ADAP ADVOCACY ASSOCIATION PRESENTATION Monday August 4, 2014
description
Transcript of ADAP ADVOCACY ASSOCIATION PRESENTATION Monday August 4, 2014
+
ADAP ADVOCACY ASSOCIATION
PRESENTATION
Monday August 4, 2014
Denver Digital Photography
Transitioning ADAP Clients to Medicaid & Marketplace Plans: The Colorado Success Story
Todd Grove Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment – AIDS Drug Assistance Program
Rich Wolf Digital Photography
FED ER AL H IV A ID S R ESO U R C ES
P A R T AEM As -T G As
D enver M ayor'sO ffice of H IV R esource s
P A R T BS tates and T errito rie s
ADAP & Base Fundin gS tate of CO -CDPHE
P A R T CInfectious D isease C lin ic s
B eacon, D enver,P ueblo C om m ., S t. M ary 's
P A R T S D -FW IC Y -D E N T AL
S P NSC hild ren 's U n ivers ity H osp .
M in o rity A ID S In it ia t iveP A R T S A B C
Part B - ADAP outreac hPart A- Sub. abuse, mental health
H e a lth R e sou rc e S e rv ice s A dm in istra t ionH IV /A ID S B u re a u (H R S A - H A B )
R ya n W h ite T re a tm en t E x te ns io n A ct o f 2 0 09R Y A N W H IT E C A R E A C T
•Medicaid
•Colorado Indigent Care Program (CICP)
•Medicare
•Tobacco class action lawsuit funds
Other Federal and State Programs
Colorado AIDS Drug Assistance Program
H IV M ed ic a tionA ss is tan c e P ro g ram
(H M A P ) D ire c td is tribu tio n H IV m e d ica t io ns
H e a lth Insu ra n ceA ss is tan c e P ro g ram
(H IA P ) - A cce ss to m e d ica t io nsth ro ug h p riva te in s u ra n ce
B ridg in g th e G a p, C OS t. P ha rm . A s s ista n ceA cc e ss to m e d ica t io ns
th ro ug h M e d P t D o r A d v.
S u pp le m e n ta l W ra p A rou ndP ro g ra m (S W A P )
A cc ess to co pa ym e n t ass ista n cefo r P LW H /A o n M ed ica id
A ID S D ru g A ss is tan ce P ro g ram(A D A P )
"C O R E E LIG IB IL IT Y"
Cost & Clients Served -2013
HMAP … 2,039 enrollees – 42,150 prescriptions $12,571,539.58*
HIAP … 690 – 10,887 prescriptions $1,022,003.61* $1,125,840 premiums, deductibles and co-pays
BTGC … 869 enrollees - 26,189 prescriptions $1,320,628.07*
Data provided by Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment
+What makes Colorado unique, (and may make duplication difficult)
Colorado had the nation’s largest ADAP waitlist in 2004 315 people Provided only 18 drugs (strictly
ARV)
Advocacy resulted in over $1 million in General Funding and over $3 million in tobacco class action lawsuit funds per year
Legislation allowed for ADAP committee to direct $$, with approval of the Medical Director
Allowed for innovative use of monies: Creation of a Medicare State
Pharmaceutical Assistance Program Reimbursement of insurance
premiums, as necessary Payment of inpatient medical care
HIV incidence in Colorado is “moderate” and efforts would be extremely difficult to emulate in higher incidence states, particularly those without local funding of any sort / states that did not expand Medicaid
+Colorado’s decisions related to the Affordable Care Act Expanded Medicaid (including
AwDC) to 133% of Federal Poverty Level –MAGI
Created an effective state-based insurance marketplace w/ improved Medicaid interaction
Supportive environment for enrollment outreach
Democratic Governor
Democratic majorities in both State House and Senate
Denver Digital Photography
+Colorado’s efforts to transition enrollees to ACA plans Became a non-funded partner of
Health Coverage Guide network sanctioned by the marketplace “Connect for Health Colorado”
Paid for 14 individuals during open enrollment to enroll members in Medicaid, or ADAP-approved marketplace insurance plans with complete ADAP wrap-around
Identified Medicaid-eligible members on Health Insurance assistance to transition to Medicaid (waiver offered)
Co-located staff at larger HIV clinics to apply patients for Medicaid on-line
Purchased IT to allow Health Coverage Guides to patient homes or other locations to facilitate enrollment
Completed multiple attempts to outreach to members
Required a formal request to remain uninsured if they refused
Considering “off-marketplace” insurance options for undocumented patients next year
+25,000+ ACA-related Transitions Facilitated by State HIV Programs**
ID
MT
NV
WY
OR
AK
CO UT
CA
HI
NMAZ
WA
AL
ARGA
ID
IL IN
KY MO
MT
NV
NH
OH
SC
SD
TX
VA
WY
OK
ME
MD
NJ
NY
OR
AK
CO
LA
UT
CA KS
MS
FL
HI
NMAZ
NDMN
IA
WIMI
NE
WA
PA
NCTN
WV
VT
DE
CT
DC
Medicaid QHPs13,000 12,500
Source: NASTAD**Through end of
March 2014
UNINSURED AFTER HCR
IMPLEMENTATION – RYAN WHITE
INSURED AFTER HCR IMPLEMENTATION
UNINSURED USING CICP AND HMAP IN 2013
Colorado ADAP / Insurance Status after Implementation
10
2,100 individuals
110 new HIAP members
400 new HIAP members
1,390 Medicaid /SWAP members
300 individuals1,181 insured patients
Ryan White Case Management Roles and DutiesCDPHE ADAP Office and Denver CAP for HIAP
Program management Financial management Eligibility and enrollment verification Auditing/quality assurance
Social Workers, Medical & Non- Medical Case Managers All program areas Eligibility and enrollment assistance Trouble shooting and client support
CDPHE, DCAP, ADAP OFFICE
AIDS Service Organizations &
Social Service Entities
Health Insurance Assistance Program Coordination Located at BCAP, DCAP, NCAP, SCAP & West CAP Coordination of premium, co-insurance, and co-payments No requirement for case management (can remain with other ASOs) Coordination of enrollment into marketplace by Health Coverage Guides
HIAP Coordination
Entities
+ Health Insurance Assistance Program (HIAP)
Wraps around employer, COBRA, and ACA marketplace insurance plans
Pays remaining costs of marketplace insurance after the APTC and Cost sharing assistance available has been applied
Pays premiums, medical and pharmaceutical deductibles, co-pays, and coinsurance Up to $10,000 in aggregate per client
Works with providers who are willing to bill for services
Pays for prescriptions through a Medication Assistance Card.
