Defense Acquisition Challenge Program (DACP): Aerogel for Ships: Fire barrier, IR Suppression, Blast Mitigation, Decreased Weight, Volume, Installation Costs, and Fuel Savings.Title IIIs Laser Protective Eyewear project established a domestic supplier for high performance infrared coatings for spectacles, goggles and visors. Advanced Systems & Concepts Rapidly Placing Relevant, Mature Technology into the Hands of Joint and Coalition Warfighters AS&C Partners with Services & Agencies to: Match technology to warfighting needs lab and industry outreach

Overcome resistance to transformational concepts

Ensure technology contributes to joint/ coalition capabilities

Provide joint warfighters with options for integrating service capabilities

Transfer DoD technology to the private sector: An industry on-ramp and access to meeting warfighter needsDoDs Resource for Technology TransitionArea Cruise Missile Defense (ACMD) ACTD integrates civilian and military sensors into a single air-defense common operational picture. VideoFAAJoint Based Expeditionary Connectivity Center (JBECC)Tactical RadarExisting LandlinesJoint Surveillance System RadarsCANADAPatriotDACPDPA Title IIIACTDTTITechnology Transition Initiative (TTI) used DARPAs Water Purification Pen technology to accelerate the technology fielding to Afghanistan, Iraq, and Tsunami Victims.

Advanced Systems and Concepts

ACTDs rapidly field emergent mature technologies to joint warfightersBalanced emphasis on tailoring technology with associated Tactics, Techniques, & Procedures (TTPs) to user needs Primary customers for ACTDs are joint Combatant CommandersJoint, Coalition, & transformational opportunities are prioritiesACTDs require a Lead Service/Agency and a CoCom Sponsor ACTDs are not an acquisition/procurement programCharter is to minimize processes that delay rapid fielding of demonstrations Overcoming resistance to transformational conceptsRack & Stack voting process used to select Candidate slate inside the Planning, Programming, Budgeting & Execution (PPBE) processExample: FY 2006 selection is in process nowACTD Support to Joint Combatant Commanders

*

FY 2006 AS&C Resources Overview(Direct Oversight of $325M) as of Feb 2005Source: FY 2006 Presidents Budget RDT&E/DW: $311M DPA Title III Procurement: $13M OSD Maj Equip-JCTD Procure: $1M

Program$MAdvanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD)(BA-3)$164Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD)(BA-3/4/5 & Procure)$40Joint Warfighting Program (JWP)-BA-3$10Foreign Comparative Testing (FCT)-BA-6$36Defense Production Act (DPA) Title III$13Technology Transition Initiative (TTI)-BA-3$30TechLink (BA-3)$3Defense Acquisition Challenge Pgm (DACP)-BA-5$29

Chart1

163649

40000

10205

35738

13573

29718

3435

28975

FY-06

ALL AS&C-PBR 06

ALL AS&C DIRECT RESOURCE EXECUTION (11 Active Program Elements)

Last Update: Feb 7, 2005

PA&EPA&EPA&EPB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06

AS&C OPR Responsbility in bluePEFY-01FY-02FY-03FY-04FY-05FY-06FY-07FY-08FY-09FY-10FY-11

PROGRAMBAActualActualActualCurrent EstCurrent EstPB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06

ACTD:30603750D8Z118,819157,762195,136212,570212,915163,649163,744174,549174,788179,239184,216

JCTD:30603648D8Z35,00035,00035,00035,00035,00035,000

JCTD: (Transition):40604648D8Z3,0003,0003,0003,0003,0003,000

Defense Acq Executive:50605648D8Z1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000

OSD Major Equip (JCTD):P-10902198D8Z1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000

JWP:30603727D8Z7,5387,5368,8509,94910,69610,20510,47611,20911,23111,46111,724

COSSI:70604805D8Z9,54122,73515,5040.00.00.00.00.00.0

Tech Link (New PE)30603942D8Z0.00.00.03,4307,9853,4353,4333,5703,4983,6433,698

FCT:60605130D8Z31,40534,83929,31935,95636,83335,73836,41938,27838,27139,04939,942

DPA Title III: (Executed by USAF)P0904903D8Z2,97239,52971,94777,43742,76513,5735,3845,5125,6345,7665,888

FY-06

Defense Challenge Program (DACP)50604051D8Z25,11628,97529,23829,61930,40031,11131,791ACTD163,64950%

JCTD40,00012%

JWP10,2053%

QRSP Total: (DDR&E OPR)30603826D8Z24,07671,35241,929110,717111,026115,395114,248115,788117,333FCT35,73811%

Tech Transition Initiative (TTI)3Proj: 8296,01912,72920,46629,71829,92631,28731,34532,09932,841DPA Title III13,5734%

