SMSF Real Property with Borrowing - SMSF Superannuation Accounting
Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro...
Transcript of Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro...
![Page 1: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
www.accurium.com.au P | 1800 203 123
Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF: elected segregationPresented by Melanie Dunn & Doug McBirnie
![Page 2: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
3
Agenda
Segregation and disregarded small fund assets
Elected segregation
Ask an actuary… commonly asked questions
SMSF Association National Conference
– Concurrent Session 8A: The ultimate guide to understanding ECPI and segregation
– Plenary room 3
– Friday 22 Feb, 9.30am
![Page 3: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
4
Assets solely supporting retirement phase liabilities
Claim ECPI using the segregated method in Section 295.385 of ITAA 1997– Don’t need an actuarial certificate– Income on segregated pension assets is ECPI (100% exempt)– Capital gains and losses are disregarded and not included in assessable income– General expenses are not deductible as incurred on assets producing exempt income
This method is most commonly used once a fund is fully in retirement phase Except if the fund has disregarded small fund assets it cannot use the segregated method
Segregated pension assets
![Page 4: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
5
New annual assessment each 30 June for how a fund must claim ECPI in the next year– Also applies in first year of the SMSF
SMSF will have disregarded small fund assets for the next financial year if:– At 30 June a member was in retirement phase and had over $1.6m total super balance– In next financial year the SMSF has a member in retirement phase at any time
If have disregarded small fund assets the fund is not eligible to use the segregated method for tax purposes and must claim ECPI using the proportionate method.– Actuarial certificate is required to claim ECPI
Disregarded small fund assets
![Page 5: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
6
Elected segregationMust not have disregarded small fund assets to segregate for tax purposes
Electing for an asset or pool of assets to support a retirement phase income stream
– Cannot segregate part of an asset
– May need notional sub-accounts where asset earns income to maintain segregation
Elected segregation needs to be done in advance, cannot do in arrears
![Page 6: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
7
Elected segregation documentationDocument in the Fund’s investment strategy
– Implications for member risk profiles
– Liquidity considerations to meet minimum pension standards
– Think about impact on future capital gains and losses
– Can stop and start segregation as circumstances change over time
Can elect to employ a full segregation or partial (hybrid) segregation strategy
![Page 7: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
8
Electing for assets to be segregatedThe Good Life Super Fund
![Page 8: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
9
Good Life Super Fund: full segregation
Jack has retired and commenced an ABP
Considering use of elected segregation
– Fund does not have disregarded small fund assets
Pool of assets worth $1,300,000
Jack ABP $850,000 Marilyn Accumulation $450,500
![Page 9: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
10
Good Life Super Fund: full segregation
Elect to segregate exactly $850,000 of fund assets at 1 July 2018 to Jack’s ABP
– Document as part of fund investment strategy what assets are segregated
– Make sure have segregated enough liquid assets to meet ongoing pension requirements
– Maintain notional sub accounts on shared bank account
– Income and expenses relating to the segregated assets will be allocated to Jack’s ABP
– Income and expenses relating to the other assets will be allocated to Marilyn’s account
Specific assets currently worth exactly $850,000 All other assets
Jack ABP $850,000 Marilyn Accumulation $450,500
![Page 10: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
11
Good Life Super Fund 2018-19
Segregated assets income: $44,500Net capital gain: $0
Distinct general expenses: $1,500
Concessional contribution: $25,000Other assets income: $3,515
Net capital gain: $10,000Distinct expenses: $400
Jack ABP Marilyn Accumulation
Deductible expenses: $1,600General expenses that are not distinct and severable: $3,000
![Page 11: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
12
Good Life Super Fund 2018-19 ECPI
Segregated assets income: $44,500Net capital gain: $0
Concessional contribution: $25,000Other assets income: $3,515
Net capital gain: $10,000
Jack ABP Marilyn Accumulation
Marilyn’s assets are not ‘segregated’, and with no retirement phase account all income and net capital gains are assessable
ECPI = assessable income earned on Jack’s segregated ABP assets
Annual return will have
– ECPI = $44,500
– Assessable income = $13,515
– Assessable contributions = $25,000
![Page 12: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
13
Good Life Super Fund 2018-19
The trustees decide to use the TR 93/17 formula for determining deductibility of expenses that are not distinct and severable:
– Assessable income / total income = 38,515 / (38,515 + 44,500) = 46.395%
– Total deductions = 1,600 + 400 + 0.46395 x 3,000 = $3,392
– Total non-deductible expenses = 1,500 + 0.53605 x 3,000 = $3,108
Distinct general expenses: $1,500 Distinct expenses: $400
Jack ABP Marilyn Accumulation
Deductible expenses: $1,600General expenses that are not distinct and severable: $3,000
![Page 13: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
14
Good Life Super Fund: partial segregation
Elected segregation of a property valued at $812,000 & new bank account
SMSF assets except for the property, mostly defensive assets
SMSF assets: balanced investment mix
Jack ABP $850,000 Marilyn Accumulation $450,500
Defensive risk profileGrowth risk profile
Jack ABP $850,000 Marilyn Accumulation $450,500
![Page 14: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
15
Good Life Super Fund: partial segregation
Marilyn Accumulation $450,500
Elected segregation of a property valued at $812,000 & new bank account
SMSF assets except for the property, mostly defensive assets
Jack ABP $850,000
Jack pays minimum pension payment of $34,000…
Jack now only has $4,000 in assets that are not elected as segregated… liquidity issues
Elected segregation of a property valued at $812,000 & new bank account
SMSF assets except for the property, mostly defensive assets
Jack ABP $816,000 Marilyn Accumulation $450,500
![Page 15: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
16
