Advancing Local Helicity Injection for Non-Solenoidal Tokamak StartupΒ Β· 2018. 10. 25.Β Β· startup...
Transcript of Advancing Local Helicity Injection for Non-Solenoidal Tokamak StartupΒ Β· 2018. 10. 25.Β Β· startup...
PEGASUSToroidal Experiment
University ofWisconsin-Madison
27th IAEA Fusion
Energy Conference
Gandhinagar, India
Presentation EX/P6-34
25 October 2018
Advancing Local Helicity Injection for Non-Solenoidal Tokamak Startup
M.W. Bongard
G.M. Bodner, M.G. Burke, R.J. Fonck, J.L. Pachicano, J.M. Perry, C. Pierren, J.A. Reusch, A.T. Rhodes, N.J. Richner, C. Rodriguez Sanchez, C.E. Schaefer, and J.D. Weberski
Layout
US Legal8.5 x 14β
US Letter8.5 x 11β
Panel size: A0 Portrait (0.841 m x 1.189 m)
12:1 scale
M.W. Bongard, IAEA FEC 2018
Recommended size per IAEA
110 cm x 85 cm (HxW)
A Growing Understanding of Physics and Engineering
Issues in LHI Informs its Application to Next-Step
Machines
Varying Injector Location Enables Study
of LHI Physics and Engineering Tradeoffs
New Scenarios Developed to Transfer Between LFS β HFS Injector Systems and Combine Strengths of
Each Geometry
Research on the A ~ 1 Pegasus ST is Advancing
the Physics and Technology Basis of Local
Helicity Injection Non-Solenoidal Startup
Operating Regime with Significant Reduction of Large-Scale MHD and
Increased Ip Found During HFS Injection Experiments
HFS LHI at Near-Unity A Provides access to
π½π‘ ~ 100% and Magnetic
Configurations with Minimum |B| Wells
URANIA Experiment: Converted PEGASUS
Facility for US Non-Solenoidal
Development Station
Title Header (1/2 Height Legal)
Recent Experiments Suggest High Frequency
Magnetic Activity and Reconnection Play a Role
in LHI Current Drive
β’ Solenoid-free startup desirable for ST, AT reactors
β’ LHI is promising method to accomplish this goal
β Edge current extracted from injectors at boundary
β Relaxation to tokamak-like state via helicity-conserving instabilities
β Global current limits from Taylor relaxation, helicity balance
β Hardware retractable prior to nuclear phase in reactor
β’ Routinely used for startup on PEGASUS
Research on the A ~ 1 PEGASUS ST is Advancing the Physics and Technology Basis of Local Helicity Injection Non-Solenoidal Startup
M.W. Bongard, IAEA FEC 2018
Non-Solenoidal πΌπ = 0.2 MA Plasma via LHI (πΌπππ β€ 8 kA)
Mo ArcCathode
Shaped W Cathode/Anode
Mo PMI Suppression Guard Rings
Anode
D2 gas feed
VINJ +
Varc
+
IINJ
IArc
Mo Cathode/Anode
Shield
PEGASUS
Parameters
Ip β€ 0.23 MA
π«πshot β€ 0.025 s
BT 0.15 T
A 1.15β1.3
R 0.2β0.45 m
a β€ 0.4 m
ΞΊ 1.4β3.7
Injector
Parameters
Iinj β€ 14 kA
Iinj β€ 4 kA
Vinj β€ 2.5 kV
Ninj β€ 4
Ainj = 2-4 cm2
Iarc β€ 4 kA
Varc β€ 0.5 kV
LocalHelicity
Injectors
Injected Current Stream
HFS System
LFS System
2 m
πΌππ» = 0
A Growing Understanding of Physics and Engineering Issues in LHI Informs its Application to Next-Step Machines
M.W. Bongard, IAEA FEC 2018
β’ Helicity injector source design
