Works cited: Literary Reading after 1990

2. Abcarian, R, klotz M., & Cohen S. ed. (2010). Literature: the human experience:

reading and writing. 10th ed. Boston: Bedford.

3. Abety, P. A. (1991). The notional syllabus in literature. In C. Brumfit (ed.) Assessment

in Literature Teaching. London: British Council ELT Documents.

4. Abrams, M. H. (1998). A Glossary of Literary Terms. 7th edn. New York: Harcourt

Brace.

5. Adamson, S. (1998). Literary language. In S. Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge History

of the English Language. Volume IV. 1776–1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

6. Agathocleus, T. and Dean, A. (eds) (2002). Teaching Literature: A Companion.

Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

7. Akil, L. (1999). Pre-reading stage: what else can be done? ACLET Journal. 3(1), pp.

11-13

8. Akyel, A. and Yalçin, E. (1990). Literature in the EFL class: a study of goal-

achievement incongruence. ELT Journal 44 (3): 174–80.

9. Alderson, C.J. and A. Beretta. (1992). Introduction. In J.C. Alderson and A. Beretta

(eds) Evaluating second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press:1-3.

10. Allison, D. (1998). Investigating learners’ course diaries as explorations of language.

Language Teaching Research, 2(1): 24-27.

11. Allison, D. (2002). Approaching English language research. Singapore: Singapore

University Press.

12. Allwright, D. and K. Bailey. (1991). Focus on the language classroom: an

introduction to classroom research for language teachers. New York: Cambridge

University Press.

13. Allwright, R. L. (1990). What do we want teaching materials for? Currents of change.

Oxford: Oxford University Press: 133-147.

14. Almond, M (2005) Teaching English with Drama, Modern English Publishing.

15. Alridge, M. (1995). What do parents expect? Language acquisition in a bilingual

community. Language Awareness, 4(4), 203-220.

16. Andringa, E. (1990). Verbal data on literary understanding. Poetics 19: 231–57.

17. Andringa, E. (1991). Talking about literature in an institutional context: an empirical

approach. Poetics 20: 157–72.

18. Andringa, E. (1994). Literature: empirical studies. In R. E. Asher (ed.) The

Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 2266–70.

19. Applebbe, A., Langer, J.A. , Nystrand, M. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to

developing understanding: classroom instruction and student performance in middle

and high school English. American educational research journal, 40, (3), 685-730.

20. Appleman, D. (2009). Critical encounters in high school English: teaching literary

theory to adolescents. 2nd ed. New York: Teachers College Press.

21. Arnot, F. et al. (1998). Recent research on gender and educational performance

(Online) Available: www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/genderandachievement/data/data_1.2

22. Bailey, K. (2001). Observation. In R.Carter and D. Nunan (eds) The Cambridge guide

to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press: 114-199.

23. Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard

University Press.

24. Barnet, S. (1996). A short guide to writing about literature. (7th ed.). New York:

Harper Collins.

25. Barnett, M. A. (1991). Language and literature. ADFL Bulletin 22 (3): 7–11.

26. Barnhouse Rebecca. Middle Ages in Literature for Youth. Rowman & Littlefield.

27. Barry, P. (1995) Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory.

Manchester: Manchester University Press.

28. Barton, A. (1998). Unlikely linguists? Raising achievement in all-boy teaching groups.

The Linguist, 37(3), pp. 80-83.

29. Basnett, S. (2005). Literature teaching in the Twenty-First century: A hopeless

endeavour or the start of something new. The Cambridge Quarterly, 34, 203-212.

Retrieved November 3, 2006, from http:// camqtly.oxfordjournals.org/

30. Bassnett, S. (1993). Comparative Literature: A Critical Introduction. Oxford:

Blackwell.

31. Bassnett, S. (1994). Teaching British cultural studies: reflections on the why and how.

Journal for the Study of British Cultures, 1(1), 63-74.

32. Bassnett, S. and P. Grundy. (1993). Language through literature. London: Longman.

33. Bassnett, S and A. Mountford. (1993). British studies: designing and developing

programmes outside Britain. London: The British Council.

34. Beach, R. (2000). Critical issues: Reading and responding to literature at the level of

activity. Journal of Literacy Research. Retrieved November 15, 2006, from

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3785/is_200006/ai_n8889774

35. Bean, J. C. (1996). Engaging ideas. The professor’s guide to integrating writing:

critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

36. Belsey, C. (2001). The future of English studies. Literature Matters 30: 8–11.

37. Bennet, A., & Royle, N. (1995). An introduction to literature, criticism and theory:

Key critical concepts. London: Prentice Hall & Harvester Wheatsheaf.

38. Bennett, A. and Royle, N. (1999) An Introduction to Literature, Criticism and Theory.

2nd edn. London: Prentice-Hall.

39. Bennett, T. (1990). Outside Literature. London: Routledge.

40. Benton, M. (1993). Reading and Teaching Literature. Centre for Language Education,

University of Southampton, Occasional Paper 13.

41. Beretta, A. (1992). Evaluation of language education: an overview. In J.C. Alderson

and A. Beretta (eds) Evaluating second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press. 5-20.

42. Berga, M.(1999). Fallen angels: on reading landscape poetry. Language Awareness,

8(1), 51-57.

43. Bernardo, A. (1999). Literacy, decontextualised thought and intellectualisation of

language. Literacy, 30(20), 1-13.

44. Bernhardt, E. B. (1995). Teaching literature or teaching students? ADFL Bulletin 26

(2): 5–6.

45. Bertens, H. (2001). Literary theory: The basics. London: Routledge.

46. Bhatia, T. 1982. English and the vernaculars of India: contact and change. Applied

Linguistics, 3(3), 235-245.

47. Bhatt, K. (1995). Telescoping the past six years of the CBSE-ELT project. In R. K.

Agnihothri and A. L. Khanna (eds) English language teaching in India. New Delhi:

Sage publications. 326-333.

48. Blakolo, M., & Afemikhe, O.A. (2002). The effect of literature based reading on

gifted students in Botswana. Research in education. Retrieved November 11, 200-6,

from http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3765/is_ 200211/ai_n 9100207

49. Bleich, D. (2001). ‘The materiality of language and the pedagogy of exchange’,

Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and

Culture, 1(1): 117–41.

50. Bortolussi, M. and Dixon, P. (1996). The effects of formal training on literary

reception. Poetics 23: 471–87.

