A new vision of broadband from the Broadband Forum - Broadband ...
Adaptive and Passive Flow Control for Fan Broadband Noise ... · 15.11.2015 16 Work Package 4: Flow...
Transcript of Adaptive and Passive Flow Control for Fan Broadband Noise ... · 15.11.2015 16 Work Package 4: Flow...
Adaptive and Passive Flow Control for Fan Broadband Noise Reduction
Selected final results
Lars Enghardt, DLR BerlinFLOCON project coordinator
September 2008 – August 2012
15.11.2015Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle 2
Motivation• Air traffic is predicted to grow by 5% per year in the short and medium term.
• Technology advances are required to achieve his growth with acceptable levels of noise in particular at airport surroundings.
• Fan broadband noise is one of the most important aircraft noise sources at aircraft start and landing conditions.
Objectives• Design noise reduction concepts and associated devices able to reduce fan broadband noise
at source.
• Assess the noise reduction concepts by conducting lab-scale experiments (to TRL 4).
• Complement the experiments by numerical simulations that are assessing the capability ofcurrently available numerical tools to design low broadband noise treatments and configurations.
• Develop understanding of the mechanisms involved and extrapolate the results to the aero-engine environment using state-of-the-art numerical methods.
• Select the best concepts by balancing noise benefit and integration impact.
Introduction
15.11.2015 3
Research centers:DLR - Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt (DE)ONERA - Office National d’Études et Recherches Aérospatiales (FR)ISVR - Institute of Sound and Vibration Research (UK)NLR - Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaart Laboratorium (NL)
Industrial partners:Snecma Moteurs (FR)Rolls-Royce plc (UK)EADS Innovation Works (DE)MTU Aero Engines (DE)VOLVO Aero Corporation (SW)AVIO SpA (IT)
Universities:Ecole Centrale de Lyon (FR)Universität Siegen (DE)Chalmers University of Technology (SW)Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
SME:Fluorem SAS (FR)Microflown Technologies BV (NL)Sandu M. Constantin PF (RO)
• Budget: 5.3 M€ (EU funding 3.5 M€)• Project start: 1. September 2008 • Duration: 4 years (12 months extension at no costs)• Coordination: DLR Berlin
EU FP7, 1st Call, Level 1 ProjectConsortium
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 4
Work Package 2:Airfoil treatments for low-noise
Objective• Development of leading edge and trailing edge treatments for reducing
airfoil self-noise and interaction noise and for reducing the turbulence in the wake.
Workplan• Demonstration and validation of these treatments in an open jet wind
tunnel facility (TRL 2)• Down-selection of the best trailing edge treatments for testing in a
cascade rig (TRL 3) and of the best leading edge treatments for testing in a fan rig in WP3(TRL 4).
• Modelling of these treatments using RANS and LES CFD simulations.
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 5
ISVR open jet wind tunnel
Airfoil to be investigated
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 6
2040
60
05
1015
-1-0.500.511.522.533.54
OA
SW
L re
duct
ion
[dB
A]
Geometrical AoA [degree]U [m/s]
LE1
LE2
LE3
05
1015
-100.0%
-80.0%
-60.0%
-40.0%
-20.0%
0.0%
20.0%
CL reduction
Treatments
Geometrical angle of attack [degree]
ONERA LE
CL
redu
ctio
n
AoA [degree]TEDown select of best LE treatment:
ONERA wavy pattern
Leading edge treatment
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
Acoustic pressure field (Pa)
15.11.2015 7
Calculation : V. Clair
3D multi-bloc grid with 1 motif of 2S wing
ONERA Euler computations on wavy-edge case
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 8
20
40
60
05
1015
-1-0.500.51
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
OA
SW
L re
duct
ion
[dB
A]
Geometrical AoA [degree]U [m/s]
TE15
TE17
05
1015
-2.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
CL reduction
Treatments
Geometrical angle of attack [degree]
ISVR TE
CL
redu
ctio
n
AoA [degree]TE
Down select of best TE treatment:ISVR serrated edge
Trailing edge treatment
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 9Slide 9
AVIO3D LES on Treated airfoils
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
Velocity on a plane normal to the serration plate
ROOT MID TIP
ROOT
MID
TIP
15.11.2015 10
ISVR tandem experiment
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 11
Work Package 3: Casing and airfoil treatments for low noise in a fan stage
Objective Development of new and innovative technologies for fan broadband noise
reduction focusing on airfoil treatments and the interaction between blade tip and fan casing.