Elected segregation of a property valued at $812,000 & new bank account
SMSF assets except for the property, mostly defensive assets
Jack takes lump sum payment of $15,000…
Segregated asset value exceeds account to which attributed – no longer segregated
SMSF assets: balanced investment mix
Good Life Super Fund: partial segregation
Marilyn Accumulation $450,500
Elected segregation of a property valued at $812,000 & new bank account
SMSF assets except for the property, mostly defensive assets
Jack ABP $816,000
Jack ABP $801,000 Marilyn Accumulation $450,500
![Page 16: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
17
Let’s consider Jack & Marilyn did segregate a property to Jack’s ABP at 1 July 2018
– Segregation documented in the fund investment strategy and separate bank account set
up for the property (also segregated)
ECPI in 2018-19 = segregated method ECPI + proportionate method ECPI
– Segregated method ECPI = income on segregated property and bank account
– Proportionate method ECPI = exempt income proportion x income on all other assets
Good Life Super Fund ECPI calculation
![Page 17: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
18
![Page 18: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
19
![Page 19: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
20
![Page 20: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
21
![Page 21: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
22
Segregated property
![Page 22: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
23
![Page 23: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
24
Segregated income: $42,500Distinct expenses $1,500
Assessable income: $15,515
Deductible expenses $600General expenses $3,400
![Page 24: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
25
Good Life Super Fund ECPI 2018-19
Segregated method ECPI = $42,500Proportionate method ECPI = 0.07482 x 15,515 = $1,160.83ECPI = 42,500 + 1,160.83 = $43,661
![Page 25: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
26
Total deductions = 600 + (deductible proportion x 3,400)
Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income proportion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general
expenses that relate to both segregated and unsegregated assets
– 1 – exempt income proportion = 1 – 0.07482 = 92.518%
– Actuarial calculation does not include segregated assets and so overstates a fair and
reasonable deduction, 92.518% of all fund assets are not producing assessable income
Need to allow for all fund liabilities, including segregated assets…
Good Life Super Fund expenses
![Page 26: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
27
Jack and Marilyn obtain an Accurium actuarial certificate and also request for us to provide them
with the expense deductibility proportion allowing for all fund liabilities.
– Expense deductibility proportion = 34.727%
– This identifies that 34.727% of all fund liabilities on average were non-retirement phase liabilities
producing assessable income
– Total deductions = 600 + (0.34727 x 3,400) = $1,780.72
– Non-deductible expenses = 1,500 + (0.65273 x 3,400) = $3,719.28
Good Life Super Fund expenses
![Page 27: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
28
Elected segregation can only be used where the fund does NOT have disregarded small fund assets (can still segregate for investment purposes) and must be documented
Beware of liquidity issues and understand impact on member risk profiles
A net capital gain or loss on segregated assets will be disregarded = 100% exempt
Claim ECPI using
– both segregated and proportionate method if use partial segregation
– segregated method if employ full segregation
General administrative expenses
– relating to segregated assets will be non-deductible
– which are not distinct and severable must be apportioned based on a fair and reasonable method based on all fund assets
A fund that has elected segregation
![Page 28: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
29
Can you use elected segregation only for investment purposes?
Is elected segregation commonly used in SMSFs?
What does the question on the application form ‘Is the fund eligible to use the segregated method?’ actually mean?
If I select that the fund is eligible to use the segregated method how come I don’t see any segregated assets in the chart?
Commonly asked questionsAsk an actuary…
![Page 29: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
30
If I come via a platform with all the data pre-filled does it correctly complete all the information about segregated assets?
How do you show an asset becoming segregated/unsegregated during the year on the actuarial certificate application form?
Can you choose to treat the fund as not having elected or deemed segregation for tax purposes?
How should the income on a segregated asset be treated?
Commonly asked questionsAsk an actuary…
![Page 30: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
31
How is a period where the fund is solely in accumulation phase treated under the ECPI rules? How is the income in this period taxed?
If a fund has an accumulation balance for part of the year does this mean you can’t use the segregated method?
Can you choose to segregate assets to support an accumulation account?
Commonly asked questionsAsk an actuary…
![Page 31: Advanced segregation strategies in an SMSF · Actuarial method using (1 – exempt income pro portion) is no longer fair and reasonable for general expenses that relate to both segregated](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042915/5f52380606f4840fad72aff4/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
www.accurium.com.au P | 1800 203 123www.accurium.com.au P | 1800 203 123
QUESTIONS?
Call us on 1800 203 123 Email us at [email protected] Visit the TechHub: https://www.accurium.com.au/technical-hub
The information in this presentation has been prepared by Accurium Pty Ltd ABN 13 009 492 219 (Accurium). It is general information only and is not intended to be financial product advice, tax advice or legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Whilst all care is taken in the preparation of this presentation, no warranty is given with respect to the information provided and Accurium is not liable for any loss arising from reliance on this information. Scenarios, examples and comparisons are shown for illustrative purposes only and should not be relied on by individuals when they make investment decisions. We recommend that individuals seek professional advice before making any financial decisions. This presentation was accompanied by an oral presentation, and is not a complete record of the discussion held. No part of this presentation should be used elsewhere without prior consent from the author.