Acquis Communautaire
-
Upload
filipe-mandieta-gotardi -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
359 -
download
0
Transcript of Acquis Communautaire
Sciences Po - Politics in the European Union
THE ACQUIS COMMUNAUTAIRE IS A
THREAT TO THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE
STATE
Politics in the European UnionProf. Thomas Raineau
Filipe Mandieta Gotardi
15/10/12
Sciences Po - Politics in the European Union
Introduction
“The Acquis Communautaire is a threat to the sovereignty of the State”
15/10/12
Sciences Po - Politics in the European Union
Introduction
“The Acquis Communautaire is a threat to the sovereignty of the State”
15/10/12
Sciences Po - Politics in the European Union
Acquis Communautaire
15/10/12
1. Free movement of goods2. Freedom of movement for workers3. Right of establishment and freedom to provide
services4. Free movement of capital5. Public procurement6. Company law7. Intellectual property law8. Competition policy9. Financial services10. Information society and media11. Agriculture and rural development12. Food safety, veterinary and phytosanitary policy13. Fisheries14. Transport policy15. Energy16. Taxation17. Economic and monetary policy18. Statistics
19. Social policy and employment(including anti-discrimination and equal opportunities for women and men)
20. Enterprise and industrial policy21. Trans-European networks22. Regional policy and coordination of structural
instruments23. Judiciary and fundamental rights24. Justice, freedom and security25. Science and research26. Education and culture27. Environment28. Consumer and health protection29. Customs union30. External relations31. Foreign, security and defence policy32. Financial control33. Financial and budgetary provisions34. Institutions35. Other issues
Sciences Po - Politics in the European Union
Introduction
“The Acquis Communautaire is a threat to the sovereignty of the State”
15/10/12
Sciences Po - Politics in the European Union
Problématique
“The dynamics of the EU can be portrayed as
shifting between the survival of the nation-
state versus the Union as a potential
‘suprastate’. Within this framework, to what
extent have the Acquis Communautaire and
the concept of sovereignty enabled the EU and
its Member States to pursue their interests vis-
à-vis each other?”
15/10/12
Sciences Po - Politics in the European Union
Plan• Introduction
• Problématique
1. The Acquis Communautaire as a tool for
European Integration
2. The pursuit of domestic agendas through
national sovereignty
• Conclusion15/10/12
Sciences Po - Politics in the European Union
1. The Acquis Communautaire as a tool for European integration
• The impact of the EU’s pre-accession
procedures to potential member states
• Transposition and implementation of
EU law: the issue of compliance
15/10/12
Example - Post-Communist
members and worlds of
compliance
Sciences Po - Politics in the European Union
2. The pursuit of domestic agendas through national sovereignty
• From Maastricht to Lisbon: the rising costs to national sovereignty
• The (re)constitution of boundaries in face of European integration: the embedding of interests under the heading of sovereignty
15/10/12
Example – The safeguard of sovereignty through
national opt-outs: the reluctant approaches of the
United Kingdom and Denmark
Sciences Po - Politics in the European Union
Conclusion
15/10/12
“Almost every major nation has been obliged by the pressures of the post-war world to pool significant areas of sovereignty so as to create
more effective politics units”Margaret Thatcher – 19th May 1975
Speech in Hendon European Referendum campaign
Europeanisation
Sovereignty
Simultaneous institutional facts in a continuous logic of mutual interaction that shapes the behaviour of the
States
Sciences Po - Politics in the European Union
• Tanja E. Aalberts, “Sovereignty Reloaded? A Constructivist Perspective on European Research”, Constitutionalism Web-Papers, Vol. 2, 2005
• Rebecca Adler-Nissen, “A Political Sociology of Sovereignty: Treaty Opt-Outs and the Doxa of an Even Closer Union”, 2009
• Erkki Bahovski, “Sovereignty in the European Union: Case studies relating to Estonia”,
Reuters Foundation Fellowship, 2004
• Gerda Falkner, Oliver Treib, “Three Worlds of Compliance or Four? The EU-15
Compared to New Member States”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 46, 2008, pp.293-313
• Bernard Steunenberg, “Is big brother watching? Commission oversight of the national
implementation of EU directives”, European Union Politics, Vol. 11, 2010, pp.359-380
• Milada Anna Vachudova, “Corruption and Compliance in the EU’s Post-Communist
Members and Candidates”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 47, 2009, pp.43-62
• EU Legislation and Scrutiny Procedures, Factsheet L11, Legislation Series, House of
Commons Information Office, Revised September 201 http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-information-office/l11.pdf
15/10/12
Bib
liogra
phy