AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

download AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

of 20

Transcript of AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    1/20

    Aboriginal & Treaty Rights and ProvincialForestry Management RegimesBy Russell Diabo, Wolf Lake First Nation, Policy Advisor

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    2/20

    Haida/Taku Legal Principles

    a) the Crowns duty of consultation andaccommodation is founded not in a fiduciaryduty as had been held by the B.C. Court ofAppeal, but in the honour of the Crown (16,Haida);

    (b) the duty to consult arises when the Crown

    has knowledge, real or constructive, of thepotential existence of an Aboriginal right or titleand contemplates conduct that mightadversely affect it (35, Haida);

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    3/20

    Haida/Taku Legal Principles

    (c) the scope of the Crowns duty is proportionate to apreliminary assessment of the strength of the assertedAboriginal right or title and to the seriousness of thepotentially adverse effect upon the right or title (39,Haida);

    (d) the consultation must be meaningful, in good faithand with a willingness of the C rown to make changesbased on the information that emerges during the

    consultation process (29, Taku River Tlingit);

    (e) sharp dealing is not permitted, but mere hardbargaining will not offend the right of the Aboriginalgroup to be consulted (42, Haida);

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    4/20

    Haida/Taku Principles

    (f) there is no duty to reach agreement andAboriginal groups do not have a veto power overwhat can be done with land claimed by them;

    rather, it is a process of balancing interests, of giveand take (10 and 48, Haida); and

    (g) where accommodation is required in makingdecisions that may adversely affect an asserted

    Aboriginal right or title, the Crown must balanceAboriginal concerns reasonably with the potentialimpact of the decision on the asserted right or titleand other societal interests (50, Haida and 42,

    Taku River Tlingit).

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    5/20

    Burden of Proof on First Nations

    It is not only Crown governments and third partiesthat have responsibilities and obligations as a resultof these legal principles. These legal principles alsoplace a burden on the First Nations to get organizedinternally to manage consultation requests andnegotiate accommodations from the Crowngovernments, industry and other third partiesoperating on a First Nations traditional territory untilthe Aboriginal Rights, Title or Treaty issues can beresolved.

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    6/20

    Post Haida/Taku Burden of Proof

    The Haida decision means that the Crown has tohave knowledge of any First Nations asserted orpotential claims and concerns about serious

    infringements or irreparable harm that is or willbe caused by current or future provincially (andfederally) authorized activities or plans that affectAboriginal lands and resources on traditional

    territory, pending the reconciliation of Aboriginaltitle and/or Treaty rights with the Crowns assertionof title, through a treaty, agreement or courtdetermination.

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    7/20

    Assessment of Rights vs. Impacts

    First Nations need to set up a consultation trackingsystem.

    Connected to the consultation tracking system should bean information management system that includes a GIS.

    First Nations need to develop an internal consultationprocedures process and procedures.

    First Nations need to develop an external consultationprotocol process and procedures.

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    8/20

    5. ACTS

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    9/20

    Information Management

    researchers

    governmentcommunity knowledge

    industry

    interest groups

    academics }maps

    letters

    reports

    databases

    stories

    decision

    interpretation

    }

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    10/20

    Logical Framework

    Traditional Ecological

    KnowledgeSocial Customs

    Toponymy

    ABL-FECSensitive Area Mapping

    Measures to HarmonizeElders Field Trip

    Projects:

    PROGRAM

    INDI GENOUS KNOWLEDGE

    Data Compilation

    Digitization of EcoforestryDataCut Plan Map Digitization

    Synthetic Map ProductionBuffer Zone Study

    Sub-Program: FORESTR Y

    Projects:

    Aerial Moose Inventory

    Wildlife Data CompilationHabitat Supply Analysis& Modeling

    ABL Harvest StudyMoose Management

    Strategy

    Sub-Program: WILDLIFE

    Projects:

    PROGRAM

    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

    OF NATU RAL RESOURCES

    Regional Socio-Economic

    StudyABL Socio-Economic StudyLegal Framework Study

    Projects:

    PROGRAM

    ECONOMIC/SOCIAL

    DEVELOPMENT

    TRILATERAL AGREEMENT

    MITCHIKANIBIKOK INIK

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    11/20

    Indigenous Knowledge ProgramTo document Algonquin ecological & social

    knowledge for incorporation into the IRMP, &thereby facilitate harmonization of Algonquin &

    non-Algonquin land-use regimes consistent with

    the interest of the Algonquins of Barriere Lake.

    MITCHIKANIBIKOK INIK

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    12/20

    MITCHIKANIBIKOK INIK SAS Mapping

    Wood

    Occupancy

    Moose YardsSpawning Areas

    Sacred Areas

    Burial Sites

    TobaccoMedicinal Plants

    Sugar Bush

    Roots

    LEGEND

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    13/20

    Areas of ConcernManagement Strategy

    ABL Areas of Concern (SAS)

    Algonquin traditional occupancy and use sites documented during Phase I -

    Strategies & Prescriptions developed by IRMP Technical Team inconsultation with ABL for Phase II IRMP planning.

    Ministry of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Parks Guidelines& Land Affectation

    Quebec Forest Act

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    14/20

    FAPAQ & MRN Affectation Zones

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    15/20

    ABL Areas of Concern (SAS)

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    16/20

    ABL Areas of Concern (TMA 1)VALUE NO. &/OR

    AREA (ha)PRESCRIPTION

    Burial Sites 4 No forestry operations within AoCAbsolute buffer of 60m

    CeremonialSites

    1 No forestry operations within AoCAbsolute buffer of 100mRestriction on forest operations in area during gatheringsViewshed analysis as required

    HeritageSites

    1 Absolute buffer of 60mModified harvest within 400 m; harvest strategies determined throughconsultations with ABL

    OccupancySites

    12 permanent19 tent sites

    5-yr harvest exclusion buffer of 2km around permanent sites5-yr harvest exclusion buffer of 5km around settlements (5+ cabins)Absolute buffer of 60m

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    17/20

    ABL Areas of Concern (cont.)

    TMA 1

    VALUE NO. &/OR

    AREA (ha)

    PRESCRIPTION

    SacredAreas

    5 431 ha No forestry operations within AoCAbsolute buffer of 60mVisibility analysis where required

    Spring

    Water

    6 Harvest exclusion

    Absolute buffer of 60m

    MedicinalPlantCollection

    23 556 ha Measures to Harmonize as requiredMaintain 560 ha of Algonquin designated collection areasthroughout 20-year planning period

    RootCollection

    597 ha Maintain 597 ha of Algonquin designated collection areasthroughout 20-year planning period

    SpecialtyWoods

    23 2,211ha

    Measures to Harmonize for specific sitesMaintain 1,434 ha of Algonquin designated collection areasthroughout 20-year period

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    18/20

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    19/20

    19

    Public

    LandDesignations

  • 7/29/2019 AFN NAFA Forest Forum Presentation Mar 29 11

    20/20

    Conclusions

    Provinces developing consultation processes &procedures, First Nations need to do the same.

    First Nations need to collect cultural, historical andcurrent use data and natural resource inventory data.

    First Nations need to assess how much territory has beentaken up and what is left.

    The consultation/accommodation processes will be ineffect for years, likely decades.