Defense Challenge Program (DACP)3Proj: 82712,03817,0930.00.00.00.00.0TTI29,7189%

Quick Reaction Fund (DDR&E)3Proj: 8266,01915,52221,46380,99981,10084,10882,90383,68984,492Tech Link3,4351%

Rapid Reaction Fund (DDR&E)3Proj: 82835,20034,91975,0000.00.00.00.0DACP28,9759%

325,293100%

Total AS&C Direct Controls:170,275262,401338,813369,164356,776325,293318,620334,024335,167342,368350,100

Total does not include Gray DDR&E Funding lines: QRF and RRF

&R&"Arial,Bold"Point of Contact:&"Arial,Regular"Mark Peterson. 695-7937

&L&Z&F&R&A

ALL AS&C-PBR 06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

FY-06

FY-2006 AS&C Direct Resource ExecutionFY-2006 Pres Bud Submit-(Feb 2005)$325 M

OTT Funding

OTT Funding Current Estimate FY2005 PRESBUD

Last Update: July 2004

NEEDS UPDATING TO PBR-06

PB-04PB-05PB-05PB-05These $$ figures are Linked to the Main Spreadsheet

($ in Thousands)FY-02FY-03FY-04FY-05 APPROPOTTFY-02FY-03FY-04FY-05

COSSI: (0604805)22,73515,5040.00.0COSSI22,73515,5040.00.0

COSSI Total:22,73515,5040.00.0Dual Use30,46210,07510,4965,151

Dual Use (by Service)MANTECH227,909216,851253,001249,743

Army: (0602805A)10,0450.00.00.0TTI0.06,01913,25121,463

Navy: (0602805N)10,0000.00.00.0TECH Link1,0001,5003,5478,084

Air Force (0602805F)10,41710,07510,4965,151DPA Title III39,52971,94777,43742,765

DUAL USE Total:30,46210,07510,4965,151Total:321,635321,896357,732327,206

MANTECH (by Service)

Army: 0708045A61,05979,06685,85391,886

Navy: 0708011N70,32671,70464,27060,365

Air Force: 0708011F55,69445,34057,00757,212

DLA: 0708011S40,83020,74145,87140,280

MANTECH Total:227,909216,851253,001249,743

Tech Trans Initiative (TTI): (0603826D8Z)0.06,01913,25121,463

TTI Total:0.06,01913,25121,463

Tech Link: (0603942D8Z)0.00.03,5478,084

TECH LINK Total:1,0001,5003,5478,084

DPA Title IIII: (0904903D8Z)39,52971,94777,43742,765

DPA Title III Total:39,52971,94777,43742,765

Tech Transfer (NATIBO)0.00.00.00.0

OTT Oversight funding Total:321,635321,896357,732327,206

&L&Z&F&A&RLast Printed&D

OTT Funding

00000

00000

00000

00000

COSSI

Dual Use

MANTECH

TECH Link

DPA Title III

Dollars in Thousands

OTT Resource OversightFY-05 Appropriated (Not Adjusted for Congressional Reductions)

CTO Funding

CTO Funding FY2006 PRESBUD

Last Update: February 2005

PA&EPA&EPB-06PB-06PB-06PB-06These $$ figures are Linked to the Main Spreadsheet

($ in Thousands)FY-01FY-02FY-03FY-04FY-05FY-06FY-07CTOFY-01FY-02FY-03FY-04FY-05FY-06FY-07

FCT: (PE 0605130D8Z)31,40534,83929,31935,95636,83335,73836,419FCT31,40534,83929,31935,95636,83335,73836,419

FCT Total:31,40534,83929,31935,95636,83335,73836,419DACP0.00.012,03817,09325,11628,97529,238

DACP: (New FY05 PE 0604051D8Z)0.00.012,03817,09325,11628,97529,238Total:31,40534,83941,35753,04961,94964,71365,657

DUAL USE Total:0.012,03817,09325,11628,97529,238

OTT Oversight funding Total:34,83941,35753,04961,94964,71365,657

Note: Techlink OSD PE is new starting in FY-04. Prior years funding was through a DARPA Program Element and executed by the USAF.