Assistance in enrollment through Connect for Health Colorado marketplace
Insurance Enrollment Sites
Boulder County AIDS Project
Colorado AIDS Project
Northern Colorado AIDS Project
Southern Colorado AIDS Project
Western Colorado AIDS Project
+Supplemental Wrap Around Program (SWAP)• New ADAP program to cover all Medicaid-eligible clients
with medication co-pay coverage for ADAP formulary
• Members will be able to use many more pharmacies if they choose (rather than 4 previous ADAP pharmacies)
• Recertification process easier (as member would have been screened eligible for Medicaid) = eliminates need for supporting documentation – income, residency.
• ADAP suggests that patients continue to use HMAP network pharmacy at least at first - easy movement to HIAP, or to HMAP if “churning” is an issue – allows for back-billing.
+The problem of “CHURN”
Loss of Medicaid may mean up to 45 days until access to insurance is established;
Enrollees can receive medication assistance for ADAP formulary drugs only through that time
May not qualify for CICP or the facility may not offer CICP
Enrollees often fail to notify ADAP of change in situation
Enrollees need to notify marketplace of change in income affecting eligibility; tax penalties and credits difficult to manage by the program
Enrollees may not be able to access same providers under Medicaid, or may have a waitlist
Problems presented by loss of Medicaid
Problems presented by loss of job/ eligibility for marketplace insurance
+How to improve % of clients who recertify every six months
Can’t get medications, (missed doses, would have to pay own costs)
HIAP can’t pay premiums or pay medical co-pays until recertification is complete
Medicaid and marketplace may not be told of changes of income – affect eligibility and APTC/ cost sharing
Patients are used to being able to miss recertification and rectify the situation with relative ease
Colorado is working on a system where recertifying with ADAP would make individuals recertified for all Ryan White services
With a loss of Medicaid or insurance temporarily, enrollees can get medication through HMAP
Members can get assistance in enrolling in the proper assistance program
Instituting text message reminders
Implications of not recertifying Benefits to enrollee
+Significant financial effect already:
From an average of 1,300 patients provided direct medications in fall 2013, the average has dropped to 300 (largely categorically ineligible for Medicaid or insurance, or CHURN members)
From over $1.2 million in costs, estimates after back-billing to Medicaid are $300,000 in expenses per month.
Increased budget for Health Insurance by close to $2 million dollars
Much smaller investment required for Medicaid wrap -around
UNINSURED PATIENTS INSURED PATIENTS
Denver Digital Photography
+Net effect & concerns:
Robust application for partial pay rebates have provided significant program income
HRSA requires states to spend rebate income BEFORE Ryan White dollars
Results in large unexpended balance that may be “carried forward”, but will return to HRSA for redirection to other states if not spent in time
While morally correct to do so, any change in ability to apply for rebates would cause huge decrease in revenue…and lost Ryan White dollars would be desperately needed again
Successful management of Ryan White and funding offered by individual states will be redirected to states who refuse to expand Medicaid or invest in the epidemic in their own states
REBATE INCOME IMPLICATIONS of lost income
+Innovations to “Get to Zero”
Prevention planning to include discussion of biomedical components such as nPEP and perhaps even PrEP
Prevention planning may include targeted $ resources to assist high risk HIV – individuals to seek behavioral health interventions and other preventative financial assistance
PREVENTION and CARE
Denver Digital Photography
People
who have lived
with
diagnosed H
IV in
fectio
n for a
t least
12 months .
..
At least
one care
visit p
ast yea
r
Engaged in
care
or viro
logically
suppre
ssed pas..
.
