Affirming Catholicism Response June 07 on Nassau

5
 Discussion Document for members of A ffirming Catholicism on A n Anglican Coven ant : A Draft for Discussion  (ACDFD) 1  Mark D. Chapman Affirming Catholicism made a full response to the document Towards an Anglican Covenant. 2 It laid out the theological and ecclesiological principles which should underpin the production of an Anglican Covenant. These principles have shaped this brief response to An Anglican Covenant: A Draft for Discussion, which was produced at the first meeting of the Covenant Design Group meeting in the Bahamas in January 2007, and presented to the Primates of the Anglican Communion at their meeting in Tanzania in February 2007. 3 It is a more developed version than that included as the appendix to The Windsor Report, and is more historically aware about the nature and development of Anglicanism. The contents are divided into six sections, the first is a Preamble, the second three describe the Doctrinal and Missiological Basis of Anglicanism, and the last two describe the Existing Institutions and Proposals for Change. Brief analyses and comments are offered under these three headings: 1. Preamble: the use of the term ‘covenant’ (§1). What is most significant is that the first use of the word ‘covenant’ is as an active verb (§1). The model of covenant used is far closer to the agreements between churches in ecumenical discussion than to any Biblical model – this seems to be far removed from most Biblical covenants which are made between two quite unequal parties (God and human beings). Instead the agreement is made between equals who pledge to work together. It is possible that there would have been greater clarity if the word ‘covenant’, which has such a complex and contested religious history, had been avoided altogether. As used in ACDFD it means much the same as ‘pledge’ or ‘agree to abide by’. This sense of commitment is the key point of the document – this amounts to a voluntary pledge by the individual churches of the Anglican Communion to the definitions and methods of conflict resolution contained in the document. 1 This critical analysis is based in part on my Introduction to the forthcoming volume: Mark D. Chapman (ed.), The Anglican Covenant: Unity and Diversity in the Anglican Communion (London: Continuum, 2007). 2 It was released on 13 Dec 2006. This document is available at: http://www.affirmingcatholicism.org.uk/UserFiles/Affirming%20Catholicism%20Response%20to%2 0Covenant%2015%2012%2006.doc). 3 A slightly modified version was issued in April 2007: Anglican Communion Office,  An Anglican Covenant: A Draft for Discussion (April 2007), available at: http://www.anglicancommunion.org/commission/d_covenant/docs/Draft%20Covenant%20Text%200 70504.pdf.

Transcript of Affirming Catholicism Response June 07 on Nassau

Page 1: Affirming Catholicism Response June 07 on Nassau

8/4/2019 Affirming Catholicism Response June 07 on Nassau

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/affirming-catholicism-response-june-07-on-nassau 1/5

Page 2: Affirming Catholicism Response June 07 on Nassau

8/4/2019 Affirming Catholicism Response June 07 on Nassau

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/affirming-catholicism-response-june-07-on-nassau 2/5

Page 3: Affirming Catholicism Response June 07 on Nassau

8/4/2019 Affirming Catholicism Response June 07 on Nassau

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/affirming-catholicism-response-june-07-on-nassau 3/5

Page 4: Affirming Catholicism Response June 07 on Nassau

8/4/2019 Affirming Catholicism Response June 07 on Nassau

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/affirming-catholicism-response-june-07-on-nassau 4/5

Page 5: Affirming Catholicism Response June 07 on Nassau

8/4/2019 Affirming Catholicism Response June 07 on Nassau

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/affirming-catholicism-response-june-07-on-nassau 5/5