Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort
description
Transcript of Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort
![Page 1: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
![Page 2: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic:a multi-stakeholder effort
![Page 3: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
East Africa’s Infrastructure: A Regional Perspective
![Page 4: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Methodology and approach
Methodology Data collection by local/international consultants and Bank staff
based on standardized methodology Baseline year for data is 2006, does not reflect subsequent
evolution Approach
Focus on benchmarking ECCAS’s infrastructure against other African RECs and benchmarking ECCAS member countries with each other
![Page 5: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Key Message #1
Infrastructure has contributed almost one percentage point in per capita growth in East Africa
![Page 6: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Infrastructure contributed almost one percentage point in East Africa’s recent growth spurt
![Page 7: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Catching-up on infrastructure could boost growth by almost six percentage points
![Page 8: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Key Message #2
East Africa consists of a number of midsized economies
![Page 9: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Both typical and unique features of East Africa’s economic geography
Typical African characteristics2 countries have economies <$10 billion2 countries have populations <10 million4 countries are landlocked Transboundary river basins (e.g. Nile)
Unique geographic featuresNumber of mid-sized economiesSignificant contiguous areas of wealth-generationEconomic activity away from the coast
![Page 10: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Topographical profile of East Africa
![Page 11: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Spatial distribution of economic activity
![Page 12: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Key Message #3
Northern corridor is by far most significant artery for the region
![Page 13: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
A middling performer on prices and delays associated with road freight
Corridor Length (kms)
Road in good condition (%)
Trade density
(US$m per km)
Implicit velocity(km
/hr)
Freight tariff ($US/tonne-km)
Central 3280 49 4.2 6.1 0.13
Western 2050 72 8.2 6.0 0.08
Eastern 2845 82 5.7 8.1 0.07
Southern 5000 100 27.9 11.6 0.05
![Page 14: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Main northern corridor corridors paved and in good condition, but elsewhere not so
Condition (%) Type (%)
Good Fair Poor Paved
Mombasa to Nairobi to Kampala 50 34 13 97
Mombasa to Nairobi to Kampala to Kigali 40 36 11 94
Mombasa to Nairobi to Kampala to Juba 44 48 9 84
Dar Es Salaam to Bujumbura 45 36 6 57
Addis Ababa to Djibouti 37 17 16 23
![Page 15: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The key sea corridors not always in good condition
![Page 16: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Regional traffic largely concentrated on the northern corridor at present
Percentage in traffic bands
(AADT)
<300300-1000 >1000
Mombasa to Nairobi to Kampala 10 5 85
Mombasa to Nairobi to Kampala to Kigali 8 9 83
Mombasa to Nairobi to Kampala to Juba 28 8 64
Dar Es Salaam to Bujumbura 43 18 39
Addis Ababa to Djibouti 34 66 0
![Page 17: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The key corridors vary hugely on traffic volumes
![Page 18: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Key Message #4
Regional roads more developed in EAC area, no real connectivity
with broader East Africa
![Page 19: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Regional road network in EAC, generally in better condition than in the broader East Africa
Condition (%) Type (%) Good Fair Poor PavedBurundi 42.4 27.9 24.2 94.4Kenya 40.5 38.4 21.1 79.5Rwanda 66.7 33.3 0.0 100.0Tanzania 44.9 35.7 3.7 60.0Uganda 13.5 47.4 4.3 69.9EAC 38.0 38.7 13.2 73.3 Ethiopia 43.5 10.9 11.3 69.9Sudan 0.0 15.3 9.1 11.6EAC Plus 29.8 26.5 11.7 57.2
![Page 20: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Marked absence of connectivity between EAC, and broader East Africa
![Page 21: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Relatively low traffic on regional roads
Percentage of traffic bands