Virologic
suppre
ssion***
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%100% of PLWH
80% of PLWH73% of PLWH
65% of PLWH
HIV Care Continuum as of December 31, 2013, Colorado
* Data source: Enhanced HIV/AIDS Reporting System (eHARS). Defined as persons diagnosed with HIV infection (regardless of stage of disease) through year- end 2012, who were alive at year-end 2013.**Data source: CDPHE's CD4/VL database and eHARS. Calculated as the percentage of persons who had ≥2 CD4 or viral load results at least 3 months apart during 2013 among those diagnosed with HIV through year-end 2012 and alive at year-end 2013 or as the percentage of persons who were virologically suppressed at the time of their last lab during 2013, but did not have any additional lab >90 days away from this during 2013.*** Calculated as number of persons who had suppressed VL (<=200 copies/mL) at most recent test during 2013, among those diagnosed with HIV through year-end 2012 and alive at year-end 2013.
7,689
4,968
5,6106,188
Continuum of Care – Picture for ADAP Members
Focus on services that are proven to help people move through the cascade toward viral suppression
If a person is eligible for Medicaid, Medicare, or commercial insurance, the Ryan White Program is required to “vigorously pursue enrollment “ of the person in these types of coverage
If there is a service that would help move people through the cascade but cannot be funded from a third party payer, Ryan White funding can be used to pay for that service.
Monitor how well the entire system of care is assisting with achievement of viral suppression, not just the long-standing Ryan White system.
The post-ACA approach to HIV care:
Helping People Move Through the Cascade
First Diagnosis with HIV
Linked to Care
Retained in Care
Achieve Viral Suppression
The Process is NOT Linear
First Diagnosis with HIV
Linked to Care
Retained in Care
Achieved Viral Suppression
Lapsed in Care
Re-Engaged
ADAP Advocacy Association
Jeffrey S. Crowley
Distinguished Scholar/
Program Director, National HIV/AIDS Initiative
O’Neill Institute
Georgetown Law
Ryan White services are critical to engagement in care
+Innovation in the use of DIS, LTC and RTC personnelPROVIDE RESOURCES AS NECESSARY to ensure successful linkage to care and treatment
Disease Investigation Specialists – immediate linkage to enrollment services in ADAP, Medicaid, and Ryan White $$ when a patient has not enrolled in coverage
Linkage to Care – in addition to above, assessment of substance abuse, mental health issues, and access to resources through “Critical Event” pilot (described later)
Retention in Care personnel from State Health & partner agencies reviewing patients who appear to have dropped out of care, again, with $$ resources to assist – including housing, inpatient mental health and substance abuse treatment, medical transportation –
+
What is a “critical event”?
An event that makes it much more likely a client will drop out of medical care or never seek medical care to begin with.
A “marker” for a destabilizing crisis.
A severe challenge to a client who wants to achieve and maintain viral suppression.
Critical Event Initiative
+
Focused on short term stabilization (<90 days)
More structured approach to submitting and approving requests
Expedited and simplified for clients
Focused on clients at greatest risk of not achieving viral suppression
Uniform eligibility and assistance statewide
Coordinated across agencies and providers
Is not affected by funding shortages at local agencies
CE is an enhancement
+
Newly diagnosed with HIV (within the prior 90 days)
Recently lapsed in care (within the prior year)
Two Targets for the Pilot
+
Recently homeless (within prior 90 days)
Recently unemployed (within prior 90 days)
Diagnosed with gonorrhea, syphilis, or chlamydia (within prior 180 days)
Worsening health status due to hepatitis C (within prior 180 days)
Named as a partner, potentially infected someone with HIV (within prior 180 days)
Domestic violence (within prior 180 days)
Diagnosed with another acute illness requiring complex medical treatment or hospitalization, such as cancer (within prior 180 days)
Evidence based screening shows potentially severe addiction or drug dependence.
Evidence based screening shows potentially severe mental illness.
Critical Events for the Pilot
+
Clients with multiple critical events prioritized higher than clients with a single critical event.
State health staff and community agencies use same data system to track requests, plans, budgets, client progress, and case closure
The process starts with a “CE Form” submitted by state health staff or contractor
Evaluation of requests coordinated by a state health staff person
Each request has a “sponsor” at state health
Additional protocol provisions
+ How is CE different from the support already available to clients?
Existing Public Health Order (PHO) Process Only a small range of critical events
are related to a PHO. Enhanced services are offered in lieu
of, or as part of, a public health order.
If the client is determined not to meet PHO criteria, no enhanced services are offered.
Less involvement of community contractors
Existing processes for housing, EFA, etc. Clients experiencing critical events use
the “standard” process to request assistance.
Different levels of assistance and FPL eligibility based on place of residence (TGA)
Data sharing issues being addressed by statewide taskforce – would those in need want to identify themselves to state health for fear of incrimination or disease investigation concerns?
+Contact information:
Todd Grove ADAP Coordinator
Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment
303-692-2783 [email protected]
www.colorado.gov/pacific/cdphe/services-people-hiv
https://www.facebook.com/COADAP
Rich Wolf Digital Photography
+Like us on facebook!www.facebook.com/COADAP