&L&Z&F&A&RLast Printed&D

CTO Funding

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

FCT

DACP

Dollars in Thousands

CTO Office

BES FY2006

ALL AS&C DIRECT RESOURCE EXECUTION (7 Program Elements)

Last Update: Nov 15, 2004

PB04PB05PB05APPNBES-06BES-06BES-06BES-06BES-06BES-06

AS&C OPR Responsbility in bluePEFY-01FY-02FY-03FY-04FY-05FY-06FY-07FY-08FY-09FY-10FY-11

PROGRAMBAActualActualCurrent EstCurrent EstAPPROP.BES-06BES-06BES-06BES-06BES-06BES-06FY-04

ACTD:30603750D8Z157,762195,136218,167219,001195,748198,614202,774208,265213,141217,654ACTD218,167

JWP10,284

JWP:30603727D8Z7,5368,85010,28410,9369,92510,20110,59610,88311,13811,374COSSI0.0

FCT36,464

COSSI:70604805D8Z22,73515,5040.00.00.00.00.00.0DPA Title III77,437

TTI13,251

Tech Link (New PE)30603942D8Z0.00.03,5478,0842,1732,1792,1662,1842,2352,282Tech Link3,547

DACP17,793

FCT:60605130D8Z34,83929,31936,46435,63334,92035,65536,37537,28938,16238,970

DPA Title III: (Executed by USAF)P0904903D8Z39,52971,94777,43742,76513,5735,3845,5125,6345,7665,888

FY-05

Defense Challenge Program (DACP)50604051D8Z0.00.00.025,71328,97529,23829,68930,48231,19631,857ACTD219,00160%

JWP10,9363%

QRSP Total: (DDR&E OPR)30603826D8Z0.024,07646,56642,92657,95058,47659,37860,96462,39263,714FCT35,63310%

Tech Transition Initiative (TTI)3Proj: 8290.06,01913,25121,46328,97529,23829,68930,48231,19631,857DPA Title III42,76512%

Defense Challenge Program (DACP)3Proj: 8270.012,03817,7930.00.00.00.00.0TTI21,4636%

Quick Reaction Fund (DDR&E)Proj: 8260.06,01915,52221,46328,97529,23829,68930,48231,19631,857Tech Link8,0842%

Rapid Reaction Fund (DDR&E)Proj: 8280.035,20034,9190.00.00.00.00.0DACP25,7137%

363,595

Total AS&C Direct Controls:262,401338,813376,943363,595314,289310,509316,801325,219332,834339,882

Total does not include Gray DDR&E Funding lines: QRF and RRF

&R&"Arial,Bold"Point of Contact:&"Arial,Regular"Mark Peterson. 695-7937

&L&Z&F&R&A

BES FY2006

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

FY-05

FY-2005 AS&C Direct Resource ExecutionFY-2005 Appropriation$364M

AS&C Programswww.acq.osd.mil/asc

ProgramWebsitePhoneAdvanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD)www.acq.osd.mil/actd(703) 697 - 3568 DPA Title IIIwww.dtic.mil/dpatitle3(703) 607 - 5314Independent R & Dwww.dtic.mil/ird(703) 607 - 5314Comparative Test Officewww.acq.osd.mil/cto(703) 602 - 3740Def Acquisition Challengehttps://bids.acqcenter.com/dacp(703) 602 - 3739Technology Transferwww.dtic.mil/techtransit(703) 607 - 5315TechLinkwww.techlinkcenter.org(703) 607 - 5315TechMatchwww.dodtechmatch.com(703) 607 - 5315NATIBOwww.dtic.mil/natibo(703) 607 - 5315Dual Use S&Twww.dtic.mil/dust(703) 607 - 5315Tech. Transition Initiativewww.acq.osd.mil/iti(703) 607 - 5316ManTechwww.dodmantech.com(703) 607 - 5319

*

BA5 System Development & Demonstration ($19.75B)BA4 Advanced Component Development & Prototypes ($14.14B)BA3 Advanced Technology Development ($5.06B)BA2 Applied Research ($4.14B)BA1 Basic Research ($1.32B)Technology Base(BA1 + 2) = $5.46B)Science and Technology(BA1 + BA2 + BA3 = $10.52B)15% of RDT&EBA6 RDT&E Management Support ($3.77B)BA7 Operational Systems Development ($21.16B)Development(BA4 + BA5 = $33.89B)(BA6 + BA7 = $24.93B)FY 2006 RDT&E Presidents Budget RequestDefense Wide DUSD (AS&C) RDT&E Support Totals $311 M (~200 M from ACTD/JCTD BA-3)OSD Defense Wide Transition Programs Highly Leveraged across Service and Agency Budgets. Less than half a percent of RDT&E supports AS&C programs$69.4B

Components (All RDT&E)$BUSA9.73USAF22.61USN18.04Def Agency & SOCOM18.97

*

ACTD Projects Positionedbetween S&T & AcquisitionS&TAcquisition & LogisticsACTDIs aTransition ProgramTransition programs are not acquisition programs, and should not be science projectsFilling the Gap between S&T and Acquisition for the CoCom CustomerAdvanced Concept Technology DemonstrationTry before you buyThe 80% Solution71% of all ACTDs transition at least one product into a warfighting capability

Advanced Systems and Concepts

Resource Perspective:Core Military Capabilities and Joint EnablersCharacterization of CoCom Needs:Core Service-specific capabilities (~80%?)Joint military capabilities (~20%?)