<300 300-1000 >1000
Burundi 12 80 8
Kenya 42 14 44
Rwanda
Tanzania 38 21 41
Uganda 26 36 38
EAC 39 21 40
Ethiopia 29 61 10
Sudan
EAC Plus 52 25 23
![Page 22: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Most traffic concentrated in EAC area
![Page 23: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Key Message #5
East Africa’s railways do not constitute a regional network
and demand relatively low
![Page 24: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
East Africa has one binational railway, but otherwise networks are not interconnected
![Page 25: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Rail productivity measures generally poor
![Page 26: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Traffic volumes on East African railways particularly low even by African standards
![Page 27: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Key Message #6
Performance and capacity at Mombasa and Dar Es Salaam
drive the regional story
![Page 28: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Regional ports story is about relative roles of Mombasa and Dar Es Salaam
![Page 29: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
East Southern West/ Central
Global Best Practice
Container Dwell Time (Days) 5-28 4-8 11-30 <7
Truck Processing Time (hours) 4-24 2-12 6-24 1
Crane Productivity (containers/hour)
8-20 8-22 7-20 20-30
Crane Productivity (tons/hour)
8-25 10-25 7-15 >30
Charges
Container handling ($/TEU) 135-275 110-243 100-320 80-150
General cargo handling charge ($/ton)
6-15 11-15 8-15 7-9
East African ports are in the middle of the African range, well behind global best practice
![Page 30: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Performance relatively good in general, except for Port Sudan
Djibouti Mombasa Port Sudan
Dar Es Salaam
Djibouti Kenya Sudan Tanzania
Container dwell time (days) 8 5 28 7
Truck processing time (hours) 12 5 24 5
Container crane productivity (container per hour) 17 10 8 20
Container cargo handling charge (USD per TEU) 135 68 150 275
General cargo handling charge (USD per ton) 8 7 10 14
![Page 31: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Capacity is a significant issue at both Mombasa and Dar Es Salaam
(a) General Cargo (b) Containers
![Page 32: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Key Message #7
Vibrant internal air transport market across East Africa
![Page 33: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
One area where connectivity is strong between EAC and broader East Africa
![Page 34: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
A medium-sized market with strong levels of connectivity (thanks to Addis and Nairobi)
![Page 35: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
East Africa features among Africa’s top 60 air transport routes
![Page 36: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Strong growth in intra-regional air transport capacity
![Page 37: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Strong connectivity with all countries having regular service to both hubs
![Page 38: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Dramatic modernization of aircraft fleet
![Page 39: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
East Africa about half way along with respect to market liberalization
Community General status of YD implementation Status of air services liberalization
Overall implementation score
AMU No implementation. No liberalization within the AMU initiated, but need is recognized. 1
BAG Principles of the YD agreed upon in a multilateral air services agreement.
Up to fifth freedom granted, tariffs are free, and capacity/frequency is open. 4
CEMACPrinciples of the YD agreed upon in an air transport program. Some minor restrictions remain.
Up to fifth freedom granted, tariffs are free, and capacity/frequency is open. Maximum two carriers per state may take part.
5
COMESA
Full liberalization agreed upon (“legal Notice No. 2”), but application and implementation remain pending until a joint competition authority is established.
Pending. Operators will be able to serve any destination (all freedoms), and tariffs and capacity/frequency will be free.
3
EACEAC council issued a directive to amend bilaterals among the EAC states to conform with the YD.
Air services are not liberalized, as the amendments of bilaterals remain pending. 3
SADC
No steps taken toward implementation, although the civil aviation policy includes gradual liberalization of air services within the SADC.
