ACUTE HEART FAILURE - c.ymcdn.com · Normotensive AHF •Acutely decompensated systolic or...

33
ACUTE HEART FAILURE Julie Gorchynski MD, MSc, FACEP, FAAEM Department of Emergency Medicine Emergency Residency Program UTHSC, San Antonio TCEP 2014

Transcript of ACUTE HEART FAILURE - c.ymcdn.com · Normotensive AHF •Acutely decompensated systolic or...

ACUTE HEART FAILURE

Julie Gorchynski MD, MSc, FACEP, FAAEM

Department of Emergency MedicineEmergency Residency Program

UTHSC, San AntonioTCEP 2014

No disclosures

Objectives

• Overview

• Cases

• Current Therapy

• Risk stratification: phenotypes

• AHF studies

• Future therapeutic agents

Case 1

• 78 yo male c/o SOB

• 187/92 – 32- 88% RA – 98.6F

• PE: JVD, rales, peripheral edema

• A. Diuretic, NTG, CPAP

• B. Diuretic, CPAP

• C. NTG, CPAP

• D. Dobutamine, CPAP

Case 2

• 78 yo male c/o SOB

• 132/67– 32- 88% RA – 98.6F

• PE: JVD, peripheral edema

• A. Diuretic, NTG, CPAP

• B. Diuretic, CPAP

• C. NTG, CPAP

• D. Dobutmaine, CPAP

Case 3

• 78 yo male c/o SOB

• 89/46– 32- 88% RA – 98.6F

• PE: JVD, rales, peripheral edema, ALOC

• A. Diuretic, NTG, CPAP

• B. Diuretic, CPAP

• C. NTG, CPAP

• D. Dobutamine, CPAP

AHF: Epidemic

• Major public health concern

• Hospitalizations• 1 million /year

• 80% via ED

• Cost: $32 billion/year

• Significant M&M

• High recidivism

Hospitalization

• Predicts early death and readmissions

• Mortality rates

• 5-15 x more likely to die first year

• 3 – 6 months mortality 10%-20%

• I year mortality 22%-32%

• Recurrent admissions for decomposition

• 35% readmitted at 60-90 days

Current Therapies

• 40 years• Modestly effective at best • Same medications

• NTG, Diuretics, Inotropes

• Not improve • In-hospital or • Post-discharge survival rates or • Decreased readmissions

• No mitigation in mortality rate

• Unlike ACS and CVA

Acute Heart Failure

• NOT a single disease entity

• Single therapy NOT efficacious

• Individualize therapy

• Not everyone gets

• Diuretic

• Vasodilator

• Inotrope

• Recognize: syndrome

• Heterogeneous

• Numerous co-morbidities

• Emphasis

• Clinical phenotypes

• Therapy

• Clinical findings and

• Initial systolic blood pressure

Current HF Therapies

Chronic LV HF

• Well established guidelines

• ARBs, ACEI, beta-blocker

• Improved outcomes

AD HF

• No improvement in outcomes

• Loop diuretics• Class I recommendation

• Vasodilators

• Inotropes

• Short term feel better

• No long term impact

Acute Heart Failure

• CONGESTION• Majority

• Pulmonary or systemic congestion

• Caused by elevated LV filling pressure

• SOB, JVD, peripheral edema

• EF > 50% : “preserved” LV systolic function

• LOW CARDIAC OUTPUT• Uncommon but high mortality rate

• Circulatory failure

• Fatigue, N/V, ALOC, SOB, reduced exercise capacity

• Severe LV systolic dysfunction

• EF < 20%

Precipitating Factors in AHF

Cardiac

• Afib with RVR

• Ischemia, ACS

• Arrhythmias

• Valvular disease

• Myopathies

• Uncontrolled HTN

Non-cardiac

• COPD, Asthma, Pneumonia

• Noncompliance

• CRI, Anemia

• TH, DM

• CVA

• Surgery

• Alcohol, Drugs

Therapeutic Goals

• Improve signs and symptoms

• ED

• First 6-12 hours

• Improve quality of life

• Short term

• Improve post discharge outcomes

• Long term

Treatment Emphasis

• Initiate early therapy

• Maintain oxygenation

• Prevent intubation

• Improve clinical symptoms

• Prevent infarction

AHF Disease Stratification

• 3 phenotypes

• Based on systolic blood pressure on presentation

• Hypertensive

• Normotensive

• Hypotensive

Target therapy by phenotype

Systolic BP (mmHg)

• Hypertensive > 160

• Normotensive

• Hypotensive < 100

First agent

• Vasodilators

• Loop diuretics

• Inotropes

Hypertensive AHF

• Vascular failure

• Sbp > 160 mm Hg

• Develops over hours

• Preserved EF > 50%

• Increased SVR

• Pulmonary congestion

• respiratory distress,

rales, orthopnea

• O2 saturation < 90%

• Pulmonary edema

• Extreme form

• Agents

• Vasodilators

• First line treatment

• Adjunct therapy

• Loop diuretics

Pharmacological therapy:

