ACM SIGUCCS 2007 keynote

8/15/2019 ACM SIGUCCS 2007 keynote

1/97

Web 2.0, teaching, and learning:

early 2007

ACM SIGUCCS

Savannah, 2007


2/97

Plan of the talk

1. Web 2.0 in early

2007

2. Web 2.0 and rich

media

3. Mobility

4. Pedagogies

5. Web 2.0

storytelling

(Middlebury, Vermont, spring 2006)


3/97

Thematics

Emergence in

time and space

Pedagogy Dynamic

informationecology

Weaktechnologicaldeterminism

(Radio Open Source blog/podcast, 2006)


4/97

One metaphor

Web 2.0 and education is like gaming and

education: awareness of it is challenging

Huge, financially and quantitatively successful

worlds

Global and rapidly developing

(BBC VikingQuest, 2006;

Gwen, 2006)


5/97

One metaphor


education: awareness is challenging

Bad anxieties,

policies, and media

coverage

Perceived lack ofseriousness

(Rome: Total War, 2004)


6/97

One metaphor


education: intersections are possible

Take advantage ofpreexisting projectsMod/warp/hackDIYLiteracy: IF and audience

(World of Warcraft, 2004-present)


7/97

Historical antecedents

But first, a bit of media literacy criticism:

[T]his discovery of yours will

create forgetfulness in the learners'

souls, because they will not use

their memories; they will trust to theexternal written characters and not

remember of themselves.


8/97

Antecedents

And:

The specific which you havediscovered is an aid not to

memory, but to reminiscence,

and you give your disciples nottruth, but only the semblance of

truth


9/97

Antecedents

Even worse:

they will be hearers of many things

and will have learned nothing; theywill appear to be omniscient and willgenerally know nothing; they will betiresome company, having the show

of wisdom without the reality.-Plato, Phaedrus (370 or so BCE)

Jowett translation


10/97

I. Web 2.0

The terms history: Tim OReilly, 2005

Draws on

Web history Expands

social

software


11/97

I. Web 2.0

Microcontent, rather than sites or large documents

Gliffy


12/97

I. Web 2.0

Multiply authored microcontent, rather

than sites or large documents


13/97

I. Web 2.0

Open content

and/or services

and/or standards

(Pepysblog, 2003-)


14/97

I. Web 2.0

Open

microcontent

+ multipleauthors =

network

constructivism

(Pepysblog, 2003-)


15/97

I. Web 2.0

Data mashups

(Flickr +

Google

Maps)


16/97

I. Web 2.0

Perpetual beta (OReilly, now history)


17/97

I. Web 2.0

AJAX-based projects? Also Flash, HTML


18/97

I. Web 2.0

OReilly: platforms for development


19/97

I. Web 2.0

Web 2.0 components, movements

Collaborative writing platforms: the wiki way


20/97

I. Web 2.0

Research: wikis are textually productive

-Vigas, Wattenberg, Dave (IBM Historyflow, 2004)


21/97

I. Web 2.0

News-gathering: wikis are textually productive

(OhMyNews! , WikiNews)


22/97

I. Web 2.0

Web 2.0 components, movements

collaborative writing platforms: the blogosphere


23/97

I. Web 2.0

Addressable content chunks


24/97

I. Web 2.0

Distributed

and/or

attachedconversations


25/97

I. Web 2.0

State of the blogosphere

57 million blogs tracked by Technorati:

As of October 2006, about 100,000 new

weblogs were created each day the

doubling of the blogosphere has slowed a

bit (every 236 days or so(David Sifry, November 2006)

Chart follows


26/97

I. Web 2.0


27/97

I. Web 2.0

State of the blogosphere, more

12 people million using three platforms,

including LiveJournal: majority women(Anil Dash, MeshForum 2006)