51. Bortolussi, M. and Dixon, P. (2003). Psychonarratology: Foundations for the

Empirical Study of Literary Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

52. Brandt, C. (1999). The Epic of Gilgamesh: In the high school writing classroom. In C.

Edgar, & R. Padgett (Eds.), Classics in the classroom: using great literature to teach

writing (pp. 10-12). New York: Teachers and Writers Collaborative.

53. Brandvik. Mary Lou . English Teacher's Survival Guide. Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.

54. Bredella, L. (2000). Literary texts and intercultural understanding. In M. Byram (ed.)

Routledge Encyclopaedia of Language Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge,

pp. 382–7.

55. Bredella, L. and Delanoy, W. (1996). Challenges of Literary Texts in the Foreign

Language Classroom. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.

56. Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language

pedagogy. New York: Longman.

57. Brumfit, C. (ed.) (1991). Assessment in Literature Teaching. London: Macmillan.

58. Brumfit, C. and Benton, M. (eds.) (1992). Teaching Literature: A World Perspective.

(Review of English Language Teaching 2: 3). London: Macmillan

59. Burden, P. (2000). The use of ‘only English’ in a learner-centred university classroom

in Japan. RELC Journal, 13(1), 139-149.

60. Burke, M. (2003). Literature as parable. In J. Gavins, & G. Steen (Eds.), Cognitive

poetics in practice (pp.115 - 128). London: Routledge.

61. Burns, A and S. Hood. (1998). Teacher’s voices, Vol.3: teaching critical literacy.

Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research. (NCELTR)

62. Burton, J. (1991). The teacher as curriculum developer: Sydney: NCELTR.

63. Butler, L. S. J. (1991). Registering the Difference: Reading Literature through

Register. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

64. Byrd, P. (1995). Materials writers guide. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

65. Callaghan, M. (1998). An investigation into the causes of boys’ underachievement in

French. Language Learning Journal, 17, 2-7.

66. Candlin, C. N. (1996). General Editor’s Introduction to R. Carter and J. McRae (eds.)

Language, Literature and the Teacher. London: Longman, pp. x–xvi.

67. Carey-Webb, A. (2001). Literature and lives: a response-based, cultural studies

approach to teaching English. Urbana, Ill: NCTE.

68. Carter. R., & Long, M.N. (1991). Teaching literature: Longman handbooks for

language teachers. New York: Longman.

69. Carter, R. (1994). Literary language. In R. E. Asher (ed.) The Encyclopaedia of

Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 2247–9.

70. Carter, R. (1996). Look both ways before crossing: developments in the language and

literature classroom. In R. Carter and J. McRae (eds.) Language, Literature and the

Learner: Creative Classroom Practice. London: Longman, pp. 1–15.

71. Carter, R. (1999). Common language: corpus, creativity and cognition. Language and

Literature 8 (3): 195–216.

72. Carter, R. and Long, M. N. (1990). Testing literature in EFL classes: tradition and

innovation. ELT Journal 44 (3): 215–21.

73. Carter, R. and Long, M. N. (1990) Teaching Literature. Longman Handbooks for

Language Teachers. Harlow: Longman.

74. Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. (1995) Discourse and creativity: bridging the gap

between language and literature. In G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer (eds.) Principle and

Practice in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 303–21.

75. Carter, R. and McRae, J. (1996). The Penguin Guide to English Literature: Britain

and Ireland. London: Penguin.

76. Carter, R. and McRae, J. (2001). The Routledge History of Literature in English. 2nd

edn. London and New York: Routledge.

77. Carter, R. A. 1996. Look both ways before crossing: developments in the language

and literature classroom. In R. Carter and J. McRae (eds) Language, literature and the

learner. London: Longman. 1-15.

78. Carter, R.A. (1998). Vocabulary: Applied linguistic perspectives. London: Routledge.

79. Carter, R.A. (1999). Common language: corpus, creativity and cognition. Language

and Literature, 8(3), 195-216.

80. Carter, R.A. and M. Long. (1991). Teaching literature. New York: Longman.

81. Carter, R.A. and M. J. McCarthy. (1995). Grammar and the spoken language. Applied

Linguistics, 16(2), 141-158.

82. Carter, R.A. and J. McRae. (1996). Introduction. In R. Carter and J. McRae (eds)

Language, literature and the learner. London: Longman. xix-xxviii.

83. Carter, R.A. et al.(1998). Telling tails: grammar, the spoken language and materials

development. In B. Tomlinson (ed.) Materials development in language teaching.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 67-86.

84. Carter, R & McRae, J [Eds] (1996) Language, Literature and the Learner: Creative classroom practice, Longman.

85. Carter, R and Long, M (1991) Teaching literature, Longman.86. Cayab, E. and G. M. Jacobs. (1999). Making small groups work via co-operative

learning. ACLET Journal, 3(2), 27-32.

87. CBSE [Central Board of Secondary Education, India] 1998a: Interact in English Class

IX Grammar Workbook: New Delhi

88. CBSE 1998b: Interact in English Class IX Literature Reader: New Delhi

89. CBSE 1998c: Interact in English Class IX Main Coursebook: New Delhi

90. CBSE 1998d: Interact in English Class X Grammar Workbook: New Delhi

91. CBSE 1998e: Interact in English Class X Literature Reader: New Delhi

92. CBSE 1998f: Interact in English Class X Main Coursebook: New Delhi

93. Chambers, F. (1997). Seeking consensus in coursebook evaluation. ELT Journal,

51(1), 29-35.

94. Chan, P. (1999). Literature, language awareness and EFL. Language Awareness, 8(1),

38-49.

95. Church, G. W. (1997). The significance of Louise Rosenblatt on the field of teaching

literature. Inquiry 1 (1): 71–7; reproduced at

http://www.vccaedu.org/inquiry/inquiryspring97/ i11chur.html

96. Clark, M.M. (2009). Beyond critical thinking, Pedagogy, 9 (2), 325-330.

97. Clark, U. and Zyngier, S. (2003). Towards a pedagogical stylistics. Language and

Literature 12 (4): 339–51.

98. Cohen, A. (1995). In which language should multi-linguals think? Language Culture

and Curriculum, 8(2), 99-113.

99. Coleman, H. (1992). Moving the goalposts: project evaluation in practice. In

J.C.Alderson and A Beretta (eds) Evaluating second language education. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press. 223-246.

