AEIS REPORT 2010-2011

AEIS REPORT AEIS REPORT 2010-20112010-2011

SAN FELIPE DEL RIO C.I.S.D.SAN FELIPE DEL RIO C.I.S.D.

OVERVIEWOVERVIEW

Academic Year: 2010-11Academic Year: 2010-11 SFDRCISD Rating: SFDRCISD Rating:

Academically AcceptableAcademically Acceptable AEIS DATA SOURCES:AEIS DATA SOURCES:

* Assessment Program* Assessment Program

* PEIMS* PEIMS

Purpose of AEIS ReportPurpose of AEIS Report

An Overview of the Academic An Overview of the Academic Excellence Indicator System Excellence Indicator System Report (AEIS)Report (AEIS)

The AEIS Report pulls together a wide range of information on the performance of students in each school district in Texas every year. This information is put into the annual AEIS reports which are made available to schools districts and the public during the fall. The performance indicators are:

•State Administered Assessment Performance: by Special Groups, Grades, and Subjects, including Alternative Assessments

•Student Success Initiative

• Attendance Rates

•Completion and Drop Out Rates (4 Year Longitudinal)

•Percent of Graduates Completing the Recommended High School Program

•Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate (IB) Exam Results

•SAT and ACT Examination Participation and Results

•PEIMS Data: Budget, Financial, Staff, Demographics, Special Program Participation, Attendance, Retention, and “Leavers” (Graduates/Dropouts)

•State and District Performance Reports

•Campus Performance Reports

Points to ConsiderPoints to Consider The information in AEIS provides factual foundation for dialogue about the The information in AEIS provides factual foundation for dialogue about the

performance of our district or campuses. performance of our district or campuses.

Do not rely on a single indicator, such as test scores, to draw absolute conclusions Do not rely on a single indicator, such as test scores, to draw absolute conclusions about student learning or school performance .about student learning or school performance .

Student learning and school performance should be analyzed in the context of each Student learning and school performance should be analyzed in the context of each school's unique environment and characteristics .school's unique environment and characteristics .

The opinions of parents, school staff, and students can be very helpful in The opinions of parents, school staff, and students can be very helpful in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of schools .understanding the strengths and weaknesses of schools .

Remember to look at school performance over time. Remember to look at school performance over time. SSI-2005, 5th graders must pass the Reading and Math TAKS to be promoted. SSI-2005, 5th graders must pass the Reading and Math TAKS to be promoted.

SSI-2008, 8 SSI-2008, 8 thth graders graders

must pass the Reading and Math TAKS to be promoted.must pass the Reading and Math TAKS to be promoted. SSI-2010, 3SSI-2010, 3rdrd graders graders no longer included in SSI no longer included in SSI

ExemplaryExemplary – For every subject, at least 90% of the tested students met standard or – For every subject, at least 90% of the tested students met standard or

met standard with TPM.met standard with TPM.

Recognized Recognized – For every subject, at least 80% of the tested students met standard or – For every subject, at least 80% of the tested students met standard or

met floor and required improvement or met standard with TPM.met floor and required improvement or met standard with TPM.

Academically Acceptable Academically Acceptable – Varies by subject:– Varies by subject:

Reading/ELAReading/ELA – At least 70% of the tested students pass the test. – At least 70% of the tested students pass the test.

Writing Writing – At least 70% of the tested students pass the test.– At least 70% of the tested students pass the test.

Social Studies Social Studies – At least 70% of the tested students pass the test.– At least 70% of the tested students pass the test.

Mathematics Mathematics – At least 65% of the tested students pass the test.– At least 65% of the tested students pass the test.

ScienceScience – At least 60% of the tested students pass the test. – At least 60% of the tested students pass the test.

or met Required Improvement or met standard with TPMor met Required Improvement or met standard with TPM

Reading / ELA Math Writing Science Social Studies

2010 2011 2009 2010 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011

District 85 83 79 76 90 88 73 72 90 91DRHS 89 90 75 73 74 74 93 93DR 9th 89 82 73 65DRMS 82 81 76 76 91 89 64 62 87 86

Garfield 84 76 86 86 91 85 79 77

N Heights 85 78 84 80 86 91 83 72

SFMMS 83 75 79 69E Side 92 85 83 84 95 82 84 88Lamar 67 80 71 80 74 78 57 69

B. Vista 90 93 91 93 92 96 92 85Chavira 95 92 96 92 95 99 91 85

Calderon 76 73 77 71 96 88 68 69

L Green 85 87 87 89 83 84 83 81

Yellow Highlight Indicates IncreaseYellow Highlight Indicates Increase

TAKS MET STANDARD (SUM OF ALL GRADES) (ACCOUNTABILITY INDICATOR)

