Addressing bone loss in shoulder instability lennard funk

39
Lennard Funk Addressing Bone Loss The Pragmatic Approach [email protected]

Transcript of Addressing bone loss in shoulder instability lennard funk

Lennard Funk

Addressing Bone Loss The Pragmatic

Approach

[email protected]

www.wrightington.com

Basil Vandegriend, 2006

2

www.wrightington.com

How best to measure Glenoid Bone Loss?

1. X-Rays

2. MRI

3. CT

4. Arthroscopy

3

www.wrightington.com

How much glenoid loss for Bony Reconstruction?

1. 5%

2. 10%

3. 20%

4. 25%

www.wrightington.com

What is a significant Hill-Sachs Lesion?

1. 4cm long

2. 20% humeral head surface

3. 40% humeral head surface

4. Engaging at Arthroscopy

GLENOID BONE LOSS

6

www.wrightington.com

Where does 20-25% come from?

Itoi Cadaveric Studies - JBJS, 2000: Stability of repaired cadaveric shoulders

With no glenoid removed With 21% anterior glenoid removed ER and ABER

Yamamoto & Itoi - AJSM, 2009 Stability ratio mechanical test 8 cadavers At 20% stability ration greatly decreased

Yamamoto - JBJS, 2010 Same study (with 5 more shoulders)!!

7

www.wrightington.com

Pear

8

Inverted Pear

www.wrightington.com 9

• Glenoid loss 20-30% • FU 34 months • 15% Recurrence rate

“requiring surgery”

• ‘Inverted Pear’ • FU 27 months • 67% Recurrence rate

(89% contact athletes)

HUMERAL HEAD BONE LOSS

10

www.wrightington.com

What is a significant Hill-sachs lesion?

Bigliani & Flatow (1996) [quoted in Cetik (2007)]:

Mild - <20% Moderate - 20-45% Severe - >45%

11

> 30% = Needs Treatment

www.wrightington.com

What is a significant Hill-sachs lesion?

Balg & Bouileau (2008) in ISIS: Visible on AP X-Ray in External Rotation

12

www.wrightington.com

Funky Pizza Method

13

www.wrightington.com

Remplissage“Fill-in / padding” Eugene Wolf (2008)

14

www.wrightington.com

Indications for Remplissage

Wolf (2008): Combined glenoid bone defect & large Hill-Sachs

Burkart (2009): Moderate to large Hill-Sachs (>3 mm depth) with bony glenoid loss of >25% Borderline cases where glenoid defect is close to 25% but Hill-Sachs is small to moderate in size

Boileau (2010):

Large, Calandra Grade 3 Hill-Sachs, without glenoid bone-loss

15

Assessing Bone Loss

16

www.wrightington.com

Balance Stability Angle - Matsen

Effective Glenoid Arc = the area of the glenoid’s articular surface available for humeral head compression Balance Stability Angle = the angle between the centre of the glenoid and the end of the effective glenoid arc in any direction (18 degrees anterior)

17

www.wrightington.com

‘Glenoid Track’ - Itoi & Yamamoto

Yamamoto - Cadaver

Metzger - MRI/MRA

Omori - In-vivo

18

Yamamoto N, Itoi E, Abe H, et al. JSES 2007 Metzger et al. AAOSM, 2010 Omori et al. AJSM. March 2014.

Defined as the contact area between the glenoid and the humeral head while keeping the arm in maximum external rotation, maximum horizontal extension, and 0° to 90° of abduction relative to the trunk. "If a Hill-Sachs lesion extends medially over the glenoid track, there is a risk of engagement.

www.wrightington.com

Largest Track (contact) found in full ABER = 84% of glenoid width

19

‘Glenoid Track’

www.wrightington.com 20

‘Glenoid Track’If the medial margin of a Hill-Sach’s lesion lies outside the glenoid track, this will cause an engaging Hill-Sach’s. "Bony defect of the glenoid will narrow the glenoid track, which can cause the medial margin of a relatively small Hill-Sach’s lesion to be outside the glenoid track

www.wrightington.com

1. Measure the diameter (D) of the inferior glenoid, either by arthroscopy or from 3D CT scan.

2. Determine the width of the anterior glenoid bone loss (d). 3. Calculate the width of the glenoid track (GT) by the following

formula: GT=0.83D-d 4. Calculate the width of the HSI, which is the width of the Hill-

Sachs lesion (HS) plus the width of the bone bridge (BB) between the rotator cuff attachments and the lateral aspect of the Hill-Sachs lesion: HSI = HS + BB.