100. Coles Robert. Teaching Stories ..Modern Library

101. Collie, J. and S. Slater. (1993). Short stories: for creative language classrooms.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

102. Collie, J & Slater, S (1987) Literature in the Language Classroom, CUP.103. Cook, G. (1994). Discourse and literature: the interplay of form and mind.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

104. Cook, G. (1996). Language play in English. In J. Maybin and N. Mercer (eds)

Using English from conversation to canon. London: Routledge. 198-227.

105. Corden, R. (2000). Reading-writing connections: the importance of interactive

discourse. English in Education, 34(2), 35-44.

106. Court, F. (1992) Institutionalizing English Literature: The Culture and Politics

of Literary Study. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

107. Crawford, R. (1992). Devolving English Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

108. Crystal, D. (1996). The English language today. In D. Graddol, D. Leith and J.

Swann (eds) English: history, diversity and change. London: Routledge. 29-32.

109. Culler, J. (1975/2002). Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the

Study of Literature. 2nd edn. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

110. Culler, J. (1981/2002). The Pursuit of Signs. Semiotics, Literature,

Deconstruction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

111. Cunningsworth, A. (1996). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann.

112. Davis, J. N. (1992). Reading literature in the foreign language: the

comprehension/ response connection. The French Review, 65 (3), 359-370. Retrieved

December 20, 2006, from http://www.jstor.org/

113. Davis, J. N. (1992) Reading literature in the foreign language: the

comprehension/ response connection. The French Review 65 (3): 359–70.

114. Davis, J. N., Kline, R. R., Carbón Gorell, L. and Hsieh, G. (1992) Readers and

foreign languages: a survey of undergraduate attitudes toward the study of literature.

Modern Language Journal 76 (3): 320–32.

115. Daw, P. (2000). The gaps I mean – subject knowledge and the training of

English teachers. English in Education, 34(2), 3-15.

116. Day, J., Speigel, D.L. McLellan, J., & Brown, V.B. (2002). Moving forward

with literature circles. New York: Teaching resources/ Scholastic.

117. Deignan, A., D. Gabrys and A. Solska. 1997. Teaching English metaphors

using crosslinguistic awareness-raising activities. ELT Journal, 51(4), 352-359.

118. Delanoy, W. (1993) ‘Come to Mecca’. Assessing a literary text’s potential for

intercultural learning. In W. Delanoy etal. (eds.) Experiencing a Foreign Culture.

Tuebingen: Narr, pp. 275–99.

119. Delbanco, A. (1999) ‘The decline and fall of literature’, New York Review of

Books, 4, November: 32–8.

120. Den Otter, A. G. (1991) Literary criticism and receptive data rather than

interpretive truth. Poetics 20 (4): 363–90.

121. Derrida, J. (1992) Acts of Literature. ed. D. Attridge. New York and London:

Routledge.

122. Di Yanni, R. (2002). Literature: Reading fiction, poetry, and drama (5th ed.).

New York: McGraw Hill.

123. Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., Twilley, L. C. and Leung, A. (1993) Literary

processing and interpretation: towards empirical foundations. Poetics 22 (1): 5–33.

124. Drabble, M. (ed.) (2000) The Oxford companion to English literature. 6th ed.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

125. Dresang, E.T., & McClelland, K. (1999). Radical change: Digital age literature

and learning. Theory into Practice, 38, 160-167. Retrieved March 24, 2006, from

http://www.jstor.org/

126. Duff, A. and Maley, A. (1990) Literature: Oxford English Resource Books for

Teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

127. Duff, A & Maley, A (2000) Drama Techniques in Language Learning, CUP128. Duff, A & Maley, A (2007) Literature (Resource Books for Teachers), OUP.129. Duff, A and A. Maley. (1990). Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

130. Durant, A. and Fabb, N. (1990) Literary Studies in Action. London: Routledge.

131. Eaglestone (2000) Doing English. A Guide for Literature Students. 2nd edn.

London and New York: Routledge.

132. Eaglestone, R. (2002) Doing English: A Guide for Literature Students.

London: Routledge.

133. Eagleton, T. (2008). Literary theory: an introduction, 3rd ed. Minneapolis, MN:

University of Minnesota Press.

134. Earthman, E. (1992). Creating the virtual work: readers’ processes in

understanding literary texts. Research in the teaching of English, 26(4), 351-384.

135. Easthope, A. (1991) Literary into Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.

136. Edmondson, W. (1997). The role of literature in foreign language learning and

teaching: some valid assumptions and invalid arguments. AILA Review 12: 42–55.

137. Edwin, M. (1993). The teaching of literature in English in Malaysian secondary

schools. In C. Brumfit and M. Benton (eds.) Teaching Literature: A World

Perspective. London: Macmillan, pp. 44–9.

138. Edwin, M. (1992). Extension activities in the literature classroom. The English

Teacher, 21, 224-232.

139. Edwin, M. (1996). Common ground: incorporating new literatures in English

in language and literature teaching. In R. Carter and J. McRae (eds) Language,

literature and the learner. London: Longman. 204-216.

140. Elliott, R. (1990) Encouraging reader-response to literature in ESL situations.

ELTJ 44 (3): 191–8.

141. Elliott, R. (1990). Encouraging reader-response to literature in ESL situations.

ELT Journal, 44(3), 191-198.

142. Ellis, J. (1997) Literature Lost: Social Agendas and the Corruption of the

Humanities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

143. Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT

Journal, 51(1), 1-10.

144. Ellis, R. (1998). The evaluation of communicative tasks. In B. Tomlinson (ed.)

Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press. 217-238.

145. Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language

Teaching Research, (4) 5, 193-220.

146. Fabb, N. (1997) Linguistics and Literature. Oxford: Blackwell.

147. Fairclough, N. 1992. Critical language awareness. London: Longman.

148. Farris, C. (2004). Teaching the teaching of literature. Peer Review. Retrieved

November 10, 2006, from http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa4115/is_

200404/ai_n9465079

149. Filene, P.G. (2005). The joy of teaching. Chapel Hill, NC: University Of North

Carolina Press.

150. Flowerdew, J and L. Miller. (2000). Chinese lecturers’ perceptions, problems

and strategies in lecturing in English to Chinese speaking students. RELC Journal,

13(1), 116-137.

151. Folger Shakespeare Library. (2006). Shakespeare set free: teaching Twelfth

Night Othello. New York: Simon & Shuster.

152. Forceville, C.(1996). Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s reading

images: the grammar of visual design. Language and Literature, 8(2), 163-177.

153. Foster, T.C. (2003). How to read literature like a professor: A lively and

entertaining guide to reading between the lines. New York: Harper Collins.