SAMPLE STUDY USING THE AEIS REPORTS

2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

Staff 1,360.80 1,261.10 1,284.50 1,290.80 1,397.2

Professional 772.7 778.4 780.2 793.8 791.4

Teacher 644.4 648.9 659.2 665.2 653.6

Professional Support 86.7 88.5 77 81.6 92.8

Campus Administration 30.6 31 35 34 32

Central Admin 11 10 9 13 13

Educational Aides 148.9 146.5 159.5 157.3 161.6

Auxiliary Staff 439.1 336.1 344.8 339.7 444.2

BUDGETED REVENUE INFORMATION Total Revenue $79,136,852 $87,140,231 $88,906,647 $89,732,572 $95,178,209

Total Revenue Per Pupil $5,699 $6,413 $6,522 $6,564 $6,760

BUDGETED EXPENDITURE INFORMATION Expenditures $79,219,566 $82,102,322 $94,378,525 $97,134,476 $96,543,789

Expenditures Per Pupil $5,448 $5,876 $6,201 $6,241 $6,404

SAMPLE STUDY USING THE AEIS REPORTS (cont)

DRHS 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

Total Students 1,981 2,101 2,082 2,005 1,983

9th Grade 50 38 93 0 0

10th Grade 767 800 719 703 675

11th Grade 641 664 686 670 631

12th Grade 523 599 584 632 677

StateState RegionRegion District

English Language Learners Progress Indicator

2010-2011 80 76 71

2009-2010 79 77 73

2008-2009 76 73 68

1994-1995 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001DISTRICT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZEDD.R.H.S. ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLED.R. 9TH ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLED.R.M.S. ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLES.F.M.S. ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZEDGARFIELD ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED EXEMPLARY EXEMPLARY ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLENORTH HEIGHTS RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED EXEMPLARY RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZEDM. RUSSELL M.S. ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLEEAST SIDE ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZEDLAMAR ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLEBUENA VISTA ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED EXEMPLARY RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZEDCHAVIRA ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZEDCALDERON ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE EXEMPLARY RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZEDL. GREEN N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED

2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008DISTRICT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLED.R.H.S. ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLED.R. 9TH ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLED.R.M.S. ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLES.F.M.S. RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE N/A N/A N/AGARFIELD RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLENORTH HEIGHTS RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZEDM. RUSSELL M.S. RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE N/A N/AS.F.M.M.S N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLEEAST SIDE RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLELAMAR RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZEDBUENA VISTA ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZEDCHAVIRA ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZEDCALDERON RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLEL. GREEN RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE

2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011DISTRICT ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLED.R.H.S. ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLED.R. 9TH RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED UNACCEPTABLED.R.M.S. ACCEPTABLE RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLEGARFIELD RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLENORTH HEIGHTS RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLES.F.M.M.S RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLEEAST SIDE RECOGNIZED EXEMPLARY RECOGNIZEDLAMAR RECOGNIZED ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLEBUENA VISTA RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZEDCHAVIRA EXEMPLARY EXEMPLARY RECOGNIZEDCALDERON ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLEL. GREEN RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED RECOGNIZED

SAN FELIPE DEL RIO CISDSCHOOL REPORT CARDS

School Code

School Name

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

233901110 Buena VistaAcademically Acceptable

Academically Unacceptable

Recognized Recognized Recognized Recognized

233901002 Del Rio FreshmanAcademically Acceptable

Academically Acceptable


Recognized RecognizedAcademically Unacceptable

233901001 Del Rio HSAcademically Acceptable






233901043 Del Rio Middle Academically Acceptable




RecognizedAcademically Acceptable

233901112 Dr. CalderonAcademically Acceptable






233901113Dr. L Green Academically

AcceptableAcademically Acceptable




Recognized

233901105 East SideAcademically Unacceptable



Recognized Exemplary Recognized

233901102 GarfieldAcademically Acceptable



Recognized RecognizedAcademically Acceptable

233901108 Cardwell Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated

233901106 LamarAcademically Acceptable

Recognized Recognized RecognizedAcademically Acceptable


233901103 North HeightsAcademically Acceptable

Recognized Recognized Recognized RecognizedAcademically Acceptable

233901111 R. Chavira Recognized Recognized Recognized Exemplary Exemplary Recognized

233901104 S.F.M.M.S.Academically Acceptable



Recognized RecognizedAcademically Acceptable

05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11

ExemplaryExemplary 0 0 0 1 2 0

Total 0 0 0 1 2 0

RecognizedRecognized 1 3 4 8 7 4

Total 1 3 4 8 7 4


Academically Acceptable 10 8 8 3 3 7

AEA: Academically Acceptable 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 10 8 8 3 3 7