No liberalization has been initiated. 2
WAEMU The YD is fully implemented. All freedoms, including cabotage, granted. Tariffs have been liberalized. 5
![Page 40: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Kenya and Ethiopia still dominant, shifting market shares among smaller players
Market share (%) 2001 2004 2007Kenya Airways 42 51 47Ethiopian Airlines Enterprise 11 17 19Rwandair Express 8 11African Star Airways Ltd. 8Precision Air Services Ltd. <1 3 4Emirates 5 3 3Air Tanzania Company Ltd. 6 9 1East African Safari Air 5 East African Airlines Limited 12 FlyGlobeSpan 6 British Airways P.L.C. 5
![Page 41: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Air safety standards improving in East Africa
![Page 42: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Key Message #8
Regional power trading saves over 10 percent of costs and almost 4 million tons of CO2
![Page 43: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Interconnections limited as of today but ambitious plans exist for EAPP/NB
![Page 44: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Low access and limited availability of power, relatively good utility performance
![Page 45: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Demand for power mostly being met at power pool level but with country variation
Total net demand in
2005
% suppressed demand as a share of net
demand (2005)
Market demand
2015*
Social demand with
national targets 2015
Total net demand
2015Burundi 0.2 13 0.3 0.5 0.7Djibouti 0.2 6 0.3 0.1 0.4Egypt 84.4 0 119.9 3.4 123.3
Ethiopia 2.1 5 3.4 7.4 10.7Kenya 4.6 8 6.8 5.2 12
Rwanda 0.1 5 0.2 0.3 0.5Sudan 3.2 5 5.2 3.9 9.2
Tanzania 4.2 5 6.2 1.7 7.9Uganda 1.6 5 2.5 1.7 4.2EAPP 100.6 1 144.8 24.2 169SAPP 258.8 1 383 14 396.9WAPP 31.3 30 69.6 24.8 94.3CAPP 10.7 9 17.1 3.1 20.2
![Page 46: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Regional power trade saves EAPP/NB US$1 billion a year
(US$ billion) Trade expansion Trade stagnation
Base growth Low growthNew Investment
-Generation 4.4 2.6 4.2 -Inter-connectors 0.1 0 0.1 -Distribution 1.1 1.1 1.0Refurbishment 0.5 0.5 0.5
Variable cost 6.8 9.7 5.6
Total cost 15.0 16.0 13.5
Note: Numbers include Egypt
![Page 47: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Volume traded has potential to increase from 12 to 162 terra-watt hours a year
Trade expansion Trade stagnation
![Page 48: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Many countries need to invest in cross-border interconnectors and a few in large hydro
(MW) Interconnectors Additional hydro
EAPP/NBI 27,755 10,968Burundi 78 0Egypt 10,000 0Ethiopia 2,997 6,766Kenya 266 0Rwanda 120 236Sudan 13,491 3,136Tanzania 266 279Uganda 537 551
![Page 49: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Most countries have higher immediate spending needs under power trade
![Page 50: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Two major exporters (Ethiopia, Sudan), and one major importer (Egypt)
![Page 51: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Trade expansion Trade stagnation
Regional power trade increases reliance on hydro-power reducing CO2 emissions
![Page 52: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Increasing hydro brings annual savings of 20 million tons of CO2
WAPP SAPP EAPP CAPP Total WAPP SAPP EAPP CAPP Total
Production difference (TWh) Emissions savings (M ton)
Coal -41.5 0.7 -40.8 -37.8 0.6 -37.2
Diesel -0.8 -0.3 0.3 -0.8 -0.6 -0.2 0.2 -0.6
Gas -9.2 -5.3 -42.4 -56.8 -4.7 -2.7 -21.5 -28.9
HFO 0.2 0.4 -4.9 -4.3 0.1 0.3 -3.6 -3.2
Hydro 11.5 47.5 43.4 5.1 107 0
Total 1.6 0.5 2.4 0.3 4.7 -5.2 -40.7 -20.4 -3.6 -69.9
![Page 53: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Economic gains? Trade shaves less than a cent per kilowatt-hour from cost of power(US cents/kWh) Trade expansion Trade stagnation DifferenceCAPP 7 9 -2
EAPP/NB 12 12 0
SAPP 6 7 -1WAPP 18 19 -1
Burundi 11 15 -4
Egypt 9 9 0
Ethiopia 19 16 +3
Kenya 12 13 -1
Rwanda 12 12 0
Sudan 13 13 0
Tanzania 10 8 -2
Uganda 12 11 -1
![Page 54: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Unit benefit (US$/kWh)
Net power trade (TWh)
Annual benefits (US$m pa)
One time investment (US $m)
Rate of Return (%)
EXPORTERS Ethiopia 0.19 26.2 5,974 1,001 60Rwanda 0.12 1 144 59 24Sudan 0.13 13 2,044 1,032 20Tanzania 0.1 2.4 288 44 66Uganda 0.12 2.8 403 145 28IMPORTERS Burundi 0.03 1 210 10 210Djibouti <.01 <1 0Kenya 0.01 12 1,200 30 400Egypt <.01 123 6,165
Power trade could potentially lead to impressive returns
![Page 55: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Model can be used to explore sensitivities to key environmental factors
Impact of oil price increases? For EAPP, increasing oil price from US$46 to US$75/bbl to