154. Freeman, D. (1993). Read ‘reading the language itself’. Language and

Literature, 2(2), 129-133.

155. Gallagher, K. (2004). Deeper reading: comprehension challenging Texts, 4-12.

New York: Stenhouse.

156. Garvin, P. (ed.) A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure and

Style. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

157. Ghosn, I. (2002). Four good reasons to use literature in primary school ELT.

ELT Journal, 56(2), 172-179.

158. Ghosn, I (2002) ‘Four good reasons to use literature in primary school ELT' in ELT Journal, 56: 172-179, Oxford University Press.

159. Gibson Rex. Teaching Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press.

160. Gill, S. (1995). Pass or fail: male or female? what part do attitudinal factors

play in male underachievement in the Bruneian junior certificate of education

examination? Available at: http://www.surrey.ac.uk/ELI/gills.html.

161. Gilroy, M. and Parkinson, B. (1997) Teaching literature in a foreign language.

Language Teaching 29: 213–25.

162. Gilroy, M. and B. Parkinson. (1997). Teaching literature in a foreign language.

Language Teaching, (29), 213-225.

163. Goh, C. (1997). Metacognitive awareness and second language listeners. ELT

Journal, 51(4), 361-369.

164. Goh, S. T. (1991). Higher order reading comprehension skills in literature

learning and teaching at the lower secondary school level in Singapore. RELC Journal

22 (2): 29–43.

165. Graddol, D. (2001). English in the future. In A. Burns and C. Coffin (eds)

Analysing English in a global context. London: Routledge. 26-37.

166. Graff, G. (2003). Clueless in academe: how schooling obscures the life of the

mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

167. Graff, G. (2003) ‘Conflict clarifies: a response’, Pedagogy: Critical

Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 3(2): 266–

73. (‘Symposium: Teaching the Conflicts at Twenty Years’: 245–75.)

168. Graff, G. (1995) Literature Against Itself. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.

169. Graff, G & Birkenstein C. (2009). They say/ I say: the moves that mater in

academic writing. New York: W.W.Norton And Co.

170. Graves, B. and Frederiksen, C. H. (1991). Literary expertise in the description

of a fictional narrative. Poetics 20: 1–26.

171. Gray, J. (2000). The ELT coursebook as a cultural artefact: how teachers

censor and adapt. ELT Journal, 54(3), 274-283.

172. Gregory, M. (2001) ‘Curriculum, pedagogy, and teacherly ethos’, Pedagogy:

Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture,

1(1): 69–90.

173. Griffith, K. (1999). Hamlet meets Frankenstein: Exploring the possible worlds

of classic literature. In C. Edgar, & R. Padgett (Eds.), Classics in the classroom: using

great literature to teach writing (pp. 111-119). New York: Teachers and Writers

Collaborative.

174. Groeben, N. (2001) Literary creativity. In D. Schram and G. Steen (eds.) The

Psychology and Sociology of Literature. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 17–34.

175. Grossman, P.L. (2001). Research on the teaching of literature: Finding a place.

In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 4th ed. (pp. 416-432). New

York: MacMillan.

176. GSI teaching & resource Centre, teaching guide for graduate student

instructors. Available online at http://gsi.berkeley.edu/teachingguide/tghome.html

177. Guerin, W.L., Labor, E., Morgan, L., Reesman, J.C., & Willingham, J.R.

(2005). A handbook of critical approaches to literature (5th ed.). New York: Oxford

University Press.

178. Guillory, J. (1993) Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon

Formation. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.

179. Guillroy, J. (2008). On the presumption of knowing how to read.ADE Bulletin,

145, 8-11.

180. Halasz, L. (1991) Emotional affect and reminding in literary processing.

Poetics 20: 247–72.

181. Hall, G. (2005) Literature as social practice. In S. Goodman and K. Hadoran

(eds.) The Art of English Literary Creativity. London: Routledge/Open University, ch.

9.

182. Hall, G. M. (1999). Awareness, response and what might lie beyond: a critical

linguistic perspective on literature as a social practice and the implications of this

perspective for the use of literature in education. Language Awareness 8(1), 3-14.

183. Hall, G (2005) Literature in Language Education, Palgrave Macmillan. 184. Hanauer, D. (1997b) Reading poetry and surface information recall. In S.

Tötösy and I. S (eds.) The Systemic and Empirical Approach to Literature and Culture

as Theory and Application. University of Alberta and Siegen University: Lumis, pp.

453–67.

185. Hanauer, D. (2001b) What we know about reading poetry: theoretical positions

and empirical research. In D. Schram and G. Steen (eds.) The Psychology and

Sociology of Literature. Amsterdam and Phladelphia: Benjamins.

186. Hanauer, D. (1997). Poetry reading in the second language classroom.

Language Awareness, 6(1), 2 –16.

187. Harker, W.J. (1994). “plain sense” and “poetic significance:” tenth-grade

readers reading two poems. Poetics, 22, 199-218.

188. Harris, V. (1998). Making boys make progress. Language Learning Journal,

18, 56-62.

189. Hartman, D. (1995). Eight readers reading: the intertextual links of proficient

readers reading multiple passages. Reading research quarterly, 30(30), 520-561.

190. Henning, S. D. (1992) Assessing literary interpretation skills. Foreign

Language Annals 25 (4): 339–55.

191. Herz. S. k., & Gallo, D.R. (1996). From Hinton to Hamlet: Building Bridges

between Young Adult Literature and the Classics. Greenwood.

192. Hirvela, A. (1996). Reader-response and ELT. ELT Journal, 50 (2) 127-134.

193. HMSO (1995) English in the Curriculum. London: HMSO.

http://www.nc.uk.net/. Hoffstaedter-Kohn, P. (1991) Linguistic competence and poetic

text processing. In E. Ibsch, D. Schram and G. Steen (eds.) Empirical Studies of

Literature. Rodopi: Amsterdam, pp. 87–94.

194. Holmes, J. (1992). An introduction to sociolinguistics. New York: Longman.

195. Holmes, V & Moulton, M (2001) Writing Simple Poems, CUP.196. Hoorn, J. F. (2001) A renaissance perspective on the empirical study of

literature. In D. Schram and G. Steen (eds.) The Psychology and Sociology of

Literature. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 129–44.

197. Hunt, R. A. (1996) Literacy as dialogic involvement: methodological

implications for the empirical study of literary reading. In R. J. Kreuz and M. S.