Workplan• Demonstration and validation of these technologies (selected best concept
from WP2, special overtip treatment) on a low speed laboratory rotating rig • Demonstration of vane trailing edge treatment technology for fan
broadband noise reduction under rotating rig flow conditions
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 12
EADS low speed fan rig
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 13
Tuneable Overtip Acoustic Treatment
EADS - Overtip acoustic treatment
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 14
OGV Treatment
Porous Trailing EdgeSinter metal spheres
CFD / CAA
OGV treatments
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 15
SN / FLU: Cavity Treatment
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 16
Work Package 4: Flow Control in a Fan Stage
Objective• To develop and assess several broadband noise reduction concepts by
means of flow control in a fan-OGV stage.• To understand the physical influence of the flow control concepts on
broadband noise.
Workplan• Support the assessment of each concept with numerical and experimental
investigations. • Achieve broadband noise reductions in experiments performed under
representative conditions of a fan-stage.
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 17
mass flow meter
radial blower
microphone array
duct section for suction
DAQ system
continous circumferential slit at rotor LE
DLR laboratory scale fan rig
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR BerlinX-Noise EV FC Meeting, Lausanne 18
NLR: Source localization and azimuthal mode decomposition
15.11.2015Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR BerlinX-Noise EV FC Meeting, Lausanne 19
DLR: Stator with variable vane stagger angle
TUB: Instantaneous spanwise vorticity and pressure time derivative
TUB: Noise impact of Gurney flaps
Adaptation of stator vane loading
15.11.2015Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR BerlinX-Noise EV FC Meeting, Lausanne 20
Trailing edge blowing
MTU: Simulation of wake filling (different slit counts)
USI: Rotor blade with internal channels
15.11.2015 21
Experimental assessment of the wake filling
Wake filling
5 slots in the rotor trailing edge
Supply of pressurized air
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 22
Axial Velocity:
no wake filling with wake filling (blowing 142 g/s)
Turbulence intensity:
Wake filling
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 23Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
ONERA: LES computation resultscomparison of baseline and blowing case
ONERA: LES computation resultscomparison of baseline and blowing case
Average relative velocity amplitude and streamlines near the trailing edge of the rotor
15.11.2015 24
Wake filling (post FLOCON)
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 25
Wake filling (post FLOCON)
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 26
Technology Evaluation
• Virtual platforms used for the in-flight noise transposition:
The FLOCON technology is assessed on the Short-Medium Range (SMR) and Long-Range (LR) OPENAIR virtual aircraft platforms
The SMR engine platform AP2-EP1b - is a turbofan BPR 9 engine - engine modelling provided by SN- The technology level of this engine is coherent with an initial EIS date in
year 2012
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 27
Technology Evaluation
-0.35
-0.3
-0.25
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
Del
ta E
PNL
tota
l
(e
ngin
e+ai
rfra
me)
FLOCON technologies impactsEPNL total (engine + airframe) WP2
Wavy LE
Microfiber LE
Porous LE
Porous TE
Saw-tooth serrations
Butterfly TE
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 28
Technology Evaluation
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 29
Technology Evaluation
-0.25
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
Del
ta E
PNL
tota
l
(e
ngin
e+ai
rfra
me)
FLOCON technologies impactsEPNL total (engine + airframe) WP4
Gurney flaps T4.1
Suction of rotor vortex T4.2
Wake-filling T4.3
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle
15.11.2015 30
• A wide range of concepts was considered and developed to Technology Readiness Level 4 (laboratory scale validation): Rotor trailing edge blowing Rotor tip vortex suction Rotor overtip treatments Rotor and Stator leading and trailing edge treatments Partly lined stator vanes
• Experiments were performed on 4 rigs: two rotating rigs, supported by more detailed measurements on a single airfoil and on a cascade.
• Numerical methods were used to optimize the concepts for experimental validation and to extrapolate the results from laboratory scale to real engine application.
• The potential benefit of each concept was assessed, including any associated penalties (weight, complexity, aerodynamic performance).
• Recommendations were made as to which concepts could be integrated into new engine designs or will require further validation at industrial rig or full engine-scale.
Summary: Final results
Author: Lars Enghardt, DLR Berlin19th CEAS Workshop, La Rochelle