adds 600 MW of hydro and increases costs by 30%
Impact of climate change? For EAPP, 25% reduction in rainfall reduces reliance on
hydro by 4,000 MW and raises costs by 9%
![Page 56: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Key Message #9
Most pressing issue for the region is to complete the fiber
optic backbone
![Page 57: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Huge difference in GSM coverage between EAC and broader East Africa, no interconnection
![Page 58: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Region stands out for high cost and low penetration of internet services
CEMAC ECOWAS COMESA EAC SADC Broadband subscribers (per 100 inhabitants) 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.36International Internet bandwidth (per capita) 11 16 9 11 19Internet subscribers (per 100 inhabitants) 0.06 0.24 0.09 0.05 0.53Main telephone lines outside largest city (per 100 inhabitants) 0.2 0.39 0.53 0.24 1.89
Mobile telephone subscribers (per 100 inhabitants) 22 25 12 21 31Prices (US$) Prepaid mobile monthly price basket 15.11 14.04 9.09 12.18 11.32Price of a 3 minute call to USA 5.68 0.83 2.2 1.37 1.5Price of the 20 hour Internet basket 67.97 79.98 50.91 95.7 75.6Price of the fixed telephone monthly price basket 12.59 9.35 6.85 13.33 13.27
![Page 59: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Ethiopia stands out for its low mobile coverage and penetration
![Page 60: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Marked price differential between EAC versus Ethiopia and Sudan
![Page 61: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Cost of international calls within EAC substantially exceeds that of calls to US
![Page 62: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Some progress with intra-regional roaming particularly Kenya, Uganda
Roaming possible
![Page 63: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
No single operator dominates region, but several have important multi-country presence
![Page 64: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
As of 2006, none of the EAC countries enjoyed access to submarine cables
![Page 65: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Several undersea cables planned for East Africa by 2012
![Page 66: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Countries with submarine access benefit, and those with competitive access even more so
Share of countries
(%)
Price per minute for a call within
Sub-Saharan ($)
Price per minute for a call to US ($)
Price for 20 hours per month of dial-up Internet access ($)
No access to submarine cable
67 1.34 0.86 67.95
Access to submarine cable 32 0.57 0.48 47.28
Monopoly international gateway
16 0.70 0.72 37.36
Competitiveinternationalgateways
16 0.48 0.23 36.62
![Page 67: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
At least 3,500 kilometers missing to complete regional fiber optic backbone network
(kilometers) Gap (kms)Investment
(US$m
Eastern 3,565 96Burundi 90 2Ethiopia 408 11Kenya 894 24Rwanda 198 5Sudan 670 18Tanzania 1,220 33 Uganda 85 2
![Page 68: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Completing regional fiber optic network promises high rates of return
Broadband price
(US$/mo.)Broadband
Subscriptions (‘000s)
Benefts (US$mn/yr)
Costs (US$mn)
Rate of Return
(%) Baseline
2008 InducedBaseline
2008 InducedBurundi 0.2 2Ethiopia 304.1 0.4 5.5 6 11 59Kenya 24.9 3.3 120.9 11 24 46Rwanda 55.0 4.2 6.5 2 5 42Sudan 14.5 44.6 354.3 21 18 116Tanzania 39.7 6.4 43.5 7 33 22Uganda 121.5 4.8 9.1 6 2 304
![Page 69: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Key Message #10
Spending needs for regional integration look much more affordable for EAC than for
East Africa as a whole
![Page 70: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
(US$mn)
Transport Power ICT Total Total
Needs Inv O&M Inv O&M Inv O&M Inv O&M
Burundi 1 3 1 0 1 3 3 7Kenya 17 27 3 2 0 22 27 49Rwanda 1 2 59 1 0 60 2 62Tanzania 29 32 44 104 3 0 76 136 212Uganda 14 16 145 9 0 0 159 25 183EAC 61 80 252 113 7 0 320 193 513 Ethiopia 23 34 1,008 98 1 0 1,032 132 1,164Sudan 65 42 1,032 52 2 0 1,099 94 1,192EAC Plus 149 155 2,292 263 10 0 2,451 418 2,870
Bulk of spending needs in Ethiopia, Sudan power sector to develop hydro for export
![Page 71: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Burden of regional spending high in many countries – notably Ethiopia, Sudan
![Page 72: Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostic: a multi-stakeholder effort](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062315/56816039550346895dcf5a35/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Regional integration needs represent substantial share of infrastructure spending