AFCEA Technet – Augusta

MG Harold GreeneDeputy for Acquisition & Systems ManagementAssistant Secretary of the Army(Acquisition, Logistics and Technology)

12 September 2013

Agenda

• EnvironmentEnvironment• Developing 1 Network

S S E t i• SoS Enterprise• Industry Opportunities• Questions

2

The EnvironmentWhere we were:

• Focused on Iraq & Afghanistan• OCO funding• OCO funding• Available resources• Flexibility to experiment/innovate

Where we are headed:

d f fl• End of current conflicts • Changing strategic environment • Smaller Army: CONUS based, regionally aligned• Resource constrained• Budget uncertainty• Budget uncertainty• Program decisions today lead to Army of 2025• S&T decisions today lead to the Army of 2035

Maintain our edge and modernize the force in a disciplined, affordable manner

3

Our Environment“Our top priority is to ensure that our forces defending

the homeland, those in Afghanistan and Korea, and those next to deploy and rotate into theater, have the

resources required to execute their missions ”resources required to execute their missions.-- Sequestration Message from the Secretary of the Army,

Chief of Staff of the Army and the Sergeant Major of the Army, March 2013

• Budget Control Act impacts for the next decade

• Continuing Resolutiong

• Budget Reduction and Flexibility• Force Structure• Readiness• Modernization

4

Setting the StageFederal Spending

FY62: National Defense FY17: National Defense ~12% f F d l B d

Net Interest7%

~49% of Federal Budget~12% of Federal Budget(estimate in PB13 Request)

Defense Discretionary

17%

Net Interest6%

Defense Discretionary

12%

Net Interest11%

Defense Discretionary

49%

Non‐Defense Discretionary

18%

Mandatory26%

17%

Non‐Defense Discretionary

14%Mandatory63%

Non‐Defense Discretionary

12%

Mandatory65%

FY62 FY13 Request FY17 est

DiscretionaryDiscretionary MandatoryMandatory2 213B2 213B

OutlaysOutlaysFY13 Federal Budget Request

Options to Reduce Federal Spending Options to Reduce Federal Spending •Decrease spending

• Sequestration

‐‐1,265B1,265B ‐‐2,213B2,213B

Net InterestNet Interest‐‐246B246B

Income TaxIncome Tax+1 294B+1 294B

Payroll TaxPayroll Tax+990B+990B

‐‐3,655B3,655B

• Balanced Budget approach

• Increase revenues

D fi itD fi it

+1,294B+1,294B

Corp TaxCorp Tax+365B+365B

+990B+990B

OtherOther+234B+234B

ReceiptsReceipts+2,882B+2,882B

5

Source:  Fiscal Year 2013 Historical Tables, Budget of the U.S. Government

DeficitDeficit‐‐772B772B

Army TOA

Source:  DoD Comptroller Information System, Budget of the U.S. Government

6

Aviation, Mission Command, Ground Systems, S&T = 61% of total Army RDA budget

Better Buying Power 2.0

Where Industry & Government Can Collaborate:Can Collaborate:

• Better Buying Power• Mandate Affordability as a Requirement• Implement “Should Cost” Based Management• Increase Test Efficiencies• Collaborate Closely with Industry

• Opportunities for Foreign Military Sales• Design Systems with Exportability Features

• Program Execution• Reduce/Eliminate Risk• Meet Cost, Schedule and Performance Goals

Hit Your Marks!!Hit Your Marks!!

7

“THINK!”

Enabling Our Soldier to Dominate the BattlefieldIncrease operational

maneuverability

Increase Force Protection

Eliminate Tactical Surprise

Achieve Operational Overmatch

On-demand Individual & Team

Training

Improve operational

energy

Reduce life cycle

cost Overmatch

Optimize Soldier

Training energycost

Optimize Soldier Performance

Operation in contest environment without degradation

Reduce expenses of storing, transporting & waste handling of consumables

8

What Right Looks Like

WeMust Train as We Fight

The Network is Core to a Smaller, More Capable, Better Trained Expeditionary Army

We Must Train as We FightDeploy Little to No

Notice Anytime,Anywhere in AustereEnvironments

Future

Environments Installations as a

Docking StationModernized From

St t i C tStrategic Core tothe Tactical Edge

Single SecureNetwork

IncorporateEchelons AboveArmy Requirements

Centralized d

9

Management andDecentralized Execution

Approach

10

Building a Secure NetworkFrom DIACAP

to Risk Management FrameworkRisk Management Framework

Securing our Network is Mitigating Risk

-Address at each Milestone-Continual Process-Instituted earlier than DIACAP

11

Network Integration EvaluationWhat We Have Accomplished

Procurements as a result of NIEsRifleman Radio WIN T I 2WIN‐T Inc 2 HMSCommand Post, Nett Warrior handhelds tactical radios, antennas,

DOTML-PF Approach

antennas, Mitigators/filters and 

integration kits. 