McNealy (eds.) Empirical Approaches to Literature and Aesthetics. Advances in

Discourse Processes, Vol. 52. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

198. Hutchings, W. and O’Rourke, K. (2002) ‘Problem-based learning in literary

studies’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 1(1): 73–83.

199. Ibsch, E., Schram, D. and Steen, G. (eds.) (1991) Empirical Studies of

Literature. Proceedings of the Second IGEL Conference, Amserdam, 1989.

Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

200. Insko, J. (2003) ‘Generational canons’, Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to

Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 3(3): 341–58.

201. Isaac, A. (2002) ‘Opening up’ literary cloze. Language and Education 16 (1):

18–36.

202. Jackendoff, R. 1993. Patterns in the mind: language and human nature.

London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

203. Jackson, T. (2003). Questioning interdisciplinary: Cognitive science,

evolutionary psychology, and literary criticism. Poetics Today, 21 (2), 191-205.

Retrieved March 14, 2006, from http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/poetics_today/

204. Jago Carol) Classics in the Classroom. Heinmann .

205. Jago Carol, and James Strickland. With Rigor for All: Teaching the Classics to

Contemporary Students. Heinemann.

206. Jay, G. S. (1997) American Literature and the Culture Wars. Ithaca, NY:

Cornell University Press.

207. Joshi, S. (ed.) (1991) Rethinking English: Essays in Literature, Language,

History. New Delhi: Trianka.

208. Kachru, B. 1992. Models for non-native Englishes. In B. Kachru (ed.) The

other tongue: English across cultures. Urbana, Ill: University of Illinois Press. 48-74.

209. Kachru, B. 1997. World Englishes 2000: resources for research and teaching.

In L.E. Smith and M.L.Forman (eds) World Englishes 2000 literary studies east and

west. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press. 209-251.

210. Kachru, B. and C.L. Nelson. 2001. World Englishes. In A. Burns and C. Coffin

(eds) Analysing English in a global context. London: Routledge. 9-23.

211. Kennedy, C. 1995. ‘Wish you were here’: little texts and language awareness.

Language Awareness, 4(3), 161-172.

212. Kim, M. (2004) Literature discussions in adult L2 learning. Language and

Education 18 (2): 145–66.

213. Knapp, J.V. (2004). Current conversations in the teaching of college level

literature. Style. Retrieved November 11, 2006, from http://www.findarticles.com/p/

articles/mi_m2342/is_1_38/ai_n13774332

214. Kneepkens, E. W. E. M. and Zwaan, R. A. (1994) Emotions and literary text

comprehension. Poetics 23: 125–38.

215. Kramsch, C. and Kramsch, O. (2000) The avatars of literature in language

study. Modern Language Journal 84: 553–73.

216. Kramsch, C. 1995. The cultural component of language teaching. Language,

Culture and Curriculum, 8(2), 83-92.

217. Kramsch, C., A. Cain and Elizabeth Murphy – Lejeune. 1996. Why should

language teachers teach culture? Language Culture and Curriculum, 9(1), 99-107.

218. Kramsch, C (1993) Context and Culture in Language Teaching, OUP.219. Krishnaswamy, S. and T. Sriraman. 1995. English teaching in India: past,

present and future. In R. K. Agnihothri and A. L. Khanna (eds) English language

teaching in India: New Delhi: Sage Publications. 31-57.

220. Lambert, R. and E. Shohamy. 2000. Language policy and pedagogy.

Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

221. Langer, J. A. (1990) The process of understanding: reading for literary and

informative purposes. Research in the Teaching of English 24 (3): 229–60.

222. Lanser, s.b. (1994). “the t-word: theory as trial and transformation of the

undergraduate classroom.” In teaching contemporary theory to undergraduates, eds.

Sadoff and cain. Modern language association.

223. Lazar, G. (1993) Literature and Language Teaching: A Guide for Teachers

and Trainers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

224. Lazar, G. 1993. Literature and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

225. Lazar, G. 1994. Using literature at lower levels. ELT Journal, 40(2), 115-124.

226. Lazar,G (1993) Literature and Language Teaching, CUP.227. Lehman, B. A. and Scharer, P. L. (1996) Reading alone, talking together: The

role of discussion in developing literary awareness. The Reading Teacher 50 (1): 26–

35.

228. Leland, L., & Harste ( ) . Teaching children’s literature: it’s critical. New York:

Rutledge.

229. Levine, G. (2001) ‘The two nations’, Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to

Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 1(1): 7–19.

230. Lim, C. 2000. The English language syllabus 2001: change and continuity.

Teaching of English Language and Literature, 16(2), 9-14.

231. Lindblom, K. (2003). Teaching English in the world: Literature and public

discourse in times of global unrest. The English Journal, 39(1), 96-99. Retrieved

December 7, 2006, from http:// www.jstor.org/

232. Liskin-Gasparro, J. E. (1999) Teaching of literature in foreign language

programs bibliography.

http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~ridavis/aausc/archive/pragadmin/ lit-read.html.

233. Louw, B. (1997) The role of corpora in critical literary appreciation. In A.

Wichmann et al. (eds.), Teaching and Language Corpora. Harlow: Longman, pp.

240–51.

234. Lynn, S. (1994). Texts and contexts: Writing about literature with critical

theory. New York: HarperCollins.

235. MacRae, J. (1991) Literature with a Small ‘l’. London: Macmillan.

236. Maley, A. 1992. Fables, foibles and follies. In M. Tariniya. (eds) English

language teaching: theory and practice. Madras: T.R. Publications. 39-52

237. Maley, A. 1993. Short and sweet. Vol. 1. London: Penguin.

238. Maley, A. 1995. Materials writing and tacit knowledge. In A.Hidalgo and G.

M. Jacobs (eds) Getting started: materials writers on materials writing. Singapore:

SEAMEO Language Centre. 220-239.

239. Maley, A. 1996. Short and sweet. Vol. 2. London: Penguin.

240. Maley, A & Duff, A (1989) The Inward Ear: Poetry in the language classroom, CUP.

241. Maley, A & Moulding, S (1985) Poem into Poem: Reading and writing poems with students of English. CUP.

242. Maley, A (2001) ‘Literature in the language classroom' in The Cambridge Guide to Teaching ESOL, Cambridge University Press.

243. Mao, Sihui. 1996. ‘Interfacing’ language and literature: with special reference

to the teaching of British cultural studies. In R. Carter and J. McRae (eds) Language,

literature and the learner. London: Longman. 166-184.

244. Margolin, U. 1996. Telling our story: on ‘we’ literary narratives. Language and

Literature, 5(2), 116-133.