Diversity: diaries, public intellectuals,

carnivals, knitters, moblogs, warblogshome and abroad


28/97

I. Web 2.0

Web 2.0 components, movements: social

objects

http://flickr.com/

Photo sharing:

Flickr
http://flickr.com/http://flickr.com/http://flickr.com/http://flickr.com/http://flickr.com/


29/97

I. Web 2.0

Reach of Flickr

100 million images, as of Feb 2006

As of October 2006, 4 million Flickr

members (3/4 notin the US)

1 million photos uploaded each day

(

http://www.radioopensource.org/photogr

)
http://www.radioopensource.org/photography-20/http://www.radioopensource.org/photography-20/


30/97

I. Web 2.0

Reach of Flickr

26 million

searchable,shareable

images in Flickr

(December 2006)

(Ben Harris-Roxas, 2006)


31/97

I. Web 2.0

Reach of Flickr: Game Neverending, 2002-2003

The secret is, even though it's called GameNeverending, it's not really a game at all. It's a socialspace designed to facilitate and enable play. Thegame-elements are there to provide both theconstraints and the building blocks of interaction -since the thing you'll notice about the kind of play I'mtalking about above is that it is the kind of thing that

goes on between people.-Stuart Butterfield, Mindjack interview, 2003

http://www.mindjack.com/feature/gne.html
http://www.mindjack.com/feature/gne.htmlhttp://www.mindjack.com/feature/gne.html


32/97

I. Web 2.0

Reach of Flickr

(Ben Harris-Roxas, 2006)

Its metadata is goodenoughDid popular CMS/

LMSes keep higher

education fromcontributing?


33/97

I. Web 2.0

Web 2.0 enables the Web office

Example: Google Spreadsheets

http://spreadsheets.google.com/


34/97

I. Web 2.0

What can we learn from this? Ton

Zylstra:

In general you could say that both

Flickr and delicious work in a

triangle: person, picture/bookmark,and tag(s). Or more abstract a

person, an object of sociality, and

some descriptor...


35/97


36/97

I. Web 2.0

What can we learn from this?

Jyri Engesrom is succinct:

The fallacy is to think that socialnetworks are just made up of people.They're not; social networks consist ofpeople who are connected by ashared object.

-http://www.zengestrom.com/, 2005
http://www.zengestrom.com/http://www.zengestrom.com/


37/97


38/97

I. Web 2.0

Home

Owain

Hestia

Chickens

Ripton


39/97

I. Web 2.0

Folksonomy

User benefit

Search

Retrieval

Self-awareness

http://del.icio.us/

for DoctorNemo
http://del.icio.us/http://del.icio.us/


40/97

I. Web 2.0

Community surfacing

Ontology

Concepts

Collaborative research


41/97

I. Web 2.0

Case study, tagging

museums:

the Steve project

http://www.steve.museum/
http://www.steve.museum/http://www.steve.museum/


42/97

I. Web 2.0

Tagging museums: the Steve project

Expert discourse, controlled vocab


43/97

I. Web 2.0

Tagging museums:the Steve project

Users tag differently Curators get it

(Metropolitan Museumof Art, 2004)


44/97

I. Web 2.0

Tagging libraries:

PennTags

Coded locally Also tags the

open web

http://tags.library.upenn.edu/


45/97

I. Web 2.0

Tagging in the world: Amazon.com

gets it


46/97

I. Web 2.0

Social bookmarks:

del.icio.us

(See also FURL,Connotea,

CiteULike, Harvards

H20, Scholar.com,

RawSugar,Shadows, etc)

http://del.icio.us/DoctorNemo
http://del.icio.us/DoctorNemohttp://del.icio.us/DoctorNemohttp://del.icio.us/DoctorNemo


47/97

I. Web 2.0

Components, movements

Mixing and mashing:

the RSS feed

(Bloglines)


48/97

I. Web 2.0

Social object: the person

FaceBook

MySpace

LinkedIn

ZoomInfo

CyWorld

Less than four years after its launch, 15 million people,or almost a third of the country's population, aremembers. (BusinessWeek, September 2005)


49/97

I. Web 2.0

Social news:

Memeorandum,

Tailrank, Digg,TechMeme


50/97

II. Rich media and Web 2.0

Web 2.0

influences rich

media

Podcasting


51/97


How old is the term?

