Adapting IRI – new environment growth and evolution challenges and responsibilities.
23
Adapting IRI – new environment growth and evolution challenges and responsibilities
-
Upload
madeleine-potter -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Adapting IRI – new environment growth and evolution challenges and responsibilities.
Adapting IRI –new environment
growth and evolution
challenges and responsibilities
Where is there a need for climate information and services?
GCOS GPCC
“The work USAID is funding at IRI has enabled us this year to expand our index insurance project, to 37,000 additional farmers in Rwanda.
Insurance will allow these smallholder farmers to withstand the impacts of bad years, and to risk making productive investments.
A major challenge to index insurance is the paucity of local historical weather data. In Rwanda this is greatly exacerbated by the impacts of the civil war and genocide, which left the last 19 years with virtually no record.
The IRI has worked to validate and make available US-NOAA’s ARC2 satellite data for this purpose.”
Fritz Brugger - Syngenta Foundation Head Agricultural Support Services, May 2013.
Funding
$0
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
$8,000,000
$9,000,000
$10,000,000Uruguay INIA
NSF 3
NSF 2
NSF 1
NASA
McKnight
Atmospheric Aerosols
NTCC
FOEN
WFP
Oxfam
INAP
Bahi
NOAA CORE
$0
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
$8,000,000
$9,000,000
$10,000,000Uruguay INIA
NSF 3
NSF 2
NSF 1
NASA
McKnight
Atmospheric Aerosols
NTCC
FOEN
WFP
Oxfam
INAP
Bahi
NOAA CORE
$-
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
$8,000,000
$9,000,000
$10,000,000 CPGU
Syngenta
DOE
CIT
CSIRO
WELCOME TRUST
Uruguay
NIH
Brazil INMET
NSF
ONR
UN
NASA
CCAFS
NOAA
USAID
2010 2014
$-
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
$8,000,000
$9,000,000
CCAFSCITCMIP5/NASA/GMAOCPGUCSIRODOEIFADIICA INMETILOJPL-INESNASA FLOOD RISKNASA StakeholderNIHNOAA Best PracticesNOAA ENSONOAA IRAPNOAA ISINOAA MAPPNOAA MAPPNOAA Scale & PredictNSFNSF Argentine PampasNSF CareersNSF GoddardSyngentaUBLBFI-INESUCLA UruguayUSAID BogarUSAID EGAT/E3USAID HEDUSAID IRGWELCOME TRUSTWHO - TDRWMO $-
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
$8,000,000
$9,000,000
CPGU
Syngenta
DOE
CIT
CSIRO
WELCOME TRUST
Uruguay
NIH
Brazil INMET
NSF
ONR
UN
NASA
CCAFS
NOAA
USAID
Total staff then, now
2010 2011 20130
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Down 35%
- 25
Up27%
+ 12
Staffing
Promotions by Title 2011 2013
Research Scientist Senior Research Scientist 5
Associate Research Scientist Research Scientist 2
Post Docs Associate Research Scientist 2
Staff Associate Senior Staff Associate 3
Research Assistant Staff Associate 1
Despite cuts, the staffing level for researchers is close to 2010 levelsThe ratio of administrative staff to research staff declined by 46% ( .35 to .19)
2013
2011
2010
0 30 60
48
35
52
9
10
18
Administration, Mgt, IT
Research
Staffing
Frameworks
870 M people do not have enough to eat.
$60-180 B a year in adaptation spending by 2030.
Members of the UNFCCC Party Party (Annex I)
Party (Annex I and II)
USAID Climate Change and Development StrategyAdaptation Results Framework – March 2013
- Knowledge sharing
- Coordination
- Focus on Action
Collaboration
Institutions with which IRI has collaborated since 1996
How do we sustain the global public goods we produce?
What is the right balance of work at IRI?
Is outreach critical to our survival – non project events – COFs, COPs, Boards, travel – how do we sustain it?
Administrative, IT, communications, mgt. imbalance – how do we balance it?
How do we become more robust?
