longer to get in.

• But why did some of them end up in prison even with the programme in place?


reintegration

• This study is an improvement to previous studies and has a strong sample and method.

• Its findings can therefore be generalised and are also more valid

• Employment-based programmes play an integral role in the last few moths of prison

• They develop skills that allow them to integrate into society


reintegration

• The programmes focus on job-search technique, individual psychometric assessments and on job placements

• The study suggests that planning the return to the community addresses some of the points raised in Azjens model and increases the likelihood of success.


reintegration

• 64.7% are reconvicted within 2 years

• Males aged 18-20 it is 75.3%

• What happens if the release of a prisoner is not planned?

Evaluaiton

• + Usefulness – the research is highly useful in preventing recidivism of offenders (employment-based programmes play an integral role in the last few months of prison allowing them to reintegrate better into society and giving them control over their future/TOPB)

• – Ethnocentrism – as the participants were all from Canada it is difficult to generalise the results to other populations.

• + Large Sample – as the sample is large, which will give an a more reliable and generalisable data set.

• + No experimenter bias – as the study was a content analysis using computer software, we can argue that there is a low chance of experimenter bias.

• – There is a lack of depth in this research, we do not know why the employed offenders are less likely to reoffend

Depression/Suicide Study 2 - Background

Depression and suicide risk in prisons

• In 2007 there were 92 unnatural deaths in prison• A further 100 were resuscitated • This is based on information from the ‘Howard

League for Penal Reform’• The Howard League for Penal Reform is the

oldest penal reform charity in the UK.

The Howard League for Penal Reform - Core Beliefs

• The Howard League for Penal Reform works for a safe society where fewer people are victims of crime

• The Howard League for Penal Reform believes that offenders must make amends for what they have done and change their lives

• The Howard League for Penal Reform believes that community sentences make a person take responsibility and live a law-abiding life in the community

In the news

• Suicide and prison closely linked (BBC Health Report)

• Two fifths of women prisoners and a fifth of male prisoners in England and Wales have attempted suicide, according to official statistics

• Most had attempted to take their lives before they were admitted to prison, but the number of suicides in jail is also rising (is this key?)

• Many came from a background of violence and abuse

In the news

• Prison campaigners say the figures, released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), show the strong link between social deprivation, mental ill health and imprisonment and the need for a multi-agency approach to cutting crime and better prison screening of mental illness

• What is this suggesting?

Of those who had attempted suicide in the past year there were eight main risk factors

• The most common were being white and being young.

• Others included having a poor education and very little support from family and friends

• Suicide attempts were also strongly linked to mental disorders such as schizophrenia, heavy alcohol abuse and neurosis

Depression and suicide risk in prisons

• At any one time 1500 prisoners are on suicide watch

Self-harm in prison

• What signs could you look for? (as stated on the HM Prison website):

• Your relative or friend might be unusually quiet, withdrawn or just not interested in things

• They might stop taking care of themselves • They might seem lonely and isolated • They may be finding it very difficult to come to terms with

their situation • They might feel despair and that things are out of their

control • They may feel many different emotions—anger, despair,

hopelessness

Old study:

Dooley study (for those who have already done it):

Dooley, Unnatural deaths in prison

• Dooley looked at unnatural deaths from 1972 – 1987.

• Prisoner A is one of the examples in the text• Death by consciously self-inflicted injury (CSI)• He had been convicted of manslaughter in 1977

and received a 6-year sentence


• Manslaughter is a legal term for the killing of a human being, in a manner considered by law as less culpable (evil) than murder.

• He had apparently been depressed fir a number of weeks prior to the offence

• Felt extremely guilty and when considered for parole this feeling of guilt increased


• A month before his death he tried to hang himself• Seen weekly by a psychiatrist• Hanged himself from a coat hook in his cell• Was classed as misadventure (accidental death)

not suicide• Dooley found the most common method of

suicide was hanging

Dooley (1990) – Unnatural Deaths in Prisons

• Aims: - To investigate all unnatural deaths that occurred in prisons in England & Wales between 1972 and 1987


• Procedure: - A content analysis of Prison Department records. A checklist that included social, psychiatric and forensic history was used to analyse the data. The groups recorded as suicide were compared to those not recorded as suicide.


• Findings: - 442 unnatural deaths were recorded

• 300 were recorded as suicide • The remaining 142 were recorded with a

variety of verdicts (mainly misadventure) • Including 52 from consciously self-inflicted

injury (CSI) • More of the suicide group were on remand

(not yet sentenced) • More of the CSI group were female. • Most deaths occurred at night.


• Using page 57 (discussion) and your booklets discuss the conclusions of this study

• Why does overcrowding cause stress?• Why are there more suicides among prisoners on

remand?• How would you attempt to stop this in prison?