Nature of CoCom Joint Needs:Interactive, Multi-Service core military capabilitiesJoint enabling capabilitiesUnique Regional/Specified mission needs ACTD/JCTD Target AreaACTD/JCTD Target AreaACTD/JCTD Target AreaTTI, DACP, FCT TargetsTTI, DACP, FCT Targets

*

ACTD Examples & HighlightsBiometrics Automated Toolset HUMINT and Counter-Intelligence Support Tools ACTD (1999-2003)Theater Support Vessel(2003-2006)Agile Transportation for the 21st Century(2002-2005)--Accelerated

Dynamic CONOPS Collapses V,T, A Process

JFCOM

CENTCOM

FORCE REQUIREMENTS

FORCEREQUIREMENTS

SOURCED FORCES

MOVEMENTDETAILS

(RLD)

SCHEDULED DEPARTURE& ARRIVAL TIMES

FORCEREQUIREMENTS

REQUIREMENTS

B8

B8

SC

V

S

T

FORSCOM

S

AT21 - Dynamic Optimization

*

ACTDs either: Transition to Program of Record, Residual Meets Need of Warfighter, or Return to Technology Base Deliverables of an ACTD: Concept of Operations {to include Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTP)} Military Utility Assessment (MUA) Residual Leave BehindFY 2005 there are 79 Active ACTDsSpartan ScoutMidyear Start (2002-2007)Active Denial System(2002-2006)Joint Explosive Ordnance Disposal (JEOD) ACTD(2002-2006)ADS Video Spartan VideoTactical Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (TACT IFSAR ACTD)(2003-Canceled 2005)

Operation Allied Force

KosovoCOMPLETED ACTDsDeployed in Recent ConflictsAfghanistanOperation Enduring Freedom OAF OEF OIF NE O Completed ACTDs Used in Recent Conflicts Adaptive Course of Action X Advanced Joint Planning X X X X Airbase/Port Biological Detection X X X X Area Cruise Missile Defense X X Battlefield Awareness & Data Dissemination X X X Chemical Add-On to Biological Detection X X X X Coastal Area Protection X X Coherent Analytical Computing Environment X X Common Spectral MASINT Exploitation X X X X Consequence Management X X X X X Counterproliferation I X X X Counterproliferation II X X X Counter Sniper X C41 for Coalition Warfare X X X Extending Littoral Battlespace/JTF WARNET X

OAF - Operation Allied Force KosovoOEF - Operation Enduring Freedom AfghanistanOIF - Operation Iraqi Freedom IraqNE - Noble Eagle US Air SpaceO Other

Note: Other includes conflicts and operations like providing support to USFK, the Space Shuttle Columbia recovery operation and US Olympics

KeyDec 2004Updated Dec 2004

Operation Allied Force

KosovoCOMPLETED ACTDsDeployed in Recent ConflictsAfghanistanOperation Enduring Freedom OAF OEF OIF NE OCompleted ACTDs Used in Recent Conflicts

Global Monitoring of Space ISR Systems X High Altitude Endurance UAV Global Hawk X X Human Intell & Counterintelligence Tool X X X Info Assurance: Auto Intrusion Det Environment X X X X Integrated Collection Management X X Joint Biological Remote Early Warning X X X Joint Combat Identification X Joint Logistics X X Joint Medical Operations/Telemedicine X X Link-16 X X X X

Medium Altitude Endurance UAV Predator X X X Military Ops in Urban Terrain X X X Navigation Warfare X Precision/Rapid Counter-MRL X Personnel Recovery Mission Software X X

Precision SIGINT Targeting X X X X Precision Targeting Identification X X X Rapid Force Protection Initiative X Small Unit Logistics X X Space Based Space Surveillance Operations X X

Theater Air & Missile Defense Interoperability X Theater Precision Strike Operations X X X Unattended Ground Sensors X X X