With the benefit of hindsight, it all seems

quite obvious. MP3 players, like Apple'siPod, in many pockets, audio production

software cheap or free, and weblogging

an established part of the internet


52/97


How old is the term? all the

ingredients are there for a new boom

in amateur radio.But what to call it? Audioblogging?

Podcasting? GuerillaMedia?

(Ben Hammersley, The GuardianFebruary 12, 2004)


53/97


Whats happened since February 2004?


54/97


Whats happened since?

More than 22 million American adults owniPods or MP3 players and 29% of them havedownloaded podcasts from the Web so thatthey could listen to audio files at a time oftheir choosing.

-Pew Internet and American Life study,

April 2005


55/97


Whats happened

since

podcasting in

2001?

Neologisms:

godcasting

nanocasting

podfading

podsafe

podspamming

podvertising

porncasting


56/97


57/97


Web 2.0 influences rich media: video


58/97


Videoblogging

(vlog?vog?)

(Rocketboom, Amanda Congdon)

(already moved on)


59/97


(Second Life, 2004-present)

Web 2.0 influences rich media: social

gaming and Web 2.0?


60/97

III. Mobility

Found on BBC site, June 2005

Everything in

cyberculture,

just:AmbientAcceleratedAnnotated


61/97

III. Mobility

Devices proliferate,

obviously


62/97

III. Mobility

Your own personal walled garden, or

pocket global village?


63/97

III. Mobility

Pedagogies

Information on

demand Time usage

changes

Class/world barrier

reduction

Swarming

Personal intimacy

with units

Spatial mapping Mobile, multimedia,

social research

Distributed

conversations


64/97

IV. Pedagogies

Teaching with Web 2.0: its not all new

Web 1.0, internet pedagogies

Hypertext Web audience

Discussion for a

Collaborative document authoring

Groupware


65/97

IV. Pedagogies

Teaching with Web 2.0: its not all new

Earlier pedagogies

Journaling Media literacy


66/97

IV. Pedagogies

Teaching with Web 2.0: CMS involvement

Moodle modules


67/97

IV. Pedagogies

Teaching with Web 2.0: Blackboard

Beyond

Chief Executive Officer Michael Chasen...explained, "Just as the Web 2.0 is facilitating

a change in the way people interact online,

e-Learning 2.0 represents a transformational

shift for how the Internet can improveeducation. Blackboard is excited to work

with our clients to help shape and accelerate

this transformation.


68/97

IV. Pedagogies


Beyond

(Kevin Creamer, March 10 2006)


69/97

IV. Pedagogies


Beyond


70/97


71/97

IV. Pedagogies

Teaching with Web 2.0: more

principles

Ease of entry Personalization

Public

intellectuals


72/97


73/97

IV. Pedagogies

Teaching with Web 2.0: net.gen:

33 percent of online teens share theirown creative content online, such asartwork, photos, stories or videos.

32 percent say that they have created orworked on webpages or blogs for others,

including groups they belong to, friends orschool assignments.

http://www.pewtrusts.com/pdf/PIP_Teens_1105.pdf


74/97

IV. Pedagogies


22 percent report keeping their ownpersonal webpage.

19 percent of online teens keep a blog,and 38 percent of online teens read blogs.

19 percent of Internet-using teens say

they remix content they find online intotheir own artistic creations.



75/97

IV. Pedagogies


Teens are often much more enthusiasticauthors and readers of blogs than theiradult counterparts. Teen bloggers, led byolder girls, are a major part of this tech-savvy cohort.

