ADAPTING TO CHANGE AND UNCERTAINTY LESSONS FROM THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA Chad Day School of...
-
date post
20-Jan-2016 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of ADAPTING TO CHANGE AND UNCERTAINTY LESSONS FROM THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA Chad Day School of...
ADAPTING TO CHANGE AND UNCERTAINTY
LESSONS FROM THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA
Chad Day
School of Resources & Environment
Simon Fraser University
Dave Marshall
Fraser Basin Council
Vancouver, British Columbia
PLANNING, MANAGEMENT, IMPLEMENTATION
• Compare Columbia Basin with three large-scale governance systems
• How effective are our decision-making systems?
– policy options, predicting risk, acting early, responding to uncertainty?
– Promote sustainability in basin?
• Examples: CALFED, PSWQ Action Team, Fraser Basin Council, Columbia
Evaluative Criteria
• Legislation– Comprehensive– prioritized– enforceable– public involvement
• Adaptive planning, implementation, monitoring– Clear goals, priorities, targets– Range of initiatives– Public evaluation of outcomes– Ecosystem based
Evaluative Criteria
• Representation
– All interests at decision table
• Financing
– Sustainable and adequate
• Leadership
– Innovative, political support
• Outcomes
– Promoting social, economic, & environmental sustainability
CALFED Bay-Delta Program
Problems– Ecosystem Quality
– Water supply and quality
– Levee reliability
1995 FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION– coordinated approach to CA economy, water, &
environment
Framework forAction (1995)
CALFED Bay-Delta Policy Group
Record ofDecision (2000)
Federal Agencies State Agencies
Resources Agency
- Department of Water Resources
- Department of Fish & Game
- Reclamation Board
- Delta Protection Commission
- Department of Conservation
- San Francisco Bay Conservation
and Development Commision
California Environmental Protection Agency
- State Water Resources Control Board
Department of Health Services
Department of Food and Agriculture
Department of the Interior
- Bureau of Reclamation
- Fish & Wildlife Service
- Geological Survey
- Bureau of Land Management
Environmental Protection Agency
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Department of Agriculture
- Natural Resources Conservation Service
- Forest Service
Department of Commerce
- National Marine Fisheries Service
Bay-Delta Advisory Council (30+ Representatives)Agriculture Urban Rural Environment Business Fishing
CALFED Accomplishments 2000
Watersheds
WaterManagement
Storage
Conveyance
DrinkingWater Quality
WaterMarkets
LeveeIntegrity
ProgramGovernance
EnvironmentalWater
Water UseEfficiency
EcosystemRestoration
Public AdvisoryBodies
CALFED
• Legislation
• Adaptive
• Representation
• Financing
• Leadership
• Sustainability
• Promising program
• Yes
• Agencies decide Stakeholders advise• $879 MM in 2000
• Strong political, support
• Time will tell? Too late?
Puget Sound Ecological Problems
• 7million now; 9 in 20 years• Marine species: 220 fish, 26 mammals, 100 birds• 3 listed fish, many fish and bird declining• 70% of tidal wetlands lost, 33% shorelines
changed, shellfish beds down 25%, sediments contaminated in urban areas
• Public education and research• Action Team implements
Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team
• Restore and protect biological health and diversity– Wetlands & aquatic habitats– Pollutant elimination
• Partnership framework-all interests– 12 counties, 122 cities
• Comprehensive Conservation & Management Plan (CWA)-6th iteration since 1987
• Biannual PSWQ work plan• Sound + basin
Puget Sound Water Quality Planning and Management
Puget SoundCouncil Members (12)
Puget Sound Water QualityAction Team (17)
Chair: Governor’s Representative
Washington State
(2) State House of Representatives
(2) State Senate
Other Interests (Goveneor)
(1) Agriculture
(1) Business
(1) Cities
(1) Counties
(1) Environmental Community
(1) Shellfish Industry
(1) Tribes
Chair: Governor’s Representative
United States Federal
(1) Environmental Protection Agency
(1) Fish and Wildlife Service
(1) National Marine Fisheries Service
Washington State
(1) Agriculture
(1) Community Development
(1) Conservation Commission
(1) Ecology
(1) Fish and Wildlife
(1) Health
(1) Natural Resources, Public Lands
(1) Outdoor Recreation
(1) Parks and Recreation
(1) Transport
(1) City Mayor
(1) County Council
(1) Tribal Environment
Puget Sound
Water Quality
Management Plan
Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team
• Legislation
• Adaptive
• Representation
• Financing
• Leadership
• Sustainability
• Focused, clear, supportive
• Yes
• Agencies decide, public advise
• Adequate
• Innovative, inventive, adaptive
• Impressive beginning, Time will tell?