Dec 2004

Operation Allied Force

KosovoACTIVE ACTDs Deployed in Recent ConflictsAfghanistanOperation Enduring Freedom Active Network Intrusion Defense X Adaptive Battlespace Awareness X X Boundary Step X Coalition Theater Logistics X X Comm/Navigation Outage Forecast System X X X X X Computerized Operational MASINT Weather X X X Contamination Avoid at Seaports of Debarkation X Expendable Unmanned Aerial Vehicle X X Ground-to-Air Passive Surveillance X Homeland Security Command & Control X Joint Adv Health & Usage Monitoring System X Joint Area Clearance X X Joint Distance Support & Response X Joint Explosive Ordnance Disposal X X Joint Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance X Language & Speech Exploitation Resources X X Overwatch X Pathfinder X X Personnel Recovery Extraction Survivability X Restoration of Operations X Spartan X SIGINT Processing XTheater Support Vessel X XThermobarics X

OAF OEF OIF NE O Active ACTDs Used in Recent ConflictsDec 2004

*

ACTD Historical Funding ProfileBudget Vs. AppropriationDollars in MillionsStarting in FY 2001 Congress fully supports ACTD Budget RequestFY-06ACTD & JCTD

Advanced Systems and Concepts

Can the Current ACTD businessprocess be improved? Current ModelAll other Sources (~70%)OSD AS&C Cash Resources (~30%)ArmyPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxNavyPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxUSAFPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxUSMCPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxAgencyPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxNon-DoD AgenciesCoCOMSupportCoalitionPartnersChallenges:Front-end (start-up) and tail-end (transition) funding issues create serious PPBE challenges.Little incentive for Service participation as New ACTDs create immediate unfundeds.Significant start-up and demonstration delays after JROC decision: Avg 6 month delay waiting for Implementation Agreements.Many different Program Elements fund ACTDs (Little visibility at Service levelaccountability challenges) Projects require sustained commitment of resources once initiated.Unfunded Requirements (UFRs) during execution cause significant risk and disruption as OSD tries to share the UFRs with stakeholders.Even successful demonstrations risk waiting 2 years (or more) for resources to be programmed via rigid PPBE process.Goal is to initiate ACTDs within months of a JROC approval. However, two year PPBE process creates Service challenge in funding new ACTDs. (Difficult to achieve before the third year)

*

ACTDTime is right to take the best parts of the ACTD program and initiate a new business modelthe Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) JCTD developed based on:GAO Audit (2002): Break traditional barriers to transition joint technologiesDefense Science Board (2003): Strengthen the CoCom influenceJoint Capability Study (2004 Aldridge Study): Better joint business modelsInternal OSD direction (2004-2005): SECDEF/CJCS: Joint has become the rule--is no longer an occasional luxury --- Rapidly changing environment and Global War on Terror (GWOT) has created the need to develop Joint capabilities more rapidlyEnhance the ACTD program & provide better visibility of fundingLeverage the Joint Capabilities Integrated Development System (JCIDS process) to establish an improved process for transitioning ACTDs to acquisition programs Congressional influence (2005) : Maintain focus on the acceleration of innovative, relevant capabilities to meet most critical warfighter needsJCTDThe JCTD program was initiated in the FY 2006 Presidents Budget3-5 year transition

*

DUSD (AS&C) Direct FundingACTD & JCTD Programs(Actuals & FY 2006 Presidents Budget)As of February 2005JCTD program initiated in FY 2006. Three to five year transition from ACTD to JCTD JCTDs are resourced in RDT&E/DW (BA-3, BA-4, BA-5) and Procurement accounts

*

JCTD/ACTD OSD Funding(FY 2006 Presidents Budget$M)Beginning in FY 2006, initiation of the JCTD process. 3-5 year transition periodOSD Shifts $40M from ACTD to JCTD to initiate the program

ACTD and JCTD Program Funding SummaryAPNBAPEFY-04FY-05FY-06FY-07Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD)RDT&E30603750D8Z212.570 212.915 163.649 163.744

Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD)RDT&E30603648D8Z35.00035.000Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD)RDT&E40604648D8Z3.0003.000Defense Acquisition Executive (JCTD Pilot Program)RDT&E50605648D8Z1.0001.000Procurement (JCTD Pilot), Major Equipment- OSD Def WideProc10902198D8Z1.0001.000Total JCTD:40.00040.000Total ACTD and JCTD213213203204