Academically Unacceptable

Academically Unacceptable 0 0 0 0 0 1

AEA: Academically Unacceptable

0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 0 0 0 0 1

Not Rated

AEA: Not Rated 0 0 0 0 0 0

Not Rated: Alternative Education

0 0 0 0 0 0

Not Rated: Other 1 1 1 1 1 1

Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues

0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 1 1 1 1 1 1

Total Schools 13 13 13 13 13 13

Class of 2005 Class of 2006 Class of 2007 Class of 2008 Class of 2009 Class of 2010

Number in Class 572 639 611 659 650 706

Graduation Rate 73.8 71.4 69.1 70.4 74.3 80.9

Continued GED Rate 10.3 12.2 14.1 14.9 10.6 10.6

Received GED Rate 6.6 3.6 3.6 .8 2.9 1.3

Longitudinal Dropout Rate 9.3 12.8 13.3 14 12.2 7.2

Completion I Rate 84.1 83.6 83.1 85.3 84.9 91.5

Completion II Rate 90.7 87.2 86.7 86 87.8 92.8

High School Completion Rates for Grades 9-12 by Class Year

PSAT (Pretest for the SAT)PSAT (Pretest for the SAT)

October 2008: 269October 2008: 269



October 2011: 1,161October 2011: 1,161

PLAN (Pretest for ACT)PLAN (Pretest for ACT)October 2010: 549October 2010: 549

Seniors 2010 :Seniors 2010 : (Data based on THECB)(Data based on THECB)

AttendingAttending 4 yr Texas university: 122 4 yr Texas university: 122

AttendingAttending 2 yr Texas 2 yr Texas community/technical/community/technical/ vocational college: 184 vocational college: 184

SeniorsSeniors 2011: (2011: (Data based on students Data based on students applying in the DRHS College Center)applying in the DRHS College Center)

AppliedApplied 4 yr: 246 4 yr: 246

AppliedApplied to 2yr :287 to 2yr :287

AppliedApplied to 2yr & 4yr: 143 to 2yr & 4yr: 143THECB Report of 2011 graduates enrolled in a THECB Report of 2011 graduates enrolled in a Texas institution will be available April 2011Texas institution will be available April 2011

Scholarship OffersScholarship Offers(Amount is based on reward letters,(Amount is based on reward letters,

student and/ or parent input)student and/ or parent input)

Seniors 2008Seniors 2008No Data GatheredNo Data Gathered

Seniors 2009Seniors 2009Approximately 1 MillionApproximately 1 Million

Seniors 2010:Seniors 2010: Approximately 5 millionApproximately 5 million

Seniors 2011:Seniors 2011:

Approximately 8 millionApproximately 8 million

Applied for Financial AidApplied for Financial Aid

Seniors 2010: 389Seniors 2010: 389

Seniors 2011: Close to 393Seniors 2011: Close to 393

Amount is based on students that applied at Amount is based on students that applied at the DRHS College Readiness Center.the DRHS College Readiness Center.

(Exact amount of applicants is not available (Exact amount of applicants is not available for release from the U.S Dept. of Education)for release from the U.S Dept. of Education)

National Hispanic Recognition Program National Hispanic Recognition Program Scholars:Scholars:

2009: 4 students 2009: 4 students

2010: 7 students2010: 7 students

2011: 10 students2011: 10 students

National Merit Scholar: National Merit Scholar:

2004: 12004: 1

2005-2009: 02005-2009: 0

2010: 1 student 2010: 1 student

2011: 1 student 2011: 1 student

SATSAT 2007 Seniors: 1742007 Seniors: 174 2008 Seniors: 2032008 Seniors: 203 2009 Seniors: 1502009 Seniors: 150 2010 Seniors: 2202010 Seniors: 220 2011 Seniors : 2742011 Seniors : 274

ACTACT 2007 Seniors: 712007 Seniors: 71 2008 Seniors: 692008 Seniors: 69 2009 Seniors: 492009 Seniors: 49 2010 Seniors: 852010 Seniors: 85 2011 Seniors: 912011 Seniors: 91

AEIS REPORT 2010-2011

Documents

Transcript of AEIS REPORT 2010-2011