Advanced Diagnostic Approach of Failures for Grid ... · 5 % Performance improvement (availability...
Transcript of Advanced Diagnostic Approach of Failures for Grid ... · 5 % Performance improvement (availability...
Andreas LiveraResearch Associate University of Cyprus, FOSS Research Centre for Sustainable Energy - PV Technology Laboratory
Advanced Diagnostic Approach of Failures for Grid-connected PV Systems
Outline
• Introduction
• Methodology
• Results
• Conclusions
• Future Work
218/09/2019
Introduction
318/09/2019
• Key factor for future PV uptake (PV value chain) is to reduce Levelized Cost ofElectricity (LCoE).
• Increasing performance and reducing operating costs (advanced monitoring).
Robust condition monitoring
Failure detection and classification
Data quality and sanity
System health state
Added Values Services: Performance loss quantification
Degradation rate estimation
Quality Control
Cost-effective O&M
Background & Objective
418/09/2019
Example:100 MWp plantLCoE of 0.08 €/kWh160,000 MWh/yr (M€ 12.8/yr)
~0.64 M€/year
5 % Performance improvement (availability and quality control)
Main challenge in the quest for ensuring quality of operation and reduced LCoE is to safeguard reliability and cost-effective O&M (advanced monitoring).
Background & Objective
518/09/2019
Specific Objective: Development of an innovative condition monitoring platform for proactive and reactive O&M with enhanced data analytic functionalities.
Advanced baseline condition monitoring solution to ensure operational quality and optimise energy production.
Partners: GI and UCYProject: Innovative Performance Monitoring System for Improved Reliability and Optimized Levelized Cost of Electricity IPERMON [Solar-ERA.net project]Budget: €400,000Duration: 36 MonthsWeblink: http://www.pvtechnology.ucy.ac.cy/projects/ipermon/
Approach – Advanced condition monitoring
618/09/2019
Experimental setup – Data acquisition system (DAQ)
• Test-bench PV system in Cyprus• OTF GI in Arizona
Data quality routines (DQRs)• Identify missing/erroneous data• Correction of data
PV system model prediction• Predict electrical characteristics of
the system
Degradation rate Health state detector Failure diagnosis routines (FDRs)
Methodology – Data quality routines (DQRs)
718/09/2019
• Identify missing (or erroneous) data, outliers and outages.• Estimate system availability and sensor deviations.• Correct data through data imputation techniques (k-NN and Kalman filtering).
Methodology – PV system model prediction
818/09/2019
• Parametric and machine learning simulation models.
Highest prediction accuracy - FFNN
Bypass diode pattern
Methodology – Failure signatures
918/09/2019
• Different failure types (open- and short-circuit PV module, inverter shutdown,shorted bypass diode and partial shading) emulated to test-bench PV system.
• Characterise the effect of failure on the main DC electrical parameters.• Create failure signature profiles and patterns - Fault Introduction.
Inverter shutdownPartial shading
• Comparative assessment between measured and predicted measurementsagainst set threshold levels (TL).
• Statistical outlier detection rules between and predicted measurements.• Health state detector (real time).
1018/09/2019
Methodology – Failure detection stage
Methodology – Failure classification stage
1118/09/2019
• Unsupervised procedure based on Fuzzy Logic Rules.• Supervised learning models (k-NN, DT, SVM and FIS) on data-set partition.• Performance assessment: confusion matrix and specificity
Train set (70 % - 2083 data points)
Test set (30 % - 893 data points)
Monthly data-set (2976 data points)
2062 normal points
21 fault points
884 normal points
9 fault pointsGpoa Tm ……… PDC Label
1 % Fault signatures
Results – Open-circuit failure (Inverter/Fuse/Interconnect)
1218/09/2019
All FDR models diagnosed the open-circuit PV module faults – Specificity 100 %
Parameters required for failure classification:DC power, voltage and current.
Affected parameters:↓ DC power↑ DC voltage ↓ DC current
Results – Short-circuit failure
1318/09/2019
FDR k-NN model diagnosed the short-circuit PV module faults – Specificity 90 %
Parameters required for failure classification:DC power, voltage and current.
Affected parameters:↓ DC power↓ DC voltage
Results – Partial shading
1418/09/2019
FDR k-NN model diagnosed partial shading – Specificity 100 %
Parameters required for failure classification:DC power, voltage, current, AIS and AzS.
Affected parameters:↓ DC power ↓ DC voltage ↓ DC current
Results – Bypass diode failure
1518/09/2019
FDR k-NN model diagnosed bypass diode failures – Specificity 70 %
Parameters required for failure classification:Time, DC power, voltage and current.
Affected parameters:↓ DC power↓ DC voltage
Conclusions
1618/09/2019
• A methodology that will assist in maintaining optimal level of operation of PV
plants was proposed through the development of FDRs.
• The developed FDRs were capable of detecting accurately the faults (100 %).
• The classification models showed good accuracy of classifying each failure
occurrence within the test set used for benchmarking.
• The developed k-NN model exhibited the best classification performance
(average specificity of 92 %).
• However, a combination of models is recommended for achieving high
classification accuracies.
Future work
1718/09/2019
• Use of historic data for further assisting the classification stage.
• Operational verification of the algorithms on experimental test-setup at the
Outdoor Test Facility (OTF) of Gantner Instruments (GI) in Arizona and other 3rd
party datasets.
Thank you for your attention
18
Andreas LiveraResearch Associate
FOSS - PV Technology LaboratoryUniversity of Cyprus
Email: [email protected]
More information…Website: www.pvtechnology.ucy.ac.cy
Acknowledgments