β πΌπππ, π€: set πΌππΏ β₯ πΌπ
β πππππ΄πππππππ: attain / sustain πΌπ
β Armoring, limiters to minimize PMI
β’ Injector system geometry
β Provide initial relaxation via near-PF null
β Site conformal to desired plasma shape
β Facility port access compatibility
β’ Injector impedance and power systems
β ππππ = ππππ(ππππ , πππππ , β¦ )
β’ Scaling to high πΌπβ Larger size
β High π΅π
β Longer pulse
β’ Handoff to non-inductive CD
β LHI β OH H-mode demonstrated
β’ Confinement, impurities, and dissipation during LHI
β’ LHI current drive mechanism
LHI Physics Models Coupled Physics/Engineering Needs Outstanding Issues
πΌπ ππΏπ»πΌ + ππΌπ + ππΌππ· = 0 ; πΌπ β€ πΌππΏ
Reconnecting LHI Current Stream
β’ Global πΌπ limits:
β Taylor relaxation
β Helicity conservation
β’ Predictive power balance: πΌπ(π‘)
β’ 3D resistive MHD / NIMROD
β Initial relaxation
β Role of reconnection
ππΏπ»πΌ β π΄ππππ΅π,πππππππ/Ξ¨
πΌπ β€ πΌππΏ~ πΌππΉπΌπππ/π€
Time [ms]
LHI OH H-mode
Low-π΅π πΌπ(ππΏπ»πΌ) Scaling
β’ Extrema of feasible LHI geometries deployed in Pegasus
β’ Low-field-side (LFS) injection
β Injectors on outboard midplane
β High π πππ β low ππΏπ»πΌ
β Dynamic shape β strong ππΌππ·
β’ πΌπ ~ 0.2 MA attained in both geometries
β Power supply and PMI limited
Varying Injector Location Enables Study of LHI Physics and Engineering Tradeoffs
M.W. Bongard, IAEA FEC 2018
Location of LHI Systems,Static HFS Plasma Geometry
Quantity LFS HFS
ππππ β€ 3 β€ 2
π΄πππ 2 cm2 4 cm2
π πππ 0.70 m 0.26 m
π΅πππ β€ 0.08 T β€ 0.22 T
ππππ β€ 1.5 kV β€ 1.5 kV
πΌπππ 6 kA 8 kA
ππππ 9 MW 12 MW
ππΏπ»πΌππΏπ»πΌ,πΏπΉπ
1 3.7
Injector System Comparisons LFS: Non-solenoidal Induction HFS: Helicity Injection
β’ High-field-side (HFS) injection
β Injectors in lower divertor
β Low π πππ β strong ππΏπ»πΌ
β Static shape β minimal ππΌππ·
New Scenarios Developed to Transfer Between LFS β HFS Injector Systems and Combine Strengths of Each Geometry
M.W. Bongard, IAEA FEC 2018
πΌπ = 0.225 MA LFS β HFS LHI Startup
π πππ = 26 cm, π΅π = 0.15 TThomson Scattering Profiles π πππ = 26 cm, t = 28.5 msβ’ LFS β HFS handoff provides ready access
to full-π΅π operations with HFS injectors
β LFS: Simpler relaxation access, lower PMI
β HFS: Higher ππΏπ»πΌ
β Seamless transfer between separate LHI systems
β’ Informs HFS high-π΅π LHI system design
β Relaxation, sustainment requirements may demand
separate hardware features in higher-field machines
β’ Record LHI πΌπ = 0.225 MA attained
β Peaked temperature, density pressure profiles
β ππ > 100 eV, ππ ~ 1Γ1019 m-3
Recent Experiments Suggest High Frequency Magnetic Activity and Reconnection Play a Role in LHI Current Drive
M.W. Bongard, IAEA FEC 2018
β’ NIMROD simulations of HFS LHI reproduce features observed in experiment
β Relaxation to tokamak-like state
β Bursty 10βs kHz π = 1 activity on LFS Mirnovs
β Identifies helical current stream reconnection as
a current drive mechanism
PEGASUS NIMROD
Internal π΅π§ Measurements