Advanced Systems and Concepts

New Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) business process Proposed Funding ModelNon-DoD AgenciesCoCOMSupportCoalitionPartners First two years of Resources fenced by OSD Held in OSD PE. Most compelling JCTDs will be resourced (incentive created)Year 3 (if necessary) funded by all stakeholdersTransition Year funded by OSDallow time for Services to POM for transitionOSD can afford more risk protecting scarce resources.DARPA funds included in centralization model to cement partnership between development and transition Unfunded requirements easier to address without Service or Comptroller intensive reprogramming actions in year of execution New Model will provide clear visibility of total JCTD Cash budgeted and executed (OSD/C, Congressional & GAO concern)Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) pilot program for selected JCTDs post BA-4.AgencyPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxPExxxxFYDP Timeline (Based on 3 year Demo Phase)DAE Pilot programBA-5 (0605648D8Z) -------------------OSD Maj EquipProcurement(0902198D8Z)JCTD OverviewLimited number of Selected Joint Peculiar JCTDs may enter the DAE Pilot program. Most JCTDs will Transition through normal processes.

*

ACTD-JCTD Wing Walk Enhancing the Business Model for the Joint Customer

Combatant Commander remains the Primary CustomerAdvance Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD)Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) Final Demonstration: 3-4 years Final Demonstration: 2 3 years with spiraled-out capabilities. Impact: Mature capabilities demonstrated to the joint warfighter faster. Challenging ACTD selection process: CoCom near-term versus rigid PPBE 2 year resource process. Greater CoCom Focus through JCTD Selection Process: Stakeholders have decision in resource allocation for funds already set-aside.Impact: JCTDs maintain relevancy/purposely resourced for success. OSD provides limited funds: Services required to break programs to fund new capabilities.JCTD Resources (Quick Start): OSD provides majority Service funding for the first two years of the JCTD.Impact: Accelerate JCTD initiation and increase funding stability. Difficult to track ACTD funding in Service lines (multiple Program Elements). JCTD-specific Program Elements Created. Impact: Increase funding accountability and tracking. Provides time for Services to POM for selected JCTDs. ACTDs face difficult Transition challenges, creating joint & coalition orphans. JCTD Transition stability: Funding across the Acquisition process. DAE pilot program Impact: Prevents delays and provides a strong advocate for joint orphaned capabilities.

*

Performance Metric ComparisonACTD vs. JCTDSource: FY 2006 Presidents Budget

Performance MetricACTDJCTDProject Selection FocusThreat Based: Shared Military Service and CoCom influenceCapability Based: Greater CoCom influence looking at nearer term joint/coalition needs..Spiral TechnologiesNo Metric currently establishedSpiral Technology available within one year of JCTD initiation.Final Demonstration Completed (Starting Point: Approved ID)3 to 4 years after initiation (Implementation Directive (ID) Signed)50% completed by the end of the 2nd year. All JCTDs completed by the end of the 3rd year.Shared Funding and Visibility of resourcesOSD provides no more than 30% of the budgeted resources. Funding provided from many different program elements.OSD provide significantly more funding (more than 50% depending on cost of the JCTD), especially in the first two years.Military Utility Assessment (MUA) conducted by an independent activityMUA traditionally tied to a specific planned exercise for evaluationJCTDs not necessarily tied to an exercise. Greater flexibility to establish military utility via operational real-world demonstration or specifically designed test/venueTransition of technology70% of ACTDs transition at least one product to sustainment80% of JCTDs transition at least 50% of their products to sustainment

*

Why Evolve ACTDs To JCTDs Now?Its the right thing to do: (ADM Fargo, USPACOM)CoCom customers need an early voice in needs process that responds quickly.AT&L can provide a compelling joint approach as an answer to:Starting fast (inside the PPBE process). Prevents breaking Service programs at the start of each ACTD.Addresses the Valley of Death between successful demonstrated capabilities & transition to acquisition/sustainment.GAO, Congressional, DSB, and other studies which support the philosophy of the JCTD initiative.

The time is right: JCTD fits the transformation and GWOT initiatives of the Department Directly supports the SECDEFs goals of shifting to a more rapid, joint capability process that will increase CoCom influence.

*

ACTD/JCTD Back-up Slidesand QuestionsFinally, I will add that we are encouraged by recent actions taken by DOD to initiate a joint concept technology demonstration business process as it is intended to meet joint and coalition forces needs and promotes many of the good practices we outlined above. To be successful, this process must have the authority and clout to overcome traditional barriers and the tools necessary to drive a knowledge-based, evolutionary acquisition approach. GAO Testimony before the HASC Subcommittee on Tactical Air & Land Forces by Michael Sullivan, Acting Director, Acquisition and Sourcing Management (March 2005)