245. Marshall, J. (2000) Research on response to literature. In M. L. Kamil et al.,

Handbook of Reading Research. Volume III. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

246. Martin, A. L. and Laurie, I. (1993) Student views about the contribution of

literary and cultural content to language teaching at the intermediate level. Foreign

Language Annals 26 (2): 188–207.

247. Masny, D. and Sue-san Ghahremani-Ghajar. 1999. Weaving multiple literacies:

Somali children and their teachers in the context of school culture. Language, Culture

and Curriculum, 12(1), 72-93.

248. Mathur, P. 1995. Curriculum change in process: the case of an ELT project. In

R. K Agnihothri and A.L. Khanna (eds) English language teaching in India. New

Delhi: Sage Publications. 301-315.

249. Maubach, A. and C. Morgan. 2001. The relationship between gender and

learning styles amongst ‘A’ level modern languages students. Language Learning

Journal, 23, 41-47.

250. McCarthy, M. J. and R. A. Carter 1995. Spoken grammar: what is it and how

can we teach it? ELT Journal, 49(3), 207-218.

251. McCurrie, M. K. (2004) ‘From the edges to the center: pedagogy’s role in

redefining English departments’, Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching

Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 4(1): 43–64.

252. McDonough, J. and C. Shaw. 1993. Materials and methods in ELT: a teacher’s

guide. London: Blackwell.

253. McGann, J. with Griffith, J., Kremer, J., Kroeger, R. L., Moriarty, B., Pikler, J.,

Simpson, B. and Stephenson, K. (2001) ‘ ‘‘Reading fiction/teaching fiction’’: a

pedagogical experiment’, Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature,

Language, Composition, and Culture, 1(1): 143–65.

254. McGrath, I. 2002. Materials evaluation and design for language teaching.

Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

255. McKeachie, W. J., & Gibbs, G. (1998). Teaching tips: strategies, research, and

theory for college and university teachers. New York: D.C. Heath & Co.

256. McKeachie, W. J., & Svinicki, M. (2006). Teaching Tips: strategies, research,

and theory for college and university teachers, 12th ed. Houghton Mifflin.

257. McLaughlin, D. 1997. The clash of cultures: learning through English in Papua

New Guinea. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 10(2), 89-105

258. McMahon Robert. Thinking About Literature: New Ideas for High School

Teachers. Heinemann.

259. McRae, J. (1996) Representational language learning: from language

awareness to text awareness. In R. Carter and J. McRae (eds.) Language, Literature

and the Learner. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.

260. McRae, J. 1991. Literature with a small ‘l’. Basingstoke: MEP/Macmillan.

261. McRae, J. 1992a. The mere understanding: representation reading in practice.

The English Teacher, 2, October, 33-44.

262. McRae, J. 1992b. Wordsplay. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

263. McRae, J. 1996. Representational language learning: from language awareness

to text awareness. In R. Carter and J. McRae (eds) Language, literature and the

learner. London: Longman. 16-40.

264. McRae, J. 1998. The language of poetry. London: Routledge.

265. McRae, J. and L. Pantaleoni. 1990. Chapter and verse. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

266. McRae, J (1994) Literature with a small 'l', Macmillan Education. 267. McRae, J (1998) The Language of Poetry, Routledge.268. Mee, Yin. 1990. Teaching listening – an overview. The English Teacher, 19,

65-71.

269. Mehrothra, R. 2000. Decolonizing English teaching in India. RELC Journal,

31(2), 134-144.

270. Miall, D. and Kuiken, D. (1994) Foregrounding, defamiliarization and affect:

response to literary stories. Poetics 22: 389–407.

271. Miall, D. and Kuiken, D. (1999) What is literariness? Three components of

literary reading. Discourse Processes 28: 121–38.

272. Miall, D. S. and Kuiken, D. (2001) Shifting perspectives: readers’ feelings and

literary response. In W. van Peer and S. Chatman (eds.) New Perspectives on

Narrative Perspective. New York: SUNY Press.

273. Miall, D. and D. Kuiken. 1999. What is literariness? three components of

literary reading. Discourse Processes. 28(2), 121-138.

274. Miller, J. H. (2002) On Literature. London: Routledge.

275. Milner, A. (1996) Literature, Culture and Society. London: University College

London Press.

276. Montgomery, M. et al. 2000. Ways of reading. London: Routledge.

277. Naidoo, B. (1994) Through whose eyes? Exploring racism through literature

with white students. In D. Graddol, J. Maybin and B. Stierer (eds.) Researching

Language and Literacy in Social Context. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters and the

Open University.

278. Nardoccio, E. F. (1992) Reader Response to Literature: The Empirical

Dimension. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

279. National Endowment for the Arts (2004) Reading at Risk: A Survey of Literary

Reading in America. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts (Research

Division Report No. 46). Available at: http://www.nea.gov/pub/ ReadingAtRisk.pdf.

280. Nescente, R. 2001. Student anxiety. English Teaching Professional, 19, 18-21.

281. Nunan, D. 1992. Research methods in language learning. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

282. Nunan, D. 1999. Second language teaching and learning. Boston MA: Heinle

and Heinle.

283. Nystrand, M. & Gamoran, A. (1991). Intsructional discourse, student

engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the teaching of English, 25(3),

261-290.

284. Nystrand, M. and Gamoran, A. (1991) Instructional discourse, student

engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English 25 (3):

261–90.

285. O’Neill, R. 1990. Why use textbooks? ELT Journal, 36(2), 104-111.

286. O’Sullivan, R. 1991. Literature in the language classroom. The English

Teacher, 20, 53-59.

287. Onukagou, C. 1997. The whole language’ approach to literacy education in the

third world: the Nigerian experience. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 10(3), 186-

199.

288. Palmer, C., & den Hartog, D. (2005). Teaching English literature in 2004: An

Australian comment. The Cambridge Quarterly, 34, 285-295. Retrieved November 10,

2006, from http://camqtly.oxfordjournals.org/

289. Palmer, p. (1997). The courage to teach. San Francisco, Ca: Jossey Bass.

290. Paran, A (2006) Literature in Language Teaching and Learning, TESOL.291. Paran, A (2007) ‘Literature at Length' in English Teaching Professional,

September, Issue 52, Modern English Publishing. 292. Parkinson, B. and H.R Thomas. 2000. Teaching literature in a second

language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

293. Parkinson, B & Reid-Thomas, H (2000) Teaching literature in a second language, Edinburgh University Press.

294. Pennington, M. 1995. Factors shaping the introduction of process writing in

Hong Kong secondary schools. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 8(1), 51-34.