12

Cost Avoidance

ARMYWarfighting  Strategic

Direction for Future Integration Evaluations

ARMY 2020 Mission Command

Movement & Maneuver Fires

Functions

• Air• Land• Sea

NIE 15 2‐ CS 16 Validation / Joint fires

Domains

Intelligence Sustain Protection

• Space• Cyber• Human  NIE 15.1

CS 15 V lid ti / D t i l C t A t / CYBER

‐ CS 16 Bridge / Joint Fires

‐ Expanded JIIM

NIE 15.2 ‐ Expanded JIIM

NIE14 1

NIE 14.2

‐ CS 15 Bridge / Intelligence, Surveillance & Reconnaissance

‐ CS 15 Validation / Doctrinal Concept Assessments / CYBER

‐ Expanded JIIM NIE/ BCT Design (3rd BN) /LVC‐IA

NIE 13.2

NIE14.1 ‐ Joint Participation  /  LVC‐IA

‐ CS 14 Validation /  Intelligence, Surveillance & Reconnaissance 

‐ Training & Leader Development / Emerging LVC Initiatives / Instrumented HST w/ network

NIE 13.1‐ CS 14 Bridge / Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance Baseline, 

‐ Battle Command Transport Convergence – Intel and Log; Operational Energy

NIE is more than a field evaluation … it is the integration, training and validation leading to DOTMLPF

13

NIE  is more than a field evaluation … it is the integration, training and validation leading to DOTMLPF recommendations for the Army  

Take Aways for Industry

• A tool for rapid decisions by informed Senior Leadership• Designed as a step by step process through phases • Helps the Army fill significant Gaps and Objectives• Provides fairness in the selection of systems entering NIE

• The information you provide is how we assess your readiness to come to NIE

Feedback is not a “Criticism” of your system It is meant to help you understand

14

Feedback is not a “Criticism” of your system. It is meant to help you understand what the Army observed for your technology’s strengths and weaknesses

CS13 Successfully Used in TheatreCS13 Successfully Used in Theatre

• 3-89 CAV, 4/ conducted the first successful combat patrol with CS 13 equipment (30 Jul 2013).

• Units able to:• successfully make VOIP calls and use on-

PoP

• successfully make VOIP calls and use on-board mission command applications on the move

• Communicate (voice and data) with ( )individual soldiers in buildings

• Track PLI of individual soldiers in complex terrain

• Establish TOC-quality connectivity on the move in extremely difficult terrain

TCN

15

CS13 becoming a proven Force Multiplier!

The OutputA D l d T ti l N t k

The Army’s Deployed Tactical Network is an

Army Deployed Tactical Network

Tactical Network is an Extension of the

Enterprise into the Battlespace

IPN-Installation Processing NodeJTF- Joint Task ForceRHN-Regional Hub NodeSTEP- Standardized Tactical Entry PointTNOSC- Theater Network Operations

Security Center

A Single, Secure, Standards-Based, Versatile Infrastructure, Linked by Networked and Redundant Transport S t S W fi hti d B i A li ti Al ith D t t P id S ldi d Ci ili th

y

16

Systems, Sensors, Warfighting and Business Applications, Along with Data to Provide our Soldiers and Civilians the Information They Need, When They Need It, in Any Environment to Manage the Army Enterprise and Enable Full-

Spectrum Operations with Our Joint, Coalition, and Interagency Partners

Upcoming Opportunities for Industry

4th QTR FY 14

3rd QTR FY 14I f ti W f

- Information Technology Enterprise Solutions-Services (ITES-3S): - NIE 15.1

NIE 14 23 d QTR FY 14-Information Warfare-Tactical Vehicle System – Recompete- Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Services-Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance and Surveillance S stem (EMARSS)

- NIE 14.2

2nd QTR FY 14System (EMARSS)

- COMSEC-Common Infrared Countermeasures (CIRCM) - Tactical Network Initialization (TNI)

-Mission Command support- Manpack Radio 

1st QTR FY 14- Defense Communication and Transmission

( )-Joint Battle Command-Platform (JBC-P): Blue Force Trackning-1

- Rifleman Radio- Enterprise Services

A C t t W iti

17

Systems support-Train Educate And Coach (TEACH)

- Army Contract Writing System

How Industry Can Help Us

• Be Good Stewards/Partners – Don’t let Us Write Stupid Requirements – Comment on Draft RFPS!

• Help Us Reduce Complexity on the Battlefield – Smaller, Faster, Cheaper

• Focus on ‘Open Systems’ and Common Operating Environment (COE) vs. Proprietary Interface Designs and Approaches( ) y g

• IRAD Dollars – Where is it Best to Spend and Commit

P ti i t i N t k I t ti E l ti (NIE)• Participate in our Network Integration Evaluations (NIE)

Th N t k i C t S ll M C bl B tt T i d E diti A

18

The Network is Core to a Smaller, More Capable, Better Trained Expeditionary Army

Questions?

19

AFCEA Technet – Augusta

MG Harold GreeneDeputy for Acquisition & Systems ManagementAssistant Secretary of the Army(Acquisition, Logistics and Technology)

12 September 2013