*

OverviewJoint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD)(Four parts to the 3-5 year initiative to transformthe ACTD program to JCTD)Front-end incentive funds create fair-share partnership. First two years of Service resources fenced in OSD. (JCTD PE will eventually replace ACTD PE) Incentive to participate without breaking Service core programs. Also provides stability of funding. The Best JCTDs win the resources. Creation of new JCTD specific Program Elements (Defense Wide and Service) (New D/W JCTD PEs have been created RDT&E BA-3/4/5) Visibility and Accountability of funds Allows time for Services to POM for outyears as JCTD proves successful One year of Transition funding (New OSD JCTD PE in RDT&E BA-4) Bridge the S&T capability Valley of Death DoD prepared to catch successful capabilities without destructive delays Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Pilot program Transition Joint Peculiar systems into a fielded capability (New OSD PEs: RDT&E BA-5, OSD Procurement). Lays the groundwork for USD (AT&L) to pilot new acquisition models and look at ways to address joint challenges identified in the Joint Capability Study (Aldridge Study). Tracking joint capability through acquisition into initial sustainmentResources were shifted from the ACTD program to initiate the JCTD business model

Advanced Systems and Concepts

Quotes on Joint Needs

"The ability of the armed services the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, the Marine Corps and the Coast Guard to work together is increasing. It has to increase. Jointness has to become the rule and not an occasional luxury.

Secretary of DefenseSpeech at the Association of the U.S. Army Annual Meeting,Phoenix, Oct. 27, 2004

The rapidly changing international environment and the global war on terrorism require that we create joint capabilities more quickly.

General Myers, CJCS(Joint Force Quarterly: Summer 2002)UNCLASSIFIEDADM Fargo (USPACOM)

Im writing in support of the AT&L JCTD initiative, which evolves the Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration Program and intends to stabilize start-up and transition funding for rapid development of Joint capabilities.We need a stable program that rapidly provides new Joint capabilities for demonstration, assessment, and operational use. The ACTD program has served us well. The JCTD initiative to stabilize funding and aid transition of new Joint capabilities, with minimal impact on Service programs, is the right thing to do.

Area Cruise Missile Defense (ACMD) Problem: The continental US & North America lacks a robust capability to detect, track, and engage low altitude, low visibility cruise missiles, UAVs, and light aircraft. Current air defenses are perimeter-ized and lack connectivity to various data sources and sensors. Benefits: Extensively used in Op Noble Eagle and Clear Skies Remains employed for National Capital Region air protection Employed for all Presidential CONUS travel Supported the 2004 G8 Summit and Republican National Convention Primary capability for Air Force Reserve/Air National Guard combat air defense patrols in CONUS Transitioned to 1st AF and ANG. USAF procuring 14 JBECC systems under the Joint Battle Center System Mobile program of record.Solution: Mobile Connectivity shelter (JBECC) Correlation Engines to process disparate data Comm Link into existing C4I networks Augment NORAD Air Defense Provide early detection of unidentified air tracks Connectivity to NORAD through tactical data links Link FAA, NORAD and 1st AF air defense forces

FY 2001 ACTD (Completed)

Expendable Unmanned AerialVehicle (EUAV)Problem: Lack of low cost, expendable tactical surveillance and payload dispensing capabilities for counter-drug and other operations.

Benefits: Much lower cost (75% less) than tactical UAVs Permits ready field access to ISR info when higher fidelity systems unavailable or not cost effective to risk their loss Employed extensively in OIF and OEF TERN and MAKO UAVs transitioned to SOCOM

FY 2002 ACTDSolution: Tactical surveillance, payloads, and payload dispensing technologies on low-cost, all-weather autonomously guided, expendable/recoverable unmanned vehicles.

NAVMAR Applied Science (Jessup, MD) UAVs and air-delivered sensors $9.3M, with potential $10M follow-on Phoenix Worldwide Industries ( Miami, FL) Air-delivered sensors $1.5M, with potential $2M follow-onCloud Cap Technology (Hood River, OR) Autopilot systems $100K, with potential $200K follow-onAdvanced Ceramic Research (Tucson, AZ) Advanced composite UAVs$300K, with potential $500K follow-onCOMPASS Systems (Patuxent River, MD) Ground stations, software integration $1.1M, with potential $2M follow-on Five other small businesses participatingXPV-1 Tern and MAKO UAVsEmployed Successfully inOperations Enduring and Iraqi FreedomACTD Small Business Success Stories Expendable Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

Theater Support Vessel (TSV)Status:OEF/OIF/Joint Military Exercises SupportSailed over 80,000 NM, delivering 1.385 troops and 7,445 cargo tonsFY05 RSOI/Foal Eagle, Cobra Gold, Talisman Sabre, Bright Star 05Self-Protection DemoProgram of Record in the Joint HSV Program OfficeContinuing to spiral operational productsC4ISR Upgrades Battle Command Center/EMPRsScalable Self Protection System

Participants: OM: CENTCOM, CASCOM (Deputy)TM/XM: PEO CS&CSS, PM Force Projection,PM Army Watercraft SystemsIndependent Assessor: AECSponsor(s): US Army Schedule: Independent Assessments/ LUAs 2QFY04 - 4QFY05MUA 4QFY05

Problem This Solves: Need for a joint expeditionarycapability to deliver combat ready units configured forimmediate employment in JOA.