295. Pennycook, A. 1998. English and the discourses of colonialism. London:

Routledge.

296. Perkins, D. (1992) Is Literary History Possible? Baltimore: Johns Hopkins

University Press.

297. Picken, J. (2005) Helping FL learners to make sense of literature with

metaphor awareness raising. Language Awareness 14.

298. Pilkington, A. (1994) Against literary reading conventions. In R. Sell and P.

Verdonk (eds.) Literature and the New Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

299. Pison, R. 2000. Integrating language and literature: an approach to teaching

literary texts. ACLET Journal, 4 (1), 14-19.

300. Pope, R. (1995) Textual Intervention: Critical and Creative Strategies for

Literary Studies. London: Routledge.

301. Pope, R. (2002) The English Studies Book: An Introduction to Language,

Literature and Culture. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.

302. Pope, R (1995) Textual Intervention: Critical and creative strategies for literary studies, Routledge.

303. Pulverness, A (2003) ‘Literature' in English Teaching Professional, October, Issue 29, Modern English Publishing.

304. Pulverness, A (2007) ‘The ghost at the banquet' in English Teaching Professional, May, Issue 50, Modern English Publishing.

305. Rajan, B. 1999. The imperial temptation. In B. Rajan and E. Sauer (eds) Milton

and the imperial vision. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press. 294-314.

306. Rajan, R. S. (ed.) (1992) The Lie of the Land: English Literary Studies in India.

Delhi: Oxford University Press.

307. Rea-Dickens, P. and K. Germaine. 1992. Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

308. Report of the ministry of education. 1998-1999. British Columbia: Government

of British Columbia. 1-4.

309. Ricardson, A. & Steen, F.F. (2002). Literature and cognitive revolution: An

introduction. Poetics Today, 23, pp.1-8. Retrieved October 6, 2006, from http://

poeticstoday.dukejournals.org/

310. Rice, P. and Waugh, P. (eds.) (2001) Modern Literary Theory: A Reader. 4th

edn. London: Arnold.

311. Richards, I. A. (1924) Principles of Literary Criticism. London: Routledge &

Kegan Paul.

312. Richardson, A. (1994) Literature, Education and Romanticism: Reading as

Social Practice, 1780–1832. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

313. Richter, D H., Ed. (1999). Falling into theory: conflicting views on reading

literature, New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

314. Ridgway, T. 2000. Listening strategies – I beg your pardon? ELT Journal,

54(2), 179-185.

315. Rivkin, J., & Ryan, M. (2002). Literary Theory: An Introduction (Rev. ed.).

Massachusetts: Blackwell.

316. Rizzo, R. A. (1993) in C. Brumfit and M. Benton (eds.) Teaching Literature: A

World Perspective (Review of English Language Teaching 2: 3). London: Macmillan

Modern English Publications and The British Council.

317. Robinowitz, P. J. & Smith, M. W. (1998). Authorizing readers: Resistance and

respect in the teaching of literature. New York: Teachers College Press.

318. Rodgers, J. 1990. ‘The World of Sick Proper’. Currents of change in language

teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

319. Rose, A. 1995. Lewis Carroll’s ‘Jabberwocky’: non-sense not non-sense.

Language and Literature, 4(1), 1-13.

320. Rosenblatt, L. (1994) The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional

Theory of the Literary Work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press.

321. Rosenblatt, L. (1995) Transactional theory of the literary work. In C. R.

Cooper (ed.)

322. Rosslyn, F. (2005) Literature for the masses: The English literature degree in

2004. The Cambridge Quarterly, 34(1), 313-322. Retrieved October 5, 2006, from

http:// camqtly.oxfordjournals.org/

323. Ryan, M. (2004). Literary theory: A practical introduction (2nd ed.).

Massachusetts: Blackwell.

324. Sam, W. 1990. Drama in teaching English as a second language – a

communicative approach. The English Teacher, 19, 81-94.

325. Sanger, K (1998) The Language of Fiction, Routledge.326. Sanger, K (2001) The Language of Drama, Routledge.327. Scholes, R. (2001). The Crafty reader. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

328. Schram, D. and Steen, G. (eds.) (2001) The Psychology and Sociology of

Literature: In Honor of Elrud Ibsch. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.

329. Scott, V. M. and Tucker, H. (2002) SLA and the Literature Classroom:

Fostering Dialogues. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.

330. Semino, E. 1995. Schema theory and the analysis of text worlds in poetry.

Language and Literature, 4(2), 79-107.

331. Shaffer-Koros, C. M., & Reppy, J. M. (1999). Explorations in world literature:

Readings to enhance academic skills. New York: Cambridge University Press.

332. Shamim, F. 1996. In or out of the action zone: location as a feature of

interaction in large ESL classes in Pakistan. In K.Bailey and D. Nunan. (eds) Voices

from the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 123-144.

333. Showalter, E. (2003). Teaching literature. Malden (Mass) & Oxford:

Blackwell.

334. Showalter, E. (2004). Teaching Literature. Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work

published 2003)

335. Showalter, E. (2002) Teaching Literature. Oxford: Blackwell.

336. Simpson, P. (1997) Language through Literature. London: Routledge.

337. Sinclair, B. 1996. Learner autonomy and literature teaching. In R. Carter and J.

McRae (eds) Language, literature and the learner. London: Longman. 138-150.

338. Sithamparam, S. 1991. Strategies for the use of poetry in the language

classroom. The English Teacher, 20, 61-68.

339. Slatoff, W. (1970) With Respect to Readers: Dimensions of Literary Response.

Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

340. Slimani, A. 1992. Evaluation of classroom interaction. In J.C Alderson and A.

Beretta (eds) Evaluating second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press. 197-221.

341. Smallwood, B. 1990. The literature connection: a read-aloud guide for

multicultural classrooms. Wheaton, IL: Addison-Wesley.

342. Sonjae, A. (n.d.) How should we be teaching English literature. Retrieved

August 24, 2006, from http://www.sogang.ac.kr/~anthony/TeachLit.htm.

343. Spiro, J. (1991) Measuring literary skills. In C. Brumfit (ed.) Asssesment in

Literature Teaching. London: ELT Documents.

344. Spiro, J (2004) Creative Poetry Writing, OUP.345. Spiro, J (2006) Storybuilding, OUP.346. Sriraman, T. 1993. English language teaching in India. Madras: T. R.