(Pew Internet and American Life,November 2005)



76/97

IV. Pedagogies

Teaching with Web 2.0: blogging

Distributed

conversation Collaborative

writing

Object-oriented

discussion


77/97

IV. Pedagogies

University of British Columbia uses: as personal logs/ journals to keep track of

work/learning activities

as digital photo

albumsas potential e-

portfolio tools


78/97

IV. Pedagogies

Currently, UBC is using weblogs:

as course web pages, encouraging discussionand collaboration

as private management and communication tools forlarge campus groups, administrative teams, andcommunities of practice

to easily update online newsletters to keep a collection of useful, searchable links

(http://weblogs.elearning.ubc.ca/home/about.php)
http://weblogs.elearning.ubc.ca/home/about.phphttp://weblogs.elearning.ubc.ca/home/about.phphttp://weblogs.elearning.ubc.ca/home/about.phphttp://weblogs.elearning.ubc.ca/home/about.php


79/97

IV. Pedagogies

Wiki pedagogies

Collective research

Group writing Document editing

Information literacy

Discussion

Knowledge accretion


80/97

IV. Pedagogies

Web video pedagogies

Archiving

Digital storytelling Web video

information literacy

Falling Sand, Zombie version


81/97

IV. Pedagogies

Social object pedagogies

Prompts

Discussion object Composition materials


82/97

IV. Pedagogies

Social object pedagogies

Annotate details

Remix (Make it mine)

Edugadget

http://www.edugadget.com/2005/05/07/flickr-creative-commons


83/97

IV. Pedagogies

RSS pedagogies

Shaping Web reading

Pushing student-created content (motherblog, Feed to Javascript)

Web 2.0 wrangling


84/97

IV. Pedagogies

Podcasts and teaching:

profcasting

Bryn Mawr College:Michelle Francl,

chemistry

Duke: Classroom

recording

Learning objects:

Gardner Campbell,

University of

Richmond

Duke: Course

content

dissemination Information literacy


85/97


86/97

IV. Pedagogies

Blog problem: privacy Contrary to class safe space (Gary Kornblith) Culture of too much disclosure

Problem increasing archivally

Some responses Can block comments and/or readers

Teachable moment: what is privacy in 2007? Complement other practices


87/97

IV. Web 2.0 storytelling

Web 2.0 storytelling

Nonfiction (Pulse)

Fiction (I Found aCamera)


88/97

IV. Web 2.0 storytelling

Web 2.0 storytelling:ARGs

Distributed

Cross-platform

Collaborative

Examples:A. I.,ILoveBees, PerplexCity, NIN


89/97

V. Web 2.0 storytelling

Lonelygirl15

One YouTube

Another YouTube Myspace

Blogs

Discussion frenzy

Media attention(2006-)


90/97


The return of

serial media:

Flickr and

storytelling Tell a story in 5

frames group

Gender Miscommunication

(Nightingai1e, 2006)


91/97



92/97


V W b 2 0 lli


93/97


V W b 2 0 t t lli


94/97


Gender Miscommunication (Nightingai1e, 2006)

V W b 2 0 t t lli


95/97


Flickr andstorytelling:collaboration,workshopping,

community In the Tell a

story in 5frames group,'Alone With

The Sand'

(moliere1331, 2005)

A question of divided


96/97

A question of divided

architectures

(Valdis Krebs, 2004)


97/97

NITLE blog http://b2e.nitle.org

NITLE Labhttp://nitle.org/index.php/nitle/laboratory

National Institute for Technology andLiberal Education http://nitle.org
http://b2e.nitle.org/http://nitle.org/index.php/nitle/laboratoryhttp://b2e.nitle.org/http://b2e.nitle.org/http://b2e.nitle.org/http://nitle.org/index.php/nitle/laboratoryhttp://b2e.nitle.org/

ACM SIGUCCS 2007 keynote

Documents

Transcript of ACM SIGUCCS 2007 keynote