HTN AHFNesiritide: rBNP

• VMAC study (+)

• ASCEND-HF trial (+/--)

• Rose study (-)

• Neutral

• Neither unsafe or efficacious

Serelaxin: rHR-2

• RELAX-AHF (+) • Peptide regulates

maternal adaptation to pregnancy

• Reduces signs and symptoms of congestion

• Reduces 180-day CV mortality

• Reduces all cause mortality by 37%

Vasodilators

Serelaxin

• Increases renal function

• Improves vascular compliance

• Improves cardiac output

Relaxin

• Improves dyspnea

• Improves congestion

• No improvement in re-hospitalization rate

• PRE-RELAX-AHF (+)

• RELAX-AHF 2

Serelaxin and Relaxin

• Beneficial effects on dyspnea and post discharge clinical outcomes • Decreased LOS• Decrease in worsening of HF inpatient• Improved signs and symptoms inpatient• Supported by biomarker changes

• Hs-Toponin T, Cystatin C, NT- proBNP

• Given early • Within 16 hours (window of time)

• Prevent end-organ damage

• Long-term end organ protection• No benefit

Normotensive AHF

• Acutely decompensatedsystolic or diastolic CHF

• Normal blood pressure

• Develops over days or weeks

• Chronic HF

• Peripheral edema• Common

• Systemic congestion • Primarily

• Pulmonary congestion• Minimal

• Agents• Loop diuretics • First- line therapy

Hypotensive AHF

• Low cardiac output

• Sbp < 100 mmHg

• EF < 20%

• Decreased renal function• Poor renal blood

flow

• ALOC, lethargy, abdominal pain, muscle aches

• Congestion• Subtle

• Cardiogenic shock• Extreme form

• Agents• Dobutamine• First line treatment

Pharmacological Therapy:

Hypotensive AHF

• Inotrope: mainstay

• Enhance cardiac contractility

• Dobutamine, milrinone, levosimendan (Europe)

• Alleviate symptoms

• Compromised vital organ perfusion and hypotension

• DAD-HF trial and ROSE trial: dopamine (-)

• Milrinone and Levosimendan

• serious adverse effects

• Limited efficacy in improving signs and symptoms

• OMTIME-CHF

• Milrinone : first large scale (-)

• REVIVE-1 and REVIVE-2 trials and SURVIVE study

• Levosimendan : (-)

• Dobutamine (-)

Omecamtiv mecarbil

• Novel inotropic agent

• Cardiac myosin activator

• Direct effects on sarcomere

• Dyspnea response rate improved

• Improved stroke volume

• ESC 2013 (+)

• ATOMIC HF (+)

• (+) Intracellular Ca2+ not increased

• No pro-arrhythmic potential

• COSMIC-HF

• Ongoing

• Oral form

CART analysis and ADHERE data

• Correlation of systolic BP and outcomes for AHF

• Sbp < 115 mmHg

• Worse in-hospital prognosis

• Sbp > 160 mm Hg

• Good myocardial contractile reserve

• Better outcomes

• Pharmacological agents

• Currently initiated

• In-hospital 24 hours

• Implement early

• < 16 hours in ED

Non-invasive ventilation

• CPAP vs BIPAP

• Maintain oxygenation

• Prevent intubation

• Feel better faster• Clinically oriented outcome• Decreases work of breathing• Increases intra-thoracic pressures > cardiac output• Studies

• Neutral but lack of harm

BIOMAKERS

• BNP• Delta

• Fall of 30%

• NT-pro BNP

• Higher levels• Poor prognosis

• Identify high risk patients

• Aggressive therapy

• Disease severity

• Troponin

• Cr and Cystatin C• Renal marker for injury

• ST2 • fibrosis markers

• heart

• Galectin-3 • fibrosis markers

• Heart

• Copeptin: newest

• Vasopressin peptide

• Hormone in HF

• Tailor therapy• Receptor vasopressin

antagonist

Case 1

• 78 yo male c/o SOB

• 187/92 – 32- 88% RA – 98.6F

• PE: JVD, rales, peripheral edema

• A. Diuretic, NTG, CPAP

• B. Diuretic, CPAP

• C. NTG, CPAP

• D. Dobutamine, CPAP

Case 2

• 78 yo male c/o SOB

• 132/67– 32- 88% RA – 98.6F

• PE: JVD, peripheral edema

• A. Diuretic, NTG, CPAP

• B. Diuretic, CPAP

• C. NTG, CPAP

• D. Dobutmaine, CPAP

Case 3

• 78 yo male c/o SOB

• 89/46– 32- 88% RA – 98.6F

• PE: JVD, rales, peripheral edema, ALOC

• A. Diuretic, NTG, CPAP

• B. Diuretic, CPAP

• C. NTG, CPAP

• D. Dobutmaine, CPAP

Overview

• Heterogenous syndrome

• Based on 3 phenotypes • HTN > 160 Vasodilator• Normotensive Loop diuretic• Hypotensive < 100 Inotrope

• Initiate therapy early

• CPAP/ BIPAP

• Future agents• Initiate in ED

Questions