New Study:

Palmer and Connelly (2005) – Depression, hopelessness and suicide ideation amongst

vulnerable prisoners• The link between imprisonment & suicide is

a strong • Outlined in the study by Dooley et al • Found that those who were depressed were

more likely to commit suicide than those who weren’t.

• This same link was found by Palmer & Connelly in their study into suicide risk (more detail than Dooley)


vulnerable prisoners• Palmer & Connelly approached adult male prisoners in a Cat. B

local prison in England who were new to custody and asked whether they would be willing to participate in a study.

• 24 who identified themselves as having a history of self-harm. • This as the experimental group which was matched on age,

ethnicity etc as a control group. • Both groups were then were asked to complete several self reports,

all relating to depression. • These were the Beck’s scale into hopelessness, the Beck’s scale

into Depression and the Beck’s scale for suicide intentions. • The higher the participants scored the more at risk of

suicide/depression they were.


vulnerable prisoners• At the end of the study it was found that the

experimental group scored higher than the control group.

• They were more at risk of suicide than the control group which did not have a history of self-harm.

• Overall it can be seen how young and newcomers to the prison system who have a history of self-harm are more predisposed to commit suicide than others.

Evaluation points


vulnerable prisonersKey evaluative points•Assessments conducted on arrival and some individuals who self-harm/ have suicidal tendencies may not cope with this particular level of stress initially.•May not be clear if this is state or trait hopelessness/ depressed mood (situation v disposition/individual debate)•Reliability questioned and further research required (you also have the issue of self report method – demand characteristics and socially desirable response.


vulnerable prisonersKey evaluative points•High ecological validity as they used real prisoners in a real prison (good comparison here to Reicher and Haslam or Zimbardo)•Generalisability low as they used a small sample compared to the number of prisoners in jail.•Can not generalise to females as all male sample-In 2012, 4,590 male suicides were registered, compared with 1,391 female

The prison situation and roles / study 3

• Zimbardo

• Reicher and Haslam

• Zimbardo and Haney

The prison situation and roles

• Haney and Zimbardo; The past and future of prison policy in the USA

• This study considers what has happened in US prisons 25 years on from the original Stanford Prison Experiment

• The original goal was to demonstrate the power of institutional environments on people who pass through them (what perspective was identified in this study?)


• Different to Milgram’s study as he looked at the effects on individuals complying with an authority figure’s increasingly severe demands (individual explanation)

• Haney et al was more interested in the situation that people were in


• In the original Stanford study (1973) pathological behaviour was attribute to the prison situation and not by the nature of the individual (agree disagree?)

• This original study was set out to lead to improvements in the system

• In 1998 Haney and Zimbardo presented a paper in the American Psychologist in the changes that had taken place in the US prison system over 25 years.

• They presented 6 points as lessons to be learned.


• There are two parts to the study, summarising the changes (P1) and suggesting changes (P2)

Part 1

• Ronald Reagan’s Republican ‘War on Drugs’ (1980s) led to political pressure to put more criminals behind bars.

• The concept of rehabilitation was discredited – criminals deserved punishment.

• Rigid sentencing, with no possibility of parole.• Many new prisons built, USA imprisons more people

than any other modern nation (2008 prison population 2 million).

• Racial bias in prison population 48% African-Caribbean men although they only represent 6% of the general population.

• Many for drug offences. • Hispanics also over represented.• Introduction of the ‘Supermax’ prison cell.

A ‘Supermax’ prison cell

Part 1

• Haney and Zimbardo argue that the USA is perpetuating (continuing) discrimination against black people and encouraging a dispositional (when its situational) explanation of criminal behaviour.

• The ‘supermax’ cell is another example of a dispositional explanation being used to categorise some prisoners as ‘problem prisoners’. Are they a problem (screening problems)?

Study 1

• A Dispositional explanation sees the cause of criminal behaviour as being entirely due to an individual’s personality, rather than considering the environment which would be a situational explanation.

• Task: - What situations variables or factors might explain the over representation of Blacks in the American penal system?

Part 2 – suggested improvements (6 in total)

• Prisons should be used sparingly as they are psychologically damaging, alternatives should be sought.

• Prisons should take account of individual differences, in particular how a person is likely to react to confinement.

• Rehabilitation programmes are needed to teach prisoners the skills to cope once they are released. For example, anger management programmes, drug and alcohol detox etc

Part 2 – suggested improvements (6 in total)

• Prisoner assessments should include an assessment of situational factors, as well as psychological factors.

• Behaviour should be seen in the context of events or situation.

• Reform needs to come from people outside of the prison system who are empowered to act on it. (Those within the system are not impartial).

• Psychological knowledge should be used to improve the conditions within prisons.

What do you think to these ideas?

After a Guilty Verdict G543 Forensic Psychology (GMN) (1)Imprisonment (planned behaviours,...

Documents

Transcript of After a Guilty Verdict G543 Forensic Psychology (GMN) (1)Imprisonment (planned behaviours,...