Publications.

347. Steen, G. 1999. Genres of discourse and the definition of literature. Discourse

Processes, 28(2), 109-119.

348. Steen, G. (1991) The empirical study of literary reading: methods of data

collection. Poetics 20: 559–75.

349. Talib, I. S. 1992. Why not teach non-native English literature? ELT Journal,

46(1), 51-55.

350. Talib, I. S. 2002. The language of postcolonial literatures: an introduction.

London: Routledge.

351. Talib, I. (2002) The Language of Postcolonial Literatures. London: Routledge.

352. Talib, I. S. (1992) Why not teach non-native English literature? ELT Journal

46: 51–5

353. Talif, R. 1992. Literature: a broader definition. The English Teacher, 21, 19-23.

354. Taylor, A. 2000. Boy-free zone? Language Learning Journal, 21, 3-7.

355. TExEs preparation manual for English Language Arts and Reading 8-12.

Available at: http:// www.texes.ets.org/assets/pdf/testprep_manuals/131-

alar8_12_55003_web.prd

356. The electronic magazine Humanising Language Teaching has a number of articles about creativity, the use of literature in the EFL classroom and a section on poems: http://www.hltmag.co.uk/

357. The Newsletter of the IATEFL Literature, Media and Cultural Studies (LMCS) SIG contains an editorial, a letter from the co-ordinator, interviews, reviews, articles, ideas, and practical teaching tips: http://lmcs.iatefl.org/

358. Thomas, M. and J. Albee. 1998. Higher order literacy. Available:

http://members.aol.com/MattT10574/HigherOrderLiteracy.htm.

359. Tickoo, M.L. 2001. Socio-cultural blindspots in language curriculum renewal:

causes, consequences, cures. In W. A. Renanadya and N. R. Sunga (eds) Language

curriculum and instruction in multicultural societies. Anthology Series 42. Singapore:

SEAMEO Language Centre. 107-122.

360. Timucin, M. (2001) Gaining insights into alternative teaching approaches

employed in an EFL literature class. CAUCE 24: 269–93. Universidad de Sevilla.

361. Tomlinson, B. 1991. Survey: vocabulary practice books. ELT Journal, 45(2),

169-173.

362. Tomlinson, B. 1994. Openings. London: Penguin.

363. Tomlinson, B.1998. Seeing what they mean: helping L2 readers to visualise. In

B. Tomlinson (ed.) Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press. 265-278.

364. Tomlinson, B. 1999a. Developing criteria for evaluating L2 materials. IATEFL

Issues, Feb/March. Issue no 147, 10-13.

365. Tomlinson, B. 1999b. What do you think? issues in materials development.

Folio, 5(2), 3-10.

366. Tomlinson, B. 2000. Materials for cultural awareness: combining language,

literature and culture in the mind. The LanguageTeacher, 24 (2), 19-21.

367. Tomlinson, B., B. Dat, H. Msuhara and R. Rubdy. 2001. EFL courses for

adults. ELT Journal, 55(1), 80-101.

368. Toolan, M. 1998. Language in literature: an introduction to stylistics. New

York: Oxford University Press.

369. Trimmer, J. and Warnock, T. (1992) Cultural and Cross-cultural Studies and

the Teaching of Literature. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

370. Tripathi, P.D. 1992. The chosen tongue. English Today, 32(4), 3-11.

371. Tsui, A. 1999. Which agenda? medium of instruction policy in post – 1997

Hong Kong. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 12 (3), 196-213.

372. Tully, M. 1997. English: an advantage to India? ELT Journal, 51(2), 157-164.

373. Underhill, A. 1999. Facilitation in language teaching. In J. Arnold (ed.) Affect

in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 125-141.

374. van Lier, L. 1990. Ethnography: bandaid, bandwagon or contraband. In C.

Brumfit and R. Mitchell. (eds) Research in the language classroom. London: Modern

English Publications. 33-53.

375. van Lier, L. 1998. The relationship between consciousness, interaction and

language learning. Language Awareness, 7 (2 and 3), 128-145.

376. van Lier, L. 1995. Introducing language awareness. London: Penguin.

377. van Peer, W. (1992) Literary theory and reader response. In F. Nardoccio (ed.)

Reader Response to Literature: The Empirical Dimension. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

378. van Schooten, E. and de Glopper, K. (2003) The development of literary

response in secondary education. Poetics 31 (3–4): 155–87.

379. VanZanten Gallagher, S. (2001) ‘Contingencies and intersections: the

formation of pedagogical canons’, Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching

Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 1(1): 53–67

380. Vilches, M. 2000. Language and literature: the inseparable interface. ACLET

Journal, 4(1), 6- 13.

381. Villaneauva, V., Ed. (2003). Cross talk in comp. theory. Second Edition.

Urbana, Ill: NCTE.

382. Viswanathan, G. 1999. Milton and education. In B. Rajan and E. Sauer (eds)

Milton and the imperial vision. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press. 273-293

383. Watson, G. 1999. Evidentiality and affect: a quantitative approach. Language

and Literature, 8(3), 216-239.

384. Watts, R. J. (1991) Cross-cultural problems in the perception of literature. In R.

Sell (ed.) Literary Pragmatics. London: Routledge.

385. Weinstein Arnold. A Scream Goes Through the House: What Literature

Teaches Us About Life. Random House.

386. Weir, C. and J. Roberts. 1994. Evaluation in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell.

387. West, M. 1960. Teaching English in difficult circumstances. London:

Longman.

388. Widdowson, H.G. 1992. Practical stylistics: an approach to poetry. Oxford:

Oxford University Press. www.mapsofindia.com www.nic.edu.in

389. Widdowson, P. (1999) Literature. London: Routledge.

390. Wolf, D.P. (1998). Reading reconsidered: Literature and literacy in high

school. New York: the College Board.

391. Zeitz, C. M. (1994) Expert–novice differences in memory, abstraction, and

reasoning in the domain of literature. Cognition and Instruction 12 (4): 277–312.

392. Zwaan, R. (1991) Some parameters of literary and news comprehension:

effects of discourse type perspective on reading rate and surface structure

representation. Poetics 20: 139–61.

393. Zwaan, R. A. (1993) Aspects of Literary Comprehension: A Cognitive

Approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

394. Zwaan, R. A. (1996) Toward a model of literary comprehension. In B. K.

Britton and A. C. Graesser (eds.) Models of Understanding Text. Mahwah, NJ:

Erlbaum.