High Speed Rapid Littoral Maneuver and Force ClosureRapid Unassisted Ingress and Egress Enables Austere Port OperationsReduction of Reception and Staging Times in Theater of OperationsMitigate Anti-Access and Area Denial Efforts Solution: High Speed Vessel Capable of:Intra-Theater Movement of Combat Ready UnitsShip-to-Ship and Ship-to-Shore OperationsSupporting Operations in the LittoralsApril 2005FY 2003 ACTD

Tactical Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (IFSAR) MappingProblem(s): U.S. Forces do not have the capability to rapidly collect High-Resolution Terrain Information (HRTI) and produce wide area high-resolution digital elevation models on short notice. Proposed Solution(s): The IFSAR Mapping ACTD would demonstrate a capability to rapidly collect and generate high-resolution terrain information (HRTI) data from a mid-altitude unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV).Status: ACTD cancelled due to excessive cost growth and programmatic risk.Could not gain access to Global Hawk (environmentally controlled payload bay), so design was re-targeted to Predator B (payload bay NOT environmentally controlled). Increase in scope to modify radar design coupled with programmatic delays resulting from difficulty in obtaining commitment for any UAV platform caused excessive cost growth and risk. FY 2003 ACTD (Cancelled)Status cont: Currently reviewing options using remaining funds to assess what portion of USSOUTHCOMs immediate needs can be met.

Agile Transportation for 21st Century (AT)Solution: Insert COTS technologies, automate and streamline business processes, and utilize commercial best practices for supply chain management.Benefits:

FY 2002 ACTDProblem: The DTS has stovepipe processes for managing movement requirements, liftasset availability, and execution planning in separate environments and no capability to match global movement requirements against available lift assets to produce an optimized transportation schedule that meets warfighter delivery requirements.Benefits:

Improve Force Projection and customer confidenceOptimize and analyze strategic/operational movement requirementsDetermine proposed mode selection, consolidations and routingsMaximize asset utilization and cost avoidance

Dynamic CONOPS Collapses V,T, A Process

JFCOM

CENTCOM

FORCE REQUIREMENTS

FORCEREQUIREMENTS

SOURCED FORCES

MOVEMENTDETAILS

(RLD)

SCHEDULED DEPARTURE& ARRIVAL TIMES

FORCEREQUIREMENTS

REQUIREMENTS

B8

B8

SC

V

S

T

FORSCOM

S

AT21 - Dynamic Optimization

*

Multi-Service Core MilitaryCapabilities. Common denominator Military forcesprovided worldwide as self-integrated, self-sustaining echelonsby the Services. (Global Positioning System, Movement Tracking System)

Joint Enabling Capabilities.Additional capabilities required bywarfighters to exercise jointcommand, and to enable core militaryelements to function effectively as acoherent joint force. (Network Centric Operations, Common Operational Picture)

What are Joint Capabilities?AS&C Program PerspectiveUnique Regional/Specified Mission Requirements. Capabilities beyond common core military capabilities required by warfighters to effectively function in operational environments associated with assigned regional or specified missions. (Foliage Penetrating Radar, Language Translators)

Joint is an inter-Service reliance acting together as one - not a patchwork of deconflicted Service operations.(General Tommy Franks, excerpts from American Soldier)

Biggest change over the yearsBA 4 5

* Tactical IFSAR was attempting to demonstrate the capability to provide high resolution terrain mapping capability on short-notice using a high altitude UAV (Global Hawk). Cancelled in March 2005 due to excessive cost growth and programmic riskCould not obtain access to a Global Hawk and other alternatives proved too costly to pursue at this time.How to account for the $10M drop in FY-2006:$10 Million Dollar drop in FY 2006 is a result of a bow-wave effect that started in FY-01. Eighteen ACTDs were started in FY 2001 with resources for several of these delayed until FY-03 and FY-04, creating higher tails in those years. At the same time the ACTD program was given a metric by USD (AT&L) to start at least 15 new ACTDs each year. A $200M program was considered steady state