Actuaries in Wider Fields. Nairobi 2008. ©2006 Deloitte & Touche Actuaries in wider fields 2 What...
-
Upload
agatha-sharp -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Actuaries in Wider Fields. Nairobi 2008. ©2006 Deloitte & Touche Actuaries in wider fields 2 What...
Actuaries in Wider Fields.
Nairobi 2008
©2006 Deloitte & ToucheActuaries in wider fields2
•What is an actuary?
•General Insurance
•Banking
•Risk Management
•Workforce modeling
Actuaries in Wider FieldsAgenda
©2006 Deloitte & ToucheActuaries in wider fields3
What is an actuary?The traditional view
©2006 Deloitte & ToucheActuaries in wider fields4
What is an actuary?The modern view
©2006 Deloitte & ToucheActuaries in wider fields5
What is an actuary?An actuary is what an actuary does…
• We do math
• We have business skills
• We have IT skills
• We understand data
•WE ADD VALUE
©2004 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu6
General Insurance
Financial Condition Reporting (FCR)
IFRS
Jaco van der Merwe20 June 2008
©2006 Deloitte & ToucheActuaries in Wider fields
General Insurance - Brief overview of FCR
What ?
• A proposed regulatory framework for South African Short Term Insurers
• Driven by the FSB
• AIS calibrated the framework
Why ?
• Improve risk management in Insurers
• Align with international risk-based regulatory approaches
• More efficient use of capital
©2006 Deloitte & ToucheActuaries in Wider fields
General Insurance - Brief overview of FCR
When ?
• Calibration commenced in 2005
• Completed early 2006
• Implementation:– Initially: 2008
– Update: >= 2009
How ?
• Prescribed model (AIS calibration)
• Certified model
• Internal model
©2006 Deloitte & ToucheActuaries in Wider fields
General Insurance - Brief overview of FCR
How exactly ?• Insurance & Asset risk• Risks:
– Underwriting risk– Reserving risk– Matching & liquidity– Market risk– Credit risk – not explicit
• Features– 1 year horizon– VaR: 98%, 99%, 99.5%– New business– Run-off to ultimate– Advanced Diversification & Correlation allowance
©2006 Deloitte & ToucheIFRS for General Insurers - June 2008 10
General Insurance – IFRS impactPhase II timeline
Discussion PaperExposure
draftFinal
standardImplementation
(earliest)
Publication
End of comment
period
May 2007November
2007Sept 2009? Sept 2010
(+12 months)2012 / 2013
©2006 Deloitte & ToucheIFRS for General Insurers - June 2008 11
General Insurance – IFRS impactThe Proposed Current Exit Value Model• 3 building blocks to measure insurance liabilities :
Explicit, unbiased, market-consistent, probability weighted and current estimates of the contractual cash flows;
Current market discount rates that adjust the estimated cash flows for the time value of money;
An explicit and unbiased estimate of the margin that market participants require for:• Bearing risk (a risk margin); and• Providing other services (a service margin)
Key issues for general insurers
©2006 Deloitte & ToucheIFRS for General Insurers - June 200813
PREMIUM ACQ
D1RMDCF DP
ACQ: Acquisition Costs
DCF: Discounted Cash Flow
SC: Service Cost
RM: Risk Margin
D1: Day 1 Profit
DP: Deferred Profit
General Insurance – IFRS impactPremium Allocation
SC
©2006 Deloitte & Touche
Banking.Actuarial Solutions for BusinessJune 2008
Banking - Value managementThe traditional view
• Traditionally banks have been able to report and monitor their net asset value
Assets
Liabilities
Net Asset Value
©2006 Deloitte & ToucheActuaries in wider fields16
Banking - Value managementThe full picture
• Using actuarial techniques banks are able to measure:
• Net asset value, plus
• The value of profits expected to be generated from existing customers, and
• The value of profits expected to be generated from new customers.