5. If HSI > GT, the HS is off track, or engaging. If HSI < GT, the HS is on track, or non-engaging.

21

www.wrightington.com

Normal Glenoid Track

22

83%

www.wrightington.com

Anterior Glenoid Deficiency

23

D

83%

www.wrightington.com

The Formula:

24

1. Measure the diameter (D) of the inferior glenoid, either by arthroscopy or from 3D CT scan (of Opposite shoulder).

2. Determine the width of the anterior glenoid bone loss (d).

3. Calculate the width of the glenoid track (GT) by the following formula: GT=0.83D-d

4. Calculate the width of the HSI, which is the width of the Hill-Sachs lesion (HS) plus the width of the bone bridge (BB) between the rotator cuff attachments and the lateral aspect of the Hill-Sachs lesion: HSI = HS + BB.

5. If HSI > GT, the HS is off track, or engaging. If HSI < GT, the HS is on track, or non-engaging.

D

83%

www.wrightington.com

The Formula:

25

1. Measure the diameter (D) of the inferior glenoid, either by arthroscopy or from 3D CT scan.

2. Determine the width of the anterior glenoid bone loss (d).

3. Calculate the width of the glenoid track (GT) by the following formula: GT=0.83D-d

4. Calculate the width of the HSI, which is the width of the Hill-Sachs lesion (HS) plus the width of the bone bridge (BB) between the rotator cuff attachments and the lateral aspect of the Hill-Sachs lesion: HSI = HS + BB.

1. If HSI > GT, the HS is ‘off track’, or engaging.

2.If HSI < GT, the HS is ‘on track’, or non-engaging.

www.wrightington.com

Treatment Paradigm

26

Group Glenoid Defect Hill-Sachs Recommended

Treatment

1 <25% On Track Arthroscopic Bankart

2 <25% Off Track Arthroscopic Bankart + Remplissage

3 >25% On Track Latarjet

4 >25% Off TrackLatarjet +

Remplissage / Humeral Bone Graft

Decision Making

27

www.wrightington.com

Balg & Bouileau, JBJSB, 2007:

Instability Severity Score!

28

www.wrightington.com

Balg & Bouileau, JBJSB, 2007:

No difference between: Gender (p=0.32) Type of Sports (p=0.31)

Difference between: Age (p=0.001) Level of sport (p=0.03) Shoulder laxity (p=0.03) Hill-Sachs lesion (p=0.002)

29

www.wrightington.com

My approach to Latarjet:

30

Considerations:

www.wrightington.com

Pragmatic 1:

24yr male footballer First Traumatic Dislocation

31

www.wrightington.com

Final repair

www.wrightington.com

Sugaya Technique

Sugaya et al. 2005

www.wrightington.com

Pragmatic 2:

28yr male Multiple recurrent traumatic dislocations with reducing force. Dislocating dressing & sleep Now avoidance Unable to work as nurse

34

www.wrightington.com

www.wrightington.com 36

“Soap and water and common sense are the best disinfectants”

William Osler

www.wrightington.com

Thank You

37

www.wrightington.com

Clinical (Classification)

MR Arthrogram

Glenoid

Bankart

Repair(scope / open)

Deficiency

Latarjet / Eden-Hybinette

Humeral Head

Large Hill-Sachs

Remplissage / Allograft

Capsule

HAGL

Repair(open / Scope)

Hyperlax

Shift / Plication

www.wrightington.com