A Few Statistics
The Fraser Basin:
• Headwaters commence high in the Rocky Mountains and flow 1377 km to sea
• Constitutes 25% of the land mass of BC
• Is home to 2.7 million people - and growing!
• Produces 80% of the provincial economic output & contributes 10% of Canada’s GDP
• Is undammed on its main stem and major tributaries
FBC Vision...
“Social well-being supported by
a vibrant economy and sustained by a healthy
environment”
The Council is Governed by Four Directions:
The Fraser Basin Council:A Unique Model of Governance
A balanced and flexible partnership, comprised of:
“4 Orders” of Canadian Government (Federal, Provincial, Local , First Nations)
+
Private Sector
+
Civil Society
Board Structure36 Director Board:
• Federal Government (3)
• Provincial Government (3)
• Local Government (8)
• First Nations (8)
• Regional Representatives (10)
• Basin-Wide Representatives (4)
What makes the Council Unique?
• Brings broad range of individual perspectives together to achieve common ground toward sustainable solutions
• Acts as catalyst, sustainability educator, facilitator, and jurisdiction and conflict resolution agent
• Develops new modes of co-operative decision-making
• No legislated “teeth” - instead, uses dialogue toward decision-making
What does the Council DO (and not do)
• Typically the Council is invited to become involved
• Issues are often long-standing unresolved sustainability challenges
• Solutions demand inclusive and representative participation carried out in a safe and equal environment
• Focus on meaningful action on the ground
• NOT a think-tank
• NOT an academic exercise or research unit
• NOT a regulator
FRASER BASIN COUNCIL
• Legislation
• Adaptive
• Representation
• Financing
• Leadership
• Sustainability
• None, done through Council Partners
• Definitely
• Consensus Based Decision-Making
• Innovative and growing
• Influential and effective
• Fundamental
COLUMBIA BASIN
How to Consider Threats like Climate Change?• 1961 Columbia Basin Treaty-industrialized• Hydroelectricity, flood control, navigation,
irrigation, • urban, industrial, recreation lower priority• Recently ecology• Federal-provincial dominance: Corp, BPA,
BCH, BoR, Forestry and BLM 55% of U.S. basin
COLUMBIA BASIN INSTITUTIONS
• NPPC: States and tribes – Fish policy secondary now to ESA under
NMFS + U.S. Fish & Wildlife– Power policy
• Which forum(s) should consider climate change in Columbia?
Technical Management TeamNational Marine Fisheries Service
Corps of Engineers
Bonneville Power Administration
Bureau of Reclamation
US Fish and Wildlife Service
States of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana
13 Tribes
Selected Columbia Basin Committees
Columbia River Treaty EntitiesBonneville Power Administration
Corps of EngineersBC Hydro
International Joint CommissionBoards of Control
Commission on Environmental Cooperation/NAFTA
Technical Management Team
• TMT Guidelines 5j (dam & reservoir operations)“Member of the public may comment on an issue or agenda item at the end of the meeting. They may also comment outside the TMT process.”
• No nongovernmental interest group members on TMT
• NPPC and Montana are not members• Does not reflect diversity of interests in basin
Northwest Power Planning Council
Implementation byBPA Corps BofR FERC etc..
Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority4 state Fish and Wildlife managers
13 Tribes
Power Committee(One member per State)
Fish and Wildlife Committee(One member per State)
Idaho State (2)Oregon State (2)
Montana State (2)Washington State (2)
Addressing Climate Change?
• No forum where all interests can work toward consensus decisions on such questions
• No international forum where all interests meet on regular basis
• Have all parts of orchestra but no conductor• No coordinating institution like CALFED,
PSWQAT, CBC• Difficult to achieve consensus, not impossible
Columbia Basin• Legislation
• Adaptive process
• Representation
• Financing
• Leadership
• Sustainability
• Not yet integrated
• Yes generally; climate?
• No
• Adequate
• Need coordinating body shared decision making
• Time will tell?