NewClients VNB
ExistingCustomers Value of in force
Profit already earned Net asset value
©2006 Deloitte & TouchePresentation name (view/header footer)17
Banking - Value managementProfit measurement
Interest marginThe difference between borrowing & lending
Expense marginThe difference between costs incurred and fees earned
Bad debtsPD & LGD
Tax
Cost of capitalThe cost of holding money to support the business
©2006 Deloitte & TouchePresentation name (view/header footer)18
Banking - Value managementCustomer targeting
-1
1
2
3
4
5
RiskValueProfile/
Value Rating
Definite rejection
Qualified acceptance
Value / Credit Rating CardPer customer
assessment
(Low)
(Low)
(High)
Premium offer
Normal acceptance
(High)0 1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
Credit
Definite rejection
Qualified acceptance
(Low)
(Low)
(High)
Premium offer
Normal acceptance
(High)
Cre
dit R
isk
-1
1
2
3
4
5
RiskValueProfile/
Value Rating
Definite rejection
Qualified acceptance
Value / Credit Rating CardPer customer
assessment
(Low)
(Low)
(High)
Premium offer
Normal acceptance
(High)0 1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
Credit
Definite rejection
Qualified acceptance
(Low)
(Low)
(High)
Premium offer
Normal acceptance
(High)
Cre
dit R
isk
The sweet spot
©2006 Deloitte & TouchePresentation name (view/header footer)19
• Our experience has shown that there is often a term structure to default rates
Banking - credit impairmentProbability of default
Default Rate by Duration
0.00%
0.20%
0.40%
0.60%
0.80%
1.00%
1.20%
1.40%
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Yea
rs f
rom
in
cep
tio
n
©2006 Deloitte & TouchePresentation name (view/header footer)20
Our credit impairment modelBehavioural analysis• Behavioural analysis is key to the accuracy of the expected cash flows projected
– Lump sum early settlements
– Behavioural instalments
– Rolls out of default
• Revolving credit facilities are particularly tricky– Requires establishment of priority of payment rules
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
0 5 10 15 20 25
Years
Loan
Out
stan
ding
©2006 Deloitte & ToucheActuaries in wider fields21
Risk Management
©2006 Deloitte & Touche
Risk Management
• What do actuaries know about risk management?
• Product design
• Underwriting
• Matching of assets and liabilities by nature, term etc.
• Prudence and other capital requirements
• Reinsurance
• Traditionally ERM has not been seen as an actuarial area
• Focus on Operational Risk
• But expanding
• More quantitative
• Collision!
Actuaries in wider fields22
©2006 Deloitte & Touche
Risk Management
• Response from the profession
• IAA Enterprise & Financial Risks Committee
• IAA ERM webinars and programs
• Institute&Faculty: FIRM working group set up
• ST9 from 2010
• Practical manifestations
• New generation risk based capital requirements
• Simple accounting ratios
• Formula based on risk sensitive parameters
• SA, Mauritius (2007)
• Integrated measurement and management: UK ICAS and now Solvency II
Actuaries in wider fields23
©2006 Deloitte & Touche
• Risk management is at the core of Solvency II
– Risk based capital calculated in Pillar 1 for underwriting risk, market risk, credit risk and operational risk
– Robustness of risk management framework considered in Pillar 2 with potential capital charge for other risk classes including group and strategic risk
– Transparency of the risk management framework through Pillar 3
• Management is different to measurement!
– Holding additional capital is not the only answer to dealing with risk
– A backroom model that calculates capital requirement will NOT be acceptable to regulatory authorities
– Must be a ‘live’ system embedded in risk management processes and management information systems of company
The importance of risk management
Underwriting Risk
Investment Risk
Credit Risk
Liquidity Risk
Operational Risk
Pillar 1Minimum Standards
Regulations on minimum capital
requirements
Reserving
Investment
Pillar 2Supervisor Review
Regulations on financial services
supervision
(Capabilities and
powers of regulators, areas of
activity)
Pillar 3Market Discipline
Transparency
Disclosure requirements
Competition related
elements
SOLVENCY II
Risk
Manag
emen
t
Enterprise Risk Management
Strategic Risk Management
Risk management culture
Ris
k C
on
trol
Pro
cess
es
Extr
em
e
Even
ts
Man
ag
em
en
t
Ris
k &
E
con
om
ic
Cap
ital
Mod
els
Rating agencies Standard & Poors, Moody’s and Fitch have indicated that they will consider the effectiveness of an institutions enterprise risk
management explicitly in their rating approach.
Strategic Workforce PlanningA statistical approach to human capital planning
Ashleigh TheophanidesActuarial & Insurance Solutions at DeloitteApril 2008
Strategic Workforce Planning
A statistical approach to human capital planning
©2006 Deloitte & ToucheStrategic Workforce Modelling26
The world around us….
These statistics illustrate that there is a battle for brainpower…
©2006 Deloitte & ToucheStrategic Workforce Modelling27
The problem…
• A company needs to ensure that it has a sufficient supply of the required skills that it needs a to meet its business objectives.
• This may seem simple
…or is it?
What will the effect of globalisation and emigration have?
What will the effect of globalisation and emigration have?
Considering the impact of staff movements,
trends in skills movements, the effect of the
ageing population, the effect of exogenous factors like HIV/AIDS
and other diseases compounds the issue.
???
Are there sufficient resources for the
Specific skills in the market now.
©2006 Deloitte & ToucheStrategic Workforce Modelling28
Statistics – using predictive modelling
• Human capital is regarded as a significant asset in businesses today
• Workforce planning models facilitate a more scientific approach to managing the human capital needs of an organization
• Predictive Workforce Modeling allows an organisation to:
– Consider what its staffing needs are going to be in the future
– Project its expected supply of staff in the future
– Identify shortages or surplus of staff for these years (GAP)
– Put plans in place to satisfy the Human Capital needs that are expected to arise.
A member firm ofDeloitte Touche Tohmatsu