β’ Anomalous, reconnection-driven ion heating present during LHI
β Continuously sustains ππ > ππ
β Consistent with two-fluid reconnection theory
β ππ correlated with highfrequency activity
β’ Internal magnetic measurements find significant high-frequency spectral content
β ~700 kHz feature: arc source
β Broadband continuum
Operating Regime with Significant Reduction of Large-Scale MHD and Increased πΌπ Found During HFS Injection Experiments
β’ Abrupt MHD transition can lead to improved performance
β Low-f π = 1 activity reduced by over 10Γ on LFS
β Bifurcation in πΌπ evolution following transition
β Up to 2Γ πΌπ at fixed ππΏπ»πΌ
β Linear scaling of πΌπ(ππΏπ»πΌ) in this regime at low π΅π = 0.05 T
β’ Sustained discharges without π = 1 activity possible
β Implies π = 1 mode not responsible/required for LHI current drive
β’ Mechanism for transition unclear, under investigation
β π = 1 reduction interpreted as stabilization of injector streams
β Extremely sensitive to π΅π, π΅π, πΌπ, fueling
β Access scales with πΌπ/πΌππΉ ~ 1: min- π΅ well?
β If extensible to higher π΅π, may afford simpler LHI system
requirements
M.W. Bongard, IAEA FEC 2018
Operating Space for ~8,500 HFS LHI Discharges
New Reduced MHD Regime Improves Plasma Performance
HFS LHI at Near-Unity A Provides Access to π½π‘ ~ 100%and Magnetic Configurations with Minimum π΅ Wells
β’ Access to highly-shaped, high π½π‘ plasmas
β Low πΌππΉ ~ 0.6 πΌπ
β π΄ ~ 1: high π , low βπ, and high π½π,πππ₯
β Reconnection-driven ππ > ππ
β Disrupting at ideal no-wall stability limit
β’ High-π½π‘ equilibria contain large min- π΅ region
β Up to 47% of plasma volume
β Potentially favorable for stabilization of drift modes, reduction of stochastic transport
β’ Minimum π΅ regime arises from 3 major influences
β π΅π ~ π΅π at π΄ ~ 1
β Hollow π½(π )
β Pressure-driven diamagnetism (although π½π < 1)
M.W. Bongard, IAEA FEC 2018
Min π΅ Well inπ½π‘ ~ 100% Plasma
120
100
80
40
20
0
bt(%
)
60
1050IN
15
Troyon Stability Diagram for Tokamaks, STs
High πΌπ = 5π΄πΌπ/πΌππΉ > 10 accessible at π΄ ~ 1.2 in PEGASUS
URANIA Experiment: Converted PEGASUS Facility forUS Non-Solenoidal Development Station
M.W. Bongard, IAEA FEC 2018
β’ Mission: compare / contrast / combine reactor-relevant startup techniques at πΌπ ~ 0.3 MA
β LHI, CHI, RF/EBW Heating & CD
β Goal: guidance for ~1 MA startup on NSTX-U, beyond
β’ Upgrades from PEGASUS to URANIA:
β New centerstack assembly: No solenoid magnet
β Increase π΅π 4Γ: 0.15 β 0.6 T
β Longer pulse: 25 β 100 ms
β Improved shape control with new PF, divertor coils
β Diagnostic neutral beam: kinetic and impurity diagnostics
β EBW RF Heating & CD (w/ ORNL)
β Transient, Sustained CHI (w/ Univ. Washington, PPPL)
β’ Engineering design underway
β Centerstack upgrade scheduled for late 2019
PEGASUS URANIA
Solenoid-free24-turn TF Bundle
High-Stress OH Solenoid12-turn TF Bundle
URANIA Experiment
URANIA Concept Drawing